WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #290 - June 25th 2025 - Ramesh Thakur

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news talks it B.

0:00:12.373 --> 0:00:16.173
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.693 --> 0:00:19.733
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.773 --> 0:00:24.813
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of the now the Leighton

0:00:24.933 --> 0:00:27.653
<v Speaker 1>Smith Podcast powered by news talks it B.

0:00:28.133 --> 0:00:31.893
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to podcast two hundred and ninety for June twenty five,

0:00:32.053 --> 0:00:36.253
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. Ramesh the Kur has contributed to a

0:00:36.333 --> 0:00:40.533
<v Speaker 2>number of podcasts, and with very good reason. A quick

0:00:40.613 --> 0:00:43.573
<v Speaker 2>survey of his career tells you that and I have

0:00:43.613 --> 0:00:46.693
<v Speaker 2>a great respect for his opinions. Now, we left recording

0:00:46.853 --> 0:00:50.493
<v Speaker 2>the interview until the very last minute in order to

0:00:50.493 --> 0:00:53.413
<v Speaker 2>be as up to date as possible. But first, there

0:00:53.453 --> 0:00:56.133
<v Speaker 2>is one aspect that we can cover now. That is

0:00:56.173 --> 0:00:59.933
<v Speaker 2>that the accusations that the military action taken by President

0:00:59.973 --> 0:01:05.453
<v Speaker 2>Trump is illegal constitutionally so based on the need for

0:01:05.733 --> 0:01:09.373
<v Speaker 2>a president to see congressional approval first. Now, while there's

0:01:09.813 --> 0:01:12.013
<v Speaker 2>a little more to it than that, we don't need

0:01:12.053 --> 0:01:15.373
<v Speaker 2>to dive into the minutia. Now, there are two articles

0:01:15.413 --> 0:01:19.213
<v Speaker 2>I'll referred to, and each of them is independent of

0:01:19.253 --> 0:01:22.253
<v Speaker 2>the other, but there is a bit of crossover as well.

0:01:22.773 --> 0:01:29.253
<v Speaker 2>George Treatment published War and the Constitution on June twenty three,

0:01:29.493 --> 0:01:32.133
<v Speaker 2>which would be June twenty four. Here, the US attack

0:01:32.173 --> 0:01:35.813
<v Speaker 2>on Iran's nuclear facilities has raised an important constitutional issue.

0:01:36.093 --> 0:01:40.173
<v Speaker 2>The US Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war.

0:01:40.653 --> 0:01:43.893
<v Speaker 2>It was a wise and appropriate principle. Wars that perhaps

0:01:43.973 --> 0:01:47.253
<v Speaker 2>the most consequential actions a nation can take. They can

0:01:47.293 --> 0:01:50.493
<v Speaker 2>put a nation's very survival at risk and endangered military

0:01:50.493 --> 0:01:55.173
<v Speaker 2>and civilian lives. Wars also reshape the economy and must

0:01:55.213 --> 0:01:59.973
<v Speaker 2>bind nature place some limits on citizens constitutional right to

0:02:00.053 --> 0:02:04.293
<v Speaker 2>control government actions. Congress is designed to be the representative

0:02:04.413 --> 0:02:08.933
<v Speaker 2>and guaranteur of the right of citizens to govern themselves. Therefore,

0:02:08.973 --> 0:02:12.333
<v Speaker 2>the idea was that the US could not wage war

0:02:12.453 --> 0:02:15.933
<v Speaker 2>without the consent of Congress, nor avoid war if Congress

0:02:16.013 --> 0:02:19.133
<v Speaker 2>deemed it necessary. As commander in chief of the military,

0:02:19.173 --> 0:02:22.093
<v Speaker 2>the President could decide how a war would be waged,

0:02:22.693 --> 0:02:26.133
<v Speaker 2>but not whether there would be a war. The last

0:02:26.173 --> 0:02:28.973
<v Speaker 2>time the United States followed the Constitution in going to

0:02:29.013 --> 0:02:33.253
<v Speaker 2>war was in December nineteen forty one, after the Pearl

0:02:33.293 --> 0:02:36.413
<v Speaker 2>Harbor attack. Now again then goes into quite a bit

0:02:36.453 --> 0:02:40.853
<v Speaker 2>of history of how things have gone basically since then,

0:02:41.093 --> 0:02:44.533
<v Speaker 2>but in referring to time the time factor, he says,

0:02:44.733 --> 0:02:47.413
<v Speaker 2>But the nature of time and war has changed dramatically,

0:02:47.693 --> 0:02:51.093
<v Speaker 2>especially over the last twenty years. A modern Pearl Harbor

0:02:51.213 --> 0:02:54.693
<v Speaker 2>might defeat the US military in a few hours. Another

0:02:54.733 --> 0:02:59.893
<v Speaker 2>critical change is in communication and transparency. A congressional debate

0:03:00.613 --> 0:03:03.773
<v Speaker 2>over going to war in the eighteenth century could unfold

0:03:03.813 --> 0:03:06.653
<v Speaker 2>without the knowledge of the would be adversary. Even if

0:03:06.653 --> 0:03:09.373
<v Speaker 2>a spy were present, it would take substantial time to

0:03:09.413 --> 0:03:13.893
<v Speaker 2>relay the information. Today, by contrast, congressional debates are by

0:03:14.013 --> 0:03:18.573
<v Speaker 2>nature public. Even if a secret session were called, spies

0:03:18.613 --> 0:03:22.813
<v Speaker 2>in Washington could immediately alert the target nation, introducing a

0:03:22.933 --> 0:03:26.773
<v Speaker 2>danger of a preemptive strike on US forces. When you're

0:03:26.813 --> 0:03:30.133
<v Speaker 2>getting the picture, but he gets more specific. A congressional

0:03:30.133 --> 0:03:33.173
<v Speaker 2>debate over the strike on Iran's nuclear facilities would have

0:03:33.293 --> 0:03:38.573
<v Speaker 2>eliminated a fundamental necessity of war, that is, surprise. It

0:03:38.653 --> 0:03:44.413
<v Speaker 2>would also undermine a fundamental element in diplomacy. This reality has,

0:03:44.493 --> 0:03:47.453
<v Speaker 2>since the end of World War II, shifted the power

0:03:47.453 --> 0:03:52.013
<v Speaker 2>to initiate war from Congress to the commander in chief.

0:03:52.533 --> 0:03:55.173
<v Speaker 2>If war is imposed on the US, it must respond,

0:03:55.413 --> 0:03:58.613
<v Speaker 2>long before Congress is convened to debate and vote on

0:03:58.653 --> 0:04:02.893
<v Speaker 2>its response. If the US initiates war. Surprise is essential

0:04:02.933 --> 0:04:07.253
<v Speaker 2>for success. Further on, former declarations of war have become

0:04:07.293 --> 0:04:10.853
<v Speaker 2>globally obst elite. It talks about the last eighty years

0:04:10.893 --> 0:04:14.893
<v Speaker 2>Congress has been sidelined not by conspiracy, but by the

0:04:14.933 --> 0:04:17.133
<v Speaker 2>speed and complexity of modern warfare.

0:04:17.573 --> 0:04:18.773
<v Speaker 3>And there's there's quite a.

0:04:18.773 --> 0:04:22.213
<v Speaker 2>Bit more detail, including the nine to eleven attacks and examples.

0:04:22.813 --> 0:04:26.253
<v Speaker 2>The critical argument here is that at this point in history,

0:04:26.413 --> 0:04:31.253
<v Speaker 2>technology has rendered declarations of war obsolete. Checks and balances

0:04:31.413 --> 0:04:35.573
<v Speaker 2>are the foundation of the Constitution's architecture, and war is

0:04:35.573 --> 0:04:38.493
<v Speaker 2>the most serious of matters. This is not a matter

0:04:38.573 --> 0:04:42.933
<v Speaker 2>of Republicans or Democrats, conservatives or liberals. Perhaps a new

0:04:43.013 --> 0:04:47.173
<v Speaker 2>constitutional convention can solve this problem, but it is hard

0:04:47.253 --> 0:04:51.093
<v Speaker 2>to imagine a solution. Let's not forget that George Friedman

0:04:51.373 --> 0:04:56.253
<v Speaker 2>was a professor of war at the War College in

0:04:56.293 --> 0:04:58.373
<v Speaker 2>Pennsylvania for a number of years.

0:04:59.213 --> 0:04:59.413
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:04:59.453 --> 0:05:03.053
<v Speaker 2>There is a second opinion, and it's from somebody who

0:05:03.093 --> 0:05:06.813
<v Speaker 2>I who I have great respect for also, and that

0:05:06.933 --> 0:05:09.973
<v Speaker 2>is Jonathan Turley, who who is the Shapiro Professor of

0:05:09.973 --> 0:05:12.933
<v Speaker 2>Public Interest Law at George Washington University.

0:05:13.453 --> 0:05:14.413
<v Speaker 3>And the interesting thing.

0:05:14.293 --> 0:05:19.173
<v Speaker 2>About Turley, he gives a great deal. He's called on

0:05:19.333 --> 0:05:26.373
<v Speaker 2>by Congress to give opinions on a constant basis legal opinions,

0:05:26.693 --> 0:05:30.413
<v Speaker 2>and he appears on Fox under similar terms. But the

0:05:30.453 --> 0:05:33.933
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing is he is a registered Democrat, but he's

0:05:33.933 --> 0:05:36.653
<v Speaker 2>not one of your left wing nutters, and there's more

0:05:36.653 --> 0:05:39.813
<v Speaker 2>and more of those. So he wrote the Claude Reign's

0:05:40.013 --> 0:05:45.373
<v Speaker 2>School of Constitutional Law. Democrats denounce s reigning and attackers unconstitutional,

0:05:46.253 --> 0:05:51.053
<v Speaker 2>so said a minority leader, Chuck Schumer is particularly shocked.

0:05:51.173 --> 0:05:54.373
<v Speaker 2>That's where the Claude Reigned School of Constitutional Law comes from,

0:05:54.373 --> 0:05:59.213
<v Speaker 2>the movie where the word shocked was thrown about. Just

0:05:59.293 --> 0:06:02.293
<v Speaker 2>in case you didn't know, Chuck Schumer is particularly shocked.

0:06:02.893 --> 0:06:06.813
<v Speaker 2>Schumer insisted that no president should be allowed to unilaterally

0:06:06.893 --> 0:06:10.093
<v Speaker 2>march this nation into something as consequential as war, with

0:06:10.293 --> 0:06:14.533
<v Speaker 2>erratic threats and no strategy. Schumer is the same politician

0:06:15.373 --> 0:06:19.693
<v Speaker 2>who was silent or supportive in earlier unilateral attacks by

0:06:19.733 --> 0:06:24.653
<v Speaker 2>democratic presidents. In twenty eleven, Obama approved a massive military

0:06:24.653 --> 0:06:29.333
<v Speaker 2>campaign against Libya. He says, I represented a bipartisan group

0:06:29.333 --> 0:06:34.253
<v Speaker 2>of members of Congress challenging that action. We were unsuccessful,

0:06:34.973 --> 0:06:38.333
<v Speaker 2>as were such prior challenges I have long criticized. He

0:06:38.333 --> 0:06:40.853
<v Speaker 2>goes on the abandonment of the clear language of the

0:06:40.893 --> 0:06:45.373
<v Speaker 2>Constitution on the declaration of wars. Only eleven such declarations

0:06:45.373 --> 0:06:47.893
<v Speaker 2>have been made in our history. This has not happened

0:06:47.893 --> 0:06:51.693
<v Speaker 2>since World War II in nineteen forty two. Over one

0:06:51.813 --> 0:06:55.693
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty five military campaigns have spanned from Korea

0:06:55.893 --> 0:07:00.853
<v Speaker 2>to Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. It is not a rule

0:07:01.093 --> 0:07:04.853
<v Speaker 2>honored solely in the breach. By the way, Hillary clipp

0:07:04.973 --> 0:07:09.093
<v Speaker 2>was also involved in one such action. The War Powers

0:07:09.173 --> 0:07:13.813
<v Speaker 2>Act has always been controversial and largely ineffectual. Presidents have

0:07:13.893 --> 0:07:18.453
<v Speaker 2>long asserted the inherent power to conduct such attacks under

0:07:18.493 --> 0:07:22.813
<v Speaker 2>their Article I authority as the designated Commander in Chief

0:07:22.933 --> 0:07:26.253
<v Speaker 2>of the Armed Forces. The WPA, which is the War

0:07:26.413 --> 0:07:29.493
<v Speaker 2>Powers Act, bars the use of armed forces in such

0:07:29.493 --> 0:07:32.933
<v Speaker 2>a conflict for more than sixty days without congressional authorization

0:07:33.853 --> 0:07:37.653
<v Speaker 2>for use of military force or a declaration of war

0:07:37.693 --> 0:07:41.013
<v Speaker 2>by the United States. There is a further thirty day

0:07:41.053 --> 0:07:44.733
<v Speaker 2>withdrawal period, and it gets very complicated with different days

0:07:44.733 --> 0:07:48.333
<v Speaker 2>for different things from what have you. Obama also defied

0:07:48.373 --> 0:07:52.773
<v Speaker 2>the War Powers Resolution on Syria. He actually did ask

0:07:52.853 --> 0:07:57.493
<v Speaker 2>for congressional authorization to take military action in that country

0:07:57.573 --> 0:08:00.573
<v Speaker 2>in twenty thirteen. Let me just repeat that for emphasis.

0:08:01.013 --> 0:08:05.013
<v Speaker 2>He actually did ask for congressional authorization to take military

0:08:05.053 --> 0:08:09.213
<v Speaker 2>action in that country in twenty thirteen, but Congress refused

0:08:09.333 --> 0:08:10.013
<v Speaker 2>to approve it.

0:08:10.693 --> 0:08:11.413
<v Speaker 3>So what happened?

0:08:12.213 --> 0:08:18.773
<v Speaker 2>He did it anyway, despite Congress especially denying authorization. Despite

0:08:18.813 --> 0:08:24.413
<v Speaker 2>Congress expressly denying authorization for the introduction of US armed forces.

0:08:24.773 --> 0:08:28.773
<v Speaker 2>Both Obama and Trump did precisely that. Trump was wise

0:08:28.853 --> 0:08:32.533
<v Speaker 2>though to notify Congress. However, what occurs after that is

0:08:32.773 --> 0:08:37.733
<v Speaker 2>anyone's guess. What remains has been little more than political

0:08:37.773 --> 0:08:43.173
<v Speaker 2>theater and one more paragraph toward the end. In the meantime,

0:08:43.973 --> 0:08:47.573
<v Speaker 2>the calls for impeachment are absurd given the prior actions

0:08:47.573 --> 0:08:52.493
<v Speaker 2>of presidents in using this very authority. Once again, some

0:08:52.653 --> 0:08:55.533
<v Speaker 2>Democrats appear intent on applying a different set of rules

0:08:55.533 --> 0:08:59.453
<v Speaker 2>for impeaching Trump than any of his predecessors. Trump can

0:08:59.573 --> 0:09:03.893
<v Speaker 2>cite both history and case law in allowing presidents to

0:09:03.933 --> 0:09:07.933
<v Speaker 2>take such actions. At most, the line over war powers

0:09:08.053 --> 0:09:11.413
<v Speaker 2>is tury. The Framers wanted impeachments to be based on

0:09:11.813 --> 0:09:16.653
<v Speaker 2>brightline rules in establishing high crimes and misdemeanors. This is

0:09:16.733 --> 0:09:20.133
<v Speaker 2>all part of the claud Rain's School of constitutional law.

0:09:20.813 --> 0:09:24.613
<v Speaker 2>Members will once again express their shock and disgust in

0:09:24.653 --> 0:09:27.333
<v Speaker 2>the use of the same authority that they once accepted

0:09:27.573 --> 0:09:30.533
<v Speaker 2>in prior Presidents Trump has a great number of risks

0:09:30.573 --> 0:09:34.893
<v Speaker 2>in this action from global military and economic consequences. The

0:09:34.933 --> 0:09:38.613
<v Speaker 2>War Powers Act is not one of them, if history

0:09:38.693 --> 0:09:41.853
<v Speaker 2>is any measure. So that's where we'll leave it, and

0:09:41.933 --> 0:09:58.173
<v Speaker 2>after a short break, Ramesh. Thekur Buckerlan is a natural

0:09:58.413 --> 0:10:02.373
<v Speaker 2>oral vaccine in a tabletorm called bacterial i sate. It'll

0:10:02.373 --> 0:10:05.973
<v Speaker 2>boost your natural protection against bacterial infections in your chest

0:10:06.053 --> 0:10:09.253
<v Speaker 2>and throat. A three day course of van Buckeland tablets

0:10:09.293 --> 0:10:11.493
<v Speaker 2>will help your body build up to three months of

0:10:11.573 --> 0:10:16.373
<v Speaker 2>immunity against bugs which cause bacterial cold symptoms. So who

0:10:16.373 --> 0:10:19.213
<v Speaker 2>can take bucolan well, the whole family from two years

0:10:19.213 --> 0:10:22.413
<v Speaker 2>of age and upwards. A course of Buckelan tablets offers

0:10:22.493 --> 0:10:26.133
<v Speaker 2>cost effective and safe protection from colds and chills. Protection

0:10:26.253 --> 0:10:29.733
<v Speaker 2>becomes effective a few days after you take buccolan and

0:10:29.893 --> 0:10:32.653
<v Speaker 2>lasts for up to three months following the three day course.

0:10:33.213 --> 0:10:35.933
<v Speaker 2>Buccolan can be taken throughout the cold season, over winter

0:10:36.253 --> 0:10:39.453
<v Speaker 2>or all year round. And remember Buckelan is not intended

0:10:39.493 --> 0:10:43.213
<v Speaker 2>as an alternative to influenza vaccination, but may be used

0:10:43.253 --> 0:10:47.013
<v Speaker 2>along with the flu vaccination for added protection. And keep

0:10:47.013 --> 0:10:49.573
<v Speaker 2>in mind that millions of doses have been taken by

0:10:49.653 --> 0:10:53.453
<v Speaker 2>Kiwis for over fifty years. Only available from your pharmacist.

0:10:53.733 --> 0:10:57.093
<v Speaker 2>Always read the label and users directed, and see your

0:10:57.093 --> 0:11:00.373
<v Speaker 2>doctor if systems persist. Farmer Broker Auckland.

0:11:08.693 --> 0:11:09.053
<v Speaker 3>LATM.

0:11:09.093 --> 0:11:12.293
<v Speaker 2>Smith rames the Kur it's great to have you back

0:11:12.293 --> 0:11:15.253
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast, albeit that the subject matter is a

0:11:15.293 --> 0:11:16.253
<v Speaker 2>little disturbing.

0:11:16.333 --> 0:11:19.413
<v Speaker 3>I trust you well, well, thank you. I hope you're

0:11:19.413 --> 0:11:19.813
<v Speaker 3>will too.

0:11:20.013 --> 0:11:24.253
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, I want to start in a different sort of

0:11:24.293 --> 0:11:28.813
<v Speaker 2>way on this occasion. I received this email this morning,

0:11:28.853 --> 0:11:31.013
<v Speaker 2>which is why it's not in our mail room later on,

0:11:31.813 --> 0:11:34.173
<v Speaker 2>and I thought it wasn't a bad way to start,

0:11:34.893 --> 0:11:39.933
<v Speaker 2>this author inquires. He says, on the subject of Iran,

0:11:40.133 --> 0:11:43.093
<v Speaker 2>I have a couple of questions I haven't heard being asked,

0:11:44.013 --> 0:11:49.573
<v Speaker 2>why does an oil rich country need nuclear power? And

0:11:49.693 --> 0:11:52.253
<v Speaker 2>if he ran second question, if I Run has enriched

0:11:52.373 --> 0:11:56.173
<v Speaker 2>uranium to sixty percent, have they even started building the

0:11:56.253 --> 0:11:59.493
<v Speaker 2>nuclear power plant yet or are they just focusing on

0:11:59.773 --> 0:12:05.893
<v Speaker 2>an enrichment program. Now, with your background and experience with

0:12:06.013 --> 0:12:09.813
<v Speaker 2>nuclear matters, I'm guessing that you're in a position to

0:12:10.213 --> 0:12:12.773
<v Speaker 2>comment on that, we'll get onto your background shortly.

0:12:14.333 --> 0:12:18.733
<v Speaker 3>Sure, on the first question, why does it need nuclear

0:12:18.933 --> 0:12:23.773
<v Speaker 3>power for energy if it has such vast oil reserves,

0:12:24.213 --> 0:12:27.893
<v Speaker 3>I think the answer would be two fuld to that. Firstly,

0:12:29.133 --> 0:12:33.653
<v Speaker 3>it's always a sensible policy for any country to aim

0:12:33.733 --> 0:12:38.733
<v Speaker 3>for energy security by a mix of different sources of energy,

0:12:39.813 --> 0:12:43.493
<v Speaker 3>and nuclear if you can afford it and have the

0:12:43.493 --> 0:12:48.773
<v Speaker 3>technical means, plays an important part for pretty much every country,

0:12:48.813 --> 0:12:53.893
<v Speaker 3>except for self destructive limitations by Australia, where we have

0:12:54.173 --> 0:12:58.413
<v Speaker 3>one third of the world's known uranium reserves, are happy

0:12:58.453 --> 0:13:00.493
<v Speaker 3>to export it to mind it and export it to

0:13:00.533 --> 0:13:06.933
<v Speaker 3>other countries for economic reasons, but by law prohibited for ourselves.

0:13:07.013 --> 0:13:12.053
<v Speaker 3>So that's the first part. The second part, of course,

0:13:12.173 --> 0:13:21.693
<v Speaker 3>is nuclear is indeed the most green emission friendly sort

0:13:21.733 --> 0:13:26.573
<v Speaker 3>of energy we have in terms of its contributions which

0:13:26.613 --> 0:13:32.173
<v Speaker 3>are minimal, and it's it's essentially very safe, it's reliable,

0:13:32.733 --> 0:13:37.653
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't involve additional transmission lines and all that can

0:13:37.653 --> 0:13:42.933
<v Speaker 3>be tailored to existing grid and provides based load power,

0:13:43.013 --> 0:13:46.133
<v Speaker 3>so I think there are good reasons for that. However,

0:13:46.253 --> 0:13:49.293
<v Speaker 3>this is where you get into the second question. I'm

0:13:49.333 --> 0:13:53.053
<v Speaker 3>not sure that Iran has actually and I know it

0:13:53.053 --> 0:13:56.933
<v Speaker 3>as research reactors, research reactors. I don't know if it

0:13:57.013 --> 0:13:59.933
<v Speaker 3>has nuclear power plants or not. But that's in a

0:13:59.973 --> 0:14:04.453
<v Speaker 3>sense irrelevant because to get nuclear energy as a source

0:14:04.493 --> 0:14:09.693
<v Speaker 3>of power, you do not need to get beyond a

0:14:09.733 --> 0:14:17.093
<v Speaker 3>five percent enrichment at the most. The Iranians have been

0:14:17.173 --> 0:14:21.733
<v Speaker 3>enriching up to sixty percent. Now that's slightly misleading, because

0:14:21.733 --> 0:14:25.413
<v Speaker 3>what you have is if you take the benchmark of

0:14:25.453 --> 0:14:29.293
<v Speaker 3>the now abandoned twenty fifteen nuclear deal with their arm

0:14:29.613 --> 0:14:32.773
<v Speaker 3>they were limited to three point six seven percent enrichment,

0:14:33.453 --> 0:14:38.533
<v Speaker 3>which has no militarily sensitive implications whatsoever for weapons production.

0:14:40.253 --> 0:14:43.133
<v Speaker 3>To get to weapons grade, you need to enrich to

0:14:43.293 --> 0:14:47.813
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent. Now. The reason that is completely misleading is

0:14:48.493 --> 0:14:51.253
<v Speaker 3>it's not a linear progression in terms of the technical

0:14:51.333 --> 0:14:55.813
<v Speaker 3>challenges to go from five percent to ninety percent. Once

0:14:55.893 --> 0:14:59.293
<v Speaker 3>you cross five percent, and once you've got to twenty percent,

0:15:00.213 --> 0:15:04.693
<v Speaker 3>you have effectively overcome all the technical challenges, and then

0:15:04.733 --> 0:15:08.173
<v Speaker 3>it becomes a matter just of keeping on spinning the

0:15:08.413 --> 0:15:13.493
<v Speaker 3>centrifugures to purify the uranium. More and more so as

0:15:13.533 --> 0:15:17.933
<v Speaker 3>you separate what's called you two thirty eight and collect

0:15:17.973 --> 0:15:19.693
<v Speaker 3>you two thirty five, which is what you need to

0:15:19.733 --> 0:15:23.453
<v Speaker 3>make bombs, and so that's a matter of time rather

0:15:23.493 --> 0:15:27.813
<v Speaker 3>than any technical challenges remaining. So at sixty percent enrichment,

0:15:28.533 --> 0:15:30.973
<v Speaker 3>let me put it this way, you are effectively at

0:15:31.093 --> 0:15:35.773
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine percent weapon grade achievement already with your purification.

0:15:36.453 --> 0:15:39.453
<v Speaker 3>And that's why that is a concern. And no other

0:15:39.533 --> 0:15:46.053
<v Speaker 3>country has even tried or is engaged in this level

0:15:46.093 --> 0:15:50.973
<v Speaker 3>of purification for the purposes of getting energy. It doesn't

0:15:50.973 --> 0:15:55.973
<v Speaker 3>make any sense. So clearly the intent was to achieve

0:15:56.013 --> 0:16:01.533
<v Speaker 3>the capability. Having said that, we have to be very

0:16:01.573 --> 0:16:05.133
<v Speaker 3>clear and careful. Then in the last few days with

0:16:05.253 --> 0:16:07.893
<v Speaker 3>the strikes, there's been a lot of and you'll have

0:16:07.933 --> 0:16:11.813
<v Speaker 3>seen the reports on how Trump said that his Director

0:16:11.853 --> 0:16:15.373
<v Speaker 3>of National Intelligence, toul Sie Gabbard, essentially didn't know what

0:16:15.373 --> 0:16:17.893
<v Speaker 3>she was talking about, and she's wrong when she says

0:16:18.693 --> 0:16:21.973
<v Speaker 3>they are not weaponizing. I went back and checked on

0:16:22.013 --> 0:16:26.733
<v Speaker 3>her actual statement, and the intelligence community assessment on which

0:16:26.773 --> 0:16:30.573
<v Speaker 3>there is consensus across the fifteen or sixteen different agencies,

0:16:31.133 --> 0:16:35.733
<v Speaker 3>is quite clear cut. One Iran has not in fact

0:16:36.253 --> 0:16:41.773
<v Speaker 3>authorized the making of weapons. Two that said, they have

0:16:42.013 --> 0:16:47.413
<v Speaker 3>since the deal collapsed in twenty eighteen, broken free of

0:16:47.453 --> 0:16:51.493
<v Speaker 3>the constraints to the deal, and been engaged in expanding

0:16:51.533 --> 0:16:55.813
<v Speaker 3>the number of centrifugears, in increasing the purity of enrichment

0:16:55.893 --> 0:16:59.573
<v Speaker 3>all the way to sixty percent, in acquiring stockpile, in

0:16:59.733 --> 0:17:03.093
<v Speaker 3>upgrading the quality of centrifugures from the first generation to

0:17:03.093 --> 0:17:06.533
<v Speaker 3>which they limited to my advanced centrifugures. And none of

0:17:06.573 --> 0:17:11.773
<v Speaker 3>this makes any sense than as an an intent to

0:17:11.893 --> 0:17:16.733
<v Speaker 3>acquire the technical capability to proceed to rapid warm making

0:17:17.613 --> 0:17:21.373
<v Speaker 3>if and when the political authorities in charge direct them

0:17:21.373 --> 0:17:23.493
<v Speaker 3>to do so. So it's the two part thing there.

0:17:23.733 --> 0:17:28.213
<v Speaker 3>They were rapidly advancing to acquire the capability the materials,

0:17:28.413 --> 0:17:32.333
<v Speaker 3>building infrastructure, but there's no indication to suggest that they

0:17:32.373 --> 0:17:36.733
<v Speaker 3>had actually decided to cross that threshold, and not the

0:17:36.853 --> 0:17:41.533
<v Speaker 3>least because I suspect they wanted to avoid provoking precisely

0:17:41.813 --> 0:17:44.573
<v Speaker 3>this sort of military strikes. Okay, it's slightly complex, but

0:17:44.653 --> 0:17:45.813
<v Speaker 3>that's where it stood, all right.

0:17:46.253 --> 0:17:50.733
<v Speaker 2>So that gives rise to another question, how long would

0:17:50.773 --> 0:17:53.973
<v Speaker 2>it take to get the sixty percent to weapons grade

0:17:54.093 --> 0:17:57.373
<v Speaker 2>proper and utilize it.

0:17:57.493 --> 0:18:00.693
<v Speaker 3>That's a very interesting question. You get different answers to that,

0:18:01.813 --> 0:18:04.973
<v Speaker 3>but I think there is consensus that that becomes a

0:18:04.973 --> 0:18:09.373
<v Speaker 3>matter of weeks rather than months. It might be a

0:18:09.373 --> 0:18:11.653
<v Speaker 3>good point to go back to the twenty fifteen nuclear deal.

0:18:12.973 --> 0:18:16.893
<v Speaker 3>What had happened was, I think it is a good

0:18:16.933 --> 0:18:20.293
<v Speaker 3>starting point. Let's put this way between two thousand and three,

0:18:20.373 --> 0:18:24.133
<v Speaker 3>so that's the Iraq War and twenty thirteen when you

0:18:24.173 --> 0:18:27.893
<v Speaker 3>had the interim deal with Iran. In that period, the

0:18:28.013 --> 0:18:32.973
<v Speaker 3>number of centrifugures that Iran had multiplied from one hundred

0:18:33.053 --> 0:18:38.773
<v Speaker 3>and sixty three to nineteen thousand. Okay, this is under sanctions.

0:18:38.933 --> 0:18:46.493
<v Speaker 3>Before the deal of the nineteen thousand, around eleven thousand

0:18:46.613 --> 0:18:50.533
<v Speaker 3>were installed but not in operation, and around six seven

0:18:50.573 --> 0:18:53.813
<v Speaker 3>thousand whatever eleven and a half to seven and a

0:18:53.853 --> 0:19:01.453
<v Speaker 3>half were actually being operated. The deal got the numbers

0:19:01.493 --> 0:19:05.693
<v Speaker 3>of installed centrifugures by two thirds from nineteen thousand to

0:19:05.893 --> 0:19:10.573
<v Speaker 3>six thousand something, and the number of centrifugures in operation

0:19:10.733 --> 0:19:16.253
<v Speaker 3>cut it down to half to five four thousand, five

0:19:16.293 --> 0:19:21.373
<v Speaker 3>thousand something like that. From memory. More importantly, the stockpile

0:19:21.453 --> 0:19:25.853
<v Speaker 3>of envesed uranium at five percent purity or between five

0:19:25.853 --> 0:19:30.733
<v Speaker 3>and twenty percent from memory was cut by ninety eight percent,

0:19:31.933 --> 0:19:36.373
<v Speaker 3>from ten thousand prologram to three hundred kilograms. The Iraq

0:19:36.453 --> 0:19:39.253
<v Speaker 3>heavy reactive plant that was making usonium, which is the

0:19:39.253 --> 0:19:41.693
<v Speaker 3>second part of way to the bomb, that was closed

0:19:41.693 --> 0:19:50.813
<v Speaker 3>down entirely, the dismantled and separated fuel. The instructure touched

0:19:50.813 --> 0:19:55.893
<v Speaker 3>in infrastructure in other words, was put under international IAEA inspection.

0:19:56.733 --> 0:20:03.413
<v Speaker 3>IAEA inspectors were given unprecedented access for inspection, which could

0:20:03.453 --> 0:20:07.253
<v Speaker 3>be delayed via a small amount, but not indefinitely postponed

0:20:07.253 --> 0:20:10.613
<v Speaker 3>because there was but appeal procedures in place for that

0:20:10.653 --> 0:20:15.533
<v Speaker 3>as well. And the IAEA also put on electronic oxy

0:20:15.573 --> 0:20:19.573
<v Speaker 3>to monitor that the facilities that were under safe storage

0:20:19.773 --> 0:20:22.653
<v Speaker 3>were not in fact being breached. So there was an

0:20:22.693 --> 0:20:28.213
<v Speaker 3>effective dismantlement control inspection region put in place, and the

0:20:28.293 --> 0:20:34.653
<v Speaker 3>goal was essentially to widen to lend in the timeline

0:20:35.413 --> 0:20:40.453
<v Speaker 3>from detection to the capacity to acquire weapons if a

0:20:40.533 --> 0:20:44.413
<v Speaker 3>decision was made to cross, and that changed from a

0:20:44.453 --> 0:20:47.373
<v Speaker 3>matter of weeks or months to at least one year

0:20:48.093 --> 0:20:52.173
<v Speaker 3>during which you could do things in response. Since then

0:20:52.333 --> 0:20:57.733
<v Speaker 3>they have acquired more enriched material uranium. They have installed

0:20:57.773 --> 0:21:01.853
<v Speaker 3>more advanced centrifuges distributed between four THOUGH and the Tance,

0:21:02.853 --> 0:21:05.053
<v Speaker 3>mostly in four THO, but some also in the TANS,

0:21:05.653 --> 0:21:09.213
<v Speaker 3>and they built up the nuclear Science Center in Isfahan,

0:21:09.453 --> 0:21:13.453
<v Speaker 3>particularly with Chani's help. So we believe that the capacity

0:21:14.133 --> 0:21:17.853
<v Speaker 3>has reduced to the timeline to a matter of weeks,

0:21:18.613 --> 0:21:22.253
<v Speaker 3>maybe three weeks, maybe just over a month, but not

0:21:22.333 --> 0:21:26.413
<v Speaker 3>much longer than that. And after the strikes this has

0:21:26.493 --> 0:21:30.373
<v Speaker 3>lended again possibly two one to two years, but had

0:21:30.413 --> 0:21:33.773
<v Speaker 3>not been eliminated, and that was the concern that they

0:21:33.813 --> 0:21:38.493
<v Speaker 3>wanted to degrade its capability, so that we the outside

0:21:38.493 --> 0:21:41.613
<v Speaker 3>of the international community, and particularly Israel because it's the

0:21:41.613 --> 0:21:45.213
<v Speaker 3>most exposed to this, had time to react to that,

0:21:45.773 --> 0:21:48.893
<v Speaker 3>and that's again where we think things stand at the moment.

0:21:50.693 --> 0:21:55.133
<v Speaker 3>To be clear, for the have been attacked by the

0:21:55.173 --> 0:21:59.813
<v Speaker 3>so called MOP, the massive ordnance penetrator, the GBU fifty

0:21:59.853 --> 0:22:03.013
<v Speaker 3>seven is a technical name, which is a thirteen thousand

0:22:03.093 --> 0:22:05.693
<v Speaker 3>or thirteen and a half thousand kilogram bomb with the

0:22:05.693 --> 0:22:09.093
<v Speaker 3>biggest ordinance we have in the world. It's been used

0:22:09.093 --> 0:22:11.853
<v Speaker 3>by the way previously they used in Afghanistan a smaller

0:22:11.933 --> 0:22:14.813
<v Speaker 3>version of that. I forget what it's called GVU forty

0:22:14.813 --> 0:22:17.053
<v Speaker 3>three or something. So this is the first time it's

0:22:17.093 --> 0:22:20.653
<v Speaker 3>been used and it's been successful, but it will take

0:22:20.693 --> 0:22:28.213
<v Speaker 3>time to assess the damage with any reliability, and they

0:22:28.213 --> 0:22:32.373
<v Speaker 3>had sufficient advance warning that we have good reason to

0:22:32.413 --> 0:22:36.853
<v Speaker 3>believe that most of the material in which uranium and

0:22:36.893 --> 0:22:41.253
<v Speaker 3>the tooling require the infrastructure was in fact moved out

0:22:41.893 --> 0:22:46.133
<v Speaker 3>Furdo and taken somewhere else. They're called that. I think

0:22:46.133 --> 0:22:49.493
<v Speaker 3>they're talking about another mountain fortress called Pickaxe or something

0:22:50.413 --> 0:22:53.533
<v Speaker 3>which people have suspected but not known about before this.

0:22:54.173 --> 0:22:57.733
<v Speaker 3>So the capability has been, as I said, severely degraded,

0:22:58.813 --> 0:23:02.693
<v Speaker 3>but Iran has retained the capacity to reconstitute the program.

0:23:03.613 --> 0:23:12.133
<v Speaker 3>The regime is still intact, it's not been toppled. And Iran,

0:23:14.533 --> 0:23:19.373
<v Speaker 3>I think, was so badly weakened that his response to

0:23:19.413 --> 0:23:22.853
<v Speaker 3>the US strikes was symbolic more than substantives. And they

0:23:22.853 --> 0:23:24.893
<v Speaker 3>gave advance war in the Americans that they were willing

0:23:24.973 --> 0:23:28.813
<v Speaker 3>to hit their base in Qatar. So all the signs

0:23:28.853 --> 0:23:32.813
<v Speaker 3>are that Iran was desperate to take a face saving

0:23:32.893 --> 0:23:37.653
<v Speaker 3>off ramp, which they have taken. We know that this

0:23:38.533 --> 0:23:43.573
<v Speaker 3>strike on Iran using American military capability and technical capability

0:23:44.333 --> 0:23:47.893
<v Speaker 3>has been the goal and ambition of a Prime Minister

0:23:47.973 --> 0:23:50.573
<v Speaker 3>nad and Yahoo for over a decade to before the

0:23:50.653 --> 0:23:53.613
<v Speaker 3>Iran dealing in twenty fifteen. Left alone. The Hamas attack

0:23:53.893 --> 0:23:57.093
<v Speaker 3>in Clover twenty twenty three. And in a sense you

0:23:57.133 --> 0:24:01.293
<v Speaker 3>could argue that they have succeeded in maneuvering on manipulating

0:24:01.333 --> 0:24:06.893
<v Speaker 3>Trump into doing their job for them, Hence the F

0:24:07.013 --> 0:24:10.533
<v Speaker 3>bomb word by Trump, but his frustration when the ceasefire

0:24:10.573 --> 0:24:13.693
<v Speaker 3>began to be violated Toby both sides, and he just

0:24:13.973 --> 0:24:20.933
<v Speaker 3>blew up in exasperation. So surprisingly, Trump has been more

0:24:20.973 --> 0:24:27.293
<v Speaker 3>effective than any predecessor, both hitting, hitting hard, restoring the

0:24:27.333 --> 0:24:32.813
<v Speaker 3>credibility of American deterrence if you like, and yet at

0:24:32.813 --> 0:24:37.533
<v Speaker 3>the same time, so far at least limiting his involvement

0:24:38.093 --> 0:24:40.773
<v Speaker 3>to what he wanted to do in time and in targets.

0:24:41.133 --> 0:24:43.253
<v Speaker 3>They didn't hit all the targets that they could have.

0:24:43.933 --> 0:24:48.893
<v Speaker 3>They haven't destroyed Iran's capacity to export oil, and they've

0:24:48.933 --> 0:24:52.813
<v Speaker 3>given them ways out provided they don't actually start weaponizing

0:24:53.013 --> 0:24:57.253
<v Speaker 3>and reconstituting it Israel wanted. More So, Trump has been

0:24:57.373 --> 0:25:03.693
<v Speaker 3>just as exasperated at Israel. So there's some signs that

0:25:04.573 --> 0:25:08.013
<v Speaker 3>Trump doesn't deserve more credit than perhaps he's been given.

0:25:09.213 --> 0:25:12.293
<v Speaker 3>He's made it difficult for the Democrats domestically to really

0:25:12.333 --> 0:25:16.933
<v Speaker 3>criticize him on this. Nonetheless, I think you know, if

0:25:16.933 --> 0:25:19.013
<v Speaker 3>you're dealing with the Middle East, the ghosts of history

0:25:19.053 --> 0:25:22.133
<v Speaker 3>are very prominent, and we need to be a bit

0:25:22.213 --> 0:25:28.493
<v Speaker 3>careful of the sohol law of unintended and particularly perverse consequences.

0:25:28.693 --> 0:25:34.133
<v Speaker 2>Let's get onto that shortly. Was Trump overreaching when he

0:25:34.173 --> 0:25:43.053
<v Speaker 2>made the announcement of the the bombings initially overreaching in

0:25:43.133 --> 0:25:46.413
<v Speaker 2>what sense in that had had completely wiped out?

0:25:47.773 --> 0:25:50.493
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I don't think there's evidence to back that up.

0:25:50.533 --> 0:25:56.933
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, Trump is Trump. We know he's moombastic.

0:25:57.013 --> 0:26:00.173
<v Speaker 3>He you know, any deal he's done is never been

0:26:00.213 --> 0:26:02.653
<v Speaker 3>a deal like that in history et cetera, et cetera,

0:26:02.773 --> 0:26:06.213
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that, and certainly in the American system.

0:26:06.253 --> 0:26:10.693
<v Speaker 3>I think people discount the element of Nonetheless, the substance

0:26:10.693 --> 0:26:14.813
<v Speaker 3>of his claim is correct. He acted decisively, he gave

0:26:14.893 --> 0:26:19.693
<v Speaker 3>them time to So, you know, one of the good

0:26:19.773 --> 0:26:23.133
<v Speaker 3>things about what Trump has done we haven't seen any

0:26:23.173 --> 0:26:30.173
<v Speaker 3>evidence of significant, if any, civilian casualties. So what he

0:26:30.253 --> 0:26:35.173
<v Speaker 3>did was a mix of strikes using deception, a misdirection

0:26:35.253 --> 0:26:38.013
<v Speaker 3>in terms of timing and calendar decoy is being sent

0:26:38.093 --> 0:26:40.453
<v Speaker 3>over Hawaii when in fact the direction of the travelers

0:26:40.453 --> 0:26:43.453
<v Speaker 3>the other way around, A mix of the what I

0:26:43.453 --> 0:26:46.933
<v Speaker 3>think there was seven B two planes involved the two

0:26:47.013 --> 0:26:51.733
<v Speaker 3>bombs eats, so fourteen of these mops, the GBU fifty

0:26:51.733 --> 0:26:59.573
<v Speaker 3>seven plus Tomahawk missiles fired from c essentially at Isfahan facilities,

0:26:59.613 --> 0:27:05.133
<v Speaker 3>the scientific infrastructure, and then saying we're not going to

0:27:05.173 --> 0:27:10.533
<v Speaker 3>do anymore unless you choose to escalate. The fear of

0:27:10.693 --> 0:27:16.453
<v Speaker 3>attritional escalation for the moment has abated. It's controlled and

0:27:16.573 --> 0:27:20.613
<v Speaker 3>managed escalation where they have demonstrated both the intent and

0:27:20.653 --> 0:27:25.333
<v Speaker 3>the capability. Helped im miserably by the fact that the

0:27:25.453 --> 0:27:29.613
<v Speaker 3>air differences and the missile launches were totally destroyed and

0:27:29.653 --> 0:27:34.413
<v Speaker 3>degraded by Israel in the two weeks leading up to

0:27:34.453 --> 0:27:38.413
<v Speaker 3>the US attack, and the fact that, as I said,

0:27:38.453 --> 0:27:46.293
<v Speaker 3>Iran's retaliation was limited and signaled in advanced The underlying,

0:27:46.573 --> 0:27:51.373
<v Speaker 3>more important and more crucial strategic signaling is we don't

0:27:51.413 --> 0:27:57.813
<v Speaker 3>wish to escalate. We accept what you have done, and okay,

0:27:57.853 --> 0:27:59.773
<v Speaker 3>it's a defeat for us, it's a meliation for us,

0:27:59.773 --> 0:28:02.573
<v Speaker 3>but we retain the capability, and that gives a sufficient

0:28:03.773 --> 0:28:06.893
<v Speaker 3>face that we can accept it. That seems to me

0:28:07.893 --> 0:28:11.933
<v Speaker 3>to be the condition at the moment. One other thing,

0:28:13.653 --> 0:28:17.613
<v Speaker 3>I think the most important recent example of this law

0:28:17.813 --> 0:28:23.253
<v Speaker 3>unintended purpose consequence ironically enough is the Hamas attack on

0:28:23.333 --> 0:28:29.813
<v Speaker 3>seventh October twenty twenty three. That was barbaric, that was savage,

0:28:30.133 --> 0:28:33.893
<v Speaker 3>And on the military front, I think they achieved more

0:28:33.933 --> 0:28:36.933
<v Speaker 3>success than they would have dared to dream of. On

0:28:36.973 --> 0:28:41.693
<v Speaker 3>the political side and strategic site, it has been a

0:28:41.733 --> 0:28:47.453
<v Speaker 3>tremendous setback for the entire cause. Hamas has not quite finished,

0:28:47.453 --> 0:28:50.653
<v Speaker 3>but close to it has. Vola is nearly finished in Iran,

0:28:51.493 --> 0:28:54.693
<v Speaker 3>Asad is no longer even in serior, let alone in power.

0:28:54.773 --> 0:28:59.013
<v Speaker 3>He is hiding somewhere in Russia. Buthis are still around,

0:28:59.053 --> 0:29:07.773
<v Speaker 3>but badly affected. Israel has demonstrated unbelievable capability in terms

0:29:07.773 --> 0:29:11.973
<v Speaker 3>of intel, in penetration and precision attacks using pages and

0:29:12.013 --> 0:29:18.053
<v Speaker 3>talkies and the airplanes and extraordinarily extraordinary attack So it's

0:29:18.093 --> 0:29:20.733
<v Speaker 3>so it's king of all the surveys in that sense,

0:29:21.413 --> 0:29:24.853
<v Speaker 3>and they have been able to attack Iran directly and

0:29:25.053 --> 0:29:29.693
<v Speaker 3>shown that Iran is, in fact, compared to Israel, still

0:29:29.693 --> 0:29:31.933
<v Speaker 3>a paper tiger, but you know, you can get paper

0:29:31.933 --> 0:29:35.293
<v Speaker 3>cups as well, which are not very pleasant always. So

0:29:35.733 --> 0:29:39.773
<v Speaker 3>all that helped Israel achieved complete air dominance and the

0:29:39.773 --> 0:29:42.613
<v Speaker 3>Americans were able to come in and attack without fearing

0:29:42.653 --> 0:29:46.453
<v Speaker 3>any damage. To themselves. So it's a good one two

0:29:46.493 --> 0:29:50.693
<v Speaker 3>combination in team. But do not under estimate the extent

0:29:50.733 --> 0:29:56.133
<v Speaker 3>to which Israel is still dependent upon American goodwill as

0:29:56.173 --> 0:30:00.213
<v Speaker 3>well as the American supply chain.

0:30:00.293 --> 0:30:04.613
<v Speaker 2>That's that is unquestionable. Look let me let me just

0:30:06.093 --> 0:30:07.973
<v Speaker 2>let me put it this way. Let me ask you this.

0:30:09.173 --> 0:30:14.533
<v Speaker 2>With the history that's that's what now forty six years

0:30:14.573 --> 0:30:24.413
<v Speaker 2>old of Iran Tehran, Yeah, and the developments that have

0:30:24.493 --> 0:30:28.133
<v Speaker 2>taken place on the nuclear front and the way they've

0:30:28.173 --> 0:30:33.573
<v Speaker 2>played their game. Out of one hundred, how much would

0:30:33.653 --> 0:30:36.973
<v Speaker 2>you trust the present administration.

0:30:38.773 --> 0:30:44.853
<v Speaker 3>Of the US now in Iran? I wouldn't you? See?

0:30:44.893 --> 0:30:48.613
<v Speaker 3>This is a problem. There is no reason to trust

0:30:48.773 --> 0:30:52.173
<v Speaker 3>either the United States or Iran in terms of promises

0:30:52.213 --> 0:30:56.813
<v Speaker 3>made and formal agreement signed. And this is where we

0:30:56.933 --> 0:31:00.693
<v Speaker 3>get back to the twenty fifteen deed. It was a

0:31:00.813 --> 0:31:05.493
<v Speaker 3>multilaterally negotiated deed which the Americans led on their site,

0:31:05.813 --> 0:31:08.853
<v Speaker 3>involved all the five permanent members of Security Council plus

0:31:08.853 --> 0:31:15.293
<v Speaker 3>Germany and the EU. The deal was then unanimously endorsed

0:31:15.293 --> 0:31:20.533
<v Speaker 3>by the Security Council in twenty fifteen. It involved dismantlement

0:31:20.653 --> 0:31:24.573
<v Speaker 3>and suspension of Iran's program in return for sanctions lifting

0:31:24.893 --> 0:31:29.493
<v Speaker 3>and assistance with nuclear weapons with the sorry lifting of

0:31:29.533 --> 0:31:34.213
<v Speaker 3>sanctions and development of the economic development. And there was

0:31:34.253 --> 0:31:39.053
<v Speaker 3>a ten to fifteen year period in which there was

0:31:39.093 --> 0:31:44.093
<v Speaker 3>an opportunity to pursue diplomatic pathway to the things. This

0:31:44.293 --> 0:31:50.613
<v Speaker 3>was unilaterally abandoned by the United States under Trump one

0:31:51.533 --> 0:31:58.493
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen, the IAE had repeatedly certified that Iran

0:31:58.853 --> 0:32:01.933
<v Speaker 3>was in compliance with the deal. So in twenty eighteen

0:32:02.013 --> 0:32:05.133
<v Speaker 3>is the US that puts herself into a position of

0:32:05.213 --> 0:32:10.973
<v Speaker 3>non compliance. And I've seen states from Ayado La Kameni

0:32:11.253 --> 0:32:15.373
<v Speaker 3>after that, as well as from the North Koreans saying

0:32:15.373 --> 0:32:18.253
<v Speaker 3>this means you cannot trust the Americans to honor a

0:32:18.293 --> 0:32:21.613
<v Speaker 3>deal that has been signed and other other parties and

0:32:21.813 --> 0:32:26.373
<v Speaker 3>compliance with it. You take the example of Kadafi in

0:32:26.493 --> 0:32:31.053
<v Speaker 3>Libya who agreed to internationally supervised nuclear disarmament and then

0:32:31.213 --> 0:32:37.013
<v Speaker 3>was attacked, taken out, and killed in twenty eleven. At

0:32:37.053 --> 0:32:39.493
<v Speaker 3>the time that Trump pulls out, he was engaged in

0:32:39.533 --> 0:32:42.773
<v Speaker 3>discussions with the North Koreans, and essentially the North Koreans

0:32:42.773 --> 0:32:45.733
<v Speaker 3>and the Iranians and the Russians and Chinese said, what

0:32:45.893 --> 0:32:48.693
<v Speaker 3>is the point of even entering into negotiations with the

0:32:48.773 --> 0:32:52.053
<v Speaker 3>US when a successor administration can just pull out and

0:32:52.093 --> 0:32:58.053
<v Speaker 3>there's no consequences for them. So this effort at abandoning

0:32:58.093 --> 0:33:02.093
<v Speaker 3>agreements solemnly made after years of negotiation, that is a

0:33:02.093 --> 0:33:06.173
<v Speaker 3>problem on both sides. And the longer term consequence of

0:33:06.213 --> 0:33:12.333
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be whichever regime is in power

0:33:12.413 --> 0:33:14.533
<v Speaker 3>in Iran, and we have to be careful on that

0:33:14.533 --> 0:33:19.933
<v Speaker 3>that it's not personalized or individualized to one leader or regime.

0:33:20.853 --> 0:33:25.573
<v Speaker 3>Whoever is in power in Iran and other countries are

0:33:25.613 --> 0:33:30.773
<v Speaker 3>going to conclude one the regional bully in the Middle

0:33:30.773 --> 0:33:35.533
<v Speaker 3>East has been defanked good. The overpowering bully in the

0:33:35.573 --> 0:33:38.853
<v Speaker 3>global neighborhood is out of control. We better look after

0:33:38.893 --> 0:33:42.453
<v Speaker 3>ourselves and should we then look at acquiring by Hoko

0:33:42.493 --> 0:33:46.853
<v Speaker 3>by Krok nuclear weapons for ourselves. So it's that two

0:33:46.973 --> 0:33:49.533
<v Speaker 3>stages thing that varies me as well. That the message

0:33:49.533 --> 0:33:53.013
<v Speaker 3>sent out is we don't care about international law. We

0:33:53.093 --> 0:33:56.453
<v Speaker 3>don't care about international rules, We don't care about agreements

0:33:56.453 --> 0:34:00.453
<v Speaker 3>that we have negotiated and led on. We have the bomb,

0:34:00.613 --> 0:34:03.133
<v Speaker 3>we have the military power. You don't like it tough

0:34:04.093 --> 0:34:07.373
<v Speaker 3>That not necessarily a good message to send. So I

0:34:07.373 --> 0:34:10.693
<v Speaker 3>feel very conflicted in this sense. And in that sense also,

0:34:10.773 --> 0:34:16.653
<v Speaker 3>I think actually going directly after Iran and targeting nuclear

0:34:16.693 --> 0:34:21.973
<v Speaker 3>scientists and the political leadership is a mixed message being

0:34:21.973 --> 0:34:27.813
<v Speaker 3>sent in terms of however, you're into the necessity of

0:34:27.893 --> 0:34:30.813
<v Speaker 3>some sort of a rules based order that is governed

0:34:30.853 --> 0:34:31.493
<v Speaker 3>by norms.

0:34:31.893 --> 0:34:37.373
<v Speaker 2>So taking all that into account, do you congratulate Donald

0:34:37.373 --> 0:34:40.013
<v Speaker 2>Trump for what he's achieved or otherwise?

0:34:41.413 --> 0:34:46.733
<v Speaker 3>No? I do, And I hope he he has the

0:34:46.973 --> 0:34:50.893
<v Speaker 3>self belief and he doesn't care for criticisms and whatever

0:34:50.973 --> 0:34:53.453
<v Speaker 3>other people say, so he may just go by his

0:34:53.493 --> 0:34:57.413
<v Speaker 3>gut instinct and say, you know, I've taken the position

0:34:57.493 --> 0:35:00.213
<v Speaker 3>just midpoint between the military adventurism of the New York

0:35:00.293 --> 0:35:06.053
<v Speaker 3>on Hawks and the pacifism and passivity of people racked

0:35:06.093 --> 0:35:10.213
<v Speaker 3>by indecisiveness and unable to respond challenges. And he said,

0:35:10.293 --> 0:35:15.293
<v Speaker 3>you know, not only my threats credible, my deadlines are credible.

0:35:15.613 --> 0:35:18.133
<v Speaker 3>You don't respond by the deadline have saidn to you

0:35:18.653 --> 0:35:21.453
<v Speaker 3>I have set for you. Then we will react, and

0:35:21.493 --> 0:35:24.893
<v Speaker 3>we will react with the means and at a place

0:35:24.893 --> 0:35:27.493
<v Speaker 3>of our choosing, with targets of our choosing. So he's

0:35:27.533 --> 0:35:32.773
<v Speaker 3>restored that credibility, and that is good. I think restoring

0:35:32.813 --> 0:35:38.333
<v Speaker 3>the timeline between having the capability and weaponization that is good.

0:35:38.373 --> 0:35:40.773
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's no question but that Iran has been

0:35:40.773 --> 0:35:43.533
<v Speaker 3>a destabilizing force in the least and the number of

0:35:43.573 --> 0:35:48.253
<v Speaker 3>statement statements it has made about destroying Israel. You can't

0:35:48.293 --> 0:35:51.213
<v Speaker 3>blame Israel, given its particular history and what happened in

0:35:51.293 --> 0:35:55.493
<v Speaker 3>October twenty three from being genuinely concerned about that. But

0:35:55.653 --> 0:35:59.773
<v Speaker 3>having said that, the danger for Israel has been it

0:35:59.813 --> 0:36:06.053
<v Speaker 3>has relied almost entirely on military means, and I think

0:36:08.693 --> 0:36:11.893
<v Speaker 3>there has to be a much more sustained effort, with

0:36:11.973 --> 0:36:16.853
<v Speaker 3>pressure on all sides to resolve the underlying political problem,

0:36:17.533 --> 0:36:23.373
<v Speaker 3>which is, how do you reconcile the existence of Israel

0:36:24.933 --> 0:36:29.133
<v Speaker 3>and it's right to exist as a legitimate state with

0:36:29.333 --> 0:36:33.813
<v Speaker 3>diplomatic relations with its neighbors, with some sort of recognition

0:36:34.933 --> 0:36:39.693
<v Speaker 3>of the decades of suffering of the Palestinians, Because you

0:36:39.773 --> 0:36:47.453
<v Speaker 3>cannot have a regional solution that depends primarily upon humiliating

0:36:47.453 --> 0:36:52.173
<v Speaker 3>the Palestinians and leaving them weak and disenfranchised and marcialized,

0:36:53.373 --> 0:36:56.493
<v Speaker 3>and you cannot have a solution that ignores Israel's legitimate

0:36:56.573 --> 0:37:01.053
<v Speaker 3>rights to existence within scure borders in peaceful relations. Now

0:37:01.093 --> 0:37:04.573
<v Speaker 3>there's no evidence that Israel is privately accept that, provided

0:37:04.613 --> 0:37:07.573
<v Speaker 3>the other side is as well. But I don't think

0:37:07.693 --> 0:37:12.773
<v Speaker 3>that undermines my claim about the one country that has

0:37:13.213 --> 0:37:17.653
<v Speaker 3>over the decades kept expanding its effective borders defacto borders

0:37:17.813 --> 0:37:20.373
<v Speaker 3>is in fact Israel. It hasn't drunk. So I think

0:37:20.373 --> 0:37:23.733
<v Speaker 3>we need to somehow try and square that circle. It's

0:37:23.773 --> 0:37:26.093
<v Speaker 3>not easy, and I've said to you before, you know,

0:37:26.293 --> 0:37:29.533
<v Speaker 3>if you think you understand the Middle East, you've been misinformed.

0:37:30.573 --> 0:37:35.013
<v Speaker 3>It's the one thing that has eluded everyone. But because

0:37:35.053 --> 0:37:42.693
<v Speaker 3>of his peculiar individual traits, Trump potentially has a better

0:37:42.773 --> 0:37:48.253
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to achieve some lasting legacy there than most precedents

0:37:48.293 --> 0:37:50.373
<v Speaker 3>I can think of in my time, which goes back

0:37:50.413 --> 0:37:53.853
<v Speaker 3>a long way. So yes, I do congratulate him, including

0:37:53.893 --> 0:37:56.853
<v Speaker 3>for his restraint and not expanding it and the fact

0:37:56.893 --> 0:38:00.333
<v Speaker 3>that he has expressed his exasperation publicly with regard to

0:38:00.413 --> 0:38:03.373
<v Speaker 3>Israel as well. That may give some hope to the

0:38:03.413 --> 0:38:06.293
<v Speaker 3>other side that, okay, maybe we should look for a deal.

0:38:06.853 --> 0:38:09.453
<v Speaker 3>And this is a rare opportunity because he's only got

0:38:09.493 --> 0:38:11.453
<v Speaker 3>another tween and a half years or so to go,

0:38:12.253 --> 0:38:14.333
<v Speaker 3>So it depends on how it works out. From now

0:38:14.373 --> 0:38:20.573
<v Speaker 3>but essentially short term unqualified congratulations, medium to long term

0:38:21.733 --> 0:38:25.693
<v Speaker 3>wait and see, but still unbalanced on the positive rather

0:38:25.773 --> 0:38:28.853
<v Speaker 3>negative side, would be my assessment, and.

0:38:28.893 --> 0:38:32.293
<v Speaker 2>It's a very good assessment. Just going back to Israel

0:38:32.373 --> 0:38:37.333
<v Speaker 2>for for momentarily anyway, the the what do they call it,

0:38:37.373 --> 0:38:42.133
<v Speaker 2>the twin two nation state states, its two.

0:38:42.013 --> 0:38:46.373
<v Speaker 3>State solution, two state solution. It's it's out. I don't

0:38:46.453 --> 0:38:50.653
<v Speaker 3>understand why people are obsessed on it and on it. Well,

0:38:50.773 --> 0:38:52.973
<v Speaker 3>neither it still wants it, nor do the other side.

0:38:53.373 --> 0:38:56.053
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm very pleased to hear you say that, because

0:38:56.453 --> 0:38:58.973
<v Speaker 2>it's been pushed time and time again, and it will

0:38:59.373 --> 0:39:02.173
<v Speaker 2>it will still be pushed. It is, it is being

0:39:02.173 --> 0:39:03.453
<v Speaker 2>promoted actually.

0:39:03.253 --> 0:39:05.293
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, including by my governments here. Yeah.

0:39:06.173 --> 0:39:11.773
<v Speaker 2>And it's a it's it's an ignorant approach, is mys

0:39:11.813 --> 0:39:12.653
<v Speaker 2>my terminology?

0:39:14.453 --> 0:39:17.173
<v Speaker 3>How can how can you just it's a fact denying approach.

0:39:17.973 --> 0:39:18.893
<v Speaker 3>There you go, that'll do.

0:39:19.293 --> 0:39:21.813
<v Speaker 2>But if you wanted to put it into into the

0:39:21.853 --> 0:39:25.653
<v Speaker 2>sort of local vernacular of anyway.

0:39:24.813 --> 0:39:30.293
<v Speaker 3>Why why would you expect a country or a.

0:39:31.733 --> 0:39:39.013
<v Speaker 2>Or a an attitude and a policy and a belief

0:39:39.613 --> 0:39:42.293
<v Speaker 2>that one country needs to be swept off the face

0:39:42.293 --> 0:39:46.173
<v Speaker 2>of the earth and expect them to live side by side.

0:39:46.653 --> 0:39:49.093
<v Speaker 3>Now, okay, let me exp I mean, I give you

0:39:49.133 --> 0:39:51.493
<v Speaker 3>a very short and blunt answer, but let me just

0:39:53.213 --> 0:39:55.733
<v Speaker 3>go back into my professor ordify, I got diplomatic one.

0:39:57.213 --> 0:39:59.453
<v Speaker 3>I think there are two factors in response to what

0:39:59.493 --> 0:40:04.053
<v Speaker 3>he said. Firstly, we have to go back to October

0:40:04.093 --> 0:40:08.653
<v Speaker 3>twenty change its feet, because until then we'd have repeated

0:40:09.333 --> 0:40:15.533
<v Speaker 3>cycles of attacks and retaliations, and each time Israel has

0:40:15.533 --> 0:40:21.133
<v Speaker 3>had to re establish its escalation dominance, re established deterrence,

0:40:21.213 --> 0:40:25.253
<v Speaker 3>but also deterrence based on escalation dominance, the capacity, the

0:40:25.373 --> 0:40:30.693
<v Speaker 3>demonstrated and known capacity to control every run of the

0:40:30.773 --> 0:40:33.573
<v Speaker 3>escalation ladder that the other side wanted to go to.

0:40:33.733 --> 0:40:37.373
<v Speaker 3>So Israel was military dominant, and given the population dynamics,

0:40:37.413 --> 0:40:39.933
<v Speaker 3>even if you look at Israel and Iran, what you've

0:40:39.933 --> 0:40:42.173
<v Speaker 3>got nine million or so in Israel and ninety million

0:40:42.213 --> 0:40:45.533
<v Speaker 3>in Iran, so it's only one tenth year in in population.

0:40:45.973 --> 0:40:47.813
<v Speaker 3>And then you had all the others that did the

0:40:47.853 --> 0:40:51.893
<v Speaker 3>asymmetry is very powerful. And then narrow geographics, all that exists. Okay,

0:40:52.333 --> 0:40:55.573
<v Speaker 3>so they'd gone through it started repeatedly, but what they

0:40:55.613 --> 0:40:59.013
<v Speaker 3>experienced in October twenty three, and I don't think most

0:40:59.093 --> 0:41:03.053
<v Speaker 3>Western publics have really registered the fact that that actually

0:41:03.173 --> 0:41:06.973
<v Speaker 3>was a mini holocaust. And the way to grasp it

0:41:07.053 --> 0:41:13.893
<v Speaker 3>is take the entire American casualty tour in Vietnam War

0:41:13.933 --> 0:41:18.493
<v Speaker 3>from start to finish, from the early sixties, mid sixties

0:41:18.933 --> 0:41:25.933
<v Speaker 3>through to whenever it was until they came out of Vietnam.

0:41:26.293 --> 0:41:29.653
<v Speaker 3>The entire casualty was around fifty to fifty four thousand

0:41:29.653 --> 0:41:33.133
<v Speaker 3>American troops killed soldier skilled in that war. If you

0:41:33.213 --> 0:41:37.693
<v Speaker 3>scale up israel population to the US, then what happened

0:41:37.693 --> 0:41:41.453
<v Speaker 3>on seventh October was not an Israeli version of nine

0:41:41.453 --> 0:41:45.213
<v Speaker 3>to eleven. It was as if all the American casualties

0:41:45.213 --> 0:41:49.693
<v Speaker 3>in Vietnam was suffered in one day. That's the scale

0:41:49.733 --> 0:41:52.693
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about. Plus the fact that these were not

0:41:52.813 --> 0:41:59.213
<v Speaker 3>primarily military, they were primarily civilian casualties, and the grotesqueness

0:41:59.333 --> 0:42:03.493
<v Speaker 3>of the attacks and the sexualized violence and then the

0:42:03.533 --> 0:42:09.173
<v Speaker 3>hostage taken. So you have to get trying grasp that

0:42:09.413 --> 0:42:14.093
<v Speaker 3>and internalize that to understand the trauma of that on

0:42:14.253 --> 0:42:18.173
<v Speaker 3>Israel and what it did was, I think it tripped

0:42:18.493 --> 0:42:24.813
<v Speaker 3>their internal taculus that deterrence. Restoring deterrence is no longer enough.

0:42:25.373 --> 0:42:27.773
<v Speaker 3>We have to go all out and defeat the enemy.

0:42:29.253 --> 0:42:33.493
<v Speaker 3>And they've defeated the enemy piecemeal, compartmentalized the threats, went

0:42:33.573 --> 0:42:38.693
<v Speaker 3>after them one by one, first Hamas, then Hesbela, then Iran.

0:42:39.933 --> 0:42:43.293
<v Speaker 3>So from that point of view, that is a change

0:42:43.413 --> 0:42:47.013
<v Speaker 3>in the fundamental underlying strategy on which the secrecy arrests,

0:42:47.733 --> 0:42:50.493
<v Speaker 3>and you can't blame them for that second factor. That

0:42:50.613 --> 0:42:54.173
<v Speaker 3>is important, and that is important for our Western publics

0:42:54.173 --> 0:43:00.613
<v Speaker 3>to come to terms with. I think the widespread anti

0:43:00.653 --> 0:43:08.173
<v Speaker 3>Israel descending into anti Semitic demonstrations on our streets and

0:43:08.373 --> 0:43:11.493
<v Speaker 3>within our political system now has had the effect of

0:43:11.533 --> 0:43:15.693
<v Speaker 3>bringing home to israelis that element of strategic and loneliness.

0:43:15.973 --> 0:43:19.893
<v Speaker 3>They paid a very heavy price for that in the Holocaust,

0:43:20.733 --> 0:43:23.493
<v Speaker 3>and it meant we are on our own and we

0:43:23.573 --> 0:43:27.293
<v Speaker 3>had better take care of this potential, not just existing

0:43:28.093 --> 0:43:32.013
<v Speaker 3>but potential threats and possible threats in the future as

0:43:32.093 --> 0:43:34.813
<v Speaker 3>much as we can now. And if you're going to

0:43:34.813 --> 0:43:39.133
<v Speaker 3>be criticized like this anywhere, we might as well make

0:43:39.173 --> 0:43:41.213
<v Speaker 3>sure that the criticism is worth it in terms of

0:43:41.253 --> 0:43:46.253
<v Speaker 3>the security achievements we can implement today. So I think

0:43:46.893 --> 0:43:50.373
<v Speaker 3>are the demonstrations and the widespread nature of the demonstrations

0:43:50.733 --> 0:43:54.773
<v Speaker 3>has been counterproductive in freeing Israel of trying to worry

0:43:54.813 --> 0:43:57.973
<v Speaker 3>about Western public opinion. It made them more determined to

0:43:58.013 --> 0:44:00.373
<v Speaker 3>do what they want to do on their own, regardless

0:44:00.373 --> 0:44:03.333
<v Speaker 3>of the cost in pr if you like in the West.

0:44:04.093 --> 0:44:07.133
<v Speaker 3>So that if we don't understand that, I don't think

0:44:07.133 --> 0:44:11.453
<v Speaker 3>we understand that dynamics of the Israeli decision making, and

0:44:11.493 --> 0:44:12.973
<v Speaker 3>therefore you're not going to be able to.

0:44:14.493 --> 0:44:16.253
<v Speaker 2>Moderate that if you want to work all right, So

0:44:16.613 --> 0:44:22.213
<v Speaker 2>just just side stepping here, momentarily explain to me, and

0:44:22.293 --> 0:44:24.213
<v Speaker 2>I have a feeling it won't take it long. But

0:44:24.333 --> 0:44:27.413
<v Speaker 2>explain to me how the imbecile who won the recent

0:44:27.533 --> 0:44:31.733
<v Speaker 2>Australian election, why did even look hasn't even looked apparently

0:44:32.773 --> 0:44:37.053
<v Speaker 2>at the at the at the videos, the pictures that

0:44:37.093 --> 0:44:42.133
<v Speaker 2>were taken of that day on October seven, might even

0:44:42.333 --> 0:44:43.733
<v Speaker 2>might even go near them.

0:44:44.053 --> 0:44:46.973
<v Speaker 3>They haven't done that, neither he nor the Foreign minister.

0:44:47.173 --> 0:44:52.613
<v Speaker 3>They haven't. They haven't been to this southern Israel that

0:44:53.093 --> 0:44:56.973
<v Speaker 3>was unforgivable. I think they should have gone. I think

0:44:58.413 --> 0:45:02.973
<v Speaker 3>you know there are ways of dealing with allies. The

0:45:03.933 --> 0:45:06.973
<v Speaker 3>look that I mean not to use the words you

0:45:07.133 --> 0:45:10.293
<v Speaker 3>used with regard to Albin easy, but I don't have

0:45:10.333 --> 0:45:13.933
<v Speaker 3>a very high opinion of him. I think he is amiable,

0:45:14.293 --> 0:45:17.493
<v Speaker 3>but he's totally out of his depth with the foreign

0:45:17.493 --> 0:45:20.253
<v Speaker 3>minister of any wrong. I think she's confident, but this

0:45:20.413 --> 0:45:23.933
<v Speaker 3>was never her portfolio in opposition, and I think on

0:45:23.973 --> 0:45:26.333
<v Speaker 3>this she has been learning on the job and is

0:45:26.373 --> 0:45:28.733
<v Speaker 3>still out of her debt as well. I think, yes,

0:45:28.813 --> 0:45:30.493
<v Speaker 3>they should have gone there, should have watched the video.

0:45:30.573 --> 0:45:37.013
<v Speaker 3>I think they they have fallen into the track of

0:45:37.093 --> 0:45:39.933
<v Speaker 3>some sort of a moral equivalence between victim and perpetrator,

0:45:39.933 --> 0:45:42.573
<v Speaker 3>which is about to what happened in October twenty three

0:45:43.893 --> 0:45:47.733
<v Speaker 3>and not seeing the video. But you know, Greater Thurnberg

0:45:47.813 --> 0:45:50.053
<v Speaker 3>and company they refuse to see that video as well,

0:45:50.093 --> 0:45:50.693
<v Speaker 3>if you remember.

0:45:50.813 --> 0:45:53.173
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but sheated a category of her own and not

0:45:53.213 --> 0:45:54.133
<v Speaker 2>a decision maker.

0:45:54.613 --> 0:46:00.293
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I think all that is true, But unfortunately

0:46:00.373 --> 0:46:04.453
<v Speaker 3>I don't see any alternative person, even in the opposition benches,

0:46:04.973 --> 0:46:09.613
<v Speaker 3>whom I would have great faith in on this. Well,

0:46:09.653 --> 0:46:12.333
<v Speaker 3>but that, you know, the mismanaged, not Israel, and now

0:46:12.413 --> 0:46:15.493
<v Speaker 3>he's missed the mismanaged their alliance with the United States

0:46:15.613 --> 0:46:17.173
<v Speaker 3>as well. Well.

0:46:17.253 --> 0:46:19.773
<v Speaker 2>That that leads to yet another question. That's a step

0:46:19.813 --> 0:46:22.693
<v Speaker 2>further away than where we want to be. But nevertheless,

0:46:23.013 --> 0:46:28.093
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned voters, and it's voters who put people like

0:46:28.693 --> 0:46:31.533
<v Speaker 2>Albanesi into office the only way you can get there.

0:46:32.293 --> 0:46:36.013
<v Speaker 2>So what does it say about the about the intelligence

0:46:36.813 --> 0:46:42.053
<v Speaker 2>or the education or the media influence that the population

0:46:42.413 --> 0:46:48.053
<v Speaker 2>of Australia and New Zealand and other countries have that

0:46:48.173 --> 0:46:51.693
<v Speaker 2>they just don't grasp the reality of the situation.

0:46:53.693 --> 0:46:58.093
<v Speaker 3>I'll disagree with you on that. The reality is the

0:46:58.173 --> 0:47:02.133
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party this year got what just around one third

0:47:02.173 --> 0:47:06.493
<v Speaker 3>of the VOTs. So Albanesi is Prime Minister and Labor

0:47:06.613 --> 0:47:09.253
<v Speaker 3>is in government not because of the people's vote, but

0:47:09.333 --> 0:47:14.933
<v Speaker 3>because of the peculiar and uniquely self destructive system of

0:47:16.133 --> 0:47:20.533
<v Speaker 3>preferential voting we have here. I can vote for person one,

0:47:20.733 --> 0:47:22.933
<v Speaker 3>and person who's number fourteen one of my list can

0:47:23.053 --> 0:47:27.293
<v Speaker 3>end up being my representative. Well because of the preference vestiers. Look,

0:47:27.973 --> 0:47:30.133
<v Speaker 3>the system is much more to blame for that and

0:47:30.173 --> 0:47:32.093
<v Speaker 3>what you see. And this is a general problem. I

0:47:32.133 --> 0:47:34.653
<v Speaker 3>think we have talked about this across the West, that

0:47:34.813 --> 0:47:39.333
<v Speaker 3>there is a disenchantment and disillusionment from the existing political

0:47:39.373 --> 0:47:43.293
<v Speaker 3>systems and the so called uniparties or the so called blob.

0:47:43.653 --> 0:47:45.693
<v Speaker 3>No matter who you vote for, you get the same

0:47:45.733 --> 0:47:49.053
<v Speaker 3>policies regardless of what their promise in the campaign. So

0:47:49.173 --> 0:47:51.693
<v Speaker 3>two thirds of Australians did not vote for it, voted

0:47:51.813 --> 0:47:55.853
<v Speaker 3>for parties other than Labor and other than Albanesi as

0:47:55.893 --> 0:47:59.373
<v Speaker 3>my minister, and what I've actually referred to this in

0:47:59.413 --> 0:48:03.853
<v Speaker 3>writing this. Australia is the second example in recent times,

0:48:04.093 --> 0:48:08.773
<v Speaker 3>following the UK of loveless landslides. But they make the

0:48:08.853 --> 0:48:12.653
<v Speaker 3>mistake of misinterpreting two thirds of the people putting against

0:48:12.653 --> 0:48:15.493
<v Speaker 3>them as a powerful mandate because of the number of

0:48:15.533 --> 0:48:18.893
<v Speaker 3>seats they have in parliament. Albanesi has more seats in

0:48:18.933 --> 0:48:24.213
<v Speaker 3>Parliament for Labor and more parliamentary control despite having significantly

0:48:24.293 --> 0:48:28.933
<v Speaker 3>lower vot share than Kevin Rudd had for example. So

0:48:29.013 --> 0:48:30.573
<v Speaker 3>I think we need to be careful that. You know,

0:48:32.493 --> 0:48:36.093
<v Speaker 3>it's the system where let me put it away, voters

0:48:36.133 --> 0:48:38.693
<v Speaker 3>propose the preference system disposes.

0:48:39.813 --> 0:48:44.133
<v Speaker 2>Well, I grew up with the preference system, not in

0:48:44.253 --> 0:48:48.213
<v Speaker 2>thew in Australia, you know. Okay, Well, I don't forget

0:48:48.253 --> 0:48:51.933
<v Speaker 2>that I am Australian. Yeah, Okay.

0:48:51.933 --> 0:48:54.213
<v Speaker 3>Conversely, don't forget I am in New Zealand and I

0:48:54.253 --> 0:48:56.653
<v Speaker 3>was in New Zealand and we went from first past

0:48:56.693 --> 0:48:59.613
<v Speaker 3>the post to m and P which has many attractions.

0:48:59.653 --> 0:49:02.813
<v Speaker 3>But if you go to this last election, but the

0:49:02.853 --> 0:49:05.973
<v Speaker 3>one before when Justin the Atan became PM under the

0:49:06.013 --> 0:49:10.573
<v Speaker 3>old first part of the post, John Cuda on a landslide. Well,

0:49:10.613 --> 0:49:13.493
<v Speaker 3>I think we keep seeing all of us democratic countries,

0:49:14.293 --> 0:49:18.253
<v Speaker 3>but if you do that exercise of putting different systems

0:49:18.293 --> 0:49:21.533
<v Speaker 3>in each of the major Western democracies, you'd get a

0:49:21.533 --> 0:49:25.573
<v Speaker 3>completely different government formation. Well, it can't be the case

0:49:25.573 --> 0:49:28.813
<v Speaker 3>that it is people's choices being reflected in government. It's

0:49:28.853 --> 0:49:30.493
<v Speaker 3>the system. Ramesh.

0:49:30.533 --> 0:49:33.053
<v Speaker 2>When when I came to New Zealand, which is a

0:49:33.053 --> 0:49:39.093
<v Speaker 2>long time ago, and we were up for the for

0:49:39.173 --> 0:49:43.293
<v Speaker 2>the for the vote and m MP became became it,

0:49:43.853 --> 0:49:47.573
<v Speaker 2>I argued as hard as I could and gave as

0:49:47.653 --> 0:49:50.933
<v Speaker 2>much as I was able to to not having m

0:49:51.053 --> 0:49:56.013
<v Speaker 2>MP and for going for the for the preferential approach yep.

0:49:57.333 --> 0:49:59.813
<v Speaker 2>And I because I thought it was the best, and

0:49:59.853 --> 0:50:01.653
<v Speaker 2>I still think it was the best at the time.

0:50:01.813 --> 0:50:06.293
<v Speaker 2>But in all countries there's been we've seen the births

0:50:06.333 --> 0:50:09.893
<v Speaker 2>of all these clip on parties that achieve what you

0:50:10.613 --> 0:50:15.253
<v Speaker 2>what you've just described. So then taking all that into account,

0:50:15.293 --> 0:50:18.533
<v Speaker 2>my question for you is, in your opinion, what is

0:50:18.573 --> 0:50:19.653
<v Speaker 2>the best system we could have.

0:50:20.413 --> 0:50:25.053
<v Speaker 3>That's a very good question, But in a sense I don't.

0:50:25.653 --> 0:50:29.093
<v Speaker 3>I haven't looked into that in any detail, because before

0:50:29.133 --> 0:50:31.693
<v Speaker 3>I would invest time in that, I need to see

0:50:31.693 --> 0:50:34.693
<v Speaker 3>how much is possible in Australia, how much is constitution

0:50:34.813 --> 0:50:40.973
<v Speaker 3>and how much can be changed. But certainly and there

0:50:42.293 --> 0:50:44.373
<v Speaker 3>let me put it this way. I was a photograph

0:50:44.373 --> 0:50:48.933
<v Speaker 3>then I had two senior colleagues, one of whom was

0:50:48.933 --> 0:50:51.853
<v Speaker 3>a member of the commission that recommended MMP, the later

0:50:51.933 --> 0:50:57.013
<v Speaker 3>Richard Mulgan. Another, Anthony Wood, was a resident expert in

0:50:57.013 --> 0:51:00.933
<v Speaker 3>New Zealian politics, and they disagreed fundamentally on this. Anthony

0:51:02.253 --> 0:51:05.013
<v Speaker 3>was very much in favor of retaining the first but

0:51:05.173 --> 0:51:09.413
<v Speaker 3>the post not the least, because he said it's the

0:51:09.453 --> 0:51:12.053
<v Speaker 3>most effective system for being able to throw the buses out.

0:51:12.093 --> 0:51:16.293
<v Speaker 3>If you don't like that, you've seen that validated in

0:51:16.413 --> 0:51:20.533
<v Speaker 3>many countries by now. But I know that I don't

0:51:20.573 --> 0:51:23.653
<v Speaker 3>like the Australian system. I don't think it's one the other.

0:51:23.893 --> 0:51:26.933
<v Speaker 3>I think in the zeally at the time my sense

0:51:27.093 --> 0:51:29.493
<v Speaker 3>was I would have struck a compromise between the two.

0:51:30.373 --> 0:51:32.653
<v Speaker 3>I would have had fifty percent of the seats elected

0:51:32.653 --> 0:51:35.493
<v Speaker 3>on first past the post and the remaining fifty percent

0:51:36.053 --> 0:51:38.573
<v Speaker 3>on some sort of proportional so that you can't try

0:51:38.613 --> 0:51:41.133
<v Speaker 3>to combine the two to get the benefit support.

0:51:44.293 --> 0:51:48.973
<v Speaker 2>If you've got proportional, you've got basically what you've got now.

0:51:48.893 --> 0:51:52.213
<v Speaker 3>Lists, Yes, but only half the seats.

0:51:53.853 --> 0:51:57.173
<v Speaker 2>But for only half the seats, you're you're paying people

0:51:57.253 --> 0:51:59.853
<v Speaker 2>who are not elected. So you still haven't got you

0:51:59.893 --> 0:52:02.253
<v Speaker 2>still haven't gotten an appropriate.

0:52:02.493 --> 0:52:05.613
<v Speaker 3>No, but essentially most people, now, I mean you've got

0:52:05.653 --> 0:52:09.213
<v Speaker 3>overwhelming evidence for that, most people for the party rather

0:52:09.293 --> 0:52:14.693
<v Speaker 3>than than individual members. Yes, So so the party is

0:52:14.773 --> 0:52:15.573
<v Speaker 3>to recognize that.

0:52:16.333 --> 0:52:19.613
<v Speaker 2>How about how about this, how about we elect we

0:52:19.613 --> 0:52:25.213
<v Speaker 2>we elect our own members, our own politicians for the

0:52:25.253 --> 0:52:29.173
<v Speaker 2>seat that we live in. We elect them individually, like

0:52:29.173 --> 0:52:30.133
<v Speaker 2>the Americans.

0:52:30.733 --> 0:52:33.573
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, there are also the multi member constituencies where

0:52:33.573 --> 0:52:35.413
<v Speaker 3>you can have that also, so that there are different

0:52:35.453 --> 0:52:38.373
<v Speaker 3>ways of looking at it.

0:52:38.973 --> 0:52:44.013
<v Speaker 2>But sorry, so just just to say that the party

0:52:44.493 --> 0:52:48.813
<v Speaker 2>doesn't come first, the local electric comes first, and then

0:52:48.893 --> 0:52:49.893
<v Speaker 2>and therefore yes, but.

0:52:49.853 --> 0:52:54.293
<v Speaker 3>That if you have only that, then it becomes unworkable

0:52:54.293 --> 0:52:56.653
<v Speaker 3>and the whole system fall example, because you have no party,

0:52:56.893 --> 0:52:59.133
<v Speaker 3>you don't contvote for a platform, you don't know who's

0:52:59.173 --> 0:53:01.893
<v Speaker 3>going to be the leader. Then et cetera. So it did.

0:53:02.213 --> 0:53:08.573
<v Speaker 3>If you actually work it through, it becomes unworked will

0:53:08.653 --> 0:53:11.493
<v Speaker 3>very quickly. An alternative to that is to have some

0:53:11.533 --> 0:53:16.053
<v Speaker 3>sort of a recall system or too far out of line,

0:53:16.493 --> 0:53:20.693
<v Speaker 3>you know, you have five percent of the voters in

0:53:20.733 --> 0:53:25.093
<v Speaker 3>any constituency demanded recall or re election. That will keep

0:53:25.093 --> 0:53:27.693
<v Speaker 3>them in line much better too. Well, what about the

0:53:27.693 --> 0:53:31.413
<v Speaker 3>Swiss system. I like the Swiss system, but I'm not

0:53:31.453 --> 0:53:34.773
<v Speaker 3>sure that you can replicate that with I guess because

0:53:34.773 --> 0:53:37.413
<v Speaker 3>in Australia and New Zealand, but I also look at

0:53:37.493 --> 0:53:43.013
<v Speaker 3>the bigger countries. So yeah, But the basic point is

0:53:43.413 --> 0:53:46.693
<v Speaker 3>there's two things we need to address. One is other

0:53:46.853 --> 0:53:49.773
<v Speaker 3>existing systems in the different countries delivering the best outcomes,

0:53:50.093 --> 0:53:52.653
<v Speaker 3>and there's no reason to believe that something that worked

0:53:53.013 --> 0:53:57.173
<v Speaker 3>sixty years ago is still good for contemporary conditions. The

0:53:57.213 --> 0:54:01.813
<v Speaker 3>second one is how do you ensure integrity of promises

0:54:01.853 --> 0:54:06.173
<v Speaker 3>made in campaigns with policies enacted as government. And that's

0:54:06.173 --> 0:54:07.893
<v Speaker 3>where a lot of the problem comes in as well.

0:54:08.373 --> 0:54:13.093
<v Speaker 2>Let me climb back on track, yeah, and put some

0:54:13.253 --> 0:54:17.613
<v Speaker 2>questions to you. There's a lot said about the population

0:54:17.773 --> 0:54:24.133
<v Speaker 2>of Iran rebelling and throwing out somehow getting getting themselves

0:54:24.213 --> 0:54:28.573
<v Speaker 2>rid of the current regime. Yep, what chance of that?

0:54:28.613 --> 0:54:31.133
<v Speaker 3>Do you think? This is where we need to be

0:54:31.253 --> 0:54:33.813
<v Speaker 3>very careful of what we wish for and go back

0:54:33.853 --> 0:54:38.773
<v Speaker 3>to my unintended perverse consequences. You know, in general around

0:54:38.813 --> 0:54:42.573
<v Speaker 3>the world, but particularly in the Middle East, history doesn't

0:54:42.693 --> 0:54:47.253
<v Speaker 3>move forwards in a linear fashion. It typically skips sideways

0:54:48.093 --> 0:54:51.813
<v Speaker 3>and no one knows where exactly it's going to land.

0:54:52.573 --> 0:54:56.373
<v Speaker 3>And that is a risk. If we get a change

0:54:56.373 --> 0:55:01.853
<v Speaker 3>of regime, the chances are bigger rather than smaller, that

0:55:01.973 --> 0:55:05.773
<v Speaker 3>we'll get a more hawkish regime. We are familiar with

0:55:05.853 --> 0:55:10.573
<v Speaker 3>the distaste in the US, well, unhappiness in the US

0:55:10.613 --> 0:55:14.253
<v Speaker 3>and distaste in Israel with the twenty fifteen utility. But

0:55:14.333 --> 0:55:18.933
<v Speaker 3>that was a controversial decision in Iran as well. The

0:55:20.733 --> 0:55:25.293
<v Speaker 3>strongly nationalists within Iran. We're not happy with that that.

0:55:25.413 --> 0:55:29.133
<v Speaker 3>They said, you know, we don't trust Americans. This is

0:55:29.173 --> 0:55:33.413
<v Speaker 3>sipping from the poison chalice yet again, and they felt

0:55:33.493 --> 0:55:38.013
<v Speaker 3>vindicated when Trump pulled out in twenty eighteen. So I

0:55:38.013 --> 0:55:41.253
<v Speaker 3>think the chances are that if the regime was displaced,

0:55:41.253 --> 0:55:44.373
<v Speaker 3>the regime of the Atholas was displaced, it would be

0:55:44.413 --> 0:55:48.173
<v Speaker 3>some version of the IRGC. The revolutionary regards who take

0:55:48.213 --> 0:55:52.453
<v Speaker 3>over power, and the reports indicate that some powers were

0:55:52.493 --> 0:55:58.013
<v Speaker 3>transferred to them by Athola, how many fearing assassination, the

0:55:58.133 --> 0:56:02.453
<v Speaker 3>chances of a genuinely democratic outcome would be smaller rather

0:56:02.493 --> 0:56:10.453
<v Speaker 3>than greater, from Afghanistan, through Iran, through Libya's Syria even

0:56:10.573 --> 0:56:17.733
<v Speaker 3>already today. Interventions and even out of a Spring revolutions

0:56:18.693 --> 0:56:21.933
<v Speaker 3>created euphoria in the short term, but have left the

0:56:22.013 --> 0:56:30.653
<v Speaker 3>legacy of dysfunctionality, societal breakdown, economic breakdown, po little breakdown, chaos,

0:56:30.693 --> 0:56:37.413
<v Speaker 3>and anarchy. And you're really going to have to be

0:56:37.893 --> 0:56:41.933
<v Speaker 3>an very strong optimist to believe that we'd get a

0:56:41.933 --> 0:56:45.733
<v Speaker 3>different outcome in Iran, and the consequences given this population

0:56:46.293 --> 0:56:49.693
<v Speaker 3>would be even worse in terms of the refugee max

0:56:49.973 --> 0:56:54.973
<v Speaker 3>mass refugee outflows and the internal civil wars. So i'm

0:56:55.093 --> 0:56:58.493
<v Speaker 3>very You know, we didn't like Saddam Hussin, but he

0:56:58.613 --> 0:57:01.573
<v Speaker 3>kept the lid on. We didn't like Asad, but he

0:57:01.653 --> 0:57:05.613
<v Speaker 3>kept the lid on. We didn't like Adafi, but again

0:57:05.613 --> 0:57:08.373
<v Speaker 3>he kept the lid on. It's hard to argue that

0:57:08.453 --> 0:57:12.893
<v Speaker 3>has followed in each of these has been better than

0:57:13.013 --> 0:57:17.413
<v Speaker 3>the things the regimes are replaced. So I'm a bit

0:57:17.493 --> 0:57:20.733
<v Speaker 3>variable going down the path. Yet again we've been down that,

0:57:21.293 --> 0:57:25.413
<v Speaker 3>we've seen that movie. It's never got well before. So

0:57:25.933 --> 0:57:30.373
<v Speaker 3>if now I think we should also to be fair,

0:57:30.493 --> 0:57:34.813
<v Speaker 3>remember that the West has a very bad history in

0:57:34.813 --> 0:57:37.813
<v Speaker 3>interfering in Iran, going back to the overthrow of their

0:57:37.853 --> 0:57:43.133
<v Speaker 3>democratic government and installing the Shah in power. I think

0:57:43.453 --> 0:57:46.733
<v Speaker 3>there were many people outside of the West who who

0:57:46.853 --> 0:57:51.733
<v Speaker 3>for decades argue that preservation or democracy in the West

0:57:52.053 --> 0:57:55.533
<v Speaker 3>seems to require oppression of people's aspirations in the rest,

0:57:56.213 --> 0:57:58.133
<v Speaker 3>and there is an element of truth to that as

0:57:58.173 --> 0:58:03.453
<v Speaker 3>well as having said that, I mean I've been to Iran.

0:58:03.493 --> 0:58:08.213
<v Speaker 3>There's no question but that there's very little love for

0:58:08.373 --> 0:58:12.053
<v Speaker 3>the regime, for the regime of the Atolas amongst the population,

0:58:13.333 --> 0:58:16.453
<v Speaker 3>and they very much wanted to have the same sources

0:58:16.493 --> 0:58:21.093
<v Speaker 3>of not just lifestyles but core freedoms that we take

0:58:21.133 --> 0:58:23.533
<v Speaker 3>for granted in the West, and not to tay for

0:58:23.613 --> 0:58:28.413
<v Speaker 3>granted but deride and and and mock in the West. Now,

0:58:29.093 --> 0:58:35.093
<v Speaker 3>so that part is there. You know, we've never been

0:58:35.373 --> 0:58:39.253
<v Speaker 3>fully happy with the extent of democracy in Singapore, but

0:58:39.333 --> 0:58:43.373
<v Speaker 3>if you think about it, for Singapore, it has produced

0:58:43.413 --> 0:58:45.733
<v Speaker 3>a lot of good results with a few of the

0:58:45.813 --> 0:58:51.653
<v Speaker 3>disfunctionalities of full fledged liberal democracies in the West or

0:58:52.533 --> 0:58:56.933
<v Speaker 3>non democracies elsewhere. Did you spend time in Singapore, Well,

0:58:56.973 --> 0:58:59.293
<v Speaker 3>I've I've been visiting on an offense state for a

0:58:59.293 --> 0:59:03.173
<v Speaker 3>short period. Sim it's Jim Allen I'm thinking of. Actually

0:59:03.253 --> 0:59:06.973
<v Speaker 3>he taught it for a bit. He was in Hong Kong.

0:59:06.973 --> 0:59:09.613
<v Speaker 3>Not not not to Singapore. He was in Hong Kong.

0:59:10.173 --> 0:59:13.093
<v Speaker 3>I know he's in Hong Kong, all right. Well, somebody

0:59:13.173 --> 0:59:16.413
<v Speaker 3>was in Singapore. He spent some years in Hong Kong

0:59:16.413 --> 0:59:20.533
<v Speaker 3>before he came was in New Zealand. All right.

0:59:21.133 --> 0:59:27.173
<v Speaker 2>I'll double check it from from myself, but I accept

0:59:27.773 --> 0:59:30.533
<v Speaker 2>for the present I could be wrong.

0:59:30.293 --> 0:59:32.133
<v Speaker 3>But my memory is that I don't think he spent

0:59:32.213 --> 0:59:34.013
<v Speaker 3>time on Singapore in Hong Kong.

0:59:36.653 --> 0:59:40.373
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it interesting actually that the number of people who

0:59:42.413 --> 0:59:44.693
<v Speaker 2>went through, if I may put it that way, who

0:59:44.733 --> 0:59:52.653
<v Speaker 2>taught at a targo and have dispersed into other parts

0:59:52.653 --> 0:59:55.173
<v Speaker 2>of the world simply because New Zealand couldn't hold them.

0:59:55.373 --> 1:00:00.693
<v Speaker 2>Your one, Jim Allen's another. There's somebody else I'm trying

1:00:00.733 --> 1:00:07.453
<v Speaker 2>to think of who was at the University of Tasmania.

1:00:07.813 --> 1:00:11.253
<v Speaker 3>Yes, of course, a fine fellow yep.

1:00:13.413 --> 1:00:17.133
<v Speaker 2>That anyway, My point was that we can't hold on

1:00:17.173 --> 1:00:21.173
<v Speaker 2>to people because for whatever reason New Zealand doesn't have

1:00:21.573 --> 1:00:27.733
<v Speaker 2>enough to enough to offer to retain. So the situation

1:00:27.853 --> 1:00:33.853
<v Speaker 2>with Russia and China, their parts in such as they

1:00:33.893 --> 1:00:38.893
<v Speaker 2>are or were in the Middle East we're currently talking

1:00:38.933 --> 1:00:44.733
<v Speaker 2>about and beyond, and also your opinion on how on

1:00:44.893 --> 1:00:48.453
<v Speaker 2>earth this current European war is going to sort itself out.

1:00:49.173 --> 1:00:54.133
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the consequences of the last couple

1:00:54.133 --> 1:00:57.133
<v Speaker 3>of weeks we to go to Iran is the break

1:00:57.173 --> 1:01:02.653
<v Speaker 3>in the Sobal Crink alliance or group China, Russia, Iran,

1:01:02.773 --> 1:01:06.773
<v Speaker 3>North Korea. It's going to make the others China and

1:01:06.813 --> 1:01:11.453
<v Speaker 3>North Korea, Russia more determined to modernize their nuclear arsenal.

1:01:11.813 --> 1:01:16.973
<v Speaker 3>It has shown up the emptiness of aligning with this

1:01:17.013 --> 1:01:21.973
<v Speaker 3>group for others in that Russia has been displaced from

1:01:21.973 --> 1:01:26.013
<v Speaker 3>a releast China and Russia will limit it to expressing

1:01:26.653 --> 1:01:32.453
<v Speaker 3>plastitudes Iran as a source of supply of drones for Russia.

1:01:32.733 --> 1:01:35.573
<v Speaker 3>We'll see how that plays out. I suspect it will

1:01:36.093 --> 1:01:39.853
<v Speaker 3>strengthen the relationship between China and Russia. I'm not sure

1:01:39.853 --> 1:01:46.293
<v Speaker 3>it has any lasting significance for shaping Chinese behavior visa

1:01:46.373 --> 1:01:50.333
<v Speaker 3>VI Taiwan. People are saying it will show the American credibility,

1:01:50.373 --> 1:01:56.773
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think that lessons translate across the regions. Conversely,

1:01:56.853 --> 1:02:00.693
<v Speaker 3>I think it doesn't necessarily work to advantage to have

1:02:00.813 --> 1:02:04.413
<v Speaker 3>America distracted yet again by a major crisis in the

1:02:04.413 --> 1:02:08.333
<v Speaker 3>Middle East, as opposed to focusing on the Indo Pacific.

1:02:08.973 --> 1:02:13.533
<v Speaker 3>Russia has clearly kept at its war in Ukraine. President

1:02:13.613 --> 1:02:16.773
<v Speaker 3>Zelenski has kept making odd statements, you know, don't forget us,

1:02:16.773 --> 1:02:20.853
<v Speaker 3>don't forget us, we need help still, et cetera. But

1:02:20.893 --> 1:02:24.733
<v Speaker 3>I think the American the trumpetministration is less receptive to

1:02:24.813 --> 1:02:28.493
<v Speaker 3>his pleas than has been the case for the past things.

1:02:29.053 --> 1:02:32.813
<v Speaker 3>The other important factor is it shows the strategic irrelevance

1:02:32.853 --> 1:02:37.053
<v Speaker 3>of the Europeans as well when it comes to major decisions.

1:02:38.133 --> 1:02:40.293
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure how many of them are even consulted

1:02:40.893 --> 1:02:44.813
<v Speaker 3>some or maybe given information in advance, but they've essentially

1:02:44.853 --> 1:02:49.653
<v Speaker 3>been shown to be hangers on rather than shared decision

1:02:49.653 --> 1:02:52.533
<v Speaker 3>making at the table. So we'll see as we speak

1:02:52.973 --> 1:02:57.653
<v Speaker 3>how this plays out with the Native summit in the Netherlands.

1:02:57.693 --> 1:03:01.293
<v Speaker 3>Now I don't know they're meeting at the Hague or

1:03:01.373 --> 1:03:05.373
<v Speaker 3>in Amsterdam, whichever it is, it's I think it confirms

1:03:05.413 --> 1:03:07.653
<v Speaker 3>that there's the United States and then there's the rest.

1:03:08.493 --> 1:03:12.733
<v Speaker 3>It's not going to diminish Trump's transactional approach to diplomacy.

1:03:12.853 --> 1:03:17.573
<v Speaker 3>He's most susceptible to flattery, but I think that's not

1:03:17.613 --> 1:03:21.493
<v Speaker 3>a lasting benefit. He's prepared to change his mind. He

1:03:21.573 --> 1:03:26.333
<v Speaker 3>has shown the ability to keep a secret, and after

1:03:26.613 --> 1:03:31.093
<v Speaker 3>all the telegram gate and stuff like that, that was

1:03:31.093 --> 1:03:34.413
<v Speaker 3>a question mark. But in this they managed to retain

1:03:35.453 --> 1:03:40.413
<v Speaker 3>the details secret until the operation was actually implemented. So

1:03:40.453 --> 1:03:43.133
<v Speaker 3>that's something for the good as well. It's an opportunity

1:03:43.173 --> 1:03:47.973
<v Speaker 3>if you think of the tremendous upheavals, it is an

1:03:48.013 --> 1:03:55.693
<v Speaker 3>opportunity for significant long term geopolitical game changing decisions for

1:03:55.813 --> 1:03:59.613
<v Speaker 3>the Middle least for Europe, less so I think for

1:03:59.653 --> 1:04:03.013
<v Speaker 3>the Indo Pacific, and that's probably a good place on

1:04:03.053 --> 1:04:06.253
<v Speaker 3>which to land with is that it has broken the

1:04:06.373 --> 1:04:09.773
<v Speaker 3>existing mold. What will be the new contrast of the

1:04:09.813 --> 1:04:13.733
<v Speaker 3>Middle East and Europe and the North Atlantic. Let's fait

1:04:13.813 --> 1:04:16.373
<v Speaker 3>and see. I think we are in a better position

1:04:16.693 --> 1:04:19.253
<v Speaker 3>now than we were at the start of the year.

1:04:19.693 --> 1:04:23.093
<v Speaker 3>I think the Trump administration deserves considerable credit for that

1:04:23.133 --> 1:04:26.133
<v Speaker 3>for all the criticisms directed at them. I'm not sure

1:04:26.133 --> 1:04:28.533
<v Speaker 3>that it has any major implications long term for what

1:04:28.573 --> 1:04:32.133
<v Speaker 3>happens in Russia and China, but if it does, it's

1:04:32.173 --> 1:04:35.253
<v Speaker 3>going to make them more careful with regard to challenging

1:04:35.933 --> 1:04:40.413
<v Speaker 3>or provoking Trump. I think they will be not necessarily

1:04:40.453 --> 1:04:43.573
<v Speaker 3>on the best behavior, but on less verse of a

1:04:43.653 --> 1:04:48.413
<v Speaker 3>behavior than they have been or were under the Biden administration.

1:04:49.813 --> 1:04:50.493
<v Speaker 3>Very interesting.

1:04:50.813 --> 1:04:53.733
<v Speaker 2>So then I think my final question to you is

1:04:54.373 --> 1:04:59.093
<v Speaker 2>how do you see the Middle East coming out of

1:04:59.133 --> 1:05:01.413
<v Speaker 2>this as we have discussed it and as we know

1:05:01.493 --> 1:05:05.373
<v Speaker 2>it's happening. In other words, how will Iran sort this out?

1:05:05.973 --> 1:05:11.493
<v Speaker 3>I think they will pause, recover, recuperate. I think there

1:05:11.533 --> 1:05:17.973
<v Speaker 3>will be more determined efforts to invest in nuclear weapon capability.

1:05:19.533 --> 1:05:22.933
<v Speaker 3>I should have added, by the way, that personally, I

1:05:22.973 --> 1:05:28.453
<v Speaker 3>do believe that the Aya tolders and the Islamic clerics

1:05:28.733 --> 1:05:34.053
<v Speaker 3>actually were a defense against overt weaponization. I have no

1:05:34.173 --> 1:05:39.653
<v Speaker 3>reason to doubt that their statements that possessing little and

1:05:39.773 --> 1:05:46.493
<v Speaker 3>using nuclear weapons is contrary to core Islamic doctrine, paralleling

1:05:46.533 --> 1:05:49.413
<v Speaker 3>the arguments that the Catholic bishops have been in the past,

1:05:49.453 --> 1:05:54.293
<v Speaker 3>for example, about nuclear weapons and that they were under pressure.

1:05:55.173 --> 1:05:58.533
<v Speaker 3>When I was in Iran, I went to Isfahan and

1:05:58.613 --> 1:06:01.613
<v Speaker 3>I was taken to the points where they were subjected

1:06:01.653 --> 1:06:05.133
<v Speaker 3>to a chemical weapons attacks by So I'm saying, if

1:06:05.133 --> 1:06:09.053
<v Speaker 3>you remember, and the point made to me was beyonder

1:06:09.093 --> 1:06:13.813
<v Speaker 3>great pressure as victims of weapons of mass destruction, which

1:06:13.853 --> 1:06:18.573
<v Speaker 3>the West tried to minimize or deny initially, beyond under

1:06:18.573 --> 1:06:22.013
<v Speaker 3>great pressure to go down the nuclear path. But if

1:06:22.013 --> 1:06:24.773
<v Speaker 3>we don't want to do that, but as a compromise,

1:06:25.533 --> 1:06:29.053
<v Speaker 3>we sort of investing in the capability if we ever

1:06:29.093 --> 1:06:31.773
<v Speaker 3>do decide to go down that part. That was the message,

1:06:31.973 --> 1:06:35.013
<v Speaker 3>not as explicitly as that, but that was the message

1:06:35.013 --> 1:06:37.773
<v Speaker 3>I got from that. So I think there is reason

1:06:37.813 --> 1:06:41.253
<v Speaker 3>to believe that as well. I think they're going to

1:06:41.293 --> 1:06:43.613
<v Speaker 3>have to work out a more intet I think to

1:06:43.733 --> 1:06:50.213
<v Speaker 3>the Iranians, the Palestinians, Serians obviously a different category. In Lebanon,

1:06:50.813 --> 1:06:54.133
<v Speaker 3>our message has to be you're defeated for the foreseable future.

1:06:54.173 --> 1:06:57.093
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to be able to challenge Isuel militarily,

1:06:57.733 --> 1:07:01.693
<v Speaker 3>accept that reality and move on. I think to Israel

1:07:01.733 --> 1:07:04.173
<v Speaker 3>the message has to be you can't have a permanent

1:07:04.253 --> 1:07:08.333
<v Speaker 3>future based on military superiority. The demographics work against you.

1:07:08.853 --> 1:07:11.493
<v Speaker 3>It goes against everything we know about history to believe

1:07:11.533 --> 1:07:15.093
<v Speaker 3>that one country can keep nuclear weapons forever and no

1:07:15.173 --> 1:07:18.573
<v Speaker 3>other country in the region can get it again or

1:07:18.733 --> 1:07:22.813
<v Speaker 3>can't get it. Ever, that's not going to happen. There's

1:07:22.853 --> 1:07:28.533
<v Speaker 3>been no web, no category of arms in history that

1:07:28.613 --> 1:07:32.133
<v Speaker 3>has remained restricted to a few if it's proven to

1:07:32.133 --> 1:07:36.613
<v Speaker 3>be effective, either in deterrent or in its operational functions,

1:07:37.093 --> 1:07:39.173
<v Speaker 3>So that also the periferation thing is going to be

1:07:39.173 --> 1:07:42.133
<v Speaker 3>have to looked at. I think one of the biggest

1:07:42.133 --> 1:07:46.493
<v Speaker 3>casualties of this is in fact, the lantice work of

1:07:46.533 --> 1:07:50.853
<v Speaker 3>international institutions and the norms and rules of laws centered

1:07:50.893 --> 1:07:53.493
<v Speaker 3>around them. So I don't think the UN comes out

1:07:53.533 --> 1:07:56.493
<v Speaker 3>of this looking very in very good health. That's going

1:07:56.533 --> 1:07:59.333
<v Speaker 3>to have to be looked at as well. So, yes,

1:07:59.373 --> 1:08:02.413
<v Speaker 3>the old system is gone, possibly forever. What's going to

1:08:02.413 --> 1:08:06.173
<v Speaker 3>be the new one? At this stage we don't know.

1:08:08.453 --> 1:08:12.373
<v Speaker 3>Do we have faith in our leaders to reshape a

1:08:12.453 --> 1:08:15.613
<v Speaker 3>new order? I wish I could answer yes on that,

1:08:16.733 --> 1:08:20.013
<v Speaker 3>but I don't see the equivalent of the leaders at

1:08:20.013 --> 1:08:22.293
<v Speaker 3>the end of the Second World War who put in

1:08:22.333 --> 1:08:25.893
<v Speaker 3>place a system that did deliver for everyone. And I

1:08:25.933 --> 1:08:30.453
<v Speaker 3>mean everyone, and produced a lot of good outcomes across

1:08:30.493 --> 1:08:35.893
<v Speaker 3>the board economically, socially, health wise, politically for most of

1:08:35.933 --> 1:08:40.653
<v Speaker 3>the world. I don't see that category of leadership anywhere

1:08:40.653 --> 1:08:43.333
<v Speaker 3>in the world. At the moment, I thought you might

1:08:43.333 --> 1:08:46.493
<v Speaker 3>have been toward Trump a little. I do that he's

1:08:46.493 --> 1:08:50.773
<v Speaker 3>better than the alternatives, and I think it's a volatility

1:08:51.333 --> 1:08:56.213
<v Speaker 3>and unpredictability that varies me. But he seems to be

1:08:56.213 --> 1:09:00.853
<v Speaker 3>behaving much better, behaving in the sense of foreign policy

1:09:01.613 --> 1:09:06.093
<v Speaker 3>decisions as well, much better in the second term, perhaps

1:09:06.173 --> 1:09:11.053
<v Speaker 3>having learned from being so bar and being moderated by

1:09:11.053 --> 1:09:16.333
<v Speaker 3>its first the experience of the first administration. Right, I

1:09:16.373 --> 1:09:24.653
<v Speaker 3>think we have to acknowledge the great geopolitical weight, the

1:09:24.773 --> 1:09:29.253
<v Speaker 3>gravitational pull, the normative weight to the United States and

1:09:29.373 --> 1:09:32.333
<v Speaker 3>pin a hope in its ability to lead the rest

1:09:32.373 --> 1:09:37.813
<v Speaker 3>of the world towards a less dangerous and less unstable

1:09:37.853 --> 1:09:41.973
<v Speaker 3>and less unpredictable future. And there are you know, they're

1:09:41.973 --> 1:09:46.173
<v Speaker 3>all saying every challenge, in every every challengeing crisis is

1:09:46.213 --> 1:09:49.253
<v Speaker 3>also an opportunity. So maybe he will lead the way

1:09:49.413 --> 1:09:51.413
<v Speaker 3>to reconfiguring.

1:09:52.293 --> 1:09:52.573
<v Speaker 2>That that.

1:09:54.973 --> 1:09:56.093
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's all we can hope for.

1:09:56.133 --> 1:10:00.373
<v Speaker 2>At the moment, I was going to do this much

1:10:00.413 --> 1:10:04.413
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the in the discussion. So I will ask

1:10:04.493 --> 1:10:07.013
<v Speaker 2>you finally this it's not a question, it's a it's

1:10:07.053 --> 1:10:10.773
<v Speaker 2>a request you're I mean, for instance, you write a

1:10:10.773 --> 1:10:15.053
<v Speaker 2>book in published a book in twenty fifteen nuclear weapons

1:10:15.093 --> 1:10:21.533
<v Speaker 2>and International Security, just for the sake of people's information.

1:10:22.693 --> 1:10:26.933
<v Speaker 2>Your association with matters nuclear was quite broad for some time.

1:10:29.053 --> 1:10:33.653
<v Speaker 2>You have the authority to comment as you have and

1:10:33.693 --> 1:10:37.493
<v Speaker 2>the way that you have. So where did you get that?

1:10:37.653 --> 1:10:42.013
<v Speaker 2>Where did you cover off and get that knowledge?

1:10:42.373 --> 1:10:47.333
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's a lifetime of professional work on it. I

1:10:47.373 --> 1:10:49.533
<v Speaker 3>mean from what I said earlier, it's very clear that

1:10:49.573 --> 1:10:54.733
<v Speaker 3>I don't have very anybodries about nuclear power for energy,

1:10:55.293 --> 1:11:01.373
<v Speaker 3>provide it. All modern safeguards in design and operation are

1:11:01.413 --> 1:11:05.093
<v Speaker 3>meant I met, and I think the apport that's on that.

1:11:07.493 --> 1:11:14.093
<v Speaker 3>In terms of nuclear arms, I still think they're essentially unusable.

1:11:15.253 --> 1:11:17.173
<v Speaker 3>That one of the big reasons they haven't been used

1:11:17.213 --> 1:11:19.293
<v Speaker 3>since nineteen forty five is that in fact they are

1:11:19.293 --> 1:11:22.973
<v Speaker 3>not usable, and there's all sorts of arguments about that

1:11:23.613 --> 1:11:27.373
<v Speaker 3>their only purpose can be deterrence. Even then, there are

1:11:27.493 --> 1:11:30.893
<v Speaker 3>major question marks about them. But having said all that,

1:11:31.693 --> 1:11:34.813
<v Speaker 3>it's a foods gold of an ambition to believe that

1:11:35.093 --> 1:11:38.573
<v Speaker 3>you can disarm those who already have the weapons one

1:11:38.613 --> 1:11:41.413
<v Speaker 3>by one. I think it has to be a global

1:11:41.453 --> 1:11:46.653
<v Speaker 3>effort and a global treaty with a robust inspection and

1:11:46.773 --> 1:11:49.893
<v Speaker 3>verification system in which all parties have confidence.

1:11:50.573 --> 1:11:54.333
<v Speaker 4>If we had that, the biggest losers actually would be

1:11:55.413 --> 1:11:58.853
<v Speaker 4>actors like Russia and China, because, as has been demonstrated,

1:11:59.773 --> 1:12:04.573
<v Speaker 4>the United States and the West generally still have unique

1:12:05.413 --> 1:12:13.053
<v Speaker 4>technological superiority and capabilities that gives them overwhelming conventional superiority,

1:12:14.293 --> 1:12:17.053
<v Speaker 4>and they otherwise actors that are less likely to be

1:12:17.173 --> 1:12:20.373
<v Speaker 4>interested in wars of aggression than the other side, if

1:12:20.373 --> 1:12:22.973
<v Speaker 4>you like. And I also think it's true, but for

1:12:23.133 --> 1:12:26.933
<v Speaker 4>his reasons, but I won't go into detail with India

1:12:27.013 --> 1:12:30.133
<v Speaker 4>vias of Pakistan. So I think the risks of nuclear

1:12:30.133 --> 1:12:35.373
<v Speaker 4>weapons used by bad actors or by accident or by

1:12:36.213 --> 1:12:40.333
<v Speaker 4>misinformation and missignaling the risks out for any potential benefit.

1:12:40.373 --> 1:12:44.053
<v Speaker 3>And I like to see that addressed. But it's not

1:12:44.093 --> 1:12:47.413
<v Speaker 3>going to happen suddenly. It's not going to be happened

1:12:47.453 --> 1:12:53.293
<v Speaker 3>by ignoring the security concerns that people countries have, and

1:12:53.373 --> 1:12:55.293
<v Speaker 3>so it has to be addressed. I think the problem

1:12:55.373 --> 1:12:59.853
<v Speaker 3>has been having signed the MPT. The five countries that

1:12:59.933 --> 1:13:03.133
<v Speaker 3>were accepted as nuclear weapons then took that as a

1:13:03.173 --> 1:13:07.973
<v Speaker 3>permanent dispensation to retain nuclear weapons and stop anyone else

1:13:07.973 --> 1:13:11.333
<v Speaker 3>from getting it. Well, that didn't work. We may not

1:13:11.373 --> 1:13:14.933
<v Speaker 3>have the twenty countries you think the weapons that people

1:13:14.973 --> 1:13:19.733
<v Speaker 3>are President Kennedy feared in the sixties, but we do

1:13:19.853 --> 1:13:21.853
<v Speaker 3>have more than five. We have nine at the moment.

1:13:23.853 --> 1:13:27.653
<v Speaker 3>You'd have to be someone completely ahistorical to believe that

1:13:27.693 --> 1:13:30.013
<v Speaker 3>it can be restricted to nine if you don't actually

1:13:30.013 --> 1:13:33.773
<v Speaker 3>address getting rid of it. One final point on that.

1:13:34.093 --> 1:13:37.493
<v Speaker 3>Up until twenty seventeen, I didn't accept it, but I

1:13:37.533 --> 1:13:40.293
<v Speaker 3>could see that there's a basis for arguing that the

1:13:40.333 --> 1:13:42.613
<v Speaker 3>five countries that had them under the NPT, that's the

1:13:42.733 --> 1:13:47.853
<v Speaker 3>United States, United Kingdom, France, China, and Russia, that their

1:13:48.573 --> 1:13:52.893
<v Speaker 3>possession was at least legal, even if you're not legitimate

1:13:52.973 --> 1:13:56.533
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the NPT, because there was no deadline

1:13:56.573 --> 1:13:59.453
<v Speaker 3>set under the NPT for them to dismantle. But after

1:13:59.533 --> 1:14:03.133
<v Speaker 3>six of the NPT does require them to dismantle disarm,

1:14:04.253 --> 1:14:08.173
<v Speaker 3>And to argue that the treaty that came into if

1:14:08.413 --> 1:14:12.573
<v Speaker 3>what was it nineteen seventy I think in negotiated and

1:14:12.613 --> 1:14:15.973
<v Speaker 3>signed in sixty eight in operation since nineteen seventy, so

1:14:16.013 --> 1:14:20.973
<v Speaker 3>fifty five years later, that they haven't violated ALTOST six.

1:14:20.973 --> 1:14:23.773
<v Speaker 3>It's a very difficult argument to make. But regardless of that,

1:14:24.413 --> 1:14:27.573
<v Speaker 3>in twenty seventeen we have TPNW, the Treaty for the

1:14:27.573 --> 1:14:30.693
<v Speaker 3>Prohibsion of Nuclear Weapons, which does make it very clear

1:14:30.693 --> 1:14:32.493
<v Speaker 3>that as far as the rest of the world is concerned,

1:14:32.573 --> 1:14:35.133
<v Speaker 3>in other words, as far as the international community concerned,

1:14:35.333 --> 1:14:38.613
<v Speaker 3>possession of nuclear weapons by any state is contrary to

1:14:38.693 --> 1:14:42.013
<v Speaker 3>existing international law and certainly international maniteer in law, and

1:14:42.053 --> 1:14:44.813
<v Speaker 3>we want it dismantled. It doesn't mean you can get

1:14:44.813 --> 1:14:48.293
<v Speaker 3>it immediately. It's an aspirational treaty because no country that

1:14:48.773 --> 1:14:51.733
<v Speaker 3>has them, and no country that shelters under them, including Australia,

1:14:51.813 --> 1:14:55.013
<v Speaker 3>as signed it. But I think you know, and much

1:14:55.133 --> 1:14:57.453
<v Speaker 3>like what I was saying about Israel, if you want

1:14:57.453 --> 1:15:00.293
<v Speaker 3>to have a vision for a path forward, it has

1:15:00.373 --> 1:15:02.653
<v Speaker 3>to be a world free of nuclear weapons and the

1:15:02.653 --> 1:15:07.533
<v Speaker 3>threat of use of nuclear weapons because and I prefer

1:15:07.573 --> 1:15:10.213
<v Speaker 3>to make the argument starting from the point that they

1:15:10.293 --> 1:15:14.133
<v Speaker 3>haven't been use because they're not usable and the impact

1:15:14.213 --> 1:15:17.853
<v Speaker 3>is negative rather than positive. And if you start from that,

1:15:18.253 --> 1:15:20.773
<v Speaker 3>you then say, well, how can we make it into

1:15:20.813 --> 1:15:25.533
<v Speaker 3>a credible system that reassures everyone, and then we can

1:15:25.613 --> 1:15:27.533
<v Speaker 3>more correctly dismantling it.

1:15:28.013 --> 1:15:31.373
<v Speaker 2>I could keep talking or listening, because you're doing most

1:15:31.373 --> 1:15:34.773
<v Speaker 2>of the talking, for at least another hour, but we

1:15:34.813 --> 1:15:40.293
<v Speaker 2>shan't keep it another day. Keep it for another day. Well,

1:15:40.493 --> 1:15:42.733
<v Speaker 2>as I was going to say, until we talk again.

1:15:43.253 --> 1:15:46.213
<v Speaker 2>But I want to thank you because it's been most informative.

1:15:46.253 --> 1:15:50.053
<v Speaker 2>I've learned plenty, and I think that most people who

1:15:50.253 --> 1:15:53.573
<v Speaker 2>have been listening would have learned plenty. And there have

1:15:53.613 --> 1:15:56.693
<v Speaker 2>been so many side roads that I could have taken

1:15:56.773 --> 1:15:59.453
<v Speaker 2>that I didn't because I didn't want to keep going

1:15:59.493 --> 1:16:03.373
<v Speaker 2>off in all sorts of different directions. It would have

1:16:03.413 --> 1:16:07.173
<v Speaker 2>been like a stew But nevertheless, like you say, save

1:16:07.253 --> 1:16:11.293
<v Speaker 2>it for another day. So Ramish, you're a good man

1:16:11.453 --> 1:16:14.133
<v Speaker 2>and I appreciate it. Thank You's been a pleasure.

1:16:14.493 --> 1:16:29.573
<v Speaker 5>Thanks Daisy, missus producer.

1:16:29.653 --> 1:16:33.213
<v Speaker 2>We're into the mail room for podcast two hundred and ninety.

1:16:33.693 --> 1:16:35.853
<v Speaker 6>Amazing Latent two hundred and ninety.

1:16:36.333 --> 1:16:37.933
<v Speaker 3>I've got to go back and count up the number

1:16:37.973 --> 1:16:39.533
<v Speaker 3>of times we've said that or some.

1:16:39.853 --> 1:16:40.853
<v Speaker 6>It is pretty amazing.

1:16:41.333 --> 1:16:42.093
<v Speaker 3>It is amazing.

1:16:43.013 --> 1:16:47.413
<v Speaker 2>Now let's see what we have may I lead from Olivia.

1:16:48.693 --> 1:16:52.133
<v Speaker 2>This is something that Olivia Pearson, who I had on

1:16:52.173 --> 1:16:55.333
<v Speaker 2>the podcast a number of times in the earlier days,

1:16:55.773 --> 1:16:59.693
<v Speaker 2>has set out to people who she likes, and I

1:16:59.733 --> 1:17:02.813
<v Speaker 2>appear to be one of them. Since twenty sixteen, President

1:17:02.813 --> 1:17:06.653
<v Speaker 2>Trump has conducted somewhere in the vicinity of nine hundred

1:17:06.733 --> 1:17:12.213
<v Speaker 2>political rallies, an astronomical number befitting the man's colossal energy

1:17:12.253 --> 1:17:16.213
<v Speaker 2>and courage. At nearly all of them, he has consistently

1:17:16.293 --> 1:17:19.813
<v Speaker 2>maintained that he will never let the Islamic Republic of

1:17:19.853 --> 1:17:24.133
<v Speaker 2>Iran acquire nuclear weapons. This is simply because he knows

1:17:24.213 --> 1:17:27.013
<v Speaker 2>that the regime will use them on Israel and the

1:17:27.133 --> 1:17:31.573
<v Speaker 2>United States. At these same rallies, Trump has also consistently

1:17:31.613 --> 1:17:34.453
<v Speaker 2>stated that he will not involve the US in New

1:17:34.733 --> 1:17:39.013
<v Speaker 2>Forever Wars, the force of his focus being America first.

1:17:39.613 --> 1:17:44.453
<v Speaker 2>And then she has Then she's sent an address which

1:17:44.653 --> 1:17:48.173
<v Speaker 2>is Olivia Pearson p I E. R. S O N

1:17:48.493 --> 1:17:54.933
<v Speaker 2>dot org slash blog slash Trump acted to fulfill a

1:17:55.093 --> 1:18:00.013
<v Speaker 2>long term promise, and I think it's probably worth worth

1:18:00.053 --> 1:18:01.253
<v Speaker 2>listening to later.

1:18:01.373 --> 1:18:04.733
<v Speaker 6>This is from Bronwyn and her subject is Owen Jennings's letter.

1:18:05.413 --> 1:18:09.653
<v Speaker 6>She says, great letter by Owen Jennings sadly becoming increasingly

1:18:09.893 --> 1:18:12.573
<v Speaker 6>obvious that Luxon does not work for the New Zealand

1:18:12.573 --> 1:18:15.773
<v Speaker 6>people but for some global interest and they will have

1:18:15.893 --> 1:18:20.253
<v Speaker 6>some reason for the hasty Gomod regulation which will benefit them,

1:18:20.453 --> 1:18:24.533
<v Speaker 6>not us. I'm sure he was installed on purpose, as

1:18:24.573 --> 1:18:27.933
<v Speaker 6>the media started talking him up as the next National

1:18:27.973 --> 1:18:30.493
<v Speaker 6>Party leader as soon as he left her in New Zealand.

1:18:31.013 --> 1:18:33.493
<v Speaker 6>As for you asking him whether he wants to be

1:18:33.573 --> 1:18:38.373
<v Speaker 6>remembered as badly as Jabsinder and be forced to live overseas,

1:18:38.453 --> 1:18:42.213
<v Speaker 6>I doubt he cares. She had her Harvard position lined up,

1:18:42.253 --> 1:18:46.373
<v Speaker 6>and I'm sure lux Flakes has a globalist position lined

1:18:46.453 --> 1:18:48.613
<v Speaker 6>up too, now that he has Prime Minister of New

1:18:48.693 --> 1:18:51.533
<v Speaker 6>Zealand on his CV. And that's from bromwan.

1:18:52.093 --> 1:18:56.573
<v Speaker 2>Ron, Well, that's some very savage actually, I'm not going

1:18:56.653 --> 1:18:59.373
<v Speaker 2>to argue with you. You're entitled to your opinion. I

1:18:59.453 --> 1:19:02.613
<v Speaker 2>might share quite a large portion of it. So from

1:19:02.693 --> 1:19:07.733
<v Speaker 2>Brett London came up recently. It is subsiding while the

1:19:07.773 --> 1:19:11.493
<v Speaker 2>other ind of the island is rising, as also are

1:19:11.533 --> 1:19:16.093
<v Speaker 2>regions further north. This situation is the result of settling,

1:19:16.653 --> 1:19:21.173
<v Speaker 2>for example, continuing to settle since the previous glacier period

1:19:21.453 --> 1:19:25.973
<v Speaker 2>melt in Braggetts, No humans needed the weight of the ice,

1:19:27.053 --> 1:19:31.253
<v Speaker 2>as many will know, deforms the Earth's crust. Claims of

1:19:31.333 --> 1:19:34.493
<v Speaker 2>sea level rise in these and other places, as pointed

1:19:34.533 --> 1:19:37.813
<v Speaker 2>out in your article, is very ill advised and misleading

1:19:37.813 --> 1:19:41.733
<v Speaker 2>to the public perception, while all the while we are

1:19:41.933 --> 1:19:46.693
<v Speaker 2>all getting blamed for what are natural processes. Nature will

1:19:46.733 --> 1:19:49.413
<v Speaker 2>have the last word whether humans are here or not.

1:19:50.093 --> 1:19:53.733
<v Speaker 2>We just aren't that important in the greater scheme of things,

1:19:53.813 --> 1:19:57.813
<v Speaker 2>as you know reclimate matters. I can't blame people for

1:19:57.893 --> 1:20:01.733
<v Speaker 2>absorbing the constant messaging hammering us every day. There is

1:20:01.893 --> 1:20:05.093
<v Speaker 2>just so much of it and is pervasive. The credibility

1:20:05.133 --> 1:20:08.773
<v Speaker 2>behind the messaging is very shaky given how many it

1:20:08.813 --> 1:20:11.333
<v Speaker 2>can be proven to be wrong and over such a

1:20:11.453 --> 1:20:14.133
<v Speaker 2>length of time. Our New Zealand government is one of

1:20:14.173 --> 1:20:17.653
<v Speaker 2>the worst for what it is doing to the place

1:20:17.813 --> 1:20:21.173
<v Speaker 2>in the name of a false god. I have a

1:20:21.173 --> 1:20:26.573
<v Speaker 2>great week from bread. This government's really no different to

1:20:26.613 --> 1:20:27.733
<v Speaker 2>the previous government, is it?

1:20:27.813 --> 1:20:27.933
<v Speaker 3>On?

1:20:28.013 --> 1:20:33.413
<v Speaker 2>This maybe a slight improvement, but still lacking integrity.

1:20:34.133 --> 1:20:40.613
<v Speaker 6>Laden George says. Solar panels and windmills produce direct current.

1:20:41.253 --> 1:20:44.733
<v Speaker 6>The grid operates on alternating current. With the fifty cycles

1:20:44.773 --> 1:20:48.573
<v Speaker 6>per second frequency. To connect the DC to the grid

1:20:49.053 --> 1:20:52.693
<v Speaker 6>requires it to be converted to AC. This requires very

1:20:52.733 --> 1:20:58.533
<v Speaker 6>expensive inverters. Once converted, the AC produced must be synchronized

1:20:58.573 --> 1:21:02.213
<v Speaker 6>with the fifty hertz To do this synchronization, and it

1:21:02.253 --> 1:21:07.093
<v Speaker 6>requires an existing AC grid. This lack of synchronization is

1:21:07.133 --> 1:21:11.373
<v Speaker 6>what caused the problems of Portugal these so called renewables.

1:21:13.013 --> 1:21:16.453
<v Speaker 6>These so called renewables are heavily subsidized. I would suggest

1:21:16.493 --> 1:21:19.973
<v Speaker 6>you contact an electrical engineer who can explain this better

1:21:20.373 --> 1:21:23.013
<v Speaker 6>than a retired electrician. And that's from George.

1:21:23.413 --> 1:21:23.813
<v Speaker 3>George.

1:21:23.853 --> 1:21:28.053
<v Speaker 6>And if you understand that you're a better man than I, yes,

1:21:28.093 --> 1:21:29.813
<v Speaker 6>well I'm a better man than you anyway, Jung.

1:21:30.373 --> 1:21:39.133
<v Speaker 2>At any level, I have my advisor and that's mister Leyland. Um,

1:21:39.293 --> 1:21:42.293
<v Speaker 2>so if I'm going to ask anybody, that'll be him.

1:21:42.613 --> 1:21:46.213
<v Speaker 2>Dear Layton and Carolyn. When George Friedman said that the

1:21:46.293 --> 1:21:50.053
<v Speaker 2>potus doesn't create a crisis, but instead they respond to

1:21:50.093 --> 1:21:53.053
<v Speaker 2>the reality that they're trapped in, he really got me

1:21:53.173 --> 1:21:57.933
<v Speaker 2>pondering do we write history or does history write us?

1:21:58.693 --> 1:22:01.733
<v Speaker 2>Given the impossible odds of Donald Trump surviving a fully

1:22:01.813 --> 1:22:06.933
<v Speaker 2>weaponized lawfare, a hostile mainstream media two assassination attempts, and

1:22:07.133 --> 1:22:11.333
<v Speaker 2>still manage to return for a second presidential term. I'm

1:22:11.373 --> 1:22:15.533
<v Speaker 2>beginning to believe that indeed history writes us. People who

1:22:15.653 --> 1:22:19.493
<v Speaker 2>unjustifiably hate Trump call him a fool. But what they

1:22:19.533 --> 1:22:23.053
<v Speaker 2>don't realize is that ultimately God will have the last laugh,

1:22:23.733 --> 1:22:26.653
<v Speaker 2>because in a world that has turned completely upside down,

1:22:27.093 --> 1:22:30.893
<v Speaker 2>he often chooses the foolish in order to shame the wise.

1:22:32.173 --> 1:22:34.933
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to love Trump to accept the fact

1:22:34.973 --> 1:22:36.813
<v Speaker 2>that he has done a lot of good in the

1:22:36.813 --> 1:22:40.053
<v Speaker 2>world in just a short time since becoming Potus two.

1:22:40.733 --> 1:22:43.773
<v Speaker 2>And here is a recent development that should get those

1:22:44.053 --> 1:22:48.973
<v Speaker 2>self righteously wise people's nickers. In a twist, the government

1:22:49.013 --> 1:22:51.573
<v Speaker 2>of Pakistan has formally recommended Donald Trump for the twenty

1:22:51.613 --> 1:22:55.853
<v Speaker 2>six Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his decisive diplomatic

1:22:55.893 --> 1:23:01.813
<v Speaker 2>interventions during the recent India Pakistan crisis. As George Friedman mentioned,

1:23:02.093 --> 1:23:09.213
<v Speaker 2>Trump is literally redefining cultural norms, taxes, foreign policy, policy, allies,

1:23:09.573 --> 1:23:14.093
<v Speaker 2>and so on. Trump is a purported fool who is

1:23:14.253 --> 1:23:18.053
<v Speaker 2>unpredictably effective. If being a fool would make the world

1:23:18.693 --> 1:23:22.533
<v Speaker 2>a better place than long live the fools of this world.

1:23:22.573 --> 1:23:27.213
<v Speaker 2>To quote the indomitable Thomas soul. Thomas sol once said

1:23:27.213 --> 1:23:29.533
<v Speaker 2>that a fool can put on his coat better than

1:23:29.533 --> 1:23:32.013
<v Speaker 2>a wise man can put it on for him. The

1:23:32.053 --> 1:23:35.933
<v Speaker 2>implications of that undermine most of the agenda of the

1:23:35.973 --> 1:23:40.813
<v Speaker 2>political left. Thank you, Jim as always very good. As

1:23:40.853 --> 1:23:44.173
<v Speaker 2>to the answer of your question, there's no answer this

1:23:44.293 --> 1:23:47.133
<v Speaker 2>question at the bottom. It doesn't matter. Wants to know

1:23:47.173 --> 1:23:49.293
<v Speaker 2>if you managed to take me to the beach last week.

1:23:51.933 --> 1:23:52.573
<v Speaker 3>That's funny.

1:23:52.653 --> 1:23:53.493
<v Speaker 6>I believe we did.

1:23:55.053 --> 1:24:00.853
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I compounded. I do have another letter regarding George Treatment.

1:24:02.053 --> 1:24:04.773
<v Speaker 2>Where do I put it, missus producer. It's over here somewhere.

1:24:04.933 --> 1:24:06.893
<v Speaker 6>I don't know you've read them all anyway.

1:24:07.093 --> 1:24:13.893
<v Speaker 2>Well, anyway, it's from It's from Allison Allison. I'm going

1:24:13.933 --> 1:24:18.453
<v Speaker 2>to give it proper consideration and maybe next week pretty

1:24:18.453 --> 1:24:18.933
<v Speaker 2>hard hitter.

1:24:20.453 --> 1:24:21.453
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. We'll see you.

1:24:21.373 --> 1:24:23.573
<v Speaker 6>Next week late and you will thank you so much.

1:24:23.853 --> 1:24:24.493
<v Speaker 3>It's welcome.

1:24:40.213 --> 1:24:43.933
<v Speaker 2>Finally, in podcast two ninety, there is a subject that

1:24:44.133 --> 1:24:47.853
<v Speaker 2>is getting a lot of attention in well places where

1:24:47.893 --> 1:24:51.013
<v Speaker 2>it's happening. Where what's happening what I'm about to talk

1:24:51.013 --> 1:24:58.093
<v Speaker 2>about very briefly in Europe, in England in particular, and

1:24:58.493 --> 1:25:02.973
<v Speaker 2>the subject is multiculturalism. The cult of multiculturalism is regarded

1:25:02.973 --> 1:25:06.653
<v Speaker 2>by its debtees as the pinnacle of Western achievement and

1:25:06.733 --> 1:25:11.933
<v Speaker 2>the end of European history. After the thesis an antithesis

1:25:11.973 --> 1:25:16.613
<v Speaker 2>of domination and enslavement, the warring clans and machine gunning

1:25:16.653 --> 1:25:21.133
<v Speaker 2>of millions, the populations of Europe will transcend their inglorious

1:25:21.253 --> 1:25:24.653
<v Speaker 2>arrogance and be at one with the enlightened nations.

1:25:24.293 --> 1:25:24.813
<v Speaker 3>Of the world.

1:25:25.533 --> 1:25:29.773
<v Speaker 2>The despotic superstructures of Europe or shelby subsumed by the

1:25:29.893 --> 1:25:35.613
<v Speaker 2>unblemished global majority, the black, brown, and indigenous populations of

1:25:35.653 --> 1:25:39.493
<v Speaker 2>the world, and there shall be no oppression, no hatred,

1:25:40.093 --> 1:25:45.693
<v Speaker 2>and no poverty. In short, we multiculturalism, and then we die.

1:25:46.813 --> 1:25:50.573
<v Speaker 2>But devotion to diversity in multiculturalism is a luxury belief

1:25:51.133 --> 1:25:54.373
<v Speaker 2>championed by those who are able to isolate themselves from

1:25:54.413 --> 1:25:57.773
<v Speaker 2>the consequences of their own liberal attitudes. It is a

1:25:57.933 --> 1:26:02.253
<v Speaker 2>theology of sorts, whether it's saints and devils. Despite the

1:26:02.293 --> 1:26:05.013
<v Speaker 2>bloodshead and the bankruptcy the torture of the tears, the

1:26:05.053 --> 1:26:10.213
<v Speaker 2>disciples continue to believe that diversity is strength. Their faith

1:26:10.333 --> 1:26:13.133
<v Speaker 2>endures and has only grown deeper in the face of

1:26:13.213 --> 1:26:17.773
<v Speaker 2>adversity because of this core conviction it is better to

1:26:17.813 --> 1:26:22.133
<v Speaker 2>be dead than racist, as the most recent example, and

1:26:22.173 --> 1:26:26.733
<v Speaker 2>really what triggered this commentary. I want to quote you

1:26:26.773 --> 1:26:29.733
<v Speaker 2>something that was published on the twenty first of June.

1:26:30.013 --> 1:26:35.293
<v Speaker 2>Broadcaster Selina Scott was viciously attacked and robbed by a

1:26:35.333 --> 1:26:39.253
<v Speaker 2>gang in broad daylight last week. She revealed the EXITV

1:26:39.453 --> 1:26:43.333
<v Speaker 2>News at ten Anchor seventy four. Bravely fought back, but

1:26:43.413 --> 1:26:47.173
<v Speaker 2>said the ordeal left her chatter and traumatized. She said

1:26:47.173 --> 1:26:51.013
<v Speaker 2>she was leaving a Waterstones in Piccadilly, Central London. I

1:26:51.053 --> 1:26:54.613
<v Speaker 2>know that shop, I go there when she was struck

1:26:54.693 --> 1:26:57.253
<v Speaker 2>on the back of her right knee and thought that

1:26:57.333 --> 1:27:00.533
<v Speaker 2>she'd been stabbed. A gang of around seven or eight

1:27:00.573 --> 1:27:04.453
<v Speaker 2>men and women in expensive sportswear and seemingly of East

1:27:04.493 --> 1:27:08.013
<v Speaker 2>Asian origin who were in front of her, then turned

1:27:08.013 --> 1:27:11.413
<v Speaker 2>in head derrin. They tried to grab her designer backpack,

1:27:11.453 --> 1:27:15.213
<v Speaker 2>which she tightly held onto. Another group then barged into her,

1:27:15.213 --> 1:27:17.413
<v Speaker 2>and she realized she was being attacked from both sides

1:27:17.453 --> 1:27:20.893
<v Speaker 2>at the same time. Selina managed to keep hold of

1:27:20.933 --> 1:27:23.853
<v Speaker 2>the bag when she fought back, and the gang walked

1:27:23.853 --> 1:27:27.853
<v Speaker 2>off laughing. She later realized they'd managed to unzip the

1:27:27.893 --> 1:27:31.133
<v Speaker 2>bag and take a purse which had her driving license,

1:27:31.253 --> 1:27:36.293
<v Speaker 2>cards and cash. Miss Scott, a TV icon since the

1:27:36.373 --> 1:27:40.093
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighties who famously at a viewed Donald Trump, slammed

1:27:40.213 --> 1:27:43.213
<v Speaker 2>the lack of police presence to deter or catch the

1:27:43.253 --> 1:27:46.733
<v Speaker 2>criminal thugs. She said she walked up and down some

1:27:46.813 --> 1:27:49.973
<v Speaker 2>of London's busiest central areas and did not see a

1:27:50.013 --> 1:27:53.893
<v Speaker 2>single officer. The journalist wrote in The Mail on Sunday

1:27:53.933 --> 1:27:56.573
<v Speaker 2>that the events were so swift and practiced that it

1:27:56.613 --> 1:27:59.693
<v Speaker 2>was clear it was a coordinated assault. She added, I

1:28:00.013 --> 1:28:03.213
<v Speaker 2>was right by a busy bus stop, although no one

1:28:03.213 --> 1:28:05.773
<v Speaker 2>would have known what was going on. It was slick,

1:28:05.933 --> 1:28:08.973
<v Speaker 2>brief and clearly engineered to have in the middle of

1:28:09.013 --> 1:28:12.213
<v Speaker 2>the crowd. I still feel shattered after what had happened.

1:28:12.253 --> 1:28:15.053
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe it happened to me. I am mentally

1:28:15.093 --> 1:28:18.053
<v Speaker 2>resilient and physically fit, but if they attacked me in

1:28:18.093 --> 1:28:21.533
<v Speaker 2>such a brazen way, they can attack anyone. You're left

1:28:21.533 --> 1:28:25.773
<v Speaker 2>feeling not just traumatized, but stupid that you have somehow

1:28:25.933 --> 1:28:29.253
<v Speaker 2>let it happen. I'm also furious about the lack of

1:28:29.293 --> 1:28:32.013
<v Speaker 2>police on our streets. No wonder the gang who set

1:28:32.093 --> 1:28:35.413
<v Speaker 2>about me have a sense of impunity. They can do

1:28:35.453 --> 1:28:38.613
<v Speaker 2>anything they want because they know that no one will

1:28:38.613 --> 1:28:41.493
<v Speaker 2>stop them. So we know that this has been going

1:28:41.533 --> 1:28:45.773
<v Speaker 2>on all over England. Actually plenty of it in London,

1:28:45.773 --> 1:28:49.413
<v Speaker 2>plenty of it up north. There are many articles that

1:28:49.453 --> 1:28:51.973
<v Speaker 2>I could quote from. It's just that that one. I

1:28:52.013 --> 1:28:54.213
<v Speaker 2>read it and I thought I would to respond to it.

1:28:54.773 --> 1:28:57.533
<v Speaker 2>And the article before that, by the way, was written

1:28:57.533 --> 1:29:00.533
<v Speaker 2>by Charles Bentley Aster and what I read was only

1:29:00.573 --> 1:29:04.213
<v Speaker 2>the first two paragraphs of about five pages. But I

1:29:04.213 --> 1:29:06.773
<v Speaker 2>suppose you could say that what the real trigger was.

1:29:06.853 --> 1:29:09.773
<v Speaker 2>The real trigger was a book that I have mentioned

1:29:09.813 --> 1:29:13.253
<v Speaker 2>more than once over the years, published in twenty eleven,

1:29:14.973 --> 1:29:22.453
<v Speaker 2>Delectable Lie. A liberal repudiation of Multiculturalism. Now, before you

1:29:22.733 --> 1:29:27.253
<v Speaker 2>get exercised about some sort of reference to multiculturalism and

1:29:27.253 --> 1:29:30.413
<v Speaker 2>here we go again or whatever, let me point out

1:29:30.413 --> 1:29:33.733
<v Speaker 2>something to you. It's written by a Muslim in Canada,

1:29:34.133 --> 1:29:36.333
<v Speaker 2>a Muslim in Canada. I quote you from the back

1:29:36.373 --> 1:29:40.293
<v Speaker 2>of the book. My point is that although multiculturalism once

1:29:40.333 --> 1:29:43.493
<v Speaker 2>seemed a very good idea, at least to politicians and

1:29:43.653 --> 1:29:47.133
<v Speaker 2>others smitten with the ambition for unity, it is increasingly

1:29:47.173 --> 1:29:51.053
<v Speaker 2>shown to be a lie, a delectable lie perhaps. Yet

1:29:51.093 --> 1:29:55.333
<v Speaker 2>a lie. Nevertheless, that is destructive of the West's liberal,

1:29:55.373 --> 1:30:00.853
<v Speaker 2>democratic heritage, tradition and values based on individual rights and freedoms.

1:30:01.173 --> 1:30:04.813
<v Speaker 2>This could have been foretold as Indeed, those philosophers and

1:30:05.013 --> 1:30:08.853
<v Speaker 2>historians of ideas who viewed freedom as in measures more

1:30:08.893 --> 1:30:13.253
<v Speaker 2>important than equality in the development of the West did foretell.

1:30:14.213 --> 1:30:18.533
<v Speaker 2>They admonished people against the temptation to abridge freedom in

1:30:18.573 --> 1:30:22.173
<v Speaker 2>pursuit of equality. Do we do that in this country?

1:30:22.173 --> 1:30:26.653
<v Speaker 2>Do you think now? The author Salem Mansur is alm

1:30:26.933 --> 1:30:31.333
<v Speaker 2>m An su R is a professor of political science

1:30:31.333 --> 1:30:36.653
<v Speaker 2>at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario. He

1:30:36.813 --> 1:30:40.773
<v Speaker 2>is the author of a number of other books, Islam's Predicament,

1:30:41.333 --> 1:30:46.253
<v Speaker 2>Perspectives of a Dissident Muslim, and co editor of Indira

1:30:46.533 --> 1:30:51.253
<v Speaker 2>Rajiv Years the Indian Economy and Polity nineteen sixty six

1:30:51.293 --> 1:30:55.173
<v Speaker 2>to nineteen ninety one. It's also nationally syndicated columnists for

1:30:55.213 --> 1:30:59.213
<v Speaker 2>the Sun chain of newspapers in Canada and the recipient

1:30:59.893 --> 1:31:07.453
<v Speaker 2>of the Stephen S. Wise Humanitarian Award, Profiles Encourage in

1:31:07.493 --> 1:31:11.813
<v Speaker 2>two thousand six. You know, it's not a matter of race,

1:31:11.973 --> 1:31:14.333
<v Speaker 2>It's a matter of and I've decided this a long

1:31:14.333 --> 1:31:17.333
<v Speaker 2>time ago. It's a matter of culture. Basically, people can

1:31:17.413 --> 1:31:21.093
<v Speaker 2>change their cultures, but they can't change their race, and

1:31:21.173 --> 1:31:25.013
<v Speaker 2>the two should be considered separately. Speaking of race not

1:31:25.093 --> 1:31:29.653
<v Speaker 2>being being able to be changed. A very fine example

1:31:29.693 --> 1:31:33.333
<v Speaker 2>of that, while belief and culture can is ion hersey

1:31:33.453 --> 1:31:36.733
<v Speaker 2>Eli and I've been reading quite a bit of her commentaries, Blake.

1:31:37.333 --> 1:31:41.333
<v Speaker 2>They are worthy of your time. More power to her.

1:31:41.893 --> 1:31:45.013
<v Speaker 2>And I know you'll say that we should get her

1:31:45.053 --> 1:31:47.933
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast, and I don't disagree. So that will

1:31:47.933 --> 1:31:50.453
<v Speaker 2>take us out for podcasts number two hundred and ninety.

1:31:50.893 --> 1:31:54.933
<v Speaker 2>We love you, mail, please keep it rolling. Latent at

1:31:54.973 --> 1:31:58.613
<v Speaker 2>NEWSTALKZNB dot co dot z, Caravin at newstalksb dot co

1:31:58.773 --> 1:32:03.253
<v Speaker 2>dot zid nice things to me, complaints to her. We

1:32:03.333 --> 1:32:06.413
<v Speaker 2>shall return for podcasts two hundred and ninety one very soon.

1:32:06.653 --> 1:32:09.973
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, as always, thank you for listening and

1:32:10.053 --> 1:32:11.173
<v Speaker 2>we shall talk soon.

1:32:18.973 --> 1:32:22.573
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more from news Talks at b Listen

1:32:22.693 --> 1:32:25.653
<v Speaker 1>live on air or online, and keep our shows with

1:32:25.773 --> 1:32:28.933
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio.