1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:01,720 Speaker 1: All right, on the huddle of this evening we have Trius, 2 00:00:01,760 --> 00:00:04,400 Speaker 1: Shirst and Josie Pagani. Trush's obviously with Shirton Willis pr 3 00:00:04,440 --> 00:00:08,800 Speaker 1: and Josie's with Child Fund CEO. There hire you too, Hello, Josie. 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:10,559 Speaker 1: What do you think we do about this? I mean, 5 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:13,160 Speaker 1: if money, we're never going to beat the Chinese on money. 6 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:16,280 Speaker 1: So is the nuclear option here to take away citizenship rights? 7 00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:18,880 Speaker 2: Well, I think you've got to take a step back. 8 00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:21,720 Speaker 2: So they've obviously got stuck in a stalemate here and 9 00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 2: neither's backing down. And the mistake that Mark Brown has 10 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:27,840 Speaker 2: made is the lack of consultation. Right, So in the 11 00:00:27,880 --> 00:00:31,120 Speaker 2: realm countries in New Zealand, we have we have you know, 12 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:35,360 Speaker 2: we have some territory which is the ross dependence in 13 00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:39,519 Speaker 2: the Antarctica. We've got a dependent territory in Tokelau. And 14 00:00:39,560 --> 00:00:42,040 Speaker 2: then our relationship with the Cooks is sort of free association. 15 00:00:42,960 --> 00:00:45,640 Speaker 2: We do the foreign policy basically, yeah, but there's a 16 00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:48,480 Speaker 2: lot of sort of debate over how far that goes 17 00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:50,920 Speaker 2: and so on. So so yes, Mark Brown's made a 18 00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:53,320 Speaker 2: mistake in not consulting with us, because that's part of 19 00:00:53,320 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 2: our constitutional arrangement. But there's a need, you know, I 20 00:00:56,960 --> 00:00:59,520 Speaker 2: think New Zealand needs to take a deep breath too, 21 00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 2: because you know, what have they done? They've signed a 22 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:04,559 Speaker 2: deal with China. Well so have we. China's our biggest 23 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:07,440 Speaker 2: trading partner. It's not like the Cooks have suddenly decided 24 00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:10,520 Speaker 2: to go nuclear and build a nuclear power station or something. 25 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:13,039 Speaker 2: And we're not at war with China. So let's take 26 00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 2: a step and yet, God, what do you know that 27 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:17,120 Speaker 2: I don't want we come on? 28 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:20,200 Speaker 1: I mean, like we are obviously operating in an environment 29 00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 1: where China is going to take Taiwan at some stage 30 00:01:22,800 --> 00:01:24,959 Speaker 1: and we're going to have to be potentially on a 31 00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 1: war footing. 32 00:01:25,840 --> 00:01:28,920 Speaker 2: Yes, but we've also got clearly us a very good 33 00:01:29,040 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 2: job internationally of kind of hedging, right. We try not 34 00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 2: to pick sides between you know, the China blocks. 35 00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:39,600 Speaker 1: This is about China setting up bases across the Pacific, 36 00:01:39,720 --> 00:01:42,520 Speaker 1: and depending on how this has rolled out, what's so 37 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:44,200 Speaker 1: I tell you, I'm sure they're not going to set 38 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:44,960 Speaker 1: one up in the Cooks. 39 00:01:45,400 --> 00:01:47,319 Speaker 2: Maybe they are, but you've also got to realize that 40 00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:49,600 Speaker 2: even though we had this free association with the Cooks, 41 00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:52,760 Speaker 2: the Cooks are independent countries and even the cook can't 42 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:55,720 Speaker 2: exist stuff free associations, so we can't. We can't do 43 00:01:55,800 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 2: this slightly patronizing thing of going, oh, you're our backyard, 44 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 2: and you know you can't do it deal with China 45 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:03,040 Speaker 2: just we've done a deal with China. So I think 46 00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:05,920 Speaker 2: the answer here is not to go, don't do a 47 00:02:05,960 --> 00:02:08,839 Speaker 2: deal with China. It's to go, why are they doing one? 48 00:02:09,160 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 2: They're doing it because China says, right, we'll build your port. 49 00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:13,560 Speaker 2: That's what you want, So why aren't we doing that 50 00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:16,440 Speaker 2: with our aid money? And what's often what happens is 51 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:18,800 Speaker 2: with our aid money, we tend to go in and go, 52 00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:20,840 Speaker 2: we've got a great idea for you, and we'll do 53 00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:23,000 Speaker 2: this in the Pacific. Why don't we listen to them 54 00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:24,920 Speaker 2: and go, actually, we'll do the thing you want us 55 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 2: to and we'll beat China because we've got better relationships 56 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:30,720 Speaker 2: than you, not more money, better relationships, Jo. 57 00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:34,639 Speaker 3: Trash, I think this is the right tactic from Peter's. 58 00:02:34,760 --> 00:02:38,559 Speaker 3: It's a ratcheting up of the pressure, but it's proportionate 59 00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:42,160 Speaker 3: and targeted. I don't think you want to use citizenship 60 00:02:42,520 --> 00:02:45,560 Speaker 3: as part of the realm, as you don't want to 61 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:48,560 Speaker 3: politicize it. And let's face it, we if we play 62 00:02:48,600 --> 00:02:52,760 Speaker 3: that card, we have completely lost the last thing. We 63 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:55,840 Speaker 3: have completely lost that We've got one. 64 00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:58,520 Speaker 2: Hundred thousand new Zealanders of Cogan and descent here. 65 00:02:58,880 --> 00:03:03,320 Speaker 3: That's right. So I think that the other thing is 66 00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:07,280 Speaker 3: obviously citizenship is constitutionally embedded, so that that is that 67 00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:10,720 Speaker 3: is fraught and difficult, and we need these lines of 68 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:14,320 Speaker 3: communication open there that there is a there is a 69 00:03:14,360 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 3: fracture here at the moment, but it's not a rupture. 70 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:20,919 Speaker 3: And I think we want to keep our can completely, 71 00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:24,280 Speaker 3: keep our options open because to your point, if if 72 00:03:24,880 --> 00:03:28,240 Speaker 3: the direction of travel is as you say, if we 73 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 3: revoked citizenship now, then it is absolutely open slava for 74 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:37,040 Speaker 3: the Chinese or anyone else to go in and really, 75 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:41,200 Speaker 3: you know, effectively take over our role with the Long Islands. 76 00:03:41,320 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 2: I think what's really sad about this is that Mark 77 00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 2: Brown when he came in, he's been in for a 78 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:47,960 Speaker 2: few years now, he came in with a real strong 79 00:03:48,280 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 2: drive for economic development and the Cooks and you know, 80 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:52,320 Speaker 2: how are we going to make our own money get 81 00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:56,360 Speaker 2: off being dependent on aid? And he actually succeeded in that, 82 00:03:56,520 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 2: you know, the Cook Islands lifted themselves out of being 83 00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:05,280 Speaker 2: tasked a class as a developing country and they became 84 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:09,600 Speaker 2: a mid level developed country that's now gone down again. 85 00:04:09,760 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 2: So you know, he's got all the right intentions, and 86 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:14,600 Speaker 2: part of this China deal is trying to cement that 87 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:17,040 Speaker 2: right yea port and economic development stuff. 88 00:04:17,120 --> 00:04:20,280 Speaker 1: So yeah, I hope the city I take your point right, 89 00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:22,360 Speaker 1: see it from their point of view, rather than imposing 90 00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:25,680 Speaker 1: our values on them. Trisha, there's a text here that says, 91 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:27,960 Speaker 1: this is Apropos, A and Z making two point five 92 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:31,120 Speaker 1: billion dollars profits gone up nearly twenty percent private business, 93 00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 1: the CEO's remunerations, the shareholder's business, no one else's. I 94 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:36,839 Speaker 1: feel much like that. I'm stressed about this. 95 00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:39,800 Speaker 3: I absolutely agree with that, and I think often in 96 00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:44,640 Speaker 3: these debates we lose that proportionality and around this debate 97 00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:47,599 Speaker 3: that this ongoing, it's not even a debate, but we 98 00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:53,080 Speaker 3: make statements about people's remuneration, especially these big CEOs. Unless 99 00:04:53,279 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 3: you are one of those CEOs or you have seen 100 00:04:55,839 --> 00:04:59,679 Speaker 3: them working up close, you really have no idea of 101 00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:03,880 Speaker 3: the responsibilities they carry and the flesh and blood that 102 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:07,120 Speaker 3: they have to give to get that that salary. And 103 00:05:07,160 --> 00:05:09,960 Speaker 3: it is up to shareholders if they view that that 104 00:05:09,960 --> 00:05:12,599 Speaker 3: that that person is up to that value. I think 105 00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:16,520 Speaker 3: we need a much more mature conversation around it, and 106 00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:18,520 Speaker 3: in fact, I would love it if we never ever 107 00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:22,320 Speaker 3: again saw one of these knee jerk you know, headlines 108 00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:25,760 Speaker 3: about and also credit to Antonio. I heard her on 109 00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:27,719 Speaker 3: the show earlier and I thought the way that she 110 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:32,120 Speaker 3: spoke to that, she didn't shy away, she owned it. 111 00:05:32,120 --> 00:05:34,400 Speaker 3: It's a It's a real mark of her leadership, I think. 112 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:34,720 Speaker 3: I think. 113 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:36,240 Speaker 1: So, hey, Josie, hang going to take and we'll get 114 00:05:36,279 --> 00:05:38,240 Speaker 1: your take after the break. It's back with the huddle, right, Josie, 115 00:05:38,279 --> 00:05:39,039 Speaker 1: what's your take. 116 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:42,039 Speaker 2: On the salaries. Look, I don't mind people being paid 117 00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:44,960 Speaker 2: what they're worth of their making making a lot of 118 00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:47,480 Speaker 2: money for the company. I think what New Zealanders don't 119 00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:49,280 Speaker 2: like is when you find out that you know, the 120 00:05:49,320 --> 00:05:52,320 Speaker 2: former head of Fonterra who lost god knows how many 121 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:56,360 Speaker 2: million was paid, you know, and the job, and the 122 00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:58,880 Speaker 2: same with you know, Fletcher Building. Whether it's it so, 123 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:00,599 Speaker 2: I think it's just it's more that there's just this 124 00:06:00,640 --> 00:06:03,320 Speaker 2: sort of auto feel that you kind of just get 125 00:06:03,360 --> 00:06:05,320 Speaker 2: more money if you're in those roles. But with the 126 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:08,400 Speaker 2: bank's profits, you know, part of the problem here is 127 00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:10,800 Speaker 2: that they're making a profit when we're in one of 128 00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:14,680 Speaker 2: the worst recessions in a long time. Insolvencies have gone 129 00:06:14,720 --> 00:06:17,440 Speaker 2: up about one thousand percent, unemployment's gone up, so it's 130 00:06:17,520 --> 00:06:19,640 Speaker 2: not really a sign that the economy is doing well. 131 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:22,320 Speaker 2: I don't believe that. And I also think, you know, 132 00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:24,080 Speaker 2: there's still a problem in the lack of competition in 133 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 2: the banking sector. I mean, ninety percent are Australian owned banks. 134 00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:27,640 Speaker 3: You know. 135 00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 1: Looking fixes Nicola fix at six o'clock she will, We'll 136 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:34,200 Speaker 1: ask her about that. Okay, Trish, what do you think 137 00:06:34,240 --> 00:06:36,880 Speaker 1: happens next with the Maori Party? Do they because t 138 00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:39,119 Speaker 1: udoroff Level was on the show earlier said he thinks 139 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:40,560 Speaker 1: that they're going to go for the walker jumping law. 140 00:06:40,640 --> 00:06:41,120 Speaker 1: Do they do that? 141 00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:44,760 Speaker 3: Well, it's a it's a very critical strategic question for 142 00:06:44,839 --> 00:06:49,320 Speaker 3: to Party Maori and here's why. So invoking the walker 143 00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:52,279 Speaker 3: jumping bill is easy for them, that's the easy part. 144 00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:53,839 Speaker 3: So what they have to do is they have to 145 00:06:53,880 --> 00:06:56,800 Speaker 3: get two thirds of their caucus to agree. They take 146 00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 3: it to Speaker Brownly as long as they've followed the 147 00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:02,920 Speaker 3: proceeds and they've got the two thirds effectively, he then 148 00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:06,120 Speaker 3: rubber stamps it right, so that then triggers vacancy of 149 00:07:06,160 --> 00:07:10,680 Speaker 3: seats and two by elections. Here's the tricky bit for 150 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:14,320 Speaker 3: to Party Malori. You are a tiny party. You are 151 00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:17,280 Speaker 3: absolutely fractured. We know they've got no dough and their 152 00:07:17,360 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 3: bleeding members because of all the disunity. If they go 153 00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:26,560 Speaker 3: for two by elections before the general election, I would 154 00:07:26,680 --> 00:07:31,840 Speaker 3: put money on it that Mariomeenno and Taku Taku would 155 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:34,760 Speaker 3: stand again. So to Party Malori would have to stand 156 00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:38,000 Speaker 3: candidates against those two. And who else is going to 157 00:07:38,040 --> 00:07:41,200 Speaker 3: want those seats? Lay Labor Labour wants those seats back. 158 00:07:41,320 --> 00:07:45,200 Speaker 3: That would be an absolute gift to Labor. And if 159 00:07:45,320 --> 00:07:47,960 Speaker 3: Labor could win them in two by elections before the 160 00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:51,600 Speaker 3: general election, highly likely they will win them again in 161 00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:54,560 Speaker 3: the general election. And so to Party Mali would have 162 00:07:54,720 --> 00:07:57,720 Speaker 3: actually put a risk two very valuable seats. 163 00:07:57,800 --> 00:08:00,800 Speaker 2: So the alternative then is that they end up in 164 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 2: parliament within a sense to Maru parties and then they've 165 00:08:04,640 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 2: got to differentiate themselves. And I think this point you 166 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:08,800 Speaker 2: were making, Heather is it's hard to see what the 167 00:08:08,840 --> 00:08:15,320 Speaker 2: differences between Rahwari and Debbi and Takuta and Maria Mino. 168 00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:19,000 Speaker 1: Can a difference be that Maria Meno and Takuta because 169 00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 1: they will not be They're not trying to become part 170 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:23,200 Speaker 1: of a labor led government, so they can afford to 171 00:08:23,240 --> 00:08:25,600 Speaker 1: be as radical as you like, whereas these are the lot. 172 00:08:25,640 --> 00:08:27,040 Speaker 1: Now I have to tack a little bit to the same. 173 00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:30,400 Speaker 2: And I think both both parties. I'm already calling them 174 00:08:30,400 --> 00:08:31,880 Speaker 2: two parties, and I want to kind of feel that 175 00:08:31,920 --> 00:08:34,280 Speaker 2: this is a positive thing, that Mary politics is fracturing 176 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:36,520 Speaker 2: in a way that it is healthy. Right, it's got 177 00:08:36,559 --> 00:08:39,200 Speaker 2: one voice for Mari. But it just feels like you've 178 00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:42,840 Speaker 2: got two basically ethno nationalist parties, that's what you've got. 179 00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:46,560 Speaker 2: And you know, I mean Takuta said during the by election, 180 00:08:46,880 --> 00:08:49,160 Speaker 2: you know he doesn't want Paquiera and Indians and sind 181 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:51,760 Speaker 2: Islanders voting in a Mari Electric. Well now it seems 182 00:08:51,760 --> 00:08:53,640 Speaker 2: there are some Mari who don't want mar to vote 183 00:08:53,640 --> 00:08:54,440 Speaker 2: in a Mari Electric. 184 00:08:54,520 --> 00:08:55,920 Speaker 1: So it's just not getting very confusing. 185 00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:58,000 Speaker 2: It's a bit like you know, the People's Judaea's Front 186 00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:01,319 Speaker 2: against the Judaea's People's Front. But I would hope I 187 00:09:01,400 --> 00:09:03,680 Speaker 2: think you're right. I think it might push to party 188 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:07,200 Speaker 2: Mari into being the parliamentary voice of Mary again and 189 00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 2: they start to be a little bit more respectful of 190 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:15,880 Speaker 2: parliament and maybe it pushes whatever party Takuza and Goniameno 191 00:09:16,040 --> 00:09:18,880 Speaker 2: decide to call themselves into being the kind of radical 192 00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:20,480 Speaker 2: out of parliament parties and they'll be gone. 193 00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:22,320 Speaker 3: Well the risk is for them though, and I think 194 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:26,720 Speaker 3: this is actually a high likelihood now voters, it doesn't 195 00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:30,040 Speaker 3: matter what stripe they are, they publish. They punish disunity 196 00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:33,839 Speaker 3: the hardest, and I think that their reality to Party 197 00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:36,960 Speaker 3: Maria is steering down now is that they could lose 198 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 3: their party being in parliament totally. I don't think anyone 199 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 3: in that party currently understands what it takes to get 200 00:09:44,920 --> 00:09:49,680 Speaker 3: an activist grouping and actually get it into parliament, like 201 00:09:49,760 --> 00:09:53,080 Speaker 3: Tariana did and like Peta Sharpouls did and. 202 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:56,320 Speaker 2: Bring he sounded great, Well, it's so reasonable. 203 00:09:56,400 --> 00:09:59,160 Speaker 3: There's only one party that has managed to come back 204 00:09:59,240 --> 00:10:02,120 Speaker 3: from being out of parliament, and that's New Zealand first. 205 00:10:02,120 --> 00:10:04,360 Speaker 3: They've done it twice. But as we know Winston Peters, 206 00:10:04,559 --> 00:10:08,160 Speaker 3: he defies political gravity. So the likelihood of that happening 207 00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:12,080 Speaker 3: for to party Mary is, I think is very low. 208 00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:16,000 Speaker 3: And I've heard from several people over the weekend who 209 00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:18,320 Speaker 3: are in and around this and have been working behind 210 00:10:18,360 --> 00:10:21,359 Speaker 3: the scenes for party Marie for years. They are heartbroken 211 00:10:21,400 --> 00:10:24,200 Speaker 3: at what's happening because they can see the very live 212 00:10:24,280 --> 00:10:25,400 Speaker 3: possibility that they're. 213 00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:27,000 Speaker 2: Going to lose everything that was always going to happen. 214 00:10:27,040 --> 00:10:30,040 Speaker 2: I mean, I like that quote that Penni said during 215 00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:32,720 Speaker 2: the last by election where he said they need more action, 216 00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:35,520 Speaker 2: less hucker and that's the problem. 217 00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:38,240 Speaker 1: All right, guys have spreadfast, by the way, just quickly. 218 00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:44,760 Speaker 1: Does John Thamahay need to go? Will he goes? 219 00:10:45,160 --> 00:10:45,319 Speaker 2: Guy? 220 00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:46,319 Speaker 1: I'm not going to say. 221 00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:49,560 Speaker 3: What I'm going to say is I think from a 222 00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:52,640 Speaker 3: unity point of view, he he does, and to allow 223 00:10:52,679 --> 00:10:56,240 Speaker 3: the party to move on. I think financially the party 224 00:10:56,320 --> 00:10:59,320 Speaker 3: is tied to John Tomaheery and that's why he's staying in. 225 00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:02,560 Speaker 2: And it's also got you know, Raweri is his son 226 00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:05,319 Speaker 2: in law, his daughter's you know, involved in party. 227 00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:08,480 Speaker 1: It's me It's messy, all right, guys, thanks, thank you 228 00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:11,640 Speaker 1: very much, appreciate it. Trish Sheerson Joseph beganni our huddle 229 00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:15,360 Speaker 1: this evenings. For more from Hither Duplessy Allen Drive listen 230 00:11:15,440 --> 00:11:18,480 Speaker 1: live to news talks. It'd be from four pm weekdays, 231 00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:20,800 Speaker 1: or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio