WEBVTT - Tax for investors 101

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Jorda and welcome to this episode of Shed Lunch, where

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>we delve into the often vexed subject of tax.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>We're going to do a one oh one on what

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it means to invest in individual companies and funds and

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>to keep it as simple as we can. I'm joined

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>by Mark lash, a partner with Deloitte.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Private investing involves risk you might lose the money you

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 3>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 3>Everything you're about to see and hear is current at

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>the time of recording.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to studio Mark, Thanks Allen.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, tax for most of us, I know it's your

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>every day, but for most of us it's a tricky subject.

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think it is.

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, tax is very spac specific and there's a lot

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 4>of complexity in the rules that we have in New Zealand.

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 4>And some of those rules are relatively simplistic at the

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 4>at the simple investment end, and some of those rules

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 4>are incredibly complex when we start to get into things

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>like foreign investment funds and investing in those. So it's

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 4>always important I think to you know, to remember that

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 4>because text is specific, you've got to be too careful

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 4>to ensure that the that you take advice where that

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 4>is appropriate, and ensure that a lot of the advice

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 4>that's actually written in terms of iety commentaries and the

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 4>like of your generic right, so they are intended to

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>be guides, are not necessarily specific advice. So our recommendation

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 4>to clients is always to take specific advice where they

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 4>need to take that advice, and to be very careful

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 4>around ensuring that they don't just rely on generic comments.

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.559
<v Speaker 1>What about AI, there's a lot of chet GP text

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of questions you can throw in and get all

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sorts of answers.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>What's your experience there.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 4>I think AI is probably in its infancy at the moment,

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 4>so you do want to be a little bit careful

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 4>about you what you are relying on. Ultimately, Lee, in

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand, it's up to the individual taxpayer to ensure

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 4>that their tax positions are correct, and so it's so

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 4>important that they do take advice in the right way

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 4>or rely on the right type of information. My experience

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 4>is that tools like chat GBT are credibly useful tools,

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 4>but you do need to be careful that they provide

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 4>you just with generic comment rather than specific advice.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's think about the retail investor then, what

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>would be the things that they need to consider. I mean,

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you can have dividends and you can have share gains

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and losses. Obviously, what does a retail investor need to

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>think about?

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, at the end of each year, a retail investor

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 4>needs to ensure that they have appropriately accounted for the

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 4>income that they've received from their investments, whether it's interest

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 4>or dividends that they've received, and those need to be

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 4>brought to tax and any sort of square up amounts

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 4>dealt with with inland revenue. It's also appropriate for investors

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 4>to stand back and reflect on the nature of the

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 4>activity that they've can do during the year. So we

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 4>don't have a comprehensive capital gains tax in New Zealand,

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 4>but we do tax gains from investments where those investments

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 4>have been purchased for a dominant purpose of selling them

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 4>if they are part of a business activity or share

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 4>trading activity conducted by that person. So we do recommend

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 4>that people stand back at the end of the year

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 4>and have a look at what they've done from an

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 4>investment activity. Point of view and reflect on whether or

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 4>not they might have some concerns that Inland Revenue might

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 4>view them as as being a trader in business or

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 4>having acquired those investments for a purpose of disposing of them.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark with platforms like Shaersy's, we deduct the tax from

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the distributions for most, not all investors. But it would

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>be fair to say that investors can't just set and forget.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>There are obligations that they have under tax, aren't.

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 4>They Absolutely so, As I mentioned before, the obligation to

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 4>ensure that the tax appropriate tax has been paid does

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 4>fall on the relevant investor. It's it's not Chazy's responsibility.

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 4>And if the investor hasn't got it right, then Inland

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Revenue will will be in contact. I think you know

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 4>the things that Chas's and other platforms do you know,

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 4>do the services they provide do issis greatly if you like,

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 4>in terms of ensuring that tax has been withheld. Ideally,

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 4>it it ensures that for most investors they're not going

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 4>to get a nasty surprise come come the end of

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 4>the year. But in some instances, when a conservative approach

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 4>is taken around, you know, withholding, it can actually mean

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 4>for some investors that they are actually entitled to refunds

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 4>of amounts because in New Zealand we do we do

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 4>tax people on a on a marginal rate basis. So

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 4>what that means is that as people earn more, their

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 4>tax rate progressively increases. So you know, if a flat

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 4>rate of thirty three percent tax has been deducted, that

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 4>could be well in excess of, for example, tax rate

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 4>applying to a twelve year old student. Yeah, who's only

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 4>got a ten and a half percent tax rate, So

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 4>there could be refundaments that are available.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's unpack the difference between if I invest in an

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>individual company or if I, say, want to invest in

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a managed fund or an exchange traded fund, what's the

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>tax treatment? Because I understand one could be more effective

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>than the other.

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So with most managed funds and exchange traded funds,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 4>they are wrapped up in a product that we refer

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 4>to as a portfolio investment entity or pie. With a pie,

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 4>they typically take care of all of the tax on

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 4>behalf of the relevant investor, so investors don't then need

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 4>to include their income from those investments in their personal

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 4>tax return. The way that works is that the investor

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 4>is required to notify the PIE of their prescribed investor rate,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 4>which broadly equates to what their margin digital tax rate

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 4>would be on that investment income. The PIE in that

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 4>instance then ensures that the relevant tax is deducted and

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 4>paid within the PIE on behalf of the investor and

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 4>pays out the tax paid return to the investor. So

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 4>in those situations, investors are not required to include that

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 4>income in their tax return. Now, the maximum pier that

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 4>can be elected is twenty eight percent, So for investors

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 4>that are subject to twenty eight to thirty three or

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 4>thirty nine percent marginal tax rates, using a or investing

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 4>into a PIE can can generate a more advantageous tax outcome.

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 4>If we can compare that with investing directly into a company.

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Then typically dividends from New Zealand or Australia and the

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 4>like are then subject to tax at the marginal rate

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 4>of that particular investor. So if you have a tax

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 4>rate of thirty three you're thirty nine percent, then that

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 4>is the rate of tax that you will pay on

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 4>that investment. So you can see if you were to

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 4>be able to have an equivalent investment in a PIE

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 4>that could be kept at twenty eight percent rather than

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 4>those high rates. It's really important in that context for

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 4>investors to ensure that they have notified of the correct

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 4>pir that applies to them so that the correct amount

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 4>of tax can be deducted by the pie and an

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 4>event that you get it wrong, that can sometimes lead

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 4>to adjustments being made by a land revenue and compliance

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 4>costs as you sort that out whether you've underpaid or

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 4>overpaid in that particular instance.

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Are there penalties that iod hands down? If your light

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>sounds quite dracony and saying like that, but you know

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>if you aren't paying the right amount of tax?

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it obviously.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Depends on the individual and the amounts involved. But is

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there straight penalties that we know of?

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 4>There are? There is a whole penalty regime that exists

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 4>within the Income Tax Act where where you know not

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 4>the correct amount of tax is not being paid at

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 4>that at the correct time. In our experience, thus far,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 4>inland Revenue hasn't taken a hard line, if you like,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 4>in relation to a failure to elect the correct rates.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 4>It's more been focused around ensuring that the top up

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 4>or catch up amount of taxes collected and that the

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 4>correct pr is applied going forward.

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there a hunch though, that a number of investors

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe aren't applying the correct or paying the correct tax.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Inland Revenue's got quite sophisticated in and around how

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 4>they manage these types of things now and do have

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 4>a number of tools that they can use to ensure

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 4>that they are matching the correct pr to the relevant taxpayer.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Our experience is that it's less likely that people are

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 4>going to be able to sort of game the system

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 4>by having the incorrect rate.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of jargon with tax it would appear now

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>often we hear about imputation or franking credits. I think

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>victation as New Zealand franking is often if you are

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>invested in the AX or the Australian share market, can

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you explain to us when they come in to be

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You're quite right.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Imputation credits and franking credits are in essence the same thing,

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 4>but just ones in New Zealand credit and the others

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 4>are an Australian credit. The underlying concept around it is

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 4>that when a company makes makes a profit, it has

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 4>to pay some tax, and that tax that the company

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 4>pays should be able to be passed through to the

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 4>shareholder for them to claim as a credit. So in

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand, the company tax that is paid generates an

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 4>imputation credit that the shareholder can claim back. In Australia,

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 4>the company tax paid generates a franking credit that an

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Australian resident shareholder can claim back. So if a company

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 4>makes one hundred dollars a profit, it has to pay

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 4>corporate tax of twenty eight dollars. That same one hundred

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 4>dollar a profit also gets taxed in the hands of

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 4>the shareholder when it's distributed, but the shareholder is able

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 4>to claim back that twenty eight dollars company tax that's

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 4>already been paid as an imputation credit.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>When does that happen though? So if I in my

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>tax return, am I? If I see the word gross dividend?

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that one hundred dollars? But actually I then get

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>some money back?

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So the gross dividend concept is recognizing the cash

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 4>that's been paid to the investor together with the imputation

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 4>credit that is attached to that dividend, plus any withholding

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 4>tax that's been deducted. So it's that gross amount that

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 4>is required to be put into the investor's tax return

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 4>or tax calculation that's then subject to tax at the

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 4>tax rate of the investor, but then you can claim

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 4>a credit against that tax. And the credits that you

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 4>can claim are the imputation credit that's been attached and

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 4>also any withholding tax that's been deducted, and if there

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 4>is an excess amount that can sometimes be refunded.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm investing into Australia, then I want to

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>be tax efficient or as efficient as.

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I can be.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I need to keep an eye on those franking credits

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and percentage thereof.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's always important to start with tax.

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Shouldn't be the tail wagging the roll, you know, you

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 4>should always start with a sound investment plan, diversified investment portfolio,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 4>which as well outside my area of expertise naturally, but

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 4>it is useful to just sort of keep an eye

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 4>on the way in which the taxation rules might apply

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 4>to the different types of returns that you're receiving from

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 4>from your investment portfolio, and certainly in the case of

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Australian investments into Australian company, it's important to just keep

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 4>in mind those ones that are that are paying a

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 4>franked dividend and those that are paying an unfranked dividend,

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 4>and the reason for the subtle difference is that if

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 4>the dividend coming out of Australia is not fully franked,

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 4>then it'll be subject to withholding tax. Those withholding taxes

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 4>are able to be claimed as a credit in New

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 4>Zealand in most circumstances, so sometimes you can get sit

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 4>as subtle differences in the after tax return or the

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 4>effective tax rate that comes from investing into Australian entities.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>What about dual listed companies, We've got quite a few

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously on chess. Would it be more tax advantageous if

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you like to invest in the New Zealand share market

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the ASEX for them.

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, typically from a tax perspective, it shouldn't make any

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 4>any difference in the sense that a New Zealand company

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 4>that's registered on the Australian Australian Stock Exchange is still

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 4>in New Zealand company still will be paying if you

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 4>like a New Zealand dividend with imputation credits, So those

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 4>sorts of things shouldn't necessarily influence a New Zealand investors' decision.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that investor might look at is

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 4>that if an entity is dual listed, is whether that's

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 4>because they are deriving income from both New Zealand and Australia,

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 4>and whether there might be subtle differences in the way

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 4>that that company pays to it and such that they're

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 4>able to, if you like, provide imputation credits to New

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 4>Zealand investors and franking credits to Australian investors, because because

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 4>neither of those credits are able to be claimed in

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 4>either country.

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>One thing mark too, that often comes up is you

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>can merely go along investing and you get your dividends

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and your tax is all deducted and hopefully everything's happy.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 2>But is there a time when investors really need to

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 2>be thinking.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>About or is there extra that I should be telling

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the IID And I'm assuming that.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 2>When you look at an entire.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Portfolio that might have property, it might have other assets.

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking beyond say you're Cheesy's portfolio.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so if you're not a natural person, so companies

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 4>and trusts are all required to file a tax return

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 4>for natural persons. You've sort of got two different pathways

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 4>that you end up going down. The first is the

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 4>sort of the simplified approach, which is any sense a

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 4>letter of assessment by inland revenue. So if Inland Revenue

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 4>believe that if all of the income that the individual

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 4>has received has been taxed largely its source in New Zealand,

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 4>so for example, sellaring wages subject to PYE investment income

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 4>that's been subject to withholding tax or imputation credits in

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand. And if Inland Revenue believes that that's the

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 4>sole sources of your income and they have most of

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 4>that information necessary to do a calculation of the assessment

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 4>for the year, then for those individuals, they'll receive this

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 4>letter of assessment and their responsibility is to review that,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 4>to check that and to make sure that it's right.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 4>If it's not right, there's an obligation to notify a

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 4>land revenue changes. There is a little sort of deminimous

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 4>rule there around other income that's sort of less two

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 4>hundred dollars or less. So if there's an amount that's

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 4>missing from that assessment and it's two hundred dollars or less,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 4>then there is no requirement to notify in Land revenue

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 4>of that fact. If an in revenue doesn't believe that

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 4>it has all of that information necessary to do that assessment.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Then individuals will be required to file an IR three

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 4>tax return, and that could include things like there's overseas income,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 4>there's income subject to the under the fIF or Foreign

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Investment Fund rules. There could be rents from property, there

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 4>could be tax losses, there could be income from self employment,

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 4>those sorts of things.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a nice segue to investing offshore. And I don't

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so much mean Australia, but perhaps the US, which you know,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of companies on Cheesy's that are

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>US based investing there. Things get a little bit different,

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>don't they with the I think the FAF is the

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of the acronym that's everywhere.

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 2>If you can explain that for US.

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 4>I'll certainly have a go. So the Foreign Investment Fund

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 4>regime is intended to capture all foreign investments, particularly or

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 4>traditionally into companies. There is Australia is actually caught within

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 4>the context of those rules. However, because of our close

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 4>economic relationship with Australia and the fact that a lot

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 4>of New Zealanders invest into Australia, we have what's called

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 4>a Foreign Investment Investment Fund Exemption list. So that typically

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 4>is entities in Australia that are listed on the Australian

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Stock Exchange that are resident in Australia, those companies are

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 4>included in a sort of an exemption list. What that

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 4>effectively means is that you don't need to apply the

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Foreign Investment Fund rules to those particular investments. You can

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 4>just treat them, going to call it as normal investments

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 4>where you pay tax on dividends as and when they

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 4>are received. For everybody else or everywhere else in the

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 4>world that is subject to the Foreign Investment Fund rules.

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 4>What effectively that does is it sort of ignores, if

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 4>you like, the dividends that are paid, and the investments

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 4>are taxed on the basis of a number of methods,

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 4>but in the sense sort of deemed income for tax

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 4>purposes and for individuals. The two main options there are

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 4>the fair dividend rate and the comparative value method.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>So you can choose which and just to stop you

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>their mark, I think you wouldn't be subject to the

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Investment Fund unless you were investing fifty thousand in

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand or you had that in investments or is

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that right?

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 4>It's correct. There's a deminimus so an exclusion from having

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 4>to apply these horrendous rules. If you if you if

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 4>you hold foreign investment fund interests that cost are less

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 4>than New Zealand fifty thousand dollars, if you are unfortunately

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 4>fortunate enough to hold investments over that threshold, then you

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 4>will be subject to these rules and the complications that

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 4>go with that.

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>So if you had a couple of thousand dollars in Tesla,

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>for example.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 2>You'd probably be all right, that's correct.

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>It would only be if you had a fear bit

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more thinking of that though, surely at that stage you'd

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>begin an advisor to have a lock unless you were

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>a real wizard tax.

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's not many people that have a go can

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 4>I use that phrase? It doing it themselves. It's these

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 4>rules are are incredibly complicated. The method dollar, the methods

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 4>that are that are available to people to sort of

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 4>return their income are tricky. And so we do recommend

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 4>that if you are subject to the foreign investment fund rules,

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 4>that you do seek to get some advice in and

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 4>around the preparation of your tax position on an annual basis, because.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Could it be that without realizing it, you might actually

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>almost be paying more tax than you're actually getting in

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a return.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 4>That's correct, you know. So, for example, under the fair

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 4>dividend rate method, you have a deemed dividend equal to

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 4>five percent of the opening market value of that investment.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 4>So if you'd bought one thousand dollars of Tesla shares,

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 4>for example, and they were valued at one thousand dollars

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 4>on the first of April twenty twenty four, then your

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 4>deemed income for the year will be five percent of that.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 4>And if the dividend yield coming out of that Tesla

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 4>stock is you know, around the one one to two percent,

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 4>which often American companies do tend to have relatively low

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 4>dividend yields, the actual cash dividend that you receive may

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 4>be well less than the deemed income that you have

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 4>from that investment under the fair dividend rate. There is

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 4>another methodology that's available to natural persons and trustees of trusts,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 4>and that's to use comparative value. And that comparative value

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 4>methodology effectively seeks to tax you on the unrealized gain

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 4>that you've had during the year. So if the shares

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 4>were worth a thousand dollars at the beginning of the

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 4>year and they're worth nine hundred and you've made a loss.

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 4>You have a choice to be able to say, I'll

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 4>take that comparative value method. I'll take that loss, in

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 4>which case your income under the Foreign Investment Fund rules

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 4>is nil, and you do have the option to choose

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 4>between years. So yeah, some of it can be quite complicated.

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Just thinking if you've got a less complicated portfolio, but

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>you are wanting to make sure that you are paying

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the tax you should be. Apart from the fact that

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>she says has deducted from the distribution so far, are

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what resources are out there? I mean, does this wonderful podcast,

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But apart from the.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so Inland Revenue you have some really good material

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 4>on their website. You can obviously avail yourself of tools

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 4>like chat GPT just sort of to sort of give

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 4>you some sort of base base information around it shares.

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 4>These and a number of other investment platform and providers

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 4>produce resources that are intended to help provide some advice

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 4>to investors about how these rules might potentially potentially work.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 4>Our recommendation would be yeah, by all means, you know,

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 4>undertake and do a bit of due diligence, get to

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 4>get get familiar with with how you think the rules

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 4>might apply. But then if you do have foreign investment

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 4>fund interests, we'd recommend you engage in an appropriate skill

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 4>tax advisor to help you sort of work your way

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 4>through those rules. It does get quite complicated, particularly if

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 4>you've got dividends that are being received and there's withholding

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 4>tax that's been deducted overseas, and you've got some withholding

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 4>tax that's been deducted New Zealand. Sometimes the withholding tax

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 4>that you can claim might be limited under the double

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 4>taxation agreements that New Zealand has with the US, for example,

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 4>and sometimes not the correct amount of taxes in fact

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 4>being deducted, and so you may be limited around how

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 4>much you can actually claim. So someone can get quite

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 4>tricky and you have to track and calculate the amount

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 4>of tax credits on a line by line, investment by

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 4>investment basis.

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Mark for your insights today. It's been great to

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>have you in the studio.

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Helen. Hopefully I've managed to make tax a little

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 4>less confusing for people, but you really appreciate the opportunity.

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And thanks everyone for tuning in. Hopefully that was a

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more simple for you. You can watch shared Lunch on YouTube,

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or you can follow the podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Leave us at rating and tell us what you'd like

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear next. See you next time on Shared Lunch