WEBVTT - The one word shaping this year's political battle for the Beehive

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyota.

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. New Zealand

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Politics kicks off this year.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 3>Under the shadow of a looming general election. From a

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 3>continued cost of living.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Crisis and economic recovery to treaty debates and tensions between

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 2>coalition partners, this year will see a mixed bag from

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the Beehive. It comes off the back of a major

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 2>push for economic growth in twenty twenty five, with Roma

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 2>reform and fast track approvals dominating headlines.

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 3>But will all of that pay off today?

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 2>On the Front Page, we dive into where each party stands,

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>what they've announced us far, and what the election campaign

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>could bring us with Newstalk z.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 3>B political reporter Ethan Griffin. Ethan, as we enter the

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>new year, what do you see as I guess the defining.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Issues that we're going to be voting on come election

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six and.

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 4>One word, it's the economy, right, Everything relies on the economy.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 4>It's the biggest issue for voters. Voters vote on how

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 4>they're feeling in their back pocket. Now, we haven't seen

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 4>much growth in the last two years at all, we're

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 4>expecting moderate growth in the next twelve months. The question

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 4>really will be how much growth do we see. National's

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 4>fortunes rely pretty much entirely on the economy. It's not

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 4>a be all and end all. They will seriously be

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 4>hoping that we see some growth this year. Also expect

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 4>health to be a bit of a focus as well.

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 4>The IPSOS Issues Monitor, which sort of records the biggest

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 4>issues for New Zealand voters, is pretty clear right now

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 4>that health is the second biggest issue. It was an

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 4>issued last campaign as well. National and Labor have spent

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of time talking about it over the last

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 4>two years, so expect that to be on the agenda

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 4>as well. I'd also keep it eye on superannuation this year.

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 4>There's been a bit of talk from Labor and New

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Zealand First on that. Both have pretty strong policies on

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 4>the issue of super annuation. Expect the policy from National

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 4>on that as well. And one more to keep an

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 4>eye on immigration and migration. We've had some pretty high

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 4>rivals over the term. Expect New Zealand First to be

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 4>talking a bit about that. But a bigger issue than

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 4>that is of course the New Zealand is moving offshore migration,

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 4>particularly the key he is heading over the ditch, so

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 4>expect Labor to focus a lot on that as well.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.839
<v Speaker 3>We mentioned the health of our economy there.

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it's obviously a major point of contention heading

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 2>into the election. Do you reckon national will be in

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 2>trouble even if it's a moderate shift When it comes

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to the economy. How many eggs have they put in

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 2>the economy basket?

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Pretty much all of them. I think it's fair to

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 4>say they will be that this will be the number

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 4>one concern on the ninth floor right now. What level

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 4>of growth are we going to see this? And as

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 4>I said, I think it's clear that we will see

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 4>some and we desperately need it. The question will be

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 4>how much do we see. They will be hoping it's

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 4>a lot. Will it be enough to get them over

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 4>the line. I'm not ready to make predictions on that,

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 4>but the economy is undoubtedly going to be the bigest

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 4>issue of the campaign.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 2>And of course we'll look for Ford to budget twenty

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty six.

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully it will be a bit sexier than last.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Year's potentially, but then again, the government's broke, They've got

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 4>no money, there's no surplus in the next five years

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 4>in the foreseeable future. This is a government who is

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 4>essentially relying on cutting parts of the state and audition

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 4>out money to other areas, which they've done with things

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 4>like farmac cancer, Droon's health and things like that. It's

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 4>unlikely to be a budget where lots of lollies are

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 4>thrown around, but you never know, do you, Reckon.

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Parties will start politicking straight off the back of the

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 2>summer holidays.

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think so. Expect in the next two weeks

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 4>some major set piece speetures by both leaders. Chris Luxon

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 4>is planning a State of the Nation's speech which you

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 4>can expect to hear at some point in the next

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 4>few weeks. I have no doubt that Precipians will follow

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 4>with some sort of rally as well. Both parties will

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 4>be getting into January with their away caucuses, their caucus

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 4>retreats where they all go away to various parts of

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 4>the country and have their little meetings and their little

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>huis in those places and then come together ready to

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 4>fight at election campaign. Of course, you've got Vatima and

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 4>Waitangi coming up as well the start of the political year,

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 4>and that will make things even more explosive.

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 2>What pressure points do you see arising from the current

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 2>coalition government as they're more than likely straight off the

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>back going to be going their separate ways and trying

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 2>really hard to differentiate themselves from the others.

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well this is kind of uncharted territory right this

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 4>is the first three party coalition government. I think it's

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 4>fair to say, looking at the polls right now, the

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 4>parties have actually done an all right job differentiating themselves

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 4>throughout the term. I think the rules of MMP have

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 4>slightly been shifted. I think we've seen a lot more

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 4>disagreement this term than we have seen in any previous

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.119
<v Speaker 4>MMP governments, and I think the polls reflect that. Both

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 4>AT and New Zealand first sitting quite comfortably there in

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 4>the polls. On Winston, we're seeing it already. I sat

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 4>down with him shortly before Christmas and he was criticizing

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 4>the National's talk on the economy and the lack of

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 4>action that we're seeing. He's also been prinicle of Acts

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Regulatory Standards Bill as well. For David Seymour, the obvious

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 4>one there is race relations. I also sat down with

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 4>him just before Christmas and he says, that's a drum

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 4>that he's going to continue to bang. It's a very

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 4>important issue for the ACT Party, so expect that to

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 4>be part of the election campaign as well. In terms

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 4>of it heating up this year it's an election year,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 4>it undoubtedly will. But I think it's also worth noting

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 4>here that all three parties have done a fairly decent

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 4>job of differentiating themselves throughout the term, so expect to

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 4>see a little bit more of that this year. It's

0:05:58.400 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 4>naturally an election year.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Are you surprised that David Seymour will continue to bang

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>on that drum?

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Not hugely. It's a very important issue for him and

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 4>clearly a very important issue for his voter base. I

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 4>think of all the policies that he's come up with

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 4>in the last how long he's been in politics ten

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 4>years now, even euthanasia, I don't think God has much

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 4>attention for him. It was successful for him, it didn't pass,

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 4>he got lots of headlines out of it, his supporters

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 4>love it. I would imagine it's going to be an

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 4>issue that he continues to explore come election.

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Yet, how would you describe twenty twenty five for the

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 5>ACT Party in a word or two tough.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It was tough for everybody, but towards the end that

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>just started to feel like we were turning a corner.

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And I hope a people come back into twenty twenty six,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that momentum will continue for the whole country. And of

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>course I'd be lying if I didn't say I hope

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it continues for act of course.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Okay, well said.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 2>In terms of minor parties, Ethan, do you think any

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 2>A well placed to really bring it back home in

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six and have a kind of breakout moment.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 4>I suppose I can't see any breakout moments immediately right now.

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 4>What I can see is a breakaway moment, and that's

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 4>obviously to Party Mardi. They had a disastrous year last year,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 4>particularly the last few months. They had six MP's coming

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 4>into parliament this term. They've now got four. Two of

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 4>them have been booted, Mariamno Cupa Kingi from the north

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 4>and Tucke to Ferris from the south, both quite popular MPs,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 4>particularly Maririu and Menno up north. Expect to see potentially

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 4>those who run as independents or a new breakaway Maori

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 4>movement begin. It will also be really interesting to see

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 4>how the party sits with its own supporter base in

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 4>terms of those people that support Muddey and Meno and

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Target and are feeling disillusioned with the party. Looking also

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 4>at the Greens, they've been bouncing around prey much we

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 4>you'd expect them to in the polls, but it's interesting

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 4>of all the party leaders. Zoe Swarbrick, co Leader of

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the Green Party, this is her first election as a

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 4>leader of a party, sort of inted interesting to watch

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 4>her and see how she performs this year as well.

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 2>It's actually easy to forget that it's her first election

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 2>as leader because she has always been a prominent presence

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 2>within the Green Party. Do you reckon that that's going

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 2>to change anything for her or is she just going

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>to track on.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 4>She's a popular politician and she connects with a lot

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 4>of different people. It'll be really interesting to see her

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 4>traveling the length of the country and campaigning. Of course,

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 4>she's also got her own seat, all Concentral, which she'll

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 4>be campaigning in as well, so it'll be very interesting

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 4>to see how she balances that, and more broadly for

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 4>the Greens, which electorates they keep as well. Of course

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 4>you've got Tamitha Paul here in Wellington Central. Those boundaries

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 4>have changed, they might not be as favorable to the Greens.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 4>And then you've got Julianne Genta and Wellington Bays the

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 4>renamed Wellington Bays electorate, and it looks like from boundary

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 4>changes that would benefit her as well. So the Greens

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 4>could be in for quite a good year.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 2>Know that the Opportunities Party has a new leader. Do

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>you reckon they're going to make any waves.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 4>They have a new leader, right, They've got some new blood.

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 4>They'll probably quite energized. I know that they've still sort

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 4>of been around and polls around that sort of one

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 4>to two percent area, I think, outside of twenty seventeen

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 4>where Gareth Morgan were leading them. This election is probably

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>their best shot at getting into Parliament. That's not saying

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 4>they will. That is a wild call to say that.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 4>What I do think and see in the political realm

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 4>right now is the Purple vote is down. The Purple

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 4>vote is very very small. People are looking for alternatives.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Some people may be looking at the Opportunities Party and

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 4>thinking this could be a good alternative. It's really going

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 4>to depend what policies they come out with. How much

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 4>coverage they get and where the voters see them as

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 4>a viable alternative to the parties already in parliament and whatever.

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean.

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>We spoke about this a little bit on the podcast

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>last year, this idea potentially of a breakoff another Moldi

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 2>led party. Of course, you mentioned those two that have

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>been expelled. What are the likelihoods or is there any

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 2>whisperings around Parliament that that could actually happen or will

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>they just likely run as independence.

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 4>It's really hard to say. It's going to depend on

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 4>them talking to their people and the support that they're

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 4>engaging for themselves. I think it is interesting that in

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 4>the High Court action we saw last year where Maniammino

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Kapakingi challenged the Mardi Party around her expulsion, that was

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 4>just her, It wasn't both of them taking that compactionion together.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not sure how much we read into that

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 4>in terms of how they are engaging with each other.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 4>If they could form their own movement or runners independents.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 4>It's also very possible one of them might drop out

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 4>and choose not to run and the other one does.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 4>I guess it's really a wedding.

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Game and remind us of a few election promises that

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>we've already heard from thus far.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's actually been very light so far. To Labor,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 4>we've obviously had their capital gains tax policy, a twenty

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 4>eight percent flat capital gains tax on investment properties, not

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 4>the family home, not yes, and not the farm. Then

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 4>they've got their Future Fund, which essentially is taking the

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 4>dividends from stat Own Enterpris's assets, chucking them into a

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 4>little investment kitty and waiting thirty years to start pulling

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 4>money out of that. And obviously they want to get

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 4>rid of the Regulatory Standards Act in their first one

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 4>hundred days as well. That's pretty much at the Labor

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 4>the national they want to bring, can we say, the

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 4>contributions from three percent to six percent by twenty thirty two.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 4>I imagine there would be some broad cross party support

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 4>for a policy like that. Obviously, they are the major

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 4>party of government, so expect to hear much more from

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 4>them as well.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Is it surprising this early on not to have, you know,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>announced anything.

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 4>More potentially from Labour's perspective, Yes, they've had two years

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 4>in opposition now they've had the same leadership, so they

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 4>haven't sort of they've had to sort of get used

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 4>to opposition, but they haven't had to get used to

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 4>a whole new leadership team. You would think they would

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 4>be bubbling away on the background on some policy. I'm

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 4>sure they have and it will come to the four

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 4>this year, but you'd probably expect more from Labor at

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 4>this point in the term. In terms of the government,

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 4>I think it's fair to say they've been focused on governing.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 4>They release policies all the time, policies that the government

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 4>progresses with. It'll be very interesting to see of the

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 4>three parties of government what they bring to an election campaign.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, perhaps Labor hasn't needed to.

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>How have the poles been looking at that at the

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 2>last half of last year?

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 4>And this is the really interesting thing, right, the poles

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 4>are at nice edge territory. There were forty seven poles

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 4>conducted last year. I went back and had a lock.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 4>Labor was leading in twenty two of them. National was

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 4>leading in twenty five of them. So it is really

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 4>split down the middle there. Now, those are various poles,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 4>different methodology, different companies, so take it all with a

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 4>grain of salt. Also have to make the point that

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 4>the government was leading in most of them. While Labor

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 4>was the largest party. If things could stay the same,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 4>we could realistically see some of the weakest purple vote

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 4>in an MP right. That's the red and the blue

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 4>vote coming together. They are at record lows right now,

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 4>and the minor parties are in very very strong positions.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 4>It'll be interesting to see a Disney consolidation as the

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 4>year goes on, but right now the polls are in

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 4>very much Nithe Edge territory.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 6>I've still got a lot of energy for this job.

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 6>I only took over about eight months before the election.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 6>I had eight months as Prime Minister, and you know

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 6>I said there as soon as I took over from Gacinda,

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 6>I want Labor to get back to focusing on what

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 6>the Labor Party is all about. Jobs, health homes, you know,

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 6>making sure we're raising living standards for all New Zealanders,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 6>focusing on the things that unite New Zealanders rather than

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 6>the things that divide us apart, making sure that we

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 6>we're dealing with controversial and tricky areas like the Treaty

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 6>for example, that we're slowing down a bit and we're

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 6>bringing people with us. We're not you know, people don't

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 6>feel like a whole lot's happening that they don't know

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 6>about and they're mistrustful of their You know, I started

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 6>that work when I became Prime Minister and then, you know,

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 6>I still think that's that the Labor Party needs to do.

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 6>I think we need to make sure that we're there

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 6>for the people who we represent.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 2>And in terms of all of the party leaders, I

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>know that there were a few questions swirling around last year.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you Reckon Hopkins will continue through to the election.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 3>I know he's told us he will.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 4>I think it's I think it's likely Labor are in

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 4>a good position right now. The only way you could

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 4>see him falling out of that job as if things

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 4>get really dire for the Labor Party. And there's a

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 4>fun fact here, Actually, this is the first time ever

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 4>if both lead to stand their job, the first time

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 4>ever under MMP that two leaders had fought an election

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 4>twice in a row. The last time that happened was

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 4>before an MP in nineteen ninety three with Jim Vulger

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 4>and Mike Moore. And this is where it gets interesting.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 4>In nineteen ninety Bulger smashed Mike mooreter win his first

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 4>term in office. Three years later, more came within one

0:14:55.520 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 4>seat of winning against Jim Vulger. So it doesn't repeat,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 4>but it may give us an indication of how tight

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 4>this election could be.

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 3>And when those numbers become clearer.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know that Labor and Tipati, Maori and

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the Greens have all kind of kept a separate from themselves,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and I suspect the coalition government parties will do the

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 2>same coming into the year. When do you expect them

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to kind of merge together?

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 3>I suppose I think.

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Throughout the year all we're going to see is them

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of come apart a little bit more. It's fairly

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 4>clear who the preferred partners are, right, Green's work with Labor,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 4>the Maori Party want to work with the Left Actors

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 4>very much. Act would work with National. It's as simple

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 4>really as that. But there is differentiation there. The parties

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 4>have different policies. I imagine as we head towards election day,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 4>those differentiations are going to be much more clear. It's

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 4>only after the election that they'll start to come together

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 4>and negotiate either side depending on where they sit, and

0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 4>then we'll get a result after that.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 3>And you match mentioned Ratna and why Tongey.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Of course, before the unofficial kicking off of the political year.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Do we know anything about those events? Has anyone said

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 2>that they're not going.

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 4>No at this stage. Well, we have Latona next week

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 4>up in the very ot Snagtak. At this time of

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 4>year that is generally seen as the start of the

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 4>political year. Pretty much all party leaders go to that event.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 4>I think David Seam has missed it a few times.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 4>And then of course in early February we have White

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Honey up North and that is always a set piece event.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting the Prime Minister Chris Luckxon didn't attend last year.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 4>He actually spent the day with Natahou and Kadoa just

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 4>outside of christ Church. So it will be interesting to

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 4>see if, given it's an election year, he will attend

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 4>White Honey celebrations. Safe to assume David Seam will be there,

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Chriss Hipkins will be there, the Greens will be there.

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Winston usually goes that's his nahe up in the North,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 4>so no doubt he'll be there. The question really is

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 4>the Prime Minister. He hasn't made a decision on that yet.

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 2>And Ethan finally give me some predictions for this year.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind how wild they are and I don't

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 2>mind if you want to put some cash down if

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you're really confident about some as well.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 4>Predictions are a fool's game, particularly in politics.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 3>But I can't play.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 4>I'll give you three. I'll give you three. It will

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 4>be a November election. I'm pretty confident in that both

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 4>National and Labor won't get more than forty percent of

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 4>the party vote, and either David Seymour or CRUs Hipkins

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 4>will get married, but both won't. Only one will. They're

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 4>both engaged, obviously, so.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 3>Only one will.

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've already seen a Woman's Day and Z cover

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 2>from one of them. Do you reckon there's going to

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 2>be another as well, featuring Seymour.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 4>We'll have to wait and see. I don't know if

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 4>he's ever been in Woman's Day actually, but I feel

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 4>like I feel like you quite enjoy it.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so as well.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I reckon I'll put a couple of dictions down

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 2>as well. I think you're you're straight on the money

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 2>with no party reaching forty percent, so I agree with

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>you on that. But also I think a major announcement

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 2>in regards to assets sales before the next election as well.

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 3>I think that's going to be a hot topic.

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 4>I agree, it's certainly going to be one to watch.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much for joining us, Ethan, Thanks Chelsea. That's

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 3>it for this episode of the Front Page.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 2>You can read more about today's stories and extensive news

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 2>coverage at NZDHERLD dot co dot nz. The Front Page

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>is produced by Jane Ye and Richard Martin, who's also

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 2>our editor.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm Chelsea Daniels.

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the Front Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow for another look

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 2>behind the headlines.