1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,480 Speaker 1: To the Health Department, where the law allowing faster approval 2 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:05,720 Speaker 1: of medicines by far makers passed. Also twelve months scripts 3 00:00:05,720 --> 00:00:08,240 Speaker 1: will become a thing as of February. The FARMAC law, 4 00:00:08,360 --> 00:00:11,920 Speaker 1: by the way, also allows medical conferences to advertise yet 5 00:00:11,960 --> 00:00:15,720 Speaker 1: to be approved medicines. That was the weirdest thing ever. Anyway, 6 00:00:15,760 --> 00:00:18,079 Speaker 1: Simming and Brown is the Health Minister and with us morning. 7 00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:19,320 Speaker 2: Good morning. 8 00:00:19,480 --> 00:00:22,120 Speaker 1: That conference thing, How was that ever a thing? 9 00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:26,440 Speaker 2: Oh, look, it's a very weird piece of legislation. When 10 00:00:26,440 --> 00:00:28,520 Speaker 2: we found out about it, we asked the officials whether 11 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:31,400 Speaker 2: that heard of Google and whether or not some doctors 12 00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:33,760 Speaker 2: might use Google to actually work out what drugs might 13 00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:36,639 Speaker 2: be available in other countries. And of course it made 14 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:41,239 Speaker 2: absolutely no sense that medical conferences were not able to 15 00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:44,720 Speaker 2: advertise non approved medicines. And so we've changed the law. 16 00:00:44,800 --> 00:00:47,320 Speaker 2: David Seymour and I work together. We've changed the law 17 00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:50,400 Speaker 2: and now we've got medical conferences coming to New Zealand 18 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:53,080 Speaker 2: which otherwise would have been in Australia, which is fantastic 19 00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 2: for our economy. 20 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:56,360 Speaker 1: So that's sort of a tourism move, isn't it, Because 21 00:00:56,360 --> 00:00:58,800 Speaker 1: conferences didn't come because of that very rule. I mean, 22 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:00,680 Speaker 1: what do you reckon we've missed out on over the years. 23 00:01:00,840 --> 00:01:02,560 Speaker 1: It must be tens of millions of dollars. 24 00:01:03,120 --> 00:01:04,720 Speaker 2: Oh, it would be tens of millions of dollars. I 25 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:08,280 Speaker 2: mean two conferences next year, three three hundred people combined 26 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:13,280 Speaker 2: are coming to New Zealand, which is fantastic for Auckland, 27 00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:15,800 Speaker 2: fantastic for New Zealand. But if you add that up 28 00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:18,240 Speaker 2: over many years, that would be you know, thousands less, 29 00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:21,120 Speaker 2: thousands of fewer visitors coming to New Zealand spending money 30 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:24,400 Speaker 2: in hotels and restaurants and accommodation and lo and behold. 31 00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:27,760 Speaker 2: It's all because they they weren't able to advertise medicines 32 00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:30,400 Speaker 2: which may be approved in other countries. And as I said, 33 00:01:30,840 --> 00:01:34,320 Speaker 2: Google is available free of charge to everybody. 34 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:36,839 Speaker 1: It's nuts the far Maake approval thing. So in other words, 35 00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 1: if it's approved in one of our close jurisdictions, we 36 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:41,960 Speaker 1: can do it here. That's another I mean, I'm not 37 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:43,960 Speaker 1: pissing in your pocket to put it bluntly, but I 38 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:47,119 Speaker 1: mean that's another painfully obvious thing, isn't it. 39 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:51,240 Speaker 2: Yeah? Absolutely, And again, so we're working with David Seymour 40 00:01:51,240 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 2: and this is part of our coalition agreement to make 41 00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:58,200 Speaker 2: sure that we could literally speed up the approval of 42 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:01,160 Speaker 2: these of drugs. So we do it for cars, so 43 00:02:01,480 --> 00:02:04,040 Speaker 2: you know, if a car has approved in a different jurisdiction, 44 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:06,560 Speaker 2: we allow that car to be recognized here in New Zealand. 45 00:02:06,760 --> 00:02:09,400 Speaker 2: We don't go into a complete safety check all over again. 46 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:11,960 Speaker 2: You know, it's about the same with medicine. So if 47 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:16,160 Speaker 2: it's approved and a comparable jurisdiction or two other comparable jurisdictions, 48 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:18,640 Speaker 2: it can then be approved in the thirty days by 49 00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:21,160 Speaker 2: med Safe here in New Zealand. So it's about making 50 00:02:21,240 --> 00:02:25,120 Speaker 2: medicines more available to New Zealand as faster, which is 51 00:02:25,520 --> 00:02:26,160 Speaker 2: what we want. 52 00:02:26,520 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 1: What was their pushback argument? What was it? They were 53 00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:32,120 Speaker 1: arguing that we're so special, so unique, so different, they 54 00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 1: needed to do their own investigation. 55 00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:37,800 Speaker 2: Well, I think it's part partially that you know, these 56 00:02:37,960 --> 00:02:40,640 Speaker 2: laws haven't been looked at for a long period of time, 57 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:42,320 Speaker 2: so they'll put back it. They'll put in place in 58 00:02:42,360 --> 00:02:46,360 Speaker 2: a period of time when these approval processes weren't or 59 00:02:46,360 --> 00:02:49,720 Speaker 2: the information shearing may not have been as easy. But ultimately, 60 00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:52,520 Speaker 2: you know, through COVID, we saw how this really slowed 61 00:02:52,520 --> 00:02:56,760 Speaker 2: down approvals for critical medicines you know, we campaigned on 62 00:02:56,800 --> 00:02:58,959 Speaker 2: that at the last election part of our coalition agreement. 63 00:02:59,000 --> 00:02:59,760 Speaker 2: We've now delivered it. 64 00:03:00,160 --> 00:03:02,520 Speaker 1: The twelve month script. How much of this has always 65 00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:04,600 Speaker 1: been about I mean the doctor would argue, well you 66 00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:06,360 Speaker 1: and never know you might be growing another leg. But 67 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 1: how much of it's really about the admin fee for 68 00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:10,519 Speaker 1: the pharmacist and the script fee for the doctor. 69 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:14,359 Speaker 2: Well, I think I mean, ultimately this will save patients 70 00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:17,079 Speaker 2: up to one hundred and five dollars a year by 71 00:03:17,240 --> 00:03:21,720 Speaker 2: doctors being able to make up twelve months prescriptions. It 72 00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:24,600 Speaker 2: will still be the doctor's description, so depending on the 73 00:03:24,639 --> 00:03:26,920 Speaker 2: condition of the patient. But if you think about long 74 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:31,040 Speaker 2: term conditions such as asthma and other you're managing diabetes, 75 00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 2: other things which patients are having to go back every 76 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:36,920 Speaker 2: three months to their GP, that will free up time 77 00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:39,160 Speaker 2: with the GP. They're able to then see other patients 78 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:43,160 Speaker 2: during that time. So ultimately it's about putting patients first, 79 00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:45,760 Speaker 2: making it easier for them to get the medicines they need, 80 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:49,280 Speaker 2: and ultimately, if they've got more access to medicines, we 81 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 2: keep people healthy in the community and not turning up 82 00:03:51,520 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 2: to a hospital. 83 00:03:52,040 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 1: But how much pushback have your head from the pharmacist 84 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:56,000 Speaker 1: and the doctors who aren't getting them money because they're 85 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 1: not writing scripts anymore. 86 00:03:57,760 --> 00:03:59,600 Speaker 2: I mean, I think there's a variety of views in 87 00:03:59,640 --> 00:04:03,240 Speaker 2: both of those sectors in terms of their their view. 88 00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:06,320 Speaker 2: I think the reality is that our doctors are in 89 00:04:06,400 --> 00:04:09,880 Speaker 2: an enormous amount of pressure and a lot of they're 90 00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 2: incredibly busy. We know how long it takes for people 91 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:15,840 Speaker 2: to get appointments, which is a big issue that we're addressing. 92 00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:18,280 Speaker 2: But ultimately this will free up the ability for them 93 00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:19,240 Speaker 2: to see other patients. 94 00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:23,640 Speaker 1: And so I had Brian Rochan before and I didn't 95 00:04:23,640 --> 00:04:25,120 Speaker 1: ask him because it didn't have time. Where are we 96 00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:26,200 Speaker 1: at with the industry election. 97 00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 2: So negotiations are ongoing, So there. 98 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:33,080 Speaker 1: Are negotiations, active negotiations. People are around the table. 99 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:39,480 Speaker 2: There are negotiations underway between the government and the unions 100 00:04:39,520 --> 00:04:42,440 Speaker 2: in terms of the senior doctors. That is before I 101 00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:45,360 Speaker 2: think the employment courts due to the fact that Health 102 00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:48,960 Speaker 2: New Zealander is applied to fix the terms of that agreement. 103 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 1: Okay, nice to talk, appreciate it very much, sum and 104 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:54,880 Speaker 1: Brown Health Minister. Does any of that that you've just heard, 105 00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:59,480 Speaker 1: whether you are aware of it or not, just explain 106 00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:01,440 Speaker 1: to me. I mean, none of that's going to save 107 00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:02,960 Speaker 1: them if they're going to have trouble next year on 108 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:05,320 Speaker 1: the election. Name you're not changing about because of that? 109 00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 1: But is that not just good, basic common sense. They've 110 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:13,120 Speaker 1: rectified a problem that really should have been rectified. Does 111 00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:15,320 Speaker 1: anyone actually disagree with any of what you just heard? 112 00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 2: For more from the Mic Asking Breakfast, listen live to 113 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:21,960 Speaker 2: news Talks. It'd be from six am weekdays, or follow 114 00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 2: the podcast on iHeartRadio