WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #244 - June 19th 2024 - Jodie Bruning

0:00:09.133 --> 0:00:12.013
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news talks it B.

0:00:12.413 --> 0:00:16.173
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.813 --> 0:00:19.813
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.853 --> 0:00:24.933
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of this now the Leighton

0:00:25.053 --> 0:00:27.733
<v Speaker 1>Smith Podcast powered by news talks it B.

0:00:28.093 --> 0:00:31.333
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Podcasts two hundred and forty four. For June nineteen,

0:00:31.573 --> 0:00:36.413
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, sociologist J R. Brunning guests on podcast

0:00:36.493 --> 0:00:39.613
<v Speaker 2>two four fourth and for very good reason. She has

0:00:39.693 --> 0:00:44.213
<v Speaker 2>forced her way into public attention through research and producing

0:00:44.213 --> 0:00:48.293
<v Speaker 2>papers of relevance. Her latest production, and it is a production,

0:00:48.613 --> 0:00:52.013
<v Speaker 2>a ninety page effort, is on a most important issue,

0:00:52.693 --> 0:00:58.133
<v Speaker 2>digital IDs and cbdc's, the combination of which threaten results

0:00:58.173 --> 0:01:02.293
<v Speaker 2>we should be aware of, but patently we're not. Let

0:01:02.293 --> 0:01:06.253
<v Speaker 2>me quote. CBDCs have not been pushed into policy space

0:01:06.373 --> 0:01:09.933
<v Speaker 2>by the citizens of nations, but by the big global

0:01:10.053 --> 0:01:14.333
<v Speaker 2>central banks and the fintech industry. There is compelling evidence

0:01:14.493 --> 0:01:19.093
<v Speaker 2>that power and interoperability of the digital infrastructure will not

0:01:19.133 --> 0:01:23.213
<v Speaker 2>only enhance government control and surveillance, but that it presents

0:01:23.413 --> 0:01:28.693
<v Speaker 2>a real risk to civil, constitutional, and human rights. This

0:01:28.853 --> 0:01:33.133
<v Speaker 2>tech is scalable, and it's out of sight because of

0:01:33.173 --> 0:01:36.373
<v Speaker 2>the mixture of interests involved, from the Reserve Bank of

0:01:36.413 --> 0:01:40.613
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand to allied government agencies, to the fintech sector

0:01:40.893 --> 0:01:45.173
<v Speaker 2>and RB and z's Central Bank colleagues, the decision making

0:01:45.253 --> 0:01:47.933
<v Speaker 2>processes and authorities will be difficult to track and assess

0:01:48.373 --> 0:01:51.733
<v Speaker 2>should something go wrong. Now, may I suggest that you

0:01:51.893 --> 0:01:55.293
<v Speaker 2>listen to this interview from beginning to end and then

0:01:55.333 --> 0:01:57.853
<v Speaker 2>look up a couple of the papers that she has produced.

0:01:58.213 --> 0:02:01.813
<v Speaker 2>But more details on all of that very shortly, but

0:02:01.933 --> 0:02:04.453
<v Speaker 2>just a note on this week's podcast. It is shorter

0:02:04.533 --> 0:02:08.133
<v Speaker 2>than normal. We are covering the interview and then we

0:02:08.173 --> 0:02:11.733
<v Speaker 2>do a shortish mail room. The reason for it is

0:02:11.773 --> 0:02:13.413
<v Speaker 2>that there has been a bit of sickness in the

0:02:13.453 --> 0:02:16.773
<v Speaker 2>house over the last week and hopefully you won't be

0:02:17.333 --> 0:02:20.813
<v Speaker 2>exposed to much of it. Due to the ability to

0:02:21.253 --> 0:02:24.013
<v Speaker 2>edit things, it's been a full time job, let me

0:02:24.053 --> 0:02:27.693
<v Speaker 2>tell you. Doing the interview, I had my microphone closed

0:02:28.133 --> 0:02:31.253
<v Speaker 2>most of the time. However, I think that it all

0:02:31.253 --> 0:02:34.493
<v Speaker 2>come out right in the end. Jr. Running is very

0:02:34.573 --> 0:02:39.013
<v Speaker 2>very good. Now. I wanted to mention that because it's

0:02:39.053 --> 0:02:41.893
<v Speaker 2>been a case of spending more time in bed, particularly

0:02:41.933 --> 0:02:44.853
<v Speaker 2>in the morning, and the other morning I heard the

0:02:44.893 --> 0:02:47.693
<v Speaker 2>news I think it was at about six point thirty

0:02:48.173 --> 0:02:50.733
<v Speaker 2>or something. Usually i'd be up by then. There was

0:02:50.733 --> 0:02:55.293
<v Speaker 2>the story of Jasindra Dern and her latest well whatever

0:02:55.293 --> 0:02:57.853
<v Speaker 2>you want to call it, and I immediately started rolling

0:02:57.893 --> 0:03:00.613
<v Speaker 2>words around of my head about what I would say

0:03:00.613 --> 0:03:04.133
<v Speaker 2>about it, and then I thought, no, let it go.

0:03:04.453 --> 0:03:08.253
<v Speaker 2>It's gone now who cares? And then reality set in.

0:03:08.413 --> 0:03:13.613
<v Speaker 2>Of course, reality set in because it's fine to forgive,

0:03:14.413 --> 0:03:17.133
<v Speaker 2>but when people are not repentant, when people carry on

0:03:17.293 --> 0:03:20.493
<v Speaker 2>in the same manner of what as to what they

0:03:20.573 --> 0:03:25.333
<v Speaker 2>have in the past, then there's no forgiveness to be had.

0:03:25.893 --> 0:03:28.213
<v Speaker 2>And I think the best way to cover this is

0:03:28.253 --> 0:03:31.653
<v Speaker 2>to read a letter to you that came in that

0:03:31.733 --> 0:03:37.813
<v Speaker 2>same morning at five point thirty three from Liz just

0:03:37.933 --> 0:03:39.653
<v Speaker 2>when we thought it was safe to go back into

0:03:39.653 --> 0:03:43.533
<v Speaker 2>the water exclamation mark. The extrag below is from just

0:03:43.613 --> 0:03:47.333
<v Speaker 2>sindro Render's Facebook page. It details how she has started

0:03:47.373 --> 0:03:51.653
<v Speaker 2>an excite quote an exciting new initiative called Field. It's

0:03:51.693 --> 0:03:57.013
<v Speaker 2>all about humanizing leadership with empathy and kindness. She also

0:03:57.053 --> 0:04:02.093
<v Speaker 2>says she's focused on unity without using fear to divide people.

0:04:02.733 --> 0:04:06.093
<v Speaker 2>For those of us who lived through her tyranny, who

0:04:06.173 --> 0:04:09.173
<v Speaker 2>lost their jobs, had loved ones locked out of New

0:04:09.253 --> 0:04:13.533
<v Speaker 2>Zealand or die alone. Her lack of self awareness and

0:04:13.613 --> 0:04:18.373
<v Speaker 2>blatant stupidity astounds me. Liz goes on, this is another

0:04:18.453 --> 0:04:20.893
<v Speaker 2>of her attempts to remain relevant and to suck the

0:04:21.053 --> 0:04:26.053
<v Speaker 2>ill informed and bewildered into supporting her socialist idealist agenda.

0:04:27.093 --> 0:04:29.813
<v Speaker 2>She is not and never will be remembered as a

0:04:29.893 --> 0:04:33.533
<v Speaker 2>kind and empathetic leader. She was driven by her ego

0:04:33.613 --> 0:04:38.093
<v Speaker 2>and vanity projects, and she almost single handedly destroyed New Zealand.

0:04:38.493 --> 0:04:41.893
<v Speaker 2>I sincerely hope that field is not her way of

0:04:41.933 --> 0:04:45.613
<v Speaker 2>working her way back onto the global political stage. Her

0:04:45.653 --> 0:04:49.573
<v Speaker 2>influence is dangerous, and the potential outcome of that influence

0:04:49.733 --> 0:04:53.093
<v Speaker 2>on the ill informed and those who are not aware

0:04:53.133 --> 0:04:56.453
<v Speaker 2>of what she did to our society would be devastating.

0:04:57.733 --> 0:05:02.413
<v Speaker 2>Extract below largely waffle with no substance, no change there

0:05:02.493 --> 0:05:05.773
<v Speaker 2>best wishes Liz. Now. Anybody who doesn't understand that's most

0:05:05.813 --> 0:05:09.613
<v Speaker 2>who doesn't understand what the word progressive actually means in

0:05:09.693 --> 0:05:14.533
<v Speaker 2>political terms, is at a loss to describe what her

0:05:14.533 --> 0:05:20.453
<v Speaker 2>politics are. Is very simple. Progressive progressivism is the road

0:05:20.893 --> 0:05:25.133
<v Speaker 2>to Marxism, to communism. If you like, I'm not making

0:05:25.173 --> 0:05:28.493
<v Speaker 2>it up. There's plenty of reference to it, but that's

0:05:28.533 --> 0:05:30.733
<v Speaker 2>the way that it is. And I think that what's

0:05:30.773 --> 0:05:33.693
<v Speaker 2>going on, what has been going on since her flight

0:05:33.813 --> 0:05:37.853
<v Speaker 2>from office, indicates that that is much the case, and

0:05:37.973 --> 0:05:49.213
<v Speaker 2>in just a moment, Jody Brunning. There are essential fat

0:05:49.293 --> 0:05:51.813
<v Speaker 2>nutrients that we need in our diet as the body

0:05:51.853 --> 0:05:55.293
<v Speaker 2>can't manufacture them. These are Omega three and Amiga six

0:05:55.333 --> 0:05:59.173
<v Speaker 2>fatty acids. Equism is a combination of fish oil and

0:05:59.293 --> 0:06:03.373
<v Speaker 2>virgin evening primrose oil, a formula that provides an excellent

0:06:03.493 --> 0:06:06.333
<v Speaker 2>source of Amiga three and Amiga six fatty acids in

0:06:06.413 --> 0:06:10.453
<v Speaker 2>their naturally existing ratios. The Omega six from evening primrose

0:06:10.493 --> 0:06:13.853
<v Speaker 2>oil assists the Omega three fish oil to be more effective.

0:06:14.133 --> 0:06:17.333
<v Speaker 2>Equisine is a high quality fish oil supplement enriched with

0:06:17.493 --> 0:06:21.693
<v Speaker 2>evening primrose oil that works synergistically for comprehensive health support.

0:06:22.053 --> 0:06:26.293
<v Speaker 2>Source from the deep sea sardines Anchovisa magril provide essential

0:06:26.373 --> 0:06:30.093
<v Speaker 2>Amega three fatty acids in their purest form without any

0:06:30.213 --> 0:06:33.533
<v Speaker 2>internal organs or toxins. Every batch is tested for its

0:06:33.573 --> 0:06:37.253
<v Speaker 2>purity before it's allowed to be sold. Equisine supports cells

0:06:37.293 --> 0:06:40.613
<v Speaker 2>to be flexible, so important to support healthy blood flow

0:06:41.093 --> 0:06:45.773
<v Speaker 2>and overall cardiovascular health. Equisine can support mood, balance and

0:06:45.893 --> 0:06:48.933
<v Speaker 2>mental clarity and focus in children, all the way to

0:06:49.053 --> 0:06:52.613
<v Speaker 2>supporting stiff joints, mental focus, brain health and healthy eyes

0:06:52.893 --> 0:06:55.693
<v Speaker 2>as we get older. Equisine is a premium high grade

0:06:55.693 --> 0:06:59.333
<v Speaker 2>fish and evening primrose oil to be taken in addition

0:06:59.413 --> 0:07:02.853
<v Speaker 2>to a healthy diet and is only available from pharmacies

0:07:02.933 --> 0:07:06.253
<v Speaker 2>and health stores. Always read the label and users directed

0:07:06.613 --> 0:07:15.213
<v Speaker 2>and if symptoms persist. Seainguid healthcare professional farmer Broker Auckland

0:07:19.973 --> 0:07:25.933
<v Speaker 2>Leighton Smith j R. Brunning is a consultant sociologist. Her

0:07:25.933 --> 0:07:30.053
<v Speaker 2>work explores governance, cultures, policy and the production of scientific

0:07:30.133 --> 0:07:34.333
<v Speaker 2>and technical knowledge. Brunning is a trustee of the Physicians

0:07:34.373 --> 0:07:38.653
<v Speaker 2>and Scientists for Global Responsibility New Zealand or. The address

0:07:38.733 --> 0:07:40.733
<v Speaker 2>is PSGR dot org dot enz.

0:07:41.173 --> 0:07:41.293
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:07:41.293 --> 0:07:44.373
<v Speaker 2>If that sounds dull and boring, let me alert you

0:07:45.053 --> 0:07:48.493
<v Speaker 2>is not. Her most recent work involves digital ideas and

0:07:48.653 --> 0:07:52.693
<v Speaker 2>central bank digital currencies, about which there is growing public concern,

0:07:52.853 --> 0:07:57.613
<v Speaker 2>both individually but especially when coupled together. Now, if you're

0:07:57.733 --> 0:08:01.693
<v Speaker 2>trying to imagine why, think of the World Economic Forum

0:08:01.733 --> 0:08:05.853
<v Speaker 2>at the Reserve Bank of New Zealand as bedmates. Running's

0:08:05.893 --> 0:08:10.133
<v Speaker 2>major contribution is a ninety page paper stepping back from

0:08:10.173 --> 0:08:14.813
<v Speaker 2>the brink the programmable ledger, which I was term as challenging,

0:08:15.173 --> 0:08:18.693
<v Speaker 2>but there is a safety net. A nine page that

0:08:18.933 --> 0:08:21.853
<v Speaker 2>is one tenth size of the Monster report. A nine

0:08:21.893 --> 0:08:25.053
<v Speaker 2>page reduced version which is much easier for most of

0:08:25.093 --> 0:08:29.253
<v Speaker 2>us to grasp, is available. Details to follow shortly. Jr.

0:08:29.493 --> 0:08:32.533
<v Speaker 2>Jody Brunning, it's great to have you on the Latensmith podcast,

0:08:32.573 --> 0:08:33.173
<v Speaker 2>and I thank you.

0:08:33.573 --> 0:08:35.893
<v Speaker 3>Look, it's great to be here with you. Lton, thank

0:08:35.893 --> 0:08:36.933
<v Speaker 3>you for inviting me on.

0:08:37.253 --> 0:08:39.573
<v Speaker 2>You start by saying, this is on the ninth pager.

0:08:39.813 --> 0:08:43.853
<v Speaker 2>Don't be misled. Judging the risk from central bank digital

0:08:43.893 --> 0:08:48.013
<v Speaker 2>currencies in isolation is a rookie mistake. Did you know

0:08:48.053 --> 0:08:49.573
<v Speaker 2>it was going to be so long when you started?

0:08:50.053 --> 0:08:53.653
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely not that. And you're talking about a recent article

0:08:53.693 --> 0:08:56.973
<v Speaker 3>in the Daily Telegraph, so people just have to can

0:08:57.053 --> 0:09:00.453
<v Speaker 3>quickly search for that. Yeah. No, I didn't know it

0:09:00.493 --> 0:09:03.773
<v Speaker 3>would be that long. And this is because, as you

0:09:03.973 --> 0:09:08.893
<v Speaker 3>learn something about a very complex subject, was a very

0:09:08.933 --> 0:09:13.333
<v Speaker 3>open ended bit that needs to be addressed Otherwise people

0:09:13.413 --> 0:09:17.013
<v Speaker 3>are left questioning. I guess, so we had to sort

0:09:17.013 --> 0:09:20.573
<v Speaker 3>of keep talking about this issue and fleshing out those

0:09:20.733 --> 0:09:21.333
<v Speaker 3>those gaps.

0:09:21.373 --> 0:09:26.173
<v Speaker 2>I guess It's interesting you say that, because I probably

0:09:26.333 --> 0:09:28.693
<v Speaker 2>three years ago, no more than that'd be four years

0:09:28.693 --> 0:09:32.253
<v Speaker 2>ago now. I interviewed a professor from the Melbourne Institute

0:09:32.533 --> 0:09:35.733
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne Tech. He and two others had had written a

0:09:35.733 --> 0:09:40.053
<v Speaker 2>book that was on digitization and it was going to

0:09:40.053 --> 0:09:45.573
<v Speaker 2>be the release of freedom amongst the community in the world,

0:09:46.013 --> 0:09:49.173
<v Speaker 2>and got I got quite a bit of hefty feedback

0:09:49.293 --> 0:09:53.573
<v Speaker 2>on it, saying that this is a con they're not

0:09:53.733 --> 0:09:57.413
<v Speaker 2>they're not working on something to This was the suggestion,

0:09:57.533 --> 0:09:59.533
<v Speaker 2>they're not working on something to give us freedom, They're

0:09:59.573 --> 0:10:01.933
<v Speaker 2>working on something who's going to do exactly the opposite.

0:10:02.413 --> 0:10:05.293
<v Speaker 2>And I could see the point of the people who

0:10:05.293 --> 0:10:09.253
<v Speaker 2>were saying that, do you run into any of that, Well,

0:10:09.293 --> 0:10:11.853
<v Speaker 2>I guess we shouldn't be surprised.

0:10:11.973 --> 0:10:15.813
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's a very very ancient sort of things,

0:10:16.053 --> 0:10:20.573
<v Speaker 3>looking at power and aggregating power, and powerful people usually,

0:10:20.813 --> 0:10:23.533
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're not usually happy with one super yosh

0:10:23.573 --> 0:10:26.573
<v Speaker 3>or whatever. They normally like three or four, and so

0:10:27.373 --> 0:10:31.733
<v Speaker 3>I think it's pretty natural for powerful interests to want

0:10:31.733 --> 0:10:35.933
<v Speaker 3>to consolidate their interest and sort of the game of monopoly,

0:10:36.453 --> 0:10:41.533
<v Speaker 3>you know, is an ancient sort of concept, and we're

0:10:41.613 --> 0:10:44.813
<v Speaker 3>used to sort of the oligopolies or the oligarchs in

0:10:45.133 --> 0:10:49.453
<v Speaker 3>you know, old societies ruling and so it's not a

0:10:49.613 --> 0:10:52.253
<v Speaker 3>it's a very human thing to concentrate power.

0:10:52.333 --> 0:10:55.013
<v Speaker 2>And but we've never seen anything like it before like

0:10:55.093 --> 0:10:57.053
<v Speaker 2>what we're experiencing now where we're headed.

0:10:58.013 --> 0:11:00.493
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and so this is just just to let people

0:11:01.133 --> 0:11:05.413
<v Speaker 3>to help people understand. My undergraduates of BBS and I

0:11:05.493 --> 0:11:08.573
<v Speaker 3>have masters in sociology, and what I've been looking at

0:11:08.573 --> 0:11:12.613
<v Speaker 3>for the last decade or so is technology and science

0:11:12.733 --> 0:11:16.533
<v Speaker 3>and how we regulate technology and science, be it a

0:11:16.573 --> 0:11:21.293
<v Speaker 3>commercial formulation, a pesticide and nanotech. And now we're looking

0:11:21.333 --> 0:11:24.493
<v Speaker 3>at the silicon, we're looking at digital technologies. And so

0:11:24.573 --> 0:11:27.933
<v Speaker 3>the difference that we have now and this is why

0:11:27.973 --> 0:11:30.733
<v Speaker 3>I think PSDR we're happy to take this paper on

0:11:31.453 --> 0:11:36.133
<v Speaker 3>is its scalability potential, so we can use tech for

0:11:36.213 --> 0:11:41.013
<v Speaker 3>good to help us in our everyday lives. But the

0:11:41.173 --> 0:11:45.373
<v Speaker 3>trick is powerful interests. Also we'll see that that technology

0:11:45.413 --> 0:11:49.333
<v Speaker 3>is is very able to be scaled up and we

0:11:49.373 --> 0:11:51.933
<v Speaker 3>can get into how it can be scaled up for

0:11:52.213 --> 0:11:56.173
<v Speaker 3>their own interests. So it's the scalability potential. And we

0:11:56.413 --> 0:12:01.253
<v Speaker 3>put this together with the programmability of the digital currencies

0:12:01.253 --> 0:12:04.053
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to be talking about, and that changes

0:12:04.213 --> 0:12:04.693
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:12:05.773 --> 0:12:08.693
<v Speaker 2>What's an alternative word for scale up or scale.

0:12:10.493 --> 0:12:14.613
<v Speaker 3>Well, sort of increase exponentially.

0:12:14.653 --> 0:12:18.093
<v Speaker 2>I guess I was thinking of those who can't quite

0:12:18.093 --> 0:12:19.213
<v Speaker 2>place the meaning.

0:12:19.693 --> 0:12:22.093
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's the the idea of going from the horse

0:12:22.093 --> 0:12:24.773
<v Speaker 3>and cart to the car. How could we, you know,

0:12:25.013 --> 0:12:28.853
<v Speaker 3>consider what would be the outcome of that? What? How

0:12:28.893 --> 0:12:30.773
<v Speaker 3>did we have to change all the rules on the

0:12:31.253 --> 0:12:33.893
<v Speaker 3>on the road to ensure that people weren't, you know,

0:12:34.133 --> 0:12:37.293
<v Speaker 3>rolling the car at every fast corner. So it's, you know,

0:12:37.373 --> 0:12:40.293
<v Speaker 3>scaling things up creates all these you know, it's the

0:12:40.373 --> 0:12:43.453
<v Speaker 3>no known, it's the unknowns, unown unknowns, it's you know,

0:12:43.533 --> 0:12:47.213
<v Speaker 3>it's it's we just cannot And this is why it's

0:12:47.213 --> 0:12:50.173
<v Speaker 3>a very much a governance issue, and y p SR

0:12:50.253 --> 0:12:53.253
<v Speaker 3>are hoping that, you know, people from the school of governors,

0:12:54.813 --> 0:12:59.533
<v Speaker 3>legal experts in public law, constitutional and administrative law, will

0:12:59.573 --> 0:13:02.693
<v Speaker 3>become interested in this. It's it's a very big issue

0:13:02.773 --> 0:13:04.333
<v Speaker 3>because of the scalable potential.

0:13:04.453 --> 0:13:07.733
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you a blunt question at this point,

0:13:08.453 --> 0:13:12.733
<v Speaker 2>which I might have left till later. Considering those organizations

0:13:13.013 --> 0:13:16.053
<v Speaker 2>in the world who are backing this and promoting it,

0:13:16.333 --> 0:13:19.933
<v Speaker 2>and some of them dishonestly, Is there any real way

0:13:20.213 --> 0:13:24.813
<v Speaker 2>that little Old New Zealand can control its own future

0:13:25.293 --> 0:13:29.533
<v Speaker 2>by escaping what might be coming down the track?

0:13:30.173 --> 0:13:34.613
<v Speaker 3>Well, if we're simply talking about central bank digital currencies CBDCs,

0:13:34.813 --> 0:13:38.893
<v Speaker 3>we can very easily step away from that. And of

0:13:38.933 --> 0:13:43.573
<v Speaker 3>course the issue here is around the public waking up

0:13:43.653 --> 0:13:47.853
<v Speaker 3>and being courageous enough to share information that looks critically

0:13:48.373 --> 0:13:51.813
<v Speaker 3>at how these technologies can be scaled up. And I

0:13:51.853 --> 0:13:56.813
<v Speaker 3>think we're seeing some examples of countries pausing or moving away.

0:13:57.573 --> 0:14:01.613
<v Speaker 3>And it's very clear that all internationally. When you see,

0:14:01.653 --> 0:14:06.853
<v Speaker 3>for example, the CBDC, you know, the Reserve Bank of

0:14:06.893 --> 0:14:09.493
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand, take go and have a look on CBDC

0:14:11.173 --> 0:14:13.653
<v Speaker 3>website and it will show you how many countries are involved.

0:14:13.653 --> 0:14:17.733
<v Speaker 3>And of course the cbd website is controlled and overseen

0:14:17.773 --> 0:14:21.253
<v Speaker 3>by the Boston Consulting Group, so we see that all

0:14:21.293 --> 0:14:26.853
<v Speaker 3>the main Wow Aunt, CBDC is awesome. All those and

0:14:26.893 --> 0:14:30.173
<v Speaker 3>this is where PSR are talking. All those sort of

0:14:30.173 --> 0:14:33.893
<v Speaker 3>policy papers, those white papers have all been produced by

0:14:33.653 --> 0:14:38.053
<v Speaker 3>the organizations with the financial and dare I say political

0:14:38.213 --> 0:14:43.053
<v Speaker 3>conflicts of interest. So because most of the and we

0:14:43.093 --> 0:14:47.053
<v Speaker 3>can call that propaganda as well that has been produced

0:14:47.653 --> 0:14:50.413
<v Speaker 3>that they hope that will be adopted about by our

0:14:50.453 --> 0:14:54.293
<v Speaker 3>governments and then pushed through really quickly, is by these

0:14:54.893 --> 0:14:59.733
<v Speaker 3>organizations with the conflicts of interest. The people of New Zealand,

0:15:00.293 --> 0:15:03.053
<v Speaker 3>you know, they can say we don't actually want to

0:15:03.093 --> 0:15:05.613
<v Speaker 3>do this anymore. It is possible.

0:15:06.253 --> 0:15:10.413
<v Speaker 2>Can I offer my opinion that it's possible. But it's

0:15:10.453 --> 0:15:12.653
<v Speaker 2>only possible if there is a is a if there

0:15:12.733 --> 0:15:16.093
<v Speaker 2>is a very large ground swell. And at this point

0:15:16.173 --> 0:15:17.853
<v Speaker 2>of time I struggle to see that.

0:15:18.533 --> 0:15:22.653
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's because I mean what we have now Unfortunately,

0:15:22.773 --> 0:15:25.253
<v Speaker 3>you know, in April there was an RB and Z

0:15:25.493 --> 0:15:29.053
<v Speaker 3>you know Digital Cash in New Zealand puff piece and

0:15:29.093 --> 0:15:33.133
<v Speaker 3>what we see is a very obsequious legacy media that

0:15:33.333 --> 0:15:36.973
<v Speaker 3>will not critically analyze this. And one of the big,

0:15:37.293 --> 0:15:40.173
<v Speaker 3>the big takeaways that we want people to understand from

0:15:40.213 --> 0:15:43.693
<v Speaker 3>our paper is that there is not a single academic

0:15:43.813 --> 0:15:48.373
<v Speaker 3>expert or an expert that is lacking you know, the

0:15:48.413 --> 0:15:51.053
<v Speaker 3>financial conflicts of interest, the complex of interests having worked

0:15:51.053 --> 0:15:54.453
<v Speaker 3>with a management consultancy firm or you know, a big

0:15:54.453 --> 0:15:57.053
<v Speaker 3>global bank. There is not a single expert in New

0:15:57.133 --> 0:16:03.053
<v Speaker 3>Zealand talking about cpdc's critically and the potential for these

0:16:03.093 --> 0:16:07.653
<v Speaker 3>technologies and the risk of what might happen should there

0:16:07.693 --> 0:16:11.453
<v Speaker 3>be what's called unified ledger in time. So there's a

0:16:11.653 --> 0:16:14.493
<v Speaker 3>there's a policy creep that can happen that can further,

0:16:16.173 --> 0:16:18.973
<v Speaker 3>you know, push policy into the arms of the big

0:16:19.173 --> 0:16:22.733
<v Speaker 3>big banks. So this is the this is the and

0:16:22.733 --> 0:16:26.613
<v Speaker 3>this is what I've observed in my work looking at

0:16:26.813 --> 0:16:31.693
<v Speaker 3>policy and regulation and new technologies is the information supporting

0:16:31.773 --> 0:16:35.893
<v Speaker 3>the safety and efficacy of these technologies is produced by

0:16:35.973 --> 0:16:40.053
<v Speaker 3>the very institutions with the conflicts of interest and and

0:16:40.213 --> 0:16:42.493
<v Speaker 3>part of that real problem later and this is what

0:16:42.693 --> 0:16:46.453
<v Speaker 3>my masters looked at, is the difficulty scientists and researchers

0:16:46.533 --> 0:16:53.653
<v Speaker 3>have in accessing funding to research issues that is contrary

0:16:53.813 --> 0:16:58.813
<v Speaker 3>or that might contradict the position of the government of

0:16:58.893 --> 0:17:02.493
<v Speaker 3>the day. And so it's very difficult for any scientist

0:17:02.613 --> 0:17:05.573
<v Speaker 3>or researcher to get long term funding that is not

0:17:05.733 --> 0:17:12.453
<v Speaker 3>aligned with the interests of the ministry that is responsible

0:17:12.453 --> 0:17:16.253
<v Speaker 3>for funding science. That's the Ministry for Business and Innovation

0:17:16.853 --> 0:17:21.253
<v Speaker 3>and Employment. So mb is responsible for funding science. And

0:17:22.373 --> 0:17:26.133
<v Speaker 3>that is a really big problem. So that scientists are

0:17:26.213 --> 0:17:28.973
<v Speaker 3>cought and researchers are caught by the short and curlyes

0:17:29.293 --> 0:17:34.133
<v Speaker 3>because they're financial because their funding is so precarious today, does.

0:17:33.933 --> 0:17:36.813
<v Speaker 2>It make it worse that we are driving through an

0:17:36.853 --> 0:17:40.293
<v Speaker 2>economic period that has put us in a very very

0:17:40.493 --> 0:17:41.413
<v Speaker 2>difficult position.

0:17:42.013 --> 0:17:46.013
<v Speaker 3>Well, well, I mean you have this sort of combined forces.

0:17:46.053 --> 0:17:49.173
<v Speaker 3>You've got the lack of the freedom, of lack of

0:17:49.213 --> 0:17:53.613
<v Speaker 3>academic freedom in New Zealand. You've got the obsequious sort

0:17:53.613 --> 0:17:57.093
<v Speaker 3>of legacy media that doesn't have the resources or the

0:17:57.213 --> 0:18:01.893
<v Speaker 3>somehow the inclination for long form critical journalism. So we've got,

0:18:02.333 --> 0:18:04.733
<v Speaker 3>you know, and they're meant to be the fullest stay.

0:18:05.773 --> 0:18:07.773
<v Speaker 3>Then if you think that, if you think about the

0:18:07.773 --> 0:18:12.453
<v Speaker 3>scientists researchers that can't independently research, who do judges go

0:18:12.573 --> 0:18:17.133
<v Speaker 3>to when there's a decision to be made or when

0:18:17.173 --> 0:18:20.653
<v Speaker 3>people are calling for advice. So we see that the

0:18:20.773 --> 0:18:24.773
<v Speaker 3>judiciary are always going to be a little bit captured

0:18:24.813 --> 0:18:30.333
<v Speaker 3>by the executive, by the ministries and the agencies because

0:18:30.373 --> 0:18:35.693
<v Speaker 3>they're producing the information inverted commas, evidence, the policy papers,

0:18:35.693 --> 0:18:39.173
<v Speaker 3>the risk assessments. Then you add to the fact that

0:18:39.213 --> 0:18:46.773
<v Speaker 3>there's an economic downturn, and the economic downturn provides if

0:18:46.853 --> 0:18:49.933
<v Speaker 3>we lack sort of that information about how we make

0:18:50.053 --> 0:18:54.653
<v Speaker 3>cash or the potential about of fiscal policy and the

0:18:54.693 --> 0:18:58.093
<v Speaker 3>appropriations process. If we just only default and think that

0:18:58.133 --> 0:19:00.653
<v Speaker 3>we need a UBI and that can only be made

0:19:00.733 --> 0:19:05.093
<v Speaker 3>through the retail the seed, you know, sorry, the central bank,

0:19:05.133 --> 0:19:07.813
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank of New Zealand having the power to

0:19:08.973 --> 0:19:13.093
<v Speaker 3>retail currencies. People think that's the only way we can

0:19:13.133 --> 0:19:17.693
<v Speaker 3>actually solve financial problems. And we're in deep doo dooos,

0:19:18.053 --> 0:19:22.333
<v Speaker 3>you know, So that the economic downturn is an antecedent

0:19:22.493 --> 0:19:26.893
<v Speaker 3>I think, excuse my pronunciation, it's sort of alongside these

0:19:26.933 --> 0:19:29.213
<v Speaker 3>other problems, but it's not the biggest problem, you know.

0:19:29.773 --> 0:19:32.613
<v Speaker 3>And one of the interesting things I think is that

0:19:33.533 --> 0:19:35.253
<v Speaker 3>we need to understand that the Reserve Bank of New

0:19:35.333 --> 0:19:39.173
<v Speaker 3>Zealand has gone through, as Christian Hawksby stayed in twenty

0:19:39.213 --> 0:19:42.893
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, the most significant changes since the Reserve Bank

0:19:42.933 --> 0:19:47.213
<v Speaker 3>of New Zealand reforms of the nineteen eighties. In twenty

0:19:47.333 --> 0:19:50.253
<v Speaker 3>twenty four at the he said to the Financial and

0:19:50.493 --> 0:19:53.933
<v Speaker 3>Expenditure Committee, you know, they're going through this massive process

0:19:53.973 --> 0:20:00.773
<v Speaker 3>of transformation and modernization. So the Reserve Bank has, interestingly,

0:20:01.453 --> 0:20:05.933
<v Speaker 3>during the depths of COVID, when we have been really

0:20:05.973 --> 0:20:09.373
<v Speaker 3>distracted with COVID, we've been very distracted. The people that

0:20:09.453 --> 0:20:15.653
<v Speaker 3>are interested in politics or interested in justice and sort

0:20:15.693 --> 0:20:19.653
<v Speaker 3>of civil constitutional human rights have been busy looking at

0:20:19.813 --> 0:20:26.333
<v Speaker 3>what has been happening in terms of COVID legislation. Several acts,

0:20:26.893 --> 0:20:30.813
<v Speaker 3>several bills have been passed that have been part of

0:20:30.853 --> 0:20:35.973
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank of New Zealand's transformation process. You know,

0:20:36.213 --> 0:20:40.413
<v Speaker 3>one of the bills had the Monetary Policy Amendment Act

0:20:40.453 --> 0:20:44.613
<v Speaker 3>had only fourteen submissions. The Financial Market Infrastructures Act in

0:20:45.213 --> 0:20:49.213
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one had nine submissions to it, The Reserve

0:20:49.253 --> 0:20:52.053
<v Speaker 3>Bank of New Zealand Act thirty one submissions, the Deposit

0:20:52.133 --> 0:20:57.253
<v Speaker 3>Takers Act twenty forty three submissions. So the Reserve Bank

0:20:57.253 --> 0:21:01.253
<v Speaker 3>of New Zealand has gone through the most significant transformation

0:21:01.413 --> 0:21:05.053
<v Speaker 3>process through all this new legislation, and you look at

0:21:05.613 --> 0:21:08.613
<v Speaker 3>how few people have sort of known about it, ormitted

0:21:08.653 --> 0:21:12.053
<v Speaker 3>to it. And so we look, we again turned to

0:21:12.133 --> 0:21:15.813
<v Speaker 3>the conventional legacy media that there's only been sort of

0:21:15.813 --> 0:21:18.773
<v Speaker 3>reporting of this is what the Reserve Bank's you know,

0:21:18.973 --> 0:21:22.813
<v Speaker 3>doing in a happy, little puffy, puffy pand you know,

0:21:22.973 --> 0:21:28.093
<v Speaker 3>there's there's nothing critical critically looking at all this legislation

0:21:28.333 --> 0:21:31.733
<v Speaker 3>and picking it apart. So, you know, Michael Riddell has

0:21:31.813 --> 0:21:34.333
<v Speaker 3>been on poaking. Cassandra been doing quite a bit of

0:21:34.373 --> 0:21:39.333
<v Speaker 3>work criticizing the RB and Z, but it's we've had

0:21:39.333 --> 0:21:43.773
<v Speaker 3>such an amazing time and it's really surprising that that

0:21:43.853 --> 0:21:46.013
<v Speaker 3>in particular has occurred over COVID.

0:21:47.013 --> 0:21:50.453
<v Speaker 2>The Reserve Bank management reminds me very much of the

0:21:51.733 --> 0:21:55.293
<v Speaker 2>military governance in the United States at the moment. And

0:21:55.333 --> 0:21:57.773
<v Speaker 2>if you don't know what I mean, they have They

0:21:57.813 --> 0:22:03.573
<v Speaker 2>have launched themselves into different directions, both of them different directions,

0:22:03.573 --> 0:22:08.053
<v Speaker 2>but both of them woke and woke to an ultimate degree,

0:22:08.573 --> 0:22:09.253
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:22:11.093 --> 0:22:16.973
<v Speaker 3>Yes. So the reason people are traditionally now and let's

0:22:17.013 --> 0:22:21.053
<v Speaker 3>just preface this latent because because I'm a sociologist and

0:22:21.133 --> 0:22:23.893
<v Speaker 3>I've been looking at this in depth over the say,

0:22:23.893 --> 0:22:26.133
<v Speaker 3>the last three or four months, But I am very

0:22:26.133 --> 0:22:29.773
<v Speaker 3>happy for people to criticize me if I am incorrect,

0:22:30.173 --> 0:22:32.373
<v Speaker 3>But as long as we have a discussion about it,

0:22:33.133 --> 0:22:35.973
<v Speaker 3>that is a wider, broader discussion looking at the big,

0:22:36.093 --> 0:22:38.893
<v Speaker 3>big issues. So when you talk about them being woke,

0:22:39.533 --> 0:22:43.373
<v Speaker 3>being woke means they're taking on this is what I

0:22:43.373 --> 0:22:48.013
<v Speaker 3>aren't My understanding is they're taking on political issues or

0:22:48.133 --> 0:22:52.453
<v Speaker 3>values that might not represent the average key way. And

0:22:52.573 --> 0:22:56.973
<v Speaker 3>of course, the reason people have historically trusted central banks

0:22:57.053 --> 0:22:59.733
<v Speaker 3>or the Reserve Bank of New Zealand is because they don't.

0:23:00.293 --> 0:23:04.573
<v Speaker 3>They don't they're very constrained in what they can politically

0:23:04.653 --> 0:23:08.333
<v Speaker 3>do because they can print money. They've been very construing.

0:23:08.533 --> 0:23:12.093
<v Speaker 3>So if all of a sudden their powers in encompass

0:23:12.453 --> 0:23:18.053
<v Speaker 3>climate change, which this has happened, that is a political

0:23:18.213 --> 0:23:22.253
<v Speaker 3>shift and I think people need to understand that. So

0:23:22.293 --> 0:23:27.573
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank of New Zealand has actually more powers

0:23:28.173 --> 0:23:31.253
<v Speaker 3>than the average and we discussed this in our paper.

0:23:31.493 --> 0:23:33.613
<v Speaker 3>The Reserve Bank of New Zealand has more powers than

0:23:33.693 --> 0:23:37.813
<v Speaker 3>the average central bank. So it's not only responsible for

0:23:37.973 --> 0:23:42.493
<v Speaker 3>monetary policy, so you know, the ocr the central Bank

0:23:42.573 --> 0:23:47.013
<v Speaker 3>is a financial markets regulator responsible for oversight of the

0:23:47.053 --> 0:23:52.253
<v Speaker 3>financial system and prudential regulation of banks, deposit takers and

0:23:52.373 --> 0:23:57.573
<v Speaker 3>insurance companies. As well as that the Reserve Bank engaged

0:23:57.613 --> 0:24:01.453
<v Speaker 3>in large scale asset purchases and over COVID. And that's

0:24:01.493 --> 0:24:04.893
<v Speaker 3>interesting because we think there's been about eleven billion dollars

0:24:04.893 --> 0:24:09.973
<v Speaker 3>in losses there. And then interesting with this Financial Market

0:24:10.013 --> 0:24:13.493
<v Speaker 3>Infrastructures Act in twenty twenty one, they introduced into this

0:24:13.613 --> 0:24:19.213
<v Speaker 3>legislation the concept of the systemically important financial institution so

0:24:19.253 --> 0:24:23.533
<v Speaker 3>they si they and that's the too big to Fail

0:24:23.653 --> 0:24:28.933
<v Speaker 3>clauses that you're seeing coming through America that were introduced

0:24:28.933 --> 0:24:33.973
<v Speaker 3>after the global financial crisis. So they're really broad powers

0:24:34.293 --> 0:24:37.613
<v Speaker 3>are not just all those responsibilities. But we're seeing sort

0:24:37.653 --> 0:24:41.533
<v Speaker 3>of we're seeing the political things come in the DEI,

0:24:42.573 --> 0:24:48.213
<v Speaker 3>the climate change, and their budgets doubled as well. So

0:24:48.853 --> 0:24:53.453
<v Speaker 3>this is extremely worrying because when you listen to the

0:24:53.453 --> 0:24:57.613
<v Speaker 3>Select Committee February twenty twenty four, people are sort of

0:24:57.813 --> 0:25:04.133
<v Speaker 3>asking the Bank's questions as if they're an organization that

0:25:04.173 --> 0:25:08.293
<v Speaker 3>should make political decisions. I think people do not understand

0:25:08.493 --> 0:25:12.413
<v Speaker 3>how important it is that that is the role of parliament,

0:25:12.693 --> 0:25:17.453
<v Speaker 3>not unelected bureaucrats sitting in their own office, you know,

0:25:17.493 --> 0:25:20.133
<v Speaker 3>sitting in offices that can't actually get voted out of office.

0:25:20.573 --> 0:25:23.893
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking to the administrative state, and the administrative

0:25:23.973 --> 0:25:27.573
<v Speaker 2>state has has has made huge in roads into many

0:25:27.573 --> 0:25:30.933
<v Speaker 2>aspects of life. And I refer again to the United

0:25:30.933 --> 0:25:35.453
<v Speaker 2>States where where basically it saw its birth. But here

0:25:35.813 --> 0:25:39.613
<v Speaker 2>the best example that I can utilize is Auckland Transport,

0:25:41.333 --> 0:25:43.813
<v Speaker 2>who have taken on roles that they were never they

0:25:43.813 --> 0:25:47.493
<v Speaker 2>were never associated with, not supposed to be associated with

0:25:47.813 --> 0:25:54.333
<v Speaker 2>extended their powers and during the period specifically that you

0:25:54.453 --> 0:25:57.173
<v Speaker 2>refer to the COVID period, they were they had free

0:25:57.173 --> 0:25:59.813
<v Speaker 2>hand to just do what they want. And we know,

0:26:00.533 --> 0:26:05.133
<v Speaker 2>we know that they're under inspection because various people, starting

0:26:05.173 --> 0:26:08.333
<v Speaker 2>with I suppose the latest mayor of Auckland, have been

0:26:08.413 --> 0:26:12.333
<v Speaker 2>in assaulting them. Not to forget one or two podcasters,

0:26:12.853 --> 0:26:17.253
<v Speaker 2>but the point being that that is one example, but

0:26:17.373 --> 0:26:20.453
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of others, including I think the medical field.

0:26:21.693 --> 0:26:25.133
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and so I think the the other problem is

0:26:25.133 --> 0:26:30.293
<v Speaker 3>that these agencies and these ministries become so big that

0:26:30.413 --> 0:26:34.573
<v Speaker 3>they become this rolling ball getting even bigger and bigger.

0:26:35.053 --> 0:26:40.293
<v Speaker 3>And I am a very big fan of a working

0:26:40.373 --> 0:26:45.893
<v Speaker 3>democratic government. But when the information that is supporting their

0:26:45.893 --> 0:26:49.533
<v Speaker 3>policy agendas is solely being produced by the agencies who

0:26:49.773 --> 0:26:54.413
<v Speaker 3>will only grow bigger, then that doesn't work. So, you know,

0:26:54.453 --> 0:26:56.213
<v Speaker 3>we have this is why we have the problem that

0:26:56.693 --> 0:27:00.413
<v Speaker 3>science is now controlled by the Ministry for Business and Innovation.

0:27:00.933 --> 0:27:03.453
<v Speaker 3>This is why we have the problem that agriculture is

0:27:03.853 --> 0:27:08.653
<v Speaker 3>you know, funding for agricultural research is controlled by the

0:27:08.693 --> 0:27:11.533
<v Speaker 3>agency who likes innovation and patents. So we're not going

0:27:11.573 --> 0:27:16.333
<v Speaker 3>to solve drought problems when the only money that they

0:27:16.333 --> 0:27:18.213
<v Speaker 3>want to spend on research has got to be tied

0:27:18.293 --> 0:27:22.573
<v Speaker 3>to a patent. And you look at for example, education,

0:27:23.253 --> 0:27:27.253
<v Speaker 3>you know, education has been you know, the curriculum development

0:27:27.293 --> 0:27:31.813
<v Speaker 3>is core core, and that's I think, I believe in NGO.

0:27:32.213 --> 0:27:35.973
<v Speaker 3>So if you had, if you had teachers being responsible

0:27:35.973 --> 0:27:39.853
<v Speaker 3>for example, for their own you know, for improving and

0:27:40.333 --> 0:27:44.373
<v Speaker 3>upskilling the curriculum, you would actually have more fighting more.

0:27:44.573 --> 0:27:47.693
<v Speaker 3>It would be slower, it would be difficult, but it

0:27:47.733 --> 0:27:50.973
<v Speaker 3>would be the people who are who have the most

0:27:51.013 --> 0:27:53.213
<v Speaker 3>expertise doing it. This is the same so science, but

0:27:53.333 --> 0:27:57.573
<v Speaker 3>right now you're getting these agencies creating their own agendas

0:27:57.573 --> 0:28:01.013
<v Speaker 3>and so Jeffrey Palmer has talked about this recently and

0:28:01.053 --> 0:28:04.733
<v Speaker 3>he said, what happens is the parliamentarians they've got no funding,

0:28:04.773 --> 0:28:09.293
<v Speaker 3>they've got no research resources, so they must, you know,

0:28:09.813 --> 0:28:14.173
<v Speaker 3>divert genuflect to the big agencies because that's where all

0:28:14.213 --> 0:28:17.173
<v Speaker 3>the information and the knowledge is coming from. This is

0:28:17.213 --> 0:28:19.493
<v Speaker 3>a very big problem in a democracy.

0:28:20.453 --> 0:28:22.613
<v Speaker 2>Is democracy under a threat in this country? Do you think?

0:28:23.733 --> 0:28:29.933
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? But it's not dead. But we very much people

0:28:30.053 --> 0:28:34.413
<v Speaker 3>need and my interest is information. So I see how

0:28:34.453 --> 0:28:39.373
<v Speaker 3>the flows of information then can perpetuate power or the

0:28:39.413 --> 0:28:43.933
<v Speaker 3>flows of information can help us understand situations and chat

0:28:44.013 --> 0:28:48.573
<v Speaker 3>and wage war and debate and get cross with each other.

0:28:48.613 --> 0:28:50.613
<v Speaker 3>But the most important thing is that we should be

0:28:50.693 --> 0:28:55.013
<v Speaker 3>actually talking about all these different issues. And this is

0:28:55.053 --> 0:28:58.533
<v Speaker 3>why you know, pstr and Zena have released this paper,

0:28:58.573 --> 0:29:01.773
<v Speaker 3>because if we don't talk about the issues, this is China,

0:29:01.893 --> 0:29:05.453
<v Speaker 3>this is you know, Russia in its darkest days. It's

0:29:05.613 --> 0:29:10.133
<v Speaker 3>an authoritarian state does not let the people you know

0:29:10.333 --> 0:29:13.693
<v Speaker 3>chat and debate, and neither does it let they're elected

0:29:13.933 --> 0:29:18.973
<v Speaker 3>members debate and challenge each other. And we're moving, I believe,

0:29:19.053 --> 0:29:24.013
<v Speaker 3>into a very polarized environment. And when we're polarized, we

0:29:24.093 --> 0:29:26.613
<v Speaker 3>go into our corners, and we've got to come out

0:29:26.653 --> 0:29:29.693
<v Speaker 3>of those corners and know that even if it's really difficult,

0:29:29.853 --> 0:29:33.173
<v Speaker 3>we've we've got to keep talking to each other. And

0:29:33.213 --> 0:29:38.293
<v Speaker 3>the problems of governance are never black and white. They're complex,

0:29:38.853 --> 0:29:43.853
<v Speaker 3>they're nebulous. You know, they involve going upstream into you know,

0:29:44.053 --> 0:29:49.173
<v Speaker 3>into I guess environments that often have lots of political

0:29:49.173 --> 0:29:54.693
<v Speaker 3>and financial conflicts where you'll see large, powerful interests. And

0:29:54.853 --> 0:29:57.653
<v Speaker 3>that's a little bit why you know, often you get

0:29:58.453 --> 0:30:02.333
<v Speaker 3>when you start asking questions about sort of technologies you

0:30:02.333 --> 0:30:06.733
<v Speaker 3>know from nanotech to GM to to pesticides to the

0:30:06.813 --> 0:30:10.053
<v Speaker 3>tech we're talking about today. It's very easy for people

0:30:10.053 --> 0:30:12.693
<v Speaker 3>to call you are you're a team foil where you're

0:30:12.733 --> 0:30:17.013
<v Speaker 3>a conspiracy theorists like, well, actually, I think it's incumbent

0:30:17.253 --> 0:30:20.653
<v Speaker 3>upon us ever since, ever since they put spikes on

0:30:21.253 --> 0:30:24.973
<v Speaker 3>you know, heels to make horses go faster, to say,

0:30:25.093 --> 0:30:28.133
<v Speaker 3>what what what is this tech achieving? Is it going

0:30:28.213 --> 0:30:29.893
<v Speaker 3>to make the horse go faster or they're going to

0:30:29.893 --> 0:30:32.693
<v Speaker 3>get some you know, saws in the sides of their flanks?

0:30:32.773 --> 0:30:35.573
<v Speaker 3>You know, So we actually always have to ask how

0:30:35.613 --> 0:30:39.253
<v Speaker 3>how is the tech going to support us and make

0:30:39.333 --> 0:30:43.333
<v Speaker 3>human you know, society, tribe, and perhaps we're actually the

0:30:44.053 --> 0:30:47.813
<v Speaker 3>tech we're seeing today, we're not thriving more so maybe

0:30:47.853 --> 0:30:50.173
<v Speaker 3>we can ask what is going wrong here?

0:30:50.413 --> 0:30:54.733
<v Speaker 2>Have you in your in your work spend any time

0:30:54.893 --> 0:30:59.733
<v Speaker 2>on digital currencies per se bitcoin specifically.

0:31:00.893 --> 0:31:03.733
<v Speaker 3>No, I listen, look, I try to be really informed.

0:31:03.773 --> 0:31:06.693
<v Speaker 3>I listened to a lot of podcasts my you know,

0:31:06.733 --> 0:31:10.373
<v Speaker 3>my husband's a software engineers, so you know, talking about

0:31:10.413 --> 0:31:14.213
<v Speaker 3>this sort of tech is not outside our spectrum of conversation,

0:31:14.413 --> 0:31:17.973
<v Speaker 3>but we haven't and so I try to be really informed,

0:31:17.973 --> 0:31:21.493
<v Speaker 3>but not not really because I guess I only have

0:31:21.613 --> 0:31:24.933
<v Speaker 3>so many hours in the day, so you know, I've

0:31:24.973 --> 0:31:27.933
<v Speaker 3>been listening. You know, your excellent interviews with John Orcock

0:31:28.453 --> 0:31:32.413
<v Speaker 3>are really great for helping people understand about bitcoin. I

0:31:33.133 --> 0:31:37.813
<v Speaker 3>guess my question, Laighton, I am. You know, like I

0:31:37.933 --> 0:31:41.213
<v Speaker 3>didn't grow up you know, in that happy family with

0:31:41.213 --> 0:31:45.493
<v Speaker 3>the mummy and you know, and everything been great. So

0:31:45.653 --> 0:31:49.093
<v Speaker 3>I was lucky enough to be an at home mum

0:31:49.213 --> 0:31:51.813
<v Speaker 3>and you know, then started working when they were younger.

0:31:51.853 --> 0:31:56.773
<v Speaker 3>And on this my situation always is, you know, how

0:31:56.813 --> 0:31:59.093
<v Speaker 3>can a woman that is working, probably a little few

0:31:59.213 --> 0:32:02.213
<v Speaker 3>more hours because she's got to do the cleaning, do this,

0:32:02.253 --> 0:32:05.733
<v Speaker 3>do that? How can she be as informed as a man?

0:32:06.093 --> 0:32:10.453
<v Speaker 3>How can she access you know, if bitcoin? Bitcoin has

0:32:10.493 --> 0:32:16.013
<v Speaker 3>to work whatever social strata you're on, whatever education level

0:32:16.053 --> 0:32:20.293
<v Speaker 3>you're on, it has to actually work similarly for females

0:32:20.293 --> 0:32:24.053
<v Speaker 3>and males. And right now I don't see like how

0:32:24.213 --> 0:32:30.853
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin is equally as accessible, you know. And and this

0:32:30.933 --> 0:32:33.333
<v Speaker 3>is I guess this is my point why I see

0:32:33.373 --> 0:32:37.773
<v Speaker 3>governments as being really important. It's the single woman, you know,

0:32:37.933 --> 0:32:41.333
<v Speaker 3>in the supermarket. Can she afford good quality meat, good

0:32:41.413 --> 0:32:45.693
<v Speaker 3>quality of veggies? How do we create a social structure

0:32:45.733 --> 0:32:48.133
<v Speaker 3>that means we're going to thrive and that our young

0:32:48.213 --> 0:32:50.653
<v Speaker 3>people are going to grow up healthy and strong. And

0:32:50.733 --> 0:32:53.733
<v Speaker 3>so I guess I keep coming back to the Bitcoin

0:32:53.773 --> 0:32:56.333
<v Speaker 3>seems to be the really great if you're a guy

0:32:56.373 --> 0:32:58.293
<v Speaker 3>and you can do a ton of research and you

0:32:58.373 --> 0:33:01.253
<v Speaker 3>know a lot about it. But that's sort of that's

0:33:01.013 --> 0:33:03.693
<v Speaker 3>a that's my kind of thought for bitcoin really at

0:33:03.693 --> 0:33:04.093
<v Speaker 3>the moment.

0:33:04.213 --> 0:33:07.893
<v Speaker 2>But it's well, I think I'm not in a position

0:33:07.973 --> 0:33:10.533
<v Speaker 2>to you with you. Well I suppose I could be,

0:33:10.613 --> 0:33:14.453
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not. I just want to quote you quickly.

0:33:14.813 --> 0:33:17.493
<v Speaker 2>This is a little outside what we're here to discuss,

0:33:17.573 --> 0:33:22.533
<v Speaker 2>but there is a connection obviously. Fred Krueger quote bitcoin

0:33:22.693 --> 0:33:28.013
<v Speaker 2>is going to replace Fiat. In a recent interview in Entrepreneur,

0:33:28.213 --> 0:33:31.853
<v Speaker 2>investor and mathematician Fred Krueger said bitcoin is going to

0:33:31.853 --> 0:33:35.053
<v Speaker 2>replace theat According to Kruger, FIAT is unable to compete

0:33:35.093 --> 0:33:37.893
<v Speaker 2>with bitcoin. He sees the world moving to a global

0:33:38.053 --> 0:33:42.733
<v Speaker 2>monetary standard based on bitcoin. And then the author of

0:33:42.773 --> 0:33:47.093
<v Speaker 2>this short article says, realize what Kruger is saying here,

0:33:47.293 --> 0:33:49.653
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to take a gamble here and reach

0:33:49.773 --> 0:33:53.573
<v Speaker 2>the next five lines. The global M two money supplies

0:33:53.613 --> 0:33:58.373
<v Speaker 2>currently around one hundred and three trillion. The market capitalization

0:33:58.453 --> 0:34:02.493
<v Speaker 2>of bitcoin is one point three trillion. This means for

0:34:02.493 --> 0:34:05.253
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin to become the global monetary standard, it needs to

0:34:05.293 --> 0:34:08.933
<v Speaker 2>go up by one hundred times one hundred. Is this

0:34:09.053 --> 0:34:13.813
<v Speaker 2>possible Since the famous pizza incident, I don't know what

0:34:13.813 --> 0:34:18.413
<v Speaker 2>that is. In twenty ten, bitcoin has risen one million times.

0:34:19.093 --> 0:34:21.933
<v Speaker 2>Krueger knows of no other asset that has done this.

0:34:22.613 --> 0:34:25.013
<v Speaker 2>His message is simple. This is a make or break

0:34:25.013 --> 0:34:27.573
<v Speaker 2>moment for a lot of people. If you want to

0:34:27.613 --> 0:34:31.853
<v Speaker 2>accumulate wealth by bitcoin now you could argue that that's

0:34:31.853 --> 0:34:35.373
<v Speaker 2>a promotion if you like, or even propaganda. But I'm

0:34:35.413 --> 0:34:40.573
<v Speaker 2>seeing more and more confidence in bitcoin now. The connection

0:34:40.773 --> 0:34:46.213
<v Speaker 2>between the Reserve Bank of New Zealand's CBDC and bitcoin

0:34:46.413 --> 0:34:49.893
<v Speaker 2>or the differences, take that approach whichever way you prefer,

0:34:50.173 --> 0:34:50.653
<v Speaker 2>what is it?

0:34:51.933 --> 0:34:56.613
<v Speaker 3>Well, so at the moment, central bank digital currencies globally

0:34:56.813 --> 0:35:01.653
<v Speaker 3>aren't really looking at being on the blockchain, and Bitcoin's

0:35:01.733 --> 0:35:05.213
<v Speaker 3>on that blockchain, and of course, of course all the

0:35:05.253 --> 0:35:08.933
<v Speaker 3>greenies buying bitcoin. When you look at the energy required

0:35:08.933 --> 0:35:11.813
<v Speaker 3>to do all those mathematical formulations to keep working, is

0:35:12.453 --> 0:35:14.653
<v Speaker 3>a sort of an interesting thing to you know, a

0:35:14.733 --> 0:35:20.133
<v Speaker 3>little thing for the greens to go down and CBDCs.

0:35:20.133 --> 0:35:22.493
<v Speaker 3>So at the moment they're not on the blockchain, they're

0:35:22.533 --> 0:35:25.973
<v Speaker 3>just basically going to be sort of controlled and overseen

0:35:26.173 --> 0:35:32.453
<v Speaker 3>by reserve banks, central banks. But of course the etiology,

0:35:32.533 --> 0:35:36.933
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the design, how how CBDs c's

0:35:36.973 --> 0:35:39.933
<v Speaker 3>have come about. They've come about by a lot of

0:35:40.053 --> 0:35:44.533
<v Speaker 3>policy work by the financial, tech, finance and technology industries

0:35:44.533 --> 0:35:48.613
<v Speaker 3>who have also you know, being involved with the establishment

0:35:48.653 --> 0:35:53.373
<v Speaker 3>of bitcoin. But so whereas you know bitcoin has you know,

0:35:53.453 --> 0:35:57.533
<v Speaker 3>the doubling and the production or the reduction of coin

0:35:57.613 --> 0:36:02.813
<v Speaker 3>is is a mathematical formulation, CBDCs can be produced at

0:36:03.173 --> 0:36:06.653
<v Speaker 3>will and at whim by central banks. This is where

0:36:07.173 --> 0:36:11.853
<v Speaker 3>they're very dangerous because they can be and they will

0:36:12.173 --> 0:36:15.133
<v Speaker 3>likely be a political tool. And when I say a

0:36:15.173 --> 0:36:18.933
<v Speaker 3>political tool, this is because the Bank of International Settlements

0:36:19.533 --> 0:36:23.453
<v Speaker 3>and the large global banks are very much seeing them

0:36:24.213 --> 0:36:29.333
<v Speaker 3>as a as a way of achieving policy, you know,

0:36:29.373 --> 0:36:32.293
<v Speaker 3>the desire of what sort of policy might be achieved,

0:36:32.333 --> 0:36:36.133
<v Speaker 3>and so we can we can provide those financial incentives.

0:36:36.133 --> 0:36:40.493
<v Speaker 3>And it's carrot, it's carrot and stick stuff. We know that.

0:36:40.733 --> 0:36:43.933
<v Speaker 3>For example, so if a reserve bank was going and

0:36:44.253 --> 0:36:48.613
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a terrible idea, they can if they

0:36:48.613 --> 0:36:51.733
<v Speaker 3>were designing a CBDC, they can choose to have a

0:36:51.733 --> 0:36:55.013
<v Speaker 3>negative interest rate, they can choose to have a you know,

0:36:56.013 --> 0:36:59.573
<v Speaker 3>positive interest rate. They can choose, you know, all the

0:36:59.613 --> 0:37:03.653
<v Speaker 3>program the payments will be programmable. So the Reserve Bank

0:37:03.653 --> 0:37:06.373
<v Speaker 3>of New Zealand and its current consultation says, oh, we

0:37:06.413 --> 0:37:09.773
<v Speaker 3>won't make the money program But the problem is the

0:37:09.813 --> 0:37:13.773
<v Speaker 3>payments will be programmable, they will be revocable because they

0:37:13.813 --> 0:37:16.093
<v Speaker 3>have to be revocable in case the mistake is made.

0:37:16.813 --> 0:37:21.293
<v Speaker 3>So we know that all this program these programmability functions,

0:37:21.293 --> 0:37:25.013
<v Speaker 3>which is not there with bitcoin. So a third party

0:37:25.093 --> 0:37:28.013
<v Speaker 3>locks can be put in place where so, for example,

0:37:28.053 --> 0:37:31.653
<v Speaker 3>the Health Ministry might decide that, you know, this group

0:37:31.733 --> 0:37:35.973
<v Speaker 3>of welfare benefit beneficiaries can get this much money if

0:37:36.053 --> 0:37:40.133
<v Speaker 3>they get their kids injected with the latest vaccine and

0:37:40.613 --> 0:37:44.813
<v Speaker 3>get their teeth scene too, and then they tend them

0:37:44.813 --> 0:37:47.053
<v Speaker 3>to school, they'll get this extra money, you know. So

0:37:48.253 --> 0:37:51.733
<v Speaker 3>the Ministry for Health can instruct that through to the

0:37:51.773 --> 0:37:54.293
<v Speaker 3>Central Bank of New Zealand, who could then send that

0:37:54.413 --> 0:38:01.013
<v Speaker 3>advice out to whatever fintech industry is contracted to then

0:38:02.213 --> 0:38:05.773
<v Speaker 3>design the smart contract. Sorry that is a smart contract

0:38:05.813 --> 0:38:09.573
<v Speaker 3>that would be third party processes. It would be involved

0:38:09.773 --> 0:38:13.613
<v Speaker 3>with the financial and tech industries will be contracting and

0:38:13.693 --> 0:38:18.293
<v Speaker 3>designing the software perhaps, so this is how disaggregated it

0:38:18.333 --> 0:38:21.093
<v Speaker 3>will be. And this is this is part of the problem.

0:38:21.373 --> 0:38:23.733
<v Speaker 3>So like the blockchain is, you know, you can see

0:38:24.053 --> 0:38:27.493
<v Speaker 3>your ID code wherever you want. It's quite transparent, whereas

0:38:27.573 --> 0:38:32.533
<v Speaker 3>this stuff is all black boxed like in an aircraft.

0:38:33.053 --> 0:38:36.533
<v Speaker 3>You can't see what's happening when you can't know. And

0:38:36.693 --> 0:38:41.773
<v Speaker 3>there's a term they use called composability. So smart contracts

0:38:41.813 --> 0:38:48.253
<v Speaker 3>which are let's let's they are self little self executing programmed,

0:38:50.173 --> 0:38:56.373
<v Speaker 3>self executing applications of programmable platforms that can trigger an

0:38:56.453 --> 0:39:03.053
<v Speaker 3>action if some pre specified condition is met. And that's

0:39:03.333 --> 0:39:06.733
<v Speaker 3>that's a Bank of International Settlements. That's the way they

0:39:07.253 --> 0:39:11.693
<v Speaker 3>see smart contracts. So they can be composable. Smart contracts

0:39:11.693 --> 0:39:14.733
<v Speaker 3>can be bundleable. So that's so you're you know, you

0:39:14.733 --> 0:39:19.133
<v Speaker 3>were talking about not being able to you know, your

0:39:19.213 --> 0:39:21.853
<v Speaker 3>your bank account could be frozen if you go outside

0:39:21.893 --> 0:39:24.373
<v Speaker 3>the region of the Bay of Plenty, so it could

0:39:24.453 --> 0:39:26.693
<v Speaker 3>you know, the smart contract could be applicable to all

0:39:26.733 --> 0:39:28.973
<v Speaker 3>people in the Bay of Plenty, so they don't have

0:39:29.053 --> 0:39:31.373
<v Speaker 3>any you know, they can't fill up with petrol outside

0:39:31.373 --> 0:39:34.093
<v Speaker 3>that region, and of course.

0:39:34.453 --> 0:39:37.693
<v Speaker 2>Contract which, of course which which of course would make

0:39:37.933 --> 0:39:42.013
<v Speaker 2>lockdowns far more readily available to the powers that be.

0:39:43.213 --> 0:39:46.413
<v Speaker 3>And this is a scalability potential. Yes.

0:39:48.173 --> 0:39:53.653
<v Speaker 2>The biggest problem I believe is how to advise people

0:39:53.733 --> 0:39:57.733
<v Speaker 2>who don't usually care, who haven't got time for it,

0:39:57.933 --> 0:40:00.533
<v Speaker 2>who don't care, who think you're, like you said, a

0:40:00.573 --> 0:40:04.733
<v Speaker 2>tenfoil hatter or whatever, and they're just not interested in

0:40:04.853 --> 0:40:07.853
<v Speaker 2>knowing what's going on. How do you how do you

0:40:07.933 --> 0:40:09.813
<v Speaker 2>best apro Well?

0:40:09.853 --> 0:40:13.293
<v Speaker 3>I think for me, I am informed, and I want

0:40:13.453 --> 0:40:16.813
<v Speaker 3>I work in this area, which is politically often politically

0:40:16.893 --> 0:40:24.653
<v Speaker 3>uncomfortable because I have children, and my children are young

0:40:24.693 --> 0:40:28.933
<v Speaker 3>adults and they are growing up and I I'm not,

0:40:29.013 --> 0:40:30.653
<v Speaker 3>you know, And part of it we're not We don't

0:40:30.653 --> 0:40:32.933
<v Speaker 3>look at we don't look at history, so we don't understand.

0:40:32.933 --> 0:40:36.093
<v Speaker 3>So we might learn about World War Two, we might

0:40:36.213 --> 0:40:40.933
<v Speaker 3>learn about and Frank, we might learn about the concentration camps,

0:40:40.933 --> 0:40:43.373
<v Speaker 3>but when we're at high school, we don't actually learn

0:40:43.453 --> 0:40:46.973
<v Speaker 3>about the extent which there was a massive propaganda campaign

0:40:47.853 --> 0:40:51.533
<v Speaker 3>be fleeting up to that with Russia, with the Chinese Revolution,

0:40:52.053 --> 0:40:57.213
<v Speaker 3>how now gained young students? You know, the history of

0:40:57.253 --> 0:41:02.213
<v Speaker 3>propaganda and gaining the youth to to to jump on

0:41:02.293 --> 0:41:06.973
<v Speaker 3>board without the nuances the experiences of older generations, and

0:41:07.053 --> 0:41:10.933
<v Speaker 3>so younger people can achieve really powerful, important things. But

0:41:11.813 --> 0:41:15.013
<v Speaker 3>we need to I think as older people you know

0:41:15.133 --> 0:41:17.853
<v Speaker 3>listening to this podcast, and I know you know, young

0:41:17.933 --> 0:41:20.453
<v Speaker 3>tradees will be listening to this as well, with you know,

0:41:20.533 --> 0:41:24.933
<v Speaker 3>common sense people will be listening to them. It's exactly

0:41:25.013 --> 0:41:28.213
<v Speaker 3>it's learning to speak up when it's a little bit uncomfortable,

0:41:28.573 --> 0:41:31.653
<v Speaker 3>because if you don't speak up now, there's a very

0:41:31.653 --> 0:41:34.133
<v Speaker 3>big chance in hell that that is not going to

0:41:34.133 --> 0:41:38.333
<v Speaker 3>get any easier. And so I have two there's two

0:41:38.413 --> 0:41:41.733
<v Speaker 3>reasons why I believe democracy is the most at risk.

0:41:42.373 --> 0:41:45.933
<v Speaker 3>And one is because we keep sort of delegating authority,

0:41:46.333 --> 0:41:50.413
<v Speaker 3>whether it's through trade agreements or through other agreements such

0:41:50.413 --> 0:41:54.173
<v Speaker 3>as you know agreement you know, tacit agreements with UN

0:41:54.253 --> 0:41:58.653
<v Speaker 3>agencies such as WHO. So when we delegate authorities to them,

0:41:58.733 --> 0:42:01.813
<v Speaker 3>we lose a little bit of our you know, sovereignty,

0:42:01.853 --> 0:42:06.533
<v Speaker 3>our democratic strength. And the other way we're losing is

0:42:06.893 --> 0:42:09.453
<v Speaker 3>through the fact that the as I said, the information

0:42:09.573 --> 0:42:12.853
<v Speaker 3>is controlled by those big agencies, and when those big

0:42:12.893 --> 0:42:15.493
<v Speaker 3>agencies need an extra portion and they need an extra

0:42:16.493 --> 0:42:18.573
<v Speaker 3>they want to follow a little bit more of this

0:42:18.773 --> 0:42:22.013
<v Speaker 3>you know, digitizing government stuff they get in the big

0:42:22.173 --> 0:42:27.013
<v Speaker 3>management consultancies. And so people need to understand how bad

0:42:27.133 --> 0:42:30.333
<v Speaker 3>this situation is. So the Reserve Bank of New Zealand

0:42:30.333 --> 0:42:34.253
<v Speaker 3>are the only people right now producing the evidence for

0:42:34.373 --> 0:42:38.133
<v Speaker 3>how marvelous and wonderful CBDCs are. So there's no you know,

0:42:38.173 --> 0:42:40.213
<v Speaker 3>like I said, there's no expert lawyers out there, no

0:42:40.333 --> 0:42:44.373
<v Speaker 3>expert governance people out there, no one there's kids, you

0:42:44.493 --> 0:42:47.373
<v Speaker 3>not PSDR and SRE. This is why we've come into

0:42:47.413 --> 0:42:49.893
<v Speaker 3>this space because no one else is here. It's not

0:42:49.973 --> 0:42:54.173
<v Speaker 3>our dream. And so we need to understand that if

0:42:54.453 --> 0:42:57.813
<v Speaker 3>the governments are only looking at the agencies doing this,

0:42:58.373 --> 0:43:01.453
<v Speaker 3>and I'm probably going on about this too much, we

0:43:02.173 --> 0:43:05.693
<v Speaker 3>are fully ignorant and we are victims to that policy.

0:43:05.853 --> 0:43:08.733
<v Speaker 3>So the question at the dinner table is should the

0:43:08.853 --> 0:43:12.893
<v Speaker 3>RBNZ be the only agency providing all the evidence for

0:43:13.933 --> 0:43:18.773
<v Speaker 3>the safety and efficacy of central bank digital currencies? And

0:43:18.813 --> 0:43:21.533
<v Speaker 3>this is when we stop being tinfoil hat wearers, because

0:43:21.533 --> 0:43:23.453
<v Speaker 3>we're actually saying this is a reasonable question.

0:43:24.653 --> 0:43:28.853
<v Speaker 2>Let me quote the beginning of your monster paper in

0:43:28.893 --> 0:43:33.013
<v Speaker 2>the executive summary by releasing this discussion paper Physicians and

0:43:33.093 --> 0:43:37.453
<v Speaker 2>Scientists for Global Responsibility New Zealand, that is psg r

0:43:37.693 --> 0:43:44.173
<v Speaker 2>n Z aim to encourage debate around governance, democracy and

0:43:44.253 --> 0:43:50.173
<v Speaker 2>the interoperability of digital identity systems and central bank digital currencies.

0:43:50.813 --> 0:43:53.853
<v Speaker 2>What are the risks from adopting CBDCs which are tied

0:43:53.893 --> 0:43:58.573
<v Speaker 2>to your digital ID, your digital twin? What is the

0:43:58.613 --> 0:44:02.293
<v Speaker 2>answers to that? So, Jody, what are the risks from

0:44:02.373 --> 0:44:06.933
<v Speaker 2>adopting cbdc's which are tied to your digital ID, your

0:44:06.973 --> 0:44:07.853
<v Speaker 2>digital twin as.

0:44:07.773 --> 0:44:10.453
<v Speaker 3>You put it, so thank you for that. Yeah, that

0:44:10.653 --> 0:44:14.933
<v Speaker 3>we haven't talked about digital IDs yet, so so digital

0:44:14.933 --> 0:44:21.893
<v Speaker 3>ideas are increasingly so the whole of New Zealand government

0:44:22.013 --> 0:44:24.773
<v Speaker 3>hasn't has put in put out the requirement that all

0:44:24.853 --> 0:44:29.773
<v Speaker 3>agencies offer they accept real me, they accept a digital

0:44:29.813 --> 0:44:33.653
<v Speaker 3>identity for as equally to a passport. But what we're

0:44:33.693 --> 0:44:37.413
<v Speaker 3>seeing now is we're seeing it increasingly increasingly they might

0:44:37.493 --> 0:44:41.573
<v Speaker 3>only only accept your real me identity and so when

0:44:41.613 --> 0:44:45.813
<v Speaker 3>you get your digital ID, you they take them er scams,

0:44:45.853 --> 0:44:52.133
<v Speaker 3>so they have your biometric data. And the issue here

0:44:52.213 --> 0:44:56.493
<v Speaker 3>is so the Department of Internal Affairs controls all this

0:44:56.613 --> 0:45:00.573
<v Speaker 3>information and so the Department of Internal Affairs is sort

0:45:00.613 --> 0:45:05.493
<v Speaker 3>of has information sharing agreements across the whole of government,

0:45:06.133 --> 0:45:08.253
<v Speaker 3>so they can share your data and we don't know

0:45:08.413 --> 0:45:11.853
<v Speaker 3>how much this is shared or shareable because of course

0:45:11.893 --> 0:45:17.173
<v Speaker 3>it's black boxed. So the DEA administers the Digital Identity

0:45:17.253 --> 0:45:22.973
<v Speaker 3>Services Trust Framework Act and the Electronic Identity Verification Actors.

0:45:23.053 --> 0:45:25.573
<v Speaker 3>So that's the back end management of our personal data.

0:45:26.253 --> 0:45:31.173
<v Speaker 3>So then you add that, you toddle that to for example,

0:45:31.213 --> 0:45:38.453
<v Speaker 3>if CBDCs where your main money account of retail CBDCs,

0:45:39.213 --> 0:45:45.293
<v Speaker 3>then we have the capacity for a surprising amount of

0:45:45.453 --> 0:45:51.253
<v Speaker 3>control acrosshole of government. And so you know, psgr And said,

0:45:51.493 --> 0:45:54.253
<v Speaker 3>we've always looked at the fact that often you know,

0:45:54.293 --> 0:45:58.733
<v Speaker 3>it's a round up the Glacious eight trials. It was

0:45:59.013 --> 0:46:01.373
<v Speaker 3>what came out in that was that the formulation was

0:46:01.413 --> 0:46:04.373
<v Speaker 3>so much more toxic than the active ingredient. So when

0:46:04.773 --> 0:46:09.573
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank only talks about CBDCs, the formulation is

0:46:09.613 --> 0:46:12.973
<v Speaker 3>more toxic than the active ingredient. When they're combined with

0:46:13.053 --> 0:46:18.253
<v Speaker 3>digital ideas, that's when i've got the capacity to survalue

0:46:18.373 --> 0:46:21.493
<v Speaker 3>when you're walking down the street and know where you are,

0:46:22.053 --> 0:46:27.093
<v Speaker 3>then they've got the capacity to understand your transactions because

0:46:27.093 --> 0:46:30.733
<v Speaker 3>you're using your CBDC and you're transacting, transacting on your

0:46:30.733 --> 0:46:34.093
<v Speaker 3>real may identity, so that, like we keep talking, the

0:46:34.133 --> 0:46:39.333
<v Speaker 3>scalability of this is significant. And so it's when all

0:46:39.373 --> 0:46:45.453
<v Speaker 3>this is linked together that harm happens. That's the problem.

0:46:46.093 --> 0:46:47.853
<v Speaker 3>And so this is normally if you have your and

0:46:47.853 --> 0:46:49.533
<v Speaker 3>this is the other problem. And we have the same

0:46:49.573 --> 0:46:55.013
<v Speaker 3>problem when we have retail banks operating in an oligopoly.

0:46:55.533 --> 0:46:58.453
<v Speaker 3>So this is why sort of Richard Werner, who's an

0:46:58.453 --> 0:47:01.733
<v Speaker 3>international economist, he says, we need to do a heck

0:47:01.813 --> 0:47:03.533
<v Speaker 3>of a lot of work, and this is government policy.

0:47:03.573 --> 0:47:08.493
<v Speaker 3>Governments can turn around do this tomorrow to let small

0:47:08.533 --> 0:47:14.333
<v Speaker 3>local banks establish themselves and serve small local communities. The

0:47:14.373 --> 0:47:17.573
<v Speaker 3>minute you get oligopolies, you get the government and the

0:47:17.853 --> 0:47:23.893
<v Speaker 3>oligopolies naturally working together to shape regulation to make sure

0:47:23.933 --> 0:47:27.773
<v Speaker 3>it's virtually agreeable. And often this is a way of

0:47:28.093 --> 0:47:33.253
<v Speaker 3>not just it's a strategic way of the large corporations

0:47:33.293 --> 0:47:35.773
<v Speaker 3>reinforcing their position because it makes it harder for the

0:47:35.853 --> 0:47:39.413
<v Speaker 3>little guys to get going. So you know, this is

0:47:39.413 --> 0:47:42.333
<v Speaker 3>a this is a very good industry tactic. It's done

0:47:42.333 --> 0:47:46.333
<v Speaker 3>across big food, it's done across pesticize regulation, it's you know,

0:47:46.413 --> 0:47:51.333
<v Speaker 3>it's it's it's a common thing to do. So you know,

0:47:51.413 --> 0:47:54.293
<v Speaker 3>when these things are linked, you know when digital ideas

0:47:54.373 --> 0:47:57.453
<v Speaker 3>linked to cbdc's harm happens.

0:47:58.373 --> 0:48:00.573
<v Speaker 2>So where are we out at the moment then with

0:48:00.853 --> 0:48:06.933
<v Speaker 2>the existence of both and their connectivity in the in

0:48:06.973 --> 0:48:07.973
<v Speaker 2>the future.

0:48:09.053 --> 0:48:12.893
<v Speaker 3>So right now, government, if you want a government job,

0:48:13.773 --> 0:48:16.333
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you're able to get a government

0:48:16.413 --> 0:48:19.413
<v Speaker 3>job unless you have a real May identity. Right now,

0:48:19.573 --> 0:48:21.973
<v Speaker 3>if I wanted to get funding through the poking through

0:48:22.013 --> 0:48:24.333
<v Speaker 3>the Losttery grant scheme, I would have to get a

0:48:24.373 --> 0:48:29.493
<v Speaker 3>digital identity. If I was PSDR and Z was looking

0:48:29.533 --> 0:48:32.613
<v Speaker 3>for funding through that, I personally would have to get

0:48:32.653 --> 0:48:36.613
<v Speaker 3>a digital identity. So they're bringing it in through funding mechanisms.

0:48:37.093 --> 0:48:43.893
<v Speaker 3>I'm aware that if teachers need if they have something

0:48:43.933 --> 0:48:46.093
<v Speaker 3>that's been contested and they need to get it resolved

0:48:46.173 --> 0:48:49.573
<v Speaker 3>or envy, they need to have I believe, a digital identity.

0:48:49.813 --> 0:48:52.893
<v Speaker 3>So the digital identity creep is happening. So all the

0:48:52.933 --> 0:48:56.973
<v Speaker 3>students now they're devaulting to digital identities to the real

0:48:56.973 --> 0:49:01.573
<v Speaker 3>May identities to apply for tertiary education because it's just

0:49:01.693 --> 0:49:06.013
<v Speaker 3>easier and quicker. So they've got a definite creep of

0:49:06.133 --> 0:49:12.133
<v Speaker 3>people onto digital identities. So if we look at China, China,

0:49:12.333 --> 0:49:18.973
<v Speaker 3>in China, they're paying wages of people through CBDCs, and

0:49:19.173 --> 0:49:21.293
<v Speaker 3>we know that the Chinese are quickly getting rid of

0:49:21.293 --> 0:49:25.333
<v Speaker 3>their CBDC money. They don't trust it, they quickly truncefer that.

0:49:26.653 --> 0:49:28.653
<v Speaker 3>But we know that this is you know, say, the

0:49:28.693 --> 0:49:31.333
<v Speaker 3>public sector will use the power of the public sector

0:49:31.613 --> 0:49:37.653
<v Speaker 3>to force people onto this. So when and I guess

0:49:37.693 --> 0:49:40.413
<v Speaker 3>I became a lursi and started getting really into this

0:49:40.493 --> 0:49:44.773
<v Speaker 3>when I saw that ad for the trial project the

0:49:44.773 --> 0:49:49.013
<v Speaker 3>cbdc's and when I saw that ad, I directly put

0:49:49.093 --> 0:49:54.093
<v Speaker 3>in an official Information at request. I wanted to understand

0:49:54.453 --> 0:49:58.933
<v Speaker 3>where the cabinet, the Prime Minister, where the ministers had

0:49:59.493 --> 0:50:04.013
<v Speaker 3>to what extent have they been briefed on CBDCs, to

0:50:04.093 --> 0:50:07.133
<v Speaker 3>what extent did they understand the risks? Now that was

0:50:07.173 --> 0:50:11.333
<v Speaker 3>a December in December official Information at Requests. I heard

0:50:12.013 --> 0:50:15.853
<v Speaker 3>back from that two weeks ago. That's how long it

0:50:15.853 --> 0:50:16.613
<v Speaker 3>took me to get that.

0:50:17.293 --> 0:50:19.173
<v Speaker 2>And in terms of weeks, how long is it.

0:50:21.893 --> 0:50:26.533
<v Speaker 3>So December to May? So it took five and a

0:50:26.573 --> 0:50:30.853
<v Speaker 3>half months to get a response for this official Information

0:50:30.893 --> 0:50:32.733
<v Speaker 3>at Requests because they transferred it back to the arm

0:50:32.813 --> 0:50:36.293
<v Speaker 3>in z because the cabinet cabinet ministers didn't want to

0:50:36.413 --> 0:50:40.453
<v Speaker 3>answer it, and because they haven't been briefed. They really

0:50:41.093 --> 0:50:44.053
<v Speaker 3>have not been briefed in general, so our MPs are

0:50:45.053 --> 0:50:47.893
<v Speaker 3>lastly ignorant about the potential. So it comes back to

0:50:47.973 --> 0:50:51.293
<v Speaker 3>the academics. The experts aren't speaking up, media is not

0:50:51.333 --> 0:50:54.493
<v Speaker 3>speaking up. You know, Members of payment have no idea

0:50:54.973 --> 0:50:58.573
<v Speaker 3>and this is the biggest transformation in in you know,

0:50:58.813 --> 0:51:00.253
<v Speaker 3>money potentially.

0:51:01.853 --> 0:51:05.453
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Well tell me this, Grant Robertson, because you've

0:51:05.493 --> 0:51:09.333
<v Speaker 2>you've you've attached yourself to this, or you've asked this

0:51:09.413 --> 0:51:12.533
<v Speaker 2>question in one of them, in one of the pieces

0:51:12.853 --> 0:51:17.973
<v Speaker 2>Grant Robertson, how much did he know about the advancement

0:51:18.013 --> 0:51:18.213
<v Speaker 2>of this?

0:51:19.933 --> 0:51:22.853
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't think. I don't think they've been briefed.

0:51:22.973 --> 0:51:26.613
<v Speaker 3>You know that I haven't. I tried to get I

0:51:26.733 --> 0:51:29.933
<v Speaker 3>asked directly, how much is the Minister for Finance, the

0:51:29.933 --> 0:51:33.053
<v Speaker 3>minister responsible for you know, basically the treasury in the

0:51:33.133 --> 0:51:35.773
<v Speaker 3>RB and there and I don't you know, there's been

0:51:36.213 --> 0:51:41.613
<v Speaker 3>nothing zip. It's just impossible to understand this. And of

0:51:41.653 --> 0:51:44.653
<v Speaker 3>course the minute, this is a big loophole. The minute

0:51:44.653 --> 0:51:49.653
<v Speaker 3>a minister gets moves out into a different portfolio. They

0:51:49.653 --> 0:51:53.013
<v Speaker 3>don't have to answer question official information, actual quests from

0:51:53.013 --> 0:51:56.493
<v Speaker 3>their previous portfolio. But I don't you know there has

0:51:57.613 --> 0:52:00.453
<v Speaker 3>has Nikola been briefed to what extent does she know?

0:52:00.613 --> 0:52:03.013
<v Speaker 3>But and the truth is she will only know as

0:52:03.053 --> 0:52:06.053
<v Speaker 3>much as she knows from the RB and ZAT and accenture.

0:52:06.493 --> 0:52:10.013
<v Speaker 3>So you know, this is we can talk about eccentia

0:52:10.053 --> 0:52:12.693
<v Speaker 3>in a bit. This is this is a major problem.

0:52:12.773 --> 0:52:16.133
<v Speaker 2>We all right, so quickly some quick Q and as

0:52:16.493 --> 0:52:19.133
<v Speaker 2>if we can, if I can think of the questions

0:52:19.453 --> 0:52:25.453
<v Speaker 2>fast enough. There is an old argument. It's the greatest

0:52:25.453 --> 0:52:28.093
<v Speaker 2>loser argument I've ever known. I think, if you've got

0:52:28.093 --> 0:52:30.013
<v Speaker 2>nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear it, what

0:52:30.053 --> 0:52:31.453
<v Speaker 2>do you say?

0:52:32.573 --> 0:52:35.413
<v Speaker 3>So that leaves us really really, really really really big

0:52:35.453 --> 0:52:37.933
<v Speaker 3>space for the demagogues and the tyrants to step in

0:52:38.053 --> 0:52:40.293
<v Speaker 3>and to create unfair laws. And then you wake up

0:52:40.333 --> 0:52:43.573
<v Speaker 3>one day and you say, but that law's unfair. But

0:52:45.053 --> 0:52:50.053
<v Speaker 3>you can't fight back. You can't fight back because the

0:52:50.213 --> 0:52:53.693
<v Speaker 3>laws have been put in place that stop you. So

0:52:54.453 --> 0:52:57.773
<v Speaker 3>you presume everything's going to be fair and lovely. But

0:52:57.893 --> 0:53:00.413
<v Speaker 3>what happens if it's not? And when it's not so

0:53:01.653 --> 0:53:04.773
<v Speaker 3>and the problem is, I think again, this is this

0:53:04.813 --> 0:53:07.693
<v Speaker 3>is when you're at the barbecue. How many laws have

0:53:07.773 --> 0:53:14.333
<v Speaker 3>been pushed through using emergency rational emergency excuses, And then

0:53:14.653 --> 0:53:18.093
<v Speaker 3>COVID that all the all the the mandates came through

0:53:18.213 --> 0:53:22.173
<v Speaker 3>using what's called delegated or secondary legislation. It came through

0:53:22.213 --> 0:53:26.813
<v Speaker 3>with perhaps only two ministers, maybe three ministers making those

0:53:26.853 --> 0:53:31.293
<v Speaker 3>decisions for the mandates to go through without any reviews

0:53:31.373 --> 0:53:34.413
<v Speaker 3>of the scientific literature. That's remember, that's a game being played,

0:53:34.493 --> 0:53:36.933
<v Speaker 3>is they don't actually look at the published scientific literature

0:53:37.573 --> 0:53:40.093
<v Speaker 3>and they say that this is the evidence. But the

0:53:40.093 --> 0:53:43.853
<v Speaker 3>evidence only involves the evidence that the industry involves. You know,

0:53:44.093 --> 0:53:47.893
<v Speaker 3>during COVID that was that was Spiza gives them. So

0:53:48.613 --> 0:53:51.973
<v Speaker 3>we need to understand that when agencies are making decisions

0:53:52.013 --> 0:53:58.053
<v Speaker 3>that do not involve using independent, impartial researchers and actors,

0:53:59.453 --> 0:54:03.373
<v Speaker 3>then we cannot trust the decisions being made of those agencies.

0:54:03.413 --> 0:54:06.533
<v Speaker 3>So that I have nothing to hide means that you're

0:54:06.613 --> 0:54:10.533
<v Speaker 3>sitting dark when things are that when things go wrong

0:54:10.613 --> 0:54:11.693
<v Speaker 3>or they become unfair.

0:54:11.893 --> 0:54:14.133
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've had an argument for as long as I

0:54:14.173 --> 0:54:16.773
<v Speaker 2>can remember now, and I don't know where it came from.

0:54:16.813 --> 0:54:18.413
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to think. I thought of it myself. But

0:54:18.773 --> 0:54:23.973
<v Speaker 2>you you've got nothing to hide. You think you think

0:54:24.013 --> 0:54:26.373
<v Speaker 2>you've got nothing to hide. You're not the one that

0:54:26.453 --> 0:54:31.453
<v Speaker 2>makes the decisions on what should be hidden or not hidden,

0:54:31.653 --> 0:54:34.213
<v Speaker 2>and what what's right or wrong at any given stage.

0:54:34.973 --> 0:54:38.013
<v Speaker 2>You're not the authority in charge of the rules. That's

0:54:38.053 --> 0:54:43.333
<v Speaker 2>the point exactly. I just don't get. I don't understand

0:54:43.373 --> 0:54:46.413
<v Speaker 2>how otherwise intelligent people, and I can think of two

0:54:46.813 --> 0:54:52.253
<v Speaker 2>prominent people still still argue that now you included, you included.

0:54:52.293 --> 0:54:53.253
<v Speaker 2>Did you want to say more?

0:54:54.093 --> 0:54:57.853
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would those two intelligent and prominent people, I

0:54:58.693 --> 0:55:02.493
<v Speaker 3>would quickly like to draw their attention to So the

0:55:02.533 --> 0:55:04.813
<v Speaker 3>attorney general. Can we take a quick talk about the

0:55:04.813 --> 0:55:11.493
<v Speaker 3>attorney general? Right? So attorney general has constitutional responsibilities. Judith

0:55:11.493 --> 0:55:15.213
<v Speaker 3>Collins is required to ensure that the operations of executive

0:55:15.213 --> 0:55:19.893
<v Speaker 3>government are conducted lawfully and constitutionally, and that the government

0:55:19.973 --> 0:55:23.893
<v Speaker 3>is not prevented, through the through use of legal process,

0:55:23.933 --> 0:55:28.173
<v Speaker 3>from lawfully implementing its chosen policy. Now, remember, lawful lawfully

0:55:28.173 --> 0:55:30.773
<v Speaker 3>implementing means it can just go bang bang bang through

0:55:30.933 --> 0:55:34.493
<v Speaker 3>emergency powers or secondary legislation. But we have a big

0:55:34.533 --> 0:55:38.933
<v Speaker 3>problem because Judith Collins is the Attorney General. I have

0:55:39.173 --> 0:55:44.053
<v Speaker 3>never seen an Attorney General with the extent of ministerial

0:55:44.173 --> 0:55:49.373
<v Speaker 3>portfolios that Collins had. She's the Minister for start you know,

0:55:49.493 --> 0:55:51.853
<v Speaker 3>just breathing deeply everyone, because this is a long list,

0:55:52.653 --> 0:55:57.453
<v Speaker 3>Minister for digitizing content. She's the Minister for Defense. She's

0:55:57.453 --> 0:56:01.133
<v Speaker 3>the Minister for the GC s B. She's the Minister

0:56:01.213 --> 0:56:04.773
<v Speaker 3>for the nz SIS. She's the minister who is leading

0:56:04.813 --> 0:56:08.053
<v Speaker 3>the coordination of the government's response to the Royal Commission's

0:56:08.053 --> 0:56:11.733
<v Speaker 3>report into the terrorist attack on the christ Church Mosques.

0:56:12.173 --> 0:56:16.173
<v Speaker 3>She's the Minister for Space, and she's the Minister for Science,

0:56:16.373 --> 0:56:20.893
<v Speaker 3>Innovation and Technology. And if you remember, Science and Innovation

0:56:21.013 --> 0:56:25.213
<v Speaker 3>and Technology is caught under MB and will not do

0:56:25.333 --> 0:56:29.293
<v Speaker 3>any research that is contrary to that of the Government

0:56:29.493 --> 0:56:34.093
<v Speaker 3>of the day. Should the Attorney General, who is that

0:56:34.733 --> 0:56:39.013
<v Speaker 3>the Minister for responsible for good law also have those

0:56:39.053 --> 0:56:40.493
<v Speaker 3>ministerial portfolios?

0:56:42.253 --> 0:56:43.413
<v Speaker 2>The answer is it's crazy.

0:56:45.133 --> 0:56:49.133
<v Speaker 3>It's just I think the word is diabolical later and

0:56:49.533 --> 0:56:51.413
<v Speaker 3>I like crazy.

0:56:52.533 --> 0:56:58.013
<v Speaker 2>Or diabolically crazy. But anyway, there's two more things. At

0:56:58.093 --> 0:57:02.493
<v Speaker 2>least I want to slip in digitally. These heavy criticism

0:57:02.533 --> 0:57:06.933
<v Speaker 2>by New York University Law School paper. This is something

0:57:06.973 --> 0:57:11.653
<v Speaker 2>I only read the very short time ago, and I've

0:57:11.653 --> 0:57:14.573
<v Speaker 2>got to go back and deal with it further, because

0:57:14.733 --> 0:57:19.573
<v Speaker 2>coming from a university in New York, little in America

0:57:19.653 --> 0:57:24.573
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, something like this seems out of context.

0:57:25.493 --> 0:57:28.213
<v Speaker 2>At twenty twenty two, paper paving a Digital Road to

0:57:28.293 --> 0:57:32.413
<v Speaker 2>Hell question Mark by the Center for Human Rights in

0:57:32.453 --> 0:57:36.053
<v Speaker 2>Global Justice New York University School of Law heavily criticized

0:57:36.093 --> 0:57:39.893
<v Speaker 2>the models of digital ideas that have been propagated by

0:57:39.933 --> 0:57:44.013
<v Speaker 2>these large organizations. The policy development that followed the World

0:57:44.093 --> 0:57:48.173
<v Speaker 2>bank initial efforts have reflected the concern in this New

0:57:48.293 --> 0:57:53.693
<v Speaker 2>York University School of Law paper. Key issues include privileges

0:57:53.813 --> 0:57:59.173
<v Speaker 2>economic identity is disconnected from legal status and steers attention

0:57:59.333 --> 0:58:03.653
<v Speaker 2>away from civil registration, threatens a range of fundamental rights,

0:58:03.893 --> 0:58:06.773
<v Speaker 2>from the right to social security to the rights to privacy.

0:58:07.413 --> 0:58:10.733
<v Speaker 2>And that's the big one for me. The surported benefits

0:58:10.813 --> 0:58:15.973
<v Speaker 2>remain mostly unsubstantiated in the absence of serious baseline studies,

0:58:16.133 --> 0:58:20.613
<v Speaker 2>cost benefit and value for money analysis and impact assessments.

0:58:20.933 --> 0:58:22.933
<v Speaker 2>I'll stop there because I don't want to take up

0:58:22.973 --> 0:58:26.173
<v Speaker 2>too much time. But the authors the authors just went

0:58:26.213 --> 0:58:29.013
<v Speaker 2>on to note all too often digital ID systems are

0:58:29.053 --> 0:58:32.973
<v Speaker 2>mired in a lack of transparency. Even the legislation underlying

0:58:32.973 --> 0:58:37.333
<v Speaker 2>digital ID where it exists often does not provide adequate

0:58:37.373 --> 0:58:40.213
<v Speaker 2>information about what the system will entail you go.

0:58:41.493 --> 0:58:46.413
<v Speaker 3>So this is really interesting. They looked at the World Bank,

0:58:46.573 --> 0:58:50.053
<v Speaker 3>the role of the World Bank's bank, that World Bank

0:58:50.173 --> 0:58:54.453
<v Speaker 3>singular in setting the white papers, the policy, the framing,

0:58:54.573 --> 0:58:59.213
<v Speaker 3>the language for digital identities. In our PSCR and Z paper,

0:58:59.333 --> 0:59:01.653
<v Speaker 3>we've gone and said, look at look at the Bank

0:59:01.693 --> 0:59:06.293
<v Speaker 3>of International International Settlements the BIS. Look at how they've

0:59:06.413 --> 0:59:11.413
<v Speaker 3>set the policy, the language, the framing, the principles, the risks,

0:59:11.853 --> 0:59:15.533
<v Speaker 3>and so what we have is these big, global, powerful

0:59:15.573 --> 0:59:21.293
<v Speaker 3>banks that have legal indemnity that are outside the purview

0:59:21.373 --> 0:59:26.053
<v Speaker 3>of any democratic nation, setting the language, the risk framing,

0:59:26.773 --> 0:59:30.253
<v Speaker 3>all that sort of stuff. And so that's why those

0:59:30.293 --> 0:59:32.773
<v Speaker 3>those academics looked at that background, and then they came

0:59:32.853 --> 0:59:35.813
<v Speaker 3>down and they looked at how the risks and so

0:59:35.853 --> 0:59:38.973
<v Speaker 3>there's a there's an image that we've reproduced in the

0:59:39.093 --> 0:59:43.613
<v Speaker 3>latter later sort of twentieth fifth of our paper, and

0:59:44.053 --> 0:59:47.813
<v Speaker 3>it's there. They're they're showing how digital identity stretches into

0:59:47.973 --> 0:59:52.253
<v Speaker 3>every single part of society. So when you overlay digital

0:59:52.293 --> 0:59:55.613
<v Speaker 3>identity stretching into every single part of society, how we

0:59:55.693 --> 1:00:00.373
<v Speaker 3>pay your access, Every single stratu of society is overlaid

1:00:00.413 --> 1:00:05.293
<v Speaker 3>with that. So that's a really important paper to consider.

1:00:05.333 --> 1:00:08.333
<v Speaker 3>And we've cited that and yeah, yeah, we've that's that's

1:00:08.413 --> 1:00:12.053
<v Speaker 3>highlighted in a chapter in our paper. It's really important

1:00:12.093 --> 1:00:13.253
<v Speaker 3>to understand.

1:00:12.933 --> 1:00:16.413
<v Speaker 2>Off the top of your head the four democratic myths.

1:00:16.813 --> 1:00:19.133
<v Speaker 2>Can you recall them?

1:00:19.293 --> 1:00:22.173
<v Speaker 3>I said, four democratic risks? Risks?

1:00:22.213 --> 1:00:22.893
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, did you?

1:00:23.693 --> 1:00:28.213
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? So the first thing is that they and this

1:00:28.333 --> 1:00:30.333
<v Speaker 3>is what you will talk about a lot, is that

1:00:30.373 --> 1:00:33.493
<v Speaker 3>they The first one is that digital IDs linked to

1:00:34.213 --> 1:00:39.573
<v Speaker 3>cbdc's enhance all of government oversight over private activity, so

1:00:39.613 --> 1:00:44.333
<v Speaker 3>that is surveillance on steroids. The second one is that

1:00:44.413 --> 1:00:49.893
<v Speaker 3>they will be transferred electronicity electronically using these pre programmable

1:00:49.893 --> 1:00:53.333
<v Speaker 3>smart contracts that are all so composable they can be

1:00:53.453 --> 1:00:57.133
<v Speaker 3>bundled together. Then we have the third one is the

1:00:57.173 --> 1:01:02.933
<v Speaker 3>potential for erosion of parliamentary oversight. So what will happen

1:01:03.053 --> 1:01:05.173
<v Speaker 3>is that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand will basically

1:01:05.253 --> 1:01:08.533
<v Speaker 3>take on more powers relating to money for production, and

1:01:08.573 --> 1:01:12.333
<v Speaker 3>that will be outside of the appropriations process that normally

1:01:12.453 --> 1:01:16.693
<v Speaker 3>is our democratic way of you know, creating ways which

1:01:16.733 --> 1:01:18.853
<v Speaker 3>say poorer communities might have a little bit of a

1:01:19.093 --> 1:01:23.093
<v Speaker 3>more access to resources or better access to health and education.

1:01:23.373 --> 1:01:29.293
<v Speaker 3>That helps, you know, results in less inequalities. So for example,

1:01:29.573 --> 1:01:33.253
<v Speaker 3>then the fourth one is the continued increase in oversight

1:01:33.373 --> 1:01:39.053
<v Speaker 3>and delegation of the production of policy, strategy and rules

1:01:39.093 --> 1:01:42.973
<v Speaker 3>to the BIS, that Bank of International Settlements and the

1:01:43.013 --> 1:01:46.253
<v Speaker 3>International Monetary Fund. So what happens is these guys, with

1:01:46.333 --> 1:01:49.573
<v Speaker 3>all their big white papers and all their big expertise,

1:01:50.093 --> 1:01:54.133
<v Speaker 3>they become the go to institution for the Reserve Bank.

1:01:54.173 --> 1:01:58.333
<v Speaker 3>Now we've already seen that following this massive, big consultation

1:01:58.453 --> 1:02:01.813
<v Speaker 3>with the IMF and twenty sixteen that resulted in all

1:02:01.893 --> 1:02:05.733
<v Speaker 3>this changing, including building in those too big to fail

1:02:05.933 --> 1:02:11.213
<v Speaker 3>clauses in the financial markets infrastructures at So we've got

1:02:11.213 --> 1:02:13.373
<v Speaker 3>those four risks and as well as that which we

1:02:13.373 --> 1:02:16.213
<v Speaker 3>didn't obviously I should have put in, is the financial

1:02:16.373 --> 1:02:20.773
<v Speaker 3>like this, the Reserve Bank has oversighted financial market. If

1:02:20.773 --> 1:02:23.493
<v Speaker 3>they enter as a player, they're saying, oh, no, it'll

1:02:23.533 --> 1:02:26.013
<v Speaker 3>be good because there'll just be another player. And I'm like,

1:02:26.413 --> 1:02:30.053
<v Speaker 3>so another player that can't go bust and is too

1:02:30.093 --> 1:02:34.973
<v Speaker 3>big to fail. That's not an equal playing field. So

1:02:35.133 --> 1:02:38.733
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're the main sort of risks because you know,

1:02:39.333 --> 1:02:41.373
<v Speaker 3>and then and then you've got that other risk that

1:02:41.413 --> 1:02:45.133
<v Speaker 3>they could there could be a digital run to foreigns.

1:02:45.493 --> 1:02:48.893
<v Speaker 3>So that our bank our central banks think that there

1:02:48.933 --> 1:02:52.733
<v Speaker 3>could be a digital run to foreign CBDCs if other

1:02:52.813 --> 1:02:58.853
<v Speaker 3>CBDCs are doing this, and it's unlikely. I think the biggest,

1:02:59.493 --> 1:03:03.453
<v Speaker 3>the biggest people aren't wanting to get on CBDCs because

1:03:03.453 --> 1:03:07.533
<v Speaker 3>they fundamentally don't trust the expanded oversight and powers of

1:03:07.573 --> 1:03:10.973
<v Speaker 3>the government. The only way governments right now getting people

1:03:11.013 --> 1:03:15.213
<v Speaker 3>into c bydcs is through regulatory or mission creep, where

1:03:15.493 --> 1:03:16.933
<v Speaker 3>they force people onto them.

1:03:17.733 --> 1:03:21.733
<v Speaker 2>I just questioned whether expanded oversight and whatever has reached

1:03:22.133 --> 1:03:26.413
<v Speaker 2>even fifty percent of the population, whether we are with

1:03:26.533 --> 1:03:29.573
<v Speaker 2>regard to all of this, And that takes me back

1:03:30.293 --> 1:03:33.133
<v Speaker 2>to your comments right at the beginning about the legacy

1:03:33.173 --> 1:03:37.973
<v Speaker 2>media and their failure, and I to be honest, they

1:03:38.133 --> 1:03:42.093
<v Speaker 2>don't deserve the job in the first place. That I often.

1:03:43.093 --> 1:03:49.773
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mates with the next mainstream journo, and they

1:03:50.213 --> 1:03:54.293
<v Speaker 3>got so sick and tired of basically pulling off the

1:03:54.333 --> 1:03:59.013
<v Speaker 3>Reuters press releases and rehashing that or the government agency

1:03:59.053 --> 1:04:03.213
<v Speaker 3>press releases and rehashing that they're disgusted by it. They

1:04:03.413 --> 1:04:06.533
<v Speaker 3>know that's the formulation of legacy media.

1:04:07.333 --> 1:04:10.293
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, because this has been so good and there's

1:04:10.373 --> 1:04:15.493
<v Speaker 2>been so much left unsaid and discussed, whether you would

1:04:15.533 --> 1:04:17.853
<v Speaker 2>consider a return in the not too di some future.

1:04:19.213 --> 1:04:23.773
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'd be grateful if I could just quickly talk

1:04:23.813 --> 1:04:26.933
<v Speaker 3>about psdr's recommendations in our paper.

1:04:28.213 --> 1:04:29.533
<v Speaker 2>I think you should go for it.

1:04:30.373 --> 1:04:33.573
<v Speaker 3>So what I think we can ask for so right now,

1:04:34.933 --> 1:04:39.653
<v Speaker 3>right now, they're looking at these digital cash trials. I

1:04:39.653 --> 1:04:43.573
<v Speaker 3>don't believe so I see trials as there is as

1:04:43.613 --> 1:04:48.373
<v Speaker 3>a soft launch, and so instead we should say that

1:04:48.413 --> 1:04:51.933
<v Speaker 3>there is a minimum sixty moderatorium two election cycles at

1:04:52.013 --> 1:04:55.933
<v Speaker 3>least until twenty thirty of any trial or CBDC release,

1:04:56.573 --> 1:04:59.773
<v Speaker 3>and so we can we can observe what is happening

1:04:59.773 --> 1:05:05.933
<v Speaker 3>in foreign jurisdictions. And then after twenty thirty that decision

1:05:06.373 --> 1:05:10.453
<v Speaker 3>for the RBNZ to enter the CBDC world should only

1:05:10.493 --> 1:05:14.893
<v Speaker 3>be taken by Parliament at all of people's vote. And

1:05:14.933 --> 1:05:17.013
<v Speaker 3>this is after we see a heck of a lot

1:05:17.053 --> 1:05:23.093
<v Speaker 3>of information and data produced by independent people. I also

1:05:23.773 --> 1:05:28.173
<v Speaker 3>we've also recommended that that digital ideas, digital IDs, a

1:05:28.253 --> 1:05:32.293
<v Speaker 3>real mey identity should never ever be the only form

1:05:32.813 --> 1:05:37.813
<v Speaker 3>of identity that is accepted by any government agency in

1:05:37.853 --> 1:05:42.973
<v Speaker 3>any form, and that passports and driver's licenses are equally acceptable,

1:05:43.853 --> 1:05:46.413
<v Speaker 3>and we know that passports and driver's license in Australia

1:05:46.413 --> 1:05:50.053
<v Speaker 3>have a historically low rate of fraud. And then the

1:05:50.133 --> 1:05:53.253
<v Speaker 3>fourth one is that the DA, with their expansion of

1:05:53.333 --> 1:05:57.733
<v Speaker 3>powers and their capacity to control real meat, we should

1:05:57.773 --> 1:06:02.853
<v Speaker 3>be really examining the context of information sharing cross government

1:06:02.893 --> 1:06:06.013
<v Speaker 3>behind the scenes. So they were just before recommendations and

1:06:06.053 --> 1:06:07.853
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to come back on it, mat.

1:06:08.693 --> 1:06:11.733
<v Speaker 2>That would be great because I'm just looking at some

1:06:12.013 --> 1:06:14.573
<v Speaker 2>stuff here. I have a full print out by the

1:06:14.573 --> 1:06:19.053
<v Speaker 2>way of the of the monster stepping back, stepping back

1:06:19.053 --> 1:06:23.813
<v Speaker 2>from the brink where where you said you said that

1:06:23.893 --> 1:06:31.333
<v Speaker 2>the original one which arrived in my inbox was from

1:06:31.373 --> 1:06:33.573
<v Speaker 2>the Telegraph.

1:06:33.613 --> 1:06:37.333
<v Speaker 3>So you've got you've got the If there is a

1:06:37.413 --> 1:06:40.933
<v Speaker 3>Daily Telegraph New Zealand article that's come out, hope I'm

1:06:40.973 --> 1:06:44.013
<v Speaker 3>hoping will be a Brownstone paper coming out next week.

1:06:44.773 --> 1:06:53.973
<v Speaker 3>But if you search for on Instagram, on Twitter, on substatic,

1:06:54.533 --> 1:06:59.413
<v Speaker 3>and you will for at p s g r n

1:06:59.533 --> 1:07:03.533
<v Speaker 3>Z so psgr is in New Zealand, twenty five year

1:07:03.573 --> 1:07:05.693
<v Speaker 3>old New Zealand charity. We've been around for ages, but

1:07:05.733 --> 1:07:07.453
<v Speaker 3>we've got no money, so no one knows about it.

1:07:07.973 --> 1:07:11.453
<v Speaker 3>And ENDZ is on the end because that is the

1:07:11.453 --> 1:07:15.453
<v Speaker 3>only like, the only handle I could get that is consistent.

1:07:15.533 --> 1:07:19.253
<v Speaker 3>So if you search for PSCR and Z on subset,

1:07:19.253 --> 1:07:25.853
<v Speaker 3>Twitter or Instagram, you'll find a link to us, and

1:07:25.893 --> 1:07:28.293
<v Speaker 3>you'll find a link to the paper or ps TR

1:07:28.773 --> 1:07:29.893
<v Speaker 3>dot org dot.

1:07:29.773 --> 1:07:35.333
<v Speaker 2>NZ, PSCR dot org dot NZ that eighty page ninety

1:07:35.373 --> 1:07:38.933
<v Speaker 2>page whatever piece is. They're both worth reading. Start with

1:07:39.013 --> 1:07:42.933
<v Speaker 2>the shorter one and you'll know you'll get a line

1:07:42.973 --> 1:07:45.613
<v Speaker 2>on yourself if you find that you're interested in more.

1:07:46.253 --> 1:07:52.293
<v Speaker 2>And I'd approve that. So Jodie, it's been great and

1:07:52.373 --> 1:07:53.653
<v Speaker 2>we shall talk soon.

1:07:54.853 --> 1:07:57.333
<v Speaker 3>An absolute pleasure, late, and thank you for this chance.

1:08:02.253 --> 1:08:05.453
<v Speaker 2>Now I have to report some bad news. We did

1:08:05.493 --> 1:08:07.493
<v Speaker 2>have a mailroom and it was a very good mail

1:08:07.533 --> 1:08:11.813
<v Speaker 2>room I my dad. Unfortunately the male failed to get delivered.

1:08:12.173 --> 1:08:15.093
<v Speaker 2>That covers a lot of areas I know, and it's

1:08:15.093 --> 1:08:17.813
<v Speaker 2>got all of us confused, but it's going to have

1:08:17.893 --> 1:08:22.293
<v Speaker 2>to wait until next time. So the only thing left

1:08:22.293 --> 1:08:27.493
<v Speaker 2>to say is with apologies of course, is that we

1:08:27.533 --> 1:08:30.573
<v Speaker 2>shall return with two forty five in the not too

1:08:30.573 --> 1:08:34.053
<v Speaker 2>distant future. Until then, thank you for listening and we

1:08:34.093 --> 1:08:34.813
<v Speaker 2>shall talk soon.

1:08:42.613 --> 1:08:46.333
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more from News Talks ed B. Listen

1:08:46.373 --> 1:08:49.373
<v Speaker 1>live on air or online, and keep our shows with

1:08:49.453 --> 1:08:52.613
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go with our podcast on iHeartRadio