1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,280
Speaker 1: Here's a bit of insight into how the radio industry works.

2
00:00:02,360 --> 00:00:05,160
Speaker 1: Yesterday morning leads story Matt Doocy on the Mike Hosking Breakfast.

3
00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:08,240
Speaker 1: Matt Doosey was due to ring in. Matt Doocey's nowhere

4
00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:10,000
Speaker 1: to be seen. At about five minutes past seven. We

5
00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:12,560
Speaker 1: go to as what's happened to Matt Doocy? We start

6
00:00:12,640 --> 00:00:15,680
Speaker 1: chasing him down. It turns out the person in his

7
00:00:15,760 --> 00:00:18,600
Speaker 1: office had written down the wrong number for him to ring,

8
00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:21,200
Speaker 1: So obviously immediate in confidence and needs to be dealt

9
00:00:21,200 --> 00:00:24,159
Speaker 1: with forthwith do the basics brilliantly? I thought was the

10
00:00:24,239 --> 00:00:27,240
Speaker 1: National Party? It's not so. Anyway, he rings the number

11
00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:29,320
Speaker 1: that's written down in front of him. Person answers the

12
00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:32,879
Speaker 1: phone Hello. He goes Hello, It's Matt Doocy reporting for

13
00:00:32,880 --> 00:00:36,000
Speaker 1: the Mike Hosking Breakfast, to which he hears the words,

14
00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:40,800
Speaker 1: oh you no longer have an interview on the Mike

15
00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:45,640
Speaker 1: Hosking Breakfast, goes on, what's unusual, hangs up and he disappears. Anyway,

16
00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:47,440
Speaker 1: we eventually track him down and put him there. Whose

17
00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:51,199
Speaker 1: phone number was that? Whose phone number was that? That

18
00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:55,000
Speaker 1: phone number belonged to Radio New Zealand. So Matt Doocy,

19
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:58,120
Speaker 1: Minister of the Crown, rang up the state broadcaster as

20
00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:01,240
Speaker 1: funded by you, and I threw our tax money and

21
00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:03,560
Speaker 1: said Matt Doosey reporting for the my Cosking Breakfast, to

22
00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:05,919
Speaker 1: which point they said, you no longer have an interview

23
00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:08,120
Speaker 1: with the Mi Cosking Breakfast. Now that's not true. Of course,

24
00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:11,360
Speaker 1: that's a lie. They lied, They made it up and

25
00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:14,560
Speaker 1: they lied. Now several questions for you. One, do I

26
00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:18,000
Speaker 1: secretly admire them for being so quick witted that the

27
00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:20,440
Speaker 1: first thing they do is instead of going, oh, you've

28
00:01:20,440 --> 00:01:22,600
Speaker 1: probably got the wrong number, or whops, you've rung radio

29
00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:26,280
Speaker 1: in New Zealando, sorry, they say you no longer have

30
00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:29,039
Speaker 1: an interview with the my Consking Breakfast. That's quite sharp,

31
00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:32,800
Speaker 1: to be honest. Probably worth looking into employing that person,

32
00:01:32,840 --> 00:01:36,000
Speaker 1: whoever they were, because there are some people here aren't

33
00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:42,920
Speaker 1: remotely that sharp. Second, is it underhand? Third? Is that

34
00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:46,160
Speaker 1: just competition and that's life? And would we have done

35
00:01:46,240 --> 00:01:48,480
Speaker 1: the same thing if we were alert enough to do

36
00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:51,960
Speaker 1: the same thing. Fourth? Is it just pure straight up

37
00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:54,120
Speaker 1: and down sabotage and you shouldn't lie and make stuff

38
00:01:54,160 --> 00:01:56,520
Speaker 1: up that isn't true? What are your thoughts on this?

39
00:01:56,800 --> 00:01:57,120
Speaker 2: Fifth?

40
00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:03,520
Speaker 1: If we find out and I can who the person is.

41
00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:11,320
Speaker 1: Should I name and shame them? Thoughts? Please? Sex, I'm sorry?

42
00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:12,960
Speaker 2: Should we just ring them?

43
00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:14,760
Speaker 1: Yeah, but they won't be the same that it's a

44
00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:16,360
Speaker 1: general line. What if it's someone different?

45
00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:17,359
Speaker 2: Seven?

46
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:18,040
Speaker 1: Yes?

47
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:20,919
Speaker 2: Was it Russian state interference?

48
00:02:21,160 --> 00:02:25,320
Speaker 1: Very good question, hard to tell. Was the a bird

49
00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:26,200
Speaker 1: in the background?

50
00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:34,720
Speaker 2: Eight? Is there like, you know, an anchorman? Yes, it's

51
00:02:34,720 --> 00:02:37,760
Speaker 2: sort of like an internewsroom rivalry. And eventually we'll have

52
00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:40,280
Speaker 2: to go down to the oh yeah, you know, to

53
00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:43,799
Speaker 2: the basketball court and with our aeriels and our zip

54
00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:45,760
Speaker 2: guns and have a fight.

55
00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:50,320
Speaker 1: You no longer have an interview with the mic Asking Breakfast.

56
00:02:51,160 --> 00:02:57,680
Speaker 1: Click for more from the mi Casking Breakfast. Listen live

57
00:02:57,800 --> 00:03:00,680
Speaker 1: to news talks it'd be from six am we or

58
00:03:00,720 --> 00:03:02,639
Speaker 1: follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.