WEBVTT - Auckland's 'Super City' turning 15 - but how super is it really? 

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Yoda. I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page,

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. This

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>year marks fifteen years since the birth of Auckland's supercity.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>The controversial idea to merge eight regional and district councils

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>into one super council was kickstarted after a Royal Commission

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>on Auckland governance back in two thousand and seven. The

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>city now stretches from Welsford down to Bombay and from

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Uruay to Hoe their point. More than a decade later,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>discussions are still being had about whether it was a

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>good move for New Zealand's largest and most populated city. Today,

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Front Page ends At Herald's senior writer Simon

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Wilson joins us to discuss what needs to be done

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sure Auckland's still thriving for the next fifteen years.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So fifteen years on, Simon, how super is our supercity?

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, the Auckland City has been a supercity officially

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 2>in legislation for fifteen years. That's when the new amalgamation

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>in twenty ten, the amalgamation of eight different local authorities

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 2>now around the Auckland region was completed and we got

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Auckland Council, which is both a regional council that in

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the way that other parts of the country have, as

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>well as a city council in the way that other

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 2>cities have the combined them won so it's called a

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>unitary council. After fifteen years, it has now been an

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to take stock of just how well that's progressing,

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 2>What is being solved in the city, what is the

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>state of play with funding, with planning, with ambition, and

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>how are we doing with our natural resources and with

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.919
<v Speaker 2>the way in which people are able to thrive.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>So tell me.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>About this latest research from the Auckland at fifteen that's

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>by the University of Auckland's Complex Conversations Lab, which sounds

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like something that we just do in our day to

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>day right, thank you, Right. How are Auckland is feeling

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about the supercity?

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, there are some The way in which the survey

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 2>was done was that it's a kind of opten survey

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 2>of people who went online and participated in conversations about

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 2>what the city is like and where it should be going,

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 2>responded to some provocations and statements added their own for

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>other people to talk about and the surveys from that

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 2>process built up a picture of what people think they had.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>I think five hundred and seventy five participants who made

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>over one thousand proposals, and out of that they reached

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>in many ways a very high degree of consensus. So

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>there is over ninety percent support for enhancing the natural

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>environment of the city. And I don't think that should

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>surprise anybody. We know we live in a beautiful city,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 2>and we know we want to look after it, and

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 2>we know we want to make the most of it

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and not threaten it. That environmental side comes turns into

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>things like the beach is clean, when the storms come,

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 2>do they remain clean or clean enough? So will we

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 2>doing enough in those sorts of areas as are we

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>dealing with CARDI dieback? Are we looking after the forests?

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Are we making sure there is enough what is called

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>urban nahili, which is the urban forest. We're making sure

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 2>there's enough greenery in the city. And we know that

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 2>those things are becoming more important, not just because we

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>like trees and trees are good for our mental health,

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 2>but also trees provide enormous amounts of shelter, and that's

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>becoming more important. In some parts of the city, particularly

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>in the south of Auckland, where the sun is getting

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>hotter and stronger and the weather wilder, and we need

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>those kinds of protections too. So all of that's happening.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>There is a big push for the city to become

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 2>more innovative. Question for Auckland is that we have pretty

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 2>highly educated population, pretty highly mobile, We are a relatively

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>wealthy country, and we have pretty good communication networks, and

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 2>all of those things ought to mean that we're very

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 2>well placed globally to become what's called an innovation city,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to be using technology to make the most of our

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.239
<v Speaker 2>economic opportunities, and to do it from this fabulous place

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>so that we attract what Sir Paul Callahan used to

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 2>call the people to come and work, play and live

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 2>here because it's a great place to live and because

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 2>you can do the stimulating, interesting work that you want

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to do that maybe you were doing in Europe or

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Australia or America, that you come and to it in

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand, come and do it in Auckland, where you

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 2>get all the advantages of the outdoor life as well

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 2>as the fascinating diverse society, and you still got those

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>economic advantages too. The problem with that vision is that

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 2>it is the vision of almost every city in the

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>world that's about the same sizes.

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, yes, why should you choose all exactly?

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 2>So, what is the thing that is going to make

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 2>Auckland unique? And we can't be smug about it. We

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 2>can't just go We'll look. You know, it's a great

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 2>place to get your kayak out and get on the harbor,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>go surfing or go tramping or whatever, because other people

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>offer those things too and can offer a better sentard

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of living. We know, housing prices are really high here,

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 2>so there's a real barrier and those sorts of things.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, there are a range of issues that we

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>confront that we're not very good at confronting, and unless

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 2>we get much better at them, we risk being left

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 2>behind by other cities in Asia and Australia and in

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 2>other parts.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Of the world overall. When this new line opens, Auckland's

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 3>rail networks will start looking quite different. In addition to

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the new and upgraded stations, the network will have far

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 3>more capacity, slightly more coverage, and much better cross city connections.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 3>But in my view it's important as extra capacities to

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 3>good use While it will be most needed during the

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 3>busy peak periods, I want to see it be used

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 3>to boost off peak frequencies as well. There are many

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 3>stations in Auckland suburbs that only get trains every twenty

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 3>to thirty minutes and I'd like to see this improved

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 3>to more turn up and goes to our frequencies.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, one of those things that I guess that we're

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>not amazing at might be that cohesion in public transport.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Now seventy six percent I believe said that we lack

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a cohesive public transport vision and I've got to agree

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>with them, But how much do you reckon the City

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>rail Link will better those results when it's open.

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 2>The Yeah, So the theory of the City rail Link

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 2>is that it will double patronage of our rail system.

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't mean that everybody's going to start catching

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the train. It's not like that. You know, most people

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 2>don't live near a train station, but a lot of

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 2>people do. And when you think about congestion on the roads,

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 2>congestion was identified in the survey as the biggest single

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 2>transport problem to be solved. The problem with that is

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that there are different ideas about how to solve it

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>right now. Some people say more roads, Some people say

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 2>better public transport, better cycling and so on, so that

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you take people off the roads. Some people say congestion charging,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>so that the busiest roads should be have a toll

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>on them at those times to discourage people from using them.

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Then these debates are ongoing in relation to the CRL.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>If you could move ten, twenty, even ten percent of

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the population who are currently driving every day, you could

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>move them onto other forms of transport, onto public transport,

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 2>in particular, you would overnight, you would solve the congestion problem.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 2>You would have streets that are freer than they currently

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>are during school holidays. So the CRL is a big

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 2>part of that is a big part of saying there

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>will be twice as many trains. The trains, the train

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 2>trips will be faster, They will take people further to

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 2>where they want to go, because if you're coming into

0:07:59.960 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the city, you won't just be deposited at Britain Art.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>You'll be able to get off at Cutting a Happy Road,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>or get off at Midtown area now closer to perhaps

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 2>to where you work or where you study, and those

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 2>things will all make public transport more appealing. That's the

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>theory of that. And you know there are other things too.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>If we had a concerted effort to have kids not

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>be driven to school, that would make a real material

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>difference to congestion on our roads, not just for in

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 2>terms of the school traffic, but also in terms of

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>people who you know. You drop the kids at school

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>and then you could drive on to work, or you

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>drive to work, so you might as well drop the

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>kids to school. It's a checking anything. If you could

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 2>break that, go back to a generation or two earlier

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>where that wasn't the norm. Now you'd make a big difference.

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Again, I guess, how is it working having such diverse

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>parts of the city under the same council. You can

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>forget the further north you go from the city center.

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Just how much is considered part of Auckland. Do the

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>people in say fung A Paroa have the same concern

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>as someone in Wayuku.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Often they don't. If they're stuck on the motorway and traffic,

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 2>then they essentially do have the same concerns. If you

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>think about Fungapara, so that's a relatively developed suburban area

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that's a good distance away from the city, different from Wayuku,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>which is very rural. A lot of Auckland now is

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 2>rural geographically, but not many people live there now. Most

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>people live in the built up areas. Of course, by definition.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>The example that people always used to give when the

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 2>supercity was formed was what are we going to do

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>about our waterfront? And there were so many different local

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 2>authorities that had different points of view that nothing ever happened.

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Since the super City, the waterfront of Auckland has developed

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>quite significantly. So you think about Queen's Wharf was given

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 2>back to or Council and became they wanted to make

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 2>it the People's Wharf, the renovation of Shed ten. They're

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the North Wharf area, that the viaduct, which was pre

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Supercity but has continued to evolve, the North Warf area.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 2>There are cycleways, there are great recreational areas. There are

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 2>lots of things for people to do that are free,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 2>as well as going drink and eating, the bars and

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 2>restaurants and so on. You think about the sale GP

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 2>thing last summer, where there was enormous, enormous popular support

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>for events that people could get to. Those sorts of

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>things have all evolved and been made possible because of

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the super city. It's been easier to plan, easier to organize,

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 2>easier to get approval and funding for that kind of development.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the upside. The downside is that it's a city

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 2>of one point seven million people. There are twenty one

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.599
<v Speaker 2>local boards, most of them have populations that are bigger

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>than most other cities in the country, and they have

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>local boards which are part time members. They don't have

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 2>anything like the funding of other city councils. So there

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 2>is a real gap at the local democratic level now

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 2>between decisions that get made centrally by Auckland councils centrally

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 2>and people's aspirations in their neighborhoods and their suburbs. And

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that's very hard to know how to bridge because you know,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the one obvious way to bridge it would be to say,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 2>let's have lots more democratic engagement. Let's have lots more

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for people in local areas to belong to committees

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and communities where they can feed in ideas and have

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 2>a say in what happens. But nobody's very keen on

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>paying for that. Nobody wants to have that kind of

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>local democracy where we've got lots and lots and lots

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 2>of officials. That's quite problematic. Decision making is removed and

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 2>nobody has a real has a clear answer.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And I can imagine the funding in these small areas

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, I'm just thinking about a situation

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps where a local board is petitioning for a zebra

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>crossing in their town center versus what that money could do,

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>say for the waterfront in the viaduct, and how like

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>who along that line would that local board need to

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>go through to get the funding for that zebra crossing,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>because I can probably tell you right now that that

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>funding is probably going to go towards something in the city,

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>right Actually.

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, So that the council in its fifteen

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 2>years has had slightly different ways of organizing how the

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 2>money is spent, but it's always been driven by the

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>idea that there will be pots of money for each

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>of the local areas. So if there is money to

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>be spent in your area and your local board wants

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a zebra crossing there, that money won't be taken and

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 2>used in another local board area or in downtown, right,

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 2>that will be allocated to the local board to spend

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>in that way, they might have to persuade Auckland Transport

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>that it's worth having. An Auckland Transport might come back

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>to them and say, well, we've got twenty requirements for

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>more zebra crossings and yours, in terms of the risks

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>that we've measured, is only number ten, so we can't

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>do it this year. Now, that might happen, and you

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 2>have an ongoing debate about that, because the local board

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>will say, but this is our priority, so therefore they

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>should listened to. Transport will say well, it's not our priority.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's a clash that is not managed very well

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Now, so you do get that tension.

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>But Auckland Transport can't say, well, the money you want

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>to spend on the zebra crossing, we're going to spend

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 2>it in another part of the city.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>They can't say that, right, So I'm going down a

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>conspiratorial path, am I.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I'll put my pitchfork away.

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Having just said that, local boards would probably say we

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>want more money. You know, there was a under an

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>earlier there there was a proposal. Can't remember the exact

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 2>wording of it, but it was the one, the one

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>big project. Each local board had to say, this is

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the one thing we want to fund and they only

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 2>got one.

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh wow.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>So there was this pot of each of them had

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>a pot of a reasonablysizeable amount of money and they

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 2>got to decide each one and that led to some problems.

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 2>That system isn't quite in place now, so it's always

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 2>evolving the way the city city works. But that led

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>to some problems where what about project number two and

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>three and four? Are they just not going to happen?

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 2>You know those things are going to be important too,

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>And that was one of the problems. Another problem was

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 2>you had a case out and with a couple of

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>local boards near each other. Both of them wanted and

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 2>entertainment a recreation center, and they both got They both

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>made those projects their one project, and they were pretty

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 2>close to each other, only a kilometer or so apart,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and the city planning didn't need those two centers so

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>close to each other. But the idea of the local

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 2>boards deciding meant that that was progressing. I think in

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 2>fact that got stopped in the end. But you can

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>see the problem that would be there. How you balance

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>central planning with local important local decision making every day

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 2>is a problem. It doesn't mean it's not worth doing,

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's but that is part of the thing that

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>the council engages with.

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that the rest of the country probably rolls

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>their eyes and hates when we center in on Auckland,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But something Deloitte Chief Executive Mike Horn said in the

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>research stuck out to me. He said, if Auckland isn't

0:14:55.800 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>competing globally, then New Zealand will suffer. Couple of things here. Firstly,

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think the country needs to accept that in

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>order to thrive, Auckland needs to do well.

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. And one of the things about

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Auckland is that we have something like a third of

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the population and I think thirty eight percent of the GDP.

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Now that's quite low for a major city. So the

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>GDP in London compared to the British GDP is much higher.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 2>In other countries where there is one big city as

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>we have, you would expect it to be higher than

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the proportion that we have. So that that is a

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>problem for the city now and a problem for the

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 2>country New Zealand has. If our farming, if our agriculture

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 2>isn't doing well, we are in trouble as our whole country.

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 2>It's not just farmers in trouble. We're all in trouble

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 2>if it isn't doing well. We know that, but that

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 2>is also true about Auckland itself. Auckland is such a

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>powerhouse economically now that if it isn't doing well, then

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the country suffers as well. So we need from a

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>national perspective, we need planning to do both those things

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 2>as well as keep the regions viable so they're worth living.

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>And we don't want everybody to come to Auckland because

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>that's just that's there would be a nightmare.

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>For everyone road through a nightmare aready, right, and there aren't.

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>The houses and all the rest of it. And you

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>want the regions to be viable, but you also need

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 2>that central city to be strong. And as you say,

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the Deloitte chief executive Mike Horn saying, we need to

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>understand that's that's one of the things he said that.

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 2>He also says, we've had an incremental approach to development

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>and that has to change because it's meant to be

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 2>slipping away. You know, I've been following the super city

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>since it was formed in twenty ten, and the first

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>to me, Lenn Brown, always used to say, don't fret

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 2>about the fact that we're not getting big transformative change

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 2>happening straight away. Every little bit helps. We will do

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 2>this incremental thing, and it will build on the last

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and we will keep building on it and the next

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>and the next. And that is how most polots tix

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 2>works most of the time. It's the reality of politics.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 2>And he knew that, and the city was progressing. But

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 2>what Mike Horn is saying is that actually that isn't enough.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 2>We understand that we are not making ourselves attractive enough

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 2>for the world's best and brightest to come and live

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 2>and work here, for the world's entrepreneurs to want to

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 2>set up here and put money into the New Zealand economy.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>We understand we need to transform in order to do that.

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 2>We also understand that you can't just make the buses

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 2>a bit more efficient and I hope to transform the

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 2>transport system. You've got to be thinking bigger about it

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 2>than that. You can't just make the schools a little

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>bit better and hope to transform the problems we have

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 2>an education. You've got to do better than that. You

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 2>can't just build a few more houses and solve the

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 2>housing crisis. You've got to build a lot more houses

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to solve the housing crisis and on it. Guys, how

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 2>we get how we do those transformative things is extremely

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 2>difficult because probably most people are reasonably comfortable with the

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>idea that we as The survey shows very high support

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 2>for density done well, particularly around transport hubs. Doesn't follow

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>that you want more density in your street?

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, What are your thoughts on living in Auckland.

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Auckland is expensive. I've lived overseas a lot and being

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 4>back two years and coming back I was shocked.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not too bad.

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 4>It can be expensive.

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes it's inflation.

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Got a UNI and I have to pay for parking

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for the train station.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 3>I guess you do a bet of it.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But even then sometimes it's not enough.

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 3>How much are you paying for renting here in Auten City.

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm sharing with somebody, so my share is four hundred

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 4>and fifty dollars one week. I just done that in Thailane, Cambodia.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 4>I was paying four hundred dollars for one month.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Get the government to bring some things down, take some

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 3>money out of things that's unnecessary and put into things

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 3>actually matter.

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>And we're already I mean, I guess we're in that

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>catch twenty two, because we're already paying London Sydney New

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>York prices to live in Auckland. And it's kind of

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like that thing, Well, why should you get paid more

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>at work when you're doing the work you are at

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the moment for the pay that you're getting. You know,

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just like why why should the city thrive and

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>why should it better itself when everyone is paying these

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>prices to live here? Anyway? Like, what's the incentive there

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for people to attract more people? Well, we've got one

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>point seven million people here already, what's going to What

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is it going to take, I guess for us to

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>make that jump and just to really fasten things up

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>and get to the Sydney, get to the New York,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>get to the London.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I would argue that we need a housing price structure

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that means there are enough places for everybody to live.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 2>That's at all the different price points and all the

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 2>different types of housing. Now you can't just look after

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 2>a certain proportion of the population in that way. An

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 2>awful lot follows from housing. If people have got decent housing,

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 2>then they're more likely that their families will be healthier,

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 2>more likely to be kids going to school. Now more

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>likely people are in work and able to stay and work.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 2>All of those things follow from having a place, a

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 2>secure or and dry, safe place to live, So that's

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>really important. Beyond that though, what's the point of difference

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>for Auckland, Well, in terms of big cities. You know

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 2>something somebody said to me once when I first moved

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to Auckland, which is over twenty years ago. They said,

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 2>what I like about it is the mess. What he

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 2>meant was, you walk down the street. You don't know

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 2>who you're going to meet or see, you don't know

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 2>what you're going to see, you don't know what might

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 2>have been changing. It's always stimulating. And that's a big

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 2>city thing where the fact that it doesn't quite work

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 2>properly but people make it work for them. If that

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 2>is possible, that can be pretty exciting. You know. One

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 2>of the things that means is that really cool little

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 2>bar there that those people set up in a place

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't even seem like it should be a bar,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>but hell, they're now music venue. And you know, if

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 2>you think about a place like Wammy Bar in Auckland,

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 2>that seems nonsense. It's an underground and it doesn't seem

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 2>big enough and all the rest of it. But people

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 2>make do People make do with the mess, and when

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 2>they can do that and thrive, you get that happening

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 2>in all the different sorts of ways, and that can

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 2>be very exciting to live in. So we need that

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 2>you need, and it means that you need, as I

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 2>said before, place to live. It also means that you

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 2>know that you're not going to spend too much of

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.239
<v Speaker 2>your life stuff stuck in traffic. You've got to have

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 2>viable alternatives to that, and you've got to have a

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 2>sense in the economy that there are opportunities for people

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>that people can move on up and take risks and

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 2>make money. You've got to have those things happening, and

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>if they are all happening, then big City has become exciting.

0:21:53.480 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us, Simon, Thank you. It's it's for

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this episode of the Front Page. You can read more

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>about today's stories and extensive news coverage at enzdherld dot

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 1>co dot nz. The Front Page is produced by Ethan

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Sills and Richard Martin, who is also our sound engineer.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to the Front Page on iHeartRadio

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for another look behind the headlines.