WEBVTT - Why Trump 2.0‘s first 100 days in office are drawing global concern

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Gilda. I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page,

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>a daily podcast presented by The New Zealand Herald. Donald

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump has made it through his one hundred days back

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in office and people are not thrilled with his performance.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>His approval ratings at the one hundred day mark are

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the lowest in seventy years, with only a forty four

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>percent approval for a man who won the popular vote

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>only seven months ago. It comes as his tenure has

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>so far been dominated by tariffs and trade wars, cutting

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>public services, gender mass deportations, and hitting out at his enemies.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Trump bump has even taken on a new meaning,

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with Canada and Australia's left leaning political parties reversing polls

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>from the start of the year to stay in government.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But with roughly fourteen hundred days left in his presidency,

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what does the future for Trump two point zero? We're

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>working through that today on the Front Page with University

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>of Otago professor of International Relations Robert Patman. Robert, how

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>would you rate Donald Trump's performance as US presidents so far?

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think even from the point of view supporters,

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 2>it's been a rocky ride. It's been chaotic and shambolic,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's not really surprising given the fact that mister

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Trump has put so much emphasis with his senior appointments

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>on loyalty rather than competence. So what we've witnessed is

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>a very ambitious agenda, both domestically in the United States

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>and internationally. But there is a suspicion that the implementation

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>of that agenda is in hands which are not particularly steady.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there have just been so many fit things that

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have happened in just one hundred days. Most notably has

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>been the cuts to the public service and the me

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, so let's focus on Doge first. This desire

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to save billions by cutting services seems to have riled

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>up the public a lot more than probably anticipated. There's

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>been multiple reports of constituents confronting leaders at public meetings,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>reports of infighting between Trump's cabinet and Elon Musk. Is

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it a surprise that this has proved so toxic with

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the public.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 2>There, No, not really, because partly because there's a perception

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>that some of the people like Elon Musk and his

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>team of youngish software engineers who are overseeing as sort

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 2>of taking a chainsaw to the public service. They're not

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 2>particularly competent or experienced in the running of governance. Mister

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>musk background is not in that area. Also, there is

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>mounting indignation that mister Musk seems to be cutting everything

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>except his own government contracts, which are extremely big with

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 2>the government. So he is a contractor of the government.

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>But there is a complict of interest here, and I

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 2>think that's causing some concern. But yes, over one hundred

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and twenty thousand federal workers have been fired. We've seen

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 2>important fassets of American soft power, like us AID, which

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>is responsible for dispensing America's development aid around that that's

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 2>been disestablished. With the loss of ten thousand jobs. That's

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 2>going to have a long term effect on how the

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 2>world perceives America to some degree. First of all, there

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 2>is a sense that the expectation of DOGE it's been

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 2>working for three months. They claim they initially claimed they'd

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 2>saved two trillion. They then downlaid that claim to one trillion,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and now it's down to one hundred and fifty billion.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think they found all the waste and fraud

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that they claim. There has been very little evidence produced

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>to back up claims that they have discovered such waste

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and fraud, and it's not very impressive making claims and

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 2>not be aund to back them up. So I think

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>that's contributed to a sense of uneasy. You know, people

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>are losing their jobs and that is a concern.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>The economy has also been a big issue. Trump was

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>voted in with a promise to lower the price of groceries.

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Instead is actually making everything more expensive while also tanking

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy. So why did he even choose to do

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this in the first place.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a very good question. Mister Trump and his

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 2>supporters seem to have got it in their heads that

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the American economy was in an appalling state, when in

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>fact it was the best economy in the world by

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>every objective or impartial economic measure. So he inherited a

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>very strong economy, but he now seems to be in

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 2>the process of undermining that. And of course some economies

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>are warning that America could be entering a recession, its

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 2>economy could be going to recession. You only have to

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 2>look at the stock market to see its cumulative hemorrhaging

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>to realize the scale of how America's gone in the

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>wrong direction economically, and that is you know, more than

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 2>eleven trillion has been lost from the US stock market

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 2>since mister Trump came to power. In general, yes, it's

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 2>rallying a bit now, but it's lost the you know,

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 2>it's lost a lot of ground, and the overall trend

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 2>has been downwards. So it's having good and bad days,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 2>but the bad days tend to out and number the

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>good ones.

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>When does it become the Trump economy?

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 4>It partially is right now, and I really mean this.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 4>I think the good parts of the Trump economy and

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 4>the bad parts of the Baden economy because he's done

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>a terrible job. He did a terrible job on everything.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>But sir, you acknowledge when you announced your tariffs, for example,

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 3>the stock market dropped, it's been volatile. It has since

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 3>gone up. Do you take responsibility that?

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 3>Do you take responsibility?

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 4>Ultimately? I take responsibility for everything. But I've only just

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 4>been here for a little more than three months. Yeah.

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, a lot of people who did support Trump seem

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to have turned on him over his handling of the economy.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I've seen lots of commentary online from people saying that

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>they didn't vote for this from Trump. They voted for

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>him because they wanted to shake up the establishment. They

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted inflation to come down, they wanted immigration under control.

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But has he betrayed voters or is this kind of

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>what we have come to expect from him.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 2>No, I think mister Trump, there were some things which

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>he have you pulled out of a hat, so to speak.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>He's threat to annex Canada and also Greenland, as well

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>as takeover Gaza. As far as I can see, there

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>was nothing in his campaign that suggested he might do that,

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>although he made threatening noises immediately after he was elected

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 2>with respect to Canada. But on the other matters, Doge

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 2>was certainly something that Musk and mister Trump had agreed

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 2>even before the election. Musk was a key player for

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>mister Trump's election victory. He pumped in about two hundred

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and seventy seven million dollars into supporting Trump, and of

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 2>course was rewarded with a very good job. But this

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 2>is very much a government by billionaires. I mean, thirteen

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 2>heads of government agencies are now billionaires, and that's prompted

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>people on the left of the political spectrum, like Bernie

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez known as AOC. They've been

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 2>launching a nationwide anti oligarchy campaign. With respect to the

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 2>question you asked, I think mister Trump indicated he was

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 2>always going for tariffs, so that was no surprise. He

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>often said, it's a beautiful thing, tariffs. There's two things

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 2>that have troubled mister Trump for a long time. The

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>first of all the perception that Americans being ripped off.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>All I can say, if America's being ripped off, the

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 2>people respond deemed to be responsible for that. The rest

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>of the world have done a remarkably competent job, because America,

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>by the time mister Trump came to power, remained head

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and shoulders the most powerful country in the world. And

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the second thing was tariff's He believed that tariffs could

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>correct the situation, and I think many of his voters

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 2>did not seem to realize that tariffs are actually internal

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 2>tax on American consumers. And there was a very interesting

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>development where Amazon attempted to point out to their consumers

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the actual price of the tariffs that the American government

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>has imposed on certain products coming from overseas, and that

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>met from a very angry response from mister Trump and

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>his press spokesperson Caroline leave It And as a result

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of that pressure, Amazon removed the explanation to their consumers

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>in detailing the actual costs of the tariffs being imposed.

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 2>So it is a sensitive issue. But yeah, I mean,

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I think many people took at face value his claimed

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 2>that he could reduce costs, while in the next breath

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>he was saying, I'll be adding some tariffs as well.

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>They probably didn't make the connection between the imposition of

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>tariffs and the increase in their cost of doing.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's funny that you bring up Amazon, actually, because I

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>was going to as well. I know that there's some

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about Elon Musk not being particularly happy with how

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>things are going. And now when I saw Amazon in

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the headlines, I thought, oh, Jeff Bezos was in what

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the front row of the inauguration as well. Do you

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>think that he will continue to have the support from

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Musk and Jeff Bezos or will that

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>linger for the next few years.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 2>It's difficult to predict. But what we do know in

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>the first three months, those high tech bros, people like Bezos, Musk,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Suckerberg from Facebook all strong supporters of Trump going for

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the White House. They have been all of them have

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.599
<v Speaker 2>been quite hit quite hard by the losses on the

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>stock exchange. It's been high tech companies that have borne

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the brunt of that. Give you an example, when mister

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 2>Trump introduced his tariffs on the second of April. Within

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 2>the next two days, there were six trillion in losses

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 2>in the stock exchange for trially of those affected high

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>tech digital companies. That may be part of the reason

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 2>why Musk is unhappy. I suspect also he's unhappy about

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>what's happening to Tesla, one of the five companies under

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 2>his control, which has gone through. I mean it's external sales,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 2>particularly in Europe, have collapsed, and people have been very

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>angry about what Musk has been saying about many countries,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>including Germany. People do have real clout and they can

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>exercise it by simply stopping buying products, which they have

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>done in some cases. But yes, it's going to be

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>interesting to see how this sort of constellation of high

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 2>tech leaders in very big businesses whether they are going

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>to stick with mister Trump through thick and thin. I

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 2>suspect some may peel off, but others may believe on balance,

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>the advantage is to be in a position where they

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 2>can influence the White House or at least have a

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>channel of communication. But yes, there's a lot of unknowns

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>at this stage, Chelsea. We're only three months in the administration,

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 2>or one hundred days or so, and so you know,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot could happen in the next three months.

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Just after the one hundred day mark, there was the

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>first administration official shakeup, with Mike Waltz losing his post

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>as National Secretary Advisor in the wake of that signal

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>chat leak and other scandals. Are you surprised it took

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>so long after that scandal broke for a head to

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>roll over this.

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the circumstances relating to his remove. Obviously the

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 2>signal gate episode did not help, but he is perhaps

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>one of the more combatant and experienced people working in

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 2>the national security field. Mister Trump, as one insiders said,

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>likes his officials to act as staff rather than principles.

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>There is a bit of a sus that mister Waltz,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>who came to the job with some i say solid

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 2>credentials in the national security area, had quite distinct views.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>He was a hard liner on Russia, so he disagreed

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>with the administration's softly, softly approached towards Vladimir Putin, and

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>also he had views on other foreign policy questions. So

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 2>he apparently was the subject of considerable pushback from other

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>members of the administration, and that was why he was

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 2>effectively demoted and given the job of US Ambassador to

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 2>the UN, which is a high profile job, but clearly

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>that was not what he was appointed for. So yes,

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>he's one of the first casualties. I think the first

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of many. I think some people, I mean a lot

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 2>of people are speculating how long can the sectory of

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 2>defense last? Pete Hegseth. He was also involved in a

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 2>second signal chat, which again contravene government regulations about classified communication.

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Waltz will be the end of it.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Mister Trump has always had a bit of an uncomfortable

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.239
<v Speaker 2>relationship with his national security advisors. In his first administration,

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>he got through about three or four, and there is

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 2>a you know, mister Trump, I think is uncomfortable with

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 2>independent people around him who challenge him. Of course, you

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 2>need that for good decision making, and that's why one

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 2>is feeling slightly uneasy that if mister Trump continues to

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>surround himself with cronies or echoes, then we're going to

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 2>have some disastrous decisions made.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 4>And remember this, this is Baiden's word. This was a

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 4>war that was never going to happen if our president.

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 4>This is a horrible, horrible war. And I get to

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 4>see shots of soldiers through you know satellite that are

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 4>so just so terrible. Five thousand soldiers a week on

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 4>average are dying. They're not American soldiers. But I want

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 4>to solve the problem Russian soldiers and the Ukrainian soldiers.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 4>And if I can save five thousand souls, I just

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 4>love doing it.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 3>How long do you give both countries before you're going

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 3>to walk away?

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, there'll be a time when I will say, Okay,

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 4>keep going, keep being stupid.

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, of course, the other big thing with the US

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>at the moment is how it is handling international relations. Hey, notably,

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of back and forth on Ukraine

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and Russia. You know, one minute he's berating Voladimir Zelensky

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Oval Office, the next is criticizing Putin for

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>holding up peace talks. I mean, how destabilizing is this

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of flip flopping and lack of clarity.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>It is destabilizing, but it's actually showing the administration to

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>be very weak, and that is the danger for not

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>just the United States, but for countries like New Zealand.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>The Ukraine conflict, the outcome of that conflict is crucial.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 2>It has big implications for the Indo Pacific. Two of

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the biggest backers of Russia's invasion of Ukraine are China

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 2>and India. And quite frankly, here we have the most

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 2>powerful country in the world led by the Trump. Mister Trump,

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>who sees himself as a strong leader. And what does

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>he do. He coses up to the aggressor that has

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>he legally invaded a liberal democracy and sides with the

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>aggressor against the victim of aggression. Through Chinese non sentimental eyes.

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>That looks like weakness. Yes, he has added, belatedly some

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 2>criticisms of mister Putin, but the peace settlement deal that

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>he's pushing is basically solving all of mister Putin's problems,

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's based almost it could have been written in

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the Kremlin. There does seem to be some reconsideration going

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>on now by mister Trump. He has signed a minerals

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 2>deal with Selensky's government, and that has, as you indicated,

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 2>quite rightly, been some disgruntlement picked up on true social

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 2>mister Trump's media channel of Putin. But I think it's

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>been a very bad start, and he's also split relations

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>between Europe and the United States. And really you could

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>say this about his tariffs as well. But I think

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 2>his foreign policy has at times been incoherent. He you know,

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the official rationale for coosing up to mister Putin's dictatorship

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>is that the United States, what's the form a geopolitical

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 2>partnership with Putin or something like that. According to mister Rubio,

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the sector of state in order to peel Russia off

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 2>from China. I think that's unrealistic. But putting that to

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>one side, China will see mister Trump's behavior as possibly

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>well almost certainly as weakness, and that will encourage them

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>to become more assertive in our neck of the woods,

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>in the Indo Pacific and possibly in the Pacific Island

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Nations region. And certainly it could be expected to up

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the pressure on countries like Taiwan. So that is worrying

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>ineffectively what mister Trump is not, you know, you're quite

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>right use the term destabilizing. He's upended eighty years of

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 2>American foreign policy, he's effectively he's dismantling what's called the

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 2>rules based international order, which most liberal democracies, including our own,

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 2>depend on rules are there for the week, not for

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 2>the strong. But mister Trump's vision of international relations is

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 2>very different from New Zealand's. He sees the world in

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 2>top down terms, a world that's run by great powers,

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>with America the greatest power of all, sitting at the

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 2>top table and negotiating deals with the likes of Putin

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and China. As for the middle powers and the small powers, well,

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 2>they will have to go and negotiate bilateral deals with

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 2>the United States and basically get what they're accept what

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 2>they're offered. So this is a radical break from the past.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 2>It's the most biggest change in the American foreign policy

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>since nineteen forty six forty seven. And I think New

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Zealand will have to speak out at some point because

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 2>what America is doing in its foreign policy is actually

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 2>directly undermining our national interests. New Zealand, like many small

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and middle powers, needs rules. It needs institutions because they provide,

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 2>if you like, a level playing field for small countries

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to operate in. And mister Trump seems to be determined

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 2>to dispense with that, and you know, it does have

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 2>real consequences for US. We trade with one hundred countries

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>around the world, and I think there's now pressure on

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 2>our government and other governments to bypass the United States

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and to protect their interest by upholding the free trade system,

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 2>the rules based trade system, which many countries believe in,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>including China as well as the EU as well as

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 2>many other countries. So, you know, I think we are

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 2>witnessing not just destabilization, but perhaps a sort of fork

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 2>in the road moment where America is parting company with

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 2>many of its traditional allies and we're seeing an international

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 2>realignment as a result.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us, Robert.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this episode of The Front Page. You

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at enzdherld dot co dot MZ. The Front Page is

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>produced by Ethan Sills and Richard Martin, who is also

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>our sound engineer. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts, and

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>tune in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.