1 00:00:01,240 --> 00:00:04,560 Speaker 1: Ever du for see Ellen Heather. I employed one hundred 2 00:00:04,559 --> 00:00:08,319 Speaker 1: and five people. I recently recruited a CFO. The top 3 00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:11,159 Speaker 1: runner was a woman. We had to pass on the 4 00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: woman because she couldn't commit to traveling to our offices 5 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:16,520 Speaker 1: in Taiwan and Vietnam, and she also had issues with 6 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:19,040 Speaker 1: the weekly late call with management because it interfered with 7 00:00:19,040 --> 00:00:22,280 Speaker 1: her cooking dinner. Seventeen past six. Now, if your home 8 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:25,160 Speaker 1: insurance premiums have gone up, sperrethal for owners of apartments 9 00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:27,280 Speaker 1: and also multi unit buildings, because it looks like they 10 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:29,960 Speaker 1: have been hit extra hard. Genati Traine, as the Heralds 11 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:30,920 Speaker 1: Wellington Business editor. 12 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:32,560 Speaker 2: Hey you name Hey Heather. 13 00:00:32,760 --> 00:00:33,839 Speaker 1: How hard have they been hit? 14 00:00:34,760 --> 00:00:37,040 Speaker 2: Well? Pretty hard, And it really depends on where you live. 15 00:00:37,760 --> 00:00:41,040 Speaker 2: The Treasury recently surveyed a bunch of apartment and other 16 00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:45,080 Speaker 2: multi unit building owners. It only surveyed one hundred and 17 00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 2: forty two of them, so quite a small sample size. 18 00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:51,479 Speaker 2: But from that group it found that in Wellington in 19 00:00:51,520 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 2: the five years to twenty twenty three, those premiums rose 20 00:00:54,600 --> 00:00:58,600 Speaker 2: by fifty eight percent, and in Auckland they doubled. Now, 21 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:02,600 Speaker 2: by way of context, you know houses on standalone houses 22 00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:06,520 Speaker 2: owned and by people who live in them. Those premiums 23 00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:10,000 Speaker 2: only increased by thirty percent over that time, so we're 24 00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:13,039 Speaker 2: looking at thirty percent versus fifty eight or one hundred percent. 25 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:17,360 Speaker 2: Now Wellington, particularly, those premiums were super high, about eight 26 00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:21,840 Speaker 2: two hundred dollars a year, much lower in Auckland at 27 00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:25,880 Speaker 2: about one eight hundred. Now, these numbers the Treasury colle 28 00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:28,600 Speaker 2: collected a little bit rope, you know, because that sample 29 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:32,039 Speaker 2: sizes is small, But I think that that general trend 30 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:36,680 Speaker 2: is there, those multi unit building premiums shooting up much 31 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:38,560 Speaker 2: more quickly than regular insurance. 32 00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 1: I'll tell you what I found fascinating was that the 33 00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:43,600 Speaker 1: respondents who were talking about they said that the earthquake 34 00:01:43,600 --> 00:01:45,920 Speaker 1: strengthening that they had done on their buildings hadn't lowered 35 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:47,360 Speaker 1: their insurance premiums. Why not? 36 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, I think that is a real blow 37 00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:54,000 Speaker 2: because I know some body corps are sinking really large 38 00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 2: sums of money into getting the buildings up to stand 39 00:01:57,640 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 2: in and you'd think if you do that, it would 40 00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:03,640 Speaker 2: make a difference. The insurers told the Treasury that actually, 41 00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:08,800 Speaker 2: just because a building meets the standards, the building standards 42 00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:11,120 Speaker 2: to make it really safe, doesn't mean to say that 43 00:02:11,120 --> 00:02:13,760 Speaker 2: that building won't be damaged. So the building could still 44 00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:16,720 Speaker 2: be damaged and therefore costs the insurer a lot, even 45 00:02:16,760 --> 00:02:21,079 Speaker 2: if it's built in such a way that keeps people safe. 46 00:02:21,400 --> 00:02:24,160 Speaker 2: So I think that that is a real blow. The 47 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 2: Treasury reckons that the amount you could save is only 48 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:30,080 Speaker 2: about ten percent on your premium if you go to 49 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 2: all that hassle and expense to, you know, to get 50 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:34,040 Speaker 2: your building up scratch. 51 00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:36,320 Speaker 1: This is fascinating again, and really quickly, why is Treasury 52 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:38,680 Speaker 1: pairing back its monitoring of the insurance costs? 53 00:02:39,320 --> 00:02:43,559 Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, this had me scratching my head. Previously, 54 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:48,000 Speaker 2: the Treasury got Finity Consulting, which is the scrip of actuaries, 55 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:52,639 Speaker 2: to do these quarterly reports that go into much greater 56 00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:55,280 Speaker 2: detail than the survey we've just been talking about, really 57 00:02:55,320 --> 00:02:58,360 Speaker 2: sort of gnally stuff to see how much insurance is 58 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:01,000 Speaker 2: costing and what the coverage is like. That has only 59 00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:04,200 Speaker 2: happening annually. Now I think that is probably a cost 60 00:03:04,639 --> 00:03:09,280 Speaker 2: saving thing. Also, the Treasury is no longer as interested 61 00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:13,560 Speaker 2: in monitoring how the private insurance market is responding to 62 00:03:13,639 --> 00:03:17,560 Speaker 2: EQUC doubling its coverage. So in twenty twenty two, EQC 63 00:03:17,600 --> 00:03:19,840 Speaker 2: took on a whole lot more risk. Everyone was worried 64 00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:22,600 Speaker 2: that if that happened, the insurers wouldn't actually cut their premiums. 65 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:25,360 Speaker 2: That didn't actually happen, which is why the Treasury was 66 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 2: monitoring it, So it's pairing that back. The thing I 67 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:33,640 Speaker 2: think is significant here is that the government is acknowledging 68 00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:37,000 Speaker 2: that it can't really do anything about this risk based pricing, 69 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:40,200 Speaker 2: the fact that some property owners face very, very high 70 00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:43,080 Speaker 2: insurance bills. In fact, the government is happy for this 71 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:46,600 Speaker 2: to happen because if insurers kind of do the dirty 72 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 2: work making people who live in risky properties pay more insurance, 73 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:54,120 Speaker 2: that encourages people move to move to safer areas, which 74 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:57,000 Speaker 2: means if there's a storm or something bad, the government 75 00:03:57,040 --> 00:03:59,200 Speaker 2: doesn't effectively have to bow out those people. So that 76 00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:03,000 Speaker 2: government is actually quietly happy for the insurance industry to 77 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 2: do a lot of the heavy lifting encouraging people to 78 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:07,280 Speaker 2: move to safer places. 79 00:04:07,440 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 1: I see that makes sense, Jine, Thanks very much, appreciate it. 80 00:04:09,680 --> 00:04:13,120 Speaker 1: Janet to training The Herald's Wellington Business Editor. For more 81 00:04:13,160 --> 00:04:16,520 Speaker 1: from Heather Duplessy Allen Drive, listen live to News talks 82 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:20,800 Speaker 1: 'b from four pm weekdays, or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio,