1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,800 Speaker 1: A landmark decision has been handed down in the War 2 00:00:02,880 --> 00:00:07,000 Speaker 1: against gangs. Judge Peter Andrew has ruled that Headhunter's boss 3 00:00:07,080 --> 00:00:11,840 Speaker 1: Wayne Boyle must forfeit fifteen million dollars in assets. Police 4 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:15,040 Speaker 1: argued that Doyle's assets were a direct result of criminal 5 00:00:15,040 --> 00:00:17,680 Speaker 1: activity and he was, in fact the gang's president, not 6 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:21,960 Speaker 1: just your average Joe Blog's member. Police Association President Chris 7 00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:24,480 Speaker 1: Carr hills with me. Now, Chris, good morning. 8 00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:25,800 Speaker 2: Good morning, Ryan. 9 00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:29,479 Speaker 1: Hey, it's a long time to get fifteen million dollars 10 00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:30,840 Speaker 1: ten years through the courts. 11 00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's been a very long process, a lot of 12 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:37,280 Speaker 2: very hard work. But this is something police have looked 13 00:00:37,320 --> 00:00:40,200 Speaker 2: at for many, many years, and it took a change 14 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 2: in legislation to sort of enable police to be able 15 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:45,560 Speaker 2: to get to where they've got. But it's a massive result. 16 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 2: I mean, normally when police sees assets are linked to 17 00:00:48,840 --> 00:00:53,239 Speaker 2: a specific offending, some drug importation, something like that. But 18 00:00:53,320 --> 00:00:56,680 Speaker 2: this is looking at long term leadership of a gang 19 00:00:57,000 --> 00:01:00,560 Speaker 2: who is established just to commit a legal action money 20 00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:05,720 Speaker 2: and he's lost homes, he's lost the clubrooms. It's a 21 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:09,400 Speaker 2: magnificent result for police, but sends are very clear message 22 00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:11,760 Speaker 2: to gangs that their money isn't going to be safe, 23 00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:13,200 Speaker 2: but is it? 24 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:16,280 Speaker 1: Does something else need to change so that doesn't take 25 00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:18,440 Speaker 1: ten years next time, or of the changes that have 26 00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 1: already been made. Will that speed it up? Hopefully? 27 00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, this certainly needs to speed up. And I think 28 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:27,200 Speaker 2: there's some lot of lessons to be learned out of 29 00:01:27,200 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 2: this sort of prosecution. And you know it'll be appealed, 30 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:32,840 Speaker 2: We know that. But in some ways that may be 31 00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:35,679 Speaker 2: a good thing because it'll set the higher courts will 32 00:01:35,680 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 2: set the rules going forward as well, which I think 33 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:40,479 Speaker 2: will be very helpful. The judge has taken a long 34 00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:42,920 Speaker 2: time to make a very considered opinion, so I think 35 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:44,479 Speaker 2: it'll stand up in the higher court. 36 00:01:44,800 --> 00:01:48,040 Speaker 1: Ten months. He took ten months to deliberate. Do you 37 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:50,680 Speaker 1: how hard is it to prove who's in charge of 38 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:53,480 Speaker 1: a gang? I mean, is it not kind of obvious? 39 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 2: Yeah? Well, well I think with Doyle it was very obvious. 40 00:01:57,680 --> 00:01:59,880 Speaker 2: Everyone knew he was the chief. Now that was an 41 00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 2: and he was the boss of that gang. But you know, 42 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:07,320 Speaker 2: you've got to prove that to a standard of truth 43 00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:09,800 Speaker 2: beyond well in fact and the court it's on the 44 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:16,240 Speaker 2: balance probabilities. So he was a very good example of 45 00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:18,519 Speaker 2: us and it will be a lot harder for some games. 46 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 2: But I'm saying that, you know, there's ways that police 47 00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:25,600 Speaker 2: can do this now and this it's a really good 48 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:28,359 Speaker 2: example going forward. And what I like is it's not 49 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:31,760 Speaker 2: just assets that he's accumulated, you know, in recent times. 50 00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:36,480 Speaker 2: These are assets he's owned for decades. And so it's 51 00:02:36,480 --> 00:02:39,359 Speaker 2: a big landmark ruling for police and it's one that 52 00:02:39,400 --> 00:02:41,360 Speaker 2: will have some real implications going forward. 53 00:02:41,560 --> 00:02:43,800 Speaker 1: Chris, thank you for that. Chris can't help Police Association 54 00:02:43,880 --> 00:02:45,880 Speaker 1: prison and I wonder when we'll see that house on 55 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:49,920 Speaker 1: trade me For more from News Talks' b listen live 56 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:52,840 Speaker 1: on air or online, and keep our shows with you 57 00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:55,920 Speaker 1: wherever you go with our podcast on IR Radio