WEBVTT - Episode 75: Warriors hooker Sam Healey on 11th hour call-up to face the Sharks

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:12.693
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from News Talks EDB. Follow

0:00:12.773 --> 0:00:18.533
<v Speaker 1>this and our Wide Ranger podcast now on iHeartRadio The

0:00:18.573 --> 0:00:22.613
<v Speaker 1>Big League Podcast, League Podcast Poet by News Talks EDB.

0:00:23.493 --> 0:00:26.893
<v Speaker 2>This week on The Big League Podcast, Warriors hooker Sam

0:00:26.973 --> 0:00:30.173
<v Speaker 2>Healey joins to discuss his eleventh hour caller for the

0:00:30.213 --> 0:00:33.333
<v Speaker 2>statement thumping of the Sharks, the continued rise of the

0:00:33.333 --> 0:00:36.693
<v Speaker 2>squad's youngsters, and how Wade Egan has helped take his

0:00:36.773 --> 0:00:39.773
<v Speaker 2>game to another level. Michael Burgas and I will analyze

0:00:39.773 --> 0:00:43.493
<v Speaker 2>what the Kronella victory means, discuss whether the Warriors have

0:00:43.613 --> 0:00:47.053
<v Speaker 2>the best junior cohort in the competition, and give the

0:00:47.093 --> 0:00:49.413
<v Speaker 2>side a roughly mid season report card.

0:00:49.773 --> 0:00:53.413
<v Speaker 3>My name is Nathan Limb. Let's go b LB.

0:00:54.253 --> 0:00:58.373
<v Speaker 2>Jacob Laban, Demitric Weimunger and Leka Hala Sema are the

0:00:58.453 --> 0:01:03.333
<v Speaker 2>strongest trio of youngsters in the NRRAL. All had outstanding

0:01:03.493 --> 0:01:06.973
<v Speaker 2>performances in what was really a shock forty to ten

0:01:07.173 --> 0:01:10.773
<v Speaker 2>pencing of the show in Crnella Vy among that with

0:01:11.173 --> 0:01:14.853
<v Speaker 2>premiere ball running defense, his distribution to put James Fisher

0:01:14.893 --> 0:01:17.693
<v Speaker 2>Harris in a hole for an easy try. Laban with

0:01:17.853 --> 0:01:20.893
<v Speaker 2>strong moments on both sides of the ball early in

0:01:20.933 --> 0:01:24.053
<v Speaker 2>the contest, and Halasima, for such a big bloke, is

0:01:24.133 --> 0:01:27.133
<v Speaker 2>proving to be a weapon in the year. When you

0:01:27.173 --> 0:01:30.653
<v Speaker 2>throw in Ali Latawa and Sam Heay, the Warriors aren't

0:01:30.693 --> 0:01:32.773
<v Speaker 2>just looking good for this year, They're looking good for

0:01:32.893 --> 0:01:37.773
<v Speaker 2>the next five. Michael Burgess, Senior New Zealand Herald ryder.

0:01:38.293 --> 0:01:41.653
<v Speaker 2>How much has that victory and the Warrior's next generation

0:01:41.933 --> 0:01:42.893
<v Speaker 2>of players.

0:01:42.533 --> 0:01:47.253
<v Speaker 4>Surprised you, Nathan, Yeah, two big questions. I mean that

0:01:47.253 --> 0:01:51.173
<v Speaker 4>that performance was remarkable. I think that's the thing is

0:01:52.693 --> 0:01:55.413
<v Speaker 4>every so often in the Warriors season you get a

0:01:55.413 --> 0:01:58.733
<v Speaker 4>performance that makes you sit up and go wow. The

0:01:58.813 --> 0:02:01.293
<v Speaker 4>thing is, we've already had a few performances this season

0:02:01.333 --> 0:02:03.453
<v Speaker 4>we were sat up and gone well, like some of

0:02:03.133 --> 0:02:06.893
<v Speaker 4>the close wins, the way they defended against the Cowboys

0:02:06.653 --> 0:02:11.333
<v Speaker 4>for what seemed like forever, and there's been I thought

0:02:11.613 --> 0:02:14.573
<v Speaker 4>the Dragons was an exceptional effort. There's already been a couple,

0:02:14.733 --> 0:02:18.173
<v Speaker 4>but this one, you're like, far out this team. They've

0:02:18.213 --> 0:02:21.893
<v Speaker 4>done this to what you call a heavyweight contender, you know,

0:02:22.013 --> 0:02:24.853
<v Speaker 4>and they didn't just beat them, they blew them away

0:02:25.733 --> 0:02:28.053
<v Speaker 4>at home. Quite a tough place to play. Not many

0:02:28.133 --> 0:02:31.253
<v Speaker 4>Kiwi fans, not many Warriors fans go to that part

0:02:31.253 --> 0:02:36.253
<v Speaker 4>of Sydney. You put all that together and you're thinking, well,

0:02:37.133 --> 0:02:40.093
<v Speaker 4>the question about where is this team going is now

0:02:40.293 --> 0:02:42.173
<v Speaker 4>more like how high?

0:02:42.653 --> 0:02:44.253
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean they enjoy it top of the

0:02:44.333 --> 0:02:47.293
<v Speaker 2>ladder again on twenty two points with the Raiders and

0:02:47.333 --> 0:02:49.613
<v Speaker 2>the Bulldogs. The Bulldogs at the time we're recording this

0:02:49.693 --> 0:02:51.653
<v Speaker 2>on the Mondays, the Bulldogs still have to play the

0:02:51.693 --> 0:02:54.093
<v Speaker 2>Eels tonight. Presumably they get the job done and go

0:02:54.133 --> 0:02:56.893
<v Speaker 2>to twenty four. But the Warriors, I mean, at this

0:02:56.933 --> 0:02:59.093
<v Speaker 2>point we're going into the buy now, but so guaranteed

0:02:59.733 --> 0:03:03.453
<v Speaker 2>two points. There's two elements to this and we will

0:03:03.493 --> 0:03:06.213
<v Speaker 2>go through all of it. It's the way in which

0:03:06.253 --> 0:03:09.653
<v Speaker 2>the Warriors played themselves. But also so I think everyone

0:03:09.773 --> 0:03:11.933
<v Speaker 2>was a bit shocked at how poorly the Sharks played

0:03:11.973 --> 0:03:14.173
<v Speaker 2>and the Roosters put forty points on them a couple

0:03:14.213 --> 0:03:16.453
<v Speaker 2>of weeks ago, and wasn't sure whether we read a

0:03:16.453 --> 0:03:18.013
<v Speaker 2>lot into that they were coming off the buy.

0:03:18.133 --> 0:03:20.893
<v Speaker 3>But for me, the Sharks, it was two things.

0:03:20.893 --> 0:03:24.453
<v Speaker 2>The Sharks were particularly disappointing, but the Warriors, I was

0:03:24.453 --> 0:03:27.013
<v Speaker 2>struggling to come up with criticisms and improvements.

0:03:28.213 --> 0:03:31.333
<v Speaker 4>You go through the Warriors team one to seventeen and

0:03:30.613 --> 0:03:33.893
<v Speaker 4>everyone had good moments. Everyone played well, which you know

0:03:34.013 --> 0:03:37.013
<v Speaker 4>doesn't always happen in the Ireland. The team Sport Cornell.

0:03:37.493 --> 0:03:39.813
<v Speaker 4>You're right, they've just lost their edge. They've lost their

0:03:39.853 --> 0:03:42.173
<v Speaker 4>edge slightly because it's the same Cranella team that beat

0:03:42.173 --> 0:03:44.933
<v Speaker 4>the Melbourne Storm earlier this season. To beat the Storm,

0:03:45.173 --> 0:03:47.613
<v Speaker 4>you've got to play well. They were really good in

0:03:47.693 --> 0:03:50.333
<v Speaker 4>round one against Benrith. They're still in their roster is

0:03:50.373 --> 0:03:53.973
<v Speaker 4>still pretty awesome, awesome forward pack. They've just lost something,

0:03:53.973 --> 0:03:57.813
<v Speaker 4>which happens. I think they'll probably get it back. I

0:03:57.853 --> 0:03:59.893
<v Speaker 4>don't think they were that poor. I thought they were

0:03:59.933 --> 0:04:03.173
<v Speaker 4>pretty good in the first half and on another night

0:04:03.213 --> 0:04:05.893
<v Speaker 4>there could have been ahead. That was the thing. They

0:04:06.013 --> 0:04:09.893
<v Speaker 4>certainly had more opportunities. But the Warrior's defense just so

0:04:09.893 --> 0:04:13.093
<v Speaker 4>so resilient at the moment. And to answer your early

0:04:13.213 --> 0:04:16.893
<v Speaker 4>question about the next generation, as they surprised me, yes,

0:04:17.333 --> 0:04:22.453
<v Speaker 4>because it's their consistency. Like I've seen a lot of

0:04:23.093 --> 0:04:25.413
<v Speaker 4>young players come and go in my time covering the Warriors,

0:04:25.453 --> 0:04:27.773
<v Speaker 4>and what normally happens is they'll come in, they have

0:04:27.813 --> 0:04:30.053
<v Speaker 4>a couple of good games, then they have a flat

0:04:30.053 --> 0:04:31.733
<v Speaker 4>period they have to go back to reserve grab then

0:04:31.773 --> 0:04:34.973
<v Speaker 4>they might come back. But the three guys you mentioned

0:04:35.573 --> 0:04:38.933
<v Speaker 4>have played I'm trying to think they've all played more

0:04:38.973 --> 0:04:41.253
<v Speaker 4>than ten games a season. HALLI seem has played a

0:04:41.293 --> 0:04:45.493
<v Speaker 4>lot more, and they've been pretty consistent every game. And

0:04:45.773 --> 0:04:48.333
<v Speaker 4>for guys nineteen twenty twenty one to be doing that

0:04:49.053 --> 0:04:51.893
<v Speaker 4>is remarkable. It's because it's partly because the team's going

0:04:51.893 --> 0:04:56.733
<v Speaker 4>so well, but it's been a fantastic surprise.

0:04:57.733 --> 0:05:00.773
<v Speaker 2>Now Warrior's coach Andrew Webster will hear from him just now.

0:05:00.973 --> 0:05:04.013
<v Speaker 2>He says the performance was needed in the absence of

0:05:04.253 --> 0:05:07.053
<v Speaker 2>injured co captain Mitch Barnett.

0:05:07.533 --> 0:05:11.293
<v Speaker 4>Not China the Army, but trying to just be better.

0:05:11.173 --> 0:05:14.533
<v Speaker 2>At what every player does and bring more dayboring. I

0:05:14.573 --> 0:05:16.693
<v Speaker 2>thought that, and I think that was the other thing

0:05:16.773 --> 0:05:19.533
<v Speaker 2>that I noticed about this one is that I kind

0:05:19.533 --> 0:05:22.493
<v Speaker 2>of forgot that we were missing the our front line

0:05:22.693 --> 0:05:25.573
<v Speaker 2>prop pretty much. That's how good the performance is. What

0:05:25.933 --> 0:05:29.133
<v Speaker 2>we're of our middle forwards. And you took about Labour

0:05:29.293 --> 0:05:32.693
<v Speaker 2>and Vaimonga, especially in the carriers that they had sort

0:05:32.733 --> 0:05:34.493
<v Speaker 2>of early in this game. It's not like I suppose

0:05:34.613 --> 0:05:36.213
<v Speaker 2>with these new players, it's not that they're just coming

0:05:36.213 --> 0:05:37.493
<v Speaker 2>on for a few minutes prior to a bit of

0:05:37.693 --> 0:05:40.573
<v Speaker 2>impact off the interchange. These players are starting, they're playing

0:05:40.613 --> 0:05:42.653
<v Speaker 2>big minutes, and they're carrying this team up the middle

0:05:42.653 --> 0:05:43.293
<v Speaker 2>of the park.

0:05:44.093 --> 0:05:47.813
<v Speaker 4>Making really big contributions in different ways. Like you said

0:05:47.853 --> 0:05:51.853
<v Speaker 4>in your intro, and we were missing the Warriors, missing

0:05:51.853 --> 0:05:54.613
<v Speaker 4>the most effective prop. I think you saw a bit

0:05:54.653 --> 0:05:56.893
<v Speaker 4>at the start though they were doing quite a few

0:05:56.933 --> 0:05:58.933
<v Speaker 4>early shifts. They were going a bit wider than normal.

0:05:59.333 --> 0:06:02.773
<v Speaker 4>That was on purpose, I think, to get away from

0:06:02.773 --> 0:06:04.333
<v Speaker 4>some of the collisions in the middle, because they know

0:06:04.373 --> 0:06:06.493
<v Speaker 4>how Crenell has got a big pack, so they didn't

0:06:06.533 --> 0:06:08.853
<v Speaker 4>just want to take them up the middle. Because it

0:06:08.933 --> 0:06:13.013
<v Speaker 4>is hard without Barnett. The test will be can they

0:06:13.093 --> 0:06:16.093
<v Speaker 4>keep doing that without him? Like in some ways you

0:06:16.213 --> 0:06:19.453
<v Speaker 4>respond the first time, but to keep doing it over

0:06:19.453 --> 0:06:23.013
<v Speaker 4>another eleven games, that's hard to be honest, mate. I

0:06:23.053 --> 0:06:26.253
<v Speaker 4>thought that Andrew Webster got it exactly right the way

0:06:26.293 --> 0:06:29.813
<v Speaker 4>he dealt with the Mitch Barnett situation, and that came

0:06:29.893 --> 0:06:32.173
<v Speaker 4>through to the performance because he didn't hide from it.

0:06:32.173 --> 0:06:33.973
<v Speaker 4>He said, this is a blow, this is this is

0:06:34.013 --> 0:06:37.213
<v Speaker 4>bloody terrible for Mitch. It's really tough for us, but

0:06:37.253 --> 0:06:39.373
<v Speaker 4>we've got to move on. But I really thought he

0:06:39.453 --> 0:06:41.413
<v Speaker 4>was good with the players the way he said to them,

0:06:41.893 --> 0:06:44.813
<v Speaker 4>you don't have to try and be Mitch Bunnett. You

0:06:44.893 --> 0:06:47.293
<v Speaker 4>just got to all be a bit better. And that's

0:06:47.333 --> 0:06:47.813
<v Speaker 4>what they did.

0:06:48.573 --> 0:06:50.573
<v Speaker 2>Now we're going to hear from Warrior's hook at Sam

0:06:50.653 --> 0:06:53.373
<v Speaker 2>Heay next, who was brought in at the eleventh hour

0:06:53.453 --> 0:06:56.493
<v Speaker 2>for the injured Wade Egan. But first here are the

0:06:56.573 --> 0:07:01.093
<v Speaker 2>highlights Warriors, forty Sharks, ten sharks of.

0:07:01.173 --> 0:07:04.893
<v Speaker 3>The hockey playing on all the.

0:07:08.373 --> 0:07:12.613
<v Speaker 5>Wake, sawret he reached the sky and pun't sit down.

0:07:13.013 --> 0:07:17.173
<v Speaker 5>Aristovada will Chip early saw himself up against Kennedy.

0:07:17.773 --> 0:07:18.893
<v Speaker 3>He uses it.

0:07:19.533 --> 0:07:23.413
<v Speaker 5>Turn it down by Adam Topic Trendle quick its hero

0:07:23.693 --> 0:07:24.653
<v Speaker 5>because I've got them.

0:07:25.453 --> 0:07:26.933
<v Speaker 3>It's Horreaddy who.

0:07:26.853 --> 0:07:30.693
<v Speaker 5>Points it down. They eventually filled me in your area

0:07:30.893 --> 0:07:35.453
<v Speaker 5>for there are shots everywhere in Rosto gram Trendle, Tevila,

0:07:36.173 --> 0:07:42.773
<v Speaker 5>He's goes get charging through and Fisher Harris he went

0:07:42.893 --> 0:07:48.813
<v Speaker 5>in untouched. What a piece of deception is mentalming and Lily.

0:07:48.653 --> 0:07:53.093
<v Speaker 4>Scoop dressed to say no longer kill a way.

0:07:53.493 --> 0:07:55.013
<v Speaker 3>He want use her in again.

0:07:55.533 --> 0:07:58.693
<v Speaker 4>Arrista Vita, I need to get the contest I.

0:07:58.893 --> 0:08:03.373
<v Speaker 3>Do and coming down with it is looker have the

0:08:03.613 --> 0:08:06.053
<v Speaker 3>same out Aristavada turns a.

0:08:06.133 --> 0:08:09.813
<v Speaker 4>Dun you and he just goes straight through the start.

0:08:09.573 --> 0:08:12.853
<v Speaker 5>The party, now you bas fans, Haris.

0:08:12.573 --> 0:08:13.693
<v Speaker 4>De Veta light.

0:08:15.333 --> 0:08:20.413
<v Speaker 5>Straight to Harris de Vita, nobody in front of him, Simnels, Harris.

0:08:20.053 --> 0:08:22.453
<v Speaker 3>Sta Veda rams a double deep.

0:08:22.893 --> 0:08:23.973
<v Speaker 4>In the second part.

0:08:24.493 --> 0:08:27.893
<v Speaker 3>Audio courtesy of Fox Sports The Big League Podcast.

0:08:28.973 --> 0:08:32.773
<v Speaker 2>Michael Burgess got a quick chat with Sam Healey following

0:08:32.893 --> 0:08:34.893
<v Speaker 2>the landmark victory over the Sharks.

0:08:35.013 --> 0:08:35.853
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a listen.

0:08:36.333 --> 0:08:39.173
<v Speaker 4>Why do you think things win so well? Tonight's the

0:08:39.213 --> 0:08:40.333
<v Speaker 4>team I think.

0:08:40.293 --> 0:08:42.693
<v Speaker 6>Just obviously putting off all we've been doing the last

0:08:43.053 --> 0:08:46.453
<v Speaker 6>couple of months is been pretty successful for us, and

0:08:46.933 --> 0:08:49.773
<v Speaker 6>having all those tight games and obviously coming through with

0:08:49.813 --> 0:08:52.733
<v Speaker 6>the Windsay, tonight, we just sort of stuck in it

0:08:52.853 --> 0:08:55.173
<v Speaker 6>and got some points, which was good.

0:08:56.133 --> 0:08:58.693
<v Speaker 4>Looked like a real sort of confidence about the team

0:08:58.733 --> 0:09:03.693
<v Speaker 4>from the start. And also intensity. Yeah, for sure, I

0:09:03.813 --> 0:09:04.893
<v Speaker 4>were ready to go to this game.

0:09:04.973 --> 0:09:06.493
<v Speaker 6>I think when you can are going to turn on

0:09:06.613 --> 0:09:08.813
<v Speaker 6>to play and I'm out to We had to bring

0:09:08.893 --> 0:09:11.733
<v Speaker 6>our bring our best, so we had to start with

0:09:11.813 --> 0:09:12.413
<v Speaker 6>that intensity.

0:09:12.453 --> 0:09:14.773
<v Speaker 4>I think we did that. And what about you? How

0:09:14.853 --> 0:09:16.773
<v Speaker 4>were you feeling running out there? How are you feeling

0:09:16.773 --> 0:09:17.613
<v Speaker 4>at the start of the game.

0:09:18.893 --> 0:09:22.493
<v Speaker 6>It's a bit weird, to be honest, run out different colors.

0:09:23.333 --> 0:09:25.773
<v Speaker 6>Obviously played a lot at Shuck Park in the juniors

0:09:25.773 --> 0:09:28.533
<v Speaker 6>and stuff for Corna. But it was good, mate, It

0:09:28.573 --> 0:09:30.573
<v Speaker 6>was good to be able to run out of here

0:09:30.613 --> 0:09:31.373
<v Speaker 6>and get the win.

0:09:32.613 --> 0:09:34.933
<v Speaker 4>Can you just tell us about your day today, Sam,

0:09:35.053 --> 0:09:39.293
<v Speaker 4>how it's sort of unfolded? And also when you actually

0:09:40.293 --> 0:09:41.853
<v Speaker 4>found out you were going to play? I understand this

0:09:41.933 --> 0:09:43.613
<v Speaker 4>morning you were thinking still in yourself, for I was

0:09:43.613 --> 0:09:45.013
<v Speaker 4>cup can you so, can you just tell us about

0:09:45.013 --> 0:09:45.333
<v Speaker 4>your day?

0:09:46.293 --> 0:09:49.213
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? I found out about probably I don't know, maybe

0:09:49.333 --> 0:09:52.053
<v Speaker 6>ten eleven o'clock where he pulled me aside and said

0:09:52.413 --> 0:09:55.413
<v Speaker 6>there's a chance, and I said, oh right, I didn't

0:09:55.413 --> 0:09:58.013
<v Speaker 6>really know. And then about twenty minutes later I looked

0:09:58.013 --> 0:09:59.613
<v Speaker 6>at waiter and he didn't He didn't look too good,

0:09:59.653 --> 0:10:03.813
<v Speaker 6>so I thought, yeah, yeah, I'm probably hon here. So yeah,

0:10:03.853 --> 0:10:06.973
<v Speaker 6>that was when I sort of come to the realization

0:10:07.053 --> 0:10:08.293
<v Speaker 6>I was playing so to get light around it.

0:10:08.493 --> 0:10:11.133
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I was all right. So you woke up

0:10:11.173 --> 0:10:13.093
<v Speaker 4>this morning thinking about yourself? I was cut. I mean,

0:10:13.213 --> 0:10:13.933
<v Speaker 4>how hard was it?

0:10:14.573 --> 0:10:14.733
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:10:14.773 --> 0:10:16.533
<v Speaker 4>How did you get your hit around it? The fact

0:10:16.573 --> 0:10:18.493
<v Speaker 4>that you were playing on such a big occasion.

0:10:20.373 --> 0:10:22.253
<v Speaker 6>No, I think it's all like wheb, you just sort

0:10:22.293 --> 0:10:24.373
<v Speaker 6>of spoke to me and Wade, I spoke to me,

0:10:24.613 --> 0:10:29.373
<v Speaker 6>but sort of just simplifying my role and just backing

0:10:29.413 --> 0:10:31.653
<v Speaker 6>myself and having confidence that I can do the job.

0:10:31.693 --> 0:10:35.253
<v Speaker 6>Which if they have the confidence in me, that's that's

0:10:35.373 --> 0:10:37.973
<v Speaker 6>enough for me. So yeah, I felt I felt pretty

0:10:37.973 --> 0:10:39.773
<v Speaker 6>good to guy out there and then I could do it.

0:10:39.853 --> 0:10:43.253
<v Speaker 4>Bob. What does it mean to you to have your

0:10:43.293 --> 0:10:46.733
<v Speaker 4>first start back at Cornella and to be part of

0:10:46.773 --> 0:10:47.813
<v Speaker 4>a team performance like that.

0:10:49.533 --> 0:10:53.213
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Mane, it's pretty special. Obviously growing up on the

0:10:53.253 --> 0:10:57.413
<v Speaker 6>hill down are at Cornella and been there. Oh I

0:10:57.573 --> 0:11:00.813
<v Speaker 6>knows how many shark scenes, and obviously man playing here

0:11:01.733 --> 0:11:04.333
<v Speaker 6>and I have a pretty successful career down here at Carnella.

0:11:04.733 --> 0:11:06.893
<v Speaker 6>It's pretty cool to come back and get the win,

0:11:08.373 --> 0:11:10.093
<v Speaker 6>a family and friends on the health so it's good.

0:11:11.053 --> 0:11:13.333
<v Speaker 4>Is there a bit of mixed emotions though with effect

0:11:13.773 --> 0:11:15.853
<v Speaker 4>how much the sharks have meant to your family and

0:11:15.973 --> 0:11:19.733
<v Speaker 4>especially to your father, No, I don't think so.

0:11:19.933 --> 0:11:22.973
<v Speaker 6>Look, that's that's sort of I've sort of moved on

0:11:23.093 --> 0:11:26.893
<v Speaker 6>from that, and I'm worried now. So now I'm just

0:11:27.373 --> 0:11:28.893
<v Speaker 6>really happy to be part of the group. That we're

0:11:28.933 --> 0:11:32.413
<v Speaker 6>in and that we're charging their own so that's good.

0:11:33.333 --> 0:11:35.773
<v Speaker 4>Can just tell us Sam about your decision to come

0:11:36.093 --> 0:11:39.333
<v Speaker 4>to Auckland, how it sort of came about and how

0:11:39.453 --> 0:11:41.013
<v Speaker 4>the decision process was for you.

0:11:42.733 --> 0:11:46.493
<v Speaker 6>It's just an opportunity to play roll. And obviously where

0:11:46.573 --> 0:11:48.613
<v Speaker 6>he spoke to Webby, my early tap with him is

0:11:49.133 --> 0:11:52.493
<v Speaker 6>really positive and he sort of like spoke to me

0:11:52.533 --> 0:11:54.453
<v Speaker 6>in a really positive way and that he believed in

0:11:54.573 --> 0:11:58.213
<v Speaker 6>me and he thought I could I could genuinely, genuinely

0:11:58.333 --> 0:12:00.653
<v Speaker 6>be at a number nine in the NRL and that's

0:12:00.693 --> 0:12:03.893
<v Speaker 6>all I needed. Someone to believe in men have confidence

0:12:03.933 --> 0:12:06.493
<v Speaker 6>in me, and that was enough for me to come

0:12:06.573 --> 0:12:08.253
<v Speaker 6>over and have the opportunity to play in an role.

0:12:08.453 --> 0:12:09.253
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was not for me.

0:12:10.493 --> 0:12:12.693
<v Speaker 4>And what was the process like of sort of joining

0:12:12.733 --> 0:12:16.333
<v Speaker 4>the club and getting i don't know, getting amongst the

0:12:16.413 --> 0:12:19.773
<v Speaker 4>group and proving yourself and fitting in and all that

0:12:19.853 --> 0:12:20.293
<v Speaker 4>sort of thing.

0:12:22.333 --> 0:12:25.893
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it was a bit difficult obviously, first time living

0:12:25.933 --> 0:12:28.573
<v Speaker 6>out at home and got on a one way plot

0:12:28.653 --> 0:12:32.293
<v Speaker 6>of New Zealand, which was pretty daunting. Walking into the

0:12:32.373 --> 0:12:35.093
<v Speaker 6>shed that first day was it was like nothing I'd

0:12:35.093 --> 0:12:37.933
<v Speaker 6>ever done before. But for me, I needed to test

0:12:37.973 --> 0:12:40.413
<v Speaker 6>myself and get out of my comfort zone and I

0:12:40.493 --> 0:12:42.533
<v Speaker 6>think I've grown a lot from it, so yeah, it's

0:12:42.533 --> 0:12:43.173
<v Speaker 6>super positive.

0:12:43.813 --> 0:12:46.853
<v Speaker 4>And how is how was life in Auckland, you know,

0:12:47.133 --> 0:12:50.053
<v Speaker 4>away from footy? How's life been for you in Auckland? No,

0:12:50.213 --> 0:12:50.613
<v Speaker 4>it's good.

0:12:51.733 --> 0:12:54.453
<v Speaker 6>Obviously, got got a house and that I lived with

0:12:54.533 --> 0:12:57.693
<v Speaker 6>a couple of boys that I played with, so it's good.

0:12:58.973 --> 0:13:00.333
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, good to have a couple.

0:13:00.173 --> 0:13:03.213
<v Speaker 6>Of mates there and obviously building connections within the group,

0:13:03.293 --> 0:13:05.693
<v Speaker 6>and it's just really good to be in a training

0:13:06.173 --> 0:13:07.613
<v Speaker 6>with how well the squad's.

0:13:07.253 --> 0:13:10.493
<v Speaker 4>Doing and everything? Yeah, yeah, who are you flirting with?

0:13:12.093 --> 0:13:15.733
<v Speaker 6>Tadastell Smith's I live with him and a couple of the.

0:13:15.813 --> 0:13:19.533
<v Speaker 4>Cup boys, so oh cool. Well that's so. How's that?

0:13:20.333 --> 0:13:24.773
<v Speaker 4>How's that household? It must be an interesting place to be. No,

0:13:24.933 --> 0:13:25.293
<v Speaker 4>it's good.

0:13:25.333 --> 0:13:28.653
<v Speaker 6>It's it's a bit frantic at dinner time when everyone's

0:13:28.653 --> 0:13:32.853
<v Speaker 6>cooking their separate meals in the kitchen, but it's good.

0:13:32.893 --> 0:13:36.213
<v Speaker 6>It's good fun having people around, and obviously being my

0:13:36.333 --> 0:13:38.653
<v Speaker 6>first time out of home, it's good to have people

0:13:38.693 --> 0:13:39.533
<v Speaker 6>around and everything.

0:13:39.613 --> 0:13:41.453
<v Speaker 4>With my missus and that living back in a show.

0:13:41.533 --> 0:13:44.733
<v Speaker 6>Hopefully she'll join me over there soon. So no, it's

0:13:44.773 --> 0:13:47.133
<v Speaker 6>good to have people around it. I've become quite close

0:13:47.173 --> 0:13:48.853
<v Speaker 6>with those boys, So it's good.

0:13:49.133 --> 0:13:51.373
<v Speaker 4>And just a couple more Sam's that's okay. What's the

0:13:51.653 --> 0:13:53.893
<v Speaker 4>big on the team with so many so many other

0:13:53.973 --> 0:13:56.653
<v Speaker 4>young guys or being in a general environment with so

0:13:56.733 --> 0:13:59.973
<v Speaker 4>many young guys that are also ambitious and doing well.

0:14:02.213 --> 0:14:02.733
<v Speaker 3>No, it's good.

0:14:02.773 --> 0:14:05.973
<v Speaker 6>I think all the older boys and the coaching staff

0:14:06.013 --> 0:14:08.533
<v Speaker 6>has sort of given us the confidence to that we

0:14:08.573 --> 0:14:10.613
<v Speaker 6>can do a job and we can sort of thrive

0:14:10.693 --> 0:14:13.813
<v Speaker 6>in this environment. And we've got a lot of good

0:14:13.893 --> 0:14:18.453
<v Speaker 6>leaders like Fish and Capes and as guys have been there,

0:14:18.533 --> 0:14:22.013
<v Speaker 6>done it and can sort of lead the way and

0:14:22.093 --> 0:14:23.013
<v Speaker 6>say boys come with us.

0:14:23.093 --> 0:14:25.053
<v Speaker 4>So no, it's good. It's good.

0:14:25.093 --> 0:14:27.813
<v Speaker 6>And a lot of a lot of naturally talented.

0:14:27.973 --> 0:14:29.013
<v Speaker 4>Kiwi boys over here.

0:14:29.213 --> 0:14:32.493
<v Speaker 6>And I'd love to see where they're atting five to

0:14:32.533 --> 0:14:35.733
<v Speaker 6>six years times, because where they're at at the moment

0:14:35.813 --> 0:14:38.493
<v Speaker 6>and where they could be is just it's pretty insane.

0:14:39.373 --> 0:14:41.493
<v Speaker 4>And what have you learned off Wade Egan from watching

0:14:41.573 --> 0:14:44.133
<v Speaker 4>him at training? And I imagine you know, talking to

0:14:44.213 --> 0:14:46.693
<v Speaker 4>him when you can about dummy half play, about being

0:14:46.733 --> 0:14:47.333
<v Speaker 4>a number nine.

0:14:49.173 --> 0:14:51.813
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I spent a spent a fair bit of time

0:14:52.053 --> 0:14:54.893
<v Speaker 6>with Waiter, even just listen to him in meetings and

0:14:54.933 --> 0:14:56.813
<v Speaker 6>stuff like that, the way he thinks around the game,

0:14:56.893 --> 0:15:00.853
<v Speaker 6>and just watching him at training and watching clips and everything,

0:15:00.933 --> 0:15:03.613
<v Speaker 6>and just trying to pick up little things that he

0:15:03.733 --> 0:15:06.613
<v Speaker 6>does and ask him questions here and there, and it's

0:15:06.693 --> 0:15:10.453
<v Speaker 6>definitely definitely broke my game forward. I think if I like,

0:15:10.533 --> 0:15:12.533
<v Speaker 6>if I look at myself twelve months ago to where

0:15:12.573 --> 0:15:14.493
<v Speaker 6>I am now, I'm a completely different player. So and

0:15:15.333 --> 0:15:17.613
<v Speaker 6>I definitely credit some of that to him in the

0:15:17.653 --> 0:15:21.093
<v Speaker 6>way that he's sort of the influence he's had on me.

0:15:21.253 --> 0:15:27.933
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, this is the Big League Podcast. This is

0:15:28.173 --> 0:15:32.413
<v Speaker 1>going Yeah, the Big League Podcast on the Warriors Bandwagons.

0:15:32.493 --> 0:15:33.213
<v Speaker 1>It's day one.

0:15:33.533 --> 0:15:36.173
<v Speaker 2>Fantastic to hear from Sam Healley for the first time

0:15:36.253 --> 0:15:38.693
<v Speaker 2>on the Big League Podcast. Burge.

0:15:39.093 --> 0:15:41.213
<v Speaker 3>It was cool hearing about his flatting situation as well.

0:15:41.733 --> 0:15:44.613
<v Speaker 4>I love that you just the scenes of the four

0:15:44.653 --> 0:15:47.253
<v Speaker 4>of them, four forty players in the kitchen are all

0:15:47.293 --> 0:15:49.653
<v Speaker 4>pretty young, probably haven't had much time at a home,

0:15:50.493 --> 0:15:53.973
<v Speaker 4>and you just imagine the big servings that have been

0:15:54.013 --> 0:15:56.973
<v Speaker 4>put together and the fuel they need and the coordination

0:15:57.093 --> 0:15:59.733
<v Speaker 4>around the kitchen. But it must be so cool as

0:15:59.733 --> 0:16:03.533
<v Speaker 4>an athlete flating with other athletes because everyone gets it.

0:16:04.333 --> 0:16:06.493
<v Speaker 4>Compared to imagine if he was with three other punters,

0:16:06.693 --> 0:16:09.493
<v Speaker 4>you know, or three your because they're about that age,

0:16:09.533 --> 0:16:11.453
<v Speaker 4>that'll be what's wrong with my mate? It'll be a

0:16:11.493 --> 0:16:14.453
<v Speaker 4>friggin disaster. I don't know what you're trying to say,

0:16:14.493 --> 0:16:18.933
<v Speaker 4>but I did. The other thing that that caught my

0:16:18.933 --> 0:16:20.613
<v Speaker 4>attention to the interview was the way he said that

0:16:21.093 --> 0:16:23.173
<v Speaker 4>you know, he jumped in a one way flight to

0:16:23.293 --> 0:16:26.293
<v Speaker 4>come here, pretty apprehensive because and he walks into the

0:16:26.533 --> 0:16:28.813
<v Speaker 4>sheds the first day and he's like, jeez, what this

0:16:29.013 --> 0:16:30.573
<v Speaker 4>is so different to where I've been. I was so

0:16:30.773 --> 0:16:33.573
<v Speaker 4>in my comfort zone. Good on him, he's just taking

0:16:33.653 --> 0:16:35.893
<v Speaker 4>that big step. He looks like a really good player.

0:16:35.933 --> 0:16:37.933
<v Speaker 4>I mean to do what he did in just his

0:16:38.093 --> 0:16:41.053
<v Speaker 4>second game in the NRL. Come in for Egan only

0:16:41.093 --> 0:16:43.133
<v Speaker 4>found out I matched their morning, comes in and plays

0:16:43.213 --> 0:16:45.933
<v Speaker 4>like that against against his former club where his dad's

0:16:45.973 --> 0:16:46.373
<v Speaker 4>a legend.

0:16:47.013 --> 0:16:49.533
<v Speaker 2>It's just amazing, mate. You're right, it would be a

0:16:49.573 --> 0:16:51.653
<v Speaker 2>disaster if they were was my mates. Let's go through

0:16:51.733 --> 0:16:54.333
<v Speaker 2>this game in a little bit more detail. Firstly, our

0:16:54.373 --> 0:16:56.973
<v Speaker 2>webster's detailed what he's most proud of.

0:16:57.093 --> 0:16:57.933
<v Speaker 3>It won't surprise you.

0:16:58.173 --> 0:17:00.573
<v Speaker 4>Definitely have a bench like even right to the end

0:17:00.613 --> 0:17:03.093
<v Speaker 4>there when he knew and had a game where would

0:17:03.133 --> 0:17:05.413
<v Speaker 4>just turn it up for each other. Fine in a way, scrambling.

0:17:05.733 --> 0:17:09.253
<v Speaker 2>Let's go through another player who's performance I thought was

0:17:09.373 --> 0:17:11.893
<v Speaker 2>just out of this world. Best of the season, Chanelle

0:17:11.973 --> 0:17:16.533
<v Speaker 2>Harris Tavita was outstanding. We talk a lot about Luke Metcalf,

0:17:16.613 --> 0:17:19.893
<v Speaker 2>but for me, Cht has flown under the radar.

0:17:20.013 --> 0:17:20.613
<v Speaker 3>Two tries.

0:17:21.293 --> 0:17:24.013
<v Speaker 2>I think he's kicking generally it's better than Metcals gets

0:17:24.053 --> 0:17:26.533
<v Speaker 2>a lot higher on those bombs. His distribution and his

0:17:26.613 --> 0:17:28.893
<v Speaker 2>ball running. He just picks his moments really really well.

0:17:29.413 --> 0:17:32.213
<v Speaker 2>Not to mention those one off hats. He made twenty

0:17:32.253 --> 0:17:35.133
<v Speaker 2>three tackles in that game. Booge great defender.

0:17:35.333 --> 0:17:38.213
<v Speaker 4>I mean when you think of Chanell and you talk

0:17:38.293 --> 0:17:41.213
<v Speaker 4>to people at the Warriors about him, the first thing

0:17:41.253 --> 0:17:44.773
<v Speaker 4>they'll say is he's a competitor. He just competes on everything.

0:17:44.813 --> 0:17:48.333
<v Speaker 4>He's the guy sliding on the loose ball. He's the

0:17:48.413 --> 0:17:51.733
<v Speaker 4>guy making the big tackle or the tackle these he made.

0:17:52.013 --> 0:17:54.053
<v Speaker 4>He's the guy competing for the bomb, getting the tap

0:17:54.133 --> 0:17:56.373
<v Speaker 4>back they score, So he does the one percent. Doesn't

0:17:56.373 --> 0:18:00.093
<v Speaker 4>always get noticed other for other things, which means, yeah,

0:18:00.333 --> 0:18:03.653
<v Speaker 4>I guess he's got a there's mixed feelings about him

0:18:03.653 --> 0:18:07.133
<v Speaker 4>sometimes among the fans, but he's doing a great job

0:18:07.213 --> 0:18:10.013
<v Speaker 4>and people forget he came back after a year off

0:18:10.613 --> 0:18:12.213
<v Speaker 4>and it was always going to be a struggle, and

0:18:12.253 --> 0:18:15.293
<v Speaker 4>then he was in a struggling team. So very happy

0:18:15.373 --> 0:18:17.653
<v Speaker 4>for him the way things are working out. I'm not

0:18:17.693 --> 0:18:19.213
<v Speaker 4>sure if he's a better kick of the metcalf, but

0:18:19.293 --> 0:18:21.693
<v Speaker 4>I take your point. He's becoming very good at just

0:18:23.173 --> 0:18:25.773
<v Speaker 4>placing it in the corner with those little what would

0:18:25.773 --> 0:18:30.253
<v Speaker 4>you call them, little sort of mini bombs, somewhere between

0:18:30.293 --> 0:18:32.173
<v Speaker 4>a bomb and a chip, the mini bombs, Yeah, the

0:18:32.253 --> 0:18:34.533
<v Speaker 4>many Nathan Limb kind of ones used to try and

0:18:34.613 --> 0:18:38.853
<v Speaker 4>do it how at college. Absolutely not domitic Vai Manger,

0:18:38.853 --> 0:18:40.893
<v Speaker 4>who we mentioned briefly at the start, But for me,

0:18:41.013 --> 0:18:44.973
<v Speaker 4>that's easily his best performance of the season.

0:18:45.853 --> 0:18:49.533
<v Speaker 3>Notice how I pronounce v Manger, not Vay Mayenger. I

0:18:49.653 --> 0:18:51.173
<v Speaker 3>don't know how it's so different.

0:18:51.293 --> 0:18:56.453
<v Speaker 2>Vi Manger, his defense, his ball running, his distribution, especially

0:18:56.493 --> 0:18:58.533
<v Speaker 2>to James Brusher Harris, that tray he just went in

0:18:58.813 --> 0:19:01.693
<v Speaker 2>untouched and it was sort of touched on the deception

0:19:02.053 --> 0:19:02.973
<v Speaker 2>that he's brought as well.

0:19:04.173 --> 0:19:06.293
<v Speaker 4>The reception was amazing and it was great to have

0:19:06.373 --> 0:19:09.053
<v Speaker 4>the Australian commentators who you're right with his name, but

0:19:09.093 --> 0:19:12.533
<v Speaker 4>it was it was fantastic the way they just were

0:19:12.573 --> 0:19:14.613
<v Speaker 4>blown away by that pass because it was it was

0:19:14.653 --> 0:19:16.453
<v Speaker 4>a magical pass. It was one of those passes where

0:19:16.493 --> 0:19:19.373
<v Speaker 4>the cameramany was missed it. You know, how did that happen?

0:19:20.813 --> 0:19:23.453
<v Speaker 4>But he was actually really good the week before too,

0:19:23.533 --> 0:19:27.293
<v Speaker 4>if I remember, like he had two or three really

0:19:27.373 --> 0:19:31.213
<v Speaker 4>critical offloads last week. And I think that's always a

0:19:31.213 --> 0:19:33.133
<v Speaker 4>great sign for a young player to have the confidence

0:19:33.373 --> 0:19:36.613
<v Speaker 4>to go for offloads, because you know what happens, mate,

0:19:36.653 --> 0:19:39.573
<v Speaker 4>if he goes for an offload, someone drops it and

0:19:39.653 --> 0:19:41.413
<v Speaker 4>they're forty minutes out, they give the ball up and

0:19:41.493 --> 0:19:43.453
<v Speaker 4>da da da. Who's going to go and and go

0:19:43.533 --> 0:19:46.413
<v Speaker 4>on about it? We are fans are he's made a mistake.

0:19:46.453 --> 0:19:48.533
<v Speaker 4>What's he doing that? So he's confidence to have the offloads,

0:19:48.533 --> 0:19:51.213
<v Speaker 4>he's so strong to do it. And yeah, I mean

0:19:51.453 --> 0:19:54.573
<v Speaker 4>you'd say, like Hellia seem has probably got more of

0:19:54.813 --> 0:19:59.333
<v Speaker 4>the attention so far, which is fair enough, but this guy,

0:19:59.493 --> 0:20:03.773
<v Speaker 4>he's some player just all round, all round, plus seems

0:20:03.853 --> 0:20:05.293
<v Speaker 4>like a real good hit on his shoulders.

0:20:05.613 --> 0:20:08.813
<v Speaker 2>We talked about Charles Nickel Cook starting Roger to Varsi

0:20:08.893 --> 0:20:12.493
<v Speaker 2>sheck last week in terms of their contributions, but I'm

0:20:12.533 --> 0:20:14.693
<v Speaker 2>going to bring them up again because they deserve it.

0:20:14.933 --> 0:20:18.733
<v Speaker 2>Chance with his try saving tackles but also topping the

0:20:18.813 --> 0:20:21.093
<v Speaker 2>running meters again with two hundred and forty two from

0:20:21.133 --> 0:20:26.293
<v Speaker 2>twenty one runs, sixty nine post contact meters, six tackle breaks.

0:20:26.373 --> 0:20:29.333
<v Speaker 2>Roger to Varsask with two hundred meters from twenty two runs,

0:20:29.413 --> 0:20:33.413
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven post contact meters, five tackle breaks. The amount

0:20:33.453 --> 0:20:36.933
<v Speaker 2>of work that those two get through it helps them

0:20:36.973 --> 0:20:39.613
<v Speaker 2>middle so much because they're taking on such a volume

0:20:39.693 --> 0:20:41.693
<v Speaker 2>of the work they are.

0:20:41.973 --> 0:20:43.613
<v Speaker 4>I mean that was the issue with the with the

0:20:43.733 --> 0:20:46.893
<v Speaker 4>Raiders defeating against the Raiders in Auckland. Was the Raiders

0:20:46.973 --> 0:20:51.173
<v Speaker 4>back five just dominated or outplayed the Warriors back five

0:20:51.573 --> 0:20:54.773
<v Speaker 4>and it all sort of snowballs from there. Roger, I

0:20:54.853 --> 0:20:57.053
<v Speaker 4>think we talked about this last week, Nath but he's

0:20:57.093 --> 0:21:01.093
<v Speaker 4>found his place. Good decision by Webster. Webs Will probably

0:21:01.093 --> 0:21:02.733
<v Speaker 4>mad he made a mistake last year having him center.

0:21:03.013 --> 0:21:05.293
<v Speaker 4>He's found his place on the wing. The exciting thing

0:21:05.373 --> 0:21:06.733
<v Speaker 4>is I think he's going to get better and better

0:21:06.813 --> 0:21:09.133
<v Speaker 4>there because he's still getting used to be there. And

0:21:09.333 --> 0:21:11.893
<v Speaker 4>Chance it just looks like he's got a spring in

0:21:11.933 --> 0:21:15.133
<v Speaker 4>a step, bay like, he looks like he's moving a

0:21:15.173 --> 0:21:17.973
<v Speaker 4>bit faster. He's got all this energy. I think he's

0:21:18.013 --> 0:21:20.213
<v Speaker 4>in a really good place mentally. It must help when

0:21:20.253 --> 0:21:25.693
<v Speaker 4>the team is going forward, obviously, but I think he

0:21:25.813 --> 0:21:27.493
<v Speaker 4>might be coming into some of that form we saw

0:21:27.533 --> 0:21:28.133
<v Speaker 4>in twenty three.

0:21:28.973 --> 0:21:30.813
<v Speaker 2>Now, if we look at the game as a whole,

0:21:30.893 --> 0:21:32.813
<v Speaker 2>you said, obviously, especially in the first half, you didn't

0:21:32.813 --> 0:21:36.773
<v Speaker 2>think the Sharks were that poor in terms of the defense.

0:21:36.853 --> 0:21:38.613
<v Speaker 2>I thought a couple of times Nicko Hines put in

0:21:38.853 --> 0:21:41.893
<v Speaker 2>a couple of questionable cacks that just about went straight up.

0:21:42.493 --> 0:21:44.493
<v Speaker 2>I thought their defense was a little bit lacking in

0:21:44.533 --> 0:21:47.413
<v Speaker 2>the second half. The Warriors, though, in terms of the

0:21:47.533 --> 0:21:50.533
<v Speaker 2>flow of their game, they're scoring first. For the seventh

0:21:50.693 --> 0:21:55.613
<v Speaker 2>consecutive game, they've scored the first try, and the complaint,

0:21:55.693 --> 0:21:58.213
<v Speaker 2>obviously in the last few weeks, has been they get

0:21:58.253 --> 0:22:00.293
<v Speaker 2>to the second half, they're head by streets and they

0:22:00.373 --> 0:22:02.933
<v Speaker 2>go to sleep and let the other side back into it.

0:22:03.133 --> 0:22:05.933
<v Speaker 2>The most pleasing part of this performance was the fact

0:22:05.933 --> 0:22:07.853
<v Speaker 2>that when they were up by streets in the second half,

0:22:08.453 --> 0:22:10.493
<v Speaker 2>kept the foot on the throat of Cronella.

0:22:11.093 --> 0:22:13.973
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, you're anticipating in Krenella comeback. You know

0:22:14.013 --> 0:22:15.933
<v Speaker 4>they're a good team. You thought there'd be a response.

0:22:16.053 --> 0:22:19.973
<v Speaker 4>But the Warriors kept throwing punches, which, as you say,

0:22:20.133 --> 0:22:22.533
<v Speaker 4>was very pleasing because you have seen sometimes in the

0:22:22.573 --> 0:22:24.333
<v Speaker 4>past they'll get a lead and then they'll get a

0:22:24.373 --> 0:22:28.293
<v Speaker 4>bit conservative kick to a corner, but just a safe carecule.

0:22:28.373 --> 0:22:30.973
<v Speaker 4>They die with the ball fifteen meters out, fifth tackle,

0:22:31.813 --> 0:22:34.293
<v Speaker 4>just for territory, whereas here they were going for it,

0:22:34.413 --> 0:22:36.253
<v Speaker 4>which is how some of those tries come out. I

0:22:36.333 --> 0:22:39.213
<v Speaker 4>mean that the Lecqua Halle seemed try for me was

0:22:39.213 --> 0:22:42.293
<v Speaker 4>the one where just the way he stormed onto that

0:22:42.813 --> 0:22:45.133
<v Speaker 4>bomb chip, it was probably a bit too far, but

0:22:45.253 --> 0:22:47.693
<v Speaker 4>he makes it, bashes the defender of the way puts

0:22:47.733 --> 0:22:50.093
<v Speaker 4>it down. That was a moment where you're like, Okay,

0:22:50.773 --> 0:22:53.093
<v Speaker 4>this team has arrived. And the other thing I would

0:22:53.093 --> 0:22:57.133
<v Speaker 4>say is the defense. Like that defense in the first half,

0:22:57.373 --> 0:22:58.733
<v Speaker 4>there was a period with they head I think the

0:22:58.813 --> 0:23:02.493
<v Speaker 4>Sharks had four consecutive sets around the goal line. The

0:23:02.573 --> 0:23:06.733
<v Speaker 4>Warriors held them out. That sort of stuff really breaks

0:23:06.813 --> 0:23:09.973
<v Speaker 4>the spirit, ay breaks the spur opposition team, so that's

0:23:10.013 --> 0:23:10.693
<v Speaker 4>pretty critical.

0:23:11.893 --> 0:23:14.973
<v Speaker 2>The Warriors had barely any tackles in the Sharks twenty,

0:23:15.013 --> 0:23:17.493
<v Speaker 2>which is remarkable considering they scored twenty points. It was

0:23:17.533 --> 0:23:19.893
<v Speaker 2>a stat that went up late in the game. Warriors

0:23:19.973 --> 0:23:22.933
<v Speaker 2>had seven tackles in the Sharks twenty. The Sharks had

0:23:22.973 --> 0:23:26.773
<v Speaker 2>twenty four in the Warriors twenty. Yeah, which reinforces the

0:23:27.053 --> 0:23:29.853
<v Speaker 2>defense that they had to do. But also for a change,

0:23:29.933 --> 0:23:32.813
<v Speaker 2>the Warriors were scoring a lot of medium to long

0:23:32.893 --> 0:23:35.573
<v Speaker 2>range tries because they're making breaks around halfway and all

0:23:35.613 --> 0:23:37.853
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing, and that for me also shows

0:23:37.933 --> 0:23:40.373
<v Speaker 2>just how clinical they were when they did have those opportunities.

0:23:40.853 --> 0:23:43.853
<v Speaker 2>The only criticism that I could come up with from

0:23:43.893 --> 0:23:46.733
<v Speaker 2>that game was that both the Sharks tries came down

0:23:46.813 --> 0:23:48.893
<v Speaker 2>that left edge, which has been the vulnerable side that

0:23:49.413 --> 0:23:51.613
<v Speaker 2>teams have looked to attack. This what Tennis Lesniak and

0:23:51.693 --> 0:23:53.693
<v Speaker 2>Cape walls. But when I went back and looked at

0:23:53.733 --> 0:23:55.573
<v Speaker 2>both tries, I really didn't think there was much else

0:23:55.693 --> 0:23:57.893
<v Speaker 2>that what Tennis a lesnie act could do.

0:23:59.093 --> 0:24:02.413
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm sure the assistant coaches will still find something

0:24:02.453 --> 0:24:04.413
<v Speaker 4>in the review. I mean, that right edge has been

0:24:04.973 --> 0:24:08.013
<v Speaker 4>it's the edge that teams are targeting, and a lot

0:24:08.053 --> 0:24:11.013
<v Speaker 4>of tries have been conceded down that edge, so they

0:24:11.093 --> 0:24:13.493
<v Speaker 4>still need to fix it. But they did some good

0:24:13.533 --> 0:24:15.773
<v Speaker 4>defense later on. I mean, I think the other thing

0:24:15.853 --> 0:24:19.333
<v Speaker 4>we need to touch on is the big clash slash

0:24:19.413 --> 0:24:24.053
<v Speaker 4>battle slash confrontation between Fisher Harris and Vanila Blake. You

0:24:24.133 --> 0:24:26.853
<v Speaker 4>know it's Fisher Harris one now, isn't it. I Mean,

0:24:26.893 --> 0:24:29.973
<v Speaker 4>there was so much talk about Vanua Blake coming into

0:24:30.013 --> 0:24:31.413
<v Speaker 4>the game. I think he said a bit as well,

0:24:31.493 --> 0:24:32.973
<v Speaker 4>I'll never forget what he did for the Warriors. He

0:24:33.053 --> 0:24:35.413
<v Speaker 4>was great for the Warriors in twenty three. He was

0:24:35.453 --> 0:24:38.533
<v Speaker 4>good seasons before that. It was okay last year. But

0:24:39.093 --> 0:24:41.973
<v Speaker 4>there's no doubt in my mind that Fisher Harris is

0:24:42.413 --> 0:24:44.533
<v Speaker 4>an upgrade in terms of your better fit. He just

0:24:44.613 --> 0:24:48.133
<v Speaker 4>fits the club. He's inspiring the youngsters so much so

0:24:48.853 --> 0:24:50.413
<v Speaker 4>because I think for new Blake and he ran for

0:24:50.413 --> 0:24:53.213
<v Speaker 4>about one hundred and thirty hundred and forty meters, which

0:24:53.293 --> 0:24:55.573
<v Speaker 4>is not a lot by his standards, and I think

0:24:56.093 --> 0:24:58.893
<v Speaker 4>that shows the fact that Fisher Harris is keeping him quiet.

0:24:59.013 --> 0:25:01.253
<v Speaker 4>That defense Big League.

0:25:00.973 --> 0:25:04.693
<v Speaker 2>Podcast, Right, the Warriors have the bye this week, which

0:25:04.813 --> 0:25:07.573
<v Speaker 2>means I guarantee two points I mentioned doing there in

0:25:07.613 --> 0:25:09.853
<v Speaker 2>the podcast. They are joint with the Raiders and the

0:25:09.853 --> 0:25:12.293
<v Speaker 2>Bulldogs at the top of the ladder. On twenty two points.

0:25:12.373 --> 0:25:14.853
<v Speaker 2>Presuming the Bulldogs get the job done against the Eels tonight,

0:25:14.893 --> 0:25:18.373
<v Speaker 2>they'll go top on twenty four. The Raiders also have

0:25:18.573 --> 0:25:21.373
<v Speaker 2>the buy this week, so they'll get a guaranteed too

0:25:21.893 --> 0:25:25.613
<v Speaker 2>as well. Now fourteen out of twenty seven rounds and

0:25:25.853 --> 0:25:28.733
<v Speaker 2>seems an apt time to give the side a roughly

0:25:29.133 --> 0:25:30.893
<v Speaker 2>mid season report card.

0:25:30.973 --> 0:25:31.293
<v Speaker 4>Burge.

0:25:31.573 --> 0:25:35.053
<v Speaker 2>Now, four rounds and I gave them a B plus. Obviously,

0:25:35.973 --> 0:25:38.893
<v Speaker 2>we do our best to be balanced and critical because

0:25:38.933 --> 0:25:43.133
<v Speaker 2>that is our job. But this season has been unprecedented,

0:25:43.173 --> 0:25:44.853
<v Speaker 2>and you have to give credit, were credit as you.

0:25:45.013 --> 0:25:48.133
<v Speaker 2>I'm upgrading the B plus to an A plus. Gee,

0:25:48.213 --> 0:25:51.053
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to be in your class. Fire out not

0:25:51.173 --> 0:25:51.493
<v Speaker 2>to deliver.

0:25:51.613 --> 0:25:54.733
<v Speaker 4>Become a teacher, I don't, although you're quite a inspiring

0:25:54.973 --> 0:25:55.693
<v Speaker 4>charismatic guy.

0:25:55.773 --> 0:25:59.133
<v Speaker 2>But can I be a high school primary school teacher?

0:25:59.173 --> 0:26:01.653
<v Speaker 2>What do you, Reckon might like to be a primary

0:26:01.653 --> 0:26:03.773
<v Speaker 2>school teacher? You'd probably be good with primary school. I

0:26:03.773 --> 0:26:05.613
<v Speaker 2>re can be good with the little ones.

0:26:05.853 --> 0:26:08.253
<v Speaker 4>Little ones. I think the teenagers are pretty hard work

0:26:08.333 --> 0:26:10.933
<v Speaker 4>these days, or more the teenager's parents are pretty how

0:26:10.933 --> 0:26:17.213
<v Speaker 4>it works these days? Yeah, yeah, A plus. It's I

0:26:17.293 --> 0:26:19.613
<v Speaker 4>think I gave them a B back after round four.

0:26:19.693 --> 0:26:21.333
<v Speaker 4>That seems a long time ago. That was after the

0:26:21.853 --> 0:26:24.013
<v Speaker 4>Tigers game, wasn't it. So this is the second bye.

0:26:24.133 --> 0:26:25.893
<v Speaker 4>Great timing for the Buye by the way, I think

0:26:25.933 --> 0:26:30.533
<v Speaker 4>they've had so many physical clashes, really good timing. It's

0:26:30.573 --> 0:26:36.333
<v Speaker 4>probably a minus for me. Okay, there's still room for improvement.

0:26:37.453 --> 0:26:40.933
<v Speaker 4>The attack, with the exception of a couple of recent games,

0:26:41.533 --> 0:26:46.093
<v Speaker 4>hasn't always been what they need or what they want,

0:26:46.213 --> 0:26:50.053
<v Speaker 4>So they'll be room for improvement, but far out to

0:26:50.133 --> 0:26:52.053
<v Speaker 4>be ten to three at this point of the season.

0:26:52.213 --> 0:26:55.853
<v Speaker 4>Like you're going through your analysis before about the table.

0:26:56.493 --> 0:27:01.773
<v Speaker 4>So the top four, Bulldog's, Raiders, Warriors, Storm. Can we

0:27:01.973 --> 0:27:07.453
<v Speaker 4>see anyone else? Without getting ahead of ourselves? Can we

0:27:07.533 --> 0:27:10.053
<v Speaker 4>see anyone else coming into that top four? You know,

0:27:10.333 --> 0:27:12.813
<v Speaker 4>That's what I was thinking about after this game. Can

0:27:12.893 --> 0:27:17.693
<v Speaker 4>the Sharks leap up from where they are? Possibly? Cowboys,

0:27:18.293 --> 0:27:20.533
<v Speaker 4>don't know if they're good enough. I feel like the

0:27:20.653 --> 0:27:24.373
<v Speaker 4>only teams that could disrupt this top four are the

0:27:24.493 --> 0:27:27.973
<v Speaker 4>Sharks and the Broncos if the Broncos get going. So

0:27:28.533 --> 0:27:30.933
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty exciting to be sitting here where we were

0:27:31.013 --> 0:27:33.773
<v Speaker 4>in early June to be saying that she was the

0:27:33.853 --> 0:27:36.893
<v Speaker 4>Warriors are looking good, not just for the playoffs, mate,

0:27:36.973 --> 0:27:38.533
<v Speaker 4>but they're looking good for the top four.

0:27:38.733 --> 0:27:40.733
<v Speaker 2>Well, the thing is you said about who can break

0:27:40.773 --> 0:27:42.693
<v Speaker 2>into that top four, because the GAP's opened up now

0:27:42.933 --> 0:27:46.333
<v Speaker 2>there is a four point gap between the Sharks in

0:27:46.413 --> 0:27:50.813
<v Speaker 2>fifth and Melbourne in fourth on twenty points, the Sharks

0:27:50.893 --> 0:27:53.533
<v Speaker 2>on sixteen, the Warriors, Bullers and Raiders on twenty two.

0:27:54.053 --> 0:27:55.933
<v Speaker 2>So you're right in terms of if the Broncos going

0:27:55.973 --> 0:27:59.093
<v Speaker 2>to run. Obviously they had an incredible performance against the Titans,

0:27:59.213 --> 0:28:01.093
<v Speaker 2>look like the All Blacks, played like the All Blacks.

0:28:02.293 --> 0:28:04.893
<v Speaker 2>But then also you've got the Sharks who've had back

0:28:04.933 --> 0:28:08.533
<v Speaker 2>to back forty point hidings basically, and then you've got

0:28:08.613 --> 0:28:11.813
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys on fifteen, the Dolphins on fourteen. You know,

0:28:11.893 --> 0:28:13.493
<v Speaker 2>you're going all the way back to if you're talking

0:28:13.493 --> 0:28:15.533
<v Speaker 2>about the Broncos one of the teams that could break

0:28:15.573 --> 0:28:19.573
<v Speaker 2>in the eight points behind the Warriors.

0:28:19.453 --> 0:28:21.013
<v Speaker 4>That's the thing. That's the thing. But they are a

0:28:21.093 --> 0:28:23.853
<v Speaker 4>team that have the I think have the roster to

0:28:23.973 --> 0:28:25.893
<v Speaker 4>do it. I don't know if any of these other

0:28:25.973 --> 0:28:29.133
<v Speaker 4>teams that we're looking at, Cowboys, Dolphins, Seagulls, Roosters all

0:28:29.173 --> 0:28:32.693
<v Speaker 4>on fourteen, Dragons on fourteen, and the Rabbit Rabbito's definitely not.

0:28:32.773 --> 0:28:35.053
<v Speaker 4>They've had so many injuries. I don't think those other

0:28:35.133 --> 0:28:38.093
<v Speaker 4>teams have the roster to do something crazy like a

0:28:38.613 --> 0:28:40.893
<v Speaker 4>what have we got eleven twelve games left to win

0:28:41.653 --> 0:28:44.293
<v Speaker 4>eight or nine out of eleven. So the Warriors are

0:28:44.333 --> 0:28:45.773
<v Speaker 4>in a fantastic position.

0:28:47.093 --> 0:28:50.893
<v Speaker 2>I suppose in regards to my A plus, another justification

0:28:50.973 --> 0:28:53.013
<v Speaker 2>you said, obviously there have been problems. We talked about

0:28:53.133 --> 0:28:55.173
<v Speaker 2>the first tackle players, that sort of thing of a

0:28:55.213 --> 0:28:57.573
<v Speaker 2>few issues they still need to solve, and that's true.

0:28:57.613 --> 0:28:58.573
<v Speaker 3>Every team is going to have that.

0:28:58.853 --> 0:29:00.733
<v Speaker 2>But I suppose the reason behind giving you an A

0:29:00.813 --> 0:29:03.453
<v Speaker 2>plus is I feel like those things are things we've

0:29:03.933 --> 0:29:06.453
<v Speaker 2>talked about through this early part of the season, and

0:29:06.533 --> 0:29:09.573
<v Speaker 2>they've actually they've really improved. If you think about in

0:29:09.653 --> 0:29:12.653
<v Speaker 2>comparison to five or six weeks ago we were talking

0:29:12.653 --> 0:29:15.333
<v Speaker 2>about in terms of the Warriors attack, they put on

0:29:15.413 --> 0:29:18.213
<v Speaker 2>forty points and the place that they're in right now,

0:29:18.573 --> 0:29:21.413
<v Speaker 2>top of the table, the attacks firing, the defense looked really,

0:29:21.453 --> 0:29:23.973
<v Speaker 2>really good, and it's the standout bar maybe a couple

0:29:24.013 --> 0:29:25.693
<v Speaker 2>of issues on that right edge.

0:29:26.613 --> 0:29:29.253
<v Speaker 4>A plus for me, defense is amazing. Yeah, I think

0:29:29.253 --> 0:29:33.293
<v Speaker 4>they've they've got the best completions in the NRL. They're

0:29:33.333 --> 0:29:36.093
<v Speaker 4>topping a whole lot of other stats. The aplus will

0:29:36.133 --> 0:29:38.493
<v Speaker 4>come though for me, when we see what they can

0:29:38.573 --> 0:29:42.133
<v Speaker 4>do against Bulldogs that's coming not too far away, what

0:29:42.293 --> 0:29:46.933
<v Speaker 4>they can do against the Raiders and the Storm. They've

0:29:47.013 --> 0:29:50.013
<v Speaker 4>now become the benchmark. Kevin. They that the expectation for

0:29:50.093 --> 0:29:52.653
<v Speaker 4>this team has grown, so we know they can deal

0:29:52.733 --> 0:29:55.373
<v Speaker 4>with teams outside the top four and the Crenal are

0:29:55.413 --> 0:29:57.573
<v Speaker 4>a top four team as well. Really, now, what do

0:29:57.653 --> 0:30:01.493
<v Speaker 4>they do against the big guns? Because they're seen as

0:30:01.493 --> 0:30:02.813
<v Speaker 4>a big gun and.

0:30:02.813 --> 0:30:05.493
<v Speaker 2>The Warriors are up against the Panthers after the buy

0:30:05.693 --> 0:30:08.653
<v Speaker 2>so in a couple of weeks. Whereas captain James Qpecshi

0:30:08.693 --> 0:30:11.373
<v Speaker 2>Harris obviously four time premiership when it with the Panthers,

0:30:11.573 --> 0:30:15.013
<v Speaker 2>he was asked about the comparisons between the Warriors and

0:30:15.173 --> 0:30:17.653
<v Speaker 2>his Penrith Panthers side, but he's refused to be drawn

0:30:17.693 --> 0:30:17.853
<v Speaker 2>on it.

0:30:18.253 --> 0:30:20.853
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to say like I'm not comparing or anything

0:30:20.933 --> 0:30:22.493
<v Speaker 4>like that. We just do our own thing and like

0:30:22.933 --> 0:30:25.093
<v Speaker 4>week's a week, what's done, has done it? Just focus

0:30:25.133 --> 0:30:28.533
<v Speaker 4>on the scroup. Howkin about this year? How many times

0:30:28.573 --> 0:30:31.133
<v Speaker 4>do you think James is going to be asked those

0:30:31.253 --> 0:30:33.453
<v Speaker 4>kind of questions over the next eleven rounds.

0:30:34.733 --> 0:30:36.453
<v Speaker 3>Should we make it a vision to just ask him

0:30:36.493 --> 0:30:37.133
<v Speaker 3>that every time?

0:30:37.173 --> 0:30:40.893
<v Speaker 4>Because seriously, like whenever they play in Australia, there's some

0:30:41.053 --> 0:30:43.653
<v Speaker 4>kind of question around that. And obviously the questions back

0:30:43.693 --> 0:30:47.533
<v Speaker 4>here because there's a fascination for premiership wins, five Grand finals.

0:30:47.573 --> 0:30:49.173
<v Speaker 4>Who was at that club for a long time? Everyone

0:30:49.173 --> 0:30:51.653
<v Speaker 4>wants to know. But James, what do you think of

0:30:51.733 --> 0:30:55.333
<v Speaker 4>this place compared to Panthers? But he's very careful, he's

0:30:55.333 --> 0:30:58.933
<v Speaker 4>pretty smart, you know. He doesn't want to make headlines

0:30:59.213 --> 0:31:02.253
<v Speaker 4>about oh for sheer Harris believes that the Warriors were

0:31:02.253 --> 0:31:04.053
<v Speaker 4>on track to become the new Panthers. It's the last

0:31:04.093 --> 0:31:05.573
<v Speaker 4>thing he wants. He's not that kind of guy. So

0:31:05.653 --> 0:31:08.053
<v Speaker 4>he's just going to keep Come on, James, just saying

0:31:08.133 --> 0:31:11.333
<v Speaker 4>he's to keep flat batting in a way headlines and

0:31:11.533 --> 0:31:13.893
<v Speaker 4>just wait for the exclusive off season chat with Michael Burgers.

0:31:13.893 --> 0:31:15.093
<v Speaker 4>I reckon, that's that's what you want.

0:31:15.173 --> 0:31:21.453
<v Speaker 3>Oh yes, On the Big League Podcast, it's coming, The Big.

0:31:21.373 --> 0:31:25.733
<v Speaker 1>League Podcast on the Warriors Bad Wagons since day one,

0:31:27.573 --> 0:31:30.733
<v Speaker 1>The Big League Podcast for the biggest league fans.

0:31:32.413 --> 0:31:36.213
<v Speaker 3>Birch quick fire predictions for a short round.

0:31:36.693 --> 0:31:37.053
<v Speaker 4>What is this?

0:31:37.173 --> 0:31:40.373
<v Speaker 2>Fifteen both six out of eight last week? Who did

0:31:40.453 --> 0:31:44.413
<v Speaker 2>you pick in the Sharks Warriors game? Ummm, you picked

0:31:44.453 --> 0:31:48.253
<v Speaker 2>the the home side. I think you didn't pick the Warriors.

0:31:49.493 --> 0:31:50.893
<v Speaker 4>I think it was I think it was technically a

0:31:50.893 --> 0:31:52.613
<v Speaker 4>Warrior's home game, So I think I did pick.

0:31:52.493 --> 0:31:56.413
<v Speaker 2>The shocking shocking to picking the Sharks last week, boos,

0:31:56.453 --> 0:31:59.533
<v Speaker 2>they got flogged. Having said that, I picked the Dragons

0:31:59.573 --> 0:32:03.173
<v Speaker 2>and was by fifty. So here we go Sharks versus

0:32:03.253 --> 0:32:04.493
<v Speaker 2>the Dragons to start off with.

0:32:04.573 --> 0:32:06.493
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, where do we go here? I mean, I don't

0:32:06.533 --> 0:32:09.213
<v Speaker 4>know that these two teams, these are the local rivals

0:32:09.253 --> 0:32:12.173
<v Speaker 4>in the shire in southern Sydney. They're both really really

0:32:12.213 --> 0:32:16.293
<v Speaker 4>dislike each other. You'd think the Sharks would bounce back surely,

0:32:16.453 --> 0:32:18.493
<v Speaker 4>and you'd think that the Dragons have got some issues

0:32:18.573 --> 0:32:21.333
<v Speaker 4>after that threshing. So I will go with the Sharks.

0:32:21.413 --> 0:32:23.533
<v Speaker 4>But it's a short turnaround. I think this is a

0:32:23.853 --> 0:32:26.973
<v Speaker 4>Thursday night game, so far out it's not good for

0:32:27.133 --> 0:32:29.533
<v Speaker 4>the team. But I'll go to Canella. I'll agree with you.

0:32:29.613 --> 0:32:31.733
<v Speaker 2>Both teams got flogged, but surely the Sharks pack a

0:32:31.813 --> 0:32:34.733
<v Speaker 2>backup Titans who got flogged by the Broncos and the.

0:32:34.773 --> 0:32:37.053
<v Speaker 3>Seagulls who got upset by the Knights.

0:32:38.213 --> 0:32:41.973
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, another one that we didn't see coming. I guess

0:32:42.053 --> 0:32:44.653
<v Speaker 4>that's the magic of the n RL. Mainly for me here,

0:32:45.493 --> 0:32:49.773
<v Speaker 4>I just don't know where the Titans. How the Titans

0:32:49.773 --> 0:32:51.853
<v Speaker 4>are going to come back this season. I think they're

0:32:51.853 --> 0:32:54.253
<v Speaker 4>already destined for a pretty miserable second half.

0:32:54.333 --> 0:32:55.053
<v Speaker 3>Are they're rubbish?

0:32:55.373 --> 0:32:59.933
<v Speaker 4>Seagulls and Knights Roosters? Do the Knights go back to back?

0:33:00.093 --> 0:33:01.893
<v Speaker 4>Do they go back to back? I mean they must

0:33:01.933 --> 0:33:04.373
<v Speaker 4>be feeling good about themselves. They're at home. The Roosters

0:33:04.373 --> 0:33:06.013
<v Speaker 4>will be missing a couple of players.

0:33:06.093 --> 0:33:07.373
<v Speaker 2>And they had the buy so they're coming off the

0:33:07.413 --> 0:33:09.173
<v Speaker 2>by and before that the two point loss of the Raiders.

0:33:09.493 --> 0:33:11.973
<v Speaker 2>I'll go the versas in that case, we'll agree with

0:33:12.013 --> 0:33:14.613
<v Speaker 2>you there. Cowboys versus the Dolphins. This is the best

0:33:14.653 --> 0:33:15.253
<v Speaker 2>match of the round.

0:33:15.773 --> 0:33:18.013
<v Speaker 4>Both teams, as we talked about before that, that are

0:33:19.173 --> 0:33:21.413
<v Speaker 4>in the top eight or well yeah, in the top

0:33:21.453 --> 0:33:24.693
<v Speaker 4>eight eventually, and both playing really well. I love what

0:33:24.813 --> 0:33:27.773
<v Speaker 4>Christian Wolf was doing at the Dolphins. Cowboys, great attacking team.

0:33:29.213 --> 0:33:33.053
<v Speaker 4>Toss the coin Queensland Derby. I'll go with the I'll

0:33:33.093 --> 0:33:34.173
<v Speaker 4>go to the home team, Cowboys.

0:33:34.653 --> 0:33:37.773
<v Speaker 2>So the Cowboys coming off a thirty eight fourteen loss

0:33:37.813 --> 0:33:41.893
<v Speaker 2>to the Storm in Melbourne. The Dolphins flogging the Dragons

0:33:41.933 --> 0:33:45.213
<v Speaker 2>fifty six six, and I'm going to disagree with you. Yeah,

0:33:45.453 --> 0:33:48.013
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to back the Dolphins to beat North Queensland

0:33:48.213 --> 0:33:51.213
<v Speaker 2>Rabbit versus the Bulldogs to finish. Bulldogs obviously get to

0:33:51.213 --> 0:33:52.853
<v Speaker 2>play their around. Because we're recording this on a Monday

0:33:53.973 --> 0:33:56.093
<v Speaker 2>eels tonight. We've both picked them last week.

0:33:56.813 --> 0:33:59.213
<v Speaker 4>I really feel for the Rabbit as they Cody Walker

0:33:59.213 --> 0:34:01.213
<v Speaker 4>has been out for six or seven games, comes back

0:34:01.853 --> 0:34:04.693
<v Speaker 4>and he's out again with it looks like a groin

0:34:04.733 --> 0:34:06.813
<v Speaker 4>strain for I don't know a couple of weeks, so

0:34:08.093 --> 0:34:10.773
<v Speaker 4>they had a massive injury toll. I'd love it if

0:34:10.773 --> 0:34:12.453
<v Speaker 4>they can beat the Bulldogs, it'd be great, but I

0:34:12.533 --> 0:34:15.413
<v Speaker 4>can't see it. I will agree with you, neither Bulldogs

0:34:15.693 --> 0:34:19.333
<v Speaker 4>to win that round. Enjoy by around people. Thank you

0:34:19.413 --> 0:34:21.653
<v Speaker 4>for making us a part of your week. Michael Purgas,

0:34:21.693 --> 0:34:23.973
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for your time, your wisdom, your insight. Seventy

0:34:24.013 --> 0:34:26.733
<v Speaker 4>five episodes, shake my hand, good man.

0:34:26.773 --> 0:34:28.613
<v Speaker 3>Well we definitely each other her up. That's well done,

0:34:28.653 --> 0:34:31.213
<v Speaker 3>well done. Please follow and rate the podcast. My name

0:34:31.293 --> 0:34:34.973
<v Speaker 3>is Nathan lem We will be back next week. Have

0:34:35.173 --> 0:34:36.213
<v Speaker 3>a fantastic week.

0:34:41.133 --> 0:34:43.693
<v Speaker 1>For more from news Talks, there'd be listen live on

0:34:43.853 --> 0:34:46.773
<v Speaker 1>air or online, and keep our shows with you wherever

0:34:46.853 --> 0:34:49.413
<v Speaker 1>you go with our podcast on iHeartRadio