1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,040 Speaker 1: So strange, possibly confusing messages coming from the police have 2 00:00:03,080 --> 00:00:05,400 Speaker 1: a retail crime. There's a directive to police staff that 3 00:00:05,480 --> 00:00:08,240 Speaker 1: tells them they will no longer be investigating shoplifting if 4 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:11,360 Speaker 1: it's less than five hundred bucks. The retailers, upon hearing that, 5 00:00:11,400 --> 00:00:13,440 Speaker 1: want of word, of course with the Minister. Our Sunday 6 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:16,759 Speaker 1: Kirschel is the chairperson of the Ministry of Justices Retail 7 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:18,560 Speaker 1: Crime Group and is with a sunny. 8 00:00:18,239 --> 00:00:20,239 Speaker 2: Morning, very good morning, Mike. 9 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:22,520 Speaker 1: Do you know what's going on? Have you got clarity 10 00:00:22,560 --> 00:00:23,119 Speaker 1: on this or not? 11 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:27,159 Speaker 2: See this police infection was a bolt out of the 12 00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:30,560 Speaker 2: blue and retailers would be concerned by this, and I'm 13 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:33,640 Speaker 2: looking to get clarity on this matter from the Police 14 00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:37,559 Speaker 2: indist and the Police Commissioner. You know, these policies have 15 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 2: already failed in America and the UK, where gangs of 16 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:47,320 Speaker 2: shoplifters exploit similar policies to make illegal gains without consequences. 17 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:50,520 Speaker 2: So I want the police to clarify their position. If 18 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 2: they have set limits as suggested in the news reports, 19 00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 2: we will be advocating strongly that these are immediately removed 20 00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:01,360 Speaker 2: and a police adopted zero tool approach to retail crime. 21 00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:04,040 Speaker 1: This sort of goes against if it's true, this goes 22 00:01:04,040 --> 00:01:06,160 Speaker 1: against what you're working towards, doesn't it. 23 00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:09,199 Speaker 2: That's very true. You know, we thought we are making 24 00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 2: a huge progress and these kind of instructions hinder the 25 00:01:14,760 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 2: work that we're doing. You know, getting on top of 26 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:22,560 Speaker 2: the problems require the government adopter zero a tolerant response, 27 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:26,280 Speaker 2: and the best deterrence for retail crime is having criminals 28 00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 2: not they will be caught and face consequences for the crimes, 29 00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:33,760 Speaker 2: but giving them a free pass due to low thirshold 30 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:37,440 Speaker 2: will involved in criminals and increase retail crime exactly. 31 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:40,840 Speaker 1: Well, I just wonder what has been articulated is what 32 00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 1: they do anyway, and it just happens to have leaked out. 33 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:45,679 Speaker 1: In other words, if you report something worth a couple 34 00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:48,360 Speaker 1: hundred bucks, you kind of know they're not going to 35 00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 1: look at it, don't you, rightly or wrongly? 36 00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:53,600 Speaker 2: Mike. We need to learn lessons. You know. Even in 37 00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 2: the UK they have gone in the totally opposite direction 38 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:00,680 Speaker 2: with a bill in the House of Commons right now 39 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:07,080 Speaker 2: that would repeal low value shifting. Shoplifting defined as two 40 00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:10,560 Speaker 2: hundred pounds or less, which is biscally five hundred. New 41 00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:14,680 Speaker 2: Zealand a House of Lord's committee last November described this 42 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:18,359 Speaker 2: as a tribalizing theft, and the UK government responded in 43 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:22,040 Speaker 2: February doing what we thought police did here to treat 44 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 2: theft as theft. To be fair to the Police Commissioner 45 00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 2: Richard Chambers, this smacks of policy by consent and that 46 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:32,720 Speaker 2: is not his approach. 47 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:34,520 Speaker 1: All right, Well, we'll stay on top of this and 48 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 1: see where we go. Sunny Kerschel, who's with the He's Chafferson, 49 00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:39,799 Speaker 1: the Ministry of Justice Retail Crime Group. I was told 50 00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 1: this morning that we went to Mitchell and Mitchell quote 51 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:46,200 Speaker 1: unquote is no longer doing interviews on the subject, which 52 00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:48,720 Speaker 1: I thought was ironic because I hadn't heard him interviewed 53 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:50,720 Speaker 1: at all on the subject. But he will be presenting 54 00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 1: himself tomorrow on this program. For more from the Mic 55 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 1: Asking Breakfast, listen live to news talks. It'd be from 56 00:02:56,840 --> 00:03:00,200 Speaker 1: six am weekdays, or follow the podcast on I heardredeo