WEBVTT - Rugby Direct - Episode 161

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:12.693
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from News Talks b follow

0:00:12.773 --> 0:00:17.013
<v Speaker 1>this and our wide range of podcast now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:19.253 --> 0:00:21.013
<v Speaker 2>Straight down the middle.

0:00:20.733 --> 0:00:22.373
<v Speaker 3>Of dry.

0:00:23.813 --> 0:00:24.413
<v Speaker 4>Try.

0:00:24.773 --> 0:00:26.013
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in to Rugby Direct.

0:00:26.093 --> 0:00:28.613
<v Speaker 5>John r Hen Health Technique, all your aches and pains

0:00:28.613 --> 0:00:38.773
<v Speaker 5>from the sports and another alien Disappearances, Joseph Lee or

0:00:39.333 --> 0:00:42.693
<v Speaker 5>Joey Marno the man that can do it All across

0:00:42.773 --> 0:00:45.213
<v Speaker 5>Rugby and Rugby League Podcast. Nick Bailey, Great, have you

0:00:45.253 --> 0:00:48.133
<v Speaker 5>in for Liam Napier this week? Welcome on and again,

0:00:48.453 --> 0:00:48.813
<v Speaker 5>Oh what.

0:00:48.813 --> 0:00:51.413
<v Speaker 4>An introduction Smith here, Thanks for that. I'm sure I'm

0:00:51.453 --> 0:00:53.333
<v Speaker 4>not sure if that NS and me listeners across the

0:00:53.333 --> 0:00:56.293
<v Speaker 4>podcast stable are enjoying me jumping between codes week to

0:00:56.293 --> 0:00:58.653
<v Speaker 4>week from the Big League Podcast back to Rugby Direct,

0:00:58.653 --> 0:01:02.133
<v Speaker 4>but I'm happy to be here and speaking of habit, health,

0:01:02.133 --> 0:01:04.613
<v Speaker 4>aches and pains from sport and work, probably leisure as well.

0:01:04.653 --> 0:01:07.933
<v Speaker 4>For Liam Napier, I hope he's doing okay after Nral's Magic.

0:01:07.693 --> 0:01:10.453
<v Speaker 5>Ground from him for a good twenty four plus hours.

0:01:10.493 --> 0:01:13.773
<v Speaker 5>So hopefully we'll report back for Judy at some point

0:01:13.773 --> 0:01:16.093
<v Speaker 5>this week and be on deck for the podcast next week.

0:01:16.093 --> 0:01:16.893
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure he had a great week.

0:01:16.933 --> 0:01:19.853
<v Speaker 5>It looked like a great weekend over there, and I suppose,

0:01:20.013 --> 0:01:22.053
<v Speaker 5>you know, if you're Super Rugby, you're trying to figure

0:01:22.053 --> 0:01:24.973
<v Speaker 5>out the lessons of how you apply that to Super Round,

0:01:24.973 --> 0:01:26.653
<v Speaker 5>which is obviously taking a break this year. I just

0:01:26.653 --> 0:01:28.933
<v Speaker 5>don't know that you can replicate that across Super Rugby.

0:01:28.973 --> 0:01:31.253
<v Speaker 5>I think they're trying to find something that's just not

0:01:31.333 --> 0:01:32.813
<v Speaker 5>going to quite work.

0:01:33.693 --> 0:01:34.573
<v Speaker 2>It'll be interesting to see.

0:01:34.573 --> 0:01:37.573
<v Speaker 4>I heard some comments from Super Rugby chair Kevin malloy

0:01:37.653 --> 0:01:40.093
<v Speaker 4>on Weekend Sport with Jason Pine just yes, they certainly

0:01:40.133 --> 0:01:42.493
<v Speaker 4>is in the thinking, whether that be down my way

0:01:42.613 --> 0:01:45.373
<v Speaker 4>Smith at christ Church to help open Tokaha next year.

0:01:45.373 --> 0:01:47.733
<v Speaker 4>I feel like there's a lot that makes a fair

0:01:47.733 --> 0:01:50.573
<v Speaker 4>amount of sense for mine or fig where they absolutely

0:01:50.573 --> 0:01:53.253
<v Speaker 4>adore their rugby. Of course there's some logistical challenges here,

0:01:53.293 --> 0:01:55.533
<v Speaker 4>but the NRL is certainly onto a winner there with

0:01:55.573 --> 0:01:56.053
<v Speaker 4>major round.

0:01:56.053 --> 0:01:57.253
<v Speaker 3>Has to be said, they certainly are.

0:01:57.293 --> 0:01:59.333
<v Speaker 5>Well, let's get into the round that was in Super

0:01:59.493 --> 0:02:03.933
<v Speaker 5>Rugby Pacific and the most recent game that rounded out

0:02:03.973 --> 0:02:06.373
<v Speaker 5>the round, but a Sunday afternoon footy which is always

0:02:06.453 --> 0:02:09.053
<v Speaker 5>a treat under the roof in Dunedam probably the best

0:02:09.093 --> 0:02:11.893
<v Speaker 5>game of the round, to be honest with you, Mina

0:02:11.933 --> 0:02:16.533
<v Speaker 5>Pacific at beating the Highland is thirty four twenty nine. Look,

0:02:16.693 --> 0:02:19.373
<v Speaker 5>I think you look at this Muana side and they

0:02:19.693 --> 0:02:23.093
<v Speaker 5>are continuing to upset the apple cart. Now, whether it's

0:02:23.133 --> 0:02:24.853
<v Speaker 5>good enough to make the playoffs, we'll get onto that

0:02:25.213 --> 0:02:27.053
<v Speaker 5>in a week while on the podcast. But what they're

0:02:27.053 --> 0:02:29.813
<v Speaker 5>doing is showing up every week, which is what we've

0:02:29.853 --> 0:02:32.293
<v Speaker 5>asked for them in recent years. And they've going down

0:02:32.333 --> 0:02:34.013
<v Speaker 5>to the need in which they haven't done, you know,

0:02:34.133 --> 0:02:37.493
<v Speaker 5>particularly well in previous years, and kept at it and

0:02:37.493 --> 0:02:39.013
<v Speaker 5>got the win. And I thought they were the better

0:02:39.053 --> 0:02:42.453
<v Speaker 5>team yesterday afternoon and deserving of that win. You've got

0:02:42.493 --> 0:02:44.173
<v Speaker 5>to give a lot of credit to Artie sa Via

0:02:44.413 --> 0:02:47.933
<v Speaker 5>wonderful try, you know, the double grubber, Regather scoring in

0:02:48.053 --> 0:02:50.853
<v Speaker 5>the corner, but everything else that he did across the game.

0:02:51.093 --> 0:02:53.453
<v Speaker 5>He has been so influential on this team this year

0:02:53.453 --> 0:02:56.573
<v Speaker 5>and kept talking about it, but it's hard to understate

0:02:56.693 --> 0:02:58.853
<v Speaker 5>just how valuable his presence has been to the side.

0:02:58.853 --> 0:02:59.893
<v Speaker 5>What did you make of that game.

0:02:59.813 --> 0:03:02.173
<v Speaker 2>Nick, eh? The South Island Slayers.

0:03:02.173 --> 0:03:04.573
<v Speaker 4>Aren't they Minor Pacifica or was it last month beating

0:03:04.573 --> 0:03:07.733
<v Speaker 4>the Crusaders down my way and now down a bit

0:03:07.773 --> 0:03:09.733
<v Speaker 4>further down Stie High One and getting the job done

0:03:09.733 --> 0:03:10.933
<v Speaker 4>over Jamie Joseph's side.

0:03:10.973 --> 0:03:13.213
<v Speaker 2>Look, I thought they were deserved.

0:03:12.813 --> 0:03:15.333
<v Speaker 4>Victors, and you summed it up brilliantly around the impact

0:03:15.333 --> 0:03:17.333
<v Speaker 4>that Ardie sav has and I know on this podcast

0:03:17.333 --> 0:03:19.893
<v Speaker 4>when Leans usually in this seat, you guys are waxing

0:03:19.973 --> 0:03:22.933
<v Speaker 4>lyrical about his influence both on and off the field.

0:03:22.733 --> 0:03:25.333
<v Speaker 2>But the way his body at work on both sides

0:03:25.373 --> 0:03:25.773
<v Speaker 2>of the ball.

0:03:26.013 --> 0:03:29.453
<v Speaker 4>He is in another stratosphere at the moment, and it

0:03:29.533 --> 0:03:31.333
<v Speaker 4>was almost as if I know a lot of the

0:03:31.373 --> 0:03:34.053
<v Speaker 4>headlines in the highlight moment with the Chip and Chase.

0:03:34.133 --> 0:03:36.053
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's obviously he wanted that that Chip and

0:03:36.133 --> 0:03:38.173
<v Speaker 4>Chase Trice somewhere on his resume after the one that

0:03:38.213 --> 0:03:41.213
<v Speaker 4>got scrubbed out the week before. But that's just I

0:03:41.253 --> 0:03:45.133
<v Speaker 4>guess a footnote really on his full performance, like, well,

0:03:45.133 --> 0:03:48.653
<v Speaker 4>what have we got here? Eighty one meters for nineteen carries,

0:03:48.693 --> 0:03:51.733
<v Speaker 4>three defenders, beat in three clean breaks are just an

0:03:51.773 --> 0:03:54.293
<v Speaker 4>all round inspiration and the way he's able to then

0:03:54.373 --> 0:03:56.973
<v Speaker 4>exert more out of the rest of the team just

0:03:57.053 --> 0:03:59.413
<v Speaker 4>can't be understated. And I think that loose forward trio

0:03:59.573 --> 0:04:04.413
<v Speaker 4>as a three with Miracle Fire, Lungey and Tupo Thayoloa,

0:04:04.453 --> 0:04:06.933
<v Speaker 4>who could have easily been in a Highlands juty this

0:04:07.013 --> 0:04:08.573
<v Speaker 4>season given he was playing for the Seat Up and

0:04:08.573 --> 0:04:11.573
<v Speaker 4>Stags and NPC last year. They're right up there in

0:04:11.613 --> 0:04:14.173
<v Speaker 4>terms of a loose forward trail in Super Rugby Pacific

0:04:14.213 --> 0:04:17.133
<v Speaker 4>full stop. So look, we'll get to the Highlanders in

0:04:17.133 --> 0:04:19.533
<v Speaker 4>a sec. But Moana give them a ton of credit.

0:04:20.093 --> 0:04:21.733
<v Speaker 4>I love the way they go about their player. I

0:04:21.733 --> 0:04:24.733
<v Speaker 4>love seeing some of their outside backs like Kyra and

0:04:24.733 --> 0:04:29.653
<v Speaker 4>Thomoyflau and open space. They're just their box office appointment viewing.

0:04:30.733 --> 0:04:33.053
<v Speaker 4>And they're very much now in the playoff picture. They've

0:04:33.053 --> 0:04:35.733
<v Speaker 4>got a terribly difficult run home with the last three games,

0:04:35.733 --> 0:04:37.853
<v Speaker 4>which we'll get to, but the fact that they're just

0:04:37.973 --> 0:04:40.253
<v Speaker 4>there in the top six at the minute, in that

0:04:40.333 --> 0:04:44.533
<v Speaker 4>sixth position, it's a success story for the season for sure.

0:04:44.653 --> 0:04:45.013
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:04:45.053 --> 0:04:47.613
<v Speaker 5>And they lose yesterday, they're probably out of the playoff mix,

0:04:47.653 --> 0:04:49.453
<v Speaker 5>aren't they, because it's just too much work to do

0:04:49.493 --> 0:04:51.973
<v Speaker 5>over the closing rounds of the competition. And you know,

0:04:52.053 --> 0:04:55.773
<v Speaker 5>Jack Taylor scores with seven eight minutes to go, converted

0:04:55.773 --> 0:04:58.053
<v Speaker 5>by robins and you go, yeah, this is maybe not

0:04:58.093 --> 0:05:01.453
<v Speaker 5>going to be their day. But then Milani Matavel who

0:05:01.573 --> 0:05:03.093
<v Speaker 5>came off for the bench and had a real impact.

0:05:03.173 --> 0:05:06.093
<v Speaker 5>I thought with that charge down. Now I've gone back

0:05:06.093 --> 0:05:07.693
<v Speaker 5>and watched it a couple of times, I think Robinson

0:05:07.693 --> 0:05:10.693
<v Speaker 5>that time to pull out probably should have seen Mazavel

0:05:10.813 --> 0:05:13.653
<v Speaker 5>in his eye line of vision and maybe pulled out

0:05:13.693 --> 0:05:15.933
<v Speaker 5>of it and not kicked it or just taken the tackle.

0:05:16.453 --> 0:05:19.693
<v Speaker 5>He's probably going to rue that. But great vision from

0:05:19.893 --> 0:05:22.213
<v Speaker 5>the replacement half back from one just to see that

0:05:22.253 --> 0:05:26.173
<v Speaker 5>opportunity coming through, got the balance and then the dive

0:05:26.213 --> 0:05:29.133
<v Speaker 5>in the corner was pretty special as well, and they

0:05:29.133 --> 0:05:31.013
<v Speaker 5>closed it up from there. And just that they have

0:05:31.053 --> 0:05:34.213
<v Speaker 5>a sense that of a never say die attitude and

0:05:34.213 --> 0:05:37.053
<v Speaker 5>it hasn't always turned into victories the seats in Mauana Pacifica,

0:05:37.093 --> 0:05:38.973
<v Speaker 5>but you look back at some of the performances they

0:05:39.013 --> 0:05:41.293
<v Speaker 5>probably should have been in the hound as earlier on

0:05:41.333 --> 0:05:43.173
<v Speaker 5>in the comp when they were twenty one points down

0:05:43.213 --> 0:05:47.373
<v Speaker 5>at halftime, they came back and stormed back against the Hurricanes.

0:05:47.373 --> 0:05:49.733
<v Speaker 5>From memory, the Chiefs they are forty three seven down

0:05:49.773 --> 0:05:52.293
<v Speaker 5>and maybe should have ended that game with, you know,

0:05:52.533 --> 0:05:54.453
<v Speaker 5>actually a losing bonus point. They didn't get it on

0:05:54.493 --> 0:05:57.093
<v Speaker 5>that occasion, but they've been the masters of the second spell,

0:05:57.133 --> 0:05:58.973
<v Speaker 5>but they also just don't know when they're beaten. That's

0:05:59.013 --> 0:06:02.293
<v Speaker 5>a really strong quality to have for Mowana given in

0:06:02.373 --> 0:06:05.013
<v Speaker 5>recent seasons the cops and pastings and the heads have

0:06:05.133 --> 0:06:07.573
<v Speaker 5>gone down completely agree.

0:06:07.333 --> 0:06:09.413
<v Speaker 4>And on the other side of the the equation the

0:06:09.493 --> 0:06:12.493
<v Speaker 4>Highlander is they're sort of finding ways to lose at

0:06:12.533 --> 0:06:14.653
<v Speaker 4>the moment, or finding ways where they're not icing the

0:06:14.653 --> 0:06:17.973
<v Speaker 4>big moments like the Tane Robinson clearance Kirk which ends

0:06:18.053 --> 0:06:20.453
<v Speaker 4>up a charge down trying the corner to the replacement

0:06:20.533 --> 0:06:22.573
<v Speaker 4>half back, and you've got to feel a little bit

0:06:22.613 --> 0:06:24.933
<v Speaker 4>for Jamie Joseph sid They're already up against it in

0:06:25.013 --> 0:06:29.573
<v Speaker 4>terms of attracting players down south to the southernmost franchise

0:06:29.613 --> 0:06:33.413
<v Speaker 4>in the country. They're investing a lot in youth and

0:06:33.453 --> 0:06:36.773
<v Speaker 4>trying to surround some young players with some veterans, but

0:06:36.813 --> 0:06:39.493
<v Speaker 4>it just isn't quite working for them at the moment,

0:06:39.533 --> 0:06:42.373
<v Speaker 4>and now they're very much a danger with their run

0:06:42.413 --> 0:06:47.373
<v Speaker 4>home Hurricanes Crusaders' chiefs after the bye this week of

0:06:47.453 --> 0:06:49.853
<v Speaker 4>being wooden Spooners, which when you reflect back a couple

0:06:49.893 --> 0:06:52.253
<v Speaker 4>of months ago, there was all this conversation and chatter

0:06:52.333 --> 0:06:54.413
<v Speaker 4>run oh the Highlanders have they turned a corner.

0:06:54.733 --> 0:06:56.333
<v Speaker 2>How good's Tamathya.

0:06:55.973 --> 0:06:59.333
<v Speaker 4>Tabatavanaha going at second five eighth's that's sort of forgotten

0:06:59.373 --> 0:07:02.493
<v Speaker 4>about now and some real conversations to be had about

0:07:02.573 --> 0:07:05.493
<v Speaker 4>the Highlanders and where they track moving forward into twenty

0:07:05.493 --> 0:07:05.973
<v Speaker 4>twenty six.

0:07:06.213 --> 0:07:06.413
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:06.413 --> 0:07:09.693
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, And they seem to be falling off a cliff

0:07:09.693 --> 0:07:12.933
<v Speaker 5>a little bit. I don't know what that is necessarily

0:07:12.933 --> 0:07:14.373
<v Speaker 5>down to it, but they're not playing as a team.

0:07:14.413 --> 0:07:17.733
<v Speaker 5>They look really clunky. You know that the bright spot

0:07:17.733 --> 0:07:19.893
<v Speaker 5>in recent weeks has been the return of Jackie running

0:07:19.893 --> 0:07:22.973
<v Speaker 5>away to Vockie Nepkins for them, but they just look

0:07:24.173 --> 0:07:26.933
<v Speaker 5>really clunky whatever they do, whether it's a line out,

0:07:27.293 --> 0:07:30.893
<v Speaker 5>set piece and just across the park, they're not playing

0:07:30.933 --> 0:07:34.493
<v Speaker 5>in rhythm with each other. And they're missing, you know,

0:07:34.573 --> 0:07:36.813
<v Speaker 5>a partner for Fabian hond at Locke. They seem to

0:07:37.813 --> 0:07:40.453
<v Speaker 5>specialize in not picking back up locks on the bench.

0:07:40.653 --> 0:07:42.493
<v Speaker 5>I'm just not sure if some of the strategy around

0:07:42.533 --> 0:07:45.333
<v Speaker 5>that obviously had injuries, but they don't look like a

0:07:45.373 --> 0:07:48.133
<v Speaker 5>cohesive unit at the moment, and things just seem to

0:07:48.133 --> 0:07:51.453
<v Speaker 5>be unraveling a little bit for the Highlanders, and it's that.

0:07:51.453 --> 0:07:53.773
<v Speaker 2>First five eighth position ultimately too. Elliott isn't it.

0:07:53.813 --> 0:07:56.813
<v Speaker 4>I know they've put a fair bit of faith and

0:07:56.973 --> 0:07:59.133
<v Speaker 4>the young fella the names just escaping the top of

0:07:59.173 --> 0:08:02.573
<v Speaker 4>the head, Cam Miller obviously, Tane Robinson. They've kind of

0:08:02.573 --> 0:08:05.013
<v Speaker 4>gone back and forth there. They've got a lot of

0:08:05.013 --> 0:08:07.493
<v Speaker 4>depth all of a sudden at halfback. Have really been

0:08:07.533 --> 0:08:09.413
<v Speaker 4>impressed by the emerge. It's a hasty as well as

0:08:09.453 --> 0:08:11.613
<v Speaker 4>fuck a tava. They've got young Dylan Pledger over the

0:08:11.653 --> 0:08:14.413
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand under twenties at the moment, but ultimately in

0:08:14.453 --> 0:08:18.013
<v Speaker 4>this competition to be successful or be competitive, you really

0:08:18.053 --> 0:08:20.493
<v Speaker 4>need a game driver in that ten jersey and they

0:08:20.573 --> 0:08:22.053
<v Speaker 4>yet to find one at the minute.

0:08:21.733 --> 0:08:24.653
<v Speaker 5>They are, but the Hurricanes back to Saturday night, seem

0:08:24.693 --> 0:08:27.293
<v Speaker 5>to have found one thirty five seventeen over the Chiefs

0:08:27.293 --> 0:08:30.773
<v Speaker 5>and it's not all down to Ruben Love, but boy

0:08:30.813 --> 0:08:33.533
<v Speaker 5>here is making an impact in that ten jersey. And

0:08:33.893 --> 0:08:36.853
<v Speaker 5>conversely for the Chiefs, I think Jacob has been playing well,

0:08:37.053 --> 0:08:39.653
<v Speaker 5>but they're really missing McKenzie as that second playmaker option

0:08:39.973 --> 0:08:42.133
<v Speaker 5>in that back line, whether he's playing fifteen or ten.

0:08:43.613 --> 0:08:45.653
<v Speaker 5>We've just seen in the last week or two even

0:08:45.653 --> 0:08:49.333
<v Speaker 5>against the Force, but especially against the Hurricanes, boy them

0:08:49.333 --> 0:08:52.493
<v Speaker 5>as Damien McKenzie and the Hurricanes took full advantage. That

0:08:52.613 --> 0:08:55.813
<v Speaker 5>was clearly the Hurricanes' best effort of the season. And

0:08:56.173 --> 0:08:58.653
<v Speaker 5>you know we talked about leaving maybe before being on

0:08:58.693 --> 0:09:00.613
<v Speaker 5>this podcast, and then what he would say, the cane

0:09:00.653 --> 0:09:03.053
<v Speaker 5>train is just beginning to gather a little bit of steam.

0:09:03.133 --> 0:09:06.093
<v Speaker 4>Nick Oh, is it what all of a sudden the

0:09:06.173 --> 0:09:08.613
<v Speaker 4>Hurricanes are looking like that team that you don't want

0:09:08.613 --> 0:09:11.093
<v Speaker 4>to face first round and the playoffs, And I know

0:09:11.173 --> 0:09:13.973
<v Speaker 4>the Rugby Direct drums were beating for Ruben Love to

0:09:14.013 --> 0:09:16.733
<v Speaker 4>be instored at first five eighth for quite some time.

0:09:17.293 --> 0:09:18.173
<v Speaker 2>Clark laidlaw.

0:09:18.333 --> 0:09:19.813
<v Speaker 4>In fact, I think the last time I came on

0:09:19.853 --> 0:09:21.853
<v Speaker 4>the podcast as well, we were chatting about it too,

0:09:22.213 --> 0:09:25.013
<v Speaker 4>and that was not dismissing anything that Riley Hohap is

0:09:25.493 --> 0:09:26.133
<v Speaker 4>capable of.

0:09:26.213 --> 0:09:28.533
<v Speaker 2>It was just looking for a bit more butt X factor.

0:09:28.573 --> 0:09:30.813
<v Speaker 4>They needed to chance they're um given their ladder position,

0:09:31.133 --> 0:09:33.173
<v Speaker 4>and what a master stroke it's proven to be so far.

0:09:33.293 --> 0:09:36.173
<v Speaker 4>Not only that from Ruben Love and the goalkicking was

0:09:36.213 --> 0:09:39.173
<v Speaker 4>really slick to but I think the emergence or the

0:09:39.173 --> 0:09:43.013
<v Speaker 4>faith being put in Callum Harken at fullback speaking of

0:09:43.013 --> 0:09:47.333
<v Speaker 4>those dual playmakers, has then just taken the Hurricanes attack

0:09:47.453 --> 0:09:50.253
<v Speaker 4>to another level. Yes, I've also got camroy guard sniping

0:09:50.253 --> 0:09:52.693
<v Speaker 4>in and around the ruck. I really like their midfield

0:09:52.693 --> 0:09:55.133
<v Speaker 4>combination as well with Riley Higgins and Billy Proctor. But

0:09:55.613 --> 0:09:58.573
<v Speaker 4>that ten to fifteen axis, you know, we saw the

0:09:58.653 --> 0:10:02.253
<v Speaker 4>hark in fifty twenty two which was a real momentum

0:10:02.253 --> 0:10:04.813
<v Speaker 4>swinger as well, just kept the foot on for the Canes.

0:10:05.333 --> 0:10:06.373
<v Speaker 2>They've found something there.

0:10:06.413 --> 0:10:08.133
<v Speaker 4>I know they've got Brett Cameron coming back from a

0:10:08.133 --> 0:10:09.973
<v Speaker 4>set is knee injury, playing a bit of club rugby.

0:10:10.013 --> 0:10:11.293
<v Speaker 2>But all of a sudden they've.

0:10:11.133 --> 0:10:14.013
<v Speaker 4>Gone from some real issues around their game drivers to

0:10:14.453 --> 0:10:17.813
<v Speaker 4>landing on a really slick ten to fifteen combination with

0:10:17.893 --> 0:10:21.133
<v Speaker 4>their incumbent ten returning from injury come the business end

0:10:21.133 --> 0:10:22.973
<v Speaker 4>of the season. But heck of a knight for the

0:10:23.013 --> 0:10:25.533
<v Speaker 4>Canes could have easily gone the other way. You know,

0:10:25.573 --> 0:10:29.053
<v Speaker 4>they lose their X factor player on the flanks and

0:10:29.133 --> 0:10:30.773
<v Speaker 4>Kenny in the hollow to what appears to be a

0:10:30.813 --> 0:10:34.253
<v Speaker 4>serious knee injury. They had a couple of moments there,

0:10:34.293 --> 0:10:37.093
<v Speaker 4>you know, Billy Proctor intercept that Daniel Rohner gets his

0:10:38.053 --> 0:10:40.213
<v Speaker 4>second try the night seventeen nine at half time.

0:10:40.333 --> 0:10:42.013
<v Speaker 2>It's just the credits I know we're speaking a.

0:10:41.933 --> 0:10:44.973
<v Speaker 4>Lot about the attack, but to hold a Chiefs team

0:10:45.013 --> 0:10:47.733
<v Speaker 4>like that, irrespective of being without Damien McKenzie, but to

0:10:47.773 --> 0:10:50.133
<v Speaker 4>hold them scoreless in the second half, I think that's

0:10:50.173 --> 0:10:53.533
<v Speaker 4>what will impress Clark Laidlaw the most. You know, that's

0:10:53.573 --> 0:10:56.733
<v Speaker 4>a that's a real sign of encouragement there for the

0:10:56.813 --> 0:11:01.373
<v Speaker 4>Hurricanes as they build towards the playoffs, and they are, if.

0:11:01.253 --> 0:11:03.973
<v Speaker 2>Not the hot team at the moment, certainly right up there.

0:11:04.053 --> 0:11:04.253
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:04.293 --> 0:11:06.013
<v Speaker 5>I thought what was smart in that first spell is

0:11:06.053 --> 0:11:08.213
<v Speaker 5>they didn't get too worried. Obviously they can see that

0:11:08.733 --> 0:11:10.973
<v Speaker 5>just on half time again to set, but they keep

0:11:11.053 --> 0:11:13.213
<v Speaker 5>the school board tacking over and we don't often see

0:11:13.253 --> 0:11:15.053
<v Speaker 5>that in super rugby that you know, they were happy

0:11:15.093 --> 0:11:17.253
<v Speaker 5>to set all for keeping the school board going up

0:11:17.293 --> 0:11:19.733
<v Speaker 5>in threes. Reuben Love knocking over that early penalty goal,

0:11:19.773 --> 0:11:22.493
<v Speaker 5>then they considered the first of the road to tries

0:11:22.613 --> 0:11:24.813
<v Speaker 5>and then they just you know, tapped over another penalty

0:11:24.853 --> 0:11:27.493
<v Speaker 5>goal a couple in quick succession, and had that nine

0:11:27.533 --> 0:11:31.533
<v Speaker 5>to seven lead before that Jacob penalty and then the

0:11:31.653 --> 0:11:34.733
<v Speaker 5>converted try on halftime. But what they did was just

0:11:34.813 --> 0:11:36.933
<v Speaker 5>kept that pressure going on the Chiefs and we haven't

0:11:36.933 --> 0:11:39.373
<v Speaker 5>often seen that in Super rugby this season. There's just

0:11:39.413 --> 0:11:41.813
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of school board pressure and you know,

0:11:41.853 --> 0:11:43.893
<v Speaker 5>taking your shots at goal. It's very very rare we

0:11:43.933 --> 0:11:46.333
<v Speaker 5>see that and I really actually liked it from the Hurricanes.

0:11:46.653 --> 0:11:48.573
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was very discipline, wasn't it.

0:11:48.653 --> 0:11:51.573
<v Speaker 4>And as you say, just applying that school board pressure

0:11:51.573 --> 0:11:53.653
<v Speaker 4>and not letting it get beyond arms reached that all

0:11:53.693 --> 0:11:56.133
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden you're chancing your arm and you're chasing

0:11:56.173 --> 0:11:56.533
<v Speaker 4>the game.

0:11:57.093 --> 0:11:58.213
<v Speaker 2>And I thought just.

0:11:58.213 --> 0:12:01.333
<v Speaker 4>Their ability to keep the ball alive as well, like

0:12:02.133 --> 0:12:05.693
<v Speaker 4>they're so often they'd bend the defensive line of the Chiefs,

0:12:05.693 --> 0:12:08.813
<v Speaker 4>but then it was just a late offload when a

0:12:08.813 --> 0:12:11.253
<v Speaker 4>player was going down in the contact to just keep

0:12:11.413 --> 0:12:15.293
<v Speaker 4>putting applying that pressure. Yeah, that back line is just

0:12:15.493 --> 0:12:20.133
<v Speaker 4>full of some serious talent. And how about Baal and

0:12:20.173 --> 0:12:22.413
<v Speaker 4>Sullivan A he's probably thinking I might come on for

0:12:22.413 --> 0:12:24.093
<v Speaker 4>half an hour in the midfield or something like that,

0:12:24.133 --> 0:12:26.493
<v Speaker 4>gets his boarding passer up very early in the piece

0:12:26.533 --> 0:12:29.293
<v Speaker 4>after that Naholo injury, and look, I know he's just

0:12:29.333 --> 0:12:31.333
<v Speaker 4>on the end of the chain for a couple of them.

0:12:31.453 --> 0:12:33.573
<v Speaker 4>I've thought the second trol is a really strong finish,

0:12:33.653 --> 0:12:36.293
<v Speaker 4>but for him to get over for all four tries.

0:12:36.333 --> 0:12:37.453
<v Speaker 2>He'd be pretty happy with that too.

0:12:37.533 --> 0:12:37.693
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:37.733 --> 0:12:40.253
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think he's a quality player ballin Suarvan and

0:12:41.453 --> 0:12:43.893
<v Speaker 5>he obviously he's been the midfield Billy Proclet comes back,

0:12:43.893 --> 0:12:47.053
<v Speaker 5>he loses that spot, but he's such a versatile player

0:12:47.053 --> 0:12:49.453
<v Speaker 5>that I think he can really add to this Hurricane siding.

0:12:49.693 --> 0:12:51.613
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned the top when we was talking about this game.

0:12:52.213 --> 0:12:53.693
<v Speaker 5>We'll get to the Plaff makes a wee bit later

0:12:53.733 --> 0:12:55.173
<v Speaker 5>in the pod. But you just do not want to

0:12:55.173 --> 0:12:56.933
<v Speaker 5>play this Hurricanes team at the moment. They're going to

0:12:57.093 --> 0:12:59.293
<v Speaker 5>buy They're going to freshen up over the next week

0:12:59.373 --> 0:13:01.173
<v Speaker 5>or so. They've got a couple of tricky games to

0:13:01.253 --> 0:13:04.693
<v Speaker 5>come before the season closes out, but they just you know,

0:13:04.773 --> 0:13:07.653
<v Speaker 5>the Highlanders obviously to welcome to the Capitol, they've got

0:13:07.733 --> 0:13:10.093
<v Speaker 5>to go visit the Reds in Brisbane, which should be

0:13:10.173 --> 0:13:12.013
<v Speaker 5>an interesting game in the context of the clubs. And

0:13:12.013 --> 0:13:15.053
<v Speaker 5>they close out against Milana. But with the momentum they're

0:13:15.093 --> 0:13:17.733
<v Speaker 5>beginning to get in this competition when we get to playoffs,

0:13:17.813 --> 0:13:19.653
<v Speaker 5>you don't want to be playing this Hurricanes team.

0:13:20.133 --> 0:13:20.813
<v Speaker 2>Certainly don't.

0:13:21.013 --> 0:13:23.613
<v Speaker 4>And you look at maybe where we project them to

0:13:23.653 --> 0:13:26.213
<v Speaker 4>finish at the moment. I actually personally have them winning

0:13:26.213 --> 0:13:29.013
<v Speaker 4>those three games. Certainly the Highlanders game the Reds one

0:13:29.013 --> 0:13:30.773
<v Speaker 4>will be tricky, as will Mowana. It'll be interesting to

0:13:30.773 --> 0:13:33.533
<v Speaker 4>see by that point final round the regular season if

0:13:33.573 --> 0:13:36.773
<v Speaker 4>Moana is run is done, or if they've managed to

0:13:37.133 --> 0:13:39.093
<v Speaker 4>win another one of these New Zealand Derby's on the

0:13:39.173 --> 0:13:42.973
<v Speaker 4>road home. But look there at this point in time

0:13:42.973 --> 0:13:46.213
<v Speaker 4>could be facing a Chiefs or a Crusaders round one

0:13:46.213 --> 0:13:48.013
<v Speaker 4>of the competition. You think all the work those two

0:13:48.013 --> 0:13:50.253
<v Speaker 4>teams are put in to get up there at the top,

0:13:50.293 --> 0:13:53.133
<v Speaker 4>and you look down and all g whiz arguably playing

0:13:53.293 --> 0:13:55.493
<v Speaker 4>the form team and the competition at the moment, which

0:13:56.213 --> 0:13:58.853
<v Speaker 4>you know they're always capable on paper, aren't they. Ali

0:13:58.893 --> 0:14:01.053
<v Speaker 4>At the Hurricanes, you know those players. It was just

0:14:01.093 --> 0:14:05.173
<v Speaker 4>about finding that right blend, that right mix, having that confidence,

0:14:05.453 --> 0:14:07.573
<v Speaker 4>and we need to give credit to it. We're talking

0:14:07.573 --> 0:14:09.253
<v Speaker 4>a lot about the backs and Roy Guard and love

0:14:09.293 --> 0:14:13.973
<v Speaker 4>and hearken that there loose Ford trio very impactful. I

0:14:14.013 --> 0:14:18.173
<v Speaker 4>thought Tyrel Lomax was really strong again as well. So look,

0:14:18.893 --> 0:14:21.293
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of encouraging signs if you're a Hurricane.

0:14:21.053 --> 0:14:23.733
<v Speaker 5>Supporter, I certainly and a bit more encouraging for the

0:14:23.733 --> 0:14:27.773
<v Speaker 5>Blues forty nineteen over the Force on Friday night at

0:14:28.093 --> 0:14:29.933
<v Speaker 5>Eden Park. Look, I don't think this was a vintage

0:14:29.933 --> 0:14:32.653
<v Speaker 5>Blues performance by any stretch of the imagination, but they

0:14:32.693 --> 0:14:34.733
<v Speaker 5>got what they needed out of it. They needed the

0:14:34.773 --> 0:14:38.333
<v Speaker 5>bonus point. They got that and just got some confidence

0:14:38.453 --> 0:14:41.773
<v Speaker 5>back in the in the mix after what had been

0:14:42.333 --> 0:14:44.693
<v Speaker 5>a tricky few weeks, especially that poor performance against the

0:14:44.773 --> 0:14:48.773
<v Speaker 5>Reds at sun Corpse Stadium the week prior, largely case

0:14:48.853 --> 0:14:51.573
<v Speaker 5>of job done for the Blues. They almost threw away

0:14:51.573 --> 0:14:54.173
<v Speaker 5>that bonus point at the end when Angus had the

0:14:54.173 --> 0:14:57.653
<v Speaker 5>old topoken to touch and missed wild swing and the

0:14:57.693 --> 0:14:59.613
<v Speaker 5>Force get the ball back and get a penery thought on,

0:14:59.933 --> 0:15:02.133
<v Speaker 5>is this going to cost the Blues a bonus point?

0:15:02.133 --> 0:15:03.933
<v Speaker 5>And look, in the context of that season, that could

0:15:03.933 --> 0:15:06.573
<v Speaker 5>have been huge, And speaking to Simon Cron, the Force

0:15:06.653 --> 0:15:08.573
<v Speaker 5>coach after the game, he's like, that would I did

0:15:08.613 --> 0:15:10.413
<v Speaker 5>see it on wanting to deny the Blues the bonus

0:15:10.413 --> 0:15:13.173
<v Speaker 5>point because in the race for playoff spots, every point,

0:15:13.213 --> 0:15:15.973
<v Speaker 5>every competition point, is so big. But it just wasn't

0:15:16.013 --> 0:15:19.213
<v Speaker 5>to be in the end. Yeah, not vintage Blues by

0:15:19.253 --> 0:15:22.573
<v Speaker 5>any stretch of the imagination, but a game that could

0:15:22.573 --> 0:15:23.613
<v Speaker 5>have gone Ryan again.

0:15:24.013 --> 0:15:25.773
<v Speaker 3>They were leading.

0:15:25.573 --> 0:15:28.853
<v Speaker 5>At halftime fourteen twelve seven. I think it was scored

0:15:28.973 --> 0:15:31.333
<v Speaker 5>just after the break the Force they struggled to shut

0:15:31.333 --> 0:15:33.693
<v Speaker 5>them down, but it was really the last twenty twenty

0:15:33.693 --> 0:15:36.053
<v Speaker 5>five minutes where they just took charge and put the

0:15:36.053 --> 0:15:38.093
<v Speaker 5>game beyond reach for the Western Force.

0:15:38.693 --> 0:15:41.413
<v Speaker 4>That Angus Tart of our moment was when you look

0:15:41.413 --> 0:15:43.133
<v Speaker 4>at when you look at the ladder, there is nothing

0:15:43.213 --> 0:15:45.173
<v Speaker 4>separating the Blues in the Force, so that could have

0:15:45.213 --> 0:15:48.133
<v Speaker 4>easily been a swing the other way if the Force

0:15:48.173 --> 0:15:50.173
<v Speaker 4>had gone on to deny the Blues a bonus point there.

0:15:50.213 --> 0:15:54.053
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, a huge sigh of relief for Angus Tarl.

0:15:54.173 --> 0:15:55.773
<v Speaker 4>Just before we get into the Blues. I just want

0:15:55.773 --> 0:15:59.373
<v Speaker 4>to mention Harry Potter. Over the last couple of weeks

0:15:59.693 --> 0:16:02.893
<v Speaker 4>he is I used to just think maybe it was

0:16:02.933 --> 0:16:04.933
<v Speaker 4>because of his name that his name would just be

0:16:04.973 --> 0:16:07.853
<v Speaker 4>constantly brought up in commentaries, and you know, obviously it's

0:16:07.893 --> 0:16:12.853
<v Speaker 4>a pretty unique name given the book and movie series.

0:16:12.893 --> 0:16:15.533
<v Speaker 4>But like every time he touches the ball, something happens

0:16:15.533 --> 0:16:18.093
<v Speaker 4>and around him, and they need to give him more opportunities.

0:16:18.133 --> 0:16:20.053
<v Speaker 4>So just a quick shout out to Harry Potter.

0:16:20.173 --> 0:16:24.573
<v Speaker 5>Completely agree he's been outstanding and he makes something happen.

0:16:24.613 --> 0:16:26.733
<v Speaker 5>So he does to pop up everywhere on the park

0:16:26.773 --> 0:16:29.973
<v Speaker 5>and that tray screens achieves the previous week from the restart.

0:16:30.453 --> 0:16:33.813
<v Speaker 5>Incredible to show that pace. So I think he has

0:16:33.893 --> 0:16:36.893
<v Speaker 5>to be in the Australian mix for the line series.

0:16:37.053 --> 0:16:38.773
<v Speaker 5>The form that he's in, they could do a lot

0:16:38.813 --> 0:16:40.933
<v Speaker 5>worse than selecting him on one of those wings.

0:16:41.093 --> 0:16:44.093
<v Speaker 2>Spiders on at the moment. He's a serious talent.

0:16:44.133 --> 0:16:46.173
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, on the Blues, it was quite interesting smoothly

0:16:46.173 --> 0:16:48.773
<v Speaker 4>looking at the deepest statistics in this game, and it

0:16:48.813 --> 0:16:51.213
<v Speaker 4>was almost as if the Blues maybe took a look

0:16:51.213 --> 0:16:53.613
<v Speaker 4>at what the Crusaders did last week against the Highlanders

0:16:53.653 --> 0:16:57.133
<v Speaker 4>in terms of backing themselves without the ball, backing their defense,

0:16:57.173 --> 0:17:00.133
<v Speaker 4>backing their kicking game, and said we might try that too.

0:17:00.173 --> 0:17:03.613
<v Speaker 4>You know, the Force had was it sixty one percent

0:17:03.653 --> 0:17:07.253
<v Speaker 4>of possession, sixty percent of territory. Blues ended up making

0:17:07.293 --> 0:17:10.213
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and ninety ten tackles to the Forces ninety three.

0:17:10.333 --> 0:17:13.373
<v Speaker 4>So as you say it wasn't vintage from the Blues,

0:17:13.453 --> 0:17:14.893
<v Speaker 4>they did what was required.

0:17:15.573 --> 0:17:17.133
<v Speaker 2>They turned the screws late.

0:17:17.773 --> 0:17:20.853
<v Speaker 4>They went back to what has been successful for them

0:17:20.893 --> 0:17:23.173
<v Speaker 4>over the last eighteen or so months in terms of

0:17:23.173 --> 0:17:26.093
<v Speaker 4>that direct style of play in and around the ruck

0:17:26.173 --> 0:17:29.933
<v Speaker 4>and just I guess sort of constantly applying that pressure

0:17:30.013 --> 0:17:34.173
<v Speaker 4>until the defense wilts and they got the bonus point ultimately,

0:17:34.253 --> 0:17:36.893
<v Speaker 4>so that they've given themselves a chance. Look, they've got

0:17:37.013 --> 0:17:41.093
<v Speaker 4>an interesting run home with a trip now to face

0:17:41.813 --> 0:17:45.013
<v Speaker 4>the Drawer over there in Fiji, who of course beat

0:17:45.013 --> 0:17:47.293
<v Speaker 4>the Reds and the Weekend Read's a pretty handy team

0:17:47.293 --> 0:17:49.653
<v Speaker 4>at the minute as well. So the draw very much

0:17:49.653 --> 0:17:53.813
<v Speaker 4>have an opportunity to continue their spoiling run given they're.

0:17:53.613 --> 0:17:54.693
<v Speaker 2>Out of the playoff picture.

0:17:54.733 --> 0:17:57.333
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, if you're a Blues fan, I don't think

0:17:57.373 --> 0:18:00.613
<v Speaker 4>you can be crowing that we're back or anything like that,

0:18:00.773 --> 0:18:03.693
<v Speaker 4>but a step in the right direction. It's just whether

0:18:03.813 --> 0:18:06.773
<v Speaker 4>now they can build on that momentum. Because for me, anyway,

0:18:06.813 --> 0:18:08.653
<v Speaker 4>I thought when they only would just be in by

0:18:08.773 --> 0:18:11.093
<v Speaker 4>James O'Connor penalty down my way against the Crusaders a

0:18:11.133 --> 0:18:12.573
<v Speaker 4>few weeks ago, I thought, well, there was a lot

0:18:12.653 --> 0:18:14.773
<v Speaker 4>to like actually about that Blues performance. They should have

0:18:14.773 --> 0:18:17.333
<v Speaker 4>actually beaten the Crusaders down here in christ which yet

0:18:17.493 --> 0:18:19.613
<v Speaker 4>they go over to Brisbane the next week and the

0:18:19.613 --> 0:18:23.413
<v Speaker 4>wheels fell off, so for Vern Cotter, it's now about stability,

0:18:23.493 --> 0:18:26.013
<v Speaker 4>looking at the reviews, seeing what worked well and trying

0:18:26.013 --> 0:18:29.813
<v Speaker 4>to apply that and build some pressure as they go through.

0:18:29.733 --> 0:18:31.213
<v Speaker 2>With Drewer mowana Ge.

0:18:31.333 --> 0:18:33.253
<v Speaker 4>That's going to be a cracking game in a couple

0:18:33.293 --> 0:18:35.933
<v Speaker 4>of weeks, then a bye and then the Wireta's at.

0:18:35.813 --> 0:18:38.173
<v Speaker 5>Home absolutely, and look, we mentioned to see where they

0:18:38.173 --> 0:18:40.893
<v Speaker 5>get Caleb Clark maybe back this week for the trip

0:18:40.933 --> 0:18:45.093
<v Speaker 5>to Fiji. They obviously one have Mark Dalaire for a

0:18:45.173 --> 0:18:47.373
<v Speaker 5>couple more weeks yet, but if they can get Caleb

0:18:47.373 --> 0:18:49.613
<v Speaker 5>Clarke back in that changes the back line a little bit.

0:18:49.613 --> 0:18:52.973
<v Speaker 5>They can move Aj Lamb probably back to midfield, which

0:18:53.013 --> 0:18:54.933
<v Speaker 5>I think is a stronger mix in him. In twelve

0:18:55.173 --> 0:18:57.533
<v Speaker 5>he came off the bench shot on the weekend. Vancotta

0:18:57.853 --> 0:18:59.973
<v Speaker 5>reluctant to give too many details. They made a switch

0:19:00.013 --> 0:19:02.413
<v Speaker 5>at training on Thursday, so whether it was a off

0:19:02.453 --> 0:19:05.253
<v Speaker 5>field matter, I'm not entirely sure. He came off the

0:19:05.293 --> 0:19:07.493
<v Speaker 5>bench when he was originally listed to starter on the

0:19:07.573 --> 0:19:12.533
<v Speaker 5>left wing. If you gets some consistency going build some momentum. Again,

0:19:12.613 --> 0:19:14.813
<v Speaker 5>we talk about the Hurricanes and they've got more momentum

0:19:14.853 --> 0:19:17.013
<v Speaker 5>in the Blues habit at this point, but not aside

0:19:17.053 --> 0:19:20.173
<v Speaker 5>you'd want to face in week one, especially if you've

0:19:20.173 --> 0:19:22.453
<v Speaker 5>got that one or two home seating in the playoffs.

0:19:22.453 --> 0:19:23.973
<v Speaker 5>You wouldn't want to welcome the Blues to town.

0:19:24.653 --> 0:19:25.333
<v Speaker 2>No, you wouldn't.

0:19:25.733 --> 0:19:29.373
<v Speaker 4>They've got enough playoff experience within that mix to after

0:19:29.533 --> 0:19:33.933
<v Speaker 4>last year. So yeah, they're a dangerous prospect. I'm still

0:19:33.973 --> 0:19:38.653
<v Speaker 4>far from convinced, and certainly I'm sure there's even some

0:19:39.093 --> 0:19:41.853
<v Speaker 4>up your way, Ali who would agree that they're not

0:19:41.973 --> 0:19:44.253
<v Speaker 4>in the position obviously that they would have thought they

0:19:44.293 --> 0:19:47.493
<v Speaker 4>would have been in after the success they had last year.

0:19:47.533 --> 0:19:49.733
<v Speaker 4>But they're in with a chance, as are many teams.

0:19:49.773 --> 0:19:51.733
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, they'd have to be one, maybe just one

0:19:51.773 --> 0:19:53.853
<v Speaker 4>pig below the Hurricanes I want want to face, and

0:19:53.893 --> 0:19:55.293
<v Speaker 4>they're opening run in the playoffs, all.

0:19:55.213 --> 0:19:56.933
<v Speaker 5>Right, They's tack ad break here on rug Bitterrick come

0:19:56.973 --> 0:19:59.373
<v Speaker 5>back with the second half of the podcast after this

0:19:59.493 --> 0:20:00.813
<v Speaker 5>with our friends at Habit Health.

0:20:01.493 --> 0:20:06.013
<v Speaker 1>This is Rugby Direct, a podcast for real rugby fans.

0:20:09.293 --> 0:20:12.213
<v Speaker 5>Every try to drive, had sixty second, every tackle to

0:20:12.373 --> 0:20:13.613
<v Speaker 5>tackle get up again?

0:20:16.253 --> 0:20:20.053
<v Speaker 1>Well I take him before At time It's Ruggy Direct Talk.

0:20:20.813 --> 0:20:23.853
<v Speaker 5>You're back with Rugby Direct powered by Habit Health. Time

0:20:23.893 --> 0:20:26.573
<v Speaker 5>now for our Final four for Rugby Top Berks, myself

0:20:26.613 --> 0:20:29.453
<v Speaker 5>and Nick debate them. Topic number one, Nick must if

0:20:29.453 --> 0:20:32.093
<v Speaker 5>you saw this last week, but changes to the World

0:20:32.213 --> 0:20:36.293
<v Speaker 5>seven Series from next season now. There's been some financial

0:20:36.293 --> 0:20:39.133
<v Speaker 5>issues plaguing the series since they went to this new

0:20:39.573 --> 0:20:42.293
<v Speaker 5>format a couple of years ago. Trimmed it down, but

0:20:42.413 --> 0:20:45.013
<v Speaker 5>what it hasn't done is trim the costs, which was

0:20:45.333 --> 0:20:47.733
<v Speaker 5>largely sort of why they did. It's become a more

0:20:47.773 --> 0:20:49.733
<v Speaker 5>streamlined sort of model. I think they had up to

0:20:49.853 --> 0:20:53.133
<v Speaker 5>twelve thirteen World Series tournaments at one stage. Obviously New

0:20:53.213 --> 0:20:55.533
<v Speaker 5>Zealand used to be on the calendar. They've gone back

0:20:55.533 --> 0:20:58.933
<v Speaker 5>to seven teams sorry seven series, so six plus a

0:20:58.973 --> 0:21:02.693
<v Speaker 5>World Championship, which is ongoing at the moment in Los Angeles.

0:21:02.893 --> 0:21:05.013
<v Speaker 5>They've decided that's not enough and they're going to go

0:21:05.093 --> 0:21:07.493
<v Speaker 5>to the top eight teams in the world play the

0:21:07.533 --> 0:21:11.493
<v Speaker 5>top tier, and teams eight downwards going to a second

0:21:11.493 --> 0:21:15.093
<v Speaker 5>tier that feeds potentially into the top tier in a

0:21:15.133 --> 0:21:19.293
<v Speaker 5>World Championship. Bit convoluted, but ultimately one of the other

0:21:19.373 --> 0:21:22.693
<v Speaker 5>changes is two day events, and we're going to see

0:21:22.693 --> 0:21:24.613
<v Speaker 5>more of the top teams play each other because there's

0:21:24.653 --> 0:21:26.773
<v Speaker 5>only going to be eight teams at every of the

0:21:26.973 --> 0:21:30.293
<v Speaker 5>top tier World Series events. There's all sorts of flow

0:21:30.373 --> 0:21:32.293
<v Speaker 5>charts and diagrams if you want to dive a little

0:21:32.293 --> 0:21:34.773
<v Speaker 5>bit more deeply into this. But what do you make

0:21:34.773 --> 0:21:35.413
<v Speaker 5>of these changes?

0:21:35.453 --> 0:21:39.173
<v Speaker 4>N'tick still no valelves for Sevens in their marketing, so

0:21:39.413 --> 0:21:41.333
<v Speaker 4>a bit concerned that that wasn't top of the list

0:21:41.333 --> 0:21:42.773
<v Speaker 4>in terms of changes, but no, look at it does

0:21:42.853 --> 0:21:45.013
<v Speaker 4>very much feel like last chance saloon for the Sevens.

0:21:45.053 --> 0:21:46.813
<v Speaker 4>I know they're obviously part of the Olympic program and

0:21:46.893 --> 0:21:51.493
<v Speaker 4>have been since Rio in twenty sixteen, but yeah, it

0:21:51.533 --> 0:21:56.213
<v Speaker 4>was interesting, but perhaps massaging of this announcement because ultimately

0:21:56.253 --> 0:21:59.373
<v Speaker 4>you still have your six tournaments so this year for examples,

0:21:59.453 --> 0:22:02.693
<v Speaker 4>do buy Cape Town, Perth, Vancouver, Hong Kong, Singapoint and

0:22:02.733 --> 0:22:05.173
<v Speaker 4>at the moment as we record this podcast, the Los

0:22:05.253 --> 0:22:09.013
<v Speaker 4>Angeles Final. So it's very much that X plus one

0:22:09.213 --> 0:22:10.853
<v Speaker 4>for the top tier, and then there's going to be

0:22:10.893 --> 0:22:13.573
<v Speaker 4>another six tournaments for tiers two and three.

0:22:13.813 --> 0:22:15.933
<v Speaker 2>I guess my biggest question is who.

0:22:15.573 --> 0:22:20.333
<v Speaker 4>Outside of you know, the real hardcore fans of those

0:22:20.373 --> 0:22:24.373
<v Speaker 4>teams ranked nine to sixteen is tuning into those tournaments

0:22:24.693 --> 0:22:28.333
<v Speaker 4>both at venue and on the broadcast, and maybe it's

0:22:28.373 --> 0:22:32.213
<v Speaker 4>just me and the fact that my interest has dimmed

0:22:32.253 --> 0:22:34.933
<v Speaker 4>a little bit following on from I guess the halcyon

0:22:35.053 --> 0:22:37.293
<v Speaker 4>days of Wellington and to Hamilton are now no longer

0:22:37.333 --> 0:22:40.013
<v Speaker 4>a presence here. And look, I don't want to take

0:22:40.013 --> 0:22:42.413
<v Speaker 4>anything away from the Black Fans seven success as well.

0:22:42.613 --> 0:22:45.933
<v Speaker 4>They're probably the main reason that i'd tune in and

0:22:46.493 --> 0:22:49.213
<v Speaker 4>see how they're going because some of the rugby seven's

0:22:49.293 --> 0:22:53.533
<v Speaker 4>rugby they play is top tier, you know, arguably better

0:22:53.573 --> 0:22:56.173
<v Speaker 4>than watching some of the men's games. So it's an

0:22:56.213 --> 0:22:59.453
<v Speaker 4>interesting conundrum. I wonder I'll send it back to you, Elliott,

0:22:59.453 --> 0:23:01.973
<v Speaker 4>but if they weren't in the Olympics cycle, they're coming

0:23:02.013 --> 0:23:04.453
<v Speaker 4>up Olympic cycle twenty twenty eight, would they just run

0:23:04.453 --> 0:23:07.133
<v Speaker 4>a line through sevens and go It's been a great run,

0:23:07.493 --> 0:23:09.973
<v Speaker 4>but something has to give and we're not a bottomless

0:23:09.973 --> 0:23:10.453
<v Speaker 4>pit of money.

0:23:10.453 --> 0:23:14.333
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that's a very very good question, and yeah,

0:23:14.333 --> 0:23:17.893
<v Speaker 5>I think they might, honestly, and World Rugby has tried

0:23:17.933 --> 0:23:20.493
<v Speaker 5>to make sevens work, tried to make this World Series

0:23:20.533 --> 0:23:22.333
<v Speaker 5>work for a number of years, and you're right, they're

0:23:22.333 --> 0:23:25.653
<v Speaker 5>not a bottomless pit of cash. The Olympics was supposedly

0:23:25.693 --> 0:23:29.293
<v Speaker 5>going to be the start of something for sevens and

0:23:29.613 --> 0:23:31.453
<v Speaker 5>it was all sorts of talk about how players are

0:23:31.493 --> 0:23:34.533
<v Speaker 5>going to cross codes and go and play the chase

0:23:34.573 --> 0:23:35.333
<v Speaker 5>of Olympic medal.

0:23:35.373 --> 0:23:35.493
<v Speaker 2>Look.

0:23:35.493 --> 0:23:37.853
<v Speaker 5>I can remember being on the Sports Tesk and Sean

0:23:37.933 --> 0:23:39.493
<v Speaker 5>Johnson was asked about it, would he want to make

0:23:39.493 --> 0:23:41.373
<v Speaker 5>an Olympic middle That's never happened. None of those players

0:23:41.373 --> 0:23:43.973
<v Speaker 5>have crossed over and it's still been seen there as

0:23:44.093 --> 0:23:46.533
<v Speaker 5>rather niche when we had Antone de Pont make it,

0:23:46.613 --> 0:23:49.813
<v Speaker 5>but that was for a home World sorry home Olympics

0:23:49.973 --> 0:23:52.293
<v Speaker 5>and Paris in twenty twenty four, and that was huge

0:23:52.493 --> 0:23:53.093
<v Speaker 5>and it was great.

0:23:53.093 --> 0:23:53.893
<v Speaker 3>But it's not going.

0:23:53.733 --> 0:23:57.293
<v Speaker 5>To see more all blacks crossover and play sevens at

0:23:57.413 --> 0:24:00.133
<v Speaker 5>LA twenty eight. So the World Series, they just do

0:24:00.133 --> 0:24:02.613
<v Speaker 5>not quite know what to do with it. And as

0:24:02.653 --> 0:24:04.173
<v Speaker 5>long as there's in the sevens and I think the

0:24:04.213 --> 0:24:08.213
<v Speaker 5>World Series survives, But I think the Olympic spot is

0:24:08.453 --> 0:24:11.173
<v Speaker 5>the question. You know, there's flag football potentially coming in

0:24:12.173 --> 0:24:15.093
<v Speaker 5>or for the next Olympics and all sorts of challenges

0:24:15.973 --> 0:24:17.773
<v Speaker 5>for it that I just don't know they can necessarily

0:24:17.813 --> 0:24:20.333
<v Speaker 5>guarantee that sevens will be at the Olympics. I think

0:24:21.013 --> 0:24:23.013
<v Speaker 5>wild rugby obviously love to keep it there, but they

0:24:23.053 --> 0:24:24.773
<v Speaker 5>just can't quite figure it out. And maybe if it

0:24:24.813 --> 0:24:27.173
<v Speaker 5>wasn't at the Olympics, you'd be reduced to maybe just

0:24:27.253 --> 0:24:29.733
<v Speaker 5>keeping say a Hong Kong event or a Dubai and

0:24:30.013 --> 0:24:32.533
<v Speaker 5>maybe two or three events a year, and that wouldn't

0:24:32.533 --> 0:24:35.173
<v Speaker 5>be great for the blackfan sevens program, which has been

0:24:35.213 --> 0:24:37.773
<v Speaker 5>so so good in recent times. But I just get

0:24:37.773 --> 0:24:40.533
<v Speaker 5>the feeling that world rugby don't know what to do

0:24:40.613 --> 0:24:40.933
<v Speaker 5>with it.

0:24:41.453 --> 0:24:43.853
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, completely agree, and I as you made me think

0:24:43.893 --> 0:24:48.133
<v Speaker 4>around whether franchising sevens is the way to go. But

0:24:48.253 --> 0:24:50.493
<v Speaker 4>like what we're having with Tea twenty cricket at the moment,

0:24:50.533 --> 0:24:53.053
<v Speaker 4>you know, you get all these bilateral international series that

0:24:53.093 --> 0:24:55.933
<v Speaker 4>don't really shift the needle, But then you've got an

0:24:55.933 --> 0:24:59.493
<v Speaker 4>Indian Premier League or a competitions over in the UK.

0:25:00.093 --> 0:25:02.333
<v Speaker 4>Could a franchise again, who's funding that?

0:25:02.373 --> 0:25:02.773
<v Speaker 2>I don't know?

0:25:02.853 --> 0:25:05.293
<v Speaker 4>But could that sort of create some interest? And then

0:25:05.293 --> 0:25:09.893
<v Speaker 4>you're one and only international sevens is the Olympics and

0:25:09.973 --> 0:25:12.533
<v Speaker 4>if it still exists the Commonwealth Games. I'm not so sure,

0:25:12.573 --> 0:25:14.693
<v Speaker 4>but I think some big decisions that have been made,

0:25:14.733 --> 0:25:16.373
<v Speaker 4>it feels like a real fork in the road moment

0:25:16.413 --> 0:25:16.853
<v Speaker 4>for sevens.

0:25:17.013 --> 0:25:19.693
<v Speaker 5>It certainly does topic two. The Black Ferns announced their

0:25:19.693 --> 0:25:22.173
<v Speaker 5>squad for the Pack four, which she gets underway well

0:25:22.173 --> 0:25:24.013
<v Speaker 5>this weekend from a New Zealand perspective, at least when

0:25:24.013 --> 0:25:26.893
<v Speaker 5>they play Australia at in Newcastle on Saturday afternoon. No

0:25:27.013 --> 0:25:30.893
<v Speaker 5>Renee Homes, no Ruby Towey, no Chelsea Bremner, all filling

0:25:31.173 --> 0:25:34.293
<v Speaker 5>the axe from Allen Bunting. What do you make of

0:25:34.333 --> 0:25:37.053
<v Speaker 5>these selections? Look, I looked at it and thought, I

0:25:37.053 --> 0:25:40.493
<v Speaker 5>don't know if Ruby Tooey is in the top mix

0:25:40.973 --> 0:25:45.173
<v Speaker 5>of outside backs in New Zealand at the moment. Didn't

0:25:45.173 --> 0:25:47.653
<v Speaker 5>think she had a great or picky campaign. Renee Holmes,

0:25:47.693 --> 0:25:49.093
<v Speaker 5>I don't think I had a great or peacky campaign.

0:25:49.133 --> 0:25:50.653
<v Speaker 5>But she's been there, done that for the Black Ferns

0:25:50.693 --> 0:25:52.773
<v Speaker 5>and offers the goalkicking as well, so I was a

0:25:52.813 --> 0:25:54.933
<v Speaker 5>little bit more surprised to see her there. But I

0:25:54.973 --> 0:25:58.293
<v Speaker 5>genuinely didn't know if Bunting would be brave enough to

0:25:59.293 --> 0:26:02.013
<v Speaker 5>cut Toey, but he has been and now it's a

0:26:02.053 --> 0:26:03.933
<v Speaker 5>long way back for her to get a spot at

0:26:03.973 --> 0:26:05.853
<v Speaker 5>the World Cut. What have you made of these selections?

0:26:06.413 --> 0:26:08.173
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it is a long way back because you look

0:26:08.173 --> 0:26:10.733
<v Speaker 4>at it, well, I guess it's far aparmer Carp, isn't it.

0:26:10.773 --> 0:26:12.773
<v Speaker 4>That's the only way you can really shift the needle.

0:26:12.813 --> 0:26:15.093
<v Speaker 4>And then how much can you gain from their compared

0:26:15.133 --> 0:26:17.853
<v Speaker 4>to how many inroads can be made by the current

0:26:17.933 --> 0:26:20.133
<v Speaker 4>Black Ferns mix in the in the pack four before

0:26:20.133 --> 0:26:24.453
<v Speaker 4>the World Cup. But I feel they had to pick Braxton,

0:26:24.493 --> 0:26:27.253
<v Speaker 4>Sirence and McGhee, so you had to make room a

0:26:27.293 --> 0:26:30.773
<v Speaker 4>concession there for at least one player. And then the

0:26:30.813 --> 0:26:34.613
<v Speaker 4>fact that Porsche Woodman Wickliffe was listed as an outside

0:26:34.653 --> 0:26:36.613
<v Speaker 4>back as opposed to a midfielder.

0:26:37.133 --> 0:26:38.493
<v Speaker 2>Again, you had to make room.

0:26:38.333 --> 0:26:41.213
<v Speaker 4>For Porscha Woodman Wickcliffe in your mix if you plan

0:26:41.333 --> 0:26:43.933
<v Speaker 4>on playing her on the wing. And as you say,

0:26:44.013 --> 0:26:46.893
<v Speaker 4>based on the ope key form alone, I feel like

0:26:46.973 --> 0:26:50.093
<v Speaker 4>that was the right call to bring Sirence and McGhee

0:26:50.293 --> 0:26:53.173
<v Speaker 4>and Woodman and Wickcliffe in and Tilley and Holmes out.

0:26:53.213 --> 0:26:56.373
<v Speaker 4>It will be interesting to see the point you made

0:26:56.373 --> 0:26:58.933
<v Speaker 4>the elliot around Renee Holmes at fullback. I just looked

0:26:58.933 --> 0:27:01.333
<v Speaker 4>at again looking through that list, and that's probably where

0:27:01.653 --> 0:27:03.893
<v Speaker 4>I wonder, outside of Sorrence and McGee, who are they

0:27:03.933 --> 0:27:07.213
<v Speaker 4>thinking as back up fullback? So of any of them,

0:27:07.253 --> 0:27:10.773
<v Speaker 4>I feel like Renee Holmes has the greater chance of

0:27:10.853 --> 0:27:14.213
<v Speaker 4>maybe getting back in over Toy, which is a pretty

0:27:14.213 --> 0:27:16.613
<v Speaker 4>big cool given Ruby Toy standing in the women's game.

0:27:16.653 --> 0:27:16.853
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:27:16.893 --> 0:27:21.293
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm intrigued. I if Braxton's sign and McGee is injured,

0:27:21.773 --> 0:27:26.533
<v Speaker 5>where that Mex goes for fullback is really interesting. I

0:27:26.573 --> 0:27:29.893
<v Speaker 5>wonder whether Callie brazy It might be asked to play fullback.

0:27:29.933 --> 0:27:34.813
<v Speaker 5>Potentially she's a traveling reserved to Newcastle. Intrigued to see

0:27:34.853 --> 0:27:35.733
<v Speaker 5>where they go to with that.

0:27:36.173 --> 0:27:40.053
<v Speaker 4>I think I heard Alan Barling story say Rissy pory Lane,

0:27:40.053 --> 0:27:42.373
<v Speaker 4>who's obviously away with the Sevens, is sort of a

0:27:42.493 --> 0:27:46.653
<v Speaker 4>hybrid nine fifteen option in his mind. So that's where

0:27:46.653 --> 0:27:49.173
<v Speaker 4>this versatility of these sevens players come. Obviously we're waiting

0:27:49.213 --> 0:27:51.813
<v Speaker 4>to see how Georgia Miller slots back and listed there

0:27:51.933 --> 0:27:55.013
<v Speaker 4>is a loose forward, but yeah, still some decisions to

0:27:55.013 --> 0:27:57.613
<v Speaker 4>be made or I'm fascinated by how it all unfolds

0:27:57.613 --> 0:27:58.293
<v Speaker 4>over the coming weeks.

0:27:58.373 --> 0:28:01.213
<v Speaker 5>Yes, indeed, so am I and topic at number three,

0:28:01.333 --> 0:28:04.693
<v Speaker 5>let's after round twelve give us your super Rugby top

0:28:04.733 --> 0:28:07.293
<v Speaker 5>six and finishing order. Nick, I want to hear how

0:28:07.333 --> 0:28:09.293
<v Speaker 5>you're thinking with just a few rounds to go.

0:28:10.013 --> 0:28:13.533
<v Speaker 4>Well, look if Jack Mesley or Kevin Malowy is listening

0:28:13.533 --> 0:28:15.693
<v Speaker 4>to this edition of the Rugby Direct podcast. Just have

0:28:15.693 --> 0:28:17.773
<v Speaker 4>a look on the NRL dot com website. They've got

0:28:17.813 --> 0:28:20.573
<v Speaker 4>this thing called a ladder predictor that would be great

0:28:20.573 --> 0:28:20.853
<v Speaker 4>to do.

0:28:20.893 --> 0:28:23.413
<v Speaker 2>Rather than my notes here where I was manually.

0:28:23.173 --> 0:28:26.213
<v Speaker 4>Trying to figure out how many points each team is

0:28:26.253 --> 0:28:28.373
<v Speaker 4>going to win in the next three or four weeks.

0:28:28.373 --> 0:28:31.653
<v Speaker 4>But I've done my best look, I think, and probably

0:28:32.093 --> 0:28:35.093
<v Speaker 4>maybe call me bys whatever being based down here in Christs,

0:28:35.133 --> 0:28:36.693
<v Speaker 4>but I think the Crusaders are going to finish top.

0:28:37.093 --> 0:28:39.013
<v Speaker 4>It's level at the moment with the Chiefs, but they

0:28:39.013 --> 0:28:41.333
<v Speaker 4>do have the.

0:28:40.453 --> 0:28:42.493
<v Speaker 2>Benefit of a game in hand.

0:28:42.493 --> 0:28:45.533
<v Speaker 4>I do see them dropping one of those four, whether

0:28:45.613 --> 0:28:48.893
<v Speaker 4>that's the Chiefs this weekend, whether that's the Waretas has

0:28:48.933 --> 0:28:51.173
<v Speaker 4>been an unhappy hunting ground in Sydney, or even the Brumbies.

0:28:51.293 --> 0:28:54.413
<v Speaker 4>It isn't the easiest run home, but I back them

0:28:54.493 --> 0:28:59.653
<v Speaker 4>to finish top and then I've got the Chiefs second.

0:28:59.813 --> 0:29:03.933
<v Speaker 4>They either lose this weekend or even if they do win,

0:29:04.293 --> 0:29:06.853
<v Speaker 4>as I say, toss of a coin, maybe points differential.

0:29:06.893 --> 0:29:08.893
<v Speaker 4>It does come down to between the Crusader and the Chiefs.

0:29:08.893 --> 0:29:11.773
<v Speaker 4>But I'm backing them to beat Mowana and the Highlanders.

0:29:12.373 --> 0:29:15.053
<v Speaker 4>The Brumbies of course have beat them tars at the weekend.

0:29:15.093 --> 0:29:16.773
<v Speaker 4>I'm backing them to to win at least two of

0:29:16.773 --> 0:29:19.173
<v Speaker 4>the three and again wouldn't shock me if they beat

0:29:19.213 --> 0:29:22.733
<v Speaker 4>the Crusaders and Cameras. I've got them third. The big

0:29:22.773 --> 0:29:26.613
<v Speaker 4>mover of the last fortnight is the cane train. Hopefullyam

0:29:26.693 --> 0:29:29.653
<v Speaker 4>Napier's enjoying this on the flight back home. But look,

0:29:29.693 --> 0:29:33.893
<v Speaker 4>I've got them beating the Highlanders, I've got them beat

0:29:33.933 --> 0:29:36.973
<v Speaker 4>even beating the Reds in Brisbane, and I've got them

0:29:36.973 --> 0:29:40.573
<v Speaker 4>beating Maana. So they're fourth for mine. The Reds dropped

0:29:40.613 --> 0:29:43.773
<v Speaker 4>to fifth. They've got enough points in the bag though

0:29:43.813 --> 0:29:45.853
<v Speaker 4>to hold on. I think they'll win one of their

0:29:45.933 --> 0:29:50.733
<v Speaker 4>last four and in sixth position at the moment.

0:29:51.133 --> 0:29:53.133
<v Speaker 2>Hold on to your hats the Blues.

0:29:54.693 --> 0:29:55.133
<v Speaker 3>I'm one.

0:29:56.613 --> 0:29:57.373
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, tough scene.

0:29:57.453 --> 0:30:01.373
<v Speaker 4>Apologies for all our faithful fans, listeners and supporters of Majana.

0:30:01.453 --> 0:30:04.373
<v Speaker 4>I think they'll do enough even if they drop a

0:30:04.453 --> 0:30:07.013
<v Speaker 4>game from here, so the Blues run home. They got

0:30:07.053 --> 0:30:10.693
<v Speaker 4>the drawer that crucial game against Moana and the Waratas,

0:30:10.693 --> 0:30:13.373
<v Speaker 4>who can't win anywhere outside of New South Wales.

0:30:13.453 --> 0:30:16.693
<v Speaker 2>So that's my sex. Unfortunately for Milana.

0:30:16.733 --> 0:30:19.213
<v Speaker 4>I just feel, you know, when we reflect back to

0:30:19.413 --> 0:30:22.053
<v Speaker 4>earlier in the podcast and we were talking about some

0:30:22.133 --> 0:30:24.933
<v Speaker 4>of those games against the Highlanders for example, the Hurricanes,

0:30:25.053 --> 0:30:26.893
<v Speaker 4>or even that Chiefs won and Poker Co they shouldn't

0:30:26.893 --> 0:30:27.173
<v Speaker 4>have won.

0:30:27.373 --> 0:30:28.093
<v Speaker 2>They should have won.

0:30:28.173 --> 0:30:31.373
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps they did so much poor work in that first

0:30:31.413 --> 0:30:34.693
<v Speaker 4>forty to make it an insurmountable task. But it's just

0:30:34.733 --> 0:30:41.493
<v Speaker 4>that that run home Blues at home, Chiefs away, Hurricanes away.

0:30:42.613 --> 0:30:46.413
<v Speaker 4>For me, they're just going to fall short, but it's

0:30:46.453 --> 0:30:48.173
<v Speaker 4>gonna be a fantastic finish and that's what we want

0:30:48.213 --> 0:30:49.613
<v Speaker 4>in this competition. There's going to be a lot of

0:30:49.613 --> 0:30:54.653
<v Speaker 4>interest in these next three weeks because nothing is guarantee.

0:30:54.693 --> 0:30:56.453
<v Speaker 2>That's just one man's prediction about you.

0:30:56.453 --> 0:30:56.813
<v Speaker 3>We've got.

0:30:56.973 --> 0:30:58.653
<v Speaker 5>I've got the same top six as you, just in

0:30:58.693 --> 0:31:01.533
<v Speaker 5>a slightly different order. I've gone Chiefs to round out top.

0:31:02.413 --> 0:31:05.133
<v Speaker 5>I think the Crusaders will drop points, whether it's this week,

0:31:05.373 --> 0:31:07.893
<v Speaker 5>Similar to you, I think they've got at least one

0:31:07.973 --> 0:31:10.973
<v Speaker 5>game or a loss coming up in that last four games.

0:31:11.013 --> 0:31:14.013
<v Speaker 5>It's a tricky ish run home for them, whether it

0:31:14.013 --> 0:31:16.893
<v Speaker 5>comes this week or against the Brumbies or Wartas away.

0:31:16.933 --> 0:31:18.773
<v Speaker 5>So I got the Chiefs top the Crusaders, second the

0:31:18.813 --> 0:31:22.573
<v Speaker 5>Brumbies and third Hurricanes. Fourth Blues I've got making it

0:31:22.613 --> 0:31:25.853
<v Speaker 5>in fifth and the Reds to come home in sixth

0:31:25.973 --> 0:31:26.493
<v Speaker 5>at the end.

0:31:26.573 --> 0:31:27.933
<v Speaker 3>So no Mowana.

0:31:28.773 --> 0:31:31.653
<v Speaker 5>But boy, if they can beat the Blues at home

0:31:31.733 --> 0:31:34.093
<v Speaker 5>in a couple of weeks time, the seventeenth, I believe

0:31:34.133 --> 0:31:36.293
<v Speaker 5>it is at North Harbor Stadium, which has turned into

0:31:36.333 --> 0:31:38.053
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of a fortress for them, then that

0:31:38.133 --> 0:31:40.893
<v Speaker 5>shakes up the whole race in itself, so there is

0:31:40.933 --> 0:31:42.973
<v Speaker 5>more water to go under the bridge. But as it stands,

0:31:43.013 --> 0:31:45.493
<v Speaker 5>I think the Blues will make it and Mawana with

0:31:45.573 --> 0:31:49.253
<v Speaker 5>that Chiefs, Hurricanes Blues run in just a little bit

0:31:49.293 --> 0:31:51.853
<v Speaker 5>too much ground to make up unfortunately.

0:31:51.573 --> 0:31:54.013
<v Speaker 4>And look, don't rule out the drawer beating the Blues

0:31:54.053 --> 0:31:56.253
<v Speaker 4>this week. I'm just going to say that here, and

0:31:56.333 --> 0:31:58.413
<v Speaker 4>I'm either going to look like a genius or an

0:31:58.413 --> 0:32:02.493
<v Speaker 4>idiot in seven days time. But they're on their day

0:32:02.853 --> 0:32:07.373
<v Speaker 4>and better in Laotoka, but still equally pretty handy and suver.

0:32:09.133 --> 0:32:11.973
<v Speaker 4>That's no gimmy for the Blues, so just watch out

0:32:11.973 --> 0:32:12.573
<v Speaker 4>for that one this week.

0:32:12.613 --> 0:32:14.133
<v Speaker 5>Nd he was a cracking win. They got over the

0:32:14.173 --> 0:32:16.613
<v Speaker 5>Reds as well. Last minute try to get the job

0:32:16.653 --> 0:32:20.013
<v Speaker 5>done over the weekend, which has them in fifteenth in

0:32:20.053 --> 0:32:22.333
<v Speaker 5>the latter and so that is remarkable to be bottom

0:32:22.413 --> 0:32:24.653
<v Speaker 5>and have fifteen points on the board. Final topic in

0:32:24.693 --> 0:32:27.333
<v Speaker 5>the Final four, Jordy Barrett stint at Leinster won't win

0:32:27.373 --> 0:32:30.533
<v Speaker 5>the Champigins cut but hasn't been worth it. So Len's

0:32:30.573 --> 0:32:33.213
<v Speaker 5>obviously losing to Northampton, which is I've seen some people

0:32:33.253 --> 0:32:35.453
<v Speaker 5>call it one of the biggest shocks in European Champions

0:32:35.493 --> 0:32:40.053
<v Speaker 5>Cup history. I think Leinster were twenty point favorites according

0:32:40.093 --> 0:32:43.293
<v Speaker 5>to some of the stats and the bookies. They dropped

0:32:43.333 --> 0:32:45.813
<v Speaker 5>that game and a little bit of a chatter that

0:32:45.973 --> 0:32:49.853
<v Speaker 5>maybe ended and the conditioning program meant that Jordy Barrett

0:32:49.853 --> 0:32:51.813
<v Speaker 5>couldn't start. He came off the bench played the last

0:32:51.893 --> 0:32:55.773
<v Speaker 5>half hour from a couple of commentators suggested that maybe

0:32:55.773 --> 0:32:57.453
<v Speaker 5>he was still mad at the match despite any coming

0:32:57.453 --> 0:32:59.773
<v Speaker 5>on for half an hour, But would you classify the

0:32:59.853 --> 0:33:02.573
<v Speaker 5>stint has been worth it for Jordy Barrett.

0:33:03.093 --> 0:33:06.613
<v Speaker 4>Like I listened to Jordy again Weekend Sport with Jason

0:33:06.653 --> 0:33:09.533
<v Speaker 4>Pine a few weeks ago and look, I'll take his

0:33:09.573 --> 0:33:12.093
<v Speaker 4>comments at face value. He feels like he wanted to

0:33:12.093 --> 0:33:14.933
<v Speaker 4>go over there test himself in a new environment, grow

0:33:15.013 --> 0:33:15.733
<v Speaker 4>his game.

0:33:16.413 --> 0:33:17.693
<v Speaker 2>And come back a better player.

0:33:17.853 --> 0:33:20.813
<v Speaker 4>And as of a few weeks ago, his comments were, Yep,

0:33:21.173 --> 0:33:25.093
<v Speaker 4>I've ticked those boxes. And by all accounts of those

0:33:25.133 --> 0:33:28.213
<v Speaker 4>who follow the game closer in the Northern Hemisphere, he's

0:33:28.253 --> 0:33:30.493
<v Speaker 4>been a sensation. Has been quite interesting though, hasn't it

0:33:30.533 --> 0:33:33.013
<v Speaker 4>Smithy around? There's been a little bit of commentary and

0:33:33.053 --> 0:33:35.893
<v Speaker 4>maybe misguided commentary around. You know, he's been playing week in,

0:33:35.973 --> 0:33:38.213
<v Speaker 4>week out and he's going to be a bit naked

0:33:38.333 --> 0:33:40.093
<v Speaker 4>or spent by the time he gets back for a

0:33:40.173 --> 0:33:43.413
<v Speaker 4>potential All Blacks series against France in July. But if

0:33:43.453 --> 0:33:44.933
<v Speaker 4>you look a bit closer, he had the best part

0:33:44.933 --> 0:33:48.013
<v Speaker 4>of eight weeks off during the Six Nations, so it

0:33:48.053 --> 0:33:50.253
<v Speaker 4>will be interesting. I guess the proof will ultimately be

0:33:50.373 --> 0:33:53.693
<v Speaker 4>when he comes back and what is a real stacked

0:33:53.773 --> 0:33:57.573
<v Speaker 4>midfield picture to see what type of form Jordi Barrett is.

0:33:57.613 --> 0:34:01.293
<v Speaker 4>But look, I'm all for these experiences if it helps

0:34:01.813 --> 0:34:05.773
<v Speaker 4>keeping our top tier talent in New Zealand long term,

0:34:06.053 --> 0:34:09.013
<v Speaker 4>and look, I personally wouldn't mind. Where were actually chatting

0:34:09.053 --> 0:34:11.773
<v Speaker 4>to a couple of Crusaders senior Crusaders players at a

0:34:11.853 --> 0:34:13.733
<v Speaker 4>media session a couple of weeks ago. I won't name names,

0:34:13.733 --> 0:34:14.973
<v Speaker 4>but they were saying I'd love to see it go

0:34:15.653 --> 0:34:17.813
<v Speaker 4>the other way, where they get a you know, a

0:34:17.893 --> 0:34:20.613
<v Speaker 4>Sam Prendergas for example, comes down and plays for the

0:34:20.693 --> 0:34:23.373
<v Speaker 4>Highlanders for a season, you know, Like I think that

0:34:23.413 --> 0:34:28.213
<v Speaker 4>would spark even greater interest and transfer movement and rugby,

0:34:28.293 --> 0:34:30.333
<v Speaker 4>and it doesn't necessarily have to just be a one

0:34:30.373 --> 0:34:31.013
<v Speaker 4>way strict well.

0:34:31.013 --> 0:34:33.133
<v Speaker 5>One of the most successful has been Publo Meteta, who

0:34:33.133 --> 0:34:35.693
<v Speaker 5>came in twenty twenty two and did that season with

0:34:35.773 --> 0:34:39.933
<v Speaker 5>the Crusaders because he wanted experience, you know, the New

0:34:40.053 --> 0:34:42.253
<v Speaker 5>Zealand style of rugby, and I thought it was great

0:34:42.293 --> 0:34:44.933
<v Speaker 5>for the comp there. Yes, they're only coming for one

0:34:44.973 --> 0:34:48.013
<v Speaker 5>season and it's the short term attachment, but I think

0:34:48.093 --> 0:34:51.773
<v Speaker 5>ultimately creates interest in the comp interest in everything. Henry

0:34:51.773 --> 0:34:54.533
<v Speaker 5>Pollock's been a real staff for an English rugby on

0:34:54.533 --> 0:34:57.413
<v Speaker 5>the rise. If you want to come and improve his

0:34:57.493 --> 0:34:59.013
<v Speaker 5>game and go to the Hurricanes or go to the

0:34:59.053 --> 0:35:01.493
<v Speaker 5>Crusade wherever it might be, that's going to create interest.

0:35:01.573 --> 0:35:03.853
<v Speaker 5>So but I think ultimately we might see more of

0:35:03.893 --> 0:35:07.493
<v Speaker 5>it in world rugby, which can only be a good thing.

0:35:07.573 --> 0:35:10.213
<v Speaker 5>Let's get into our being. Liam had a good week.

0:35:10.573 --> 0:35:13.933
<v Speaker 5>He picked four of five, got the Reds drew a

0:35:14.013 --> 0:35:16.733
<v Speaker 5>game wrong, but else where he was correct with the Blues, Canes,

0:35:16.773 --> 0:35:21.613
<v Speaker 5>Brumbies and Mowana. I picked the Chiefs and the Highlanders

0:35:22.173 --> 0:35:24.973
<v Speaker 5>to get victories and they did not. So he's closed

0:35:24.973 --> 0:35:26.893
<v Speaker 5>the gap to five points, thirty nine and a half

0:35:26.933 --> 0:35:28.693
<v Speaker 5>to thirty four and a half. So pressure's on you

0:35:28.733 --> 0:35:31.773
<v Speaker 5>here this week, Nick, to see how whether you can

0:35:31.893 --> 0:35:33.093
<v Speaker 5>keep some of the He's on me.

0:35:34.253 --> 0:35:37.213
<v Speaker 4>Only only the four games, so yeah, I got much

0:35:38.173 --> 0:35:39.813
<v Speaker 4>much runway here, but I'll do my best.

0:35:39.893 --> 0:35:40.133
<v Speaker 2>Lamb.

0:35:40.173 --> 0:35:43.853
<v Speaker 5>Well, you picked earlier a couple of moments ago drew

0:35:43.893 --> 0:35:46.293
<v Speaker 5>a Blues You suggested look out for a drawer up.

0:35:46.293 --> 0:35:47.653
<v Speaker 5>See any willing to lock that in?

0:35:47.973 --> 0:35:48.173
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:35:48.173 --> 0:35:49.693
<v Speaker 2>I lock it in, you know, So I'll stay true

0:35:49.693 --> 0:35:51.053
<v Speaker 2>to my word. I think.

0:35:52.533 --> 0:35:54.653
<v Speaker 4>The nature of the Blues season being a little bit

0:35:54.733 --> 0:35:58.933
<v Speaker 4>up and down. I just get I'm still unconvinced, and

0:35:59.053 --> 0:36:02.413
<v Speaker 4>I haven't really been convinced in them all year. And

0:36:02.893 --> 0:36:07.853
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the force, you know, despite their their improvement,

0:36:08.573 --> 0:36:11.573
<v Speaker 4>are a real line in the sand. You know, when

0:36:11.653 --> 0:36:13.293
<v Speaker 4>if you beat them by X amount of points, all

0:36:13.293 --> 0:36:14.373
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden, you're a good team.

0:36:14.453 --> 0:36:18.013
<v Speaker 5>So toss d I'm going the Blues to get it

0:36:18.053 --> 0:36:20.533
<v Speaker 5>done in a close one live on Godsport and my

0:36:20.613 --> 0:36:23.893
<v Speaker 5>Heart Radio. Warritars and Reds stat against state made against

0:36:23.893 --> 0:36:27.893
<v Speaker 5>mate Sydney the venue for this one. The war retar

0:36:28.053 --> 0:36:30.813
<v Speaker 5>is very disappointing on the weekend against the Brumbies. But

0:36:30.853 --> 0:36:32.733
<v Speaker 5>do they bounce back against their old rivals.

0:36:34.053 --> 0:36:36.373
<v Speaker 4>This is a tough one for mine, given both teams

0:36:36.493 --> 0:36:39.573
<v Speaker 4>were a little bit disappointing and the Reds sets a

0:36:39.613 --> 0:36:43.733
<v Speaker 4>long road trip home from Suva back to Brisbane, back

0:36:43.773 --> 0:36:46.893
<v Speaker 4>to Brisbane and then down to Sydney, and just given

0:36:46.933 --> 0:36:50.893
<v Speaker 4>the home record of the Waratars, I think that may

0:36:51.133 --> 0:36:52.653
<v Speaker 4>give them the edge if I had.

0:36:52.533 --> 0:36:54.693
<v Speaker 2>To make a pick, which I do, That's why I'm here.

0:36:54.733 --> 0:36:57.373
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, Tars, I'm going to visit as the Reds

0:36:57.373 --> 0:36:59.533
<v Speaker 5>to win that one. Looking forward to this one. Crusaders

0:36:59.613 --> 0:37:03.373
<v Speaker 5>cheap seven o five on Saturday night at Apollo Project

0:37:03.453 --> 0:37:06.053
<v Speaker 5>stating a hum in christ Church. Or check the forecast,

0:37:06.053 --> 0:37:08.813
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be three degrees Saturday nights.

0:37:10.693 --> 0:37:11.733
<v Speaker 3>Nick, what do you reckon?

0:37:12.173 --> 0:37:14.453
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, just firstly as a recommendation, because you are

0:37:14.493 --> 0:37:16.853
<v Speaker 4>calling this one, Elliott while you're down here and I'm

0:37:17.013 --> 0:37:20.013
<v Speaker 4>hopefully going to be sunning myself on the Sunshine coast.

0:37:20.533 --> 0:37:23.853
<v Speaker 2>M yeah, pack up all your layers electric.

0:37:25.053 --> 0:37:27.413
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was about to say for our listeners radio

0:37:27.413 --> 0:37:30.333
<v Speaker 4>sport listeners. Back in the day Corey Flynn used to

0:37:30.653 --> 0:37:34.173
<v Speaker 4>pack an electric blanket on occasion might be required. Just

0:37:34.293 --> 0:37:37.973
<v Speaker 4>the nature of that window as it just gets through

0:37:38.013 --> 0:37:39.813
<v Speaker 4>in the corner of the standard there up into our

0:37:39.813 --> 0:37:40.573
<v Speaker 4>commentary position.

0:37:40.613 --> 0:37:41.093
<v Speaker 2>But you'll love it.

0:37:41.173 --> 0:37:45.733
<v Speaker 3>How excited if next year it's going to be unreal?

0:37:45.893 --> 0:37:47.533
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely unreal? Cannot wait?

0:37:47.613 --> 0:37:51.013
<v Speaker 4>But yeah on this one fascinating contest, isn't it, and

0:37:51.133 --> 0:37:54.813
<v Speaker 4>probably will determine who finishes top spots. We haven't really

0:37:54.853 --> 0:37:57.813
<v Speaker 4>got to it, but you know, Takim a confirmation season

0:37:57.933 --> 0:38:01.693
<v Speaker 4>ending knee knee injury and subsequent surgery coming up to

0:38:01.773 --> 0:38:06.133
<v Speaker 4>repair his acl Like I thought Rivers Rayhanna was steady

0:38:06.213 --> 0:38:07.733
<v Speaker 4>enough against the Highlanders.

0:38:07.733 --> 0:38:09.213
<v Speaker 2>But the Highland aren't the chiefs.

0:38:09.413 --> 0:38:12.613
<v Speaker 4>And I'm really intrigued come Wednesday afternoon when we see

0:38:12.653 --> 0:38:15.533
<v Speaker 4>all the teams. Do they stick with Ray Harner as

0:38:15.573 --> 0:38:18.293
<v Speaker 4>a starter and O'Connor as a closer or do they

0:38:18.293 --> 0:38:21.933
<v Speaker 4>look to reverse that? But I will keep my faith

0:38:22.093 --> 0:38:25.093
<v Speaker 4>in the Crusaders at home.

0:38:25.853 --> 0:38:27.653
<v Speaker 3>Just I think the Chiefs.

0:38:27.813 --> 0:38:30.413
<v Speaker 5>Look, the Crusaders got beaten by them, what almost fifty

0:38:30.413 --> 0:38:33.653
<v Speaker 5>points earlier in the comp They've improved obviously since then.

0:38:33.773 --> 0:38:36.853
<v Speaker 5>But I think the Chiefs with Damie McKenzie back, Wallace

0:38:36.893 --> 0:38:38.933
<v Speaker 5>a teed might start this week after a couple of

0:38:39.013 --> 0:38:39.973
<v Speaker 5>weeks off the bench.

0:38:40.133 --> 0:38:42.733
<v Speaker 3>I think the Chiefs in a close one. I'm looking

0:38:42.733 --> 0:38:43.213
<v Speaker 3>forward to it.

0:38:43.453 --> 0:38:45.253
<v Speaker 4>Gee, this is a real swing week all of a sudden,

0:38:45.253 --> 0:38:46.573
<v Speaker 4>isn't it is? In competition?

0:38:47.093 --> 0:38:50.613
<v Speaker 5>It could be dangerous for my lead and the Force

0:38:50.693 --> 0:38:53.613
<v Speaker 5>and the Brumbies to round out a shortened week of

0:38:53.773 --> 0:38:57.093
<v Speaker 5>Super rugby this one in Perth on Saturday night. Now

0:38:57.133 --> 0:39:00.213
<v Speaker 5>the Force now on the outside looking in of the playoffs.

0:39:00.213 --> 0:39:03.573
<v Speaker 5>But if they win that, look it's all go again.

0:39:03.693 --> 0:39:06.013
<v Speaker 5>So what do you reckon to The Force went at home?

0:39:06.533 --> 0:39:09.613
<v Speaker 4>Well, just based on the final four before, I've got

0:39:09.613 --> 0:39:10.653
<v Speaker 4>the Brumbies winning out.

0:39:10.853 --> 0:39:12.853
<v Speaker 2>So that includes this one.

0:39:13.693 --> 0:39:17.453
<v Speaker 4>I thought after the loss they had against Hurricans, they

0:39:17.453 --> 0:39:19.933
<v Speaker 4>were very impressive against the Tars and I expect that

0:39:20.573 --> 0:39:24.333
<v Speaker 4>momentum to extend this week through in this game in Perth.

0:39:24.453 --> 0:39:25.733
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm with you. I'm going to give you the

0:39:25.773 --> 0:39:27.413
<v Speaker 3>same one. That one. I think the Brumby's to win

0:39:27.453 --> 0:39:27.733
<v Speaker 3>that one.

0:39:27.733 --> 0:39:31.773
<v Speaker 5>In Perth Rugby Deric Metal voting time, Artie Savier out

0:39:31.813 --> 0:39:33.813
<v Speaker 5>on top on thirteen vote and Barrett on twelve. Will

0:39:33.893 --> 0:39:38.333
<v Speaker 5>Jordan in third on nine points. Nick, your three two

0:39:38.373 --> 0:39:39.693
<v Speaker 5>ones if you'd be so kind.

0:39:39.893 --> 0:39:44.013
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, three two ones for mine, and look, rugby direct

0:39:44.093 --> 0:39:46.453
<v Speaker 4>medal leader is going to push a bit clear via

0:39:46.533 --> 0:39:49.733
<v Speaker 4>me because I've got three points for Artie Savia. We

0:39:49.813 --> 0:39:53.693
<v Speaker 4>wax lyrical at the top, but he was sensational again

0:39:54.413 --> 0:39:57.493
<v Speaker 4>and the miner's position and.

0:39:57.453 --> 0:39:59.853
<v Speaker 2>Sixth on the ladder at the moment. A large part

0:39:59.893 --> 0:40:00.213
<v Speaker 2>of that.

0:40:00.293 --> 0:40:03.013
<v Speaker 4>Is through his influence. So three points for Artie Savia.

0:40:03.293 --> 0:40:07.013
<v Speaker 4>I got two for Ruben Love, who looks very much

0:40:07.053 --> 0:40:08.933
<v Speaker 4>at home as a ten and I'm I think it's

0:40:09.173 --> 0:40:13.693
<v Speaker 4>going to do his all blacks credentials or selection potential

0:40:13.853 --> 0:40:16.533
<v Speaker 4>all the world of good his versatility, but he is

0:40:17.373 --> 0:40:19.613
<v Speaker 4>riding a waiver of confidence at the moment, goal kicking

0:40:19.733 --> 0:40:23.893
<v Speaker 4>very slick, Love that crossfield kick and just the confidence

0:40:23.973 --> 0:40:26.253
<v Speaker 4>of him at ten. So he gets my two with

0:40:26.293 --> 0:40:27.973
<v Speaker 4>a big win over the Chiefs and that was the

0:40:27.973 --> 0:40:30.173
<v Speaker 4>big statement win for me of the week. So my

0:40:30.653 --> 0:40:34.693
<v Speaker 4>one I start tossing up between a number of hurricanes players,

0:40:34.733 --> 0:40:38.293
<v Speaker 4>but I've ended up landing on Callum Harkin just because

0:40:38.373 --> 0:40:41.293
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a real story of perseverance. Didn't get

0:40:41.333 --> 0:40:42.973
<v Speaker 4>a super rugby contract at the beginning of the year.

0:40:42.973 --> 0:40:45.413
<v Speaker 4>I thought he was actually very impressive in NPC. Has

0:40:45.493 --> 0:40:48.773
<v Speaker 4>fought his way back in through circumstance and injury, and

0:40:48.973 --> 0:40:52.813
<v Speaker 4>again he looks very slick at fifteen and a real

0:40:52.853 --> 0:40:55.733
<v Speaker 4>point of difference from his kicking game and running game.

0:40:55.813 --> 0:40:58.013
<v Speaker 4>And yeah he gets my one point might be the

0:40:58.013 --> 0:41:00.733
<v Speaker 4>first point for him or the Rugby Direct medal, but

0:41:01.093 --> 0:41:01.773
<v Speaker 4>he's on the board.

0:41:01.853 --> 0:41:03.093
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I thought he was excellent.

0:41:03.133 --> 0:41:05.253
<v Speaker 5>Again. It was great hearing the clip from him this

0:41:05.293 --> 0:41:08.053
<v Speaker 5>week that last week rather than Collie Adam Cooper when

0:41:08.053 --> 0:41:10.573
<v Speaker 5>he spoke to him after all those wins in Wellington

0:41:11.013 --> 0:41:13.133
<v Speaker 5>last week and he said he probably still would have

0:41:13.173 --> 0:41:16.133
<v Speaker 5>been out on the building site because that's his trade

0:41:16.173 --> 0:41:19.413
<v Speaker 5>and his old boss wasn't favorable to calling it a

0:41:19.493 --> 0:41:23.013
<v Speaker 5>day too early, so if it wasn't rugby, he was

0:41:23.093 --> 0:41:24.853
<v Speaker 5>doing here. But he's probably on the building site, still

0:41:24.853 --> 0:41:26.773
<v Speaker 5>out in the wins, so he's quite grateful to be

0:41:27.253 --> 0:41:27.973
<v Speaker 5>chucking the ball around.

0:41:27.973 --> 0:41:28.733
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was great.

0:41:28.973 --> 0:41:31.813
<v Speaker 5>Our threes and twos are exactly the same, Artie Savia,

0:41:32.133 --> 0:41:33.613
<v Speaker 5>What more can you say? I think he's the best

0:41:33.613 --> 0:41:36.053
<v Speaker 5>player in the world at the moment, probably alongside Antilino

0:41:36.093 --> 0:41:39.613
<v Speaker 5>point obviously injured, but just the whole array of skills

0:41:39.653 --> 0:41:42.493
<v Speaker 5>we saw from him in that Moana game. He was exceptional.

0:41:42.533 --> 0:41:45.493
<v Speaker 5>So he is going to extend out with two three

0:41:45.533 --> 0:41:48.493
<v Speaker 5>pointers this week. Rubin Love gets my two as well,

0:41:48.533 --> 0:41:50.773
<v Speaker 5>and I'm giving one to Boden. Barrett pulled the strings

0:41:50.813 --> 0:41:54.013
<v Speaker 5>in that game against the Force for the Blues and

0:41:54.293 --> 0:41:56.493
<v Speaker 5>we'll keep them really alive in the playoff mix and

0:41:56.493 --> 0:42:00.333
<v Speaker 5>did what they needed to do, So Boden gets my one.

0:42:00.693 --> 0:42:02.013
<v Speaker 3>Well update you next week, I can tell you.

0:42:02.093 --> 0:42:06.413
<v Speaker 5>Artie Savia is right out in front of this rugby

0:42:06.453 --> 0:42:09.653
<v Speaker 5>director MVP medal vote. That about does us for rank

0:42:09.693 --> 0:42:11.773
<v Speaker 5>be direct for a week? Nick, thanks for stopping by.

0:42:11.773 --> 0:42:14.293
<v Speaker 5>I appreciate your time as always, and you enjoy a

0:42:14.373 --> 0:42:16.093
<v Speaker 5>well deserved break across the ditch.

0:42:16.813 --> 0:42:20.133
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much, Elliott, and enjoy the comforts of

0:42:20.213 --> 0:42:24.133
<v Speaker 4>Apollo Orange Theory projects, Ami, whatever it's called these days,

0:42:24.293 --> 0:42:24.973
<v Speaker 4>You're in for a treat.

0:42:25.013 --> 0:42:26.773
<v Speaker 2>Saturday Night Night shall be a cracking game. Can't wait

0:42:26.813 --> 0:42:27.133
<v Speaker 2>to churn it.

0:42:27.293 --> 0:42:29.653
<v Speaker 3>Looking forward to that on gold Sport on iHeartRadio. Just

0:42:29.693 --> 0:42:30.693
<v Speaker 3>a quick programming note.

0:42:30.613 --> 0:42:34.693
<v Speaker 5>We'll be back next Wednesday. Slightly delay podcast next week,

0:42:35.053 --> 0:42:36.053
<v Speaker 5>but we look forward.

0:42:35.853 --> 0:42:37.373
<v Speaker 3>To joining you again. Then.

0:42:37.573 --> 0:42:39.413
<v Speaker 5>Thanks to Last and Bars English and I thanks it

0:42:39.413 --> 0:42:41.493
<v Speaker 5>as always to Habit Health, tackling all your aches and

0:42:41.533 --> 0:42:43.733
<v Speaker 5>pains from sports and work.

0:42:47.853 --> 0:42:50.493
<v Speaker 1>For more from news Talks at b Listen live on

0:42:50.573 --> 0:42:53.533
<v Speaker 1>air or online, and keep our shows with you wherever

0:42:53.573 --> 0:42:56.173
<v Speaker 1>you go with our podcast on iHeartRadio