WEBVTT - Will Egypt, holding the 'crown' of COP27, deliver? | EP 18

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.310
<v Speaker 1>this is a C N A podcast,

0:00:03.390 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no extra time.

0:00:05.580 --> 0:00:09.219
<v Speaker 1>This is your chance to step up to template is

0:00:09.220 --> 0:00:13.340
<v Speaker 1>to action and put a future back on the right track.

0:00:15.140 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the climate conversations with me julie you? Most

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.810
<v Speaker 2>people will by now have heard that the biggest international

0:00:22.810 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>climate conference, cop 27 is taking place this month in

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.210
<v Speaker 2>Sharm el Sheikh in Egypt. Some may even be aware

0:00:30.220 --> 0:00:32.930
<v Speaker 2>the event could be a turning point for the climate

0:00:32.940 --> 0:00:34.010
<v Speaker 2>and the planet.

0:00:34.270 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 2>But before we delve into what's up for discussion, let's

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>try and clear up the basics. What is cop 27

0:00:41.370 --> 0:00:44.190
<v Speaker 2>why is it such a big deal and can it

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.140
<v Speaker 2>actually save the world? We're here to tell you everything

0:00:48.140 --> 0:00:51.500
<v Speaker 2>you need to know about cop is Melissa lo she

0:00:51.500 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 2>is a research fellow at N. U. S. Center for

0:00:53.610 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Nature based Climate Solutions. Melissa is only 35 years old

0:00:58.610 --> 0:01:01.830
<v Speaker 2>but she has been to 10 previous cop meetings and

0:01:01.830 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 2>is attending this year's conference as well.

0:01:04.490 --> 0:01:07.250
<v Speaker 2>Welcome Melissa. Thanks for having me julie

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:14.030
<v Speaker 2>first things first. What is? So the cop stands for

0:01:14.030 --> 0:01:17.750
<v Speaker 2>the conference of the parties and this primarily refers to

0:01:17.750 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the U. N. Framework convention on Climate change and so

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.009
<v Speaker 2>parties are meeting for the 27th time this year in

0:01:24.010 --> 0:01:27.030
<v Speaker 2>Sharm el sheikh Egypt. There's a lot of jargon has

0:01:27.030 --> 0:01:29.660
<v Speaker 2>been throwing around at cop events but what we

0:01:29.670 --> 0:01:33.750
<v Speaker 2>Here over and over again is a Paris agreement or

0:01:33.750 --> 0:01:38.110
<v Speaker 2>Paris accord as I believe was signed back in 2015

0:01:38.230 --> 0:01:42.940
<v Speaker 2>on this day. The Paris agreement on climate change enters

0:01:42.940 --> 0:01:45.820
<v Speaker 2>into force. Tell us a bit about what it is

0:01:45.819 --> 0:01:48.610
<v Speaker 2>and why is it still important? The Paris agreement was

0:01:48.620 --> 0:01:50.460
<v Speaker 2>agreed in December 2015

0:01:50.630 --> 0:01:53.780
<v Speaker 2>And what the agreement does it commits all countries to

0:01:53.790 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>reducing the rise in global temperatures to not beyond 1.5°.

0:01:58.650 --> 0:02:01.650
<v Speaker 2>I think the amazing thing about the Paris agreement is

0:02:01.650 --> 0:02:06.070
<v Speaker 2>that it requires all countries unlike its predecessor, the Kyoto Protocol.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 2>And I think a lot of countries are extremely confident

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that the Paris agreement

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.460
<v Speaker 2>in its current form will take us to where we

0:02:12.460 --> 0:02:14.500
<v Speaker 2>need to be as long as we put forward the

0:02:14.500 --> 0:02:17.580
<v Speaker 2>right targets to get there. In fact, the slogan for

0:02:17.580 --> 0:02:23.669
<v Speaker 2>cop 26 was keeping 1.5 alive. But let's face it melissa,

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.300
<v Speaker 2>we've been increasingly hearing in how the 1.5 degree target

0:02:27.300 --> 0:02:30.850
<v Speaker 2>is fast fading away. Do you think it's still a

0:02:30.850 --> 0:02:33.850
<v Speaker 2>feasible goal? Well, we have to keep our hopes up

0:02:33.860 --> 0:02:34.910
<v Speaker 2>and absolutely

0:02:34.935 --> 0:02:39.484
<v Speaker 2>right. The 1.5 degree window is closing extremely fast and

0:02:39.485 --> 0:02:42.255
<v Speaker 2>we must do more than what we're already doing. And

0:02:42.255 --> 0:02:44.734
<v Speaker 2>so the paris agreement, one of the key things about

0:02:44.735 --> 0:02:48.425
<v Speaker 2>it is also an ambition cycle. So every five years

0:02:48.425 --> 0:02:51.955
<v Speaker 2>countries need to up their targets, meaning they have to

0:02:51.955 --> 0:02:55.804
<v Speaker 2>put forward more ambitious targets. And Singapore has actually submitted

0:02:55.805 --> 0:02:57.855
<v Speaker 2>a new enhanced target this year and we will be

0:02:57.855 --> 0:02:59.590
<v Speaker 2>bringing it to the cop 27

0:02:59.770 --> 0:03:02.590
<v Speaker 2>I think that countries if they're serious about fighting climate

0:03:02.590 --> 0:03:06.109
<v Speaker 2>change and addressing its impacts, they will follow this ambition

0:03:06.110 --> 0:03:10.450
<v Speaker 2>cycle and submit new and better targets every five years goals.

0:03:10.450 --> 0:03:14.500
<v Speaker 2>A year ago, the country's banks, business leaders announced a

0:03:14.500 --> 0:03:18.410
<v Speaker 2>slew of climate plans and pledges, how have those big

0:03:18.410 --> 0:03:22.940
<v Speaker 2>promises progress since? That's a great question because cop 26

0:03:22.940 --> 0:03:25.510
<v Speaker 2>was just last year in November and so were one

0:03:25.510 --> 0:03:29.110
<v Speaker 2>year in and the world has changed tremendously within this year.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.450
<v Speaker 2>And I think one of the biggest worries is what's

0:03:32.450 --> 0:03:36.350
<v Speaker 2>happening in europe right now. The Russia Ukraine crisis resulting

0:03:36.350 --> 0:03:40.150
<v Speaker 2>in huge energy crunch. I think a lot of countries

0:03:40.150 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 2>that we think might backslide on their targets simply because

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 2>they're not able to get energy supply for the winter

0:03:48.570 --> 0:03:52.370
<v Speaker 2>coming ahead. We haven't really seen great progress in the

0:03:52.370 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>last one year as countries recover from the covid 19 pandemic,

0:03:55.690 --> 0:03:58.460
<v Speaker 2>hopefully coming out of it better and stronger.

0:03:58.630 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 2>But it's just one crisis after another. Of course remain

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.780
<v Speaker 2>hopeful and optimistic that we'll get through eventually. But I

0:04:05.780 --> 0:04:09.310
<v Speaker 2>think this year has just been particularly tough if last

0:04:09.310 --> 0:04:13.430
<v Speaker 2>year's cop was the commitment cop where climate pledges and

0:04:13.430 --> 0:04:16.630
<v Speaker 2>targets were set. Many say that this year is the

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:21.750
<v Speaker 2>implementation cop what are the big objectives this time, expectations

0:04:21.750 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>are really high this year for the cop to deliver

0:04:24.900 --> 0:04:29.169
<v Speaker 2>On something called mitigation ambition under the mitigation work program.

0:04:29.170 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 2>So this is for countries to raise their ambitions before

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:36.670
<v Speaker 2>2030 and why is 2030 important? It's because that's when

0:04:36.670 --> 0:04:40.580
<v Speaker 2>the first round of nationally determined contributions or climate pledges

0:04:40.589 --> 0:04:43.990
<v Speaker 2>are due in 2030. There's a big program called the

0:04:43.990 --> 0:04:47.229
<v Speaker 2>mitigation work program that will take us there. So countries

0:04:47.230 --> 0:04:49.980
<v Speaker 2>are going to agree on a process to get us

0:04:49.980 --> 0:04:51.169
<v Speaker 2>there in 2030

0:04:51.670 --> 0:04:52.170
<v Speaker 1>issues

0:04:52.170 --> 0:04:56.490
<v Speaker 2>Relating to climate adaptation. So if mitigation fails, given that

0:04:56.490 --> 0:04:59.020
<v Speaker 2>the climate will warm and continue to warm with what's

0:04:59.020 --> 0:05:01.860
<v Speaker 2>already been emitted into the atmosphere, we need to think

0:05:01.860 --> 0:05:05.790
<v Speaker 2>about how to enhance climate resilience among the most vulnerable

0:05:05.790 --> 0:05:08.460
<v Speaker 2>of countries. And so climate adaptation is on the table

0:05:08.470 --> 0:05:09.969
<v Speaker 2>at Cop 27 this year.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.589
<v Speaker 2>There's also the big issue of loss and damage. So

0:05:13.589 --> 0:05:16.860
<v Speaker 2>there are a number of developing countries, particularly small islands,

0:05:16.870 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 2>that are asking for developed countries to put money towards

0:05:20.730 --> 0:05:24.850
<v Speaker 2>disaster relief, for loss and damage funding so that they

0:05:24.850 --> 0:05:28.410
<v Speaker 2>can make peace with some of their losses that are irreparable.

0:05:28.420 --> 0:05:31.089
<v Speaker 2>And the last issue that is squarely on the table

0:05:31.089 --> 0:05:32.750
<v Speaker 2>is climate finance countries need

0:05:32.767 --> 0:05:35.366
<v Speaker 2>To come up with a new floor of at least

0:05:35.367 --> 0:05:40.247
<v Speaker 2>us $100 billion 2025 onwards. And we're watching eagerly as

0:05:40.247 --> 0:05:43.967
<v Speaker 2>to whether that commitment will take place because I think

0:05:43.967 --> 0:05:46.916
<v Speaker 2>it's really important to build trust and rebuild the trust

0:05:46.916 --> 0:05:49.356
<v Speaker 2>that perhaps has been lost with the lack of progress

0:05:49.367 --> 0:05:52.236
<v Speaker 2>in the last year. Who are the leaders that you're

0:05:52.237 --> 0:05:54.556
<v Speaker 2>most excited to hear from. And I think it's really

0:05:54.557 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>important

0:05:55.414 --> 0:05:58.594
<v Speaker 2>that the heads of states of countries that have submitted

0:05:58.594 --> 0:06:01.654
<v Speaker 2>new pledges from cop 26. So there are only about

0:06:01.654 --> 0:06:06.394
<v Speaker 2>20 countries that have displayed climate leadership before cop 27

0:06:06.404 --> 0:06:09.344
<v Speaker 2>of course this includes Egypt the host of the cop

0:06:09.344 --> 0:06:14.084
<v Speaker 2>27 this year. Australia Indonesia being the g 20 chair

0:06:14.094 --> 0:06:17.614
<v Speaker 2>India has also come forward with an updated nationally determined

0:06:17.613 --> 0:06:18.049
<v Speaker 2>contribute

0:06:18.331 --> 0:06:20.861
<v Speaker 2>per the Glasgow climate pack. So I'm really eager to

0:06:20.861 --> 0:06:23.351
<v Speaker 2>hear what these countries have to say, but also the

0:06:23.351 --> 0:06:26.221
<v Speaker 2>large emitters like china and the U. S. And of course,

0:06:26.221 --> 0:06:28.251
<v Speaker 2>I think Singapore will also have a part to play

0:06:28.261 --> 0:06:31.841
<v Speaker 2>at the cop 27 this year, but we know who

0:06:31.841 --> 0:06:35.211
<v Speaker 2>won't be attending this year. This is no longer a

0:06:35.211 --> 0:06:35.651
<v Speaker 2>climate

0:06:35.651 --> 0:06:39.741
<v Speaker 1>conference, this is now a global north green wash

0:06:39.741 --> 0:06:40.710
<v Speaker 2>festival,

0:06:40.890 --> 0:06:44.669
<v Speaker 2>wow some harsh words from the young Swedish activist Greta

0:06:44.670 --> 0:06:48.190
<v Speaker 2>to Hamburg. They're criticizing the global summit as a forum

0:06:48.190 --> 0:06:51.740
<v Speaker 2>for greenwashing mel does she have a point

0:06:51.740 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>here?

0:06:52.450 --> 0:06:56.130
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've been attending cop for a very long time

0:06:56.130 --> 0:06:59.469
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes I dread going as well because it's a

0:06:59.470 --> 0:07:01.700
<v Speaker 2>lot of work. It's a lot of effort on the

0:07:01.700 --> 0:07:05.490
<v Speaker 2>ground to capacity build people talk to the media trying

0:07:05.490 --> 0:07:08.930
<v Speaker 2>to get the complex negotiations untangled for everyone.

0:07:09.180 --> 0:07:12.250
<v Speaker 2>I hesitate to say it's greenwashing. I think it's important

0:07:12.250 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 2>that we're there. I think what's more important is what

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.830
<v Speaker 2>we do when we leave the cop the cop is

0:07:17.830 --> 0:07:20.660
<v Speaker 2>a platform for negotiations is a place where people go

0:07:20.670 --> 0:07:24.010
<v Speaker 2>and bring their points across, particularly for young people and

0:07:24.010 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>if Greta thunberg were to attend, she would be able

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.170
<v Speaker 2>to inspire a lot of people, but I'm sure she

0:07:29.170 --> 0:07:31.650
<v Speaker 2>just wants to send a very strong message that actually

0:07:31.650 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the work needs to be happening on the ground.

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.630
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of skeptics, there are those who think cop 27

0:07:37.630 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 2>will likely disappoint, especially with 2022 now being a typical

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:45.530
<v Speaker 2>year with recession fears food and energy shortages and the

0:07:45.530 --> 0:07:47.010
<v Speaker 2>war in Ukraine

0:07:47.250 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Melissa, how concerned are you that the level of ambition

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>in Egypt will likely fail to match that in Glasgow

0:07:55.090 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>or would the meeting hold more relevance? You're absolutely spot

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.830
<v Speaker 2>on on that expectations are really high for cop 27

0:08:03.830 --> 0:08:06.780
<v Speaker 2>to meet the same level of ambition

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and goals that the cop 26 presidency put on the table.

0:08:10.290 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>But let's keep in mind this is an african cop

0:08:13.050 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and I think the focus areas are fairly different from

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.260
<v Speaker 2>what the U. K. Was focusing on and I think

0:08:18.260 --> 0:08:21.340
<v Speaker 2>the U. K has a different set of clout as well.

0:08:21.350 --> 0:08:25.170
<v Speaker 2>Mark Carney was special rap and I believe he managed

0:08:25.170 --> 0:08:28.150
<v Speaker 2>to bring big banks to commit to net zero finance

0:08:28.150 --> 0:08:28.740
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:08:28.900 --> 0:08:32.290
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important to know what each court presidency

0:08:32.300 --> 0:08:34.210
<v Speaker 2>brings to the table and what they can do at

0:08:34.220 --> 0:08:38.050
<v Speaker 2>each cop and certainly I feel that if cop 27

0:08:38.050 --> 0:08:41.220
<v Speaker 2>were to be a success, it would deliver on adaptation

0:08:41.220 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and loss and damage as well as climate finance. I

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.309
<v Speaker 2>believe that cop 26 played a role in driving the

0:08:47.309 --> 0:08:51.790
<v Speaker 2>interest among non party stakeholders. So beyond government. So we

0:08:51.790 --> 0:08:52.599
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of

0:08:52.809 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>said the private sector joining us at cop 26 but

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.010
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll see a different set of participants attending

0:08:59.010 --> 0:09:02.420
<v Speaker 2>cop 27 because they want to drive resilience, they want

0:09:02.420 --> 0:09:05.339
<v Speaker 2>to drive loss and damage payments. And I think all

0:09:05.340 --> 0:09:08.010
<v Speaker 2>of these views are very valid and we have to

0:09:08.010 --> 0:09:10.020
<v Speaker 2>hear them out and there's something at the court. We

0:09:10.020 --> 0:09:15.179
<v Speaker 2>call procedural justice where you have to afford countries and

0:09:15.190 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>voices to be heard

0:09:16.860 --> 0:09:19.220
<v Speaker 2>Even if the outcome and the outcome will be a

0:09:19.220 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>form of compromise. At least people feel they've been given

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 2>a platform to talk about these important issues and work

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.690
<v Speaker 2>towards an end goal. So where do you expect the

0:09:28.690 --> 0:09:33.060
<v Speaker 2>most struggle? The last cop 26 got extended for a

0:09:33.059 --> 0:09:35.179
<v Speaker 2>couple of days. Is that something that you expect a

0:09:35.179 --> 0:09:38.450
<v Speaker 2>cop 27 as well. Yes. The interesting thing about the

0:09:38.450 --> 0:09:39.630
<v Speaker 2>cop is

0:09:39.653 --> 0:09:42.583
<v Speaker 2>that there is a phrase that uses nothing is agreed

0:09:42.583 --> 0:09:46.102
<v Speaker 2>until everything is agreed. So it's a package deal if

0:09:46.102 --> 0:09:49.392
<v Speaker 2>you will and there are many different tracks of negotiations

0:09:49.393 --> 0:09:51.663
<v Speaker 2>happening at the cop at any one point in time

0:09:51.673 --> 0:09:55.843
<v Speaker 2>is extremely confusing. You have to track different agendas and

0:09:55.852 --> 0:09:59.012
<v Speaker 2>basically what happens in the end is a package of

0:09:59.023 --> 0:10:02.023
<v Speaker 2>decisions are put forward to the ministers when they arrive

0:10:02.023 --> 0:10:02.423
<v Speaker 2>in the sec

0:10:02.566 --> 0:10:05.826
<v Speaker 2>week and the ministers will go and evaluate based on

0:10:05.826 --> 0:10:09.006
<v Speaker 2>their own countries interest, but also in the global interest

0:10:09.016 --> 0:10:12.236
<v Speaker 2>and they will decide on some trade offs. And I

0:10:12.236 --> 0:10:14.726
<v Speaker 2>think everybody leaves the car a little bit unhappy because

0:10:14.726 --> 0:10:18.806
<v Speaker 2>if we left extremely happy, we've done something completely wrong

0:10:18.816 --> 0:10:21.915
<v Speaker 2>for the climate. So everybody leaves a bit unhappy because

0:10:21.916 --> 0:10:23.626
<v Speaker 2>it means that we have to make some cuts and

0:10:23.626 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>some changes to our behavior.

0:10:25.450 --> 0:10:28.410
<v Speaker 2>I think where the most contention will happen is the

0:10:28.410 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>adaptation and loss and damage and loss and damage is

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 2>particularly challenging because

0:10:33.890 --> 0:10:38.030
<v Speaker 2>my sense is that if developed countries end up committing

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:42.030
<v Speaker 2>to this loss and damage funding, it would perhaps mean

0:10:42.030 --> 0:10:45.390
<v Speaker 2>that they've essentially admitted that they've caused climate change. And

0:10:45.390 --> 0:10:47.970
<v Speaker 2>I think that's something really difficult for them to admit

0:10:47.980 --> 0:10:51.610
<v Speaker 2>at the cop level. Perhaps they might give some money elsewhere.

0:10:51.620 --> 0:10:55.350
<v Speaker 2>Denmark for instance, announced it would commit something like 100

0:10:55.350 --> 0:10:57.830
<v Speaker 2>million danish kroner in september this year

0:10:57.855 --> 0:10:59.975
<v Speaker 2>to loss and damage. So that's happening outside of the

0:10:59.975 --> 0:11:04.145
<v Speaker 2>cop and Scotland and Belgium have also individually pledged money

0:11:04.145 --> 0:11:07.145
<v Speaker 2>to help countries offset the damage that have been caused

0:11:07.145 --> 0:11:09.985
<v Speaker 2>by climate change. And in some cases this damage is irreversible.

0:11:09.985 --> 0:11:13.015
<v Speaker 2>And so how do we see an outcome where countries

0:11:13.015 --> 0:11:16.975
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like they have to admit to that responsibility

0:11:16.985 --> 0:11:20.185
<v Speaker 2>and then we should be solutions oriented rather than problem

0:11:20.195 --> 0:11:21.820
<v Speaker 2>oriented when we go to the cops

0:11:22.390 --> 0:11:27.459
<v Speaker 2>Keep listening as I'll be posing more climate-related questions to Melissa,

0:11:27.530 --> 0:11:30.260
<v Speaker 2>some of which have been asked by our followers on

0:11:30.260 --> 0:11:33.310
<v Speaker 2>social media. Alright Melissa, there are some of the questions

0:11:33.309 --> 0:11:36.569
<v Speaker 2>are followers have posed for you and I feel like

0:11:36.580 --> 0:11:39.170
<v Speaker 2>no one can answer this first question better than you

0:11:39.170 --> 0:11:41.930
<v Speaker 2>since you've been to cop 10 times. So for those

0:11:41.929 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 2>of us who have never been to cop, what's it like?

0:11:45.100 --> 0:11:46.349
<v Speaker 2>It must be pretty intense.

0:11:46.780 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 2>It is and it's extremely overwhelming. It's your first cop

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.579
<v Speaker 2>and I know it's your first cop. So when you

0:11:52.580 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>go there okay, first thing you have to wear comfortable

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.860
<v Speaker 2>shoes because the court venue is massive and you have

0:11:57.860 --> 0:12:00.340
<v Speaker 2>to walk to different places in your case, it will

0:12:00.340 --> 0:12:03.150
<v Speaker 2>be the media area, but you also want to perhaps

0:12:03.150 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 2>attend some negotiations like plenary sessions, I'm considered an observer

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:08.430
<v Speaker 2>to the cop.

0:12:08.510 --> 0:12:11.450
<v Speaker 2>So the National University of Singapore has been accredited since

0:12:11.450 --> 0:12:14.950
<v Speaker 2>2014 as an official observer. What we do is we

0:12:14.950 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>get a yellow batch and so the different badges of

0:12:17.890 --> 0:12:21.090
<v Speaker 2>the cops allows you into different rooms and for observers,

0:12:21.090 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 2>we get to go into some of the smaller rooms.

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.300
<v Speaker 2>As long as countries decide that they will allow observers

0:12:26.300 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>in the room for transparency were allowed to sit in

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:30.110
<v Speaker 2>for and listen to the news

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.510
<v Speaker 2>and quite often we take notes so that we can

0:12:32.510 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 2>make sense of it a bit later. There are also

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.250
<v Speaker 2>a lot of side events that you can attend at

0:12:37.250 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the copies are basically like seminar style events that you

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 2>can go listen to interesting speakers and then their pavilions

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:48.459
<v Speaker 2>that countries set up to showcase the important policies and

0:12:48.460 --> 0:12:51.329
<v Speaker 2>work that they've been doing and perhaps to drive partnerships

0:12:51.330 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:12:52.179 --> 0:12:54.540
<v Speaker 2>And that's actually what I'm most looking forward to is

0:12:54.550 --> 0:12:57.229
<v Speaker 2>the number of people going from Singapore this year has

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>increased because this is the first time Singapore will be

0:12:59.920 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 2>hosting a pavilion at the cop. So the cop is

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.830
<v Speaker 2>really like a big expo almost right. But it's very

0:13:06.830 --> 0:13:12.059
<v Speaker 2>serious because negotiations affect lives negotiations affect the trajectory of

0:13:12.059 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>our emissions. Ultimately, when it comes to climate change, what's

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.860
<v Speaker 2>one thing to look out for a cop that may

0:13:17.885 --> 0:13:20.405
<v Speaker 2>many of us don't know about fossil of the day

0:13:20.405 --> 0:13:23.615
<v Speaker 2>is an award that young people come together and give

0:13:23.615 --> 0:13:26.434
<v Speaker 2>out at the end of each day at six o'clock.

0:13:26.445 --> 0:13:30.525
<v Speaker 2>It's very entertaining because they sing the Jurassic theme park song,

0:13:30.535 --> 0:13:33.465
<v Speaker 2>Somebody dresses up as a T rex. And you know,

0:13:33.465 --> 0:13:35.905
<v Speaker 2>when it happens because it draws a very large crowd

0:13:35.915 --> 0:13:39.275
<v Speaker 2>essentially is a form of a demonstration where young people

0:13:39.275 --> 0:13:42.975
<v Speaker 2>will award a fossil to the top three countries that

0:13:42.975 --> 0:13:43.590
<v Speaker 2>have

0:13:43.929 --> 0:13:47.750
<v Speaker 2>displayed some form of frustrating behavior at the cop. The

0:13:47.750 --> 0:13:50.310
<v Speaker 2>country will be given a fossil that day at the

0:13:50.309 --> 0:13:52.070
<v Speaker 2>end of the two weeks there will be a big

0:13:52.070 --> 0:13:54.730
<v Speaker 2>fossil colossal fossils. Sometimes we call it. It's quite an

0:13:54.730 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 2>entertaining demonstration by youth. It reflects how closely they tracked

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.359
<v Speaker 2>the negotiations. So I think all countries are usually quite

0:14:02.370 --> 0:14:05.599
<v Speaker 2>on guard because they worry that they become a fossil. Right?

0:14:05.610 --> 0:14:08.860
<v Speaker 2>That's one of the fun side of cop that

0:14:09.030 --> 0:14:10.979
<v Speaker 2>those of us who have been many years we look

0:14:10.980 --> 0:14:14.059
<v Speaker 2>forward to very much because it's hard to deal with

0:14:14.059 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 2>climate change. I think we just need a little bit

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.870
<v Speaker 2>of comic relief every now and then. Why is Egypt

0:14:19.870 --> 0:14:24.010
<v Speaker 2>hosting cop 27 so controversial. There have been a lot

0:14:24.010 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>of news reports about how Egypt is organizing this cop.

0:14:28.010 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Some have observed that number one sham el Sheikh is

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.710
<v Speaker 2>not the easiest place to get to. It's a resort town.

0:14:34.710 --> 0:14:36.540
<v Speaker 2>It's really expensive for a lot of

0:14:36.550 --> 0:14:39.860
<v Speaker 2>observers. And the second thing is it appears that Egypt

0:14:39.860 --> 0:14:43.290
<v Speaker 2>is also clamping down on activists. They're not allowing activists

0:14:43.290 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 2>to attend the cop. Some observers have shared that they

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think that this cop will have that procedural justice

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.020
<v Speaker 2>providing the platform for youth voices and strong activist voices.

0:14:53.030 --> 0:14:56.270
<v Speaker 2>And I think interestingly enough this is the first african

0:14:56.270 --> 0:14:59.990
<v Speaker 2>cop since cop 22 which was held in marrakech in

0:14:59.990 --> 0:15:04.060
<v Speaker 2>Morocco in 2016. The year after the paris agreement was adopted.

0:15:04.250 --> 0:15:07.850
<v Speaker 2>And that last cop was also very exciting and interesting

0:15:07.850 --> 0:15:09.780
<v Speaker 2>because it was the U. S. Election that year in

0:15:09.780 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>2016 and president trump actually became president while we were

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 2>in marrakech which set a different tone all together when

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>we were there. So this particular cop I hope it's

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>not too controversial but it's a cop that has experienced

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of changes in the last year. So again

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.730
<v Speaker 2>because of the high prices because of the activism clamped down.

0:15:27.730 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>It seems I think these have shown a not so

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>great light on the presidency. The U. N. F triple C.

0:15:33.050 --> 0:15:38.230
<v Speaker 2>Executive secretary Patricia espinosa has stepped down after six years

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.020
<v Speaker 2>as the chief of the U. N. Framework Convention on

0:15:41.020 --> 0:15:44.170
<v Speaker 2>climate change. And so this year is a transition year.

0:15:44.180 --> 0:15:47.990
<v Speaker 2>So we have a new successor to the U. N. F. C. C. C.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.410
<v Speaker 2>Executive secretary is Simon style from Granada and he was

0:15:51.410 --> 0:15:54.020
<v Speaker 2>just appointed in august this year. It remains to be

0:15:54.020 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 2>seen how effective he will be in steering the cop

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.310
<v Speaker 2>and the outcomes this year. And I think we also

0:16:00.310 --> 0:16:01.850
<v Speaker 2>have interesting

0:16:02.030 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 2>look ahead because it's been announced already that cop 28

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>will be held in U. A. E. So one of

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.900
<v Speaker 2>my biggest worries is that because we already know where

0:16:10.900 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the next cop is going to be and when it's

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 2>going to happen that countries might feel like oh then

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.660
<v Speaker 2>let's like forward stuff to next year.

0:16:17.675 --> 0:16:20.285
<v Speaker 2>But I hope they don't do that of course who

0:16:20.285 --> 0:16:24.435
<v Speaker 2>gets to decide which country gets to be the next presidency.

0:16:24.445 --> 0:16:27.375
<v Speaker 2>It rotates among the five regions in the world. So

0:16:27.375 --> 0:16:31.105
<v Speaker 2>there's europe there's Asia the Middle East and the Americas

0:16:31.105 --> 0:16:34.675
<v Speaker 2>and so on. Any given country can offer to host

0:16:34.675 --> 0:16:38.185
<v Speaker 2>the cop. I like to liken the cop presidency to

0:16:38.185 --> 0:16:41.390
<v Speaker 2>something like the miss universe. When you are the presidency,

0:16:41.390 --> 0:16:43.770
<v Speaker 2>you have to hold it until you hand over the

0:16:43.770 --> 0:16:45.270
<v Speaker 2>torch to the next person

0:16:45.450 --> 0:16:48.790
<v Speaker 2>genuinely feel a little bit sorry for the UK because

0:16:48.790 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 2>they've been holding this torch for so long. The cop

0:16:52.930 --> 0:16:57.130
<v Speaker 2>26 was actually postponed in 2020 because of the pandemic.

0:16:57.130 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>They haven't had an easy task but I think handing

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:01.710
<v Speaker 2>it over will be a big relief to them

0:17:02.310 --> 0:17:06.410
<v Speaker 2>Up next. You'll hear what Melissa thinks cop 27 means

0:17:06.410 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 2>for Singapore and what role the country is expected to

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>play at the climate conference.

0:17:19.330 --> 0:17:22.389
<v Speaker 2>Hi, I'm Adrian Tan and I'm Christina robert. We are

0:17:22.390 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the host of a new podcast called working. We're here

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 2>to get into the essential things that no one tells

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.820
<v Speaker 2>you about working in company culture from office politics to

0:17:30.820 --> 0:17:34.130
<v Speaker 2>dealing with burnout. If you've ever wanted to eavesdrop on

0:17:34.130 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>an interesting conversation by the water cooler. This podcast is

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 2>for you look out for our episodes wherever you get

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:41.530
<v Speaker 2>your podcast.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.070
<v Speaker 2>So melissa, let's talk about what cop 27 means for Singapore.

0:17:53.070 --> 0:17:55.970
<v Speaker 2>What role the country is expected to play at the

0:17:55.970 --> 0:18:00.820
<v Speaker 2>climate conference. Singapore is expected to submit enhanced carbon emission

0:18:00.820 --> 0:18:02.580
<v Speaker 2>goals at cop 27.

0:18:02.850 --> 0:18:06.629
<v Speaker 2>Given that it's a country that contributes about 0.1% of

0:18:06.630 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 2>global greenhouse gas emissions, new climate emissions at cop 27

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:15.820
<v Speaker 2>mean anything absolutely 0.1% of emissions really isn't very much

0:18:15.820 --> 0:18:18.490
<v Speaker 2>in the global scheme of things. But of course, I

0:18:18.490 --> 0:18:22.100
<v Speaker 2>think it's important that we play our part. We strongly

0:18:22.100 --> 0:18:26.030
<v Speaker 2>believe here in Singapore in the multilateral rules based process

0:18:26.030 --> 0:18:29.670
<v Speaker 2>that is these U. N. Negotiations and so therefore we

0:18:29.670 --> 0:18:32.060
<v Speaker 2>must play an active role if we want to be

0:18:32.060 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 2>seen as

0:18:32.369 --> 0:18:37.729
<v Speaker 2>it's incredible negotiating party by submitting our enhanced target this

0:18:37.730 --> 0:18:40.300
<v Speaker 2>year as per the Glasgow Climate Pact and what it

0:18:40.300 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 2>called for countries to revisit and strengthen its targets. I

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:48.100
<v Speaker 2>think put Singapore in a really good position to encourage

0:18:48.109 --> 0:18:51.660
<v Speaker 2>nudge other parties who haven't done so yet. You would

0:18:51.660 --> 0:18:54.250
<v Speaker 2>have heard that D P. M. Lawrence Wong at the

0:18:54.250 --> 0:18:59.030
<v Speaker 2>opening of the Singapore International Energy Week announced Singapore's revision

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 2>of our NBC, which is now a fixed

0:19:01.890 --> 0:19:06.750
<v Speaker 2>Level target of 60 million tons of emissions in 2030.

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.290
<v Speaker 2>Of course, he also mentioned that we will peak

0:19:09.300 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier before

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 2>that and then come down and it's been expressed as

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.930
<v Speaker 2>a stretch target. And so for me, I'm really looking

0:19:15.930 --> 0:19:19.290
<v Speaker 2>forward to seeing the NDC submitted officially to the U

0:19:19.290 --> 0:19:20.940
<v Speaker 2>N F C C C and to look at the

0:19:20.940 --> 0:19:24.389
<v Speaker 2>specific details as to how we look to achieve this target.

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.190
<v Speaker 2>The other target that we have announced formally as well

0:19:27.190 --> 0:19:29.790
<v Speaker 2>is the net zero by 2050 target. And that's also

0:19:29.790 --> 0:19:31.410
<v Speaker 2>in fact part of the paris agreement

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>which calls and encourages countries to submit long term low

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.620
<v Speaker 2>emissions development strategies. And in 2020 Singapore actually was fairly

0:19:39.619 --> 0:19:42.449
<v Speaker 2>noncommittal about this. We said we can achieve net zero

0:19:42.460 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 2>if the technology is viable by the end of the century,

0:19:45.810 --> 0:19:48.070
<v Speaker 2>there's a bit more pressure because more and more countries

0:19:48.070 --> 0:19:49.930
<v Speaker 2>up in that net zero targets right? There are about

0:19:49.930 --> 0:19:54.109
<v Speaker 2>53 countries now that have targets by 2050 and most

0:19:54.109 --> 0:19:56.970
<v Speaker 2>of them are net zero. And so Singapore felt that

0:19:56.970 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 2>we needed to re look at this and because of

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.540
<v Speaker 2>the Article six or international carbon markets that were finalized,

0:20:03.540 --> 0:20:06.510
<v Speaker 2>the rules were finalized last year, cop 26 as well

0:20:06.510 --> 0:20:07.850
<v Speaker 2>as two sets of technologies,

0:20:07.859 --> 0:20:12.820
<v Speaker 2>Carbon capture storage and utilization as well as hydrogen. It

0:20:12.820 --> 0:20:15.770
<v Speaker 2>now looks as if Singapore can at least make a

0:20:15.780 --> 0:20:18.939
<v Speaker 2>strong effort to achieve net zero. Once we exhaust the

0:20:18.940 --> 0:20:23.130
<v Speaker 2>mitigation options, we might buy carbon credits through the international

0:20:23.140 --> 0:20:26.190
<v Speaker 2>frameworks to get to zero in 2050. But I think

0:20:26.190 --> 0:20:28.100
<v Speaker 2>the key really is to try and mitigate as de

0:20:28.100 --> 0:20:29.909
<v Speaker 2>carbonized as much as possible before that.

0:20:30.130 --> 0:20:32.500
<v Speaker 2>And like I said, I think Singapore will play, in

0:20:32.500 --> 0:20:35.100
<v Speaker 2>my opinion, we often play an outsized role at the

0:20:35.100 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 2>cops because we make effort to understand other countries interests

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.030
<v Speaker 2>at the court meetings and were sometimes described as an

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:46.500
<v Speaker 2>honest broker or facilitator of outcomes because we can think

0:20:46.500 --> 0:20:50.910
<v Speaker 2>of solutions that might be a bit more palatable or

0:20:50.910 --> 0:20:52.580
<v Speaker 2>appealing to a variety of country.

0:20:52.590 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 2>For example, Minister graceful last year was asked to co

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.650
<v Speaker 2>facilitate article six negotiations which were really contentious and we

0:21:00.650 --> 0:21:02.590
<v Speaker 2>did a great job. So I think we have track

0:21:02.590 --> 0:21:04.940
<v Speaker 2>record and I think we'll be called upon again. There

0:21:04.940 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 2>will be plenty of issues and negotiations that's going to

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.190
<v Speaker 2>take place at cop 27. But is there anything in

0:21:11.190 --> 0:21:15.060
<v Speaker 2>particular that would matter for Singapore specifically

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and also for those of us in the region? What

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.510
<v Speaker 2>should we keep a lookout for? Well, I think everything

0:21:20.510 --> 0:21:22.550
<v Speaker 2>is important. I know that's not the right answer but

0:21:22.550 --> 0:21:26.380
<v Speaker 2>I think everything is really important because of the package deal.

0:21:26.390 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Everything is interconnected. If we dropped the ball on for

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.859
<v Speaker 2>example adaptation and loss and damage which is really important

0:21:32.859 --> 0:21:36.980
<v Speaker 2>to a large number of developing least developed countries, then

0:21:36.990 --> 0:21:40.340
<v Speaker 2>we really haven't won even if Singapore other countries got

0:21:40.340 --> 0:21:41.149
<v Speaker 2>what they wanted.

0:21:41.369 --> 0:21:45.290
<v Speaker 2>The world suffers planet suffers a really key outcome for

0:21:45.290 --> 0:21:48.050
<v Speaker 2>us not just in Singapore but also the region. Singapore

0:21:48.050 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 2>being in Southeast Asia is adaptation is lost and damaged.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.020
<v Speaker 2>Many of our neighboring countries have many people living along

0:21:55.020 --> 0:21:58.510
<v Speaker 2>the coastlines and we've already seen some terrible effects of

0:21:58.510 --> 0:22:01.650
<v Speaker 2>climate change. I think Philippines is a good example every

0:22:01.650 --> 0:22:03.530
<v Speaker 2>year during the cop is typhoon season.

0:22:03.730 --> 0:22:06.859
<v Speaker 2>It hits home because our Philippine negotiators will be at

0:22:06.859 --> 0:22:09.550
<v Speaker 2>the cop and there'll be sometimes in tears you just

0:22:09.550 --> 0:22:11.770
<v Speaker 2>feel for them. You want to do something about it.

0:22:11.780 --> 0:22:15.060
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's important to situate ourselves as Singaporeans

0:22:15.070 --> 0:22:18.270
<v Speaker 2>within the larger context of the region and also the world,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.340
<v Speaker 2>we can't say to have one if one thing or

0:22:20.340 --> 0:22:23.100
<v Speaker 2>the other doesn't get agreed. So what do you yourself

0:22:23.100 --> 0:22:25.190
<v Speaker 2>hope to see a cop 27 and what would make

0:22:25.190 --> 0:22:28.330
<v Speaker 2>it a successful outcome in your eyes?

0:22:28.500 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 2>That's a tough question. A lot of hopes are on

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 2>the adaptation and loss and damage agenda item, but I

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.179
<v Speaker 2>think personally that the mitigation work program is also important.

0:22:38.180 --> 0:22:41.410
<v Speaker 2>Climate finance delivery is going to be key in order

0:22:41.410 --> 0:22:44.670
<v Speaker 2>to get to a successful outcome. Perhaps that trust has

0:22:44.670 --> 0:22:47.100
<v Speaker 2>to be rebuilt and where better to do this and

0:22:47.100 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>in africa. All right, Mel, thank you so much for

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.310
<v Speaker 2>your time. I really enjoyed talking to you. You're welcome julie.

0:22:53.609 --> 0:22:57.270
<v Speaker 2>Well hopefully countries can put political differences aside and come

0:22:57.270 --> 0:23:01.410
<v Speaker 2>together to address a common existential threat. It's a difficult

0:23:01.410 --> 0:23:04.350
<v Speaker 2>task for sure. But if the hope and optimism of

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>people like melissa is anything to go by, we may

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.270
<v Speaker 2>still have a chance. The team behind the climate conversations

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>is Jacqueline chan Joanne chan Danieli Christina robert and me julie,

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:17.129
<v Speaker 2>you

0:23:17.310 --> 0:23:20.390
<v Speaker 2>do like and subscribe to this podcast so you can

0:23:20.390 --> 0:23:23.890
<v Speaker 2>catch the next episode. Thank you for listening. Bye for

0:23:23.890 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 2>now