WEBVTT - Investing in US markets via KiwiSaver

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Kyoda.

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Shared Lunch, brought to you by Chase's. My

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 2>name is Halen Madison. We're looking at two things today.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 2>The first is the new Chasy's US five hundred key

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>we Save fund, and given that, what is the state

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 2>of the US markets. I'll be joined by Christa Leiba,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>the head of Global and multi asset Investments at Harbor

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Asset Management, and by our very own Chaza's head of

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 2>super and Funds, Matt McPherson. But before we get started,

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>here's some important information.

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 3>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 3>the time of record.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Chris and welcome Matt to the program.

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Hellen.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Chair Za's has just launched its own US five hundred fund,

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>which is managed by Vanguard and tracks the famous S

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred. Matt, that's been pretty popular. What

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 2>is it about this fund that that is so popular?

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, really popular with our investors. The single most popular

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 5>option on Chersey's and I guess there's a few reasons that.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 5>The first is it's a great way of getting exposure

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 5>to those large US companies without having to go through

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 5>and pickstocks yourself. So it comes with diversification because it's

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 5>over five hundred companies in the index. I guess. The

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 5>other point is that ETFs tend to be much lower

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 5>cost than say a managed fund, So there's sort of

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 5>combination of reasons that they are really really popular.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Chris, the US markets have been up and down, as

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>we know, Tariffs are on, they're off, they're paused all

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 2>over the show, and there's been a concern about the

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>US economy investing in US stocks. Now, what would you

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>say investors need to think about?

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>So far this year, it has been all about tariffs,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 4>but there are actually some other things that might be

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 4>slipping under the radar a little bit for investors because

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>the talk has been so dominated by tariffs. And something

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 4>I draw out is that we're in the midst of

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 4>the US earning season. Currently, we've had ninety percent of

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 4>companies report, We've had seventy seven percent of those companies

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 4>beat consensus earnings expectations, So a lot of your viewers

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 4>will be thinking that well from the early part of April.

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Actually markets have bounced back quite substantially. One of the

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 4>key reasons for that has been the earning season, but

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 4>it's it's also been the outlook statements from the companies

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 4>that we've seen. Outlook statements have actually been relatively strong,

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot of resilience shown in the face of what

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 4>is quite an uncertain tariff environment. Coming in to the year,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 4>the US market was expected to grow quite substantially. We

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.119
<v Speaker 4>had the average price target the S and P five

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred b substantially in the double digits from most south

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.399
<v Speaker 4>side brokers. Obviously, what we've seen so far has been

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 4>a little bit disappointing, and part of that is a

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>reflection of where the economic data is lay. So so

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 4>far this year, the US has slowed down. In the

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 4>first quarter, it looked to be slowing down quite markedly.

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 4>So we have some real time measures of US GDP

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 4>like the GDP now measure, and that came down quite substantially. Subsequently,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 4>though it's bounced back, So what we're seeing in the

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 4>US is a slow down, but actually from a relatively

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 4>high level. Now with tariffs, who knows is the real

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 4>comment there? We will see ebbs and flows, but what

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>I can point out over the last month is that

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 4>we've gone from a point we're thinking that this is

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 4>going to be absolutely disastrous and we're going to have

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 4>extremely high tariffs to the direction of travel being one

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 4>that's quite incrementally positive. But it is President Trump, and

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 4>we know that it can be unpredictable and that can

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 4>unsettle markets a bit. But I just don't think it's

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 4>all about tariffs. Take into account that the US economy

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 4>is slowing but not too bad, and earnings remain to

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 4>be resilient, and for long term investors, share prices tend

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 4>to follow earnings through time.

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>When we look at the US five hundred fund that

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Cheesy's has launched, this is a key we saber fund.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 2>This is not just a fun that you can jump

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>into on your Cheesys app if you like. That's a

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 2>bit different pretty much to what has been out there. Now.

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us how significant that changes.

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 5>There are a few other key saber funds that allow

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 5>you to invest into the SMP five hundred already. I

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 5>guess what differentiates it from some of the other funds

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 5>that we offer, though, is that it's one hundred percent

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 5>invested into equities, so it comes it's classified as an

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 5>aggressive option, it comes with a higher risk indicator, which

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 5>means higher volatility people need to be comfortable with, and

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 5>it comes with the potential of higher returns over the

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 5>long term. Now, before we launched this fund, we actually

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 5>prioritize to feature that enables people to split their key

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 5>saver across multiple base funds. And the reason we did

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 5>that is because people said they wanted to invest more

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 5>than five percent of their kivsaver into the S and

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 5>P five hundred.

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And that five percent is that because that's what the scheme.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 5>Has been a self select option since we launched our

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 5>scheme a couple of years ago. They won more than

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 5>five but they don't necessarily want to invest one hundred

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 5>percent of their kipsaver into a fund that only invests

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 5>in US equities. And that's how we're seeing it used

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 5>so far. People are generally adding some US five hundred

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 5>to their investment plan rather than replacing their managed fund

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 5>provider completely.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So is that how it works.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>You actually need to be able to just you could

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>go one hundred percent. You obviously can go more than

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 2>five percent, which you can now with self select, but

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 2>you can't actually with self select invest in the US

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 2>can you?

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Yet you can via some of the inside x ETFs

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 5>that we offer.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Chris, what do you think the risks are for investors

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>thinking about the US markets? You've said that things look

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 2>pretty positive yues has been a bit of a slow down.

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Some of those companies are really well established, you know,

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 2>big balance sheets, all of that sort of thing, compared

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>to what's happening in Australasia. Anyway, there's still always risk

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 2>and there's volatility. So I suppose it depends on someone's appetite.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 2>What would you say?

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? So one of the rests I draw out is

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 4>when you're investing in the US market, you're inheriting US

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 4>dollar exposure as well. So the US share market may

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 4>go really really well, but investors have to be prepared

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 4>for the potential outcome that currency, particularly over the shorter term,

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 4>might move things around a bit. So you could have

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.239
<v Speaker 4>a scenario we are investing in the US market, US

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 4>market's done ten percent, you might be thinking your key

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 4>we save has done quite well. However, it could be

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 4>during a period where the US dollar is weakened and

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>if the US dollars a weekends by ten percent by

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 4>the time that is in New Zealand dollars, that that

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 4>would be a flat sort of return. Look, that's not

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 4>my base case by any means, but it's simply saying

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 4>that there are two key levers in this investments, how

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 4>the shares do, but also the currency on the US

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 4>market overall. It's the world's biggest market for a reason.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 4>There's the key global share indices that people use tend

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 4>to have a sixty to sixty five percent allocation to

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 4>the US. So I wouldn't look at its risk profile

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 4>as being that different than say a global share fund.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 4>There are some geographical considerations you need to take into account. Obviously,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 4>the US market will have sensitivities more to US policy.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 4>There can also be events that hit the US harder

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 4>than other economies around the world. So those are just

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 4>a few things to take into account when looking at

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 4>a fund of that nature.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Even so, Matt, given what has been happening in the

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 2>US and the level of volatility, there would be some

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 2>viewers and listeners probably thinking is my key we say

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>was safe if I start investing even a proportion of

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>it in the US.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 5>Of For sure, I think one thing that gives me

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 5>a bit of confidence is there. There's a lot of

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 5>uncertainty and change at the moment. We all appreciate that.

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 5>I think if you go back in time, we would

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 5>often say that same thing. At the moment, things feel

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 5>very uncertain. And what we find is over time, those big,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 5>well run, successful American companies there's a lot of energy

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 5>that comes from that and a lot of focus on

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 5>solving problems. So one of the reasons these companies have

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 5>become successful is because they are really good at solving

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 5>hard problems. And so I guess I take a little

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 5>bit of confidence that we've got some focus and some

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 5>very big brains working on how to solve whatever the

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 5>problem of the day is. And at the moment, it

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 5>feels like the problem of the day is maybe some

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 5>of the policies that's coming out of the States. But

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 5>go back a couple of years ago, we also had

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 5>at the time probably what felt like equally or even

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 5>larger issues with things like the pandemic. And this is

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 5>repeated over time.

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Matt. It's quite interesting. I was talking to a US

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 4>invest or the other and we're talking about this very thing,

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 4>and he said to me, just imagine that you were

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 4>sitting there in twenty nineteen and someone came up to

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 4>you and said, over the next five years, you're going

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 4>to have a global pandemic, so you're all going to

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 4>be locked down for months on end. Then once we

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 4>get out of it, you're going to have the worst

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 4>inflation that you've had in recorded history. Then we're going

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 4>to increase interest rates by the most that we ever

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 4>have in history, and the response to that will be

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 4>a second bear market? And what sort of return would

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 4>you expect over that time? And you kind of go, well,

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 4>that's a lot to put into five years, And the

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 4>answer is returns have actually been above average over that time. So,

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 4>I mean the lesson in that for me is that

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 4>sometimes when you look at the headlines, you can go, look,

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 4>this is really scary, But the reality is, is it

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 4>more or less scared than a pandemic, two or three

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 4>bear markets depending on the time, and the highest inflation

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 4>and interest rates ever, that probably seems a little bit

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 4>light or even on par relative to those particular events.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I guess that's why understanding your investment horizon is

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 5>probably the most important thing you can do before you're

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 5>making any decisions, because in any one of those situations.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 5>If you were thinking short term, you probably would have

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 5>been really upset, and if you're thinking long term, you

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 5>probably would be you know, you're feeling confident that you've

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 5>made the right decisions.

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 2>There are some fund managers in Europe and the Light though,

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 2>who have been pulling back a bit, not pulling out

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>of the US markets. They're still in there, but they

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>have been just gradually pulling back because they've been feeling

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 2>a bit skittish about the Trump administration and they are

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>actually thinking that structurally their allocation will be somewhat different.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 2>And this may be a longer term thing because it

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 2>will happen gradually over time.

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris, just keen for your on that.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so starting point matters in this discussion because coming

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 4>into twenty twenty five, foreign ownership of US shares was

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 4>at all time highs. And if we think about the

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 4>narrative coming into twenty twenty five, it's that the US

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 4>has got the best companies at the forefront of AI

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 4>economy is chugging away really, really well. And it's actually

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 4>the reversal of some of those themes as opposed to

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump himself that's actually driving and it's not in

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 4>the figures I've seen is that they're certainly not leaving

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 4>in their droves. I would more classify it as being

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 4>they've gone from an overweight position and a very optimistic

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 4>view of the market to probably nearer to longer term benchmarks. So,

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 4>as I said, it's not all Trump. Deep seek was

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 4>a really big factor in this. So we had coming

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 4>into the year this deep consensus that the U US

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 4>is just going to completely own AI. China won't get

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 4>a look in because the US cut off the fastest

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 4>chips are to China. Now they're able to innovate. I

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 4>don't know how, it doesn't really matter how. The fact

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 4>is they're there. They're a player. It's not just Deep Secrets.

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 4>It's Baidu, it's ten Cent, it's Ali Barber. So that

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 4>has been one of the reasons why we've seen some

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 4>investor interest go away from the US. The other is

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 4>what's happening in Europe at the moment. Now we're actually

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 4>starting to see some fiscal impulse in Europe, so we've

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 4>had some budget relaxation rules within the EU. It means

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 4>that Germany has past a spending package that is going

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 4>to pump a lot of stimulus into their economy. We're

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 4>starting to see at the margin a little bit more

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 4>stimulatory policy from France and Italy as well. So this

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 4>is from economies that have been in austerity for the

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 4>past fifteen years. So that has been a fundamental change

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 4>which has led people to reduce their overweight positions from

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 4>the US. I think we've just gone from a point

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 4>where investors thought that the US was probably just their

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 4>only choice or their best choice, to one where people

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 4>are looking at Europe saying, look, valuations are a bit

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 4>more reasonable over there, and actually things perhaps weren't as

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 4>bad as we thought overall.

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Are we seeing those fund managers in Europe particularly okay,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 2>they might be investing in their own or they might

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>be investing in, say, Asian markets.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of that?

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 4>I think where the tide has rarely turned, as in

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:51.239
<v Speaker 4>China and Hong Kong stocks. You'll remember the narrative around

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 4>just the past couple of years actually, of many people

0:14:54.720 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 4>questioning whether these stocks are investable or not. The latest

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 4>starter we're seeing is that investors are starting to go

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 4>back over there. Why well, we're starting to see a

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 4>little bit of stimulus come out of China. They know

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 4>that Trump's tariffs are going to be a big challenge

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 4>on their economy, so they're meaningfully pumping the accelerator when

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 4>it comes to stimulus in their economy. And actually the

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 4>other thing too is the stocks there are cheap. Now,

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 4>if we are to draw one criticism of the US market,

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 4>it is that the valuations in the market are relatively high.

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 4>So investors might look at some of the companies in

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Asia and go, well, actually, relative valuation wise, although there's risks,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm happy to step in.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 2>If we get back to the US five hundred fund

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 2>that she has launched. You said it was the most

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>popular feature that we've been asked for for key we Saver,

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 2>But are people putting me their money where their mouths?

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Are they actually investing and deciding that will use this

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>for Keysaber.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we launched about a week ago. We've seen quite

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 5>a good response on people switching to our scheme. We've

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 5>also seen a lot of our members add the US

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 5>five hundred fund to their investment plans or rebalance their

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 5>portfolios to include more of it. And the third group

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 5>we've seen is around ten percent of the people who

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 5>have signed up in that last week haven't been in

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 5>key SABER before. And that's really interesting because I think

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 5>through a combination of great experience and access to a

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 5>wide range of product, we're managing to engage people who

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 5>for whatever reason, have not been part of KISABER in

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 5>the past. And what we see is that a lot

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 5>of these people are self employed.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Of course, just thinking about other SCA classes, we've focused

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 2>on shares predominantly in this conversation, What about bonds?

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>What about gold that's having another resurgence.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Are you seeing with global investors and investors here at

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 2>home even thinking about other asset classes beyond equities?

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so bond yeards been attractive for some time. We

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 4>saw as the market was really worried about tariffs, we

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 4>saw bond yields fall quite substantially, so they got down

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 4>to around three point eight percent for the US ten

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 4>year yield, So that provided a bit of a cushion

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 4>as shares were falling quite substantially over that time. Since then,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 4>we've actually seen a bounce back up, and part of

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 4>that is just around the worry that the market has

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 4>around the amount of debt that the US might need

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 4>to raise and the more supply of bonds. Obviously that

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 4>puts pressure on bond yields, So the returns there have

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 4>been okay. I still think on a go forward basis

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 4>they look relatively attractive. Gold has been an interesting one,

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 4>and I suspect part of the resurgence that we've seen

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 4>in gold is there has been an uptick in the

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 4>US and inflation expectations. So there's a University of Michigan

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 4>measure where they go out and survey people and go,

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, what do you think inflation will be over

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 4>particular timeframes. Now that measure for the five to ten

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 4>year inflation is at the highest level since the mid nineties,

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 4>So inflation expectations out there are quite high. So people

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 4>are looking at what are the inflation hedges that I

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 4>convest in, and gold through time has proven to be

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 4>quite a solid inflation hedge for people. I think the

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 4>other aspect, too, is there is some talk around about

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 4>the US continuing to be the world's global reserve currency.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 4>I think that's been over egged a little bit. I

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 4>think the US has a very solid position as continuing

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 4>to be the world's reserve currency. But at these times

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 4>where you talk about tariffs, you can sometimes get these

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 4>narratives taking on a life of their own. So I

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 4>think that has led people to say, okay, well, let's

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 4>diversify our holdings a bit. We'll have some holdings in

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 4>US dollars, holdings in euro, holdings in Japanese yen, which

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 4>is a popular safe haven currency, but let's also have

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 4>an allocation to gold as well. And that really skyrip,

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 4>isn't it?

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Just thinking about more modern asset classes.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 2>If you like crypto, do you see a time when

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 2>people be able to put their key we save it

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>into crypto in the same way that we're offering the

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 2>share options.

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean right at the moment, we're looking at

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 5>us self select, which is the next chapter after the

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 5>US five hundred fund for us with our product, and

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, we're trying to work out what to include.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 5>We start with a principle that we want to provide

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 5>as much access as we can and let our members

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 5>decide on where to put their own money. And so

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 5>the crypto ETFs that have launched, they are widely held,

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 5>there is a lot of liquidity. Some of them have

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 5>actually considerably lower volatility than some of the big name companies,

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 5>say at the top of the S and P five

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred list. So I think it's a really good argument

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 5>to say, maybe via an ETF, that crypto should be

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 5>something that people can allocate. Again, with our guardrails kind

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 5>of process built into our product, that may be up

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 5>to five percent of your portfolio with exposure to crypto

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 5>is something that someone can make a choice about rather

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 5>than us making that choice.

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 4>For Matt, what's interesting with cryptocurrency is the trends that

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing come out of the US with regards to this.

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 4>So you mention ETFs, well, what that has enabled is

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 4>for people to have a really safe way to get

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 4>exposure to cryptocurrency. That's actually helped enable better institutional participation

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 4>in the cryptocurrency market. So it's interesting in the US,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 4>You've got the likes of Yale Harvard who have said

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 4>that they have exposure to cryptocurrencies. You're also starting to

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 4>see kind of state pension funds and even some sovereign

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 4>wealth funds participate. To be honest, i'm surprised, you know,

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 4>back in many years ago, I kind of looked at

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 4>it and didn't quite get it. But it really has

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 4>come a long way in terms of just who can participate, accessibility,

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 4>but also institutional support for the sector as well.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Matt, So how long before we might see self select

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>stocks individual stocks in the US being available for people

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 2>in their key we say a scheme.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, the good thing is, in order to launch the

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 5>US five hundred fund, a lot of the hard work,

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 5>I suppose the infrastructure is in place for us. So

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 5>that is our next priority that we've started actively working

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 5>on now, as you self select won't put absolute time

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 5>on it because it's really important that we go through

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 5>our testing and validation steps and get this right before

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 5>we release it. Current best estimate is I think middle

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 5>of the year.

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 2>What about things like private equity, because it's pretty popular infrastructure,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, private equity has been really topical in twenty twenty five,

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 5>and for good reason. If we look at Ossie, which

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 5>we always do because they had a fifteen year head

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 5>start on us with superannuation, their super funds have a

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 5>much higher exposure to private assets. They're super funds are

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 5>investing in anything from large infrastructure projects to small startup companies.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 5>We tend to be a little bit less adventurous in

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 5>New Zealand at this stage, but there's a lot of

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 5>talk about it, and I think there's actually a lot

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 5>of will we need to overcome some of the challenges

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 5>with regard to valuations and liquidity because that's tough for

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 5>private companies. But yeah, I'm confident. I think as kwisaver

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 5>continues to mature, that'll happen. We're at that kind of

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 5>tipping point at the moment where these things start becoming

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 5>really viable for super funds.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 2>We've got the budget coming up. There is if you like,

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>rumors that the government might cut its contribution, which is

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>five hundred plus dollars a year. Chris, do you think

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 2>that's going to have any effect at all.

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure it will on Kiwi saber participation because

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 4>key We Saber fulfills a few key functions.

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 4>One, it's really well regulated and people get accessed to

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 4>a wide range of investments, right, some lower cost and

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 4>more passive and some high cost and more active. So

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 4>I think it's working really well in Most people I

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 4>talk to are really positive about key We Saver. Second,

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 4>obviously you still get your employer contribution, which as meaningful

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 4>might not be quite as high as Australia, but it's

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 4>still meaningful for people. So I think overall it would

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 4>be a shame. Don't get me wrong to see changes,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 4>because I think what makes schemes popular is actually when

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 4>they're largely left alone by politicians so people can invest

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 4>with confidence.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Might take almost sorry, Chris, I must take the opposite here.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 5>I think we're overdue for a policy review KEYSAB. We're

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 5>only a tiny little scheme, but I think we've tried

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 5>to be as vocal as we can. I'll come back

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 5>to agreeing with Chris now. With the government contribution is

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 5>that it's not targeted anyway, and what I'd like to

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 5>see actually is targeted and targeted at the people that

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 5>are being left behind. And I mentioned self employed before,

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 5>and you mentioned the kickstart and children. The fact that

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 5>the government contribution is not available to anyone under eighteen

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 5>seems contrary to good sense, which would be to get

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 5>people involved in QPSAB as early as possible and incentivize that,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 5>and incentivize people who are self employed because they are

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 5>not receiving having if they receive an employer contributions coming

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 5>out of their own pocket twice and so you know,

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 5>there's I think let's have a look at the policy settings.

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 5>But I do take your point that the more that

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 5>you that you kind of mess around with it, So

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 5>any changes need to be really well signaled.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:51.239
<v Speaker 4>Oh look, and I'm more thinking about messing with it

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 4>in a negative way, and if want to mess with

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 4>it in a positive way around higher contributions.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We've actually looked at that ourselves, haven't We met.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 5>What we heard when we got involved in kvsaver is

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 5>industry saying that contributions need arise, and we heard the

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Retirement Commission say largely the same thing. But the voice

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 5>that was kind of missing from that was the people

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 5>who were going to have to make the higher contributions,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 5>and that's you and me, that's the members. So we

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 5>went out and asked a bunch of our investors, not

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 5>our necessarily our KIV saver members, but just people on

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 5>the Cheesies platform. It was overwhelming how many people said,

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 5>I get it. I'd prefer to have a little bit

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 5>less in my take home this week in order to

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 5>have more retirement. It was seventy eight percent who supported

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 5>that idea, which is phenomenal because it's counter to everything

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 5>that we assumed people would think, Like at the height

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 5>almost of the cost of living crisis.

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Chaps, we probably need to wrap it up there, just

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 2>wondering what would you like to see with key We

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 2>savor on terms of innovation in the near turn, not

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 2>so much the long term the near term.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 4>So I think the private asset discussions really interesting. It's

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 4>one where I think we need a little bit of

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 4>a mindset shift around fees. For example, is one of

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 4>them right? You know, these are more expensive assets to

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 4>get your hands on, but they can come with a

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 4>higher reward as well. I think the other part of that, too,

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 4>is that there is a global trend of companies staying

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 4>private for longer, and we see companies realizing more of

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 4>their value in the private markets in many cases than

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 4>they do in the public markets. I also saw a

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 4>stat the other day, and I won't get the percentage

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 4>completely right, but the amount of companies valued over one

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 4>hundred million dollars in the uses that are private versus

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 4>public is something like three or four to one. So

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 4>when we look at our investments, why do we have

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 4>all of it in the area that has less exposure.

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 4>We've got companies out of New Zealand like Crimson Education,

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Black Halter. We've got companies that are really starting to

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 4>be relevant on the global stage. We've seen a few

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 4>of them even acquired this year, so that's global investors

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 4>going I want to slice of that company. So I'd

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 4>love to see that development further, and hopefully as an industry,

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 4>we can get together, navigate the challenges, and just make

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 4>it happen.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 5>I guess as an innovator, we're asked all the time

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 5>who we're competing against, who do we see as our

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 5>biggest threat, And the answer is consistently just apathy. It's

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 5>just that whole thing that people don't think about their kipisaver.

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 5>They'll put more time into thinking about what they're can

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 5>have for tonight, then they will about where their retirement

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 5>is invested, and no matter who it's invested, I just

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 5>want people to just to try and give that a

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 5>little bit more time. I guess the innovation is important

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 5>because it comes along from time to time and maybe

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 5>it helps people to consider. So I don't not really,

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't have a strong place on where the innovation

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 5>comes from. I just want to see it continue so

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 5>that people will continue to engage a little bit more

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 5>with their retirement savings.

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yep, I think everyone would like to see that.

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.239
<v Speaker 2>Thanks both of you for being with us today and

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>thanks to you for joining us You can watch shed

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Lunch on YouTube or listen on your favorite podcast app.

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Leave us a rating and tell us what you'd like

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 2>to hear next. Ma Tawa