WEBVTT - Fix, float, or flip? Mortgage strategy 2025–Tony Alexander

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's challenging. I think for the investors out there, the

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>maintenance costs, the insurance costs in particular, and of course

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the council rates just bang bang bang. I certainly expect

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>house prices to go up. I mean where they sit

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on average at the moment is basically exactly where they

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>were four years ago, so early twenty twenty one, by

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>our lookers. For the economy to improve, when does that

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>lead to people's feelings about the labor market changing? When

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>do people feel a greater amount of job security?

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Cura and Welcome to Shed Lunch, brought to you by Shehz's.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Helen Madison. Today on the program, we take a

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>pulse check of the property market. Will more interest rate

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 2>can'ts revive house prices that have been down more than

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent in some regions, or will investors and sellers

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.959
<v Speaker 2>be disappointed? Independent economist Tony Alexander has been mulling over

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the numbers and the sentiment before we dive in. Here's

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>some important information for you to consider.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Investing in risk you might lose the money you start with.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 3>We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor. We also

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>recommend reading product disclosure documents. Before deciding to invest. Everything

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 3>you're about to see and hear is current at the

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>time of recording.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Welcome Tony. Great to see you in person in the

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>studio for the first time.

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, now it's good to be here in person

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than just down the remote camera from Australia.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes. That's right, let's get into it. Then, interest rates

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>are on the downward cycles, and I know you've said

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 2>before that you think the cuts that we're having will

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 2>finish or bottom out mid twenty twenty five. Last week

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the Reserve Bank did what we thought it would do

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 2>and they reduce rates by fifty basis points. So we're

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 2>three point seventy five anything in that monetary policy statement

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 2>which a company. That announcement has made you think differently

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>from where the bottom might be.

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, previously I thought maybe three point five percent would

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>be the bottom. But the Reserve Bank, first of all,

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they brought forward in time by about a year when

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they see monetary policy reaching its bottom, and the low

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>point they've got there is either three or three point

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent. In the document it says three point

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Well, we're not going to get three point

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>one percent. It's going to be three or three point

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and I think they've given a strong benefit

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of the doubt to the upturn they see in the

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>economy not really driving much inflation. So maybe three point

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent, I guess, is where I think we're

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>going to see the bottom the for the official cash rate,

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>and chances are that's going to be around near the

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>middle of the.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Year, so similar to what you saw before. What about

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>house prices though, because this seems to be quite a

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 2>bit of optimism out there that these this downward cycling

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>rates will actually lift prices, which, as we know, have

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 2>been down They've been twenty percent in some places. What's

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>your view on where house prices are going, because you

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 2>have seen one stage they could even go up.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, well, I certainly expect house prices to go up.

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean where they sit on average at the moment

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is basically exactly where they were four year years ago,

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>so early twenty twenty one, when we're already seeing a

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of a surge with the pandemic and very low

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and Alvir's gone et cetera. Just recently, when

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I look at the data from ARII and Z in particular,

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me they're not really going anywhere quite frankly.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>We saw a bit of a movement upward twenty twenty

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>three with the first home buyers going into the market,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and then that sort of faded away, and again in

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. We saw a bit of a movement

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>upwards around about the middle of the year July, August,

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, when talk a rows of interest rates going down,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but that sort of faded a bit over summer as well.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So for the moment, I'd say the market is flat,

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but I would expect, yes, interest rates going down, people

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>rolling on to low interest rates for out a bit

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of cash. It's going to be I think when people

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>have a bit more confidence about their jobs, the labor

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>market improving, that's maybe more when it's reasonable to think

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>about we're going to have a long string of small

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>increases each month coming along.

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>It does seem to be maybe anecdotally, a lot of

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>listings out there at the moment, and I do wonder

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>whether it's about sellers are readjusting their expectations when it

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>comes to price, because it would appear that it's a

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 2>bit of a buyer's market and that sellers really maybe

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 2>can't get what they thought. They did. Look this week

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 2>at Ryman Healthcare, the retirement operator that's listed, and that's

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>going to raise another one billion dollars in capital. And

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons they said they were doing that

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 2>is that people that were thinking about coming into the

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>retirement village hadn't been able to sell their houses at

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the price they liked, so they've deferred coming in. So

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Ryman's got extra stock that's empty. So yeah, I just

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 2>wondered what your perspective on that was.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, if you look at the data from real

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.119
<v Speaker 1>estate dot co dot Nz, they have total listings sitting

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>around about thirty two to thirty three thousand at the moment,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that's up about eighteen one eight percent from a year ago.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Compare that with under fourteen thousand in the middle of

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, So it's quite a change from back then.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And I guess what I'm perceiving in the housing market

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>now is that there are more people willing to sell.

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what happened in twenty twenty three. The first buyers

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>went into the market are the first home buyers. Then

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the investors moved into the market, and then

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investors sellers. They stepped into the market,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and we saw a similar sort of thing last year,

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and so there are a number of people who want

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to sell, get on with their lives, et cetera. But

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it is definitely strongly a buyer's market. In my survey

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of real estate agents, I've got a net forty percent

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of them saying it's a buyer's market still. And when

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the vendors willing to capitulate too, many

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>have memories of where the prices were, you know, two

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>three years or so ago, So a lot of them

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>still aren't willing to discount, you know, to meet the

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>market and get on with their life, whether it be

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>retirement or shifting, et cetera. So there could easily still

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more downward price adjustment to the

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>very near future, but I think it's more going to

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>be the buyers coming back into the market later this

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>year as the employment situation looks better. But certainly the

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>vendors are out there.

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Where does that leave the investors then? I mean, perhaps

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>because the prices are depressed, there's some not so much bargains,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>but there's some reasonable pickings.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's challenging, I think for the investors out there

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>because the cost of running a rental business is now

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>so much more than before, the maintenance costs, the insurance

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>cost in particular, and of course the council rates just

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>bang bang bang, everyone around the country being told, well,

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this is what you're getting this year, Like in the

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Hut Valley there, I think lober Hunt it might have

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>been fifteen percent they're getting this year, and plans are

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for the same next year, bang bang, you know for

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a few years after that. So that just changes the

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>dynamic and the investors have to think, Okay, costs are

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>going up, what is my ability to get extra rent

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>coming through? Not good? At the moment. I've got about

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a net twenty one percent or so of landlords in

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a survey that I run saying it is very difficult

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to get a good tend the moment a year ago

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in net twenty percent was saying it's easy to get

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a good tenant. So for the investors, I know, I

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>see some commentary out there people saying we see the

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>investors coming back into the market as buyers. I think

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that flow is relatively small out there. The bigger change

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is the investors as sellers. So again in my survey

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of the property investors, I have about a net fourteen

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>percent of the landlord saying they're looking to sell now.

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>The last time that measure was positive, as in more

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>looking to buy than sell, was about March of twenty

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and the proportions saying they want to buy

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>gross number it's unchanged about twenty one percent, So twenty

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the landlord saying yeah, I'd like to buy,

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>same now as a year and a half or two

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago. What's changed is that back there early twenty

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, I only had about twenty percent saying I'm

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>looking to sell. Now it's thirty five percent. So this

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is the change in the investor market in the past

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sor twelve to eighteen months. More in the of the

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>investors are looking to sell. The numbers don't quite add

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>up for them, and they're not expect acting rapid capital

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gain in the near future. So that to me is

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the main change out there, not necessarily any great change

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in investors buying. There's more investors looking to sell and

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe put the money somewhere.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Else Tony, when you say investor money is probably going elsewhere,

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 2>do we have any inkling on where that might be,

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 2>is it listed property trust? Is it even commercial property,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 2>which I think has come back a little well.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Certainly people have had a strong interest in commercial property

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>for the past three to four years. With the residential

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>market moving backwards, investors, when we're looking for something different,

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm having to learn about earthquake ratings, et cetera. Out there,

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>there has actually been relatively good demand from tenants for

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial property, or more essentially in terms of upgrading. A

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of businesses. They need to boost their productivity, they

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>need to look for cost savings, et cetera. So there's

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of restructuring happening in the say the logistics side.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>The warehouse over there doesn't work any longer. You need

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a bigger one over there, meaning you can close two

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>or the other warehouses. You want something maybe near one

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of the motorways, etc. There seems to be a lot

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of construction of new commercial buildings in that regard. The

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>demand for office space has sort of shifted towards strong

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>support for the prime stuff out there, not so much

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for the lower grades as yet. But yeah, that there's

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>actually been strong interest for the commercial property I think

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for some time. I guess the relevant thing there is

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that when interstrates go down, the interest in commercial property

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>goes up. My view is that interstrate's going down that

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>are relevant to the commercial property investors three five ten

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>year interst rates. We're probably just about near the end

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of those interrastrate falls, So I don't necessarily think commercial

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>property demand is going to rise all that much over

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and above what you'd naturally expect with the economy starting

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to improve this year.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 2>If we look around the country, it does appear to

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 2>be a bit of a mixed picture. If we think

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>back to the residential property market, I think in your

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>surveys of real estate agents that look like Northland was

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 2>still a bit subdued. Auckland has a ton of listings.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>I think they have plenty was coming back but strongly.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Harks Bay similar, Wellington still in the dulgrums. South Island

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a bright spot. What's your view on

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>that picture? Yeah?

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Regionally it is reasonably diverse. Christ Church, I think

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>there's good economic support in terms of the tourist numbers.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>There's still recovery to happen there. Rejuvenation of the CBD

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>will rebuilding of it, et cetera. The affordability of housing

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is a big positive as well. So I've long had

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a positive view on christ Church slash Canterbury, and when

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I say Canterbury, South Canterbury of course with a dairy

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>payout being pretty strong, so that's going to be positive

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for Irashburton's tim marous et cetera. Or setting some of

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the freezing works are lost down in tomorrow. For instance,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in Auckland Yere there's an oversupplied town houses and that's

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of dominating the market in people's thinking at the moment,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>especially out the west Auckland direction on northwest, and it's

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>going to take a while for that to run through,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and part of that running through is then there will

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>be a further decrease in townhouse construction and it'll set

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the scene for maybe it's eighteen months from now, people

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>will look around and go not too many spare townhouses,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we need to build some more, and then there'll

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>be a lag and building some more over twenty twenty six,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So that cycle is going to be interesting for Auckland.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>A wee bit further out, christ Church maybe has a

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of oversupply of some townhouses in the CBD,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit there Wellington. People have to be careful.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>There's Wellington City and then lower Heart, Upper Hut Capity

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Coast and back towards Poiriuha. For Wellington City, there are

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>challenges under Labors government. We saw the number of public

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>servants go up about eighteen one eight thousand, and obviously

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them are losing their jobs. Now there's

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly going to be more restructuring, slash redundancies in the

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>public service. The government has to address it. Seventeen billion

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>dollar deficit. There's extra money going to have to clearly

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>be able allocated for defense as well, and so that

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to keep Wellington depressed for I think you

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>quite all of this year quite frankly, maybe into bit

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty six for the city, but not necessarily

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the same for the Hut Valley and up Capiti Coast.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>There's just so much development going to be happening up there,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Transmission Gully Motorway in place, and of course the expressway

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>getting extended to north of Livin as well. So have

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a positive view there. Why Kato Taranaki, they're going to

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>benefit again from the dairy payout being relatively good. Not

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that I have any particularly divergent view on New Plymouth.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just a good always a good solid underpinning there.

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, yeah, Toweronger may have to wait till there's

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit more strength in Auckland and then the user

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>will sell your house in Auckland, get a good price,

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>retire across to Toweronger. That engine will start a chugging

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>away again. But it's not really doing it at the moment.

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's think about mortgage holders. I mean, I think at

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 2>least half have fixed at quite short terms. So we're

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 2>talking six months in one year. With rates nearly bottoming,

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 2>people are probably thinking what do do and do you

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to see a change to those longer

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 2>term rates. That said, this week there seems to be

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a war between ASP and Westpac that

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 2>two year rate at four point ninety nine. What's your thoughts?

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, when west Pac for two weeks had three years

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>at four point nine to nine, I jumped up and

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>down and said now that is what I would take basically,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't. The other banks didn't jump in. It

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't last, and so yeah, I see the competition is

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for the two year period. If I had a mortgage

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, and I was thinking I'll get a

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of it repaid in the next two years. I

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>personally would probably take the two years at four point

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>nine to nine percent. I see no great benefit any longer. Personally,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's sticking floating six months, twelve months. Those rates will

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>come down a bit further. Do I think people need

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to hurry. I don't see the upward leg of the

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy cycles starting again until maybe late twenty six,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe twenty twenty seven. But that's the next shift in

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the market. In terms of thinking about interest rates, it's

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>all been monetary policy is easing.

0:13:59.280 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>It's easing.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Eventually it stops seizing. Oh, that's going to be later

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>on this year, second half of this year.

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder when it goes up back up again. The

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>market's not really there yet. When that happens, you'll probably

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>start to see them upward movement in the three to

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>five year wholesale borrowing costs for the banks and those

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>interrast rates rising. That might be a story for next year.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Most people, being kiwis, are only going to fix for

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>two years, three years. A few will jump in the

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>even when the five year rate was at two point

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>nine nine percent. Hardly anybody fix back then from twenty

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty to twenty twenty one. But most people are probably

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be reasonably happy in the two year period.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And what's going to happen Take ourselves two years from now,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>so that's twenty twenty seven. Interest rates might be going

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>up by then. So that's the difficulty. You fix two

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.239
<v Speaker 1>years at the moment because it seems to be pretty attractive.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Your rate's going to mature right when there's upside risk

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>on the interest rates coming forward, and then you're going

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a bit of a problem. So that's one

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>reason I was such in favor of three years four

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine. Maybe it comes back again and again I'd

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>probably say that's what I would personally go for.

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>So a conundrum for people fixing longer or shorter. Yep,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 2>it's almost like timing the market.

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes something sticks out and you say, well, I don't

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>really have a view on where rates are going to

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>go in the near future, but this one seems screen's

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>quite good. And that was the two ninety nine to

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>five year one from twenty twenty twenty one, and I think,

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like I say, close to five percent were just under

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for three years I mean, if there was a four

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or five year rate, I'd probably take that at four

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>point nine nine percent. If one of the banks was

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>going to offer that, they probably won't because the competition

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>where people are looking is more in the two year

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>time frame.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Quite frank, Yeah, and that's hence why I think ASP

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 2>and Wespeck have done what they had And also that

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>seems to be one of the few moves. Most of

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the rate moves since the OCR last week is floating.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, floating is really closely tied to the cash rate.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>It goes up, goes up, it goes down. The float

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at the more rate will come down. The one year

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>fixed rates will also tend to move, but once you

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>get out further along the year curve, this reflects expectations

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of where the market is going to go. And the

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>reason we haven't seen like fresh cuts in three, four

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or five year mortgage rates is because the markets had

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>already factored in that the low point for the cash

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>rate isn't going to be twenty twenty six or twenty seven,

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be the end of this year. So

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Reserve Bank merely validated what the market had already moved.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Towards and that's why most of us are now thinking

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we are probably at the low point in the cycle

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>for three, four or five year fixed rates, bank borrowing costs,

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and the mortgage rates. Two years there could be a

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more downside, but I really think it's going

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty limited from here.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 2>With those longer term rates too. Isn't that what the

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical kind of world economy and the effects that it has.

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that more something that affects those rates and those

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>shorter term right?

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, most definitely. If there's a big shock out there,

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>then the Reserve Bank will respond one way or another.

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Are to that, And of course they expressed a lot

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty in their monetary policy statement about what's going

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen in the world economy, because well, duh, none

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of us know exactly what is going to happen. You

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>think to yourself, Okay, if tariffs go up, there's more inflation. Oh,

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>interstrates will be higher. But if tariffs go up, maybe

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that depresses world growth. Oh that means less inflation, That

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>means interstrates go down. You just got to take it

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>as it comes, quite frankly, See what's going to develop

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>out of all of this. So there is a lot

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty for the whole interrastrate structure still out there.

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>If we're looking ahead it where interstrates are likely to

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>go in the very near future. I certainly think it's

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>reasonable to expect that come the next review April. I

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's early April, they will cut by I think

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>not half but quarter of a percent, and then there's

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>probably one more after that, So whatever that is six

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>or eight weeks after early April. I guess where I

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>differ from many others is that I don't think they'll

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>take it down to three percent. I think they'll get

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to the three point twenty five percent and pretty much

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>say that's probably going to be it. But again, the

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty out there in the world we're living in a

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Trumpian politics, economics, international environment. We've just got to hang

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on for the ride. Quite frankly, let's.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Jump back to construction and consense. That's usually a bit

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 2>of a litmus test as to how things are going.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I do note that renovations seem to be back in vogue.

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Can you tell us a bit about that.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's interesting that in my Monthly Spending Plans survey

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the I think there's only two areas which

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>have shown much of a change recently. One is a

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>few more people are thinking about buying a house to

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>live in themselves. I think that's the first home buyers

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>still looking to take advantage of the opportunity out there

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>with not much competition from investors. And the other one

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is that things are still relatively depressed and terms of

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>people saying I'm going to buy a motor vehicle or appliance.

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>But for the home renovations, there's definitely a strong upward

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>trend which has gone through there, and maybe for some

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>people it's a feeling of there's a few more tradees

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>out there now because house building is falling away. There's

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a few more people offering their services electrical plumbing and

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a carpentry, et cetera. So there's an opportunity maybe to

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>get some of that work done without having to pay

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>an absolute arm and a leg in order to get

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>it completed and run the job. The risk of the

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>job's not going to be done, you know, for quite

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>some time if they shoult off to something that's going

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to pay better in the near term. So I think

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's that it's also the case, I think that there's

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>always the older generation out there looking to improve things,

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>heading into retirement or fresh into it, and it looks

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>like some of them are deciding, look, I've waited long

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>enough unless just finally get this place looking okay. But

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>it is a bit of a surprising thing there. It

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is an area of spending growth.

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Bathrooms and kitchens predominantly rather than great, big new housing.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Does sound like, yeah, yeah, I think so. Yeahs a

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of an upgrading of the existing stock or the

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>places that people already own out there. I don't think

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>my survey there is capturing people saying renovations. Oh, that's

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the granny flat I'm putting out the back. I don't

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>think they're including that particular item in there, Tony.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Just with construction. Let's unpack that little more. What are

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the dynamics there.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the dynamic would be that when you get residential

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>real estate turnover of existing you know, used houses picking up,

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it eventually leads to the number of consents being issued

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>for new houses to be built picking up. And we've

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>seen a bit of an increase in real estate turnover.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>That's about seventy two thousand in the past year. A

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>year a year and a half ago it was fifty

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand. So yes, he's an upward trend, but it's

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>relatively mild. And given the oversupply of townhouses which sits

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>out there and developers. You see developers that put some

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of these properties into the rental pool, and once they

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>see the housing market moving, they're going to offer them

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>up for sale. It's going to keep things constrained into

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of twenty twenty six, the year. I think the

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>townhouse construction keeps going down into twenty twenty six and

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the finance requirement, you know, pre sales, that sort of thing.

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Whereas for individual standalone houses, i'd see that rising before

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year. Sort of just a combination

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of not so much of an oversupply in that market

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, just the effect of the interest rates off

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>coming through and the labor market perception starting to improve

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>as well. But it's going to be a different dynamic

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>townhouses versus standalone.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>And is there any areas in particular where you think

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 2>construction will be more buoyant.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I suppose Again on christ Church, I've got a positive

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>view there. The population movement that is happening down there.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>For affordability reasons. All the growth we see down at

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Rollston obviously in particular, but also north of the city

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Northern Corridor opening up there, so that's definitely positive.

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Outside of that, again, up the Capity Coast with the

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>expressway network is very positive also, an aging population looking

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to retire up there if they can find the land there.

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>There is actually a bit of a shortage of land

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in some areas up there. For Auckland, there's going to

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>be expansion up the Northwest area for the next few decades,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, but that's where the over supply of the

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>townhouses is and where some of these negative stories are

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>around it. They get so roasting hot you're having to

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>run your AC to cool the place down. So you know,

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>us key with is when we when we have a

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>house building boom of some regard, it's like something always

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>seems to go wrong. It's either leaking or in this case,

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>ye're just getting too hot in the upstairs room too

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>many windows.

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Quite frankly, let's look at inflation. That's always a big bogie,

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 2>and it does feel from what the Reserve Bank has

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>said that things are in check two point two percent,

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 2>and that's kind of their main mandate. You've talked a

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.479
<v Speaker 2>lot about cyclical inflation, which, as I understand it is

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 2>almost a natural phenomenon when there's a recovery, when there's

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 2>an upturn, you're probably going to get a bit of inflation.

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 2>You've always worn that that's probably around the corner and

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.719
<v Speaker 2>not as far as way as we think. Have you

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 2>changed your mind on that?

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, No, I still definitely got that view. I

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>think some of the upside risk is greater because of

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the risk of tariffs going up, for instance. So now

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm still of the view. And what I look at there,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a number of things. One of them is the

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>A and Z's Monthly Business Outlook Survey. On average since

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety two, inflation has average two point three percent

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>since then, on average, and net twenty six percent of

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>businesses have said, yeah, in the next twelve months, I'm

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>going to increase my prices. That was eighty two percent

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>net two and a half or so years ago, so

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that was horrible inflation seven percent or so. That got

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>down to thirty net thirty five percent the middle of

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. It's now gone up to a net forty

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>six percent of businesses saying I'm going to increase my

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>prices in the next twelve months, not now, but when

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity presents itself. So that says to me, when

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the customer flows are stronger, because businesses have got compressed

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>margins at the moment, and because many of their costs

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>are still going up. When the opportunity presents itself and

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they think I can get a price increase away and

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>people are still going to keep buying my product, they're

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>going to do it. And I guess maybe I see

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>some of that from later this year and especially in

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, not at the moment unless you're a

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>council or electricity company or you know, oligopoly generally or

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>monopoly in the case of a council. But that's my

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>perception of the risk further out now. The Reserve Bank

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>is not focused on that for the moment. That's something

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that they'll be looking at later this year.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>In America, there's a little bit of a look at

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it for their economy, but yeah, it's a focus ICEE

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>coming a bit further out, and look, if it looks worrying,

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll get the longer term interest rates and the medium

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>term rates going up before the end of this year.

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll just have to see how that pans out.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 2>So mor gaduate relief at the moment, but it could

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>be that we're going to be paying more.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>For goods and services eventually. I mean the Yeah, the

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate is going to go up. And this is

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>one I guess a big problem for the investors, of course,

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>because one of the key area of inflation where it's

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>coming from and their cost increases is the rates. Maybe

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>not so much the insurance premiums, there's a wee bit

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of a plataum in going there, but the council rates

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>going up. They've got a monopoly. There's nothing you can

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>do about it, and so that is affecting. I guess

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of older people, their thoughts about what

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>can I afford to spend in retirement? Can I even

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>afford to stay in this same house? I would expect

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to events that leads to some people are downshifting out

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>into the regions because they're going to be able to

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>free up some cash in order to pay the pay

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the council rates. And for some of the generation below

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>them are the middle generation older than the kids, which

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>are going to Australia for some of them increasingly, the

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>answer is, and this is just one factor in there.

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm following my kids to Australia. I've got a neighbor

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>during that they're selling up and following their two kids

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>across to the Gold Coast. So that generation the late thirties, forties,

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>early fifties they go, I'm out of here.

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>That is a new phenomena out there in terms of

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>some population loss for New Zealand. And some of them

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>would have been people who might otherwise have been thinking

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>time to prepare for retirement. Let's get an investment property. No,

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to they're going to look at going overseas.

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 2>But look, you often spend quite a bit of time

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 2>actually in Australia. You've got property there yourself. What are

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the pickings there? Is it better to be trying to

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>buy property over there if you want to have that esset.

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I've got no view on that. I mean, I'm not

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a property investor myself, so I've got no idea about

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what's a reasonable yield or anything like that. The Australian market,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be careful because the rules vary from

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>state to state, like in Queensland as a foreigner, even

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>tho it's a keywet you'll pay an extra ten percent

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of stamp duty, three percent local stamp duty and

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>then an extra seven percent foreigner buying situation it varies

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>in the other states, but first of all, you need

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk to a lawyer or accountant over there, figure

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>out what's going on there, and just be aware there

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is quite a difference between the top eight capital cities

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and the regional towns. It's dynamic which is more volatile

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>than we have in New Zealand. They talk about sea

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>change people retiring to be near the sea side, or

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>tree change that are going out into the countryside to

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>be near more trees, and that dynamic is quite different

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>from in New Zealand because the countryside here is not

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>really all that far away from our main cities. So

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 1>people definitely need to do a bit of research over

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>there and don't always assume that the places are going

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to be greatly cheaper, especially if you're looking at one

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of the major cities. Sydney is vastly expensive, for instance,

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so do your research.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Also, we've had changes here or are about to happen

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 2>with foreign buyers. I wondered whether that had had any

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 2>effect or because it's such a high net worth situation

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that it may it's all too early to have any idea.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, given New Zealand First is in the governing coalition

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.959
<v Speaker 1>and they're opposed to reopening the housing market. Generally, if

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we get any easing up, it's only going to be

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>for the more expensive houses out there. It's really not

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be relevant for the housing market of interest

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to ninety nine percent of people out there, quite frankly,

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, no, I don't see that one really coming

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>along and causing an extra bush upward in our housing market.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just not going to happen.

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Other factors migration. We've talked a little bit about the

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 2>fact that the brain drain an uprightists are going to

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Australia and probably buying them and probably not coming back.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Their parents are following them. As you've just said, what

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>about people coming into the country, And that usually has

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 2>an effect on the property market, doesn't it usually?

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>But we've got to be careful because we've had this

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>period of weakness in the housing market, even though we

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>had like in the year October twenty twenty three and

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the record net gain of one hundred and thirty five

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand people. So the correlation is not necessarily as strong

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>as people think when people talk about a correlation of

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>all the net migration numbers driving Auckland in particular. People

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>used to always talk about about that. Well, that's usually

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>only if the market is rising already, and they go

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>market's rising, I wonder why, Oh, the net migration is

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>strong and they grab onto that. But most migrants coming

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>into New Zealand they're not going to be able to

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>buy a house for a long period of time. They've

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>probably got no money. They're coming into New Zealand because

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they've got no money and they can get a job

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and build their life and their family, you know, starting

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>up a new here. So you know there's probably x

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>billion two three billion people overseas who if you gave

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>them the ticket, will be on the plane tomorrow and

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>come across to New Zealand. From an accommodation point of view,

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it would have upward pressure on our market. But in

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of a house buying, it'll depends if we buy

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the properties to go and rent to them would be

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the main dynamic there. I've proven, I think to myself

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>from over thirty years ago, and I reckon the other

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>economists have reached the same Cook conclusion. You cannot forecast

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>net migration flows in New Zealand, not even six to

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve months ahead. You cannot do it. So we take

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>these things as they come.

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Tony keen to find out what your outlook for the

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 2>year is now that we've had another cut and possibly

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 2>will have some more. But it's not just about interest

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>rate cuts.

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>No, No, there's more in the mix there. There are

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely some positives for the New Zealand economy. The Reserve

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Bank predicting the economy will grow about zero point six

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>percent a quarter from here on out possible. I think

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>they could be a little bit optimistic. But you're the

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>positives of the interest rate pain easing away and disappearing.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>That's completely different from saying there's an interest rate boost

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>coming along, which is more your pandemic pece GFC that

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. The dairy payout, so that's positive for

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the dairying regions, not so much of an impact on

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the country.

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>World economy neither here nor there too greatly I think,

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and causing too much to happen there. Construction, yeah, infrastructure

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a slow burn to improve, so that'll be a stimulant,

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's incremental over a long period of time. Commercial

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I definitely see some positives here on the commercial construction side,

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>house building, standalone houses improving later this year. Townhouse construction

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>just falling straight lining away. I think to some point

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty six is going to be a restraint

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on growth. I think there's scope for a few more

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>foreign students to come into New Zealand. On the tourism side, yeah,

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe the government's new campaign will drag a

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.719
<v Speaker 1>few more people into New Zealand. It's got a lot

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of publicity overseas, so it's so good on them. It

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't boost the productivity in our economy, it doesn't boost

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>our income per capita or at all, just more people

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>serving in the cafeterias, cafes, et cetera. But overall, my

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>outlookers for the economy to improve, and I guess my

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>focus will be mainly when does that lead to people's

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>feelings about the labor market changing? When do people feel

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a greater amount of job security. I'll be able to

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>see that straight away in my real estate survey, because

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I asked the agents and they're right at the cold

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>face and they'll see it. I'd'm thinking that there's sometime

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of this year and that will

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>then I think flow through to the housing market putting

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in a better performance. But for the moment while, I've

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>still got about a net fifty one percent of the

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>agents saying all people are worried about their jobs or sorry,

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a gross fifty one percent. It's just going to keep

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a dampner on the housing market for

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the first half of this year.

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Tony for coming in and joining us in the

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 2>studio today, and thanks everyone for joining in. You can

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 2>watch Shared Lunch on YouTube or follow the podcast on

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 2>your favorite podcast app. Leave us a racing and tell

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 2>us what you'd like to hear next. Ma Taba