WEBVTT - Max Whitehead: Why are Gen X so unhireable?

0:00:05.721 --> 0:00:10.001
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talk SEDB.

0:00:12.801 --> 0:00:42.641
<v Speaker 2>The Weapon Classes. I wanted to let that roll for

0:00:42.641 --> 0:00:44.041
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, but I guess we'd better get on

0:00:44.081 --> 0:00:46.001
<v Speaker 2>and do our job. Welcome, Welcome back to the Weekend

0:00:46.041 --> 0:00:49.481
<v Speaker 2>Collective on tim beverage and by the way, a fascinating

0:00:49.561 --> 0:00:51.481
<v Speaker 2>chat in the previous hour for the Health hab with

0:00:51.601 --> 0:00:55.121
<v Speaker 2>Dr Mark Williams Neuroscience about just the effect of devices

0:00:55.161 --> 0:00:58.121
<v Speaker 2>on our on our health and actually the scariest thing

0:00:58.201 --> 0:01:00.641
<v Speaker 2>was basically the fact that we're just becoming dumber because

0:01:00.681 --> 0:01:03.081
<v Speaker 2>the devices and IQ rates of declining. So if you

0:01:03.361 --> 0:01:04.881
<v Speaker 2>wanted a reason to get off your phone, there's a

0:01:04.881 --> 0:01:08.001
<v Speaker 2>good one. Anyway, if you want to check out anto

0:01:08.001 --> 0:01:09.801
<v Speaker 2>the previous hours and me to chat with Peter Dunn

0:01:09.841 --> 0:01:13.521
<v Speaker 2>about the Luxeen and Winston having a crack at luxon

0:01:13.601 --> 0:01:15.721
<v Speaker 2>for talking to world leaders and getting ahead of it.

0:01:15.761 --> 0:01:17.641
<v Speaker 2>Should have talked to Winston first. And then we had

0:01:17.641 --> 0:01:20.321
<v Speaker 2>a chat with David Carter, former Speaker of the House

0:01:20.441 --> 0:01:26.161
<v Speaker 2>and Minister of Local Government about just celebrities and voting

0:01:26.201 --> 0:01:28.281
<v Speaker 2>for them just because we recognize the name for our mayors.

0:01:28.361 --> 0:01:30.721
<v Speaker 2>You can go and check out our podcast look for

0:01:30.721 --> 0:01:32.921
<v Speaker 2>the Weekend Collective on the News talks he Be website.

0:01:33.321 --> 0:01:37.401
<v Speaker 2>We'll go to iHeartRadio. But right now it's time for

0:01:37.441 --> 0:01:39.561
<v Speaker 2>another hour, which'll be can checking out in the podcast

0:01:39.561 --> 0:01:41.401
<v Speaker 2>if you're not listening to it live. It is smart money.

0:01:41.521 --> 0:01:45.281
<v Speaker 2>My guest is he's an employment relation expert. He doesn't

0:01:45.321 --> 0:01:47.681
<v Speaker 2>really need much of an introduction to this audience. I

0:01:47.721 --> 0:01:49.361
<v Speaker 2>think if you've been listening to The Weekend Collective for

0:01:49.401 --> 0:01:52.561
<v Speaker 2>a while, you'll be familiar with the tone, the dulcet

0:01:52.561 --> 0:01:54.521
<v Speaker 2>tones of Max Whitehead go a Max, how you going?

0:01:54.561 --> 0:01:56.561
<v Speaker 3>Hey, you've had an exciting build up to the show,

0:01:56.601 --> 0:01:59.001
<v Speaker 3>because really, some really good stuff's been happening. By the sound,

0:01:59.081 --> 0:02:01.681
<v Speaker 3>I wish I was there. I mean, because that your

0:02:01.761 --> 0:02:07.201
<v Speaker 3>last segment that adolescens. I just watched that segment of

0:02:07.401 --> 0:02:08.281
<v Speaker 3>Man it touched me.

0:02:08.521 --> 0:02:11.441
<v Speaker 2>It really is that that. That's a Netflix thing.

0:02:11.521 --> 0:02:13.161
<v Speaker 3>I've got children. You should see it.

0:02:13.281 --> 0:02:14.721
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're going to.

0:02:14.641 --> 0:02:15.441
<v Speaker 3>Put it into schools.

0:02:15.641 --> 0:02:17.961
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be Yeah, apparently it's quite heavy going too,

0:02:18.001 --> 0:02:20.081
<v Speaker 2>I think, isn't it? But yeah, I'll have to check

0:02:20.121 --> 0:02:23.681
<v Speaker 2>it out. I'm busy watching something light and fluffy mine.

0:02:23.721 --> 0:02:25.881
<v Speaker 2>You're also I'm enjoying the f one at the moment

0:02:26.881 --> 0:02:29.041
<v Speaker 2>you're following the F one and all the fortunes of

0:02:29.081 --> 0:02:30.041
<v Speaker 2>Liam Lawson and all that.

0:02:30.121 --> 0:02:32.721
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, I just followed him, of course. And then

0:02:33.761 --> 0:02:35.641
<v Speaker 3>then I think the TA B said that they put

0:02:35.681 --> 0:02:38.241
<v Speaker 3>him something special on for him and if you bet

0:02:38.241 --> 0:02:40.521
<v Speaker 3>for him, and then I realized that the odds can't

0:02:40.521 --> 0:02:42.521
<v Speaker 3>be good for him. No, I didn't expect him to win.

0:02:42.761 --> 0:02:44.681
<v Speaker 3>But you know, a bit sad he got pushed aside,

0:02:44.681 --> 0:02:45.361
<v Speaker 3>but that's life.

0:02:45.641 --> 0:02:48.841
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, now we want your calls on eight hundred

0:02:48.881 --> 0:02:51.601
<v Speaker 2>eighty ten eight. And look, if there's any issue that

0:02:51.641 --> 0:02:56.001
<v Speaker 2>you're concerned about with your either as an employer or

0:02:56.281 --> 0:02:59.681
<v Speaker 2>as an employee, give us a call. And I'm sure

0:02:59.721 --> 0:03:01.521
<v Speaker 2>maxud I love to give you the benefit of his

0:03:01.641 --> 0:03:06.521
<v Speaker 2>wisdom and experience on eight hundred eighty text nine two

0:03:06.641 --> 0:03:09.001
<v Speaker 2>ninety two. But we always like to kick things off

0:03:09.001 --> 0:03:12.001
<v Speaker 2>with a couple of angles of conversation for you to

0:03:12.081 --> 0:03:17.161
<v Speaker 2>digest and participate on. And the first one is is

0:03:17.201 --> 0:03:23.561
<v Speaker 2>there a stigma around age getting old? And should we

0:03:23.641 --> 0:03:27.041
<v Speaker 2>be valuing age a little more than sort of looking

0:03:27.081 --> 0:03:28.961
<v Speaker 2>at people and thinking, oh, they're getting towards sixty five

0:03:29.001 --> 0:03:32.321
<v Speaker 2>and start to write people off and case and point,

0:03:32.361 --> 0:03:37.401
<v Speaker 2>and the reason for this discussion is Winston Peters. Much

0:03:37.481 --> 0:03:39.761
<v Speaker 2>as you know, we might have heard some criticisms of

0:03:39.801 --> 0:03:42.121
<v Speaker 2>them before by Peter Dunn about his motives for having

0:03:42.161 --> 0:03:44.841
<v Speaker 2>a crack at Luxon and all that. And look, Winston Winston,

0:03:44.881 --> 0:03:49.121
<v Speaker 2>the wily old politician, the co Martyr of New Zealand Parliament.

0:03:49.641 --> 0:03:53.001
<v Speaker 2>He's he's been doing it for a long time. He's

0:03:53.161 --> 0:03:58.721
<v Speaker 2>eighty years old now. And yet who would question whether

0:03:59.441 --> 0:04:04.321
<v Speaker 2>Winston is not up to the job, Because clearly Winston

0:04:04.401 --> 0:04:07.321
<v Speaker 2>is up to the job. He's received huge plaudits for

0:04:07.361 --> 0:04:10.281
<v Speaker 2>the job that he does as Foreign Affairs Minister. I

0:04:10.281 --> 0:04:14.481
<v Speaker 2>would say that the average punter who follows politics with

0:04:14.561 --> 0:04:16.721
<v Speaker 2>more than a passing interest would look at Winston and think,

0:04:16.761 --> 0:04:19.441
<v Speaker 2>you know what, regardless of my opinion of him or

0:04:19.481 --> 0:04:22.121
<v Speaker 2>whether I vote for him as a foreign minister, at

0:04:22.121 --> 0:04:25.881
<v Speaker 2>the age of eighty, the guy is he's rocking and rolling.

0:04:26.481 --> 0:04:29.641
<v Speaker 2>So is that an example of why we should not

0:04:29.681 --> 0:04:32.961
<v Speaker 2>write off older people and that age is just a number.

0:04:33.601 --> 0:04:36.161
<v Speaker 3>Well, you got to think about it. It's a great

0:04:36.161 --> 0:04:39.561
<v Speaker 3>discussion because we got Winston, who is wiley. I think

0:04:39.561 --> 0:04:42.041
<v Speaker 3>he really is. But by goodness, I've been around a

0:04:42.041 --> 0:04:44.121
<v Speaker 3>long time, so I remember the days when he skinned

0:04:44.121 --> 0:04:46.601
<v Speaker 3>his knees and he was an embarrassment and I remember

0:04:46.641 --> 0:04:49.481
<v Speaker 3>the time when he got throwing out of the National

0:04:49.481 --> 0:04:52.481
<v Speaker 3>Party for that particular reason. And he's made some silly

0:04:52.521 --> 0:04:55.561
<v Speaker 3>statements in the early days. But now he can read

0:04:55.641 --> 0:04:59.641
<v Speaker 3>politics better than anybody and he's proven that again and again.

0:04:59.841 --> 0:05:02.321
<v Speaker 2>There's also a lesson there and just persistence, isn't it,

0:05:02.601 --> 0:05:05.961
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean he's plead Knox member. He got

0:05:06.001 --> 0:05:08.641
<v Speaker 2>I mean he got ended up out of parliament after

0:05:09.081 --> 0:05:10.681
<v Speaker 2>you know, when people decided that I had enough in

0:05:10.681 --> 0:05:12.601
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand first and he was out and then he's back.

0:05:13.121 --> 0:05:16.641
<v Speaker 3>Jim Boljas kicked him out and he's held a grudge

0:05:16.641 --> 0:05:18.481
<v Speaker 3>against the National Party for years, but he's back with

0:05:18.561 --> 0:05:21.281
<v Speaker 3>him now. But you know, the other thing is the

0:05:21.321 --> 0:05:25.761
<v Speaker 3>President of the United States is about the same age, yes.

0:05:25.561 --> 0:05:27.641
<v Speaker 2>He is, well, actually in the former president of the

0:05:27.721 --> 0:05:29.401
<v Speaker 2>United States is around the same age as well.

0:05:29.481 --> 0:05:32.521
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, and look at the performance difference. It's completely

0:05:33.001 --> 0:05:38.001
<v Speaker 3>you know, the previous president really struggled and his age

0:05:38.041 --> 0:05:42.081
<v Speaker 3>really showed him that last year. So he's witty, he's smart,

0:05:42.121 --> 0:05:45.121
<v Speaker 3>he's electric, but he's thinking he can actually beat the hecklers.

0:05:45.401 --> 0:05:49.121
<v Speaker 3>He really does performing well and his brain is super

0:05:49.161 --> 0:05:52.801
<v Speaker 3>sharp trumpy. Well, I don't know what goes on in

0:05:52.841 --> 0:05:55.921
<v Speaker 3>his brain. I don't think anyone else does. But what

0:05:56.041 --> 0:05:59.121
<v Speaker 3>we got is somebody courageous. But there's that reckless because

0:05:59.121 --> 0:06:02.521
<v Speaker 3>he's getting old as well. But he's really really doing

0:06:02.561 --> 0:06:03.921
<v Speaker 3>some changes to the world.

0:06:03.961 --> 0:06:08.041
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's get onto the Can you you can't discriminate

0:06:08.081 --> 0:06:11.081
<v Speaker 2>against people based on their gender? Generally, I don't think

0:06:11.121 --> 0:06:14.161
<v Speaker 2>you can, And generally I wouldn't think you can discriminate

0:06:14.281 --> 0:06:17.361
<v Speaker 2>against them on age. But can you discriminate against people

0:06:17.401 --> 0:06:17.841
<v Speaker 2>on age?

0:06:17.921 --> 0:06:20.961
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Human Rights ex specifies it. No, you cannot.

0:06:21.321 --> 0:06:25.641
<v Speaker 3>So if employers have problems of this, So a person's

0:06:25.681 --> 0:06:29.881
<v Speaker 3>becoming elderly, they're becoming slower, they be a bit more less,

0:06:30.521 --> 0:06:33.841
<v Speaker 3>can't respond quick quick enough and even physically.

0:06:33.881 --> 0:06:35.241
<v Speaker 2>That's a performance issue, isn't it.

0:06:35.321 --> 0:06:37.201
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And that's how they've got to treat it. But

0:06:37.241 --> 0:06:38.041
<v Speaker 3>not with age.

0:06:38.121 --> 0:06:39.801
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if you turn up for a job and you

0:06:39.881 --> 0:06:42.121
<v Speaker 2>happen to be, you know, in your seventies or something,

0:06:42.401 --> 0:06:45.601
<v Speaker 2>and you demonstrate you can do the job, age shouldn't

0:06:45.601 --> 0:06:46.441
<v Speaker 2>be a barrier to you.

0:06:46.481 --> 0:06:49.441
<v Speaker 3>No, it should not, And but yet it is. I

0:06:49.481 --> 0:06:52.521
<v Speaker 3>can say to you now because I'm getting into that

0:06:52.601 --> 0:06:58.041
<v Speaker 3>older age group and never I just adjust my nappy.

0:06:58.321 --> 0:07:02.001
<v Speaker 3>But just but what I was just about to say is,

0:07:02.281 --> 0:07:05.001
<v Speaker 3>you know, it definitely is a barrier out there. It's subconscient,

0:07:05.241 --> 0:07:07.841
<v Speaker 3>but right through New Zealand. You actually look at in

0:07:07.881 --> 0:07:11.121
<v Speaker 3>your world. You know, radio stars and things in Australia

0:07:11.201 --> 0:07:15.481
<v Speaker 3>they're much older. TV celebrities are the really good ones

0:07:15.481 --> 0:07:19.281
<v Speaker 3>are much older. There's not many older ones here compared

0:07:19.321 --> 0:07:21.761
<v Speaker 3>to what's happening in Australia. They're in New Zealand. We

0:07:21.801 --> 0:07:24.801
<v Speaker 3>do judge people on age, and we shouldn't we should

0:07:24.881 --> 0:07:25.281
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I.

0:07:25.201 --> 0:07:27.681
<v Speaker 2>Guess there are certain industries where age is not such

0:07:27.721 --> 0:07:30.521
<v Speaker 2>a barrier that you know, the older yet you deem

0:07:30.561 --> 0:07:34.041
<v Speaker 2>to have a bit more life experience and dealing with things.

0:07:34.041 --> 0:07:36.641
<v Speaker 2>Probably actually this this gig can talk back. If you're

0:07:36.961 --> 0:07:38.601
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you're around fifty, you're a youngster.

0:07:39.441 --> 0:07:42.761
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well yes, well possibly, but I mean you've got

0:07:42.801 --> 0:07:45.561
<v Speaker 3>to have some intelligence for your sort of work as well,

0:07:45.601 --> 0:07:47.001
<v Speaker 3>and you've got to be quick witted, and you've got

0:07:47.081 --> 0:07:49.401
<v Speaker 3>to be able to handle, you know, situations that can

0:07:49.441 --> 0:07:52.121
<v Speaker 3>be a bit risky and do it lightning fast. What

0:07:52.241 --> 0:07:55.801
<v Speaker 3>if I mean what are diplomacy.

0:07:55.241 --> 0:07:59.681
<v Speaker 2>What can are there ways that older people who still

0:07:59.681 --> 0:08:02.041
<v Speaker 2>want to continue working, Because the other reason we're talking

0:08:02.041 --> 0:08:04.361
<v Speaker 2>about this, they are an increasingly large number of people

0:08:04.721 --> 0:08:07.161
<v Speaker 2>who working beyond the age of sixty five. And I

0:08:07.201 --> 0:08:10.241
<v Speaker 2>think I saw some frightening status to what younger people

0:08:10.321 --> 0:08:12.521
<v Speaker 2>thought how long they were going to work for and

0:08:12.721 --> 0:08:15.241
<v Speaker 2>there was quite a large number. I need to find

0:08:15.241 --> 0:08:18.841
<v Speaker 2>that stat actually about how many people thought they would

0:08:18.841 --> 0:08:20.961
<v Speaker 2>be stopping at sixty five, and it was a minority,

0:08:20.961 --> 0:08:21.721
<v Speaker 2>I think, wasn't it.

0:08:21.881 --> 0:08:25.281
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was. And of course nowadays people are wanting

0:08:25.321 --> 0:08:28.361
<v Speaker 3>to come back. If anything, the older people are the

0:08:28.401 --> 0:08:31.681
<v Speaker 3>pension doesn't quite give you that luxurious, nice living standard

0:08:31.681 --> 0:08:33.961
<v Speaker 3>as you had before. Now there's a couple of things

0:08:34.001 --> 0:08:35.721
<v Speaker 3>that older people should do if they want to get

0:08:35.761 --> 0:08:38.761
<v Speaker 3>back in the workforce, and that is one. There's a

0:08:38.801 --> 0:08:41.081
<v Speaker 3>perception out there that you're going to want more money.

0:08:41.241 --> 0:08:43.841
<v Speaker 3>I actually talked to an HR person today just because

0:08:43.841 --> 0:08:46.681
<v Speaker 3>I knew this was coming up, and she said that

0:08:46.801 --> 0:08:49.161
<v Speaker 3>we actually have a feeling that people are going to

0:08:49.481 --> 0:08:52.361
<v Speaker 3>of the older generation will be expecting high money. That's

0:08:52.441 --> 0:08:53.721
<v Speaker 3>one that surprises me.

0:08:54.281 --> 0:08:56.201
<v Speaker 2>I would have thought, because.

0:08:55.961 --> 0:08:57.401
<v Speaker 3>You've been around a long time, and you do have

0:08:57.441 --> 0:08:59.921
<v Speaker 3>the experience. You've been in the industry for years and

0:09:00.001 --> 0:09:02.521
<v Speaker 3>years and years, and you've had increments every year to

0:09:02.601 --> 0:09:04.641
<v Speaker 3>take you up. And of course you will be expensive.

0:09:05.121 --> 0:09:07.881
<v Speaker 3>So older people, you've got to say that I'm at

0:09:07.921 --> 0:09:12.321
<v Speaker 3>reasonable cost. My expectations aren't beyond what's reasonable. The other

0:09:12.361 --> 0:09:17.401
<v Speaker 3>thing is technology, because that's a barrier old The people

0:09:17.441 --> 0:09:20.801
<v Speaker 3>that are making decisions expect you because you're older, you're

0:09:20.841 --> 0:09:23.441
<v Speaker 3>not savvy with tech. You need to get up there.

0:09:23.561 --> 0:09:26.001
<v Speaker 3>You need to keep right up to what's going on,

0:09:26.401 --> 0:09:28.881
<v Speaker 3>and particularly with AI right now, because that's going to

0:09:28.921 --> 0:09:31.121
<v Speaker 3>change the world. Now. If you're right up to date

0:09:31.161 --> 0:09:33.401
<v Speaker 3>and even ahead of some of the younger people, you're

0:09:33.401 --> 0:09:35.121
<v Speaker 3>going to be a head for that job. Interview as well,

0:09:35.161 --> 0:09:37.841
<v Speaker 3>I would say, because the employer will be looking at it.

0:09:38.081 --> 0:09:40.041
<v Speaker 3>So the way to actually sell it, if I was

0:09:40.081 --> 0:09:43.001
<v Speaker 3>you would say, hey, I'm very much aware of it.

0:09:43.041 --> 0:09:47.001
<v Speaker 3>I may be using AI myself, however I do it

0:09:47.041 --> 0:09:49.241
<v Speaker 3>cautiously because I don't know where it's going to go.

0:09:50.121 --> 0:09:53.401
<v Speaker 2>Actually, are people allowed to know how old you are

0:09:53.441 --> 0:09:57.161
<v Speaker 2>for a job. No, unless it's something where there's a

0:09:57.201 --> 0:09:59.441
<v Speaker 2>prescribed by law thing like I don't think there's an age,

0:09:59.521 --> 0:10:01.201
<v Speaker 2>which you can be a commercial pilot or something.

0:10:01.321 --> 0:10:04.441
<v Speaker 3>Well, what we advise, we've have for years and years

0:10:04.441 --> 0:10:07.601
<v Speaker 3>and years of employers, and I work for the EMA

0:10:07.721 --> 0:10:12.241
<v Speaker 3>Employees Association, do not ever ask their age because then

0:10:12.281 --> 0:10:14.841
<v Speaker 3>you're up for an allegation of discrimination.

0:10:15.161 --> 0:10:17.841
<v Speaker 2>So you actually cannot even ask someone. Look, you don't

0:10:17.841 --> 0:10:19.921
<v Speaker 2>have to tell me. Can you say, Look, you don't

0:10:19.961 --> 0:10:21.801
<v Speaker 2>have to tell me, but how old are you?

0:10:21.801 --> 0:10:21.961
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:10:22.721 --> 0:10:24.201
<v Speaker 2>Can you say what years were you?

0:10:24.281 --> 0:10:25.361
<v Speaker 3>It's not advisable.

0:10:25.441 --> 0:10:27.521
<v Speaker 2>Can you ask them what year did you go to

0:10:27.561 --> 0:10:28.121
<v Speaker 2>that school?

0:10:28.241 --> 0:10:30.481
<v Speaker 3>You could ask them that, but I mean again, they

0:10:30.481 --> 0:10:33.401
<v Speaker 3>could use that and say he knew that I was

0:10:33.841 --> 0:10:37.721
<v Speaker 3>touching on fifty nine and mine's going to get a

0:10:37.721 --> 0:10:41.041
<v Speaker 3>pension next year or whatever, and then discriminated against me.

0:10:42.121 --> 0:10:44.281
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you just don't want to get into legal

0:10:44.321 --> 0:10:46.481
<v Speaker 3>action against you because you're going to turn that that

0:10:46.521 --> 0:10:50.521
<v Speaker 3>person down. They will then claim what was the reason, Oh,

0:10:50.561 --> 0:10:53.081
<v Speaker 3>it's because of my age. I'll sue the buggers.

0:10:53.161 --> 0:10:56.401
<v Speaker 2>God, we'd love your calls on this. Eight hundred and

0:10:56.401 --> 0:10:58.361
<v Speaker 2>eighty ten. Aady, are you someone who's older who's looking

0:10:58.401 --> 0:11:02.321
<v Speaker 2>at keeping working or getting a job, and how do

0:11:02.361 --> 0:11:06.081
<v Speaker 2>you handle the question of age or do you believe

0:11:06.121 --> 0:11:10.281
<v Speaker 2>that we are, that we stigmatize and look at older

0:11:10.321 --> 0:11:12.361
<v Speaker 2>people in a negative way, when in fact they might

0:11:12.401 --> 0:11:15.481
<v Speaker 2>have a lot to offer. Case in point, as I say,

0:11:15.881 --> 0:11:18.401
<v Speaker 2>just because he's out his eightieth birthday, Winston Peters. To

0:11:18.401 --> 0:11:21.241
<v Speaker 2>be honest, if you didn't have a Minister of Foreign

0:11:21.281 --> 0:11:23.721
<v Speaker 2>Affairs and you could just hire anyone and Winston was available,

0:11:23.721 --> 0:11:25.561
<v Speaker 2>he'd be like, let's have a chat with Whney, wouldn't

0:11:25.561 --> 0:11:27.441
<v Speaker 2>you You'd hire them, good high Whinny, wouldn't you.

0:11:27.561 --> 0:11:30.081
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I'd go to him for advice. Hey, what's

0:11:30.121 --> 0:11:32.121
<v Speaker 3>going to happen in the future. He seems to better

0:11:32.161 --> 0:11:34.881
<v Speaker 3>predict it rather well because he's how often is here

0:11:34.961 --> 0:11:38.761
<v Speaker 3>the balance of power? The whole population don't get this privilege.

0:11:38.761 --> 0:11:41.161
<v Speaker 3>He's at it so many times. He's actually told us

0:11:41.321 --> 0:11:44.881
<v Speaker 3>who we're going to have in parliament, told us what anyway?

0:11:44.961 --> 0:11:45.761
<v Speaker 3>Enough of Winston.

0:11:47.521 --> 0:11:50.201
<v Speaker 2>Hey, let's take some calls. Where are we up to?

0:11:50.321 --> 0:11:54.561
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to Tom, Hey, Tom Max waited here, it's.

0:11:55.921 --> 0:11:59.161
<v Speaker 4>Tom here. I've got a performance issue, which you just

0:11:59.201 --> 0:12:02.401
<v Speaker 4>mentioned before at my work. I just want to ask

0:12:02.441 --> 0:12:04.841
<v Speaker 4>your opinion about my situation, if that's okay.

0:12:04.681 --> 0:12:07.201
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sure. Have you been accused of poor performance.

0:12:08.481 --> 0:12:11.601
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and so I don't want to need to be

0:12:11.601 --> 0:12:13.561
<v Speaker 4>careful about not reguining my who I work for. But

0:12:14.721 --> 0:12:19.401
<v Speaker 4>so I work for a large government department, and have.

0:12:19.361 --> 0:12:22.001
<v Speaker 3>They given you a performance improvement plan?

0:12:23.481 --> 0:12:24.601
<v Speaker 4>They're about two yes?

0:12:25.601 --> 0:12:25.761
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:12:25.801 --> 0:12:31.361
<v Speaker 4>So well, firstly, so the work I do is office based,

0:12:31.721 --> 0:12:35.961
<v Speaker 4>and we receive applications from members of the public which

0:12:35.961 --> 0:12:43.321
<v Speaker 4>we need to process and we need to evaluate the applicants,

0:12:44.161 --> 0:12:51.961
<v Speaker 4>how the applicants meets various government policies and determine various

0:12:52.041 --> 0:12:58.841
<v Speaker 4>risk factors. Can get very complicated, and so I've been

0:12:58.841 --> 0:13:05.561
<v Speaker 4>told that I'm about ten or twenty below the weekly output.

0:13:05.721 --> 0:13:09.281
<v Speaker 3>So Tom, the big key here for you is that

0:13:09.321 --> 0:13:11.841
<v Speaker 3>you are entitled to a lot of information which I

0:13:11.881 --> 0:13:15.481
<v Speaker 3>guarantee you haven't had. You might surprise me government departments

0:13:15.521 --> 0:13:18.801
<v Speaker 3>of HR departments that can spend all day preparing this stuff.

0:13:18.881 --> 0:13:21.001
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, what you can what you should be asking

0:13:21.081 --> 0:13:24.001
<v Speaker 3>for is what exactly have I done that I've let

0:13:24.081 --> 0:13:25.961
<v Speaker 3>you down that you think I'm not performing?

0:13:26.041 --> 0:13:26.241
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:13:26.521 --> 0:13:29.001
<v Speaker 3>I want you to name the dates, the time, the

0:13:29.041 --> 0:13:33.121
<v Speaker 3>people involved, the conversations that actually give you that right

0:13:33.481 --> 0:13:36.641
<v Speaker 3>that evidence. Can you give me five examples please, and

0:13:36.681 --> 0:13:40.481
<v Speaker 3>then specify you want facts, not just you want you

0:13:40.521 --> 0:13:42.361
<v Speaker 3>want facts, not just opinions.

0:13:42.561 --> 0:13:44.881
<v Speaker 2>So sorry, what are the rest of the what's the

0:13:44.921 --> 0:13:46.561
<v Speaker 2>rest of the story. What's where you're at with at

0:13:46.561 --> 0:13:46.921
<v Speaker 2>the moment?

0:13:47.881 --> 0:13:52.041
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So I I've had a few meets my manager,

0:13:52.201 --> 0:13:56.321
<v Speaker 4>and I mean so our workers can be get quite

0:13:56.401 --> 0:14:01.081
<v Speaker 4>assessed as well, and so my my quity is very

0:14:01.081 --> 0:14:03.561
<v Speaker 4>good to excellent for last few months. There's no problem

0:14:03.641 --> 0:14:06.681
<v Speaker 4>my quarity. And I sit to my manager just last week,

0:14:06.721 --> 0:14:08.961
<v Speaker 4>I said, are there any other issues with my employment?

0:14:09.001 --> 0:14:11.521
<v Speaker 4>Which is an issue? There's no, not at all. Just

0:14:12.121 --> 0:14:16.201
<v Speaker 4>your output is below our expectations. So my question is

0:14:17.601 --> 0:14:19.401
<v Speaker 4>there's that enough for them to put me on a

0:14:19.401 --> 0:14:23.281
<v Speaker 4>performance plan? And so they he's first giving me six

0:14:23.321 --> 0:14:27.281
<v Speaker 4>weeks ago on what he calls informal performance plan. But boy,

0:14:27.441 --> 0:14:30.641
<v Speaker 4>is like five pages of documents which I need to sign,

0:14:30.881 --> 0:14:37.001
<v Speaker 4>and there's expectations per week for every six weeks. And

0:14:37.121 --> 0:14:39.561
<v Speaker 4>if I don't meet the expectations and that six weeks,

0:14:39.761 --> 0:14:41.841
<v Speaker 4>then I go on a formal performance plan. And I

0:14:41.881 --> 0:14:45.521
<v Speaker 4>was told that if I don't meet expectations after three

0:14:45.561 --> 0:14:48.361
<v Speaker 4>months on the formal performance plan, then I could be

0:14:48.361 --> 0:14:51.481
<v Speaker 4>down the road. I'll be down the road.

0:14:51.641 --> 0:14:53.481
<v Speaker 2>Tom can I just ask you before we get into

0:14:53.521 --> 0:14:57.521
<v Speaker 2>this further, do you know how were you set in

0:14:57.601 --> 0:14:59.961
<v Speaker 2>terms of your output with other other people?

0:14:59.961 --> 0:15:01.481
<v Speaker 6>And asked that?

0:15:01.881 --> 0:15:04.201
<v Speaker 4>So where I worked, there is I mean, I mean nationwide,

0:15:04.241 --> 0:15:07.721
<v Speaker 4>there are thousands of employees, and where I work, there's

0:15:07.761 --> 0:15:11.401
<v Speaker 4>probably I'm not sure exactly about probably four hundred plus

0:15:11.441 --> 0:15:13.761
<v Speaker 4>employees where I work. I mean, we all do different

0:15:13.761 --> 0:15:16.401
<v Speaker 4>types of work, that's all kind of similar. And I'm

0:15:16.441 --> 0:15:18.801
<v Speaker 4>absolutely certain I'm not the only person who's not meeting

0:15:18.841 --> 0:15:22.281
<v Speaker 4>their target requirements. And I have asked that of them

0:15:22.601 --> 0:15:24.201
<v Speaker 4>and they say, no, we can't talk to other people

0:15:24.201 --> 0:15:25.281
<v Speaker 4>wause it's private information.

0:15:25.881 --> 0:15:28.041
<v Speaker 2>Oh Okay, there's a lot to dig into here, isn't there?

0:15:28.041 --> 0:15:30.521
<v Speaker 2>Max you get into it.

0:15:30.961 --> 0:15:34.241
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well I go back back by the time I

0:15:34.361 --> 0:15:37.521
<v Speaker 3>go right back to where I started. What I advise

0:15:37.601 --> 0:15:40.241
<v Speaker 3>you to do is ask some questions, get some facts.

0:15:40.281 --> 0:15:43.681
<v Speaker 3>You have been accused of something, you should ask them

0:15:43.761 --> 0:15:46.121
<v Speaker 3>and put this in writing for me or for anybody

0:15:46.241 --> 0:15:48.721
<v Speaker 3>might want to represent you that you've asked them to

0:15:48.761 --> 0:15:52.401
<v Speaker 3>provide the facts to support their allegation of poor performance.

0:15:52.961 --> 0:15:55.641
<v Speaker 3>And look, you've just made a very good point there.

0:15:55.681 --> 0:15:57.561
<v Speaker 3>You know, where do you stand compared to your peers.

0:15:58.561 --> 0:16:00.921
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's a question you can ask, is anyone

0:16:00.921 --> 0:16:03.761
<v Speaker 3>else performing at this level? I mean those sort of

0:16:03.841 --> 0:16:06.401
<v Speaker 3>questions you've got to write to put forward. Sorry, Tom,

0:16:06.481 --> 0:16:08.121
<v Speaker 3>you spoke, Yeah.

0:16:08.121 --> 0:16:10.321
<v Speaker 4>So who's the reply to that? Was that more than

0:16:10.361 --> 0:16:14.121
<v Speaker 4>half of two teams who do the same work as

0:16:14.161 --> 0:16:16.121
<v Speaker 4>I do, more than half of the staff who do

0:16:16.681 --> 0:16:20.641
<v Speaker 4>the same week as I are meeting expectations. So I

0:16:20.641 --> 0:16:22.521
<v Speaker 4>don't know what that means. More than half is that

0:16:23.161 --> 0:16:25.481
<v Speaker 4>there's tety percent who aren't.

0:16:25.721 --> 0:16:28.001
<v Speaker 3>So in writing put it in right? So I asked

0:16:28.041 --> 0:16:30.681
<v Speaker 3>the boss, can you please give me some responses in writing?

0:16:30.721 --> 0:16:33.881
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm getting advice on this and my advisor needs

0:16:33.921 --> 0:16:35.841
<v Speaker 3>to see what you've got to help how you respond

0:16:35.921 --> 0:16:37.761
<v Speaker 3>to these questions? Ah?

0:16:37.841 --> 0:16:37.961
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:16:38.081 --> 0:16:40.641
<v Speaker 4>So what I do is very much computer based, so

0:16:40.641 --> 0:16:43.441
<v Speaker 4>they've got time and you know, all these apicases we get,

0:16:43.441 --> 0:16:45.241
<v Speaker 4>it's all done in the computer, so that he has

0:16:45.281 --> 0:16:49.521
<v Speaker 4>got statistics to show that on a week, on a monthly, weekly,

0:16:49.561 --> 0:16:51.761
<v Speaker 4>a monthly basis, my output is so much and so

0:16:51.841 --> 0:16:55.401
<v Speaker 4>much and I'm not meeting the expectations of Has he

0:16:55.441 --> 0:16:55.961
<v Speaker 4>given this to you?

0:16:56.041 --> 0:16:56.281
<v Speaker 5>Tom?

0:16:56.601 --> 0:16:58.081
<v Speaker 2>Can? I can? I ask Tom?

0:16:59.281 --> 0:17:00.521
<v Speaker 5>He is?

0:17:01.481 --> 0:17:04.601
<v Speaker 4>He not exactly? But he has got the end he

0:17:04.601 --> 0:17:06.801
<v Speaker 4>would give it to me. I know that you do.

0:17:06.881 --> 0:17:09.321
<v Speaker 2>You get a sense. I've just a couple of questions,

0:17:09.361 --> 0:17:12.001
<v Speaker 2>a bit of guess where here. But firstly I've got

0:17:12.041 --> 0:17:15.041
<v Speaker 2>a text asking have is this a new manager.

0:17:17.081 --> 0:17:19.881
<v Speaker 4>Last six months? But I think I think he might

0:17:19.921 --> 0:17:24.801
<v Speaker 4>be getting directions from higher up. I've been I've been

0:17:24.801 --> 0:17:27.841
<v Speaker 4>at this organization for like just over twenty years now

0:17:28.161 --> 0:17:31.081
<v Speaker 4>and two years from the retirement or two years from

0:17:31.121 --> 0:17:35.041
<v Speaker 4>sixty five, and I've got a good history and good

0:17:35.081 --> 0:17:38.361
<v Speaker 4>record with them. My output very goes up and down,

0:17:38.841 --> 0:17:41.401
<v Speaker 4>but I've got a very good attendance. I turned to

0:17:41.401 --> 0:17:43.681
<v Speaker 4>work every day I've had them.

0:17:45.081 --> 0:17:48.201
<v Speaker 3>I'm just interrupted you because you know we should move on.

0:17:48.241 --> 0:17:50.481
<v Speaker 3>But I was just going to say to you that

0:17:50.601 --> 0:17:52.881
<v Speaker 3>really we've got. What you've got to do is we're

0:17:52.961 --> 0:17:59.201
<v Speaker 3>so careful, so careful that you don't sign off any

0:17:59.241 --> 0:18:01.241
<v Speaker 3>of those new rules he's putting in front of you.

0:18:01.601 --> 0:18:04.881
<v Speaker 3>He'll be even giving you some KPIs key performance issues,

0:18:06.081 --> 0:18:08.881
<v Speaker 3>standards to indicators that you're going to have to get

0:18:08.921 --> 0:18:11.801
<v Speaker 3>to and you might use the words back, are you

0:18:11.881 --> 0:18:14.881
<v Speaker 3>setting me up to fail? And because that's possibly what

0:18:14.961 --> 0:18:18.361
<v Speaker 3>he's trying to do, and say I'm reluctant to sign

0:18:18.441 --> 0:18:24.081
<v Speaker 3>this off until I'm satisfied that it's fear and reasonable person.

0:18:24.561 --> 0:18:30.521
<v Speaker 4>My main question is, if I don't meet the I

0:18:30.921 --> 0:18:35.681
<v Speaker 4>don't meet the expectations after the formal performance plan and

0:18:35.761 --> 0:18:39.521
<v Speaker 4>review after several months, is that enough to dismiss someone?

0:18:39.721 --> 0:18:43.121
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it is if you fail again right through. But

0:18:43.161 --> 0:18:46.441
<v Speaker 3>they if you challenge them, if you came to someone

0:18:46.521 --> 0:18:48.921
<v Speaker 3>like me and we challenge them, They've got to show

0:18:49.321 --> 0:18:52.321
<v Speaker 3>there was enough justification for them to dismiss you. And

0:18:52.321 --> 0:18:54.641
<v Speaker 3>that's what I'm asking you to do now, is to

0:18:54.681 --> 0:18:58.401
<v Speaker 3>ask them for that information now, to justify what their

0:18:58.441 --> 0:19:00.881
<v Speaker 3>actions are and why they're coming at you, because I

0:19:00.881 --> 0:19:03.601
<v Speaker 3>can sense it from you, Tom, You've bewildered at the moment.

0:19:03.721 --> 0:19:06.241
<v Speaker 2>Can I also ask Tom, do you have a sense

0:19:07.201 --> 0:19:10.361
<v Speaker 2>that they are doing in these performance reviews as a

0:19:10.401 --> 0:19:13.921
<v Speaker 2>way of reducing numbers within your workplace, and so they've

0:19:13.961 --> 0:19:17.081
<v Speaker 2>simply changed the goalposts so they can find a bunch

0:19:17.121 --> 0:19:19.681
<v Speaker 2>of people who don't quite meet what their targets are.

0:19:20.801 --> 0:19:22.161
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure. I'm not sure about that. I mean,

0:19:22.161 --> 0:19:24.241
<v Speaker 4>it's a speak of one as a big organization. So

0:19:25.241 --> 0:19:27.841
<v Speaker 4>we haven't had any you know, in the last year

0:19:28.361 --> 0:19:32.401
<v Speaker 4>with government cutbacks. We haven't had significant cutbacks.

0:19:33.081 --> 0:19:35.801
<v Speaker 3>I really don't know, so I'll help you there. Because

0:19:35.841 --> 0:19:38.801
<v Speaker 3>normally it's easier to make somebody redundant than it is

0:19:38.841 --> 0:19:41.881
<v Speaker 3>to actually get them for flight issues. So it's quicker.

0:19:42.121 --> 0:19:43.081
<v Speaker 3>It's a quicker way of doing it.

0:19:43.121 --> 0:19:46.001
<v Speaker 2>Cheaper to get them for performance issue though, isn't it possibly?

0:19:46.121 --> 0:19:48.361
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Because I mean twenty years of service where Tom is,

0:19:48.721 --> 0:19:50.401
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be a costly person to get out

0:19:50.441 --> 0:19:50.721
<v Speaker 3>the door.

0:19:50.881 --> 0:19:54.721
<v Speaker 4>So first long told any redundancy or know that?

0:19:55.001 --> 0:19:57.521
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, hey, looks stay on the line. We'll move

0:19:57.521 --> 0:19:59.201
<v Speaker 2>on Tom. But stay listening because I just want to

0:19:59.201 --> 0:20:03.201
<v Speaker 2>ask Max, So what a Tom's just remind us. I'm

0:20:03.201 --> 0:20:05.001
<v Speaker 2>sure there are plenty of people who will have these issues.

0:20:05.921 --> 0:20:08.081
<v Speaker 2>If you suspect you're being managed out of your job.

0:20:08.281 --> 0:20:10.001
<v Speaker 2>What are his first actions?

0:20:10.081 --> 0:20:10.241
<v Speaker 6>Now?

0:20:10.321 --> 0:20:11.841
<v Speaker 3>First thing he should do is go back and ask

0:20:11.881 --> 0:20:14.161
<v Speaker 3>for facts and ask for it in writing because he

0:20:14.201 --> 0:20:17.281
<v Speaker 3>needs to get advice, and before he signs off, and

0:20:17.321 --> 0:20:20.441
<v Speaker 3>then when he's asked again sign the document, he should

0:20:20.481 --> 0:20:22.921
<v Speaker 3>since say I don't like I don't I don't feel

0:20:22.921 --> 0:20:26.401
<v Speaker 3>comfortable signing this because you're setting me up to fail.

0:20:26.761 --> 0:20:30.441
<v Speaker 3>If he's got a good reason and six months in

0:20:30.481 --> 0:20:32.001
<v Speaker 3>the job, he's.

0:20:31.841 --> 0:20:35.561
<v Speaker 2>Been twenty years there. See. That seems to me that

0:20:35.561 --> 0:20:38.961
<v Speaker 2>if someone can be successful and be in a position

0:20:39.001 --> 0:20:42.161
<v Speaker 2>for twenty years to suddenly be managed out of a job.

0:20:42.401 --> 0:20:46.361
<v Speaker 2>Because the thing that raises alarm for me is are

0:20:46.401 --> 0:20:48.801
<v Speaker 2>they shifting the goalposts from the gig that you've been

0:20:48.841 --> 0:20:53.201
<v Speaker 2>doing consistently and acceptably for twenty years? So how could

0:20:53.241 --> 0:20:56.201
<v Speaker 2>it have changed? He would, he'd be there must be

0:20:56.201 --> 0:20:57.961
<v Speaker 2>a way of raising that. It's like, hang on a minute,

0:20:58.081 --> 0:21:00.561
<v Speaker 2>twenty years. I've been doing fine. This has never been

0:21:00.641 --> 0:21:03.321
<v Speaker 2>raised with him before. I haven't changed my output. It's

0:21:03.361 --> 0:21:06.161
<v Speaker 2>as it has been for the last twenty years. You're

0:21:06.201 --> 0:21:07.121
<v Speaker 2>shifting the goal pace to.

0:21:07.081 --> 0:21:10.321
<v Speaker 3>Get rim what's happened? And he's already told us so.

0:21:10.521 --> 0:21:12.841
<v Speaker 3>A couple of levels up, there's been a new manager coming.

0:21:13.201 --> 0:21:15.241
<v Speaker 3>The new manager and that's what already A Texas is

0:21:15.521 --> 0:21:17.921
<v Speaker 3>mentioned to you. The new managers come in. I'm going

0:21:18.001 --> 0:21:19.881
<v Speaker 3>to make a name for myself here. I'll get rid

0:21:19.921 --> 0:21:20.601
<v Speaker 3>of the dead wood.

0:21:21.001 --> 0:21:24.921
<v Speaker 2>Tom's they But if you've been successful in a job

0:21:24.961 --> 0:21:27.921
<v Speaker 2>for twenty years, they can't suddenly go Oh, by the

0:21:27.921 --> 0:21:29.881
<v Speaker 2>way we've set these are your targets. Now, if you

0:21:29.881 --> 0:21:31.681
<v Speaker 2>don't meet them, we're going to performance manage you out.

0:21:31.761 --> 0:21:33.361
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't feel like that's.

0:21:33.161 --> 0:21:36.081
<v Speaker 3>Now they want time to sign it. You've got my boat,

0:21:36.081 --> 0:21:38.041
<v Speaker 3>You've got my advice on both days. First, get the

0:21:38.081 --> 0:21:40.521
<v Speaker 3>facts and the second mine is do not sign it

0:21:40.881 --> 0:21:43.041
<v Speaker 3>until you're comfortable that you can achieve those things.

0:21:43.121 --> 0:21:43.321
<v Speaker 7>Yep.

0:21:43.441 --> 0:21:45.921
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So hopefully that's good advice for your tom and

0:21:46.321 --> 0:21:49.881
<v Speaker 2>you know, otherwise, get some advice. I'm sure people want

0:21:49.881 --> 0:21:50.201
<v Speaker 2>to get it.

0:21:50.201 --> 0:21:51.801
<v Speaker 3>And Tim, I'm going to tell you that there's going

0:21:51.841 --> 0:21:54.361
<v Speaker 3>to be callers now, because this happens every day in

0:21:54.441 --> 0:21:57.681
<v Speaker 3>my world. I'll get callers from everybody and the new

0:21:57.721 --> 0:22:00.641
<v Speaker 3>managers come in and he wants to show the boss

0:22:00.681 --> 0:22:02.841
<v Speaker 3>how wonderful he is cleaning out the dude would and

0:22:02.881 --> 0:22:04.001
<v Speaker 3>get the performance back up.

0:22:05.441 --> 0:22:08.601
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, that sounds like a challenging scenario, doesn't it. Right, Hey, look,

0:22:08.961 --> 0:22:10.921
<v Speaker 2>we'll be back in just a moment. It's twenty eight

0:22:10.921 --> 0:22:12.041
<v Speaker 2>and a half past five.

0:22:15.161 --> 0:22:15.881
<v Speaker 8>Sitting.

0:22:26.321 --> 0:22:31.241
<v Speaker 2>Living's welcome back to the week and collective. This is

0:22:31.281 --> 0:22:33.361
<v Speaker 2>smart money. My guess is Max Whitehead, as we all know,

0:22:33.361 --> 0:22:36.721
<v Speaker 2>an employment relations expert talking well, we've been talking about

0:22:36.801 --> 0:22:39.521
<v Speaker 2>age as well, but the last conversation has thrown up

0:22:39.561 --> 0:22:41.761
<v Speaker 2>the question around how do you how can you avoid

0:22:41.881 --> 0:22:45.201
<v Speaker 2>being performanced managed out of a job. But any questions

0:22:45.241 --> 0:22:47.561
<v Speaker 2>you've got around your employment relationship, whether it be as

0:22:47.601 --> 0:22:49.401
<v Speaker 2>a boss or an employee, you give us a call,

0:22:50.001 --> 0:22:50.961
<v Speaker 2>Helen Hello.

0:22:51.041 --> 0:22:56.401
<v Speaker 8>Oh hello, Kevin Max. Now this thing about our discrimination

0:22:57.161 --> 0:23:02.601
<v Speaker 8>on age Tony Sorry. Peter Bouchi is the chief on vidsman.

0:23:03.201 --> 0:23:06.281
<v Speaker 8>He has been forced out of his job. His frames

0:23:06.361 --> 0:23:08.801
<v Speaker 8>is as good as it ever was, simply because he

0:23:08.921 --> 0:23:13.801
<v Speaker 8>turned twenty egoes, he's turned seventy two. And when they

0:23:13.801 --> 0:23:17.521
<v Speaker 8>did that revise the legislation to bring that in, they

0:23:17.561 --> 0:23:21.681
<v Speaker 8>didn't change that, so that the Ombuton's office, you know,

0:23:21.761 --> 0:23:24.281
<v Speaker 8>he had to go by because he was seventy two

0:23:24.361 --> 0:23:25.361
<v Speaker 8>and no other reason.

0:23:26.001 --> 0:23:28.801
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that's a separate that's a separate act of parliament.

0:23:28.841 --> 0:23:30.561
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's the way it is.

0:23:30.641 --> 0:23:33.201
<v Speaker 3>Tim was just telling me that during the break, because

0:23:34.041 --> 0:23:36.401
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there is a human rights tech which affects

0:23:36.441 --> 0:23:39.121
<v Speaker 3>all of us ordinary people, but that person is deemed

0:23:39.121 --> 0:23:41.721
<v Speaker 3>to be somebody pretty special, and that's so they passed

0:23:42.521 --> 0:23:46.121
<v Speaker 3>an act of parliament. He was he's gone, isn't he?

0:23:46.801 --> 0:23:49.681
<v Speaker 8>I think? So he's yeah, sharp as attack. You know,

0:23:49.761 --> 0:23:51.841
<v Speaker 8>I doesn't want to go and doing a great job.

0:23:52.681 --> 0:23:54.801
<v Speaker 3>We get judges like that and they get right up

0:23:54.801 --> 0:23:58.361
<v Speaker 3>there in terms of age, but you know that they

0:23:58.481 --> 0:24:01.001
<v Speaker 3>can't stay too long either because of the he gets

0:24:01.041 --> 0:24:01.281
<v Speaker 3>up to that.

0:24:01.481 --> 0:24:05.321
<v Speaker 2>I actually think there is another reason for that as well, though, Helen,

0:24:05.441 --> 0:24:09.641
<v Speaker 2>is that the Ombudsman is someone who reviews actions of

0:24:09.801 --> 0:24:12.521
<v Speaker 2>the government and the public service. So he has actually

0:24:12.561 --> 0:24:17.281
<v Speaker 2>a very powerful role. And so if he was if

0:24:17.281 --> 0:24:19.841
<v Speaker 2>he was getting older and hanging on to the job

0:24:20.601 --> 0:24:23.241
<v Speaker 2>even though maybe he wasn't as good as it, it's

0:24:23.361 --> 0:24:26.161
<v Speaker 2>very difficult for the government to say it's time for

0:24:26.241 --> 0:24:30.401
<v Speaker 2>you to go when because it looks it could look

0:24:30.441 --> 0:24:32.841
<v Speaker 2>bad that they're doing it because they don't like the

0:24:32.881 --> 0:24:36.881
<v Speaker 2>decisions he's arriving at. So the Act the Act probably

0:24:37.121 --> 0:24:39.321
<v Speaker 2>is necessary from the point of view of like it

0:24:39.481 --> 0:24:44.001
<v Speaker 2>just removes that uncomfortable issue of having to say to

0:24:44.001 --> 0:24:46.641
<v Speaker 2>the ombudsmen, will you're done, sunshine?

0:24:47.041 --> 0:24:48.561
<v Speaker 8>I can see that, I could see that, but.

0:24:49.321 --> 0:24:51.521
<v Speaker 3>Just you know, a lot of those senior roles have

0:24:51.601 --> 0:24:55.441
<v Speaker 3>fixed term just specifically for that, but they don't mention

0:24:55.601 --> 0:24:57.241
<v Speaker 3>age quite often, but this one they do.

0:24:57.521 --> 0:25:00.681
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So actually it's a strange one because you think

0:25:00.681 --> 0:25:03.481
<v Speaker 2>they can amount that just by simply saying you've got

0:25:03.481 --> 0:25:07.801
<v Speaker 2>a five year term and maybe have something in there

0:25:07.841 --> 0:25:10.521
<v Speaker 2>that if somehow we've got questions around your cognitive ability,

0:25:10.561 --> 0:25:13.601
<v Speaker 2>you have to do a pass an assessment. Oh it

0:25:13.601 --> 0:25:15.081
<v Speaker 2>all gets complicated, doesn't max.

0:25:14.961 --> 0:25:17.201
<v Speaker 3>Well, it does. There's so much it does. And we

0:25:17.241 --> 0:25:20.761
<v Speaker 3>see these legislations that are conflicting with each other, and

0:25:20.921 --> 0:25:23.921
<v Speaker 3>the judge, particularly in the High Court and some of

0:25:23.921 --> 0:25:26.561
<v Speaker 3>those other ones have to make a decision which which

0:25:26.681 --> 0:25:29.321
<v Speaker 3>legislation will take prison in here, and they do it

0:25:29.401 --> 0:25:30.121
<v Speaker 3>quite frequently.

0:25:31.521 --> 0:25:34.281
<v Speaker 2>Here's one I've gotten. I've been in a telco forty

0:25:34.361 --> 0:25:37.761
<v Speaker 2>nine years, very experienced up to date forced us into

0:25:38.041 --> 0:25:41.721
<v Speaker 2>owner operator. They've just offered me a contract. W's reduced

0:25:41.761 --> 0:25:44.081
<v Speaker 2>my ind come by forty percent from a year ago.

0:25:45.001 --> 0:25:47.721
<v Speaker 2>I barely survive now, so I'll be below minimum wage.

0:25:47.761 --> 0:25:49.841
<v Speaker 2>No wonder they have problems in the North Island to

0:25:49.961 --> 0:25:51.801
<v Speaker 2>the with internet outages.

0:25:53.281 --> 0:25:56.921
<v Speaker 3>Bloody hell is this chorus? I think now? It doesn't

0:25:56.961 --> 0:26:01.961
<v Speaker 3>say they went and gave them made them contractors, And

0:26:02.321 --> 0:26:06.401
<v Speaker 3>my goodness, that's that's really s And I would say

0:26:06.401 --> 0:26:09.161
<v Speaker 3>that if your skills, surely you can get another job

0:26:09.201 --> 0:26:12.081
<v Speaker 3>somewhere else. Why put up with a minimum wage or

0:26:12.161 --> 0:26:13.241
<v Speaker 3>less than even.

0:26:13.641 --> 0:26:16.081
<v Speaker 2>Well's I guess as he said, because if you're.

0:26:15.921 --> 0:26:18.481
<v Speaker 3>A contract well that's lawful. By the way, if you're

0:26:18.521 --> 0:26:20.961
<v Speaker 3>a contractor, you can be paid less than a minimum wage.

0:26:22.641 --> 0:26:24.721
<v Speaker 2>That does seem pretty rapid, doesn't it. I don't know

0:26:25.001 --> 0:26:28.761
<v Speaker 2>beyond that. Well, if he could, if you've been an employee,

0:26:28.801 --> 0:26:30.761
<v Speaker 2>how do they force you to become a contractor once

0:26:30.801 --> 0:26:32.161
<v Speaker 2>you've been an employee.

0:26:32.321 --> 0:26:34.241
<v Speaker 3>It's why you can be very cautious when you actually

0:26:34.241 --> 0:26:36.481
<v Speaker 3>do that. Flick over and agree with the boss, but

0:26:36.601 --> 0:26:39.361
<v Speaker 3>you can still challenge it and say, well, in reality,

0:26:39.441 --> 0:26:42.521
<v Speaker 3>I'm an employee. Because all these there's a heap of tests.

0:26:42.761 --> 0:26:44.681
<v Speaker 3>It's complicated, but it can get there.

0:26:46.161 --> 0:26:48.841
<v Speaker 2>Another one says. A text says experience and capability to

0:26:48.841 --> 0:26:52.281
<v Speaker 2>do jobs should be respecting the work, et cetera. For

0:26:52.401 --> 0:26:55.001
<v Speaker 2>the older age group, older people have come through the

0:26:55.081 --> 0:26:58.081
<v Speaker 2>invention and development over our time and employment. I find

0:26:58.121 --> 0:27:00.201
<v Speaker 2>young people now want others to do to work for them,

0:27:00.201 --> 0:27:03.201
<v Speaker 2>and I think technology and sorry and think technology will

0:27:03.241 --> 0:27:06.521
<v Speaker 2>do and everything doesn't work out that way. Get the job,

0:27:06.561 --> 0:27:08.041
<v Speaker 2>do the work, don't leave the computer us.

0:27:08.401 --> 0:27:10.641
<v Speaker 3>Well, one of the reasons we're well and very low

0:27:11.241 --> 0:27:13.961
<v Speaker 3>productivity in New Zealand is the fact that we let

0:27:14.081 --> 0:27:17.961
<v Speaker 3>our technology is not up there because ninety seven percent

0:27:18.081 --> 0:27:22.241
<v Speaker 3>of all businesses in New Zealand, not all the enterprises

0:27:22.601 --> 0:27:24.961
<v Speaker 3>are less than twenty people in there, so we're small

0:27:25.041 --> 0:27:30.281
<v Speaker 3>businesses and we haven't got that AI will the robotics particularly,

0:27:30.321 --> 0:27:34.201
<v Speaker 3>and these young people expect robotics to do everything. Unfortunately

0:27:34.241 --> 0:27:36.441
<v Speaker 3>a lot of businesses just can't afford that, and that's

0:27:36.481 --> 0:27:40.361
<v Speaker 3>why we're lagging behind the competitors around the globe.

0:27:41.161 --> 0:27:44.001
<v Speaker 2>Another text here from Patricia high Tim and Max. Great

0:27:44.001 --> 0:27:48.321
<v Speaker 2>call from Tom. My opinion is new manager being backed

0:27:48.321 --> 0:27:51.681
<v Speaker 2>by senior management. Therefore new manager has the confidence to

0:27:51.681 --> 0:27:54.841
<v Speaker 2>deal with Tom full stop. Stand your ground, Tom, listen

0:27:54.841 --> 0:27:57.041
<v Speaker 2>to Max. So much for the no surprises at performance

0:27:57.041 --> 0:27:59.521
<v Speaker 2>review time. This carry on is rife and government departments

0:27:59.601 --> 0:28:00.321
<v Speaker 2>cheers Patricia.

0:28:00.481 --> 0:28:04.121
<v Speaker 3>Oh go Patricia. I liked her her texts and she's

0:28:04.121 --> 0:28:06.241
<v Speaker 3>dead right. We're banks to all that. Yeah, I think

0:28:06.241 --> 0:28:08.681
<v Speaker 3>you need to challenge it, Tom and ask for more facts.

0:28:09.201 --> 0:28:12.801
<v Speaker 2>Kearencies. What's the difference between them asking your age and

0:28:12.961 --> 0:28:15.281
<v Speaker 2>asking what's wrong with you? If you have a day

0:28:15.321 --> 0:28:17.481
<v Speaker 2>off sick? Both a private.

0:28:17.801 --> 0:28:20.561
<v Speaker 3>You can answer this, you did before. Actually, well, they're

0:28:20.561 --> 0:28:23.201
<v Speaker 3>two different things. Yeah, I mean your age and your

0:28:23.401 --> 0:28:26.721
<v Speaker 3>ability to perform or having even sick. If you're not

0:28:26.761 --> 0:28:29.961
<v Speaker 3>reliably attending work, that's another matter. But you don't.

0:28:30.121 --> 0:28:32.481
<v Speaker 2>I think she's saying, are they allowed to ask you

0:28:32.521 --> 0:28:34.001
<v Speaker 2>what's wrong with you if you have day off sick?

0:28:34.241 --> 0:28:35.601
<v Speaker 2>Actually I don't think you have to tell them what's

0:28:35.601 --> 0:28:38.681
<v Speaker 2>wrong with you. You just have to say I'm unwell. And

0:28:38.801 --> 0:28:40.081
<v Speaker 2>if you want, I'm not going to tell you what

0:28:40.121 --> 0:28:42.921
<v Speaker 2>it is, I'll give you a medical stuff exactly. But

0:28:43.001 --> 0:28:45.001
<v Speaker 2>you should have a trusting relationship where you go on.

0:28:45.201 --> 0:28:47.801
<v Speaker 3>You know, yeah, and you did right and do have

0:28:47.841 --> 0:28:50.241
<v Speaker 3>a trusting relationship. But employers have only thing they are

0:28:50.441 --> 0:28:53.001
<v Speaker 3>entitled to know is will you be reliably able to

0:28:53.081 --> 0:28:57.521
<v Speaker 3>tend work from hereafter? And what was the reason you're off?

0:28:57.561 --> 0:29:00.601
<v Speaker 3>And if your doctor's given you a certificate, the employe's

0:29:00.601 --> 0:29:04.361
<v Speaker 3>got no he has to accept it or she has

0:29:04.401 --> 0:29:05.481
<v Speaker 3>to accept what is.

0:29:05.401 --> 0:29:07.921
<v Speaker 2>The pragmatic way of getting a certificate from a doctor,

0:29:07.961 --> 0:29:10.081
<v Speaker 2>Because you know, going to the doctor these days, that's

0:29:10.121 --> 0:29:10.601
<v Speaker 2>not cheap.

0:29:11.321 --> 0:29:13.121
<v Speaker 3>They've got a pad right beside him because they write

0:29:13.121 --> 0:29:16.841
<v Speaker 3>so many It's just what was wrong. Three weeks ago,

0:29:16.881 --> 0:29:18.441
<v Speaker 3>I had an illness. The boss wants me to have

0:29:18.481 --> 0:29:20.961
<v Speaker 3>a certificate for that. Okay, right, what day was that?

0:29:21.441 --> 0:29:22.921
<v Speaker 2>So you just give him a call. You shouldn't have

0:29:22.961 --> 0:29:24.041
<v Speaker 2>to necessary avenue.

0:29:23.761 --> 0:29:25.281
<v Speaker 3>But they have to go. And the doctor makes a

0:29:25.281 --> 0:29:26.801
<v Speaker 3>bit of money out of that. But then he writes

0:29:26.841 --> 0:29:29.241
<v Speaker 3>this to certificate and rips it off the pad and

0:29:29.721 --> 0:29:32.321
<v Speaker 3>gives it to the person. That's forty bucks or sixty

0:29:32.321 --> 0:29:35.121
<v Speaker 3>bucks or whatever it is for a doctor's appointment. Now, yeah, no,

0:29:35.241 --> 0:29:37.361
<v Speaker 3>that's been going on for a long time, and there's

0:29:37.361 --> 0:29:40.521
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people, like employers associations are very unhappy

0:29:40.521 --> 0:29:45.521
<v Speaker 3>with the recklessness that the medical certificates are released by retrospectively.

0:29:45.561 --> 0:29:46.761
<v Speaker 3>That didn't make any sense.

0:29:47.001 --> 0:29:50.401
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we want your cause as well. Any questions you've

0:29:50.401 --> 0:29:53.361
<v Speaker 2>got for Max Max White, he is an employment relations expert.

0:29:53.401 --> 0:29:54.681
<v Speaker 2>If you want to get in touch with them, he's

0:29:54.681 --> 0:29:56.601
<v Speaker 2>got one of those fun numbers. It's quite easy to remember.

0:29:56.601 --> 0:29:58.401
<v Speaker 2>But for the time being, I cannot think what it

0:29:58.481 --> 0:30:00.081
<v Speaker 2>is is If people want to get in touch with

0:30:00.121 --> 0:30:00.801
<v Speaker 2>the Max.

0:30:00.761 --> 0:30:03.721
<v Speaker 3>Two one twenty four to seven, ninety three ninety three,

0:30:04.321 --> 0:30:04.681
<v Speaker 3>what did.

0:30:04.641 --> 0:30:04.921
<v Speaker 8>You go for?

0:30:04.921 --> 0:30:07.081
<v Speaker 2>The ninety three ninety three is of course, it's like inflation.

0:30:07.201 --> 0:30:07.921
<v Speaker 2>On our ninety two.

0:30:07.921 --> 0:30:09.281
<v Speaker 3>When I got to the number, I didn't even I

0:30:09.281 --> 0:30:12.481
<v Speaker 3>thought one shit number because there was no two numbers

0:30:12.481 --> 0:30:14.921
<v Speaker 3>in there that were the same. So I thought, ah,

0:30:14.961 --> 0:30:17.241
<v Speaker 3>this is rubbish. And the girl that was working for me,

0:30:17.321 --> 0:30:20.641
<v Speaker 3>she said, have another look at it. It was twenty

0:30:20.641 --> 0:30:23.241
<v Speaker 3>four to seven ninety three ninety three. Well, and there

0:30:23.241 --> 0:30:25.001
<v Speaker 3>was a pizza around at the time with ninety three

0:30:25.121 --> 0:30:26.121
<v Speaker 3>ninety three at the end of it.

0:30:26.481 --> 0:30:29.481
<v Speaker 2>Do you ever get called for no pizza? You know,

0:30:29.561 --> 0:30:33.041
<v Speaker 2>hold them, hold the hold the mushrooms. Anyway, Hey, look,

0:30:33.281 --> 0:30:36.361
<v Speaker 2>we'd love your cause on eight hundred eighty ten eighty.

0:30:36.441 --> 0:30:38.241
<v Speaker 2>Any questions you've got for Max. We've got a few

0:30:38.241 --> 0:30:40.201
<v Speaker 2>things we can dig into here between the two of us,

0:30:40.241 --> 0:30:42.921
<v Speaker 2>but if you'd like to jump the queue and get

0:30:42.961 --> 0:30:45.201
<v Speaker 2>them with your question, then give us a call. Eight

0:30:45.321 --> 0:30:48.241
<v Speaker 2>hundred eighty ten eighty. It's twenty six news Talk, said,

0:30:48.241 --> 0:30:50.641
<v Speaker 2>b Yes, welcome back, this is smart money. My guess

0:30:50.761 --> 0:30:53.161
<v Speaker 2>is Max Whitehead is an employment relations expert and the

0:30:53.241 --> 0:30:55.561
<v Speaker 2>numbers is eight hundred eighty ten eighty. Taking your cause.

0:30:55.681 --> 0:30:58.401
<v Speaker 2>We started talking about whether you know age is a

0:30:58.401 --> 0:31:02.321
<v Speaker 2>big deal these days, but we're also as the conversation.

0:31:02.361 --> 0:31:04.641
<v Speaker 2>Evolve's been talking about being performance managed out of a job,

0:31:04.721 --> 0:31:07.161
<v Speaker 2>or any of questions you might have around your employment situation,

0:31:07.601 --> 0:31:08.841
<v Speaker 2>boss or otherwise.

0:31:09.121 --> 0:31:11.921
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting subjects tonight. I'm really touching some buttons of

0:31:12.001 --> 0:31:14.961
<v Speaker 3>me and you and I have been having a conversations

0:31:15.001 --> 0:31:17.161
<v Speaker 3>during the breaks. You know, it's been amazing.

0:31:17.321 --> 0:31:20.201
<v Speaker 2>Tom, your your turn? Sorry not Tom, Colin? What am

0:31:20.201 --> 0:31:21.241
<v Speaker 2>I saying? Colin? Colin?

0:31:21.281 --> 0:31:21.561
<v Speaker 6>Colin?

0:31:21.601 --> 0:31:22.681
<v Speaker 3>Hello? Colin? Max here?

0:31:23.641 --> 0:31:26.841
<v Speaker 7>Hello? Max? How are you very good? I have a question.

0:31:27.881 --> 0:31:31.361
<v Speaker 7>If you've got twenty sick days, right, and was the

0:31:31.401 --> 0:31:34.361
<v Speaker 7>school holidays coming up? Can you use three of those

0:31:34.401 --> 0:31:37.521
<v Speaker 7>sick days to have off as you told that on holiday.

0:31:37.721 --> 0:31:39.561
<v Speaker 3>No, No, you're going to use them for sick reasons.

0:31:39.601 --> 0:31:41.481
<v Speaker 3>You're going to have a good reason, medical reasons to

0:31:41.481 --> 0:31:47.281
<v Speaker 3>do it. And unfortunately the answer that is no. No, Okay,

0:31:47.601 --> 0:31:49.441
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, that's not the answer you wanted to have.

0:31:51.481 --> 0:31:54.201
<v Speaker 2>If you were sick, that would be different. I don't

0:31:54.201 --> 0:31:55.921
<v Speaker 2>know whether that means you cannot go for a walk

0:31:55.961 --> 0:31:57.841
<v Speaker 2>in the park with them, but if you were sick,

0:31:58.121 --> 0:31:58.721
<v Speaker 2>that's different.

0:31:59.281 --> 0:32:04.041
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, yeah, But you couldn't just take three sick

0:32:04.121 --> 0:32:08.881
<v Speaker 7>days and then go with your son to wherever you

0:32:08.881 --> 0:32:09.281
<v Speaker 7>want to go.

0:32:09.361 --> 0:32:11.681
<v Speaker 3>And I'm just wondering if Tim is actually implying maybe

0:32:11.681 --> 0:32:12.641
<v Speaker 3>you should say you're sick.

0:32:12.681 --> 0:32:14.001
<v Speaker 2>I know I'm not saying that.

0:32:14.041 --> 0:32:16.241
<v Speaker 7>No, well, that's what it come across as.

0:32:16.801 --> 0:32:19.241
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, no, no, no.

0:32:19.361 --> 0:32:21.361
<v Speaker 2>Actually, that's an interesting question because I do know people

0:32:21.361 --> 0:32:24.161
<v Speaker 2>who go, oh, I've got so many sick days owing

0:32:24.161 --> 0:32:27.001
<v Speaker 2>to me. It's like, well, they're available to you, but

0:32:27.001 --> 0:32:29.001
<v Speaker 2>they're not owed to you in the sense that you

0:32:29.001 --> 0:32:32.561
<v Speaker 2>can just say I'm sick today unless you can get a.

0:32:32.881 --> 0:32:35.001
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Colin, you should say them up because you never

0:32:35.041 --> 0:32:36.441
<v Speaker 3>know what's around the corner for you.

0:32:37.201 --> 0:32:42.001
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's true because I worked for this company and

0:32:42.561 --> 0:32:47.561
<v Speaker 7>when COVID struck, the government paid us eighty percent. Yeah,

0:32:47.761 --> 0:32:50.081
<v Speaker 7>so we had enough, We had enough sick days that

0:32:50.241 --> 0:32:53.801
<v Speaker 7>they the company paid us one hundred percent because we

0:32:53.881 --> 0:32:55.041
<v Speaker 7>had so many sick days.

0:32:55.401 --> 0:32:59.601
<v Speaker 3>Ah. Yeah, well that's interesting, and of course they do

0:32:59.641 --> 0:33:02.601
<v Speaker 3>accumulate up to twenty days. So yeah, it will over

0:33:02.721 --> 0:33:04.921
<v Speaker 3>years and years, you get to actually get quite a

0:33:05.121 --> 0:33:07.201
<v Speaker 3>you raised up. So I'm sure Colin you've done that.

0:33:07.641 --> 0:33:09.721
<v Speaker 2>Mindear Colin, would be very difficult for you to take

0:33:09.761 --> 0:33:11.921
<v Speaker 2>us sicky now, because if your boss is listening and

0:33:11.961 --> 0:33:14.161
<v Speaker 2>recognizes your voice would be like, how Colin, you've seen

0:33:14.161 --> 0:33:19.841
<v Speaker 2>your sick days to the showte thanks.

0:33:19.601 --> 0:33:22.041
<v Speaker 3>Going, he's a good sport.

0:33:23.201 --> 0:33:23.561
<v Speaker 2>Kevin.

0:33:23.681 --> 0:33:25.121
<v Speaker 3>Hello, Hello Kevin Max.

0:33:25.161 --> 0:33:31.481
<v Speaker 5>Here just a question. I'll be for a company for

0:33:32.401 --> 0:33:37.401
<v Speaker 5>on my fourth year now every year where to a

0:33:38.521 --> 0:33:45.001
<v Speaker 5>I'll call it a employment review. For now, it's called

0:33:45.041 --> 0:33:51.801
<v Speaker 5>an employment review, which is due in October every year.

0:33:51.881 --> 0:33:54.881
<v Speaker 5>I've got the ash for it intro of the other stuff,

0:33:55.641 --> 0:34:02.681
<v Speaker 5>and we haven't got it on on on that particular time, Kevin.

0:34:02.761 --> 0:34:04.961
<v Speaker 3>Is it on the employment agreement? Is it specified that

0:34:05.121 --> 0:34:06.801
<v Speaker 3>every year they're going to do a review?

0:34:07.841 --> 0:34:13.321
<v Speaker 5>Okay? Oh, extended a bit in my contract that says

0:34:14.001 --> 0:34:20.681
<v Speaker 5>you and you're two for a employment review in October

0:34:21.881 --> 0:34:29.521
<v Speaker 5>of your anniversary obviously, but it doesn't guarantee a pay right.

0:34:29.641 --> 0:34:33.041
<v Speaker 3>No, no it doesn't. But the other thing is, Colin, Kevin,

0:34:33.081 --> 0:34:35.161
<v Speaker 3>if they're not giving that to you, they are in

0:34:35.241 --> 0:34:37.801
<v Speaker 3>breach of your contract. So you actually you can take

0:34:37.841 --> 0:34:40.321
<v Speaker 3>a legal action against them if they I mean it's

0:34:40.401 --> 0:34:42.881
<v Speaker 3>a petty reason, but I mean because they'll say I'll

0:34:42.881 --> 0:34:45.281
<v Speaker 3>do it next month. But I mean, you might even

0:34:45.281 --> 0:34:47.201
<v Speaker 3>say that you've been talking to this guy on the radio,

0:34:48.161 --> 0:34:52.681
<v Speaker 3>Tim beverage, No, Max Whitehead, and he's advised me that

0:34:52.761 --> 0:34:54.921
<v Speaker 3>you are in breach of contract by failing to give

0:34:54.921 --> 0:34:56.961
<v Speaker 3>it to me. Can I have please do a review

0:34:57.321 --> 0:35:00.761
<v Speaker 3>and give consideration to a wage rise. Probably doesn't help

0:35:00.801 --> 0:35:02.521
<v Speaker 3>you get a wage rise. But if you actually tell

0:35:02.561 --> 0:35:03.521
<v Speaker 3>him the bosses.

0:35:03.321 --> 0:35:08.761
<v Speaker 5>Bridg actually interested in a pay rise, have you one's

0:35:08.801 --> 0:35:13.201
<v Speaker 5>pay yet? But what my point is they're quite happy

0:35:13.201 --> 0:35:16.001
<v Speaker 5>to throw your concrete at you a cure and brick

0:35:16.081 --> 0:35:22.641
<v Speaker 5>of it. But their attitude is, well, you know, we

0:35:22.721 --> 0:35:26.561
<v Speaker 5>don't care that we have done that. And what to

0:35:26.601 --> 0:35:29.721
<v Speaker 5>me is they say it's not a pay review, but

0:35:29.761 --> 0:35:31.841
<v Speaker 5>it is a pay review. So that's at the end

0:35:32.321 --> 0:35:36.361
<v Speaker 5>on my concrete. At stage it doesn't guarantee a pay rise.

0:35:36.881 --> 0:35:40.321
<v Speaker 5>Surely that means it is a pay review because it

0:35:40.321 --> 0:35:41.881
<v Speaker 5>doesn't guarantee you pay right.

0:35:42.201 --> 0:35:43.881
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, and what they're just saying they're going to

0:35:43.881 --> 0:35:46.081
<v Speaker 3>look at your pay I mean there's probably a whole

0:35:46.081 --> 0:35:48.241
<v Speaker 3>lot of factors come into it. And you know, employers

0:35:48.241 --> 0:35:51.641
<v Speaker 3>don't always always give people a handout. In fact, some

0:35:51.681 --> 0:35:57.721
<v Speaker 3>people should take it the reduction, I don't know. But anyway, look, Kevin,

0:35:57.801 --> 0:35:59.401
<v Speaker 3>it's a good question. I think there's a lot of

0:35:59.441 --> 0:36:02.081
<v Speaker 3>people affected by it because a lot of employers get

0:36:02.121 --> 0:36:04.481
<v Speaker 3>caught up and it's such a busy time and you know,

0:36:04.641 --> 0:36:06.401
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what is it coming up text time

0:36:06.481 --> 0:36:08.601
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it might be. There's always a reason why

0:36:08.641 --> 0:36:10.601
<v Speaker 3>they can't do it so well.

0:36:10.961 --> 0:36:13.801
<v Speaker 5>In this case of a jew and October and we

0:36:13.841 --> 0:36:15.401
<v Speaker 5>haven't got it in April.

0:36:15.321 --> 0:36:17.121
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think make a fuss of it, and if

0:36:17.121 --> 0:36:19.641
<v Speaker 3>you want to take it further, lodge it with the

0:36:19.641 --> 0:36:22.801
<v Speaker 3>Employment Relations Authority you can for a breach of contract.

0:36:23.761 --> 0:36:25.921
<v Speaker 5>And I say, I'm not really worry about it. I

0:36:26.001 --> 0:36:27.721
<v Speaker 5>just wanted to see you if I had ground to

0:36:27.841 --> 0:36:32.401
<v Speaker 5>stein on. They drove something at me, So so okay,

0:36:32.681 --> 0:36:36.441
<v Speaker 5>if they threw something bash at me, could I use

0:36:36.481 --> 0:36:37.121
<v Speaker 5>that again to them?

0:36:37.921 --> 0:36:40.401
<v Speaker 3>Certainly you could. I mean if they are in breach now,

0:36:40.441 --> 0:36:42.201
<v Speaker 3>and they are in breach later on and something comes

0:36:42.241 --> 0:36:45.041
<v Speaker 3>at you, you can do it. Yeah. Hey, thanks for

0:36:45.081 --> 0:36:45.761
<v Speaker 3>the call, Kevin.

0:36:45.921 --> 0:36:50.121
<v Speaker 2>Yep, got on you, Kevin, Thank you for that, right,

0:36:51.161 --> 0:36:54.321
<v Speaker 2>just looking for a couple of texts here. I don't

0:36:54.321 --> 0:36:57.161
<v Speaker 2>know why more businesses and organizations aren't open to older

0:36:57.201 --> 0:37:00.241
<v Speaker 2>people working part time or job share. I'm a fifty

0:37:00.281 --> 0:37:02.161
<v Speaker 2>five year old woman having trouble funding work when I've

0:37:02.201 --> 0:37:04.561
<v Speaker 2>never had any problems funding work in the past. The

0:37:04.681 --> 0:37:06.921
<v Speaker 2>union for my profession isn't very helpful.

0:37:07.121 --> 0:37:10.841
<v Speaker 3>I see EMA are actually promoting it. They're saying, folks,

0:37:10.881 --> 0:37:13.721
<v Speaker 3>if you're you ought to be using older people more often,

0:37:13.721 --> 0:37:15.921
<v Speaker 3>but actually do it part time and get them in

0:37:16.001 --> 0:37:18.881
<v Speaker 3>for part of the hours. But use their experience and

0:37:19.201 --> 0:37:22.841
<v Speaker 3>they're actually probably more stable. But and put them in

0:37:22.881 --> 0:37:25.401
<v Speaker 3>a slot that you can fill. But actually you will

0:37:25.401 --> 0:37:28.241
<v Speaker 3>find it quite helpful, and you can negotiate with them

0:37:28.241 --> 0:37:29.721
<v Speaker 3>at a lower rate of pay than they were all

0:37:29.801 --> 0:37:31.081
<v Speaker 3>used to when they were employed.

0:37:31.601 --> 0:37:33.921
<v Speaker 2>Right, We'll be back in just a just a minute.

0:37:33.921 --> 0:37:35.641
<v Speaker 2>This is News Talks a B. It's ten to six

0:37:35.721 --> 0:37:38.401
<v Speaker 2>News Talks a B with Tim Beverage with Max Whitehead,

0:37:38.441 --> 0:37:41.561
<v Speaker 2>employment relations consultant expert guru.

0:37:42.441 --> 0:37:43.601
<v Speaker 3>Bring it on, bloke.

0:37:43.841 --> 0:37:47.041
<v Speaker 2>There we go, John, Hello, Yeah.

0:37:47.081 --> 0:37:48.121
<v Speaker 6>How you doing John?

0:37:48.161 --> 0:37:48.601
<v Speaker 3>Max here?

0:37:49.841 --> 0:37:52.561
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I've got a question for you, guys. I've been

0:37:52.681 --> 0:37:55.401
<v Speaker 6>with this being employed with this company for the top

0:37:55.441 --> 0:38:00.841
<v Speaker 6>months now. I haven't had my performance and everything. It's

0:38:00.881 --> 0:38:06.801
<v Speaker 6>nothing wrong with my performance at Dentist and I have

0:38:06.961 --> 0:38:12.801
<v Speaker 6>put in a lot of hours this company, including working

0:38:12.881 --> 0:38:16.281
<v Speaker 6>outside of the company hours that there is the weekends

0:38:16.481 --> 0:38:21.521
<v Speaker 6>or inn and public holidays with contractors and everything. So

0:38:21.561 --> 0:38:24.881
<v Speaker 6>I've actually, you know, apply myself and that part is

0:38:24.961 --> 0:38:26.961
<v Speaker 6>to spit my market.

0:38:27.121 --> 0:38:28.001
<v Speaker 3>So what are they done to you?

0:38:28.081 --> 0:38:28.321
<v Speaker 7>John?

0:38:28.561 --> 0:38:30.161
<v Speaker 2>We'll have to keep it quick, joinks you've got about

0:38:30.201 --> 0:38:30.881
<v Speaker 2>a minute and a half.

0:38:31.481 --> 0:38:34.401
<v Speaker 6>Oh okay, Now what I've been that I've just been

0:38:34.561 --> 0:38:40.561
<v Speaker 6>given the notified notice about last week saying that my

0:38:40.921 --> 0:38:43.921
<v Speaker 6>role has been a step disestablished.

0:38:45.281 --> 0:38:48.801
<v Speaker 3>So that's normal, John, I'm afraid you're you're heading for redundancy.

0:38:49.161 --> 0:38:53.161
<v Speaker 3>The answer I got to that is my advice is

0:38:53.201 --> 0:38:56.001
<v Speaker 3>to what I said to the previous quarter. Because your

0:38:56.241 --> 0:38:59.641
<v Speaker 3>jobs under threat, you've got rights to some information. You've

0:38:59.641 --> 0:39:02.881
<v Speaker 3>got to ask lots of questions. You know, why my job?

0:39:02.921 --> 0:39:05.481
<v Speaker 3>Why is my my colleagues not doing it? What is

0:39:05.521 --> 0:39:08.441
<v Speaker 3>it that's about my role that is under threat? Is

0:39:08.481 --> 0:39:12.761
<v Speaker 3>it because it's an effective and efficient And put a

0:39:12.841 --> 0:39:15.681
<v Speaker 3>whole lot of really difficult questions to them and ask

0:39:15.761 --> 0:39:18.161
<v Speaker 3>them and ask for it in writing, please for your advisor.

0:39:18.961 --> 0:39:21.481
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Sorry, we couldn't talk to you for longer on that, John,

0:39:21.561 --> 0:39:24.721
<v Speaker 2>just because time is against us. But yeah, absolutely ask questions.

0:39:24.721 --> 0:39:26.441
<v Speaker 2>You're not just someone who gets it all dished up

0:39:26.481 --> 0:39:28.401
<v Speaker 2>to them. You're entitled to ask questions and to stand

0:39:28.441 --> 0:39:28.961
<v Speaker 2>up for yourself.

0:39:29.041 --> 0:39:29.641
<v Speaker 3>The one term.

0:39:29.721 --> 0:39:32.201
<v Speaker 2>Yep, there you go. Hey, great to see Max.

0:39:32.281 --> 0:39:32.801
<v Speaker 5>Yeah you too.

0:39:33.041 --> 0:39:36.241
<v Speaker 3>I really enjoyed today, well as you do everyday.

0:39:36.281 --> 0:39:38.201
<v Speaker 2>Don't you make it sound like you make it sound

0:39:38.241 --> 0:39:40.001
<v Speaker 2>like I enjoyed myself today. But as for a couple

0:39:40.041 --> 0:39:41.121
<v Speaker 2>of weeks, a few weeks.

0:39:41.561 --> 0:39:45.321
<v Speaker 3>Now, I've always enjoyed in here. You know that you've

0:39:45.321 --> 0:39:47.601
<v Speaker 3>got to be scrape me out of the off the

0:39:47.601 --> 0:39:48.921
<v Speaker 3>floor to get me out of here. Yeah.

0:39:48.961 --> 0:39:50.761
<v Speaker 2>And if you want to catch up with Max, he's easy.

0:39:50.841 --> 0:39:54.281
<v Speaker 2>Just google and wax Max Whitehead and Max. There's an

0:39:54.321 --> 0:39:58.361
<v Speaker 2>unfortunate for them, isn't it? Max Whiteheads on eight hundred

0:39:58.361 --> 0:40:02.001
<v Speaker 2>and twenty four seven ninety three three. Well, looking forward

0:40:02.041 --> 0:40:05.321
<v Speaker 2>to next weekend. Just a little teaser. We're looking for

0:40:05.401 --> 0:40:06.761
<v Speaker 2>the one roof radio show.

0:40:06.761 --> 0:40:06.961
<v Speaker 5>We'll have.

0:40:07.081 --> 0:40:09.801
<v Speaker 2>Elsa Wolfo was a new guest last time. She's a

0:40:09.801 --> 0:40:11.961
<v Speaker 2>bit of a renovations expert on how to add value

0:40:11.961 --> 0:40:14.481
<v Speaker 2>to your home and for the Health Hub. On Sunday,

0:40:14.521 --> 0:40:17.081
<v Speaker 2>we've got Alex Bartle, a sleep expert, joining us and

0:40:17.161 --> 0:40:19.241
<v Speaker 2>Hannah McQueen. It's been a while since we've seen Hannah,

0:40:19.281 --> 0:40:22.201
<v Speaker 2>so she's back and we'll be chatting to Hannah on

0:40:22.281 --> 0:40:25.641
<v Speaker 2>smart Money. Hey, thanks for your company. Thanks for your

0:40:25.641 --> 0:40:28.161
<v Speaker 2>company this evening Sunday at six US next and thanks

0:40:28.201 --> 0:40:32.521
<v Speaker 2>to my producers Tyra and Mary, and we'll look forward

0:40:32.521 --> 0:40:34.801
<v Speaker 2>to your company again next weekend. Have a great week,

0:40:35.481 --> 0:40:39.921
<v Speaker 2>Catch you soon on the out of your Name.

0:40:43.801 --> 0:40:47.201
<v Speaker 5>Angels up in the clouds, hi Yah, let's know We down.

0:41:07.241 --> 0:41:09.961
<v Speaker 1>For more from the Weekend Collective, listen live to News

0:41:10.041 --> 0:41:13.681
<v Speaker 1>Talk SEDB weekends from three pm, or follow the podcast

0:41:13.761 --> 0:41:14.681
<v Speaker 1>on iHeartRadio.