1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,120 Speaker 1: Berries in the house. Berry, good afternoon. 2 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:04,640 Speaker 2: Well, yeah I could be in the house. I was 3 00:00:04,680 --> 00:00:07,480 Speaker 2: down at Wellington. But I see that if you want 4 00:00:07,480 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 2: to go and visit and watch the proceedings, you're not 5 00:00:10,520 --> 00:00:13,000 Speaker 2: allowed to for the rest of the year. As you say, Ryan, 6 00:00:13,039 --> 00:00:16,280 Speaker 2: it is a pity because a lot of people do 7 00:00:16,320 --> 00:00:19,240 Speaker 2: turn up to have a look at the politicians behave 8 00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:22,760 Speaker 2: and it's because of those your bows yesterday, the pro 9 00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 2: Palestinian lot. They were outside as well, so why on 10 00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:28,360 Speaker 2: if they had to. 11 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:30,000 Speaker 1: Take it inside attention seeking? 12 00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:34,040 Speaker 2: Well, totally. I'm surprised that Jerry Browney didn't actually clear 13 00:00:34,120 --> 00:00:35,880 Speaker 2: the public gallery immediately. 14 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:38,480 Speaker 1: Can you remember the gallery being closed like that? 15 00:00:38,560 --> 00:00:39,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, it has been closed before. 16 00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:42,080 Speaker 1: It has been closed before, but hopefully not for too 17 00:00:42,159 --> 00:00:45,120 Speaker 1: much longer. I think they said till Christmas. So the 18 00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:47,960 Speaker 1: Green Sea a sinister side in scrapping the rm A. 19 00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 2: I mean it's incredible when you you know, arguably the 20 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:56,480 Speaker 2: most significant attack on red tape and cumbersome rules and 21 00:00:56,560 --> 00:01:01,360 Speaker 2: regulations that we've seen, like Chris Boship said, in a generation. 22 00:01:01,880 --> 00:01:05,520 Speaker 2: But the Greens who took a four percent dive in 23 00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:09,080 Speaker 2: the one used varying poll this week, we're on the 24 00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:14,160 Speaker 2: feed in Parliament today suggesting something sinister he is co 25 00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:18,200 Speaker 2: Green's leader Marlama Davidson pointing her in the farious finger 26 00:01:18,240 --> 00:01:19,000 Speaker 2: at Chris Luxon. 27 00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:23,240 Speaker 3: Was any analysis done as to whether ministers or MPs 28 00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:27,840 Speaker 3: would benefit from this? And if not, why not? And 29 00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:30,040 Speaker 3: answer to the first question, we haven't done that. Does 30 00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:35,039 Speaker 3: he have confidence then that no ministers or government members 31 00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 3: hold consents that will benefit from these blanket extensions? And 32 00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 3: if so, on what basis. 33 00:01:43,319 --> 00:01:45,759 Speaker 2: I have confidence that we manage our conflicts appropriately? 34 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:47,639 Speaker 4: Point of order of funeral sham Jones. 35 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:50,480 Speaker 3: Not only was a wild allegation made about members of 36 00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 3: this side of the house, then further. 37 00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:54,600 Speaker 4: Unproven, reckless statements were permitted. 38 00:01:54,760 --> 00:01:58,000 Speaker 3: There was mostly an inference in a question, but not 39 00:01:58,240 --> 00:02:01,960 Speaker 3: a wild allegation, and I think it was adequately answered. 40 00:02:03,680 --> 00:02:04,800 Speaker 1: And what a waste of time. 41 00:02:05,160 --> 00:02:09,799 Speaker 2: Well, you know, honestly talk about conspiracy theories as if 42 00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:13,800 Speaker 2: you had set about taking apart this massive piece of 43 00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:17,640 Speaker 2: legislation and going hang on, you've got you're waiting for 44 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:20,520 Speaker 2: a consent your minister is. 45 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 1: Mean, it's ridiculous, pat But also does she assume that 46 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:26,880 Speaker 1: Labor was guilty of the same crime when they took there's. 47 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:28,960 Speaker 2: A place, Yeah, not as successfully. 48 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 1: And was Labor really kept in the dark on these 49 00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:32,520 Speaker 1: changes to begin with? 50 00:02:32,639 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 2: Well, that's what they said. They've said they were kept 51 00:02:36,040 --> 00:02:40,040 Speaker 2: in the dark. But I'd say hang on a mo 52 00:02:40,280 --> 00:02:43,880 Speaker 2: to that one. The bill's architect, Chris Bishop has said 53 00:02:43,880 --> 00:02:46,720 Speaker 2: he consulted with Labor on the charges or on the 54 00:02:46,840 --> 00:02:50,360 Speaker 2: changes he's made. Have a listened to Carmel Seppaloni on 55 00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:50,680 Speaker 2: that one. 56 00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 4: He has had a number of briefings. You know, I'll 57 00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:55,520 Speaker 4: give him that, but I mean it was dropped at 58 00:02:55,520 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 4: one pm yesterday. But I mean it was dropped at 59 00:02:57,560 --> 00:02:59,840 Speaker 4: one pm yesterday and then now all of a sudden, 60 00:02:59,840 --> 00:03:01,800 Speaker 4: you know, we've still got to take it away and 61 00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:05,359 Speaker 4: consider it. So some of what's in there we expected 62 00:03:05,919 --> 00:03:07,799 Speaker 4: and we need a chance to be able to look 63 00:03:07,840 --> 00:03:08,640 Speaker 4: over it thoroughly. 64 00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:13,440 Speaker 2: That was Carmel Seppaloni on our opposite number are in 65 00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:17,240 Speaker 2: z this morning on their political panel. The idea that 66 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:20,400 Speaker 2: they poach from us, of course the Ginny and Mark, 67 00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:24,040 Speaker 2: which I think is much more entertaining. But talk about 68 00:03:24,080 --> 00:03:27,360 Speaker 2: having your Christmas cake and eating it too. I mean 69 00:03:28,320 --> 00:03:30,800 Speaker 2: I did edit twice that she said it because I 70 00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:34,400 Speaker 2: wanted you to basically hear her coming back on herself. 71 00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:38,480 Speaker 2: I mean, what more did they expect a lot? Obviously, 72 00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:41,600 Speaker 2: are like credit for having a look at it while 73 00:03:41,600 --> 00:03:44,360 Speaker 2: they were in government and then sitting on their hands. 74 00:03:45,240 --> 00:03:47,520 Speaker 2: Honestly exactly talk about lose the argument. 75 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:48,240 Speaker 3: Although I do. 76 00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 1: Think there's some mirit and politicians holding far unlike sometimes 77 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 1: I like it when they don't give you an immediate 78 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:56,280 Speaker 1: hot take and immediate put. You know where they say, 79 00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:57,680 Speaker 1: I'm going to go away and I'm going to read 80 00:03:57,720 --> 00:03:59,880 Speaker 1: this properly and come back with a view. 81 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 2: You know, that's a such because you don't know what 82 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:03,200 Speaker 2: you've been briefed on. 83 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:08,680 Speaker 1: I suppose in this case that might be true. Now, 84 00:04:08,920 --> 00:04:11,320 Speaker 1: this debate between Nichola Willison Ruth Richardson is probably going 85 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:12,240 Speaker 1: to happen next week. 86 00:04:12,960 --> 00:04:16,000 Speaker 2: Well we don't know, do we, But certainly Nichola Willis 87 00:04:16,040 --> 00:04:18,120 Speaker 2: has thrown down the gauntlet. I liked her analysis on 88 00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:20,880 Speaker 2: at the beginning of the program because it is right 89 00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:24,800 Speaker 2: the far right. A lot of people don't remember that 90 00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:28,719 Speaker 2: not only is Ruth Richardson the chair of the Taxpayers 91 00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:33,400 Speaker 2: Union that's setting out to take Nikola Willis apart, she 92 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:37,520 Speaker 2: was the architect of the mother of all budgets. She 93 00:04:37,640 --> 00:04:42,200 Speaker 2: was the first woman finance minister to present a budget 94 00:04:42,279 --> 00:04:45,160 Speaker 2: in this country and it's one that will never forget. 95 00:04:45,200 --> 00:04:47,160 Speaker 2: I mean, if you only have to look at what 96 00:04:47,240 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 2: she did in that budget, she cut welfare benefits, the 97 00:04:52,160 --> 00:04:56,200 Speaker 2: unemployment benefit by about twenty five percent. That in those 98 00:04:56,279 --> 00:04:58,760 Speaker 2: days was fourteen dollars a week. Doesn't sound like much, 99 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:01,560 Speaker 2: but it was probably quite a bit then I remember it, 100 00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:04,080 Speaker 2: not that I was on a benefit. Of course, the 101 00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:07,599 Speaker 2: secondest benefit she cut around twenty percent, and that was 102 00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:11,480 Speaker 2: twenty seven dollars a week, and support for families was reduced, 103 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:19,560 Speaker 2: basically the whole family benefit was changed. So really, I 104 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:22,920 Speaker 2: think I think it'll be quite an interesting between these two. 105 00:05:23,120 --> 00:05:26,359 Speaker 2: And you know, in fairness to Ruth Richardson, she was 106 00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 2: a hard ass, no doubt about that. 107 00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:32,039 Speaker 1: And it was to make friends, to make friends. Hey, 108 00:05:32,480 --> 00:05:35,159 Speaker 1: the fudge chocolate thing for the taxpasion as well. I've 109 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:37,240 Speaker 1: been told that I wasn't meant to mention it because 110 00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:40,760 Speaker 1: it's embargo till tomorrow. Oh dear, And you've eaten your fudge, 111 00:05:40,839 --> 00:05:43,400 Speaker 1: eaten my fudge hand in the cookie jar. 112 00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 2: You've had your cake and eat as well, So there you. 113 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,120 Speaker 1: Go, all right, very thanks for that. Very Soper News 114 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:49,680 Speaker 1: Talks political Correspondent. 115 00:05:50,279 --> 00:05:53,440 Speaker 3: For more from Heather Duplessy Allen Drive, Listen live to 116 00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:56,559 Speaker 3: News Talks it'd be from four pm weekdays, or follow 117 00:05:56,600 --> 00:05:58,360 Speaker 3: the podcast on iHeartRadio