WEBVTT - The Panel: Census data shows more than half the population has no religion

0:00:05.761 --> 0:00:09.721
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from news Talks B.

0:00:10.441 --> 0:00:12.921
<v Speaker 2>And my first panelist, where would you go with? Let's go?

0:00:13.761 --> 0:00:15.201
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say age before beauty, but that

0:00:15.281 --> 0:00:16.921
<v Speaker 2>just gets me into trouble. That's an easy one, but

0:00:17.081 --> 0:00:19.961
<v Speaker 2>let's just go with age and beauty. Of course it's

0:00:20.001 --> 0:00:22.681
<v Speaker 2>Pete wolf Camp from the Resident Builder and here on

0:00:22.721 --> 0:00:24.601
<v Speaker 2>news Talks a baptew.

0:00:24.201 --> 0:00:25.641
<v Speaker 3>More of one less than the other. I think as

0:00:25.681 --> 0:00:27.761
<v Speaker 3>time moves on, more.

0:00:27.601 --> 0:00:31.041
<v Speaker 2>Of that means yes, I guess that's inevitably. Hey, by

0:00:31.041 --> 0:00:33.601
<v Speaker 2>the way, I did enjoy you've actually come dressed for

0:00:33.641 --> 0:00:35.921
<v Speaker 2>theme because I have. I got dressed up, especially the

0:00:36.041 --> 0:00:38.921
<v Speaker 2>Hiver's CROSI I am, and they're not in sports mode,

0:00:39.081 --> 0:00:41.681
<v Speaker 2>so you're ac accident waiting to happen.

0:00:41.801 --> 0:00:45.601
<v Speaker 3>None of their Hivers bright orange they were.

0:00:45.681 --> 0:00:46.641
<v Speaker 2>Are they your first pair?

0:00:47.161 --> 0:00:49.721
<v Speaker 3>No? No, In fact, these I don't know how many

0:00:49.721 --> 0:00:52.441
<v Speaker 3>pairs I've had. I've had one pair that I like

0:00:52.521 --> 0:00:55.121
<v Speaker 3>so much that I actually tried to retread them. That

0:00:55.201 --> 0:00:58.521
<v Speaker 3>being a combination of sort of thrift and dutchness and

0:00:58.761 --> 0:01:01.001
<v Speaker 3>and things like that couldn't actually work that well.

0:01:01.121 --> 0:01:03.801
<v Speaker 2>To be thrift in dutchness, you being of Dutch descent

0:01:03.841 --> 0:01:06.321
<v Speaker 2>which wait to get away with that's right, and also

0:01:06.521 --> 0:01:09.201
<v Speaker 2>joining me as editor of the New Zealand Gardener magazine.

0:01:09.281 --> 0:01:10.801
<v Speaker 2>Joe McCarroll, God, Joe, how are you going?

0:01:10.881 --> 0:01:11.841
<v Speaker 4>I am tickety booth?

0:01:12.281 --> 0:01:14.961
<v Speaker 2>Tickety booth? Where does tickety boo come from? I've been

0:01:15.161 --> 0:01:17.321
<v Speaker 2>looking at some of these expressions we take for granted,

0:01:17.681 --> 0:01:20.641
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know. I just sometimes think, where.

0:01:20.481 --> 0:01:21.441
<v Speaker 3>Does tickety booths love?

0:01:21.481 --> 0:01:23.281
<v Speaker 2>It's very English, isn't it.

0:01:23.281 --> 0:01:27.401
<v Speaker 4>It's just tickety boo origin story like down the mines

0:01:27.441 --> 0:01:29.961
<v Speaker 4>when the children were coming back from their fourteen hours.

0:01:29.761 --> 0:01:33.921
<v Speaker 3>Sho oh no, if the clock got to fourteen hours

0:01:33.961 --> 0:01:35.241
<v Speaker 3>and your shift was up, then.

0:01:35.121 --> 0:01:39.121
<v Speaker 2>It was tickety booth tickety bo Oh my goodness. Hopefully

0:01:39.161 --> 0:01:41.481
<v Speaker 2>something more And isn't that? But anyway, by the way.

0:01:41.441 --> 0:01:42.841
<v Speaker 3>We'll get a text on this, won't we.

0:01:44.081 --> 0:01:46.161
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, we get texts all the time. By the way,

0:01:46.161 --> 0:01:50.561
<v Speaker 2>you can text. You can text on nine two nine two. Right,

0:01:50.641 --> 0:01:55.481
<v Speaker 2>let's get into it, shall we. So firstly I covered

0:01:55.601 --> 0:01:57.761
<v Speaker 2>this because I've been doing afternoons this week. But the

0:01:57.761 --> 0:02:01.121
<v Speaker 2>mood of the boardroom rankings, which were normally when I

0:02:01.121 --> 0:02:03.321
<v Speaker 2>see the mood of the boardroom comes out, I'm sort

0:02:03.321 --> 0:02:04.761
<v Speaker 2>of like, oh yeah, Murder of the Boardroom, And then

0:02:04.761 --> 0:02:06.001
<v Speaker 2>I had a bit of a read it and actually

0:02:06.001 --> 0:02:09.441
<v Speaker 2>found it quite interesting as to the perception of everyone's performances.

0:02:09.801 --> 0:02:12.681
<v Speaker 2>The thing that initially stood out to me was that,

0:02:13.121 --> 0:02:15.681
<v Speaker 2>and I think he might be happy about this that

0:02:15.961 --> 0:02:18.601
<v Speaker 2>Christopher Luxen wasn't racked at the top. It was Erica Stanford,

0:02:18.601 --> 0:02:20.881
<v Speaker 2>but five of his team members were racked above him.

0:02:21.201 --> 0:02:23.681
<v Speaker 2>And I guess as a team builder, he'd be happy

0:02:23.721 --> 0:02:24.721
<v Speaker 2>with that, wouldn't he, Pete.

0:02:24.761 --> 0:02:26.321
<v Speaker 3>I suspect that he's not going to be sort of

0:02:26.361 --> 0:02:29.161
<v Speaker 3>threatened or upset about that. That what he wants to

0:02:29.161 --> 0:02:31.241
<v Speaker 3>do is have his ministers doing a good job. And

0:02:31.281 --> 0:02:34.561
<v Speaker 3>if they're regarded by those people surveyed as doing a

0:02:34.601 --> 0:02:38.081
<v Speaker 3>good job, and arguably even a better job than him,

0:02:38.641 --> 0:02:39.361
<v Speaker 3>then that's great.

0:02:39.921 --> 0:02:43.841
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I don't shortened sweet there, Pete. What do you reckon? Joe?

0:02:44.161 --> 0:02:46.321
<v Speaker 4>Oh? I mean, I could have predicted a lot of

0:02:46.321 --> 0:02:48.601
<v Speaker 4>it before I read it, Like, I mean, I'm not

0:02:48.641 --> 0:02:52.721
<v Speaker 4>particularly surprised that the business community are feeling pretty happy

0:02:52.721 --> 0:02:54.881
<v Speaker 4>with the center right government. I think it aligns with

0:02:55.601 --> 0:02:56.961
<v Speaker 4>what they're looking for. But I think it's interesting.

0:02:57.041 --> 0:02:59.121
<v Speaker 2>I mean, well, that's right because the optimism had gone

0:02:59.121 --> 0:03:00.881
<v Speaker 2>from a one point eight to two last year at

0:03:00.881 --> 0:03:03.001
<v Speaker 2>a five to a three point two to three. Yeah,

0:03:03.001 --> 0:03:05.401
<v Speaker 2>that's right, and that's that's generally what you probably referring to.

0:03:05.401 --> 0:03:08.561
<v Speaker 4>Their Yeah, it's certainly no surprises, it's no surprises, But

0:03:08.641 --> 0:03:11.281
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think it's interesting to how we should

0:03:11.281 --> 0:03:13.481
<v Speaker 4>wait these things. You know, when you look at economic

0:03:13.601 --> 0:03:16.921
<v Speaker 4>activity in New Zealand, it's so strongly driven by those SMEs.

0:03:17.561 --> 0:03:20.481
<v Speaker 4>And so I'm not saying this isn't a cohort, but

0:03:20.521 --> 0:03:23.121
<v Speaker 4>it is a cohort, and they have got a bias

0:03:23.961 --> 0:03:26.161
<v Speaker 4>because what they think is this, you know, what makes

0:03:26.201 --> 0:03:29.201
<v Speaker 4>them optimistic is an economy in which they can make money,

0:03:29.761 --> 0:03:31.321
<v Speaker 4>which makes sense, which is.

0:03:31.321 --> 0:03:35.441
<v Speaker 3>Also which they can employ people, create more wealth, those

0:03:35.441 --> 0:03:37.081
<v Speaker 3>sorts of things downside to.

0:03:37.001 --> 0:03:39.841
<v Speaker 4>That, well it's more than one of the factors. Then

0:03:40.001 --> 0:03:44.481
<v Speaker 4>they don't consider as a factor like well being, workers' rights.

0:03:44.521 --> 0:03:47.921
<v Speaker 4>You know, those are not factors which would improve the outlook.

0:03:48.241 --> 0:03:49.561
<v Speaker 4>In my cynical view.

0:03:49.481 --> 0:03:51.481
<v Speaker 3>You don't have workers if you don't have a business, right,

0:03:51.881 --> 0:03:54.361
<v Speaker 3>So let's have business and then we'll sort out the reason.

0:03:54.521 --> 0:03:56.681
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, and I see what you're saying, but

0:03:56.721 --> 0:04:00.241
<v Speaker 4>I'm like you know, if let's have business, let's sort

0:04:00.241 --> 0:04:01.401
<v Speaker 4>out the rest. I mean, that's kind of what we're

0:04:01.401 --> 0:04:03.401
<v Speaker 4>talking about now with some of the policy that's been

0:04:03.481 --> 0:04:05.641
<v Speaker 4>rolled out where it's like, just cut the red tape,

0:04:05.641 --> 0:04:08.481
<v Speaker 4>and you think, oh, and I'm conflicted about it. I

0:04:08.841 --> 0:04:10.641
<v Speaker 4>see the temptation to say cut the red tape, but

0:04:10.641 --> 0:04:12.721
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, some of that red tape it's protecting us

0:04:12.721 --> 0:04:14.281
<v Speaker 4>as well as long it's down.

0:04:14.361 --> 0:04:15.841
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I see that. But then you look at Erica

0:04:15.881 --> 0:04:17.881
<v Speaker 3>Stanford and I was watching a clip with her talking

0:04:17.921 --> 0:04:20.001
<v Speaker 3>about education. Right, so they did a big review of

0:04:20.001 --> 0:04:22.321
<v Speaker 3>what's going on with the how the Ministry of Education

0:04:22.361 --> 0:04:27.121
<v Speaker 3>has been administering school properties. Basiclyne terribly right.

0:04:28.041 --> 0:04:29.801
<v Speaker 2>So that's actually a ripper of a store.

0:04:30.001 --> 0:04:31.281
<v Speaker 3>It's a fantastic out.

0:04:31.761 --> 0:04:35.281
<v Speaker 2>It's a shockhead. Just one and a half million to

0:04:35.321 --> 0:04:39.041
<v Speaker 2>two million dollars to build a classroom.

0:04:38.921 --> 0:04:40.881
<v Speaker 4>Honestly, can we get it.

0:04:41.201 --> 0:04:43.881
<v Speaker 3>Don't get too hysterical about that figure though, You've got

0:04:43.921 --> 0:04:45.401
<v Speaker 3>to kind of crunch some numbers on that.

0:04:46.321 --> 0:04:48.441
<v Speaker 2>And a classroom doesn't even have I mean, it doesn't

0:04:48.481 --> 0:04:50.561
<v Speaker 2>even have a toilet, it doesn't have a kitchen.

0:04:52.281 --> 0:04:54.681
<v Speaker 3>Also, we're not talking about a classroom like you know,

0:04:54.841 --> 0:04:56.961
<v Speaker 3>most of us would imagine classrooms that we sat in

0:04:57.001 --> 0:04:59.881
<v Speaker 3>as children or something like that. Classrooms are not like that,

0:04:59.961 --> 0:05:02.801
<v Speaker 3>And it might be reflective of the sorts of buildings

0:05:02.881 --> 0:05:07.561
<v Speaker 3>that the MOE have been doing recently, often slightly more elaborate.

0:05:07.601 --> 0:05:10.641
<v Speaker 3>They're part of larger complexes, they've got more amenity in

0:05:10.681 --> 0:05:13.441
<v Speaker 3>them and so on. But I still think that, you know,

0:05:13.481 --> 0:05:17.121
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing the numbers still on stretch at the school.

0:05:17.201 --> 0:05:20.121
<v Speaker 3>I'm on a board of trustees, right, so we've done

0:05:20.161 --> 0:05:23.041
<v Speaker 3>a recent building project and I know what the numbers are,

0:05:23.081 --> 0:05:25.321
<v Speaker 3>and I know what the classroom rate would be, and

0:05:25.361 --> 0:05:28.321
<v Speaker 3>it's considerably less than that. Now that's not done by

0:05:28.441 --> 0:05:31.321
<v Speaker 3>m o E. That's done by the diocese basically.

0:05:31.361 --> 0:05:39.521
<v Speaker 2>So e hey, no, I didn't mean done by we

0:05:39.561 --> 0:05:42.561
<v Speaker 2>are digressing. I guess the thing was. I mean, I

0:05:42.641 --> 0:05:44.401
<v Speaker 2>actually thought when you said no surprises, Joe, that you

0:05:44.441 --> 0:05:48.481
<v Speaker 2>were talking about the rankings as well, which had what

0:05:48.641 --> 0:05:50.041
<v Speaker 2>was it, Erica Stanford number one.

0:05:50.241 --> 0:05:52.881
<v Speaker 4>I think Erica Stanford's performing. Yeah, you know, I think

0:05:52.921 --> 0:05:55.241
<v Speaker 4>she's a future leader of the National Party and probably

0:05:55.241 --> 0:05:56.761
<v Speaker 4>a Prime Minister of New Zealand. I think she has

0:05:56.801 --> 0:06:00.121
<v Speaker 4>been brilliant in her ministerial portfolio. But yeah, I mean

0:06:00.161 --> 0:06:02.881
<v Speaker 4>I think there was no surprises there for me. I

0:06:02.921 --> 0:06:05.881
<v Speaker 4>think the people who were judging it, they waited it

0:06:05.921 --> 0:06:08.841
<v Speaker 4>as I would have expected based on the position they're

0:06:09.281 --> 0:06:10.561
<v Speaker 4>experiencing life from.

0:06:10.601 --> 0:06:12.761
<v Speaker 3>There was an interesting article too, I think Matthew Houghton

0:06:12.801 --> 0:06:16.201
<v Speaker 3>went to that border the mood of the boardroom and

0:06:16.361 --> 0:06:18.921
<v Speaker 3>wrote a piece going because there was also the discussion

0:06:18.961 --> 0:06:22.361
<v Speaker 3>between Labor and National around superannuation, and his comments were

0:06:22.401 --> 0:06:24.241
<v Speaker 3>along the lines of these are the two people who

0:06:24.241 --> 0:06:26.281
<v Speaker 3>should be leading the country, which I thought was fascinating

0:06:26.281 --> 0:06:32.281
<v Speaker 3>as well. Who said Edmonds and Nichola Willis So I

0:06:32.361 --> 0:06:35.161
<v Speaker 3>had a debate about superannuation. And I think his reflection

0:06:35.241 --> 0:06:36.801
<v Speaker 3>on being in the room and I haven't a chance

0:06:36.881 --> 0:06:39.001
<v Speaker 3>to look at the debate yet, was actually, these two

0:06:39.041 --> 0:06:40.721
<v Speaker 3>people should be leading the country.

0:06:40.561 --> 0:06:42.361
<v Speaker 4>And that's a good sign. It's a good sign when

0:06:42.361 --> 0:06:45.121
<v Speaker 4>there are leaders in waiting, and it's a good sign

0:06:45.161 --> 0:06:48.001
<v Speaker 4>when there's intelligence at the top in all parties. Yes,

0:06:48.201 --> 0:06:50.721
<v Speaker 4>well maybe not all parties.

0:06:54.161 --> 0:06:56.001
<v Speaker 2>Well, I know it'll be interesting because if we have

0:06:56.041 --> 0:06:58.321
<v Speaker 2>the same opinion on which parties might be struggling in

0:06:58.321 --> 0:07:01.481
<v Speaker 2>that one but the other one. Actually, the interesting thing

0:07:01.481 --> 0:07:04.721
<v Speaker 2>for Luxeon Christopher Luxon was that he had key performance

0:07:04.721 --> 0:07:07.601
<v Speaker 2>in and this is why I think he'd be happy

0:07:07.641 --> 0:07:09.921
<v Speaker 2>with it, because they were things about, you know, selling

0:07:09.961 --> 0:07:13.481
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand and branding and about ten different things, but

0:07:13.561 --> 0:07:15.801
<v Speaker 2>the one he scored four point four I think out

0:07:15.801 --> 0:07:18.681
<v Speaker 2>of five was his ability to build a good team

0:07:19.041 --> 0:07:21.281
<v Speaker 2>and everything, which is exactly how he has pitched his

0:07:21.361 --> 0:07:24.681
<v Speaker 2>Prime ministership. So I would say he should be he

0:07:24.721 --> 0:07:27.281
<v Speaker 2>should be pretty pretty happy with that, do you think, Pete.

0:07:27.401 --> 0:07:30.441
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And it always surprised me at the lead up

0:07:30.481 --> 0:07:34.081
<v Speaker 3>to the election last year that the pitch for National

0:07:34.241 --> 0:07:38.201
<v Speaker 3>was not more along lines of here's our team and

0:07:38.281 --> 0:07:42.401
<v Speaker 3>here's your team effectively, because I think they did bring

0:07:42.441 --> 0:07:44.361
<v Speaker 3>to the table a lot of people with a hell

0:07:44.401 --> 0:07:47.601
<v Speaker 3>of a lot more qualifications and ability than Labor did,

0:07:47.641 --> 0:07:49.281
<v Speaker 3>and maybe that's why the election went the way that

0:07:49.321 --> 0:07:51.321
<v Speaker 3>it did. So I think in that sense, if he

0:07:51.401 --> 0:07:53.521
<v Speaker 3>ends up being lower down the ranking and he's able

0:07:53.561 --> 0:07:55.641
<v Speaker 3>to put a team forward, that goes, actually, here's my

0:07:55.721 --> 0:07:58.081
<v Speaker 3>high performance because they're the ones actually doing the work.

0:07:58.201 --> 0:08:00.361
<v Speaker 3>If I've got someone doing infrastructure, then I want my

0:08:00.361 --> 0:08:02.241
<v Speaker 3>best person doing that. I don't have to do it.

0:08:02.441 --> 0:08:04.041
<v Speaker 3>I have to make sure that they do it. Well,

0:08:04.161 --> 0:08:05.841
<v Speaker 3>that's good leadership. I would have thought I.

0:08:05.801 --> 0:08:07.921
<v Speaker 2>Would have thought so. And it's consistent with the way

0:08:07.961 --> 0:08:10.841
<v Speaker 2>he's been selling his leadership, I guess, isn't it. Joe.

0:08:10.921 --> 0:08:13.601
<v Speaker 4>He absolutely I mean, he has never made any secret

0:08:13.721 --> 0:08:17.241
<v Speaker 4>that he is running the country like you would run

0:08:17.241 --> 0:08:20.441
<v Speaker 4>a business. And I see some upsides to that. But

0:08:20.481 --> 0:08:23.641
<v Speaker 4>in the end of country is not a business, sure actually,

0:08:23.681 --> 0:08:25.081
<v Speaker 4>and I think that is where you get the downside.

0:08:25.081 --> 0:08:28.081
<v Speaker 4>I mean, those KPIs, I think it would be if

0:08:28.081 --> 0:08:30.921
<v Speaker 4>we had more time to really tease them and say,

0:08:31.081 --> 0:08:35.681
<v Speaker 4>is this delivering a new Zealand that for vulnerable people?

0:08:35.721 --> 0:08:38.321
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not sure they are. I think they they're

0:08:38.361 --> 0:08:42.121
<v Speaker 4>delivering more for people who already have more hot take.

0:08:42.881 --> 0:08:45.801
<v Speaker 2>See. I know, I think I'd probably disagree with that

0:08:45.841 --> 0:08:48.721
<v Speaker 2>because I think that you can't you can't distribute tax

0:08:48.801 --> 0:08:50.961
<v Speaker 2>unless you're making money and having productive economy. And I

0:08:51.041 --> 0:08:52.601
<v Speaker 2>think there is I think we sort of can have

0:08:52.681 --> 0:08:55.761
<v Speaker 2>hopefully a cake can eat it too. But fun facts

0:08:55.761 --> 0:08:57.481
<v Speaker 2>before we get into it. There's one found fact I

0:08:57.521 --> 0:09:01.441
<v Speaker 2>really loved, and it's just that an old school campaigner,

0:09:01.761 --> 0:09:05.521
<v Speaker 2>guess who was one ahead of luxen By. He was

0:09:05.521 --> 0:09:08.361
<v Speaker 2>on three point seven to three on three point seven

0:09:08.401 --> 0:09:12.841
<v Speaker 2>four with Studith Collins, which enjoyed that. But here's another

0:09:12.881 --> 0:09:15.001
<v Speaker 2>fun fact. I actually did cover this in the afternoons.

0:09:15.081 --> 0:09:18.201
<v Speaker 2>Did you know Erica Stanford, I think considered almost a

0:09:18.281 --> 0:09:19.801
<v Speaker 2>music deger and I had a meeting because I might

0:09:19.841 --> 0:09:22.361
<v Speaker 2>be doing as I might be doing Christmas concert with

0:09:22.401 --> 0:09:26.921
<v Speaker 2>them with a particular brass band, and that's been hosted

0:09:26.921 --> 0:09:30.481
<v Speaker 2>in the past by Erica Stanford, who apparently plays a

0:09:30.561 --> 0:09:33.961
<v Speaker 2>mean besides heard that and actually here, I mean, she's

0:09:34.001 --> 0:09:35.361
<v Speaker 2>a bit out of practice in this one, I'd say,

0:09:35.361 --> 0:09:38.321
<v Speaker 2>because she's been enough like twenty three years. It's a

0:09:38.321 --> 0:09:41.401
<v Speaker 2>few years she left school. But we've got a little

0:09:41.441 --> 0:09:51.121
<v Speaker 2>clip of it. I think, am we big job there?

0:09:51.361 --> 0:10:00.961
<v Speaker 2>Pits change anyway. I just think it's interesting when you

0:10:00.961 --> 0:10:05.881
<v Speaker 2>hear about humanized something in Parliament, and it was funny

0:10:05.881 --> 0:10:08.201
<v Speaker 2>watching her suddenly go from joking around and being like,

0:10:08.281 --> 0:10:11.041
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to play this thing and she's just the determination.

0:10:13.641 --> 0:10:15.761
<v Speaker 2>Just a little bit of a fun fact for you there.

0:10:15.841 --> 0:10:18.161
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's move it on a bit because from someone

0:10:18.161 --> 0:10:20.521
<v Speaker 2>who wasn't going to probably in the mood of the boardroom,

0:10:20.721 --> 0:10:24.121
<v Speaker 2>be a superstar, perhaps not in the in the top

0:10:24.241 --> 0:10:30.441
<v Speaker 2>top it was Casey Cassello. I don't think now it's

0:10:30.641 --> 0:10:34.281
<v Speaker 2>it's easy. Let's not talk about the arguments so much

0:10:34.481 --> 0:10:38.921
<v Speaker 2>of whether you know, smoking versus heated tobacco versus vapes.

0:10:39.321 --> 0:10:41.241
<v Speaker 2>I think the problem for her is the whole argument

0:10:41.241 --> 0:10:45.001
<v Speaker 2>has got lost because she has not handled this issue

0:10:45.441 --> 0:10:48.201
<v Speaker 2>at all well. And I think she's a I still

0:10:48.201 --> 0:10:51.081
<v Speaker 2>think she's a massive chink in the armor of a

0:10:51.121 --> 0:10:53.641
<v Speaker 2>government that might consider in many respects it's doing well.

0:10:54.841 --> 0:10:56.361
<v Speaker 2>Casey Costello is not doing well as.

0:10:56.281 --> 0:10:59.161
<v Speaker 4>She Jo Gacy Costello is a hot mess. I mean,

0:10:59.241 --> 0:11:02.801
<v Speaker 4>I don't think she's coming across as competent, you know.

0:11:02.881 --> 0:11:05.521
<v Speaker 4>And I mean there's a lot of swirling swellings, narratives

0:11:05.521 --> 0:11:08.161
<v Speaker 4>about conspiracies and that multimately not a tax breaks for

0:11:08.321 --> 0:11:12.401
<v Speaker 4>you know. And I think if you were going to conspire,

0:11:12.881 --> 0:11:17.281
<v Speaker 4>pick a more effective person, you know, Because yeah, I

0:11:17.641 --> 0:11:21.561
<v Speaker 4>think she's she is a massive failing in the government.

0:11:21.601 --> 0:11:24.601
<v Speaker 2>Right now. I would say, well, I failed to well

0:11:24.641 --> 0:11:26.121
<v Speaker 2>absolutely when I've got you here for your view, but

0:11:26.161 --> 0:11:27.481
<v Speaker 2>we're all going to be on a similar page on

0:11:27.481 --> 0:11:30.161
<v Speaker 2>this one. I think Joe, because she talked about this

0:11:30.201 --> 0:11:32.481
<v Speaker 2>independent advice she had and she would eventually give it

0:11:32.561 --> 0:11:33.241
<v Speaker 2>looked like she just.

0:11:33.241 --> 0:11:35.401
<v Speaker 4>Went she and printed something off the internet.

0:11:35.441 --> 0:11:38.121
<v Speaker 2>Now, I reckon she either just went Now where were

0:11:38.161 --> 0:11:40.921
<v Speaker 2>those articles that got sent to me by a particular person.

0:11:40.921 --> 0:11:42.441
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to know if it was just someone a

0:11:42.481 --> 0:11:44.841
<v Speaker 2>lobbyist for the stuff, who said, hey, have a read

0:11:44.881 --> 0:11:47.281
<v Speaker 2>of these, or she'd lost it and she just went,

0:11:47.361 --> 0:11:52.241
<v Speaker 2>I better google this heated tobacco versus vapes and smoking

0:11:52.721 --> 0:11:55.321
<v Speaker 2>and just found five or sex articles.

0:11:56.161 --> 0:11:58.681
<v Speaker 3>Even make your point, I mean, I just think the

0:11:58.721 --> 0:12:01.561
<v Speaker 3>idea of going and saying I've got some research and

0:12:01.601 --> 0:12:04.441
<v Speaker 3>then not being able to provide that research undermines your

0:12:04.481 --> 0:12:05.721
<v Speaker 3>credibility immediately.

0:12:05.801 --> 0:12:07.641
<v Speaker 4>I think there's been a lot of you know, the

0:12:07.721 --> 0:12:11.801
<v Speaker 4>record can't be found. I can't find that documentation. Like

0:12:11.841 --> 0:12:13.521
<v Speaker 4>I say, it feels chaotic.

0:12:14.321 --> 0:12:16.081
<v Speaker 2>And here's the thing though, But I reckon if she

0:12:16.201 --> 0:12:18.521
<v Speaker 2>was a national MP, I think she would have been

0:12:19.361 --> 0:12:22.041
<v Speaker 2>shifted out in the same way we've seen already happen.

0:12:22.201 --> 0:12:24.881
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, gone. But she's a New Zealand first MP,

0:12:25.281 --> 0:12:27.961
<v Speaker 2>and I think while i've been I have sung Winston's

0:12:27.961 --> 0:12:31.161
<v Speaker 2>praises as our foreign minister, and I've loved him telling

0:12:31.201 --> 0:12:33.161
<v Speaker 2>off the Russians and all that sort of stuff. I

0:12:33.201 --> 0:12:35.561
<v Speaker 2>hope he doesn't defend her to the detriment of the government,

0:12:35.561 --> 0:12:38.921
<v Speaker 2>because I actually think she needs to be shifted on.

0:12:39.041 --> 0:12:41.001
<v Speaker 4>And I think and I understand I am singing from

0:12:41.041 --> 0:12:45.321
<v Speaker 4>my own song here and perhaps agreement, but I think

0:12:45.321 --> 0:12:48.361
<v Speaker 4>this is a mark of luxe and being slightly powerless.

0:12:49.201 --> 0:12:52.721
<v Speaker 4>He can't act because I think he's terrified ab upsetting Winston.

0:12:52.921 --> 0:12:55.081
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's powerless. It's just a reflection

0:12:55.161 --> 0:12:57.481
<v Speaker 3>of the fact that they are in coalition, right, and

0:12:57.961 --> 0:13:00.561
<v Speaker 3>that what you do is in some way moderated by

0:13:00.601 --> 0:13:01.201
<v Speaker 3>your partners.

0:13:01.401 --> 0:13:04.681
<v Speaker 4>I think those coalition should be weighted based on the

0:13:05.081 --> 0:13:08.841
<v Speaker 4>proportional representation. I think those decisions should be weighted in

0:13:08.921 --> 0:13:12.481
<v Speaker 4>terms of who New Zealand has voted for, and I

0:13:12.521 --> 0:13:16.761
<v Speaker 4>think in that sense there's too much sway held by

0:13:16.761 --> 0:13:17.721
<v Speaker 4>the two minor parties.

0:13:18.881 --> 0:13:22.961
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's about the look. It's also no coalition.

0:13:23.161 --> 0:13:26.081
<v Speaker 2>I don't think could have one party say I want

0:13:26.121 --> 0:13:29.441
<v Speaker 2>you to well, I don't know, because she's what is

0:13:29.481 --> 0:13:31.721
<v Speaker 2>she is. Yeah, I don't know what the what the

0:13:31.801 --> 0:13:34.161
<v Speaker 2>rules would be long term because we've had we had

0:13:34.281 --> 0:13:36.801
<v Speaker 2>the last three years where labored enough to account to

0:13:36.841 --> 0:13:39.841
<v Speaker 2>anyone except themselves. And I wonder if we still haven't

0:13:39.841 --> 0:13:42.521
<v Speaker 2>worked out what coalition politics looks like, which probably asked

0:13:42.521 --> 0:13:44.761
<v Speaker 2>them what they do. In Germany they have a coalition

0:13:44.841 --> 0:13:48.921
<v Speaker 2>of that's quite amazingly coupled together coalitions.

0:13:48.921 --> 0:13:50.721
<v Speaker 3>But I think you're right. I mean, the hard thing

0:13:50.801 --> 0:13:53.481
<v Speaker 3>must be that people in national must know that this

0:13:53.521 --> 0:13:57.081
<v Speaker 3>person is now liability to our government, which includes us and.

0:13:56.961 --> 0:14:00.561
<v Speaker 4>Two and two in the next generation. I mean, you know,

0:14:00.721 --> 0:14:04.161
<v Speaker 4>these aren't decisions that are sort of meaningless in terms

0:14:04.201 --> 0:14:09.001
<v Speaker 4>of the consequences. I mean, I'm genuinely quite sad to

0:14:09.121 --> 0:14:11.521
<v Speaker 4>think that the movement we were making towards smoke free

0:14:11.721 --> 0:14:15.161
<v Speaker 4>to New Zealand is just being squandered.

0:14:16.841 --> 0:14:20.121
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, thing is, it's predicated on the idea that

0:14:20.161 --> 0:14:22.241
<v Speaker 2>you can ban something and I just don't think you could.

0:14:22.281 --> 0:14:24.481
<v Speaker 2>I think that we are still trending downward with smoke.

0:14:24.521 --> 0:14:26.081
<v Speaker 2>It still shocks me the number of people at smoke

0:14:26.121 --> 0:14:28.921
<v Speaker 2>though it's like ten percent. I mean, it's a surprisingly

0:14:29.001 --> 0:14:31.481
<v Speaker 2>large number of people when I don't know anyone who smokes.

0:14:31.681 --> 0:14:35.521
<v Speaker 4>We are trending downwards on smoking, but we are like

0:14:35.721 --> 0:14:39.841
<v Speaker 4>strocking on vaping, and I mean that is shocking because

0:14:39.881 --> 0:14:40.121
<v Speaker 4>you know.

0:14:40.161 --> 0:14:42.001
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to ban that either. I mean, that's

0:14:42.041 --> 0:14:42.321
<v Speaker 2>the thing.

0:14:42.481 --> 0:14:46.441
<v Speaker 4>But it's been so rearly targeted at young people.

0:14:46.201 --> 0:14:49.201
<v Speaker 3>And it's simple things to do about it. Make it prescription.

0:14:49.761 --> 0:14:52.601
<v Speaker 4>Plane packaging, prescription only vape stores.

0:14:53.641 --> 0:14:56.121
<v Speaker 2>It's complicated. Hey, look, I think we might take quick

0:14:56.121 --> 0:14:59.081
<v Speaker 2>break and we'll come back and see about how people

0:14:59.121 --> 0:15:02.201
<v Speaker 2>got hot and hot under the collar about Crys Relux

0:15:02.281 --> 0:15:04.281
<v Speaker 2>and daring to sell Hiss apartment and actually makes some

0:15:04.321 --> 0:15:06.641
<v Speaker 2>money out of it. Well, I suspect he might have

0:15:06.641 --> 0:15:07.601
<v Speaker 2>spent a fear whack of it.

0:15:07.601 --> 0:15:08.721
<v Speaker 4>Will be interested to know.

0:15:08.841 --> 0:15:19.921
<v Speaker 5>I have Okay, twenty three past three News Talk, Yes

0:15:20.001 --> 0:15:21.281
<v Speaker 5>where everything.

0:15:23.361 --> 0:15:29.641
<v Speaker 2>For the Great Heisman, Zim Wogle book mon Tiger.

0:15:29.601 --> 0:15:30.321
<v Speaker 1>Was Master.

0:15:36.641 --> 0:15:39.401
<v Speaker 2>And welcome back to the Weekend Collective. This is the panel.

0:15:39.481 --> 0:15:41.961
<v Speaker 2>My panelist Joe mccarell, editor of The New Zealand Garden,

0:15:42.041 --> 0:15:44.441
<v Speaker 2>and Pete wolf Camp, resident builder Here on news Talk

0:15:44.521 --> 0:15:48.321
<v Speaker 2>zaid b. Now just on the continue a little bit

0:15:48.361 --> 0:15:52.001
<v Speaker 2>of politics. The so Christopher Luxon has moved into Premier House.

0:15:52.121 --> 0:15:54.801
<v Speaker 2>He didn't sound actually that thrilled about being there today.

0:15:54.841 --> 0:15:55.961
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's all right.

0:15:56.441 --> 0:15:56.601
<v Speaker 1>Ah.

0:15:56.801 --> 0:15:58.881
<v Speaker 2>And and the other news, of course, which the news

0:15:59.041 --> 0:16:01.401
<v Speaker 2>one News banged on about for a while, a big

0:16:01.481 --> 0:16:04.161
<v Speaker 2>headline that somebody has sold alse in Wellington and made

0:16:04.201 --> 0:16:08.161
<v Speaker 2>money PABs Maybe I don't know, but the apartment was

0:16:08.281 --> 0:16:10.961
<v Speaker 2>last sold for seven hundred and ninety five thousand, and

0:16:12.361 --> 0:16:14.681
<v Speaker 2>I think it's been I think he made a profit

0:16:14.721 --> 0:16:17.001
<v Speaker 2>of around one hundred and seventy not taking into account

0:16:17.001 --> 0:16:19.001
<v Speaker 2>what he spent on it. I actually didn't think this

0:16:19.241 --> 0:16:21.881
<v Speaker 2>was such a I mean, it's newsworthy, I guess because

0:16:21.881 --> 0:16:25.361
<v Speaker 2>people want to know what it was. But I'm not

0:16:25.401 --> 0:16:26.361
<v Speaker 2>sure what point he was making.

0:16:26.401 --> 0:16:32.281
<v Speaker 3>Pain The headline just enormously upset me, and not upset me,

0:16:32.841 --> 0:16:35.641
<v Speaker 3>just made me furious because of the nature of the headline.

0:16:35.641 --> 0:16:38.121
<v Speaker 3>So the headline is luxant avoids tax.

0:16:38.961 --> 0:16:40.721
<v Speaker 2>No, that was mischievous, wasn't it. That's right?

0:16:40.841 --> 0:16:44.361
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, there's no tax to pay on capital gain. Now,

0:16:44.401 --> 0:16:45.961
<v Speaker 3>whether that's a good thing or a bad thing, that's

0:16:46.001 --> 0:16:48.761
<v Speaker 3>up to you. But suggesting you know that the whole

0:16:48.841 --> 0:16:50.361
<v Speaker 3>thing around tax avoidance right.

0:16:50.361 --> 0:16:51.241
<v Speaker 2>Is such a hot topic.

0:16:52.721 --> 0:16:57.721
<v Speaker 3>That's just so mischievous and nasty to be blunt, it

0:16:57.921 --> 0:16:58.601
<v Speaker 3>really annoyed me.

0:16:58.881 --> 0:16:59.041
<v Speaker 2>Joe.

0:17:00.121 --> 0:17:03.081
<v Speaker 4>I think the reason people are talking about this is

0:17:03.201 --> 0:17:05.281
<v Speaker 4>not because he sold the apartment. It's not because he

0:17:05.321 --> 0:17:07.921
<v Speaker 4>made money on it, and frankly, even the tax situation,

0:17:08.241 --> 0:17:12.081
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the brightline test is changing. He's gotten in

0:17:12.081 --> 0:17:14.121
<v Speaker 4>ahead of that. But I mean, who wouldn't do that.

0:17:14.521 --> 0:17:17.841
<v Speaker 4>That's just a logical thing to do. But I guess

0:17:18.001 --> 0:17:20.681
<v Speaker 4>it was his reaction to it that I think is

0:17:20.961 --> 0:17:23.921
<v Speaker 4>what it was. Very tone deaf. He said that thing.

0:17:23.921 --> 0:17:27.641
<v Speaker 4>If we're going to criticize people for being successful, you know,

0:17:28.001 --> 0:17:31.241
<v Speaker 4>I get it, I'm rich. That may be a slight paraphrase.

0:17:32.521 --> 0:17:33.401
<v Speaker 2>I actually.

0:17:34.601 --> 0:17:37.921
<v Speaker 3>Like it didn't for me, resonated a different way, which is,

0:17:38.521 --> 0:17:41.161
<v Speaker 3>at a certain point, can we give up worrying about

0:17:41.241 --> 0:17:43.881
<v Speaker 3>how much money he's got right and has he acted

0:17:43.961 --> 0:17:45.801
<v Speaker 3>in his own self interest in this? No, I don't

0:17:45.801 --> 0:17:49.601
<v Speaker 3>believe he has. Has he made some money on a property, yeah,

0:17:49.841 --> 0:17:53.361
<v Speaker 3>and in that case, good on them. Basically, I don't.

0:17:53.801 --> 0:17:55.881
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a misreading. I don't think he's being

0:17:56.081 --> 0:17:59.161
<v Speaker 4>criticized for being successful. I think he's criticized for being

0:17:59.601 --> 0:18:02.281
<v Speaker 4>tone deaf in a cost of living crisis, you know.

0:18:02.361 --> 0:18:04.201
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he did, and it is his right to

0:18:04.241 --> 0:18:06.521
<v Speaker 4>sell property that he owns, you know, but wealth is

0:18:06.601 --> 0:18:09.081
<v Speaker 4>not a messed in a vacuum, you know. And I

0:18:09.241 --> 0:18:12.561
<v Speaker 4>think this idea that oh, well I've made money and

0:18:12.721 --> 0:18:16.921
<v Speaker 4>that's due to my entirely myself, that that's just never true.

0:18:17.681 --> 0:18:21.161
<v Speaker 4>And I think, if you're making money, yeah, at a

0:18:21.321 --> 0:18:22.521
<v Speaker 4>cost to other people.

0:18:22.801 --> 0:18:25.001
<v Speaker 2>I thought, Look, I think he was responding to the

0:18:25.121 --> 0:18:27.441
<v Speaker 2>questions that were like, oh, you've made this money, haven't

0:18:27.441 --> 0:18:30.561
<v Speaker 2>paid any tax, and he I thought he was just saying, look, yes,

0:18:30.681 --> 0:18:33.881
<v Speaker 2>I have made money out of it. And actually, the

0:18:33.921 --> 0:18:36.001
<v Speaker 2>funny thing that I was kind of amused by was

0:18:36.161 --> 0:18:38.121
<v Speaker 2>the word that we've got a new word for wealthy

0:18:38.321 --> 0:18:40.681
<v Speaker 2>and as sorted, because that was the language he used.

0:18:40.681 --> 0:18:42.241
<v Speaker 3>He said, I'm sorted.

0:18:42.321 --> 0:18:45.001
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, I've worked hard, I've done well in my

0:18:45.121 --> 0:18:47.881
<v Speaker 2>career and I've done well, and look I'm sorted. And

0:18:48.241 --> 0:18:51.241
<v Speaker 2>I think he was pushing back against this distraction like

0:18:51.321 --> 0:18:53.161
<v Speaker 2>all the prime ministers sold a house and made money

0:18:53.201 --> 0:18:54.561
<v Speaker 2>out of it. It's like, well, hang on a minute.

0:18:54.601 --> 0:18:56.201
<v Speaker 2>You didn't want him to you wanted him to live,

0:18:56.241 --> 0:18:58.361
<v Speaker 2>and you didn't want him to take an allowance, which

0:18:58.401 --> 0:19:00.161
<v Speaker 2>he could have taken, but then it ended up didn't

0:19:00.281 --> 0:19:02.681
<v Speaker 2>not taking which would have been which was a political

0:19:02.721 --> 0:19:05.401
<v Speaker 2>mistake for him. But then you know, he moved into

0:19:05.841 --> 0:19:08.801
<v Speaker 2>premier House and he's so he doesn't need his apartment.

0:19:08.921 --> 0:19:10.601
<v Speaker 2>He could have rented it and continue to make money.

0:19:10.641 --> 0:19:11.481
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't have even been.

0:19:12.121 --> 0:19:13.041
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't have been a story.

0:19:13.161 --> 0:19:15.961
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's interesting that he sold it in

0:19:16.281 --> 0:19:18.321
<v Speaker 2>a market that's pretty flat managed to make money, which

0:19:18.401 --> 0:19:18.801
<v Speaker 2>tells me.

0:19:19.681 --> 0:19:21.481
<v Speaker 3>And it's a good property location.

0:19:21.641 --> 0:19:24.681
<v Speaker 2>Well, the real estate agent hinted, he said, they've done

0:19:24.681 --> 0:19:26.521
<v Speaker 2>a lot of they've done a lot to it, and

0:19:26.961 --> 0:19:29.881
<v Speaker 2>Amanda Luxen had done a lot, had very good taste

0:19:29.921 --> 0:19:32.321
<v Speaker 2>with what she'd done. But we never had that presented

0:19:32.361 --> 0:19:34.161
<v Speaker 2>by the news. It was just like al hes sold

0:19:34.201 --> 0:19:36.521
<v Speaker 2>it and made money, naughty him, and he avoids tax.

0:19:36.561 --> 0:19:39.201
<v Speaker 2>It's like I thought it was just the avoidance thing

0:19:39.441 --> 0:19:41.641
<v Speaker 2>just really wound me up. Well, because it is a

0:19:41.721 --> 0:19:45.681
<v Speaker 2>word that describes, Yeah, it's that you've deliberately tried to

0:19:45.761 --> 0:19:48.521
<v Speaker 2>avoid tax. It's a it is a taxation related word.

0:19:48.721 --> 0:19:50.881
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I actually agree with you on that.

0:19:50.961 --> 0:19:51.761
<v Speaker 3>I think that's more.

0:19:53.721 --> 0:19:56.921
<v Speaker 4>Of it in an egregious way. But at the same time,

0:19:57.001 --> 0:19:59.641
<v Speaker 4>I just think he sold that property. He sold another

0:19:59.641 --> 0:20:01.521
<v Speaker 4>property owned and he has the absolute right to do.

0:20:01.561 --> 0:20:02.321
<v Speaker 2>That, absolutely.

0:20:02.441 --> 0:20:07.001
<v Speaker 4>But that's probably five or six times the median income.

0:20:07.401 --> 0:20:11.881
<v Speaker 4>You know that you've made tax free and on top

0:20:12.001 --> 0:20:14.761
<v Speaker 4>of tax cuts that I think the benefit of which

0:20:14.921 --> 0:20:17.361
<v Speaker 4>is felt more by people at the top of the heap,

0:20:17.441 --> 0:20:19.521
<v Speaker 4>and at the same time saying we can't afford the

0:20:19.601 --> 0:20:20.361
<v Speaker 4>denaed in the hospital.

0:20:20.681 --> 0:20:23.081
<v Speaker 3>There's not a theory that actually still an apartment is

0:20:23.121 --> 0:20:24.681
<v Speaker 3>not going to change the numbers on them.

0:20:25.081 --> 0:20:29.001
<v Speaker 4>I absolutely agree, but I just think it is tone deaf.

0:20:29.201 --> 0:20:31.761
<v Speaker 4>I think he just fails to read the room. I

0:20:31.841 --> 0:20:33.761
<v Speaker 4>think he should have shown a lot more humility.

0:20:34.441 --> 0:20:36.281
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how what would he do though to

0:20:36.361 --> 0:20:38.961
<v Speaker 2>show humility? Yes, I mean, if you're going to be humble,

0:20:38.961 --> 0:20:41.721
<v Speaker 2>you'd be like, yes, I've made money, and yes I'm

0:20:41.761 --> 0:20:45.561
<v Speaker 2>successful already. You could say he's being arrogant just by

0:20:45.641 --> 0:20:47.561
<v Speaker 2>pointing out facts, you know what I mean, How could

0:20:47.601 --> 0:20:49.601
<v Speaker 2>he be humble? He could lie and so I'm not

0:20:49.641 --> 0:20:51.401
<v Speaker 2>as rich as people think on there are people who

0:20:51.401 --> 0:20:53.721
<v Speaker 2>are much richer. That would be a false humility. I

0:20:53.761 --> 0:20:55.601
<v Speaker 2>don't know if he can win this one, you see, Joe.

0:20:56.361 --> 0:20:58.961
<v Speaker 3>I do think that he probably got hopped by someone

0:21:00.521 --> 0:21:03.521
<v Speaker 3>reached the point where it's like, come on, we've got I'm.

0:21:03.361 --> 0:21:08.041
<v Speaker 2>Still delighted that he said if rick In I thought, oh,

0:21:08.201 --> 0:21:10.801
<v Speaker 2>naughty that was a different interview of Justin.

0:21:11.121 --> 0:21:13.721
<v Speaker 3>I think Joe, to your point where he was perhaps

0:21:13.881 --> 0:21:17.241
<v Speaker 3>tone deaf, was claiming the accommodation benefit on that property

0:21:17.241 --> 0:21:17.761
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning.

0:21:17.881 --> 0:21:19.641
<v Speaker 4>I think we've talked about that before. I think that

0:21:19.761 --> 0:21:20.841
<v Speaker 4>was completely tone deaf.

0:21:20.801 --> 0:21:23.681
<v Speaker 3>And good onor for stepping and straight away realizing it's

0:21:23.681 --> 0:21:24.921
<v Speaker 3>going to be a problem. I'm going to pay the

0:21:24.961 --> 0:21:27.041
<v Speaker 3>money back, I'm going to stop claiming it. And now

0:21:27.081 --> 0:21:30.081
<v Speaker 3>I suppose by moving into premier house and selling the apartment,

0:21:31.041 --> 0:21:32.241
<v Speaker 3>it's all off the board, right.

0:21:32.401 --> 0:21:34.881
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I would have no problem with any of that.

0:21:35.081 --> 0:21:38.121
<v Speaker 4>But I think if you are lucky enough to be

0:21:38.241 --> 0:21:41.361
<v Speaker 4>successful and be comfortable and have money, part of that

0:21:41.721 --> 0:21:44.361
<v Speaker 4>is luck and good fortune and a lot of people

0:21:44.361 --> 0:21:45.281
<v Speaker 4>who have helped you on the way.

0:21:45.321 --> 0:21:47.161
<v Speaker 3>And I find it, along with a bit of luck

0:21:47.201 --> 0:21:48.881
<v Speaker 3>and a little bit of good fortune, is some bloody

0:21:48.881 --> 0:21:51.041
<v Speaker 3>hard work a lot. So I'm thinking, you know, there

0:21:51.081 --> 0:21:53.561
<v Speaker 3>are over six hundred thousand rental properties in the country,

0:21:53.681 --> 0:21:55.921
<v Speaker 3>about seventy eight percent of them are owned by people

0:21:56.001 --> 0:21:59.161
<v Speaker 3>that own one or two rental properties. Now, most of

0:21:59.241 --> 0:22:01.841
<v Speaker 3>those people, and I know a bunch of them, are

0:22:01.921 --> 0:22:04.281
<v Speaker 3>people that have set aside money, that have scripted and

0:22:04.361 --> 0:22:07.641
<v Speaker 3>saved and you know, looked after themselves so that they're

0:22:07.681 --> 0:22:10.121
<v Speaker 3>not a burden on the government going forward. I don't

0:22:10.121 --> 0:22:12.361
<v Speaker 3>think we should diminish that and the hard work that

0:22:12.441 --> 0:22:13.681
<v Speaker 3>those people do at all.

0:22:14.041 --> 0:22:16.641
<v Speaker 4>Oh, and I don't intend to, you know, I completely

0:22:16.681 --> 0:22:18.441
<v Speaker 4>agree with you. I mean, I think there's something fundamentally

0:22:18.481 --> 0:22:20.721
<v Speaker 4>wrong with the basis of our economy is selling each

0:22:20.721 --> 0:22:23.121
<v Speaker 4>other secondhand houses. I mean, I think that is a flaw,

0:22:23.201 --> 0:22:25.281
<v Speaker 4>but that's not the fault of people who own them.

0:22:26.401 --> 0:22:28.721
<v Speaker 3>This is great, but there's some hard lessons in that too,

0:22:28.881 --> 0:22:32.601
<v Speaker 3>because you know, and look, it's like I've got a

0:22:32.721 --> 0:22:36.081
<v Speaker 3>second you know, Like for me, what influences me is

0:22:36.241 --> 0:22:38.721
<v Speaker 3>like my mum and dad they retired or dad sold

0:22:38.761 --> 0:22:41.321
<v Speaker 3>the business years ago. They put some money into shares

0:22:41.481 --> 0:22:44.681
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand shares in nineteen eighty six. Right, they

0:22:44.761 --> 0:22:47.121
<v Speaker 3>went from two dollars fifty they were down to four

0:22:47.161 --> 0:22:48.801
<v Speaker 3>cents a couple of years ago. They might be back

0:22:48.841 --> 0:22:52.201
<v Speaker 3>to two dollars fifty hour. Right, so that they did

0:22:52.241 --> 0:22:54.361
<v Speaker 3>the right thing. Put it into a productive asset. They

0:22:54.441 --> 0:22:57.201
<v Speaker 3>put money into a buddy finance company that went ballly up.

0:22:57.481 --> 0:22:59.801
<v Speaker 3>If they had a border rental property. All those years ago,

0:23:00.201 --> 0:23:02.001
<v Speaker 3>they would have been so much better off. No wonder

0:23:02.041 --> 0:23:03.281
<v Speaker 3>people buy rental properties.

0:23:03.641 --> 0:23:06.321
<v Speaker 2>Oh, no, wonder, that's a whole. That's almost we're moving

0:23:06.361 --> 0:23:08.601
<v Speaker 2>the conversation on. We'll be talking about cgts again and

0:23:08.641 --> 0:23:09.961
<v Speaker 2>we'll be in the property how so we'll have to

0:23:10.041 --> 0:23:14.281
<v Speaker 2>move on, all right, But thanks kids. Hey, by the way,

0:23:14.401 --> 0:23:16.801
<v Speaker 2>just quickly on the politics before we take a break.

0:23:16.961 --> 0:23:19.641
<v Speaker 2>Chris Bushop is open to new tolls to fun roadst

0:23:19.681 --> 0:23:22.041
<v Speaker 2>Do you mind tolls? I don't mind them them as

0:23:22.121 --> 0:23:24.241
<v Speaker 2>long as there's an option to go yes, route B.

0:23:24.681 --> 0:23:26.201
<v Speaker 2>And that's where I think for the people in the

0:23:26.201 --> 0:23:29.681
<v Speaker 2>wire upper right in this new road over the over

0:23:29.721 --> 0:23:32.481
<v Speaker 2>the hills there, that shouldn't be told, right because that's

0:23:32.521 --> 0:23:37.401
<v Speaker 2>replacing something that's broken. Yeah, and that has still been

0:23:37.481 --> 0:23:39.201
<v Speaker 2>consulted on to be fair, So we don't know what's

0:23:39.241 --> 0:23:39.641
<v Speaker 2>going to happen.

0:23:39.721 --> 0:23:41.121
<v Speaker 3>That would distink if they told me.

0:23:41.561 --> 0:23:43.361
<v Speaker 2>But do you mind tell new roads tolls?

0:23:43.681 --> 0:23:45.881
<v Speaker 4>I think like you to him, If it's a bypass

0:23:46.001 --> 0:23:49.241
<v Speaker 4>that saves time and there is an alternate route, I

0:23:49.681 --> 0:23:53.481
<v Speaker 4>think we have to pay for public infrastructure.

0:23:54.481 --> 0:23:56.401
<v Speaker 3>Drive to walk with in the new motorway. Do you

0:23:56.521 --> 0:23:58.881
<v Speaker 3>want to save two dollars eighty by tootling along the

0:23:58.881 --> 0:23:59.281
<v Speaker 3>old State.

0:24:00.121 --> 0:24:02.841
<v Speaker 2>No, boy, I tell you what the tolls I mean,

0:24:02.881 --> 0:24:04.601
<v Speaker 2>they've got a lot of them in Europe, but you

0:24:05.201 --> 0:24:07.121
<v Speaker 2>them because either run to take the scene at route

0:24:07.161 --> 0:24:08.321
<v Speaker 2>or you want to go quickly for me to be

0:24:08.481 --> 0:24:10.441
<v Speaker 2>But the one that did my head and was luckily

0:24:10.481 --> 0:24:12.081
<v Speaker 2>I had a pass which got me a discount on it.

0:24:12.161 --> 0:24:14.841
<v Speaker 2>But the return toll through the mont Blanc Tunnel from

0:24:15.041 --> 0:24:20.161
<v Speaker 2>Shamo total fifty four euro. Fifty four euro. And I said,

0:24:20.201 --> 0:24:21.761
<v Speaker 2>I hang on, man, I forgot this pass here, and

0:24:21.841 --> 0:24:23.361
<v Speaker 2>I showed him a ski pass. He goes, are lucky,

0:24:23.361 --> 0:24:26.481
<v Speaker 2>You're lucky. You show me that's sixteen that even then

0:24:26.601 --> 0:24:27.201
<v Speaker 2>sixteen euro.

0:24:27.361 --> 0:24:29.361
<v Speaker 3>That's the toll road and tall.

0:24:29.401 --> 0:24:29.761
<v Speaker 2>Wronger.

0:24:30.161 --> 0:24:33.241
<v Speaker 3>That's enormously disappointing, right, It's like.

0:24:34.201 --> 0:24:35.441
<v Speaker 4>It's like about a kilometer lost.

0:24:36.721 --> 0:24:37.561
<v Speaker 3>It's not even I.

0:24:37.601 --> 0:24:40.521
<v Speaker 2>Guess doesn't feel grand kilometer is like a ripoff. If

0:24:40.561 --> 0:24:42.961
<v Speaker 2>that kilometer saved you twenty kilometers.

0:24:42.561 --> 0:24:47.001
<v Speaker 3>You'd be like, doesn't no, exactly, that's underwhelming that one, ah, right.

0:24:48.201 --> 0:24:50.641
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's worth the two dollars eighty I

0:24:50.761 --> 0:24:51.561
<v Speaker 4>paid to drive on it.

0:24:51.721 --> 0:24:54.001
<v Speaker 3>No, I got to the end of it when said

0:24:54.041 --> 0:24:56.241
<v Speaker 3>it like I was hoping for more.

0:24:56.641 --> 0:24:59.281
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I mean when it first opened, I remember thinking, oh,

0:24:59.321 --> 0:25:03.081
<v Speaker 2>this is quite fun. Anyway, that was back in the

0:25:03.121 --> 0:25:05.361
<v Speaker 2>days where I remember driving those round around some of

0:25:05.401 --> 0:25:07.961
<v Speaker 2>those rough raids in my nineteen seventy one forty escort.

0:25:08.081 --> 0:25:09.841
<v Speaker 2>Was always more entertaining to take the long route, to

0:25:09.881 --> 0:25:11.921
<v Speaker 2>be honest, yep, that's how I learned how to do

0:25:11.961 --> 0:25:14.881
<v Speaker 2>a bit of rally driving in between roder and taring.

0:25:15.161 --> 0:25:18.241
<v Speaker 2>That was great fun after at ten o'clock at night. Anyway,

0:25:18.521 --> 0:25:21.121
<v Speaker 2>as we're going to be back with more, including just

0:25:21.681 --> 0:25:23.481
<v Speaker 2>a good news I mean not good news, it's not

0:25:23.561 --> 0:25:26.801
<v Speaker 2>news really, but hopeful news that there's been another sighting

0:25:26.801 --> 0:25:29.761
<v Speaker 2>of the Mara Coopa a lot today with a sighting

0:25:29.801 --> 0:25:31.841
<v Speaker 2>of Tom Phillips and god, I hope they actually catch them.

0:25:31.881 --> 0:25:33.161
<v Speaker 2>But we'll be back in a minute to discuss that

0:25:33.241 --> 0:25:35.201
<v Speaker 2>and other things. This is the panel on News Talk

0:25:35.241 --> 0:25:37.241
<v Speaker 2>Sai'd be week in Collective. It's twenty three minutes to

0:25:37.321 --> 0:25:55.001
<v Speaker 2>four finer. That's fun, Live Religion and welcome back to

0:25:55.441 --> 0:25:58.161
<v Speaker 2>the Weekend Collective. This is the panel and I'm Tim Beverage,

0:25:58.161 --> 0:26:02.761
<v Speaker 2>I'm my guests Joe mccarell and Pete wolf Camp just correicktly'

0:26:03.081 --> 0:26:04.601
<v Speaker 2>there's not really too much to say about this, but

0:26:04.721 --> 0:26:07.521
<v Speaker 2>the fresh in quarries after there's been another tip on

0:26:07.601 --> 0:26:11.481
<v Speaker 2>the Maracopa family, Tom Phillips and has three children apparently

0:26:11.561 --> 0:26:16.201
<v Speaker 2>being spotted by some peak hunters and some bushmen near Maracopa,

0:26:17.081 --> 0:26:21.521
<v Speaker 2>reporting to police on Thursday. I do get optimistic, Pete,

0:26:21.521 --> 0:26:24.081
<v Speaker 2>when I hear these stories reported and it's you know,

0:26:24.721 --> 0:26:26.481
<v Speaker 2>a couple of days later, it's been reported now that

0:26:26.801 --> 0:26:28.641
<v Speaker 2>hopefully they're closing the net and there's going to be

0:26:28.641 --> 0:26:31.081
<v Speaker 2>an announcement that they have been found. But I mean,

0:26:31.161 --> 0:26:31.921
<v Speaker 2>how long has it been?

0:26:32.081 --> 0:26:33.841
<v Speaker 3>What was the reward that was out a little while ago,

0:26:33.841 --> 0:26:40.041
<v Speaker 3>one hundred thousand lead seemingly Yeah, so you know, if

0:26:40.081 --> 0:26:44.041
<v Speaker 3>somebody knows, they obviously don't want to say, which is

0:26:44.161 --> 0:26:47.321
<v Speaker 3>remarkable that you'd give up the chance to get eighty grand?

0:26:47.761 --> 0:26:49.601
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. How much would you need to sell out someone

0:26:49.641 --> 0:26:50.321
<v Speaker 2>who was close to you?

0:26:50.441 --> 0:26:59.081
<v Speaker 4>Though, Joe, I'm thinking about it. I think though you're

0:26:59.121 --> 0:27:02.561
<v Speaker 4>dealing with people who because I mean, my view which

0:27:02.641 --> 0:27:05.721
<v Speaker 4>is based on nothing like I've got no ine info here,

0:27:05.761 --> 0:27:09.881
<v Speaker 4>but I'm like, someone is supporting this family and they

0:27:10.001 --> 0:27:12.841
<v Speaker 4>are doing it for ideological reasons. They're not doing it just,

0:27:13.721 --> 0:27:15.561
<v Speaker 4>you know, to help out a mate or something. It's

0:27:15.641 --> 0:27:21.001
<v Speaker 4>gone beyond just you know, this is someone someone's doing

0:27:21.041 --> 0:27:26.161
<v Speaker 4>this for reasons of deep seated an ideology they believe.

0:27:25.921 --> 0:27:29.721
<v Speaker 2>In, possibly, and they're making it. They're doing huge damage

0:27:29.721 --> 0:27:33.121
<v Speaker 2>to those kids, huge damage. I mean, it's awful, teaching

0:27:33.161 --> 0:27:35.681
<v Speaker 2>them to be outcast from society and mistrust authority in

0:27:35.721 --> 0:27:38.401
<v Speaker 2>all society, other members of their family. It's just I

0:27:38.481 --> 0:27:43.201
<v Speaker 2>think he's just it's the It's deplorable, absolutely.

0:27:42.801 --> 0:27:45.441
<v Speaker 4>And I think we are in really one hundred percent

0:27:45.481 --> 0:27:47.441
<v Speaker 4>agreement on that, and I think most of New Zealand

0:27:47.481 --> 0:27:49.241
<v Speaker 4>would be right.

0:27:49.721 --> 0:27:53.481
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's move on. Hey, more happy things. This is

0:27:53.601 --> 0:27:56.201
<v Speaker 2>there's quas, some inflammatory topics and in our panel is

0:27:56.481 --> 0:27:59.641
<v Speaker 2>this afternoon more than half the population. So the census

0:27:59.681 --> 0:28:01.401
<v Speaker 2>has been done. I mean, I guess there was a

0:28:01.441 --> 0:28:03.321
<v Speaker 2>bit of a question about how well they actually collated

0:28:03.321 --> 0:28:05.321
<v Speaker 2>the census and collected but let's move on from that.

0:28:05.761 --> 0:28:08.761
<v Speaker 2>But the proportion of people with no religion has increased

0:28:08.801 --> 0:28:11.081
<v Speaker 2>from forty eight point two percent of the population in

0:28:11.121 --> 0:28:15.881
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen to now more than half fifty one point

0:28:15.961 --> 0:28:18.481
<v Speaker 2>six percent, so just over half of us are not religious.

0:28:18.761 --> 0:28:21.401
<v Speaker 2>I would say, depends whether or not you count being

0:28:21.441 --> 0:28:24.241
<v Speaker 2>a fan of Taylor Swift's religion, in which case you

0:28:24.321 --> 0:28:25.081
<v Speaker 2>might reverse that number.

0:28:25.121 --> 0:28:27.561
<v Speaker 3>But I think they're looking at formal religions.

0:28:27.401 --> 0:28:30.321
<v Speaker 2>For I know, I'm just I'm being asking mischievous. Yeah,

0:28:30.481 --> 0:28:32.841
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing this, but I mean in a way. That's

0:28:32.921 --> 0:28:35.041
<v Speaker 2>the point I'm making is that I think even if

0:28:35.041 --> 0:28:38.241
<v Speaker 2>people aren't following formal religion, they're substitu tuating it with

0:28:38.281 --> 0:28:41.161
<v Speaker 2>other sorts of worship, whether they be of celebrities or whatever.

0:28:41.321 --> 0:28:43.441
<v Speaker 2>But what do you make of it? Peter, You're a

0:28:43.481 --> 0:28:44.761
<v Speaker 2>good Catholic bl an't you? Yeah?

0:28:45.121 --> 0:28:48.201
<v Speaker 3>Well maybe not. Good Catholics are very naughty.

0:28:48.481 --> 0:28:49.281
<v Speaker 2>He's not the Messiah.

0:28:49.321 --> 0:28:50.601
<v Speaker 3>It's a very naughty buye.

0:28:51.481 --> 0:28:52.001
<v Speaker 2>I tell you what.

0:28:52.121 --> 0:28:54.961
<v Speaker 3>My response this is what's fascinating, given that I've got

0:28:55.001 --> 0:28:58.161
<v Speaker 3>some involvement in the sense with Catholic education. Is one

0:28:58.201 --> 0:29:00.841
<v Speaker 3>of the things about Catholic education is, and I guess

0:29:00.921 --> 0:29:03.481
<v Speaker 3>religious education in general, it's oversubscribed.

0:29:04.401 --> 0:29:04.761
<v Speaker 5>What is so?

0:29:05.161 --> 0:29:05.361
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:29:06.241 --> 0:29:10.161
<v Speaker 3>I know, for example, at our college we had seen

0:29:10.201 --> 0:29:12.561
<v Speaker 3>out about one hundred and seventy I'm sorry, we don't

0:29:12.601 --> 0:29:18.481
<v Speaker 3>ever letters, right, so over subscribed. So people are still

0:29:18.601 --> 0:29:21.201
<v Speaker 3>suggesting good schools or is it because they're good schools

0:29:21.241 --> 0:29:22.401
<v Speaker 3>because they're Catholic schools?

0:29:22.601 --> 0:29:25.601
<v Speaker 2>Or this becomes a bit of a competition, almost, doesn't it.

0:29:26.401 --> 0:29:28.681
<v Speaker 3>Life's competition, so over it?

0:29:28.841 --> 0:29:29.361
<v Speaker 2>What do you reckon?

0:29:30.121 --> 0:29:33.441
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think in terms of the school thing,

0:29:33.521 --> 0:29:35.521
<v Speaker 4>I'm a bit more cynical about that. I think there's

0:29:35.561 --> 0:29:39.281
<v Speaker 4>a lot of parents who might suddenly discover a faith

0:29:39.321 --> 0:29:41.401
<v Speaker 4>when it turns out that they don't want their kid

0:29:41.481 --> 0:29:44.481
<v Speaker 4>to attend the public school in their zone, and they

0:29:44.601 --> 0:29:47.961
<v Speaker 4>might shout for church, you know, quite regularly over that

0:29:48.161 --> 0:29:50.921
<v Speaker 4>high school period, and then perhaps you know, drift away.

0:29:51.441 --> 0:29:53.241
<v Speaker 2>But I mean that doesn't mean they're going to fill

0:29:53.241 --> 0:29:54.961
<v Speaker 2>out that the census has been Catholic though? Is it

0:29:55.081 --> 0:29:56.601
<v Speaker 2>because as private?

0:29:57.361 --> 0:29:59.281
<v Speaker 4>But I further your point to him, I think, you know,

0:29:59.441 --> 0:30:02.921
<v Speaker 4>people are still seeking things to believe in, sure, and

0:30:03.041 --> 0:30:06.521
<v Speaker 4>that's I mean Taylor Swift. I mean, that's perhaps something

0:30:06.561 --> 0:30:08.961
<v Speaker 4>people might not think was a serious thing. But you know,

0:30:09.281 --> 0:30:12.561
<v Speaker 4>I think people are still spiritually hungry and they want meaning.

0:30:13.321 --> 0:30:19.321
<v Speaker 4>But I think in my life, our sort of feelings around.

0:30:19.041 --> 0:30:19.721
<v Speaker 3>Religion have changed.

0:30:19.721 --> 0:30:21.921
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I was raised in the Catholic Church myself,

0:30:22.521 --> 0:30:24.601
<v Speaker 4>and back then it was sort of religion was almost

0:30:24.601 --> 0:30:28.401
<v Speaker 4>an unqualified good. And now I think religion and that's

0:30:28.601 --> 0:30:31.361
<v Speaker 4>not to say that religion isn't a good and there

0:30:31.361 --> 0:30:33.441
<v Speaker 4>aren't wonderful religious people who live a life of real

0:30:33.521 --> 0:30:37.801
<v Speaker 4>meaning and real faith and really contribute. But the religion

0:30:37.921 --> 0:30:42.601
<v Speaker 4>is tarnished, the idea of religion is tarnished. Why because

0:30:42.681 --> 0:30:43.841
<v Speaker 4>of a lot of news stories.

0:30:43.921 --> 0:30:46.521
<v Speaker 2>We've heard people doing terrible things in the people doing.

0:30:46.481 --> 0:30:47.841
<v Speaker 4>Terrible things in the name of religion, and that is

0:30:47.961 --> 0:30:50.121
<v Speaker 4>not the religion itself. I just want to be really clear,

0:30:50.641 --> 0:30:52.561
<v Speaker 4>but I think that in my lifetime it has been

0:30:52.561 --> 0:30:53.761
<v Speaker 4>a really fundamental change.

0:30:54.161 --> 0:30:57.121
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I certainly see that. And I think, you know,

0:30:57.201 --> 0:31:01.921
<v Speaker 3>the whole notions around you know, traditionality and so on,

0:31:02.121 --> 0:31:05.761
<v Speaker 3>those things have changed a lot. Life like. It's a

0:31:05.801 --> 0:31:09.761
<v Speaker 3>bit more ephemeral, and so people are not as wedded

0:31:09.961 --> 0:31:13.281
<v Speaker 3>to those traditions. That changes things. Look, the numbers haven't

0:31:13.321 --> 0:31:16.601
<v Speaker 3>dropped traumatically. They have dropped a little bit, So I'm

0:31:16.641 --> 0:31:17.521
<v Speaker 3>not surprised at all.

0:31:18.961 --> 0:31:20.961
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I went through a stage of being well,

0:31:21.001 --> 0:31:23.161
<v Speaker 2>I've been I went through a stage of being quite

0:31:23.161 --> 0:31:25.081
<v Speaker 2>anti religious, but that was probably because of the things

0:31:25.121 --> 0:31:27.401
<v Speaker 2>people are doing, which were terrorist acts in the name

0:31:27.401 --> 0:31:29.961
<v Speaker 2>of religion and things like that, and so I'm more

0:31:30.001 --> 0:31:32.201
<v Speaker 2>in the Christopher Hitchins school of things, but I've sort

0:31:32.241 --> 0:31:35.641
<v Speaker 2>of softened on in that respect. And that look, as

0:31:35.721 --> 0:31:39.361
<v Speaker 2>long as if what you believe in informs you or

0:31:39.441 --> 0:31:41.441
<v Speaker 2>inspires you to be a better person and to think

0:31:41.481 --> 0:31:46.321
<v Speaker 2>about your fellow man or woman, should I say then great.

0:31:46.761 --> 0:31:49.281
<v Speaker 2>I think where religion where the religious debates get a

0:31:49.321 --> 0:31:51.961
<v Speaker 2>bit tricky, especially in politics, is when people bring religion

0:31:52.001 --> 0:31:55.841
<v Speaker 2>into politics and say, I believe in this particular thing,

0:31:56.041 --> 0:31:57.721
<v Speaker 2>and therefore I'm going to tell you that this is

0:31:57.721 --> 0:31:59.041
<v Speaker 2>the way you should be living your life. And I

0:31:59.121 --> 0:32:00.961
<v Speaker 2>think that that's the thing I would push back against

0:32:00.961 --> 0:32:03.761
<v Speaker 2>the most. And we see it probably, oh, we obviously

0:32:03.801 --> 0:32:06.401
<v Speaker 2>see it very in I mean, who wants to be

0:32:06.481 --> 0:32:08.481
<v Speaker 2>a woman in Iran? I'm sorry, but you know the

0:32:08.601 --> 0:32:11.161
<v Speaker 2>choice a woman in America? Yeah, well, I mean come on,

0:32:11.321 --> 0:32:14.641
<v Speaker 2>I mean, seriously, it's a free country. But there are

0:32:14.801 --> 0:32:17.881
<v Speaker 2>problems with politics and religion, and I push back against

0:32:18.161 --> 0:32:21.601
<v Speaker 2>that sort of stuff. I mean, fair enough, I guess.

0:32:21.761 --> 0:32:25.921
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Look, it's a pretty important part of my life,

0:32:25.961 --> 0:32:27.321
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not going to hide from that.

0:32:28.241 --> 0:32:29.961
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, my kids go to a Catholic school.

0:32:30.001 --> 0:32:30.681
<v Speaker 2>My wife's Catholic.

0:32:31.001 --> 0:32:33.041
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's yeah, our son goes to a Catholic school.

0:32:33.681 --> 0:32:36.881
<v Speaker 3>I think that the school and the wider organization does

0:32:36.921 --> 0:32:41.561
<v Speaker 3>a tremendous job. So yeah, I'm not going to back

0:32:41.641 --> 0:32:42.121
<v Speaker 3>down from that.

0:32:42.521 --> 0:32:48.441
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I wasn't anticipating. That's a good point, I'm to me.

0:32:48.601 --> 0:32:50.761
<v Speaker 3>But I also appreciate the fact that for other people

0:32:50.801 --> 0:32:52.601
<v Speaker 3>it's not important, and that's absolutely okay.

0:32:53.321 --> 0:32:55.441
<v Speaker 4>But well, actually, I think and this is not coming

0:32:55.481 --> 0:32:57.521
<v Speaker 4>from a person who has a religious faith or all

0:32:57.561 --> 0:32:59.641
<v Speaker 4>of the religious faith, but I think it's a bit

0:32:59.681 --> 0:33:01.961
<v Speaker 4>of a shame because what I think that reflects is

0:33:02.041 --> 0:33:07.401
<v Speaker 4>the increasing individualism. Yeah, lives we lead, and I think

0:33:07.561 --> 0:33:11.881
<v Speaker 4>that limits us. I think it makes us less connected

0:33:11.921 --> 0:33:14.361
<v Speaker 4>to each other. I think we achieve less if we're

0:33:14.441 --> 0:33:18.761
<v Speaker 4>just all out for ourselves. And I think although there

0:33:18.801 --> 0:33:21.441
<v Speaker 4>were clearly pluses and minuses to the traditional kind of

0:33:21.521 --> 0:33:23.161
<v Speaker 4>church structure, it was collective.

0:33:23.441 --> 0:33:26.641
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Actually, by the way, just you know, putting all

0:33:26.681 --> 0:33:30.201
<v Speaker 2>aside whether the supernatural side be true. My favorite thing

0:33:30.241 --> 0:33:33.001
<v Speaker 2>from the Christian religion is and something I because I

0:33:33.121 --> 0:33:35.041
<v Speaker 2>was raised that way as well, the value of love

0:33:35.121 --> 0:33:37.521
<v Speaker 2>thy neighbor, who is thy neighbor, anyone who is going

0:33:37.561 --> 0:33:39.881
<v Speaker 2>to be affected by the consequence as a consequence of

0:33:39.921 --> 0:33:42.201
<v Speaker 2>my actions and always, And I just think that that

0:33:42.321 --> 0:33:45.961
<v Speaker 2>is such an amazing message. Regardless of that's.

0:33:45.841 --> 0:33:48.361
<v Speaker 4>True in so many different faiths, that message exists, you know,

0:33:48.641 --> 0:33:51.281
<v Speaker 4>and I think that is a really profound thing. And

0:33:51.401 --> 0:33:54.321
<v Speaker 4>you don't have to be religious to take that on board,

0:33:54.361 --> 0:33:56.361
<v Speaker 4>to think about it, to live by that mantra.

0:33:57.241 --> 0:33:59.401
<v Speaker 3>I guess the challenge is always if you're not religious,

0:33:59.401 --> 0:34:00.401
<v Speaker 3>where do you get that from?

0:34:02.041 --> 0:34:02.321
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:34:02.361 --> 0:34:04.881
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, this is that we could do. We could do,

0:34:05.241 --> 0:34:09.481
<v Speaker 2>probably need to go on too Frank Frank's show to

0:34:09.521 --> 0:34:10.481
<v Speaker 2>discuss things.

0:34:10.721 --> 0:34:13.761
<v Speaker 3>I guess what I'm not saying it's not possible because

0:34:13.761 --> 0:34:16.201
<v Speaker 3>it is. Well, I mean, the example is the challenges

0:34:16.521 --> 0:34:20.041
<v Speaker 3>from where and how readily accessible and so on. Whereas

0:34:20.401 --> 0:34:23.521
<v Speaker 3>you've got all this tradition in the Christian churches anyway,

0:34:23.761 --> 0:34:26.441
<v Speaker 3>around a life of service, around as you say, love

0:34:26.481 --> 0:34:29.241
<v Speaker 3>your neighbor, those sorts of things are there and there

0:34:29.361 --> 0:34:30.161
<v Speaker 3>to be learned.

0:34:30.281 --> 0:34:31.841
<v Speaker 2>If I was going to score a cheap point on

0:34:31.961 --> 0:34:36.321
<v Speaker 2>this pete, it would be to say that, yes, the

0:34:36.481 --> 0:34:39.321
<v Speaker 2>argument about you don't need religion to do good things,

0:34:39.881 --> 0:34:42.161
<v Speaker 2>there is an argument to do the most horrific things.

0:34:42.321 --> 0:34:44.481
<v Speaker 2>You only need to look in some of the religious

0:34:44.481 --> 0:34:46.881
<v Speaker 2>text to find all the justification you need because we

0:34:47.081 --> 0:34:49.841
<v Speaker 2>cherry pick. But that is such a cheap, quick point

0:34:49.881 --> 0:34:51.881
<v Speaker 2>to make. But to be honest, you can think of it.

0:34:51.881 --> 0:34:53.561
<v Speaker 2>If you want to go and find the most horrendous

0:34:53.681 --> 0:34:56.761
<v Speaker 2>invocations to do things nastily to people, you'll find them

0:34:57.001 --> 0:34:59.441
<v Speaker 2>in religious text. And I think in the end, I

0:34:59.521 --> 0:35:03.081
<v Speaker 2>think in humanity we pick and choose our own morality.

0:35:03.561 --> 0:35:07.361
<v Speaker 2>But gosh, this conversation's really going to sort of unwekend

0:35:07.401 --> 0:35:12.481
<v Speaker 2>collective sort of panelis territory, but you know there it is. Yeah, anyway,

0:35:12.561 --> 0:35:14.481
<v Speaker 2>but I you know, I love thy neighbor and that's

0:35:14.481 --> 0:35:16.761
<v Speaker 2>why I love you guys, and I've probably we should

0:35:16.761 --> 0:35:20.001
<v Speaker 2>probably move on because we've got really big issues to discuss,

0:35:20.081 --> 0:35:23.081
<v Speaker 2>and just to teck because Crocs or Jandles one is

0:35:23.161 --> 0:35:26.961
<v Speaker 2>a lot more dangerous than the other, and we will

0:35:27.041 --> 0:35:29.201
<v Speaker 2>touch on that in just a moment, as ten minutes

0:35:29.241 --> 0:35:29.601
<v Speaker 2>before the.

0:35:29.601 --> 0:35:41.441
<v Speaker 3>Story is coming up. Folks, Yep, welcome back.

0:35:41.281 --> 0:35:44.121
<v Speaker 2>To the Weekend Collective. I'm Tim Beverages. This is the panel.

0:35:44.201 --> 0:35:47.121
<v Speaker 2>My guests to Joe McCarroll, and Pete wolf Camp. Now

0:35:47.441 --> 0:35:50.761
<v Speaker 2>this actually was a misleading headlines, guys, but because I've

0:35:50.801 --> 0:35:53.601
<v Speaker 2>got really was fascinated with a story about the amount

0:35:53.641 --> 0:35:56.801
<v Speaker 2>of money that's been handled out by acc for injuries

0:35:57.121 --> 0:36:01.041
<v Speaker 2>for high heels, Jandles and crocs. But it implied that

0:36:01.161 --> 0:36:06.121
<v Speaker 2>Crocs were the big villain here and aligned much malign.

0:36:05.921 --> 0:36:06.921
<v Speaker 3>I've taking it personally.

0:36:07.041 --> 0:36:08.961
<v Speaker 2>Do you know the numbers on this, Joe, because it

0:36:09.121 --> 0:36:12.201
<v Speaker 2>was surprising that Crocs out of two million, only sixty

0:36:12.241 --> 0:36:13.441
<v Speaker 2>three thousand bucks.

0:36:13.601 --> 0:36:14.681
<v Speaker 3>Not two million dollars.

0:36:14.881 --> 0:36:18.041
<v Speaker 4>White, by the way, absolutely shocked me, yes, is that

0:36:18.121 --> 0:36:21.321
<v Speaker 4>people are still wearing high heels like they are for

0:36:21.401 --> 0:36:24.841
<v Speaker 4>the first half hour of a wedding and no other time.

0:36:24.881 --> 0:36:29.001
<v Speaker 2>And they are actually they're far lest common. But I think,

0:36:29.241 --> 0:36:29.841
<v Speaker 2>I think, but the.

0:36:29.881 --> 0:36:31.241
<v Speaker 4>High heel eccidents are steady.

0:36:31.881 --> 0:36:34.081
<v Speaker 3>But the thing unlike the high heels themselves.

0:36:36.001 --> 0:36:38.681
<v Speaker 4>But the thing about crocs is the number of CROCS

0:36:38.681 --> 0:36:40.281
<v Speaker 4>accidents I think is tripled, hasn't it.

0:36:40.441 --> 0:36:43.841
<v Speaker 2>That's the incredibly popular Here's the thing, here's the stat

0:36:43.881 --> 0:36:47.721
<v Speaker 2>that everyone's missing Jandle's still costing JANDLE accidents one point

0:36:47.761 --> 0:36:51.161
<v Speaker 2>three to one point four million, And it's it's funny

0:36:51.201 --> 0:36:52.881
<v Speaker 2>isn't it that you can't handle the jandle of jandle

0:36:52.961 --> 0:36:55.001
<v Speaker 2>slip in a quintessential part of New Zealand.

0:36:55.481 --> 0:36:57.641
<v Speaker 4>We literally cannot handle the jendle.

0:36:57.841 --> 0:37:01.521
<v Speaker 3>One point four million bucks and ladders cause how many

0:37:01.841 --> 0:37:03.761
<v Speaker 3>how many dollars worth of injury ladders?

0:37:03.921 --> 0:37:06.561
<v Speaker 2>Ladders are okay, a lot more than.

0:37:06.481 --> 0:37:09.841
<v Speaker 3>That the last time I looked, seventy three million dollars

0:37:09.881 --> 0:37:13.361
<v Speaker 3>a year is paid on ladders, on what falls from ladders.

0:37:13.521 --> 0:37:15.601
<v Speaker 2>Really, that's a bit of a worry because I do

0:37:15.721 --> 0:37:16.321
<v Speaker 2>have quite a long.

0:37:16.281 --> 0:37:19.401
<v Speaker 3>Leaders to get at my roof frike. You imagine the carbage.

0:37:19.681 --> 0:37:21.601
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I did learn that there's there's a thing with

0:37:21.721 --> 0:37:23.481
<v Speaker 2>crocs that you can go and you can put them

0:37:23.521 --> 0:37:26.001
<v Speaker 2>in sport mode. In sport modes, when you take the

0:37:26.041 --> 0:37:27.841
<v Speaker 2>bit that sits at the front flick, it's.

0:37:27.761 --> 0:37:30.201
<v Speaker 3>A smarts mode, then acc.

0:37:32.041 --> 0:37:35.281
<v Speaker 4>Therapy model. I could never walk.

0:37:35.921 --> 0:37:37.841
<v Speaker 2>I could never walk quickly in them. I could never

0:37:37.881 --> 0:37:40.081
<v Speaker 2>walk quickly in jendles, no matter how often I wore them.

0:37:40.121 --> 0:37:41.921
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't have that. Some people could do the

0:37:41.921 --> 0:37:45.121
<v Speaker 2>one hundred meters I reckon in about eleven seconds in jendles. Yeah, yeah,

0:37:45.401 --> 0:37:45.681
<v Speaker 2>not me.

0:37:46.321 --> 0:37:49.161
<v Speaker 4>I like a jendle, yeah, I like a jed. I

0:37:49.201 --> 0:37:51.681
<v Speaker 4>did just get a pair of crocs though, just quite recently,

0:37:51.841 --> 0:37:53.241
<v Speaker 4>speaking sort of trying to.

0:37:53.241 --> 0:37:56.921
<v Speaker 2>Be relevant, thinking of soft floppy things. I'm not sure well,

0:37:57.201 --> 0:37:58.721
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure whether we should do this, but I

0:37:58.761 --> 0:38:01.721
<v Speaker 2>would just invite my audience to look at the latest

0:38:02.641 --> 0:38:06.281
<v Speaker 2>seizure from P Diddy's estate. And I'm trying to put

0:38:06.321 --> 0:38:08.041
<v Speaker 2>it one how do we put it? So if you're

0:38:08.041 --> 0:38:11.921
<v Speaker 2>with the kids, they're a sort of toy for adult amusement,

0:38:12.641 --> 0:38:16.321
<v Speaker 2>and they start with D and end and know and

0:38:17.001 --> 0:38:19.201
<v Speaker 2>the best thing. There were seven hundred and eighty four

0:38:19.241 --> 0:38:21.681
<v Speaker 2>of them found, and the police took a photo like

0:38:21.761 --> 0:38:23.281
<v Speaker 2>you know how they lay out all the guns when

0:38:23.281 --> 0:38:24.721
<v Speaker 2>they have a gun stash.

0:38:25.281 --> 0:38:27.761
<v Speaker 3>All these sixties and they're standing at them like.

0:38:27.841 --> 0:38:29.321
<v Speaker 2>This is what we seized, as if it's a really

0:38:29.361 --> 0:38:31.601
<v Speaker 2>big heist. But I just wondered they sell those on

0:38:31.641 --> 0:38:32.761
<v Speaker 2>the police at a website and.

0:38:33.001 --> 0:38:34.881
<v Speaker 3>Well those are the old police suplus auctions.

0:38:35.201 --> 0:38:37.521
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there we go. I mean, I don't know what

0:38:37.641 --> 0:38:39.521
<v Speaker 2>excuse they could be for owning seven hundred and eighty

0:38:39.521 --> 0:38:39.841
<v Speaker 2>four of them.

0:38:39.921 --> 0:38:41.721
<v Speaker 4>Job a lot.

0:38:41.921 --> 0:38:43.681
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there's a deal on TEAMO or something.

0:38:44.721 --> 0:38:46.401
<v Speaker 3>He's in jail. Long may he stay there.

0:38:46.441 --> 0:38:49.721
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, he's I just I reckon the names that

0:38:49.881 --> 0:38:51.881
<v Speaker 2>end up being pulled along with him. It's like the

0:38:51.921 --> 0:38:54.601
<v Speaker 2>whole Epstein thing. It's on the same sort of scale. Anyway, Hey,

0:38:54.641 --> 0:38:55.161
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much.

0:38:56.761 --> 0:39:01.041
<v Speaker 3>What maybe he'll die well, Pete not wishing it on him.

0:39:01.401 --> 0:39:05.881
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say, thanks so much, guy taking

0:39:05.921 --> 0:39:06.481
<v Speaker 3>an observation.

0:39:06.601 --> 0:39:09.361
<v Speaker 2>Joe McCarroll and Pete wolf Camp, We'll look forward to

0:39:09.641 --> 0:39:11.961
<v Speaker 2>catch up with you again. The One Roof Radio Show

0:39:12.081 --> 0:39:14.201
<v Speaker 2>is next with Calvin David some core logic joining us

0:39:14.241 --> 0:39:16.521
<v Speaker 2>in just a tick. It's coming up to three minutes

0:39:16.561 --> 0:39:16.841
<v Speaker 2>to four.

0:39:26.201 --> 0:39:28.921
<v Speaker 1>For more from the Weekend collective, listen live to news

0:39:29.001 --> 0:39:32.601
<v Speaker 1>talks'd be weekends from three pm, or follow the podcast

0:39:32.721 --> 0:39:33.641
<v Speaker 1>on iHeartRadio.