WEBVTT - Is this how we reignite the economy?

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Go to Koto.

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Shared Lunch.

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Garth Bray.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Reserve Banks made another call on the official

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>cash rate and that has implications for our whole economy.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Will it provide the stimulus that we need. One of

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the earliest voices calling for stimulus to get things running again?

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Here we Banks chief economist Jared Kerr. He takes us

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>through why he sees the need for this right now.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>But first, some important information you should always consider when investing.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 3>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 3>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.279
<v Speaker 3>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 3>the time of recording.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Here is a man who thinks that stimulus might just

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>be the answer. Would that be fair to say? Oh?

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I think it's pretty clear that the economy needs

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of encouragement right now and we're just

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>not getting it. I think interest rates haven't reached that level. Well,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I know they haven't reached that level where you know,

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>investors and businesses feel like they want to take a

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>punt on something.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 2>We've launched straight into without even saying welcome to Charesis

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>and thanks for being that's all right, no mucking around,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>and straight into it. So what is it that makes

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 2>you think that there needs to be a stimilatory track

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>to monetary policy? And for someone who just wants to

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>speak in single syllables, what does that even mean?

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It means that interst rates have not yet reached a

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>level that are exciting people or are that encouraging businesses.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So we have this theoretical rate called the neutral rate, right,

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and we think it's around three. It's a Goldilocks rate.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not too hot, it's not too cold. Right. We

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>know that the cash rate at five and a half

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>percent last year was way way too restrictive, right, and

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that drove the economy into a recession. They've cut the

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>cash rate from five and a half to three and

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen that, you know, inspire anyone. What it

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>has done is it's given relief to people, but it

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really triggered them. We think it needs to go

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>down to at least two and a half and just

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to give people that incentive.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 2>So much to unpacking there. I guess some would say

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 2>your head for the neutral rate will get you to

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the place where it's up to you to make the

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 2>decisions to take the risks, all that sort of stuff.

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Why are we relying on a central bank and a

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>monetary policy to try and fire things up if they

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>aren't already ready to go.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean that's their job, right, so they

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go through it. They overstimulated during COVID. They you know,

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>they purchased a lot of government bonds, so they printed

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cash. Central banks around the world printed

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars, and we came out of it firing

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on all cylinders right because governments were spending central banks

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>were printing cash. Next minute, we had an inflation rate

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of over seven percent. Okay, they overdid it. They had

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to get that back down to two. So they lifted

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>into shraps from their zero settings to quite aggressively high settings,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>and that really hurt households and businesses, drove us back

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>into recession. And we haven't gotten out of that recession yet.

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>We're still like crawling out of this hole that the

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>central bank poured us into last year. And I think

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, just using the car, you know, example, you've

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>had your foot on the heavy on the break, you've

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>taken it off, You've put the car in neutral. It's

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>just idling. We're saying, just put your foot on the accelerator,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not hard, just get the economy gone.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Is that a consensus view? Are you guys? Are you

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>on the outer on that?

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>We were? I mean we were calling this a year

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago. We were well outside of the

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>consensus calling for a two and a half percent cash row.

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Now there are a few more. Most economists are around

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that sort of two seventy five three level, so we're

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>only arguing over fifty basis points.

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>There was a sort of a split decision back in May,

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>although there was a consensus around holding steady in Wellington.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 2>On the most recent one you had I think that

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 2>in the US the first time in about thirty something

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>years that two governors said we want to express our

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>descent with the rest of what you guys are coming

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 2>up with the Bank of England. I'm just telling this

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 2>for the people that haven't been paying attention, you know

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 2>this is it getting harder to work out what's going

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 2>on in that room, what they're deciding and how they'll pick.

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Is this just part of the cycle.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it does get a little harder when

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you're towards the end for starters. So from the Reserve

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank of New Zealand's point of view, they've gone from

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>five and a half to three. You know, there's not

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot left and they're just kind of feeling their

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>way down to the bottom, and the bottom's near right.

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.239
<v Speaker 1>You can say the same thing for other central banks

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>around the world. But you know, let's not forget we've

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>had this tariff war of sorts over this year that's

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really thrown a lot of things up in the year.

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>We know it's inflationary for the United States, so that's

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>why you're getting that sort of mixed feel from the

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>from the Fed governors, and we think it's deflationary for us,

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's yet to feed through. So you know, there's

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of balls in the year. There's a lot

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of volatility, there's a lot of question questions that need

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>to be answered.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>And we've got another complication because we've got an acting

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>governor at the moment and possibly a permanent replacement coming

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 2>through sometime soon. Does that mean that the Bank's going

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 2>to be saying, well, the Monetary Policy Committee are going

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 2>to be saying we will leave it to the new boss.

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think so. I don't think so. They've

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>got a job to do. They know what the job is.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It is a it is a committee now rather than

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a sole decision maker like it used to be. So

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you've kind of you've spread that a little bit. And

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Christian Christian knows what he's doing. Christian has been around

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>long time.

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>This is Christian Hawksby.

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Christian Hawksby who's acting governor at the moment. He's been

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Reserve Bank, I'm not sure about six or

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>seven years himself. He was working for Harbor Asset Management,

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>so he knows the markets very well. And he also

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>worked at the Bank of England prior to that. So

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about credentials. He knows what he's doing.

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>So there's no excuse, Oh, we better wait for the

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>next governor to come in. They just need to do

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what they need to do.

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people are saying it's not so much

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 2>about whatever the decision has been, it's more about where

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 2>we're headed from here. Absolutely, what the shape of that

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>curve looks like when we're going to see rates start

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to rise again, where that bottom is. Do you have

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>strong views there?

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so our So, like I said, we're at two

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Market's kind of around two seventy five ish,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>So we're not arguing over a big difference. But from

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>our point of view, that extra twenty five is meaningful,

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and it would just get mortgage rates, you know, that

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, that little bit lower than where they are today.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if we stop at two seventy five or three,

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>then mortgage rates that that's them done, that's that's the bottom.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And I just don't think that's stemmatry enough.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, So we do get to two point seventy

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>five or even two point five, what does that mean

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 2>for a mortgage customer?

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So very simply, the cash rate is what the banks

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>deal with the central bank, right, the central bank is

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the banker of the bank. So we're dealing at at

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>say three percent, but that's not where we've fund ourselves at.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Like we're all offer a term deposit rate. I think

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got one out there at like four point one

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, So that's quite a bit higher than

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the cash right. That's because we're trying to get money,

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the door, and then we lend it

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>out right, and then we're and then we're charging you know,

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>five percent on a on on a mortgage rate or above.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So you're all these rates, but the cash rate influences

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>everything above it. So you drop that cash rate from

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>five and a half to three, and what you've seen

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is mortgage rates go from seven and a half to five.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So roughly lockstep doesn't happen precisely, but it has over

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the over the year, we've seen that that whole lot

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>being being passed on. What does another fifty basis points mean?

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Will those five percent rates or slightly above go into

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the mid floors and you get that little bit of

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>extra a little bit of extra bang for buck and

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>delivering that that extra fifty basis points in the in

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the cash rate term deposit rates four as well. So

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of savers out there that go, oh,

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize it so well. Actually, you know, we've

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>been talking about rate cuts for over a year. You

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>could have been preparing yourself on the way down. We

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>always talk about the household with debt, you know, your

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates falling. Actually, if you're if you're a retirement

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're in retirement and you're getting less

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>on you on your nest egg.

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 2>And that fixed income suddenly isn't quite so attractive. You

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>need to look at diversification.

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you do this is precisely so. Putting the cash

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>rate at five and a half, you're trying to attract

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>savings right dropping it down, you're trying to get savings

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to go out into more riskier assets. You want to

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>get them out into either simply buying shares or getting

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>businesses to put money out the door to buy you know,

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>investment like tractors and stuff.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if we look around, there's been a lot

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of worry about debt. I mean, there's been a lot

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 2>of talk about debt this week. I think one of

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the major papers saying, look, we're on track to a

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars worth of combined public and brother big number.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Does a big number like that give you any pause,

0:09:58.679 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 2>any concern?

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, the big number, you know, shows a lot of

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>private debt, a lot of household debt right as a

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>percentage of income, it's gone sideways for a while, but

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it's at a very high level, you know, comparatively speaking.

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a lot of debt on the private side,

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>but we don't have a lot of public debt and

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this is something that we need to smash, smash wide

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>open in the New Zealand public.

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Smashing it down, you look about smashing it up.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely no smash the perception that we've got too

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>much debt as a government. I don't think we do.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we do it all. I think we

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>can take on a lot more debt to tackle the

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure problems that we've got. That I would argue that

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we have not only disappointed the New Zealand public, but

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>actually haven't fulfilled what we should have done as a

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>government over the last thirty years. We have not kept

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>up our infrastructure spending with our population. Right, that's just

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>a simple, simple message to everyone. You know, it takes

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>us forty minutes to drive tea case in Auckland.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Wellington looks more like Venice than it does anything else.

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>With all the water running down the streets. I mean,

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the burst pipes. There's so many examples, and

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>then the good examples christ Church. Look what happens when

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you build back beautifully. It's a cool city. People are

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot more upbeat down there, and it's because you know,

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>they've got the infrastructure, not.

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Just because the regional economy is strong and you've got

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 2>a lot of farming and something happening there and that's

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>supporting it, whereas other.

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Places Wykado and other areas not as upbeat as christ Church. Right,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they've got that farming base, you know, that's that external

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>sector that's doing well. You're getting high dairy price is

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>high meat prices, tourisms bouncing back. But the South Island

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a lot more upbeat than the than

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the North, and you know there's something going on there.

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>If you look at farming and agriculture in general. I

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>think the total agricultural debt is down at the moment,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>So at a time where those prices are great, where

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 2>farmers are making bank, they're choosing to retire that rather

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>than to invest. What does that say?

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think they've been asked to do that too,

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>because they've taken on a little bit too much. So

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the couple of the major banks have been asking,

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually maybe you should repay a little bit,

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>which is prudent. But what we're seeing and is that

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>farmers are spending on the farm, so they may have

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of run down their maintenance a bit. Now they're

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>back up to where it should be, spending more on

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>animal welfare, spending more on the farm, but not past

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the farm gate. So they might be buying a tractor,

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, but they're not buying a use. They might

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>be doing their fences, but they're not going on a holiday.

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that just shows you how cautious they are,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>even though things are pretty good and they're getting a

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>very high payout, they're spending on the farm, they're not

0:12:58.800 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>spending outside of it.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>And then if we're looking at business, I think the

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>business landing as well. You know, business borrowing in the

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 2>UNA was sort of up just a fraction, not even

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>a full percentage point. Again, that's you say, because it's

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>not stimulatory enough or companies just don't see the reward

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 2>justifying the risk.

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Same same thing, even with the investment boosts.

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 2>What happened to the investment boost so right off a

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 2>larger portion of a capital purchase, we're not seeing that

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>play through.

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>No, no, we're not, And that that just proves the

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that we're still in this recession, I believe. So

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we recorded quite a sharp contraction last year and we're

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>going sideways, and it looks like in the current quarter

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>where and now we might we might record another contraction.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's pretty weak out there. Businesses aren't taking on

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>debt because they are cautious that they're worried about what

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 1>does all this tariffs mean for us? You know, the

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand households not spending yet. You know, you're very

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>cautious as a business right now, and we're noticing that

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in in our lending. That investment boost helps, but it's

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not driving you to make the decision. And businesses aren't

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>making that decision at the moment. You ask them are

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you investing? And you're getting quite a mixed response. Most

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of them are saying no. And you ask them, are

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you hiring people? Again, most of them will say I

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>actually go through a bit of a restructure still, So

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>until that turns and we see it going positive, and

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>there's signs that it is, such.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>As sidelined, but there's signs there isn't. I mean, the

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Performance of Services index I think came out this week

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and it was the twentieth month in a row.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Less negative but negative.

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the employer right that's been in the dumpster

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>for twenty months now, twenty months, Yeah, that tells you,

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I suppose that if you're a services business, which is

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of what two thirds of the economy. Yeah, that's

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of businesses out there that are weary about hiring.

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>H landing. Who's getting hit by that?

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, you know, it depends what industry you're looking at.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, the agriculture side's doing well and they're

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>finding the workers that they need, so there's definitely not

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a shortage of workers anymore that we had just a

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.239
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. There's actually a bit of an oversupply.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>And then you go across, like you say, most of

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the services side, they're not hiring. I gave a few

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:29.119
<v Speaker 1>presentations to quite large groups recently. One was in Wellington

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and there were about two hundred people in the crowd

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and I said, are you investing? Are you hiring? And

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>about eight people put their hands up. I counted them eight.

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And then I went to christ Church and at least

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a third, maybe forty percent put their hands up, So

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>still less than fifty, but Jesus a massive difference between

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Wellington and christ Church and Auckland's kind of in the middle.

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>About twenty percent people put their hand up. So when

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I do that and I sort of gauge a crowd.

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I sort of walk out going okay, that's you know,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>depending on where you are, it's worse. But overall it's

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>still quite weak, even in the hot spots like christ Church.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 2>But then as cutting if there's that much gloom, as

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>cutting interest rates really going to provide people with the

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 2>stimulus because they're still going to be nervous about taking action.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, better than doing nothing, It's better than leaving the

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>cash rat restrictive or neutral, so you're effectively not not

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>doing anything.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 2>We talked about tariffs there, and I would just want

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>to ask you have we overbaked the concern around the

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>trade war and the tariffs and that kind of thing.

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 2>With US tariffs, I think US experts are about two

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 2>percent of our GDP. There's plenty of other places we're

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 2>doing business.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, and talking to exporters, they'll say, you know, the

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>US is actually one of the most profitable markets that

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we that we export into, so they can actually wear

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of that tariff themselves. Kiwi dollars come down

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit as well. I hope it goes a

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit further, and again that helps, you know, it

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>helps from the the US side. There's fewer US dollars

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they need to buy Kiwi. So you know, we definitely

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>got panicked at the start when Trump came out with

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>these massive numbers, but we all turned to each other

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and said, that's a negotiating in tact. He's going to

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>water it down. He warded it down a lot more

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>than what we thought, and I think if we look

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>at the impact, most of it's going to be on

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the US consumer. I would love New Zealand to get

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>a ten percent tariff rather than a fifteen percent, but

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not going to end the New Zealand story.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>They are a very very big export destination for US,

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but we export meat and they're not going to stop

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>eating burgers, and they'll wash it down with a Kiwi

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>wine as well, So I'm not too worried about that.

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, we thought, what does it mean for

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. It's a world that's slower

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and trading less with each other, but not to the

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>extent we were worried about. In April. There's a slow

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>down there. China is already diverting some of their exports

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>into Europe and elsewhere. I think that's a bit deflationary,

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that slower growth, that diversion of trade. So

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>from our perspective, we actually think it's deflationary. It's going

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to add to inflation dropping below two percent.

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 2>Of these people will worry that, like you said, it

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.239
<v Speaker 2>was going to be a widespread tip for tach kind

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of reciprocally, people haven't sort of done the tack right.

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Typical analysts like ourselves, you know, you go down these

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>rabbit holes, you go, well, this is what we've seen.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>It could spiral off over here, or it could calm

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>right down, and we were worried more about the spiraling

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>into uncharted territory, whereas it just at the end of

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the day, the tariffs are a tax take. It's all

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>mostly what it is. It's let's just, you know, take

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen percent, and when you model what the

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>impacts of tariffs are going to be ten to fifteen percent,

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>you actually generate quite a bit of revenue for the

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>government thirty forty fifty percent. Tariffs don't generate much revenue

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>because it smothers the trade exactly, people divert their trade elsewhere.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>It actually changes behavior. If you're a government and you

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>want to take you want to generate revenue, you don't

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>want to change behavior, and that's where we've ended up

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on most of these tariffs. So I'm looking at it

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and going, Okay, he's done a whole lot of negotiating,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>He's done a whole lot of things behind the scenes,

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but he's kind of he's just wanted to generate some revenue.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got to pay for the tax cuts

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that he brought in in his first term.

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Someone asked to I mean we worry about this, I

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>suppose as a nation, going back to what you said

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>about our debt levels and whether we've serviced the needs

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>of our society. Around economy, there's a lot of pressure

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>on governments to return to surplus quickly, and a lot

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of scolding gets applied to whether it's national or labor holding.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>The Treasury ventures about that return. I think at the moment,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>even Fitch, one of the ratings agencies, when it reconfirmed

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 2>that New Zealand's got a I think.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a double a plus under them.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, great credit school to have to borrow, but

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 2>please don't do any borrowing instead of almost the thing.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 2>It's nice, but don't take it for a drive because

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>they're saying you keep pushing down the road to the point

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 2>at which you're returning to surplus. And they're saying that

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 2>to worry. I mean, you've worked in international money markets

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 2>and you know you've got to heed those people, haven't you.

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, oh absolutely, it's a it's a big deal.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And New Zealand's got a triple A rating under under Movies, right,

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that's as high as it gets. I kind of wish

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have that, to be fair, and it was

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>double A and that was all we were all we

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>were going for. But yeah, no, there's there's a there's

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>an op x versus capex thing here. So there's running

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>a deficit because you're spending too much and you're not

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>collecting enough revenue and you need to think about your taxes.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>You need to think about your spending, and you know

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this government's doing doing that. But then there's the well,

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 1>if we went out to the market and issued an

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure bond and said hey, we want fifty billion dollars

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to issue that and it's going to

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>go towards infrastructure, then most people will turn around and

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>go okay, fine.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Good risk would put how money there Singapore going into

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>building as sets people. There's going to be a return

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on it, hopefully, you know, it might be a toll road,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>it might be whatever. Get the private people involved, you know,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>do what you need to do to build the infrastructure.

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the rating agencies or investors would even blink.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, okay, you're finally playing catch up for

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty years of not doing enough, cutting taxes, spending more

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on on on beneficiaries or whatever. That's what gets the

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>rating agent's more concerned building a bridge, building a road

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. That that's not a that's building in the

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>productivity of your economy. And we sit here looking at

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>these really disappointing productivity numbers for New Zealand and elsewhere,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>but for New Zealand in particular, and we just go,

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what, A lot of that's just the lack

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure. We haven't invested in ourselves, and governments need

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to realize that if you think about the long game,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately they're only thinking about three year games, if

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you think about the long game, spending more on infrastructure today,

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you a harder, faster, stronger economy. Oh and

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a larger tax base tomorrow. We don't seem to

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to think in ten twenty fifty year chunks.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>We're only thinking in three yearly chunks. Look at this

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>government now that they haven't been in there that long.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of halfway through and they're already looking to

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>next year, going jeez, we've got to deliver in order

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to get voted back in. It's not enough time, not

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>enough time for either side of government.

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 2>We might get to decide on a four year term

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>at the next selection.

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's like you want to give them a four

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>year term with the expectation to get in two almost

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like the US, you kind of expect them to get

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>two terms and you've got them in there for a

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>chunk of time and you can kind of get stuff

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>done over that over that time frame. But three yearly

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and then and then the complications of coalitions, it's just,

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it really inhibits their ability to get stuff done.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Well. It provides ideas, yeah, possibly, but I mean you

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>get ideas. You get minority parties like Act with the

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Greens that are living in sort of slightly saltier suggestions

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 2>like we should run hard on that deficit or we should,

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, really pull the chucks out and go for

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 2>an extremely simultary position and that what what function does

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 2>that have?

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think you get you get these two centralist parties,

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you get some on either side recommending the

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>more extreme, and a lot of odors will look at

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the two central parties and go, you know what, they're

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>not really either size, not really giving me something. So

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to the ones that are a bit more extreme,

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and we and we see that. I just wish we

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>would have a better debate about the type of debt

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that we could issue and what that money would be

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>used for. If we went out to the investment community

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and said, give us fifty billion dollars we want to

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>do these projects over the next ten years, will you

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>fund us? Absolutely? They would absolutely. They are looking for

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>ten twenty thirty year debt. ACC is a great example.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Insurance companies. They want long term bonds to invest into,

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so they would be you know, itching to buy twenty

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty year bonds.

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Were the world champions of comparing ourselves straight to kicker,

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 2>who's doing it better than us? Right now?

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Australia is definitely uperforming us at the moment.

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's because they are, and you know they're. Their

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>central bank didn't go as hard on the rate hikes,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so therefore the Ossie economy didn't slow down as much.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>They didn't record a technical recession. They've got a recession

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>in per capita terms, but it's quite shallow compared to ours.

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So we just look at the Aussie economy and go,

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>oh man, it's just growing nicer than ours. The labor

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>markets tighter, wage growth is more. They're just more buoyant

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>than we are at the moment, and that's why we've

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>seen a net forty three thousand kiwis leave in the

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>last year.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 2>People are heading there, mostly.

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Didn't going to Australia, so we've seen seventy odd thousand

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>kiwis leave and then some coming back, but that net

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>forty three is huge. That's a lot of kiwis leaving.

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>It goes in cycles, and we saw it in twenty

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and twelve when the Aussie mining boom was really in

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.479
<v Speaker 1>full flight and people were going over driving a truck

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>and per for like two hundred thousand dollars. Not so

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>much of that these days, not so much of that,

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but definitely better prospects at the moment. Otherwise we wouldn't

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be seeing the numbers of kiwi are leaving to Australia.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 2>How much of it is off savings and just a stronger,

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, a better national superinnuation structure so that people

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 2>are putting more money aside.

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I mean that's been a strength of Australia for

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 1>a while. Now. They've got I think the fifth largest

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>sovereign wealth fund on the planets for an economy, which

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>is less than two percent of the global economy. To

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>have that sort of savings there, and do you know what,

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't think they've got enough. They are still increasing

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>their compulsory I think it's gone up to twelve percent now.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It was nine percent when I was working there. I

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you what, working thirteen and a half years in Australia,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I've actually got this nice little nest egg sitting there

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that I wouldn't have had Otherwise. There's no way I

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>could afford to put nine percent away over that entire period.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's sitting there and it's great. We're doing it

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>here now. Should be compulsory should be a much higher rate.

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>But you know, some things Australians just do do better

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.239
<v Speaker 1>than us. They dig holes better than us, I can

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>tell you that much. But we grow stuff on top

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>much better than them. One thing they are pretty good at,

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and particularly at the state level, is the big infrastructure stuff.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they just seem to get stuff done. And

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I use Sydney as a classic example, where you've got

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this bridge and it's got heaps lanes, it's got a

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>train track gone both ways, so trains can go across,

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>you can walk down one side, you can cycle across

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the other side of it. And that was built, you know,

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty years ago. That's not enough. Their cities grew and

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they've got a tunnel going underneath. Now you've got theories.

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>You've got plenty of ways to get across the Sydney Harbor.

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Right here, You've got a bridge that was built in

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, I think, on the cheap. On the cheap,

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it reached capacity five years later, so we tacked on

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>some clip ons and we've done nothing since. The only

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>other way to get across is with maybe a fury

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're lucky, or a kayak' that's your option. Strong

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>swimmers need strong swimmers exactly. I think it just highlights

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the difference between us. They can they can deliver these

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>big projects in Australia and they can think a lot

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>further ahead for some reason, and I just wish we

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>would snap out of it.

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's look at we're in the middle of earning season

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 2>at the moment. What are the economic themes, the macro themes,

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the big bits of or clues you're getting about the

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 2>state of the world and the state of the economy

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>from some of the results that we're starting to see through.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 2>We've had you know, like I think a two milk

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>and a couple of the big gent Taylor's here, ass

0:28:55.800 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 2>he's had the some of the resources reports in the

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 2>last couple of days. Does that help color your understanding

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 2>of what we're going through?

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does? It does you know, you get a

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>flavor as the house. You know, certain certain businesses are

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>fairing and you know it doesn't match the data yet

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of does There's certain external businesses that are exporting stuff,

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they're doing they're doing okay, tourism related stuff, some some

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>other things are bouncing back. But generally looking across the

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>whole economy, if you actually go beyond the listed companies

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and you look at say corporate tax that the government's collecting.

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's very very weak, very soft. So you know it's

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>still it's still you know, better than last year, but

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>not good. And we're still sort of feeling our way

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>out of this of this recession. You know, earnings overseas

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>have been okay, but you know, I'm not shooting the

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>lights out.

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 2>And you've got a lot of I D based liquidations.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>They're already coming cracking down.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>They have just gone like that, and it's like, you know,

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we see we sit there and go, you know, I'm sorry,

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but that's exactly what you see in a recession. People

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hold on for as long as they can and then

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>if the if you're not recovering quickly, which we're not,

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>then unfortunately a lot of these businesses go bust. And

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 1>we have seen quite a lift in receiverships, liquidations, you know,

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>all that, all that horrible stuff that we don't want

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to see. And again we look at that and say, hey, yeah,

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of pain out there. What are we

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>doing as a country? Government's not stilatory, central banks not stilatory.

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We've been through this huge recession. Where's the where's the

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>helping hand?

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 2>You've been quite interested in understanding money and finance and

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the economy for quite some time. How did that spark start?

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, pretty much my my my whole sort of adult life.

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Like it started at school and like many students are

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>completely useless at English Mass, you know, I was getting

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>like you know b's and c's and stuff. And then

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I had this fantastic economics teacher who's now teaching at

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>with Slate Girls, Dan Rennie, and he just brought it

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to life. He got me reading the monetary policy statements

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>from the Reserve Bank at like the age thirteen fourteen,

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and I've been reading my whole life. That's my whole life.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading these monetary policy statements. But my best

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>mate he went on to be a lawyer, so he

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>was dreaming about being a lawyer and I'm dreaming about

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>being an economist. And we both get together these days

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and look back and laugh and you know we were

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we basically have done what we said we're going to

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>do it, like age fifteen.

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 2>How do we get people fired up about that interested

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in those things?

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it just or yeah, try it out. I Mean

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some cool things that I wish that I wish

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 1>were around when I was at at school. There's a

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>system or a program called Banker, which is so cool.

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>They get students, you know, really involved in finance and

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>making decisions as if they're adults and you know, running

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a home, running a business, buying shares, that sort of stuff,

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and they get them involved in it early. I think,

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, financial literacy is something where I don't think

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.959
<v Speaker 1>it requires a lot and I'm glad the government's tackled

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this and said, you know, we need to do this.

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it requires a lot of teaching to

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>give you just a real basic understanding. I'm always saddened

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>when I hear of people being so scared to walk

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>into a bank. Oh, I don't want to talk to them.

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to approve my loan. It's like walk

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in there, slap it on the desk and say I

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>want my loan, you know, and if they say no,

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>go to the next one. Go to the next one.

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>You know what.

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The bank's there. They want you as a customer. And

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's that financial literacy. You know, if you if you're

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not there and you and you're you're not comfortable in

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>your own understanding, you are going to be nervous walking

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>into a bank. And that shouldn't be the case if

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they had had proper bit of training on on on

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>just how to do simple things and putting money away

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>into it into a shares your account I think is

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>part of that.

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, money makes it matter.

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, they'll be scared of it. Just just start

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>doing it right.

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's see if that attitude will infuse itself out

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 2>after this podcast and we'll start to see those green shirts.

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Jared Kre thank you very much for your time here,

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.719
<v Speaker 2>and thanks very much for your attention for listening in.

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Whatever you made of that, let us know, let us

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 2>know if there's something else that we should be covering

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>here on the Shared Lunch. That's us for now,