WEBVTT - Geoffrey Miller: Concerns that Israel's attacks on Iran will continue

0:00:05.761 --> 0:00:09.441
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talks,

0:00:09.521 --> 0:00:10.681
<v Speaker 1>EDB and.

0:00:10.801 --> 0:00:14.561
<v Speaker 2>Yes Yesterday, Our time, about now. Actually twenty four hours ago,

0:00:14.601 --> 0:00:18.401
<v Speaker 2>the Israeli Defense Force carried out multiple strikes on Iranian

0:00:18.561 --> 0:00:22.881
<v Speaker 2>military targets, killing four soldiers. Israel's army has said the

0:00:22.921 --> 0:00:26.961
<v Speaker 2>attacks are in retaliation to continuous attacks from Iran. The

0:00:27.001 --> 0:00:31.241
<v Speaker 2>President of the United States, Joe Biden, says someone optimistically,

0:00:31.241 --> 0:00:34.041
<v Speaker 2>I think that he's hopeful that this will mark the

0:00:34.161 --> 0:00:38.441
<v Speaker 2>end of a month's long cycle of escalation, but many

0:00:38.481 --> 0:00:40.761
<v Speaker 2>experts are concerned this is going to worsen the conflict.

0:00:41.041 --> 0:00:46.001
<v Speaker 2>And with me now is geopolitical analyst Jeffrey Miller Jeffrey Good.

0:00:45.841 --> 0:00:47.961
<v Speaker 3>Afternoon, Good afternoon, Tim.

0:00:48.761 --> 0:00:51.401
<v Speaker 2>Was this a valid response from Israel?

0:00:53.001 --> 0:00:55.601
<v Speaker 3>Well, Israel will see it that way. It was a

0:00:55.601 --> 0:01:01.841
<v Speaker 3>carefully calibrated response. It targeted mainly military sites in Iran,

0:01:02.201 --> 0:01:05.241
<v Speaker 3>around twenty different sites and three different locations, so it

0:01:05.281 --> 0:01:08.641
<v Speaker 3>was significant. But what it did not do was target

0:01:08.721 --> 0:01:11.401
<v Speaker 3>oil facilities or nuclear facilities. And there's been a lot

0:01:11.441 --> 0:01:14.761
<v Speaker 3>of talk and concern that Israel would seek to do

0:01:14.841 --> 0:01:18.121
<v Speaker 3>that would seek to undertake a large scale a strike,

0:01:18.441 --> 0:01:22.921
<v Speaker 3>just given what Israel's been doing particularly in Lebanon in

0:01:22.961 --> 0:01:25.881
<v Speaker 3>the last few months, we just had every reason to

0:01:25.921 --> 0:01:28.801
<v Speaker 3>think that with the large scale response from Israel, I

0:01:28.841 --> 0:01:31.521
<v Speaker 3>think there was a significant response, and in the wider context,

0:01:31.561 --> 0:01:36.441
<v Speaker 3>it was a very big response by Israel yesterday. But

0:01:37.001 --> 0:01:39.761
<v Speaker 3>I think Israel also to some degree stepped back from

0:01:39.801 --> 0:01:42.841
<v Speaker 3>the brink here and it didn't go for that for

0:01:42.961 --> 0:01:47.521
<v Speaker 3>those nuclear facilities, oil facilities because of UIs pressure behind

0:01:47.521 --> 0:01:50.561
<v Speaker 3>the scenes, and I think Ben and men who decided

0:01:50.601 --> 0:01:54.001
<v Speaker 3>to just step back a little bit and not go

0:01:54.441 --> 0:01:54.881
<v Speaker 3>too far.

0:01:55.641 --> 0:01:58.281
<v Speaker 2>What was it specifically in retaliation too, in terms of

0:01:58.281 --> 0:02:01.681
<v Speaker 2>what Iran had been doing, because that's part a bunch

0:02:01.721 --> 0:02:03.001
<v Speaker 2>of missiles at Israel, aren't they.

0:02:03.641 --> 0:02:05.361
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Looks hard for everyone to keep keep up

0:02:05.401 --> 0:02:08.881
<v Speaker 3>here because we've had so many exactly so many responses

0:02:08.881 --> 0:02:12.601
<v Speaker 3>and counter responses and rounds of escalation this year. It's

0:02:12.601 --> 0:02:16.281
<v Speaker 3>hard for anyone to keep up. But yesterday's strikes by

0:02:16.361 --> 0:02:20.481
<v Speaker 3>Israel were in direct response to an attack by Iran

0:02:20.921 --> 0:02:24.001
<v Speaker 3>on Israel on the first of October, in which Iran

0:02:24.081 --> 0:02:27.841
<v Speaker 3>sent around one hundred and eighty ballistic missiles towards Israel

0:02:27.961 --> 0:02:33.401
<v Speaker 3>and did some significant damage on Israeli military facilities. It

0:02:33.401 --> 0:02:38.401
<v Speaker 3>was more significant than actually was publicized immediately after those strikes,

0:02:38.641 --> 0:02:42.881
<v Speaker 3>and so that was what Israel was responding to yesterday.

0:02:43.081 --> 0:02:46.641
<v Speaker 3>And in the past month or so, the Israel Israel

0:02:46.681 --> 0:02:51.401
<v Speaker 3>has been given the use of a new defense air

0:02:51.441 --> 0:02:54.801
<v Speaker 3>defense system from the United States, a very advancedment called FAD.

0:02:55.481 --> 0:02:59.641
<v Speaker 3>And there's some suggestion, you know, no hard evidence, but

0:03:00.081 --> 0:03:02.721
<v Speaker 3>that that might have been part of the deal. The

0:03:02.841 --> 0:03:05.881
<v Speaker 3>US supplied a more high tech edense system there's only

0:03:05.881 --> 0:03:09.321
<v Speaker 3>six of them in the world to Israel, and in response,

0:03:09.441 --> 0:03:12.481
<v Speaker 3>Israel did not go for the jugular with yesterday with

0:03:12.561 --> 0:03:15.801
<v Speaker 3>Iran and undertook a more moderate response. And one might expected.

0:03:15.921 --> 0:03:17.961
<v Speaker 2>What's the name of that their defense system again.

0:03:18.521 --> 0:03:21.641
<v Speaker 3>It's it's called farn THHAA D is an acronym. Don't

0:03:21.681 --> 0:03:24.321
<v Speaker 3>don't ask me to spell out all the words. That

0:03:24.401 --> 0:03:27.281
<v Speaker 3>something begins with terminal and then high altitude.

0:03:27.321 --> 0:03:29.881
<v Speaker 2>There are terminal high altitude defense.

0:03:30.001 --> 0:03:31.721
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I think something like that.

0:03:31.801 --> 0:03:36.161
<v Speaker 2>Is that something that's like the iron dime two point

0:03:36.281 --> 0:03:37.921
<v Speaker 2>zero or is it something completely different?

0:03:38.921 --> 0:03:41.441
<v Speaker 3>I think it's it's it's that on that spectrum. I

0:03:41.481 --> 0:03:43.361
<v Speaker 3>so there are only half a dozen of them in

0:03:43.401 --> 0:03:45.761
<v Speaker 3>the world. There was one station number of years ago

0:03:45.801 --> 0:03:50.201
<v Speaker 3>in South Korea that really angered China quite significantly. So

0:03:50.281 --> 0:03:52.721
<v Speaker 3>it's clearly got an awful lot of capability. It's got

0:03:52.721 --> 0:03:57.081
<v Speaker 3>a lot of high tech radar capability, and you know,

0:03:57.161 --> 0:03:59.721
<v Speaker 3>in some ways it's surprising that hasn't been stationed in

0:03:59.761 --> 0:04:03.241
<v Speaker 3>Israel already, but it just shows that the thread is

0:04:03.321 --> 0:04:07.201
<v Speaker 3>quite severe from Israel's perspective, and they've showed themselves up

0:04:07.201 --> 0:04:10.241
<v Speaker 3>with that new system. Perhaps in exchange, they didn't as

0:04:10.241 --> 0:04:13.481
<v Speaker 3>if they undertake a more widespread of attack yesterday.

0:04:13.561 --> 0:04:15.921
<v Speaker 2>Because Iran has its only a defense system. How much

0:04:15.961 --> 0:04:18.881
<v Speaker 2>of the of Israel's attack was actually repelled. Do we

0:04:18.881 --> 0:04:20.801
<v Speaker 2>know what sort of proportion of missiles got through?

0:04:21.681 --> 0:04:25.921
<v Speaker 3>I think very little. I mean, Israel's technology is you know,

0:04:26.321 --> 0:04:30.641
<v Speaker 3>it is very very it's a very high standard, and

0:04:30.681 --> 0:04:36.161
<v Speaker 3>that's because it's largely developed in coordination with the United States,

0:04:36.201 --> 0:04:38.241
<v Speaker 3>and they have one of the most advanced militaries, if

0:04:38.281 --> 0:04:41.081
<v Speaker 3>not the most advanced military in the world. Iran simply

0:04:41.121 --> 0:04:45.241
<v Speaker 3>does not. So Israel did significant damage to air defense

0:04:45.241 --> 0:04:48.481
<v Speaker 3>facilities in Iran yesterday, going by the reports, and that

0:04:48.561 --> 0:04:51.841
<v Speaker 3>will be significant if Israel wants to undertake future attacks.

0:04:52.161 --> 0:04:56.161
<v Speaker 3>Iran's air defense systems have been knocked out effectively, and

0:04:56.361 --> 0:04:58.641
<v Speaker 3>yes they'll they'll rebuild them, no doubt, but that will

0:04:58.641 --> 0:05:01.961
<v Speaker 3>take time. And that's what's what's in it for Israel.

0:05:02.081 --> 0:05:03.401
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess there are two ways of I mean

0:05:03.401 --> 0:05:04.841
<v Speaker 2>from a layman's point of view, there's two ways of

0:05:04.881 --> 0:05:06.441
<v Speaker 2>life looking at it. That they've softened up the air

0:05:06.481 --> 0:05:08.881
<v Speaker 2>defenses so they can have another crack at them. But

0:05:10.041 --> 0:05:12.441
<v Speaker 2>one might argue they've softened up the air defense system

0:05:13.281 --> 0:05:16.681
<v Speaker 2>so they can simply say no more from you, Otherwise

0:05:16.761 --> 0:05:18.041
<v Speaker 2>we're going to hit your harder and you won't be

0:05:18.041 --> 0:05:20.801
<v Speaker 2>able to defend yourself. What is.

0:05:22.681 --> 0:05:26.161
<v Speaker 3>I think as both of those A true term certainly,

0:05:26.241 --> 0:05:29.201
<v Speaker 3>I mean that those attacks yesterday by Israel, they're destroyed

0:05:29.721 --> 0:05:34.801
<v Speaker 3>missile production, missile launch facilities, air defense facilities. You know,

0:05:34.841 --> 0:05:40.361
<v Speaker 3>this is significant in deterring future strikes by Iran. It's

0:05:40.401 --> 0:05:43.761
<v Speaker 3>not crippling in the sense because it didn't go for

0:05:44.441 --> 0:05:47.281
<v Speaker 3>you know, some of them, as I say, those other targets.

0:05:47.921 --> 0:05:50.921
<v Speaker 3>It won't lead to a full scale war. Iran has

0:05:50.961 --> 0:05:55.361
<v Speaker 3>played down the attacks, saying there's only limited damage, so

0:05:55.481 --> 0:05:59.201
<v Speaker 3>they're not looking to undertake another round of retaliation here

0:05:59.201 --> 0:06:02.561
<v Speaker 3>against Israel. And it's to everyone's benefit. And we've seen

0:06:02.601 --> 0:06:04.561
<v Speaker 3>an awful lot of escalation in the Middle East over

0:06:04.601 --> 0:06:07.081
<v Speaker 3>the past year, and I think it will do everyone

0:06:07.201 --> 0:06:09.201
<v Speaker 3>good to take a breath and step back for a moment.

0:06:09.241 --> 0:06:12.801
<v Speaker 3>And I think we need to go for diplomacy, dialogue

0:06:12.841 --> 0:06:15.801
<v Speaker 3>de escalation here, and that's something that many countries have

0:06:15.881 --> 0:06:18.441
<v Speaker 3>been working on over the past year. You know, it's

0:06:18.521 --> 0:06:22.481
<v Speaker 3>all started with Gaza, it's expanded to Lebanon, to Syria,

0:06:22.521 --> 0:06:25.961
<v Speaker 3>to Iran, to Iran. We all need to step back

0:06:26.001 --> 0:06:30.361
<v Speaker 3>here and what's been happening. We've just seen a wave

0:06:30.441 --> 0:06:33.521
<v Speaker 3>after wave of escalation and I think if anything we've

0:06:33.561 --> 0:06:35.921
<v Speaker 3>learned anything over the past year is the escalation simply

0:06:35.961 --> 0:06:39.801
<v Speaker 3>forgets more escalation. And sadly, I you know, we've got

0:06:39.881 --> 0:06:42.521
<v Speaker 3>to look at the wider context as well. With an

0:06:42.601 --> 0:06:45.521
<v Speaker 3>US election just around the corner, and you know, if

0:06:45.521 --> 0:06:48.281
<v Speaker 3>the polls are right, Donald Trump is in the box

0:06:48.321 --> 0:06:52.361
<v Speaker 3>seat to win those He is very anti Iran in

0:06:52.401 --> 0:06:56.161
<v Speaker 3>his views and very much against Iran's nuclear program. I

0:06:56.241 --> 0:07:00.481
<v Speaker 3>just wonder whether ben Aminetno's waiting and seeing look, Trump's

0:07:00.481 --> 0:07:02.361
<v Speaker 3>in the box seat to win this selection. Let's do

0:07:02.441 --> 0:07:05.041
<v Speaker 3>something bigger. On the other side of November, the.

0:07:05.441 --> 0:07:07.321
<v Speaker 2>Well so Biden City t hope a little mark the

0:07:07.401 --> 0:07:09.281
<v Speaker 2>end of a month's long cycle of escalation.

0:07:10.041 --> 0:07:12.961
<v Speaker 3>What's your view, Well, look, I think you're a very

0:07:13.041 --> 0:07:16.401
<v Speaker 3>brave person to think this is ever the end. We've

0:07:16.441 --> 0:07:19.041
<v Speaker 3>just seen just wave and wave of escalation over the

0:07:19.081 --> 0:07:21.081
<v Speaker 3>past year. If you just think where this all began

0:07:21.601 --> 0:07:23.841
<v Speaker 3>on October the seventh, twenty twenty three, and where we

0:07:23.881 --> 0:07:28.361
<v Speaker 3>are now, you know, we've gone from being just about

0:07:28.401 --> 0:07:33.001
<v Speaker 3>Gaza to being about Lebanon has Bella. Who've seen just

0:07:33.161 --> 0:07:35.361
<v Speaker 3>escalation throughout the Middle East no matter where you look.

0:07:35.481 --> 0:07:38.361
<v Speaker 3>Israel says it's fighting a seventh front war because when

0:07:38.401 --> 0:07:42.721
<v Speaker 3>you count up all the enemies it's facing from the

0:07:43.241 --> 0:07:49.121
<v Speaker 3>Hooties in Yemen through to the West Bank, Syria, ir Araan, Lebanon, Gaza,

0:07:49.161 --> 0:07:51.761
<v Speaker 3>you end up with seven fronts. And that's the situation

0:07:51.921 --> 0:07:56.441
<v Speaker 3>we're in now. We're in a wider regional war. So yes,

0:07:56.721 --> 0:07:59.681
<v Speaker 3>things could have been worse yesterday, But you know, I

0:07:59.721 --> 0:08:01.761
<v Speaker 3>think they're bad enough as they are, and I think

0:08:01.761 --> 0:08:04.641
<v Speaker 3>we need to just keep steaking out in favor of

0:08:04.681 --> 0:08:08.601
<v Speaker 3>the de escalation routes. Apparently there are more ceasefire talks underway,

0:08:08.601 --> 0:08:11.041
<v Speaker 3>and Doha again with Gaza, and I think we just

0:08:11.081 --> 0:08:13.401
<v Speaker 3>need to go back to the political solutions because you

0:08:13.441 --> 0:08:16.321
<v Speaker 3>won't solve this conflict with the military response.

0:08:16.521 --> 0:08:19.081
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that Iran will respond.

0:08:20.121 --> 0:08:22.721
<v Speaker 3>For now? I don't think they have plans to. From

0:08:22.721 --> 0:08:26.681
<v Speaker 3>the messaging that's coming out, they're saying limited damage, saying

0:08:26.721 --> 0:08:30.041
<v Speaker 3>that their Israeli response was weak. They had regular programming

0:08:30.041 --> 0:08:32.521
<v Speaker 3>on state TV. They're not hyping things out, sort of

0:08:32.521 --> 0:08:36.161
<v Speaker 3>brushing it off. Yeah, well, I think real damage was

0:08:36.201 --> 0:08:38.841
<v Speaker 3>done to the military facilities, but they're not looking to

0:08:38.881 --> 0:08:41.401
<v Speaker 3>make a big thing of it, which you would expect

0:08:41.401 --> 0:08:45.801
<v Speaker 3>if they were planning on undertaking yet another round of retaliation.

0:08:46.081 --> 0:08:48.801
<v Speaker 3>But remember this is the second tips attack, the escalation

0:08:48.841 --> 0:08:52.321
<v Speaker 3>we've seen this year. The direct confrontation between Israel and

0:08:52.321 --> 0:08:54.161
<v Speaker 3>Iran was one back in April, so it was only

0:08:54.201 --> 0:08:56.641
<v Speaker 3>six months ago. So I think the way we should

0:08:56.681 --> 0:08:58.681
<v Speaker 3>probably say this, you know, the current round is over,

0:08:58.761 --> 0:09:02.081
<v Speaker 3>but there will be sadly, almost certainly future rounds of

0:09:02.201 --> 0:09:06.841
<v Speaker 3>escalation unless we diffuse all of this through political solutions.

0:09:06.961 --> 0:09:09.681
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was going to I was gonna, well, I

0:09:09.681 --> 0:09:13.041
<v Speaker 2>am going to ask you. It feels like a rhetorical

0:09:13.121 --> 0:09:15.561
<v Speaker 2>question because I almost think that there's the answer is no.

0:09:15.681 --> 0:09:18.881
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, would return of the hostages make any difference?

0:09:18.881 --> 0:09:18.961
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:09:19.081 --> 0:09:20.681
<v Speaker 2>Or are we well beyond that now?

0:09:22.161 --> 0:09:24.001
<v Speaker 3>I think it would make some difference. I mean a

0:09:24.401 --> 0:09:26.641
<v Speaker 3>return of the hostages as part of a cease fire deal.

0:09:26.721 --> 0:09:29.521
<v Speaker 3>I think a cees fire and Gaza would be fantastic.

0:09:29.561 --> 0:09:33.441
<v Speaker 3>I think cees fire and Lebanon would be fantastic. Israel

0:09:33.521 --> 0:09:35.761
<v Speaker 3>has met an awful lot of its objectives by now,

0:09:35.961 --> 0:09:40.161
<v Speaker 3>and you go back to April, Joe Biden told Vinamayahnah

0:09:40.321 --> 0:09:44.161
<v Speaker 3>to take the win after the round of escalation then

0:09:44.321 --> 0:09:46.801
<v Speaker 3>with Iran, and I think perhaps those words take the

0:09:46.801 --> 0:09:49.841
<v Speaker 3>wind should be the message to Israel right now, just

0:09:49.881 --> 0:09:53.561
<v Speaker 3>given what's happened. They've killed Yahya Sinhwa, the head of

0:09:53.761 --> 0:09:57.481
<v Speaker 3>Hamas and Gaza. They've killed Ismail Hanair, the political leader

0:09:57.601 --> 0:09:59.801
<v Speaker 3>from US. They've killed Tassanas brother, the leader of his

0:09:59.921 --> 0:10:03.561
<v Speaker 3>the Llah. They've caused an awful lot of damage in

0:10:03.881 --> 0:10:07.721
<v Speaker 3>Lebanon and Gaza. Forty two thousand people in Gaza have

0:10:07.761 --> 0:10:10.161
<v Speaker 3>been killed, two and a half thousand and Elebanon. At

0:10:10.161 --> 0:10:12.721
<v Speaker 3>some point, I think you need to quote unquote take

0:10:12.721 --> 0:10:15.961
<v Speaker 3>the win and just stop and go for a political solution.

0:10:16.361 --> 0:10:18.921
<v Speaker 3>Go for cease fires, go for diplomacy. I think that

0:10:18.921 --> 0:10:22.161
<v Speaker 3>should be the message for Benamantno, who right now, I'm

0:10:22.161 --> 0:10:23.961
<v Speaker 3>not sure if he's willing to hear it. I think

0:10:24.161 --> 0:10:26.601
<v Speaker 3>he's looking ahead and he's seeing Donald Trump is in

0:10:26.641 --> 0:10:28.161
<v Speaker 3>the block seat to be in the White House, and

0:10:28.201 --> 0:10:31.321
<v Speaker 3>an awful lot more could play out under a Trump presidency,

0:10:31.321 --> 0:10:31.921
<v Speaker 3>that's for sure.

0:10:32.561 --> 0:10:36.121
<v Speaker 2>All right. So do you think that if Trump didn't

0:10:36.161 --> 0:10:38.121
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make the White House that there is more of

0:10:38.161 --> 0:10:41.881
<v Speaker 2>a prospect of success in a securing peace.

0:10:43.321 --> 0:10:46.441
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, and Noah, because Joe Biden certainly hasn't been

0:10:46.561 --> 0:10:50.041
<v Speaker 3>very successful over the past year overall, and in convincing

0:10:50.321 --> 0:10:53.761
<v Speaker 3>Ben Mietno to set a step back, I don't think

0:10:53.801 --> 0:10:56.161
<v Speaker 3>there's any guarantee at all that Kamala Harris would be

0:10:56.241 --> 0:11:02.481
<v Speaker 3>more successful with Ben at all. So, yeah, the situation

0:11:02.601 --> 0:11:04.601
<v Speaker 3>is pretty bleak. But yet I think we always have

0:11:04.681 --> 0:11:07.561
<v Speaker 3>to be We have to be even as when it

0:11:07.561 --> 0:11:09.361
<v Speaker 3>seems so bligue. We have to be hopeful, we have

0:11:09.401 --> 0:11:12.281
<v Speaker 3>to be optimistic. We have to keep trying for peace

0:11:12.321 --> 0:11:14.801
<v Speaker 3>and keep trying that diplomatic route. And I do think

0:11:14.801 --> 0:11:17.041
<v Speaker 3>New z Eden can play. It's just a small part,

0:11:17.081 --> 0:11:20.441
<v Speaker 3>but a significant part in that global picture, and I

0:11:20.481 --> 0:11:22.721
<v Speaker 3>think Winston Peters would do well to head to the

0:11:22.721 --> 0:11:24.441
<v Speaker 3>Middle East at some point. He's only had a very

0:11:24.441 --> 0:11:26.881
<v Speaker 3>brief stop in the Middle East over the past year.

0:11:26.961 --> 0:11:29.441
<v Speaker 3>I think New z Eden could play a small part

0:11:29.481 --> 0:11:32.361
<v Speaker 3>in those overall piece efforts by working together with friends

0:11:32.361 --> 0:11:34.961
<v Speaker 3>and partners in the Middle East and outside the region, get.

0:11:34.761 --> 0:11:36.401
<v Speaker 2>Winston to go, they give him a good telling off.

0:11:36.561 --> 0:11:39.841
<v Speaker 2>Just one last cynical question, letting Yahoo up. And before

0:11:39.921 --> 0:11:43.081
<v Speaker 2>all this happened, was facing corruption charges? Is there? And

0:11:43.241 --> 0:11:45.601
<v Speaker 2>cynically speaking, if I was just having a cup of

0:11:45.601 --> 0:11:47.041
<v Speaker 2>coffee with someone, I'd say, well, he's not going to

0:11:47.121 --> 0:11:50.121
<v Speaker 2>resolve it because as soon as everything's over, he's in trouble.

0:11:50.161 --> 0:11:52.641
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's almost an his vested interest to continue

0:11:52.641 --> 0:11:54.561
<v Speaker 2>with this stuff, isn't it.

0:11:54.561 --> 0:11:58.081
<v Speaker 3>It absolutely is. Indeed, the day the war ends, Beniminnea,

0:11:58.121 --> 0:12:01.041
<v Speaker 3>who's career ends effectively and he goes back to fighting

0:12:01.081 --> 0:12:04.481
<v Speaker 3>all these corruption charges, I think from anything's perspective, he's

0:12:04.481 --> 0:12:08.121
<v Speaker 3>probably that he's redeemed himself. There was that huge security

0:12:08.161 --> 0:12:11.441
<v Speaker 3>failure over October the seventh that allowed that massive attack

0:12:11.481 --> 0:12:15.321
<v Speaker 3>by hamas On on Israel, but since then, particularly the

0:12:15.401 --> 0:12:20.001
<v Speaker 3>various assassinations of the leadership of Hamas and his Billah,

0:12:20.881 --> 0:12:24.041
<v Speaker 3>the destruction of so many his BLA facilities in Lebanon

0:12:24.081 --> 0:12:28.161
<v Speaker 3>and de Route and his BELA infrastructure and south southern Lebanon,

0:12:28.401 --> 0:12:31.841
<v Speaker 3>the destruction of Hamas and Gaza. You know, he probably

0:12:31.841 --> 0:12:35.241
<v Speaker 3>feels he's redeemed himself, but yet he is only going

0:12:35.281 --> 0:12:38.481
<v Speaker 3>to face an awful lot of trouble if he resigns

0:12:38.601 --> 0:12:42.201
<v Speaker 3>or is sacked as PM. So he's got every reason

0:12:42.241 --> 0:12:45.481
<v Speaker 3>to continue for as long as as humanly possible. I mean,

0:12:45.881 --> 0:12:49.321
<v Speaker 3>I think he's seventy five now, so he probably feels

0:12:49.321 --> 0:12:52.921
<v Speaker 3>that he's still got a lot, a lot, a lot

0:12:52.961 --> 0:12:53.481
<v Speaker 3>to play for.

0:12:53.641 --> 0:12:55.801
<v Speaker 2>Taken him out in the box. Hey, Jeffrey, I really

0:12:55.801 --> 0:12:58.201
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your time this afternoon. Thanks so much for your insight.

0:12:58.921 --> 0:12:59.921
<v Speaker 3>He very welcome to him.

0:12:59.961 --> 0:13:02.201
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we got thanks that as Jeffrey mill here is

0:13:02.201 --> 0:13:06.481
<v Speaker 2>a geopolitical analyst, and yeah, actually that's fascinating and fascinating

0:13:06.481 --> 0:13:07.601
<v Speaker 2>insights into the whole thing.

0:13:08.401 --> 0:13:11.161
<v Speaker 1>For more from the Weekend Collective, listen live to News

0:13:11.201 --> 0:13:14.841
<v Speaker 1>Talk ZEDB weekends from three pm, or follow the podcast

0:13:14.921 --> 0:13:15.881
<v Speaker 1>on iHeartRadio.