1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,600 Speaker 1: But a concern on the coast. The Great District Council 2 00:00:02,680 --> 00:00:05,240 Speaker 1: wants assurances over a government promise and this was to 3 00:00:05,280 --> 00:00:08,959 Speaker 1: suspend any new significant natural areas. This is a major 4 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:11,799 Speaker 1: issue in country areas all over the country trouble as 5 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:13,840 Speaker 1: the legislations yet to pass. It was part of the 6 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:16,720 Speaker 1: government's one hundred day plans. So the potential cost of 7 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:19,720 Speaker 1: having to remap as the law currently stands, REMAP is 8 00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:21,880 Speaker 1: leading the West Coast rate pays a bit exposed. The 9 00:00:21,920 --> 00:00:24,799 Speaker 1: Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard is with us morning to 10 00:00:24,880 --> 00:00:28,120 Speaker 1: you wait, boke, can you offer them any reassurance? 11 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:33,040 Speaker 2: So it did write a letter to them on Friday 12 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:37,159 Speaker 2: and the other councils they're debating the Regional planment just 13 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:41,440 Speaker 2: basically emphasized that we are sticking to our commitment that 14 00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:46,120 Speaker 2: as you mentioned, the legislation around preventing the mapping of 15 00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:49,560 Speaker 2: new SNAs is progressing through the House, will be passed 16 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:52,280 Speaker 2: within the next couple of months. But that doesn't help 17 00:00:52,360 --> 00:00:55,800 Speaker 2: them with their regional policy statement, which is a local 18 00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:58,120 Speaker 2: thing where they've taken a whole bunch of stuff out 19 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:02,240 Speaker 2: of the old m People are the NPS and I 20 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:06,240 Speaker 2: just reemphasized that we are intending to make changes to 21 00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:09,080 Speaker 2: the NPS that we're going to be getting very shortly, 22 00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:12,920 Speaker 2: and you know, they've made the pragmatic decision, thankfully, to 23 00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 2: just press pause on that part until they've got clague. 24 00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:20,040 Speaker 2: You know, we've made those changes. They can see what 25 00:01:20,080 --> 00:01:21,199 Speaker 2: those changes are, so. 26 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:23,080 Speaker 1: Your reassurance is enough. In other words, I think they're 27 00:01:23,080 --> 00:01:25,319 Speaker 1: exercised about the fact the law hasn't changed. Therefore the 28 00:01:25,360 --> 00:01:27,280 Speaker 1: law is currently still the law. Therefore they have to 29 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:28,760 Speaker 1: adhere to the law. Is that the problem? 30 00:01:29,640 --> 00:01:32,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, pretty much, And unfortunately I can't go and change 31 00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:35,160 Speaker 2: the law environmentes as much as i'd. 32 00:01:34,959 --> 00:01:37,360 Speaker 1: Like to know, where is it at? Literally when you 33 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:39,200 Speaker 1: say a couple of months, we don't know or are 34 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:41,080 Speaker 1: we waiting for public submissions or where is it. 35 00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:44,399 Speaker 2: At the submissions of it? So that this is part 36 00:01:44,440 --> 00:01:48,560 Speaker 2: of what we call the RIM Bill one and it 37 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:50,720 Speaker 2: has done its first reading in the House. It's been 38 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:55,760 Speaker 2: a select committee. So it'll be coming back, I believe, 39 00:01:56,360 --> 00:02:01,600 Speaker 2: with a reasonable pretty close to it a month or 40 00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:03,880 Speaker 2: so for the second reading. Then we'll have the committee, 41 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:07,720 Speaker 2: the whole House and the third reading. So assuming everything 42 00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:10,920 Speaker 2: works normally, should be within a couple of months that 43 00:02:10,960 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 2: it has fully passed through the. 44 00:02:12,080 --> 00:02:14,000 Speaker 1: House because of course, for the coast, I mean, a 45 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:17,440 Speaker 1: massive suathes of their land could be snated, couldn't they, 46 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:19,320 Speaker 1: And they why they don't need that? 47 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:24,040 Speaker 2: No, And it's absolutely ridiculous. I mean very center of 48 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:27,400 Speaker 2: the coasters and the dock stayed anyway, for them to 49 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:29,799 Speaker 2: feel the knee or anyone to feel the knee that 50 00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 2: they've got to go and capture all these little spots 51 00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:36,560 Speaker 2: of trees on private landowner's property makes no sense. There's 52 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 2: already have a lot of significant biodiversity that's already protected 53 00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:44,160 Speaker 2: down there. It just makes no sense whatsoever to capture 54 00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:46,280 Speaker 2: this private owner own Does any of it. 55 00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:48,400 Speaker 1: Ever make sense from what the previous government we're looking 56 00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:50,520 Speaker 1: to do. All it seemed to do is create angst 57 00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:51,519 Speaker 1: in the rural community. 58 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:54,679 Speaker 2: Credit hell of angst. And when you look at it, 59 00:02:54,800 --> 00:02:59,040 Speaker 2: the amount of biodiversity that's locked you know, it's not 60 00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 2: locked up by laws and stuff, but farmers have voluntarily 61 00:03:02,639 --> 00:03:06,840 Speaker 2: put huge amounts of land into QB two covenants. I 62 00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:08,600 Speaker 2: think if you added the most get that they're like 63 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:13,359 Speaker 2: Fiftlands National Park in the country. That's massive to me 64 00:03:13,600 --> 00:03:16,480 Speaker 2: or you know, the sensible thing. You've got a clear 65 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:20,240 Speaker 2: desire from farmers out of there to protect what's on 66 00:03:20,280 --> 00:03:23,880 Speaker 2: their property, work with them, not impose rules on them. 67 00:03:23,919 --> 00:03:25,880 Speaker 1: Good stuff, all right, So the message has been sent 68 00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:28,720 Speaker 1: so the councils can head pause. Andrew Hogart and an 69 00:03:28,760 --> 00:03:30,520 Speaker 1: Associate Environment minister. 70 00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:33,360 Speaker 2: With us this morning. For more from The Mic Asking Breakfast, 71 00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:36,840 Speaker 2: listen live to news talks they'd be from six am weekdays, 72 00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:39,120 Speaker 2: or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio