1 00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:08,480 Speaker 1: Kiota. I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, 2 00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:17,080 Speaker 1: a daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. From tomorrow, 3 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,919 Speaker 1: there'll be a fifteen percent tariff on New Zealand imports 4 00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:25,759 Speaker 1: four US businesses. The announcement of the arbitrary amount saw 5 00:00:25,840 --> 00:00:30,080 Speaker 1: US frantically send our chief trade negotiator over to Washington 6 00:00:30,440 --> 00:00:34,080 Speaker 1: in a last ditch effort to plead our case. Trade 7 00:00:34,120 --> 00:00:38,720 Speaker 1: Minister Todd McLay was also dispatched. But will that actually 8 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 1: do any good when larger economies have already signed on 9 00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:45,040 Speaker 1: the dotted line and accepted their fates. 10 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:47,199 Speaker 2: And how should. 11 00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:52,160 Speaker 1: New Zealand be diversifying our trade portfolio to rely less 12 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:56,040 Speaker 1: on the big players. Today on the front Page, University 13 00:00:56,080 --> 00:00:59,680 Speaker 1: of Auckland Emeritus Professor Jane Kelsey is with us to 14 00:00:59,680 --> 00:01:03,840 Speaker 1: discs what all this actually means for Kiwi businesses and 15 00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:13,080 Speaker 1: whether we need to reprioritize our trade relationships. First off, Jane, 16 00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 1: what are the chances of a minister or a negotiator 17 00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:20,600 Speaker 1: this laid in the game actually being able to barter 18 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:22,600 Speaker 1: a lower tariff. 19 00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:27,600 Speaker 2: For New Zealand when we have a Q as we 20 00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:33,560 Speaker 2: have of those wanting to see President Trump, we are 21 00:01:33,640 --> 00:01:37,440 Speaker 2: pretty far down the list and there is very little 22 00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:43,119 Speaker 2: that ministers or the Prime Minister can offer that would 23 00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:45,679 Speaker 2: be of interest to Trump, which doesn't mean that he 24 00:01:45,760 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 2: won't try to get whatever he can from them in 25 00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:53,920 Speaker 2: these behind door negotiations. And that's a bit of a 26 00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:57,440 Speaker 2: worry because we don't know what might in fact be offered. 27 00:01:57,600 --> 00:02:00,520 Speaker 2: But one of the things that we have seen in 28 00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:03,320 Speaker 2: all of the so called deals that have been made 29 00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:08,000 Speaker 2: is that one there's nothing in writing. Two there's nothing 30 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 2: publicly disclosed. Three there is disagreement as to what in 31 00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:17,040 Speaker 2: fact has or hasn't been offered. Fourth, Trump could well 32 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:21,600 Speaker 2: say ah, okay, but I want more and not honor 33 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 2: the deal. So who knows. But the chances therefore of 34 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:32,960 Speaker 2: our minister and Prime Minister coming out with a significant 35 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:35,560 Speaker 2: deal are pretty negligible. Right. 36 00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:39,760 Speaker 1: So how significant will this fifteen percent tariff be on 37 00:02:39,919 --> 00:02:41,239 Speaker 1: New Zealand businesses? 38 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:47,880 Speaker 2: Tariffs are kind of blunt instruments. It will mean that 39 00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 2: exports from New Zealand imports into the US are higher 40 00:02:54,040 --> 00:02:57,920 Speaker 2: cost for importers in the US and consumers in the US. 41 00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:04,320 Speaker 2: That could affect how much New Zealand goods they buy. 42 00:03:04,880 --> 00:03:08,560 Speaker 2: So it's not that New Zealand exports pay the teriffs, 43 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:12,280 Speaker 2: it's that it might affect them in the market. But 44 00:03:12,400 --> 00:03:14,680 Speaker 2: at the same time, if you look at the effect 45 00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:19,120 Speaker 2: of things like the exchange rate, that has a really 46 00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:25,320 Speaker 2: significant effect on the prices as well. What other countries 47 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:29,480 Speaker 2: exports are and how they might be affected are also 48 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:34,960 Speaker 2: part of this equation. So it's very hard to be 49 00:03:35,080 --> 00:03:40,920 Speaker 2: specific about what the consequences would be, and when people 50 00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:44,760 Speaker 2: put figures on that, you should be quite skeptical, especially 51 00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:48,560 Speaker 2: because we have no idea about all of these counterfactuals. 52 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:52,800 Speaker 1: I mean, does it make it worse for our businesses though, say, 53 00:03:52,840 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 1: because we've got competitors like Australia in UK they've cut 54 00:03:56,240 --> 00:03:59,440 Speaker 1: a ten percent deal, we've got fifteen percent. Like if 55 00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 1: I was a US based business, say if I owned 56 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:05,600 Speaker 1: I don't know, like a diner or something, would they 57 00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 1: then choose Australian beef over New Zealand beef. 58 00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:16,640 Speaker 2: There's a whole lot of differences already. Consumers have preferences 59 00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:23,280 Speaker 2: and importers have preferences, and there are different qualities of products. 60 00:04:23,480 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 2: I mean, if you just look at wine for example, 61 00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:30,279 Speaker 2: that they're not directly substitutable. There's a whole lot of 62 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:34,520 Speaker 2: factors in play there, and yes, I can understand that 63 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:41,440 Speaker 2: the New Zealand wine makers have some concerns, but we 64 00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:44,640 Speaker 2: need to view those in the big picture. We also 65 00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:48,320 Speaker 2: need to be clear that this is sending a message 66 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 2: about dependency on particular markets and dependency on the export 67 00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:58,120 Speaker 2: of particular products and the kind of economic model that 68 00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:01,480 Speaker 2: we have been working to in this country for a 69 00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 2: number of decades that is a pretty basic export commodity model. 70 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:15,400 Speaker 2: So it's a time and a warning to rethink, not 71 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:18,680 Speaker 2: just to look at what the figures might look like. 72 00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:22,480 Speaker 1: Do we place too much importance on our trade relationships 73 00:05:22,520 --> 00:05:24,880 Speaker 1: with those big juggernaut players. 74 00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:30,200 Speaker 2: There's been a lot of talk about the need for diversification, 75 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:37,839 Speaker 2: especially because of New Zealand's excessive dependency on China as 76 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:43,440 Speaker 2: a market, but also on lower value added products like 77 00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:48,480 Speaker 2: export of whole logs or lower value added dairy products 78 00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:53,840 Speaker 2: and so on, and so it's not simply about diversifying 79 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:58,839 Speaker 2: to other markets, but it's also about rethinking our own 80 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:04,599 Speaker 2: domestic economic model, which currently is based largely on the 81 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:13,400 Speaker 2: housing market and secondly on relatively low value added exports 82 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:17,479 Speaker 2: to a relatively small number of countries, but we have 83 00:06:18,120 --> 00:06:21,400 Speaker 2: a great difficulty generating that discussion here. There was a 84 00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:26,560 Speaker 2: Productivity Commission report several years ago before the Productivity Commission 85 00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:32,400 Speaker 2: was disbanded that set out a process for diversification which 86 00:06:32,440 --> 00:06:39,760 Speaker 2: would flicken our domestic production, and that unfortunately seems to 87 00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:44,400 Speaker 2: have fallen on deaf ears. So you know, this, as 88 00:06:44,480 --> 00:06:46,280 Speaker 2: I said before, is a kind of wake up call 89 00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:51,080 Speaker 2: for us to start thinking differently, and maybe we have 90 00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:53,040 Speaker 2: President Trump to think for something. 91 00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:57,799 Speaker 3: We don't want to be any worse off than anybody else. 92 00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:01,400 Speaker 3: New Zealand exporters into North America. I check in with 93 00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:03,480 Speaker 3: quite regularly. They're actually doing really well. Whether it's the 94 00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:06,440 Speaker 3: zest breeze, whether it's the red meat guys, the wine 95 00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:08,920 Speaker 3: guys are obviously our second biggest exports there as well. 96 00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 3: A lot of them are saying they're able to pass 97 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:14,040 Speaker 3: it on to the American consumer, which is what has 98 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 3: been happening. And again a big market. Just remember three 99 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:20,320 Speaker 3: hundred and sixty million people. If you find wealthy retailers 100 00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:23,120 Speaker 3: and wealthy consumers, you can still navigate your. 101 00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:23,480 Speaker 2: Way through it. 102 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:29,000 Speaker 1: When we say a diversification of our domestic market, what 103 00:07:29,160 --> 00:07:32,440 Speaker 1: could we be doing, say to make that happen. 104 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:35,600 Speaker 2: If we just look at a story I read this 105 00:07:35,720 --> 00:07:42,000 Speaker 2: morning about a large producer that uses a lot of 106 00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:49,640 Speaker 2: energy importing the products that they're going to use from 107 00:07:49,800 --> 00:07:53,480 Speaker 2: Vietnam when there are local producers here, or if we 108 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:58,760 Speaker 2: look at reliance on the overseas big tech operators for 109 00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:02,520 Speaker 2: running server farms and so on, when we could do 110 00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 2: that here. There are real opportunities here, and we seem 111 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:15,720 Speaker 2: to have an aversion to taking those opportunities. At the 112 00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 2: same time, we have some problems in some of the 113 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:23,800 Speaker 2: trade agreements that we have negotiated over the years, which 114 00:08:24,200 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 2: restrict us, for example, putting local content requirements on foreign investors. 115 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:33,960 Speaker 2: So if we look on our ports and we see 116 00:08:34,040 --> 00:08:39,080 Speaker 2: all of those logs being exported whole as opposed to 117 00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 2: being processed here, there are limitations on our ability to 118 00:08:45,640 --> 00:08:54,439 Speaker 2: require foreign forestry investors to process logs here for added 119 00:08:54,559 --> 00:08:59,440 Speaker 2: value as opposed to exporting whole. That's going to be 120 00:08:59,520 --> 00:09:03,680 Speaker 2: reinforce by the Overseas Investment Amendment that's currently before the 121 00:09:03,760 --> 00:09:08,480 Speaker 2: Select Committee, which is going to make it harder, for example, 122 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:12,520 Speaker 2: in relation to forestry investments, to set conditions such as 123 00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:16,959 Speaker 2: replanting and so on on on foreign investors in forestry. 124 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:23,679 Speaker 2: We need to think about how we can address those 125 00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:28,400 Speaker 2: kind of constraints and not add to them. And that's 126 00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:31,520 Speaker 2: again a conversation that there seems to be an aversion 127 00:09:31,640 --> 00:09:35,760 Speaker 2: to having, but it would make a really significant difference 128 00:09:36,559 --> 00:09:39,880 Speaker 2: to the value that we get from our natural resources. 129 00:09:40,080 --> 00:09:42,280 Speaker 1: The New Zealand economy is already a bit flat at 130 00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:46,040 Speaker 1: the moment right Unemployment hit five point two percent in 131 00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:49,800 Speaker 1: the Dune quarter and many economists are predicting a contraction 132 00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:55,720 Speaker 1: or slower growth in the next quarter. Will tariffs make 133 00:09:55,800 --> 00:09:59,679 Speaker 1: our recovery and the cost of living more of a struggle? 134 00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:05,400 Speaker 2: I don't think they'll make that much difference, frankly, and 135 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:09,599 Speaker 2: certainly know the difference between a ten percent and a 136 00:10:09,679 --> 00:10:15,640 Speaker 2: fifteen percent, which is what Australia, for example, has got 137 00:10:15,679 --> 00:10:18,840 Speaker 2: A ten percent is not going to make that much 138 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:25,839 Speaker 2: difference in the overall picture. Whether we can stop closing down, 139 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:28,960 Speaker 2: for example, the mills that we've had in Tocata and 140 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:32,240 Speaker 2: various other places, those are the things that are affecting 141 00:10:33,080 --> 00:10:39,400 Speaker 2: our job numbers and losing skilled people, good good working class, 142 00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:47,280 Speaker 2: well paying jobs, and losing our people off to Australia 143 00:10:46,360 --> 00:10:50,760 Speaker 2: those I think are going to have a more significant impact. 144 00:10:57,240 --> 00:11:01,520 Speaker 1: In terms of trump tarent tariffs and the tariff chat 145 00:11:01,679 --> 00:11:06,800 Speaker 1: and thinking about our overseas trading portfolio, I suppose how 146 00:11:06,880 --> 00:11:12,040 Speaker 1: might these tariffs influence New Zealand's trade diversification efforts with 147 00:11:12,200 --> 00:11:15,800 Speaker 1: other countries, not just China, but like the EU or 148 00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:17,560 Speaker 1: that Southeast Asian market. 149 00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:20,120 Speaker 2: I don't think it's going to have much impact it 150 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:25,079 Speaker 2: al I mean, there's a term called trade diversion, which 151 00:11:25,160 --> 00:11:28,840 Speaker 2: means that if you stop exporting so much to one 152 00:11:28,920 --> 00:11:36,400 Speaker 2: place because of tariffs, will you therefore start looking for 153 00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:42,040 Speaker 2: other markets. That's a positive part of trade diversion. Sometimes 154 00:11:43,320 --> 00:11:46,080 Speaker 2: it's used for more negative reasons. I don't think it's 155 00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:48,920 Speaker 2: going to have really that much impact it all. We've 156 00:11:48,960 --> 00:11:53,760 Speaker 2: seen already that, you know, the EU f TA, the 157 00:11:53,840 --> 00:11:56,040 Speaker 2: China f t A and so on are supposed to 158 00:11:56,080 --> 00:12:00,080 Speaker 2: have had really significant impacts, but it's very hard to 159 00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:03,480 Speaker 2: tell exactly what those have been as well. There's often 160 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:06,920 Speaker 2: real overstatements about what the effect of those agreements are. 161 00:12:07,640 --> 00:12:11,000 Speaker 2: And frankly, my concern about the tariffs is not all 162 00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:17,600 Speaker 2: of these supposed economic impacts, but what the non tariff 163 00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:22,439 Speaker 2: demands that Trump might make ah and what the effects 164 00:12:22,480 --> 00:12:27,440 Speaker 2: of those are going to be. And I think it's 165 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:34,160 Speaker 2: a mistake to view the Trump use of tariffs as 166 00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:40,600 Speaker 2: purely economic considerations. But even if we just look at 167 00:12:40,760 --> 00:12:47,439 Speaker 2: the tariff's issue with Trump, we've seen some very high 168 00:12:47,480 --> 00:12:54,480 Speaker 2: profile US economists saying, don't expect that this is ever 169 00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:58,360 Speaker 2: going to go back to the way it was, say, 170 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:04,720 Speaker 2: ten years ago. Yeah. So with tariffs, we've already seen 171 00:13:05,640 --> 00:13:12,640 Speaker 2: Trump one imposing tariffs which were not all reversed by Biden, 172 00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:18,920 Speaker 2: and the Trump two tariffs you can expect are not 173 00:13:19,080 --> 00:13:22,319 Speaker 2: going to be fully reversed either, even though they are 174 00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:27,800 Speaker 2: effectively unlawful in the World Trade Organization and breach various 175 00:13:27,800 --> 00:13:31,720 Speaker 2: of the US free trade agreements. So the notion that 176 00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:35,000 Speaker 2: you have a rules based system governed by the WTO 177 00:13:35,320 --> 00:13:39,839 Speaker 2: or by free trade agreements was being eroded over the 178 00:13:39,960 --> 00:13:44,280 Speaker 2: last decade by Obama and then by Trump, and then 179 00:13:44,400 --> 00:13:48,000 Speaker 2: by Biden, and again by Trump now saying Okay, I'm 180 00:13:48,040 --> 00:13:50,320 Speaker 2: just going to break the system. And so I've referred 181 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:52,840 Speaker 2: a couple of times to a wake up call. The 182 00:13:52,960 --> 00:13:56,680 Speaker 2: assumption that you can, okay, when Trump's gone, it'll all 183 00:13:56,720 --> 00:13:59,320 Speaker 2: go back to the way it was is nonsense. That's 184 00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:04,560 Speaker 2: not going to happen. Already, the World Trade Organization is 185 00:14:05,360 --> 00:14:07,520 Speaker 2: total and utter chaos. 186 00:14:08,080 --> 00:14:12,200 Speaker 1: And not just a WTOO, though I am hearing what 187 00:14:12,240 --> 00:14:16,160 Speaker 1: you're saying, and I'm thinking about the who. I'm thinking 188 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:19,360 Speaker 1: about the UN as well. It's just as it's this 189 00:14:19,480 --> 00:14:22,440 Speaker 1: chaotic kind of turn of events where you think things 190 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:27,520 Speaker 1: are happening, but what are these organizations for. Well, they're 191 00:14:27,560 --> 00:14:28,920 Speaker 1: to stop these things happening. 192 00:14:28,960 --> 00:14:31,520 Speaker 2: It's like, well, but they are, Yeah, but he's actually 193 00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:36,400 Speaker 2: played a different game with the WTO. He's withdrawn from 194 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:41,640 Speaker 2: those other ones, and he's effectively screwed their budgets. When 195 00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:45,200 Speaker 2: the US joined the WTO, the legislation required them to 196 00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:48,480 Speaker 2: do a review every five years, and they've just done 197 00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:54,239 Speaker 2: that review, and they have talked about the WTO basically 198 00:14:54,280 --> 00:14:58,920 Speaker 2: being broken, but they haven't talked about withdrawing. What they're 199 00:14:58,960 --> 00:15:03,200 Speaker 2: doing instead is demanding a whole lot of changes to 200 00:15:03,360 --> 00:15:07,160 Speaker 2: how the WTO operates without any commitment that they stay 201 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:10,160 Speaker 2: there or that they comply with the rules. So they 202 00:15:10,200 --> 00:15:14,680 Speaker 2: want no consensus based decisions anymore. They want changes to 203 00:15:15,480 --> 00:15:18,840 Speaker 2: special and differential treatment, especially for China, and so on. 204 00:15:19,280 --> 00:15:25,000 Speaker 2: Along the same lines. You may remember that Trump withdrew 205 00:15:25,040 --> 00:15:32,240 Speaker 2: from the TPPA or the CPTPP, and that the CPTPP 206 00:15:32,400 --> 00:15:37,280 Speaker 2: without the US, and then Biden, because those agreements are 207 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:43,160 Speaker 2: so unpopular in the US, started the Indo Pacific Economic 208 00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:48,320 Speaker 2: Framework IPF, which was also anti China. It's no longer 209 00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:54,440 Speaker 2: called ASHIAP Pacific, It's called Indo Pacific. But Trump didn't 210 00:15:54,560 --> 00:16:01,040 Speaker 2: like that either, and it's gone into abeyance. And so 211 00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:05,680 Speaker 2: what he's done instead is instead of trying to construct 212 00:16:05,840 --> 00:16:11,920 Speaker 2: new instruments, he's just gone for using US leverage in 213 00:16:11,960 --> 00:16:18,000 Speaker 2: this very raw sense, and not simply to isolate China, 214 00:16:18,760 --> 00:16:23,200 Speaker 2: and not simply to supposedly boost the domestic economy and 215 00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:28,000 Speaker 2: jobs in the US, but for the interests of some 216 00:16:28,080 --> 00:16:32,200 Speaker 2: of the companies, like the big tech companies. And in 217 00:16:32,240 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 2: the past when a number of countries have been trying 218 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:40,360 Speaker 2: to reign in big tech, to put taxes, digital services 219 00:16:40,440 --> 00:16:45,800 Speaker 2: taxes on or to constrain the monopolies that some of 220 00:16:45,840 --> 00:16:48,760 Speaker 2: the Google and the big search engines and so on have, 221 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:54,920 Speaker 2: and they've been putting these domestic rules in place. Obama 222 00:16:54,960 --> 00:17:01,320 Speaker 2: and Trump previously use domestic law in the US to 223 00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:05,600 Speaker 2: investigate and then put sanctions on them. Trump instead is 224 00:17:05,640 --> 00:17:08,960 Speaker 2: now not going through that ritual at all and is 225 00:17:09,080 --> 00:17:12,800 Speaker 2: just saying we'll slap these tariffs on you unless you 226 00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:18,119 Speaker 2: repeal those laws. And that's worked with Canada, it's worked 227 00:17:18,119 --> 00:17:21,560 Speaker 2: to some extent with the EU. The EU deal with Trump. 228 00:17:22,400 --> 00:17:25,800 Speaker 2: Trump says they've agreed to remove all of those The 229 00:17:25,800 --> 00:17:28,880 Speaker 2: EU has said no, we haven't. Trump has said yes, 230 00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:32,600 Speaker 2: But the negotiations aren't finished yet. And so it gives 231 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:33,720 Speaker 2: you a sense. 232 00:17:34,680 --> 00:17:37,400 Speaker 1: I can see, yeah, I can see why and how 233 00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:42,200 Speaker 1: he's using them as a tool to leverage things worldwide. Hey, 234 00:17:42,280 --> 00:17:45,080 Speaker 1: and that's something that a lot of political analysis have 235 00:17:45,680 --> 00:17:49,160 Speaker 1: pointed to as well. 236 00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:52,000 Speaker 4: MAGA leaders have quoted that Trump has won the trade 237 00:17:52,000 --> 00:17:55,560 Speaker 4: wars against the European Union, Japan, and South Korea. And 238 00:17:55,640 --> 00:17:59,480 Speaker 4: it's true that Donald Trump recognized that America has special 239 00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:02,720 Speaker 4: leverage against those countries because of the size of its 240 00:18:02,760 --> 00:18:06,680 Speaker 4: market as well as the security it provides to its allies. 241 00:18:07,359 --> 00:18:10,639 Speaker 4: So he used that geopolitical reality at a time of 242 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:16,240 Speaker 4: rising geopolitical threats to squeeze America's closest friends to force 243 00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:19,800 Speaker 4: them to make concessions. But to view these small gains 244 00:18:19,800 --> 00:18:25,040 Speaker 4: as great American victories misunderstands economics. No, one wins a 245 00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:25,680 Speaker 4: trade war. 246 00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:32,520 Speaker 1: Lastly, do you think the New Zealand government has its 247 00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:36,719 Speaker 1: trade priorities in check? Are they correct or is there 248 00:18:36,760 --> 00:18:37,879 Speaker 1: anything that they can do. 249 00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:39,640 Speaker 2: Next? 250 00:18:40,040 --> 00:18:42,480 Speaker 1: Is there is there a country that we should we 251 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:45,920 Speaker 1: should be trading with that we're not. I noticed that 252 00:18:46,000 --> 00:18:49,320 Speaker 1: we don't trade very much within many African nations. Is 253 00:18:49,359 --> 00:18:52,800 Speaker 1: it because they don't have what we want? I mean LOSTO. 254 00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:56,200 Speaker 1: I went down Alesto rabbit hole and I was like, right, 255 00:18:56,240 --> 00:18:59,160 Speaker 1: I will, I'll buy jeans from the Soto because they've 256 00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:05,119 Speaker 1: been absolutely devastated by these Trump tariffs. And is there 257 00:19:05,160 --> 00:19:07,840 Speaker 1: anywhere anywhere like that that we should be pointing our 258 00:19:07,840 --> 00:19:08,399 Speaker 1: attention to. 259 00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:13,320 Speaker 2: Unfortunately, we don't have a trade policy that's based on ethics, well, 260 00:19:13,359 --> 00:19:19,119 Speaker 2: that's based off support for development. We have a pretty 261 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 2: crude commitment to the old neoclassical model of we'll focus 262 00:19:27,520 --> 00:19:32,560 Speaker 2: on what we think we do best and seek export 263 00:19:32,680 --> 00:19:39,760 Speaker 2: markets for those, and we will do various deals in 264 00:19:41,520 --> 00:19:46,399 Speaker 2: free trade agreements or in the WTO that mean we 265 00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:49,240 Speaker 2: can export more of our stuff and we'll do a 266 00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:54,440 Speaker 2: trade off with you just around the terms of trade 267 00:19:54,119 --> 00:20:00,920 Speaker 2: of tariffs or or labeling or quarantine standards or services 268 00:20:00,960 --> 00:20:04,000 Speaker 2: and so on, and that's locked us into these supply chains, 269 00:20:05,200 --> 00:20:11,240 Speaker 2: where COVID showed us that supply chains are very vulnerable 270 00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:18,080 Speaker 2: and in particular, having dependence on particular sources make us 271 00:20:18,119 --> 00:20:24,840 Speaker 2: even more vulnerable. And yes, we could have an ethical 272 00:20:24,960 --> 00:20:30,000 Speaker 2: trade policy, but that would require us to do a rethink. 273 00:20:30,600 --> 00:20:33,960 Speaker 2: We could, as I said before, do more stuff here, 274 00:20:35,359 --> 00:20:38,639 Speaker 2: but that would require us to rethink our trade policy. 275 00:20:39,080 --> 00:20:44,080 Speaker 2: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the joint position 276 00:20:44,600 --> 00:20:49,800 Speaker 2: of the major parties for decades has been locked into 277 00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:54,879 Speaker 2: that model that is now clearly failing. But it is 278 00:20:55,280 --> 00:21:02,200 Speaker 2: very difficult to generate an alternative debate because the institutional 279 00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:08,320 Speaker 2: and political frameworks and much of the high value corporate 280 00:21:08,480 --> 00:21:13,760 Speaker 2: interests in New Zealand are so deeply embedded in that model. 281 00:21:14,359 --> 00:21:20,439 Speaker 1: Thank you for joining us, pleasure. That's it for this 282 00:21:20,560 --> 00:21:24,080 Speaker 1: episode of The Front Page. You can read more about 283 00:21:24,160 --> 00:21:28,639 Speaker 1: today's stories and extensive news coverage at enzidherld dot co 284 00:21:28,840 --> 00:21:32,680 Speaker 1: dot MZ. The Front Page is produced by Ethan Sills 285 00:21:32,760 --> 00:21:35,679 Speaker 1: and Richard Martin, who is also our editor. 286 00:21:36,160 --> 00:21:37,719 Speaker 2: I'm Chelsea Daniels. 287 00:21:38,119 --> 00:21:41,320 Speaker 1: Subscribe to the Front Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you 288 00:21:41,320 --> 00:21:44,960 Speaker 1: get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow for another look 289 00:21:45,080 --> 00:21:46,560 Speaker 1: behind the headlines.