WEBVTT - AI is changing search, will your business be ready?

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, after twenty five years of just googling stuff online

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>searches in the midst of a radical change.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're seeing the rise of conversational search and AI

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>generated search summaries, which have big implications for the seventy

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar search engine optimization industry and the ability of

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>KIWI companies to find a global audience online.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>This week on the Business of Tech, powered by two

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Degrees Business, what businesses need to know about how search

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is changing and how will measure audience engagement in the

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>world where clicks and impressions may mean a lot less

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>than they used to.

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Our guest this week is Ryan McMillan from Atlas Digital,

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>a company that specializes in paid search and social media

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 2>marketing and advertising. The perfect guy to explain and make

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 2>sense off all of these changes that are coming to

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>search and what it means for the average QWI company

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to make it on the global stage.

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>What I think we're going to see is probably less

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>use of a traditional search engine as people start to

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 3>find answers in different ways. Every year we hear something

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 3>that SEO is dead. Is SEO dead?

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure about. SEO is certainly a worth.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Changing stay tuned to find out everything you need to

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>know about the changing world of search engines.

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>First, though, if you hadn't noticed, we're about three months

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>away from the US presidential election and the miss and

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 2>disinformation is running thick and fast on social platforms like

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>x and Facebook.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It really moved up a gear following the assassination attempt

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>on former President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania on July thirteenth.

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Elin Musk's endorsement of Trump seemed to trigger a flood

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 2>of conservative slash Republican propaganda across his own platform and

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>counter offensives from liberal learning social media users.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Add in the escalating conflict in the Middle East, riots

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, sweeping political change there, and the social

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>media scene seems like even more of a saspit than

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it usually is.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 2>So what's going on and what can we expect? Is

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>we approached that pivotal election when it comes to the

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>peddling of miss and disinformation.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I caught up with aut Associate professor in Communication Studies

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and former BBC reporter doctor Helen Sissons to get some

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>perspective on what's going on. Hi, Helen, thank you for

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the Business of Tech podcast.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 5>It's a pleasure you've.

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Joined us today to talk a little bit about misinformation

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and how these new media technologies are playing a role

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in the issue of disinformation and misinformation. And we saw

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>an explosion of that very recently with the attempted assassination

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump.

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, Ben, you're absl right. What we

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 5>saw post the assassination attempt was quite alarming, and it

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 5>has been obviously the subject of discussion, and we saw

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 5>some quite senior people obviously piling in really with some

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 5>really with some very concerning and not fact checked, no

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 5>evidence to support what they were saying, accusing various people

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 5>that came from both sides. We had, you know, obviously

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 5>the usual Deep State is involved in that actually was

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 5>a Donald Trump construction, and so you know, the idea

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 5>that the deep state is after him and has been

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 5>and he's the victim has become a sort of mantra

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 5>almost and we saw that within almost minutes of the

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 5>of the attempt. We also saw quite senior people pointing

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 5>the finger at Joe Biden, which of course is incendiary

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 5>and quite and very concerning. And then we saw on

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 5>the other side, oh, this has been a you know,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 5>Trump's own supporters. They're doing this to get the sympathy

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 5>of people, and that again is very concerning because you know,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 5>we see them both sides sort of piling in and

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 5>we're in. It's very concerning for the people. If we've

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 5>taken it from the people who were on social media,

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 5>who are not politicians, who are not activists, it begins

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 5>to break down their trust. It's very It is very

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 5>It stokes fear, It stokes concern, and it stokes who

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 5>can I trust? Who's everyone out there is behaving in

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 5>a way that makes it that makes me feel unsafe.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 5>So it is really bad for everyone's a sense of

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 5>security within our democracies. And it has been coined by

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 5>one of the top researchers in this area, Claire Wardle,

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 5>who's now Brown University, as information disorder. And now we

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 5>always had obviously, rumors and misinformation have always been around,

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 5>it's just the level and so the ability of social

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 5>media to disseminate them in a way that hasn't been

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 5>possible before. Misinformation has always been around, it is because

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 5>of social media that it's now on steroids. And people believe,

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, half of New Zealanders believe that they're seeing

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 5>misinformation every day. It's not necessarily the truth. But when

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 5>half New Zealanders think that they're seeing false information every

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 5>day and ninety percent think they're seeing it monthly, then

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 5>we've got a trust issue here with our information ecosystem.

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the issue of the moment. We talked

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>pret Flea about the Trump possessionation attempt and the resulting

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>frenzy of information following that. How does that kind of

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>encapsulate where we are today, where we're more likely to

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>believe whatever kind of comes through the social media channels,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even less likely to believe the factual reporting

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that comes through mainstream media news.

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 5>As I said, you've always had this, the misinformation, the peddlers,

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 5>and you've always had But then actually they were sitting

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 5>in the pub talking to your two or three people, going,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, I think the moon landings of the fake.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Now you've got the ability for that one particular person,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 5>who perhaps only had an audience of three or four

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 5>in the pub, to have built up an audience on

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 5>social media across the world of many thousands of people.

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 5>So what social media allowed is people with perhaps unusual

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 5>views extreme in some cases extreme views to find a

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 5>to find like minded people to spread conspiracy theories. Now,

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 5>the attraction of conspiracy theories is that they make a

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 5>complicated world easy to understand. According to research from Victoria

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 5>University in twenty nineteen, so even before the pandemic, So

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 5>it's probably more now eight point nine percent of New

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 5>Zealanders believe the moon landings were faked. Social media is

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 5>allowed what we've been minority opinions to become mainstream, and

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 5>that has divided us. So that means that when you

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 5>get a critical event, instead of pulling together, there is

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 5>an opportunity for division to be stoked.

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that because you know, there are these minority opinions,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>but they somehow hitched themselves to majority beliefs. QAnon for example,

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>started out as this very fringe belief around deep state

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and child abuse rings and then it somehow became hitched

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to the majority Republican party in some way. So how

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>does that happened and how does social media enable these

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>fringe beliefs to then become hitched two majority believes?

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, they need to be amplified by people who have

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 5>large platforms. Right, Sometimes you know a view can be

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 5>seeded on somewhere like four Channel or whatever, circulate there

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 5>for a while, and then it can jump to mainstream

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.559
<v Speaker 5>social media, you know, Facebook, by somebody who's a member

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 5>of both those kinds of groups, and then it begins

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 5>to get shared. So then it's kind of an organic

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 5>sort of thing, but often it is actually something that

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 5>needs to be amplified. So for example, a fringe British

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 5>far right party a few years ago put out a

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 5>video three videos asserting that a particular incident that was

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 5>actually in Holland between two young boys was an attack

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 5>by a Muslim on a crippled white kids. And this

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 5>was on a fringe British site. Not didn't pick up

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 5>much until Donald Trump tweeted it, and when he retweeted it,

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 5>it's obviously became viral and it was fact checked again

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 5>by the wa she'd post, among others who and the

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 5>Dutch embassy had to come in and say, neither of

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 5>these boys involved in this video are either Muslim or immigrant.

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 5>They were both born and bred in the Netherlands. The

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 5>threat is real and this is very worrying because it's

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 5>divisive and it can lead to people getting hurt.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>We saw that with the christ Church attacks right his

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>manifesto was called the Great Replacement I believe Great theory, Yes,

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Great Replacement theory, which is a conspiracy theory that isn't

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>backed by science and doesn't have any basis and truth,

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but was used as a justification for one of the

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>most horrific acts of violence in New Zealand's history. So

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that is kind of this meta narrative.

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And like you say, if you believe in the truth

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of the big narrative, then it doesn't necessarily matter if

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>every single piece of smaller evidence is true or not,

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>because it feeds into your confirmation bias. Right. Do you

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>think that Donald Trump intentionally weaponized Twitter in order to

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>gain power and influence or do you think that he

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>would have found some other way if it wasn't Twitter.

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 5>I think several things came together to help Donald Trump.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 5>One of them, of course, was the constant undermining of

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 5>the mainstream media that went alongside that. The media was

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 5>a bit slow, there was some hand ringing what have you,

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 5>before they actually came out and said and called Donald

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 5>Trump a spreader of misinformation and in fact a liar. Eventually,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 5>the media didn't want to do that. They would rather

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 5>have taken each thing and fact checked it seriously and

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 5>put it against people were not there for that. And

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 5>at the same time, he was going fake news. Every

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 5>time there was a he had a rally and he

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 5>would point at individual journalism, call your fake new CNN

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 5>fake news, trying to undermine trust. So it went along

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 5>side again it was they just trust me, don't trust them.

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 5>He was speaking to these people who felt disenfranchised, felt

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 5>that they'd been forgotten, and so social media allowed him

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 5>to reach out to these little disparate groups all over

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 5>the place and bring them together for his base. So

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 5>he was talking to them and it helped him a lot.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 5>That the mainstream media didn't quite know how to deal

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 5>with this in the beginning, and again amplified many times

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 5>his messages which were nonsense, you know, many of them,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 5>but taking it seriously, and it became like his car crash.

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't know about you, but I was every morning

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 5>wake up wonder what Donald Trump had said. I was

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 5>as bad as anybody else. And this is a big

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 5>mistake that often the liberal elite can make, is not

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 5>to take seriously people who behave and act differently. They

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 5>don't think who were they talking to? And then look

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 5>at that carefully. So social media allowed him to communicate

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 5>with a set of people that had been disenfranchised, and

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 5>he's still talking to those people and they're still there.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Are we seeing this in New Zealand? Is it similar

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but on a different scale? Has our political structure with

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>MMP rather than just having a two party system per se?

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It is kind of but not to the same extent

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>as the US. Has that inoculated us a little bit

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>against the extent to which it's happened in the US.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Or are we just as bad?

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 5>More people in New Zealand believe the moon landing was

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 5>faked than in America, So I think we've got to

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 5>be very careful not to believe where this little country

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the world that nobody is going

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 5>to target, nobody cares about. It's not true. We're very strategic,

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 5>we are valuable. The fact that we are a liberal

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 5>democracy makes us very attractive as a target for some

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 5>misinformation peddlers, and there's been some excellent work done by

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Stuff Circuit on the soft power of China. I think

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 5>the disinformation campaign at the last election didn't find as

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 5>much misinformation as we thought there might be, but work

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 5>that's been done in New Zealand has shown that we

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 5>are very concerned about misinformation. New Zealanders are and believe

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 5>we see quite a lot of it, which just that

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 5>belief undermines our trust in our information sources. So we

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 5>need to work very hard to build trust and the

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 5>trust research has done out of aut Media Muliati and

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Greg Treadwell has shown that this is not going away,

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 5>but we can do things about it. Media, literacy, education,

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 5>there is a lot of hope, you know, there is

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 5>a lot of hope. People are concerned, they want to

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 5>learn and we can help. So yeah, I don't think

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 5>we should be all doom and gloom raising awareness and

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 5>knowing what has been a human pattern. It's just that

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 5>social media has allowed that pattern and a lot of

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 5>a lot of extra miles, so to speak.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.479
<v Speaker 2>So being no easy answers from hell and there. It's complex,

0:12:55.240 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 2>it's societal, it's interwoven with technological change and control of

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 2>those platforms. It's only going to get worse, and AI

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>is just another element that's going to confound things even more.

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it wasn't the most positive sounding of interviews, but

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, I think what we

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>do need to remember is people do like to speculate

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and get excited about things, but social media can just

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>take that speculation and excitement and turn it into something

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty nasty pretty quickly. So media literacy is really key,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>and just making sure that we're all you know, if

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you hear somebody talking about something, you have that little

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>voice that goes, just check that one maybe, and reminding

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>your kids that it's really important to do the same

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. That's vital.

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's going to be interesting in the

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>whole endorsement of Trump by I wouldn't say, you know,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 2>a widespread contingent of tech leaders in Silicon Valley, but

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 2>definitely some of the powerful ones. Peter Thiel, who was

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 2>a big backer last time, but most notably Elon Musk

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>within hours of the assassination attempt endorsing Trump to US

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and ninety two million followers. Incredibly powerful and

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>that's why Trump is basically said in the last week,

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I sort of need to support electric vehicles because of Elon,

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>And so he's starting to see this really which we haven't.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 2>We knew it was happening, but haven't seen it to

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>this extent. That sort of the tech bro tech elite,

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 2>conservative leaning elites anyway intertwined with Trump. They've all got

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 2>super packs. They're giving him money. There's got to be

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>some payoff for that. So, for instance, on crypto, Trump

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 2>has gone from saying cryptos a scam to basically saying, oh, yeah,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm going to I'm going to see assets,

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 2>crypto assets and use it to payoff national debt. So

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 2>he's done a one ad on that. But you know,

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 2>is a crypto sector going to see a dream run

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>of you know, no regulation and government endorsement of their

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 2>way of doing things. I doubt it. You know, Trump

0:14:54.840 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 2>is just so sort of self interested, He's got authoritarian tendencies,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and crypto goes against that.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you use the term payoff there, So

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll just let that's it.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, that's what's going on with social media and

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 2>the fight for control of the political narrative, which is

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>intensifying with the US elections looming. But there's another big

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 2>movement underway in the world of online search and the

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>advertising that goes with it.

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>The online search engine market was worth around two hundred

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>billion last year, a market dominated by Google. Even here

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in New Zealand. Google's local accounts show it generated the

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>best part of one billion dollars in sales here, much

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of which will be through businesses paying to feature at

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the top of Google search results.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Those paid links are everything for a retailer or a

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 2>financial services company trying to attract customers. But AI is

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 2>changing search. It became most evident last year with conversational

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Search debuting and Microsoft's being search engine powered by the

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 2>same tech underpinning chat GPT.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Then a few months ago, Google debut it's aioverview future,

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which will try to answer your search query, not simply

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of relevant links, but a short blurb

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>attempting to answer your question.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 2>So featuring in that AI generated blurb will increasingly be

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the place to be in search results. That is implications

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 2>for the type of content website owners create to appeal

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>to Google search algorithms.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>At List Digital is a Wellington based paid search and

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>social media startup that helps other tech startups find an

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>audience in the noisy world of search.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>It's founder, Ryan McMillan, has helped secure some impressive results

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 2>for fast growing companies like Chersey's and Jasper. He's been

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking a lot about the future of the search business

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 2>as Google Bing and others embrace AI.

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>This one is worth listening to for anyone trying to

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>find an audience online. Here's at list Digital's Ryan McMillan.

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Brian, thanks so much for coming on the business of

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Tech Now. We met probably a few months ago for

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the first time. It was on a red Eye flight

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to Wellington, and I was really taken by the conversation.

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 2>We talked about the tech landscape, startups which we're both

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 2>passionate about, and search engine optimization and started talking about

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 2>this revolution that's happening with generative AI, conversational search, which

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 2>is changing the game. So we're going to get into

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 2>that and what it means for New Zealand businesses going

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 2>global trying to find people online to buy their wares.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>But tell us a little bit first about your business

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 2>at list Digital.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Sure, So I started at list Digital about five and

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 3>a half years ago, and fundamentally what we do is

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 3>we specialize in paid search like Google Ads, paid social

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 3>like LinkedIn or Facebook advertising, and then search engine optimization

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 3>as well, which obviously we're here to talk about today.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 3>So some of our clients seventy five percent of them

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 3>to B SAS companies, with the other twenty five percent

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 3>being B two C SAS or B two C tech.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 3>And what we find with almost all of the B

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 3>to B SaaS companies is that they're looking to expand internationally.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 3>So from an SEO perspective, that can already introduce a

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 3>number of questions that need to be answered and ideally

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 3>thought of fairly early in the piece. For example, your

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 3>domain structure is something that's quite important to consider, as

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 3>is the localization of language that you'll be using. Do

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>you need to talk in different languages? Do you need

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 3>to colloquialize the language. These are just a few of

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the things that we set out to answer quite early

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 3>on and then work through building a strategy in order

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to make best use of that.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 2>So I think the perception out there is you know

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 2>search you know was in the late nineties, there were

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 2>early search engines. Google came along with the power of

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 2>its way of ranking pages and its algorithms changed the game,

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>and then nothing really happened fundamentally for the next twenty

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 2>five years. There was a lot of great innovation behind

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the scenes, but search the experience that white screen with

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the search bar didn't really change and people love Google.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Early twenty twenty three, we saw Being, which had really

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 2>been struggling in search, team up with open Ai integrating

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 2>GPT into the Being search engine. A lot of interest

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 2>in that, and that was really the start of conversational search,

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>an auto generated summary that tries to answer your question. So, Ryan,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>what is actual conversational search?

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 4>How does it work?

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 3>The ability of conversational search is, first of all, can

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 3>understand using natural language processing the intent behind what you're

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 3>looking for at a much deeper level. It's not about

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 3>going what a related keyword someone might talk about, but

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 3>actually really understanding, hey, what does this person want to know?

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 3>And then on top of that, it has this sort

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 3>of multifaceted, dynamic approach where you can continue to on

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 3>the questions you're asking and almost like it's mimicking actually

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 3>talking to a person. You know, I want to buy

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Nike shoes, and it shows you a bunch, Well, I

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>want to see all the red ones. And then now

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 3>you've got all the red ones, and you can really

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 3>build on that, and you can even loop back later

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 3>like remember those those red shoes you showed me? Can

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 3>you show me the first two? Because I want to

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 3>see those two and so the reality is that you're

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 3>almost starting to get this customer service experience from conversational search.

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Like it means that we can go a lot deeper

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 3>with the searches that we're doing, and off the back

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 3>of it probably not only answer the questions we've got better,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 3>but also walk away with a lot more than we

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of bargained for as well. For example, you could

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 3>look at buying Nike shoes, choose the red ones, and

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 3>then go, now, I really want to run this half

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 3>marathon in about six months, what's a training plan? And

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 3>you can really build that and have that all stitched

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 3>up in a few minutes versus right now, you'd need

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 3>to google half marathon training plan and it wouldn't cater

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 3>to you, it wouldn't have your past search experience, it

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't know who you are, and it wouldn't be out

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 3>of therefore, adjust that information to cater to yourself. So

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a really exciting space to be in.

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's pretty cool. And what's your take on how

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 2>this is changing search engine optimization and your own business?

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 3>It is hugely changing the game. And what I think

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see is probably less use of a

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 3>traditional search engine as people start to find answers in

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 3>different ways, and by the very nature of that, it

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 3>will also change the SEO industry itself. Do I think

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 3>that that will be the end of SEO? Certainly not.

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think SEO as we know it is going

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 3>to change, which I suppose is something quite cliche every

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 3>time every year we hear something that SEO is dead.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Is SEO dead? I'm not sure? But SEO is certainly

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 4>always changing.

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 2>So what does that mean for the types of content?

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Because ultimately your job now is to try and feature

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 2>in that auto generated summary you want. For instance, if

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 2>your campman do a clothing company and some enters tell

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>me the best clothing for a trip to root Burn.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 2>If I'm hiking the root Burn, what gear do I need?

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Katmandu wants to be in that summary at the top

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>of Google. So what do you need to do now

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that your stuff gets there.

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>The experiential nature is probably the most important piece of

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 3>SEO at the moment, and in my opinion, it's the

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>way that we really find that competitive advantage against llm's

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 3>which your AI like Gemini, which will be able to

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 3>give your answers and result in people not visiting your

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>website at all. I think with the Gemini responses, really

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 3>what they're doing is synthesizing all of the information on

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 3>the web and then using that to obviously generate an

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>answer based on the patterns and data that the model's

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 3>been trained on. So I think that there's going to

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 3>be less opportunity for businesses to really produce that sort

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 3>of information level content that doesn't necessarily have a point

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:01.479
<v Speaker 3>of difference, and that's where this originality piece really starts

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 3>to shine. The thing is about one three hundred percent

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 3>increase in searches for Reddit variants in the past twelve months,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 3>and Reddit, I believe was actually the sixth most or

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 3>so visited website in the past year compared to the

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 3>sixty eighth the year before. And I think that what

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 3>that shows is a really solid display that people want information.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 3>They want to search what do I need for the

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 3>root burn track? And they want to know I need,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, a range jacket and this many thermals and

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.479
<v Speaker 3>that type of thing. But they also want to know

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 3>from you know, John that did the root burn track

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 3>and how we found it and if autumn was a

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 3>good time to do it, and what his experience was

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think that there's a real harmony that can

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 3>exist in search results, in this sort of information seeking

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 3>dynamic where humans can continue to play a big part.

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 3>And so stepping back from that, there's a big sort

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>of semantic understanding component that Google and other search engines

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 3>have been really trying to capture the past several years.

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 3>So since about twenty thirteen and specifically in twenty fifteen,

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 3>there's pretty big updates to the Google search algorithm around

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 3>really understanding the wider meaning of what you're looking for.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 3>It used to be the case. I mean, this is

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 3>a whole other story, but it used to be so interesting.

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 3>You could literally just write in white text on a

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 3>white background life insurance five hundred times and that would

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 3>help you get to the top of Google. And these

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 3>days you don't even have to use the exact word

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 3>life insurance to rank for the keyword life insurance. Your

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 3>page just has to be about that. And so this

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 3>sort of wider contextual semantic understanding has existed in Google's

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 3>machine learning algorithm. But what's so interesting now is really

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 3>the ability, through the patterns and data matching, to anticipate

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 3>the other things that you might want to know to

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 3>your point around what does a business need to do?

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Google talks about something called EAT, which is experience, expertise, authority,

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 3>and trustworthiness, and I think that those things continue to

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 3>play a big role. Experience obviously is a big one,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 3>as demonstrated by Reddit. Fundamentally, what we want to do

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 3>is create content that's original as a keyword or as

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 3>a key point, but also that can't be copied easily,

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 3>because that's the real point of difference here. And so

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.239
<v Speaker 3>when you can leverage things like first party data. So

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 3>if you're cat man Do and you for some reason

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 3>had data on how many people are doing the rout

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 3>burn track, you could leverage that data in some way

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 3>to provide a point of difference in an article that

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 3>someone can't get elsewhere. Likewise, you could have your own

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 3>catman Do community and then break that down into the

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 3>different tracks people have done, and you have your own

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 3>sort of Reddit experience. In that sense, trustworthiness and brand

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 3>signals is a big one, and I think what we

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 3>really want to do is build around specific authors so

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 3>that they know, hey, it's Peter that's writing this article.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 3>When I follow Peter and Peter is writing for Katmandu

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 3>or Similarly, it could be if you're the CEO of

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 3>Catman do, then you build this authorship. These owned communities

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 3>are going to become more important, and I think the

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 3>placement of content across different channels, with SEO being one

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 3>of them, is really where the space is going to

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 3>move to.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's easier than ever now to actually generate

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 2>content for your website with generative AI. You can get chat,

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 2>GPT or Perplexity or Gemini to do that. But the

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 2>search engine isn't going to like that because everyone is

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 2>doing that. It's not unique. What they're wanting is that

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 2>community based stuff, that experiential stuff, case studies. So what

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 2>does does that mean? Let's say, like a campman do,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 2>should you be really pushing to get people to review

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 2>your stuff and write about your stuff on redded or

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 2>in camping forums and things like that. You're going to

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 2>have to put a lot more effort into generating that

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>more genuine content.

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I believe so.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 3>And I think that there's been this concept in se

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 3>of backlinking, which Google has always described as kind of

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 3>like votes from other website about your website, and that

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 3>provides you a significant boost in your chances of ranking

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 3>for a search result.

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 4>If lots of other websites.

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Are ranking a linking back to you, now what I

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 3>think the backlinks will continue to exist, But and that

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 3>component and the ranking algorithm of what we populate, whether

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 3>that's populated by an AI or it's populated in the

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 3>search results below that automated response, it's going to focus

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 3>much more on social signals, So are you on LinkedIn

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.199
<v Speaker 3>and have a following and other things like that. And

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 3>I think that it's also going to focus in a

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 3>big way on the review component as well, and so

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 3>building that trustworthiness through reviews I think will become one

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 3>of the key new sort of ways that you get backlinks.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 3>So yes, you should be on forums, you should be

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 3>on social channels, and really you just want to leverage

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 3>as much anecdotal personal reviews as you can, as opposed

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 3>to just writing a blog about here's how you can

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 3>get to the root burn track and then asking someone

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 3>else that wrote about a different track to link to

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the root burn track article you've written, which is the

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 3>old way of doing it.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 4>At the end of the day, like.

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 3>What Google rewards is providing users with a great experience.

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>So Google is a multi billion dollar cash machine they

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 3>invest in all sorts of stuff, from automated driving through

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 3>to all sorts of other sort of like research endeavors

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 3>that they're involved in, but really it's all funded by

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Google Ads. And so for them, success looks like someone

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 3>searching in Google, getting their answer and leaving, or you know,

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 3>continuing to search for other things. And so what they

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 3>want you to do is just provide the best user experience.

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think that the main opportunity for providing the

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 3>best user experience now comes from what can people add

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 3>to the max, not what sort of blogs can we

0:28:58.680 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 3>come up to?

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Which are a GENAI could just do it?

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we're seeing some of our B two C

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 2>brands like Charities, which is a client of yours. They're

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 2>doing great work to doing podcasts, are doing how to articles,

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 2>they're active on social media. So in the hope that

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 2>that stuff rises up because it's really good quality content.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of like maybe a company like Timely,

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 2>which is more of a B to B company, it's

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the same sort of set of rules apply. How do

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 2>you introduce that experiential sort of review type experiences? Is

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>what using Timely is Like, I mean, there are websites

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 2>like clatching that which review businesses based on their customer

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 2>service and the quality of their products. Is there going

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 2>to be a lot more of a focus on those

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>sorts of review aggregator sites that are aimed at B

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>to B type products.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I think review aggregators are one part of it. That

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 3>market itself is actually very saturated, and if you take

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 3>a given search, like you insert your vertical plus software

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 3>type search, so say like here Salon software or something

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 3>like that. In the case of Timely, those software qualifier

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 3>searches are pretty much dominated by the likes of G

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 3>two and trust Radius, et cetera. So it's important to

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 3>be part of those, but it's also important to add

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 3>a personal touch of actual customers reviewing your product, whether

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 3>that might be other sort of business influencers in the space.

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>There are sort of like smaller medium business influencers around

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 3>the world that actually focus specifically on the beauty industry,

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 3>but also just talking to your specific customers and then

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 3>tying that back to the actual business benefits. Because there's

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 3>say the G two reviews that you might get, which

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 3>are more feature driven and are really about parody and

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 3>which software does what better than the other. But then

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 3>there's also this other experience of like the purpose of

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 3>using that software, which is I now have a lot

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 3>more time, and I've managed to hire two more people.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I spend that time working on the business, not in

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the business, those types of things. So adding in that

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 3>first party data improvement that you've got and then putting

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 3>faces on it, because at the end of the day,

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 3>people pretty much buy from people.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So for decades, Google has made a lot of

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>money by you know, those first few links, sponsored links

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 2>at the top. They've talked about that this will apply

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 2>to AI overviews at some point as well. How do

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 2>you see that playing out? So you will literally pay

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to be featured in that summary overview that they give.

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 2>How do they balance that trust and interest in giving

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you the really good stuff with their desire to make

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 2>money out of those those who are featured in those summaries.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I think a lot of it will come

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 3>down to the actual trust for the brand for that business.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 3>So if people still really trust Google, then the same

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 3>way that Google ads is really effective is that actually

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 3>people might just go, oh, I'll just go to this anyway,

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 3>because you know, I trust Google, I like to I'll

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 3>continue using it. Similarly, in and the AI responses. As

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 3>long as people are getting the value from those responses,

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 3>whether they're sponsored or not, people will continue to come back.

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 3>And in Google Ads an SEO, Google has a way

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 3>to measure the actual quality of what's happening as well,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 3>sign a quality score to your ads, and that influences

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the price that you actually pay as well. And so

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't think necessarily that the sponsored component will make

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 3>people stop using the platform more or less. It's more

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 3>about the quality of the sponsored content if they got.

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Their query answer.

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, one bigger piece to think about is actually just

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the business models that will be used, because obviously open

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 3>ai is using a subscription model at the moment, and

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Google Ads is using like a pay per click model

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 3>where you click their ad, the advertiser would pay Google

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:54.959
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of money and that's how they make these

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars. So it's interesting to think about, you know,

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 3>what the actual business models will be that will drive this.

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure there will still be continue to be an

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 3>advertising component, but will that look more like a Netflix

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>where it's like there's sort of two tiers where you

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 3>can pay for a subscription and never get any sponsored content.

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, essentially paying Google almost for like a type

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 3>of ad blocker, yeah, which should almost be genius from Google,

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 3>or actually just paying to see the ads, and they

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 3>get paid both ways as well.

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 4>So it'll be interesting to see how that changes.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 2>If you do feature in an AI summary. How are

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the metrics potentially going to have to change when it's

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily all going to be about clickthrough and impressions.

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is really interesting and definitely a question that

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 3>all advertisers are asking. Fundamentally though, we need to really

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 3>think about in terms of attribution, moving away from impressions

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and clicks anyway, in my opinion, I fund you know,

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Atlas Digital obviously measures to a very great degree right

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 3>through to close one business, how much revenue we're actually

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 3>generating for a customer. Somations useful for us. But what

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 3>we do know is that when you focus on top

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 3>level brand awareness and make people feel something about your brand,

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 3>that's generally what tends to drive the majority of new

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 3>users into your company, especially as you grow. And so

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that brand advertising is going to be really

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 3>important and that you just need to really focus on.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 3>There needs to be almost some sort of metric to

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 3>understand the quality of the experience someone had, and maybe

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 3>that will be solved by things like, you know, you've

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 3>got your laptop camera and can recognize the emotions in

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 3>your face when you're looking at something. Obviously there's hover

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 3>over rates and other things like that, but I think

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 3>it's these kind of micro engagements that will start being

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 3>measured to a greater degree so that we can know

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 3>if we're eliciting positive responses around what the person's seeing

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 3>in our brand.

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 2>We have seen sort of the dark side of AI

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 2>generated search already. You know, Gemini and Google's oversights. AI

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 2>insights had a rough start putting glue on pizza that thing.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 2>So there's that aspect, the hallucinations, the misinformation that could

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 2>potentially be built into those If they see content being

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>engaged with on Reddit in a huge way, it might

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 2>be featured on Google, but it might be wrong. So

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 2>there's that problem. Then, is I guess the ethical issue

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 2>off where they're scraping content from and who gets rewarded

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 2>for producing that content If it doesn't have a product

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 2>you can buy at the end of it, someone's just

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 2>creating great quality content which Google is scooping up.

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I definitely think that the hallucinations component will be

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 3>solved in time or at least obviously reduce and the

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 3>frequency that it happens over time. The licensing component is

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 3>quite interesting to think about, and I'm not too sure

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 3>how Google is going to really deal with scooping that content,

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 3>as you put it, from different websites in the years

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 3>to come. If we think about the current information and

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 3>the web, then we've got that's what all these llms

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 3>have been trained on. And if we think of that

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 3>from a static picture, producing new content right now potentially

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 3>has become less advantageous. If you're a business, you might

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 3>want to produce fewer pieces of content that's more original experience,

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 3>as we've been discussing, or you can simply use an

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 3>LLM to mass produce content that effectively exists already and

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really add anything to the ecosystem.

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:27.720
<v Speaker 4>So, if we think.

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 3>About in two decades time, what's all the new content

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 3>going to be, people are going to have to produce it,

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 3>and Google or other searchings that are going to have

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 3>to provide some sort of way for people to get

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 3>some sort of commercial benefit from doing it. I actually

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 3>think that, you know, owning your own audience is the

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 3>best thing that you can do at the moment, whether

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.800
<v Speaker 3>that's all your followers on LinkedIn, and you know YouTube

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 3>does it so well with all their creators monetizing all

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 3>of the audiences that they've built. And then over time,

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that there will be opportunities to show and Google,

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 3>whether it's through life licensing or advertising or whatever it

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 3>may be.

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 2>So then if you do own your own customer base,

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 2>essentially we're talking about things like email distribution lists, maybe

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 2>setting up a forum for them. And if you can

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 2>do that on your own platform as opposed to just

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 2>being in a Facebook group or on LinkedIn, the insights

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get about their behavior and what they

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 2>want are going to be that much greater.

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, And I think that there's something that exists

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 3>for all of them, right, Like larger enterprises will be

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 3>able to build their own communities. I know law View

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 3>has done a fantastic job of building a community. I

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 3>think total on a B to B SaaS company. Whereas

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 3>if you're a smaller business, it might be that you

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 3>just have a subreddit and you're just constantly in that subreddit.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 3>You might have a Facebook group, and certainly there's email

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 3>distribution lists and LinkedIn groups that you can.

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Build as well.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 3>And so I think it's just not really putting all

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 3>of your eggs in one basket and then seeing how

0:37:57.320 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 3>things play out.

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what's your sort of vision for where search is

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 2>going to go in sort of the next decade? If

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.959
<v Speaker 2>we're looking big picture, it's the game has been sewn

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 2>up by Google for so long? Is this really the

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 2>starting point of a proliferation? We've got perplexity, We've got

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 2>all these stability, we've got all these AI companies. Are

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 2>they going to be able to hop over that wall

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 2>that was insurmountable before by building sort of search related

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 2>functions into their own AI products to compete with Google?

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that the search market definitely has been

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 3>a win it takes all scenario. I think that the

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 3>sad reality is that up until and I don't know

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 3>if this has changed, but up until about a year ago,

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the most search thing in being was Google, or at

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 3>least the top five, which is really demonstrative of Google's

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 3>dominance in the market. It's possible that new entrants do

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 3>come and shake that up quite significantly, but we also

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.760
<v Speaker 3>need to take into account when thinking about the future

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 3>of search that whole adoption cycle as well.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't.

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 3>While it seems like ais everywhere, a lot of people

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 3>aren't using it outside of the bubbles that we might

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 3>exist in, a lot of people have never even used it,

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 3>and they're still using Google in a big way.

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 4>And so I think that the.

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Actual time it will take before people have migrated to

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 3>a totally different system will be a very long time,

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 3>and certainly the younger generation might adopt it earlier.

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Could be the case.

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 3>But likewise, Google has a massive war chest of capital

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that they can invest and they've got Gemini rolled out. Obviously,

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 3>eating a rock a day isn't the type of thing

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that's great for their brand, but they do have a

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 3>fantastic brand that people do love. Like Google, it is

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 3>literally a verb you know, you don't bring it, And

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 3>so I think to unshake that solid position they've got

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 3>will actually be quite difficult. Where I think commercially, in

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 3>terms of digital marketing, the search market is going, I'm

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 3>not too sure. I think that I've got a couple

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.760
<v Speaker 3>of views on it. I think think that advertising models

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 3>will change quite a bit away from pay per click.

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 4>You know, if you're going to.

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 3>Reduce the attribution that you can show in terms of

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 3>how the efficacy of using those channels, then it makes

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 3>sense that they will start to stack up less versus

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 3>other channels because you simply just don't know the roy

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 3>So I think that there might be more of a

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 3>shift maybe to more subscription driven businesses versus just pure

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 3>like pay per click models. That's probably my main view.

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 3>I also just think that it's important not to shoot

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 3>your shot too early, to iteratively change your business as

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 3>you go and adjust to the times, but don't go

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 3>all in, because I think this is really just scratching

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the surface of, you know, where everything's going to go.

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, I guess it seems like Ryan is

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>saying that things won't actually change that much. There's still

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of energy and effort put

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>into figuring out how to be ahead of the game

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to search compared to others, and it's

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take specialists. It's going to take time and

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:15.439
<v Speaker 1>energy to actually learn how to do that. But it's

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just the way that you do it might be changing

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and where you put your effort not necessarily just

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, in terms of where you spend money on

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 2>paid search and social media, but in terms of building

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.760
<v Speaker 2>that sort of content base that is going to appeal

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 2>to search engines, not just Googles, but any search engine

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 2>that it has AI at the heart of it, it's

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 2>all about experiential content. It's about how to This was

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.919
<v Speaker 2>what I did with this product, and this is why

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I liked it or didn't like it, which is why

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I read it and that I have suddenly seen a

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 2>surge in traffic. So, thinking about any company, whether you're

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 2>a B to B or a B two C company,

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 2>how do I build a platform or a community or

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 2>a forum that creates that sort of content that is

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:08.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be the real rich stuff that when Google

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 2>indexes my site, the algorithm goes, ooh, this is really

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 2>useful storytelling or experiential evidence. I want to use that

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to feature in an AI overview of some sort of summary.

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what people are going to have to be thinking about,

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 2>and that is quite tricky because maintaining a community takes

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of work. You have to sort of police

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 2>it and make sure that it's a nice place to be.

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 2>We saw that in the nineties early two thousands, and

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:38.879
<v Speaker 2>with the rise of blogging, it was a great time

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 2>for the Internet because there were genuine communities that were moderated,

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 2>usually with a light touch, and it was great commentary

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 2>going on in those places. We're sort of seeing return

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>to that sort of goal that comes out of those communities.

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 2>But it's quite a big investment to sort of especially

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 2>if you're doing it off your own platforms, to sort

0:42:57.480 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 2>of build that and maintain it.

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we may, you know, unintentionally, see a

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>new arms race in terms of that content creation. You

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.479
<v Speaker 1>already have probably seen those gifts of videos going around

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the Internet of people with a literal wall of mobile

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>phones that are all plugged into a central computer and

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they're just going through and putting fake reviews up and

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>doing all this kind of stuff. So no doubt we'll

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>start to see people trying to game the system with

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>some fakery as well. I don't know how that can

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:33.439
<v Speaker 1>be done. In terms of creating your own community on

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>your own website, I don't think that's something that necessarily

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 1>will be able to be done. It's going to be

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>about creating communities on existing forums. Like you mentioned Reddit, right,

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and you have your subreddits, but you also have people

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioning things in various reddits, so you might have an

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>art reddit and people will ask what are the best

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>paint brushes? That subreddit isn't controlled by I don't know

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.359
<v Speaker 1>what's an art brand. I really should have picked something

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I know anything about that isn't necessarily controlled by a

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>particular art brand. So it's about getting your valued customers

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to engage with you in those common spaces online.

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the other thing that really struck me that

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Ryan said towards the end, there is the rise of

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 2>gen Ai built into personal assistance and voice assistance, and

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the changing nature off searching for things as a result

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 2>of that, where we sort of outsource these search queries

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 2>to a voice assistant. To date, that's been a pretty

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 2>crappy experience. It's very clunky. But what Amazon is going

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 2>to try and do with Alexa and Apple with Siri,

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 2>with Apple Intelligence and all of that will elevate that.

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 2>So that may mean that impressions and clicks are less

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 2>important in future, and that will be a great relief

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of people whose lives are dictated by

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 2>those sort of metrics at the moment. And I think

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 2>at Hired, a lot of people know that those are

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 2>hollow measurements. But what do you replaced them with. So

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:12.240
<v Speaker 2>if there is some other ways of measuring success through

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 2>searching for things in a different way and being stepped

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 2>through processes how to make a recipe, a dish based

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 2>on a recipe, how to go travel, and companies are

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 2>rewarded along the way, I think a lot of people

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 2>will welcome that.

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, it's a nice idea of the future

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 1>of search, isn't it that we would be getting our

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>information from these people who are experts and experienced and

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>have done it and can talk about it with that authority.

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I think traditionally we haven't really seen that shakeout in

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the Internet when it comes to corporate interests and advertising.

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So maybe this will be the golden time. Maybe this

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>will be the golden age of the Internet in terms

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of how we get information from other people and authoritative sources.

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That would be nice.

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 2>And literally the day after we spoke to Ryan, the

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.800
<v Speaker 2>news broke about this Department of Justice case against Google,

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 2>basically saying confirming in court Google is a monopoly and

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 2>we are going to now take some time to decide

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 2>what to do about it, and that could include everything

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 2>from telling them they can't pay Apple and Mozilla billions

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 2>of dollars to favor the Google search engine anymore, all

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 2>the way through to We're going to break you up

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 2>and how that might work. That's got years to play out,

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 2>so we won't see any immediate results from that. But

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 2>another fact there, and maybe something to your sort of

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 2>optimistic view about the era that we may be entering.

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 2>If we do have three or four strong players in search,

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.399
<v Speaker 2>what that would mean for the average Kiwi company that's

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 2>going out to try and buy some Adam ventry on

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 2>a search engine. Maybe it's going to lead to them

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 2>paying a lot less and therefo we're able to invest

0:46:57.160 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 2>more to find an audience. That would be a great thing.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he is hoping anyway. I feel like I say

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that a lot at the end of our episodes, a

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of hope. Hope is good. We finished on an

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>optimistic note.

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Ryan McMillan from Atlas Digital for joining us

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 2>this week. I learned a lot and I hope you

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 2>did too.

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget. The Business of Tech is on all

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>major podcasts platforms as well as iHeartRadio, where you can

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>stream every episode. Show notes are in the Tech section

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Business Desk website. Please leave us a review

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and share the podcast with your.

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Friends and colleagues, and get in touch with your feedback, ideas,

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 2>topics and guest suggestions. Email Ben on Ben at businessdesk

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 2>dot co dot nz. You can find both of us

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 2>looking on LinkedIn and x as well.

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned for another dose of the business of tech

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>coming your way next Thursday morning.

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Catch you then,