WEBVTT - Quick Bite: The Japanese stock market hit all time high in 2024

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a Sheersis podcast. Do you think the

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>US stock market is doing unusually well or other market's

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>doing unusually badly? Talk to me about that.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, although the US is the market that's had

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 2>most of the headlines so far this year, it's actually

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>the second largest country in the world that's actually done better.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>So the second largest country in the index is actually Japan.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 2>But actually so far this year, Japan has actually delivered

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 2>a higher return than the US stock market. The problem

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>with the Japanese sheer market all time high is the

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 2>high that they hit this year was a relative to

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty nine. Okay, all right, so it's thirty five

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>years in other words, of a zero nominal return. You know,

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>we're not even talking about talking about kind of really justable. Look,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to draw that analogue to today in

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the US. Like the valuations in Japan were just just

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>absolutely unheard of and they haven't really been tested since

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 2>on a price to earnings multiple basis. The only thing

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 2>close was the was the tech level in the US.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>But it's just a really good example of conventional wisdom

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>back then was you know, Japan was the future and

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>it didn't transpire. Interesting with Japan today, it does look

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>like and a key reason their market is rarely is

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>one there's reforms around shareholder returns. So you know, Japanese

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 2>companies were quite benevolent and you know, really took great

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>care of their employees, which is a good thing nice,

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 2>but would enter we do expenditure with expectations of really

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>low returns on capital.

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So if Japan is being a little bit less benevolent,

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is the reason the US economy and therefore it's share

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>market to a certain degree, is our performing because the

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>US is not so malevolent. Perhaps they're better capitalists, perhaps

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>more malevolent. You might even say.

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 2>There is some truth in that. If you look at

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 2>the share of a company's profit that goes to labor

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>versus what goes to the shareholders, and that is over

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 2>the past couple of decades in the US fallen, so

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>so a bigger share of the gains have gone to

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>capital over labor. More nearer term. What's quite interesting is

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>that some of the larger companies in the US, you'll

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 2>probably say they weren't great capitalists. And I'm talking specifically

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>about some of the large tech companies. So going into

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the say two they had a decade of just rarely

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 2>really check money easy to get around away with regards

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 2>to raising capital, and money was cheap, right, you know,

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 2>we had interstratets pretty much zero, and that meant that

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>actually there was a lot of fat in those businesses, right,

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, think of Meta, Think of why it's called

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Meta because they were chucking so much money into the

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>metaverse and it wasn't exactly delivering any shareholder returns. So

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 2>actually part of the gains that you've seen in the

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 2>US share market, I think, particularly in twenty twenty three

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four, has actually them been better capitalists.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>So I will use Meta as an example again because

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 2>they managed to gain deliver strong profits while reducing their workforce.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Investing involves risk. You might lose the money you start with.

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 2>We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor. We also

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 2>recommend and reading product of scosure documents before deciding to invest.