WEBVTT - A serial founder's guide to being totally wrong

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Think of the best known e commerce and software startups

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that New Zealand has produced.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 2>The zero Trade me then timely just to name four

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 2>of them.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's one tech entrepreneur and investor who has been

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>heavily involved in all four of the ones you mentioned

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and many more.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Rowan Simpson is one of the most successful serial tech

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 2>entrepreneurs in the country, and he's distilled what he's learned

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>into a new book, How to Be Wrong, A Crash

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Course in startup success.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>The biggest successes in tech companies did not invent the

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 3>technologies that they are famous for. By Apple, the biggest

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 3>technology company, did not need any of the things that

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 3>they are most famous for. But they did work out

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>what all of those things were for, and man, they

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 3>worked out how to make us want them and to

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>pay top dollar for And so the really valuable part

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>has not been the first to have the idea. The

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>really valuable part has been the one who works out

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 3>how to sell that to somebody in a way that

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>they will pay for.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on the Business of Tech by two Degrees Business,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Rowan Simpson on learning lessons, the hard Way, measuring Everything

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and near death moments and startups.

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm Ben Moore and I'm Peter Griffin and some very

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 2>articulate commentary about the state of innovation in New Zealand

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 2>coming up. Rowan's interview has lots of great nuggets of advice.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Try things, make mistakes, but learn from them and he's

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>definitely done that, going on to enjoy major success in

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand startup sector.

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So here's Rowan Simpson talking to Peter about failing pivoting

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and the importance of having a beginner's mind.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Rowan Simpson, Welcome to the business of Tech. Great to

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>see you again and thanks for coming on.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having menu. It's great opportunity.

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible, you know when you think of the legacy

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 2>that you have had in New Zealand in the startup community.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>We talk about trade me obviously zero ven timely so

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 2>nice sex and one capacity, whether on staff, as part

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of an executive team or as an investor as well.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Probably not a lot of key wes know your face,

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 2>like a Sam Morgan or a Rod Drury. You're just

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>interested to start really what your approach has been. Did

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>you ever want to be that sort of founder that

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>had all the intention or were you more happy being

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 2>a support person part of a team.

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I play my role, and I mean it's important,

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess that there is a person to front these companies.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 3>One of the things I write about in the book

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 3>is this what I call the myth of the lone genius.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 3>We tend to attach one name to any successful company,

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 3>and Sam and Rode a great examples, so that vorn

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 3>at vend would be another. But there's always a team,

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 3>there's always a big group of people that sit behind

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>any successful business like that, and I guess I'm just

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 3>one of those. So yeah, it's maybe useful for people

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 3>who might fill those roles themselves to get that perspective.

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>You start the book very clearly talking about some of

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 2>the near death experiences off those four companies. They all

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 2>had great exits or in Zero's case, listed in multi

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar business that now, but each one of those

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>companies had massive challenges. You talk about trade Me in

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and one, you said the business model was

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>not working at left us hanging by a thread. I

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>planned to provide free online classified supported by advertising, had

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 2>failed to generate revenue, and it was that successfully that

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>you added that saved the business. But for a time

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 2>there it was looking like, I mean, you guys went overseas,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>you've basically left it behind.

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Sam, his sister Jess, who was the second employee

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>before me, and myself, we were all in London at

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the same time in two thousand and one Year's Eve

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and one, So yeah, I mean we literally

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>had billboards back in those days which said only Turkey's

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>pay for classifieds. That was the tagline for trade me.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 3>So we were quite wrong about the business model. And yeah,

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean this is a repeated pattern, So I would

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>think about that across all four Like the stories we

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 3>tell about startups tend not to be actually honest or

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 3>accurate or detailed stories, and there's a good reason for that,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Like the honest story is messy, convoluted, doesn't fit so

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>nicely into soundbites. But the airbrushed versions of these stories,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion, kind of skip all the interesting bit

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 3>and often most of the important lessons as well. So yeah,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I think it is useful to tell

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 3>those stories. I was really determined in the book to

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 3>start with those four near death moments. It's easy to

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 3>retrospectively look back on those four companies and say, you

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 3>know they were great successes, but that's not how they

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 3>felt when we were actually in those moments. Like when

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 3>I left to go to the UK, if I'm honest,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think there'd be a trade me to come

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 3>back to well. And you know, that's the experience of

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 3>working in those companies day to day, and for people

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 3>working on their own startups today, like understanding that experience

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 3>is way more interesting than just reading the headline success stories.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you take Timely another great company that had a

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 2>fantastic exit as well, But and Covid obviously that that

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 2>particular product for hairdresser is you know, small businesses for

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 2>managing timing and scheduling and all that sort of stuff

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 2>went out the window when people went into to lockdown.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>That company almost went to the wall.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, you know, all of our customers were

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 3>health and beauty businesses. They take their bookings week by week,

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>and we saw those numbers go very quickly to zero

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 3>as the world shut down. Where customers all around the world,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>so it was sort of different in different places depending

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 3>on how those lockdowns worked. But that required a really

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>quick kind of you know pivot for the business. If

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 3>you're like we had to respond very quickly to that

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 3>or we would have been dead. And yet it was

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>a relatively short period of time after that twenty twenty

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 3>one when we exited the business for you know, one

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred million plus, and so you know again that experience

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 3>sort of being in that moment where the company felt

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 3>very tenuous, and you know, we had to make some

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 3>very quick, difficult decisions about how we were going to

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>adjust the cost model or the business around that too.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Only you know, a year or so later, you know

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 3>that excitement of selling the company. If you only hear

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 3>about the exit, you kind of miss a lot of

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 3>the interesting bits of that story and that journey.

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 2>You call the book How to Be Wrong, you know. So,

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 2>and it's very clear that all of these lessons and

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 2>mistakes that you've made along the way and as part

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of these companies, have built a confidence in you. You know,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 2>you talk about vend in the book, another great company

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>but was burning cash twenty fifteen, close to shutting it

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 2>all down. You came back, camped out in a hotel

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 2>room in Auckland and went to work with the team

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>there to try and save it, which was painful cutting jobs, Yeah.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Especially painful because a lot of those folks who were

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 3>let go in twenty fifteen were the ones who had

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>been you know, on the steep curve up and had

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 3>done the hard yards, so that was especially painful. And yeah,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 3>I had a lot of very direct conversations with our

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 3>investors too, because you know, at that point, because of

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the mistakes we've made Wet, we weren't going to be

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 3>able to raise external capital. So if we were going

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>to keep the company alive, we need to get support

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 3>from our existing investors. So those are crunchy discussions, you know,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I think it is. I think again it's

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 3>interesting to share those stories so that people can sort

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 3>of appreciate what that's actually like.

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because there are you know, probably a lot of

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 2>startup founders and even just small business owners at the

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>moment who are in one of those near death experiences.

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>We've already seen some of our startups that had a

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of exposure sort of fail in the last couple

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>of years, sunfed Ubco, great electric bike company, even solar Machines,

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, Gred Crofts, fantastic innovative companies run in to

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>trouble with its business model. So a lot of people

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>in these businesses are thinking, if I make a mistake here,

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>the business is over, what do you do? I guess

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to give advice. Every situation is different. But

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>what have you learned the confidence that you've built up

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to tackle these problems over successive crises in startups? What's

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>your advice?

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? So, I mean, as you say, call the book

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 3>how to be So maybe let me just run through

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the three ways to be wrong, because there's actually only three,

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 3>which surprises some people. The first way is to not

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 3>even ask the question, So don't even measure your results,

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 3>don't even ask if it's working or not. And I

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>think that's the first piece of advice. I would go, like,

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 3>be inside the business at least be very inquisitive about

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 3>whether it's working and how you will know. You can

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 3>do a lot of work to really understand how much

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 3>of the story you're telling externally actually is true internally,

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 3>So it's the first way. Second way is just to

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 3>make an error. Like we're all human, we have our

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 3>own biases, especially when you're a young company, Like the

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 3>feedback you get from your first few customers can sometimes

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>be quite misleading as you expand to a broader range

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 3>of customers. So those sorts of things. You just have

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 3>to be consciously and continuously aware that you might be wrong.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's always better to kind of have

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 3>that mindset, assume you're wrong and look for the ways

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 3>you're wrong so that you can correct them quickly, rather

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 3>than kind of assume your right, which is I think

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the sort of behavior more of an encouraging founders. And

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>then the last way is just to lie, which you

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 3>know kind of sounds facetious but actually is surprisingly common.

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 3>And I told a few of those stories in this

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 3>book too, like you, where people know that something's not working,

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 3>but it kind of doesn't serve them to be honest

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 3>about that, especially externally, and so they just sort of

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 3>plow on. And I think, you know, so all three

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 3>of those things, whether it's you know, omitting to actually measure,

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>or making a mistake or just being dishonest, like, there

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 3>are easy things you can do to avoid all three

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 3>of those mistakes. And if you really consciously avoid those

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>three things, you give yourself a chance to be right.

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 3>There's no guarantee. These are startups we're talking about, but

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I think those behaviors are you know, the things that

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I would pin my advice on.

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>You talk about the value of curiosity and continuous learning.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a continuous theme actually through the book. You're on

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>a journey, but you're learning from every interaction you have

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 2>with the founded team. When you investigate a company with

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 2>a view to investing, you talk down I think it

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>was you know, Steve Jobs quote about having this beginner's

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 2>mind as technology evolves, and I think that's really pertinent

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>at the moment where we have, you know, the biggest

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>technology that's attracting investment and hype at the moment is

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 2>generative AI. Trying to as a company reinvent yourself to

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 2>incorporate this technology, because we're being told if you don't,

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you won't be competitive anymore. What's been your approach in

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a fast moving technology landscape. Sure, you're an expert in

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>software as a service those types of business models, but

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 2>everything from accounting software to and voiceing so nice sex

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 2>very different type of business. How have you kept fresh,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 2>kept curious, and kept learning.

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's definitely a moment right now, isn't it.

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 3>And I guess old enough to have seen a few

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>of these waves with the you know, trade me road,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 3>the breaking wave of the internet really as that became

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 3>broadly adopted, and then in between then and now we've

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 3>had the mobile wave, you know, with the iPhone and

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and seven and Normwalds and so you know,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>it often surprises people, for example when I tell them

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 3>that zero iPod before the iPhone was released, which is

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of crazy to think, but so, you know, I

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 3>think all you need to do, really and I think

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 3>this is the behavior that we need to kind of

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>really try and encourage the kids especially is to understand

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 3>how things work, like be curious about how things work,

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 3>like try and deconstruct that because everything, everything was made

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 3>by somebody. So generative AI is a great example, like

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 3>you show, you know, the average person what that technology

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 3>can do and it feels magical, like they type in,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, a simple command and the machine responds in

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 3>a very human kind of way and it feels magical.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 3>But you can deconstruct that, you can understand how that works.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm about four and a half hours into a five

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 3>and a half hour podcast you recommended better on this,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 3>which is like you know, dense with information about that.

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 3>You know how they underlying technologies have evolved and been

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>built up and all those things. So yeah, if you

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 3>are curious to understand and those are things you can

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 3>inquire about and learn and discover for yourselves. And then

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 3>the next step is to realize that you can you

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 3>can build those things. You don't just have to consume

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 3>those things. And so you know, for me, that was

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the real switch that flipped when I was at university

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 3>and the Internet wave was breaking. So when I was

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 3>in second year was when the first web browser was released, Mosaic,

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 3>and you know it would it would have been easy

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 3>to see that as a consumption media and a lot

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 3>of people consume the Internet, but you can also build them.

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, having that mindset of being a writer

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 3>as well as a reader, I think is part of

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 3>that curiosity.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the things you've written in many LinkedIn posts

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and probably got a bit of flat for as well,

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 2>because we do love in this country in the startup community,

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 2>our meetups and startup founders, talking to startup founders, and

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 2>one of your bits of advice which has stuck with

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>me is don't spend time talking to other startup founders.

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Go out there and talk to your customers. If you're

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>doing software for a cement company, go and talk to

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>cement makers and go to their conferences. And that's about

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 2>that learning and that curiosity about what is actually going

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 2>to improve your product and not make you feel better

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>as a founder because you're hanging out with a bunch

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 2>of people drinking beer.

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean to be clear, I don't say don't

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 3>hang out with startup founders. That's fine, Yeah, And I

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 3>think it's probably important too, like to have peers who

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 3>can relate to the things that you're working on experiencing.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 3>But my advices, don't spend all your time in that

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 3>community because your customers aren't there. And this was a

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 3>real lesson from Timing. Actually, like when we first started Timely,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 3>we thought ourselves we thought of ourselves as a technology

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 3>company that was providing technology software effectively to the health

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>and beauty sector. And eventually, over time we realized that

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 3>we were wrong about that and we wear ourselves a

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.479
<v Speaker 3>health and beauty business and our product was technology services.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 3>And as soon as we made that switch mentally, it

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>totally changed the way that we thought about selling and

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 3>marketing the product. Like, as you say, we started hanging

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.599
<v Speaker 3>out at health and beauty conferences, not at startup conferences.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 3>It was very hard to get Ryan and scoff to

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 3>come to startup events. It wasn't their scene, and you know,

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 3>it's part of part of the success I think of

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 3>that business was really getting to know the customers deeply

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 3>and well. And yeah, like going back to those hard

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 3>moments you were talking about earlier, I think that that

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 3>allowed us to respond better because we had that connection.

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 3>We even had we even had people on the board

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 3>who were health and beauty people, not technology people, not investors,

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 3>and so they were able to you know, they were

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 3>able to see the right way to respond in those moments.

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've obviously learned a lot about investing as well

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 2>as a beautiful anecdote you're telling you Sam Morgan very

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>hard nosed, an investor, very experienced. Now so nice sex.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, you were saying, oh, that was a good return.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 2>He was going, Nah, I think we could have done

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>much better out of that. What have you learned and

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 2>how how have you did your approach to investing based

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>on the success but also maybe some of the things

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that didn't work out the way you wanted to.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was really fortunate in that Zero was a

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 3>nice hybrid for me. Like I was an employee at

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Zero but also an investor pre IPO. So in many ways,

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 3>my first kind of investment post trade me was a

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>very easy one, and the next couple that followed after

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 3>that definitely punched me in the face. And I tell

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 3>those stories, but I think the key lesson I took

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>away from that was for me, at least, what made

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 3>me happy was being closer to the founders, being part

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>of the business, and really understanding what was working in

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 3>those businesses, what wasn't working in you know, that sort

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 3>of quick iteration in the very early stages especially was invigorating.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 3>But also where I could add the most, like just

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>being an investor sitting on the sidelines and kind of

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 3>cheering them on, didn't wasn't you know, wasn't giving me

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 3>any happy points. And Sin of Sex is a great example,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 3>like I doubled my money on that, but I learned

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 3>almost nothing from it. And so yeah, the ones that

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 3>came after that were really heavily informed by that experience,

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and thankfully a lot of those have gone very well.

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we're seeing more cases of sort of hands

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 2>on investors who have all this experience, people who've gone

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 2>through two or three startups now who are willing to

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 2>this is.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 3>How ecosystems grow. And I've been saying this for a while.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 3>We talk about building an ecosystem, but actually ecosystems grow,

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's awesome now. Like I would say, if you

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.119
<v Speaker 3>define the ecosystem as just the collective noun of startups,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 3>we're in as strong a position now probably as we've

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 3>ever been. And there's a really easily understood reason for that,

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and that is a lot of people who have spun

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 3>out of drave Mee and zero and Vened and Timing

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and lots of other companies that have had successes and

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 3>are doing their next thing, either either directly you starting

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>the new company themselves, or they're investing or advising. Ryan

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 3>at Timley is doing exactly what I did ten years

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 3>ago and has handpicked two or three companies to work

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 3>closely with and is trying to make them as good

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 3>as poss like that's exactly what grows an ecosystem.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 2>We're going to close really discussing the state of the

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 2>ecosystem and the state of sort of tech in New

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Zealand as well, but keind of drill into building teams

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>in company culture. You write in the book, first, we

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 2>need to accept that being excellent at just one thing

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 2>is often insufficient. Then we need to think harder about

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the skills we have that can be combined. This is

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>true for individuals, but especially true for the team. So

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these days, I think you play an incredibly

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 2>valuable role in looking at a team. You've learned from

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the early days of trade me through to zero, what

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 2>actually makes for a good team, especially in those early

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 2>days when you may only have five or six people.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>What have you learned about that? And have we got

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 2>better at doing this? Building startup teams in New Zealand.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I think the metaphor I like to use as a

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 3>rugby team because New Zealanders kind of understand this. Like

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 3>when you think about selecting a rugby team, you've got

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different positions to fill. You know, you

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 3>need to props, you need some locks, you need a

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 3>half back, you need to fall back. And same time

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 3>with startup teams, like going back to the myth of

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the lone genius, it's kind of alluring to think if

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 3>you just have you know, a team of those crazy,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, inspirational leaders, then then magic could happen. But

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 3>actually you need you need some props, and you need

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 3>a half back to complement the fleshy winger, you know,

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, that's I think the mindset that people

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>should have is, like, is what are all the skills

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 3>we need? And those those extend well beyond just product

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>as well, like thinking about the business model, thinking about

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 3>sales and distribution, like those are not strengths in New Zealand,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>but they are skills that are vital to any successful company.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, like, I mean, you know, one of the

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 3>one of the mantras that we had at trade Me

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 3>actually was a's higher a's, b's higher cs. And so

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 3>the whole mindset was trying to hire people who were

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 3>better than us, and thankfully I managed to do that

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 3>in a couple of instances so that by the time

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 3>I left Trade Me, they more or less didn't miss me.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 3>But it's easy to do the opposite. It's easy to

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of to not think carefully about the people that

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 3>you're bringing into the team, especially in those early days,

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 3>who really set the culture and set the trajectory for

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the business. So hiring intentionally is a huge part of.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>That, I guess as a founder and as a CEO,

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 2>knowing when to step aside or as the CEO and

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>you've had that with Vorn and people like that throughout

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the history of some of these companies have gone I'm

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 2>a software guy, I'm a CTO type person. So I

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 2>guess that's really pivotal and this is where investors can help. Look,

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 2>you're still integral to the business, but not necessarily in

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>an operational role.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, i'd include myself in that as much

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 3>as anything. I'm also a generalist. I think that I

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 3>am best suited to those early stages of the business,

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 3>but everyone will have their own life cycle in these companies.

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 3>Some people can see it all the way through. Others

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 3>will be more suited to certain ages and stages of

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the business. And that's fine. It's not something I think

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 3>you need to get too stressed about. It's just understanding

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 3>what you can contribute to the business at the staf

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 3>age it's at right now.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've been at times a bit skeptical of things

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>like accelerator programs, you know, startup incubators. We've got one

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Creative HQ here in Wellington that's done reasonably well. There's

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 2>some others around the country in terms of bringing young

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 2>budding entrepreneurs together and trying to sort of flesh out

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 2>those teams and find their way and where they add

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>value to a startup. What is the best approach? What

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:28.719
<v Speaker 2>is the best way to go about that? We've got

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 2>You know a lot of people coming out of universities

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 2>and they will typically look to go into some of

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 2>these incubators. Is there a better way?

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent there's a better way? I mean, I'm interested.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 3>You say that's worked quite well. I don't. I don't

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 3>know how well.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess got a start in those places, but exactly

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 2>how do you measure would they have done it any

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 2>better or worse if they hadn't gone through the HQ.

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 3>The Cheesease founders came out of zero and Kivybanks, So

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably ascribe more of the success to that. To

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 3>be honest, I mean you need to ask them, But

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's one hundred percent a better way, which

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 3>is like the best way to get an apprenticeship on

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 3>a startup and learn is to learn by doing. Like,

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 3>all of these companies are desperately short of people, and

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 3>they will hire smart people quite readily into roles where

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 3>you will learn a huge amount and a very compressed

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 3>period of time and be paid for it, And for me,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 3>that's a much smarter route for somebody who's interested in

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 3>startups rather than an incubator program or an innovation hard

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 3>or or whatever else where where most of the advice

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 3>is going to come from people who have never done

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 3>it themselves, like learn by doing, by getting into a startup,

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 3>and even if you want to spend a couple of

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 3>years there, you'll come out the end of that with

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 3>so much experience and so many lessons that you can

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 3>apply to whatever you want to do next that will

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 3>be so much more valuable than any of those programs.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 3>So that's like, individually, I think, much smarter advice for somebody,

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 3>and then collectively, I think it goes back to what

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 3>we were just talking about before about the difference between

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 3>building and growing system. We've invested enormous amounts of money,

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars over ten fifteen years and trying to

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 3>build an ecosystem from the top down, and the measurable

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 3>results of that are pretty hard to find, you know,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 3>certainly if you look at the highest kind of level

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 3>economic indicators productivity per capita GDP, all those headline things

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 3>that we're supposed to improve as a result of us

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 3>investing that much in these things haven't improved at all.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 3>In most cases have deteriorated, So, you know, I think

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 3>collectively again, the smart way is to try and build

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>these companies up one at a time. So if you're

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 3>somebody who really wants to contribute to an ecosystem, choose

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 3>one company and go and work on it, or invest

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 3>in it, or get close to it and make it

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 3>as great as you can. And if enough of us

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 3>did that, the ecosystem would be much bigger and stronger.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and actually what you say about the Sharesas team

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 2>is really pertinent, and it goes for like the guys

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 2>behind first AML, they came out of the financial sect,

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and you see this a lot in fintech people who

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 2>work in banks, insurance companies. There's a frustration. They come

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 2>up against it in their work and they go, I'm

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 2>going to go and find a better way of doing this.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent. Discontent is the one one of the

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 3>rare things that all founders have in common. So, yeah,

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 3>that's your apprenticeship, you know.

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>So rather than come out of university, look for an

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>incubator type opportunity where you might get thrown a little

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 2>bit of money usually in exchange for some equity, go

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>into the industry that you're passionate about or want to

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>learn about.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 3>That's your apprenticeship. And if you don't know yet, like

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 3>there's some great programs for students too, Summer of Tech

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 3>here in Wellington and it's just a fantastic program, been

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 3>running for many years and some great examples of people

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 3>like you know Amanda and Nicco too, people we hired

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 3>at south Gate Labs back in the day who've gone

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 3>on to work on multiple of these successful companies. Amanda

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 3>was part of the design team timely is now at

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a new company called Connectworks. So you know, you see

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 3>those sort of dots connected through the ecosystem when people

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 3>take those opportunities and yeah, it's it's the only way

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 3>to lard.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 2>This leads us really to discussing the ecosystem where we

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 2>are at the moment in New Zealand. You know, there's

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 2>been a lot of discussion in the wake of the

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Science Sector Advisory Group report from Sir Peter Gluckman and

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.959
<v Speaker 2>his team of advisors has been put out quite disruptive

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>for R and D and innovation sector, particularly the winding

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 2>down of Callahan Innovation. You devote quite a lot of

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>space in the book to talking about Sir Paul Callahan.

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 2>You obviously have a lot of respect for him and

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 2>some of the ideas. You disagree with some of them

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>as well. But pretty sad to think twelve years on

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 2>that we are winding down something that had his esteemed

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>name on it. What is your sort of summary off

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the legacy of Sir Paul and how do we need

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to adapt that now?

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's kind of devastating how it's ended up, to

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 3>be honest. So I was lucky enough to be in

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 3>the room when he gave that lecture in twenty eleven,

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 3>which included so many of the lines that we still

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 3>repeat all the time, like, you know, New Zealand needs

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 3>to be the place where Tellent wants to live, and

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 3>the things that we're going to be great at will

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 3>be niche in confusing and surprising and so on and

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 3>so forth. Had he had all the answers in twenty eleven,

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 3>and sadly we stood something up in his name that

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of did the opposite, you know, it tried to

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 3>pick winners when he explicitly said that we're going to

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 3>be surprised by these things. So it is kind of

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 3>devastating to think that we've spent so much and have

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 3>so little to show for it in that sense, and

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I do have a lot of respect for him. I

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 3>think I think a lot of his ideas were right.

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I think I mean one that we've already talked about

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 3>where he maybe didn't quite see the future, where he

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 3>said it would only take one hundred inspired founders to

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 3>turn this country around. Yeah, and like the reality of

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 3>that is not right. Like it's true, we probably do

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 3>need a hundred Peter Becks, but every Peter Beck needs

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 3>one hundred or a thousand people whose names you don't

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 3>know to build those companies out. So we actually need

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 3>tens of thousands of people, and that's the real constraint now.

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean, it's it's a necessary reset. In

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 3>my opinion, what's happened at Callahan Innovation. I think they

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 3>got bogged down, especially in recent years, doing too many

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 3>things and again with very little measurable impact. So it's

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 3>awful for all those folks who are directly impacted by that.

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 3>But I actually hope that some of them at least

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 3>will take the opportunity now to go and work directly

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 3>on startups. Rather than working on a bureaucracy that's sort

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of an umbrella over the top of these companies. Every

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 3>single one of those companies that they've been supporting through

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Callahan will needs to hire more people. Yeah, and that's

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 3>the constraint that I keep coming back to.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 2>And there will be a new what was a Crown

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Research Institute, they call it Public Research Organization. It will

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 2>focus on artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and synthetic biology. What's

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 2>your take on that. Having written about this recently, a

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of people from the business community and the startup

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>world is saying this is doomed to fail. If you

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 2>really want to move quickly and grow the economy, as

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Christopher Laxon is saying he wants to do, actually invest

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 2>in startups that find the best AI experts in the country,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 2>don't put them under a roof of a bureaucracy. Actually

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.239
<v Speaker 2>tell them what you want to do and see if

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 2>they can solve the problems.

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and again I don't necessarily think government will solve

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 3>this problem from the top down. I guess I don't

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 3>have a very informed view on the pure science aspects

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>of that. It probably is one of the parts of

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Callahan that actually has been successful, ironically, and hopefully there

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 3>is a way that that values retained in the system.

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 3>But what you're talking about with that area is much

0:27:55.440 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 3>more invention than execution or innovation. Innovation. For me, the

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 3>definition I like to use at least is fresh thinking

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 3>applied to create value. And I think often we get

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 3>bogged down in the first part of that, which is

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the inventing part of it, and New Zealand has a

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 3>pretty good track record of being the first to think

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 3>of things, But it's the applied to create value part

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 3>that we just continue to struggle with, and I think

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 3>that's where we need to probably focus our energies and efforts.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 3>And that's sort of bad news because to be inventive,

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 3>you just need to have one novel idea. To be

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 3>graad at, execution in these businesses requires thousands of little

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 3>things to go right repeatedly over time and for years,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 3>and that's much harder work, and it requires a big team,

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 3>and again our constrainers that there's just not that many

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 3>of us. So yeah, like I think, you know, the

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 3>sorts of things that are going to ultimately lead to

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 3>the success that the Prime Minister and others talk about

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 3>is in my mind quite disconnected from that pure science end,

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 3>which is not to say we don't need it, but

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 3>it's maybe a useful precurs rather than the silver bullet.

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, if you look at something like synthetic biology,

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we've really wound down that capability in New Zealand. So

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>it's going to take a decade for the pure science

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to build up something that we're going to be able

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 2>to add value in.

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.239
<v Speaker 3>But remember the biggest successes in tech companies did not

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 3>invent the technologies that they are famous for. Apple, the

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>biggest technology company, did not mean any of the things

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 3>that they are most famous for, but they did work

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 3>out what all of those things were for, and man,

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 3>they worked out how to make us want them and

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 3>to pay top dollar for them. And so the really

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.959
<v Speaker 3>valuable part is not being the first to have the idea.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 3>The really valuable part is being the one who works

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 3>out how to sell that to somebody in a way

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 3>that they will pay for. And that's a repeated padn

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.479
<v Speaker 3>across all of these companies that I've worked in, and

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 3>in fact across every big tech company. Google wasn't the

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>first big search engine. Netflix wasn't the first streaming service.

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Zoom wasn't the first video.

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think that goes for AI in particular. We're

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>never going to be able to compete on large language models,

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 2>even with deep seeks, you know, cutting the costs. It's

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the application of AI, whether it's law view making legal

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 2>papers easier to assemble, So it's the application.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent. I think. I think my personal view

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 3>on AI is that it will always be imminent, like,

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 3>because the things that actually work will We'll just think

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 3>that they're features of the products that we use. Auto

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 3>correct is the best example I have of that. Suddenly,

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 3>after years have been quite crap, Auto crep got quite

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 3>good recently, have you noticed, And that's because it's now

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 3>using AI under the covers, right, And so yeah, we'll

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 3>just consider those things to be features of the products

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and services we use. I'll give you another example of innovation,

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 3>which is completely fieled. New Zealander basically invented pop up.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 3>We were the first country in the world to do

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 3>that format of talent reality.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Nigel Stanford's business.

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 3>No it wasn't Nigel, it was another guy, but you

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 3>might remember Troopliss, the Girls band, And then we can

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the inventor of that completely failed to capitalize on that.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Other people around the world were the ones who captured

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 3>the value of that. So yeah, I think we over

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 3>index on invention and massively under it index on execution.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in terms of that talent, In terms of that

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 2>talent constraint, I mean, we've got sort of token things

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the government's just thrown out in the last couple of

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>weeks visa changes to try and get both investors but

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 2>also digital nomad's people working here and that sort of thing.

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 2>That's only going to go so far.

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 3>So far, all those things are fine, but yeah, none

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 3>of them are a silver bullet. They are long term

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>investments unfortunately, Like the best time to pine a tree

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 3>is twenty years ago. And if you look at the

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 3>number of STEM grads we have, for example, coming out

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 3>of New Zealand universities, it's pretty woful. So we're not

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 3>we're not in a strong position really to capitalize on

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 3>these things. Sadly. We need to probably really change our

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 3>mindset of how we invest in that pipeline.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the domestic talent pipeline. Labor had the Digital Industry

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Transformation Plan that's been spiked by the government. There just

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 2>seems to be a big gap around how we get

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the pipeline really going get businesses offering apprenticeships and things

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 2>like that. I think until we solve that problem, we're

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be reliant on an overseas tech workforce trying

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 2>to lure them here for lifestyle reasons.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean. Another thing that's a little depressing about

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the active investor visa announcements in the last week or

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 3>so as we record this is it. It's that mindset

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 3>of importing foreign solutions, and I mean we do this,

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 3>we do this with capital as well. We're desperate for

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 3>international investors to come and invest in New Zealand. And again,

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 3>I think we could shift our mindset on this, Like

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 3>we have been very tentative on compulsory savings in New Zealand,

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.239
<v Speaker 3>and politicians like to compare us to Singapore and other

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 3>countries like that, Australia even you know, those countries all

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 3>have a much more aggressive superannuation scheme, you know, for

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 3>all of their people, which builds a huge pool of

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 3>capital that then gets invested. And so let me make

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 3>that really practical and specific. Like when vend was sold

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty one, about fifty percent of the ownership

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.479
<v Speaker 3>of that company was New Zealanders or New Zealand Funds,

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 3>and fifty percent were overseas investors who'd invested large amounts

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 3>of capital. We've took in about seventy million dollars of

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 3>capital into that business over the years and one of

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 3>the biggest, I think the biggest investor in vent that

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 3>exit was Squarepeg Capital, which is a big venture fund

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 3>in Melbourne. You know, their investors are the Australian superfunds,

0:33:57.640 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 3>and so if you think about it that way, like

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the value that was created at the end that was

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 3>returned to shareholders when we solved the business ultimately went

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 3>back to benefit Australian supernuation funds, So all Australians that

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 3>were invested in those funds. That's the way we should

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 3>be capitalizing on the ecosystem that we're growing, but we

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 3>just don't do it. We're very tentative about even making

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Kebsaber compulsory alone, let alone at the high levels that

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 3>is sort of mandated in countries like Australia or Singapore.

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 2>So we've got some challenges, but you're passionate about this country.

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 2>It's very clear from the book that you're optimistic for

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 2>the future as well. What's on the cards for you

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 2>this year? Are you sort of living to dream of

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 2>investing in companies? You've had a great track record, so

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 2>having you on board as a director and as an investor,

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 2>you must be getting opportunities all the time.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I see a lot. The biggest constraint

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 3>I have continues to be time. There's only so there's

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 3>only so many hours every day. It doesn't matter how

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 3>much money you have. And I like to be close

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 3>to these companies that I work with, and so that's

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 3>the constraint for me. There's a small handful of companies

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 3>that I pick pretty carefully to work with. But I

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 3>look around and think that there was a time when

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I felt like I was an investor in all of

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the good companies in New Zealand, and that's definitely no

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 3>longer true. Like there's now a wide list of companies

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 3>that are doing great things, and so yeah, for me,

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the state of the ecosystem from the bottom up has

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of never been better. I think there's things we

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 3>need to think about and configure differently from the top down.

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I think we need to do a much better job

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 3>of connecting the dots from these companies that are successful.

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 3>How does that actually benefit all New Zealanders. I don't

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 3>think we've told that story particularly well at all. But

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 3>on an individual company level, like if you're somebody who's

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 3>working on or investing in one great company at the moment,

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 3>things are good for you at the moment you and

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 3>there's lots of opportunities.

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting book How to Be Wrong, and it sort

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 2>of resonates as we were talking about being AI some

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 2>of the difficulties that early stage companies go through. Rowan

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>talks in the book about a fate worse than failure

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 2>for a startup, which he describes as being basically living dead,

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 2>and he says there are a few features off it.

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.919
<v Speaker 2>It has some customers and associated revenues, but few who

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 2>really love it. Because people don't feel strongly about it

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 2>one way or other, it's difficult to get really good

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 2>feedback product where crawls to a standstill and it just

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.479
<v Speaker 2>sort of spirals into failure. But it takes a long

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 2>time and a lot of money is lost along the way.

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I think what really underpins that idea of living death

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is what you mentioned in that quote, which is that

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the love and the passion and you know, really startups

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>require people who are going to pour everything to the

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>point where it may cost them, you know, personally into

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>that business, and that that's a hard thing to ask for.

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think sometimes I think maybe Ruin in your conversation,

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe he underestimates how large the leap can

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be for people. It's all very well and good to say,

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, these people out of Callahan, they should go

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and get into startups and throw themselves into the ecosystem.

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, you know what, maybe some of them

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. Maybe that their life does not you know,

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>allow for that kind of risk. Maybe they don't have

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the capital or the capability to do that right now.

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that is true. Having said that, he sort

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 2>of has lived that experience himself, albeit starting at a

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 2>young age, and trade me it's easier to do this

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 2>as a young person, but has then gone on to

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 2>add a lot of value to other startups who have

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 2>young teams as well. So that's great. One of the

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 2>key takeaways for me is this idea that Royan has around,

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, rather than innovation, execution is everything, and maybe

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 2>that's where we've fallen down. He said, if we have

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 2>an agency supporting startups in this country, it should be

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it should have been probably Callahan execution rather than Callahan innovation,

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 2>because he's basically saying that being first isn't the most

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 2>important thing. He pointed out in the book. Google wasn't

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the first search engine, Facebook wasn't the first social network.

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Amazon wasn't the first online store, but it did something

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 2>in the application of it, of doing its own version

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 2>of those things that gave it the edge. And sometimes

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the innovation isn't the product itself, but it's the distribution channel,

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 2>or it's the revenue model. If you take Zoom for instance,

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 2>you know it wasn't by any means the first video

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 2>conferencing tool, but it, especially during COVID, became the one

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone wanted to use. So I think that's a really

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 2>important takeaway is that we focus very much in New

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Zealand on the inventor sort of mindset where you need

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 2>to create your IP and all the value will come

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 2>from that. But and this is really important for the

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 2>world of artificial intelligence. Being first or or having something

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that is completely unique is very difficult for us. But

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 2>applying that in a very innovative way, which goes to

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 2>what David McDonald's trying to do with with its treehouse concept.

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 2>This sort of broker of APIs for the AI agents,

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, that could be the way forward. That's the

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of thinking we need. But it's all about execution.

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it goes into something that I read somebody

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>post somewhere a while ago and it stuck with me,

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately I can't remember who it was. But there's

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the you know, actually New Zealand needs to start to

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>step away from the number eight wire mentality. Yeah, because

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>realistically what people now want is, like you said, execution.

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>They want really clean user interface. They want it to

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>be you know, well processed, have a clear path, and

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, really focused on what are the

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>outcomes going to be for that company, for investors and

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for the customers, how it's going to you know, impact

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>their outcomes and deliver value. And I guess, you know,

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>just using a bit of number eight wire to make

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a fuse or fix a railing is a little bit

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of a different approach and maybe not quite right for

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the current state of startups.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I think we've actually left that behind quite a while

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 2>ago in the software space. Anyway, that mindset they've got

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 2>quite good at at all of those things, but the constraints,

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 2>as Ron points out to really nail that execution, talent

0:40:54.880 --> 0:41:00.439
<v Speaker 2>and capital were really constrained on both fronts, and there's

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 2>no great answers there. The government is tinkering with investment

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 2>and visas and all that sort of thing, but we're

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 2>well behind. Until we have great people and a pipeline

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 2>of people to go into these startups, and until we

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 2>have more capital from sovereign wealth funds, our own capital,

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 2>not just international capital, we're really going to be constrained.

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 2>So those are the two things that are standing in

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 2>a way off the sort of world that we want,

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 2>which is the knowledge economy, all the things that so

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Paul Callahan talked about, which are still as valid as ever,

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 2>but we just haven't really got as close to as

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 2>we need to.

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And if I may climb up on my soapbox slightly

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for a moment, I think that we do need to

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>create an environment where people can try really hard and

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>veil and it's not going to ruin them, you know,

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>because if people don't have security, if people don't have

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, like at least some semblance that if they fail,

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 1>it's going to you know, ruin everything, because when you're young,

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>like you say, you can do that, but if you

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>want a pipeline of people, we can't only be focusing

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:17.839
<v Speaker 1>on young people. We need to be enabling people who

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>are not just those who are already wealthy and comfortable,

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>but maybe people who are willing to take a bit

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of a risk, but maybe not their entire life, you know,

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's just you know, maybe there are some social

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>structures that we could put in place there.

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:35.800
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, and that's what Silicon Valley is really really

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 2>good at. Actually, and there are older founders there as well.

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 2>There isn't necessarily a safety net for them. The reward

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 2>is great if they succeed, but there isn't a stigma

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 2>there if you fail. You could do two or three

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 2>ventures before you have a successful startup, and they don't

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 2>do living dead over there. You know, you very quickly

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 2>die or succeed and move on to the next thing

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 2>if need be. So that's still something we need to

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>take some lessons from.

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely.

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.399
<v Speaker 2>So thanks to Ron Simpson for coming on. His book

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 2>How to Be Wrong at Crash Course and Startup Success

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 2>is out now. Links to where to find it are

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 2>in the show notes at Businessdesk dot co dot NZ.

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 2>You just check out the podcast section for them.

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Follow the business attack on.

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Your podcast platform pop choice.

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We're also streaming on iHeartRadio.

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 2>Get in touch with your feedback and topic suggestions. We're

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 2>on LinkedIn and blue Sky.

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Catch us again for the next episode next Thursday.

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 2>See it end