WEBVTT - 'Power prices are the real headline': Why 3% inflation feels worse

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Kiota.

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. Inflation has

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 2>risen even further. The latest stats and Z figures show

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 2>inflation reached three percent in the year to September. Economists

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>had it tipped to hit the top end of the

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Reserve Bank's target band of between one and three percent,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>but some say the period of circa three percent.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Could be short lived.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, labor has broken its silence on

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>what it thinks will help the economy today on the

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>front page, ends ed Herald Business Editor at Large Liam

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>dan Is with us to break down what all of

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>this means for you and your wallet. So, Liam, the

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 2>consumers price index increased three percent in the twelve months

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>to September. What has contributed to this increase?

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so well, a few really basic things actually that

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>will make have made it feel like it's a lot

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 3>worse than three percent. So power prices is the real headline.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.839
<v Speaker 3>Eleven point three percent I think for the annual rate.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 3>That was the highest annual increase we've had in New

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Zealand since nineteen eighty nine, so thirty six years. So

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 3>that people really felt that. I mean, bear in mind

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that we've been through this. This is stuff that we've

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 3>already had the headlines of people complaining about the power

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 3>prices and we're just now counting the costs. But we

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>had rates up eight point eight percent across the board roughly,

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>and they tend to get counted once a year in

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 3>the September quarter, so that's when we see them contribute.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>They're actually were up.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 3>Twelve something twelve percent the year earlier, but that's still

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot. It's still a high increase. And food prices,

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I think we're up four point six percent for the year,

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 3>so that's still ahead of the three percent. People obviously

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 3>have been feeling that with dairy prices, butter beef, some

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 3>of those things that are getting good export dollars for

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand but are making it painful for shoppers and

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 3>for consumers in the short term. So when you look

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 3>at those three things, they're sort of unavoidable basics for

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people, especially the power and the food,

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and so yeah, that is a problem, but also it's

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of seen by the Reserve Bank is sort of

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>a shorter term thing. So I think that three percent

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 3>number has landed where it was largely expected to be

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>and shouldn't cause too much problem for the Reserve Bank

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 3>for those looking to hopefully see another interest rate cut.

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I saw economists were kind of across

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the board saying it was going to reach that top

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 2>end of the higher bracket that the Reserve wants to

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of keep it into. Are you surprised that it's

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.279
<v Speaker 2>not over three percent, to be honest.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it could have been. I mean.

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is, you know, those power prices. We

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 3>had a high wholesale price, there was weather conditions, but

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>we also had a thing that comes through. They do

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 3>a sort of a regulated price increase based on power

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 3>distribution costs and that comes through every five years. So

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 3>that's another one often there. So there's a reasonable you know,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 3>there's a bit of an increase in tradable inflation, what

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>they call tradable inflation, which is those things that we

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 3>don't have much control over in the economy, food and

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>power and stuff, but non tradable which is in the

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>core of the economy, services, wages, what we're paying each other,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>that is coming down. I mean, that's always a little

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 3>bit higher anyway, but it is coming down quite sharply

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 3>because the economy has been in such bad shape. So

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I think economists could see that the things that push

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>prices down, recessionary forces that push prices down are sort

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 3>of happening. So I would say they're fairly confident that

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>this will be the peak of this cycle of inflation.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>In terms of how much aren't inflation is imported versus

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>domestically generated. What we would you say.

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 3>To that, Well, that that is that split non tradable

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>and tradeable. So non tradable inflation tends to run a

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 3>bit higher, but that is coming off tradeable inflation, the

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 3>important inflation. We've had a pretty good year last year

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 3>on that, and that's come back with the food prices

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and things, and so I think, but that some of

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 3>that tradeable inflation. I know we've got to be careful

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 3>because we tried to look through it after COVID and

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>it all exploded with inflation keeping on going and going.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 3>But generally the Reserve Bank does look through that a

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>bit more because those are those international prices that are volatile.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Petrols and obvious one, but food, cobodity prices and some

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 3>of those other imports and things. They go up and

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 3>down a lot, and it would include power prices, and

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>that is some means that the Reserve Bank can ignore

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 3>those to some extent and it focuses on something called

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 3>core inflation, which is a measure of inflation where the

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 3>extremes cut off and looking at what it's how it's

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 3>tracking over the long term or medium to long term,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and they'll be more comfortable with.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 2>That, right, so the Reserve Bank doesn't seem too spooked

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>over there. Should we see another OCR cut next month?

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we should.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I think we probably will, whether that's it, and you know,

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>if the economy, you know, continues to sort of struggle

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to get going and the recovery hasn't hasn't taken off,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 3>we might Some economists see some risk of another cut

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe in February, or that the Reserve Bank might do

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 3>fifty basis points in November, but.

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I think there are some signs that it's things are

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 3>starting to turn. A lot of the bad news is

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 3>in the rear vision mirror. It's just the way we

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 3>collect data, so we're seeing it at the tail end.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, unemployment will rise probably in the next lot

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 3>of stats, and it will be ugly as well, so

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>you know it's a line call. But the Reserve Bank's

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 3>primary job now single mandate, is to look at inflation.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>So I think probably one more cut and done, and

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 3>they should probably signal to New Zealanders that they feel

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 3>they're done, because that will encourage New Zealanders to lock

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 3>in their interest rates and actually take some of the

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 3>savings and we can all move forward a bit.

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, inflation is at three percent, it's within the band

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 4>of the Reserve Bank. Under labor it was at seven

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 4>point three percent, So we have broad inflation down and

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 4>just under eighty months or eighty months two years, and

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 4>that's making a big difference if you care about working

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 4>people and who are doing it really tough. You actually

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 4>met an economy well, and you make sure you get

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>spending under controls, so you get inflation under controls, so

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 4>you get interest rates down. That's exactly the path that

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 4>we've been putting in place. So yeah, they wreck the economy.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's be clear.

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 4>They just spent more, tax more, borrowed more, and they'll

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 4>continue to do more of that going forward. But that

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 4>is what caused the pain and suffering that New Zealanders

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 4>are experiencing up and down this country.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 2>When everyday New Zealand is here that inflation is at

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>the top of the target range, what does that actually

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>mean for them day to day.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's all about those basics, the food and power, rents,

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 3>I mean, rents was actually quite promising. Rents had dropped

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 3>to two point six percent annual increase and if you

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>look at it what's happening month or month, it's really

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 3>almost flat to zero. There are parts of the country

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 3>where rents will be coming down, so that's moving with

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the property market and with mortgage rates coming down and

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 3>house prices being subdued. But yeah, I think the trouble

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 3>is for New Zealanders who spend most of their income

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to live, they feel inflation a lot more acutely.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you're if you've.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Got a lot of money and you've got a lot

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>of discretion around you know, most of your spending and

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 3>your core living expenses are only thirty forty fifty percent

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 3>of your total income, then it doesn't matter if it

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>goes up three percent or five percent. You've still got

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 3>all this discretion at the top end. But if you're

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 3>spending all your money on living, and particularly if those

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>basics have gone up by more than three percent, you know,

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>you feel it completely. You feel all the inflation, and

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 3>so it hurts poorer people harder. And look, I think

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 3>New Zealanders more or less didn't really get over the

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 3>inflation shop post COVID. We moved pretty quickly into a

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 3>period of higher dairy prices and meat prices and things.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, when you hear New Zealander is

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 3>talking about it, a lot of people still feel like

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 3>we've just had this one long cost of living crisis.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the Reserve Bank's current approach strikes the

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 2>right balance between controlling inflation but then also supporting growth.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so.

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's an argument that they've been a bit

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 3>slow to get interest rates down. The difficulty is they

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 3>do have a single mandate. They've got a single target.

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 3>The government changed that they used to have a target

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 3>that have a mandate that said you should weigh up

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 3>unemployment and inflation and consider those things. I mean, all

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 3>central banks will consider the big picture. But then if

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 3>your number one job is inflation, you can't take the

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 3>risk that it goes above three percent and becomes embedded

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 3>and gets hard.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's hard to.

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Get down and I think central banks around the world

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 3>are a little bit feeling a little bit shell shopped

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 3>after the inflation that we had post COVID when it

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 3>got up to seven nine percent and all that stuff,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and it got away on us, and they do not

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>want to have to go through that kind of cycle

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 3>again where we're having to sort of do things to

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 3>get on top of inflation. So they just had to

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 3>be a bit cautious, unfortunately, and they couldn't just sort

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>of slash and burn. But it's looking I think, despite

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 3>this number, in some ways, it's looking a bit safer

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 3>for them.

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 2>You're always so optimistic, though you always try and stay optimistic.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, realistically, is twenty twenty six going to be

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>better or are we still riding the wave up into

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the end of twenty twenty six twenty and then entering

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty seven.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Well it gets a bit painful, actually, because I try

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 3>to be optimistic, but it's just taking so long.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Even this ra all's going to preak.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you know you'll see my columns will swing

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 3>between pessimism and optimism. But I think it is the

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 3>conditions are all in place. Interest rates are low enough

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 3>now to start stimulating the economy. There is all that

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>export money coming in from the dairy industry, the meat industry,

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Kiwi fruit, even tourism is starting to pick up a bit.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of almost back at pre COVID levels, which

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 3>was a you know, a pretty good earner for the country.

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 3>So those things really ought to shift the economy. There's

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 3>a big deficit in confidence, you know, people are businesses

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 3>are ware of investing, people are shell shocked.

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately, the lagging statistics are things like the jobs, labor

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 3>market liquidations. You know, you're going to still see negative headlines,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 3>You're going to see more liquidations of businesses.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, you're going.

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 3>To see more layoffs and rising unemployment, and that will

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 3>sort of keep a dampner on things probably into twenty

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty six, just because we won't get statistics you know,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>through for the well if unemployment peaks early next year,

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 3>we won't see those statistics till the middle of next year.

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's really what's you know, the cost

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 3>of living is one stress, and then the other one

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 3>is people not being secure in their jobs, and so

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 3>people need to be secure in their jobs to start

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 3>spending because the money coming back through lower mortgage rates,

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 3>is going into savings and paying down mortgage while people

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>are worry that their earnings might not be around where

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 3>they want them. So it's a slow thing to get

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 3>the momentum rolling and get the confidence back.

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think it will happen.

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 5>As a parent with two young kids, I worry a

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 5>lot about what kind of future they are going to

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 5>inherit from us. Unemployment's going up, inflation is going back

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 5>up again. More and more New Zealanders are simply giving

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 5>up and leaving the country while our economy shrinks, businesses close,

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 5>and opportunities seem to be disappearing. We need to turn

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 5>that around. We need to create a future that young

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 5>New Zealanders will want to be part of. A reason

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 5>for our young New Zealanders to come home after their OI,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 5>a reason for them to stay in New Zealand because

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 5>they know they can get good, well paid jobs that

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 5>will create the sort of opportunities that they deserve.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, So the Labor Party has announced to this

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand Future Fund, which it is calling its plan

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 2>to back New Zealand's potential and create secure, well paid

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>jobs across the country. It'll do that by investing in

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand infrastructure and businesses, lift productivity and reinvest by

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 2>seeding capital from a number of Crown assets, independent governance

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>of that and protecting core assets from privatization.

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Not a small task, No, yeah, I mean it's a

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a big concept. It's a concept that's not new

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 3>in a way. I mean, it's like, it's interesting. This

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>is their first bit of economic policy that they put

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 3>out and it's how I described This is going to

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 3>be administered by the New Zealand Superfund, which has got

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, billions of billions of dollars and invests wisely

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 3>and sensibly around the world and in New Zealand, but

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't want to go crazy in New Zealand because it

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>has to have a balanced portfolio and keep making money.

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 3>But I think that Labour's pitching this these are my words,

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 3>is a kind of a side hustle for the Superfund,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 3>so that the Superfund would have a sort of like

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 3>a if you think of a big money manager, a

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 3>big fund having a boutique fund off to the side

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>that is very specifically for New Zealand businesses that's smart innovation,

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>probably tech, but it doesn't specify that exactly. It could

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 3>be for infrastructure and so much more of a New

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Zealand and kind of focus, and you sort of spin

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>that off to the side. You have it managed by

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 3>the superfund. You know, they look at countries like Singapore

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 3>do it and they've been very successful and have you know,

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars worth of assets. So it's possible that

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>what you could you the goal is that you actually

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 3>make money because you're investing in these companies and taking

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 3>a stake as well as providing capital and support for

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 3>them to get going and boost the New Zealand economy.

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>The critics will say, and there'll be a hard criticism

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>from say the act Party and because they see that

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>as government's picking winners and they look at the failures

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 3>over time of governments doing that and sometimes governments get

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 3>it wrong. Why is the government trying to pick one

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 3>company over another and decide which one. Well, mon't be

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 3>the politicians, it'll be a board of investors as part

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>of a state fund. But yeah, that's sort of ideologically

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 3>opposed to that. It would sit quite well with the

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>way New Zealand first looks at the world in terms

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 3>of a state controlled investment is sort of a mixed model.

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 3>It's capitalism, but it's you know, with a state involvement

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 3>in capitalism.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was going to.

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Say, the vibe really does give New Zealand first, not

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the party, but putting New Zealand first, right, Winston would

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>quite like.

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think that'll work.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, in fact, even National could probably cope with

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 3>this kind of policy if it didn't have to have

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 3>act as a side partner. Because you hear Christopher Luxen

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 3>talk about countries like Singapore and Ireland. You know, all

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 3>these countries that have accelerated their growth with investment and innovation,

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 3>and Singapore is a classic example of one where they

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 3>really they save money and they put money back into

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 3>their own economy and their own tech companies and startups.

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 3>And you know, dare I say, it's kind of a

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's not the communist Chinese, but it's a

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 3>very modern China does it very intensely as well. Modern

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 3>modern Chinese economy is very focused on picking winners special

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 3>zones where they build industry up and they put government

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 3>money into it. And it's it's a kind of a

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of mixed model capitalism with the state involved. I mean, yeah,

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 3>this isn't a sort of a revolutionize the whole economy.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a very specific fund. I guess you know, it's

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 3>it's something that could work, and you leverage off the

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>superfund which has got this infrastructure for investment. So you

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 3>keep it very market focused and keep the disciplines there

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that you're you're not just throwing money

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 3>at things, you're actually investing things in things that will

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 3>deliver a return. It's it's a high risk, higher risk

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 3>area of investment once you get in the closer you

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 3>get to seed funding. You know, it's like venture capital,

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and you're you're you're investing in companies at a very

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 3>early stage, so there's a higher rate of failure. But

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 3>when one takes off and really does well, like literally

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 3>takes off like a rocket lab or going to say,

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 3>it can go on to be worth billions. So so

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 3>you know that the private investors that do that tend

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 3>to have a large portfolio. You need to sort of

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe invest fifty things and if one or two of

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 3>them take off, you'll actually make your money back because

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 3>you've structured things in a very clever way. And that's

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 3>what this would need to do. It would need to

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 3>be very focused on sort of market disciplines and have

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 3>a really good investment.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Team.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 3>And it's a good idea. I mean, I think that's

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 3>something that.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's something that we've looked to Australia. Australia uses

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the super Fun in much more diverse ways than we do, right,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's something that economists have been in toying with

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 2>for years.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Labors mentioned the Ossie version and how they

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 3>do it, and they've talked also about pushing the New

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Zealand super Fun to do a bit more infrastructure and

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 3>some of those things. And it does do a decent chunk,

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 3>but its primary job is to earn money for our

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 3>retirement savings, so it has to say a bit more

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 3>balanced and this is probably a way to sort of

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 3>silo out.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>This more sort of New Zealand focused.

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Innovative end steps. Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, So I mean promising.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean I could, as I say, it's something that

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 3>could be a bipartisan thing. Act would hate it, so

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine national getting on board with it. But

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 3>I could imagine somewhere down the line if a Labor

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 3>government introduced this, it wouldn't be removed.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Put it that way.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, Hopkins has said that Luxe and I quote has

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 2>no plan for our economy and that he is relying

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 2>on house prices, the Reserve Bank and foreign investors to

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 2>turn everything around. What do you make of that statement.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's sort of a plan.

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 3>The foreign you know, the foreign investment thing is part

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 3>of the plan that they are trying to so I think,

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, to be fair to luxel and that there

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 3>is he would argue that there's very much a plan.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 3>They want to get the New Zealand economy into good

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 3>shape by dealing with some of the first issues, making

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 3>it a safe, stable place to invest and then get

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 3>out and a tract foreign investment. So they believe that

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>foreign investment can really do a lot of the job

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 3>that I guess they was talking about with this, and

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 3>there is a way to do it.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the way Ireland's done it.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 3>So you probably could just about go, well, there's a

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Singapore model and there's an Irish model. This government hasn't

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 3>got the money to quite do a full Irish model

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 3>because it involves cutting taxes for foreign investors, but it's

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 3>definitely trying to make it New Zealand more attractive for

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 3>foreign investment. They you know, I think it's a bit

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 3>unfair to say they're just relying on house prices because

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 3>you listen to Chris Bishop, he's sticking to his guns

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 3>that the flat to falling house prices are a good thing.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 3>So look, the reality is house prices come back. It

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 3>probably helps the economy and helps the government. But I

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 3>don't think they're pushing that too hard. I mean, they've

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 3>been prepared to wear a fairly big downturn, so you know, look,

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 3>is there enough of a plan? Well, that's highly debatable,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 3>but I think some of that was rhetoric from Chris Hipkins.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us, Liam Jeers. That's it for this

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 2>episode of The Front Page. You can read more about

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 2>today's stories and extensive news coverage at enzidherld dot co

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 2>dot nz. The Front Page is produced by Jane Ye

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and Richard Martin, who is also our editor. I'm Chelsea Daniels.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the Front Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow for another look

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 2>behind the headlines.