1 00:00:09,093 --> 00:00:12,693 Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talks be follow 2 00:00:12,773 --> 00:00:16,133 Speaker 1: this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio. 3 00:00:16,653 --> 00:00:19,732 Speaker 2: Gareth Abdenor is an employment, workplace and information expert and 4 00:00:19,773 --> 00:00:22,653 Speaker 2: director of Abdenaor Employment Law. He joins us once a 5 00:00:22,653 --> 00:00:25,573 Speaker 2: month to ask answer your questions on anything going on 6 00:00:25,653 --> 00:00:27,373 Speaker 2: in your workplace or if you're the boss, he is 7 00:00:27,412 --> 00:00:29,813 Speaker 2: the man to chat to, and he joins us once 8 00:00:29,813 --> 00:00:31,613 Speaker 2: again live from christ Cheer Mates. 9 00:00:32,293 --> 00:00:35,533 Speaker 3: Good, Hey guys, we'll go straight to Tom A Tom, 10 00:00:35,573 --> 00:00:39,533 Speaker 3: you've got a question about ninety day trials. 11 00:00:39,293 --> 00:00:44,293 Speaker 4: Yeah, or rather the exploitation of it. A year so, Gareth, 12 00:00:45,053 --> 00:00:49,732 Speaker 4: businesses overtween employees couldn't dismiss inside a ninety day trial, 13 00:00:51,893 --> 00:00:56,853 Speaker 4: and not an employer. I've been an employee, and I've 14 00:00:56,853 --> 00:01:01,613 Speaker 4: found myself being exploited with some big, big businesses building 15 00:01:01,653 --> 00:01:08,212 Speaker 4: up big prospect pipelines, paying significantly last commissions and doing 16 00:01:08,213 --> 00:01:11,373 Speaker 4: it in such a short time that they realize, oh, 17 00:01:11,653 --> 00:01:14,133 Speaker 4: they're going to have to pay a substantial salve of 18 00:01:14,133 --> 00:01:18,292 Speaker 4: money and commission to this person. The emperor and the 19 00:01:18,292 --> 00:01:20,173 Speaker 4: owners wanted to keep the money for themselves, And so 20 00:01:20,292 --> 00:01:23,213 Speaker 4: we're off inside the ninety day trials. We have to 21 00:01:23,253 --> 00:01:27,293 Speaker 4: worry about that, and we're close to parteline ourselves. Really 22 00:01:27,333 --> 00:01:32,053 Speaker 4: interesting to give you bes reasons for justifying your dismissal. 23 00:01:33,613 --> 00:01:38,973 Speaker 5: Well, I guess the first question would be what does 24 00:01:39,013 --> 00:01:45,853 Speaker 5: the contract say about payment of these incentives. I know 25 00:01:45,893 --> 00:01:49,253 Speaker 5: a lot of people talk about ninety day trial periods 26 00:01:49,333 --> 00:01:55,413 Speaker 5: being misused and exploiting employees, but I've certainly never come 27 00:01:55,453 --> 00:01:58,453 Speaker 5: across a company that wants to go through the time 28 00:01:58,493 --> 00:02:01,853 Speaker 5: and cost of employing people just to get rid of 29 00:02:01,933 --> 00:02:06,213 Speaker 5: them in those first ninety days. And unless there's a reason. 30 00:02:07,373 --> 00:02:11,773 Speaker 4: Well, can commissions an excess of a million dollars? 31 00:02:12,133 --> 00:02:15,373 Speaker 5: Yeah, well, I mean that sounds like a good reason. 32 00:02:15,893 --> 00:02:18,012 Speaker 4: And having to pay eighty percent of out the center 33 00:02:18,013 --> 00:02:21,452 Speaker 4: of the contract signed and then might not be any 34 00:02:21,532 --> 00:02:23,733 Speaker 4: profit in the business for a couple of years until 35 00:02:23,853 --> 00:02:25,972 Speaker 4: all the consents that have been lodged, I mean to prove, 36 00:02:26,013 --> 00:02:28,173 Speaker 4: so they could start from space in the ground. 37 00:02:30,453 --> 00:02:32,732 Speaker 5: So well, I guess the thing to keep in mind 38 00:02:32,813 --> 00:02:35,813 Speaker 5: time is that while the ninety day tribe here it 39 00:02:35,933 --> 00:02:40,213 Speaker 5: does prevent you from raising a personal grievance for unfair dismissal, 40 00:02:40,813 --> 00:02:43,813 Speaker 5: it doesn't prevent you from raising a claim for breach 41 00:02:43,853 --> 00:02:47,893 Speaker 5: of good faith or disadvantage, and those are things that 42 00:02:48,013 --> 00:02:52,213 Speaker 5: could potentially apply here. So if you think that you're 43 00:02:52,413 --> 00:02:57,852 Speaker 5: entitled to payment of a big incentive, big commission, you 44 00:02:57,933 --> 00:02:59,532 Speaker 5: know it might be something that you want to get 45 00:02:59,573 --> 00:03:02,213 Speaker 5: some legal advice on, so good luck. 46 00:03:02,252 --> 00:03:08,173 Speaker 4: Example, it's all if it's say the contract is signed 47 00:03:10,173 --> 00:03:12,813 Speaker 4: after I've been dismissed, I know it's going to sign, 48 00:03:13,173 --> 00:03:16,733 Speaker 4: but then signed the ninety days after being dismissed, can 49 00:03:16,773 --> 00:03:20,773 Speaker 4: I go them for lots of revenue commission? 50 00:03:21,853 --> 00:03:24,773 Speaker 5: Well, I think that might be difficult if the contract 51 00:03:24,893 --> 00:03:29,972 Speaker 5: is only signed after you've left, but potentially, if you've 52 00:03:30,013 --> 00:03:33,653 Speaker 5: got any evidence, you could potentially have a claim for 53 00:03:33,733 --> 00:03:37,133 Speaker 5: breuch of good faith. Anyway worth looking into. 54 00:03:37,373 --> 00:03:40,213 Speaker 2: Yeah, block Tom all the best, Tom, thanks for ringing through. 55 00:03:40,373 --> 00:03:41,853 Speaker 2: One hundred and eighty ten eight year is the number 56 00:03:41,853 --> 00:03:44,213 Speaker 2: to call just on the ninety day trials. I mean, 57 00:03:44,253 --> 00:03:47,653 Speaker 2: as you mentioned before, beneficial there for employers to take 58 00:03:47,733 --> 00:03:49,893 Speaker 2: on somebody and if it doesn't quite work out, then 59 00:03:50,013 --> 00:03:52,053 Speaker 2: there's the ability there to say, hey, sorry, it wasn't 60 00:03:52,093 --> 00:03:54,613 Speaker 2: a good partnership. But the idea, you know that the 61 00:03:54,693 --> 00:03:58,133 Speaker 2: people saying that it can be used to take advantage 62 00:03:58,173 --> 00:04:01,893 Speaker 2: of workers. At the same time, for employers. They're still 63 00:04:02,053 --> 00:04:04,773 Speaker 2: taking on quite a big investment, right, bringing on anybody 64 00:04:04,813 --> 00:04:07,973 Speaker 2: for ninety days, you're still paying them, you're training them up, 65 00:04:08,413 --> 00:04:10,653 Speaker 2: not too much tentsical reason. If they're a good worker 66 00:04:10,973 --> 00:04:12,133 Speaker 2: to DITCHM at that point. 67 00:04:12,453 --> 00:04:15,373 Speaker 5: That's that's a bang on the money, Tyler. I know 68 00:04:15,893 --> 00:04:20,333 Speaker 5: people talk about these ninety day trials being misused in practice. 69 00:04:20,373 --> 00:04:22,733 Speaker 5: I just don't see it. That's not to say that 70 00:04:22,853 --> 00:04:25,413 Speaker 5: it doesn't happen, but I definitely don't think it's as 71 00:04:25,493 --> 00:04:26,653 Speaker 5: common as people make out. 72 00:04:26,813 --> 00:04:29,013 Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, we've got to text here from Sharon. 73 00:04:29,053 --> 00:04:31,773 Speaker 3: Good afternoon. I have a question regarding the recent changes 74 00:04:31,813 --> 00:04:35,453 Speaker 3: to the Holiday Act, specifically how they affect shift workers. 75 00:04:35,733 --> 00:04:38,893 Speaker 3: I'm employed in a permanent, part time role for family reasons, 76 00:04:38,933 --> 00:04:42,493 Speaker 3: but every fortnight work closer to a full time contract. 77 00:04:43,173 --> 00:04:46,053 Speaker 3: The law changes mean that I can no longer accrue 78 00:04:46,133 --> 00:04:50,613 Speaker 3: holidays on days work only on my contracted hours, but 79 00:04:51,013 --> 00:04:53,733 Speaker 3: I'm going to get paid holiday leave based on the 80 00:04:53,813 --> 00:04:55,013 Speaker 3: previous twelve weeks. 81 00:04:55,573 --> 00:04:58,293 Speaker 5: This does seem can you can you hear me screaming 82 00:04:58,533 --> 00:05:00,453 Speaker 5: and running from the building The old. 83 00:05:00,333 --> 00:05:03,133 Speaker 6: Holiday legislationship strikes again. 84 00:05:04,453 --> 00:05:10,613 Speaker 3: No. I always impressed that you can understand what we're 85 00:05:10,653 --> 00:05:12,893 Speaker 3: reading out because I just ah, you know you've heard 86 00:05:12,933 --> 00:05:13,413 Speaker 3: it all before. 87 00:05:14,093 --> 00:05:17,053 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean it sounds to me that this person's 88 00:05:17,133 --> 00:05:20,333 Speaker 5: not happy with the law change. Unfortunately, there's nothing I 89 00:05:20,413 --> 00:05:25,973 Speaker 5: can do about that, but the Holidays Act, it's not 90 00:05:26,093 --> 00:05:28,733 Speaker 5: a great piece of legislation. Let's just leave it at that. 91 00:05:29,053 --> 00:05:30,173 Speaker 6: Yeah, good luck, Sharon. 92 00:05:30,253 --> 00:05:32,773 Speaker 2: Oh A one hundred eighty ten eighty is the number 93 00:05:32,813 --> 00:05:34,973 Speaker 2: to call if you've got a question for Gareth. Now 94 00:05:35,133 --> 00:05:38,853 Speaker 2: is your opportunity. Nineteen nineteen is the text number as well, And. 95 00:05:39,133 --> 00:05:41,093 Speaker 3: As usual, we've got a smoke in question next. 96 00:05:41,173 --> 00:05:42,053 Speaker 6: Oh, that's going to be good. 97 00:05:42,733 --> 00:05:45,173 Speaker 2: We are joined by Gareth at Denor. He's an employment 98 00:05:45,253 --> 00:05:49,293 Speaker 2: workplace information expert and director at ad Denor Employment Law 99 00:05:49,453 --> 00:05:52,133 Speaker 2: and he is here to answer any curly questions you've 100 00:05:52,173 --> 00:05:53,813 Speaker 2: got about your place of work. 101 00:05:53,853 --> 00:05:55,493 Speaker 6: Oh, one hundred and eighty ten eighty to number of cooll. 102 00:05:55,493 --> 00:05:57,653 Speaker 3: We'll go straight to the text from Chris. Hey, Gareth, 103 00:05:57,693 --> 00:06:00,173 Speaker 3: I'm an employer. Would you consider a staff member using 104 00:06:00,173 --> 00:06:02,093 Speaker 3: one hundred and four to six days since the start 105 00:06:02,173 --> 00:06:05,213 Speaker 3: of twenty twenty one excessive? Not all paid out, but 106 00:06:05,373 --> 00:06:07,493 Speaker 3: still days off all the same, Thank you? 107 00:06:09,173 --> 00:06:15,573 Speaker 5: Yes, I would A lot of sick days. That's what 108 00:06:15,773 --> 00:06:21,093 Speaker 5: we're twenty five a year roughly. If you think that 109 00:06:21,813 --> 00:06:26,773 Speaker 5: the standard amount that you get is ten, that's quite 110 00:06:26,773 --> 00:06:30,293 Speaker 5: a bit. I definitely think it's a red flag, and 111 00:06:30,333 --> 00:06:34,653 Speaker 5: I'd be looking into are there are there any medical 112 00:06:34,733 --> 00:06:39,413 Speaker 5: conditions that are affecting this employee? Are there other issues 113 00:06:39,573 --> 00:06:45,413 Speaker 5: that are impacting on their health? I'd definitely be looking 114 00:06:45,493 --> 00:06:48,773 Speaker 5: closer at it because that does not sound normal. 115 00:06:49,813 --> 00:06:52,973 Speaker 3: So what do you like if someone's having un reasonable 116 00:06:53,013 --> 00:06:53,973 Speaker 3: amounts of six days? 117 00:06:54,813 --> 00:06:54,853 Speaker 4: What? 118 00:06:55,133 --> 00:06:55,173 Speaker 5: What? 119 00:06:55,333 --> 00:06:57,973 Speaker 3: What excessive sick days? So what are you what's your 120 00:06:58,013 --> 00:06:58,933 Speaker 3: recourse at that point? 121 00:06:59,933 --> 00:07:02,813 Speaker 5: Well, you you start consulting with them in good faith, 122 00:07:03,533 --> 00:07:06,853 Speaker 5: raise it as an issue, and ask for more information. 123 00:07:08,413 --> 00:07:12,653 Speaker 5: Increasingly there are people when roles that medically are just 124 00:07:13,173 --> 00:07:15,733 Speaker 5: not able to perform the role that they've been employed 125 00:07:15,773 --> 00:07:19,333 Speaker 5: to do and the general rules. You consult with the 126 00:07:19,453 --> 00:07:24,173 Speaker 5: mask for more information, and ultimately it may be it 127 00:07:24,253 --> 00:07:26,093 Speaker 5: may be that the employment gets terminated. 128 00:07:26,733 --> 00:07:28,893 Speaker 3: Now I have to ask this next question because I 129 00:07:29,173 --> 00:07:32,533 Speaker 3: teased it before. I think we've had a very similar 130 00:07:32,573 --> 00:07:35,173 Speaker 3: one before, but I can't remember the answer. Do you 131 00:07:35,253 --> 00:07:36,493 Speaker 3: have any rights as a smoker? 132 00:07:38,293 --> 00:07:38,773 Speaker 6: There's more? 133 00:07:39,453 --> 00:07:42,493 Speaker 3: Here we go, Here we go. First, it was outside. 134 00:07:43,333 --> 00:07:45,573 Speaker 3: Now we are not allowed in front of the building. 135 00:07:46,333 --> 00:07:48,613 Speaker 3: Now my manager says, we aren't even allowed to smoke 136 00:07:48,693 --> 00:07:51,053 Speaker 3: down the road. Surely I can do what I like 137 00:07:51,173 --> 00:07:53,253 Speaker 3: on my break if I'm fifty meters from work. Do 138 00:07:53,373 --> 00:07:55,653 Speaker 3: they own me that much when I am on the clock. 139 00:07:57,213 --> 00:08:01,733 Speaker 5: Yeah, That's that's one where I'm not sure the smoker 140 00:08:01,813 --> 00:08:05,733 Speaker 5: is going to get too much sympathy from the colleagues. 141 00:08:05,853 --> 00:08:10,373 Speaker 5: And technically the work place needs to be smoke free 142 00:08:10,693 --> 00:08:13,973 Speaker 5: in all indoor areas. A lot of work places do 143 00:08:15,013 --> 00:08:20,613 Speaker 5: outlaw smoking in outdoor areas that are still considered the 144 00:08:20,653 --> 00:08:25,253 Speaker 5: workplace directly outside the building is often and no no 145 00:08:25,573 --> 00:08:31,053 Speaker 5: be five obvious reasons can reflect negatively on the business. 146 00:08:32,773 --> 00:08:36,773 Speaker 5: I guess down the street, yeah, I think the employer 147 00:08:36,813 --> 00:08:39,852 Speaker 5: is most probably pushing it there, as. 148 00:08:39,773 --> 00:08:40,133 Speaker 1: They are. 149 00:08:42,053 --> 00:08:43,252 Speaker 3: First they meet us from work. 150 00:08:43,612 --> 00:08:46,693 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think they're going to be struggling with that one. 151 00:08:46,732 --> 00:08:51,293 Speaker 3: I guess maybe if you're wearing a uniform of the work, you. 152 00:08:51,333 --> 00:08:55,653 Speaker 5: Know, and if you're wearing a uniform or something, yeap, 153 00:08:56,053 --> 00:08:57,013 Speaker 5: that could be an issue. 154 00:08:57,132 --> 00:08:58,852 Speaker 3: But I mean, am I not going to go to 155 00:08:58,852 --> 00:09:01,132 Speaker 3: a toy shop just because I've seen someone smoking. 156 00:09:00,933 --> 00:09:04,532 Speaker 6: That works to put me off. This is a good question. 157 00:09:04,693 --> 00:09:07,653 Speaker 2: Get a guys and Gareth, I've, according to HR after 158 00:09:07,732 --> 00:09:09,813 Speaker 2: a work party, we're a colleague, let loose on what 159 00:09:09,973 --> 00:09:12,573 Speaker 2: they were earning. I wasn't drinking, but took that information 160 00:09:12,693 --> 00:09:14,453 Speaker 2: to the boss as it was far more than I 161 00:09:14,573 --> 00:09:16,453 Speaker 2: get for a similar job and wanted them to match. 162 00:09:16,533 --> 00:09:19,573 Speaker 2: They've now claimed that I coerced that information unfairly out 163 00:09:19,573 --> 00:09:20,373 Speaker 2: of that worker. 164 00:09:20,492 --> 00:09:21,213 Speaker 3: What are my rights? 165 00:09:22,533 --> 00:09:25,732 Speaker 5: Well, I guess it sounds like it's going to come 166 00:09:25,773 --> 00:09:29,533 Speaker 5: down to your word against your colleagues work, and which 167 00:09:29,573 --> 00:09:33,213 Speaker 5: one's more believable. If you did coerce them, that's a 168 00:09:33,252 --> 00:09:37,492 Speaker 5: big problem. Of course, must probably not helpful if you'd 169 00:09:37,533 --> 00:09:43,333 Speaker 5: both been drinking. Yeah, yeah, I mean it used to be. 170 00:09:44,213 --> 00:09:48,253 Speaker 5: It used to be that you could prevent your employees 171 00:09:48,293 --> 00:09:53,652 Speaker 5: from disclosing their their wage details, their salary. Due to 172 00:09:53,732 --> 00:09:56,573 Speaker 5: a recent law change, you can't do that anymore. So 173 00:09:57,573 --> 00:10:00,133 Speaker 5: if they choose to share it, that's all good. 174 00:10:00,933 --> 00:10:05,093 Speaker 3: How do you coerce someone's salary out of them by them. 175 00:10:04,933 --> 00:10:05,932 Speaker 6: A few more beers? I don't know. 176 00:10:06,293 --> 00:10:09,093 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think that's coucion. 177 00:10:09,852 --> 00:10:14,213 Speaker 3: This one is certainly a sort of he says, She says, 178 00:10:14,372 --> 00:10:16,773 Speaker 3: She says, she says type situation as well. I'm being 179 00:10:17,213 --> 00:10:20,532 Speaker 3: accused of bullying by a workmate manager has talked to me, 180 00:10:21,293 --> 00:10:24,373 Speaker 3: I'm not bullying. It's a strategy. What is the best 181 00:10:24,413 --> 00:10:28,612 Speaker 3: way to argue prove that bullying acquizations are false and malicious? 182 00:10:29,012 --> 00:10:31,492 Speaker 3: It's just being assumed that the bullying is real with 183 00:10:31,612 --> 00:10:34,772 Speaker 3: no evidence, just to completely made up accusation. How do 184 00:10:34,892 --> 00:10:35,852 Speaker 3: I defend myself? 185 00:10:37,132 --> 00:10:40,653 Speaker 5: It's not an easy one, that's for sure. Where there 186 00:10:40,693 --> 00:10:44,213 Speaker 5: are bullying allegations, I would expect that there's a robust 187 00:10:44,372 --> 00:10:49,372 Speaker 5: investigation before any findings. Sometimes there isn't any evidence, and 188 00:10:49,492 --> 00:10:53,173 Speaker 5: it really is up to the investigator to decide credibility, 189 00:10:53,333 --> 00:10:56,732 Speaker 5: decide who they believe. But that should be done in 190 00:10:56,813 --> 00:11:01,213 Speaker 5: a robust way. So you can't just accept that someone's 191 00:11:01,252 --> 00:11:03,973 Speaker 5: being bullied based on their say. So that would not 192 00:11:04,132 --> 00:11:04,772 Speaker 5: be reasonable. 193 00:11:05,213 --> 00:11:08,052 Speaker 3: So it would be, you know, from his perspective or 194 00:11:08,132 --> 00:11:11,973 Speaker 3: her perspective, you say, show me the evidence. 195 00:11:12,252 --> 00:11:15,213 Speaker 5: Yeah, and say, well, where's the investigation? 196 00:11:15,973 --> 00:11:18,533 Speaker 3: Has anyone else seen this? Is there an email chain, 197 00:11:18,612 --> 00:11:20,813 Speaker 3: a text chain? Is they showing me the evidence for us? 198 00:11:20,892 --> 00:11:22,813 Speaker 3: It's just on saying I don't bully and you're saying 199 00:11:22,852 --> 00:11:24,053 Speaker 3: I do, yeah. 200 00:11:24,093 --> 00:11:28,413 Speaker 5: And these days, it's almost inevitable that when someone's being 201 00:11:28,492 --> 00:11:32,333 Speaker 5: performance managed or they are underperforming at work, as soon 202 00:11:32,413 --> 00:11:35,413 Speaker 5: as they come under the microscope they claim they being bullied. 203 00:11:36,653 --> 00:11:40,612 Speaker 5: It happens more often than not. So you know, some 204 00:11:40,732 --> 00:11:43,853 Speaker 5: people are getting bullied, but I wouldn't just be accepting 205 00:11:43,933 --> 00:11:44,973 Speaker 5: it on face value. 206 00:11:45,213 --> 00:11:49,372 Speaker 2: Yeah, this question has just come through. Hi, Gareth, I 207 00:11:49,773 --> 00:11:52,612 Speaker 2: am a contractor. I've contracted to the same not for 208 00:11:52,732 --> 00:11:55,772 Speaker 2: profit organization for three years and they are my only client. 209 00:11:55,852 --> 00:11:58,453 Speaker 2: Does this put me or the organization in a difficult 210 00:11:58,492 --> 00:12:01,573 Speaker 2: position if we continue to operate like this, or should 211 00:12:01,612 --> 00:12:04,333 Speaker 2: I become an employee? And if so, what are the 212 00:12:04,372 --> 00:12:06,132 Speaker 2: benefits for me and the organization? 213 00:12:07,372 --> 00:12:10,492 Speaker 5: Goodness me, there's a lot in that one. Well, I 214 00:12:10,533 --> 00:12:13,853 Speaker 5: guess the first one is there is a law change 215 00:12:13,973 --> 00:12:16,933 Speaker 5: that has been proposed by the government which is going 216 00:12:17,093 --> 00:12:20,533 Speaker 5: through the process now, which would if you meet all 217 00:12:20,612 --> 00:12:23,453 Speaker 5: of the factors, you would clearly be a contractor. It 218 00:12:23,492 --> 00:12:27,053 Speaker 5: doesn't matter how long you have contracted to an organization. 219 00:12:27,653 --> 00:12:30,292 Speaker 5: That's not law yet, but it is expected to be 220 00:12:30,732 --> 00:12:34,932 Speaker 5: pushed through sometime this year. Whether you should stay a 221 00:12:35,012 --> 00:12:39,172 Speaker 5: contract or an employee, that's a difficult question for me 222 00:12:39,333 --> 00:12:42,932 Speaker 5: to answer because they're pluses and minuses to both. Do 223 00:12:43,213 --> 00:12:46,213 Speaker 5: you want to be working for yourself? Do you want 224 00:12:46,213 --> 00:12:50,172 Speaker 5: to have the flexibility that you could potentially turn work away? 225 00:12:51,533 --> 00:12:54,652 Speaker 5: You know, as an employee, you don't have a lot 226 00:12:54,693 --> 00:12:58,412 Speaker 5: of those choices. But yes, if you have been contracting 227 00:12:58,453 --> 00:13:01,852 Speaker 5: to the same organization for three years, there is potentially 228 00:13:01,973 --> 00:13:07,813 Speaker 5: some risk that a court would consider that you're an employee. 229 00:13:08,372 --> 00:13:12,012 Speaker 5: The risk isn't really on you, though, it's more on 230 00:13:12,132 --> 00:13:14,132 Speaker 5: the organization that you're contracting to. 231 00:13:14,573 --> 00:13:16,612 Speaker 6: Yeah, very interesting, good luck to that texter. 232 00:13:16,773 --> 00:13:18,492 Speaker 3: A lot of text coming through on the bullying thing. 233 00:13:19,413 --> 00:13:22,652 Speaker 3: What is defined as bullying, But it's a complicated I 234 00:13:22,773 --> 00:13:25,293 Speaker 3: yelled at the staff member who was acting in an 235 00:13:25,413 --> 00:13:30,933 Speaker 3: unsafe man manner on site, and he is complaining of bullying. 236 00:13:31,693 --> 00:13:34,292 Speaker 3: So yelling because say, if it's in a situation I 237 00:13:34,372 --> 00:13:37,453 Speaker 3: guess where someone's let's imagine a situation. They're in a 238 00:13:37,693 --> 00:13:40,093 Speaker 3: dangerous position, they could hurt themselves, and you go, what 239 00:13:40,213 --> 00:13:43,372 Speaker 3: are you doing you'm up at Yeah, buddy, kill yourself 240 00:13:43,492 --> 00:13:45,333 Speaker 3: up there? I mean, is that bullying? 241 00:13:46,612 --> 00:13:50,973 Speaker 5: I'd say it's unlikely that that would be bullying. Generally, 242 00:13:51,653 --> 00:13:57,852 Speaker 5: bullying needs to be repeated unreasonable behavior. There are various 243 00:13:57,933 --> 00:14:01,252 Speaker 5: definitions for it, but yelling at a person once in 244 00:14:01,453 --> 00:14:08,693 Speaker 5: circumstances where there's a legitimate reason for it, I'd be 245 00:14:08,773 --> 00:14:11,772 Speaker 5: hard pushed to consider that bullying. 246 00:14:11,933 --> 00:14:15,453 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it's very easy to make a bullying accusation, 247 00:14:15,612 --> 00:14:17,973 Speaker 2: isn't it, And I imagine that can happen. So, as 248 00:14:17,973 --> 00:14:20,093 Speaker 2: you said before, that investigation to make sure is it 249 00:14:20,213 --> 00:14:23,133 Speaker 2: really bullying or do you just not get on It's 250 00:14:23,133 --> 00:14:24,533 Speaker 2: probably a critical point, right. 251 00:14:26,373 --> 00:14:28,373 Speaker 3: I mean, the idea of bullying has evenly changed over 252 00:14:28,413 --> 00:14:32,053 Speaker 3: the years. It certainly is in some people's eyes. Hi, 253 00:14:32,413 --> 00:14:34,813 Speaker 3: we have an employee that's been off sick. We always 254 00:14:34,813 --> 00:14:37,533 Speaker 3: get these ones for three months. We recently found out 255 00:14:37,573 --> 00:14:41,292 Speaker 3: that the last five doctors' notes were forded, so has 256 00:14:41,453 --> 00:14:46,173 Speaker 3: been dismissed. However, he still has many company items laptops, keys, 257 00:14:46,213 --> 00:14:48,733 Speaker 3: et cetera. Can we legally or not turn up at 258 00:14:48,733 --> 00:14:51,333 Speaker 3: his address and get the items back? Otherwise we have 259 00:14:51,413 --> 00:14:54,053 Speaker 3: to change all the keys and locks and passwords. 260 00:14:54,093 --> 00:14:59,293 Speaker 5: Thanks Gosha Man. That's kind of getting outside of employment 261 00:14:59,373 --> 00:15:04,213 Speaker 5: law into potentially a criminal law there. Vigility justice, I 262 00:15:04,253 --> 00:15:06,693 Speaker 5: think you should most probably ask for the things first 263 00:15:06,933 --> 00:15:11,053 Speaker 5: before you send the heavies round. But you know, if 264 00:15:11,053 --> 00:15:14,613 Speaker 5: it's if it's your property, you're entitled to try and 265 00:15:14,773 --> 00:15:19,093 Speaker 5: recover it. But yeah, I wouldn't be I wouldn't be 266 00:15:19,173 --> 00:15:20,693 Speaker 5: taking vigilante justice. 267 00:15:21,253 --> 00:15:21,813 Speaker 6: Good advice. 268 00:15:22,293 --> 00:15:25,493 Speaker 3: My employer wants to track my audio and screen at home? 269 00:15:25,653 --> 00:15:26,253 Speaker 3: Is that legal? 270 00:15:28,333 --> 00:15:31,893 Speaker 5: Track audio at home and screen at home? 271 00:15:32,573 --> 00:15:33,733 Speaker 3: That's oh, that's weird. 272 00:15:33,893 --> 00:15:36,213 Speaker 6: No, the screen is quite common, isn't it. But the audio? 273 00:15:36,693 --> 00:15:39,613 Speaker 5: Yeah, the screen is quite common because you know I 274 00:15:39,773 --> 00:15:40,573 Speaker 5: see it. 275 00:15:40,693 --> 00:15:42,053 Speaker 3: So working from home would be well. 276 00:15:42,413 --> 00:15:46,653 Speaker 5: Working from home, there are lots of these devices that 277 00:15:48,133 --> 00:15:50,933 Speaker 5: record whether you're actually using the keyboard, whether you're using 278 00:15:50,973 --> 00:15:54,933 Speaker 5: the mouse. Of course, they've invented things that wiggle your mouse, 279 00:15:55,293 --> 00:15:59,453 Speaker 5: whether whether you're working or not. I'd be very concerned 280 00:15:59,493 --> 00:16:04,812 Speaker 5: about recording audio. That's very rarely acceptable. 281 00:16:05,373 --> 00:16:07,213 Speaker 3: Yeah, so I read that completely wrong. 282 00:16:08,533 --> 00:16:08,653 Speaker 4: Night. 283 00:16:08,933 --> 00:16:11,813 Speaker 6: I don't know what's not a sound be hearing as well. Yeah, 284 00:16:11,853 --> 00:16:12,613 Speaker 6: there's more. 285 00:16:12,533 --> 00:16:14,533 Speaker 3: Sense to do it well in working hours. 286 00:16:14,613 --> 00:16:16,172 Speaker 6: But yeah, all right, lover it. 287 00:16:16,453 --> 00:16:20,853 Speaker 2: Gareth, thanks you for less creepy exactly, Gareth fantastic has 288 00:16:20,853 --> 00:16:22,813 Speaker 2: always Thank you very much for coming in studio, and 289 00:16:22,893 --> 00:16:24,093 Speaker 2: we'll catch you again in about. 290 00:16:23,853 --> 00:16:25,973 Speaker 5: A month's sign sounds good, thanks guys. 291 00:16:26,133 --> 00:16:29,373 Speaker 2: That is Gareth abdenor Employment, work Place and Information Experts. 292 00:16:29,773 --> 00:16:31,493 Speaker 2: You can go visit his website if you want to 293 00:16:31,533 --> 00:16:34,853 Speaker 2: get a hold of him. Abdenorlaw dot in Z's and 294 00:16:35,053 --> 00:16:36,373 Speaker 2: we I've got to read this out. The content of 295 00:16:36,453 --> 00:16:38,773 Speaker 2: the segment is general in nature and not legal advice. 296 00:16:38,853 --> 00:16:41,613 Speaker 2: Any information discussed is not intended to be a substitute 297 00:16:41,653 --> 00:16:45,213 Speaker 2: for obtaining specific professional advice and shouldn't be relied upon 298 00:16:45,453 --> 00:16:46,133 Speaker 2: as such. 299 00:16:46,813 --> 00:16:49,693 Speaker 1: For more from News Talks B listen live on air 300 00:16:49,933 --> 00:16:52,573 Speaker 1: or online, and keep our shows with you wherever you 301 00:16:52,693 --> 00:16:55,093 Speaker 1: go with our podcasts on Iartradio