1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,160 Speaker 1: The new government's call for more sanctions against beneficiaries who 2 00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:06,040 Speaker 1: don't meet their obligations appears to have been answered by 3 00:00:06,080 --> 00:00:09,480 Speaker 1: the Ministry of Social Development. The number of sanctions issued 4 00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:11,880 Speaker 1: by MSD in the second quarter of this year is 5 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:15,319 Speaker 1: fifty percent higher than during the same period last year. 6 00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: Social Development and Employment Minister Louise ups and says why 7 00:00:18,680 --> 00:00:21,440 Speaker 1: do use of sanctions will encourage more beneficiaries to get 8 00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:24,840 Speaker 1: into work? Ricardo min Indez march is the Green Party's 9 00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:27,760 Speaker 1: spokesperson for Social Development and Employment and joins us now 10 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 1: killed up sort of, Dak, you're not happy about this. 11 00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:35,400 Speaker 2: We know benefit sanctions have never worked to actually support 12 00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:37,959 Speaker 2: people into employment, and all they do is actually push 13 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:42,120 Speaker 2: people into poverty. So Louis Substan's actually talking nonsense when 14 00:00:42,159 --> 00:00:46,199 Speaker 2: she claims a bill encourage people into employment by actually 15 00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:47,839 Speaker 2: stripping away their means of survival. 16 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:52,440 Speaker 1: Really, is it that hard to turn up for a meeting. 17 00:00:53,040 --> 00:00:54,920 Speaker 2: Let's make it clear. A lot of the people who 18 00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:59,040 Speaker 2: are on the benefit are leaving living extremely stressful lives, 19 00:00:59,120 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 2: often shifting motel to motel, experience and things like homelessness, violence, 20 00:01:04,600 --> 00:01:08,240 Speaker 2: or severe poverty. Some people actually in research they've talked 21 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:09,959 Speaker 2: about how being on the benefit it's almost like a 22 00:01:09,959 --> 00:01:12,440 Speaker 2: full time job by the nature of just how many 23 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:15,119 Speaker 2: times you have to engage work and income while you're 24 00:01:15,160 --> 00:01:16,480 Speaker 2: just trying to survive as well. 25 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:19,120 Speaker 1: So give us a worse case scenario, how much do 26 00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:20,000 Speaker 1: they have to turn up? 27 00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:20,960 Speaker 3: What do they have to do? 28 00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:25,520 Speaker 2: Well, Look, often, if you're already having to choose between 29 00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 2: your bills and paying your rent, you may not even 30 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:31,000 Speaker 2: be able to afford, for example, to get enough money 31 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:32,720 Speaker 2: to have credit on your phone. You may not be 32 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,000 Speaker 2: able to afford the cost of transport. And at the 33 00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:37,440 Speaker 2: same time, let's not pretend that a lot of these 34 00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:40,200 Speaker 2: meetings are actually meaningful. A lot of the meetings that 35 00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 2: people are dragged onto are TikTok exercises that don't help 36 00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:46,720 Speaker 2: people getting too meaningful employments. And if you're a parent 37 00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:50,640 Speaker 2: with giving responsibilities and you're forced to attend seminar after 38 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:53,120 Speaker 2: seminar that doesn't actually help you get a job, I 39 00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:56,320 Speaker 2: can absolutely see why people are being demoralized by a 40 00:01:56,360 --> 00:01:59,200 Speaker 2: failed approach that has not worked for a decade. 41 00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:03,600 Speaker 1: The ricarda If most of your social development doesn't apply sanctions, 42 00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 1: what incentive is there for anyone to actually follow the 43 00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 1: rules and meet their obligations. 44 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:12,560 Speaker 2: Well, let's make this. Let's make the processes actually support 45 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:16,519 Speaker 2: people into employment, because so far the so called obligations 46 00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:18,320 Speaker 2: on work seminnres that people have to go to have 47 00:02:18,440 --> 00:02:21,600 Speaker 2: not shown to actually help people into employment. There's also 48 00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:24,919 Speaker 2: no research that shows benefit sanctions actually help people into employment. 49 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:27,639 Speaker 2: There's no reason here or overseas, and so I think 50 00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:30,119 Speaker 2: the first step would be to make those work seminars 51 00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:33,560 Speaker 2: tailored to ensure that we're connecting people into decent, safe, 52 00:02:33,639 --> 00:02:37,160 Speaker 2: well paid work rather than any shitty job, no matter 53 00:02:38,120 --> 00:02:40,400 Speaker 2: how poor it is, just for the sake of taking 54 00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:40,800 Speaker 2: a box. 55 00:02:40,880 --> 00:02:44,120 Speaker 1: Rikato, do you reckon, just philosophically, that there are some 56 00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:46,400 Speaker 1: people out there who just don't want to work. 57 00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:50,840 Speaker 2: There may be people with complex life and caregiving arrangements, 58 00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:54,200 Speaker 2: but I don't think it's the minister's job to actually 59 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:56,560 Speaker 2: dictate each person's individual kids. 60 00:02:58,200 --> 00:03:00,880 Speaker 1: So, just philosophically, do you believe there are some people 61 00:03:00,960 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 1: receiving benefits who just don't want. 62 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 2: To work, Whether there may be one or ten, it 63 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:10,320 Speaker 2: does not. It does not mean benefits help, but benefits 64 00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 2: sanctions have not been shown to work. Jack, So I 65 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:15,320 Speaker 2: think just peddling with the same failed approach want to 66 00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:18,000 Speaker 2: actually help anyone. And it's also quite rich for the 67 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:21,360 Speaker 2: government to be kicking people off work, cutting jobs and 68 00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:23,560 Speaker 2: pushing people onto a benefit well at the same time 69 00:03:23,639 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 2: doubling down a punishment and yet not being able to 70 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 2: substantiate the millions of dollars that go into these works 71 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:32,040 Speaker 2: seminars that have not shown to help people into good work. 72 00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:35,600 Speaker 2: We've got plenty of reports that show that people get 73 00:03:35,640 --> 00:03:38,920 Speaker 2: just pushed into casual jobs that end up costing more 74 00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:40,880 Speaker 2: in chalthcare that are insecure as well. 75 00:03:41,080 --> 00:03:43,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, while we've got your Ricardo, have you have 76 00:03:43,560 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 1: you spoken to any of the other Green and peas 77 00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 1: about potentially invoking the Waker jumping law with darlingne Tana. 78 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:52,560 Speaker 2: Look, the party, people in the party will of course 79 00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:55,040 Speaker 2: have those conversations because it's a democratic party. But right 80 00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 2: now our key message remains the same that Darley needs 81 00:03:57,360 --> 00:03:58,520 Speaker 2: to resign and do the right time. 82 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:00,680 Speaker 3: Have you have you had those compsations. 83 00:04:01,480 --> 00:04:03,880 Speaker 2: We have not had a caucus meeting to discuss that. 84 00:04:03,880 --> 00:04:07,040 Speaker 3: If you've spoken to other bell we have. 85 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 2: Not had those conversations. And the reality is we'll need 86 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:14,480 Speaker 2: to actually have caucus meetings following Darlene's decision. She still 87 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:17,039 Speaker 2: has talked about how she's making up her mind about 88 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:18,600 Speaker 2: what she'll do with her future, and we've made it 89 00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:20,719 Speaker 2: really clear to her that we think that the best 90 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:22,239 Speaker 2: outcome would be for her to resign. 91 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:26,440 Speaker 1: One last question, would you personally support putting the Walker 92 00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 1: jumping decision to the party membership at the AGM? 93 00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:33,320 Speaker 2: To be honest, I haven't even thought of the off 94 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:34,880 Speaker 2: the AGEM at that point, because my hope is that 95 00:04:34,920 --> 00:04:35,200 Speaker 2: by the. 96 00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:37,960 Speaker 3: Come on, come on, you gotta have thought of it. 97 00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:38,360 Speaker 3: Come on. 98 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:41,880 Speaker 1: So if the option was we can we can put 99 00:04:41,880 --> 00:04:44,360 Speaker 1: this to a vote at the AGM for Green Party members. 100 00:04:44,360 --> 00:04:47,520 Speaker 1: Given your commitment to democracy and transparency, would you support 101 00:04:47,680 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 1: throwing that decision over to Green Party members? 102 00:04:50,360 --> 00:04:53,640 Speaker 2: I think that's a complete misinterpretation of how the bill 103 00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:56,359 Speaker 2: actually works because it does not rely on party members. 104 00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:59,240 Speaker 1: No, but if party members voted for you guys to 105 00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:02,400 Speaker 1: invoke it, would you support putting that decision to party 106 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:04,840 Speaker 1: members for you as the caucus to then invoke. 107 00:05:05,520 --> 00:05:07,440 Speaker 2: If members want to put a remat at the AGM. 108 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:09,600 Speaker 2: But it's completely up to them. But the reality is, 109 00:05:09,640 --> 00:05:12,279 Speaker 2: and as we've said before, and as somebody who works 110 00:05:12,320 --> 00:05:15,840 Speaker 2: very closely on migrant exploitian issues. I think the right 111 00:05:15,839 --> 00:05:17,560 Speaker 2: thing for Darling to do would be to refign. 112 00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:19,840 Speaker 1: Hey, thanks for your time, we really appreciate it. Ricardo 113 00:05:19,880 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 1: and INDI's much For more from Hither Duplessy Allen Drive, 114 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:27,080 Speaker 1: listen live to news Talks. It'd be from four pm weekdays, 115 00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 1: or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.