WEBVTT - Is ultra-processed food really that bad for us?

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Francisco Budkin and I'm Louise Arii and welcome

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to the first episode of season six of our New

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Zealand Here podcast, The Little Thing's Good to have you

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. It is good to be back season six

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>exciting goodness me and this podcast.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 2>We talk to experts.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>We find out all the little things you need to

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>know to improve different areas of your life. We can't

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>throw all the confusion and overload of the information out

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>there to kind of help simplify life and hopefully have

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of fun while we're.

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Doing exactly So, how was your summer alone?

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Nice and simple?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You know it wasn't gosh.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>You keep me very.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Entertained over the summer as we followed you and your

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 3>car and your caravan as you tour it around the

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 3>South Island.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here's a life hack. Okay, okay, just listen up.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Do not toe a caravan or boat behind a fully

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle. Not yet anyway. Maybe I don't know, Maybe

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure will be there entire years to come.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I say this lovingly, but is it that you know

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>caravan's put a toll on evs and you just naturally

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 3>find yourself kind of running out of battery and then

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 3>have to ditch a caravan and drive off to the

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 3>nearest town.

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Or did you guys not really manage it? No, we

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>did it.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>My husband apparently did an awful lot of research. It

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 1>was pretty confident. Yeah, just didn't work out that way. Look,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's all fine. We got to our destinations. We have

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>seen the absolute best of this country. We have not

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>done a roady like that in such a long time.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>The fairy was great. Everything about it was absolutely amazing.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So I do the upsiders. I would encourage anybody to,

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>if they haven't done a roady for a while, to

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>just go out and look at the absolute beauty that

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we have outside of our main centers.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>And twenty twenty six started well for you and the

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 3>family sure did.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Yep, just back from a beautiful family wedding. It's all

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>been very kind of surreal and lovely. What about you, well.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Twenty twenty six marks a little bit of a change

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>in our household. So I am no longer the parent

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>of school children. That's right, which is I know some

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>people feel a little emotional and quite sad that that

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>phase of their life might be over, But it's been

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.119
<v Speaker 3>nineteen years and I've loved it and made the most

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 3>of it, but I am very ready to move on.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 3>So that's very exciting. So ones at university and Auckland,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>ones at University in Canterbury, and our youngest also just

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 3>got their driver's license, so now they are independent. You know,

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>you're no longer driving them to dance classes and various

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 3>other things. So it's quite exciting. But there's so much

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 3>time in the day. I am a little bit taken

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 3>back at how much time there is in the day

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 3>which I can now work and be productive and do things, which.

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Is a good thing.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but also I'm not quite match fit to make

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the most of it. But I am very much looking

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 3>forward to having more time time to do more things,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 3>to learning new things or doing things with my partner

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 3>or you know, just.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Been able to put yourself first a little.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, as we all know, the kids don't stop

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>needing you and we don't stop providing for them. But

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same time crunch, is it. So yeah,

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you're doing things for them, mostly giving them money to

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be having long anguish conversations with the mother phone about something,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's not the day to day stuff. But take

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>ups and the drop offs and they.

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I also think as parents we should actually

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>give ourselves a few more pats on the back more

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>often when you hit milestones like this, because educating a

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>child does not always straightforward. It can be a roller

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 3>coaster of a ride. There can be issues, academic issues,

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>environmental issues, social issues, all sorts of things. And you

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>have supported and nurtured that child through that process for

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>actually a substantial period of time, thirteen years each. You've

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 3>got three kids like you you're doing it for.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>You're just going on and on and on.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>And actually, I think while it is wonderful to see

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>them moving on to their next stage of their lives

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 3>and being independent and taking steps forward as well, sometimes

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I think as parents we don't stop and kind of

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>give ourselves a little bit of a pad on the back,

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of credit. We're going, Actually, we did that,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 3>we got through. You know, sometimes it is worth just

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 3>stopping for a moment and kind of going, yeah.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Look, I've just been an absolutely amazing weekend with my

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>or my nephews and nieces and they're all adults, and

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>they're all beautiful, and they've all come through, and yeah, no,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we you know that is credit to the

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>appearance and the extended family support and all of that

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 3>But a change out this can also be a bit

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 3>difficult on a relationship. Right, Like you had kids, You've

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 3>had busy lives. Your kids are part of your day

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 3>to day life, and all of a sudden as they

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of start to leave, well they do become more independent.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Relationship kind of changes as well. You find yourself sort

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 3>of sitting on the couch up at your partner going, oh,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>it's just you and I home tonight.

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're just just us.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So one thing we are going to talk about this

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>season is how our relationship adjusts to the empty nest

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and how we you know, move on in a new

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of stage and phase in a relationship, which and

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm quite looking forward to talking about that.

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll do that this season.

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely not just picking up where you left off

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>before your children. It's a completely different setting it even

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>ones in different places, aren't they. And we've all learn

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>learnt so much and been through so much.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 2>What are you what else are you keen to talk

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>about this season?

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've had a few people approach me about talking

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about becoming a widow or a widow were we have

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>talked about separation and divorce, but that is not a

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>subject we've touched on before. And I actually think that's

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 1>really important. My own father found himself a widower at

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in his mid forties with five children. My goodness, my

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>brother also found himself for whatever, and I have friends

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>who are widows, and I just think it is something

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>we we ought to address because we're going to know

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody or it's going to happen to us or whatever.

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's another area that we should touch on,

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not in a super doomy, gloomy way. You know, there's

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>some there's some recovery and joy and the process. I'm

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>also keen to talk about some less serious topics, like

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>what the heck's going on with everybody going skinny? That's

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit weird.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh did you watch any of the awards ceremonies at

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the year.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And the globes just freaking me out.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't actually want people.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Who were small are now tiny. It's and it's I

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 3>find it's so upsetting and so frustrating. I mean, we're

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 3>both officially still got teenage daughters, and I thought we

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>were through this. I thought we had sort of passed

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 3>that period of time.

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>What was it?

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 3>The cape Moss said, nothing tastes as good as skinny feels,

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>and I thought we were through this and that, you know,

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>we were all a little bit more bodify, I know, and.

0:06:58.120 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It has been in my mind. I've seen that as well,

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>something else that we were both really keen to talk about.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>This season, we always do an episode of nutrition, So

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>we're going to kick off the season by talking about

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>ultra process foods because I don't know if you noticed,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but there seems to be endless headlines over summer about

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>ultra process foods, what you should and shouldn't be eating. Yeah,

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, neither of us are into dieting, and we

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>believe your diet can't be perfect all the time, but

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we are interested in having a clearer picture of how

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to eat for our health and what we should be

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>more mindful of consuming. So you know, when it comes

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to process and ultra process food, what's okay and what

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>should we actively avoid.

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 3>So today, Professor Sarah Berry is with us. Sarah is

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 3>a professor in the Department of Nutritional Sciences at King's College, London,

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 3>and she is the chief scientist at ZOE. You may

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>be familiar with ZOE. They work to dispel nutrition myths

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and misinformation, and we've been really lucky enough to speak

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 3>with founder Tim Spector and US medical director Will Bolschwitz

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>in previous episodes. Definitely with the listen. Sarah is at

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 3>the forefront of developments and personal nutrition and has been

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 3>in charge of some of the world's largest human nutrition studies.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Her work explores how foods impact metabolism, fat storage, and

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>long term health. And doctor Sarah Berry is with us.

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for joining us.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.239
<v Speaker 4>Welcome pleasure, Thank you for having me. We're in totally

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 4>different time zones here. It's my Friday evening, and I'm

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 4>looking forward to a nice glass of wine after this.

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm looking forward to a last cup of coffee

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>after this.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 3>I know I'm sorry that we're holding you back from

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>that glass of wine for just a little bit longer,

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 3>but we really do appreciate your time. Wondering if we

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 3>can start with quite a broad question, could you just

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 3>explain to us what our processed and ultra processed foods.

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I kind of think that's a million dollar question, because

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 4>if I'm to go into a supermarket and identify is

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 4>that an ultra process food? Even though I've been a

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 4>nutitional scientist for twenty five yearsly struggle, So I think

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 4>let's strip it back to the basics. A process food

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 4>is basically any kind of food that has gone through

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 4>some sort of processing. So it could be the fact

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 4>that you've just cooked your carrots. You know that's a

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 4>form of processing because you've cooked them. But in the

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 4>current food landscape that we live in, we are actually

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 4>used the term very differently, and we typically use it

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 4>in the context of a classification system called the NOVA

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 4>classification system, which allocates a classifier according to whether it's unprocessed,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 4>minimally processed. A processed culinary ingredient like a sort of

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 4>spice or something, or oil or something that's called an

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 4>ultra processed food, And an ultra processed food is a

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 4>classification system from this system called NOVA. It's a NOVA

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 4>for food. But it's a term that's really taken off

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 4>because it's been used in a lot of nutrition research

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 4>in order to class apply foods that have been heavily processed.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 4>But I think what's really really important to remember in

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 4>the whole discussion of ultra process food. And when we

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 4>look at the evidence and we look at these scary

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 4>headlines that are often out there about food processing, is

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 4>the term ultraprocessed food is specific to this classification system,

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 4>and this classification system is based on the extent and

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 4>the purpose of processing is a system that was never

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 4>designed to look at how processing might impact our health.

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 4>And so we see, for example, in the UK, the US,

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Australia is becoming quite similar in New Zealand as well,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 4>that about sixty percent of our food comes from this

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 4>ultra process food. But it's such a huge category, and

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 4>you have within this category of or classification of ultra

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 4>process food some that, yes, are really bad, but some

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 4>that aren't so bad. So I think we kind of

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 4>need to take a step back and think, really, what

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 4>is set about food processing that's bad in order for

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 4>us to identify what we should be avoiding and what

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 4>we shouldn't be avoiding.

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>You made a really good point there by saying it's

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily that, like you say, all processed foods

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>has been. It's what which ones in what type of

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>processing is having an inpect on our health, right because originally,

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we evolved into processing foods for storage and

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and to feed a growing population and all that sort

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing, didn't we How has it evolved from there?

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Absolutely, And I think that's a really important point,

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Lou that you make, is that processing came about for

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 4>the good. It's enabled us to produce enough food for

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 4>our growing population. It's enabled us to produce food that

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 4>is shelf stable and that is safe for us to consume.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 4>It's also enables us to really maximize the the food

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 4>from the crops that are out there and so forth,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 4>and also enables us to produce food that is a

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 4>lot cheaper. And there's some fantastic research that was recently

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 4>published showing that if you look at all of the

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 4>food that are in US supermarkets, what you see is

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 4>an ultra processed or heavily processed version versus a minimally

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 4>processed version has about a fifty percent price differential, meaning,

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 4>for example, if you take a bread that a minimally processed,

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 4>more kind of Artisian style bread is actually about fifty

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 4>percent more expensive than one of the mass produced breads

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 4>that would be classed as ultra process And they saw

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 4>this across all of the different food groups, whether it

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 4>was yogurts, whether it's pastries, whether it's meat based products, etc.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 4>So we do need to be mindful that again in

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 4>this kind of demonization of ultra process food, in this

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 4>scare mongering that you see out there, that processing does

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 4>have a really important purpose and it does enable us

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 4>to also consume food that is more affordable for many people.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 4>So what we need to do is work on identifying

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 4>which of those foods are particularly bad for us, because

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 4>our research that we've done at Zoe actually shows that

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 4>it's probably only about twenty percent of our energy that's

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 4>coming from processed foods that we know are particularly unfavorable

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 4>for our health.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So which ones are they?

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, we do have a Zoe app that allows people

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 4>to have look and unfortunately it's not available yet in

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand, but it's very much dependent on the brand

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 4>of the food and so and the kind of brands

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 4>that you have in the US. In New Zealand, sorry,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 4>it will be very different to the kind of brands

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 4>we have or we have in the US. So I

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 4>think the important thing is being able to help people

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 4>identify what is it about food in the way it's

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 4>processed that makes it unhealthy. But it's really really difficult,

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 4>and it's really difficult because processing impacts the healthfulness of food,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 4>not just through the additives and emulsifiers that everyone's talking about,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 4>but actually through lots of other mechanisms. So we know

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 4>that when you process food, and there's lots of different

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 4>ways we can process food, whether it's through heat processes,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 4>whether it's through physical disruption of the food structure, whether

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 4>it's through predigesting the food. You know, there's so many

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 4>different ways that you can process the food. But what

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 4>we know is that impacts certain features that are related

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 4>to health. Firstly, we know that typically heavily processed foods

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 4>tends to have less nutritious nutrients or less healthy nutrients.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 4>By this, it tends to have less fiber, it tends

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 4>to have more unhealthy nutrients, so it tends to have

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 4>more salt, more saturated fat, more sugar. It also tends

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 4>to have less bioactives. And these are chemicals that are

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 4>found in foods that we know have really magical properties

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 4>in improving our health. So you might have heard a

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 4>polyph phenols for example, it comes from dark figmented pigmented berries,

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, and these have really fantastic properties in terms

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 4>of you know, acting on anti inflammatory pathways and so forth.

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 4>So processed foods tend to have less of those bioactives

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 4>as well, they tend to have less nutritious nutrients. Then

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 4>they do tend to have lots of additives, lots of emulsifiers.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 4>So yes, you can look at the back of pack

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 4>and you can look at two foods and you could say, whoa,

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 4>hold on, here's a peanut butter. Here's one that just

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 4>literally has peanuts, maybe a pinch of salt and a

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 4>pinch of sugar. And then here's a peanut butter like

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 4>in the America, for example, as Reese's peanut butter, which

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 4>unfortunately my kids love. You know, yes, it's got about

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 4>thirty ingredients. It's got loads of E numbers, which are

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 4>basically numbers that are allocated to emulsifiers and additives. So

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 4>that gives you a good hint that hold on, maybe

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 4>that's not so healthy. But in my opinion, that's only

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 4>part of the picture, and that we need to look

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 4>at other features. One of those features is hyperpalatability, which

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 4>is basically how tasty that food is. And another feature

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 4>is the food structure, the food matrix, which is destroyed

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 4>in processing, which impacts how fast you eat that food,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 4>where the nutrients are absorbed, how much of the nutrients

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 4>you're absorbed in.

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So much more have our palets changed, though, I mean,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about that phrase hyperpalatability, because have we been

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>somehow you know, so exposed for so long to processed

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>foods and added salt, metatugar and things like that that

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we've you know, that would have to remove ourselves completely

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to sort of reset our palets.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's a really interesting question, and I

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 4>think it's it's true that, you know, the food that

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 4>we're now exposed to you is not the food that

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 4>we have physiologically been evolved to handle. The rate at

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 4>which the food is changing, you know, it is so

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 4>fast we cannot evolve at the same rate that the

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 4>food landscape is changing that the processing techniques are changing.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 4>And there's many many foods now that are designed by

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 4>the food industry to have a mix of nutrients that

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 4>we know bypass our natural physiological, neurological responses. So these

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 4>are foods that will be particularly high in maybe salt

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 4>and sugar, or salt and fat, or fat and sugar

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 4>that you wouldn't typically find in nature. So let's take

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 4>crisps for example. Crisps have a reasonable amount of fat

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 4>and they have a reasonable amount of salt. Now, you

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't typically find that same amount of salt and that

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 4>same amount of fat in a natural product that's not

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 4>naturally in the potatoes. But by putting them together, it's

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 4>almost kind of like bypasses our natural sensory system that

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 4>tells us, well, hold on, you've eaten enough, you don't

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 4>need anymore. Instead, what it's doing is activating the reward

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 4>system in our brain, a bit like giving us some

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of mini dopamine hits and saying, oh my god,

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 4>this is so tasty. Keep eating, keep eating, keep eating,

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 4>so that you tend to over eat hyper palatable foods.

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 4>And there's quite a bit of evidence showing that, yes,

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.239
<v Speaker 4>you tend to overeat them, and people that have more

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 4>of these hyper palatable foods put on more weight. And

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 4>so I think that's one really interesting area where you know,

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 4>we're now so accustomed to having these foods that what

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 4>do we do, How do we go back to experiencing

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 4>pleasure from that potato, for example, without all of that salt?

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 4>And there are studies showing that yes, you can retrain

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 4>your taste fuds, et cetera. But what's difficult is when

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 4>you go into your supermarket, when you go to your

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 4>corner shop or your high street and everything there or

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 4>what we know in the UK and the US, for example,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 4>is about sixty percent and I don't know in that

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 4>their stats in New Zealand, but sixty percent of the

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 4>food is probably hyper palatable. And so when you're faced

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 4>with all of this, it's really difficult to make those

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 4>healthy choices and think, oh my gosh, I know that's tasty,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 4>but hey, let me try and find something that's less tasty,

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 4>because I know it's for healthy. I can't be that good.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 4>I tell you what, when I have my wine after this,

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 4>I'll be some nice salt and vinegar crisps with it.

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I just love that expression. Palatable.

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to get you know, ex time someone got

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 3>to be meal our God, this is hyper palatable.

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Hey, we should probably talk about about why we're actually

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 3>even talking about ultra process foods in the first place,

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 3>and the impact that they have on our health and

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 3>our metabolism. I mean, what do we know about the

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 3>impact that they're having on us.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 4>So you'll probably see every day in the newspaper there's

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 4>a different headline saying ultra process foods they're killing us.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 4>They're causing everything from as i'monster cancer to heart disease,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 4>to diabetes, everything you name it, it's linked with. Yes,

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 4>we know the ultra process food are unhealthy for us. Yes,

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 4>there's lots of evidence showing their link to increase risk

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 4>of all of these different chronic diseases. But I think

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 4>what we need to be mindful of is the evidence

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 4>is typically coming from either these longitudinal studies or cross

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 4>sexual studies where you take large populations, you follow them

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 4>over a period of time, you look at what their

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 4>diet is at you know, maybe five ten year intervals,

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 4>and then you look who goes on to get what

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 4>type of disease. Now, that's a really important way that

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 4>we get a first hint of what's going on in

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 4>terms of diet and in terms of disease. But for

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 4>that kind of research, we typically use food frequency questionnaires,

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 4>which asks quite crude questions. So it would ask, for example,

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 4>do you have peanut butter or not. It wouldn't say

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 4>do you have recess peanut butter or this healthy peanut butter.

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 4>It can't differentiate between brands. So yes, there is data

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 4>to show the old process food at linked with health.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 4>But what we now know is that not all ultra

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 4>processed foods are linked in the same way and to

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 4>the same degree. And so there is some research that's

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 4>broken down quite crude categories that you can still do

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 4>through food frequency questionnaires that show that if you look

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 4>at the link between old processed food intaken an individual

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 4>and their risk of all course mortality basically meaning death,

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 4>that yes, as your old process foodn't take increases, so

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 4>does your risk of death. And it's largely attributable if

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 4>you look at the different food groups to an increase

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 4>in red process meat and in sugar sweetened and artificially

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 4>sweetened beverages. What you see, conversely, is that cereal products.

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Now I know, seal products are really a big range.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 4>They could be everything from your terrible sugary you know,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 4>kid cereals that you see in supermarket right through to

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>a healthy whole grain, but they're actually associated with a

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 4>reduced risk of all course mortality even if they're classified

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 4>a sultra process. So I think we need to be

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 4>a bit careful demonizing everything because yes, overall it shows

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 4>there's a problem, but actually not all ultra processed food

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 4>is created equally. And then within each of those food

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 4>groups I've mentioned earlier, even within those groups, whether it's cereals,

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 4>whether it's you know, even process red meat, we know

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 4>that there's a huge variability. You know, if you look

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 4>at the food group of cereals, you've got everything from

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 4>those awful sugary cereals that again unfortunately my kids love

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 4>right through to some very healthy cereals, but would still

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.719
<v Speaker 4>be classed as ultra process And so this, I think

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 4>is what makes it challenging, and this is why I

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 4>think we have to be a little bit careful getting

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 4>too scared by the stats that you see that say,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, our diet sixty percent ultra process. You know,

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 4>what are we going to do? We cannot change our

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 4>diet that radically in the food landscape that we live

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 4>in if we are that average person getting sixty percent

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 4>of our energy from ultra processed food. And that's why

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 4>again we've really got to focus on which ones are

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 4>really bad for us and which ones aren't. And I'm

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 4>sorry that I'm not giving you a list of rand

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 4>level foods in New Zealand that are the really bad ones.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>We do have an excellent peanut butter range, I think

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in New Zealand, don't we fix and fog.

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Fix and fog or picks. Yeah, they're all very very good.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 4>You don't.

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>I am going to go home and cheat the labels.

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 3>And actually the labeling is really interesting because of course

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 3>our ability to make good decisions is reliant on the

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 3>hope that our food producers giving us legible labels to

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 3>read and understand.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, absolutely, And I think to me, this is

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 4>where it gets really interesting and where my many years

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 4>of research I think really comes into play. That the

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 4>food labeling, yes, gives you that first hint. So the

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 4>example I used with peanut butter, Yes, Lisa's peanut butter.

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 4>You can look at the back and you can see,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 4>oh my gosh, it's got so many different ingredients. It's

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 4>got all of these additives and a master piers and

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 4>then you've got, for example, in the UK, I don't

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 4>know if you have it, there a peanut butter called

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 4>pipper nut. That's just a very unprocess. It's just nuts,

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 4>ground nuts and salt so yes that gives you an indication,

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 4>But what that doesn't tell us is the hyperpalatability that

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned. But it also doesn't tell us what I

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 4>think is one of the most important features alongside the

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 4>nutritional composition, of why processing can impact our health, and

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 4>that's the food structure. That when you process a food

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 4>in many instances, you change the food structure or what

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 4>we in science call the food matrix, and that has

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 4>a big impact in terms of how it impacts our health,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 4>how it impacts our metabolism, and so much more. And

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 4>that's why it's really challenging, I think, because you cannot

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 4>on the back of pack label say this is a

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 4>good food structure, that's a bad food structure. Yes, we

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 4>can help people identify has the structure been changed such

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 4>way it may negatively impact our health. And there's really

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 4>simple ways. Does that food look like the food from

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 4>which it originally came or does it not resemble that

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 4>original food? And there's simple examples that I often use

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 4>when I teach about this from my own research, an

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 4>old research as well, and there's this lovely study that

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 4>was carried out many years ago, actually even before processing

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 4>was the big issue that it is now, and This

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 4>was a study in nineteen seventy seven where they fed

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 4>people whole apples, or they literally puraid those apples. So

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 4>imagine just making it into a smoothie so it had

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 4>exactly the same ingredients. All you had done was change

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 4>the structure. You just mushed it up basically. And then

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 4>they fed people apple juice where they'd actually taken out

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 4>some of the fiber. But the important comparison is the

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 4>apples and the apple pure, because the backuppack labeling would

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 4>show that they're identical. If they were in a supermarket

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 4>and they fed these individuals apple pure and apples, they

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 4>had fifty grams of available carbohydrate, they're identical. What they

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 4>found was there was a massive difference, about tenfold difference

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 4>in terms of how quickly people eat them. You could

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 4>eat the pure so much more quickly. And what they

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 4>found was even when the invited individuals back and said, okay,

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 4>I want you to actually eat it at the same time,

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 4>so we remove this problem of the fact that you're

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 4>eating the pure faster, they found that there was a

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 4>big difference in terms of how full they felt after.

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 4>So after the apples they felt about fifty percent more

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 4>full compared to the apple pure, but it was the

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 4>same food, just change the texture and the structure. Then

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 4>they looked at the post pant or glucose response, which

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 4>is basically the post meal increase in circulating blood glucose

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 4>from the sugar from the carbohydrate in the apples and

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 4>the pure, and what they found was a big difference

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 4>in terms of about two to four hours after consuming

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 4>the pure, people had a big dip in their glucose

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 4>below baseline compared to the apples. And what this means

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 4>is when you have a dip, it drives your body

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 4>to want to quickly eat food because your body is thinking,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 4>oh my god, I'm going into a hypergodallysimic shock, which

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 4>you're not. It's just a dip in your glucose. And

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 4>what we've seen from our own Zoe predict research is

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 4>this dip is associated with people then going on to

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 4>consume three hundred and twenty calories more over a day

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 4>compared to if they don't have a dip. So what

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 4>you've got happening here is you've got this apple, you've

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 4>got the pure A backupack labelings are same, no difference

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 4>in emulsifiers, additives, nutrients, etc. But you're eating, they're at

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 4>a very different rate, You're having a very different fullness response,

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 4>You're having a very different glucose metabolic response that's causing

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 4>this dip that we believe will therefore cause you to overeat.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 4>And this study is lovely because we've since done many

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 4>studies that have really replicated this, and you know, lots

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 4>of other foods, except that just show how important that

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 4>structural integrity is, whereas the texture of a food is.

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 3>From the research that I've done Sarah personally into ultra

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 3>process food, you know, talking about that bag of crisps

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 3>and things, I think we all know that they don't

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 3>meet our society society needs. We don't get full if

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 3>we eat them. We all know that we kind of

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 3>eat more than we really need. So is that the

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 3>explanation for that that dip that we have, or is

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>it because they taste really good as well that we

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 3>tend to eat more of than we need.

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 4>So we tend to eat more for a number of reasons.

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 4>One because they're so tasty, so they bypass our natural

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of brains sort of breaking system saying well, you

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 4>know you've had enough. Secondly, because we tend to eat

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 4>them faster if they're processed as well, and by eating

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 4>them faster, you don't allow your body time to register

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 4>that it's full. Many processed foods are also processed in

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 4>such a way that by breaking up the structure, they're

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 4>absorbed a lot more quickly, so you have this bigger

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 4>peek and then this dip in glucose, and this dip

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 4>in glucose causes this feeling of hunger, but also it

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 4>changes where you absorb them as well, in your gut.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 4>And so what we know is that food that tends

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 4>to have the matrix more preserved tends to be absorbed

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 4>lower down the gastrointestinal tract. And what's relevant here is

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 4>lower down your gastro intestinal tract you have more fullness receptors,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 4>so more GLP one receptors. You probably all heard of

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 4>GLP one. You know, this is the the you know,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 4>the different drugs that are out there, like a zenpic

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 4>will go v And so if you're absorbing these very

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 4>mushed up foods because of how they've been processed higher

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.959
<v Speaker 4>up the gastro intestinal tracked, they don't have quite so

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 4>many GLP receptors, so you're not feeling it's so full

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 4>yet if it's absorbed more slowly because the matrix the

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 4>structure of food is slowing it down, then you're also

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 4>going to feel more full because of that.

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>What I was going to say is it's really FaceTime

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>because our brain might forget our natural process, but our

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>body doesn't, is what you're saying. If it's been processed

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>differently in our gut, no matter what our brain's saying

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>about the tastiness and bypassing all the things that are

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>actually bitter for us, the body still takes the score.

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and so you've got kind of double hits going

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 4>on that your brain's saying, wow, I want more. It's

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 4>so tasty. It's already or almost like many processed foods

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 4>I guess you could say, almost predigested. And so they're

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 4>absorbed so quickly, so they're not making you so full.

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 4>They're causing these big metabolic responses. So then as well,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 4>you're not getting your natural fullness that you would get

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 4>from a food that's being absorbed more slowly. And I

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 4>think you know a really key factor here that we

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 4>don't talk enough about is eating rate. And I think

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 4>this is really important because this is something that everyone

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 4>can control. And so what we know is that most

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 4>processed food, where you have changed the texture such that

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 4>it's softer, is eaten more quickly. And there's research showing

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 4>that ultra processed food, although I'm not so keen on

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 4>that term as you might have gathered, but food that's

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 4>classified as ultra processed according to the Noble Classification System

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 4>versus minimally processed equivalents, even if it's nutritionally matched so

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 4>same nutrients, is eaten fifty percent more quickly. So you're

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 4>eating food that's been processed to change the texture so

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 4>softer texture fifty percent more quickly. And this is really

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 4>relevant because, like I said, it causes you to overeat.

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 4>And there's some fantastic research coming out of Care and

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Forwards Group in the Netherlands that shows that if you

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 4>eat more quickly, you consume more calories. And if you

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 4>are just to slow down the rate at which you

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 4>eat your food by twenty scent, for example, you would actually,

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 4>subconsciously without realizing it, reduce the amount of calories you're

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 4>consuming by about fifteen percent. And the reason I love

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 4>this is because firstly it's related to food processing, but

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 4>also we can all do something about this. We all know,

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 4>I think who are fast eaters? I don't know about you, ladies,

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 4>but when I sit at my dining table, my husband

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 4>wolves stands food, my daughter wills down this food. My

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 4>son and I eat obviously perfectly, you know, but we

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 4>eat slowly. And you know, I mean most of us

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 4>know if we're fast eater liked be curious. No, you

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 4>do you think you're fast or self?

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I became a fast eater when I heard children, when

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I heard babies, because it just seemed to be something.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>It was just it was an efficiency.

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Thing you were, you know, you were always feeding them

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and things, and then you'd shovel a bit of food

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and really quickly. And I noticed that my habit's changed them.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But interestingly, you say that because you know, we we

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:58.479
<v Speaker 1>try to sit at the dinner table as often as

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we can, especially when you know, my son comes home

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>from university and things, and he takes for either to

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>eat Zera and the.

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Rest of us, the other three of us are saddenly going,

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 3>ah ha, this is really lovely for me dinner.

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 2>But can you hurry up?

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 3>We've got things, you know, We've got places to be,

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 3>things to do, and now I'm going to use him

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 3>as my cue. I'm going to finish my dinner with him. Yeah,

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 3>because I just shovel it in. I'm a big pain

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 3>in the ass in my family. I'm always the one

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that says, can we can you just slow down?

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you? It frustrates me knowing, And I'm pretty sure

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I learned it on Zoe actually about the slowing down

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and the eating. But the funny thing I was thinking

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about was I'm sure it was a Timspektter thing that

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>came up to my Instagram once about I'm preparing some

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>beautiful breakfast and he was like, this is how quick

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and easy it is to prepare a beautiful bowl of

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, really good cereal with some berries and yogan

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. That's great, thanks Tim. It took ages

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to eat it because it.

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Was, you know, really great.

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I know, but you know it's in the morning.

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>You're like, great that it took That's the point though,

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>right we're rushing and in the morning in particular, you

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>know you're wolf down a piece of toastless some butter

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and peanut butter or something on it and out the door.

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But actually it's every meal we need to sort of

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>think about that, not just sitting, you know, not just

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 1>at dinner time.

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 3>But I now have this wonderful I now have this

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 3>wonderful image that sort of Sarah has given us as

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 3>to why to do it. It was just something my

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 3>grandmother always told me to do. Slow down, put your

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 3>knife and fall down in between mouthfuls.

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 3>It was kind of and it just says like an

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 3>eater kitch thing. But now I have sort of this

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 3>clearer idea of what's potentially going on in my gap,

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 3>and I kind of I like that that makes it

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 3>a bit more easier to get my head around.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I personally get a little bit of fender, because if

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I've cooked a really really lovely meal, I get a

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>bit annoyed that people eat it like it's like it's

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a big mat.

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 4>That might just be I mean, I think, you know,

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 4>there's just more and more evidence coming out showing the

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 4>importance is slowing down how fast you eat your food

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 4>and the impact it has not just on the amount

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 4>of calories but also your metabolic wealth. And there's ways

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 4>that we can consciously do it. But where it becomes

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 4>difficult is that many of the foods, not all of them,

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 4>but many of the foods that have been processed, have

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 4>the texture changed, And it's the texture actually that's critical

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 4>rather than the processing per se. There's this really fascinating

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 4>study that kimin forded where he fed people in a

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 4>randomized order. On one occasion either a burger that was

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 4>quite soft texture, so kind of a soft bun, soggy lettuce,

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 4>and quite soft meat patty. Then on the other occasion,

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 4>the same individuals came in and they had exactly the

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 4>same burger, but the gun was slightly crispy, the lettuce

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 4>was slightly crispy, and the patty was slightly crispy, And

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 4>he gave a huge portion to people and said, right,

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 4>eat as much as you want to eat. They eate

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 4>the soggy or the soft bun, the soft burger lots

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 4>more quickly, and they eate more of it compared to

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 4>eating exactly the same but just crisping it up. And

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 4>he's coined this lovely expression, put your crunch back into

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 4>your lunch. And I think that's lovely because it empowers

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.919
<v Speaker 4>us firstly to consciously slow down how fast we eat.

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 4>So fantastical you're going to go and copy your son

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 4>when he's next home. But also I think we can

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 4>do this subconsciously without thinking about it, just by changing

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 4>the texture of that food as well.

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the little things.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 3>And our guest on the podcast today is chief scientist

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 3>at ZOE, doctor Sarah Berry, helping us navigate the world

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 3>of processed foods. Back after the break, Sirah, I was

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 3>just wondering, you know, we've talked about the fact that

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 3>processing can happen in so many different ways. I mean,

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 3>frozen food is a frozen vegetable is processed to a

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 3>certain you know as processed food. So we've talked about

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 3>what to look for on the labels and things. Can

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 3>anything good come out of processing food?

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely well, you know, like I said at the beginning,

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 4>processing improves the stability of the food, so the shelf

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 4>life of the food. It improves the cost of the food,

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 4>it improves the safety of the food. And you know,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 4>frozen vegetables is a perfect example, or canned vegetables, canned

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 4>fruit for example, assuming there's not lots of added sugar,

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 4>for example, of a really cheap way to have food

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 4>where also the nutrients are well preserved. So if you

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 4>take frozen peas, then because of the way that they

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 4>are processed at that time and snap frozen typically at

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 4>the point of harvest and put in our freezers. All

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 4>the vitamin C is preserved and you've got a really

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 4>cheap food and a very healthy food. And so I

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 4>think that we need to be really careful and I'll

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 4>use an English expression here not to throw the baby

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 4>out with the bath water. That yes, there are clearly

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 4>processed foods that are bad. There are clearly processing that's bad.

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 4>But it's a double edged sword. And we've done some

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 4>research at King's College, London where I've done randomized control

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 4>trials where I feed people whole almands versus ground almonds.

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 4>So again these would be foods that have identical pack

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 4>ofpack labeling, you just change through processing the structure. And

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 4>what we find is if you feed people whole almonds,

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 4>you actually excreet about thirty percent of the calories. So

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 4>what it means is if you are someone that's wanting

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 4>to have a low energy food compared compared to what's

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 4>on the back of pack labeling, consuming those almonds, it's

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 4>a whole almond, actually thirty percent of the calories are

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 4>just coming out the other end if you grind it.

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 4>And we've done this study at our university where literally

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 4>you grind it down, so you break all the cells,

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 4>you absorb all of the calories. Now, why is this

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 4>the double edged sword? So for some people who are

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 4>trying to lose weight, you obviously want to consume the

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 4>whole almonds because lots of the calories are coming out

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 4>at the other end. But there are people in our

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 4>population that don't need to lose weight, that might need

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 4>to put weight on, in which case, processing it to

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 4>break up the food structure means they access access all

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 4>the calories. It means they access more of the other nutrients,

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 4>the vitamin E for example, you'll absorb loads more, for example,

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 4>from the ground almonds than from the whole almonds. And

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 4>then we can also use processing to improve the health

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 4>illness of the food through stealth. And this is another

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 4>great way that we can actually use and harness the

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 4>power processing to improve the healthfulness of the food.

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 3>So, Sarah, it would it be fair to say that

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 3>if we have a pretty good diaroet, a good whole

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 3>food diet, is there any harm and having the occasional

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 3>bit of ultra processed food like you going and having

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 3>your crisps after this podcast.

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely not, and I think that we need to be

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 4>careful not to be too puristic about this. We need

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 4>to be really practical. We need to be practical for

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 4>whom people can't necessarily afford to rely on food that

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 4>is all minimally processed. We need to be practical from

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 4>that shelf life stability point of view, but absolutely, you know,

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:24.919
<v Speaker 4>we need to be practical from a point of view

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 4>of what's out there for us, what's actually accessible, not

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 4>just affordable, but accessible to us. We need to be

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 4>practical from a point of view of how we live

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.760
<v Speaker 4>our lives. You know, most families now in many countries

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 4>have two working parents. I don't have the time to

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 4>cook everything from scratch when I get home from work.

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Neither does my husband. So we need to be pragmatic

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 4>in this discussion about process foods as well about what's

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 4>actually practical for us. And this is where I think

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 4>what we need to do is firstly accept that we

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 4>can't all be perfect in our diet, and actually life

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 4>would be pretty damn boring if we're all perfect, including

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 4>our diet. That if we enjoy our food, great, you know,

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 4>I often say that to people if your food is

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 4>too healthy to be enjoyed. It's just not healthy at all.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 4>So if you get some pleasure in that heavily processed

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 4>crisps or chocolate or yogurt, fine, enjoy it. So long

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 4>as the bulk of your diet comes from healthy foods

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 4>to minimally processed whole foods, as long as you're getting

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 4>plenty of fiber ideally from whole foods, then don't worry

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:31.800
<v Speaker 4>about having a little bit of this. You know, sometimes

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:33.359
<v Speaker 4>a bit of what's bad for you can be good

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 4>for you. And I think that again, our research that

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 4>we've shown at Zori and I know I've already mentioned,

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 4>has shown that really it's only about twenty percent of

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 4>those processed foods that are out there that are actually

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 4>really unhealthy for us. Those foods that we're just eating

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 4>so so quickly, those foods that are so so tasty

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 4>we don't know when we're filled, and those foods that

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 4>have additives and emulsifies that are particularly harmful for us.

0:41:57.880 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Let's relax a little bit about the rest of them.

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It's been an amazing Look, just one quick question. Sorry, we

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>want to check in there because it so seems to

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>be so controversial.

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Is oils.

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's so much confusion about it and what should

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we and shouldn't we use? Are seed oil's the devil?

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 4>So firstly, extravergin olive oil I think is kind of

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 4>the king of oils. It's full of monarch saturated fatty acids,

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 4>which are fantastic for our health. It's packed with polyphenols

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 4>which have these bioactive properties that impact inflammation in a

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 4>favorable way, et cetera, et cetera. So extraverted olive oil absolutely,

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 4>we should use it where we can. For some people,

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 4>it might be quite expensive. For other people, they might

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 4>not like the taste of it. It's very fragrant oil.

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 4>I personally don't want to find my egg in extra

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 4>virgin olive oil because it's too fragrant in terms or

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 4>too powerful the taste. Seed oils, I think is one

0:42:56.840 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 4>of the most misunderstood food or ingredient at the moment.

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 4>There is so much misinformation. I mean, it's mind blowing again.

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 4>If you put it into Google, most of the things

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 4>you get up or YouTube or Instagram are these headlines

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 4>saying seed dolls are toxic, seed doors are going to

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 4>kill you. There is not evidence to support that, and

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 4>there are many, many influencers out there that are making

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 4>these claims that, oh, as seed oil intake went up,

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.839
<v Speaker 4>so did rates of heart disease obesity. Well, yeah, what

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 4>else has changed over the last fifty years. It's not

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 4>just seed oil intake. Also, about sixty percent of the

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 4>seed all that we consume is in heavily processed, unhealthy food.

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 4>What else is in that food? It's not just the

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:45.720
<v Speaker 4>seed oils. They also talk a lot about seed doors

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 4>are inflammatory. Maybe it's super physiological amounts in a test

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 4>tuble in a mouse, absolutely not in humans. We know

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 4>now that what is talked about from a theoretical biological

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 4>pathway perspective, where we know that the main fatty acid

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 4>and seed doors, which is only A six, can be

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 4>converted into precursors of inflammation in a very kind of

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 4>simple terms. We know that actually, our body is so

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 4>clever that this doesn't actually translate to an increase in

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 4>circulating inflammatory measures. And there's meta analysis or analysis that

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 4>look at loads of RCTs, loads of randomized control trials

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 4>that show from about forty different clinical trials the actually

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 4>eating seed oils, and I'm talking about seed doors that

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 4>have been refined so they have been processed. Does not

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 4>increase inflammation. In many instances, it actually has the opposite effect,

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 4>it actually reduces inflammation. And then you've got all of

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 4>these big studies coming out from the big cohorts, so

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 4>you know where you've got hundreds of thousands of people

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 4>that have been followed over many years, and it shows

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 4>though the people that consume more seed oils compared to

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:00.760
<v Speaker 4>butter or alternative animal fats have low risk of cancer,

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 4>lower risk of cardiovascular disease, lower risk of all course mortality.

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 4>So the evidence just does not stack up to the

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 4>claims that you see on social media. And you will

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 4>never see a evidence based nutritional scientist saying seed doors

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 4>are toxic. You will see many of these keto brows

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 4>that are in the supermarket topless holding their bit of

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 4>steak saying seed alls toxic and it's going to kill

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 4>us absolutely. And you know, I went on quite a

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 4>high profile podcast earlier this year and talked about the

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 4>evidence around seed oils, and after that podcast, I got

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 4>four thousand Instagram messages saying that firstly, I couldn't be

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:45.720
<v Speaker 4>trusted because I was paid by the seed all industry,

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:47.879
<v Speaker 4>and I've actually never had any research found in seed

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.479
<v Speaker 4>all the industry. I didn't know what I was talking about,

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 4>even though I've run twenty five randomized control trials in

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.240
<v Speaker 4>the air of dietary fat and seed dolls on health

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.359
<v Speaker 4>and that I'm just down right stupid. So I had

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 4>all of this. Hey, even had someone email me to say,

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 4>how does it feel to be the most hated scientist

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 4>in America? Because I dare to question the narrative around

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 4>seed doors because god forbid, they're also processor. Obviously they're

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 4>bad for us, and absolutely no, the evidence that doesn't

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 4>stack up. I think where we need to understand more

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 4>is how refine seed oils compared to cold press seed

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 4>doors that haven't gone through all of the same processes.

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 4>So by cold press seed doors, we mean let's take

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 4>some some flass seed, literally squeeze it and take the

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 4>oil out. Yes, we know that you have greater preservation

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:40.919
<v Speaker 4>of some of the bioactives like the polypemales, so yes,

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:44.000
<v Speaker 4>they might be slightly better for us. But also by

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 4>not kind of cleaning up the oil, using refinement and

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 4>using processes does make that cold press oil less stable.

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's a bit of a kind of

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 4>balancing act here. But yeah, I'm very proceed oils. Oh,

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm so answer. I'm sorry so much.

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>It's your Friday night, but there was such an emphetic answer.

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I really really really appreciate. Put the beef tallow down.

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just absolutely.

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:18.839
<v Speaker 4>And this is what's worrying is you've got our FK

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 4>in the US transforming entire popular you know, public health policy.

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 4>You go to the US, so is there recently an

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 4>outside restaurants there's notices saying seed or free restaurant. I mean,

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 4>this is really scary. And people are advising people at

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 4>our FK. They're not nutritional scientists. They haven't interpreted the

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 4>evidence correctly.

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is why we love having people like you

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 3>on this podcast, so we can clear these things up.

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 3>One very last question we have. You've spoken a little

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 3>bit about emulsifiers and editors, which aren't great for us.

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Is there anything in particular we should look out for

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 3>on the label.

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 4>I think this is really tricky because in every different

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 4>country there's different ways that they are labeled. They have

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 4>different names, they have different E numbers, so it's quite

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 4>hard to identify. Yes, we know some are worse for

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 4>us than others, but I don't think there is enough

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 4>evidence to say, Okay, these are the five really evil ones,

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 4>so I'm a little bit reluctant to call out ones.

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 4>What I would say is there's many that are actually

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 4>fine for us, that have what I think are quite

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.760
<v Speaker 4>scary names, like a scorbic acid that's actually just bitumin

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 4>c and it's in there to actually keep it more stable.

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 4>You know, you've got to massifies like lesser thin that

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 4>we think actually might be even favorable for us. But

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.479
<v Speaker 4>kind of the real baddies, you know, I would be

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:48.760
<v Speaker 4>quite cautious about sweetness. Not all sweetness, again, are created equally.

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 4>I would be a little bit cautious about sweetness like

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 4>acek potentially sparteme sucralose, for example, But I would have

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 4>that with We still don't know enough at the normal

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 4>levels that these are consumed to know quite how bad

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.359
<v Speaker 4>they are. But I would say it's very graded that

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 4>there are some that the evidence is starting to emerge

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:13.799
<v Speaker 4>that they can have quite an unfavorable effect on our

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:17.360
<v Speaker 4>got microphone, which therefore might lead to unfavorable health effects.

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Where there's others that we think probably are quite inert

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:24.360
<v Speaker 4>and neutral, and there's enough for us to start grading them.

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:27.479
<v Speaker 4>But I think to off the top of my head.

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't kind of specify these are the real baddies.

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 2>That's okay.

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I also work in research, and I know that these

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:35.799
<v Speaker 1>things take time and you will get to it.

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Thankfully, Sarah, thank you so much for your time. Go

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:43.280
<v Speaker 3>join your family, have your glass of wine. We really

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 3>appreciate you taking the time to explain this and sort

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 3>a few things out for us.

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 2>It's been brilliant. Thank you.

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Sierah.

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh, thank you. It's one of my favorite topics. So

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 4>if I was going to work late on a Friday night,

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 4>it would be late.

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 2>There is very kind of you, but no, we really

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:00.919
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. Thanks so much, Sarah.

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Pleasure that has cleared a few things up, hasn't it.

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I've got I've got some. And also I love

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a podcast where you take away a few late little

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:21.840
<v Speaker 1>sayings like crunch back into your lunch.

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I just like hyper palatable. There was a hyper palatable meal,

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Louise. The eating rate is really interesting though,

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:36.360
<v Speaker 3>it's always just something. As I said, I thought, you

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 3>know that my grandmother would tell me it was sort

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 3>of an etiquette thing. Slow down, don't guzzle your food

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 3>and things. But the way she just spoke about the

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 3>body and it processing. It just made a huge amount

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 3>of sense, and it is something we can all do. Yes,

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 3>regardless of what you're eating.

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>That is something we can control.

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 3>It is something we can control. And how often I

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 3>mean you open a packet of chips and everyone just

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 3>dives on it in our house, like if you.

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Don't get in there quickly, that will be gone. They

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 2>probably will be and you just shovel them in, right,

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, you sort of sit and enjoy the.

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Chap n it's so and it's even worse if you

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>add and some onion dip. But I was thinking about that.

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>You do shovel down the chips and then you I

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>just lately I've been remembering how crappy I feel, so

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:22.760
<v Speaker 1>then I will literally only have half a dozen because

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh no, you know you're gonna feel rubbish. Surely.

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I used to grab a bag in the supermarket, you

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>know it's three for six bucks or whatever, and wolf

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:34.800
<v Speaker 1>half a bag on my way home from the supermarket

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is my little treat.

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I think we've all sat in the car and walf

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 2>something down on them.

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, I love it when I see people at

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the supermarket and they're putting all their bags in the

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.399
<v Speaker 1>back and they just grab something, so you're gonna eat

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that all the way up.

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Totally.

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I really like Sarah's approach. It's practical, it's sensible. It's

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:57.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, eat well and you don't have to stress

0:51:57.400 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 3>about having a little bit of you know, a little

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 3>ultra process treat here and there.

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 2>We need to be practical.

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 3>We're all time poor and you know the cost of

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 3>living is hitting at the supermarket, so you have to

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 3>make some sensible decisions. You know what I take from this,

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna sort of step back and go processed so

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 3>much as processed, make sure, you know, relatively well processed. Great,

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe just be a little bit more conscious of the

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:23.480
<v Speaker 3>ultra processed foods. That's a treat something you have here

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and there. Don't stress about it too much either.

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I did.

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I did find it funny right at the outset she said,

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, artisanal versus process, and I'm like, is real

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>food artisanal?

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that interesting? You know, like.

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:40.399
<v Speaker 1>It's it's we didn't go into this, but it's it's

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>ultra process and process. But it's also marketing thing, right, Oh, totally,

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So you don't get tricked, don't get fooled. Just go

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:50.839
<v Speaker 1>for the simple things. And gosh, that was really really

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>helpful about the seed oils because it has been rattling

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>around my brain. When I go to the Supermarke and go,

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll get the extra virginal oil, but I'm not going

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to cook everything in it because it's too expensive.

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 3>You know how I said that, I'm going to follow

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 3>my son and eat at his rate. Yeah, it's going

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 3>to be really interesting to seeing that I can do that.

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to have to train myself to do that.

0:53:08.760 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably not going to hear any of the conversation.

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to be sitting there watching her meat.

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Going to take the time. I'll be talking myself through

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 3>eating dinner, which I don't think is quite the plan,

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 3>but I'm going to get there.

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:20.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get there.

0:53:20.880 --> 0:53:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, he's obviously entertaining you with stories.

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Were you told us sort of as a kid, you

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 3>had to chew your food ninety times or something ridiculous?

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Were you told things like that?

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I might have been, but we're a family of seven

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and it was just eat it or lose. Oh no,

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>so we ate pretty fast. So that we could get

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to the second helping. I just think it's it is.

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It is handy if you have a storyteller at your table,

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 1>because it does slow everything down and you do feel

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a full sitting there with your empty

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>plate when everyone else is still eating, you know.

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know.

0:53:52.320 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I think just take your grandmother's avice pie your life

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:59.319
<v Speaker 1>and fall down. I eat slower if I haven't cooked it. Yeah,

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if it's something that I've prepared myself, I'm like, okay,

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>here it is right, let's go. I'm not hugely I'm

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not as interested and I invested if somebody else is.

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Cooking in me el, I don't know why. I'm but

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 2>more relaxed about the speeder. Eat it anyway.

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>There we go, make it crunchy, and make it crunchy, folks.

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us on our New

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Zealand Herald podcast series, The Little Things. So good to

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>be back. We hope you share this podcast with the

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>women and men in your life so we can turn

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>down the food noise in the supermarket aisles. You can

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>follow this podcast on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and for more episodes from us On other topics, head

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to zid herold dot co dot nz.

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay to you next time. On the little Things,