1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,920
Speaker 1: In Britain, Rod Little in the morning to you more

2
00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:07,240
Speaker 1: to your age? Now are you excited about mister Tuckle

3
00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:09,119
Speaker 1: speaking of sport? Is he the man for the day,

4
00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:10,360
Speaker 1: or the age or the hour?

5
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:16,479
Speaker 2: Whoever takes up this poison Chalice has my full support,

6
00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:21,320
Speaker 2: sympathy and benediction when they leave. I think he's a

7
00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:24,040
Speaker 2: good idea. He's a very good football manager. He's been

8
00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:28,600
Speaker 2: very successful, he's won tournament. The objections over here are

9
00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:32,840
Speaker 2: a that he's had a rather tangled sexual life, which

10
00:00:32,880 --> 00:00:35,600
Speaker 2: doesn't bother me at all. This is based on the

11
00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:38,519
Speaker 2: fact that most famous manager, Sir Ralph Ramsey, who won

12
00:00:38,560 --> 00:00:41,800
Speaker 2: the World Cup, probably never had sexual intercourse at all.

13
00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:46,720
Speaker 2: Number two is that he is He failed at Chelsea,

14
00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:51,640
Speaker 2: but everybody fails at Chelsea. It's a club which would

15
00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:54,320
Speaker 2: suck the last bit of light out of the universe.

16
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:59,520
Speaker 2: And thirdly that he's German of course, but you know

17
00:00:59,680 --> 00:01:03,240
Speaker 2: people who think that our football manager has to be

18
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:08,760
Speaker 2: directly descended from King Alfred, that Voat has gone and

19
00:01:08,920 --> 00:01:11,759
Speaker 2: went a long time ago. We've had Tenure and Ericson,

20
00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:15,280
Speaker 2: We've had Fabio Capello. This guy seems to be a

21
00:01:15,280 --> 00:01:18,520
Speaker 2: good bet. I would slightly have preferred it if it

22
00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:22,280
Speaker 2: had been Pep Guardiola, but for a four million quit

23
00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:25,199
Speaker 2: a year. I don't object to commuted to a Cherman

24
00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:26,040
Speaker 2: good stuff.

25
00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:29,200
Speaker 1: I want to get to the House of Lord's vote

26
00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:32,720
Speaker 1: in a moment. But there's assister dying bill. How I

27
00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:35,720
Speaker 1: assume it's as controversial beer as it is everywhere around

28
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:36,080
Speaker 1: the world.

29
00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:40,000
Speaker 2: Well, you guys are a bit ahead of us here.

30
00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:42,440
Speaker 2: I mean you went through for you in three, three

31
00:01:42,520 --> 00:01:47,760
Speaker 2: or four years ago. It is controversial. It is subjected

32
00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:52,400
Speaker 2: to the not quite clean but fairly clean left right

33
00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:55,840
Speaker 2: split in that the left is by and large in

34
00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:57,880
Speaker 2: favor of it, and it's being introduced as a private

35
00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:02,600
Speaker 2: members will by a labor NP kim led better. But

36
00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:05,520
Speaker 2: it doesn't quite break down like that. We've had the

37
00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:10,080
Speaker 2: Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, who made an intervention today

38
00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:13,000
Speaker 2: and said, you know, it's a slippery slope. There was

39
00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:17,160
Speaker 2: no mention of the sanctity of life, which you might

40
00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:21,240
Speaker 2: have expected from the head of our established church. By

41
00:02:21,280 --> 00:02:25,480
Speaker 2: the same token, someone on almost as grave an ecumenical

42
00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:30,840
Speaker 2: tower as Justin Welby. Esther Ransom, Dame Esther Ransom, she

43
00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:35,120
Speaker 2: of that's life, and so on, has also intervened. She

44
00:02:35,480 --> 00:02:38,840
Speaker 2: is signed up to dipictaus in Switzerland because she has

45
00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:43,600
Speaker 2: stage four lung cancer and which is not to prolong

46
00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:47,760
Speaker 2: her existence for very much longer. So yeah, it's controversial,

47
00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:53,160
Speaker 2: it's difficult, it's very very emotive. The bill will finally

48
00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:57,400
Speaker 2: be debated at the end of November. But I think

49
00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:00,560
Speaker 2: that the guests, looking from the way that public is

50
00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:03,000
Speaker 2: and the way the Parliament is, it will go through.

51
00:03:03,400 --> 00:03:06,880
Speaker 1: As regards the Lord's vite, which is sort of on

52
00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:11,000
Speaker 1: its mery way as well. Is that remotely controversial or

53
00:03:11,080 --> 00:03:13,600
Speaker 1: just one of those bits of business that needed tidying

54
00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:15,840
Speaker 1: up and sorting a long time ago and no one

55
00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:16,880
Speaker 1: got around and doing it.

56
00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:22,840
Speaker 2: I don't. I don't think there's an enormous amount of

57
00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:28,959
Speaker 2: controversy in that. Uh you know. I think I think

58
00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:30,760
Speaker 2: there's a lot going on at the moment which is

59
00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:34,480
Speaker 2: problematic for the government, which is also obviously problematic for

60
00:03:34,520 --> 00:03:39,720
Speaker 2: the opposition. And I don't think that it's scarcely registered

61
00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:43,600
Speaker 2: over here. But then very often what what the what

62
00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:46,720
Speaker 2: the House of Rules doesn't register over here at all?

63
00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:48,960
Speaker 2: That other people are more.

64
00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:52,840
Speaker 1: Interested than we are, interesting that the white loss Jabs

65
00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:57,200
Speaker 1: thing strikes me is that controversial, because it's it's I

66
00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:00,360
Speaker 1: get what Starmer's watching Starmer and standing outside I'm attend

67
00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:02,320
Speaker 1: yesterday saying it's good for the health system, it's good

68
00:04:02,360 --> 00:04:03,120
Speaker 1: for people, it's.

69
00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:03,440
Speaker 2: Good all that.

70
00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:07,000
Speaker 1: I get all that. But if you're overweight and your

71
00:04:07,080 --> 00:04:08,960
Speaker 1: work but you don't have the money for the JAB,

72
00:04:09,640 --> 00:04:12,560
Speaker 1: how is it by being the same size and yet jobless,

73
00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:15,360
Speaker 1: the government will how does it square?

74
00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:18,320
Speaker 2: Yes, it's very difficult, isn't it. It's very difficult. My

75
00:04:19,520 --> 00:04:21,720
Speaker 2: argument has always been the way you get people back

76
00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:25,240
Speaker 2: into the workforce is by making the difference between being

77
00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:30,600
Speaker 2: on the dole and being in work significant for an

78
00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:36,040
Speaker 2: incentive I cannot see. And I think the hereditary peers,

79
00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:38,479
Speaker 2: by the way, might well have vote in favor of this,

80
00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:43,839
Speaker 2: but they're all vast in size. But that's besides the point.

81
00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:48,479
Speaker 2: I think. I don't think they've got this quite right.

82
00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:52,279
Speaker 2: There is undoubtedly a movement in this country and across

83
00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:55,760
Speaker 2: the world, and you've probably seen it as well, which

84
00:04:56,320 --> 00:05:01,039
Speaker 2: welcomes these weight loss drugs such as a sempit with

85
00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:03,560
Speaker 2: open arms and thinks that it might be a pantasy

86
00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:08,440
Speaker 2: for all of our reals. It may well be I'm

87
00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:13,400
Speaker 2: not a chemist. I'm not a physician, but I've read

88
00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:15,280
Speaker 2: an awful lot about the good that it can do.

89
00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:18,040
Speaker 2: What I don't think that it can do is is

90
00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:21,440
Speaker 2: cure slows. Yes, if I can put it like that,

91
00:05:21,800 --> 00:05:23,760
Speaker 2: I don't think that it will. I don't think that

92
00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:24,719
Speaker 2: it can do that.

93
00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:29,359
Speaker 1: No, exactly, we thought we might have moved on with

94
00:05:29,400 --> 00:05:33,039
Speaker 1: the business of the freebies. But he gets the tickets

95
00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:35,320
Speaker 1: to the Swift concert, and I can't remember the name

96
00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:37,000
Speaker 1: of the woman who was a minister who was on

97
00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:38,880
Speaker 1: the radio the other day who also got tickets to

98
00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:40,919
Speaker 1: the Swift conference, and then she was busy trying to

99
00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:42,760
Speaker 1: justify the whole thing because they were difficult to get

100
00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:45,520
Speaker 1: and the kids were whining they wanted to go. Then

101
00:05:45,560 --> 00:05:49,000
Speaker 1: we come to Soakia, who gets the Swift tickets but

102
00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:51,000
Speaker 1: then gets to meet Swift.

103
00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:54,720
Speaker 2: Yes, it seems to be inconceivable that he would have

104
00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:56,520
Speaker 2: been able to meet Swift had it not been for

105
00:05:56,560 --> 00:05:59,280
Speaker 2: the fact that he answered Card and various other members

106
00:05:59,279 --> 00:06:01,800
Speaker 2: of the Labor Party lob with the Metropolitan Police to

107
00:06:01,880 --> 00:06:05,719
Speaker 2: make sure that Taylor Swift got a very good escort,

108
00:06:06,640 --> 00:06:08,280
Speaker 2: the sort of escort you would give to someone like

109
00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:11,440
Speaker 2: Vladimir puted if he decided to come to the country.

110
00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:17,239
Speaker 2: It's very difficult to argue otherwise because this all happened

111
00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:22,080
Speaker 2: subsequent to that decision being made. He apparently had a

112
00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:25,919
Speaker 2: ten minute audience with Her Highness. I don't know what

113
00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:28,719
Speaker 2: they talked about. Hopefully he tried to tell her about

114
00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:32,800
Speaker 2: his great British energy consortium, which will have riveted her

115
00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:38,120
Speaker 2: to the spot for those ten minutes. But this is corruption,

116
00:06:38,440 --> 00:06:42,039
Speaker 2: you know, it's very low level. You know, this isn't

117
00:06:42,120 --> 00:06:45,560
Speaker 2: Russian oligarch stuff, but it is a form of corruption.

118
00:06:45,960 --> 00:06:49,600
Speaker 2: And there were ten senior labor politicians who've got these

119
00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:52,760
Speaker 2: freebies to go and see Taylor and sit in boxes

120
00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:55,880
Speaker 2: and have a bit of shampers, you know, while listening

121
00:06:55,920 --> 00:07:01,680
Speaker 2: to this vacuous drivel, and it just rubs the public

122
00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:04,680
Speaker 2: up the wrong the wrong way, especially the people in

123
00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:06,760
Speaker 2: the in the country who would have very much liked

124
00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:13,560
Speaker 2: Taylor Swift tickets. And we're probably more appropriately aged tab them,

125
00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:17,320
Speaker 2: I you know, ten or something. So it does it

126
00:07:17,360 --> 00:07:18,480
Speaker 2: does play with the public.

127
00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:20,640
Speaker 1: Yes, it does. Go well, Mike will catch up on them,

128
00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:23,240
Speaker 1: catch up on I was going to say we'll catch

129
00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:26,440
Speaker 1: up on Thursday, but given it's already Thursday. Let's let's

130
00:07:26,440 --> 00:07:29,080
Speaker 1: make it Tuesday, shall we. For more from the Mic

131
00:07:29,160 --> 00:07:32,280
Speaker 1: Asking Breakfast, listen live to news talks It'd be from

132
00:07:32,360 --> 00:07:35,800
Speaker 1: six a m. Weekdays, or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio