WEBVTT - Janet Xuccoa: The basics of trusts

0:00:05.761 --> 0:00:09.801
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talks EDB.

0:00:10.281 --> 0:00:13.121
<v Speaker 2>And welcome back to the show. I'm Tim Beverage. This

0:00:13.281 --> 0:00:15.121
<v Speaker 2>is the Weekend Collective. By the way, if you missed her,

0:00:15.161 --> 0:00:19.641
<v Speaker 2>the conversation with Greg Pain about gadget's quite fascinating actually

0:00:19.801 --> 0:00:23.281
<v Speaker 2>because I thought that the purest form of exercise without

0:00:23.321 --> 0:00:24.841
<v Speaker 2>a gadget. But I almost feel I need to go

0:00:24.881 --> 0:00:27.561
<v Speaker 2>shopping now. But you can check any of the previous

0:00:27.601 --> 0:00:29.521
<v Speaker 2>hours that any of the hours you've missed on the

0:00:29.521 --> 0:00:31.841
<v Speaker 2>show by looking for our podcast. Just look for the

0:00:31.841 --> 0:00:35.561
<v Speaker 2>Weekend Collective on iHeartRadio or wherever you podcasts, and you

0:00:35.561 --> 0:00:37.521
<v Speaker 2>can even go to the News Talk ZB website. But

0:00:37.641 --> 0:00:40.161
<v Speaker 2>now it has time for smart money. And we've been

0:00:40.241 --> 0:00:42.561
<v Speaker 2>sort of looking at doing this for a while, but

0:00:43.641 --> 0:00:46.161
<v Speaker 2>the issue of trusts often they've come up, and I've

0:00:46.161 --> 0:00:48.201
<v Speaker 2>sort of tried to rely on my very distant memory

0:00:48.201 --> 0:00:52.161
<v Speaker 2>on trust law, which is pretty pretty pathetic. So if

0:00:52.161 --> 0:00:55.521
<v Speaker 2>you've got any questions on trusts, this is the hour

0:00:55.641 --> 0:00:58.481
<v Speaker 2>to give us a call. And joining me is She

0:00:58.641 --> 0:01:00.921
<v Speaker 2>is the managing director of the New Zealand Family Trust

0:01:01.001 --> 0:01:04.041
<v Speaker 2>Services and I've been trying to pronounce her name and

0:01:04.121 --> 0:01:06.761
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of exotic ways and I got close. But

0:01:07.601 --> 0:01:09.521
<v Speaker 2>Janet Zukoa, Hello, how.

0:01:09.401 --> 0:01:10.481
<v Speaker 3>Are you hello there?

0:01:11.521 --> 0:01:14.081
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's because it's your name is spelled z u

0:01:14.201 --> 0:01:17.441
<v Speaker 2>ccoa and I was sure it had to be a

0:01:17.961 --> 0:01:20.761
<v Speaker 2>shower or something in there. But anyways, Zaka, So you're

0:01:20.841 --> 0:01:24.681
<v Speaker 2>managing director of New Zealand Family Trust Services. What is

0:01:24.721 --> 0:01:25.521
<v Speaker 2>that organization?

0:01:25.801 --> 0:01:29.641
<v Speaker 3>Ah? Well, that organization is really New Zealand as Trustee

0:01:29.681 --> 0:01:32.481
<v Speaker 3>of Choice, so it acts as an independent trustee for

0:01:32.521 --> 0:01:35.161
<v Speaker 3>many trusts in New Zealand and it carries out all

0:01:35.201 --> 0:01:37.521
<v Speaker 3>of the administration compliance work that we have to do

0:01:37.641 --> 0:01:38.641
<v Speaker 3>now for trusts.

0:01:39.001 --> 0:01:43.441
<v Speaker 2>And how did you Okay, I'm guessing being the managing director,

0:01:43.961 --> 0:01:46.121
<v Speaker 2>you've been at the game a little while. How did

0:01:46.161 --> 0:01:48.361
<v Speaker 2>you get into trust work in the first place?

0:01:48.561 --> 0:01:50.201
<v Speaker 3>Well, if I if I tell you how many years

0:01:50.241 --> 0:01:52.561
<v Speaker 3>I've been out, no, we wade away, but we won't

0:01:52.601 --> 0:01:57.561
<v Speaker 3>be doing that but definitely definitely for for several decades.

0:01:58.201 --> 0:02:01.321
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So what made you get interested in the trust

0:02:01.361 --> 0:02:01.841
<v Speaker 2>side of things?

0:02:01.921 --> 0:02:04.121
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was a little like you. I liked equity

0:02:04.321 --> 0:02:07.521
<v Speaker 3>at law school. I enjoyed equity and I do believe

0:02:07.761 --> 0:02:12.121
<v Speaker 3>in really protecting wealth and not just for the sake

0:02:12.201 --> 0:02:15.201
<v Speaker 3>of building up assets. But when you have assets, you

0:02:15.521 --> 0:02:20.881
<v Speaker 3>have choices and options, and when you satisfied your base

0:02:21.001 --> 0:02:23.921
<v Speaker 3>level of living, you can help others if you've got assets.

0:02:24.161 --> 0:02:26.361
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and actually, when you mean protecting wealth, it's not

0:02:26.441 --> 0:02:30.281
<v Speaker 2>about protecting huge wealth necessarily. It's just any anything you've accumulated,

0:02:30.361 --> 0:02:30.561
<v Speaker 2>is it.

0:02:31.121 --> 0:02:33.201
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's right. People think that you've got to be

0:02:33.361 --> 0:02:36.121
<v Speaker 3>ultra wealthy to have trust, but that's not the case

0:02:36.121 --> 0:02:39.361
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand. Our spirit of entrepreneurship is well and

0:02:39.401 --> 0:02:41.201
<v Speaker 3>surely alive. I mean New Zealand has made up of

0:02:41.281 --> 0:02:45.281
<v Speaker 3>small and medium sized companies. They dot our landscape. And

0:02:45.321 --> 0:02:48.121
<v Speaker 3>when you're in business, that comes with a risk. And

0:02:48.201 --> 0:02:51.681
<v Speaker 3>so people that have built, you know, just to simply

0:02:51.681 --> 0:02:53.801
<v Speaker 3>fail in the home, they don't want to put that

0:02:53.841 --> 0:02:55.841
<v Speaker 3>on the line, and putting it in a trust can

0:02:55.841 --> 0:02:56.881
<v Speaker 3>help protect.

0:02:56.481 --> 0:03:01.201
<v Speaker 2>That because there are people who would see if you

0:03:01.241 --> 0:03:05.441
<v Speaker 2>are hired, not hiding, of course, but there an ethical

0:03:05.481 --> 0:03:08.361
<v Speaker 2>dimension to trusts because there will always be a headline

0:03:08.401 --> 0:03:11.841
<v Speaker 2>somewhere where someone has done some dodgy dealings, but most

0:03:11.881 --> 0:03:13.681
<v Speaker 2>of their wealth has tied up in a family trust,

0:03:13.881 --> 0:03:16.121
<v Speaker 2>which means that people who maybe have felt they've been

0:03:16.161 --> 0:03:19.881
<v Speaker 2>hard done by can't get at it is there. I

0:03:19.881 --> 0:03:21.801
<v Speaker 2>guess it doesn't mean matter, Yeah.

0:03:22.001 --> 0:03:25.801
<v Speaker 3>Deep, devious, dishonest, there's all the words that come to mind,

0:03:25.801 --> 0:03:27.761
<v Speaker 3>aren't they with when you're looking at trusts, And I

0:03:27.801 --> 0:03:30.401
<v Speaker 3>think that's care of the likes of TV and books

0:03:30.401 --> 0:03:34.361
<v Speaker 3>and Panama papers. But in New Zealand, in New Zealand

0:03:34.441 --> 0:03:38.961
<v Speaker 3>in general, in Zealand in general, we have honest, hard

0:03:39.001 --> 0:03:42.001
<v Speaker 3>working kiwis that are just trying to get ahead and

0:03:42.081 --> 0:03:45.441
<v Speaker 3>protect what, protect what they've built up, and trusts to

0:03:45.601 --> 0:03:49.321
<v Speaker 3>use as a great device for that in relation to assets,

0:03:49.321 --> 0:03:53.121
<v Speaker 3>but not just against creditor claims, You've got relationship claims too.

0:03:54.241 --> 0:03:54.401
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:03:54.521 --> 0:03:57.281
<v Speaker 2>Actually, of course people if you are well. He's an

0:03:57.321 --> 0:04:01.641
<v Speaker 2>example I guess would be if you were in another relationship,

0:04:01.761 --> 0:04:04.641
<v Speaker 2>you've got children from your previous relationship and you don't

0:04:04.641 --> 0:04:06.881
<v Speaker 2>want to relationship where you find that suddenly half your

0:04:06.881 --> 0:04:08.961
<v Speaker 2>assets are gone to this new and you want to

0:04:08.961 --> 0:04:10.321
<v Speaker 2>protect the assets for your kids.

0:04:10.721 --> 0:04:13.601
<v Speaker 3>Well, So a lot of people are entering into even

0:04:13.641 --> 0:04:16.801
<v Speaker 3>first relationships later on in life and they've built their

0:04:16.801 --> 0:04:20.041
<v Speaker 3>careers and they've got some wealth behind them. Then you've

0:04:20.081 --> 0:04:23.281
<v Speaker 3>got the second second types of relationships where they've been

0:04:23.321 --> 0:04:26.321
<v Speaker 3>through a divorce or or a split on a de

0:04:26.361 --> 0:04:28.841
<v Speaker 3>facto and they want to bring you know, they're going

0:04:28.841 --> 0:04:31.601
<v Speaker 3>to bring assets with them to that relationship and they're

0:04:31.641 --> 0:04:35.161
<v Speaker 3>happy to share what they've built up with that new person,

0:04:35.321 --> 0:04:38.121
<v Speaker 3>but they want to ring fence the assets that they

0:04:38.201 --> 0:04:41.201
<v Speaker 3>bring into the relationship for themselves and their and their children.

0:04:41.721 --> 0:04:44.641
<v Speaker 3>And trust along with a good property relationship agreement and

0:04:44.881 --> 0:04:45.241
<v Speaker 3>helps that.

0:04:45.441 --> 0:04:47.881
<v Speaker 2>Do you actually do you need both? When you so,

0:04:48.001 --> 0:04:50.601
<v Speaker 2>if you had you, if you had a family, if

0:04:50.601 --> 0:04:52.961
<v Speaker 2>you had a trust to protect your assets. You're in

0:04:53.001 --> 0:04:55.081
<v Speaker 2>a new relationship, do you need the property agreement or

0:04:55.161 --> 0:04:56.481
<v Speaker 2>does your trust do all that for you?

0:04:56.601 --> 0:04:59.721
<v Speaker 3>Well? I don't. I don't necessarily think that a trust

0:05:00.041 --> 0:05:03.241
<v Speaker 3>solely will do the job. Because we've got New Zealand

0:05:03.241 --> 0:05:05.681
<v Speaker 3>courts can see through trusts and they can you know

0:05:05.721 --> 0:05:08.601
<v Speaker 3>that they can make judgments to break trusts if they

0:05:08.641 --> 0:05:10.081
<v Speaker 3>if they think that that's necessary.

0:05:10.201 --> 0:05:13.241
<v Speaker 2>And when you say see through, the common understanding is

0:05:13.241 --> 0:05:15.841
<v Speaker 2>see through as I know what you're doing here. But

0:05:15.881 --> 0:05:18.081
<v Speaker 2>when you say c through, you mean like look through

0:05:18.081 --> 0:05:20.241
<v Speaker 2>in terms of they can say I don't care what

0:05:20.321 --> 0:05:22.521
<v Speaker 2>wall you've set up here, I'm knocking it down.

0:05:22.641 --> 0:05:24.601
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm knocking down I'm going to come through and

0:05:24.601 --> 0:05:27.081
<v Speaker 3>take the assets, and I'm going to divide the assets

0:05:27.521 --> 0:05:30.121
<v Speaker 3>in an appropriate way that they that they feel is

0:05:30.321 --> 0:05:35.161
<v Speaker 3>just so properly relationship agreements. I think every lawyer would

0:05:35.401 --> 0:05:39.281
<v Speaker 3>say properly relationship agreement as a keystone to protecting health

0:05:39.361 --> 0:05:42.241
<v Speaker 3>in the first instance. And then a trust or two helps.

0:05:42.601 --> 0:05:48.601
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so who so who needs No I'm trying to put,

0:05:49.241 --> 0:05:52.601
<v Speaker 2>at what stage do you think people should consider having

0:05:52.641 --> 0:05:55.521
<v Speaker 2>a trust? Because and how many trusts are there actually

0:05:55.561 --> 0:05:57.401
<v Speaker 2>in New Zealand you consider we've got a population of

0:05:57.441 --> 0:05:58.281
<v Speaker 2>five million people.

0:05:58.401 --> 0:06:01.481
<v Speaker 3>We don't actually have a register of trusts in New Zealand.

0:06:01.561 --> 0:06:03.561
<v Speaker 3>We do, of course when the government does you know,

0:06:03.641 --> 0:06:06.721
<v Speaker 3>statistics every sort of is it three years? That is statistics?

0:06:07.081 --> 0:06:08.361
<v Speaker 2>The census is every five years?

0:06:08.641 --> 0:06:10.881
<v Speaker 3>Five years? Okay, okay, maybe every five years then.

0:06:11.121 --> 0:06:12.561
<v Speaker 2>Four I have to google that.

0:06:12.641 --> 0:06:16.201
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, whenever they do that. Whenever they do that that activity,

0:06:16.921 --> 0:06:20.921
<v Speaker 3>trusts do come up there. Yeah, but they and so

0:06:20.921 --> 0:06:24.321
<v Speaker 3>so you do see trusts and numbers like three hundred thousand,

0:06:24.481 --> 0:06:27.281
<v Speaker 3>five hundred thousand all banded around. But we don't actually

0:06:27.321 --> 0:06:30.361
<v Speaker 3>have a register in New Zealand of trusts. It's been

0:06:30.441 --> 0:06:33.281
<v Speaker 3>mooted every now and again you hear some grumbles about it,

0:06:33.321 --> 0:06:35.321
<v Speaker 3>but hasn't come out yet, so we don't know the

0:06:35.361 --> 0:06:36.041
<v Speaker 3>exact number.

0:06:36.881 --> 0:06:39.081
<v Speaker 2>Are the what are the biggest mistakes? By the way,

0:06:39.121 --> 0:06:41.201
<v Speaker 2>it is every five years the census, my producers, just

0:06:41.281 --> 0:06:44.921
<v Speaker 2>right now? What are the Can you set up your

0:06:44.961 --> 0:06:46.121
<v Speaker 2>own trust? Can you?

0:06:46.561 --> 0:06:49.081
<v Speaker 3>Literally it would be very difficult to set up your

0:06:49.121 --> 0:06:53.041
<v Speaker 3>own trusts and unwise yeah, and definitely imprudent. Yeah, you

0:06:53.561 --> 0:06:56.241
<v Speaker 3>want to want a lawyer to set up a trust,

0:06:56.321 --> 0:06:58.961
<v Speaker 3>someone who actually understands the law and knows what they're doing.

0:06:59.001 --> 0:07:02.081
<v Speaker 3>Because trust have longevity, I mean under around you and

0:07:02.121 --> 0:07:05.481
<v Speaker 3>you act the trusts at twenty nineteen, one hundred and

0:07:05.521 --> 0:07:08.081
<v Speaker 3>twenty five years those trusts live now. Of course you

0:07:08.121 --> 0:07:10.161
<v Speaker 3>can bring them for which you can invest them earlier

0:07:10.241 --> 0:07:13.201
<v Speaker 3>than that. But trusts are for a long duration. They're

0:07:13.201 --> 0:07:15.081
<v Speaker 3>not just for today and next year.

0:07:15.281 --> 0:07:16.761
<v Speaker 2>So how is there a limit to how long a

0:07:16.801 --> 0:07:17.481
<v Speaker 2>trust can last?

0:07:17.641 --> 0:07:19.441
<v Speaker 3>It used to be eighty years, now it's one hundred

0:07:19.441 --> 0:07:20.001
<v Speaker 3>and twenty five.

0:07:21.121 --> 0:07:22.401
<v Speaker 2>How do they come up with that number?

0:07:23.001 --> 0:07:24.721
<v Speaker 3>Don't know, you'd have to ask the Low Commission that.

0:07:24.761 --> 0:07:27.001
<v Speaker 3>But if you think it through, it does make sense

0:07:27.161 --> 0:07:31.161
<v Speaker 3>because you would have this generation the parents say, and

0:07:31.201 --> 0:07:33.641
<v Speaker 3>then the children, yeah, and then maybe the grand children

0:07:33.721 --> 0:07:34.761
<v Speaker 3>and then the grand children.

0:07:34.561 --> 0:07:35.721
<v Speaker 2>Depending on how late they have.

0:07:35.881 --> 0:07:38.281
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, so you can see that a trust could be

0:07:38.361 --> 0:07:42.201
<v Speaker 3>for three or more generations, and that would that's I

0:07:42.201 --> 0:07:44.441
<v Speaker 3>suppose what they were thinking about in the back of

0:07:44.481 --> 0:07:46.521
<v Speaker 3>their minds when they chose one hundred and twenty five years.

0:07:46.681 --> 0:07:51.521
<v Speaker 2>So legally, when you set up a trust, the assets

0:07:52.361 --> 0:07:54.281
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to remember everything and I'll get it wrong,

0:07:54.361 --> 0:07:57.401
<v Speaker 2>but they belong that the trustees actually become the legal

0:07:57.441 --> 0:07:59.721
<v Speaker 2>owners of whatever you put in the trust.

0:07:59.841 --> 0:08:03.041
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so have we have some positions in the trust

0:08:03.121 --> 0:08:05.321
<v Speaker 3>and well, so first off, the people that say up

0:08:05.321 --> 0:08:09.121
<v Speaker 3>the trust, they're called the settlers, and then you have

0:08:09.201 --> 0:08:13.601
<v Speaker 3>people that appoint trustees and the tire trustees and they're

0:08:13.641 --> 0:08:17.521
<v Speaker 3>called the appointurs. And then we have the trustees. They're

0:08:17.561 --> 0:08:20.481
<v Speaker 3>the people the charge was managing the assets for the

0:08:20.481 --> 0:08:23.881
<v Speaker 3>benefit of the beneficiaries, and they're the people that benefit

0:08:24.441 --> 0:08:27.281
<v Speaker 3>from the trust. So I always I liken it in

0:08:27.361 --> 0:08:30.041
<v Speaker 3>my mind too. I don't know a bit like a

0:08:30.081 --> 0:08:34.001
<v Speaker 3>cargo ship. You've got you've got the captain of the ship, okay,

0:08:34.001 --> 0:08:36.201
<v Speaker 3>and then you've got all the passengers, and then you've

0:08:36.241 --> 0:08:38.081
<v Speaker 3>got all the assets. The cargo is sitting in the

0:08:38.081 --> 0:08:38.641
<v Speaker 3>cargo holt.

0:08:39.361 --> 0:08:42.001
<v Speaker 2>I think, what's the rules around who can be a trust?

0:08:42.321 --> 0:08:45.481
<v Speaker 2>And if you are trying to protect your own assets

0:08:45.481 --> 0:08:47.641
<v Speaker 2>for you and your family, how does it work with

0:08:48.321 --> 0:08:51.361
<v Speaker 2>you establishing a trust where you are the beneficiary?

0:08:51.481 --> 0:08:53.761
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you went all those hats, aren't you. You're like

0:08:53.841 --> 0:08:56.201
<v Speaker 3>the settler, you're setting it up. You're the appointeror who

0:08:56.201 --> 0:08:59.161
<v Speaker 3>has the ability to hire and fire trustees. You're the

0:08:59.201 --> 0:09:01.601
<v Speaker 3>trustee who's meant to be looking after the assets, and

0:09:01.641 --> 0:09:04.401
<v Speaker 3>then you're one of the beneficiaries and you can't. That

0:09:04.481 --> 0:09:06.681
<v Speaker 3>doesn't look it, does it? Yeah? I know, and it

0:09:06.761 --> 0:09:08.921
<v Speaker 3>is possible, and in fact it does happen. That is

0:09:08.921 --> 0:09:11.561
<v Speaker 3>how most of our discretionary family trusts are set up

0:09:11.561 --> 0:09:13.961
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand. And then we run into all sorts

0:09:13.961 --> 0:09:17.801
<v Speaker 3>of complications there because there are rules about self benefiting

0:09:17.921 --> 0:09:21.361
<v Speaker 3>and being prudent too, making the right decisions for the beneficiaries.

0:09:21.401 --> 0:09:24.721
<v Speaker 3>And I suppose if you're challenged, it's quite hard to say, well,

0:09:24.841 --> 0:09:27.761
<v Speaker 3>I've made a complete independent decision. I haven't thought about

0:09:28.201 --> 0:09:30.721
<v Speaker 3>haven't thought about myself at all. When you're in that

0:09:30.761 --> 0:09:34.161
<v Speaker 3>position where you're holding all of the roles. And that's

0:09:34.201 --> 0:09:37.481
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons why independent trustees are are put

0:09:37.521 --> 0:09:40.521
<v Speaker 3>into a trust arrangement because they bring some independence to

0:09:40.601 --> 0:09:41.561
<v Speaker 3>some decision making.

0:09:41.761 --> 0:09:43.921
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean if you are a trustee and a beneficiary,

0:09:44.121 --> 0:09:47.801
<v Speaker 2>but they are also a couple of independent trustees, does

0:09:47.841 --> 0:09:50.041
<v Speaker 2>that mean you might not be part of that decision

0:09:50.121 --> 0:09:51.921
<v Speaker 2>or you would still just say, look, I've been part

0:09:51.921 --> 0:09:54.641
<v Speaker 2>of a decision, but I'd supported by my independent trustees

0:09:54.761 --> 0:09:55.281
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:09:55.441 --> 0:09:59.361
<v Speaker 3>Well, at lawd decision making is unanimous unless unless the

0:09:59.401 --> 0:10:02.721
<v Speaker 3>trustees says otherwise, so they would always be part of

0:10:02.761 --> 0:10:04.641
<v Speaker 3>the decision making. But you would like to think that

0:10:04.681 --> 0:10:08.601
<v Speaker 3>the dependent trustee is well qualified and able to be

0:10:08.681 --> 0:10:11.801
<v Speaker 3>smart enough to know what's best for the beneficiaries.

0:10:11.921 --> 0:10:14.481
<v Speaker 2>So that's what you guys do. Is not New Zealand

0:10:14.521 --> 0:10:20.161
<v Speaker 2>Family Trust Services, So you provide trustees.

0:10:20.241 --> 0:10:23.721
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, first off, we will be an independent trustee for

0:10:23.801 --> 0:10:26.321
<v Speaker 3>people's trusts. And you know, under the under the New

0:10:26.361 --> 0:10:31.321
<v Speaker 3>Trust Act and and different pieces of legislation like for example,

0:10:31.361 --> 0:10:35.041
<v Speaker 3>the Amendments to the Tax Administration Act and the Income

0:10:35.081 --> 0:10:39.561
<v Speaker 3>Tax Act, trust trustees can really be held to high

0:10:39.841 --> 0:10:43.281
<v Speaker 3>high standards of behavior. They can be really liable, can

0:10:43.321 --> 0:10:43.921
<v Speaker 3>be real libil.

0:10:44.681 --> 0:10:46.721
<v Speaker 2>If you're a trustee for a trust that has not

0:10:46.841 --> 0:10:49.881
<v Speaker 2>followed its obligations through then Bengo, you're in the gun,

0:10:49.921 --> 0:10:50.201
<v Speaker 2>aren't you.

0:10:50.321 --> 0:10:53.321
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely real liability and in that your assets could

0:10:53.361 --> 0:10:58.961
<v Speaker 3>be on the line. So independent trustees they're harder to

0:10:59.001 --> 0:11:01.881
<v Speaker 3>find these days, and we have we've taken the position

0:11:02.041 --> 0:11:05.921
<v Speaker 3>where we want to be independent trustees of clients trusts.

0:11:06.401 --> 0:11:09.601
<v Speaker 3>However we do do the job right, we will make

0:11:09.641 --> 0:11:12.601
<v Speaker 3>the trust, we'll ensure that it will be compliant. We

0:11:12.721 --> 0:11:15.961
<v Speaker 3>know what I call settlers censure behavior where setlers just

0:11:16.001 --> 0:11:18.481
<v Speaker 3>want to do whatever they want to do and and

0:11:18.681 --> 0:11:20.241
<v Speaker 3>you know they're just going to have their way.

0:11:20.361 --> 0:11:23.081
<v Speaker 2>Well that's I mean, that's ideally what you'd want anyway,

0:11:23.121 --> 0:11:25.521
<v Speaker 2>if you're if you're if you are a bona fide

0:11:25.321 --> 0:11:28.521
<v Speaker 2>a news person who's got some wealth that you want

0:11:28.521 --> 0:11:31.001
<v Speaker 2>to protect and you want to look after it for

0:11:31.401 --> 0:11:34.961
<v Speaker 2>your descendants. You don't want to be left to your

0:11:34.961 --> 0:11:38.441
<v Speaker 2>own devices. You want someone like you, guys, because otherwise

0:11:38.481 --> 0:11:40.241
<v Speaker 2>the courts are going to look through your trust before

0:11:40.281 --> 0:11:41.681
<v Speaker 2>you know it and puffit's all gone.

0:11:41.881 --> 0:11:43.281
<v Speaker 3>Well they are music to my years.

0:11:43.321 --> 0:11:45.681
<v Speaker 2>But it's what's music, It's what I just said.

0:11:45.761 --> 0:11:48.961
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, because it's quite surprising. It's quite clients are

0:11:48.961 --> 0:11:51.841
<v Speaker 3>comments like, no, they're my assets. Some under us it's like, well, actually,

0:11:51.921 --> 0:11:54.001
<v Speaker 3>hang on a minute, they belong to the trust, they're

0:11:54.001 --> 0:11:54.921
<v Speaker 3>not your assets.

0:11:55.001 --> 0:11:57.881
<v Speaker 2>In fact, hell, is that quite common that people think

0:11:57.961 --> 0:11:59.521
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get a trust and they come in

0:11:59.561 --> 0:12:02.161
<v Speaker 2>and you're sitting there going, oh, we're going to have

0:12:02.161 --> 0:12:04.521
<v Speaker 2>to have one of those conversations because this is not

0:12:04.561 --> 0:12:07.281
<v Speaker 2>about hiding stuff away and just doing what you want

0:12:07.321 --> 0:12:07.801
<v Speaker 2>and avoid it.

0:12:08.121 --> 0:12:13.001
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's called settler centric behavior, and there's been a

0:12:13.001 --> 0:12:15.641
<v Speaker 3>lot of it that's gone on. And of course that's

0:12:15.721 --> 0:12:18.081
<v Speaker 3>happened in the past because there hasn't really been a

0:12:18.121 --> 0:12:20.801
<v Speaker 3>lot of scrutiny on trustees. But now under that new

0:12:20.841 --> 0:12:25.281
<v Speaker 3>piece of that new piece of legislation, trustees are subject

0:12:25.281 --> 0:12:28.841
<v Speaker 3>to high levels of scrutiny. Beneficiaries can hold them to

0:12:28.961 --> 0:12:31.401
<v Speaker 3>account much more easily than what they've ever done before.

0:12:31.961 --> 0:12:34.481
<v Speaker 3>And so you'll find a lot of independent trustees who

0:12:34.521 --> 0:12:39.121
<v Speaker 3>have been fairly passive, who haven't been who haven't wanted

0:12:39.161 --> 0:12:41.801
<v Speaker 3>to or haven't demanded to look at balance sheets every

0:12:41.841 --> 0:12:44.241
<v Speaker 3>year and sit down and hold annual trusting meetings, who

0:12:44.241 --> 0:12:46.641
<v Speaker 3>haven't don all of that they want to actually get

0:12:47.041 --> 0:12:49.081
<v Speaker 3>out of the job, out of the role, and so

0:12:50.041 --> 0:12:52.481
<v Speaker 3>trust to look around for an independent trustee. And I

0:12:52.481 --> 0:12:54.521
<v Speaker 3>guess that's where we come in. Our company comes in.

0:12:54.441 --> 0:12:57.281
<v Speaker 2>Because obviously, if you've got let's say you've got a

0:12:57.321 --> 0:13:00.361
<v Speaker 2>significant level of wealth, like many millions of dollars, then

0:13:01.001 --> 0:13:04.561
<v Speaker 2>that level of the level of asset sort of wealth,

0:13:05.961 --> 0:13:09.521
<v Speaker 2>you'd be able to have trustees where you obviously there's

0:13:09.561 --> 0:13:13.041
<v Speaker 2>time is money, and you could have a more complex

0:13:13.041 --> 0:13:16.441
<v Speaker 2>trust where you would expect the the the trustees in

0:13:16.481 --> 0:13:19.361
<v Speaker 2>your role to be hands on a lot of the time,

0:13:19.401 --> 0:13:22.481
<v Speaker 2>whereas for many people they would just want a fairly

0:13:22.561 --> 0:13:26.041
<v Speaker 2>simple arrangement where the trustee I mean, where am I going?

0:13:26.081 --> 0:13:27.121
<v Speaker 2>Where am I going with? Yes?

0:13:27.201 --> 0:13:29.281
<v Speaker 3>Where you're going with that is like, well, if it's

0:13:29.361 --> 0:13:32.081
<v Speaker 3>just if the if the trust just holds the home

0:13:32.201 --> 0:13:35.481
<v Speaker 3>and maybe a family badge, Yeah, and then they have

0:13:35.521 --> 0:13:38.561
<v Speaker 3>an independent trustee sitting alongside them. Mister and missus Smith

0:13:38.561 --> 0:13:40.681
<v Speaker 3>are the independent trustee sitting alongside them. That's going to

0:13:40.721 --> 0:13:43.281
<v Speaker 3>involve lots of costs. That's probably where you're going, mate.

0:13:43.361 --> 0:13:46.361
<v Speaker 2>I'm asking how you can avoid it being something where

0:13:46.401 --> 0:13:48.601
<v Speaker 2>it's you've got someone who's on the on the clock,

0:13:48.761 --> 0:13:50.161
<v Speaker 2>you know, several months.

0:13:49.881 --> 0:13:53.481
<v Speaker 3>Of the year, Well it would be it'd be everybother

0:13:53.601 --> 0:13:56.281
<v Speaker 3>the year because of independent trustees. Trustees, it's there all

0:13:56.321 --> 0:13:59.361
<v Speaker 3>the time, but they only they probably only access them

0:13:59.401 --> 0:14:02.561
<v Speaker 3>in a situation where there's pacificst that's like the family

0:14:02.601 --> 0:14:04.521
<v Speaker 3>home and a back probably only access them a couple

0:14:04.561 --> 0:14:07.081
<v Speaker 3>of times the year. And I don't think there is

0:14:07.121 --> 0:14:10.681
<v Speaker 3>any way to avoid the cast good professional trustees chart.

0:14:11.161 --> 0:14:11.241
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:14:11.401 --> 0:14:13.081
<v Speaker 2>I guess what I mean is there would be trusts

0:14:13.161 --> 0:14:15.081
<v Speaker 2>where the job of the trustee is going to be

0:14:15.081 --> 0:14:17.321
<v Speaker 2>more complex and more expensive. Whereas if you've got a

0:14:17.361 --> 0:14:19.401
<v Speaker 2>family batch and the family home and you shove it

0:14:19.481 --> 0:14:22.801
<v Speaker 2>in a trust. Yes, intuitively, that tells me that you're

0:14:22.801 --> 0:14:26.281
<v Speaker 2>not really going to have a huge amount of trust expenses,

0:14:26.521 --> 0:14:27.601
<v Speaker 2>would you, I don't know how.

0:14:27.601 --> 0:14:29.441
<v Speaker 3>Well you would. You still need to pay for the

0:14:29.441 --> 0:14:32.161
<v Speaker 3>independent trustee to be there, and we do take we

0:14:32.321 --> 0:14:35.921
<v Speaker 3>take insurance policies that a fair whack. We still need

0:14:35.961 --> 0:14:39.961
<v Speaker 3>to spend time meeting the trustees and considering the beneficiaries

0:14:40.041 --> 0:14:42.761
<v Speaker 3>and reviewing the assets. So you've still got to have

0:14:42.801 --> 0:14:46.281
<v Speaker 3>an annual trustee meeting. You know, you still got to

0:14:46.601 --> 0:14:49.161
<v Speaker 3>have your eye over those trust assets. The law doesn't

0:14:49.161 --> 0:14:52.881
<v Speaker 3>distinguish between assets that are only worth I don't know,

0:14:52.921 --> 0:14:56.201
<v Speaker 3>half a million tire assets worth gazillions of dollars. It's

0:14:56.241 --> 0:14:57.081
<v Speaker 3>the law, is the law?

0:14:57.321 --> 0:15:00.721
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, okay. Look, if you've got any questions on

0:15:00.841 --> 0:15:05.041
<v Speaker 2>trusts and you're or you're thinking maybe do I need one?

0:15:05.041 --> 0:15:06.641
<v Speaker 2>And now you're listening to this and you're thinking, you've

0:15:06.641 --> 0:15:09.081
<v Speaker 2>got a small business and with the way things are,

0:15:09.121 --> 0:15:12.401
<v Speaker 2>maybe you need to protect some assets. Any questions you've got,

0:15:12.441 --> 0:15:13.921
<v Speaker 2>will have a crack at it. Well, I won't have

0:15:13.961 --> 0:15:17.441
<v Speaker 2>a crack at answering them, Janet will. And by the way,

0:15:17.801 --> 0:15:20.281
<v Speaker 2>you have you've given me a copy of the You've

0:15:20.321 --> 0:15:22.681
<v Speaker 2>written a book which actually is not out yet, Janet,

0:15:22.721 --> 0:15:23.121
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:15:23.361 --> 0:15:27.321
<v Speaker 3>No, Well, it's nationwide book distributors. They have got that

0:15:27.361 --> 0:15:30.081
<v Speaker 3>book now and they will be visiting I would think

0:15:30.201 --> 0:15:33.481
<v Speaker 3>most of the bookshops in New Zealand in the next

0:15:33.841 --> 0:15:35.361
<v Speaker 3>in the next month or so. I did have a

0:15:35.361 --> 0:15:38.641
<v Speaker 3>call from from a chain of bookshops last week who'd

0:15:38.681 --> 0:15:40.641
<v Speaker 3>heard that the book was available, and I just pushed

0:15:40.681 --> 0:15:44.041
<v Speaker 3>them to nationwide book distributors, who will good on movies.

0:15:44.161 --> 0:15:47.361
<v Speaker 2>And it's called trusts one two three. But you can't

0:15:47.401 --> 0:15:50.921
<v Speaker 2>quite get it yet. Soon okay, I eight hundred eighty

0:15:50.961 --> 0:15:53.521
<v Speaker 2>ten eighty will take your texts as well. But what

0:15:53.841 --> 0:15:56.241
<v Speaker 2>any questions you've got around protecting your assets and trusts?

0:15:56.561 --> 0:15:57.841
<v Speaker 2>Then we'd love to hear from you on I eight

0:15:57.841 --> 0:15:59.881
<v Speaker 2>one hundred eighty ten and eighty text nine two nine two.

0:16:00.161 --> 0:16:03.881
<v Speaker 2>It's twenty three past five News Talk zed B. It's

0:16:03.881 --> 0:16:06.361
<v Speaker 2>welcome back to the show. This is the weekend collective

0:16:06.441 --> 0:16:08.121
<v Speaker 2>Smart Money and we're doing a bit of a special

0:16:08.161 --> 0:16:10.281
<v Speaker 2>talking about trust. If you've got any questions, we'd love

0:16:10.321 --> 0:16:11.761
<v Speaker 2>to hear from you on eight hundred and eighty ten

0:16:11.761 --> 0:16:14.401
<v Speaker 2>and eighty even if you are the beneficiary of a

0:16:14.401 --> 0:16:16.401
<v Speaker 2>trust or you want to know if there's some way

0:16:16.441 --> 0:16:20.801
<v Speaker 2>you can actually get your hands on. Actually my guest

0:16:21.001 --> 0:16:24.921
<v Speaker 2>is Janet Zukoa and she is the managing director of

0:16:24.961 --> 0:16:30.001
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand Family Trust Services. Janet, if you are a trustee,

0:16:30.161 --> 0:16:33.001
<v Speaker 2>say there's a couple of you and you are beneficiaries

0:16:33.001 --> 0:16:37.001
<v Speaker 2>of a trust, you can you if you both agree,

0:16:37.361 --> 0:16:39.681
<v Speaker 2>you can just get you can? Can you dissolve the

0:16:39.721 --> 0:16:44.281
<v Speaker 2>trust if you are the only beneficiaries? How on a second, sorry,

0:16:44.281 --> 0:16:45.961
<v Speaker 2>I'll just set your microphone. They're sorry about that.

0:16:46.321 --> 0:16:48.601
<v Speaker 3>First, or if you would have to be a beneficiary,

0:16:48.681 --> 0:16:51.841
<v Speaker 3>So that's really important, and the beneficiaries have to be

0:16:51.881 --> 0:16:55.841
<v Speaker 3>certain everybody. We have to know who all the beneficiaries are.

0:16:56.521 --> 0:16:58.481
<v Speaker 3>So if it was certain that it was just the

0:16:58.521 --> 0:17:00.801
<v Speaker 3>two of you as beneficiary.

0:17:00.401 --> 0:17:03.241
<v Speaker 2>Or three or four but whoever, well, if.

0:17:02.841 --> 0:17:06.281
<v Speaker 3>It's really certain who the beneficiaries are and the classes

0:17:06.281 --> 0:17:10.041
<v Speaker 3>are closed it's just them, it's not future children or grandchildren,

0:17:10.081 --> 0:17:12.601
<v Speaker 3>that's sort of thing, then yes, they can all mind

0:17:12.641 --> 0:17:14.801
<v Speaker 3>together and they can agree to one the trust to

0:17:14.801 --> 0:17:15.161
<v Speaker 3>an end.

0:17:15.401 --> 0:17:18.201
<v Speaker 2>Because the example would be, I guess and your parents

0:17:18.281 --> 0:17:20.201
<v Speaker 2>or your grandparents have set up a trust and there's

0:17:20.241 --> 0:17:24.841
<v Speaker 2>a maybe there's just there's three or four grandchildren, and

0:17:25.241 --> 0:17:27.481
<v Speaker 2>everyone would think that you have to sort of just

0:17:28.601 --> 0:17:31.401
<v Speaker 2>receive and come from the trust according to the terms

0:17:31.441 --> 0:17:33.401
<v Speaker 2>of it. But if you're all together and you go,

0:17:33.441 --> 0:17:35.121
<v Speaker 2>hang on a minute, do we all want to just

0:17:35.761 --> 0:17:37.721
<v Speaker 2>get hold of the assets and sell it and split

0:17:37.761 --> 0:17:39.881
<v Speaker 2>them up? You can as long as you all agree.

0:17:40.321 --> 0:17:42.721
<v Speaker 3>You've got to all agree. But a lot of the

0:17:42.761 --> 0:17:45.321
<v Speaker 3>time when a trust is brought to an end, the

0:17:45.601 --> 0:17:49.281
<v Speaker 3>assets moved from trust to trust. So let's say it's

0:17:49.321 --> 0:17:53.321
<v Speaker 3>two beneficiaries and the parents have died, and the two

0:17:53.321 --> 0:17:57.641
<v Speaker 3>beneficiaries now want the assets. The assets can be divided

0:17:57.841 --> 0:18:00.241
<v Speaker 3>equally and then to a new trust set up, and

0:18:00.281 --> 0:18:03.361
<v Speaker 3>then they move from trust to trust for the beneficiaries.

0:18:03.401 --> 0:18:05.721
<v Speaker 3>And you might do that because the beneficial have lists

0:18:05.761 --> 0:18:06.281
<v Speaker 3>of their own.

0:18:06.441 --> 0:18:08.561
<v Speaker 2>Oh so they just want to have their own They

0:18:08.561 --> 0:18:10.561
<v Speaker 2>want to split it up, but they're like, look, I

0:18:10.641 --> 0:18:13.281
<v Speaker 2>still want to protect my assets absolutely, and so is

0:18:13.321 --> 0:18:14.001
<v Speaker 2>that quite common?

0:18:14.241 --> 0:18:17.521
<v Speaker 3>Very common? And so they may have business with themselves,

0:18:17.601 --> 0:18:19.561
<v Speaker 3>they have a relationship risk.

0:18:20.681 --> 0:18:22.961
<v Speaker 2>How would it work? Say, actually, I'm just coming out

0:18:22.961 --> 0:18:26.521
<v Speaker 2>with some scenarios here to if say someone set up

0:18:26.521 --> 0:18:30.081
<v Speaker 2>a trust and let's say grandma and granddad and grandma

0:18:30.161 --> 0:18:34.041
<v Speaker 2>and granddad have passed on, and the trust is for

0:18:35.721 --> 0:18:40.961
<v Speaker 2>the kids, and ultimately when those kids are gone, their grandchildren.

0:18:42.601 --> 0:18:46.481
<v Speaker 2>If for the time being the trust is just in

0:18:46.721 --> 0:18:51.441
<v Speaker 2>the favor of the first generation, do they do all

0:18:51.481 --> 0:18:53.601
<v Speaker 2>the grandchildren have to agree at all? Or can the

0:18:53.761 --> 0:18:55.441
<v Speaker 2>you know, I forget you know how things get passed

0:18:55.481 --> 0:18:59.401
<v Speaker 2>down through the generation. So those, once those potential beneficiaries

0:18:59.401 --> 0:19:01.641
<v Speaker 2>are alive, they all have to agree. Whether they be

0:19:01.881 --> 0:19:04.121
<v Speaker 2>the first generation or the second generation or the third

0:19:04.121 --> 0:19:04.641
<v Speaker 2>they've all got.

0:19:04.561 --> 0:19:07.921
<v Speaker 3>To agree absolutely, and there could also be unborn beneficiaries.

0:19:08.721 --> 0:19:10.401
<v Speaker 3>And so that's where it gets really what.

0:19:10.321 --> 0:19:13.241
<v Speaker 2>If someone's pregnant you mean, or just imaginary, but.

0:19:13.321 --> 0:19:15.801
<v Speaker 3>They haven't they don't exist yet, Okay, So it might

0:19:15.881 --> 0:19:19.201
<v Speaker 3>be for for it might be like a bloodline trust,

0:19:19.281 --> 0:19:22.841
<v Speaker 3>and so there might be unborn beneficiaries that haven't been

0:19:22.841 --> 0:19:23.321
<v Speaker 3>born yet.

0:19:23.721 --> 0:19:24.961
<v Speaker 2>So you can't get rid of that trust.

0:19:25.041 --> 0:19:27.601
<v Speaker 3>Well, at that point you can result to the courts,

0:19:27.641 --> 0:19:29.841
<v Speaker 3>because there is sections in the new Trust Act which

0:19:29.881 --> 0:19:32.001
<v Speaker 3>allow the courts to to have a look at that

0:19:32.041 --> 0:19:34.441
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing and bring the trust to an end.

0:19:34.481 --> 0:19:35.881
<v Speaker 3>But it is a result back to.

0:19:35.881 --> 0:19:38.321
<v Speaker 2>The court that's fascinating this area of law because the

0:19:38.361 --> 0:19:40.201
<v Speaker 2>thing about law, this area of law, and we have

0:19:40.201 --> 0:19:42.201
<v Speaker 2>talked about it in the break, is while there is

0:19:42.321 --> 0:19:46.121
<v Speaker 2>legislation now that the government has drafted and passed, the

0:19:46.201 --> 0:19:48.801
<v Speaker 2>law of trust goes back. I mean how many.

0:19:48.721 --> 0:19:51.841
<v Speaker 3>How far people think that it goes back to the

0:19:51.881 --> 0:19:55.721
<v Speaker 3>Crusades times, but an actual factor goes much further back.

0:19:56.121 --> 0:20:00.241
<v Speaker 3>By the late by the late Roman Republic period, we

0:20:00.321 --> 0:20:03.361
<v Speaker 3>had trusts that we're operating well at least that a

0:20:03.401 --> 0:20:06.721
<v Speaker 3>trust type of arrangement that was reflected in the laws

0:20:06.721 --> 0:20:11.441
<v Speaker 3>of succession So trusts are thousands of years old and

0:20:11.681 --> 0:20:14.161
<v Speaker 3>I can't see them. Every now and again you get

0:20:14.161 --> 0:20:16.041
<v Speaker 3>a murmur or maybe they're going to get rid of trust?

0:20:16.121 --> 0:20:16.961
<v Speaker 3>How much?

0:20:17.241 --> 0:20:19.401
<v Speaker 2>How much has the nature of trust change? But with

0:20:19.561 --> 0:20:22.521
<v Speaker 2>the legislation, are they still essentially the same?

0:20:22.721 --> 0:20:26.121
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think at their base level they are the same.

0:20:26.601 --> 0:20:29.961
<v Speaker 3>But trust. That's one of the wonderful reasons of trust.

0:20:29.961 --> 0:20:32.961
<v Speaker 3>One of the why trusts have endured for so long,

0:20:33.041 --> 0:20:37.201
<v Speaker 3>because they respond to our varying and different socio economic

0:20:37.241 --> 0:20:39.001
<v Speaker 3>conditions and our norms and our values.

0:20:39.321 --> 0:20:41.081
<v Speaker 2>I can hear cynical people who listen to talk about

0:20:41.121 --> 0:20:43.121
<v Speaker 2>going that's because it's a great way to hide. Well,

0:20:44.081 --> 0:20:46.601
<v Speaker 2>you know, we'll protect or protect wealth, depending which way

0:20:46.641 --> 0:20:48.521
<v Speaker 2>you want to look at it. Let's take some calls. Colin,

0:20:48.961 --> 0:20:52.121
<v Speaker 2>good afternoon, Yeah, good afternoon.

0:20:53.441 --> 0:20:58.361
<v Speaker 6>Just regarding I guess tax and I understand that the

0:20:58.441 --> 0:21:00.961
<v Speaker 6>tax rate's going to be up to thirty nine percent

0:21:01.041 --> 0:21:06.201
<v Speaker 6>for all trusts. So would that mean basically, you're going

0:21:06.241 --> 0:21:12.001
<v Speaker 6>to be greater burden of tax putting your assets into

0:21:12.001 --> 0:21:15.161
<v Speaker 6>a trust compared to if you didn't, for.

0:21:15.041 --> 0:21:19.041
<v Speaker 3>Example, Well, that that is true. The trust the new

0:21:19.081 --> 0:21:22.281
<v Speaker 3>trustee taxad is thirty nine percent and that that changed

0:21:22.321 --> 0:21:25.161
<v Speaker 3>on the first of April twenty twenty four. Prior to

0:21:25.201 --> 0:21:28.441
<v Speaker 3>that worth thirty three percent. And of course, because our

0:21:28.561 --> 0:21:32.041
<v Speaker 3>individual highest marginal tax rate was thirty nine percent, you

0:21:32.081 --> 0:21:36.081
<v Speaker 3>did see money moving from companies, for example, at twenty

0:21:36.081 --> 0:21:40.401
<v Speaker 3>eight percent into you know, moving around, so that you've

0:21:40.401 --> 0:21:43.281
<v Speaker 3>got good benefits of a tax. The benefits are still

0:21:43.321 --> 0:21:48.121
<v Speaker 3>there now despite the alignment with the individual top marginal

0:21:48.201 --> 0:21:50.281
<v Speaker 3>tax rate. And I'll give you an example. Let's say

0:21:50.321 --> 0:21:53.441
<v Speaker 3>that a trust does receive dividend income from a company

0:21:54.521 --> 0:21:57.081
<v Speaker 3>and the trustees they decide that they're not going to

0:21:57.081 --> 0:21:59.921
<v Speaker 3>retain that income, they're going to actually pay it out

0:21:59.961 --> 0:22:03.961
<v Speaker 3>to beneficiaries. Well, when the beneficiaries receive the income they've got,

0:22:04.161 --> 0:22:06.601
<v Speaker 3>they've got declared that a course in their personal tax return,

0:22:06.881 --> 0:22:10.241
<v Speaker 3>and then they pay tax at their personal martinal tax rate.

0:22:10.281 --> 0:22:13.281
<v Speaker 3>And that could indeed be lower than thirty nine percent.

0:22:13.441 --> 0:22:17.201
<v Speaker 3>So there are some benefits there, possibly, possibly, But nobody

0:22:17.201 --> 0:22:20.801
<v Speaker 3>would set up a trust these days for a tax benefit. First,

0:22:20.841 --> 0:22:25.241
<v Speaker 3>it would be illegal anyway, the tax benefits are merely incidental, okay.

0:22:25.441 --> 0:22:28.361
<v Speaker 3>And then really the costs of running a trust. You

0:22:28.721 --> 0:22:32.041
<v Speaker 3>we've did mention that before on the on the cost

0:22:32.081 --> 0:22:34.881
<v Speaker 3>of running a trust. You know, they don't they don't

0:22:34.881 --> 0:22:37.321
<v Speaker 3>have to be exorbitant, but that is going to cost

0:22:37.361 --> 0:22:40.801
<v Speaker 3>you something. So people don't run around trying to save

0:22:41.881 --> 0:22:44.281
<v Speaker 3>three or four cents when they've got to incur the costs.

0:22:45.521 --> 0:22:48.081
<v Speaker 2>Any follow up their Colin, are you looking at getting

0:22:48.121 --> 0:22:49.881
<v Speaker 2>a trust or you've got one?

0:22:50.641 --> 0:22:55.121
<v Speaker 6>I've had one for a few years, and yeah, so

0:22:55.481 --> 0:22:57.921
<v Speaker 6>I just I probably need to talk to my accounts

0:22:57.961 --> 0:23:00.841
<v Speaker 6>a bit more about it as well. But you know,

0:23:00.841 --> 0:23:05.601
<v Speaker 6>I'm currently paying on my normal salury thirty nine percent

0:23:05.841 --> 0:23:06.441
<v Speaker 6>top rates.

0:23:06.561 --> 0:23:07.961
<v Speaker 3>But with.

0:23:09.881 --> 0:23:13.161
<v Speaker 6>Then I'm not earning them, will I'd be paying thirty

0:23:13.241 --> 0:23:18.681
<v Speaker 6>nine percent on the trust income to myself, even though

0:23:18.681 --> 0:23:20.041
<v Speaker 6>it might not be that much money.

0:23:21.321 --> 0:23:23.921
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think I think good account at this experience

0:23:24.001 --> 0:23:28.921
<v Speaker 3>with trusts, and maybe companies they can they can often

0:23:29.121 --> 0:23:29.721
<v Speaker 3>help you with that.

0:23:31.241 --> 0:23:35.321
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, thanks Colin. Does that get my head around this?

0:23:35.361 --> 0:23:38.841
<v Speaker 2>If you've got assets, so if you it's not really

0:23:38.881 --> 0:23:41.561
<v Speaker 2>a part of it is really that relevant what the

0:23:41.561 --> 0:23:43.961
<v Speaker 2>tax top tax rate is. If your personal tax rates

0:23:43.961 --> 0:23:46.921
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine percent, if you keep those assets in there,

0:23:46.961 --> 0:23:49.081
<v Speaker 2>any income, you're going to be paying thirty nine percent anyway,

0:23:49.121 --> 0:23:51.281
<v Speaker 2>So who cares? If you're sticking in a trust, have

0:23:51.361 --> 0:23:52.881
<v Speaker 2>I got that rights?

0:23:53.441 --> 0:23:56.081
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that would be true. But trusts are often used

0:23:56.081 --> 0:24:00.201
<v Speaker 3>in conjunction with companies. So companies pay dividends and they

0:24:00.241 --> 0:24:02.921
<v Speaker 3>may pay a dividend through to a trust. And so

0:24:03.001 --> 0:24:05.401
<v Speaker 3>of course at that point you're paying t twenty eight

0:24:05.441 --> 0:24:10.401
<v Speaker 3>percent company tax rate. To pay a dividend out, you've

0:24:10.441 --> 0:24:13.201
<v Speaker 3>got to pay that thirty three percent. So there's got

0:24:13.241 --> 0:24:15.121
<v Speaker 3>to be you know, you've got to pay an extra

0:24:15.161 --> 0:24:17.241
<v Speaker 3>top upper tax I suppose of five percent, and then

0:24:17.281 --> 0:24:20.761
<v Speaker 3>it moves into the trust and you would think, do

0:24:20.881 --> 0:24:22.641
<v Speaker 3>we have to do we now have to top it

0:24:22.721 --> 0:24:25.641
<v Speaker 3>up again to the thirty nine percent, But that depends

0:24:25.681 --> 0:24:27.561
<v Speaker 3>on whether the trust is retained the income or not.

0:24:27.681 --> 0:24:31.521
<v Speaker 3>It depends on whether the recipient's got high tax rate

0:24:31.561 --> 0:24:33.241
<v Speaker 3>as well. It might have low tax rates.

0:24:33.241 --> 0:24:36.681
<v Speaker 2>So okay, we've got lots of text. Let's see how

0:24:36.721 --> 0:24:38.641
<v Speaker 2>we can get into these questions. What's the difference between

0:24:38.681 --> 0:24:39.681
<v Speaker 2>a trust and a will?

0:24:40.601 --> 0:24:44.761
<v Speaker 3>Ah? Well, wills deal with personal assets of individuals, like

0:24:45.321 --> 0:24:49.161
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, jewelry and cars, and trusts tend to

0:24:49.721 --> 0:24:53.241
<v Speaker 3>they still hold assets. But really, when you're looking at

0:24:53.361 --> 0:24:57.041
<v Speaker 3>a trust, it's a device for holding assets for a

0:24:57.041 --> 0:25:00.041
<v Speaker 3>long time. The will doesn't really come near it. Usually

0:25:00.121 --> 0:25:02.441
<v Speaker 3>you have what's called a memorandum of bushes rather than

0:25:02.481 --> 0:25:04.561
<v Speaker 3>a will, which sets out what needs to happen when

0:25:04.561 --> 0:25:05.481
<v Speaker 3>the person dies.

0:25:05.641 --> 0:25:07.241
<v Speaker 2>Can I will establish a trust?

0:25:07.801 --> 0:25:10.361
<v Speaker 3>Yes it can, Yeah, you can. You can establish a

0:25:10.361 --> 0:25:11.641
<v Speaker 3>trust via a will.

0:25:11.721 --> 0:25:14.681
<v Speaker 2>But in general, and the person who actually administers the

0:25:14.681 --> 0:25:17.481
<v Speaker 2>will I acco't reanmyber, the executive. The executives they are

0:25:17.641 --> 0:25:19.561
<v Speaker 2>acting in a sort of position as a trustee for

0:25:19.601 --> 0:25:21.361
<v Speaker 2>the time temporarily.

0:25:20.841 --> 0:25:24.321
<v Speaker 3>Well, they are there. They're overseeing the personal distribution of

0:25:24.361 --> 0:25:27.001
<v Speaker 3>the assets and accordance with the will instructions.

0:25:27.401 --> 0:25:29.121
<v Speaker 2>How do you say set up a trust as parents

0:25:29.161 --> 0:25:31.641
<v Speaker 2>who want their children to benefit from it, but not

0:25:31.721 --> 0:25:34.201
<v Speaker 2>any partners of children if their relationships break down.

0:25:34.681 --> 0:25:37.681
<v Speaker 3>You just make sure that the children are named as

0:25:37.681 --> 0:25:41.881
<v Speaker 3>specifically yes, efectly. Yeah. And also when when you do

0:25:42.001 --> 0:25:46.001
<v Speaker 3>pay out the assets to the children, you would, you know,

0:25:46.081 --> 0:25:48.761
<v Speaker 3>you would make sure you've got the right documentation around that.

0:25:48.801 --> 0:25:51.761
<v Speaker 3>You might also do that via a trust as well.

0:25:51.841 --> 0:25:55.161
<v Speaker 3>A lot of parents these days pay pay deposits, you know,

0:25:55.201 --> 0:25:57.401
<v Speaker 3>for children to get them into houses and that sort

0:25:57.441 --> 0:25:59.201
<v Speaker 3>of thing. You need to make sure that there's plenty

0:25:59.201 --> 0:26:01.681
<v Speaker 3>of documentation around that if it's coming via the trust.

0:26:02.121 --> 0:26:05.641
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we've got the calls rolling in now it would hapen.

0:26:05.681 --> 0:26:07.481
<v Speaker 2>And since we get into these texts, one more text,

0:26:07.521 --> 0:26:10.041
<v Speaker 2>then we'll get into the cause. I think I almost

0:26:10.161 --> 0:26:11.921
<v Speaker 2>can answer have a crack at answering this myself, but

0:26:11.921 --> 0:26:13.481
<v Speaker 2>I'll hand it to you. Here we go. Hi, guys,

0:26:13.521 --> 0:26:15.761
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at I'm looking at going through a divorce.

0:26:16.641 --> 0:26:20.161
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at going through a divorce. You're anticipating a divorce? Okay,

0:26:20.521 --> 0:26:23.121
<v Speaker 2>I have moved most of my assets into a trust.

0:26:23.441 --> 0:26:26.361
<v Speaker 2>Will this protect them for the divorce? I had these

0:26:26.361 --> 0:26:29.001
<v Speaker 2>assets before meeting my wife, but I don't have a prenup.

0:26:29.681 --> 0:26:31.641
<v Speaker 2>I would say that he's in trouble.

0:26:32.121 --> 0:26:34.561
<v Speaker 3>That's from being I would say they definitely go go

0:26:34.601 --> 0:26:38.041
<v Speaker 3>talk to a lawyer. That's for sure. Moving assets into

0:26:38.081 --> 0:26:41.521
<v Speaker 3>a trust to try and avoid sharing them on a

0:26:41.561 --> 0:26:43.681
<v Speaker 3>relationship that's probably not going to.

0:26:43.801 --> 0:26:45.681
<v Speaker 4>The court's going to look through that doesn't think they're

0:26:45.721 --> 0:26:49.601
<v Speaker 4>good at Yeah, And even if the assets are in trust,

0:26:49.761 --> 0:26:53.401
<v Speaker 4>if a person's done significant work on an asset then

0:26:53.561 --> 0:26:56.801
<v Speaker 4>that's held in the trust, then the courts would likely

0:26:56.881 --> 0:26:59.281
<v Speaker 4>still award some benefit to that person.

0:26:59.681 --> 0:27:02.401
<v Speaker 2>Actually probably the answer is in matrimonial property law, really,

0:27:02.441 --> 0:27:05.001
<v Speaker 2>isn't it, Because if you have kept those assets completely

0:27:05.201 --> 0:27:07.481
<v Speaker 2>separate and they've had nothing to do there with a relationship,

0:27:07.521 --> 0:27:09.161
<v Speaker 2>then talk to a lawyer and may be able to

0:27:09.241 --> 0:27:12.241
<v Speaker 2>just that's part of the argument. But it's not going

0:27:12.321 --> 0:27:13.441
<v Speaker 2>to be argument free, is it.

0:27:13.641 --> 0:27:15.281
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's not going to be argument free. So I'll

0:27:15.281 --> 0:27:17.801
<v Speaker 3>give you an example. Let's say that the trust owned

0:27:17.841 --> 0:27:21.481
<v Speaker 3>the house well before this gentleman met his newest and dewiest,

0:27:22.041 --> 0:27:24.481
<v Speaker 3>and then the newest and dewest moves into the house

0:27:24.601 --> 0:27:27.401
<v Speaker 3>and she does substantial work on the house, maybe puts

0:27:27.481 --> 0:27:31.161
<v Speaker 3>money into the house into renovations. Then I don't think

0:27:31.361 --> 0:27:34.001
<v Speaker 3>on the dissolution he's going to be able to say

0:27:35.401 --> 0:27:38.161
<v Speaker 3>it's all mine. Okay, I think I think somewhere along

0:27:38.241 --> 0:27:38.961
<v Speaker 3>the line.

0:27:38.881 --> 0:27:40.041
<v Speaker 2>It's intermingled, isn't it.

0:27:40.081 --> 0:27:42.841
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Yeah, it's into vangled and a lawyer and a

0:27:42.921 --> 0:27:46.161
<v Speaker 3>judge is going to say, you know, Purney up in

0:27:46.241 --> 0:27:48.921
<v Speaker 3>saying that I'm not I'm not giving I'm certainly not

0:27:48.961 --> 0:27:51.001
<v Speaker 3>giving financial.

0:27:50.801 --> 0:27:53.161
<v Speaker 2>No, No, that's important we do that. Do that have

0:27:53.201 --> 0:27:55.681
<v Speaker 2>that disclaimer. There's no specific advice, but where you know

0:27:55.721 --> 0:27:58.641
<v Speaker 2>you've yeah, you need to get some good advice on that.

0:27:58.721 --> 0:28:00.601
<v Speaker 2>But it's easy. I can just remember from my legal

0:28:00.681 --> 0:28:03.081
<v Speaker 2>days that if you keep your assets separate, if you've

0:28:03.081 --> 0:28:06.721
<v Speaker 2>got a separate bank account, never used by the relationship

0:28:06.761 --> 0:28:09.441
<v Speaker 2>and it sits there separately, you've got a better chance

0:28:09.441 --> 0:28:12.681
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to keep it. Probably should have set

0:28:12.761 --> 0:28:14.641
<v Speaker 2>up the trust before the relationship though.

0:28:14.721 --> 0:28:15.281
<v Speaker 3>That's helpful.

0:28:15.361 --> 0:28:17.321
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's helpful. Right, We're going to take some calls.

0:28:17.321 --> 0:28:20.241
<v Speaker 2>In just a moment. It is twenty two minutes to

0:28:20.521 --> 0:28:23.801
<v Speaker 2>six News Talks. There'd be. My guest is Janet Zuchoa.

0:28:23.961 --> 0:28:28.001
<v Speaker 2>She is the managing director of New Zealand Family Trust Services.

0:28:28.441 --> 0:28:30.361
<v Speaker 2>Answering your questions, give us a call back in a

0:28:30.401 --> 0:28:35.921
<v Speaker 2>mow and welcome back to News Talks. Be gosh, time

0:28:35.961 --> 0:28:38.361
<v Speaker 2>flies when you're talking about this stuff. We're talking about trusts.

0:28:38.481 --> 0:28:41.521
<v Speaker 2>My guest is Janet Zucchoa. She's managing director of New

0:28:41.601 --> 0:28:44.881
<v Speaker 2>Zealand Family Trust Services. And let's get into the calls now.

0:28:44.921 --> 0:28:46.441
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have to move as quickly as we

0:28:46.441 --> 0:28:47.921
<v Speaker 2>can because time is upon us.

0:28:48.241 --> 0:28:48.481
<v Speaker 7>Ron.

0:28:48.561 --> 0:28:51.601
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Hi, here you doing good things?

0:28:52.081 --> 0:28:55.441
<v Speaker 7>What good couple of couple of quick questions. A lot

0:28:55.481 --> 0:28:59.721
<v Speaker 7>of these older family trusts have been set up where

0:28:59.881 --> 0:29:03.281
<v Speaker 7>the trustees have full discretion of how the trust is

0:29:03.561 --> 0:29:07.401
<v Speaker 7>managed and all the rest of it. As they view

0:29:07.401 --> 0:29:11.801
<v Speaker 7>a beneficiary to be a discritionary beneficiary, are they able

0:29:11.801 --> 0:29:15.121
<v Speaker 7>to withhold information about the trust and not provide it

0:29:15.161 --> 0:29:16.881
<v Speaker 7>to that beneficiary upon request?

0:29:17.121 --> 0:29:20.201
<v Speaker 3>Ah, you're moving now into the disclosure obligations under the

0:29:20.241 --> 0:29:24.961
<v Speaker 3>new Trust Act. So that's an interesting point in itself.

0:29:26.241 --> 0:29:28.441
<v Speaker 3>You used to be under the old Act. That used

0:29:28.481 --> 0:29:30.561
<v Speaker 3>to be that, you know, people didn't actually necessarily know

0:29:30.601 --> 0:29:34.041
<v Speaker 3>that they were beneficiary. So there's a duty where you know,

0:29:34.081 --> 0:29:36.201
<v Speaker 3>you can hold trustees to account, but to hold a

0:29:36.201 --> 0:29:37.841
<v Speaker 3>trustee to an account, you've got to at least know

0:29:37.841 --> 0:29:39.841
<v Speaker 3>that you're beneficiary, haven't you in the first instance.

0:29:39.921 --> 0:29:40.281
<v Speaker 8>Yes?

0:29:40.561 --> 0:29:43.801
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And so now under the new Trust Act there's

0:29:44.281 --> 0:29:49.001
<v Speaker 3>sections there which layout that disclosure to be made to

0:29:49.081 --> 0:29:53.041
<v Speaker 3>beneficiaries and factors to be taken into accounts. So I

0:29:53.081 --> 0:29:55.921
<v Speaker 3>think that most trustees that I see do in detail

0:29:56.601 --> 0:29:59.521
<v Speaker 3>tell people that they are beneficiaries. But there are provisions

0:29:59.561 --> 0:30:05.161
<v Speaker 3>also under that Act not to disclose to beneficiaries they

0:30:05.161 --> 0:30:07.721
<v Speaker 3>are indeed beneficiaries, and not to disclose information.

0:30:08.761 --> 0:30:11.321
<v Speaker 7>What about the basic information that they're required to you

0:30:11.321 --> 0:30:12.961
<v Speaker 7>know how they're mandated by that new Act.

0:30:13.201 --> 0:30:18.121
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, well, it's not necessarily strict mandate. There are

0:30:18.241 --> 0:30:20.601
<v Speaker 3>there is a provision under the Act where you can

0:30:20.961 --> 0:30:24.961
<v Speaker 3>you can with hold information and not disclose. So as

0:30:25.001 --> 0:30:27.521
<v Speaker 3>long as long as the act provisions are followed, then

0:30:27.681 --> 0:30:28.481
<v Speaker 3>I guess.

0:30:29.001 --> 0:30:32.041
<v Speaker 2>Hey, did you mention the expression of discretionary beneficiary? Run

0:30:32.241 --> 0:30:34.801
<v Speaker 2>is that what's a discretionary beneficiary.

0:30:35.081 --> 0:30:39.321
<v Speaker 3>Discretionary beneficiaries is where where they are indeed beneficiary, but

0:30:39.641 --> 0:30:42.121
<v Speaker 3>they are not entitled to anything as of right, so

0:30:42.721 --> 0:30:46.321
<v Speaker 3>the trustees and trustees have to consider them. Okay, that's

0:30:46.361 --> 0:30:50.401
<v Speaker 3>what they are entitled to be, is considered, but benefiting

0:30:50.641 --> 0:30:53.481
<v Speaker 3>is discretionary and at the discretion of the trustees.

0:30:53.601 --> 0:30:55.721
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like a family trust where Dad's set up

0:30:55.721 --> 0:30:58.561
<v Speaker 2>a trust and he and dad's trustee and decides whether

0:30:58.601 --> 0:31:00.121
<v Speaker 2>that's what he's going to give each.

0:31:00.081 --> 0:31:04.401
<v Speaker 3>Child absolutely, whereas fixed beneficiaries fex beneficiaries are actually in

0:31:05.121 --> 0:31:07.841
<v Speaker 3>the trusteed depending upon terms of the trusteed, of course,

0:31:08.081 --> 0:31:11.601
<v Speaker 3>but fixed manifesturies will be entitled to capital and income,

0:31:11.721 --> 0:31:14.041
<v Speaker 3>and that's that's usually stated for kids.

0:31:14.361 --> 0:31:16.881
<v Speaker 2>Can be so complicated. I love the idea of secret

0:31:16.881 --> 0:31:18.761
<v Speaker 2>trust where you can have a secret trust that none

0:31:18.801 --> 0:31:21.721
<v Speaker 2>of the beneficiaries know that they're and it's.

0:31:21.561 --> 0:31:25.001
<v Speaker 3>Like that was that was the old time with it not.

0:31:25.041 --> 0:31:29.001
<v Speaker 2>Now old days. Okay, hey, thanks for you call Ron Lance.

0:31:29.041 --> 0:31:34.361
<v Speaker 5>Hello, yeah, Hi. So my question is I'm thirty five

0:31:34.961 --> 0:31:38.281
<v Speaker 5>years old and I've got a free freehold house and

0:31:38.801 --> 0:31:40.681
<v Speaker 5>if I was to ever get in a relationship, it's

0:31:40.681 --> 0:31:42.881
<v Speaker 5>not currently in a trust. But would it be worth

0:31:42.961 --> 0:31:45.681
<v Speaker 5>putting in a trust purely for the purposes of protecting

0:31:45.681 --> 0:31:47.961
<v Speaker 5>it in any possible future relationships?

0:31:48.601 --> 0:31:51.841
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, So you don't really want to You don't want

0:31:52.041 --> 0:31:54.521
<v Speaker 3>the nearest and dearest to come in and it's all

0:31:54.521 --> 0:31:57.121
<v Speaker 3>fine while we're playing in the sandpit happily. But when

0:31:57.201 --> 0:31:59.321
<v Speaker 3>that done, when you know, when we're starting to fight

0:31:59.401 --> 0:32:02.001
<v Speaker 3>over the bucket and spade, then that's where things can

0:32:02.001 --> 0:32:06.121
<v Speaker 3>get kind of nasty. So trust will work with them

0:32:06.401 --> 0:32:09.121
<v Speaker 3>plenty of time behind them. So if you're going to

0:32:09.161 --> 0:32:11.561
<v Speaker 3>protect or try to protect your home, you want to

0:32:11.601 --> 0:32:15.601
<v Speaker 3>do that well in advance of a relationship. So yes, indeed,

0:32:16.281 --> 0:32:18.801
<v Speaker 3>talk to a lawyer put that. I would recommend that

0:32:18.841 --> 0:32:20.881
<v Speaker 3>it would be put into a trust. But at the

0:32:20.921 --> 0:32:25.241
<v Speaker 3>same time, when you are entering into a serious relationship,

0:32:25.441 --> 0:32:28.081
<v Speaker 3>you do need to think about a property relationship agreement,

0:32:28.481 --> 0:32:30.161
<v Speaker 3>and a good lawyer will be able to guide you

0:32:30.201 --> 0:32:30.401
<v Speaker 3>on that.

0:32:31.681 --> 0:32:31.881
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:32:32.001 --> 0:32:35.201
<v Speaker 5>Sure, Yeah, because during the ownership I think like, yeah,

0:32:35.441 --> 0:32:37.761
<v Speaker 5>I joined income would be paying for rates and insurance

0:32:37.801 --> 0:32:41.121
<v Speaker 5>and and some some of the ongoing expenses holding the house,

0:32:41.241 --> 0:32:43.401
<v Speaker 5>even though and so's and so.

0:32:43.441 --> 0:32:46.001
<v Speaker 3>That's where you where you get into murky territory, which

0:32:46.041 --> 0:32:50.121
<v Speaker 3>is why the properly relationship is the agreement is really important.

0:32:50.281 --> 0:32:53.441
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so a couple of things there. Yeah. Actually, it's

0:32:53.481 --> 0:32:55.561
<v Speaker 2>the purpose of setting up the trust there is quite

0:32:55.601 --> 0:32:57.281
<v Speaker 2>a relevant one to whether the court's going to look

0:32:57.281 --> 0:32:59.081
<v Speaker 2>through it, isn't it. So what's what's an example of

0:32:59.081 --> 0:33:02.001
<v Speaker 2>a legitimate purpose? It's that a legitimate purpose. I'm about

0:33:02.001 --> 0:33:03.641
<v Speaker 2>to get into a new relationship. We're going to bang

0:33:03.641 --> 0:33:05.881
<v Speaker 2>my house and a trust so my if it doesn't

0:33:05.881 --> 0:33:07.641
<v Speaker 2>work out, they can't get the hands on it.

0:33:08.041 --> 0:33:11.881
<v Speaker 3>That's not quite a legitimate I mean, that's that's illegitimate

0:33:11.961 --> 0:33:15.001
<v Speaker 3>or no, No, that would be quite legitimate because you

0:33:15.081 --> 0:33:17.881
<v Speaker 3>wanted to try try and protect protect the house.

0:33:17.721 --> 0:33:20.361
<v Speaker 2>As opposed to I'm setting up a new business and

0:33:20.441 --> 0:33:22.121
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go into debt a lot, and I'm

0:33:22.161 --> 0:33:25.081
<v Speaker 2>going to save the family house. That sounds dodgier.

0:33:25.961 --> 0:33:28.441
<v Speaker 3>No, well, you're trying to protect the house there. But

0:33:28.761 --> 0:33:32.481
<v Speaker 3>what wouldn't what probably wouldn't be tolerated, is you've been

0:33:32.481 --> 0:33:35.161
<v Speaker 3>in a relationship for five years with your nearest and

0:33:35.241 --> 0:33:38.601
<v Speaker 3>dearest and as that last last gentleman said, you know,

0:33:39.121 --> 0:33:42.481
<v Speaker 3>joint income is going towards the outgoings of the house,

0:33:42.521 --> 0:33:44.921
<v Speaker 3>the mortgage, the rates, the insurance, is that sort of thing,

0:33:45.281 --> 0:33:47.241
<v Speaker 3>and you decide, oh, well, I think that I'll put

0:33:47.241 --> 0:33:51.241
<v Speaker 3>this into a trust so that when I when I

0:33:51.321 --> 0:33:54.761
<v Speaker 3>leave my wife or my wife lives at the husband,

0:33:55.001 --> 0:33:56.641
<v Speaker 3>then it's all going to be mine. I mean, you're

0:33:56.961 --> 0:33:59.921
<v Speaker 3>in the relationship and that's not going to be tolerated,

0:33:59.961 --> 0:34:01.001
<v Speaker 3>I doubt by the courts.

0:34:01.161 --> 0:34:03.201
<v Speaker 2>Okay, right, let's take another court bill.

0:34:03.281 --> 0:34:09.641
<v Speaker 9>Hello, hello, I am A quick question for a discretionary trust.

0:34:09.961 --> 0:34:11.641
<v Speaker 8>Can the trustees.

0:34:11.241 --> 0:34:15.681
<v Speaker 9>Decide to use the the assets of their trust or

0:34:15.721 --> 0:34:20.961
<v Speaker 9>the money and their trust a charity that doesn't benefit

0:34:21.001 --> 0:34:21.881
<v Speaker 9>the beneficiaries.

0:34:22.481 --> 0:34:25.761
<v Speaker 3>It would depend upon the terms of the trusteed, so

0:34:25.841 --> 0:34:27.161
<v Speaker 3>you would need to look there.

0:34:27.561 --> 0:34:29.601
<v Speaker 2>So that how and you're talking about there's a trust,

0:34:30.081 --> 0:34:33.161
<v Speaker 2>there are some discretionary beneficiaries, but the person who set

0:34:33.201 --> 0:34:35.241
<v Speaker 2>up the trust or the trustees also want to give

0:34:35.241 --> 0:34:37.801
<v Speaker 2>some money to a charity which gives no benefit to anyone,

0:34:37.841 --> 0:34:41.801
<v Speaker 2>but that charity beneficiaries. That God gets complicated, doesn't it.

0:34:41.921 --> 0:34:44.561
<v Speaker 3>Well, the settler I wanted that the settler might have

0:34:44.641 --> 0:34:48.281
<v Speaker 3>wanted that to happen, and so the deed of trust

0:34:48.321 --> 0:34:51.201
<v Speaker 3>he may actually provide for the trustees to have that

0:34:51.321 --> 0:34:54.241
<v Speaker 3>power to put money into charities.

0:34:53.841 --> 0:34:56.401
<v Speaker 2>Which tells me that a trust is much more flexible

0:34:56.401 --> 0:34:58.841
<v Speaker 2>than people might imagine. Then, depending on the terms of it.

0:34:58.881 --> 0:35:01.241
<v Speaker 3>Very flexible device. That's one of the reasons why they've

0:35:01.281 --> 0:35:02.281
<v Speaker 3>endured for so long.

0:35:03.201 --> 0:35:06.601
<v Speaker 2>Any other follow up there, Billy there, Yes, it's for

0:35:06.721 --> 0:35:07.401
<v Speaker 2>some context.

0:35:07.441 --> 0:35:10.201
<v Speaker 8>It's a wide ranging Indeed, it does have the word

0:35:10.321 --> 0:35:14.841
<v Speaker 8>charity in it. The main trustee has passed away, the

0:35:15.081 --> 0:35:20.481
<v Speaker 8>leftover trustees have got They say a verbal that this

0:35:20.521 --> 0:35:23.281
<v Speaker 8>person wants to set up a trust set up a

0:35:23.361 --> 0:35:28.961
<v Speaker 8>charity at some stage. I think it doesn't necessarily mean

0:35:30.161 --> 0:35:33.561
<v Speaker 8>family trust to set up a charity, but maybe personal.

0:35:34.521 --> 0:35:39.881
<v Speaker 8>So the independent trustees have decided that they will use money.

0:35:40.601 --> 0:35:45.281
<v Speaker 3>Okay, sounds sounds like some good advices needed via lawyer

0:35:45.361 --> 0:35:45.641
<v Speaker 3>on that.

0:35:45.961 --> 0:35:50.241
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, So if you can set up, so people can

0:35:50.401 --> 0:35:52.361
<v Speaker 2>basically can set up a trust where they can still

0:35:52.401 --> 0:35:54.961
<v Speaker 2>sort of enjoy the assets, et cetera. There are some

0:35:55.041 --> 0:35:59.241
<v Speaker 2>discretionary beneficiaries, but you can still sort of do whatever

0:35:59.241 --> 0:36:02.121
<v Speaker 2>you want with the assets and the trust up to

0:36:02.161 --> 0:36:03.961
<v Speaker 2>a point if you've journ it up.

0:36:04.161 --> 0:36:07.241
<v Speaker 3>So trustees have to use the assets for the benefit

0:36:07.321 --> 0:36:08.441
<v Speaker 3>of the beneficiaries.

0:36:08.841 --> 0:36:11.281
<v Speaker 2>And also well that one.

0:36:11.761 --> 0:36:14.401
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, that's actually not using it for that. It

0:36:14.561 --> 0:36:17.521
<v Speaker 3>sounds like it's not using the money for the benefit

0:36:17.561 --> 0:36:20.241
<v Speaker 3>of the beneficiaries. But the settler may also have wanted

0:36:21.081 --> 0:36:24.001
<v Speaker 3>the trustees to be able to use money for charitable

0:36:24.081 --> 0:36:24.881
<v Speaker 3>purposes to.

0:36:25.521 --> 0:36:28.361
<v Speaker 2>Okay, are is there a limit to other purposes that

0:36:28.441 --> 0:36:32.321
<v Speaker 2>are not in favor of the beneficiaries? So, for instance,

0:36:32.321 --> 0:36:34.521
<v Speaker 2>that sounds like all charitable purpose sounds like something their

0:36:34.561 --> 0:36:36.641
<v Speaker 2>trustees might be able to do. But can they do

0:36:36.681 --> 0:36:38.761
<v Speaker 2>other things that are not in favor of the beneficiaries?

0:36:41.801 --> 0:36:44.521
<v Speaker 3>Deep question question.

0:36:45.721 --> 0:36:49.081
<v Speaker 2>With about two minutes to answer it about that We'll

0:36:49.081 --> 0:36:51.161
<v Speaker 2>come back with some more texts in just a moment.

0:36:51.481 --> 0:36:55.321
<v Speaker 2>It's ten to Sex News Talks. I'd be and welcome

0:36:55.321 --> 0:36:58.201
<v Speaker 2>back to the show. This is the weekend collector Smart Money.

0:36:58.201 --> 0:37:01.721
<v Speaker 2>My guest is Janet Zuchoa, that's x u c coo

0:37:01.921 --> 0:37:04.201
<v Speaker 2>A just for because it is a it's a new

0:37:04.241 --> 0:37:07.481
<v Speaker 2>one for me, Janet, Look, we've got one. I've selected

0:37:07.521 --> 0:37:10.761
<v Speaker 2>one text because we've only a couple of minutes. Just

0:37:10.761 --> 0:37:13.481
<v Speaker 2>a quick question. A trust house now for sale as

0:37:13.521 --> 0:37:16.761
<v Speaker 2>one of two beneficiaries, Can the trust be dissolved if

0:37:16.801 --> 0:37:20.961
<v Speaker 2>you're not happy with how trustees are dividing the sale all?

0:37:21.801 --> 0:37:25.281
<v Speaker 3>Well? Again, for a question like that, there's there's lots

0:37:25.321 --> 0:37:28.201
<v Speaker 3>of angles on that I would urge in the first

0:37:28.201 --> 0:37:32.361
<v Speaker 3>instance to sit down and have a sensible conversation with

0:37:32.561 --> 0:37:36.721
<v Speaker 3>the trustees and with the other beneficiaries. Couldn't be dissolved?

0:37:36.721 --> 0:37:38.641
<v Speaker 3>I doubt very much. It could be dissolved just on

0:37:38.641 --> 0:37:42.921
<v Speaker 3>one beneficiary, say so.

0:37:41.641 --> 0:37:44.601
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like maybe one's getting more than the other.

0:37:44.481 --> 0:37:48.401
<v Speaker 3>One, not without the course to the courts. But if

0:37:48.401 --> 0:37:52.561
<v Speaker 3>it's discretionary, well, trustees may may have the discretion on

0:37:52.641 --> 0:37:57.001
<v Speaker 3>how they deal with those cell proceeds. I wouldn't. If

0:37:57.041 --> 0:37:58.881
<v Speaker 3>I was a beneficiary and I was missing out on

0:37:58.961 --> 0:38:02.081
<v Speaker 3>something like that, then I'd definitely get a little bit

0:38:02.081 --> 0:38:03.641
<v Speaker 3>of advice and see what I could do for even

0:38:03.721 --> 0:38:04.561
<v Speaker 3>up scales in.

0:38:04.601 --> 0:38:07.841
<v Speaker 2>Terms of finding a legal advice for this sort of stuff.

0:38:07.881 --> 0:38:11.441
<v Speaker 2>You are there specific I mean, you guys are trustees

0:38:11.481 --> 0:38:12.001
<v Speaker 2>more than.

0:38:12.121 --> 0:38:16.001
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, so I would I would recommend that you

0:38:16.001 --> 0:38:18.721
<v Speaker 3>would go to a good lawyer that understands trust law.

0:38:18.881 --> 0:38:21.641
<v Speaker 3>Not all lawyers, you know, work in the spere. So

0:38:21.881 --> 0:38:24.441
<v Speaker 3>I definitely find a decent lawyer that works in the

0:38:24.441 --> 0:38:27.041
<v Speaker 3>sphere of trust law if you and.

0:38:27.001 --> 0:38:28.921
<v Speaker 2>If people are looking at setting if people are looking

0:38:28.961 --> 0:38:31.041
<v Speaker 2>at setting up a trust, I mean, would they start

0:38:31.481 --> 0:38:33.561
<v Speaker 2>Could they start with the New Zealand Family Trust Services?

0:38:33.561 --> 0:38:36.761
<v Speaker 3>You guys, yeah, before, and we don't everybody that crosses

0:38:36.801 --> 0:38:39.441
<v Speaker 3>our pathway, we don't say yes absolutely you should set

0:38:39.481 --> 0:38:41.521
<v Speaker 3>up a trust. We want to know the reasons why

0:38:41.841 --> 0:38:43.841
<v Speaker 3>and we want to want to see that that's a

0:38:44.001 --> 0:38:46.521
<v Speaker 3>sensible course of action for an individual to do, because

0:38:46.521 --> 0:38:48.801
<v Speaker 3>as I said before, it's not a five minute exercise

0:38:49.441 --> 0:38:51.321
<v Speaker 3>and you do it. Once it's set up, you do

0:38:51.441 --> 0:38:53.881
<v Speaker 3>have to actually keep the compliance up. So I want

0:38:53.881 --> 0:38:55.881
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that it's going to serve the person

0:38:56.881 --> 0:38:59.241
<v Speaker 3>for why it's being set up, for it's being set up.

0:38:59.281 --> 0:39:01.521
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, we've only scratched the surface, really now I realized.

0:39:01.561 --> 0:39:03.121
<v Speaker 2>But of course your book's going to be out at

0:39:03.121 --> 0:39:06.481
<v Speaker 2>some later on this year or early next year Trusts

0:39:06.481 --> 0:39:07.121
<v Speaker 2>one two three.

0:39:07.201 --> 0:39:08.601
<v Speaker 3>It will be in the bookshop, so I think in

0:39:08.641 --> 0:39:09.761
<v Speaker 3>the next couple of weeks.

0:39:09.721 --> 0:39:11.441
<v Speaker 2>Next couple of weeks, next couple of week week go

0:39:11.721 --> 0:39:14.401
<v Speaker 2>Trusts one two three. Hey Janets, thanks so much for

0:39:14.441 --> 0:39:16.401
<v Speaker 2>your time. Time flies when you're having fun, doesn't it.

0:39:16.481 --> 0:39:16.641
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:39:16.721 --> 0:39:17.521
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well done.

0:39:17.641 --> 0:39:18.441
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me.

0:39:18.521 --> 0:39:21.561
<v Speaker 2>We're welcome and we'll be back same time next week.

0:39:21.601 --> 0:39:24.321
<v Speaker 2>You can check out the podcast. Look for the Weekend

0:39:24.321 --> 0:39:27.681
<v Speaker 2>Collective on the News Talks website or we podcast thanks

0:39:27.681 --> 0:39:30.641
<v Speaker 2>to my producer, Tyra Roberts, and I'll look forward to

0:39:30.681 --> 0:39:33.401
<v Speaker 2>your company again, same time next week. Sunday at six

0:39:33.841 --> 0:39:35.161
<v Speaker 2>is next Evergrade Evening.

0:39:37.801 --> 0:39:40.561
<v Speaker 1>For more from the Weekend Collective, listen live to News

0:39:40.601 --> 0:39:43.681
<v Speaker 1>Talks It'd be weekends from three pm, or follow the

0:39:43.721 --> 0:39:45.281
<v Speaker 1>podcast on iHeartRadio.