1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,320 Speaker 1: Common sense arrived yesterday. This in the form of the 2 00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:05,600 Speaker 1: governments reorganization of the earthquake building rules. Entire cities and 3 00:00:05,640 --> 00:00:08,480 Speaker 1: regions for goodness sake have been removed, timeframes for remediation 4 00:00:08,560 --> 00:00:11,480 Speaker 1: have been extended, and a shed loaded though eight billion 5 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:14,320 Speaker 1: plus is being saved. Chris Pink is a building construction 6 00:00:14,360 --> 00:00:16,600 Speaker 1: minister and as well as good morning morning Mite. Now 7 00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:18,880 Speaker 1: you said yesterday I watched your press conference live. You 8 00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:21,239 Speaker 1: said it was well intentioned and was it really? When 9 00:00:21,239 --> 00:00:23,560 Speaker 1: you can take something as large as Auckland out of it, 10 00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:26,000 Speaker 1: how well intentioned is a plan that broad. 11 00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:29,319 Speaker 2: Well, certainly if you think about the tragedy that was 12 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:31,880 Speaker 2: the loss of life and Canterbury earthquakes and a period 13 00:00:31,880 --> 00:00:34,240 Speaker 2: of time when everyone was wondering what that should be 14 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,120 Speaker 2: going forward, I think really understandable that they wanted to 15 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 2: be risk averse. But the truth is we do still 16 00:00:39,800 --> 00:00:42,960 Speaker 2: need to maintain life safety to has the system, but 17 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:45,120 Speaker 2: there are more nuanced ways we can do that. So 18 00:00:45,159 --> 00:00:47,000 Speaker 2: that's what we've learned in the intervening der Gate. 19 00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 1: How literally have you assessed risk under your new calculation? 20 00:00:52,479 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 2: Well, it's possible to be precise, because obviously earthquakes are 21 00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:59,600 Speaker 2: difficult to predict one year to another, but we think 22 00:00:59,600 --> 00:01:02,920 Speaker 2: if we take a risk proportionate approach that asks, first 23 00:01:02,920 --> 00:01:04,760 Speaker 2: of all, where are the parts in New Zealand that 24 00:01:04,840 --> 00:01:07,840 Speaker 2: it's least likely, And then you refine down to the 25 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:11,120 Speaker 2: remaining areas, which is to say, not au closed North 26 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:13,400 Speaker 2: lond at Chedham Island, and then you ask what are 27 00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 2: the most dangerous types of buildings and it gets the 28 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:19,360 Speaker 2: high and construction methods, then you can start to make 29 00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:22,600 Speaker 2: some sensible changes. I think that hopefully people will regard 30 00:01:22,680 --> 00:01:23,200 Speaker 2: its balance. 31 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:25,760 Speaker 1: What you what's the whole purpose of this? Is the 32 00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:29,000 Speaker 1: purpose to save some beautiful old buildings or just to 33 00:01:29,080 --> 00:01:32,000 Speaker 1: rectify people's lives who have had them shattered because they 34 00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:33,959 Speaker 1: count afford the building, can't get access to the money 35 00:01:33,959 --> 00:01:35,000 Speaker 1: to do it anyway. 36 00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:39,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a lot of the latter. The purpose of 37 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:42,240 Speaker 2: the earthquake prone building regime, We're really clear it is 38 00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:45,760 Speaker 2: to preserve life. So if it does that, we keep it. 39 00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:48,280 Speaker 2: If it doesn't, or we can say, you know, it's 40 00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:51,600 Speaker 2: a reasonable kind of approach to say that we might 41 00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:55,280 Speaker 2: be going beyond what's reasonable, then we leave it. And look, 42 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:57,280 Speaker 2: that might mean that there are some buildings that are 43 00:01:57,320 --> 00:01:59,880 Speaker 2: damaged in an earthquake and people simply need to pay 44 00:01:59,880 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 2: for those going forward. Well, they've got insurance options, but 45 00:02:02,800 --> 00:02:05,720 Speaker 2: that's a different matter from the government saying that people 46 00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:07,760 Speaker 2: must bring them up to a certain standard by a 47 00:02:07,840 --> 00:02:10,480 Speaker 2: certain time, and of course the consequence of that is 48 00:02:10,480 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 2: when they can't, the buildings can't derelict. 49 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 1: The fall down anyway, Chris appreciate it. Chris Pink's the 50 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:19,359 Speaker 1: Building and Construction Minister. For more from the Mic Asking Breakfast, 51 00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:22,920 Speaker 1: listen live to news talks. It'd be from six am weekdays, 52 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:25,120 Speaker 1: or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.