1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,840 Speaker 1: Politics Wednesday. Mark Mitchell' whether's along with Ginny Anderson, Good 2 00:00:02,840 --> 00:00:03,920 Speaker 1: morning to you both. 3 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:05,480 Speaker 2: Good morning, Mike, morning. 4 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:08,319 Speaker 3: Jenny, Good morning, Mark, Good morning, Mike, Genny. 5 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:10,120 Speaker 1: I have you got any Rhodes scholars on the Justice 6 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:12,120 Speaker 1: Select Committee there? I'm looking at the list of names. 7 00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:13,640 Speaker 1: Who's who's your brightest member? 8 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:18,439 Speaker 3: Apart from David's a doctor, so he might squeak in, Yeah, 9 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:19,759 Speaker 3: he's been a lecturer. 10 00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:23,040 Speaker 1: Duncan web useless cabinet minister according to Audrey Young, but 11 00:00:23,160 --> 00:00:26,480 Speaker 1: coming back for a strong finish, well. 12 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:28,080 Speaker 3: I think you're going to need more skills than Rhodes 13 00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:31,160 Speaker 3: scholarship to handle some of the issues that'll be throwing 14 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:32,599 Speaker 3: at that committee. It'll be a tough time. 15 00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 1: Indeed, who's the weak link there? 16 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:39,720 Speaker 3: I think, Oh goodness, where would I start? I think 17 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:41,760 Speaker 3: it's going to be really hard to cheer it if 18 00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:43,800 Speaker 3: things get right. 19 00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:46,360 Speaker 1: So Mega's in for a tough time. James Meaghan, I. 20 00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:47,760 Speaker 3: Think he will be in for a tough time. 21 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:51,040 Speaker 1: Great opening, Belle, never been heard from. 22 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:54,880 Speaker 3: Since I've cheered that committee myself, and and I know 23 00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:57,920 Speaker 3: from experience through tough bills that it can be hard, 24 00:00:57,960 --> 00:00:59,560 Speaker 3: and this will be that. I'd say the hardest. 25 00:00:59,560 --> 00:01:03,040 Speaker 1: One's I reckon, What what's this Jamie Arbuckle like deputy chair. 26 00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:05,520 Speaker 3: Oh, he's pretty quiet. He makes a good morning tea. 27 00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:07,039 Speaker 3: I'll say that when it's his turn. 28 00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:13,840 Speaker 1: Good on the morning teams. Taku Taku Tar Ferris Tucker's 29 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:15,160 Speaker 1: is good. Yeah, he's I reckon. 30 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 3: He's going to go on lively character. Well, it will 31 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 3: be interesting to see how it plays out because you 32 00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 3: will have people you have Pobson's Pledge, who are pro 33 00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:26,920 Speaker 3: the bill. You'll have groups that are anti. So it 34 00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:29,679 Speaker 3: will depend on how they come, how they present themselves. 35 00:01:29,959 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 1: The whole thing where you said you can't swear, Do 36 00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 1: you think that's going to come to pass or do 37 00:01:33,680 --> 00:01:34,840 Speaker 1: you think you're dreaming? 38 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 3: No, I think that will come to pass. That's unparliamentary language. 39 00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:40,839 Speaker 1: So I was dancing on the floor, but that didn't 40 00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:41,280 Speaker 1: stop them. 41 00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:45,399 Speaker 3: Yeah. Well, I think also the age wherein now we 42 00:01:45,480 --> 00:01:48,800 Speaker 3: have zoom a lot more and so one around the 43 00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:52,120 Speaker 3: country instead of coming in. So if someone is it's 44 00:01:52,120 --> 00:01:55,640 Speaker 3: a lot easier to handle a submission that gets out 45 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:56,720 Speaker 3: of hand if it's on his zoom. 46 00:01:56,800 --> 00:01:57,440 Speaker 2: Call Mark. 47 00:01:57,480 --> 00:01:59,880 Speaker 1: Do you feel you strike me? I mean I might, 48 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:01,760 Speaker 1: I know you reasonably well, I guess, but do you 49 00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: do you strike me as a sort of a person 50 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:05,640 Speaker 1: who doesn't mind a bit of decorum and manners. I mean, 51 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:07,680 Speaker 1: what we're seeing at the moment is not good for 52 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:08,480 Speaker 1: this country, is it. 53 00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:09,320 Speaker 2: No? 54 00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:11,480 Speaker 4: And that's what we raise our kids, so I mean, yeah, 55 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:13,720 Speaker 4: I know it sounds very simplicit, but my mum raised 56 00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:16,400 Speaker 4: me to treat others as how you'd have them treat you, 57 00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:19,200 Speaker 4: and I think that we should apply that to the House. 58 00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:21,119 Speaker 4: It doesn't mean that you can't be robust to bake, 59 00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:24,960 Speaker 4: but there should be decorum and people should treat each 60 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:28,120 Speaker 4: other with respect. I don't like when it becomes personally. 61 00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:30,119 Speaker 4: I don't think there's any need for that. I think 62 00:02:30,320 --> 00:02:32,120 Speaker 4: in terms of the Select Committee, Jones Megan will do 63 00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:34,720 Speaker 4: an outstanding job of cheering that that's a good committee. 64 00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:38,600 Speaker 4: Having been a Select Committee cheer myself. He will enforce 65 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 4: and make sure that there is a standard behavior that 66 00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:42,760 Speaker 4: is expected, and if that is not meant, then he 67 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 4: will just quite something. He asked to submit us to 68 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,280 Speaker 4: leave the committee and. 69 00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: That's the end of that. You guys, Ginny, I know 70 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:51,160 Speaker 1: you don't speak on behalf of the whole party, but 71 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:53,919 Speaker 1: to my PI Clark in terms of suspension and voting 72 00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:57,880 Speaker 1: for you guys sided with her? Why and do you 73 00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:01,000 Speaker 1: run a very real risk of being tainted and associated 74 00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 1: permanently with a bunch of radicals. 75 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:07,880 Speaker 3: We stand against what David Seymour's bill proposes to do, 76 00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:11,480 Speaker 3: and we stand against the racial division that it causes 77 00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:13,919 Speaker 3: in New Zealand, and we would like the Prime Minister 78 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 3: to show some leadership and shut that down. Imagine this, 79 00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:22,519 Speaker 3: Imagine if a luxeen got up one day and said, actually, 80 00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:26,040 Speaker 3: this is causing New Zealand hurt, this is dividing us. David, 81 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 3: we don't want this bill to proceed through six months 82 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:31,520 Speaker 3: at Select committee. Do you really think that David Seymour 83 00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:33,520 Speaker 3: is going to say I'm going to be a deputy 84 00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 3: prime minister in about you know, four or five months, 85 00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:37,400 Speaker 3: but I'll give all that up and split the government. 86 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:40,000 Speaker 3: I mean, he's not going to walk away. So I 87 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:43,160 Speaker 3: think this demands that Luckson shows some leadership in a 88 00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:46,040 Speaker 3: situation that's causing our country a lot of pots. 89 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:48,680 Speaker 1: Okay, so no, that's your stance and I take that accepted. 90 00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:51,920 Speaker 1: But in might be Clark's case, you didn't vote to censure. 91 00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:52,560 Speaker 1: Why not? 92 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 3: We stand with the view that the way this bill 93 00:03:56,800 --> 00:03:58,800 Speaker 3: has proceeded, we do not like it. 94 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:02,240 Speaker 1: So we believe separate rules. 95 00:04:02,720 --> 00:04:04,000 Speaker 2: You're supported disorder in the House. 96 00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 3: What we are supporting is that the way the House 97 00:04:07,320 --> 00:04:11,240 Speaker 3: is run is unacceptable and the ongoing issues that have 98 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 3: been undermining the Maori, not just the Maori Party, but 99 00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:20,200 Speaker 3: the Marti people. I listened to Christopher Luxen on the 100 00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:23,960 Speaker 3: radio this morning and he said, well that we you know, 101 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:26,120 Speaker 3: he doesn't like the bill even though it's proceeding to 102 00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:29,360 Speaker 3: six months at Select Committee, but he'll continue with doing 103 00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:33,640 Speaker 3: things such as they've disestablished the Maori Health Authority, They've 104 00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:35,760 Speaker 3: done a whole range of other things like removing Maori 105 00:04:35,839 --> 00:04:40,520 Speaker 3: language from government departments. He'll continue with doing. He thinks 106 00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:43,479 Speaker 3: that's a far more effective way of addressing the issue of. 107 00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:46,360 Speaker 1: It doesn't answer the question why he didn't sense since 108 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 1: you might be. 109 00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:51,160 Speaker 3: Clark, because we believe that what they're doing is wrong 110 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:52,360 Speaker 3: and we want to tend to gain. 111 00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:54,520 Speaker 1: So it doesn't matter what the Maori Party do in 112 00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 1: the Parliament. Break all the rules, no problem, that's good 113 00:04:57,080 --> 00:04:57,360 Speaker 1: with you. 114 00:04:58,240 --> 00:04:59,960 Speaker 3: I did not say that. I said in that particular 115 00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:03,280 Speaker 3: instance that you raised when we had a bill going 116 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:05,400 Speaker 3: through this House that Luxon has the power to stop, 117 00:05:05,440 --> 00:05:07,000 Speaker 3: but it's not going to take that. 118 00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:09,320 Speaker 4: We believe what you are saying, though you're saying that 119 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:14,200 Speaker 4: chaotic or disrespectful behavior in the House of Representatives is acceptable. 120 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:16,480 Speaker 3: I did not say that. I think you're putting words 121 00:05:16,480 --> 00:05:21,080 Speaker 3: to my mouth. Mark, would you like me to answer? 122 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:25,039 Speaker 1: You answered it from the we don't like the policy. 123 00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:28,160 Speaker 1: I get that, everyone gets that, but you're not the one. Well, 124 00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:30,800 Speaker 1: some of you guys actually were breaking the rules in 125 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:32,560 Speaker 1: the house. Why is that acceptable? 126 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 3: Because we're standing against a position we feel incredibly strongly about, 127 00:05:37,560 --> 00:05:39,640 Speaker 3: and that's the Treaty of White Tongy Principles Bill. 128 00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:45,080 Speaker 1: So is that your Marker, If you feel incredibly strongly 129 00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:48,000 Speaker 1: about something, you can break any rule the rules. 130 00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:50,640 Speaker 2: Yep, this particular I wouldn't. 131 00:05:50,640 --> 00:05:52,680 Speaker 3: We will not be breaking the rules and we have 132 00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:56,480 Speaker 3: not done that over a number of the other but 133 00:05:56,680 --> 00:06:00,520 Speaker 3: this issue, this issue bought fifty thousand people peaceilly out 134 00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:03,159 Speaker 3: the front of Parliament. He said, that's how strongly people 135 00:06:03,160 --> 00:06:03,760 Speaker 3: feel about it. 136 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:03,960 Speaker 2: Mark. 137 00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:06,000 Speaker 1: The problem with Shane Jones and Jerry Browne and all 138 00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:08,640 Speaker 1: of the standing orders thing is is I mean, can 139 00:06:08,680 --> 00:06:12,360 Speaker 1: they actually for a party Mariy that don't mind having 140 00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:15,440 Speaker 1: their pay suspended or they love attention. So what can 141 00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:17,960 Speaker 1: standing orders do if they wanted to do something that 142 00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:19,479 Speaker 1: would actually be effective. 143 00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:22,239 Speaker 4: Look, I don't know that is a very good question, 144 00:06:22,279 --> 00:06:24,520 Speaker 4: because I agree with you. I don't think that the 145 00:06:24,520 --> 00:06:27,320 Speaker 4: moment they care about any sentience that will be applied 146 00:06:27,720 --> 00:06:30,400 Speaker 4: in our parliament. They just think that they can do 147 00:06:30,480 --> 00:06:32,360 Speaker 4: what they like, behave like the way that they want 148 00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:35,000 Speaker 4: to intimidate whomever they want. And it just astounds me 149 00:06:35,040 --> 00:06:37,159 Speaker 4: and amazes me that you've got a senior member of 150 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 4: the Labor Party on the show with us saying that 151 00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:43,120 Speaker 4: we support that and that if you feel passionate about something, 152 00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:46,280 Speaker 4: you can break the rules. And if we all applied 153 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:48,120 Speaker 4: that rule in this country, we'd live in chaos. 154 00:06:48,200 --> 00:06:50,200 Speaker 3: Yes, I think you're coming from Mark like, I just 155 00:06:50,279 --> 00:06:52,800 Speaker 3: like to acknowledge that I do see your point. But 156 00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,600 Speaker 3: the point that I don't think that you're understanding is 157 00:06:56,000 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 3: this means a lot to a lot of New Zealanders. 158 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 1: A lot of stuff brings a lot of stuff to 159 00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:04,360 Speaker 1: New Zealanders. We don't all take the law into our 160 00:07:04,400 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 1: own hands and go nuts. 161 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:09,400 Speaker 3: This This brought over fifty thousand people out the front 162 00:07:09,400 --> 00:07:11,880 Speaker 3: of Parliament to peacefully march to say that we want 163 00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 3: a treaty of WAITANGI. We've signed it up as two people. 164 00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:17,360 Speaker 3: It does mean that it's a partnership. And I want 165 00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:20,600 Speaker 3: to bring up my children in a country that has unity, 166 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:21,880 Speaker 3: not division. 167 00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:23,400 Speaker 1: And we want to bring up in our children in 168 00:07:23,400 --> 00:07:25,920 Speaker 1: a country where law isn't taken into it. There is 169 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:29,520 Speaker 1: respect and dignity, and some morals, and some professionalism and 170 00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:31,040 Speaker 1: some adult behavior. 171 00:07:31,120 --> 00:07:33,480 Speaker 2: Especially men we're lawmakers. I mean, it's just incredible. 172 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:37,600 Speaker 3: You completely agree, I completely agree, I completely agree. But 173 00:07:37,760 --> 00:07:40,360 Speaker 3: why does not Christopher Luxon have the same standard in 174 00:07:40,440 --> 00:07:43,640 Speaker 3: terms of the way he's treating the parliamentary process, which 175 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:48,240 Speaker 3: is an absolute shocker. He is absolutely disrespecting our parliamentary 176 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:51,240 Speaker 3: process by putting a built to select committee that he 177 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:54,600 Speaker 3: has no intention of voting for at the second reading. 178 00:07:54,840 --> 00:07:58,320 Speaker 3: He's wasting our time, he's wasting taxpayers money, and he's 179 00:07:58,320 --> 00:08:01,040 Speaker 3: making an absolute joke of the system about that sort 180 00:08:01,040 --> 00:08:04,760 Speaker 3: of behavior. That sort of behavior elicits huckers in the 181 00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:07,760 Speaker 3: House and elicits fifty five thousand people coming to the 182 00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:08,400 Speaker 3: front steps of. 183 00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:12,080 Speaker 4: Harlem's I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I completely refute that that 184 00:08:12,120 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 4: what your argument quite something is this, if you feel 185 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:18,160 Speaker 4: strongly and passionately about something, you get to break the laws. 186 00:08:18,640 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 4: And there's lots of people in this country that feel 187 00:08:20,640 --> 00:08:23,560 Speaker 4: very passionate and strongly about issues, Jenny, But you, as 188 00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:25,720 Speaker 4: a lawmaker, should be saying the laws are important, the 189 00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:28,360 Speaker 4: rules are important, we should all adhere to those. But 190 00:08:28,400 --> 00:08:29,400 Speaker 4: that's not what you're saying. 191 00:08:30,400 --> 00:08:32,640 Speaker 3: You're passionate about what you're saying. Mark, I don't know. 192 00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:35,720 Speaker 3: I totally you what you're saying. I totally you're saying. 193 00:08:35,960 --> 00:08:38,560 Speaker 3: And what I say to that is that Christopher Luxen 194 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:41,320 Speaker 3: is completely right. 195 00:08:42,679 --> 00:08:45,160 Speaker 1: But you know, Jenny, you at no point except that 196 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 1: hen Ray, Willie Jackson, the Maori Party, that's all acceptable 197 00:08:50,640 --> 00:08:53,880 Speaker 1: as far as you're concerned, given the circumstances in the 198 00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:54,680 Speaker 1: specific case. 199 00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:57,800 Speaker 3: This issue goes to the core of who we are 200 00:08:57,840 --> 00:09:00,040 Speaker 3: as New Zealanders. And I'm proud to stand. 201 00:08:59,880 --> 00:09:01,560 Speaker 1: Up and that's fine by you. 202 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:06,079 Speaker 3: If we are going to talk about rewriting the Treaty 203 00:09:06,160 --> 00:09:06,760 Speaker 3: of White. 204 00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:09,600 Speaker 1: We're not rewriting the treaty. See, this is part of 205 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:12,920 Speaker 1: the problem. We are not that you've got. We are 206 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:17,080 Speaker 1: not rewriting the treaty we are defining principles that haven't 207 00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:18,720 Speaker 1: been defined by the Parliament of New Zealand. 208 00:09:19,200 --> 00:09:21,959 Speaker 3: You have forty Kings Council lawyers who are that's. 209 00:09:21,840 --> 00:09:24,240 Speaker 1: Not that's not rewriting the treaty. 210 00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:27,040 Speaker 3: By rewriting the principles you are. 211 00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:30,839 Speaker 1: You're not rewriting the principles either, You're defining the principles 212 00:09:30,880 --> 00:09:32,319 Speaker 1: by the Parliament. 213 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:38,520 Speaker 3: Of the country. Will disagree on that because it is rewriting. 214 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:41,040 Speaker 4: Michae is right about that. But it comes back to 215 00:09:41,080 --> 00:09:42,559 Speaker 4: the port. I think you need to go back and 216 00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 4: have a serious talk with christ and say we've got 217 00:09:45,240 --> 00:09:48,160 Speaker 4: this terribly wrong. We shouldn't be advocating, we shouldn't be 218 00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:51,120 Speaker 4: supporting that. If you feel passionately about passionate about an issue, 219 00:09:51,320 --> 00:09:53,280 Speaker 4: you can break the laws, you can intimidate people, you 220 00:09:53,320 --> 00:09:58,320 Speaker 4: can threaten people these that that is completely canintuitive to 221 00:09:58,360 --> 00:09:59,120 Speaker 4: the message that we. 222 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:03,319 Speaker 3: Should you're what you're supporting. This bill has driven racial 223 00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:06,560 Speaker 3: division in New Zealand and that lends at national parties feet. 224 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:08,880 Speaker 3: But what you've done by enabling. 225 00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:12,480 Speaker 2: This stake that up and we. 226 00:10:12,360 --> 00:10:14,200 Speaker 3: Want to shut it down. We don't want it to 227 00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:16,760 Speaker 3: go to committee, we don't want it to go to 228 00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:17,319 Speaker 3: select commits. 229 00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 4: Should you're the party that you should be a responsible, 230 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:24,400 Speaker 4: serious political party and take a very firm stand and 231 00:10:24,440 --> 00:10:27,320 Speaker 4: support this the Speaker of the House and making sure 232 00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:29,280 Speaker 4: that the rules are obeyed, because if they aren't obeyed 233 00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:31,680 Speaker 4: there then what does that what does it signal? 234 00:10:31,679 --> 00:10:33,000 Speaker 2: Does that send to the rest of the country. 235 00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 1: Good discussion. Nice to see you, guys, Mike Mitchell, Jinny Anderson. 236 00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:39,199 Speaker 4: For more from The Mike Asking Breakfast, listen live to 237 00:10:39,320 --> 00:10:42,400 Speaker 4: news talks it'd be from six am weekdays, or follow 238 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:44,000 Speaker 4: the podcast on iHeartRadio.