1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:00,240 Speaker 1: Right. 2 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,600 Speaker 2: Well, if building consents drive you nuts for all of 3 00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:04,880 Speaker 2: the fiddly rules and the things that make absolutely no 4 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:06,640 Speaker 2: sense at all, there might be some hope coming. The 5 00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:09,720 Speaker 2: government is considering some major reform of the system, potentially 6 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 2: seeing sixty seven authorities replaced with you who knows just 7 00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:16,120 Speaker 2: one maybe and with us. Now is the building in construction, 8 00:00:16,200 --> 00:00:17,279 Speaker 2: Minister Chris Panka. 9 00:00:17,079 --> 00:00:19,000 Speaker 1: Kris boarding header mate? 10 00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:20,680 Speaker 2: When you are thinking about this, have you got the 11 00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:22,439 Speaker 2: old leaky homes front and center? 12 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:25,920 Speaker 1: Yeah? Absolutely, Look, we're always considering how we can avoid 13 00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:28,639 Speaker 1: a scenario would lower the quality. We don't want to 14 00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:31,120 Speaker 1: do that. But the system is so inefficient at the moment. 15 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:33,960 Speaker 1: You can actually get gained without reducing standards just by 16 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:36,800 Speaker 1: having things much more joined up and actually much more 17 00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:40,960 Speaker 1: serious and inconsistent, including across those different sixty seven building 18 00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:42,640 Speaker 1: consent authorities that you just mentioned. 19 00:00:42,840 --> 00:00:44,320 Speaker 2: How can you But here's the thing, how can you 20 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:47,839 Speaker 2: have certainty and inconsistency if you've still got humans in 21 00:00:47,960 --> 00:00:50,199 Speaker 2: different building yet? Like, even if you've just got two 22 00:00:50,240 --> 00:00:52,760 Speaker 2: humans trying to interpret the same set of rules, there's 23 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:56,520 Speaker 2: going to be potentially wacky ideas well. 24 00:00:56,640 --> 00:00:59,040 Speaker 1: That's always going to be true at a level but 25 00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:02,360 Speaker 1: at the moment, you've got a recipe for greater level 26 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:04,320 Speaker 1: of disaster in that regard because you've got all these 27 00:01:04,360 --> 00:01:08,200 Speaker 1: different organizations, each with their own interpretation. Of course, they've 28 00:01:08,200 --> 00:01:10,959 Speaker 1: all got their own risk profile because with joint and 29 00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:13,959 Speaker 1: several liability, in other words, one hundred percent of being 30 00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:16,560 Speaker 1: in the gun for what goes wrong if something falls over, 31 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:19,680 Speaker 1: then they're all sort of very diligently during their own 32 00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:21,720 Speaker 1: thing in their own little corners of New Zealand. So 33 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:27,360 Speaker 1: you maximize that. But with this human potential for subjective interpretations. 34 00:01:27,480 --> 00:01:29,279 Speaker 1: The other way you deal with that is you actually 35 00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:31,959 Speaker 1: have mechanisms we can say, well, I can cross check. 36 00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:33,600 Speaker 1: You know a number of builders who say to me, 37 00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 1: I don't want to challenge the council because then I'm 38 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:38,880 Speaker 1: going to be on some sort of blacklist, and that's 39 00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:41,120 Speaker 1: their only art of call. Whereas if you open it 40 00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:43,760 Speaker 1: up a bit more, they actually divide the possibility of 41 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,280 Speaker 1: having some common sense applies for some of these ridiculous 42 00:01:46,319 --> 00:01:47,000 Speaker 1: stories that you do. 43 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,480 Speaker 2: Hear about what's your preference at the moment, do you 44 00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:52,400 Speaker 2: want to allow these guys to voluntarily get together and 45 00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:55,600 Speaker 2: decide how to voluntarily amalgamate basically, or do you want 46 00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:57,480 Speaker 2: to force them or do you just want one national 47 00:01:57,480 --> 00:01:59,480 Speaker 2: body handing out these building consents. 48 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:02,400 Speaker 1: Well, I'd mostly been thinking on the lines of a 49 00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: single national body, although with the caveat that that would 50 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:09,240 Speaker 1: look like farming out to a combination of existing ones, 51 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:12,000 Speaker 1: as in the councilors might want to continue to do 52 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:14,280 Speaker 1: that work somewhat by the way, Some do have the resources, 53 00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:18,720 Speaker 1: especially the smaller towns, but also maybe some private certifiers, 54 00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:21,639 Speaker 1: particularly backed by the accreditation and the insurance that would 55 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:23,680 Speaker 1: go with that. So that had been my thinking, to 56 00:02:23,680 --> 00:02:26,239 Speaker 1: be honest, but wanting to talk with the sector. But recently, 57 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 1: actually a lot of them have come to me with 58 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:31,680 Speaker 1: this idea of voluntarily consolidating resources within the region. So 59 00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 1: I'm open to that. I don't really care in a way. 60 00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:35,880 Speaker 1: I just want a better system than what we've got, 61 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:37,880 Speaker 1: which is any of the three options we put this, 62 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:38,919 Speaker 1: I would. 63 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:41,080 Speaker 2: Agree with that. Hey, so listen, we're getting a lot 64 00:02:41,120 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 2: of talk about the fact that there is like there 65 00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:46,240 Speaker 2: are varying rules, right. Have you got an example of 66 00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:49,760 Speaker 2: one rule that you get different interpretations of across councils. 67 00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:52,799 Speaker 1: Well, I mean so many different ones. I think that 68 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:56,760 Speaker 1: the classic one is when you have one council approving 69 00:02:56,760 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 1: a set of plans and then another council not doing that, 70 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:02,640 Speaker 1: so not even tuning up with inspections, and you can 71 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:06,960 Speaker 1: sort of have a subjective opinion about whether enough screws 72 00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:10,720 Speaker 1: or whatever. A consens plan in accordance with the building 73 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 1: code that applies to the whole country should be the 74 00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:16,800 Speaker 1: same in any given area. And the problem with that, 75 00:03:16,919 --> 00:03:18,440 Speaker 1: of course is that when you've got builders who are 76 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:21,359 Speaker 1: working at scale because they're doing offsite manufacturing in one 77 00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 1: area and then transporting elsewhere, or you've got some prefabricated stuff. 78 00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:30,440 Speaker 1: All these obviously group bold theres as well playing their 79 00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:33,079 Speaker 1: trade across New Zealand they've got the economy of scale 80 00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:35,560 Speaker 1: in the productivity that we actually want to get to 81 00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:37,760 Speaker 1: another ones who are finding it hardest because they're dealing 82 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 1: with all the different councils at the moment. So that's 83 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:42,000 Speaker 1: probably a cressit case that we've got to get past. 84 00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:44,240 Speaker 2: I really appreciate you time, mate, look after you. So 85 00:03:44,320 --> 00:03:47,840 Speaker 2: there's Chris pink Building and Construction Ministry. For more from 86 00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:50,960 Speaker 2: the Mic Asking Breakfast, listen live to news talks that'd 87 00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:54,080 Speaker 2: be from six am weekdays, or follow the podcast on 88 00:03:54,120 --> 00:03:54,880 Speaker 2: iHeartRadio