WEBVTT - The Epstein Files: What's behind the latest US political controversy?

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Kiota.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by The New Zealand Herald. You may

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 2>have heard something recently about the Epstein files. Nearly six

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>years after the disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 2>died in prison, he has once again become the center

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>of political controversy in the United States. It's after the

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Justice Department decided not to release more detailed records from

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the Epstein investigation, with Attorney General Pam Bondie concluding he

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>did not leave behind a so called client list. But

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>that hasn't stopped the avalanche of speculation and major MAGA

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>infighting over the apparent lack of transparency. So has that

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>been a major cover up or have we succumbed to

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 2>another kennedyesque conspiracy and there's actually nothing to see here.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Today on the Front Page, Associated Press Washington correspondent Eric

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Tucker will take us through the latest in the Epstein saga.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>First off, Eric, are you able to give us a

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit of background on this Epstein scandal?

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Sure so. Jeffrey Epstein was a very wealthy New York

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 3>financer who had connections with really significant powerful people in

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>the United States, both political figures and celebrities, and he

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 3>was arrested in twenty nineteen on sex trafficking charges. He

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 3>was basically accused of having sexual relationships with underage girls

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>at different properties. And one of the things that I

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 3>think is really captured the public's attention is that weeks

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 3>after his arrests, he was found dead in his New

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 3>York jail cell, and the authorities quickly determined that that

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 3>was a suicide. But there have been in the ensuing

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 3>years all sorts of theories and questions as to whether

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 3>or not in fact, it was a suicide, and conspiracy

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 3>theorists sprout around that, and then there have been questions

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 3>about who exactly his friends were, and who might have

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 3>traveled with him, and who might have engaged in any

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of similar activity with this miss Epstein.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>What was promised earlier this year by the Trump administration,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 2>so the.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department and the FBI had committed to releasing the

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>investigative file from the Epstein case. This is actually something

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 3>that Donald Trump, who is himself an associate of Jeffrey Epstein,

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 3>had talked about on the campaign trail, and this was

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 3>a pledge that we had heard repeatedly from Attorney General

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Pam Bondi. In February, she was asked in a Fox

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 3>News interview whether it was true that she was going

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 3>to release the quote unquote client list, and she nodded

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 3>her head and said that was sitting on her desk.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Pleasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, that really happen.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 4>It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 4>been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. I'm

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 4>reviewing JFK files, MLK files. That's all in the process

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 4>of being reviewed because that was done at the directive

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 4>of the president from all of these agencies.

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>She has since said that she was referring to the

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>entire Epstein case file as being on her desk, and

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 3>so the public over the course of several months began

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 3>to anticipate that there was likely going to be significant

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 3>revelations that were going to be released by the federal government.

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Right now. A lot of names in this case household

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>names in New Zealand. So can you tell me who

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the main characters are in this case?

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 3>So, Pam Bondi is someone who had been the attorney

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 3>General of the state of Florida. She is a Trump loyalist.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 3>She'd actually defended Donald Trump in one of his impeachment

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>cases here in the United States, and she's very close

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>to the president. Cash Battel is somebody who is a

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 3>sort of bombastic podcast presidence, former federal prosecutor. And Dan

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Bongino is a former Secret Service agent who came as

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 3>a deputy director. Now to understand the anger that's happened

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 3>in certain conservative circles and supporters of Donald Trump, is

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>important to note what these three people had said in

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>the past prior in some cases to them joining the government.

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 3>So Hash Battel and Dan Bongino, the two leaders of

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 3>the FBI, are two people who had openly promoted some

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 3>of the conspiracy theories that are really driving the narrative.

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>They had openly questioned the idea about whether Jeffrey Epstein

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 3>had been in fact murdered instead of committed suicide. They

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>had talked about a cover up in the government. So

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 3>these are people who, prior to joining the FBI, had

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 3>talked about and sort of raised the hope expectation that

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>they were going to release and going to be able

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to make public all sorts of documents, and they contributed

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I believe to the public anticipation that perhaps there had

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>been a cover of perhaps there were documents that had

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>not been yet seen, and I think the anger of

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 3>some of Donald Trump's face has to be sort of

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 3>recognized against that.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Fact, right, So were there some was where the file

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>was released recently.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 3>So the only thing that was released, the only thing

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of fairly new was a recording of Jeffrey Epstein's

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>jail cell, and the recording was meant to definitively put

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 3>to rest any suspicion about the circumstance of his death.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 3>But even that contained a missing minute that fueled conspiracy

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 3>theorists that perhaps the JUST perm was still holding on

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 3>to something that it should have released. But beyond that, though,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the JUST Department, in a two page memo last week

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 3>that's caused a lot of consternation, said it had concluded

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 3>that it wasn't going to release any other information because

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 3>he said the materials that didn't reviewed were pornographic in

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 3>nature and not fit for public consumption. There was no

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 3>public value, so they didn't release anything. And they also

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 3>said that there was no client list, so that he

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 3>didn't maintain a list of clients that didn't come upon it.

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>And again, this is something that when you think about

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the Attorney General Pambondi's earlier comments back in February, she

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 3>had sort of promoted the idea that such a client

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 3>list existed. So again we saw lots of anger after

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 3>that revelation. Right, So we.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 2>Don't know whether there is or isn't a client list.

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Everyone says that there isn't, but there may be. I mean,

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>what do you reckon, Eric.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 3>So we're still trying to report out exactly what happened.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 3>One thing I should note is that FBI and just

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 3>department investigators, many of them were pulled off of their

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 3>day jobs during the last several months to review all

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 3>sorts of records of related to the Epstein case file.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 3>So there's no question there's a lot of documentation, There's

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of paperwork. There are a lot of documents

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 3>and records and information that the public is not seeing,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 3>separate apart from whatever pornographic information the Attorney General is

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 3>talking about, and we're not seeing any of that. Now.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Is it possible as something could be released later? I

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>suppose that's possible. But President Trump has taken a really

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 3>specific stance on this. He has really sort of come

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 3>out in support of the Justice Department and their decision,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 3>and he has shut off questions about Jeffrey Epstein said

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 3>it's time to move on, time to turn the page.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>He's thrown his support fully behind Attorney General Bondie, So

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 3>he's made it clear he's done talking about as has

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 3>the Attorney General. So clearly the Just Department is really

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>trying to move forward away from this. How big of

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>a blowback is there right now in MAGA world specifically.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty big. I have to be honest. It's just

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a red line that it crosses for many people. Jeffrey

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Epstein is literally the most well known convicted pedophile and

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>modern day history. This is something that's been talked about

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>by many people serving in the administration, myself and many

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>others on the right and the left, of their needing

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to be transparency of the rich and powerful elites that

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>were in his circle while he was just one of

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the worst serial abusers of young women.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I see political figures from both sides of the aisle

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>demanding more transparency. That seems a bit unusual on this

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>side of the world. The likes of Marjorie Taylor Green

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and House Democrats agreeing on something.

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Does that happen often?

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>It does not happen often, not in this polarized climate

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>in Washington at all. And it's sort of hard, you'll explain,

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, It's easier to understand a little bit the

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 3>perspective of the Trump supporters who believed and sort of

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 3>had held the expectation that their own Justice Department, the

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 3>people who they had supported, were going to release this

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 3>information they had wanted. I think Democrats now are suspicious

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 3>as to what is in these files that the Trump

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 3>White House and the Trump US Department isn't allowing into

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 3>into the spotlight. You know. One of the things that's

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 3>worth noting is that this just department had talked a

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of this FBI in particular, had talked a lot

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>about transparency and accountability. That's been sort of those are

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 3>buzzwords from cash Hotel and Dan Bung Gino, And so

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>there are people who feel sort of let down that

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.239
<v Speaker 3>this does not an example of transparency or accountability in terms.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Of releasing the files, Like how hard would it be

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>for them to release them? I understand that there will

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>be sensitive information in but for example, here, you'd ask

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the government for something and if they don't or can't

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 2>legally tell you something, then they just black it out.

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that something similar that happens in the US, or

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 2>if they release something that has to be full transparency.

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>No, that's an outstanding question, and I think it is

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 3>certainly the norm, just as you mentioned here in the

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department, that people who are not charged, who are

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 3>not accused of wrongdoing, but whose names might surface an investigation,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 3>it is not the custom to release their names into

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the wild, and so there should presumably be a mechanism

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 3>to redact it. And again that it's a great question.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 3>We don't know why in this case they made a

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 3>decision not to release the information with black doubt or redacted,

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, big black lines through them. I suspect though,

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 3>that that would not have satiated the public desire for

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 3>more transparency and information to a release records, but not

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>have given the names. I think part of what's really

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 3>driving this is there's this sense and the suspicion that

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 3>there are all sorts of big, powerful names here, and

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 3>part of that is in fact based in the fact

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 3>that you know, celebrities and big political figures did in

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 3>fact fly on Jeffrey Epstein's plane. He was really well

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 3>known to people who are, you know, former presidents. But

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 3>again there's been no public allegation, no suspicion that anybody

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 3>other than Jeffrey Epstein and another person who was charged

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 3>a law with him, a former British socialite girlfriend named

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Glene Maxwell. Well they're the only two have ever been

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 3>accused of any sexual wrongdoings.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>People are saying that the magabase mad at Trump, but

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 2>is that actually the case or is that kind of

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>I suppose the mainstream media finding something controversial to talk about.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that the brunt of the anger is falling

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 3>on the leaders of the FBI and the Just Department.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 3>I do think there's anger at Trump, and sort of

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 3>confusion as to why Trump, who had promised on the

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 3>campaign trail to promote the release of this information, suddenly

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 3>not releasing it. So yeah, there is anger, but I

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>do think we're hearing more anger directed at Cash Betel

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 3>and Dan Bongino and Pambondi.

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Mister resident, I know you've urged people to move on,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 5>but I'm curious, why do you think your supporters in

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 5>particular have been so interested in the Epstein story and

0:11:58.440 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 5>so upset about how it's been handled.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 6>Do you think that is why they would be so interested?

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 6>And he's dead for a long time. He was never

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 6>a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 6>what the interest or what the fascination is. I really

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 6>don't have the credible information has been given. Don't forget

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 6>we went through years of the follow which hunted all

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 6>of the different things, the Steele dossier, which was all faked.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 6>All that information is made. But I don't understand why

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 6>the Jeffrey Epste case would be of interest to anybody.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 6>It's pretty boring stuff.

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that this will have a lasting effect

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>on Trump's legacy? I suppose, But he is quite quick

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 2>to sweep things under the carpet, isn't he.

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to say, you know, the news cycle in

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 3>the United States moves very quickly these days. I think

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 3>there's no question that the Epstein story has had staying power,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 3>though it's captured the public's attention for years in some ways,

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>and this is sort of an example of what has

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 3>happened when people who have promoted kind of frankly conspiracy

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 3>theories and uncorroborated thoughts prior to arrival, and government are

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 3>now suddenly in the positions of power where they can

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 3>deliver on those pledges to you know, dismantle the deep

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 3>state or unlock the secrets of the deep state, And

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 3>so that anger has sort of built up in surfaced,

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>and the story has had legs.

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I suppose it has all of the makings of a

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 2>really good conspiracy theory, doesn't it. It's got famous names,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 2>it's got you know, as soon as all those flight

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 2>logs came out, people were searching the Internet for photos

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>of them at parties. And it's got all of that.

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 2>It's got the secrecy, it's got the mysteriousness. And like

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 2>you said as well, those people who were pushing that

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy theory now actually getting into power. Do you think

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 2>it's now been a case that they've gotten in to

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>the FBI, I say, and realized that it's not as

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 2>easy as to release information as one may have thought legally.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely true. I think there's there's no question about that.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things that I think we haven't

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 3>talked about this's worth noting, is that the two leaders

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 3>of the FBI were very quick, I think, being able

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>to correctly see around the corner. They use different interview appearances,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, over the course of really frankly weeks to

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 3>tell people, Hey, I know you may think that Jeffrey

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Epstein was murdered, but we've seen the video ourselves. He

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 3>committed suicide. There's no doubt. And so I think that

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 3>was their early signal of sort of frankly a recognition

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 3>that some of the things they had said or sort

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 3>of foreshadowed or forecasts weren't going to come to pass.

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>But there's no question, as you said, that it's proven

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 3>difficult for people who are now empowered to make good

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 3>on some of those pledges.

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, what should the public expect next?

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 3>We're all sort of waiting to see. There was a

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 3>blow up at the White House last week between Pambondi,

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>the Attorney General, and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino. He

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 3>actually was reported to have not come to work on

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Friday to sort of contemplate his fate, and people close

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 3>to him said that he was considering resigning. But he's

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 3>apparently back at work, so we're waiting to see how

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 3>that shakes out. But obviously this has delta blood of

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>the relationship that he has had with his boss. Pam Bondi.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's gonna be one dynamic to watch. There are

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 3>other people on sort of far right conservative internet personalities

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and public figures who have posted online without any corroboration.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 3>They have spoken to their sources who say the Justice

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Department is poised to rethink its position and that more

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 3>information could be disclosed in the coming weeks. We have

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 3>no indication that's true, though, and the Just Department is

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 3>preparing to walk to go back on his earlier position.

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>We have no reason to think that that's true. But

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 3>it's again anticipated, building anticipation.

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 2>It's been six years since Jeffrey Epstein died. Do you

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 2>reckon this will be the last that we hear about him?

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Or is this turning into a kind of JFK? Is

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the moon landing real situation? Are we still going to

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>be talking about this in like five decades time?

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Only that Trump administration hopes that this story's over. The

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Attorney General appear in an unrelated news conference today she

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 3>want to take any questions about her that I'm not talking

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 3>about Jeffrey Epstein. President Trump has said we're done talking

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 3>about him. Died six years ago, as you mentioned, so

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 3>you know it's hard to say whether this will have

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 3>that same kind of staying power, but there's no question

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>that Trump administration is really working hard to turn the

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 3>page and I don't want to face any more questions

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 3>about this. Thanks for joining us, Eric, Oh, thank you,

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 3>great conversation. Appreciate it.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 2>can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 2>at enzidherld dot co dot nz. The Front Page is

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.719
<v Speaker 2>produced by Ethan Siles and Richard Martin, who is also

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 2>our editor. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to the Front Page

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 2>in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.