WEBVTT - How to spot a bubble

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Juno Koto. Welcome to Shared Lunch. I'm Garth Bray. With

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>all of the hype around AI and tech stocks, with

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>all of that building up, maybe now is a perfect

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>time to get a realistic take from someone who's been

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market long enough to remember other times when

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>it was a little frotty to know the difference between

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a bargain and a bubble. That person is Scott Phillips

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Motley Fall in Australia legendary stockpicker. But before

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we hear from Scott has some important information that you

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>should always consider an investing.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 2>the time of recording.

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Scott good A, thanks for having me on Shared Lunch. Look,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we've just had a US federal reserve rate cuts, first

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>one in nine months, like waiting for baby to be born,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>as true would tell us that after that length of

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>time between changes and the policy rate in the U

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is the price of money that will typically see a

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of a bounce in this in the s and

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>P five hundred the market and so on, and that's

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>already to record a high, right, So how is this

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>not a bubble?

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 3>How have you got? Look, let's go with the rate

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 3>cuts first, to come back to the bubble. The thing

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>about rate cuts are any economic indicators, is the market

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>tends to only react when it doesn't expect what happens.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Jerome Power, the US Federal Reserve Chair, had written this

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>almost in blood, and so we will cut rates, and

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>so it was no surprise to the market that had happened.

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 3>So part of what you're talking about about that increase

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 3>on the back of rates is true. But I think

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 3>someone's already happened. That idea of market anticipating the announcement,

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>and that's why we saw almost no move on the day,

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 3>was because it was already built into share prices. That

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 3>being said, your question about the bubble is a really

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 3>good one, and I'm going to try and separate out

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 3>a record high from a bubble, because the market always

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 3>hits record highs. It's the story of the last century plus.

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 3>On the ASX, the New Zealand stocking chains, the US markets,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 3>we hit new highs all the time, because capitalism finds

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>ways to solve new and old problems. And so that process,

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 3>that literally the creative destruction that we talk about all

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 3>the time, is what happens, whether that's a new way

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 3>of doing something or a brand new thing. Think about

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the iPhone that's now not even still twenty years old. Now,

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 3>think about any technology before or after that period of

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 3>time that makes us more productive, makes us happier, makes

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>us smarter, makes us richer. Those things happen anyway, and

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>so what's really really important to know upfront is a

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 3>bubble is sometimes absolutely a bubble. More often than not,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 3>a record high is simply the last high when we

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 3>get to the next one. And we have set record

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 3>highs for as I said, literally decades, more than a century.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 3>We've gone to new highs and new highs, and new

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 3>highs and new highs because of that credit destruction, because

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 3>human ingenuity, human activity continues to advance. So differentiating between

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>a record high and a bubble not easy, but that

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>is the job of the investor, particularly right now when

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 3>we are, as you say, at those record highs.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 4>So I guess I think I read somewhere else that

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 4>there've been studies of when there are these rate cuts,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 4>when there's been some time, and one of them sort

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 4>of said, look, you know the last twenty two times

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 4>has happened.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.119
<v Speaker 1>The market was high twelve months later. Well, you're sort

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of saying, duh, it would have been higher twelve months

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>later probably in any case, because it just keeps going up.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're both right, it would have gone up anyway probably.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, twelve months is too short to say absolutely,

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 3>but over any five year period, very very very rare.

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>You don't have a higher point at the end of

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the five years than before it. So yeah, to your point,

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 3>would have gone up there in a bubble and exuberance.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 3>By the way, so markets always overshoot, over shooting the upside,

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>they overshooting the downside. Just what they do because humans

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 3>a human And for your viewers, remembering that is so

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 3>incredibly important. I wrote to our readers literally only today

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>as we're recording this, I wrote to them and said,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 3>be mindful of the fact that sometimes the market is

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>just irrational and you've just got to deal with it.

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 3>You can't time the market. Now you can see potentially bubbles,

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 3>you can potentially see the overreactions on the downside, I've

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 3>spoken before on Shared Lunch about the COVID crash. Thirty

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 3>eight percent in a month and four days now, I

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>was buying right through, and I actually think I bought

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 3>roughly at the bottom because I knew it was the bottom.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I'm not that smart and I'm not

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>that clever, But I bought at the bottom. Why Because

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I kept buying because I looked at it and thought,

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 3>hang on, it is the future of our planet. Really,

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 3>thirty eight percent worse than it was thirty five days ago,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 3>of course not, it was a massive overreaction. So, yes,

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 3>markets go higher over time. Yes, rate cuts make assets

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>worth more. The maths of asset pricing we won't go in,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 3>I promise, but your viewers will have discounted cash flows

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>or net present values. We love three letter acronyms, right tla's.

0:04:55.880 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 3>So the reality is, when intro it's go down, assets

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 3>are worth more. They just are. So you should see

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>prices increase. By the way, then when rates go up,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 3>assets are worthless. That's also true. But be careful about

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>cycles within that longer time story. At what point in

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 3>the last one hundred and seven ten years has been

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 3>a bad time to buy shares well. Between then and now,

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the price has never been higher. Almost by definition, it's

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 3>never been a bad time to buy shares. If you've

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>got to sell them and own them today, you've done.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 3>You've bought up a cheaper prices, at least in terms

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>of the market indexes. So that's the long term story.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't mean they don't fluctuate in the meantime.

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It might have been a bad time to sell them though.

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yes, absolutely, buying when things are too high, be really,

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 3>really careful. I'm an optimist. I'm a diet in the

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>will optimist, but i have to say I'm very I'm

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>much happier being an optimistic wheneveryonel is a pessimistic middle

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>of April twenty twenty, I am like, you know what,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 3>this feels awful, but I know things will get better

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>because that always does. So I'm happy to be the optis.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 3>But everyone else is running around like chicken little when

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 3>everybody else saying, come in, the water's fine, come in,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 3>fill your boots. You know this will let stop. This

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 3>goes on forever, this is the new normal, all that

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff. I'm still optimistic, but I'm less key

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 3>to sort of throw my lodding with everybody else, I'm like, oh,

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 3>I think the future is better than it is now,

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 3>But I reckon you guys getting a bit carried away.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of the That's the skill of the art

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 3>over time, is trying to delineate between those two ideas.

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It's hard, though, right because I mean so much coverage

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>around just a couple of key stocks that sort of

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>spring to mind here for me, like a video obviously.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>But I think this week they the Chinese said to

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>some of their companies, you can't buy their chips anymore. Boom,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>three percent drop on the sheer value. Oh we're buying

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>some intel. Boom, We're back up again. This is a

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>stop that's training it more than a fifty times multiple, right,

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you know you're saying that it's you know, you're gonna

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>pay fifty times its earnings pretty much to have a

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>piece of this action that seems like an astonishing valuation.

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Yet people are going for it.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So, and that's why I wanted to. I want

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>to ditinguish point the market and individual companies. Right when

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 3>the markets sky high, there's still stuff to buy. When

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 3>the market's bombed out. Not everything's going to recover. Right,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the remmons are bombed out during the bottom of COVID

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 3>and then we broke an Australian company called Mosaic Brands,

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>great example of that. Right we had the shutdowns, the

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>lockdowns and all that kind of stuff. When the lockdown stop,

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>everything else recovered. Mosaic Brands has died. Absolutely was just

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 3>literally died as a company went bankrupt. So just because

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 3>the market's low and everything will go up, just because

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>some companies are in arguably bubble territory, I'll get doing

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 3>VideA in a second. Don I'm not saying everything's worth buying.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 3>As that exuberance, has that optimism. As that confidence continues

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>to flow through, it's pushed some companies up to a

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 3>price or I'm like, all right, well I like the company,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 3>but dude, no, I'm not paying that price. I'm not

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 3>trying to time the market. I'm not saying, oh, well,

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I know what's happening, this is the top, and I

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 3>know that in months time's going to be lower, a

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 3>year soon's going to be I have no idea, absolutely

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>no idea. All I can do is try and objectively

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 3>value the companies that I want to buy or that

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I own and then workout of that which ones do

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I buy? What do I own that I should sell.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>There is absolutely a future in which we look back,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>can go, oh man, a video is cheap than twenty

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty five, and before people scoff at that, I'm gonna

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>go back ironshirs An Amazon doesn't matter, but I should

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 3>disclose it so your viewers. No. Back in two thousand

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>and two, two thousand and eight, Back in ninety nine,

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>by the way, barrens the I Think was well Fortune,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 3>one of the US business magazines led with Amazon dot Bomb.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Right Think had Amazon today versus twenty six years ago

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>when it was Amazon dot bomb allegedly was it No,

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 3>it'll doesn't look expensive yet you bet a thousand times

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 3>earnings at one point, Like, seriously, who pays that? Now.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying video is Amazon. I'm not saying Amazon's video.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 3>What I'm saying is there were times when stuff looked

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 3>really expensive and it's absolutely worth paying. If you'd have

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 3>paid a thousand times earnings on Amazon at ten bucks

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>then out three hundred bucks a share. So you know,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying no by stuff that looks expensive. But

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 3>to your point, when stuff is that expensive in video

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>is the most and by the way, Amazon was still

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 3>tiny at that point, right, thousand times earnings, but small

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>in video is fifty times earnings and huge, Probably the

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 3>most available company in the US stock market, if not

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>pretty close at the moment at that point. Fifty times

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 3>earnings for the most valuable company in the world. That's

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 3>asking a lot. That's all of a sudden saying, hang on, guys,

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 3>this thing's got to grow at massive rates just to

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 3>justify the current price. Let alone get gains from this price. Right,

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll shot up at a second. Let's tusk another question,

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 3>but really quickly. The job of the investor is not

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 3>to be right or wrong. Sounds silly, right, The job

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 3>of the investor is not to be right. Why Because

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>you can't know in advance. My crystal ball's broken. Your

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 3>crystal ball's broken. Everybody watching. If you think your crystal

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>ball's working, go and check yourself in somewhere. It's not.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 3>I promise you. You don't know what the future holds.

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 3>What you can do, what you should do as an

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>investor is work on probabilities. Right, In other words, what

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 3>is the risk of a downside? What is the chance

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 3>of the upside. And when you do that, you're looking

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 3>at MEDEO at fifty times earnings to say, well, is

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 3>there some circumstances in which it's worth today's price? Yes? Absolutely?

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>How probable is that outcome? Relative too, maybe it's not

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 3>worth today's price. How probable is that outcome? I look

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 3>at that and go I can absolutely make a case

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>for it being worth today. AI becomes massively, massively bigger.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 3>No one ever comes up with a chip that rivals

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>in video. There's a chip shortage for the next twenty

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 3>five years. In video can set its own prices and

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 3>it goes to the moon. That's very very very possible,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 3>very possible. Right, Maybe the hour of revolution doesn't grow

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 3>quite as quickly as we think. Maybe venture capitalists run

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 3>out of money. Maybe we talked about rates they go

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>back up. We saw when rates started to go back

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 3>up after COVID a whole lot of Australian businesses went broke.

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 3>The one hour grocery delivery mobs, that was four or

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 3>five of them at one point. They all went broke

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 3>because the venture capital money dried up. Because all of

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 3>a sudden money was worth something again. And you've got

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 3>as an investor say, what are the odds that I'm right?

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 3>And if I am right, what am I going to get?

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 3>What are the odds that I'm wrong? And if I

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>am wrong, how much do I lose? Put those together

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and say, now do I really want to buy in video?

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 3>Or if I own it, do I want to hold it?

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 3>And probability is the investor's friend if you really think

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 3>it through and try and be as rational as you

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 3>can to work out what you should buy and what

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 3>you should pay.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Do you when you're working that out, can you give

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>us some insight into what level is enough for you?

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Like I've heard there are some people that say, I'll

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>work valuation and when it gets to about ninety percent

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or eighty percent or ninety five, that's when I'm out.

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll happily that money on the table and be wrong,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because more often than not, I'll be out in time.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you I mean, does it vary from case case

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>or do you have a rule you follow?

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 3>So I'm an investor who value is quality first and foremost,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 3>And one of the rules I try and live by

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 3>is I'm slow to buy, but even slower to sell.

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Right now, what does that mean? Slow to buy means

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 3>I want to make sure that I feel really, really

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 3>really good about what I'm buying, both from a quality

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>and a price perspective. And if I've done that work properly,

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 3>then i want to be even slower to sell, because

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 3>if I've analyzed them and I took about when I

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 3>sell at different prices, if I've got a quality business,

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to let that go really, really, really reluctantly.

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Right war On Buffet says, it's better to pay a

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 3>fair price for a wonderful business than a wonderful price

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 3>for our fair business. So if I've got a wonderful

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 3>business in my back pocket, in my portfolio, I'm going

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 3>to let that go really reluctantly. I'll say one of

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the business this is two of the businesses we sold

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 3>from out for our members or recommended they sell, got

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 3>to price earnings ratios of eighty and ninety times before

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 3>we recommended they sell right now, which is extraordinarily high.

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Why do we not pull the trigger earlier? Because we

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 3>kind of went, well, the great business, I really really

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 3>don't want to sell us I have to, and then

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 3>we went well, okay, now I'm out. So do we

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 3>answer your question. I'm not a value I'm not a

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 3>capital V value investor, nor am I a capital G

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 3>growth investor. I think the distinction is really unhelpful. Frankly,

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 3>people out there can do their own thing, but for me,

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 3>it's not very helpful. So you asked the question. For me,

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 3>it's probably one hundred and twenty one hundred and thirty

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 3>percent of the value is where I sell. And someone said, well,

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 3>why would you sell? Why would you wait for more

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 3>than it's worth to sell? Two things. One back quality,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 3>and that's competitive advantage of the business, the quality of management,

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 3>all the things that we talked about that another day,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 3>about what quality investing looks like. So back quality. Secondly,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be so arrogant as to believe

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 3>my calculation of value is so incredibly precise that I

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 3>know for sure arrogance and ego is the investor's absolute enemy, right,

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 3>So the humility I try to bring to it is

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 3>I think this is roughly right. But all of the

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 3>sumps I have to put in the discount rate, the

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>growth rates, the terminal values. Again we're talking about discount

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 3>of cash flows here, really boring on video format. But

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>all of that stuff is assumption laid on assumption. If

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I change a couple those numbers a little bit, I

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 3>can justify paying fifty percent more or fifty percent less

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 3>for the same company. Right, So that should tell you

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 3>that this is a really, really really inexact science. It's

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 3>an inexact art. It's a it's a guess, it's a

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 3>it's a rough yardstick. So for me, I buy hopefully well,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 3>if I've bought well, I want to be slow to sell,

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 3>and I want to be really really humble about how

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 3>likely I am to be exactly right, and then intrinsic value.

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 3>And if that's the case, let it have some rope,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 3>and then yes, sell. Now have I held stuff too

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 3>long in hindsight, absolutely yes. But if I added up

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>every company I've held for too long and compare that

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 3>against every company I sold too early, I'm still behind. Right.

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Great example, I'll rub my nose my own problems. Domino's

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 3>way back in the day went from we bought recommended,

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 3>don't members that eight bucks? I think I went about

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>thirteen bucks, right, I thought, oh may at sixty percent gain.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 3>It was a couple of years. I'm a genius, but yess,

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>looking expense, how I better get out? It went from

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 3>thirteen two Hold your breath one hundred and forty dollars. Right,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.719
<v Speaker 3>I missed a tenfold gain. I could have ten other

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 3>companies go to zero, and I still would have been

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>ahead if I'd held Dominoes. Don't be too quick to sell.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 3>But if you own quality and don't get caught up

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>with your own hubis and your own kind of you.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I've picked the stock and it's gone up, so I'm

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 3>a genius. I'm gonnalet it keep going up. Be real

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 3>with yourself, but don't don't don't. There's a great thought

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 3>saying about watering your weeds and cutting your flowers right,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 3>don't cut your flowers to a let a bloom at

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>a time. Cut them and put them into ours, for sure,

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 3>but give it a little bit of time.

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So this sounds to me a wee bit like it's

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>also bubble protection, getting back to what we were starting

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about there. If you're following that kind of

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a strategy, you'd feel pretty confident that you're you're going

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to miss the bubble. You're not going to get caught

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>up in the exuberance you Anything that's rising is rising

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>because you can see a fundamental reason for it rather

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>than just the exuberance.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Am I getting close hundred percent? The other thing I

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 3>will say for what it's worth is I think the

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 3>bubble label it's worth being aware of. But it can

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>be a little bit unhelpful because then we argue about

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 3>is it isn't a bubble? I don't know. All I

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>know is it's worth more than I think it should be.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>And that's enough to me. I don't have to say

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 3>bubble tick. I just say, would I pay that price now? No?

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Where in the world do I really want to hold

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 3>it at this price?

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it goes up, maybe goes out. I don't know.

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 3>What I do know is probabilistically, we started talking about

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot's got to go right and nothing can go wrong.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 3>That's not a good bet. So at that point you

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 3>take some money off the table. That is bubble protection,

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>as you say, because I'm not saying, well, ever, it's

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 3>going up, I'll keep holding it. Or the crowd must

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 3>be right, so I guess I should keep holding the shares.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Or you know, everyone's excited about it. I guess they

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>must know something I don't. Don't try and keep up

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 3>with the Joneses. Don't take money from your don't take

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 3>tips for your taxi driver, don't list your brother in

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>law who's getting rich owning something that no one else

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 3>wants to own. Because, as you say, we've been through it.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 3>The dot com boom and bust was a great, great,

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>great example. Another quick example Warren Buffett that the patron

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 3>saying of investors way back in ninety nine, spoke about

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 3>magazine articles. A great article you can still find on

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the internet called What's Wrong Warren? And the idea was

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Warren Buffets missing out on this boom, and everyone saying, oh,

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Buffet's lost and it's all over. What does he know?

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 3>His old fashioned twenty six years later, still on top,

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 3>still doing his thing, still a very very very good investor.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>What was wrong? He saw the bubble, he saw the

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 3>fact that nothing was wasn't worth buying. Everyone was saying,

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 3>you're missing a Warren, Look all the price are going up.

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Why'd you're playing our game? He said, Well, I buy

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 3>stuff where it's worth buying. I sell it when I

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 3>want to sell. Its nothing to buy off, stay in cash.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 3>It's not difficult, it's not sexy, it's not fun. You

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 3>don't get the headlines, you don't feel excited because I

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 3>owned the new cool thing. But it's a nice way

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 3>to make money.

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess people might have said the same thing about

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Larry Allison until about two weeks ago. Gosh, here's a

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>guy who had a pretty successful company, and he tried

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to run a few America's Cup defenses as well. But

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>so long, see you lad off the basis of one

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>innings report basically saying, you know, we I think to

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>read the priest. That's most of it supplying capacity to open.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's a pretty strong one way bit. The market

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to love it. That seems to be pretty out

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of whack. Surely if a stock can leap and deadly

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>forty percent on one innings report.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Great example, By the way, it was already up forty

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 3>percent for the year to date, so up forty percent

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 3>over the previous nine months eight months, and then up

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 3>a another forty percent top of that on one earnings report.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 3>What a share price means, it's the value of every

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 3>dollar worth of cash flow from now to eternity, discounted

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 3>back to allow for the time value of money. And

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I know that's complex. I'm going to live it there.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Other than to say, which has got forty percent. What

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 3>you're actually saying is the value of all of the

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 3>future cash list from now to eternity, and they were

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 3>an aggregate forty percent higher. Not this month, not this half,

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 3>not this year, not the last five years, over the

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 3>next five years, but from here to eternity, everything in

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 3>total is gonna be forty percent more. And so if

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 3>you don't do that, and that's not saying the the

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 3>ownsults were great, very good earning, result, great announcement. All

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 3>things were good. But to imagine that is now permanently

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and to quivocally be higher forever from here can't be Again.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned I mentioned a video. What if someone else

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 3>enters that that cloud, you know, cloud race, whereas I'll

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 3>take some share off Oracle, what happens to the share price?

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Then let's take Microsoft. Microsoft in two thousand fell in

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the dot com crash. It took fifteen years for the

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>share price to get back to where it was pre

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.239
<v Speaker 3>dot com. It was a great business. It it went

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 3>on to even bigger and better things. It was a

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 3>fantastic success story. But you can't pay just any price.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>There is such a thing as too high a price

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 3>for even the very best business in the world, So

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 3>making sure you're paying a good price for the company,

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 3>even if you know the future is bright. If Oracle

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 3>is much bigger in ten years time, is it forty

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 3>percent bigger permanently, I don't know. Is that really worth

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 3>paying for? And do you want to take that bet

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 3>given there is risk that maybe it's not back to probability.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 3>So be very very very careful getting caught up in

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the euphoria. That's the thing about bubbles. You ask about bubbles,

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I suppose the kiding to look out for is actually

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 3>not so much the companies or the share price or

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the result. It's the sentiment of the crowd when everybody

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>else is excited about it, when you know the time

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 3>is as I say, that a great story of the

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Great Depression, and I can't remember who it's told of,

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 3>and apparently it's apocryphal anyway, But the idea was basically

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 3>this particular you know, Titan of Wall Street, when you

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 3>had the taxi driver pull him asides, I think you

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.239
<v Speaker 3>should buy these shares. He's like, oh, this feels bad.

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to sell now. I'm not saying you should

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 3>use that as the test you go with. Everyone's a

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 3>shareholder these as everyone's an investor, but to be very

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 3>careful when everyone's excited, when the tides all the way in,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 3>when euphoria is at its peak, what could possibly go wrong. Well,

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 3>that's the time we'll be a little bit concerned. Now

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I will say, don't sell anything just because don't try

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 3>and time the market. A bubble can go on much

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 3>longer than you think it can. Even if it is

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 3>a bubble now, it could have got fifty percent down

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent, in which case it'll should be thirty percent

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.719
<v Speaker 3>higher than it is now. So don't try and trade

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 3>the bubble. Don't try and time the market. But when

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 3>you're buying and selling, think about what you own, think

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 3>about how good the future is probabilistically, think about and

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 3>how much you're paying for that future. And we're going

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 3>if it's a reasonable price. I mention we've sold half

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 3>a dozen companies we have. We've kept a heap more

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 3>because we actually think, despite some of the excitement in

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the market, these businesses are likely to go on beating

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 3>the market over the long term, despite what's going on

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 3>right now. So got to kind of keep both those

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 3>things in mind at the same time. It's not easy,

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>but that's the skill you need to develop as an investor.

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you and the Motley Full community either

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>classic active investors. You are really getting in there into

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the weeds. You're looking closely at what each company's performing.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>We've seen obviously a trend towards automatic diversity. Is the

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>word I'm looking for here products like ETFs. I mean,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>is that is that reducing the risk or would you

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>say there's some sort of concentration risk building up there

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that people need to be careful of there when they're

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>buying those kinds of products.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, I love passive ETFs. I'm an active investor, JUSTYB

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 3>a stockpicker. I don't mean active, by the way. It's actively.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 3>There's active, right, I'm not an active trader. I don't

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 3>buy sol By cell by Cell. I'm active in the

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 3>sense that I'm trying to find companies I think we'll

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 3>beat the index if I buy company X. I buy

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 3>it so I think in five years time it'll be

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 3>worth more and hopefully grow faster than the market. That's

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 3>my version of active. But I love passive investing. You

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:10.959
<v Speaker 3>see the fund man is out there, by the way,

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 3>who say the ETFs are destroying the market, absolute rubbish,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 3>complete and other nonsense. Passive ETFs are wonderful, wonderful, wonderful things.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Just they are right mean less business for me, so

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 3>be it. Investors are much better off than they were

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 3>because a massive range of passive ETFs are available. A

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 3>couple things to answer your question. Firstly, not all ETFs

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 3>are the same. Now your viewers know that I really

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 3>really really dislike thematic ETFs, not because individually some of

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 3>them can't do well, but because they're sold as panaceas

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 3>AI is going to be huge. Here's my AIETF.

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Even with the concentration that you're getting from Meg seven,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Meg seven companies. Some of those companies

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are bigger than entire sectors. Now you know, I'm pretty

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sure if you edit up with the healthcare sector is

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>or the you know, some parts of the industrials and

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you go to the see kind of are.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 3>So yes, absolutely when you ask about diversification in concentration.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not saying don't pick individual socks. What I'm

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 3>saying is ETFs are a great based reportfolio. And anyone

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>who said to me is this enough? I say yes, absolutely?

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you think do I think you do? Better by

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 3>picking stocks. Yes, absolutely, But is that enough if you're

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 3>young enough, if you had regularly to a handful of

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 3>diversified in next based ETFs, you'll retire very, very very

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 3>comfortably and be very happy you did. I have no doubt.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 3>If I can't make promise, I'm not allowed to, But

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I have no doubt you'll be very happy with what

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 3>you did. Right. So back to your point about concentration.

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't just own a US ETF, same as I

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't just own ASXTF, because we've got index floor banks

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 3>and minors. But if I had a global ETF or

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>a range of ETFs, you might an a SX three hundred,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.239
<v Speaker 3>you might have a developing markets, you might have an

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 3>emerging developed markets. If you got that diversification by currency,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 3>by geography, by industry, then yeah, you start to put

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 3>together a portfolio that it is diversified. Here's the other thing.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 3>When you buy an ETF, don't just put money in

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 3>a ETF once and be done with it. If your

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 3>dollar cost averaging adding regularly, maybe in hindsight we say,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 3>you know what, September twenty twenty five was a massive bubble.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 3>But if you've been adding monthly over the last year,

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 3>two years, five years, ten years. Add all that up.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 3>People say to me sometimes, oh, the mike hasn't recovered

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 3>from the highs of twenty two thousand and seven, or

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 3>it's not as high as it was in whatever. If

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 3>you'd only bought chairs on that day, maybe I'll talk

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 3>to you about it. But if you did, you are

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 3>the unluckiest person in the world. If you'd have been

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 3>buying every month for the three years before and the

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 3>three years after, you are up massively on that point.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 3>So is it diverse fied? Yes, If you buy one

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 3>ETF for one index and you buy it once, you're

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 3>absolutely rolling the dice. I still think you'll do very well,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 3>by the way, but maybe not as well if the

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 3>market was lower. If you're adding regularly to a range

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 3>of ETFs and you're adding to that regularly every payday

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 3>or every month or every quarter over five, ten, fifteen years,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, think about it. If you do it every

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 3>month fifteen years, what's that If you've made one hundred

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 3>and eighty different transactions over that period of time, have

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 3>you bought one of the is going to be at

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 3>a bubble? Probably one of those is probably going to

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 3>be at an absolute low low, most somewhere in between.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 3>But overall, I go back to the Vanguard index chart.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 3>I know your viewers have seen it a million times.

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Google Vanguard indext chart. If you do know what I'm

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 3>talking about. Yes, you might have brought it two thousand

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 3>and seven at the peak, then you're brought in two

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>thousand and nine at the trough. You might have brought

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 3>it ninety ninety nine at the peak, and then at

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and one in the trough. You're probably bought

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty March twenty twenty at the peak, and

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 3>then again in April twenty twenty in the trough. And

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 3>where are we at record highs? Sometimes you'll buy at

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 3>high prices, sometimes at low prices. I'd love to know

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 3>which ones will which side can not do it, But

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 3>you can only do that in hindsight. And in hindsight,

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 3>by the way, where a record highs every point before

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 3>that was worth buying shares.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>That you touch on an important point about regularity, And

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>I think I know the people are always looking for

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a comparison or a meter four, and people talk about it,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the Marathione approach. You know you're trying to. But if

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you've ever actually done any I don't know if you've

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>done any running. I've done a little bit in my time.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>The hardest thing is just pulling on the shoes and

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>getting up and doing it three or four or five

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>times a week and sticking with that. And that's the

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>bit that pays off almost more than anything else. So

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that is quite a crucial part, isn't it. It's just

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>getting that kind of regular habit built in so that

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in that market.

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Can I go one step before above that? Actually putting

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 3>the shoes on five times a week is really really hard.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely feel that pain. Investing regular is even easier

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 3>than that. I can decide to invest to put the shoes on,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I've still got to put the shoes on. If I

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 3>decide I want to invest regularly, and I tell my payoffice,

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 3>my payroll manager, or my bank please do this for

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>me on this date, I don't have to pull on

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 3>the shoes. Someone else puts the shoes on for me.

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 3>And that is what's beautiful about pre commitment and automation.

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 3>You automate that process so that if you've got to

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 3>company and allows it, you tell you payroll manager, please

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 3>put nine percent of my pay into my savings account.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Please put ten percent of my pay in my investing account,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>and then on payday just happens. You don't have to

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 3>pull metaphorical shoes on. But that's the beauty of pre

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 3>commitment automation is you're a million percent right. You can

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 3>actually get out of your own way. And now if

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 3>you pay all office won't do it. Tell you bank on,

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I get paid on the fifteenth of the month, or

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 3>every two weeks or every week or whatever it is.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 3>On those days, please take X dollars out of my

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>savings account and move it to my investing account. And

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 3>as long as you do that, and let it happen,

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 3>by the way, you don't miss it because it's never there.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 3>It happens automatically every time you get paid. Go well,

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I really want to go and buy a pair of jeans,

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 3>or go out for dinner, or buy address or buy

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.959
<v Speaker 3>a computer or do whatever your thing is. You've got

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 3>to choose to take that money out, put over there

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 3>and IDENTI if I want to next, I'll do it

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 3>next month, next month. If it does it automatically before

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 3>you even get to it, that's just beautiful. And you

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 3>can absolutely make it happen. It's why superannuation for Australians

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 3>particularly is important because that happens to us. Literally the

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 3>government says you can't have it, bad luck, twelve cent

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 3>of your payer go straight over there. So those kind

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 3>of forced savings or automated savings, it might suck at

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 3>the time you might want the money to buy X,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 3>Y and Z. I have not heard a single person

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 3>in Australia say, gee, unhappy the government, maybe save my superannuation.

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Never ever, ever have I heard anyone say that. They're

0:26:58.040 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 3>always like, I hate it at the time, but cheum

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 3>And that's a really nice lesson.

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a great place to leave it, especially

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go and pull your sues on

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>now Scott and being out there and yet I really

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>should do that, Scott, vertus from them not befoul. Thank

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much for giving us so much your time

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and your wisdom time in the market and you've shared

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it with us today. And thanks everybody else for listening

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and watching along with us. We'd love to know what

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you thought of that and who we should be talking

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to next for us Kuma to that shared lunch for

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this week