1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,040 Speaker 1: We've got movement into the construction sector to tell you 2 00:00:02,040 --> 00:00:05,920 Speaker 1: about this morning as well. Overall, our insulation requirements going 3 00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:07,920 Speaker 1: to change. What we're doing is a whole of house 4 00:00:07,960 --> 00:00:11,760 Speaker 1: approach and that allows more flexibility into potential saving it. 5 00:00:11,880 --> 00:00:14,040 Speaker 1: They say fifteen thousand dollars off a new build. So 6 00:00:14,240 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 1: Julian Laser is the chief executive of the Building Industry 7 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:17,919 Speaker 1: Federation and he's with us. 8 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:20,079 Speaker 2: Julian morning, Good morning, Mike. 9 00:00:20,320 --> 00:00:24,200 Speaker 1: The schedule method doesn't allow for design trade offs. I 10 00:00:24,239 --> 00:00:26,000 Speaker 1: read in the early hours of this morning. What does 11 00:00:26,040 --> 00:00:26,400 Speaker 1: that mean? 12 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:29,720 Speaker 2: Well, look at the one size fits all. So basically 13 00:00:29,760 --> 00:00:32,600 Speaker 2: what that is, it's a straight jacket. It forces you 14 00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,400 Speaker 2: to use an exact amount of insulation depending on what 15 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:39,159 Speaker 2: zone that we live in. But it means it's more 16 00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:41,960 Speaker 2: expensive and potentially over the top. So doing away with 17 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 2: it and relying on the calculation modeling methods means that 18 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:48,479 Speaker 2: we're going to have a lot more flex so designers 19 00:00:48,479 --> 00:00:53,319 Speaker 2: can use a bigger range of materials, which ultimately will 20 00:00:53,320 --> 00:00:54,160 Speaker 2: bring costs down. 21 00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:57,000 Speaker 1: Okay, so if you do the right thing by the 22 00:00:57,080 --> 00:01:00,080 Speaker 1: end of it, you'll get there. As opposed to it 23 00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:02,640 Speaker 1: is super prescriptive currently, is what we're saying. 24 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:06,400 Speaker 2: Yes, I mean the schedule method though, to be fair, 25 00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:09,039 Speaker 2: it's simpler to use. You know, there's a simple table, 26 00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:11,039 Speaker 2: so you and I could look at that and understand it. 27 00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:16,640 Speaker 2: MB could have adjusted the minimum our values and so 28 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:18,679 Speaker 2: that the schedule method would have still come out with 29 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:22,679 Speaker 2: the same outcome. This way, though, means that ultimately you 30 00:01:22,680 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 2: you probably do have to depend on a designer or 31 00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:28,600 Speaker 2: an expert to help you do the final calculations. But 32 00:01:29,200 --> 00:01:32,720 Speaker 2: there's a lot more flex and that's the key. 33 00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:35,399 Speaker 1: Does that explain the twelve months sector transition? Do we 34 00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:37,959 Speaker 1: need a twelve month transition? Is it because of that 35 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 1: complexity you've just outlined? 36 00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:42,880 Speaker 2: Yes, it is, And look, some of the industry wanted longer. 37 00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:45,640 Speaker 2: I think twelve months will be long enough just so 38 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:51,360 Speaker 2: people can adjust themselves to the having to do the 39 00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:52,200 Speaker 2: slightly differently. 40 00:01:52,960 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 1: It's definitely enough time good And does the fifteen thousand 41 00:01:56,680 --> 00:01:58,720 Speaker 1: per house on average sound about right to you? Because 42 00:01:58,720 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 1: that's a decent chunk. 43 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:04,080 Speaker 2: There's a decent chunk. Look, I think time will tell. 44 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 2: I think that the majority of residential dwellings is probably 45 00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:11,520 Speaker 2: going to be the cost difference around a little bit 46 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:15,600 Speaker 2: more modestly to say four to five K, but potentially 47 00:02:15,639 --> 00:02:16,399 Speaker 2: up to fifteen. 48 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:18,240 Speaker 1: Okay, good to talk to you. You have a good 49 00:02:18,280 --> 00:02:21,920 Speaker 1: weekend as well, Julian Lace four to five K versus fifteen. 50 00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:23,480 Speaker 1: Have to talk to Chris Pink next time I have 51 00:02:23,560 --> 00:02:26,239 Speaker 1: him on the program. You're inflating the old numbers, Christopher. 52 00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:29,600 Speaker 1: For more from the Mi Casking Breakfast, listen live to 53 00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:32,760 Speaker 1: news talks. It'd be from six am weekdays, or follow 54 00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:34,359 Speaker 1: the podcast on iHeartRadio.