1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,480 Speaker 1: Look, there are questions now over why police failed to 2 00:00:02,600 --> 00:00:05,720 Speaker 1: charge former Beehive staffer Michael Forbes over the photos on 3 00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:08,560 Speaker 1: his phone. He was obviously called audio recording his sessions 4 00:00:08,560 --> 00:00:10,799 Speaker 1: with sex workers, and then his phone, it turned out, 5 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:13,440 Speaker 1: also contained photos of women at the gym, women at 6 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:16,160 Speaker 1: the supermarket and videos of women through windows at night. 7 00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:19,319 Speaker 1: Sheridan Fraser is with the New Zealand Prostitutes Collective. Hey 8 00:00:19,400 --> 00:00:23,280 Speaker 1: Shereda Cowder Heather Sheridan. Were you aware of this before 9 00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:25,400 Speaker 1: this broke in the newspapers yesterday. 10 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:28,400 Speaker 2: Yes, at the time, on the day that it happened, 11 00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:33,040 Speaker 2: I was notified by the Brussel just to see if 12 00:00:33,080 --> 00:00:36,479 Speaker 2: I could connect them with a sex worker, a specific 13 00:00:36,479 --> 00:00:40,440 Speaker 2: sex worker friendly police officer to take the report. Unfortunately, 14 00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:42,600 Speaker 2: it was my day off and I couldn't get hold 15 00:00:42,640 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 2: of any of them, so they called one one one. 16 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:46,120 Speaker 2: I understand. 17 00:00:46,560 --> 00:00:49,640 Speaker 1: Okay. Has it surprised you then, so you would have 18 00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:51,159 Speaker 1: been aware of what was on the phone yet? 19 00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:52,480 Speaker 2: Yes? 20 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:56,000 Speaker 1: Has it surprised you that the police have not investigated 21 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:58,880 Speaker 1: or charged over at the very least the peeping tom 22 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 1: stuff which seems to be unlawful. 23 00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:05,920 Speaker 2: It does seem to be unlawful. Yeah, I certainly wasn't 24 00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:08,800 Speaker 2: surprised about the audio recording. I was aware that was 25 00:01:08,840 --> 00:01:12,120 Speaker 2: not a crime. I was aware that taking photos in 26 00:01:12,160 --> 00:01:17,080 Speaker 2: public places is not necessarily a crime. The Peeping Tom's staff, 27 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:21,760 Speaker 2: I'm not familiar enough with the laws. I wondered if 28 00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:24,760 Speaker 2: they just if maybe they were young police officers who 29 00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:28,039 Speaker 2: went familiar either and just thought if they were taken 30 00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:31,560 Speaker 2: in a public place, then maybe it wasn't a crime, 31 00:01:32,160 --> 00:01:34,320 Speaker 2: or maybe it was just the too hard basket in 32 00:01:34,440 --> 00:01:36,480 Speaker 2: terms of identifying who those women were. 33 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:38,760 Speaker 1: Have you actually seen the content of that phone? 34 00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:42,480 Speaker 2: I haven't seen all the content, but I that I 35 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:47,280 Speaker 2: have seen, you know, a couple of the a selection, 36 00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:48,280 Speaker 2: a couple of yow. 37 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 1: Do you know whether the Peeping Tom stuff that the 38 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:55,200 Speaker 1: filming of the women through the windows? Reportedly? What were 39 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:58,120 Speaker 1: those women identifiable? With the properties identifiable? It could the 40 00:01:58,120 --> 00:01:59,440 Speaker 1: cops have actually found those women. 41 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:03,200 Speaker 2: I'm not sure. I think Michael Forbes would have had 42 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 2: to disclose where he took that video, and he did 43 00:02:06,760 --> 00:02:11,000 Speaker 2: seem to be reasonably cooperative, so it was probably possible 44 00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:15,880 Speaker 2: for the police to get that disclosure. Otherwise, it's just 45 00:02:16,320 --> 00:02:19,120 Speaker 2: it just seemed like an apartment building, you know, with 46 00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:25,680 Speaker 2: a lot of windows from AFAR, So yeah, it would 47 00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:29,360 Speaker 2: have been some extra rak and some police resource for 48 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:34,000 Speaker 2: that end. You know, I suppose I would have liked 49 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 2: these things to be investigated because sometimes they are the 50 00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:40,560 Speaker 2: tip of the iceberg and there are significantly more harmful 51 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:45,960 Speaker 2: things that occur, and when you know, this is seemingly 52 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:49,800 Speaker 2: on the lower end of the spectrum, although very problematic 53 00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:53,080 Speaker 2: for the women involved, but yeah, sometimes it can be 54 00:02:53,120 --> 00:02:54,920 Speaker 2: an indicator of greater harms. 55 00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:58,040 Speaker 1: Acain, So would you like it would you like it 56 00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:01,960 Speaker 1: to be made unlawful to record intimate moments audio, you know, 57 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 1: the audio of it without the intent? 58 00:03:04,520 --> 00:03:08,760 Speaker 2: Absolutely? Absolutely. I think it's really important. Technology is changing 59 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:13,080 Speaker 2: so quickly, and you know, there's deep fake abuse that's occurring, 60 00:03:13,280 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 2: and certainly in the context of sex, there's a lot 61 00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:21,480 Speaker 2: of language, and there's a lot of there's a lot 62 00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:25,120 Speaker 2: of chitter, chatter or engagement that we don't want other 63 00:03:25,160 --> 00:03:27,160 Speaker 2: people to hear in our realize it's a very very 64 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:30,239 Speaker 2: private moment. It's a very private moment, and I think 65 00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:34,560 Speaker 2: intimate audio recordings should be on par with intimate visual recordings. 66 00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:36,240 Speaker 2: And it was something that was brought up at the 67 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 2: time the legislation came into Pass two thousand and six whatever, 68 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:45,320 Speaker 2: but yeah, clearly it didn't get through sharre it. 69 00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 1: It's good to talk to you. I really appreciate your time. 70 00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:50,640 Speaker 1: That Sheridan Fraser, who is with the New Zealand Prostitutes Collective. 71 00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:54,600 Speaker 1: For more from Heather Duplessy Alan Drive, Listen live to 72 00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:57,680 Speaker 1: news talks they'd be from four pm weekdays, or follow 73 00:03:57,720 --> 00:03:59,440 Speaker 1: the podcast on iHeartRadio