WEBVTT - Will property thrive or just survive in 2025? Tony Alexander

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Kirakoto. I'm Garth Bray and this is Shared Lunch. Today.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>We're with independent economist Tony Alexander. Another cut in the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>official cash rate. What does that mean for investors and

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>homeowners alike? What's in store for twenty twenty five? Will

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>things be as rosy or as gray as predicted? All

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of that? But first, some important information you always need

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to consider.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 2>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>the time of recording.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Tony, great to see you. You're zooming in from the

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Gold Coast. There you look like you're surviving and getting

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>ready to thrive in twenty twenty five. What did you

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>make of the Reserve Bank's OCAR decision?

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, obviously not unexpected zero point five percent. That was

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>what I was expecting, I guess. Ever, since the previous

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 3>half a percent our cut, a number of people were saying, oh,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 3>things are so bad in New Zealand, need to be

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>cutting by three quarters of a percent. But the story

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 3>for the past four weeks or so has been people

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>pulling back on those expectations in evidence of that maybe

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>some of the underlying inflationary pressures are not necessarily falling

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 3>away as rapidly for for next year, at least as

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 3>people were thinking. For me, the most interesting thing I

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>guess was that their release encapsulated sort of the two

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 3>key themes I've been putting across for many months. Number One,

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>intrastrates will fall, but they're not going down to the

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 3>really low levels that we've seen in the past. And

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 3>number two, the economy will improve, but it's not going

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>to be a particularly robust upturn. And that's what we

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 3>saw with them cutting their economic growth forecast for the

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>years to March twenty six and twenty seven about zero

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>point six percent for each of them, and yet lifting

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 3>the inflation forecast zero point one to zero point two percent.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>That I think was quite significant from them.

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So if this is a weather forecast, we've gone from

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>mainly fine to scattered showers almost it doesn't look quite

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as promising as we had first thought. And I mean, look,

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot to talk about here today. We've

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>had a President Trump's election in the US and how

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that could affect things, and obviously where people see the

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>housing market and go. But I really want to sort

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of dig in a little bit to some of the

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>information that we got from Adrian or there. Look, I

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>guess would you be expecting then if we look ahead

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to February, which is what a lot of people were

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to work out as well, are we looking at

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five basis point cut fifty again or something

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>even stronger. Was there any indication that you took, particularly

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 1>from what was said there well.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>In the press conference afterwards, the pretty strong indication was

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 3>given that they anticipate cutting zero point five percent, and

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 3>that's pretty much my expectation. It's going to take some

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 3>fairly either unusually strong or unusually weak economic data between

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>now and then, I think, to cause them to do

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 3>something different from that. For me, my greater interest is

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 3>not so much what happens in that third week of February,

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>but what happens after that. I'm advising people to pull

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 3>back on their optimism that rates might be falling to

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a great degree and that mortgage rates will fall away

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 3>to a great degree. I really don't think that's going

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 3>to be happening.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess the ocr is pretty much. It's pretty

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>much back where it was two years ago, right, I

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>mean we had that's when the RBNZ started to really

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>aggressively increase the rates. That was when that seventy five

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>basis point hype took off. I mean, so you don't

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>see another six months of aggressive cuts. It's more like

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of eighteen months of slowly getting there.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>No, I think they'll get to about as low as

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>they're going to go before the end of next year.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Now the Reserve Bank they project the cash rate will

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 3>finish twenty twenty five at about three point five percent

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 3>and the gain get down to three percent at the

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>end of twenty twenty six. I think the easing cycle

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 3>will be done and dusted well before the end of

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five, with the cash rate bottoming out somewhere

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 3>between three three and a half percent if you're lucky.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I think. I recall one forecast I was reading just

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 3>earlier on talking about maybe a four percent low. Well,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>we're at four twenty five percent at the moment, so

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's going to happen. But yeah, I

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to be done and dusted by the

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 3>end of next year, especially as the Reserve Bank anticipates

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 3>extra strengthening and economic growth over twenty twenty six, which

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>of course is going to make people start thinking about

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the cyclical upturn in inflation. And that's where my mind

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>is focusing on at the moment, not the weakness in

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the economy at the moment, the falling away of inflationary

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>pressures right now. But when does the cyclical recovery in

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 3>inflation start? And that I think is going to be

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 3>occupying people's minds in the second part of twenty twenty five.

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Why is that so important to be thinking about now?

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 3>Ah, because it limits the extent to which the medium

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>to long term wholesale interest rates are likely to go down.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>We see elements of that are now, and therefore the

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 3>extent to which the medium to long term will even

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 3>two years plus fixed mortgage rates go down. And so

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the time when people maybe more seriously start thinking about

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 3>not fixing six months and fixing for two or three years,

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to come sooner than people are thinking.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking about that long term picture, why is

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that so important to be thinking about it now?

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Because at the moment there's a high degree of optimism

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>amongst I think the general population, investors, potential home buyers,

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>that the interstrates cycle is going to be a really

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.119
<v Speaker 3>generous one, that the interustrates are going to fall away

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 3>to a strong level, the economy is going to grow strongly,

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 3>and the risk is people start making mistakes. Investors will

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 3>bet on the interest rates going to low levels, so

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 3>they risk over committing themselves to interest our sensitive stocks,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe commercial property, where of course the prices can be

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 3>highly correlated with the other direction for the interest rate movements.

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 3>For businesses also thinking oh my goodness, we're going to

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 3>see a great upturn in the economy because interest rates

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 3>are going to go so low. I do not need

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 3>to restructure at the moment. I do not lead to

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 3>lay you off as many staff and find alternative supplies

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>of materials because there's going to be all these extra

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 3>customers coming through. It's going to be okay. Well, you know,

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>for many, many months, I've been trying to emphasize to

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>business people in particular, the upturn will be mild. Don't

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 3>think about just surviving to twenty five and thinking you're

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 3>going to thrive in twenty five. It's going to be

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 3>a relatively mild recovery. Therefore, continue with your cost cutting,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>continue with trying to find efficiencies and boost productivity.

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you see why the psychology might Can you see

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>why the psychology might be affecting people that for so

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>long interest rates will we're so low that perhaps there's

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>still a little bit of that hankering back to that

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>period of didictability and an expectation that somehow we're going

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to return to that as the norm when there's a

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>completely different normal now available.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, But that's why in my weekly publication, I

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 3>have a set of graphs at the on about the

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 3>final page or the one before it, looking at where

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the fixed mortgage rates have gone over the past few years.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 3>I go back about fifteen years something like that, but

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 3>I completely blank out the observations that the line stops

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and restarts again. For the period twenty nineteen, when the

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 3>world was worried about deflation, the cash rate was only

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>one percent in New Zealand, I wipe that out. I

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>wipe out twenty twenty and twenty twenty one because they

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>were pandemic years, very unusual circumstance. So what I'm trying

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>to get people to do is realize, well, actually, the

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>likes of the three four, five year fixed rates are

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.239
<v Speaker 3>pretty much already below their average levels for the past

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 3>ten years or so leading into twenty and nineteen, and

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe that start people thinking a bit more about not

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 3>so much fixed six months. Maybe I'll start fixing longer.

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Having said that, he was just love to fix for

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 3>the short term interest rates. Hardly anyone ever goes beyond

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>three years, and that'll stick around this cycle.

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>We're a long way from that American example where people

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>lock in for thirty years or whatever. Right, it's just

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>part of the psychology.

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yep, and that generally that's worked out. Okay, So

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the plot post GFC environment two

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>thousand and nine through two, you know, eighteen to nineteen

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 3>actually just rolling one year fixed gave the lowest cost

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>of funds compared with going two year FX, three, four

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>or five years over that period. But of course you

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 3>don't have much rate certainty. You're leaving yourself vulnerable to

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 3>something coming along and comeblue it. And of course the

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 3>world that we live in is one which is very uncertain.

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 3>We're all trying to figure out, you know, with the

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Trump presidency, what does that actually mean for inflation. There's

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 3>a strong view on what it means is the but

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 3>what does it mean in New Zealand scope for inflation

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 3>and interst rate surprises is going to be really strong

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 3>in the next four years.

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I do want to try and get to some of

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that shortly, but let's just stay a little bit with

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that bigger picture here. If we've got a more subdued

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>recovery through twenty twenty five, as you suggest, what is

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that going to do for some of the big pain

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>points we've seen, like unemployment or the labor force participation

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>rate and so on. We've seen some pretty high profile

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>examples of entire businesses or even industries that are looking

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like they're really under pressure after the energy crunch, you know,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>mills shutting down in regional towns and just decimating that area.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there more of that to come? Do you think?

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I think there's more to come across all sectors in

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 3>the economy. For a long time I was warning that

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four would be a year of weeding out

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>in the business sector across all sectors, so not just

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 3>key pressure points like hospitality, the retail, house construction are

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 3>widely defined. But of course, as we can see with

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the loss of a feeling of security about electricity availability

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 3>and the price that's feeding through to those long term

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 3>investment decisions in the electricity. In the manufacturing sector highly

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>dependent upon electricity, and this is one reason the upturn

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand's economy is going to be muted. Businesses

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 3>are whether you're already here in New Zealand or eure

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>overseas thinking about investing in New Zealand, are going to

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 3>have to think about the electricity availability. And you look

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 3>at something like the data centers which are opening up

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand. Estimated within about five years they're going

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 3>to be using five hundred megawatt of energy. By then,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 3>that'll be about twenty five percent of what's used by

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Auckland households. It says that the electricity availability is going

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 3>to get even worse, especially if people keep plugging in

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>more electric vehicles and maybe electric scooters and things. So

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that's quite a change in New Zealand's dynamic where since

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 3>all the hydro electrics ends were developed into the late

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventies, there's been a feeling of electricity is readily

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 3>available in New Zealand. That's a sea change in view

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 3>this year. So there's probably a bit more of that.

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately it's rolled through part of the manufacturing sector.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's try and give people some hope. Do you see

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>any green shoots in there? Are the any investment decisions

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that are likely to proceed in this uncertain environment?

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Look, we are undoubtedly looking at an improvement in

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 3>the New Zealand economy. When I've been giving talks over

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 3>the past star three to four months and I've been

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 3>running through my long list of reasons why we're not

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 3>going to thrive, I have to stop myself about every

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>seven minutes and say, now, just to remind you, we

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 3>asked going to see a recovery in the New Zealand economy.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 3>But it's going to be more like when we came

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>out of the global financial crisis, where the peak rate

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 3>of growth was about four point one percent in twenty fifteen.

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 3>It took a long time for things really to get

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 3>chugging along. It's not going to be for this cycle

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 3>or repeat of coming out of the recession ninety seven

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 3>ninety eight when we were growing six percent within eighteen months,

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 3>or coming out of the nineteen ninety one recession when

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 3>we were also growing six percent within about two and

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 3>a half years. This is going to be a relatively

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 3>mild upturn and some of the factors contributing to it

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 3>will be obviously the intrastrate or the foot on the

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 3>pedal being lifted off the brake by the reserved bank,

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 3>so taking off intrastraight restraint, not putting on intrastrate stimulus.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 3>As I think what I'm saying to people, they're not

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 3>going to put the foot on the extra salrator by

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 3>cutting the cash right to two and a half percent,

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 3>but thank goodness, they'll be taking the foot off the brake.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Infrastructure spending to be done in New Zealand over the

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>next world century, quite frankly, so there's going to be

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 3>a lot of firms actively involved in that. There are

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 3>some early signs of stand alone house construction starting to

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 3>look better through twenty twenty five, not multi unit construction, townhouses,

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 3>et cetera twenty twenty six if you're lucky, but for

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 3>the standalone houses, things are starting to look a little

0:12:58.360 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 3>bit better.

0:12:59.440 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 3>There's been a good improvement in dairy prices recently, so

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 3>that will feed through, especially into your Taranaki Wycaddow, South

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Canterbury Southland regions, So that's positive across here in Australia

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>at the moment. There's just people are noting there's some

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 3>reasonably good upward pressure on red meat prices for a

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 3>variety of reasons. So maybe there's some hope for our

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 3>red meat sector in New Zealand where about forty percent

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 3>of them are still running at losses at the moment.

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 3>So there are those positives. The tourism numbers slowly improving

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and the net migration numbers. I don't think they're going

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 3>to go into the negative territory some people be forecasting

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 3>a few months ago. Maybe we bottom out with an

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>annual flow around about forty thousand or so, so down

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 3>from a year ago one hundred and thirty six thousand,

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 3>but are still in the positive territory.

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to pick up what you said about standalone

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>construction there, and obviously that's an indication of some pretty

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>firm intensions that people are prepared to take a bed

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on where interest rates are headed and so on. But

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I noticed in one of your recent Invests briefings you

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>were saying that investors are really shying away from new builds.

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>What's going on there?

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, I think for the investors, they can see

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 3>that there are many properties listed for sale, so the

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 3>number stock of listings for buyers generally is the best

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 3>since twenty fifteen, up about twenty six percent from a

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 3>year ago. And the focus for buyers generally is on

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 3>those existing properties maybe where they can make some changes

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 3>and improve the yield. So as an investor, you're not

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 3>just looking at this is what it costs, this is

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 3>how much I'm going to borrow, this is the rent

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to get, And it's a simple equation. You

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>just plug it in and where you go. As an investor,

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 3>you might be looking at, Okay, well, here's a property

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 3>with subdivision potential somewhere down the track. Here's a property

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 3>where I could think about adding or taking away your

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 3>room or garage or doing something. So frankly, it's more

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 3>fun buying an existing property as long as it's not

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 3>a townhouse, than would be the case just buying something

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 3>essentially or off the rack. I can see from my

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 3>various surveys, the real estate one in particular, that I

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>do that the investors are now coming back into the

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>market that are obviously encouraged by the restoration of interest

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 3>expense deductibility, bright line changes and interest rates are going down.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, they're very weary of what they see happening,

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 3>especially in the multi unit housing area, the townhouse area.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 3>There are obviously some big problems in one or two

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 3>areas there. There's an oversupply. For the moment, there's only

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 3>temporary of townhouses up in Auckland, and there's I think,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 3>just to concern that they may look to make a purchase,

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 3>but maybe I'm not going to get attend quite as

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 3>quickly as they would hope. That will change down the

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 3>track and the investors will start looking more favorably at

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 3>new construction and townhouses in particular, but just not at

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 3>the moment.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's I guess going to keep a bit of

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a clamp on the supply, and that's going to dissuade

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>some of those developers from developing at scale, right, which

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is just going to keep that, you know, keep people

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>focused in that established property market.

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 3>For the developers, certainly if the multi unit are complexes,

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 3>they can't get the pre sales at the moment and

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 3>they're not going to get the finance from the financial institutions,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 3>and so that that's why I think maybe for some

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 3>of them. If they're still looking to be builders, they

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 3>may be biasing back towards purchasing sections and building something

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 3>rather than going down the townhouse route. For the moment,

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand cities need to intensify, so this is definitely

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 3>going to come back again. The difficulty here is that

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 3>we have decades of data on standalone house construction. You know,

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 3>we've got the graphs going up and down. We can

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 3>see what happens. The numbers usually bottom out around about

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 3>fifteen thousand consents. We've done that, it's starting to slowly

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 3>edge up for the multi units. For the townhouses, basically,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 3>we don't have any cycles at all. This is the

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 3>first decent downturn, so we really don't know how low

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 3>it's goning to go down. And that's why, frankly, when

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 3>we're economists are talking about house construction the levels of activity,

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 3>we're sort of all over the place at the moment

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 3>because we don't We've got a feeling for the standalone

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>house construction, but for the multi unit, no history gives

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 3>me zero guide on when that's going to start picking

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 3>up again. On the construction, I.

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Won't hold you to it until we get the results

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in I guess in terms of those new home buyers,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously the debt to income ratio changes that have come

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in and so on, is that starting to filter through

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>from what you can see.

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for the DTI is there you know, twenty percent

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 3>is a reasonable exemption quite frankly for banks, you know,

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 3>to lend above us seven times income for the investors

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 3>and six six times for other people. So you know,

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 3>there are still quite some good scope in there. But

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 3>as the as the market heats up and prices rise

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 3>more for the existing houses, we will see people start

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 3>to look back at getting something built, but that the

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 3>numbers don't really work out out there. Relatively cheaper for

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>most people to be looking at purchasing and already constructed

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 3>property than getting something built. Now. You know, when I

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 3>look at the cost of building materials, there have been

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 3>some decreases, but it's relatively mild. I don't think there's

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 3>much of an extra decline in the cost of construction

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 3>that's going to come along. And you know, when we've

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 3>been talking for some time about forty percent increases in

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the materials costs for building a residential property in New

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Zealand in the past four years, you find the same

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 3>numbers if you're looking at material out of Australia or

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 3>out of Ireland, for instance, and there is not an

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 3>expectation that that goes backwards at.

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden.

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Everybody's building lots of standalone houses, a lot of these

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 3>extra costs are locked in. So for home builders, it's

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 3>like they're going to have to actually wait until we

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 3>get a decent increase in the prices of existing houses.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 3>And you know, for twenty twenty five, you know, I

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 3>think it's reasonable to think that house prices on average

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 3>rise five seven, maybe slightly more percent, and there maybe

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more than that over twenty twenty six.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 3>So the time will come for the higher residential construction.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 3>But I think the pace of price increase is going

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 3>to be relatively mild the next couple of years.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Now, you're coming to us from the Gold Coast, so

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I want you to quickly inflame people by telling us

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>how the property market's been working over there. Just by

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>way of comparison.

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, you've got the baby Boober generation and the

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 3>one below that cashing up out of the major cities

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 3>and they're selling four or five million dollar houses and

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.239
<v Speaker 3>Mosman and other flash places across in Sydney and they

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 3>prepared to lay it down on one hundred and fifty

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 3>one to eighty square meter apartment. Here on the GC,

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>there's all these towers going up all over the place.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 3>They build them really quickly, you know, two years from

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 3>go to woe for a twenty seven story building just

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 3>down the road for instance. The demand is massive for

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 3>property here. There was an estimate from a evaluation group

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 3>yesterday noting that on the GC they need to build

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 3>for expect population growth, fifty skyscraper apartment blocks each year

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>over the next few years for the population growth. What

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 3>it adds up to is demand is so strong and

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 3>supply is crimped. Remember cost materials have gone through the roof.

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Prices on the GC have gone up on average seventy

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 3>to eighty seventy to eighty percent for apartments in the

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 3>past four years. Demand versus supply, that's what happens. Get

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>out really yeah, yeah, it's quite extreme. It's totally different

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 3>from the cities, the eight capital cities around Australia where

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 3>actually there's falling prices at the moment in Sydney and Melbourne.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Not sure about Brisbane, but the markets can be heavily

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 3>influenced in the cities by what's happening with migration numbers,

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 3>which have been relatively strong. But there's a bit of

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 3>a movement still of some people to the regions, and

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 3>that's a dynamic. We don't get to the same extent

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand during the pandemic. Yes, some keiw's sold

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 3>in the cities and moved to the regions, but probably

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 3>we're talking the older gen who we're going to do

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 3>it anyway, and they just brought forward those plans maybe

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 3>by three years of selling in Auckland and going to

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 3>have lock North, Hastings other places like that. It's a

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>stronger phenomenon in Australia of people moving out of the

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 3>cities and into the regions as the numbers are greater.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Gosh, if you can swing a hammer, get to call

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and gatt a straight away. Look, I'm interested. We mentioned

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty that's been created in the world by the

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>US presidential election. People trying to work out what's going

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on there. I mean, I know it's MAGA is the acronym,

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's almost like vuoka volatile uncertain complex and forget

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>ambiguous as the last one is that a pretty fair

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>depiction of how investors are looking at what that election

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>means for the prospects of growth and where rates and

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>where exchange rates and things are going to go, and

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>how that could affect our economy.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the investors are scrambling around trying to

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 3>figure out exactly what this means. Now. Clearly with the

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 3>cryptocurrencies have rally done very strongly. I mean, are just

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 3>purely a speculative A said anyway, But the speculation is

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 3>that President Trump has been saying some nice things about it,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 3>and Elon Musk is in there, and he's got his

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 3>own dough doge coin I think it is if it

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 3>still exists, and the department that he's heading there has

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 3>got the same dog acronym. There are first letters, so

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 3>people are looking at that asset. There's a feeling that

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe inflation in the United States is going to be

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 3>high than would otherwise be the case because of the

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 3>tariffs which are going on materials goods going into America. Already,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>firms in Australia are holding pre tariff increased sales by

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 3>now before the price goes up for goods coming in

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 3>from Mexico from Canada, China et cetera. Of course, what

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 3>we don't know is how much of all of these

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 3>threats for tariff changes are really just bargaining positions to

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 3>get something else in exchange, either better trade access or

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 3>something of relevance in the geopolitical sphere, for instance. We

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 3>cannot know, and so this is going to be an

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>environment of high uncertainty for the next two four years,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. For New Zealand, the risks lie a bit

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 3>on the downside here because we export minimally processed commodities

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 3>to the rest of the world. A lot of the

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>rest of the world has strong farm lobby groups who

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 3>would like our stuff not to be going in there.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 3>And if we're looking at a world reverting more towards

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 3>mercantilist policies of tariffs to somehow protect your domestic producers, manufacturers, farmers,

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, we do risk getting a bit lost in

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 3>the wash there and having some negative outcomes. So the

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 3>environment for ourselves has become riskier over for the next

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 3>four years, and that may just constrain some investment in

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand in this period of time. The intrast rate

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>implications difficult to figure out, but I'd say interest rates

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 3>again not going as low as people are thinking because

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 3>of enhancement of the inflation risk.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>If we were trying to wrap it all up, what's

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>your best advice for how to make the best out

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty five, Tony?

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 3>I think people anticipates in recovery in the economy, the

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 3>labor market improving. You asked earlier on Garth about the

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 3>unemployment RATEE. You know, we're four point eight percent at

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the moment, go to five point five percent. I guess

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm not greatly concerned about that. We had six point

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.719
<v Speaker 3>seven percent back in about twenty twelve. I think eleven

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 3>point one percent or so back in about nineteen ninety two.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've seen far higher unemployment rates in the past.

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>That will act as a constraint on the strength of

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 3>recovery and consumers spending for a lot of twenty twenty five.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 3>So I think there's more rationalization to come in the retail,

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 3>hospitality are sector. And because we're in sort of the

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 3>last stages of the weakness for the economy, that doesn't

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 3>mean things improve for businesses generally. As we see that

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:59.239
<v Speaker 3>the failure's liquidations are picking up because some firms do

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 3>not have the care flow for the final three to

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 3>six months of the period of weakness. It mike the

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 3>ird demanding tax payments, etc. We will see further weeding

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 3>out across all sectors, but the scene is being set

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 3>for better activity in our economy, mainly the second half

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six rather than

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 3>the first half of twenty twenty five. Conversely, for the

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 3>biggest parts of the falls and interest rates, that'll be

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>done and dusted, I think, quite frankly by the middle

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty five.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Craky, So it sounds like Merry Christmas twenty twenty five

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>than Merry Christmas twenty twenty four from your point of view.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Tony, and thanks all of you for

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>watching and for listening. If you're listening, you're probably on Spotify,

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple or WV podcasts. If you're watching, you're on YouTube.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you like what you see, let us know

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and let us know what you'd like to see next

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>for us. That's done, Quimitu