WEBVTT - On The Front Foot Episode 200: Marking the Black Caps' performances

0:00:09.133 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from News Talk set B.

0:00:12.413 --> 0:00:15.213
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on

0:00:15.373 --> 0:00:16.173
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio.

0:00:19.293 --> 0:00:26.973
<v Speaker 2>Take it, It's it is out, The Test is over. Goodness,

0:00:27.093 --> 0:00:30.933
<v Speaker 2>make a beauty, It is out and hearing guys.

0:00:31.013 --> 0:00:33.453
<v Speaker 3>Just delivery has in un used to Bowl.

0:00:35.693 --> 0:00:39.093
<v Speaker 4>On the Front Foot with Brian Wodell and Jeremy Cody,

0:00:39.373 --> 0:00:45.933
<v Speaker 4>powered by News Talk sad B at iHeart Radio.

0:00:48.093 --> 0:00:51.893
<v Speaker 3>Hello, pre Christmas on the front Foot. The Black Cats

0:00:51.933 --> 0:00:54.573
<v Speaker 3>save the best to the last, but it's only a

0:00:54.613 --> 0:00:58.893
<v Speaker 3>consolation win the World Test Championship and the season's success

0:00:59.013 --> 0:01:02.213
<v Speaker 3>has gone lost two to one two England. Why does

0:01:02.293 --> 0:01:05.173
<v Speaker 3>it take so long to play the quality cricket they did?

0:01:05.573 --> 0:01:06.373
<v Speaker 5>In three?

0:01:06.613 --> 0:01:10.293
<v Speaker 3>The third Test, Santa wins the top whiteful job and

0:01:10.413 --> 0:01:13.253
<v Speaker 3>we've got some on the Front Foot awards to make

0:01:13.413 --> 0:01:17.733
<v Speaker 3>from the twelve Test matches. Test match is over, Jerry,

0:01:17.733 --> 0:01:20.693
<v Speaker 3>the season's gone. It's not even Christmas and we've got

0:01:20.693 --> 0:01:23.533
<v Speaker 3>no more tests for about six months. It's a bit hollow,

0:01:23.573 --> 0:01:25.733
<v Speaker 3>isn't it when you say goodbye to Test cricket and

0:01:25.773 --> 0:01:26.933
<v Speaker 3>you're only left with short.

0:01:26.693 --> 0:01:29.333
<v Speaker 6>Format weird years, isn't it?

0:01:29.933 --> 0:01:30.133
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:01:30.253 --> 0:01:30.733
<v Speaker 6>Personally?

0:01:30.773 --> 0:01:33.813
<v Speaker 7>I like the stuff after Christmas because better weather and

0:01:34.373 --> 0:01:36.773
<v Speaker 7>the pictures are a little bit better, and I think

0:01:36.813 --> 0:01:39.453
<v Speaker 7>the whole thing feels much more cricket ye if you like,

0:01:40.093 --> 0:01:43.733
<v Speaker 7>rather than prior to Christmas. But I don't know whether

0:01:43.773 --> 0:01:45.973
<v Speaker 7>it's just happened this way this season. I hope it's

0:01:45.973 --> 0:01:47.333
<v Speaker 7>not going to happen this way in the future.

0:01:47.373 --> 0:01:50.933
<v Speaker 3>All the time, Garth, you'll be having some season greetings,

0:01:50.973 --> 0:01:55.213
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure, and celebrating the festive season that a traditionalist

0:01:55.333 --> 0:01:57.773
<v Speaker 3>like you would be sad to see the Test season

0:01:57.813 --> 0:01:59.973
<v Speaker 3>come to end and we've got to wait for July

0:02:00.493 --> 0:02:03.533
<v Speaker 3>to see New Zealand and zim Barbe. As I understand.

0:02:03.213 --> 0:02:06.133
<v Speaker 8>It, it was such an odd feeling, wasn't it, watching

0:02:06.173 --> 0:02:10.293
<v Speaker 8>that Third Test in Hamilton and thinking it, you know,

0:02:10.293 --> 0:02:12.093
<v Speaker 8>it felt like the season's over. And I know that

0:02:12.093 --> 0:02:14.213
<v Speaker 8>we've got white ball cricket, as you've touched on, but

0:02:14.253 --> 0:02:18.333
<v Speaker 8>it doesn't feel the same. And I feel like, yeah,

0:02:18.413 --> 0:02:20.613
<v Speaker 8>you know, the Christmas has gone come and gone already.

0:02:21.053 --> 0:02:24.093
<v Speaker 8>Because I think for all of us cricket lovers, the

0:02:24.133 --> 0:02:26.213
<v Speaker 8>Test crickets and stuff we love, we don't mind having

0:02:26.253 --> 0:02:28.613
<v Speaker 8>games before Christmas, but we prefer to have a few

0:02:28.613 --> 0:02:31.613
<v Speaker 8>more afterwards as well. So I mean I wonder is

0:02:31.613 --> 0:02:33.773
<v Speaker 8>it designed so that it fits in with the World

0:02:33.773 --> 0:02:34.653
<v Speaker 8>Test Championship.

0:02:34.693 --> 0:02:35.413
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:02:35.973 --> 0:02:37.973
<v Speaker 8>It seems it's a bit of a shame. And I

0:02:38.253 --> 0:02:41.613
<v Speaker 8>guess what's the other thing in Jerry that occurs to me?

0:02:41.893 --> 0:02:44.653
<v Speaker 8>You know, the next Test is six months seven eight

0:02:44.693 --> 0:02:48.453
<v Speaker 8>months away in Zimbabwe, and if we'd moved into a

0:02:48.493 --> 0:02:52.093
<v Speaker 8>new series into February and March, you know, I think

0:02:52.093 --> 0:02:55.133
<v Speaker 8>this side would be forced to make changes, and hopefully

0:02:55.133 --> 0:02:58.973
<v Speaker 8>in Zimbabwe they will, but it just feels like it's.

0:02:58.813 --> 0:03:00.053
<v Speaker 5>Such a long way away.

0:03:00.733 --> 0:03:03.093
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure what's going to happen, if that makes sense,

0:03:03.573 --> 0:03:06.173
<v Speaker 8>but I hope there's a lot of reflection and a

0:03:06.293 --> 0:03:10.013
<v Speaker 8>desire to have us success plan in place, albeit too

0:03:10.133 --> 0:03:10.973
<v Speaker 8>late in my view.

0:03:11.933 --> 0:03:15.493
<v Speaker 3>Well, Jerry, the interesting thing is that Tim Southy has

0:03:15.613 --> 0:03:18.093
<v Speaker 3>had a grand fall well Sadly, Trent Bolt never got

0:03:18.093 --> 0:03:22.973
<v Speaker 3>one when he left the Test Match Arena, nor Wagner

0:03:25.293 --> 0:03:29.813
<v Speaker 3>he got a press conference in Wellington though I had

0:03:29.853 --> 0:03:34.093
<v Speaker 3>a few tears. But we hear murmurings that Test match

0:03:34.133 --> 0:03:39.933
<v Speaker 3>cricket maybe over for Cain Williamson and no confirmation of that.

0:03:40.093 --> 0:03:43.493
<v Speaker 3>But those were strong rumors coming out of Hamilton, weren't

0:03:43.493 --> 0:03:44.333
<v Speaker 3>they I'm.

0:03:44.173 --> 0:03:47.253
<v Speaker 7>Not about strong, but certainly I did hear them, Brian,

0:03:48.733 --> 0:03:51.653
<v Speaker 7>and let's hope that they're not true just yet, because

0:03:52.093 --> 0:03:55.053
<v Speaker 7>we saw the way that he played in Hamilton, and

0:03:55.133 --> 0:03:58.333
<v Speaker 7>he still adds a hell of a lot to the

0:03:58.373 --> 0:04:01.013
<v Speaker 7>New Zealand batting lineup, doesn't he. In fact, if you

0:04:01.093 --> 0:04:07.253
<v Speaker 7>looked at the bowlers and perhaps the who are available

0:04:07.333 --> 0:04:10.573
<v Speaker 7>at the moment, Henry and o'rourck's been outstanding this year,

0:04:10.613 --> 0:04:15.093
<v Speaker 7>hasn't he, but Sears and Smith to add to those two,

0:04:15.213 --> 0:04:19.053
<v Speaker 7>We've suddenly got something of a seam bowling department, haven't we.

0:04:19.053 --> 0:04:20.933
<v Speaker 6>We're bouncing a bit of pace and a wee bit

0:04:20.973 --> 0:04:21.333
<v Speaker 6>of swing.

0:04:21.853 --> 0:04:26.173
<v Speaker 7>So it's the batting actually that we've got to start

0:04:26.213 --> 0:04:27.493
<v Speaker 7>to think about and look about.

0:04:27.533 --> 0:04:27.693
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:04:28.293 --> 0:04:31.213
<v Speaker 6>If it's Williamson, the king of.

0:04:31.173 --> 0:04:34.613
<v Speaker 7>Our batting, who has been for some time now, thirty

0:04:34.653 --> 0:04:39.373
<v Speaker 7>three tests centuries, look, I would hate to think what's

0:04:39.413 --> 0:04:41.453
<v Speaker 7>going to happen, to be honest, for a wee while

0:04:41.773 --> 0:04:44.933
<v Speaker 7>it's it's, as you've already said, long time before the

0:04:44.973 --> 0:04:47.613
<v Speaker 7>next next meal, isn't it the next Test meal?

0:04:48.693 --> 0:04:52.773
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I wonder Garth. With the difference in the Test matches,

0:04:52.813 --> 0:04:55.973
<v Speaker 3>we lost the two heavily, and then we beat England

0:04:56.253 --> 0:05:00.533
<v Speaker 3>just as heavily. The difference was Williamson scored Harry Brooke

0:05:00.693 --> 0:05:04.253
<v Speaker 3>didn't or was it bigger than that? What's the difference

0:05:04.493 --> 0:05:07.213
<v Speaker 3>between the two heavy defeats and the one strong win?

0:05:08.333 --> 0:05:09.413
<v Speaker 5>Good question was I think?

0:05:09.853 --> 0:05:12.693
<v Speaker 8>I mean the first Test in christ Church and you

0:05:12.733 --> 0:05:16.173
<v Speaker 8>know everyone observing will have seen the fielding, and that

0:05:16.333 --> 0:05:19.013
<v Speaker 8>really did feel like the difference between the two sides.

0:05:19.933 --> 0:05:25.693
<v Speaker 8>New Zealand's fielding was catastrophically bad, really and Brooke was

0:05:25.773 --> 0:05:28.653
<v Speaker 8>dropped five times. The first time he was dropped he

0:05:28.693 --> 0:05:31.053
<v Speaker 8>was on seventeen. He was then dropped in the forties

0:05:31.093 --> 0:05:35.013
<v Speaker 8>and in the in the eighties, and had that catch,

0:05:35.293 --> 0:05:37.733
<v Speaker 8>had that first catch been taken, all the second one,

0:05:38.173 --> 0:05:40.773
<v Speaker 8>all the third one, things could have been very different.

0:05:41.573 --> 0:05:46.293
<v Speaker 8>So I I saw that as being series defining in

0:05:46.333 --> 0:05:49.413
<v Speaker 8>a way. And I think fielding has been an issue

0:05:49.453 --> 0:05:52.333
<v Speaker 8>for this side. They've always prided themselves on their catching,

0:05:53.333 --> 0:05:56.173
<v Speaker 8>but I've just felt in the last twelve months or

0:05:56.213 --> 0:05:59.813
<v Speaker 8>so that the catching hasn't been as good as it

0:05:59.853 --> 0:06:03.413
<v Speaker 8>has been in previous seasons. I mean, the Second Test

0:06:03.573 --> 0:06:06.933
<v Speaker 8>was a whitewash, an absolute bath for New Zealand at

0:06:06.933 --> 0:06:10.973
<v Speaker 8>the Basin Reserve. You know, New Zealand were very poor.

0:06:11.013 --> 0:06:14.573
<v Speaker 8>They batted eighty nine overs and two innings from memory

0:06:15.333 --> 0:06:19.293
<v Speaker 8>and never really got into the game again. You know,

0:06:19.373 --> 0:06:22.373
<v Speaker 8>some I think that the selection of Saldi for the

0:06:22.413 --> 0:06:25.893
<v Speaker 8>first two tests and all three really was a curiosity,

0:06:26.413 --> 0:06:28.853
<v Speaker 8>some real issues with not bringing young in when I

0:06:28.893 --> 0:06:31.053
<v Speaker 8>think many of us thought that he should have played

0:06:31.093 --> 0:06:34.253
<v Speaker 8>in the first Test. And then I guess in Hamilton,

0:06:34.533 --> 0:06:36.053
<v Speaker 8>you know, you don't want to be too unfit in

0:06:36.053 --> 0:06:38.733
<v Speaker 8>New Zealand because they they murdered England.

0:06:38.893 --> 0:06:41.573
<v Speaker 5>But I just felt that England were on the plane home.

0:06:42.853 --> 0:06:46.773
<v Speaker 8>And so you know, it just felt like they were off.

0:06:47.093 --> 0:06:48.853
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Brooke failed.

0:06:49.173 --> 0:06:51.773
<v Speaker 8>You know, I thought, for me, possibly the most significant

0:06:51.773 --> 0:06:54.973
<v Speaker 8>thing to come out of that match was the absolute

0:06:55.493 --> 0:06:59.613
<v Speaker 8>the superb fast bowling of O'Rourke. He was hostile and

0:06:59.693 --> 0:07:04.613
<v Speaker 8>Brock faced seven balls in two innings and he got

0:07:04.653 --> 0:07:07.853
<v Speaker 8>on both times. O' rourke Brook's number one in the world,

0:07:08.493 --> 0:07:11.853
<v Speaker 8>number two, and I thought I Rock had it over

0:07:11.933 --> 0:07:12.773
<v Speaker 8>both of them.

0:07:13.093 --> 0:07:14.933
<v Speaker 5>You know, it was it was a.

0:07:14.573 --> 0:07:17.373
<v Speaker 8>Really exciting to see a New Zealand bowler bowling at

0:07:17.413 --> 0:07:20.253
<v Speaker 8>one hundred and fifty k's plus and Brock did not

0:07:20.613 --> 0:07:23.093
<v Speaker 8>like it and I think it adds you know, a

0:07:23.213 --> 0:07:25.693
<v Speaker 8>very interesting to mention. You know, England are talking about

0:07:25.693 --> 0:07:29.693
<v Speaker 8>having the right side for the Ashes. I don't think so.

0:07:30.053 --> 0:07:33.693
<v Speaker 3>M interesting Garth newsflash for you. Rougter's back at number

0:07:33.733 --> 0:07:37.293
<v Speaker 3>one and Brookers number two. So Cain Williamson has to

0:07:37.413 --> 0:07:40.453
<v Speaker 3>slot in at three in these rankings and they change

0:07:40.893 --> 0:07:44.573
<v Speaker 3>every two or three minutes. Jerry Test matches in twenty

0:07:44.613 --> 0:07:47.573
<v Speaker 3>four New Zealand played twelve one six lost six in

0:07:47.613 --> 0:07:52.133
<v Speaker 3>the World Test Championship. They played fourteen one seven lost seven.

0:07:52.773 --> 0:07:55.693
<v Speaker 3>Mediocre record. Let's give them a mark out of ten.

0:07:55.773 --> 0:07:56.733
<v Speaker 3>I've given them five.

0:07:57.733 --> 0:08:00.253
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think so was five as fair.

0:08:00.333 --> 0:08:04.133
<v Speaker 7>Maybe, well, they scaled the heights beating India, didn't they.

0:08:04.213 --> 0:08:10.573
<v Speaker 7>That's clearly the Himalayas of the season, you know, probably

0:08:10.613 --> 0:08:12.053
<v Speaker 7>one of our best results ever.

0:08:12.733 --> 0:08:15.693
<v Speaker 6>But then you know, you look at the rest of

0:08:15.813 --> 0:08:16.533
<v Speaker 6>South Africa.

0:08:16.573 --> 0:08:21.253
<v Speaker 7>B We lose to Sri Lanka, we lose to Australia,

0:08:21.293 --> 0:08:26.733
<v Speaker 7>we lose to England, and we drew with Bangladesh. There's

0:08:26.773 --> 0:08:30.933
<v Speaker 7>not really all that exciting, is it. So I think, yeah,

0:08:30.933 --> 0:08:33.853
<v Speaker 7>I think between four and five. Really you Seeland won

0:08:33.933 --> 0:08:38.213
<v Speaker 7>more tests actually away from home in Asia than they

0:08:38.253 --> 0:08:42.213
<v Speaker 7>did at home, so that's a little bit disappointing really

0:08:42.253 --> 0:08:45.733
<v Speaker 7>when you want to protect your home ground, and note

0:08:45.733 --> 0:08:49.653
<v Speaker 7>you should know those conditions the best. So really we

0:08:49.693 --> 0:08:54.293
<v Speaker 7>did have opportunities, as Garth said, to beat both Australia.

0:08:53.773 --> 0:08:55.653
<v Speaker 6>And England in my mind and one.

0:08:55.533 --> 0:08:59.213
<v Speaker 7>Of the Tests, but we get into positions and matches

0:08:59.253 --> 0:09:02.133
<v Speaker 7>and we just don't nail it any longer.

0:09:02.853 --> 0:09:03.733
<v Speaker 6>The match at Hagley.

0:09:04.053 --> 0:09:07.333
<v Speaker 7>Garth mentioned the catchers of course, but I mean even

0:09:07.373 --> 0:09:12.253
<v Speaker 7>against Australia, we remember dropping Marsh I think early on

0:09:12.293 --> 0:09:15.893
<v Speaker 7>that last morning and he was on about twenty and

0:09:15.933 --> 0:09:16.573
<v Speaker 7>he went on to.

0:09:16.533 --> 0:09:18.733
<v Speaker 6>Make eighty and Australia got through.

0:09:18.813 --> 0:09:22.773
<v Speaker 7>Really and then catchers are going down on the slips

0:09:22.813 --> 0:09:24.813
<v Speaker 7>far more often than they should, especially if we have

0:09:24.933 --> 0:09:27.773
<v Speaker 7>that bowling attack I just mentioned. I hope they sought

0:09:27.813 --> 0:09:30.893
<v Speaker 7>that out. Blundell hasn't had a good season with the

0:09:30.933 --> 0:09:34.293
<v Speaker 7>gloves wads and he looks to have lost a lot

0:09:34.293 --> 0:09:38.053
<v Speaker 7>of confidence. His batting came back a fairly aggressive innings

0:09:40.293 --> 0:09:43.813
<v Speaker 7>the basin, but it obviously was in a lost cause.

0:09:44.493 --> 0:09:47.493
<v Speaker 7>And even during England that we mentioned the catchers, sorry

0:09:47.533 --> 0:09:49.773
<v Speaker 7>that Garth was talking about, they.

0:09:49.773 --> 0:09:53.013
<v Speaker 6>Kind of played Brook into form for the.

0:09:52.973 --> 0:09:56.413
<v Speaker 7>Basin Reserve where he had a very impressive innings, I thought,

0:09:56.773 --> 0:09:59.653
<v Speaker 7>But the first one wasn't and I can't. I can

0:09:59.693 --> 0:10:03.493
<v Speaker 7>tell you that Garth and I met Latham on the

0:10:03.573 --> 0:10:09.893
<v Speaker 7>outfield it had at Hagley after the match and he

0:10:10.213 --> 0:10:14.533
<v Speaker 7>maintained steadfast league that there's nothing wrong with New Zealand's

0:10:14.533 --> 0:10:16.973
<v Speaker 7>catching And it was extraordinary, wasn't it.

0:10:17.013 --> 0:10:20.613
<v Speaker 8>Gars Yeah, And I think you know we saw obviously

0:10:20.653 --> 0:10:24.453
<v Speaker 8>Tom you know he then dropped another a sitter in Hamilton.

0:10:24.533 --> 0:10:26.453
<v Speaker 8>It was strange and I think the point you make

0:10:26.573 --> 0:10:29.213
<v Speaker 8>is the one I wanted to make two Jerry about

0:10:29.213 --> 0:10:33.773
<v Speaker 8>the Australian Test. You know, they we said on air

0:10:34.733 --> 0:10:37.293
<v Speaker 8>when we went into that last day that New Zealand

0:10:37.373 --> 0:10:40.733
<v Speaker 8>must take their catches. They must and in the first

0:10:40.773 --> 0:10:45.213
<v Speaker 8>over it was Revendra dropping Marsh at point and and

0:10:45.373 --> 0:10:47.813
<v Speaker 8>you know it was a catch that should have been taken.

0:10:48.013 --> 0:10:51.413
<v Speaker 8>It was incredible that that that went down and Revender,

0:10:51.693 --> 0:10:54.373
<v Speaker 8>you know, I don't have much confidence in his fielding,

0:10:55.013 --> 0:10:57.493
<v Speaker 8>but that that changed the game. And then you saw

0:10:57.533 --> 0:11:01.853
<v Speaker 8>Marsh went on to a carey scored a ninety eight

0:11:02.093 --> 0:11:05.053
<v Speaker 8>out and they won the game. And it was that

0:11:05.253 --> 0:11:07.173
<v Speaker 8>one moment I know they got Head out on the

0:11:07.213 --> 0:11:10.613
<v Speaker 8>same over. But Head wasn't the danger man at that time.

0:11:10.693 --> 0:11:14.693
<v Speaker 5>Marsh was and it has cost them a lot.

0:11:15.333 --> 0:11:18.133
<v Speaker 8>And we continue, you know, while the New Zealand and

0:11:18.173 --> 0:11:20.173
<v Speaker 8>the England side talk about building for the Ashes. New

0:11:20.253 --> 0:11:23.333
<v Speaker 8>Zealand of course have a series coming up against Australia

0:11:23.373 --> 0:11:26.293
<v Speaker 8>in a year's time. You got a couple of years

0:11:26.333 --> 0:11:28.573
<v Speaker 8>and you know, I'm going to be very interested to

0:11:28.573 --> 0:11:30.933
<v Speaker 8>see what side they put out there and how they

0:11:30.933 --> 0:11:33.693
<v Speaker 8>build for it, and whether they have the confidence to

0:11:33.813 --> 0:11:37.533
<v Speaker 8>think ahead and look to the future and start making

0:11:37.573 --> 0:11:38.493
<v Speaker 8>some tough decisions.

0:11:38.933 --> 0:11:40.413
<v Speaker 3>Your mark's out of ten Garth.

0:11:41.013 --> 0:11:42.613
<v Speaker 5>I'm at a five as well.

0:11:42.733 --> 0:11:45.453
<v Speaker 8>Sorry to be consistent with you guys, but I but

0:11:45.653 --> 0:11:47.053
<v Speaker 8>you know you have to you have to look at

0:11:47.133 --> 0:11:49.093
<v Speaker 8>India and say, no other New Zealand team will be

0:11:49.133 --> 0:11:52.253
<v Speaker 8>in India three nil over there. It was an extraordinary achievement,

0:11:52.893 --> 0:11:55.773
<v Speaker 8>but I think they let themselves down in the matches

0:11:55.773 --> 0:11:57.053
<v Speaker 8>against Australia and England.

0:11:57.973 --> 0:12:01.053
<v Speaker 3>Is that enough to win them the Halberg Award for

0:12:01.333 --> 0:12:03.053
<v Speaker 3>Team of the Year or do you have to be

0:12:03.093 --> 0:12:06.013
<v Speaker 3>more consistent than that across the twelve months.

0:12:07.013 --> 0:12:09.333
<v Speaker 5>For me, you would have to be more consistent. I

0:12:09.373 --> 0:12:11.573
<v Speaker 5>don't think that. Yeah.

0:12:11.893 --> 0:12:14.013
<v Speaker 8>I mean again, I suppose you look at a side

0:12:14.013 --> 0:12:16.173
<v Speaker 8>that wins a World Cup, I guess that they get

0:12:16.253 --> 0:12:22.533
<v Speaker 8>put up for a nomination. Yeah, I mean I find

0:12:22.573 --> 0:12:27.173
<v Speaker 8>it slightly confusing if a side plays very well in

0:12:27.253 --> 0:12:31.053
<v Speaker 8>one series but not throughout the whole year, they wouldn't

0:12:31.053 --> 0:12:32.253
<v Speaker 8>be my nomination.

0:12:32.413 --> 0:12:33.453
<v Speaker 6>No, nor mine was.

0:12:34.053 --> 0:12:34.133
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:12:34.253 --> 0:12:37.053
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, we've got to remember that Indian series.

0:12:37.093 --> 0:12:41.053
<v Speaker 3>It was outstanding. We can't ignore that. But it's still

0:12:41.293 --> 0:12:44.733
<v Speaker 3>a disappointing year in terms of Test matches.

0:12:44.973 --> 0:12:47.373
<v Speaker 8>Can I make one other point, and that is in

0:12:47.413 --> 0:12:50.333
<v Speaker 8>relation to the selection and why I think that they

0:12:50.373 --> 0:12:53.853
<v Speaker 8>have failed in some respects. Just remember that when you

0:12:53.893 --> 0:12:56.133
<v Speaker 8>come to picking our best bowler of the year, I

0:12:56.133 --> 0:13:00.053
<v Speaker 8>think we will probably say the same person Jerry and

0:13:00.093 --> 0:13:03.573
<v Speaker 8>it's Matt Henry and I look at him. He did

0:13:03.573 --> 0:13:06.613
<v Speaker 8>not play in either Test in Tri Lanka, and that's

0:13:06.653 --> 0:13:10.133
<v Speaker 8>because Tim Saudi was and Tim's record over the last

0:13:10.133 --> 0:13:13.813
<v Speaker 8>twelve months has been very poor. So for me, another

0:13:13.853 --> 0:13:16.773
<v Speaker 8>reason why they're a four point five or five is

0:13:17.333 --> 0:13:19.973
<v Speaker 8>they've made a number They've made a number of selection

0:13:20.053 --> 0:13:23.293
<v Speaker 8>eras based on favoritism, and my view.

0:13:24.013 --> 0:13:26.373
<v Speaker 3>Has Gary Stead done enough to keep us coaching role

0:13:26.493 --> 0:13:29.413
<v Speaker 3>or should that go into the marketplace to test those

0:13:29.413 --> 0:13:30.773
<v Speaker 3>who are available to do the job.

0:13:31.173 --> 0:13:34.213
<v Speaker 7>Look, I can really only comment on the things that

0:13:34.293 --> 0:13:36.933
<v Speaker 7>you see. I haven't spent a lot of the time

0:13:36.973 --> 0:13:41.173
<v Speaker 7>around the team wads looking at practices, and obviously don't

0:13:41.213 --> 0:13:44.773
<v Speaker 7>go to unseen things like meetings and discussions and planning

0:13:44.853 --> 0:13:46.133
<v Speaker 7>and practices and.

0:13:46.133 --> 0:13:47.013
<v Speaker 6>All that sort of stuff.

0:13:48.173 --> 0:13:51.533
<v Speaker 7>We can comment, of course on the selections, and we

0:13:51.653 --> 0:13:57.013
<v Speaker 7>have done quite recently. He's the head coach in all

0:13:57.093 --> 0:14:01.973
<v Speaker 7>three formats, and we all hear about the congested schedules

0:14:02.053 --> 0:14:04.653
<v Speaker 7>and too much cricket and that sort of thing. So

0:14:04.693 --> 0:14:06.813
<v Speaker 7>it's a bit of a cheap result for the NZCA

0:14:06.893 --> 0:14:10.213
<v Speaker 7>to have one person to pay on the payroll, if

0:14:10.213 --> 0:14:13.693
<v Speaker 7>you like. I don't know how much actual coaching he does.

0:14:14.573 --> 0:14:16.693
<v Speaker 7>He's got coaches for every other part of the game,

0:14:16.773 --> 0:14:18.293
<v Speaker 7>isn't he fielding.

0:14:17.893 --> 0:14:18.693
<v Speaker 6>Batting, polling?

0:14:19.933 --> 0:14:22.813
<v Speaker 7>There seem to be others, Yeah, all around with all

0:14:22.853 --> 0:14:25.893
<v Speaker 7>the tasks. Look, I think he's a pretty he seems

0:14:25.893 --> 0:14:28.853
<v Speaker 7>a pretty solid, faithful, kind of steadfast.

0:14:28.253 --> 0:14:31.853
<v Speaker 6>Devoted guy, you know, and with the.

0:14:31.933 --> 0:14:34.413
<v Speaker 7>Number of cricketers we've got in the New Zealand system,

0:14:34.773 --> 0:14:38.453
<v Speaker 7>that might be you know, that provide a source for

0:14:38.573 --> 0:14:42.493
<v Speaker 7>him to choose from. They might be the qualities that

0:14:42.573 --> 0:14:46.693
<v Speaker 7>allow players to mature a bit better, but some will

0:14:46.733 --> 0:14:49.773
<v Speaker 7>feel other things. They will say it couldn't be bad

0:14:49.813 --> 0:14:51.733
<v Speaker 7>for a player if you play too long. Look at

0:14:51.733 --> 0:14:56.293
<v Speaker 7>Conway at the moment, for example, his struggles recently don't

0:14:56.293 --> 0:14:59.533
<v Speaker 7>appear to be improving. And does he at some point

0:14:59.613 --> 0:15:02.293
<v Speaker 7>need to get away from the scrutiny and from the

0:15:02.333 --> 0:15:05.813
<v Speaker 7>assessments and the failures and return to a place, you know,

0:15:05.933 --> 0:15:08.333
<v Speaker 7>in a system where you know he's got time to reduce,

0:15:08.373 --> 0:15:13.453
<v Speaker 7>juvenate and you get some confidence. It just seems to

0:15:13.493 --> 0:15:16.493
<v Speaker 7>me the current coaching staff there don't have any answers

0:15:16.493 --> 0:15:20.173
<v Speaker 7>to the problems. And some will also feel that, you know,

0:15:20.293 --> 0:15:22.933
<v Speaker 7>he's turned an international sports side, which is sort of

0:15:22.933 --> 0:15:25.893
<v Speaker 7>gas thing I think, into a men's club that you know,

0:15:25.973 --> 0:15:30.413
<v Speaker 7>once you're a member, irrespective of how you perform, you're

0:15:30.413 --> 0:15:33.173
<v Speaker 7>not dismissed. There's no effect at all, there's no consequence.

0:15:34.253 --> 0:15:38.333
<v Speaker 7>And so players you know, have become perhaps have they

0:15:38.413 --> 0:15:42.693
<v Speaker 7>or some players a bit too influential and what goes on,

0:15:42.853 --> 0:15:44.893
<v Speaker 7>I don't know. Look at that T twenty World Cup,

0:15:44.973 --> 0:15:48.093
<v Speaker 7>not going there beforehand, all clearing off, you know, and

0:15:48.133 --> 0:15:51.453
<v Speaker 7>to do other things after. I mean, I just I just,

0:15:51.693 --> 0:15:55.533
<v Speaker 7>you know, find that he's perhaps a bit strict with

0:15:55.293 --> 0:15:59.893
<v Speaker 7>the limit of caution that he has. Well, look, everyone

0:16:00.013 --> 0:16:02.653
<v Speaker 7>likes to pick teams, don't they. We do in the

0:16:02.693 --> 0:16:06.213
<v Speaker 7>teams to represent your country. We pour over stats and

0:16:06.253 --> 0:16:08.173
<v Speaker 7>we have a look at the players. We you know,

0:16:08.533 --> 0:16:11.973
<v Speaker 7>we developed favorites and you know, and all we see

0:16:12.053 --> 0:16:15.053
<v Speaker 7>the same players year after year. I don't forget our

0:16:15.133 --> 0:16:19.333
<v Speaker 7>eighteen beat Australia a last year twice and tests over

0:16:19.413 --> 0:16:22.653
<v Speaker 7>in Australia, so you know, rat was part of that.

0:16:22.773 --> 0:16:26.133
<v Speaker 3>Some of those players haven't come to the forefront.

0:16:26.493 --> 0:16:30.053
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think I endorsed what Jerry says

0:16:30.053 --> 0:16:32.533
<v Speaker 8>about Gary Stead. I think he's you know, he's a

0:16:32.573 --> 0:16:35.293
<v Speaker 8>he's a fine person, I think, with a good heart,

0:16:35.573 --> 0:16:37.853
<v Speaker 8>who wants the best. But he is, in my view,

0:16:38.133 --> 0:16:42.413
<v Speaker 8>crippled by conservatism. And that's you know, in the country

0:16:42.453 --> 0:16:45.333
<v Speaker 8>of New Zealand size. I always feel that when we're

0:16:45.533 --> 0:16:49.493
<v Speaker 8>at our best, it's when we you know, it must

0:16:49.493 --> 0:16:51.733
<v Speaker 8>involve a little bit of risk taking from time to time,

0:16:51.853 --> 0:16:54.173
<v Speaker 8>and I just don't see it. And so and the

0:16:54.173 --> 0:16:57.493
<v Speaker 8>greatest example of it for me is persisting with Conway

0:16:57.533 --> 0:16:59.933
<v Speaker 8>for as long as they have, and the and the

0:17:00.013 --> 0:17:04.173
<v Speaker 8>continued selection with Tim Soudy. They were prepared to have

0:17:04.333 --> 0:17:07.813
<v Speaker 8>a very hard conversation with Neil Wagner and it clearly

0:17:07.853 --> 0:17:11.533
<v Speaker 8>came as a surprised to Wagner. They weren't consistent with

0:17:11.613 --> 0:17:16.333
<v Speaker 8>Salvi and you know, I just feel that that for me,

0:17:16.453 --> 0:17:21.213
<v Speaker 8>Damn's the coaching and selection crew and I want to

0:17:21.253 --> 0:17:23.893
<v Speaker 8>see a more ambitious group. I think when you look

0:17:23.933 --> 0:17:27.853
<v Speaker 8>at Steed's record since twenty twenty one, you first see

0:17:27.933 --> 0:17:30.013
<v Speaker 8>that he came in on the quest of a wave

0:17:30.053 --> 0:17:34.053
<v Speaker 8>in twenty eighteen. They went they won the World Test

0:17:34.093 --> 0:17:35.613
<v Speaker 8>Final in twenty twenty one.

0:17:35.933 --> 0:17:37.453
<v Speaker 5>Which was a fabulous achievement.

0:17:37.733 --> 0:17:40.453
<v Speaker 8>But since then, if we're looking at Test cricket, I

0:17:40.493 --> 0:17:42.493
<v Speaker 8>think the reck that the returns of this site have

0:17:42.613 --> 0:17:48.573
<v Speaker 8>been very modest and again they've been too content for

0:17:48.693 --> 0:17:51.573
<v Speaker 8>my view to stick with the same and I don't

0:17:51.573 --> 0:17:53.493
<v Speaker 8>think there's enough hunger for places in the team.

0:17:53.493 --> 0:17:54.693
<v Speaker 5>It's not competitive enough.

0:17:55.253 --> 0:17:57.653
<v Speaker 7>The other thing was is you know, six years in

0:17:57.733 --> 0:18:02.253
<v Speaker 7>a job for stead now and I think that represents

0:18:02.293 --> 0:18:04.693
<v Speaker 7>a period of time to discover the job and what

0:18:04.733 --> 0:18:06.973
<v Speaker 7>it means and what do you do and what things

0:18:06.973 --> 0:18:09.653
<v Speaker 7>you want to change and what for what of a

0:18:09.653 --> 0:18:10.133
<v Speaker 7>better word?

0:18:10.493 --> 0:18:11.613
<v Speaker 6>To develop a culture?

0:18:11.653 --> 0:18:14.653
<v Speaker 7>You know how hard you train, the routines of the team,

0:18:14.693 --> 0:18:18.893
<v Speaker 7>the selection policies, the dealing with problems, but after that,

0:18:19.213 --> 0:18:20.893
<v Speaker 7>you know it's kind of time to move on.

0:18:21.333 --> 0:18:22.493
<v Speaker 6>Give someone else a crack.

0:18:23.813 --> 0:18:26.453
<v Speaker 7>And I feel, I mean Gary if he wants to,

0:18:26.533 --> 0:18:32.093
<v Speaker 7>because the results have been internationally okay, but apart from

0:18:32.293 --> 0:18:35.253
<v Speaker 7>since Garth, as he said, they were sixth last year

0:18:35.293 --> 0:18:38.573
<v Speaker 7>in the World Test Champions they're currently fourth. But you know,

0:18:39.453 --> 0:18:43.133
<v Speaker 7>I just think Gary should if he wants to have

0:18:43.173 --> 0:18:44.413
<v Speaker 7>a go again and apply.

0:18:44.533 --> 0:18:45.093
<v Speaker 6>That's fine.

0:18:45.733 --> 0:18:48.733
<v Speaker 7>Maybe he wants time with the family, He's earned that right,

0:18:49.333 --> 0:18:51.733
<v Speaker 7>But there are other candidates who should also have a

0:18:51.813 --> 0:18:57.613
<v Speaker 7>crack and at the coaching now, whether that's Shane Jurgenson

0:18:57.653 --> 0:19:00.733
<v Speaker 7>who's currently at Wellington he won the Plunket Shield last year,

0:19:00.733 --> 0:19:05.213
<v Speaker 7>whether it's Peter Fulton. We've lost Rob Walter who's now

0:19:05.253 --> 0:19:08.213
<v Speaker 7>gone to coach South Africa. He was here at CD.

0:19:08.773 --> 0:19:12.813
<v Speaker 7>We've lost Heinrich Milan up in Auckland, he's gone to Ireland.

0:19:12.813 --> 0:19:15.933
<v Speaker 7>Grant Bad Bruins around and at Glamorgan. At the moment

0:19:16.253 --> 0:19:19.773
<v Speaker 7>there are coaches around and maybe we can co op

0:19:20.173 --> 0:19:23.333
<v Speaker 7>a few can't we is that a possibility. Couldn't we

0:19:23.373 --> 0:19:27.573
<v Speaker 7>co op? Couldn't we co op the fleming? Couldn't we

0:19:27.613 --> 0:19:28.493
<v Speaker 7>co up the bond?

0:19:29.133 --> 0:19:32.253
<v Speaker 3>They may have to reflect on doing something like that

0:19:32.413 --> 0:19:35.933
<v Speaker 3>because we're starting a new World Test Championship we assume

0:19:36.453 --> 0:19:38.173
<v Speaker 3>in the middle of the year, and they've got time

0:19:38.253 --> 0:19:42.573
<v Speaker 3>to put that to the forefront of their thinking. It

0:19:42.573 --> 0:19:45.413
<v Speaker 3>may well be that they want white ball coaches and

0:19:45.973 --> 0:19:49.613
<v Speaker 3>red ball coaches. That's something that they can probably reflect on.

0:19:50.013 --> 0:19:54.773
<v Speaker 3>Garth has given us his bowler of the Year. I

0:19:54.853 --> 0:19:58.133
<v Speaker 3>can't argue with that. Matt Henry forty eight wickets at

0:19:58.213 --> 0:20:03.853
<v Speaker 3>eighteen quite clearly the star performer and he was getting

0:20:04.013 --> 0:20:07.173
<v Speaker 3>help in the end by the best up and coming player,

0:20:07.253 --> 0:20:10.853
<v Speaker 3>and you've talked about that Will O'Rourke. Hard to see

0:20:10.893 --> 0:20:13.933
<v Speaker 3>past them as the leaders of our attack in the future.

0:20:14.573 --> 0:20:18.453
<v Speaker 7>Oh, definitely, definitely. If we're going to continue to have

0:20:18.933 --> 0:20:22.493
<v Speaker 7>seam based pictures, green pictures, those two are going to

0:20:22.533 --> 0:20:26.133
<v Speaker 7>be crackers and maybe if we can keep people fit,

0:20:26.173 --> 0:20:28.773
<v Speaker 7>there'll be others to join them. I thought it was

0:20:29.093 --> 0:20:32.253
<v Speaker 7>you know, it was a difficult choice, for example, to

0:20:32.373 --> 0:20:35.173
<v Speaker 7>leave Smith out. I think he's shown even in the

0:20:35.213 --> 0:20:38.293
<v Speaker 7>short two you know spaces. Of the two matches he played,

0:20:39.413 --> 0:20:41.573
<v Speaker 7>he showed enough to all of us, I think, who

0:20:41.613 --> 0:20:44.453
<v Speaker 7>have watched cricket for a long time to say, we

0:20:44.693 --> 0:20:45.533
<v Speaker 7>like your bowling.

0:20:46.173 --> 0:20:47.893
<v Speaker 6>We like the way you say yes year.

0:20:47.933 --> 0:20:49.573
<v Speaker 7>But he hit around a bit and you will leave

0:20:49.613 --> 0:20:52.613
<v Speaker 7>it full and a'll weave it short at times. But

0:20:53.453 --> 0:20:57.293
<v Speaker 7>the pace we like, the energy, we like, the effort,

0:20:57.373 --> 0:21:02.413
<v Speaker 7>we like, the fielding we love. He's really starting to

0:21:02.453 --> 0:21:04.253
<v Speaker 7>show some of the others up the way he moves

0:21:04.293 --> 0:21:08.693
<v Speaker 7>around that park in the circle. And he's also seeming

0:21:08.733 --> 0:21:11.613
<v Speaker 7>to be useful with the bat. And he's going to Surrey's.

0:21:12.133 --> 0:21:14.693
<v Speaker 7>They'll teach him more. They're a very strong club, they've

0:21:14.733 --> 0:21:18.613
<v Speaker 7>won the last three championships and they'll teach him stuff

0:21:18.613 --> 0:21:21.453
<v Speaker 7>as well. So he's going to be a very useful

0:21:21.613 --> 0:21:24.333
<v Speaker 7>addition at number eight or nine in the order as well.

0:21:24.853 --> 0:21:27.453
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there can be no argument with the batsmen of

0:21:27.693 --> 0:21:31.013
<v Speaker 3>the year, and I guess the player of the year

0:21:31.093 --> 0:21:35.013
<v Speaker 3>test wise Caine Williamson one thousand and thirteen runs in

0:21:35.093 --> 0:21:39.693
<v Speaker 3>the year four centuries, four fifties. He was the man

0:21:39.853 --> 0:21:43.293
<v Speaker 3>we missed the most whenever he wasn't available. Thankfully, through

0:21:43.453 --> 0:21:46.853
<v Speaker 3>the year he was available and we talked earlier about

0:21:46.853 --> 0:21:50.293
<v Speaker 3>the possibility of not having him in the future. Who knows,

0:21:50.293 --> 0:21:53.053
<v Speaker 3>We'd have to wait and see. But he's the class

0:21:53.093 --> 0:21:56.133
<v Speaker 3>performer in this side, and he led the way with

0:21:56.213 --> 0:22:00.693
<v Speaker 3>the Batsman when others who we were expecting to contribute

0:22:00.893 --> 0:22:04.693
<v Speaker 3>the likes of Lathan, the likes of Conway, weren't able

0:22:04.733 --> 0:22:08.133
<v Speaker 3>to do so. Only three players averaged above forty in

0:22:08.173 --> 0:22:14.333
<v Speaker 3>the Test matches, Williamson, Revendra and Young and I guess

0:22:14.413 --> 0:22:16.493
<v Speaker 3>that's not really where we want to bet.

0:22:17.133 --> 0:22:17.213
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:22:17.613 --> 0:22:22.773
<v Speaker 5>And Revendra's stats were boosted or bolstered.

0:22:22.253 --> 0:22:25.293
<v Speaker 8>By a you know, a double century against South Africa

0:22:25.293 --> 0:22:26.693
<v Speaker 8>at the at.

0:22:26.533 --> 0:22:27.293
<v Speaker 5>The bay Oval.

0:22:27.373 --> 0:22:29.093
<v Speaker 8>I mean it was a very fine innings, but it

0:22:29.133 --> 0:22:31.213
<v Speaker 8>was an innings against a very ordinary attack.

0:22:32.693 --> 0:22:32.893
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:22:32.973 --> 0:22:35.973
<v Speaker 8>I think if I look at my innings of the season,

0:22:36.053 --> 0:22:39.573
<v Speaker 8>I think probably you know, for all that can did

0:22:39.573 --> 0:22:40.733
<v Speaker 8>and he was magnificent.

0:22:41.053 --> 0:22:43.453
<v Speaker 5>I think Revendra's you know, one hundred and thirty four

0:22:43.493 --> 0:22:44.973
<v Speaker 5>at BEng LaRue.

0:22:45.053 --> 0:22:47.853
<v Speaker 8>Against India in that first Test when they bowled India

0:22:47.933 --> 0:22:52.093
<v Speaker 8>out for forty six and New Zealand, you know that

0:22:52.373 --> 0:22:55.213
<v Speaker 8>that was a critical innings and his partnership with Conway,

0:22:55.533 --> 0:22:58.493
<v Speaker 8>I just thought that was for me the batting highlight

0:22:58.573 --> 0:23:02.413
<v Speaker 8>of the year on an individual basis. But having said

0:23:02.453 --> 0:23:05.533
<v Speaker 8>that and having watched him through the England series and

0:23:05.573 --> 0:23:09.293
<v Speaker 8>getting himself out six times in a row, he's got

0:23:09.293 --> 0:23:12.333
<v Speaker 8>an awful lot to do. He had a very good

0:23:12.373 --> 0:23:17.533
<v Speaker 8>series against India. But I think watching him, I'm still

0:23:17.573 --> 0:23:21.613
<v Speaker 8>not convinced that he's the number four. And just to

0:23:21.653 --> 0:23:26.213
<v Speaker 8>turn to Williamson, well, another incredible year by an amazing player.

0:23:26.373 --> 0:23:29.493
<v Speaker 8>I have to say I had this sinking feeling in

0:23:29.533 --> 0:23:31.733
<v Speaker 8>Hamilton that this might be it for him.

0:23:31.773 --> 0:23:34.773
<v Speaker 5>In the white clothing game. I don't know what it was.

0:23:34.893 --> 0:23:39.053
<v Speaker 8>It's it's that gut instinct, but I felt that I

0:23:39.133 --> 0:23:42.293
<v Speaker 8>was watching, you know, possibly Williamson playing in his last

0:23:42.293 --> 0:23:44.053
<v Speaker 8>match for in Test cricket.

0:23:44.693 --> 0:23:46.853
<v Speaker 5>I don't know why, but it just felt like that.

0:23:47.093 --> 0:23:49.813
<v Speaker 8>And I suspect that Caine he won't want a big

0:23:49.853 --> 0:23:52.493
<v Speaker 8>send off in a great big Swan song. He's not

0:23:52.533 --> 0:23:53.333
<v Speaker 8>that sort of person.

0:23:54.133 --> 0:23:54.373
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:23:54.413 --> 0:24:00.613
<v Speaker 7>Well, well, Ravendra first, at the moment, he doesn't adapt

0:24:00.653 --> 0:24:03.613
<v Speaker 7>to Test format, does he. He wants to score very

0:24:03.693 --> 0:24:07.133
<v Speaker 7>quickly and he tries to do that. It was okay

0:24:07.213 --> 0:24:10.093
<v Speaker 7>and in do because the ball doesn't bounce as soon

0:24:10.133 --> 0:24:12.653
<v Speaker 7>as you get a bit more bounce than if you

0:24:12.733 --> 0:24:16.213
<v Speaker 7>don't actually make contact with the ball at the right time,

0:24:16.733 --> 0:24:18.613
<v Speaker 7>you're normally out in front of yourself a bit too

0:24:18.693 --> 0:24:20.653
<v Speaker 7>much and you lose control of the shot it goes

0:24:20.693 --> 0:24:21.173
<v Speaker 7>in the air.

0:24:21.733 --> 0:24:24.013
<v Speaker 6>So Ravendra needs to adapt.

0:24:24.373 --> 0:24:27.173
<v Speaker 7>You could see him locked in a battle with himself

0:24:27.213 --> 0:24:31.133
<v Speaker 7>in the last innings at Hamilton. He was only three

0:24:31.173 --> 0:24:35.013
<v Speaker 7>off about thirty or forty balls and wasn't playing a

0:24:35.013 --> 0:24:37.533
<v Speaker 7>shot at all, So he went from one extreme to

0:24:37.613 --> 0:24:40.373
<v Speaker 7>the other. When he gets it, and he will get it,

0:24:40.413 --> 0:24:43.013
<v Speaker 7>he's a smart man and he's also a very, very

0:24:43.053 --> 0:24:47.533
<v Speaker 7>capable player. I agree also with Garth's comment about his fielding.

0:24:47.933 --> 0:24:51.813
<v Speaker 7>Get into the game, Revendra. He should be a gully

0:24:52.333 --> 0:24:55.973
<v Speaker 7>or a slip or someone in the covers, left hander,

0:24:56.413 --> 0:25:00.933
<v Speaker 7>someone at midwicket, in these key positions. That's where we

0:25:00.973 --> 0:25:04.813
<v Speaker 7>want to see him. But at the moment, I'm afraid

0:25:04.813 --> 0:25:07.253
<v Speaker 7>he's just not really in the game. When he fields,

0:25:07.613 --> 0:25:11.773
<v Speaker 7>he and Conwa they are always patrolling the boundaries. We

0:25:11.773 --> 0:25:15.213
<v Speaker 7>need him in there, caking catchers, making a runout, all

0:25:15.253 --> 0:25:19.133
<v Speaker 7>those sorts of things, giving encouragement. That's what I want

0:25:19.173 --> 0:25:21.893
<v Speaker 7>to see from him, and so that's a part of

0:25:21.933 --> 0:25:22.413
<v Speaker 7>his game.

0:25:22.493 --> 0:25:26.253
<v Speaker 6>I think that he really needs to work on. You know.

0:25:27.213 --> 0:25:32.053
<v Speaker 7>Williamson absolutely just terrific player. He's the one who does adapt.

0:25:32.373 --> 0:25:35.413
<v Speaker 3>What about the bowling performance of the year. Matt Henry

0:25:35.613 --> 0:25:38.333
<v Speaker 3>is our bowler of the year seven for sixty seven

0:25:38.533 --> 0:25:43.253
<v Speaker 3>against Australia and christ Yet the bowling effort against India

0:25:43.293 --> 0:25:46.613
<v Speaker 3>when they were dismissed for that total of forty six,

0:25:46.733 --> 0:25:49.653
<v Speaker 3>five for fifteen and three for one hundred and two.

0:25:50.373 --> 0:25:52.893
<v Speaker 3>And then you can throw in also the bowling of

0:25:53.013 --> 0:25:55.853
<v Speaker 3>Satna and Poune seven for fifty three and six for

0:25:55.933 --> 0:25:59.613
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and four. Who was the bowler who provided

0:25:59.653 --> 0:26:01.333
<v Speaker 3>you with the best moment?

0:26:01.733 --> 0:26:03.453
<v Speaker 5>Gat Oh, Matt Henry.

0:26:03.533 --> 0:26:06.933
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think it's tough on Centaler because his

0:26:07.053 --> 0:26:12.173
<v Speaker 8>performance was wass I mean, but again against India ten

0:26:12.213 --> 0:26:15.973
<v Speaker 8>wickets at fifteen for Henry against Australia seventeen at fifteen

0:26:16.773 --> 0:26:19.133
<v Speaker 8>and again I come back to the fact that he

0:26:19.213 --> 0:26:22.573
<v Speaker 8>did not play in gaul because Tim Saadi was preferred

0:26:22.573 --> 0:26:26.253
<v Speaker 8>over him, and that is a selection blunder and for

0:26:26.333 --> 0:26:31.493
<v Speaker 8>me it's a stain on the side and how they do.

0:26:31.573 --> 0:26:32.533
<v Speaker 5>How they've done things.

0:26:33.493 --> 0:26:37.413
<v Speaker 8>For me, I thought his performance at Hagley against Australia,

0:26:37.493 --> 0:26:41.773
<v Speaker 8>his seven for sixty seven. That's my pack against against

0:26:41.773 --> 0:26:45.333
<v Speaker 8>the fine Australian side, and then followed by by satnus

0:26:45.413 --> 0:26:48.133
<v Speaker 8>seven for as well and other a wonderful performance and

0:26:48.213 --> 0:26:49.373
<v Speaker 8>very helpful conditions.

0:26:49.533 --> 0:26:53.093
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, they were both both good conditions, weren't they that

0:26:53.133 --> 0:26:56.933
<v Speaker 7>were describing, particularly the Begoluru won for the Seamas and

0:26:56.973 --> 0:27:02.733
<v Speaker 7>the first innings lights on murky cloud, you know, the

0:27:02.733 --> 0:27:04.813
<v Speaker 7>pits that has had a little bit of moisture in

0:27:04.853 --> 0:27:07.013
<v Speaker 7>it and so on and nipped about, so that they

0:27:07.053 --> 0:27:10.693
<v Speaker 7>are ideal conditions for someone like Matt Henry. He is

0:27:10.813 --> 0:27:15.173
<v Speaker 7>so consistent, he is so much at the stumps, always

0:27:15.533 --> 0:27:18.893
<v Speaker 7>forcing you to play a stroke, nipping it about. And

0:27:19.213 --> 0:27:22.333
<v Speaker 7>he's quick enough that he can sit someone down as well.

0:27:22.333 --> 0:27:24.653
<v Speaker 7>He can bowl the odd bounce and doesn't overdo it

0:27:24.693 --> 0:27:28.533
<v Speaker 7>by any stretch. And for so long he's been on

0:27:28.653 --> 0:27:33.053
<v Speaker 7>the pine, hasn't he sitting there watching games? Now he's

0:27:33.173 --> 0:27:38.213
<v Speaker 7>leading the attack and that's a fantastic journey that he's undergone. There.

0:27:39.453 --> 0:27:44.373
<v Speaker 7>Santana is improving all the time, isn't he. Santana is

0:27:44.413 --> 0:27:47.173
<v Speaker 7>finding a way now in red ball cricket. He's got

0:27:47.173 --> 0:27:51.053
<v Speaker 7>the confidence and to dismiss root, what did you call

0:27:51.133 --> 0:27:54.013
<v Speaker 7>him the number one, didn't you Wads? In the Test

0:27:54.053 --> 0:27:57.133
<v Speaker 7>batting he got underneath the bat as he was trying

0:27:57.133 --> 0:27:59.533
<v Speaker 7>to sweep, wasn't he He was trying to he was hitting

0:27:59.613 --> 0:28:02.453
<v Speaker 7>him around the prior over it might have been the

0:28:02.493 --> 0:28:05.453
<v Speaker 7>same over, but he got one underneath his bat, just

0:28:05.533 --> 0:28:07.853
<v Speaker 7>past the gloves and it was LBW.

0:28:07.613 --> 0:28:08.653
<v Speaker 6>So he's a.

0:28:08.573 --> 0:28:14.853
<v Speaker 7>Cunning bowler and he's improving. His batting is improving, isn't

0:28:14.853 --> 0:28:17.813
<v Speaker 7>it as well? I mean he put a lot more

0:28:17.893 --> 0:28:21.293
<v Speaker 7>legs legs to tire, didn't he. When they played in

0:28:21.293 --> 0:28:24.773
<v Speaker 7>that eccentric way at the start of the third day England,

0:28:25.213 --> 0:28:27.253
<v Speaker 7>with all of them posted on the boundary, he said, yep,

0:28:27.333 --> 0:28:29.013
<v Speaker 7>I'll just take it off the fourth ball, thank you

0:28:29.133 --> 0:28:33.733
<v Speaker 7>very much, so keep bowling. So I think he's improved

0:28:33.733 --> 0:28:35.613
<v Speaker 7>a great deal too. So they're the two for me

0:28:35.853 --> 0:28:36.333
<v Speaker 7>in the year.

0:28:37.493 --> 0:28:40.613
<v Speaker 3>An email from Peter I wait heavidly every week for

0:28:40.653 --> 0:28:43.373
<v Speaker 3>your podcast, which I listened to while on my exercycle.

0:28:43.613 --> 0:28:46.053
<v Speaker 3>God that's hard work. I agree with most of the

0:28:46.053 --> 0:28:49.493
<v Speaker 3>comments on Tim Salde's retirement that he's carried on too long. However,

0:28:49.773 --> 0:28:53.373
<v Speaker 3>I've been surprised about the insistence that he's just too slow.

0:28:53.813 --> 0:28:55.973
<v Speaker 3>The English bowlers are doing a number on us and

0:28:56.053 --> 0:29:00.493
<v Speaker 3>mostly bowling around the same speeds as sauveyre taking wickets,

0:29:00.493 --> 0:29:03.253
<v Speaker 3>but he's not. I assume this is the difference between swing,

0:29:03.413 --> 0:29:05.693
<v Speaker 3>seam and bounce bowlers comments.

0:29:05.933 --> 0:29:07.213
<v Speaker 6>He's absolutely right.

0:29:08.773 --> 0:29:12.813
<v Speaker 7>I would have thought the bulk of Saudi's deliveries were lower.

0:29:13.413 --> 0:29:16.413
<v Speaker 7>To be honest, it was only in Hamilton that we

0:29:16.533 --> 0:29:19.893
<v Speaker 7>all noticed how tired and fatigued they had become. And

0:29:19.933 --> 0:29:22.293
<v Speaker 7>it may be an issue for England, especially when they

0:29:22.333 --> 0:29:24.213
<v Speaker 7>go to Wossie with the harder pictures and the herd

0:29:24.253 --> 0:29:27.333
<v Speaker 7>of footholds they've got to smash down onto all the time.

0:29:27.973 --> 0:29:29.773
<v Speaker 6>So I think the bulk.

0:29:29.733 --> 0:29:34.773
<v Speaker 7>Of Saudi's deliveries are slower, and I do think as sorry,

0:29:34.773 --> 0:29:35.693
<v Speaker 7>I forgot, was it Peter?

0:29:35.813 --> 0:29:36.373
<v Speaker 6>Did you say?

0:29:37.053 --> 0:29:37.493
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Peter?

0:29:37.653 --> 0:29:41.053
<v Speaker 6>Yep, yeah. I think Peter's right when he says it's swing.

0:29:42.253 --> 0:29:44.933
<v Speaker 7>The other bowlers, if we're talking about cars and we're

0:29:44.973 --> 0:29:48.133
<v Speaker 7>talking about Atkinson and so on, they're not so much

0:29:48.213 --> 0:29:49.773
<v Speaker 7>swing bowlers Saudi.

0:29:50.693 --> 0:29:52.293
<v Speaker 6>Saudi is really the.

0:29:52.333 --> 0:29:55.613
<v Speaker 7>Mainly at swing bowler and doesn't bowl many overs now,

0:29:56.973 --> 0:29:59.253
<v Speaker 7>and if you swing the ball at one hundred and

0:29:59.293 --> 0:30:03.093
<v Speaker 7>twenty eight you see it coming from his hand, so

0:30:03.213 --> 0:30:05.933
<v Speaker 7>you get a good look at the ball as it's

0:30:05.973 --> 0:30:09.053
<v Speaker 7>coming down towards you. It takes longer you see the

0:30:09.093 --> 0:30:11.253
<v Speaker 7>line of the ball and you've got a choice. I

0:30:11.373 --> 0:30:14.333
<v Speaker 7>either hit it, and in Crawley's case, he smashed it

0:30:14.613 --> 0:30:19.253
<v Speaker 7>if he could or missed it. And in others they

0:30:19.333 --> 0:30:22.213
<v Speaker 7>hit him, they attacked him as well. So that's the reason.

0:30:22.213 --> 0:30:24.533
<v Speaker 7>It's because he's a swing bowler and you see it

0:30:24.613 --> 0:30:27.413
<v Speaker 7>earlier from the hand than you do if you're a

0:30:27.453 --> 0:30:28.213
<v Speaker 7>seam bowler.

0:30:28.253 --> 0:30:31.013
<v Speaker 5>Only. Yeah, I agreed, Jerry, and you watched.

0:30:31.053 --> 0:30:33.493
<v Speaker 8>I thought it was very interesting watching England in the

0:30:33.533 --> 0:30:37.413
<v Speaker 8>first innings at the Hagley Oval where they really struggled

0:30:37.453 --> 0:30:41.013
<v Speaker 8>to find their length, and you know, they had Wokes,

0:30:41.293 --> 0:30:47.413
<v Speaker 8>Cars and Atkinson and they're set. They're predominantly seen bowlers,

0:30:47.693 --> 0:30:51.173
<v Speaker 8>and Saldi's a swing bowler. But as soon as they

0:30:51.173 --> 0:30:54.013
<v Speaker 8>got their length, and particularly Wokes in the second innings

0:30:54.093 --> 0:30:56.653
<v Speaker 8>and cast bowled a bit shorter, but then would would

0:30:56.733 --> 0:30:58.893
<v Speaker 8>would bowl the ones that was pitched up and catching

0:30:58.893 --> 0:31:02.093
<v Speaker 8>people on the crease. I just felt that, you know,

0:31:02.853 --> 0:31:07.853
<v Speaker 8>the scene movement in our conditions is more challenging for batsmen,

0:31:08.453 --> 0:31:11.573
<v Speaker 8>and you know, I thought if Saudi was bowling swing.

0:31:11.693 --> 0:31:13.933
<v Speaker 8>At one hundred and thirty five, for example, or one

0:31:14.013 --> 0:31:17.293
<v Speaker 8>hundred and thirty eight or one forty, it's a different

0:31:17.853 --> 0:31:21.973
<v Speaker 8>kettle of fish completely, But at one twenty five one

0:31:22.093 --> 0:31:25.293
<v Speaker 8>twenty eight, I agree with you. You see it early and

0:31:25.333 --> 0:31:27.453
<v Speaker 8>you're allowed to watch. I mean, he beat the bat

0:31:27.493 --> 0:31:30.733
<v Speaker 8>on a few occasions in fairness to him, and you know,

0:31:30.813 --> 0:31:33.373
<v Speaker 8>I don't think I've seen the bat being beaten more

0:31:33.413 --> 0:31:36.053
<v Speaker 8>times in a series than in this one. It was

0:31:36.093 --> 0:31:40.893
<v Speaker 8>a perpetual happening. But I just think England's I think

0:31:40.973 --> 0:31:46.093
<v Speaker 8>seem in our conditions was a very useful thing for

0:31:46.173 --> 0:31:48.333
<v Speaker 8>England and they exploited it extremely well.

0:31:48.653 --> 0:31:51.533
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for that email, Peter on the Front Foot twenty

0:31:51.733 --> 0:31:53.293
<v Speaker 3>at gmail dot com.

0:31:53.373 --> 0:31:57.893
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear from you, Brian Waddle, Jeremy Coney on the

0:31:58.013 --> 0:31:58.573
<v Speaker 1>Front Foot.

0:31:58.813 --> 0:32:01.893
<v Speaker 3>Following the Test match, the selectors took the opportunity to

0:32:02.533 --> 0:32:07.733
<v Speaker 3>name the latest white ball captain, Mitchell satna Is to

0:32:07.773 --> 0:32:11.853
<v Speaker 3>be the captain of the White Bull T twenty and

0:32:12.053 --> 0:32:17.013
<v Speaker 3>Odie Eyeside. Gary Stead explained the reasoning behind the choice

0:32:17.093 --> 0:32:17.613
<v Speaker 3>of Sanna.

0:32:18.013 --> 0:32:20.333
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, lookt Mitch has been a great player for New

0:32:20.373 --> 0:32:22.653
<v Speaker 9>Zealand over a long period of time, he's got a

0:32:22.653 --> 0:32:24.413
<v Speaker 9>fantastic white ball record.

0:32:24.133 --> 0:32:25.853
<v Speaker 5>And he's done some leadership for.

0:32:25.853 --> 0:32:27.653
<v Speaker 9>Us in the past couple of years as well, like

0:32:27.773 --> 0:32:31.413
<v Speaker 9>filling in when Cain or Tom or Tim moreover it's

0:32:31.453 --> 0:32:35.493
<v Speaker 9>been hasn't been available. So we think he fits the

0:32:35.773 --> 0:32:39.573
<v Speaker 9>I guess bill nicely between the older experienced players and

0:32:39.813 --> 0:32:41.973
<v Speaker 9>the younger guys coming through. He's got a great rapport

0:32:42.013 --> 0:32:45.933
<v Speaker 9>with players. He's very very valued within in our team

0:32:46.013 --> 0:32:49.453
<v Speaker 9>dressing room as well. Our preference was always to have

0:32:49.573 --> 0:32:51.933
<v Speaker 9>one guy to do both white ball formats as well,

0:32:51.973 --> 0:32:56.053
<v Speaker 9>and we think with Tom Latham going into the Test

0:32:56.093 --> 0:32:58.613
<v Speaker 9>captaincy recently and that's a huge job in itself, and

0:32:58.973 --> 0:33:02.093
<v Speaker 9>thought separating them was the right way to go. He's calm,

0:33:02.213 --> 0:33:05.733
<v Speaker 9>collected out in the middle. He's a guy that often

0:33:05.773 --> 0:33:07.773
<v Speaker 9>looks laid back but thinks a lot about the game.

0:33:08.173 --> 0:33:11.533
<v Speaker 9>Is hugely respected with ours and our dressing room as well.

0:33:12.333 --> 0:33:15.413
<v Speaker 9>I think he fills that void nicely between experienced players

0:33:15.413 --> 0:33:17.413
<v Speaker 9>and guys that are new to the game and has

0:33:17.453 --> 0:33:19.733
<v Speaker 9>a good understanding I guess of white bull cricket. He's

0:33:19.773 --> 0:33:22.693
<v Speaker 9>played in cricket all around the world, so so you'll

0:33:22.693 --> 0:33:24.933
<v Speaker 9>bring a lot of those experiences to the group and

0:33:25.413 --> 0:33:27.013
<v Speaker 9>Senator's viewpoint that.

0:33:27.013 --> 0:33:29.333
<v Speaker 10>I'm excited, but I am. It's it's obviously a privilege

0:33:29.373 --> 0:33:31.493
<v Speaker 10>to you know, play for your country and obviously to

0:33:31.533 --> 0:33:35.373
<v Speaker 10>captain as well as obviously another another one. And yeah,

0:33:35.413 --> 0:33:38.373
<v Speaker 10>obviously you know exciting times coming up, you know, looking

0:33:38.373 --> 0:33:40.733
<v Speaker 10>forward to the challenge of the captaincy and we've got

0:33:40.733 --> 0:33:43.293
<v Speaker 10>a I guess a nice little white ball run now

0:33:43.333 --> 0:33:45.013
<v Speaker 10>in the next kind of few months to to really

0:33:45.013 --> 0:33:47.533
<v Speaker 10>crack into it. Yeah, I guess it was I didn't

0:33:47.533 --> 0:33:49.013
<v Speaker 10>really think about it so much at the start, and

0:33:49.053 --> 0:33:50.533
<v Speaker 10>then you know when you do it and you kind

0:33:50.533 --> 0:33:54.213
<v Speaker 10>of get an opportunity to do it, and but I

0:33:54.213 --> 0:33:57.413
<v Speaker 10>guess full time is another challenge, and you know, really

0:33:57.453 --> 0:34:00.893
<v Speaker 10>really excited for it. You know, like you said, I've

0:34:00.893 --> 0:34:02.533
<v Speaker 10>done it a little bit on and off, and I guess,

0:34:02.933 --> 0:34:05.333
<v Speaker 10>you know, we did a kind of a way to

0:34:05.493 --> 0:34:08.533
<v Speaker 10>Ireland Scotland and really had a nice run and you know,

0:34:08.533 --> 0:34:09.973
<v Speaker 10>it was a different crew, but it was you know,

0:34:10.093 --> 0:34:13.213
<v Speaker 10>something you know I cherished and you know going forward

0:34:13.213 --> 0:34:15.973
<v Speaker 10>now it's a great opportunity and I'm really looking forward

0:34:16.053 --> 0:34:18.333
<v Speaker 10>to it. And I guess kind of putting my spin

0:34:18.453 --> 0:34:21.013
<v Speaker 10>on of what's been you know, really kind of successful

0:34:21.013 --> 0:34:22.693
<v Speaker 10>the last few years and white ball for us.

0:34:23.133 --> 0:34:28.573
<v Speaker 3>And before we go this week some awards. I've determined

0:34:29.013 --> 0:34:31.733
<v Speaker 3>the most glove Punches of the Year award goes to

0:34:32.013 --> 0:34:34.653
<v Speaker 3>Caine Williamson. Is there any other contenders for that?

0:34:35.093 --> 0:34:37.693
<v Speaker 8>No, But I've seen players starting. I've seen a few

0:34:37.693 --> 0:34:39.973
<v Speaker 8>players now they're starting to tap bats. There's a new

0:34:40.053 --> 0:34:44.213
<v Speaker 8>trend coming in. Yeah, so I think you know, stick

0:34:44.253 --> 0:34:46.213
<v Speaker 8>with your glove punch. But I think this time next

0:34:46.293 --> 0:34:48.653
<v Speaker 8>year you might be talking about the most bat taps.

0:34:49.173 --> 0:34:51.893
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think you might. Down low. They're down low too.

0:34:51.933 --> 0:34:52.733
<v Speaker 6>There are different.

0:34:54.333 --> 0:34:56.693
<v Speaker 7>The other one is the running glove punch, which would

0:34:56.733 --> 0:34:58.373
<v Speaker 7>be Phillips, Glenn Phillips.

0:34:58.853 --> 0:35:04.693
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you missed the other punch. The shoulder shrug

0:35:04.893 --> 0:35:07.333
<v Speaker 3>of the Year award has to be jasperate Boomer, doesn't it.

0:35:08.413 --> 0:35:11.413
<v Speaker 3>He's got that twitch and he does it more often

0:35:11.453 --> 0:35:12.693
<v Speaker 3>than the other cricket I see.

0:35:13.133 --> 0:35:13.853
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's good.

0:35:14.893 --> 0:35:15.773
<v Speaker 6>I can put up with that.

0:35:16.413 --> 0:35:17.453
<v Speaker 5>He can do what he likes.

0:35:17.773 --> 0:35:20.773
<v Speaker 7>Maybe a few umpires occasionally when once they've given a

0:35:20.813 --> 0:35:25.013
<v Speaker 7>decision and they just shrugged their shoulders when they have

0:35:25.093 --> 0:35:27.133
<v Speaker 7>to change their decision again.

0:35:27.613 --> 0:35:30.933
<v Speaker 3>I've got a Tailor's Award and I'm dishing out two

0:35:31.053 --> 0:35:34.413
<v Speaker 3>tape measures to the people who make cricket trousers for

0:35:34.493 --> 0:35:37.693
<v Speaker 3>Brydon Cass and willow' rourke. Surely they can make them

0:35:37.693 --> 0:35:39.733
<v Speaker 3>a little bit longer for them rather than have them

0:35:39.933 --> 0:35:41.173
<v Speaker 3>sort of just below the knees.

0:35:41.973 --> 0:35:46.813
<v Speaker 8>Well, you're missing a key a men's fashion trend wads,

0:35:46.853 --> 0:35:51.253
<v Speaker 8>which is to show your ankle. I've never understood, but

0:35:51.333 --> 0:35:54.013
<v Speaker 8>I think they're fashionably short, is that right?

0:35:54.093 --> 0:35:58.773
<v Speaker 7>I didn't know that i'd noticed that willow' rooks trousers.

0:35:58.933 --> 0:36:03.613
<v Speaker 7>I thought he had borrowed Patio Rooks. He's dad weather

0:36:03.693 --> 0:36:07.613
<v Speaker 7>in back in the nineties. But they've probably are bell bottoms.

0:36:07.613 --> 0:36:10.453
<v Speaker 7>They'd probably go out slightly wider at the bottom.

0:36:10.453 --> 0:36:11.853
<v Speaker 5>Their sailor's trousers.

0:36:12.253 --> 0:36:13.733
<v Speaker 6>Oh that's right, exactly.

0:36:14.613 --> 0:36:17.173
<v Speaker 3>Ah well, I remember that trend. When I buy on

0:36:17.213 --> 0:36:18.973
<v Speaker 3>the next set of jeans, they've got to come three

0:36:19.013 --> 0:36:20.093
<v Speaker 3>inches above the ankles.

0:36:20.173 --> 0:36:24.893
<v Speaker 7>Okay, not for your ankles, not good for me.

0:36:25.093 --> 0:36:27.333
<v Speaker 5>Like you and me with the shorter leg cone, you

0:36:27.373 --> 0:36:28.333
<v Speaker 5>could get away with it.

0:36:28.893 --> 0:36:33.093
<v Speaker 6>No, No, I wouldn't get away with it either. You

0:36:33.133 --> 0:36:35.693
<v Speaker 6>want to you don't want to see too much of

0:36:35.693 --> 0:36:36.573
<v Speaker 6>the leg from me.

0:36:37.973 --> 0:36:40.813
<v Speaker 3>And finally, having had to watch a lot of television

0:36:40.893 --> 0:36:44.613
<v Speaker 3>as well over the last few games. How many replays

0:36:44.653 --> 0:36:47.613
<v Speaker 3>do you need from every angle on the ground of

0:36:47.813 --> 0:36:50.893
<v Speaker 3>Steve Smith? Scoring one hundred is enough until you reach

0:36:51.013 --> 0:36:52.653
<v Speaker 3>the S point on your TV?

0:36:53.413 --> 0:36:55.293
<v Speaker 7>I don't know how many do you make? Get one

0:36:55.373 --> 0:36:59.613
<v Speaker 7>hundred odds? So why not one for every run? How

0:36:59.653 --> 0:37:00.253
<v Speaker 7>many you got?

0:37:01.013 --> 0:37:05.493
<v Speaker 3>I think that's how many we saw that you are. Yeah,

0:37:05.573 --> 0:37:08.053
<v Speaker 3>he's becoming a bit like Verick Coli. Every fat and

0:37:08.093 --> 0:37:10.413
<v Speaker 3>snow he gets on TV when he was in.

0:37:11.853 --> 0:37:14.133
<v Speaker 5>Is the is the S for sandpaper?

0:37:15.333 --> 0:37:19.293
<v Speaker 3>No, it's what we used to used to affirm in

0:37:19.853 --> 0:37:23.093
<v Speaker 3>radio of if you talk a load of old rubbish

0:37:23.373 --> 0:37:28.533
<v Speaker 3>the S point they call they say ship, So be

0:37:28.573 --> 0:37:30.213
<v Speaker 3>careful you don't get to the S point.

0:37:30.693 --> 0:37:32.813
<v Speaker 6>That's I'm usually running at that point.

0:37:33.333 --> 0:37:36.653
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well we've got we've got to go. We've got

0:37:36.653 --> 0:37:39.693
<v Speaker 3>to run off to have a quiet little celebratory drink

0:37:39.733 --> 0:37:42.773
<v Speaker 3>for Christmas. Wish you guys all the best. Thanks for

0:37:42.813 --> 0:37:45.333
<v Speaker 3>what you've done for on the front foot this year

0:37:45.373 --> 0:37:50.093
<v Speaker 3>and your knowledge and involvement in keeping the public involved

0:37:50.333 --> 0:37:54.293
<v Speaker 3>in the viewpoint from off the park. So have it

0:37:54.293 --> 0:37:55.373
<v Speaker 3>goes Christmas, Jerry.

0:37:55.293 --> 0:38:01.293
<v Speaker 7>If you thanks, thanks once all the business guys, go well,

0:38:01.373 --> 0:38:05.853
<v Speaker 7>guard Chasm

0:38:08.373 --> 0:38:15.053
<v Speaker 1>Do for more from news Talks at b listen live

0:38:15.293 --> 0:38:17.933
<v Speaker 1>on air or online, and keep our shows with you

0:38:18.093 --> 0:38:21.053
<v Speaker 1>wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio