WEBVTT - How has Infratil sustained double digit growth?

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Kyoda. Welcome to Sheard Lunch, brought to you by Chas's

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>with Business Desk. My name is Helen Madison and on

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the program today I'll be talking to Jason Boys, who's

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Infrastructure Investment Company in fortil.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Investing involves risk you might lose the money you start with.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor. We also

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>recommend reading product of sclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 2>the time of recording.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Jason, thanks for hosting us at the Infantile HQ

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>here in Wellington. Welcome now, Infatile. You are actually in

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>the midst of your retail investor road show around the country.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So how's that been going good?

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the team are in total on and today,

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>so I haven't had a report back on how that's gone.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>But last week we had our first roadshow meeting ever

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>in Fun Today. Over one hundred people turned up. Our

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 3>chair Allison Gary is from Fun Today, so she presented

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>at that so I think it was a I mean,

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 3>are over one hundred people was a fantastic outcome. Hopefully

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>everybody attended got something out of it.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got a number of others around the

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>country coming out.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we do ten or twelve around the country.

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I am doing Wellington and Auckland and we sort of

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 3>split it between the team who are be going through

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 3>the South londond I think next week, I expect.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>And I'm quite excited because actually there'll be one for

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Cheesy's investors this year, I'm told in July.

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 3>Said so, no questions today, but questions in July are

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 3>so bitter. Be on my toes for that. You better happy,

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 3>too happy too.

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Now thirty years since and for twol became about, which

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is quite a milestone really for the company. There's been

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a number of people at the Helm and now you're

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>at the helm. What would you say you've learned? But

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>also what lessons you've learned from them in that time?

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Thirty is is amazing, isn't it. We've had three

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>CEOs obviously, Marco are now me. I think what have

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 3>we learned? I mean a million things right, and a

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of we don't have a lot of turnover here

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>at Morrison as well, so it's pretty hard to boil

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 3>it all down into one or two things. I think,

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, the main lesson is it's never one or

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.839
<v Speaker 3>two things. It's actually always a million things that come

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 3>together to make an investment either successful or unsuccessful, because

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 3>we've had those as well. And really, I think the

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>magic of the model really has been to have a

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 3>team who's not, you know, embroiled in the day to

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>day hand to hand combat of running an airport or

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>selling mobile phone plans. You can sit above that and

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 3>try and understand what are the what are the bigger

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 3>things to be thinking about here, either now or for

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 3>the future, and then trying to use our levers because

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>we tend to control the businesses that we invest in,

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 3>to position them well for those things over time. It

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 3>is probably when I look back at the successes what

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 3>really makes them stand out, and then when I think

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 3>about the things that haven't gone so well, almost always

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I think if this as the cardinal rule now is

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 3>to not fall in love with your assets to the

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>extent that you hold on for too long. And everybody

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 3>loves all of our assets. They're like your children in

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>some ways. You know there's no favorites, but yeah, don't

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 3>hold for too long. It's like the cardinal rule I think.

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Now Morrison Group actually managers or is the manager. Now

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that for a lot of people seems a bit strange.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Can you can you unpack what that model is and

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>then how common is that?

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, it's not as common in this part of

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the world as it used to be. There was kind

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>of a spata than when in for Too was put

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>in place. It still is me common in property investing.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 3>So the model is if people don't know there is

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a company with an independent board of direct is that

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>if you're an Infratil shaholder, you'll own shares in. But

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>there's no employees of Infratill like there would be of

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 3>fishrom Pocal Healthcare or some of these overreat companies. The

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>employees are all employed by Morrison, which is a privately

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 3>owned investment manager. It's owned by the staff and largely

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 3>Alloyd's of State actually, and we work for Morrison, and

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 3>we essentially provide the sort of executive team functions of Prattle,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 3>which is overseen by the board on a day to

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 3>day basis actually around the board table and when we're

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 3>thinking about budgeting. It all would all look very familiar,

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 3>but essentially the management team sits outside the company. The

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 3>main difference really is that Morrison can have other clients,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 3>whereas you know, if you're this CEO of one in

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>z if you're docent Paris, you reallyantly work for one

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>in zed C and I hope. So whereas with Morrison,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 3>we have worked with New Zealand Supernovation Fund, Australia's Future Fund,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 3>a number of other clients who've ended up being great

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 3>partners for infantele and investing. But that's really the difference.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 3>That's not so common here anymore. But actually it's pretty

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 3>common in the UK. There is a class of investments

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 3>called investment trusts, which were all more or less structured

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>this way, and it was kind of that model that

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Lloyd imported into New Zealand and for various tax reasons,

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 3>actually ended up in a company format. But yeah, so

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 3>not unique, but certainly not as common here as it is,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 3>say in the UK.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>They've mentioned Lloyd Morrison a few times. He's the late

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Lloyd Morrison, and he did actually set up infratill way

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. Would you say his aspirations have

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>been realized?

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. He's quite ambitious guy, right, So that

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I suspect that's a pretty high bar that we're all

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 3>continually trying to live up to he He described it

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 3>what he hoped for Infantoo before he passed away, as

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 3>as creating a great New Zealand company is what he said,

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>which leaves quite a bit of room for interpretation. But

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 3>I think what he is capturing there is, you know

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 3>there are it's more than a fund where you sort

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>of pop in a few investments, like if you're doing

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>your own investing and you sort of mix a match

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 3>and you come out with a financial return and that's happy.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 3>His aspirations for Intole were much higher than that. A

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 3>company that and you sort of saw this when he

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 3>was alive, you know, was relevant to New Zealand and

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 3>other markets if possible. When he advocated for the stock

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>exchange not to be sold for various things that were

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 3>going on with airlines and the flag, those were the

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 3>levels of his aspirations for a tool. And I think

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 3>we're sort of still working I think on that part

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 3>of his vision. How can you have kind of a

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 3>broader place in people's hearts and minds than just like

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a spreadsheet.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And also, I mean eighty percent of the business is Australasian.

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Still you call yourselves a global and structure investment company,

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>but actually a lot of it still is based here.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But I suppose is that always? Is that always what

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you're hoping to have.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Or I think that's more just where we've come from,

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 3>which is a strength. So the more mature businesses will

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 3>be at home, the things where we're willing to take

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 3>more risk will tend to still be at home. First. Really,

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 3>where we want to take the investment portfolio is a

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of a more global version of what you see today.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>So could we have larger data seend the businesses offshore.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that would be interesting from an investment perspective,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 3>And certainly we have every right, I think, given what

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 3>we've achieved so far and this part of the world,

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to try to do that. And you can sort of

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 3>see that in renewables as well. Right, we've had huge

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 3>history with our words TrustPower now monor energy tilt that

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 3>came out of it definitely earned the rider. I think

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 3>to try that offshore and long Road in the US

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 3>is the early sort of signs that maybe we can

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>translate off that offshore, and we've got a few other

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 3>ways to try and integrate that model to other jurisdictions

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Jason, we'll talk about some of the successes you've had

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with the impressive results that came out a couple of

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, but I think it would be quite good

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to kind of set the scene. I mean, what has

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>been achieved has been in a climate or a world

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that is quite volatile. What are some of the challenges

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that you've faced and had to sort of get through

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to, you know, have the results you have.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely been I think we say whippy in certain areas.

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 3>The definitely volatile interest rates has been incredibly challenging for

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of investments, and because infrastructure is quite capital

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 3>intensive and uses a lot of debt if you can

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 3>set it up correctly, the quick changes and interest rates

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 3>really through COVID and after has been incredibly challenging for

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 3>the businesses, and by large, teams have navigated that incredibly well.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's always hard to really lean in with confidence

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 3>to grow businesses you think have every right to grow

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 3>when they're facing challenging cost increases. So you know, for example,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 3>if you're building a solar farm in the US, almost

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 3>a third of the cost is interest, right, so if

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 3>that's doubled overnight, You've got a lot of work that

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 3>needs to happen on the power price effectively in order

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 3>for the maths to still work. So that has no

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>doubt been challenging. And now really the big debate is

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 3>what is the new two percent rod? What is the

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 3>new long term interest rate? Is it two or three?

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Is at four? And we have no better view on

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 3>that than anyone, So it sort of plan for the

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 3>worst and hope for the best, I think is the

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 3>most sensible way to approach that in your investment pieces.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But a constant juggle and obviously you're doing your modeling

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>as you always have.

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 3>And try and be conservative in terms of hedging will

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>conserve I think then a lot of people although a

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of people there are a number of people who

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 3>could say you could take more edging, but yeah, try

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 3>and head you downside as much as you can where

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the cost justifies it. So that's always a bit of

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 3>an equation. And then really the other part is are

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 3>you in markets where either your business has pricing power

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 3>or the industry as a whole that you're in has power.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 3>To say, in that electricity example I gave before, you

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 3>can go back to whoever's buying your power and say well,

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 3>do you want the project? Yes, well, then really the

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 3>price has to change, and that's always very uncertain until

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 3>you're right in those moments. You can do all the

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 3>work that you like on that and get convinced that

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 3>that ability is there, but until I actually achieve it,

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 3>it's all very much uncertain. And I think the benefit

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 3>of getting through times like this that we have is

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 3>that has proven now, particularly in the US renewables market,

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>the power price is quite rational. Everybody seems to have

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 3>more or less the same cost to capital, which means

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>that when something like interest rate happens that affects everyone,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 3>the power price is able to be adjusted. And I

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 3>think we've been happily. You know, data seen has been

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a different story. I would say,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 3>what's really happened there is you've had the same sort

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 3>of dynamic in terms of interest rates, but there's just

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 3>been this huge explosion of demand which has helped balance

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 3>everything in that in that industry.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Just looking briefly at the numbers for the full year result,

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think earnings is probably what we'll focus on. And

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.599
<v Speaker 1>ebitt Dath is that lovely acronym which basically means that

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>before all the expenses come in. That was up sixty

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>three percent. I think it was eight hundred and sixty

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>four million. That said, one New Zealand had a fairly

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>big impact on that. So if you extrapolate that out,

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>what'll be looking at Yeah.

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's the parent at surplus and so that was

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>that would have been reflecting the revaluation of one through

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the transaction that we executed last year. Think we spoke

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 3>about that last time. The well, well, the way we

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 3>look at it is if you want to understand how

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the operations of the underlying businesses are performing, we use

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 3>this metric called proportionate EBITDAV. So we would take so

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 3>if we own fifty percent of CDCAT it's actually a

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 3>little bit less, but say fifty percent, you would take

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent of their earnings through, thirty seven percent of

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Long Road take thirty seven percent through. So take that

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 3>through across the portfolio and then compare that to the

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 3>same period last year and say how have the underlying

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 3>operations gone. So at that level we grow grew at

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 3>about it was eleven percent, I think I want to

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 3>say last year, so above we hit a number that

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 3>was above our guidance, which was nice, and then we

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 3>were growing at that kind of double digit rate that

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 3>we like to see given that we're investing a lot

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 3>in our businesses to generate that going forward.

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Down that that growth and that double digit growth is there.

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>It has been with imperature for a long timement. If

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you look back ten years in even thirty, there's always

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>been double digits and the last ten twenty two percent,

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty phenomenal. That said, the market wasn't that

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and those were the results? Were they just expecting it

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to be even better? I mean, how do you win?

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think there were a few things going on

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 3>on the day, So I think the print for the

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 3>year everybody was happy with because nobody expected us to

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 3>be above guidence. Everybody at as below it, so that

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 3>was fine. They were more thinking about the outlook. So

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>then we provided one which we've always done, even through COVID,

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 3>one year forward view of that proportionate eve deaf metric

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 3>that I talked about before, and that was still up

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 3>double digits. But two of them they were disappointed, and

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>I think I would say one was one inzet which

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 3>we had as actually flat. So although at an aggregate

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 3>level we were showing this double digit growth. We had

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 3>one in zet As flat, which is really, as we

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 3>explained on the call, as a result of what Sparker

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 3>also seeing this market, which is the enterprises, which in

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand means a lot of government as well definitely

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 3>holding back and pulling back in terms of spending on

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 3>all their needs, including the ones that we provide as well.

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think the market was prepared for that. There

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 3>was also a little bit of confusion between some normalizations

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 3>we'd shown in June when we did the rays and

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 3>what we were showing on the day, which we were

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 3>able to clean up during the day, I think, which

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 3>tied it up to normalizations. But that was a little

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 3>bit messy on the call, so apologies if you had

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 3>to listen through that slightly painful conversation. So I think

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 3>people have got their head around that, and our message

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 3>on one really is we're soft because the market is

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>soft on that side of things. Nothing particularly wrong with

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 3>our investment, and we're still actually really positive about the

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 3>leavers we have within that business to continue to achieve

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>good growth over time. Particularly remember one end Z is

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 3>still really becoming a standalone telco having been owned by

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Vodafone for all those years, so we've got plenty of

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 3>simplification we can do, which Spark's already done the good

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 3>work on, but we still have to do it to

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 3>generate above market growth we think in earnings once that

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>program completes over the next two or three years. So

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 3>we're still quite positive about that and people will be

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 3>waiting to see us execute. But we've executed well on

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>that before, so I don't think people should expect us

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>not to over the next two or three years. And

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 3>then there was another little bit of confusion on the

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 3>day because we had presented Long Roads operating earnings on

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 3>a slightly different way than the way the team the

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Long Road team had shown it in March, which even

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>though it was actually labeorly labeled correctly in March, people

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 3>had taken to mean something else. So once we tied

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>it up that message, I think people have reset their

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 3>expectations on what Long Roads earnings should be. But the

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 3>overall message there which I gave on the day was well,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 3>it's the same projects at the same really attractive marginal

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 3>economics that we've already been talking about. This is really

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 3>just how you present the earnings as to win their turn.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Up, and the share prices recovered pretty much, you think,

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>We had run quite a bit leading into the result. Actually,

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 3>just on that last day, which is an unusual actually,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 3>people like to just in case you're going to run

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 3>ount something bombastic, buy a few more shares, so it

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 3>would be normal for it to trade back. You can

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 3>never really win on that, and I think we are

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty much back to kind of the normalized share price

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 3>from what the team are telling me this morning.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the portfolio, it's always good to see what

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the waitings are, how it might have changed from year

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to year. What appeared to me that digital infrastructure really

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is the one leading the charge renewables right up there too,

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but as the waiting changing somewhat with the airport's the healthcare.

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Digital, yeah, I think we was trying to give ourselves

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the option to up or downweight sectors over time. So

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 3>you definitely think of healthcare as one of the newer

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>ideas that could increase assuming our thesis plays out as

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 3>we hoped or just well, even if we didn't expect

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 3>it to go well in the particular way it chooses to.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 3>So that's one for the future. The airport is the airport.

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 3>It's very hard for us to buy another airport.

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say you've got airports, but actually we

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have won airport and it's Wellington add Wellington. The city

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>council are wanting to sell these shares. Does that mean

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you are going to buy?

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 3>And that's all they voted that last week. Well, I

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 3>don't know exactly what they're going to do. I think

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 3>infratil shiholders, she would expect us to take a look

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>if that was actually what they want to do. People

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 3>like that investment.

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that something you'd like?

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't know until I see it really. Actually, I

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 3>think there's a price for everything, right, There's a price

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 3>at which I would sell the airport too, so I know.

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's all it's all dependent on what people want

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 3>for things, I think. But I think as it from

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 3>a portfolio strategy perspective, it's not off base at all.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the runway extension is always the other thing

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that people investors always.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Want to know about think about. Yeah. I think in

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 3>Matt Clark, our CEO there, spoke about it at our

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 3>vest day March. I think what he was saying there

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 3>really is that there are a number of other technological

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 3>ways of achieving a similar outcome. He was talking about

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 3>a new plane stopping distances, some technology the team have

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>put in on the runway itself. It's got grooves and

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a few other things that they're thinking about. We don't

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>need a runway extension. If we don't need one, we

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 3>just want to able to fly slightly further afield directly

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 3>rather than having the lovely walk.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>In Auckland because it was Surfey's. I think are worried

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and Wellington that you might change many things, I mean

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>fear but at stake.

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, exactly. It's very important, no doubt. I mean

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting, isn't it. Adam per TONI along that what

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 3>they're doing there with that big sea wall. I wonder

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 3>if they'll learn anything from that. That'll be interesting. But

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of heck full of stone.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's interesting. Double digit growth, that's something, as we

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>discussed before, that you've been able to achieve. How long

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>can it keep going eleven to fifteen percent? I think

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>is what you're saying to shareholders. How confident are you

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that that will keep coming? And can you better that?

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I think we have bettered that, haven't we in the

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 3>last few years I think, I mean, you never know,

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 3>of course on these things, but we feel like the

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.479
<v Speaker 3>portfolio is set up and the right way to give

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 3>us the best chance of achieving that. And mostly that's

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 3>through having your high single digit return underwritten by Wellington

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Airport and something like one which in most cycles will

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 3>generate that return and that's a good chunk of for two.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 3>But then also having these platforms like CDC and Long

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Road who have this ability to build a new data

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>center or a new solar farm for fifteen plus percent

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 3>type returns if you model it. But that asset out

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 3>to its end of life. Of course, if you sell

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 3>it earlier, you bring a lot of that return forward

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 3>so you can earn even more. So to me, that

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 3>balance is that's always the critical one. And it feels

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 3>like we're in a good spot now and really the

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 3>task is to make sure those proportions stand the right

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 3>balance to produce the right outcome.

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>So that you've got cash cows if you like, with

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>one New Zealand the airport's those sorts, yeah, and then

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got the other development prospects and also obviously that's

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>where a lot more capital we'll have to go up

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 3>That's right, that's right. So it's that balance of how

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 3>much you've got invested in those high single digital cash

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 3>car whatever you want to call them as sets, and

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 3>then how much can you how much do you need

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 3>to put in fifteen plus to keep the kind of

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 3>returns in the right range. The other important component if

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 3>you look back over our history of the returns is

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 3>some of those ones for the future maturing. So in

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 3>the past that's been SA Long Road and now you

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 3>have sort of gur and maybe as the one to

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 3>call out there. Yeah, So what happens often is when

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 3>those investments come of age, and sometimes that's made evident

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>by transaction. So in the case of Long Road, it

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 3>was when our partner's Munich reinvested and the value of

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>that asset became clear. That's when you get these kind

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 3>of big jumps and value as well. I think it

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 3>went up. The people's valuation of that business doubled or

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 3>tripled overnight through that through that value realization phase. You've

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 3>got those as well coming through.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Just on Long Road, we probably should explain that that

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is the renewables business in the US, Yeah, and gurin

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>is the renewables business. In Singapore and in Philippines I

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think is the other Yeah.

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 3>In Thailand and Korea and Japan, but mostly in Singapore.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>The thinking of that lovely wael chest you've got to

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and twenty million, I think it was, and

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the guidance there's obviously an opted opportunity there. Where are

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you looking in the world. I imagine it's probably not here,

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's or Australia, it's elsewhere.

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, should we look everywhere? And there are some interesting

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 3>assets here, but it's really just that balance of the portfolio. Really,

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 3>your stable cashier and as will tend to be here

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 3>where you can see and touch them, and we can

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 3>denye on the exactly you do want those ones performing,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>but the ones where are we looking at in the future.

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 3>So we announced a transaction last year with Hong Kong

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Telecom where they wanted a partner to invest in their

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 3>international business, which we haven't closed yet. So that's really

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 3>where that a good chunk of that available capital is

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 3>earmarked for. And so their international business. What I mean

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 3>by that, it's access to their exclusive access actually to

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 3>their international network of subse cables, which is extensive built

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 3>by that business and predecessor businesses over twenty years and

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 3>it carries nearly twenty percent of the world's Internet traffic.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>To give you this and a sense of the reach

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 3>of that network, very attractive asset, and then they have

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 3>a business that effectively markets that capacity to enterprise customers,

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 3>wholesale customers, and then even smaller customers. Now can access

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 3>that network through a software platform they call Console Connect,

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 3>which means you can sort of go online and using

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 3>a credit card, provision capacity for ten minutes, one hour,

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 3>three days, three months to any point on their network

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 3>in the world, which is pretty much anywhere at whatever

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of speed you might choose within the parameters that

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the network allows. And it's really that part of the

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 3>business that we think is really the future of how

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 3>people will buy connectivity, because you don't need in the

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 3>old world used to lease aligne for three years at

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 3>a fixed cost whether you are using it all or not.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 3>This software and there are sort of two or three

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 3>others in the world that can do this, but not many.

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 3>This software allows you to say, well, actually, I'm broadcasting

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 3>from the Olympics for the next three months, and I

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 3>need provision capacity down to Africa, say for my customers there,

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I can buy capacity on that line. That's incredibly high

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 3>quality because we own the network, but I only have

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 3>to pay for it for that period pare of time.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, gosh, exciting.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So what about Saudi Arabia and Middle East, all those

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>sorts of places, I mean, they seem to be going

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>off in terms of infrastructure and renewables.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we haven't really looked too much there. Actually a

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of what in our world, what we see from

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 3>that part of the world is really well funded investors

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 3>actually who are reaching out into Asia Pacific and particularly

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 3>to invest to take the money they've earned from all

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 3>of those good things and invest in Asia Pacific. But

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 3>we haven't actually spent a lot of time there yet. Anyway,

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I think we're really excited about Asia Pacific actually, And

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of infrastructure investors. If you looked at you

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 3>know KKR who are listed or the other unlisted infrastructure

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 3>funds that are being closed around the world, a lot

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 3>of them have an Asia Pacific focus. And that's really

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, population growth. You have quite strong GDP growth

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 3>in an emerging middle class and growing middle class, which

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>is important in terms of their ongoing growth. You have

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 3>electrification and because they don't really have the inflation problem

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 3>that most of the West has, which is going to

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>lead to higher interest rates, so you have a nicer

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 3>interest rate outlook. I think in that market that makes

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 3>it quite interesting for infrastructure investors anyway, in.

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>A bit of a hedge. Yeah, so India would be

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>among a lot I imagine, given its population and class.

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 3>It's a very interesting market from a fundamental perspective, and

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 3>we've done a bunch of work on it. We've tried

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 3>a few things and haven't landed something that we would like,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 3>but I think it is interesting yet.

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Now dayson, let's look at sustainability. You guys seem to

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>be leading the charge somewhat. You did put out a

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>sustainability of report last year, your first one, and then

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously climate related disclosures. They are compulsory for a number

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of ZiT X and ASEX listed companies, and there's a

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of consternation about the different standards. We aren't there yet.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's confusing, it's onerous, but surely you know is a

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>way to go. You've obviously thought about it prior. How

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>has that process been.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't necessarily disagree with all those conversation from my peers.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's a necessarily evil, but it

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 3>is it does seem like the right thing to do

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 3>because and there's just a million ways you can count

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 3>these things at the end of the day, and we're

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 3>only going to make progress if we can coalesce around

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 3>a pretty standard set of ways of counting carbon. There's

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 3>still plenty of double triple counting available, but you've kind

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 3>of just got to get started, I think. So, I mean,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 3>we're supportive. We've invested quite a lot actually in learning

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 3>a lot about this because we have fifteen different businesses

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 3>for different sectors. You're encountering these kind of double counting

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 3>and border issues and lots of different ways. So it's

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 3>actually taken quite a bit of time for us and

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 3>our management teams to get to where we've got to.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 3>And I would agree with the current that we're not

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 3>fully yet. Only the kind of good thing for us

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 3>is that New Zealand has pushed ahead really of the

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 3>rest of the world so in a lot of ways

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 3>in terms of making these compulsory. So Australia, yeah, so

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Australia is not till next year, I think, and maybe

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the year after really win it by it so it's

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 3>quite helpful for say CDC to see how we're going

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 3>through it now and then take what we've learned and

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 3>applied to them as they come. So I think that's

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 3>quite good for us because we operate everywhere anyway, But

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 3>that might not work for everyone who doesn't because.

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>CDC aren't they net zero here in New Zealand. But

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're working toward in Australia. That's right, that's right,

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>because that brings me to another question. I mean we've

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about, you know, the scale and the demand that

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>those data centers are having to now put out, and

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you know it's going great for you, but I mean

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>AI is an aspect of that.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Criticism with AI in terms of the environmental impact power

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and the like. Can you tak me through how that

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>works in terms of balancing sustainability? I think I think

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>some of the data centers do have some renewable powers them,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do they work?

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So it's totally the issue I think on data

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 3>centers in this new capacity for generative AI, because it's

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 3>such a huge chunk of megawats that needs to be

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 3>generated most you know, if you're dealing and most of

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 3>this is provisioned by hyperscalars that brands everyone knows and

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 3>they buy their power. So we're a little bit on

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.239
<v Speaker 3>the side of how they choose to do that, but

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 3>we're not disinterested at all and how they do it

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 3>and what's available over time. I think in Australia, where

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the capacity we're talking about is going in,

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>there is huge resource available to them if the transmission

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 3>capacity can be brought online. So for me, I don't

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 3>worry about it so much in the medium tom because

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of the fundamental structure of that market and the availability

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 3>of soul and wind. It's going to be just these

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>pinch points really where if it runs too far ahead

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 3>and then there are compromises that need to be made

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 3>about where the power goes, that you need to really worry.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 3>So most of our customers will be investing in large

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 3>customers would be investing and bringing on new renewable power

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 3>in order to power their data centers, but getting the

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 3>timing to line up, I think that'll be a real challenge.

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 3>So there will be an issue that will need to

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 3>be worked through and mostly driven by our customers who

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 3>actually dictate the pace of rollout of their equipment, but

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 3>also have all the levers that can pull to procure

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 3>the renewable energy. And then I think there are still

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 3>many other areas where data center sustainability needs to be examined.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 3>One would be the use of water is becoming an

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 3>increasingly big focus where actually our data centers are really

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 3>well placed. But then also there's this tricky issue of

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 3>embodied carbon, so using concrete and steel, which no one's

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 3>really on top of yet, and that but actually going

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 3>back to where you started these CIDs, because you'll figure

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 3>out a way to start counting them is totally how

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 3>you'll end up figuring out what the trade offs are

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 3>in order to bring in more sustainable versions of both

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 3>of those things concrete and steel into the construction.

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of AI, it's something that obviously is changing rapidly

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and is everywhere. As you know, in terms of your

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>company in modeling and what you foresee, you've always done

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty well in that regard. Did you see it coming

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in the way that it's manifested and where do you

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>see the potential and where it goes? Yeah?

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean definitely not. But we had been doing

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 3>work on disruptive technologies for infrastructure for quite a few years.

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 3>We invested in a Finch Capital firm. This isn't for two,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe six or seven years ago now based in San Francisco,

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 3>and the idea is a very small investment. I think

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 3>it was twenty five million US and we don't talk

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 3>about it a lot, although it's clear and the accounts

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 3>that it's there. But really the purpose of that was

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 3>to keep an eye on developments like this, and it's

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 3>always had a big machine learning an AI component to

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 3>this sort of big bangs definitely not definitely not envisaged,

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 3>but that's how we try and get it least conversant

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 3>with what the issues could be with these new technologies.

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 3>So you know, optimization and utilization of infrastructure would definitely

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 3>be quite familiar with that theme, which I think is

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 3>definitely an early application for generative AI that's relevant to us.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 3>And then you know from here that businesses themselves learn

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 3>a lot as well. So you know, one en z

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 3>or the healthcare businesses which are all now using forms

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 3>of AI, need to be conversing in the kind of

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 3>guardrails and security elements of all those things as well,

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 3>which we learned from.

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Just looking at outlock. Then you did give some guidance.

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think earnings looking at nine hundred and eighty million

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to one point zero three more billion actually, which will

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be the first time in the Big BS. You're pretty

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>confident of getting there.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, we always stress test that guidance. We've got

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 3>a really good history of heading our guidance well last

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 3>year getting above it and we're still early days, so

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 3>we update so thankfully, still looking good. We update those

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 3>usually we get a little update at the AGM then

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 3>and a half year so people can track it as

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 3>we go along as that going on?

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, Okay, and Jason, what excites you about the future.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 3>I think trying to become that great New Zealand company

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 3>is pretty exciting. Actually, a global version of what we've

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 3>got would be really exciting I think for cheerholders, which

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 3>includes me and actually a company that's known for I

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 3>think being relevant, as I said, that looks after its staff,

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 3>that looks up to its neighbors, that would be a

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 3>very happy place.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>That's been a great chat, Jason, thanks for your insights

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and for hosting us today.

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me. Let's see you again.