WEBVTT - Stuart Nash & Jordan Williams: What does the budget need to deliver?

0:00:05.721 --> 0:00:09.401
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talks.

0:00:09.401 --> 0:00:12.161
<v Speaker 2>I'd be Jordan. You've you've got got yourself into the

0:00:12.201 --> 0:00:14.361
<v Speaker 2>room for the lockup too, I see, so good on

0:00:14.401 --> 0:00:14.801
<v Speaker 2>you for that.

0:00:16.561 --> 0:00:18.401
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was a bit of a silly brew haha.

0:00:20.441 --> 0:00:23.081
<v Speaker 3>The Minister of Finance had a bit of a I

0:00:23.081 --> 0:00:26.321
<v Speaker 3>think quite an unbecoming spat with the Council of Trade

0:00:26.361 --> 0:00:30.961
<v Speaker 3>Union's economists about a year ago, and other groups including

0:00:31.001 --> 0:00:34.041
<v Speaker 3>the Taxpayers, Union, Businesses, Zeland, Infrastructure News Zealand among others,

0:00:35.041 --> 0:00:37.841
<v Speaker 3>were potentially banned from the budget, which was just stupid.

0:00:37.881 --> 0:00:40.161
<v Speaker 4>It means that basically only those.

0:00:39.961 --> 0:00:43.841
<v Speaker 3>On the on the party sorry government payroll, we're allowed in.

0:00:43.921 --> 0:00:46.481
<v Speaker 3>But luckily Treasury have seen since.

0:00:47.161 --> 0:00:48.801
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, actually is it are you going to are you

0:00:48.801 --> 0:00:50.601
<v Speaker 2>going to regret it? Is it fun being in there?

0:00:50.641 --> 0:00:52.481
<v Speaker 2>Or is it just what's it like being in the

0:00:52.481 --> 0:00:53.041
<v Speaker 2>pre budget?

0:00:53.481 --> 0:00:57.241
<v Speaker 3>It'll be my eleventh budget and it's really I mean,

0:00:57.241 --> 0:01:00.121
<v Speaker 3>the key thing is finding and it's a little bit

0:01:00.241 --> 0:01:02.201
<v Speaker 3>I don't mean to make it sound like a game,

0:01:02.241 --> 0:01:05.721
<v Speaker 3>but it's it's to find what the politician don't want

0:01:05.761 --> 0:01:09.201
<v Speaker 3>you to know, because of course you're bombarded with press releases.

0:01:09.241 --> 0:01:12.681
<v Speaker 3>I think one year, the record is about thirty two

0:01:13.201 --> 0:01:15.641
<v Speaker 3>be high press releases that come in the pack. But

0:01:15.761 --> 0:01:18.641
<v Speaker 3>really you're looking for what the government and the spin

0:01:18.721 --> 0:01:22.241
<v Speaker 3>doctors don't want you to find. And that's kind of

0:01:22.241 --> 0:01:25.041
<v Speaker 3>the game to if you can, if you can identify

0:01:25.081 --> 0:01:28.601
<v Speaker 3>those before, especially in a modern media environment where you

0:01:28.841 --> 0:01:31.561
<v Speaker 3>sort of you get sort of one yet one one

0:01:31.601 --> 0:01:33.561
<v Speaker 3>lick of the story sort of thing. There's not like

0:01:33.961 --> 0:01:36.081
<v Speaker 3>the good old days where there would be days of

0:01:36.161 --> 0:01:40.241
<v Speaker 3>rolling coverage and new angles and things. Unfortunately, the media

0:01:40.321 --> 0:01:44.041
<v Speaker 3>are so thin. That's no disrespect to you guys that

0:01:44.201 --> 0:01:47.081
<v Speaker 3>actually that you know that plays for the government's advantage.

0:01:47.121 --> 0:01:49.481
<v Speaker 3>So I would argue when even you know, we went

0:01:49.521 --> 0:01:51.281
<v Speaker 3>into bat for the Council of Trade Unions, you know

0:01:51.641 --> 0:01:54.321
<v Speaker 3>it won't surprise your listeners that, you know, the lefties

0:01:54.361 --> 0:01:56.761
<v Speaker 3>over the Air and the Taxpayers Union don't agree on much,

0:01:56.881 --> 0:02:00.201
<v Speaker 3>but we certainly agree that if you've got a legitimate interest,

0:02:00.321 --> 0:02:03.161
<v Speaker 3>if you've got like the Taxpayers Union or the counts

0:02:03.241 --> 0:02:06.601
<v Speaker 3>of trade unions literally hundreds of thousands of people that

0:02:06.761 --> 0:02:09.001
<v Speaker 3>rely on you for you know, what's really going on

0:02:09.081 --> 0:02:11.241
<v Speaker 3>inside government, then you should be there.

0:02:11.721 --> 0:02:14.321
<v Speaker 2>Hey, just look, I want to take in a little

0:02:14.321 --> 0:02:16.641
<v Speaker 2>bit to the pre government the pre budget announcement guys.

0:02:16.681 --> 0:02:19.361
<v Speaker 2>But firstly, have you caught up with the announcement that

0:02:19.441 --> 0:02:21.121
<v Speaker 2>was made of just an hour or two ago about

0:02:21.161 --> 0:02:24.121
<v Speaker 2>the funding for next four years for twenty four hour

0:02:24.241 --> 0:02:26.561
<v Speaker 2>urgent care clums you've caught up with that, Stuart.

0:02:26.801 --> 0:02:29.641
<v Speaker 5>I haven't actually caught up with her. That's what level

0:02:29.641 --> 0:02:30.481
<v Speaker 5>of funding is that.

0:02:30.601 --> 0:02:34.761
<v Speaker 2>One hundred and sixty four million dollars over the next

0:02:34.961 --> 0:02:37.001
<v Speaker 2>I think it's over the next four years. Basically, they

0:02:37.081 --> 0:02:39.441
<v Speaker 2>want to have better access and they're saying that it's

0:02:39.481 --> 0:02:42.001
<v Speaker 2>going to I'm just quoting Simmy and Brown here because

0:02:42.001 --> 0:02:44.601
<v Speaker 2>I haven't interviewed, said the funding boost is going to

0:02:44.601 --> 0:02:47.641
<v Speaker 2>mean ninety eight percent of New Zealanders will have access

0:02:47.681 --> 0:02:50.721
<v Speaker 2>to in person urgent care within an hour's drive.

0:02:51.961 --> 0:02:54.881
<v Speaker 5>So that's thems in. So that's about three point three

0:02:55.001 --> 0:02:58.401
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars of pre budget announcements. Quite a lot there, actually.

0:02:58.241 --> 0:03:00.281
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that's what I was thinking. Let's go to

0:03:00.401 --> 0:03:02.321
<v Speaker 2>you first for that, Jordan, your reaction on that, But

0:03:02.361 --> 0:03:07.481
<v Speaker 2>also how significant are is pre budget action to are

0:03:07.521 --> 0:03:08.681
<v Speaker 2>we going to is it going to be an anti

0:03:08.681 --> 0:03:10.201
<v Speaker 2>climax on the day? But tell us about the pre

0:03:10.241 --> 0:03:12.761
<v Speaker 2>budget and announced that your reaction to that, if you've, if

0:03:12.761 --> 0:03:13.841
<v Speaker 2>you managed to catch up with it.

0:03:13.881 --> 0:03:16.641
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I've said about ten emails in the

0:03:16.721 --> 0:03:19.081
<v Speaker 3>last few hours and I actually I haven't got my

0:03:19.121 --> 0:03:21.321
<v Speaker 3>head around Watson bargoed and what's not so I still

0:03:21.361 --> 0:03:23.281
<v Speaker 3>don't want to get myself into trouble.

0:03:24.081 --> 0:03:25.321
<v Speaker 2>It's something sliss stream on.

0:03:26.641 --> 0:03:29.721
<v Speaker 3>It's very clear that the government wants a little bit

0:03:29.721 --> 0:03:31.761
<v Speaker 3>of a rolling moll over the next twenty four hours

0:03:32.081 --> 0:03:35.001
<v Speaker 3>with lots of targeted commns. And this is to what

0:03:35.041 --> 0:03:38.241
<v Speaker 3>I mean, by the way the sort of the budget works,

0:03:38.241 --> 0:03:40.721
<v Speaker 3>that the government wants the milk as much as they can.

0:03:41.681 --> 0:03:44.681
<v Speaker 3>Stew's right, though you know you do the numbers. They

0:03:44.841 --> 0:03:50.201
<v Speaker 3>have announced far more new funding than what the total

0:03:50.321 --> 0:03:52.961
<v Speaker 3>new funding of this budget is. Of course, you know,

0:03:53.001 --> 0:03:56.001
<v Speaker 3>the perception is that Nicola Willis is cutting spending or

0:03:56.041 --> 0:03:58.881
<v Speaker 3>has cut spending. Nothing could be further from the truth,

0:03:59.081 --> 0:04:01.641
<v Speaker 3>both as a percentage of the economy and inflation in

0:04:01.801 --> 0:04:05.841
<v Speaker 3>justin terms, she's spending more than when Grant Robinson leed this.

0:04:05.961 --> 0:04:09.561
<v Speaker 3>I mean that it all roads point to and this

0:04:09.601 --> 0:04:12.441
<v Speaker 3>is why I actually think that there's going to be

0:04:12.481 --> 0:04:16.001
<v Speaker 3>some something. It's quite quite an extraordinary budget because in

0:04:16.241 --> 0:04:19.841
<v Speaker 3>order to make the numbers work, they've got to be

0:04:19.961 --> 0:04:23.641
<v Speaker 3>making cuts elsewhere. The question is as weird as that,

0:04:23.801 --> 0:04:26.521
<v Speaker 3>and all will be revealed on Thursday.

0:04:26.561 --> 0:04:28.441
<v Speaker 2>Well, don't we have an obvious one that everyone's been

0:04:28.521 --> 0:04:31.761
<v Speaker 2>talking about. And Andrew Vant's got upset about Jordan. I'll

0:04:31.801 --> 0:04:33.801
<v Speaker 2>go back to you, Jordan and then go to your student.

0:04:34.161 --> 0:04:37.121
<v Speaker 3>Yeah that that that I mean, it was pretty pretty

0:04:37.121 --> 0:04:40.761
<v Speaker 3>difficult or pretty pretty dumb politics, But yeah, absolutely it

0:04:40.841 --> 0:04:45.081
<v Speaker 3>was inevitable the way that notwithstanding the you know, the

0:04:45.761 --> 0:04:48.601
<v Speaker 3>so called brutal cuts that don't exist, you still had

0:04:48.601 --> 0:04:54.121
<v Speaker 3>a situation largely as a result of those that mad

0:04:54.401 --> 0:04:56.521
<v Speaker 3>change in the law. The last government did no offense

0:04:56.601 --> 0:05:00.681
<v Speaker 3>to whereby you you know, you could compare apples and

0:05:00.681 --> 0:05:03.561
<v Speaker 3>oranges and somehow, you know, you were you were getting

0:05:04.321 --> 0:05:08.321
<v Speaker 3>what was it the teachers or nurses comp comparing themselves

0:05:08.521 --> 0:05:10.601
<v Speaker 3>to prison offices, you know, this sort of thing, or

0:05:11.521 --> 0:05:13.961
<v Speaker 3>my favorite was the you know, the vet nurses and

0:05:14.041 --> 0:05:17.881
<v Speaker 3>the prison officers. You know that it was very clearly

0:05:17.961 --> 0:05:19.521
<v Speaker 3>an issue the yere to be tackled.

0:05:19.521 --> 0:05:20.801
<v Speaker 4>But I think there's going to be a lot more.

0:05:21.161 --> 0:05:24.561
<v Speaker 3>We've got a paper coming out in the morning whereby

0:05:24.721 --> 0:05:27.441
<v Speaker 3>we put to We've put together a couple of dozen

0:05:27.561 --> 0:05:31.761
<v Speaker 3>options where you where the government could reduce spending to

0:05:31.801 --> 0:05:34.121
<v Speaker 3>get the books back in the black. You know, we've

0:05:34.161 --> 0:05:38.241
<v Speaker 3>just finished our nationwide debt clock tour. You know it's

0:05:38.321 --> 0:05:43.201
<v Speaker 3>about ninety two thousand dollars per household the government has borrowed.

0:05:43.721 --> 0:05:46.521
<v Speaker 3>We are on an unsustainable path. There's going to it

0:05:46.561 --> 0:05:50.521
<v Speaker 3>is actually regardless of what Nikola Willis wants, there's going

0:05:50.561 --> 0:05:53.241
<v Speaker 3>to have to be some tough decisions over the next

0:05:53.281 --> 0:05:53.921
<v Speaker 3>few years.

0:05:54.081 --> 0:05:56.361
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Stuart, what do you make of the pre budget announcements?

0:05:56.361 --> 0:05:58.081
<v Speaker 2>Because we've seen that one I've just mentioned to you.

0:05:58.161 --> 0:06:00.801
<v Speaker 2>We've seen the defense of twelve billion over four years.

0:06:00.801 --> 0:06:05.001
<v Speaker 2>We've got education on math, support and science and innovation, infrastructuring.

0:06:05.081 --> 0:06:06.841
<v Speaker 2>I've got quite a list in fun of me. Is

0:06:06.921 --> 0:06:09.281
<v Speaker 2>this more than Is this more than we're used to

0:06:09.281 --> 0:06:10.641
<v Speaker 2>with pre budget announcements?

0:06:11.201 --> 0:06:11.961
<v Speaker 4>Not really.

0:06:12.001 --> 0:06:15.041
<v Speaker 5>I mean to go to Jordan's first point that he made.

0:06:15.601 --> 0:06:18.881
<v Speaker 5>There will be twenty to thirty press releases put out

0:06:18.921 --> 0:06:21.561
<v Speaker 5>on budget Day and a lot of the good stuff

0:06:21.601 --> 0:06:24.161
<v Speaker 5>will get lost. It's up to the media to sift

0:06:24.841 --> 0:06:26.241
<v Speaker 5>through and find out the ones that are actually going

0:06:26.281 --> 0:06:28.121
<v Speaker 5>to make the headlines. So what you do is you

0:06:28.161 --> 0:06:30.001
<v Speaker 5>release stuff that you think is going to be good

0:06:30.081 --> 0:06:32.281
<v Speaker 5>because you don't want it to get lost, like the

0:06:32.281 --> 0:06:33.801
<v Speaker 5>one that's I mean just made like the Minister of

0:06:33.921 --> 0:06:37.841
<v Speaker 5>Education around something for mass But it also signals that

0:06:37.881 --> 0:06:39.401
<v Speaker 5>there's going to be a lot more money spent in

0:06:39.441 --> 0:06:43.241
<v Speaker 5>those portfolios because you know, something like education. You don't

0:06:43.321 --> 0:06:46.681
<v Speaker 5>come out with your hero your hero policies or your

0:06:46.681 --> 0:06:50.241
<v Speaker 5>hero projects pre budget because you want them to make

0:06:50.281 --> 0:06:53.361
<v Speaker 5>the news day of the budget, because this is where

0:06:53.361 --> 0:06:55.561
<v Speaker 5>you want people to buy into it. But let me

0:06:55.601 --> 0:06:57.921
<v Speaker 5>say one other thing. I mean, this government's come out

0:06:57.921 --> 0:06:59.441
<v Speaker 5>with a going for growth agenda the to being very

0:06:59.481 --> 0:07:03.361
<v Speaker 5>clear about that. Chris Luxeon got in became leader of

0:07:03.401 --> 0:07:05.041
<v Speaker 5>the National Party and their Prime Minister on the back

0:07:05.081 --> 0:07:06.721
<v Speaker 5>of the fact that he was a businessman, he ran

0:07:06.801 --> 0:07:08.961
<v Speaker 5>in New Zealand and therefore he knows how to run

0:07:08.961 --> 0:07:12.441
<v Speaker 5>a country. So it's got to be more than just cuts.

0:07:13.361 --> 0:07:16.761
<v Speaker 5>Nicola has announced that they've got about one point three

0:07:16.801 --> 0:07:19.481
<v Speaker 5>billion to spend, but what they've got to do now

0:07:19.641 --> 0:07:23.721
<v Speaker 5>is provide something to the private sector which really turbo

0:07:23.801 --> 0:07:26.961
<v Speaker 5>boosts growth. And now I've been talking about accelerate depreciation

0:07:27.201 --> 0:07:29.241
<v Speaker 5>for two or three years when I was Minister for

0:07:29.321 --> 0:07:32.681
<v Speaker 5>Economic Development, we had papers go through the second stage

0:07:32.681 --> 0:07:34.281
<v Speaker 5>of budget. I've even talked to the Prime Minister and

0:07:34.281 --> 0:07:36.721
<v Speaker 5>the Minister of Finance about that. So you can't just

0:07:36.881 --> 0:07:39.961
<v Speaker 5>cut and hope that we'll feed into a narrative of

0:07:40.001 --> 0:07:43.361
<v Speaker 5>going for growth. You've got to provide a financial or

0:07:43.401 --> 0:07:47.241
<v Speaker 5>fiscal incentive for businesses to start investing and driving productivity.

0:07:47.321 --> 0:07:52.001
<v Speaker 5>So it is something like accelerate depreciation. But announcing that

0:07:52.321 --> 0:07:55.361
<v Speaker 5>we're going to cut public servants jobs does not turbo

0:07:55.441 --> 0:07:58.681
<v Speaker 5>charge the economy in a way that will create productivity,

0:07:59.041 --> 0:08:01.881
<v Speaker 5>wealth and get rid of some of the terms of

0:08:01.881 --> 0:08:03.681
<v Speaker 5>billion worth a debt that Jordan's been talking about.

0:08:03.841 --> 0:08:05.241
<v Speaker 2>Just before we get into what we want to see

0:08:05.281 --> 0:08:08.601
<v Speaker 2>from this budget, what has been the best pre budget

0:08:08.601 --> 0:08:09.961
<v Speaker 2>announcement in both your views?

0:08:09.961 --> 0:08:14.881
<v Speaker 3>First, Jordans, I can certainly think of the worst, and

0:08:14.961 --> 0:08:18.721
<v Speaker 3>that is the bloody one hundred million dollars for subsidies

0:08:18.761 --> 0:08:22.561
<v Speaker 3>for the for the film industry that Nicola willis to

0:08:22.961 --> 0:08:27.041
<v Speaker 3>cried in opposition and is now yet now literally borrowing

0:08:27.081 --> 0:08:30.281
<v Speaker 3>money to give to Hollywood at a time where Donald

0:08:30.281 --> 0:08:32.761
<v Speaker 3>Trump has said he's coming out to get the government,

0:08:32.801 --> 0:08:39.001
<v Speaker 3>the countries and governments that are artificially subsidizing a competition

0:08:39.081 --> 0:08:43.001
<v Speaker 3>to Hollywood. It's if a nuts in terms in terms

0:08:43.001 --> 0:08:46.801
<v Speaker 3>of the good announcement, it's probably the reduction in the

0:08:46.841 --> 0:08:50.081
<v Speaker 3>size of what's called the fiscal envelope that that stew

0:08:50.241 --> 0:08:53.641
<v Speaker 3>just referred to, and that's the amount of new permanent

0:08:53.681 --> 0:08:57.361
<v Speaker 3>spending because the way it works sort of cumulative the increases.

0:08:58.881 --> 0:09:01.521
<v Speaker 3>Nicola Willis made a big hoo ha that she has

0:09:01.601 --> 0:09:05.361
<v Speaker 3>reduced it, but I mean it's it's still I mean,

0:09:05.561 --> 0:09:08.561
<v Speaker 3>when the when labor or the media or the government

0:09:08.601 --> 0:09:12.441
<v Speaker 3>talk about cuts, what that actually meaning or what it's

0:09:12.521 --> 0:09:15.001
<v Speaker 3>not cuts in the way that that that the average

0:09:15.001 --> 0:09:18.721
<v Speaker 3>person thinks it is. It's simply growing the pie or

0:09:19.081 --> 0:09:21.321
<v Speaker 3>what the government spends slower.

0:09:21.841 --> 0:09:23.601
<v Speaker 4>And because they predicted out.

0:09:23.401 --> 0:09:26.201
<v Speaker 3>Into the future, they say that's a cut, which clearly isn't.

0:09:26.241 --> 0:09:29.561
<v Speaker 2>What did you what was your most exciting pre budget announcement, Stuart?

0:09:29.561 --> 0:09:30.721
<v Speaker 2>For good or bad reasons?

0:09:30.801 --> 0:09:34.081
<v Speaker 5>Let's let's roll with Well, well, the worst one would

0:09:34.081 --> 0:09:36.521
<v Speaker 5>have to be defense, you know, spinning over two billion

0:09:36.561 --> 0:09:39.281
<v Speaker 5>dollars on defense while at the same time telling you know,

0:09:40.201 --> 0:09:43.241
<v Speaker 5>women that pay equity isn't important and so you know,

0:09:43.401 --> 0:09:45.601
<v Speaker 5>we'd rather have tanks and guns and ships and soldiers

0:09:45.681 --> 0:09:53.201
<v Speaker 5>than than pay equity. I think was absolutely I know,

0:09:53.601 --> 0:09:56.321
<v Speaker 5>I thought they got that completely wrong and they didn't

0:09:56.321 --> 0:09:58.521
<v Speaker 5>manage political risk in a way that someone like Helen

0:09:58.521 --> 0:10:01.561
<v Speaker 5>Clark or John Key, both both superb politicians from either

0:10:01.561 --> 0:10:04.161
<v Speaker 5>side of the political spectrum, obviously did incredibly well. I

0:10:04.161 --> 0:10:05.921
<v Speaker 5>think it was the g will take head on that

0:10:06.201 --> 0:10:09.961
<v Speaker 5>my best one. I mean, I'm a huge believer in education.

0:10:10.041 --> 0:10:13.241
<v Speaker 5>I mean I used to work in the teristory sector.

0:10:13.681 --> 0:10:16.561
<v Speaker 5>I wrote the business case for a university campus and

0:10:16.561 --> 0:10:19.321
<v Speaker 5>then meeting ran it. I've got four kids in the

0:10:19.401 --> 0:10:23.681
<v Speaker 5>education system and I've had a really bad experience with

0:10:23.761 --> 0:10:25.921
<v Speaker 5>one school where I just do not think that the

0:10:25.961 --> 0:10:29.281
<v Speaker 5>teacher was up to teaching maths to my form two

0:10:29.361 --> 0:10:31.401
<v Speaker 5>year old son. With all due respect to her, she's listening.

0:10:32.161 --> 0:10:34.961
<v Speaker 5>So you know, the Minister of Education's expert maths teachers

0:10:34.961 --> 0:10:38.121
<v Speaker 5>and tests one hundred million dollars. There is no downside

0:10:38.121 --> 0:10:39.961
<v Speaker 5>to that. Kids have got to learn maths. They've got

0:10:40.001 --> 0:10:42.561
<v Speaker 5>to be competent maths and when they hit high school,

0:10:44.081 --> 0:10:46.801
<v Speaker 5>maths is the basis of economics, of finance, of everything.

0:10:46.841 --> 0:10:48.721
<v Speaker 5>We need our young kids to be competent.

0:10:48.881 --> 0:10:50.881
<v Speaker 2>Point Stuart I wonder if Judith Collins just wanted to

0:10:50.881 --> 0:10:53.241
<v Speaker 2>have guns like yours, Stuart, because they are quite famous

0:10:53.281 --> 0:10:53.681
<v Speaker 2>your guns.

0:10:53.681 --> 0:10:56.521
<v Speaker 5>But I'm almost impossible. But you know, two billion dollars

0:10:56.561 --> 0:10:58.001
<v Speaker 5>will will go a long way.

0:10:59.001 --> 0:11:00.761
<v Speaker 2>I'm think twenty five bucks a month at a fit

0:11:00.841 --> 0:11:04.761
<v Speaker 2>that center. Sorry was that mischievous of me? I'm actually

0:11:04.801 --> 0:11:06.441
<v Speaker 2>with just not get distracted about that. Have you got

0:11:06.481 --> 0:11:08.521
<v Speaker 2>any just quick follow up on that's Jordan before we

0:11:08.521 --> 0:11:10.441
<v Speaker 2>crack on with looking at the actual budget.

0:11:10.641 --> 0:11:11.241
<v Speaker 4>I didn't push.

0:11:11.521 --> 0:11:14.801
<v Speaker 3>We ad a member of staff who's so right way.

0:11:14.921 --> 0:11:17.161
<v Speaker 3>He thinks that, you know, you can't justify defense spending

0:11:17.681 --> 0:11:20.601
<v Speaker 3>even even the taxpayer union isn't quite there yet. The

0:11:20.641 --> 0:11:24.841
<v Speaker 3>thing is due in a geopolitical environment where there's real

0:11:24.961 --> 0:11:28.201
<v Speaker 3>international pressure to get your percentage of GDP spending on

0:11:28.281 --> 0:11:32.241
<v Speaker 3>defense up. I think that the broader question is is

0:11:32.281 --> 0:11:35.561
<v Speaker 3>where that defense money is going? Because our reading of

0:11:35.761 --> 0:11:39.441
<v Speaker 3>how the US and OECD with I don't know if

0:11:39.441 --> 0:11:43.881
<v Speaker 3>it's OECD or World Bank that define what defense spending is,

0:11:44.041 --> 0:11:47.201
<v Speaker 3>it actually can include some quite useful stuff the search

0:11:47.241 --> 0:11:51.641
<v Speaker 3>and rescue for example, for example, some infrastructure stuff you

0:11:51.681 --> 0:11:55.681
<v Speaker 3>can actually get within that international meaning of defense. So

0:11:55.801 --> 0:11:58.641
<v Speaker 3>I sort of kept my power dry a bit on

0:11:59.121 --> 0:12:02.241
<v Speaker 3>that one, because the key question of is is it

0:12:02.281 --> 0:12:06.361
<v Speaker 3>in defense in terms of wasting money on armored personnel carriers,

0:12:07.121 --> 0:12:10.041
<v Speaker 3>or is it stuff that actually ticks off the international

0:12:10.081 --> 0:12:12.441
<v Speaker 3>requirements but things that we'll actually use.

0:12:12.761 --> 0:12:16.401
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, let's say, Look, I just one thing. I

0:12:16.641 --> 0:12:18.801
<v Speaker 5>don't disagree with that, but I don't think we should

0:12:18.841 --> 0:12:21.841
<v Speaker 5>be bullied into spending two percent of GDP when we

0:12:21.841 --> 0:12:24.561
<v Speaker 5>don't actolutely need to. I mean, you know, I got

0:12:24.561 --> 0:12:27.481
<v Speaker 5>a feeling that the money was spending on a twentieth

0:12:27.521 --> 0:12:31.321
<v Speaker 5>century defense force when we need twenty first century solutions,

0:12:31.321 --> 0:12:32.881
<v Speaker 5>and you know, we've got to play our roles, that

0:12:33.041 --> 0:12:35.921
<v Speaker 5>is no doubt. But yeah, but I would like to

0:12:35.921 --> 0:12:37.721
<v Speaker 5>see that money spent a hell of a lot smarter

0:12:38.121 --> 0:12:39.721
<v Speaker 5>than the announcements that I've seen today.

0:12:39.921 --> 0:12:42.681
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just my two penas worth. When we did

0:12:42.721 --> 0:12:44.161
<v Speaker 2>talk bit of talk back on this, I didn't. I

0:12:44.201 --> 0:12:45.801
<v Speaker 2>don't think I got a single bit of pushback on

0:12:45.801 --> 0:12:47.881
<v Speaker 2>the defense spending. I think there's a large part of

0:12:47.881 --> 0:12:49.761
<v Speaker 2>the public who think we're embarrassed by the fact that

0:12:49.761 --> 0:12:51.361
<v Speaker 2>we see we can put up a hang glider or

0:12:51.361 --> 0:12:53.481
<v Speaker 2>to an assessmenter as a sort of say it's our

0:12:53.481 --> 0:12:56.161
<v Speaker 2>air force. But that's being a little bit mischievous, I'll

0:12:56.161 --> 0:12:58.641
<v Speaker 2>be honest with you. Hey, okay, well let's look at

0:12:58.641 --> 0:13:02.161
<v Speaker 2>this budget is Jordan? Is this budget? Is this the

0:13:02.201 --> 0:13:05.441
<v Speaker 2>one where the government sort of will take the risk

0:13:05.481 --> 0:13:07.761
<v Speaker 2>of a few tough announcements. Is it like it as

0:13:07.761 --> 0:13:10.081
<v Speaker 2>a free hit because they've got another budget after this

0:13:10.121 --> 0:13:11.361
<v Speaker 2>before they have to run for election.

0:13:12.601 --> 0:13:12.801
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:13:12.841 --> 0:13:17.441
<v Speaker 3>My reading on the National Party caucus is they realize

0:13:17.481 --> 0:13:21.441
<v Speaker 3>now that they missed the trick last year, that they wasted.

0:13:22.041 --> 0:13:24.361
<v Speaker 3>Last year's budget didn't actually get on top of any

0:13:24.401 --> 0:13:27.561
<v Speaker 3>of the big structural stuff. And we're quite an extraordinary

0:13:27.561 --> 0:13:30.121
<v Speaker 3>situation about three or four months ago where the Nats

0:13:30.161 --> 0:13:31.961
<v Speaker 3>were well, the center right were down a bit in

0:13:31.961 --> 0:13:35.441
<v Speaker 3>the polls, and of course a normal political sort of

0:13:35.521 --> 0:13:38.801
<v Speaker 3>intuition is that you then hug the center. What I

0:13:38.841 --> 0:13:40.801
<v Speaker 3>can tell you is both the focus group and the

0:13:40.881 --> 0:13:44.641
<v Speaker 3>poll data showed clearly is that they actually wanted government,

0:13:44.721 --> 0:13:48.521
<v Speaker 3>wanted mister Luxeon to stand for something. And I hope

0:13:48.641 --> 0:13:51.921
<v Speaker 3>that will be reflected on Thursday, that we actually see

0:13:51.961 --> 0:13:54.481
<v Speaker 3>something bold because we've had I mean, come on, how

0:13:54.561 --> 0:13:56.881
<v Speaker 3>much rhetoric we had about going for growth, going for growth.

0:13:57.161 --> 0:14:01.321
<v Speaker 3>We'll get on with it, and Stue rightly pointed to

0:14:01.441 --> 0:14:04.681
<v Speaker 3>accelerated depreciation. He's being a bit soft there. If you

0:14:04.761 --> 0:14:07.401
<v Speaker 3>really want to put a rocket under the economy and

0:14:07.401 --> 0:14:10.321
<v Speaker 3>go for growth, I would or the tax faser Union

0:14:10.361 --> 0:14:13.881
<v Speaker 3>have long argued that best bang for buck is full

0:14:13.921 --> 0:14:18.841
<v Speaker 3>expensing of capital items. And that's what Rushie Sonak did,

0:14:18.881 --> 0:14:21.841
<v Speaker 3>It's what Donald Trump did the first time around, and

0:14:21.921 --> 0:14:25.441
<v Speaker 3>it really would put not only a sort of stimulus

0:14:25.521 --> 0:14:29.721
<v Speaker 3>under the economy, but it's the very capital spending that

0:14:29.761 --> 0:14:34.161
<v Speaker 3>would result in high productivity, which ultimately makes new zeel

0:14:34.161 --> 0:14:34.921
<v Speaker 3>and more prosperous.

0:14:34.961 --> 0:14:36.601
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to see tax cuts at all, Stuart?

0:14:36.641 --> 0:14:37.001
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:14:37.641 --> 0:14:38.001
<v Speaker 4>No? I don't.

0:14:38.001 --> 0:14:40.401
<v Speaker 5>Do we see tax cuts. We won't see increase in

0:14:40.441 --> 0:14:43.121
<v Speaker 5>tax now. But I'm going Jordan, I agree with you.

0:14:43.201 --> 0:14:45.801
<v Speaker 5>I mean, expense and capital would just be brilliant. But

0:14:45.841 --> 0:14:47.841
<v Speaker 5>I think accelerated appreciation is a way to get around

0:14:47.841 --> 0:14:49.601
<v Speaker 5>it as well. I mean the paper that I put

0:14:49.601 --> 0:14:52.681
<v Speaker 5>forward and like I said, got quite a way down.

0:14:52.761 --> 0:14:55.601
<v Speaker 5>The process was up fifty percent over five years, and

0:14:55.601 --> 0:14:57.681
<v Speaker 5>I spoke to a whole lot of men and women

0:14:57.721 --> 0:14:59.881
<v Speaker 5>who ran big companies and they said it would be

0:14:59.921 --> 0:15:03.161
<v Speaker 5>a game changer in terms of what we spent money on.

0:15:03.641 --> 0:15:06.481
<v Speaker 5>So at appreciation law thirty years old, they appreciate an

0:15:06.521 --> 0:15:09.121
<v Speaker 5>asset its physical life as opposed to was economic life.

0:15:09.161 --> 0:15:12.161
<v Speaker 5>A gain way out of step. But what we're seeing

0:15:12.201 --> 0:15:14.721
<v Speaker 5>here is I think, you know, gone of the days

0:15:14.761 --> 0:15:17.441
<v Speaker 5>where the general public can expect the government to stimulate

0:15:17.441 --> 0:15:20.161
<v Speaker 5>the economy through spending. I think the government has to

0:15:20.161 --> 0:15:23.321
<v Speaker 5>provide now the tools for the predate set to stimulate

0:15:23.401 --> 0:15:26.321
<v Speaker 5>growth through spending, and you do that through accelerate depreciation

0:15:26.481 --> 0:15:30.041
<v Speaker 5>or expensive but you've got to put the tools in place.

0:15:30.081 --> 0:15:32.041
<v Speaker 5>I mean I read something where one of the captains

0:15:32.081 --> 0:15:34.401
<v Speaker 5>of well Ahead, of one of the think tanks, said,

0:15:35.361 --> 0:15:37.521
<v Speaker 5>you know, men and women who run businesses have got

0:15:37.521 --> 0:15:40.361
<v Speaker 5>to change their attitude. That does not work. You've got

0:15:40.361 --> 0:15:43.241
<v Speaker 5>to provide some form of economic consenter for them to

0:15:43.281 --> 0:15:46.521
<v Speaker 5>do that. Capital expending or acceleraty appreciation would do that.

0:15:46.601 --> 0:15:49.081
<v Speaker 5>I hope we see that. That would be a game changer.

0:15:49.121 --> 0:15:51.881
<v Speaker 2>I think actually I've got a text from someone saying

0:15:51.881 --> 0:15:54.241
<v Speaker 2>what the hell is accelerated depreciation, which would lead me

0:15:54.281 --> 0:15:56.681
<v Speaker 2>to the question about are they going to have stuff

0:15:56.721 --> 0:15:59.681
<v Speaker 2>in the budget that's for the general public to digest

0:15:59.721 --> 0:16:02.081
<v Speaker 2>and go No, none, we love that or is this

0:16:02.481 --> 0:16:05.321
<v Speaker 2>more something where we're going to have extended analysis in

0:16:05.361 --> 0:16:08.041
<v Speaker 2>the news and people like yourselves, Jordan, are gonna tell

0:16:08.081 --> 0:16:09.881
<v Speaker 2>us what the hidden tricks are.

0:16:10.761 --> 0:16:11.801
<v Speaker 4>Well, i'll give it.

0:16:12.041 --> 0:16:14.121
<v Speaker 3>I'll see if I can explain it in twenty seconds.

0:16:14.121 --> 0:16:16.881
<v Speaker 3>It's the best tax idea most people haven't heard of.

0:16:17.201 --> 0:16:20.521
<v Speaker 3>So let's say I'm a business and I have an

0:16:20.521 --> 0:16:23.081
<v Speaker 3>expense like wages. I get to write that off my

0:16:23.121 --> 0:16:25.921
<v Speaker 3>tax because it's an expense. But I buy a new

0:16:26.041 --> 0:16:29.521
<v Speaker 3>piece of cat, a new flang down machine. Okay, I

0:16:29.681 --> 0:16:32.521
<v Speaker 3>don't get to deduct that for the purposes of what

0:16:32.561 --> 0:16:35.921
<v Speaker 3>I pay income tax, except over the lifetime of the

0:16:35.921 --> 0:16:37.321
<v Speaker 3>assets that can be up to you know, it could

0:16:37.321 --> 0:16:40.521
<v Speaker 3>be twenty five years, and it depends on the type

0:16:40.561 --> 0:16:44.121
<v Speaker 3>of asset. What the Taxpayer's Union is arguing is give

0:16:44.281 --> 0:16:48.401
<v Speaker 3>that tax seduction that year, and we actually argue it

0:16:48.401 --> 0:16:51.081
<v Speaker 3>should be time limited. So you've got an incentive to

0:16:51.201 --> 0:16:55.041
<v Speaker 3>bring forward capital investment. Because look, it is a stimulus.

0:16:55.241 --> 0:16:57.441
<v Speaker 3>But unlike a sort of tax simulus where it's you know,

0:16:57.521 --> 0:17:00.281
<v Speaker 3>run down to Harvey Norman and you know, spend.

0:17:00.001 --> 0:17:00.841
<v Speaker 4>Your tax cart.

0:17:01.241 --> 0:17:05.481
<v Speaker 3>It's the stimulus on the very sort of cat, very

0:17:05.561 --> 0:17:09.641
<v Speaker 3>capital equipment that would make New Zealand more productive.

0:17:09.601 --> 0:17:11.481
<v Speaker 2>And culture basically essentially, isn't it.

0:17:11.881 --> 0:17:16.321
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but we have questions because we're low productivity the

0:17:17.681 --> 0:17:19.161
<v Speaker 3>very investment to increase that.

0:17:19.361 --> 0:17:21.121
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, change right.

0:17:21.161 --> 0:17:24.241
<v Speaker 5>But you're going to get some announcements like Minister Stanfords

0:17:24.321 --> 0:17:28.161
<v Speaker 5>educational one that that parents with kids at school who

0:17:28.161 --> 0:17:30.281
<v Speaker 5>are struggling with maths understands. You're going to get some

0:17:30.481 --> 0:17:34.521
<v Speaker 5>like Semians to do with health, which parents and voters understand,

0:17:34.601 --> 0:17:37.001
<v Speaker 5>and then you're going to get some I'm really hopeful

0:17:37.401 --> 0:17:38.881
<v Speaker 5>of the sort of stuff that Jordan and I are

0:17:38.921 --> 0:17:41.281
<v Speaker 5>talking about, where if we went into greater depth, we'd

0:17:41.281 --> 0:17:43.361
<v Speaker 5>lose the vast majority of people because it's sort of

0:17:43.401 --> 0:17:47.081
<v Speaker 5>a it's a big business finance, tax economics question. But

0:17:47.161 --> 0:17:49.721
<v Speaker 5>if you have those though, the men and woman who

0:17:49.801 --> 0:17:53.401
<v Speaker 5>drive growth across the country and who are responsible for

0:17:53.441 --> 0:17:56.841
<v Speaker 5>big investments will look at this and go wow, okay,

0:17:56.961 --> 0:17:59.081
<v Speaker 5>this is fantastic as well. So you've got to have

0:17:59.121 --> 0:18:02.041
<v Speaker 5>a mixture of both. You've got to have a meaningful

0:18:02.161 --> 0:18:05.681
<v Speaker 5>going for growth agenda that actually does drive growth, but

0:18:05.761 --> 0:18:09.321
<v Speaker 5>you've also got to have the social packages that actually

0:18:09.401 --> 0:18:11.601
<v Speaker 5>the public expect from a government.

0:18:11.361 --> 0:18:13.521
<v Speaker 2>Okay, guys, look, I want to just get you to

0:18:13.761 --> 0:18:15.561
<v Speaker 2>hold fire for a second and we're just going to

0:18:15.601 --> 0:18:16.961
<v Speaker 2>take a quick break and we'll come back with a

0:18:17.001 --> 0:18:18.921
<v Speaker 2>little bit more on this and just a moment where

0:18:18.961 --> 0:18:23.921
<v Speaker 2>with Jordan Williams and Stuart Nash talking about anticipations for

0:18:24.001 --> 0:18:25.761
<v Speaker 2>the budget and a whole bunch of things around that.

0:18:26.281 --> 0:18:27.961
<v Speaker 2>We'll be taking your cause later on in this our

0:18:28.041 --> 0:18:29.521
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred and eighty ten eighty, but we'll be back

0:18:29.521 --> 0:18:37.801
<v Speaker 2>in a tick. It's twenty seven past three. Yes, welcome back.

0:18:37.881 --> 0:18:41.641
<v Speaker 2>We're with Jordan Williams, the Taxpayer Union, Taxpayers Union director

0:18:41.681 --> 0:18:44.201
<v Speaker 2>and former police minister. Stuart Nash is also with us,

0:18:44.401 --> 0:18:47.841
<v Speaker 2>looking ahead to the government. Actually, Jordan, just quickly, so,

0:18:48.161 --> 0:18:49.881
<v Speaker 2>how much do you know about the budget that you

0:18:49.921 --> 0:18:51.681
<v Speaker 2>can't share because you've mentioned you've got a handful of

0:18:51.761 --> 0:18:54.281
<v Speaker 2>embargoed emails there. What do you know that we don't know?

0:18:54.361 --> 0:18:55.881
<v Speaker 4>No, that's just the normal. That's the normal.

0:18:56.321 --> 0:18:58.921
<v Speaker 3>Before you create a scandal, this is the normal media

0:18:59.161 --> 0:19:02.201
<v Speaker 3>unless be No, don't believe me.

0:19:02.241 --> 0:19:04.401
<v Speaker 4>I twist a lot of arms at the behave try

0:19:04.441 --> 0:19:07.001
<v Speaker 4>to okay, won't tell me?

0:19:07.241 --> 0:19:11.761
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, okay, let's stick with you. Then surprises we've had.

0:19:12.401 --> 0:19:15.521
<v Speaker 2>I don't know historically what the biggest surprise would have been,

0:19:15.841 --> 0:19:19.521
<v Speaker 2>but are you anticipating that Nikola Willison has got any surprises?

0:19:19.521 --> 0:19:21.521
<v Speaker 2>And what would you like it to be? Putting aside

0:19:21.561 --> 0:19:22.761
<v Speaker 2>accelerated depreciation.

0:19:23.921 --> 0:19:26.761
<v Speaker 3>So the surprises I'd love would be that actually we

0:19:27.281 --> 0:19:31.481
<v Speaker 3>see just tough but necessary decisions that we don't continue

0:19:31.561 --> 0:19:34.121
<v Speaker 3>to kick the can down the road. On New Zealand's

0:19:34.161 --> 0:19:37.441
<v Speaker 3>structural deficit. You know, you'd look at the forecasts. The

0:19:37.521 --> 0:19:41.361
<v Speaker 3>last Treasury forecasts were done just before Christmas, and that

0:19:41.441 --> 0:19:44.161
<v Speaker 3>they were forecasting that this year's budget not only was

0:19:44.161 --> 0:19:47.641
<v Speaker 3>the deficit going to be bigger than last year than

0:19:47.681 --> 0:19:51.321
<v Speaker 3>the current year we're in, but that it's going the

0:19:51.321 --> 0:19:54.161
<v Speaker 3>deficit's going to winnow amount to more than four percent

0:19:54.201 --> 0:19:58.121
<v Speaker 3>of GDP. Then the government alone is spending that's the

0:19:58.201 --> 0:20:01.801
<v Speaker 3>difference between its income and its expenditure. I'd be wrapped

0:20:01.881 --> 0:20:04.401
<v Speaker 3>if that we could actually tackle that and get it

0:20:04.481 --> 0:20:07.801
<v Speaker 3>down in such a way that right now we'll have

0:20:07.961 --> 0:20:10.481
<v Speaker 3>surplus in sort of three or four years time. But

0:20:10.521 --> 0:20:12.561
<v Speaker 3>then you look at Treasury's long term projections and we're

0:20:12.641 --> 0:20:17.561
<v Speaker 3>straight back into deficit deep because really because of NSAID

0:20:17.641 --> 0:20:20.401
<v Speaker 3>super and the cost of health spiraling out of control.

0:20:20.721 --> 0:20:22.681
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess because you're saying it's surprised you're not

0:20:22.721 --> 0:20:25.161
<v Speaker 2>expecting those wishes to be fulfilled.

0:20:25.881 --> 0:20:29.361
<v Speaker 3>I mean, full capital expensing would be That's what would

0:20:30.001 --> 0:20:32.441
<v Speaker 3>make me very excited. That would be a wonderful surprise,

0:20:32.481 --> 0:20:36.921
<v Speaker 3>particularly if it's time limited. But we shall I mean, look, look,

0:20:37.001 --> 0:20:39.281
<v Speaker 3>let's be frank well, you know, and on Thursday we

0:20:39.361 --> 0:20:43.081
<v Speaker 3>find out whether the government is serious. Is its rhetoric

0:20:43.801 --> 0:20:46.641
<v Speaker 3>around getting on top of the box and going for growth?

0:20:47.001 --> 0:20:51.561
<v Speaker 3>Is it just a continuation of the last few really, frankly,

0:20:51.761 --> 0:20:55.481
<v Speaker 3>a generation of politicians that have just been comm's led

0:20:55.521 --> 0:20:59.481
<v Speaker 3>bumper sticker type policy or do they have the mantle?

0:21:00.041 --> 0:21:03.721
<v Speaker 3>That's the begun nine. Everything else is just detail, Stuart,

0:21:03.761 --> 0:21:04.321
<v Speaker 3>What do you reckon?

0:21:04.601 --> 0:21:07.641
<v Speaker 2>Surprise is looking for something to make you happy on

0:21:07.681 --> 0:21:11.241
<v Speaker 2>budget day? Oh hang on a second, Stuart, how before

0:21:11.281 --> 0:21:13.681
<v Speaker 2>you start talking, I'll just put you back to here.

0:21:13.761 --> 0:21:14.521
<v Speaker 2>That was my fault.

0:21:14.561 --> 0:21:14.961
<v Speaker 4>Where you go?

0:21:15.361 --> 0:21:16.041
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, Stuart.

0:21:17.401 --> 0:21:19.281
<v Speaker 5>Look, I was a Minister of Police, but I was

0:21:19.321 --> 0:21:22.201
<v Speaker 5>also Minister for the Economic Development and Minister for Revenue.

0:21:22.241 --> 0:21:24.681
<v Speaker 5>I attach, so you know a lot of my comments

0:21:24.721 --> 0:21:27.961
<v Speaker 5>today are based around my economic development and tax hat

0:21:28.081 --> 0:21:29.961
<v Speaker 5>so I'm more like Jordan.

0:21:30.121 --> 0:21:30.601
<v Speaker 4>I would be.

0:21:30.681 --> 0:21:33.321
<v Speaker 5>So the bottom line is is the government has announced

0:21:33.361 --> 0:21:36.481
<v Speaker 5>Mclair has announced she has no money for spending. That's clear,

0:21:36.521 --> 0:21:38.201
<v Speaker 5>that's out there. So this is going to be an

0:21:38.201 --> 0:21:41.721
<v Speaker 5>austerity budget. Back to Jordan's comment, so what this budget

0:21:41.881 --> 0:21:45.441
<v Speaker 5>has to deliver is the means for the private sector

0:21:45.721 --> 0:21:48.521
<v Speaker 5>to drive growth in a way that the government can't.

0:21:48.561 --> 0:21:50.481
<v Speaker 5>So the government's not going to be spending on roads

0:21:50.801 --> 0:21:54.441
<v Speaker 5>or massive infrastructure projects. It hasn't got the money. So

0:21:54.601 --> 0:21:58.761
<v Speaker 5>I would be surprised if it doesn't have something, something

0:21:58.881 --> 0:22:01.961
<v Speaker 5>major in there that big business well began small actually

0:22:02.401 --> 0:22:05.001
<v Speaker 5>can look at and go, wow, this is what I've

0:22:05.201 --> 0:22:08.121
<v Speaker 5>needed to buy the kit to drive productivity, because what's

0:22:08.121 --> 0:22:13.041
<v Speaker 5>happened in this country term is we've overvalued labor and

0:22:13.081 --> 0:22:16.681
<v Speaker 5>undervalued capital. What that means is instead instead of investing

0:22:16.681 --> 0:22:19.561
<v Speaker 5>in plants and machinery to drive productivity, we just employ

0:22:19.641 --> 0:22:23.121
<v Speaker 5>more people and that is a really unproductive way to

0:22:23.161 --> 0:22:25.881
<v Speaker 5>do things. I would be surprised if there isn't a

0:22:25.921 --> 0:22:28.601
<v Speaker 5>massive spend on education. I think this minister is doing

0:22:28.641 --> 0:22:34.361
<v Speaker 5>a really good job of revamping the education system. We

0:22:34.481 --> 0:22:37.001
<v Speaker 5>need to see that continue. I would be surprised if

0:22:37.041 --> 0:22:40.201
<v Speaker 5>Simeon hasn't managed to extract something out of health because

0:22:40.201 --> 0:22:42.281
<v Speaker 5>he's struggling. I'll be honest with you. We need to

0:22:42.281 --> 0:22:44.961
<v Speaker 5>see big investment in the health sector, but again to

0:22:45.041 --> 0:22:48.681
<v Speaker 5>drive productivity. I'm a little like Jordan again. I was

0:22:48.721 --> 0:22:55.561
<v Speaker 5>surprised at nicholas announcement around the film subsidies, particularly because

0:22:55.561 --> 0:22:57.321
<v Speaker 5>Trump has come out and said we're going to put Well, no,

0:22:57.401 --> 0:22:58.921
<v Speaker 5>he hasn't said that. He's floating the idea of a

0:22:59.001 --> 0:23:01.801
<v Speaker 5>hundred pcent tariff. So if that happens, no one knows

0:23:01.841 --> 0:23:03.961
<v Speaker 5>what it actually means, but it could see the death

0:23:03.961 --> 0:23:07.401
<v Speaker 5>of the film industry new But expect to see something

0:23:07.561 --> 0:23:11.361
<v Speaker 5>that actually is meaningful around the growing for Going for

0:23:11.441 --> 0:23:14.121
<v Speaker 5>growth agenda. It's got to be that. Whereas I think

0:23:14.121 --> 0:23:16.201
<v Speaker 5>you're going to find a whole lot of keys will

0:23:16.241 --> 0:23:18.441
<v Speaker 5>give up on the man who came in because he

0:23:18.561 --> 0:23:20.921
<v Speaker 5>ran a business and knew how the economy worked. If

0:23:20.921 --> 0:23:23.801
<v Speaker 5>he doesn't deliver, then it's all just smoking mirrors.

0:23:23.841 --> 0:23:25.401
<v Speaker 2>Do you guys have agreed with each other? Them far

0:23:25.481 --> 0:23:27.281
<v Speaker 2>more than I expecting. I think as if you're just

0:23:27.321 --> 0:23:29.841
<v Speaker 2>placed on your board spare for a Stuart there.

0:23:29.881 --> 0:23:33.321
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually we do. We now have a spear spot

0:23:33.361 --> 0:23:34.801
<v Speaker 3>for the lock up on Thursdays.

0:23:35.081 --> 0:23:37.081
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to take that seat? You know we're

0:23:37.121 --> 0:23:38.201
<v Speaker 4>going to give it in the CTU.

0:23:38.401 --> 0:23:41.681
<v Speaker 5>But the thing is to what you've got is you've

0:23:41.681 --> 0:23:46.001
<v Speaker 5>got two economic pregmatists here, right, and you know we

0:23:46.041 --> 0:23:48.601
<v Speaker 5>don't agree around the margins, but we do agree on

0:23:48.641 --> 0:23:51.001
<v Speaker 5>the big issues. That is, we're an economy that is

0:23:51.121 --> 0:23:54.801
<v Speaker 5>very low multi factor productivity, ie, we work too hard

0:23:55.321 --> 0:23:59.641
<v Speaker 5>and we're not smart with how we invest because successive

0:23:59.641 --> 0:24:03.881
<v Speaker 5>governments have not provided businesses with the incentives. The tax

0:24:03.961 --> 0:24:06.481
<v Speaker 5>incentives are the tool to go and invest.

0:24:06.721 --> 0:24:06.921
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:24:07.001 --> 0:24:08.761
<v Speaker 5>Now, I think you'll find people on the right and

0:24:08.801 --> 0:24:13.561
<v Speaker 5>the leaft agree with that. That is, any education. I'm

0:24:13.561 --> 0:24:15.521
<v Speaker 5>a huge believer in the value of education. You've got

0:24:15.521 --> 0:24:17.601
<v Speaker 5>to get that right. This Sminster's doing a fantastic job.

0:24:17.801 --> 0:24:19.281
<v Speaker 5>Let's hope she's funded to continue to.

0:24:20.241 --> 0:24:24.681
<v Speaker 3>Sue's actually explained why we don't like capital gains tax

0:24:24.881 --> 0:24:27.521
<v Speaker 3>because every capital gains tax and wealth tax you get,

0:24:27.561 --> 0:24:30.961
<v Speaker 3>including the Greens, excludes the family home, which makes the

0:24:31.081 --> 0:24:34.721
<v Speaker 3>very problem that's got us into this mess that you

0:24:34.761 --> 0:24:36.521
<v Speaker 3>know it disproportionately favors housing.

0:24:36.521 --> 0:24:37.801
<v Speaker 4>It would make it even worse.

0:24:39.441 --> 0:24:42.881
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Hey, guys. I just wanted to end on a

0:24:42.961 --> 0:24:45.001
<v Speaker 2>note that's slightly more political, well hell of a lot

0:24:45.041 --> 0:24:47.601
<v Speaker 2>more political actually, because I'm not sure when this debate

0:24:47.681 --> 0:24:50.201
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen. That Jerry Brown's allowing for the

0:24:50.281 --> 0:24:53.601
<v Speaker 2>discussion around the censorship of the Mari Party. But firstly, Stuart,

0:24:53.601 --> 0:24:57.321
<v Speaker 2>you'll take on the recommendations from the Privileges Committee for

0:24:57.361 --> 0:24:59.681
<v Speaker 2>twenty one day suspension for the leaders in seven days

0:24:59.721 --> 0:25:02.361
<v Speaker 2>for Hannah Mighty Clark. What did you make of that

0:25:02.401 --> 0:25:04.921
<v Speaker 2>and Jerry's handling of it?

0:25:05.041 --> 0:25:08.961
<v Speaker 5>Subsequently, the Privileges Committee is one of the most powerful

0:25:09.001 --> 0:25:12.081
<v Speaker 5>in Parliament. I back at one hundred percent. I think

0:25:12.201 --> 0:25:15.321
<v Speaker 5>any party that boats against us, and any major party

0:25:15.321 --> 0:25:16.841
<v Speaker 5>that the Nats have said they're going to support it,

0:25:16.961 --> 0:25:20.201
<v Speaker 5>Labours come out and said they probably won't. I think

0:25:20.241 --> 0:25:24.601
<v Speaker 5>that is a massive, massive political mistake on behalf of Labor.

0:25:24.681 --> 0:25:29.081
<v Speaker 5>I think the way the Married Party has behaved is terrible,

0:25:29.441 --> 0:25:31.641
<v Speaker 5>but I also think the standards and Parliament have dropped.

0:25:31.961 --> 0:25:34.201
<v Speaker 5>It started with Trevor Mallard when he relaxes a dress

0:25:34.201 --> 0:25:36.521
<v Speaker 5>standards and it's just continued. And you know, I look

0:25:36.561 --> 0:25:40.561
<v Speaker 5>at Parliament now, guys are coming in caftans people. You know,

0:25:41.841 --> 0:25:44.281
<v Speaker 5>Rawdi looks like he's off to Hawaiian Party half the time.

0:25:44.401 --> 0:25:46.521
<v Speaker 5>Get the standards back. The speaker has the ability to

0:25:46.561 --> 0:25:49.121
<v Speaker 5>do that, pull it back and get some bloody respect

0:25:49.121 --> 0:25:51.521
<v Speaker 5>in that chain because at the moment the antics set

0:25:51.521 --> 0:25:53.481
<v Speaker 5>are going on. Like I said, I think what happens

0:25:53.561 --> 0:25:55.481
<v Speaker 5>is the vast majority of good hard work and keywis

0:25:55.521 --> 0:25:58.601
<v Speaker 5>look at this. I think it's people behaving badly. It's

0:25:58.601 --> 0:26:00.761
<v Speaker 5>a plague in everyone's house. People that their respect for

0:26:00.841 --> 0:26:04.121
<v Speaker 5>politicians diminishes and people become disenfranchised.

0:26:04.161 --> 0:26:07.641
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I actually agree wholeheartedly Stuart and Jordan. The

0:26:07.641 --> 0:26:09.801
<v Speaker 2>other thing is, I mean, Stuart used that wonderful expression

0:26:09.921 --> 0:26:13.241
<v Speaker 2>when people say the incredibly powerful, powerful Privileges Committee. But

0:26:13.321 --> 0:26:15.521
<v Speaker 2>so far, the impression that we've got until a few

0:26:15.601 --> 0:26:17.961
<v Speaker 2>days ago is that the worst you get is a

0:26:17.961 --> 0:26:19.921
<v Speaker 2>bit of a telling off after you apologize, and maybe

0:26:19.921 --> 0:26:23.521
<v Speaker 2>a day's suspension. And for instance, people ask me about

0:26:23.521 --> 0:26:26.001
<v Speaker 2>what you know, Julian Genta, how come you know it's

0:26:26.121 --> 0:26:27.961
<v Speaker 2>so much less for her? But I would argue she

0:26:27.961 --> 0:26:28.681
<v Speaker 2>should have got more.

0:26:28.721 --> 0:26:30.681
<v Speaker 4>But what's your cake? Was?

0:26:30.161 --> 0:26:33.161
<v Speaker 3>It was during a vote and it was intimidating. It

0:26:33.201 --> 0:26:37.881
<v Speaker 3>wasn't actually the Harker. It was the intimidation and going

0:26:37.921 --> 0:26:42.721
<v Speaker 3>over to the other side, and then the stumbing their

0:26:42.801 --> 0:26:46.561
<v Speaker 3>nose at the legitimacy of the Privileges Committee. Look, I've

0:26:46.761 --> 0:26:51.481
<v Speaker 3>worried for some years. I've worried about our institutions being

0:26:51.641 --> 0:26:56.401
<v Speaker 3>able to stand up to matters pertaining to Malori, particularly

0:26:56.441 --> 0:27:01.161
<v Speaker 3>around corruption in the resource management sector, in conflicts of

0:27:01.161 --> 0:27:03.241
<v Speaker 3>interest and things like that, and they put this into

0:27:03.281 --> 0:27:06.321
<v Speaker 3>a similar sort of category. I think that it is

0:27:06.481 --> 0:27:10.601
<v Speaker 3>really important for the frankly democracy to hold to Party

0:27:10.601 --> 0:27:14.081
<v Speaker 3>Malory up to the same standards as everyone else. I

0:27:14.161 --> 0:27:17.921
<v Speaker 3>note that the police recently let to Party Malory off

0:27:18.241 --> 0:27:22.121
<v Speaker 3>for not only filing a late return, but they still

0:27:22.201 --> 0:27:24.841
<v Speaker 3>haven't filed their return as it relates to that the

0:27:24.881 --> 0:27:29.281
<v Speaker 3>sort of the electoral donations and the like, And despite

0:27:29.281 --> 0:27:31.641
<v Speaker 3>having not done it, police have already said we're going

0:27:31.681 --> 0:27:34.521
<v Speaker 3>to let you off with a warning. That is that

0:27:34.681 --> 0:27:38.521
<v Speaker 3>is a danger, danger danger that we have. I don't

0:27:38.521 --> 0:27:42.281
<v Speaker 3>think it's to tear or anything. I actually think it's

0:27:42.281 --> 0:27:46.521
<v Speaker 3>our institutions not having the self confidence to be able

0:27:46.561 --> 0:27:49.641
<v Speaker 3>to do their job, and that I find really worrying.

0:27:50.361 --> 0:27:52.761
<v Speaker 3>So do I agree, yes, they should be held up.

0:27:53.001 --> 0:27:56.401
<v Speaker 3>It is a very serious punishment, particularly to dock the pay.

0:27:56.441 --> 0:28:02.401
<v Speaker 3>But this sort of punching someone in parliament, how much

0:28:02.401 --> 0:28:03.441
<v Speaker 3>more serious does it get?

0:28:03.641 --> 0:28:04.681
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? No, good on it.

0:28:04.761 --> 0:28:07.721
<v Speaker 2>Hey, guys, I really appreciate your time this afternoon. Thank

0:28:07.761 --> 0:28:10.441
<v Speaker 2>you so much. And are you going to accept Jordan's

0:28:10.441 --> 0:28:12.361
<v Speaker 2>offered to Stuart to sit next to him at the lockup?

0:28:12.841 --> 0:28:13.721
<v Speaker 4>Look forward to hearing you.

0:28:13.801 --> 0:28:14.961
<v Speaker 5>Take to buy me beer afters.

0:28:14.961 --> 0:28:17.721
<v Speaker 2>I just minded it might need to bear during it.

0:28:18.521 --> 0:28:20.201
<v Speaker 5>I've been a number of lock ups as well, remember,

0:28:20.201 --> 0:28:22.441
<v Speaker 5>and it requires a stiff whiskey, not just a beer.

0:28:25.641 --> 0:28:26.841
<v Speaker 4>Hey, thank you so much, guys.

0:28:26.841 --> 0:28:29.241
<v Speaker 2>I really appreciate your time. That is a former police

0:28:29.241 --> 0:28:32.641
<v Speaker 2>minister Stuart Nash and the Taxpayers Union director Jordan Williams.

0:28:32.681 --> 0:28:35.081
<v Speaker 2>We're going to take your calls after this as well

0:28:35.561 --> 0:28:37.481
<v Speaker 2>on your response to with the chat. Actually, you know,

0:28:37.521 --> 0:28:40.001
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't an incredible amount of colegiality there, which is

0:28:40.081 --> 0:28:41.881
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't it be nice if politics was like that all

0:28:41.921 --> 0:28:45.001
<v Speaker 2>the time, where people express, you know, varying opinions and

0:28:45.001 --> 0:28:46.761
<v Speaker 2>then acknowledge when they agree with each other and something's

0:28:46.761 --> 0:28:48.321
<v Speaker 2>a good idea. But I guess you know, once you're

0:28:48.321 --> 0:28:51.201
<v Speaker 2>outside the house, pats things to become a bit more

0:28:51.201 --> 0:28:54.201
<v Speaker 2>civil save this lack of civility for inside parliament, don't we?

0:28:54.241 --> 0:28:55.721
<v Speaker 4>But I also want to get your take.

0:28:56.321 --> 0:28:59.961
<v Speaker 2>You will hear Stuart's strong comments and echoed there by

0:29:00.281 --> 0:29:06.481
<v Speaker 2>Jordan about the punishment there's meet to party Marie, and

0:29:06.481 --> 0:29:10.201
<v Speaker 2>I thought, actually Stuart expressed himself very well there that

0:29:10.201 --> 0:29:12.721
<v Speaker 2>this is you know how much and also Jordan's saying

0:29:12.721 --> 0:29:13.841
<v Speaker 2>how much more serious would.

0:29:13.601 --> 0:29:14.121
<v Speaker 4>It have to get?

0:29:15.641 --> 0:29:17.881
<v Speaker 2>But the other side of it is that Jerry Brownlee

0:29:18.841 --> 0:29:23.441
<v Speaker 2>is going to throw it open for debate, and it's

0:29:23.441 --> 0:29:26.601
<v Speaker 2>the potential there's open ended debate, I think, is what

0:29:26.641 --> 0:29:28.281
<v Speaker 2>he's going to allow, and that seems to me to

0:29:28.321 --> 0:29:31.321
<v Speaker 2>be a sure recipe for potential fulfillerbustering, which is just

0:29:31.561 --> 0:29:33.881
<v Speaker 2>extending things out for as long as you can. But

0:29:33.921 --> 0:29:35.641
<v Speaker 2>also you'll come in some What are you looking for

0:29:35.681 --> 0:29:37.761
<v Speaker 2>in the budget? We've got time for some talk back now.

0:29:38.001 --> 0:29:39.561
<v Speaker 2>I eight one hundred and eighty ten eighty. Will there

0:29:39.601 --> 0:29:42.041
<v Speaker 2>be any surprises? There's lots of questions around the budget.

0:29:42.041 --> 0:29:44.401
<v Speaker 2>What was your favorite to pre budget announcement, et cetera,

0:29:44.401 --> 0:29:47.361
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. We're throwing it open. It's over to you

0:29:47.481 --> 0:29:50.961
<v Speaker 2>for until we wrap up this out. Just come up

0:29:51.001 --> 0:29:53.201
<v Speaker 2>to eighteen minutes too four News Talks Your B eight

0:29:53.321 --> 0:29:54.601
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighty ten eighty.

0:29:55.561 --> 0:29:58.361
<v Speaker 1>For more from the weekend collective, Listen live to News

0:29:58.361 --> 0:30:02.041
<v Speaker 1>Talk ZEDB weekends from three pm, or follow the podcast

0:30:02.121 --> 0:30:03.041
<v Speaker 1>on iHeartRadio