WEBVTT - On The Front Foot Episode 263: Assessing the Oval test

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from News Talk Sat B.

0:00:12.373 --> 0:00:15.173
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on

0:00:15.333 --> 0:00:18.333
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio.

0:00:20.133 --> 0:00:25.133
<v Speaker 2>Take it on at it is out, the Test is over,

0:00:27.773 --> 0:00:31.213
<v Speaker 2>smokes a beauty, It is out and.

0:00:31.173 --> 0:00:33.853
<v Speaker 3>Here he goes. This delivery has in the usage to go.

0:00:36.493 --> 0:00:39.893
<v Speaker 1>On the Front Foot with Brian Waddell and Jeremy Coney

0:00:40.213 --> 0:00:44.093
<v Speaker 1>powered by News Talks Dead B at iHeart Radio.

0:00:47.613 --> 0:00:50.693
<v Speaker 2>Hello back with on the Front Foot. It's a bit

0:00:50.893 --> 0:00:55.213
<v Speaker 2>rich Lord Botham criticizing dropped England captain Ben Stokes for

0:00:55.333 --> 0:00:58.933
<v Speaker 2>breaking its team kofy. So he doesn't see how to

0:00:59.373 --> 0:01:02.853
<v Speaker 2>justify what happened. Yeah, perhaps you could look back in

0:01:03.053 --> 0:01:06.813
<v Speaker 2>history for old Ian Botham. It's this series with England

0:01:06.853 --> 0:01:10.613
<v Speaker 2>squared with one to play. That's exciting and the White

0:01:10.693 --> 0:01:15.533
<v Speaker 2>Ferns well, their hopes are alive. Just I've got Scotland

0:01:15.813 --> 0:01:18.533
<v Speaker 2>at England to play. What is it going to lead

0:01:18.573 --> 0:01:21.613
<v Speaker 2>to that? A little bit later on the front foot.

0:01:21.773 --> 0:01:25.853
<v Speaker 2>But a test match, a test series, had a Test game,

0:01:25.973 --> 0:01:30.533
<v Speaker 2>Jeremy Coney. That was quality cricket from the new Zilders.

0:01:30.893 --> 0:01:33.773
<v Speaker 2>They fought back well and outplayed England, didn't they?

0:01:34.413 --> 0:01:39.733
<v Speaker 4>Yes, simply more reliable wads, very solid through the match.

0:01:41.173 --> 0:01:43.453
<v Speaker 4>I was a wee bit disappointed with the way they

0:01:43.453 --> 0:01:46.293
<v Speaker 4>got out in the first inning some of the players,

0:01:46.333 --> 0:01:50.333
<v Speaker 4>but they got partnerships through and I think the key

0:01:50.413 --> 0:01:53.293
<v Speaker 4>part in the match almost was that second morning when

0:01:53.693 --> 0:01:57.173
<v Speaker 4>England came out again and used a short ball and

0:01:57.293 --> 0:02:00.973
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand through Phillips who had had it was a

0:02:01.053 --> 0:02:06.013
<v Speaker 4>terrific innings from Phillips that whole session at the end

0:02:06.053 --> 0:02:11.773
<v Speaker 4>of first day. It was quite commanding, you know, watching him.

0:02:12.213 --> 0:02:14.733
<v Speaker 4>Don't often see a modern player trying not to hit

0:02:14.773 --> 0:02:19.653
<v Speaker 4>the ball, and yet he was able to get underneath

0:02:19.693 --> 0:02:24.573
<v Speaker 4>the ball in various ways of archer. That cost England

0:02:24.573 --> 0:02:28.773
<v Speaker 4>because then the physiotherapist the next morning said Archie, you

0:02:28.933 --> 0:02:32.933
<v Speaker 4>can't bowl after those eight overs of short pitched bowling.

0:02:33.293 --> 0:02:38.373
<v Speaker 4>So we had physios calling the bowling changes and then

0:02:38.413 --> 0:02:40.853
<v Speaker 4>from them to go on with Jamison. I mean that

0:02:40.973 --> 0:02:44.453
<v Speaker 4>was fabulous and so it was three ninety one. A

0:02:44.453 --> 0:02:49.013
<v Speaker 4>bit of gst in there perhaps, but New Zealand had

0:02:49.053 --> 0:02:51.853
<v Speaker 4>the two top innings was in the match. New Zealand

0:02:51.853 --> 0:02:54.733
<v Speaker 4>got the two hundreds in the match and New Zealand

0:02:54.733 --> 0:02:55.893
<v Speaker 4>had Henry in.

0:02:55.893 --> 0:02:59.133
<v Speaker 5>The match and that was enoughty to secure the win.

0:02:59.733 --> 0:03:03.693
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the interesting point that you talk about. Henry

0:03:03.733 --> 0:03:05.933
<v Speaker 2>was man of the match and eleven wickets deserve it.

0:03:05.973 --> 0:03:09.653
<v Speaker 2>That's a great performance. Our case had to be made

0:03:09.693 --> 0:03:13.373
<v Speaker 2>for Phillips because I thought that was a gutsy display

0:03:13.973 --> 0:03:18.333
<v Speaker 2>archers bowling, to my mind in cricket terms, was evil.

0:03:18.413 --> 0:03:21.773
<v Speaker 2>That was the firiest spell I've seen for some time

0:03:21.813 --> 0:03:22.573
<v Speaker 2>from a quickie.

0:03:23.013 --> 0:03:25.733
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, eight overs of it too. He kept on going

0:03:25.773 --> 0:03:30.133
<v Speaker 4>and he was very accurate, very accurate, and yet underneath

0:03:30.213 --> 0:03:33.453
<v Speaker 4>Nichols went and kept on too. He was not going

0:03:33.493 --> 0:03:36.533
<v Speaker 4>to play a pull shot or a hook shot. So

0:03:37.093 --> 0:03:40.573
<v Speaker 4>it was a great encounter between those two and Phillips

0:03:40.733 --> 0:03:44.133
<v Speaker 4>won it, and so he was able to carry on

0:03:44.213 --> 0:03:47.653
<v Speaker 4>a very important innings for him and for the side,

0:03:48.133 --> 0:03:50.733
<v Speaker 4>and to be able to get that, you know, three

0:03:50.853 --> 0:03:54.933
<v Speaker 4>ninety just pushed it beyond England really and New Zealand

0:03:55.213 --> 0:03:59.533
<v Speaker 4>cleverly bowled O'Rourke and Jamison mainly from the Pavilion end.

0:03:59.573 --> 0:04:02.413
<v Speaker 4>They thought there was more bounce from that end, and

0:04:02.453 --> 0:04:05.573
<v Speaker 4>then they bowled a skiddier bowl as Smith and Henry

0:04:05.933 --> 0:04:09.013
<v Speaker 4>from the Vauxhall end and that proved I think the

0:04:09.413 --> 0:04:12.653
<v Speaker 4>very good decision from Latham or whoever made it.

0:04:12.653 --> 0:04:17.653
<v Speaker 2>It was very effective that period of play when Archer

0:04:17.973 --> 0:04:21.133
<v Speaker 2>was at his peak and Phillips was batting. The way

0:04:21.413 --> 0:04:25.213
<v Speaker 2>was to me is the is the story of Test

0:04:25.253 --> 0:04:29.413
<v Speaker 2>cricket that puts Test cricket way beyond any other form

0:04:29.453 --> 0:04:31.373
<v Speaker 2>of the game, doesn't it to be able to watch

0:04:31.773 --> 0:04:37.893
<v Speaker 2>that confrontation skills of players being used, And as you say,

0:04:38.213 --> 0:04:41.133
<v Speaker 2>Phillips won because Archie didn't get.

0:04:40.973 --> 0:04:46.133
<v Speaker 4>A wicket right and he showed no little skill in

0:04:46.213 --> 0:04:49.373
<v Speaker 4>going under some of those deliveries. All Right, it might

0:04:49.413 --> 0:04:51.893
<v Speaker 4>have looked a bit awkward, and some people even had

0:04:51.933 --> 0:04:54.653
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a giggle on the occasion, but boy,

0:04:54.693 --> 0:04:58.933
<v Speaker 4>you're right it was. It was cricket for real, proper cricket.

0:04:59.613 --> 0:05:04.213
<v Speaker 4>Two guys not giving in, and that's those are the

0:05:04.253 --> 0:05:07.093
<v Speaker 4>sort of encounters you like to see, and it's the

0:05:07.133 --> 0:05:10.453
<v Speaker 4>only format that you will see that sort of thing happening.

0:05:10.933 --> 0:05:14.693
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you've got to also give some credit to,

0:05:15.293 --> 0:05:18.453
<v Speaker 2>in fact, a lot of credit to Henry Nichols. I'm

0:05:19.013 --> 0:05:22.333
<v Speaker 2>Kane Williamson's replacement. Hey oh, it's like the days of

0:05:22.453 --> 0:05:26.133
<v Speaker 2>Willie Watson coming in as replacement for Richard Hadley. There's

0:05:26.213 --> 0:05:29.973
<v Speaker 2>no replacement for players of that quality. But yet Nichols

0:05:30.053 --> 0:05:32.013
<v Speaker 2>did everything you wanted him to do.

0:05:32.933 --> 0:05:34.853
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he got a twenty odd in the first innings.

0:05:34.893 --> 0:05:38.733
<v Speaker 4>Took his time, but there were little signs that he

0:05:38.893 --> 0:05:42.173
<v Speaker 4>was starting to back himself and gain some confidence, I

0:05:42.173 --> 0:05:44.933
<v Speaker 4>think from that first and he batted for quite a

0:05:45.053 --> 0:05:48.093
<v Speaker 4>number of balls before he was bold. And then in

0:05:48.173 --> 0:05:53.773
<v Speaker 4>that second innings he hung in there and as England

0:05:53.853 --> 0:05:57.693
<v Speaker 4>set those very short set fields, some strange fields sets

0:05:58.173 --> 0:06:02.013
<v Speaker 4>short shortcover, short mid off, short mid on short mid

0:06:02.013 --> 0:06:04.813
<v Speaker 4>wicket and he just punched the ball through. He and

0:06:05.013 --> 0:06:09.413
<v Speaker 4>the were a partnership between Nichols and Ravendra that next

0:06:09.533 --> 0:06:13.653
<v Speaker 4>day was able to push New Zealand. Ravendra playing the big,

0:06:13.893 --> 0:06:17.733
<v Speaker 4>classical sort of strokes that were eye catching, but Nichols too,

0:06:18.133 --> 0:06:21.013
<v Speaker 4>don't forget. Even against the spinner, Vessel was able to

0:06:21.093 --> 0:06:24.253
<v Speaker 4>knock him over the top a few times and he

0:06:24.533 --> 0:06:29.693
<v Speaker 4>just punched the ball or steered the ball and was

0:06:29.693 --> 0:06:33.853
<v Speaker 4>getting boundaries because those fielders were in quite close. So

0:06:34.253 --> 0:06:36.893
<v Speaker 4>a really good innings from him. You couldn't ask for

0:06:37.053 --> 0:06:42.453
<v Speaker 4>more from Henry Nichols in that match. As I say,

0:06:42.533 --> 0:06:45.053
<v Speaker 4>the two hundreds came for New Zealand, didn't they They mattered?

0:06:45.173 --> 0:06:50.573
<v Speaker 2>Ye, most definitely, and you look back at a technical awareness,

0:06:51.013 --> 0:06:56.413
<v Speaker 2>I think England were technically outplayed. McCallum tried to justify

0:06:57.253 --> 0:07:02.133
<v Speaker 2>the technics that they undertook, but he was unconvincing. They

0:07:02.133 --> 0:07:08.573
<v Speaker 2>were outplayed and the technical side of things took took

0:07:08.573 --> 0:07:09.573
<v Speaker 2>over from New Zealand.

0:07:10.013 --> 0:07:11.773
<v Speaker 5>Well New Zealand once they got the runs.

0:07:11.773 --> 0:07:14.013
<v Speaker 4>Of course, that put a lot of pressure on England

0:07:14.453 --> 0:07:20.293
<v Speaker 4>in their last innings. And you know O'Rourke hasn't found

0:07:20.333 --> 0:07:24.293
<v Speaker 4>it quite so easy heres. The pitchers haven't suited him.

0:07:24.293 --> 0:07:27.653
<v Speaker 4>In the first first match at Lord's you had to

0:07:27.693 --> 0:07:31.373
<v Speaker 4>bring the stumps into play with lbw's in bold, so

0:07:32.173 --> 0:07:36.493
<v Speaker 4>his length didn't really that didn't suit O'Rourke. And in

0:07:36.533 --> 0:07:39.653
<v Speaker 4>this particular match also the odd one was keeping a

0:07:39.653 --> 0:07:43.493
<v Speaker 4>little low. But he did get important wickets like Ducket,

0:07:43.933 --> 0:07:48.293
<v Speaker 4>like Gay where he got them to flinch and turn slightly.

0:07:48.773 --> 0:07:52.053
<v Speaker 4>Duckett tried to swat him and was caught by Henry

0:07:52.093 --> 0:07:55.933
<v Speaker 4>at mid on. Jamison got a few wickets at the

0:07:55.973 --> 0:07:59.173
<v Speaker 4>starter as well. Everyone played their little bit, didn't they,

0:07:59.493 --> 0:08:04.213
<v Speaker 4>But striding above everything it was Matt Henry his skill

0:08:05.213 --> 0:08:10.293
<v Speaker 4>in that pitch, just outside of just the right links,

0:08:10.773 --> 0:08:13.813
<v Speaker 4>nipping the odd one back. You know, he nearly got

0:08:14.013 --> 0:08:16.733
<v Speaker 4>route and Brooke that second to last day didn't. He

0:08:16.813 --> 0:08:20.613
<v Speaker 4>was inside edges, just onto the pad and then he

0:08:20.693 --> 0:08:23.173
<v Speaker 4>got one to just hold its line a little bit

0:08:23.333 --> 0:08:25.853
<v Speaker 4>with Brook looking to play it as if it was

0:08:25.893 --> 0:08:28.573
<v Speaker 4>coming in, and took the outside edge and was gone.

0:08:29.133 --> 0:08:30.653
<v Speaker 5>He was looking quite dangerous.

0:08:31.013 --> 0:08:35.293
<v Speaker 2>It's it's looking to be an interesting Test match at

0:08:35.333 --> 0:08:39.693
<v Speaker 2>trent Bridge now because England back in full force. They

0:08:39.773 --> 0:08:44.813
<v Speaker 2>suffered because of the issue around Stokes. Now you know

0:08:45.653 --> 0:08:48.493
<v Speaker 2>that that has been ongoing right the way since the

0:08:48.933 --> 0:08:54.093
<v Speaker 2>Lord's Tests, but you know, are they going to overcome that?

0:08:54.213 --> 0:08:56.173
<v Speaker 2>And this lead up to the trent Bridge Test?

0:08:56.893 --> 0:08:59.573
<v Speaker 4>Oh mate, I just I had to go out on

0:08:59.613 --> 0:09:04.253
<v Speaker 4>the field to start TMS and some of and some

0:09:04.333 --> 0:09:06.653
<v Speaker 4>of the TV and that sort of thing, and the

0:09:06.693 --> 0:09:08.853
<v Speaker 4>majority of the time we were not talking.

0:09:08.693 --> 0:09:09.453
<v Speaker 5>About the game.

0:09:10.093 --> 0:09:13.573
<v Speaker 4>We were talking about the Stokes Atkinson kind of incident.

0:09:14.013 --> 0:09:19.293
<v Speaker 4>There were two investigations, one by the ECB. They thought

0:09:19.373 --> 0:09:25.333
<v Speaker 4>they breached such a contractual obligation about the curfew. They

0:09:25.373 --> 0:09:28.413
<v Speaker 4>didn't give any blame for the violent conduct at all

0:09:28.533 --> 0:09:31.213
<v Speaker 4>to either of the players, and Stokes didn't even witness it,

0:09:31.573 --> 0:09:34.453
<v Speaker 4>so that's what they came up with. Then the regulator

0:09:34.853 --> 0:09:38.053
<v Speaker 4>is the other guy who was investigating it. He's more

0:09:38.093 --> 0:09:42.853
<v Speaker 4>of a guy who takes a legal view of the

0:09:42.893 --> 0:09:45.373
<v Speaker 4>whole thing, and he found there was no case to

0:09:45.453 --> 0:09:50.293
<v Speaker 4>answer at all for them. There was no ECB rules

0:09:50.373 --> 0:09:54.293
<v Speaker 4>or regulations broken, he said, and there's no provocation about

0:09:54.333 --> 0:09:56.573
<v Speaker 4>the incident. So he just sort of pushed it from

0:09:56.653 --> 0:10:01.373
<v Speaker 4>one side. So the curfew was obviously spoken about in

0:10:01.413 --> 0:10:05.733
<v Speaker 4>the room, but it wasn't written down as contracts. Now,

0:10:05.773 --> 0:10:09.533
<v Speaker 4>I'm afraid with players occur, so there was nothing they broke,

0:10:10.093 --> 0:10:13.453
<v Speaker 4>and the habit carry on and carry on for two

0:10:13.533 --> 0:10:16.213
<v Speaker 4>weeks is absolutely absurd.

0:10:16.293 --> 0:10:18.733
<v Speaker 5>Why didn't someone take charge of the whole thing?

0:10:19.493 --> 0:10:23.093
<v Speaker 4>The point I would make now is what happens now

0:10:23.173 --> 0:10:25.173
<v Speaker 4>between Stokes McCullum.

0:10:26.453 --> 0:10:28.653
<v Speaker 5>How is that relationship?

0:10:28.773 --> 0:10:34.773
<v Speaker 4>I think Stokes personally won't be very happy and about that,

0:10:35.213 --> 0:10:38.013
<v Speaker 4>and I think that's going to be the biggest issue

0:10:38.093 --> 0:10:42.013
<v Speaker 4>now for McCullum to kind of repair that.

0:10:42.733 --> 0:10:43.013
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:10:43.853 --> 0:10:46.613
<v Speaker 4>Other people will have different views, I'm sure about it,

0:10:46.853 --> 0:10:49.573
<v Speaker 4>but that's what I took from that whole thing. There

0:10:49.653 --> 0:10:52.933
<v Speaker 4>is a gap, a schism, a fracture, whatever you want

0:10:52.973 --> 0:10:55.773
<v Speaker 4>to call it between those two players who were soaked

0:10:56.013 --> 0:10:59.213
<v Speaker 4>or those two important people Stokes and McCullum.

0:10:59.493 --> 0:11:00.333
<v Speaker 5>That has occurred.

0:11:00.973 --> 0:11:03.093
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we'll talk about that shortly with one of

0:11:03.133 --> 0:11:07.133
<v Speaker 2>your colleagues, Daniel across from TMS. But you'll be heading

0:11:07.213 --> 0:11:12.453
<v Speaker 2>up to trent Bridge and I feel though from this

0:11:12.693 --> 0:11:14.813
<v Speaker 2>side of the world, you'd have to go with the

0:11:14.933 --> 0:11:17.173
<v Speaker 2>sort of confidence New Zealand will take up there as well,

0:11:17.213 --> 0:11:19.613
<v Speaker 2>won't you. We know what happened at trent Bridge last

0:11:19.613 --> 0:11:24.493
<v Speaker 2>time they played there and Johnny Besto ran a mock,

0:11:24.533 --> 0:11:30.013
<v Speaker 2>didn't he. But the performance at the Oval where the

0:11:30.093 --> 0:11:32.613
<v Speaker 2>last time New Zealand played there was nineteen ninety nine

0:11:32.613 --> 0:11:35.613
<v Speaker 2>and Chris Kenns led us to victory in that Test

0:11:35.653 --> 0:11:40.693
<v Speaker 2>match must give them great confidence going up to Nottingham.

0:11:40.733 --> 0:11:42.213
<v Speaker 5>Definitely. Definitely.

0:11:42.533 --> 0:11:47.493
<v Speaker 4>The bowling is starting to operate nicely together. I can't

0:11:47.653 --> 0:11:54.573
<v Speaker 4>see that changing greatly. And the batting now is gaining confidence.

0:11:54.653 --> 0:11:57.413
<v Speaker 4>I think it's looking a bit longer and a bit

0:11:57.453 --> 0:12:01.653
<v Speaker 4>more certain. They're not just playing white ball shots than

0:12:01.733 --> 0:12:04.733
<v Speaker 4>getting out any longer. They're playing a decent longlings. Let's

0:12:04.773 --> 0:12:07.933
<v Speaker 4>hope that continues. I've looked at the scores at not

0:12:09.213 --> 0:12:12.773
<v Speaker 4>they're round about I mean some of the scores for example,

0:12:12.853 --> 0:12:15.973
<v Speaker 4>not playing Surry all teams three innings all four hundred.

0:12:16.573 --> 0:12:19.453
<v Speaker 4>Somerset played there the latest game on June the twelfth

0:12:19.453 --> 0:12:22.533
<v Speaker 4>to the fifteenth a three hundred and a three hundred

0:12:22.533 --> 0:12:25.893
<v Speaker 4>for Somerset and not bowled out. It's the seamers have

0:12:25.973 --> 0:12:29.013
<v Speaker 4>got most of the wickets, but there is also a

0:12:29.053 --> 0:12:32.733
<v Speaker 4>guy called Liam Patterson White who's a left arm spinner

0:12:32.893 --> 0:12:35.213
<v Speaker 4>who gets wickets for Not as well. And Leech has

0:12:35.253 --> 0:12:38.213
<v Speaker 4>got a three in that last game as well. So

0:12:38.773 --> 0:12:41.253
<v Speaker 4>whether England are going to go in with a spinner

0:12:42.013 --> 0:12:44.093
<v Speaker 4>or whether they're just going to go with their seemers,

0:12:44.093 --> 0:12:45.373
<v Speaker 4>we're going to have to wait and see.

0:12:45.413 --> 0:12:47.373
<v Speaker 5>But it is possible to get runs there.

0:12:47.933 --> 0:12:51.773
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, interesting stuff for Jerry. The Stokes issue really played

0:12:52.093 --> 0:12:57.133
<v Speaker 2>a big part in the entire Test and the lead

0:12:57.213 --> 0:13:01.253
<v Speaker 2>up to the Test. And it's a pleasure to be

0:13:01.373 --> 0:13:06.373
<v Speaker 2>joined by Test Met Special commentator Daniel Norcross because I'm

0:13:06.413 --> 0:13:09.333
<v Speaker 2>sure it's an issue that's taken a lot of time

0:13:09.413 --> 0:13:14.613
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of thought within the English media. To me,

0:13:14.693 --> 0:13:18.693
<v Speaker 2>there's been a lot of plank spoken about the Stokes issue.

0:13:18.733 --> 0:13:21.213
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's something that happens should have been dealt

0:13:21.213 --> 0:13:24.573
<v Speaker 2>with and moved on, but it's dominated the whole time

0:13:24.693 --> 0:13:28.133
<v Speaker 2>Daniel hasn't it in terms of Ben Stokes, not only

0:13:28.173 --> 0:13:31.453
<v Speaker 2>as leader of the side, but his relationships with people

0:13:31.493 --> 0:13:35.453
<v Speaker 2>around the game. And I think it's done England and

0:13:35.493 --> 0:13:37.133
<v Speaker 2>the England team at the service, isn't it?

0:13:37.933 --> 0:13:42.613
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely? And you know it's trying to process it. Brian

0:13:43.173 --> 0:13:45.613
<v Speaker 6>is trying to work out who's to blame for what,

0:13:46.733 --> 0:13:50.053
<v Speaker 6>and that's obviously what happens in these situations. You get fingerpointing.

0:13:50.133 --> 0:13:52.933
<v Speaker 6>So let me give you roughly the timeline. So within

0:13:53.693 --> 0:13:56.973
<v Speaker 6>twelve hours fifteen hours or so of England winning that

0:13:57.493 --> 0:13:59.413
<v Speaker 6>bit of a lottery of a Test match at Lord's,

0:14:00.013 --> 0:14:02.773
<v Speaker 6>suddenly you get this message that arrives on your phone

0:14:03.613 --> 0:14:05.893
<v Speaker 6>and it was pretty blunt and it said that Ben

0:14:05.933 --> 0:14:09.053
<v Speaker 6>Stokes and Gus Atkinson had been involved in an incident

0:14:09.413 --> 0:14:13.333
<v Speaker 6>in a nightclub, at which point your heart sinks because

0:14:13.893 --> 0:14:16.893
<v Speaker 6>it's the echoes. It's the echoes of the Ashes, it's

0:14:16.893 --> 0:14:19.253
<v Speaker 6>the echoes of the pre Ashes, it's the echoes of

0:14:19.653 --> 0:14:23.573
<v Speaker 6>Harry Brook and his nightclub incident in New Zealand, of Noosa,

0:14:24.213 --> 0:14:26.253
<v Speaker 6>and it takes it all the way back to, of course,

0:14:26.293 --> 0:14:30.013
<v Speaker 6>ben Stokes's fabled altercation in Bristol, which is now nearly

0:14:30.093 --> 0:14:32.973
<v Speaker 6>nine years away, and you think to yourself, how on

0:14:33.053 --> 0:14:36.693
<v Speaker 6>earth can this have happened? And the immediate reaction is,

0:14:36.973 --> 0:14:39.933
<v Speaker 6>you know, if the captain's involved in an incident like this,

0:14:40.893 --> 0:14:43.853
<v Speaker 6>then you know this is the last straw. Then you

0:14:43.973 --> 0:14:48.373
<v Speaker 6>discover gradually over time, but so slowly, Wie and this

0:14:48.533 --> 0:14:52.933
<v Speaker 6>was the issue that actually the captain wasn't involved in

0:14:52.973 --> 0:14:55.053
<v Speaker 6>an altercation at all. It happened to be in a

0:14:55.173 --> 0:14:59.053
<v Speaker 6>nightclub when a punch was thrown, not at him. And

0:14:59.413 --> 0:15:02.053
<v Speaker 6>then you find out that there was a curfew in place,

0:15:02.093 --> 0:15:04.813
<v Speaker 6>and you don't understand why there would be because to

0:15:04.853 --> 0:15:06.693
<v Speaker 6>be really clear, you know, when a Test match is

0:15:06.733 --> 0:15:08.853
<v Speaker 6>over and a lot of these players live in London,

0:15:09.293 --> 0:15:11.413
<v Speaker 6>were they really expected to be on a curfew for

0:15:11.453 --> 0:15:13.413
<v Speaker 6>the next ten days when they'd be going back to

0:15:13.453 --> 0:15:16.933
<v Speaker 6>their houses. I mean, Jamie Smith himself was going to

0:15:16.973 --> 0:15:18.453
<v Speaker 6>have to be at the birth of a child of

0:15:18.453 --> 0:15:19.933
<v Speaker 6>his was going to was he going to have to

0:15:19.933 --> 0:15:22.293
<v Speaker 6>miss it if it was after midnight? I mean the

0:15:22.333 --> 0:15:25.893
<v Speaker 6>absurdity of all these particular you know, different bits and

0:15:25.933 --> 0:15:29.453
<v Speaker 6>bobs that were that were failing to be addressed by

0:15:29.493 --> 0:15:32.373
<v Speaker 6>the ECB. So the ECB left this vacuum in which

0:15:32.413 --> 0:15:33.773
<v Speaker 6>speculation began to.

0:15:33.693 --> 0:15:37.533
<v Speaker 5>Grow, and then we discovered.

0:15:37.053 --> 0:15:39.373
<v Speaker 6>At the end of the entire process, when the end

0:15:39.413 --> 0:15:42.773
<v Speaker 6>of the process was yesterday, that the cricket Regulator had

0:15:42.813 --> 0:15:46.093
<v Speaker 6>reported that there was no breach. Now why it took

0:15:46.133 --> 0:15:52.053
<v Speaker 6>so long, no one knows. And what I guess is

0:15:52.053 --> 0:15:54.533
<v Speaker 6>is showing up here is that either the ECB have

0:15:54.693 --> 0:16:00.693
<v Speaker 6>been exceptionally incompetent in managing the message, or there has

0:16:00.773 --> 0:16:04.893
<v Speaker 6>been an attempt to kind of almost constructively dismiss s

0:16:04.893 --> 0:16:08.853
<v Speaker 6>those almost as if the relationship between the cat and

0:16:08.893 --> 0:16:12.613
<v Speaker 6>the management has broken down somewhere that we can't see

0:16:12.653 --> 0:16:14.853
<v Speaker 6>somewhere over the course of the ashes and the build

0:16:14.893 --> 0:16:18.853
<v Speaker 6>up to this series that actually they wanted him to

0:16:19.853 --> 0:16:22.933
<v Speaker 6>resign himself. We had that peculiar press conference in which

0:16:22.973 --> 0:16:26.773
<v Speaker 6>Brenda McCullen kept talking about Ben Stokes' mental health and

0:16:26.853 --> 0:16:29.653
<v Speaker 6>being worried about him, and then within three days of

0:16:29.653 --> 0:16:32.013
<v Speaker 6>that we had the CEO of Durham, the county where

0:16:32.013 --> 0:16:35.013
<v Speaker 6>he plays, saying there's absolutely nothing wrong with Ben's mental

0:16:35.013 --> 0:16:37.213
<v Speaker 6>health and we're looking forward to having him play for us.

0:16:37.533 --> 0:16:41.853
<v Speaker 6>So it's been a snaffoo of the ECB's own making.

0:16:42.093 --> 0:16:45.573
<v Speaker 6>You might argue that had Ben Stokes not bothered to

0:16:45.613 --> 0:16:47.773
<v Speaker 6>go to a nightclub at all, even if he's having

0:16:47.813 --> 0:16:51.373
<v Speaker 6>a quiet drink somewhere and nowhere near a punch, that

0:16:51.493 --> 0:16:56.053
<v Speaker 6>wasn't sensible. But it's been overblown to such an extent.

0:16:56.333 --> 0:16:58.693
<v Speaker 6>You've then found yourself with a bunch of cricketers who

0:16:58.693 --> 0:17:00.973
<v Speaker 6>have become collateral damage. And I think here of the

0:17:01.093 --> 0:17:05.533
<v Speaker 6>likes of the Demuton's Sonny Baker, James Rue coming into

0:17:05.533 --> 0:17:08.773
<v Speaker 6>a game with very inadequate preparation in a that was

0:17:08.813 --> 0:17:12.013
<v Speaker 6>not strong enough to really hold their own against a

0:17:12.173 --> 0:17:15.933
<v Speaker 6>very very good New Zealand side, Matt Fisher coming back

0:17:15.973 --> 0:17:18.333
<v Speaker 6>for his first game in four years, and they'll all

0:17:18.333 --> 0:17:20.173
<v Speaker 6>be out of the team for the next game. I mean,

0:17:20.173 --> 0:17:23.853
<v Speaker 6>we could very easily Brian have a bizarre situation in

0:17:23.853 --> 0:17:28.253
<v Speaker 6>which England field and eleven at lords are totally different

0:17:28.293 --> 0:17:30.973
<v Speaker 6>eleven for the second Test and revert to exactly the

0:17:30.973 --> 0:17:33.693
<v Speaker 6>same eleven they had at Lord's for the third Test. Now,

0:17:34.213 --> 0:17:36.813
<v Speaker 6>I'm pretty certain that's never happened in Test figure history.

0:17:37.213 --> 0:17:39.333
<v Speaker 6>And the reason things like that don't happen is because

0:17:39.373 --> 0:17:43.813
<v Speaker 6>it's a very bad idea. So you know, it's been

0:17:43.853 --> 0:17:47.653
<v Speaker 6>a terrible, terrible sequence of errors. I don't know whether

0:17:47.693 --> 0:17:50.893
<v Speaker 6>Ben Stokes's relationship with the ECB can be properly repaired.

0:17:51.213 --> 0:17:54.293
<v Speaker 6>I don't know whether his relationship with Brendan McCullum is

0:17:54.333 --> 0:17:57.613
<v Speaker 6>a healthy one. He didn't seem to be being supported

0:17:57.653 --> 0:18:01.613
<v Speaker 6>in the immediate aftermath of the news breaking. And I

0:18:01.653 --> 0:18:04.093
<v Speaker 6>would say that if New Zealand win the trent Bridge Test,

0:18:04.133 --> 0:18:05.973
<v Speaker 6>and there's a very good chance of that happening because

0:18:06.013 --> 0:18:07.933
<v Speaker 6>they're a very fine team and they're playing pretty well

0:18:07.973 --> 0:18:10.893
<v Speaker 6>at the moment, you'd have to say I think something

0:18:10.933 --> 0:18:14.533
<v Speaker 6>will break. And whether that's McCullum or Stokes or Key,

0:18:14.693 --> 0:18:17.133
<v Speaker 6>I don't know. But this is quite a significant moment

0:18:17.573 --> 0:18:21.173
<v Speaker 6>for English cricket and it's hoving interview and because of

0:18:21.213 --> 0:18:22.173
<v Speaker 6>the next seven days.

0:18:22.653 --> 0:18:26.093
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there's a perception that there is friction between individuals.

0:18:26.173 --> 0:18:28.893
<v Speaker 2>That's the big concern, isn't it. And I sort of

0:18:28.933 --> 0:18:31.653
<v Speaker 2>since on this side of the world, from reading what

0:18:31.693 --> 0:18:35.013
<v Speaker 2>I have read of various sosuation, you're probably closer to it,

0:18:35.053 --> 0:18:39.733
<v Speaker 2>and no more than me that there's a vast majority

0:18:39.773 --> 0:18:43.973
<v Speaker 2>of people now don't want Stokes as captain. Is that

0:18:44.493 --> 0:18:45.893
<v Speaker 2>a perception or is that a fact?

0:18:46.413 --> 0:18:47.613
<v Speaker 5>Well, actually.

0:18:48.733 --> 0:18:51.373
<v Speaker 6>I did a couple of events, you know, public events

0:18:51.413 --> 0:18:55.573
<v Speaker 6>where you have dinners and whatnot, and the overwhelming sentiment

0:18:55.813 --> 0:18:58.813
<v Speaker 6>in the general public that I saw was that they

0:18:58.853 --> 0:19:02.253
<v Speaker 6>wanted Stokes. I mean, partly because of the cricketer that

0:19:02.293 --> 0:19:04.933
<v Speaker 6>he is, partly because he balances the team, partly because

0:19:05.373 --> 0:19:07.973
<v Speaker 6>I don't think people in England are blaming Stokes is

0:19:08.053 --> 0:19:10.693
<v Speaker 6>kept and sy for England's failures. They're tending to blame

0:19:10.813 --> 0:19:16.573
<v Speaker 6>more the coach and Rob Key for inadequate preparation, not

0:19:16.773 --> 0:19:19.333
<v Speaker 6>giving the team what they needed in advance of the

0:19:19.693 --> 0:19:22.973
<v Speaker 6>action series, going into these series with a kind of

0:19:23.013 --> 0:19:26.573
<v Speaker 6>Devil may care attitude, and Stokes was adopting a quite

0:19:26.573 --> 0:19:29.253
<v Speaker 6>a different approach during the Ashes, as you may remember,

0:19:29.293 --> 0:19:32.333
<v Speaker 6>you know, suddenly digging himself in in Brisbane and Adelaide,

0:19:32.933 --> 0:19:35.853
<v Speaker 6>kind of abandoning the approach that had taken them to

0:19:35.893 --> 0:19:39.373
<v Speaker 6>that point. So I think actually I was quite surprised

0:19:39.413 --> 0:19:41.493
<v Speaker 6>to see it. I expected there to be a kind

0:19:41.533 --> 0:19:44.133
<v Speaker 6>of angry backlash at Stokes, what are you doing in

0:19:44.133 --> 0:19:46.653
<v Speaker 6>a nightclub. We've been through this all over again. That's it,

0:19:46.853 --> 0:19:50.533
<v Speaker 6>We've had enough. But actually there's quite a lot of

0:19:50.573 --> 0:19:54.333
<v Speaker 6>sympathy for Stokes, and whether that's because, as I say,

0:19:54.373 --> 0:19:57.653
<v Speaker 6>because he's such a colossal cricketer in English history, because

0:19:57.693 --> 0:20:01.213
<v Speaker 6>of what he represents the moments he's been at, but

0:20:01.333 --> 0:20:04.013
<v Speaker 6>also because he's such a key figure in making that

0:20:04.093 --> 0:20:05.253
<v Speaker 6>eleven actually work.

0:20:05.333 --> 0:20:07.893
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. So I would think that actually the

0:20:08.413 --> 0:20:09.493
<v Speaker 5>the bigger pressure is.

0:20:09.453 --> 0:20:13.213
<v Speaker 6>Going to be on McCollum, key and as well as

0:20:13.413 --> 0:20:16.733
<v Speaker 6>the Richards, Goulden Thompson at the top, because you know,

0:20:16.773 --> 0:20:20.453
<v Speaker 6>they are part of the decision making process that results

0:20:20.453 --> 0:20:23.973
<v Speaker 6>in there being no practice matches before the Ashes, you know,

0:20:23.973 --> 0:20:26.453
<v Speaker 6>playing a one day series in New Zealand, but sending

0:20:27.133 --> 0:20:32.213
<v Speaker 6>many of the Ashes squad there completely inadequate preparation. So yeah,

0:20:32.413 --> 0:20:36.093
<v Speaker 6>I look, it's hard to tells and it's hard to gauge,

0:20:36.133 --> 0:20:39.053
<v Speaker 6>but I think the general feeling is that people want

0:20:39.133 --> 0:20:42.893
<v Speaker 6>Stokes back and they're starting to tire of the words

0:20:42.893 --> 0:20:44.893
<v Speaker 6>that are coming out of the ECB took.

0:20:44.773 --> 0:20:47.133
<v Speaker 2>A bit of stick from their former players, Michael Vaughan

0:20:47.293 --> 0:20:50.613
<v Speaker 2>and even Ian both of them. But Rich I said

0:20:50.893 --> 0:20:53.813
<v Speaker 2>a little bit earlier. Some people just don't learn, do they. Well,

0:20:54.013 --> 0:20:55.853
<v Speaker 2>you know it, Boss took a long while to learn,

0:20:55.893 --> 0:20:58.533
<v Speaker 2>didn't he when he was playing the game. But The

0:20:58.613 --> 0:21:04.933
<v Speaker 2>end result Dan is that the England side didn't play well.

0:21:04.973 --> 0:21:08.933
<v Speaker 2>They were outplayed by New Zealand. Some qualify cricket from

0:21:08.933 --> 0:21:11.613
<v Speaker 2>the New Zealanders in that guy. There's some quality stuff

0:21:11.653 --> 0:21:15.453
<v Speaker 2>from England as well. But New Zealand outplayed them, didn't.

0:21:15.213 --> 0:21:17.653
<v Speaker 6>They well, they absolutely thrashed them. I mean the only

0:21:17.733 --> 0:21:19.613
<v Speaker 6>time that England were in that game was on the

0:21:19.653 --> 0:21:22.853
<v Speaker 6>first day and that was largely due to self inflicted

0:21:22.893 --> 0:21:25.653
<v Speaker 6>mistakes by the New Zealand batters on a pretty good

0:21:25.693 --> 0:21:27.773
<v Speaker 6>pitch on the first day. You know, there were a

0:21:27.813 --> 0:21:31.693
<v Speaker 6>few soft dismissals, there was some pretty tight, decent enough

0:21:31.733 --> 0:21:34.573
<v Speaker 6>bowling from a very callow attack. I mean, you know,

0:21:34.653 --> 0:21:38.773
<v Speaker 6>it was the most inexperienced four man pace attack England

0:21:38.773 --> 0:21:41.453
<v Speaker 6>has ever put out. Between them, they had twenty nine caps,

0:21:41.933 --> 0:21:46.053
<v Speaker 6>which is just insanely inexperienced. You know, they sort of

0:21:46.093 --> 0:21:47.653
<v Speaker 6>held their own on the first day, they were a

0:21:47.653 --> 0:21:50.853
<v Speaker 6>bit assisted by New Zealand, but thereafter New Zealand beat

0:21:50.853 --> 0:21:53.533
<v Speaker 6>them in every department of the game. England were dropping catches.

0:21:53.573 --> 0:21:55.693
<v Speaker 6>They got a new wicket keeper behind the stumps who

0:21:55.733 --> 0:21:58.613
<v Speaker 6>didn't look up to the job in his first game. Understandably,

0:21:59.173 --> 0:22:03.693
<v Speaker 6>New Zealand's bowling was persistent and penetrative, and you know,

0:22:03.893 --> 0:22:06.493
<v Speaker 6>it's wonderful to see there's a foreman pace attack there

0:22:06.533 --> 0:22:09.213
<v Speaker 6>that one day Nathan Smith is taking five six wickets,

0:22:09.213 --> 0:22:12.173
<v Speaker 6>then Kyle Jamison's chipping in with three or four willow

0:22:12.293 --> 0:22:15.773
<v Speaker 6>rowp looks like a persistent threat and amongst all of it,

0:22:16.053 --> 0:22:19.373
<v Speaker 6>Matt Henry's taking eleven wickets. They've got good plans. They

0:22:19.413 --> 0:22:21.573
<v Speaker 6>know how to keep England's best batters quiet.

0:22:21.613 --> 0:22:22.093
<v Speaker 5>I thought the.

0:22:22.053 --> 0:22:25.973
<v Speaker 6>Plans to Brook and Route were absolutely impeccable. They looked

0:22:25.973 --> 0:22:29.533
<v Speaker 6>like they were playing Test cricket, whereas England team, not

0:22:29.613 --> 0:22:33.213
<v Speaker 6>particularly surprisingly given their inexperience, looked like they were treading water,

0:22:33.693 --> 0:22:36.733
<v Speaker 6>thrashing about trying to stay in the game. And I

0:22:36.773 --> 0:22:39.773
<v Speaker 6>mean I thought before this series started that England would

0:22:39.773 --> 0:22:43.733
<v Speaker 6>really struggle to beat New Zealand. England don't lose Test

0:22:43.733 --> 0:22:45.813
<v Speaker 6>series at home very often, the last one was about

0:22:45.813 --> 0:22:46.773
<v Speaker 6>thirteen years ago.

0:22:47.613 --> 0:22:49.333
<v Speaker 5>But New Zealand are a very.

0:22:49.213 --> 0:22:53.373
<v Speaker 6>Strong team who were habitually underestimated by England and by

0:22:53.373 --> 0:22:56.173
<v Speaker 6>many of their other opponents. And they've shown it that

0:22:56.573 --> 0:22:58.653
<v Speaker 6>the bowlers are going to win you series, aren't they

0:22:58.813 --> 0:23:02.653
<v Speaker 6>And their format pace attack I think is better groove,

0:23:02.733 --> 0:23:05.893
<v Speaker 6>better honed, more experienced, and they work as a pack,

0:23:05.973 --> 0:23:07.573
<v Speaker 6>and they've got plans and they know how to get

0:23:07.573 --> 0:23:10.933
<v Speaker 6>people out. England plans were very simple. Joe Route returning

0:23:10.933 --> 0:23:13.653
<v Speaker 6>as captain when he couldn't get a wicket, goes to

0:23:13.653 --> 0:23:16.733
<v Speaker 6>a short ballploy the over bowl. Joff Er Archer again

0:23:16.933 --> 0:23:19.853
<v Speaker 6>eight o uspell. I mean shades of Mount Munganery, wasn't it.

0:23:21.573 --> 0:23:24.653
<v Speaker 6>They're just persistently sticking around with a leg slip hoping

0:23:24.693 --> 0:23:26.813
<v Speaker 6>that the little work. I mean it did on a

0:23:26.813 --> 0:23:31.053
<v Speaker 6>couple of occasions, but it's a pretty simple plan. And

0:23:31.493 --> 0:23:34.613
<v Speaker 6>I genuinely think that bas ball could have started against

0:23:34.653 --> 0:23:37.453
<v Speaker 6>New Zealand in twenty twenty two with that thrilling series

0:23:37.453 --> 0:23:39.493
<v Speaker 6>from an English point of view, and it could be

0:23:39.533 --> 0:23:40.973
<v Speaker 6>about to come to an end of the hands of

0:23:41.013 --> 0:23:42.133
<v Speaker 6>New Zealand four years later.

0:23:42.773 --> 0:23:44.973
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it's going to be seen, I guess in

0:23:45.333 --> 0:23:48.773
<v Speaker 2>trent Bridge. Is there room for spin bowler for either

0:23:48.853 --> 0:23:50.693
<v Speaker 2>side at trim Bridge? Do you see?

0:23:51.013 --> 0:23:51.293
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:23:51.813 --> 0:23:54.773
<v Speaker 6>Ordinarily I wouldn't have been particularly keen on a spinner

0:23:54.813 --> 0:23:57.533
<v Speaker 6>at trent Bridge because they don't usually prosper particularly, but

0:23:58.013 --> 0:24:00.293
<v Speaker 6>we've got some incredibly hot weather here. I mean, I

0:24:00.333 --> 0:24:02.693
<v Speaker 6>know the English often complain about heat when it's only

0:24:02.733 --> 0:24:05.733
<v Speaker 6>twenty five, but it's about thirty five to thirty eight degrees,

0:24:06.773 --> 0:24:09.053
<v Speaker 6>so that could affect the pitch interesting to see. It

0:24:09.133 --> 0:24:12.453
<v Speaker 6>could break up a bit. England's problem is that they

0:24:12.453 --> 0:24:14.933
<v Speaker 6>haven't developed a good spinner over the course of the

0:24:15.013 --> 0:24:18.293
<v Speaker 6>last four or five years. If they did play a spinner,

0:24:18.333 --> 0:24:21.373
<v Speaker 6>it would be Busher, who has had some success at

0:24:21.413 --> 0:24:24.613
<v Speaker 6>trent Bridge. I think I don't know whether New Zealand

0:24:24.653 --> 0:24:28.093
<v Speaker 6>need a spinner. With Revenderer and Glenn Phillips. I think

0:24:28.133 --> 0:24:32.573
<v Speaker 6>they've probably got enough because the pacers are bowling so well.

0:24:33.173 --> 0:24:36.133
<v Speaker 6>I would stick with what they've got. I think England

0:24:36.213 --> 0:24:38.573
<v Speaker 6>might consider the spinner because if Stokes comes back in

0:24:39.013 --> 0:24:42.573
<v Speaker 6>that balances aside. They can play four seemers and go

0:24:42.733 --> 0:24:45.573
<v Speaker 6>back to bush here. But you know, Push is a

0:24:45.573 --> 0:24:49.253
<v Speaker 6>young man who's still pretty I mean, he's quite experienced

0:24:49.253 --> 0:24:51.293
<v Speaker 6>in Test match term was weirdly interprise. He's got over

0:24:51.333 --> 0:24:54.453
<v Speaker 6>fifty wickets, but he's inexperienced in first class terms. He

0:24:54.453 --> 0:24:57.013
<v Speaker 6>hasn't played a great deal. He's got a county now

0:24:57.413 --> 0:25:00.413
<v Speaker 6>and he's not I don't think a Test quality spinner.

0:25:00.733 --> 0:25:03.293
<v Speaker 6>But they might be tempted to play him, I guess

0:25:03.333 --> 0:25:05.893
<v Speaker 6>because those conditions, because the pitch could break up. But

0:25:06.013 --> 0:25:09.533
<v Speaker 6>similar to New Zealand, they have Bethel Route who could

0:25:09.533 --> 0:25:13.173
<v Speaker 6>do that job. Whether five seamers is a bit of overkill,

0:25:13.213 --> 0:25:15.853
<v Speaker 6>I don't know. So they're indicated by playing If they

0:25:15.853 --> 0:25:17.973
<v Speaker 6>were going to play Persheer at Lord's where you never

0:25:18.013 --> 0:25:21.013
<v Speaker 6>really thought a spinner would come into it, then they

0:25:21.093 --> 0:25:22.773
<v Speaker 6>might very well picked one at trent Bridge.

0:25:22.813 --> 0:25:25.933
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, lovely to talk to you again, Daniel. Hopefully you

0:25:25.933 --> 0:25:29.053
<v Speaker 2>can get an opportunity to talk cricket with you in

0:25:29.093 --> 0:25:33.173
<v Speaker 2>the future. Get off to trent Bridge, enjoy that Test

0:25:33.253 --> 0:25:36.493
<v Speaker 2>match and hopefully enjoy New Zealand winning a series.

0:25:38.213 --> 0:25:40.613
<v Speaker 6>Well do you know they've been terrific fun to watch

0:25:40.893 --> 0:25:42.853
<v Speaker 6>and I wouldn't be grudge of the win at all.

0:25:43.693 --> 0:25:43.853
<v Speaker 3>Good.

0:25:44.173 --> 0:25:48.573
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks Daniel. Lovely to talk to you. But parochial,

0:25:48.613 --> 0:25:53.573
<v Speaker 2>I guess, and unfeared. Daniel Norcross was balanced and complimentary

0:25:53.573 --> 0:25:56.253
<v Speaker 2>to the black Caps, and I think gave a fair

0:25:56.293 --> 0:26:01.093
<v Speaker 2>assessment of life in England at the moment. Boy, they're

0:26:01.133 --> 0:26:05.413
<v Speaker 2>facing some issues. Finally this week, sitting in his office chairs,

0:26:05.413 --> 0:26:08.133
<v Speaker 2>sitting a flat white and trying to get some worked

0:26:08.133 --> 0:26:12.013
<v Speaker 2>downe Peter Holland still has time to talk cricket. You

0:26:12.053 --> 0:26:15.013
<v Speaker 2>always had time to talk cricket. It won't take too

0:26:15.093 --> 0:26:17.733
<v Speaker 2>much of your time. Most I know how business is

0:26:17.813 --> 0:26:21.813
<v Speaker 2>up there in the city of Sales, but I guess,

0:26:21.893 --> 0:26:25.413
<v Speaker 2>like me, you were able to celebrate an outstanding Black

0:26:25.453 --> 0:26:28.013
<v Speaker 2>Caps when along the way it.

0:26:28.133 --> 0:26:35.733
<v Speaker 3>Was a fabulous match and five days what a novelty?

0:26:36.253 --> 0:26:40.933
<v Speaker 3>Oh really, but it went into the fifth day that

0:26:41.253 --> 0:26:46.053
<v Speaker 3>myself I love because we had we had interesting cricket

0:26:46.373 --> 0:26:51.853
<v Speaker 3>all the way through. I really enjoy the jousting between

0:26:51.933 --> 0:26:57.213
<v Speaker 3>Phillips and Archer. What that that was riveting stuff, amazing.

0:26:57.973 --> 0:27:00.453
<v Speaker 3>It's the sort of things that you go this is

0:27:00.493 --> 0:27:03.173
<v Speaker 3>pretty good, isn't it. And I think I think Jerry

0:27:03.253 --> 0:27:06.413
<v Speaker 3>touched on the fact that Phillips played so wonderfully not

0:27:06.533 --> 0:27:08.733
<v Speaker 3>trying to hit the ball and in fact trying to

0:27:08.853 --> 0:27:14.813
<v Speaker 3>evade and and aware Archer down and I think I

0:27:14.813 --> 0:27:19.373
<v Speaker 3>think it's also picked up by Daniel Norcross that towards

0:27:19.413 --> 0:27:22.693
<v Speaker 3>a Jerry that that was say many bold eight overs

0:27:23.093 --> 0:27:25.733
<v Speaker 3>and was probably over bold by Joe Rude, which is

0:27:25.733 --> 0:27:30.853
<v Speaker 3>a shame because that was this great stuff propping up

0:27:31.253 --> 0:27:38.133
<v Speaker 3>a very inexperienced English side and as such got comprehensively beaten,

0:27:38.173 --> 0:27:40.893
<v Speaker 3>didn't they But was You can't take that away from

0:27:41.573 --> 0:27:45.413
<v Speaker 3>You can say it's an experienced team, particularly the the

0:27:45.413 --> 0:27:47.933
<v Speaker 3>the attack, but you can't take it away from the

0:27:47.933 --> 0:27:53.853
<v Speaker 3>fact that New Zealand played very well they across the board.

0:27:54.573 --> 0:27:57.973
<v Speaker 3>My only concerns will be we're not getting enough out

0:27:58.013 --> 0:28:02.733
<v Speaker 3>of our openers. Other than that, I'm greatly greatly encouraged

0:28:02.773 --> 0:28:06.333
<v Speaker 3>by what we saw from this match. I really am

0:28:06.893 --> 0:28:08.533
<v Speaker 3>revenge us really need them.

0:28:09.173 --> 0:28:11.533
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we got one more Test match of the series

0:28:11.573 --> 0:28:15.093
<v Speaker 2>and they're getting better. They certainly improved from Lords and

0:28:15.453 --> 0:28:18.773
<v Speaker 2>you know there's well, there's some probably poor memories from

0:28:19.293 --> 0:28:22.093
<v Speaker 2>Trent Bridge, remember back there when Johnny Bestow gave us

0:28:22.133 --> 0:28:24.893
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a pounding and we lost a Test

0:28:24.933 --> 0:28:27.093
<v Speaker 2>match there last time. But you know, I think the

0:28:27.173 --> 0:28:30.133
<v Speaker 2>site is better equipped to handle it. One of the

0:28:30.173 --> 0:28:33.413
<v Speaker 2>interesting things that you know, we've talked about and Daniel

0:28:33.493 --> 0:28:38.333
<v Speaker 2>Norcross I looked at it was the Stokes issue. Would

0:28:38.333 --> 0:28:40.693
<v Speaker 2>that go on in New Zealand and England were brought

0:28:40.733 --> 0:28:44.173
<v Speaker 2>down by friendly fire? Weren't they? And it's now become

0:28:44.213 --> 0:28:48.213
<v Speaker 2>almost a Mills and Boone romance story. The way the

0:28:48.613 --> 0:28:52.573
<v Speaker 2>Poms handle it. To me, it was just one issue,

0:28:52.653 --> 0:28:54.813
<v Speaker 2>deal with and move on. But you know they want

0:28:54.813 --> 0:28:56.373
<v Speaker 2>to keep it going forever in the day.

0:28:57.933 --> 0:29:01.733
<v Speaker 3>There seems to be something in the UK, whether it

0:29:01.853 --> 0:29:06.973
<v Speaker 3>be in EP or football, they're always gunning for a manager.

0:29:07.053 --> 0:29:10.613
<v Speaker 3>You have a couple of losses, they're after you straight away.

0:29:10.973 --> 0:29:12.893
<v Speaker 3>And there was there was elements of all of that.

0:29:13.013 --> 0:29:22.453
<v Speaker 3>It was it was got a vindictive, nasty attitude towards Stokes.

0:29:22.613 --> 0:29:25.733
<v Speaker 3>They want it. They're after McCullum, right or wrong, They're

0:29:25.773 --> 0:29:28.973
<v Speaker 3>after Key and they don't let go. And by the way,

0:29:29.493 --> 0:29:32.653
<v Speaker 3>what's what's been shown here is that they don't want

0:29:32.693 --> 0:29:34.413
<v Speaker 3>to let facts get in the way of the whole

0:29:34.453 --> 0:29:36.893
<v Speaker 3>story or or the pitch that they are trying to

0:29:36.933 --> 0:29:42.973
<v Speaker 3>actually run here, because when the investigations were completed, it

0:29:43.053 --> 0:29:45.813
<v Speaker 3>appears there was nothing to be seen here and and

0:29:45.813 --> 0:29:48.853
<v Speaker 3>in fact it was overblown and looks like a complete

0:29:48.973 --> 0:29:52.613
<v Speaker 3>beat up. And I have the greatest sympathy for Archer

0:29:53.133 --> 0:29:56.893
<v Speaker 3>and for that matter, Atkinson and frankly, when you've won

0:29:56.933 --> 0:29:59.453
<v Speaker 3>a match in three days and you got ten days

0:29:59.493 --> 0:30:03.653
<v Speaker 3>to go, they're all growing ups and they're allowed to

0:30:03.693 --> 0:30:06.293
<v Speaker 3>go out there. What is also fascinating there's beat up

0:30:06.293 --> 0:30:10.773
<v Speaker 3>around the curfew, nothing written down because therefore that the

0:30:11.373 --> 0:30:13.853
<v Speaker 3>ECB had nothing to hang their head on. There was

0:30:13.893 --> 0:30:19.493
<v Speaker 3>no breach of team rules or protocols. Yeah, is that

0:30:19.653 --> 0:30:24.013
<v Speaker 3>they're to get someone because there's heat coming on them

0:30:24.533 --> 0:30:27.093
<v Speaker 3>for higher up. So if I've got a victim, you know,

0:30:27.133 --> 0:30:29.893
<v Speaker 3>it's a classic thing. If I've got a victim, then

0:30:29.933 --> 0:30:32.693
<v Speaker 3>I will look after myself. I'm not sure I'm being

0:30:32.773 --> 0:30:35.253
<v Speaker 3>unkind there, but it sniffs a little bit of that,

0:30:35.333 --> 0:30:35.813
<v Speaker 3>doesn't it.

0:30:36.293 --> 0:30:39.213
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there was no no crime committed as such, but

0:30:39.293 --> 0:30:44.413
<v Speaker 2>because of the past misdemeanors in Australia, there's always a

0:30:44.453 --> 0:30:47.693
<v Speaker 2>perception and a sniff of something which you know, I mean,

0:30:47.813 --> 0:30:52.533
<v Speaker 2>it's just a pointless exercises and it's basically clickbait and

0:30:53.533 --> 0:30:55.933
<v Speaker 2>they needed to just get on with it. And you know,

0:30:56.173 --> 0:31:00.013
<v Speaker 2>I mean Stokes is at a stage in his career

0:31:00.093 --> 0:31:02.973
<v Speaker 2>where you know, he may be winding down, who knows,

0:31:03.053 --> 0:31:09.013
<v Speaker 2>but they're already trying to create a gap between he McCullen,

0:31:09.093 --> 0:31:11.773
<v Speaker 2>and of course this is an important relationship. They have

0:31:11.853 --> 0:31:14.773
<v Speaker 2>to be on the same page. But we will watch

0:31:14.853 --> 0:31:16.093
<v Speaker 2>with interest, won't.

0:31:15.853 --> 0:31:20.133
<v Speaker 3>We We will? And I also can I just add

0:31:20.133 --> 0:31:23.493
<v Speaker 3>in there. I feel sorry for Joe Root when he

0:31:23.613 --> 0:31:27.893
<v Speaker 3>hits this dumped on him, and I think it's been

0:31:27.933 --> 0:31:30.733
<v Speaker 3>proven that Joe who is a most wonderful player and

0:31:30.773 --> 0:31:33.613
<v Speaker 3>you know, a huge landmark during that Test. But maybe

0:31:33.693 --> 0:31:36.253
<v Speaker 3>Captain sees not his not his go there was no

0:31:36.293 --> 0:31:38.693
<v Speaker 3>one else and I accept that. And the poor guy

0:31:38.733 --> 0:31:44.573
<v Speaker 3>there is has a real thumping defeat on his record now,

0:31:44.613 --> 0:31:46.613
<v Speaker 3>which is kind of like it's a bit unfre on

0:31:46.653 --> 0:31:49.693
<v Speaker 3>the on the poor blog and he and he batted

0:31:49.733 --> 0:31:51.653
<v Speaker 3>through for a really good seventy and then got a

0:31:51.653 --> 0:31:54.773
<v Speaker 3>good one from Henry. So you know, I feel sorry

0:31:54.773 --> 0:31:58.973
<v Speaker 3>for Joe Root. But hopefully we're going to see Stokes

0:31:58.973 --> 0:32:01.173
<v Speaker 3>and co back and I think that's going to make

0:32:01.213 --> 0:32:04.693
<v Speaker 3>for an absolutely cracking game of cricket because when he's

0:32:04.733 --> 0:32:07.853
<v Speaker 3>back and Atkinson's back, they are a better side.

0:32:08.813 --> 0:32:11.173
<v Speaker 2>I've been I've been fighting back the tears for poor

0:32:11.213 --> 0:32:15.413
<v Speaker 2>old Joe. You know, it's been hard, and I really,

0:32:15.653 --> 0:32:18.813
<v Speaker 2>you know, have been able to wipe away those tears

0:32:19.133 --> 0:32:21.533
<v Speaker 2>and hope that he gets another duck in the next

0:32:21.573 --> 0:32:25.453
<v Speaker 2>Test match or a duck. The other thing I'm interested

0:32:25.453 --> 0:32:28.333
<v Speaker 2>in is that they can't find room for Oli Robinson

0:32:28.373 --> 0:32:31.013
<v Speaker 2>back in the team. Atkinson comes back in, but Robinson,

0:32:31.373 --> 0:32:33.733
<v Speaker 2>along with Tongue, is their best bowler. I know how

0:32:33.733 --> 0:32:37.293
<v Speaker 2>good Archer is and how dangerous he can be, but Robinson,

0:32:37.333 --> 0:32:41.493
<v Speaker 2>to my mind, was the equivalent of Matt Henry in

0:32:41.533 --> 0:32:42.653
<v Speaker 2>that second Test.

0:32:45.413 --> 0:32:48.573
<v Speaker 3>From a New Zealer point of view, I'm pleased they can't.

0:32:48.853 --> 0:32:56.493
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah they can't because I think he's that awkward

0:32:57.253 --> 0:33:00.373
<v Speaker 3>you and Chatfield with an extra couple of yards of pace.

0:33:01.213 --> 0:33:04.453
<v Speaker 3>He hits your hits, hits the back real hard, he

0:33:04.533 --> 0:33:07.493
<v Speaker 3>hits it high up on the back, he nips it back,

0:33:07.613 --> 0:33:12.253
<v Speaker 3>hits your inside. He's He's niggly and and and really difficult.

0:33:12.653 --> 0:33:16.773
<v Speaker 3>I'd be, frankly I'd be swapping out Robinson for for

0:33:16.893 --> 0:33:20.253
<v Speaker 3>Atkinson myself, because I think he's a far more dangerous,

0:33:20.413 --> 0:33:24.053
<v Speaker 3>dangerous bowler. Atkinson very good, very very good, but also

0:33:24.133 --> 0:33:27.133
<v Speaker 3>Robinson's not. He's no schmuck with the with the with

0:33:27.253 --> 0:33:30.613
<v Speaker 3>the bad either. Cam Cam can't played, just as Atkinson

0:33:30.693 --> 0:33:34.453
<v Speaker 3>can as well. Yeah, I'd be going for Robinson myself

0:33:34.453 --> 0:33:35.133
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent.

0:33:35.773 --> 0:33:40.613
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting but yeah, it's nice to have that

0:33:40.733 --> 0:33:44.133
<v Speaker 2>quality available. New Zealand has that quality available. Last week

0:33:44.453 --> 0:33:49.613
<v Speaker 2>we debated Nichols or Young as Williamson's replacement. I guess

0:33:49.613 --> 0:33:52.133
<v Speaker 2>I for one didn't give Nichols a fair hearing eye

0:33:52.173 --> 0:33:54.973
<v Speaker 2>went for the Young because he's the right hand and

0:33:55.373 --> 0:34:00.213
<v Speaker 2>no difference between them. But but really Nichols proved with

0:34:00.333 --> 0:34:04.053
<v Speaker 2>some real hard grafting plan. He's not the prettiest batsman

0:34:04.093 --> 0:34:07.653
<v Speaker 2>to watch, is he? But he did the job that

0:34:07.733 --> 0:34:09.413
<v Speaker 2>you want from number three, didn't he?

0:34:10.373 --> 0:34:11.613
<v Speaker 5>Well? No question?

0:34:11.773 --> 0:34:14.533
<v Speaker 3>And I too a bit of eat some humble pie.

0:34:14.613 --> 0:34:18.733
<v Speaker 3>I've felt that he's he sort of earned the place

0:34:18.773 --> 0:34:24.733
<v Speaker 3>of others that I thought were perhaps more more rewarding

0:34:24.853 --> 0:34:28.053
<v Speaker 3>of other spot and he was taking a place up.

0:34:28.093 --> 0:34:30.773
<v Speaker 3>But I really got to take that back and and

0:34:30.893 --> 0:34:32.933
<v Speaker 3>he did force his way in by virtue of what

0:34:33.053 --> 0:34:36.573
<v Speaker 3>he did in our summer here in New Zealand, and

0:34:36.613 --> 0:34:39.333
<v Speaker 3>that was a damn fine innings. And so I've just

0:34:39.373 --> 0:34:42.453
<v Speaker 3>got to say, yep, well done him. Another person who

0:34:42.493 --> 0:34:45.373
<v Speaker 3>I was not so sure about, and we discussed it

0:34:45.373 --> 0:34:51.013
<v Speaker 3>earlier was Blundle Good fifty and that move where he's

0:34:51.013 --> 0:34:55.813
<v Speaker 3>standing up to the stumps to Henry Ander Smith was

0:34:55.853 --> 0:34:59.253
<v Speaker 3>reminiscent and I recall it vividly when he did that

0:34:59.813 --> 0:35:03.053
<v Speaker 3>in Wellington at the Basin Reserve, and I remember sitting

0:35:03.493 --> 0:35:05.893
<v Speaker 3>in the members bar, not when I was having a

0:35:05.893 --> 0:35:10.573
<v Speaker 3>cup of tea course with one day O'Sullivan, old teammate

0:35:10.853 --> 0:35:15.053
<v Speaker 3>of mine, and we both noticed it because that changed

0:35:15.093 --> 0:35:18.533
<v Speaker 3>it that fifth day because Blundell came up. He brought

0:35:18.773 --> 0:35:22.893
<v Speaker 3>Pope back onto that out of the crease, and all

0:35:22.933 --> 0:35:26.253
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden the slips came in into play and

0:35:26.253 --> 0:35:29.533
<v Speaker 3>then they knocked over very quickly broke that end, same

0:35:29.573 --> 0:35:33.093
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing by standing up. And I noticed also

0:35:33.133 --> 0:35:36.653
<v Speaker 3>that Kerry was doing that with Nissa and Boland in

0:35:36.733 --> 0:35:42.413
<v Speaker 3>the ashes tests. I love it because that is craftsmanship

0:35:42.493 --> 0:35:46.933
<v Speaker 3>and keeping at its at its absolute best. And so

0:35:47.373 --> 0:35:51.773
<v Speaker 3>again Blundele very very well played this time, and he

0:35:52.293 --> 0:35:55.893
<v Speaker 3>probably doesn't get the plaudits he should get because he

0:35:56.133 --> 0:36:00.653
<v Speaker 3>gave back Matt Henry those opportunities to nibble away there.

0:36:00.973 --> 0:36:04.053
<v Speaker 3>And I guess because he's so accurate Henry, you know,

0:36:04.133 --> 0:36:07.173
<v Speaker 3>he's not firing one down leg and so on, it

0:36:07.213 --> 0:36:09.573
<v Speaker 3>makes it a little bit easier for bl But no,

0:36:09.773 --> 0:36:14.293
<v Speaker 3>hats off to Blundle and and two Nickels very much so.

0:36:14.453 --> 0:36:16.013
<v Speaker 3>Great great performances.

0:36:16.293 --> 0:36:20.333
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, outstanding wicket keeping and interesting when you look at

0:36:21.013 --> 0:36:24.173
<v Speaker 2>the scoreboard. The New Zealand first innings of three hundred

0:36:24.173 --> 0:36:27.133
<v Speaker 2>and ninety one. There were fifty three extras and a

0:36:27.173 --> 0:36:30.573
<v Speaker 2>lot of those were buyers and leg buys. The keeper

0:36:30.613 --> 0:36:33.213
<v Speaker 2>for England okay, he was a stand and keeper, but

0:36:34.093 --> 0:36:36.453
<v Speaker 2>you know he has a difficult time and I think

0:36:36.493 --> 0:36:38.093
<v Speaker 2>he tried to come up to the stumps at one

0:36:38.133 --> 0:36:42.253
<v Speaker 2>stage as well. But you know, it was it was

0:36:42.573 --> 0:36:47.333
<v Speaker 2>interesting stuff in terms of that game. But it's exciting

0:36:47.373 --> 0:36:50.573
<v Speaker 2>now when we look ahead, as as Jerry and Daniel

0:36:50.613 --> 0:36:53.293
<v Speaker 2>Nacross said just previously in the program when we were

0:36:53.333 --> 0:36:58.573
<v Speaker 2>talking to them, most that this is an exciting test at.

0:37:00.973 --> 0:37:05.453
<v Speaker 3>Win it takes all well you won one and both

0:37:05.493 --> 0:37:08.373
<v Speaker 3>sides of one comprehensively. Basically we're going to probably we

0:37:08.453 --> 0:37:10.333
<v Speaker 3>have the same team we had at Lord's from England

0:37:11.213 --> 0:37:15.293
<v Speaker 3>and pretty much the same team we'll play at temperature

0:37:15.293 --> 0:37:19.773
<v Speaker 3>for New Zealand. I think though, well, it's always been

0:37:19.933 --> 0:37:24.053
<v Speaker 3>a SEEMA friendly, hasn't it. It's trump Bridge. But then

0:37:24.453 --> 0:37:27.533
<v Speaker 3>I just wonder, because it's been so warm over there

0:37:27.533 --> 0:37:31.133
<v Speaker 3>in the English summer, whether that still plays. And I

0:37:31.213 --> 0:37:32.973
<v Speaker 3>think Jerry was touching on the fact that people are

0:37:33.013 --> 0:37:38.013
<v Speaker 3>be getting a lot of runs at Trent Bridge. Could

0:37:38.013 --> 0:37:42.653
<v Speaker 3>be a very interesting match again. But I like the

0:37:42.693 --> 0:37:47.373
<v Speaker 3>way our taxes has sort of going about their work.

0:37:47.533 --> 0:37:51.453
<v Speaker 3>We've got pace, we've got bounce, we've got the variations

0:37:51.493 --> 0:37:56.173
<v Speaker 3>through Henry Smith is getting getting better and better, brilliant

0:37:56.253 --> 0:38:00.293
<v Speaker 3>round out by the way for Duckett early days. You know,

0:38:00.813 --> 0:38:02.813
<v Speaker 3>it's a good team, isn't it. That they're starting to

0:38:02.813 --> 0:38:03.413
<v Speaker 3>pull together.

0:38:03.893 --> 0:38:06.773
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exciting stuff. And you're right, thirty to thirty five

0:38:06.893 --> 0:38:09.093
<v Speaker 2>degrees which will put a bit of pressure on the

0:38:09.133 --> 0:38:12.173
<v Speaker 2>captain and the use of paste bowlers and those sorts

0:38:12.213 --> 0:38:15.693
<v Speaker 2>of things. And of course Trent Bridges is a funny shape,

0:38:15.773 --> 0:38:18.253
<v Speaker 2>isn't it. They've had to remodel things. They couldn't push

0:38:18.253 --> 0:38:19.973
<v Speaker 2>it out at one part where they put the new

0:38:20.013 --> 0:38:23.173
<v Speaker 2>standard and the boundaries are not the longest. So that's

0:38:23.213 --> 0:38:26.053
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons too why there's been run scored there.

0:38:26.053 --> 0:38:29.213
<v Speaker 2>But it's exciting, too exciting to look ahead.

0:38:28.973 --> 0:38:33.453
<v Speaker 3>To very much. So I quite like the quirkiness of

0:38:33.493 --> 0:38:37.293
<v Speaker 3>some of those grounds in England. Yeah, I think that's

0:38:37.453 --> 0:38:40.133
<v Speaker 3>that's part of that, that's part of the the joys

0:38:40.133 --> 0:38:42.853
<v Speaker 3>of cricket. You know. Wasn't there one in Canterbury where

0:38:42.853 --> 0:38:45.253
<v Speaker 3>there was an oak tree down at third Man for quite.

0:38:45.053 --> 0:38:47.413
<v Speaker 2>A long time middle of the park.

0:38:47.533 --> 0:38:48.693
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the funny.

0:38:49.813 --> 0:38:51.333
<v Speaker 2>We were going to talk about the white fans this

0:38:51.373 --> 0:38:54.813
<v Speaker 2>morning too, but I'm afraid they're playing for a place

0:38:54.813 --> 0:38:58.613
<v Speaker 2>to come home somehow. There is an opportunity if the

0:38:58.653 --> 0:39:00.893
<v Speaker 2>West Indies get beaten twice in New Zealand is able

0:39:00.933 --> 0:39:04.853
<v Speaker 2>to beat England, and I hope they can at least

0:39:04.933 --> 0:39:10.653
<v Speaker 2>come away with some modicum of fectibility. But it's been

0:39:10.693 --> 0:39:15.133
<v Speaker 2>a sad performance by the White fans and the chances

0:39:15.133 --> 0:39:17.973
<v Speaker 2>of defending that title just slipped away right from the

0:39:18.013 --> 0:39:21.293
<v Speaker 2>first day. You gotta take your catches nice.

0:39:22.053 --> 0:39:26.493
<v Speaker 3>Ah. And we're not talking difficult ones either, really, are we, Brian?

0:39:27.893 --> 0:39:28.133
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:39:28.293 --> 0:39:35.213
<v Speaker 3>And these are professional athletes. Yeah, yep, that's what they are.

0:39:35.653 --> 0:39:37.893
<v Speaker 2>And they're getting they're getting paid good money. Now, I

0:39:37.893 --> 0:39:40.653
<v Speaker 2>mean it's not a million dollar stuff, but they're getting

0:39:40.653 --> 0:39:41.013
<v Speaker 2>a living.

0:39:41.773 --> 0:39:45.933
<v Speaker 3>H You can, you can and and and look, we

0:39:46.053 --> 0:39:50.093
<v Speaker 3>everyone's very kind and and very sympathetic and so on.

0:39:50.133 --> 0:39:54.173
<v Speaker 3>But frankly, this yet is not good enough. And they

0:39:54.253 --> 0:39:57.853
<v Speaker 3>must know it themselves because if they're taking it, just

0:39:57.853 --> 0:40:00.973
<v Speaker 3>just even half of those catches, catches put pressure on

0:40:01.013 --> 0:40:03.493
<v Speaker 3>the next next play. We all know how this rolls.

0:40:03.973 --> 0:40:11.173
<v Speaker 3>But I just not they're sadly. Sadly I think the.

0:40:11.293 --> 0:40:15.973
<v Speaker 2>Toast, yeah, which is a pretty but you know, provided

0:40:16.013 --> 0:40:18.773
<v Speaker 2>they take the good lessons from it, not the learnings

0:40:18.973 --> 0:40:20.893
<v Speaker 2>the less that have come out.

0:40:21.013 --> 0:40:26.293
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it is a lesson that's corrects learning. Yeah.

0:40:27.373 --> 0:40:30.493
<v Speaker 2>The The other thing too is that it's always a

0:40:30.533 --> 0:40:33.413
<v Speaker 2>sad time in cricket when your mates pass on. But

0:40:33.733 --> 0:40:36.893
<v Speaker 2>I don't know whether you knew Russell Robinson very well,

0:40:36.893 --> 0:40:40.893
<v Speaker 2>a good mate of chats, but Russell Robinson brilliant snooker player,

0:40:40.973 --> 0:40:43.173
<v Speaker 2>left arm round the wicket barlor. He used to start

0:40:43.173 --> 0:40:45.973
<v Speaker 2>with the left arm behind his back and then he

0:40:46.013 --> 0:40:50.813
<v Speaker 2>would deliver pass away this week squeaky as we knew him,

0:40:51.213 --> 0:40:55.253
<v Speaker 2>a really funny man, a lovely friend of everybody in cricket.

0:40:55.333 --> 0:40:57.693
<v Speaker 2>And he's passed away. You probably would have played a

0:40:57.733 --> 0:41:01.893
<v Speaker 2>game against him all with him at some stage.

0:41:01.453 --> 0:41:04.693
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah, absolutely, But it's a name from the

0:41:04.733 --> 0:41:08.773
<v Speaker 3>distant pass. But sadly, you know, we we you know,

0:41:08.813 --> 0:41:14.333
<v Speaker 3>we're having a few disappear on us and that's just

0:41:14.413 --> 0:41:18.453
<v Speaker 3>part of life, I suppose, but almost nice to acknowledge

0:41:18.573 --> 0:41:26.093
<v Speaker 3>and and just to just comment on the contributions of

0:41:26.173 --> 0:41:28.573
<v Speaker 3>someone who's a decent human being, good cricketer and a

0:41:28.653 --> 0:41:31.693
<v Speaker 3>lot of fun and and we're the poor, poor for

0:41:31.813 --> 0:41:34.493
<v Speaker 3>him not being around. But that is life, I guess.

0:41:34.893 --> 0:41:37.373
<v Speaker 2>And they've had impact on our lives in one way

0:41:37.413 --> 0:41:39.333
<v Speaker 2>or another and we thank them for that. The other

0:41:39.373 --> 0:41:42.893
<v Speaker 2>person who's just passed away Dave cansella who you will

0:41:42.893 --> 0:41:48.453
<v Speaker 2>have known to former CD bowler umpire father of Penny

0:41:48.613 --> 0:41:52.133
<v Speaker 2>and Roger Cainseller. He has passed away as well. And

0:41:52.733 --> 0:41:55.573
<v Speaker 2>I have a lot of memories of him going round

0:41:55.573 --> 0:42:00.013
<v Speaker 2>the domestic scene because he was an umpire player and

0:42:00.093 --> 0:42:06.093
<v Speaker 2>a very very quiet gentleman who always offered good, positive

0:42:06.133 --> 0:42:06.893
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on things.

0:42:07.493 --> 0:42:10.573
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't aware of that brand. And I do remember

0:42:10.653 --> 0:42:13.493
<v Speaker 3>Dave Conseller one as a kid when when he was

0:42:13.853 --> 0:42:17.733
<v Speaker 3>bowling you know, mediums for for CD. But more importantly

0:42:17.813 --> 0:42:21.053
<v Speaker 3>he was an umpire when when I was coming into

0:42:21.213 --> 0:42:24.413
<v Speaker 3>first class cricket at the time, And you're right about that.

0:42:24.693 --> 0:42:27.653
<v Speaker 3>The one thing that I remember about him was he

0:42:27.693 --> 0:42:32.053
<v Speaker 3>was a quiet gentleman, tall man, but very gentle spirit

0:42:32.173 --> 0:42:35.333
<v Speaker 3>and just it was a very nice fellow and and

0:42:35.693 --> 0:42:38.613
<v Speaker 3>and he sticks in my memory for sure. So our

0:42:38.613 --> 0:42:45.133
<v Speaker 3>condolences to the Conseiller family. Lovely fellow. Yeah, and never

0:42:45.213 --> 0:42:49.253
<v Speaker 3>had a lot to say, but but but yeah, that

0:42:49.573 --> 0:42:50.813
<v Speaker 3>sticks in my memory for sure.

0:42:51.413 --> 0:42:55.693
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, our condolences to both families, Russell Robinson and

0:42:55.773 --> 0:43:01.013
<v Speaker 2>Dave Kinsella and fond memories for both those individuals. All right,

0:43:01.053 --> 0:43:04.053
<v Speaker 2>well you can, you can finish your coffee off, you

0:43:04.053 --> 0:43:05.573
<v Speaker 2>can put your feet up, you can get ready for

0:43:05.653 --> 0:43:10.013
<v Speaker 2>the test at trent Bridge, and I suppose you'll be

0:43:10.093 --> 0:43:12.413
<v Speaker 2>watching the highlights of the morning rather than sleeping through

0:43:12.453 --> 0:43:13.093
<v Speaker 2>the night watching.

0:43:13.973 --> 0:43:18.213
<v Speaker 3>Well I do. I do actually tune into Jerry during

0:43:18.253 --> 0:43:22.293
<v Speaker 3>the night on the radio commentaries because I do quite

0:43:22.373 --> 0:43:25.093
<v Speaker 3>enjoy them, so I quite like that.

0:43:26.293 --> 0:43:28.813
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is he's working for so many radio

0:43:28.813 --> 0:43:31.453
<v Speaker 2>stations over there. He's doing common NonStop commentary.

0:43:31.773 --> 0:43:34.173
<v Speaker 3>I think does he know which one he's doing because

0:43:34.253 --> 0:43:36.453
<v Speaker 3>he's not getting the younger for a fellow who's a

0:43:36.573 --> 0:43:40.613
<v Speaker 3>very sprightly seventy four, he's going, okay as our Jerry.

0:43:41.293 --> 0:43:46.173
<v Speaker 2>But happy birthday for the twenty first Jeremy Coney when

0:43:46.213 --> 0:43:51.493
<v Speaker 2>he turned at seventy four, so he's I'm sure celebrated

0:43:51.533 --> 0:43:53.213
<v Speaker 2>that in the appropriate fashion.

0:43:53.533 --> 0:43:58.533
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, Yeah, toasted Jerry and on what we call winter Solstice,

0:43:58.573 --> 0:44:01.173
<v Speaker 3>and of course the longest day in summer over there.

0:44:01.213 --> 0:44:02.813
<v Speaker 3>So there you go, twenty first to.

0:44:02.813 --> 0:44:07.613
<v Speaker 2>Journey, shortest day in New Zealand. Enjoy yourself, most.

0:44:08.493 --> 0:44:10.973
<v Speaker 3>Do we'll do, and look forward to look forward to

0:44:11.053 --> 0:44:14.453
<v Speaker 3>chatting again and maybe you wrapping up a two to

0:44:14.453 --> 0:44:18.853
<v Speaker 3>one series victory for our voice New Zealand.

0:44:19.213 --> 0:44:21.773
<v Speaker 2>Thanks very much, Moose, Thank you very much. Also to

0:44:22.093 --> 0:44:25.693
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Norcross and to you Jerry. You've been sitting on there,

0:44:26.853 --> 0:44:30.853
<v Speaker 2>I since you've been enjoying this. I know you enjoyed

0:44:30.933 --> 0:44:33.453
<v Speaker 2>Test cricket, but I sense that you've had a real

0:44:34.893 --> 0:44:39.253
<v Speaker 2>enjoyment out of watching the proceedings in this three Test series.

0:44:39.453 --> 0:44:42.093
<v Speaker 2>I have, you know, lying on my beard in the

0:44:42.133 --> 0:44:46.093
<v Speaker 2>lounge watching the carry on. But it's great cricket. It's

0:44:46.133 --> 0:44:49.373
<v Speaker 2>great theater. It's what cricket to me is all about.

0:44:49.453 --> 0:44:53.773
<v Speaker 2>Forget your white ball, your colored stuff. This is great theater.

0:44:54.333 --> 0:44:57.693
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it is what it's I did.

0:44:57.773 --> 0:45:01.253
<v Speaker 4>I did get a lot of pleasure, of course, a

0:45:01.253 --> 0:45:04.653
<v Speaker 4>lot more because New Zealand happened to play well and

0:45:04.693 --> 0:45:08.693
<v Speaker 4>they earned the victory and they were better. Now the

0:45:08.733 --> 0:45:12.013
<v Speaker 4>stronger side, I think, slightly stronger side, you know, in

0:45:12.013 --> 0:45:15.453
<v Speaker 4>this third Test match, hopefully it'll be a decent pitch

0:45:15.973 --> 0:45:18.693
<v Speaker 4>and it will be a little bit more even, I think,

0:45:20.093 --> 0:45:23.733
<v Speaker 4>but New Zealand will feel if they can, you know,

0:45:24.493 --> 0:45:27.973
<v Speaker 4>repeat that kind of performance again, they'll have a good chance.

0:45:29.133 --> 0:45:33.733
<v Speaker 2>All Right, This up next week again. Enjoy Trembridge and

0:45:34.053 --> 0:45:34.733
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk again.

0:45:35.653 --> 0:45:36.933
<v Speaker 5>We'll do ones look forward to it.

0:45:37.053 --> 0:45:42.973
<v Speaker 2>Thanksumming.

0:45:48.893 --> 0:45:51.533
<v Speaker 1>For more from News Talks at b Listen live on

0:45:51.613 --> 0:45:54.573
<v Speaker 1>air or online, and keep our shows with you wherever

0:45:54.613 --> 0:45:57.133
<v Speaker 1>you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio.