WEBVTT - What stocks should I buy during a recession?

0:00:00.270 --> 0:00:02.599
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a CNA podcast

0:00:04.420 --> 0:00:07.590
<v Speaker 1>is the recession really coming? Yes or no. I think so.

0:00:07.599 --> 0:00:11.329
<v Speaker 1>Three words, when you think of a looming recession, buy

0:00:11.340 --> 0:00:15.489
<v Speaker 1>more stocks, describe recession proof stocks in a single sentence.

0:00:15.659 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>There are stable business who can still perform during a

0:00:18.209 --> 0:00:21.549
<v Speaker 1>recession and their share price is likely to lose less

0:00:21.559 --> 0:00:22.610
<v Speaker 1>if the market is crashing

0:00:22.684 --> 0:00:28.125
<v Speaker 1>top three types of stocks to invest in during a downturn, supermarkets,

0:00:28.135 --> 0:00:33.205
<v Speaker 1>health care, education, investing mistakes to avoid in a recession,

0:00:33.215 --> 0:00:36.974
<v Speaker 1>move your money into safe building assets, principle guaranteed. But

0:00:36.985 --> 0:00:40.275
<v Speaker 1>then miss the run when the market start to be

0:00:40.284 --> 0:00:40.875
<v Speaker 1>bullish again,

0:00:43.439 --> 0:00:47.700
<v Speaker 1>the big R word it's been uttered so many times

0:00:47.709 --> 0:00:52.470
<v Speaker 1>this year, striking fear even in the most seasoned economist.

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But while a recession hasn't quite yet arrived, perhaps it's

0:00:57.009 --> 0:01:00.849
<v Speaker 1>not too late to look at adding some resilience instead

0:01:00.860 --> 0:01:04.489
<v Speaker 1>to your portfolio. Hi, I'm Andrea Heng. And this is

0:01:04.500 --> 0:01:06.430
<v Speaker 1>the Money Talks podcast where we talk about

0:01:06.510 --> 0:01:09.980
<v Speaker 1>your money and there are many wonderful things you can

0:01:09.989 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>do with it. So previously, we asked ourselves, is it

0:01:13.010 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>still worth putting your money in Singapore's treasury bills and

0:01:16.410 --> 0:01:19.169
<v Speaker 1>savings bonds this year? Well, if you want to know

0:01:19.180 --> 0:01:22.089
<v Speaker 1>the answer. Look out for that episode on Spotify or

0:01:22.099 --> 0:01:25.580
<v Speaker 1>Google podcast. Just search money talks and you'll be on

0:01:25.589 --> 0:01:29.500
<v Speaker 1>the right track. But back to the dreaded R word recession,

0:01:29.940 --> 0:01:31.989
<v Speaker 1>it was a buzzword at the start of the year

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.629
<v Speaker 1>when the world was dealing with a number of unfortunate events,

0:01:35.639 --> 0:01:41.139
<v Speaker 1>staggering inflation, sky high interest rates and geopolitical conflict, all

0:01:41.150 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of which are sadly ongoing even today. So we're asking

0:01:46.389 --> 0:01:49.620
<v Speaker 1>how can we protect ourselves from a recession if it

0:01:49.629 --> 0:01:51.510
<v Speaker 1>does arrive other changes, we

0:01:51.595 --> 0:01:53.514
<v Speaker 1>we need to make to our stock portfolio so that

0:01:53.525 --> 0:01:56.684
<v Speaker 1>the sting will be less painful here to chart a

0:01:56.694 --> 0:02:00.665
<v Speaker 1>path for us. Is Alvin Chow CEO and founder of

0:02:00.675 --> 0:02:03.525
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Wealth. Thanks for joining us on money talks. Alvin,

0:02:03.535 --> 0:02:07.105
<v Speaker 1>thanks Andrea, thanks for having me. Ok. So in Singapore,

0:02:07.455 --> 0:02:11.625
<v Speaker 1>we understand that a technical recession is two consecutive quarters

0:02:11.633 --> 0:02:13.205
<v Speaker 1>of GDP decline.

0:02:13.679 --> 0:02:17.168
<v Speaker 1>But outside this definition, what are the conditions of a

0:02:17.179 --> 0:02:20.809
<v Speaker 1>recession we need to take notice of as an investor,

0:02:20.910 --> 0:02:23.369
<v Speaker 1>what are the warning signs we should be looking out for?

0:02:23.479 --> 0:02:26.449
<v Speaker 1>So as you already pointed out, the Singapore economy did

0:02:26.460 --> 0:02:29.449
<v Speaker 1>avoided a technical recession because the last quarter, the second

0:02:29.460 --> 0:02:32.289
<v Speaker 1>quarter was actually a positive GDP growth. And I would

0:02:32.300 --> 0:02:35.669
<v Speaker 1>say that looking at a bigger economy, the US economy

0:02:35.679 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 1>is definitely the one that we need to watch out

0:02:37.410 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>for because it affects the rest of the world, right?

0:02:39.529 --> 0:02:40.910
<v Speaker 1>Being the biggest economy in the world.

0:02:41.220 --> 0:02:44.649
<v Speaker 1>And for the US side, actually, the economy seems a

0:02:44.660 --> 0:02:49.149
<v Speaker 1>lot stronger than predicted. They have two consecutive quarters of

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.229
<v Speaker 1>positive GDP growth this year so far.

0:02:51.559 --> 0:02:55.860
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like the US economy is absorbing the

0:02:55.869 --> 0:02:58.020
<v Speaker 1>high interest rate rather well, right? To a lot of

0:02:58.029 --> 0:03:00.500
<v Speaker 1>people surprise. But one of the key signs that I

0:03:00.508 --> 0:03:02.199
<v Speaker 1>look out for is actually this thing called the U

0:03:02.399 --> 0:03:06.399
<v Speaker 1>curve inversion. So this curve inversion is basically taking the

0:03:06.410 --> 0:03:09.610
<v Speaker 1>10 year bond you minus away the two year bond

0:03:09.619 --> 0:03:12.259
<v Speaker 1>you OK? And what does that do? So by right,

0:03:12.270 --> 0:03:14.220
<v Speaker 1>a longer 10 year bond should give you a high

0:03:14.229 --> 0:03:16.198
<v Speaker 1>interest rate just like if you buy a 10 year bond,

0:03:16.210 --> 0:03:17.990
<v Speaker 1>you expect a high interest rate and a two year bond, right?

0:03:18.330 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>So which means a 10 year

0:03:19.815 --> 0:03:21.195
<v Speaker 1>and it's a two year Y, it should be a

0:03:21.205 --> 0:03:24.175
<v Speaker 1>positive number. Oh yeah, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, that makes sense. OK.

0:03:24.184 --> 0:03:27.074
<v Speaker 1>So when the U curve inverts, that means that the

0:03:27.085 --> 0:03:29.404
<v Speaker 1>10 year Y is actually lower than the two year Y,

0:03:30.294 --> 0:03:32.734
<v Speaker 1>that is where you get a negative number. And that's

0:03:32.744 --> 0:03:36.625
<v Speaker 1>what the economists term as a U curve inversion. OK.

0:03:36.634 --> 0:03:40.945
<v Speaker 1>And historically, this indicator, whenever the U curve inverts recession

0:03:40.955 --> 0:03:43.524
<v Speaker 1>is around the corner. Oh and where are we at?

0:03:43.535 --> 0:03:46.274
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at the U curve now, it has

0:03:46.285 --> 0:03:47.985
<v Speaker 1>been inverted for more than a year.

0:03:48.279 --> 0:03:50.699
<v Speaker 1>OK. So one thing is that it's not immediate, it

0:03:50.710 --> 0:03:52.690
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that all the moment that this U curve

0:03:52.699 --> 0:03:56.169
<v Speaker 1>inverts the recession is going to happen tomorrow. Ok. It doesn't,

0:03:56.179 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>there is a delay, it can be one year, two years.

0:03:58.369 --> 0:04:00.729
<v Speaker 1>So we are not exactly out of the woods yet,

0:04:00.740 --> 0:04:03.929
<v Speaker 1>even though the economy looks ok now, but we wouldn't

0:04:03.940 --> 0:04:06.229
<v Speaker 1>know for the second half of the year and probably

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.130
<v Speaker 1>first of the next year, we may see a recession.

0:04:09.139 --> 0:04:11.580
<v Speaker 1>So it's still in the cuts. So it may not

0:04:11.589 --> 0:04:13.270
<v Speaker 1>signal a recession

0:04:13.363 --> 0:04:18.393
<v Speaker 1>immediately, but it may also not signal a recovery immediately. Yes. Ok.

0:04:18.433 --> 0:04:20.803
<v Speaker 1>And there can be four signal as well. It is

0:04:20.812 --> 0:04:23.893
<v Speaker 1>not 100%. But I would say that based on the

0:04:23.903 --> 0:04:26.983
<v Speaker 1>historical track record of this U curve inversion, it's definitely

0:04:26.993 --> 0:04:29.041
<v Speaker 1>more than 50% accurate. Ok. So there is still a

0:04:29.053 --> 0:04:32.653
<v Speaker 1>higher chance that recession may happen. Ok. May that's the

0:04:32.662 --> 0:04:38.291
<v Speaker 1>key operative word. So while there may not be a recession, yet,

0:04:38.446 --> 0:04:41.265
<v Speaker 1>markets have deteriorated around the world, I mean, we have

0:04:41.276 --> 0:04:44.496
<v Speaker 1>seen it, it's a bloodbath in some cases and I

0:04:44.505 --> 0:04:47.816
<v Speaker 1>guess that tends to mean cheaper stocks or is that

0:04:47.825 --> 0:04:50.604
<v Speaker 1>too simplistic a a way to look at it. There

0:04:50.615 --> 0:04:54.025
<v Speaker 1>are a lot more complication if we look into the details.

0:04:54.145 --> 0:04:58.096
<v Speaker 1>So for example, definitely 2022 was a bad year for

0:04:58.105 --> 0:05:01.335
<v Speaker 1>stocks all around the world. Even in the US, it crashed,

0:05:01.346 --> 0:05:03.045
<v Speaker 1>especially for tech,

0:05:03.528 --> 0:05:06.498
<v Speaker 1>especially for tech. Those that were sensitive to interest rates

0:05:06.509 --> 0:05:09.669
<v Speaker 1>were all getting hammered. And this year is a little

0:05:09.678 --> 0:05:12.789
<v Speaker 1>bit different because the US stocks have been doing pretty well.

0:05:12.799 --> 0:05:16.928
<v Speaker 1>Even the recent correction S and P 500 index is

0:05:16.938 --> 0:05:20.079
<v Speaker 1>still up about 16% year to date. That's impressive. Yeah,

0:05:20.109 --> 0:05:23.368
<v Speaker 1>and NASDAQ is probably up more than 20% year to date. So,

0:05:23.378 --> 0:05:26.218
<v Speaker 1>I guess a lot of people didn't expect that to happen,

0:05:26.368 --> 0:05:28.519
<v Speaker 1>but we just back off a very high interest rate.

0:05:28.611 --> 0:05:30.601
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem like in the near future, the Federal

0:05:30.611 --> 0:05:32.992
<v Speaker 1>Reserve is going to cut interest rate any time soon, right?

0:05:33.002 --> 0:05:37.302
<v Speaker 1>So it is surprising that the market has went up. Ok.

0:05:37.312 --> 0:05:39.902
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is what most people find it

0:05:39.911 --> 0:05:43.661
<v Speaker 1>difficult to understand. OK. If let's say, yeah, exactly. Right.

0:05:43.671 --> 0:05:46.261
<v Speaker 1>So if the economic condition doesn't look that good, why

0:05:46.272 --> 0:05:49.381
<v Speaker 1>is the stock market going up? So historically, again, there

0:05:49.391 --> 0:05:53.011
<v Speaker 1>isn't much correlation between the stock market and the economy, right?

0:05:53.022 --> 0:05:53.561
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like

0:05:53.695 --> 0:05:58.454
<v Speaker 1>a bit weird, right? But the correlation is almost zero really? OK.

0:05:58.464 --> 0:06:01.363
<v Speaker 1>Explain this to me. And the reason is because the

0:06:01.375 --> 0:06:05.475
<v Speaker 1>stock market is usually a forward looking system kind of

0:06:05.484 --> 0:06:09.505
<v Speaker 1>like a future. Yeah, you will price in future expectation earlier. OK.

0:06:09.515 --> 0:06:12.445
<v Speaker 1>So if you expect a recession is coming, so people

0:06:12.454 --> 0:06:16.635
<v Speaker 1>will sell stocks now there's this time lag, right? And

0:06:16.644 --> 0:06:18.354
<v Speaker 1>the stock market is the indicator

0:06:19.079 --> 0:06:21.190
<v Speaker 1>and if we look at the economic indicators right, it's

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.890
<v Speaker 1>usually lagging and delayed. For example, in August, we only

0:06:24.899 --> 0:06:27.299
<v Speaker 1>get the July numbers. Yes, somebody need to compile the

0:06:27.309 --> 0:06:30.010
<v Speaker 1>report and then the boss need to because we haven't

0:06:30.019 --> 0:06:33.609
<v Speaker 1>implemented A I into our compilation system. And the moment

0:06:33.619 --> 0:06:36.130
<v Speaker 1>they released it, there's already water under the rich it

0:06:36.140 --> 0:06:39.049
<v Speaker 1>past month. Ok. But the stock market has already adjusted

0:06:39.059 --> 0:06:41.570
<v Speaker 1>by then, right? So that is why there isn't a

0:06:41.579 --> 0:06:43.230
<v Speaker 1>very strong correlation. It's not that

0:06:43.295 --> 0:06:45.626
<v Speaker 1>they have totally no relation there is. It's just that

0:06:45.635 --> 0:06:48.505
<v Speaker 1>the stock market is front running all this information, got it.

0:06:48.515 --> 0:06:52.335
<v Speaker 1>So it's anticipatory rather than reactive, you're saying? So we

0:06:52.346 --> 0:06:54.515
<v Speaker 1>are still on the edge of our seat, we're still

0:06:54.526 --> 0:06:57.645
<v Speaker 1>biting our nails waiting for the shoe to drop. Ok?

0:06:57.656 --> 0:07:00.996
<v Speaker 1>Would you say then that this is a favorable time

0:07:01.005 --> 0:07:04.936
<v Speaker 1>to buy stocks considering they are I guess cheaper or

0:07:04.946 --> 0:07:07.445
<v Speaker 1>lower priced at this time, there are definitely pockets of opportunities.

0:07:07.851 --> 0:07:10.462
<v Speaker 1>Like for example, this year, we talk about the rally

0:07:10.471 --> 0:07:13.131
<v Speaker 1>in us stocks. It is mainly driven by the A

0:07:13.141 --> 0:07:15.402
<v Speaker 1>I side of things, right? Which means that there can

0:07:15.411 --> 0:07:18.432
<v Speaker 1>be quite a lot of other sectors that are overlooked

0:07:18.441 --> 0:07:21.411
<v Speaker 1>and have yet to recover. There can be some opportunities

0:07:21.421 --> 0:07:24.712
<v Speaker 1>over there. And of course, investors also have to look

0:07:24.721 --> 0:07:28.282
<v Speaker 1>at what is their investment horizon. I would always advocate

0:07:28.291 --> 0:07:30.441
<v Speaker 1>that if you have a long term horizon, right? It

0:07:30.451 --> 0:07:31.661
<v Speaker 1>actually makes sense that every

0:07:31.727 --> 0:07:33.528
<v Speaker 1>time you have some capital to invest, you should just

0:07:33.537 --> 0:07:35.877
<v Speaker 1>go ahead instead of really timing the market because you

0:07:35.888 --> 0:07:37.847
<v Speaker 1>really would know if it's low, you buy more, right?

0:07:37.858 --> 0:07:40.648
<v Speaker 1>If it's high, you buy less, but it's that consistency

0:07:40.657 --> 0:07:43.238
<v Speaker 1>that really build out the wealth. So in a downturn,

0:07:43.247 --> 0:07:47.608
<v Speaker 1>we tend to turn to safe haven assets. So your gold, silver,

0:07:47.618 --> 0:07:52.138
<v Speaker 1>your precious metals, even property, sometimes its currency as well.

0:07:52.178 --> 0:07:55.738
<v Speaker 1>Are these worth the buy in at this time?

0:07:55.944 --> 0:07:58.003
<v Speaker 1>And what kind of returns are we looking at when

0:07:58.014 --> 0:08:02.704
<v Speaker 1>the market does recover? Generally? I don't think alternative investments

0:08:02.713 --> 0:08:06.514
<v Speaker 1>are better than say stocks for the long run. And

0:08:06.523 --> 0:08:10.783
<v Speaker 1>some of the names that you mentioned have specific characteristics.

0:08:10.963 --> 0:08:13.843
<v Speaker 1>For example, if you want to buy gold, you are

0:08:13.854 --> 0:08:16.704
<v Speaker 1>actually betting against a weakening US dollar. You are indirectly

0:08:16.713 --> 0:08:19.563
<v Speaker 1>shorting the dollar, right? Because the goal is priced in

0:08:19.574 --> 0:08:20.093
<v Speaker 1>dollar

0:08:20.420 --> 0:08:23.809
<v Speaker 1>and gold price tends to go up if the US

0:08:23.820 --> 0:08:26.769
<v Speaker 1>dollar weakens and vice versa. Right? So should I wait

0:08:26.779 --> 0:08:28.970
<v Speaker 1>for the US dollar to strengthen, then I go and

0:08:28.980 --> 0:08:30.820
<v Speaker 1>buy my gold. It's almost like you are betting on

0:08:30.829 --> 0:08:33.728
<v Speaker 1>a forex, you are betting on us dollar strength and

0:08:33.739 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar strength in turn is related to whether

0:08:36.289 --> 0:08:39.059
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve is hiking rates or cutting rates. So

0:08:39.070 --> 0:08:41.469
<v Speaker 1>you can see it's a whole big macro mess that

0:08:41.479 --> 0:08:44.189
<v Speaker 1>you need to figure out a domino thing. Exactly. So

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:49.010
<v Speaker 1>go itself doesn't have value unless people believe there is value.

0:08:49.250 --> 0:08:52.630
<v Speaker 1>And historically, it has been seen as a store of value, right?

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.770
<v Speaker 1>Because it's seen as money. I mean, it's the thing

0:08:54.780 --> 0:08:57.349
<v Speaker 1>that my mom goes to LA until US d came

0:08:57.359 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>about and the link from go and become a fiat currency.

0:09:01.010 --> 0:09:03.020
<v Speaker 1>But yet, because gold is still price in us dollar,

0:09:03.030 --> 0:09:05.619
<v Speaker 1>that relationship is still there. Right? So that's where the

0:09:05.630 --> 0:09:09.039
<v Speaker 1>value in buying gold so called lies is in the

0:09:09.049 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>UD valuation. Yes, exactly. So, the addition to buy gold

0:09:12.450 --> 0:09:14.309
<v Speaker 1>or not is really relies on the Mac

0:09:14.530 --> 0:09:17.122
<v Speaker 1>analysis, which I think is not easy to get, right?

0:09:17.252 --> 0:09:20.780
<v Speaker 1>Even economists don't get it right. I don't, I don't think,

0:09:21.322 --> 0:09:23.742
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if someone got it right, we will be

0:09:23.752 --> 0:09:26.790
<v Speaker 1>set for our lives. Right. Yeah. So I would say

0:09:26.802 --> 0:09:30.142
<v Speaker 1>that conventionally, I will still believe that stocks are one

0:09:30.151 --> 0:09:33.801
<v Speaker 1>of the best longer investments out there, ok? Because even historically,

0:09:33.971 --> 0:09:37.481
<v Speaker 1>the returns have been better than if you just buy gold. Ok.

0:09:37.492 --> 0:09:39.382
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into the nitty gritty of that.

0:09:39.614 --> 0:09:42.522
<v Speaker 1>Let's first try and define what it means to be

0:09:42.533 --> 0:09:45.943
<v Speaker 1>recession proof. Is there such a thing? Should we call

0:09:45.953 --> 0:09:52.593
<v Speaker 1>it recession safe? Instead? I think a better word is defensive, recession, defensive,

0:09:52.604 --> 0:09:55.554
<v Speaker 1>defensive stocks rather than like recession proof. So don't think

0:09:55.564 --> 0:09:58.674
<v Speaker 1>of it. Don't frame it as under the recession conversation. Yeah.

0:09:58.684 --> 0:10:01.323
<v Speaker 1>And defensive doesn't mean that you cannot let the opener,

0:10:01.403 --> 0:10:02.843
<v Speaker 1>Gore go, you still can. But at the end of day,

0:10:02.854 --> 0:10:03.983
<v Speaker 1>you want to win the match, right?

0:10:04.796 --> 0:10:07.806
<v Speaker 1>You win 21 is still nice analogy there. Nice analogy.

0:10:07.815 --> 0:10:10.665
<v Speaker 1>You have to take some hits, but it doesn't mean

0:10:10.676 --> 0:10:12.616
<v Speaker 1>you don't win the game, the long game. Yeah. So,

0:10:12.625 --> 0:10:15.195
<v Speaker 1>for example, in the context of stocks, right, which means

0:10:15.205 --> 0:10:17.995
<v Speaker 1>that if you buy defensive stocks and if the market

0:10:18.005 --> 0:10:21.346
<v Speaker 1>crash happens, it doesn't mean that your stocks won't go down. Right.

0:10:21.356 --> 0:10:23.425
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that you can go down, but if your

0:10:23.434 --> 0:10:26.866
<v Speaker 1>stocks go down less, maybe down 5% other people's stocks

0:10:26.875 --> 0:10:29.726
<v Speaker 1>were down 30% you relatively feel good. Right. Yeah,

0:10:30.869 --> 0:10:33.949
<v Speaker 1>I lost, I lost. Yeah. No, it's true though. It

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:35.940
<v Speaker 1>is true. It is true. So, I would say that

0:10:35.950 --> 0:10:39.179
<v Speaker 1>having that defensive maybe is a better word than recession proof. Ok.

0:10:39.190 --> 0:10:43.030
<v Speaker 1>So we will go with that term defensive stocks instead.

0:10:43.039 --> 0:10:46.859
<v Speaker 1>So what are the characteristics then of stocks and investments

0:10:46.940 --> 0:10:51.599
<v Speaker 1>that are defensive? Intuitively? People will always think of defensive

0:10:51.609 --> 0:10:55.189
<v Speaker 1>as sectors or businesses where people will still demand their

0:10:55.322 --> 0:11:00.420
<v Speaker 1>products and services, good sort of thing. Groceries, you will

0:11:00.432 --> 0:11:03.052
<v Speaker 1>still go to supermarket. In fact, you go more because

0:11:03.062 --> 0:11:05.580
<v Speaker 1>restaurant will be too expensive. So you go and buy

0:11:05.591 --> 0:11:08.322
<v Speaker 1>food to cook at home. That's true. So supermarket business

0:11:08.331 --> 0:11:10.622
<v Speaker 1>might even go up rather than go down. So with

0:11:10.631 --> 0:11:16.171
<v Speaker 1>something like your electricity companies, utilities, basically anything that people

0:11:16.182 --> 0:11:18.981
<v Speaker 1>would still use the product services during a recession. And

0:11:18.992 --> 0:11:20.072
<v Speaker 1>what else outside of

0:11:20.153 --> 0:11:23.083
<v Speaker 1>that segment can we look at in terms of health care?

0:11:23.093 --> 0:11:24.633
<v Speaker 1>I would think so. Right. Because if you are you, are,

0:11:24.823 --> 0:11:26.754
<v Speaker 1>you have to see a doctor, I think, especially in

0:11:26.763 --> 0:11:31.193
<v Speaker 1>Singapore where we are driving towards healthier aging, that sort

0:11:31.203 --> 0:11:33.763
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. So, there's longevity in that. Right. Or even

0:11:33.773 --> 0:11:38.004
<v Speaker 1>aging homes. Right. Because you can't stop aging because it's recession. Right. So,

0:11:38.013 --> 0:11:42.403
<v Speaker 1>so there are businesses like this that are pretty immune,

0:11:42.414 --> 0:11:44.624
<v Speaker 1>ok to the economic ups and downs, right.

0:11:44.986 --> 0:11:47.366
<v Speaker 1>The need. It's a need and not a want. What

0:11:47.375 --> 0:11:50.145
<v Speaker 1>about things like reeds? I know streets tend to be

0:11:50.155 --> 0:11:53.515
<v Speaker 1>quite popular in Singapore. Weeds can be a little bit

0:11:53.526 --> 0:11:55.745
<v Speaker 1>more cyclical. Of course, it depends on the type of

0:11:55.755 --> 0:11:58.955
<v Speaker 1>properties that they have. But if we generally look at it,

0:11:58.966 --> 0:12:03.426
<v Speaker 1>like for example, your industrial definitely is cyclical in good times,

0:12:03.434 --> 0:12:06.835
<v Speaker 1>you have more people renting spaces because they have more business,

0:12:06.846 --> 0:12:08.995
<v Speaker 1>they have more staff moving around, they have more stuff

0:12:09.005 --> 0:12:11.835
<v Speaker 1>to be produced, same as office. Right. Because if the

0:12:11.846 --> 0:12:14.356
<v Speaker 1>times are good people expand and they need more office

0:12:14.366 --> 0:12:14.776
<v Speaker 1>space

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.848
<v Speaker 1>and well, office spaces haven't looked good in a while. Yeah, exactly. Right.

0:12:18.859 --> 0:12:21.218
<v Speaker 1>So they tend to be more cyclical and sensitive to

0:12:21.229 --> 0:12:24.039
<v Speaker 1>interest rate. So that's another side of the story. But

0:12:24.049 --> 0:12:26.809
<v Speaker 1>there are health care rates. They are definitely a lot

0:12:26.820 --> 0:12:30.250
<v Speaker 1>more resilient. Ok. And what about stuff like aviation? Is

0:12:30.260 --> 0:12:32.869
<v Speaker 1>that something that we can look at as well? Hospitality,

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.729
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point in time, the tourism team

0:12:35.739 --> 0:12:38.169
<v Speaker 1>is coming back and we have yet to recover. To

0:12:38.179 --> 0:12:40.909
<v Speaker 1>pre-covid numbers for tourism, which means there can be

0:12:40.974 --> 0:12:44.044
<v Speaker 1>be some room for growth, but they are definitely not defensive.

0:12:44.094 --> 0:12:48.075
<v Speaker 1>If recession comes, we tighten your belt or another pandemic. Yeah,

0:12:48.085 --> 0:12:50.924
<v Speaker 1>you will not think of travel, you buy your food,

0:12:50.934 --> 0:12:54.174
<v Speaker 1>but you may postpone your travel. Yeah. And also considering

0:12:54.184 --> 0:12:57.474
<v Speaker 1>how we are living in such inflationary times, people are

0:12:57.484 --> 0:12:59.854
<v Speaker 1>a bit more, I guess, thrifty when it comes to

0:12:59.864 --> 0:13:02.973
<v Speaker 1>their money for luxuries like traveling. Right? So they are

0:13:02.984 --> 0:13:05.854
<v Speaker 1>definitely not defensive. But if the economy continue to be

0:13:05.864 --> 0:13:08.525
<v Speaker 1>good and picked up that, I believe tourism will do well.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.939
<v Speaker 2>Hello everyone. My name is Steven Cheer and I'm host

0:13:14.950 --> 0:13:18.869
<v Speaker 2>of CNAs Weekly news podcast, Heart of the Matter each week.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.770
<v Speaker 2>My job is to ask the questions you have. Like,

0:13:21.780 --> 0:13:25.609
<v Speaker 2>why is the coe so high? Why aren't singles dating

0:13:25.770 --> 0:13:27.890
<v Speaker 2>or what's going on with the red

0:13:27.979 --> 0:13:30.950
<v Speaker 2>hot property market in Singapore? If you want the views

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.849
<v Speaker 2>behind the news, then tune in each week as we

0:13:33.859 --> 0:13:36.109
<v Speaker 2>get to the heart of the matter, we are on

0:13:36.119 --> 0:13:38.700
<v Speaker 2>the CN A and me listen apps and wherever you

0:13:38.710 --> 0:13:42.130
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts hit, follow or subscribe. So you don't

0:13:42.140 --> 0:13:43.969
<v Speaker 2>miss an episode when it drops.

0:13:48.359 --> 0:13:51.479
<v Speaker 1>So apart from just buying lower price stocks, which seems

0:13:51.489 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the theme that we're going for. Now, there

0:13:53.770 --> 0:13:58.409
<v Speaker 1>are some segments that can weather a recession better than others, right?

0:13:58.419 --> 0:14:00.869
<v Speaker 1>So what would some of these be in your view?

0:14:00.890 --> 0:14:02.619
<v Speaker 1>I think the other way to look at it is

0:14:02.630 --> 0:14:06.340
<v Speaker 1>not to just look at sectors or businesses in terms

0:14:06.349 --> 0:14:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of what we have discussed so far. But to look

0:14:08.929 --> 0:14:11.130
<v Speaker 1>at certain characteristics of the

0:14:11.247 --> 0:14:14.986
<v Speaker 1>businesses, for example, we can evaluate whether a business is

0:14:14.997 --> 0:14:17.836
<v Speaker 1>defensive by looking at how you perform in the past.

0:14:17.846 --> 0:14:20.166
<v Speaker 1>Because if there is a recession coming, it's not going

0:14:20.177 --> 0:14:22.216
<v Speaker 1>to be the 1st 10, yeah, there are many, many

0:14:22.226 --> 0:14:26.187
<v Speaker 1>recession before. So we can definitely look at certain stocks

0:14:26.197 --> 0:14:29.017
<v Speaker 1>by looking at their past performance during the last recession,

0:14:29.026 --> 0:14:32.906
<v Speaker 1>maybe fundamental matter here. Did they cut dividends? Did they

0:14:32.916 --> 0:14:33.956
<v Speaker 1>cut revenue, did they?

0:14:34.133 --> 0:14:37.604
<v Speaker 1>But profits did decline. And if the share price go down,

0:14:37.614 --> 0:14:39.864
<v Speaker 1>how much do you go down relative to other stocks?

0:14:39.874 --> 0:14:41.994
<v Speaker 1>So then we know that there is some proof whether

0:14:42.004 --> 0:14:44.934
<v Speaker 1>this stock is indeed defensive or not. Right. And basically

0:14:44.943 --> 0:14:47.903
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the power of the rebound of that stock.

0:14:48.004 --> 0:14:51.013
<v Speaker 1>So that would give us some sensing how it would

0:14:51.023 --> 0:14:53.833
<v Speaker 1>perform into the recession come. Ok. So if these stocks

0:14:53.843 --> 0:14:56.424
<v Speaker 1>tend to be more resilient against recessions

0:14:57.020 --> 0:14:59.591
<v Speaker 1>would be their vulnerabilities. And surely there are some weak

0:14:59.601 --> 0:15:02.041
<v Speaker 1>points because they can't all be rosy all the time. Right.

0:15:02.051 --> 0:15:03.781
<v Speaker 1>The bad thing about defensive store is that ok? They

0:15:03.791 --> 0:15:07.741
<v Speaker 1>do relatively better during a recession during bad times, but

0:15:07.750 --> 0:15:10.721
<v Speaker 1>during good times, they underperform, OK? Because they tend to

0:15:10.731 --> 0:15:13.591
<v Speaker 1>be very stable, steady. Right. Right. So they just stagnate. Yeah.

0:15:13.601 --> 0:15:15.911
<v Speaker 1>So they don't grow, they don't enjoy the boom when

0:15:15.921 --> 0:15:18.101
<v Speaker 1>it comes. So when the boom comes, that's where the

0:15:18.111 --> 0:15:19.851
<v Speaker 1>risky stocks will outperform.

0:15:20.150 --> 0:15:22.450
<v Speaker 1>And for some investors who will hold on to the

0:15:22.460 --> 0:15:25.679
<v Speaker 1>defensive stocks and they will be feeling like, oh, my friend,

0:15:25.690 --> 0:15:27.789
<v Speaker 1>my neighbor is making more money than me. I cannot

0:15:27.799 --> 0:15:29.650
<v Speaker 1>take it anymore. I need to sell my defensive and

0:15:29.659 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>get into those exciting stocks. But that's where the problem

0:15:33.010 --> 0:15:37.330
<v Speaker 1>happens because when you feel that assignment lightly, it might

0:15:37.340 --> 0:15:39.599
<v Speaker 1>be near the end because everybody has made their money.

0:15:39.609 --> 0:15:41.469
<v Speaker 1>Exactly who is going to buy from by the time

0:15:41.479 --> 0:15:43.809
<v Speaker 1>you realize? Oh, you know, I could have been making

0:15:43.820 --> 0:15:45.780
<v Speaker 1>more money out of this. Your time in that

0:15:45.854 --> 0:15:48.864
<v Speaker 1>the market is too late. Yeah. So my guess about

0:15:48.875 --> 0:15:51.484
<v Speaker 1>this problem with defensive stock is that they don't prosper

0:15:51.494 --> 0:15:54.684
<v Speaker 1>during good times and people might lose patience on them. Ok.

0:15:54.695 --> 0:15:58.224
<v Speaker 1>Are there other weak points like every other business, even

0:15:58.234 --> 0:16:01.854
<v Speaker 1>defensive stock? Sometimes their business can deteriorate. Their fundamentals can

0:16:01.864 --> 0:16:04.984
<v Speaker 1>go poorer over time. Which means that if an investor

0:16:04.994 --> 0:16:08.265
<v Speaker 1>picks some of these businesses or stocks, the constant monitoring

0:16:08.275 --> 0:16:10.294
<v Speaker 1>is required right time to time may not be a

0:16:10.304 --> 0:16:11.484
<v Speaker 1>daily monitoring, but

0:16:11.719 --> 0:16:14.159
<v Speaker 1>every year maybe, you know, like a spring cleaning, you

0:16:14.169 --> 0:16:16.729
<v Speaker 1>need to look at your stocks. My observation over the years,

0:16:16.739 --> 0:16:20.020
<v Speaker 1>looking at investors, they have a tendency to buy but

0:16:20.030 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a tendency to sell. Yeah, they hang

0:16:22.770 --> 0:16:25.179
<v Speaker 1>on to it, like, out of some strange loyalty. And

0:16:25.190 --> 0:16:27.619
<v Speaker 1>I've always been intrigued by that psychology. Do you have

0:16:27.630 --> 0:16:30.460
<v Speaker 1>any observations on that one is definitely loss of version. Right.

0:16:30.469 --> 0:16:32.929
<v Speaker 1>Because it's painful to sell at a loss. It's easy

0:16:32.940 --> 0:16:35.729
<v Speaker 1>to sell something that has gained, like, 10% sell. Well,

0:16:35.739 --> 0:16:36.789
<v Speaker 1>I feel so good. Right.

0:16:37.913 --> 0:16:39.932
<v Speaker 1>10% loss. Oh. But if I sell, it means I

0:16:39.942 --> 0:16:41.843
<v Speaker 1>lose money. If I don't say I still have hope

0:16:41.853 --> 0:16:44.882
<v Speaker 1>that it might come back up this kind of mentality.

0:16:45.453 --> 0:16:47.982
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that kind of mentality is healthy? It

0:16:47.992 --> 0:16:52.632
<v Speaker 1>definitely is not that good for investor because the fact

0:16:52.643 --> 0:16:56.213
<v Speaker 1>is that no one can pick stocks 100% correct all

0:16:56.223 --> 0:16:58.572
<v Speaker 1>the time. Yeah, just like how economies don't always get

0:16:58.583 --> 0:17:02.052
<v Speaker 1>the forecast, right? Even Warren Buffett, but he is honest

0:17:02.062 --> 0:17:04.022
<v Speaker 1>about it and he's able to sell.

0:17:04.104 --> 0:17:06.805
<v Speaker 1>So even at a big loss, right, millions of dollars,

0:17:06.814 --> 0:17:08.494
<v Speaker 1>he will take that loss and he will move on.

0:17:08.594 --> 0:17:12.034
<v Speaker 1>So that is a necessary part of spring cleaning, right?

0:17:12.045 --> 0:17:14.795
<v Speaker 1>You need to keep your portfolio clean if I can

0:17:14.805 --> 0:17:17.685
<v Speaker 1>use that energy, right? A portfolio is like a garden.

0:17:17.915 --> 0:17:20.275
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you want to have as many flowers as possible, right?

0:17:20.285 --> 0:17:23.494
<v Speaker 1>That resemble your gains, right? But we cannot guarantee a

0:17:23.505 --> 0:17:26.635
<v Speaker 1>garden will always have flowers, there will always be weeds

0:17:26.834 --> 0:17:28.305
<v Speaker 1>and what do we do with them? We got to

0:17:28.314 --> 0:17:30.194
<v Speaker 1>get rid of them, we get rid of them, right?

0:17:30.479 --> 0:17:32.649
<v Speaker 1>So these weeds represent those stocks that should not be

0:17:32.660 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in the portfolio. But people don't, they keep it and

0:17:35.689 --> 0:17:37.489
<v Speaker 1>they hope that the weeds can turn into flower one day.

0:17:38.060 --> 0:17:40.510
<v Speaker 1>It's like hoarding for the wrong reason. So if we

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.770
<v Speaker 1>use that analogy, the, it just doesn't make sense. Yeah,

0:17:43.780 --> 0:17:46.169
<v Speaker 1>you are right. So you did mention the kinds of

0:17:46.180 --> 0:17:48.390
<v Speaker 1>homework we need to do before we buy into a

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.420
<v Speaker 1>company stock. So company fundamentals, historical performance. What about fund

0:17:52.430 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>baskets that comprise the so called safer, more defensive stocks

0:17:56.930 --> 0:18:00.079
<v Speaker 1>are these fund baskets an option if I don't want

0:18:00.089 --> 0:18:02.139
<v Speaker 1>to buy individual stocks and if yes,

0:18:02.233 --> 0:18:04.113
<v Speaker 1>what are the pros and cons to them? I would

0:18:04.123 --> 0:18:07.402
<v Speaker 1>definitely suggest that majority of people should buy into funds

0:18:07.412 --> 0:18:10.233
<v Speaker 1>or ETF S right? Rather than picking individual one as

0:18:10.243 --> 0:18:13.593
<v Speaker 1>we have discussed is a challenging task. You need to

0:18:13.603 --> 0:18:15.883
<v Speaker 1>pay attention and you need to know your stuff otherwise

0:18:15.892 --> 0:18:17.902
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be difficult. So what do we need

0:18:17.912 --> 0:18:22.782
<v Speaker 1>to understand overall when it comes to buying defensive stocks

0:18:22.792 --> 0:18:26.463
<v Speaker 1>in terms of returns, timing, time in the market

0:18:26.635 --> 0:18:29.365
<v Speaker 1>would think that a lot of defensive stocks appeals to

0:18:29.375 --> 0:18:32.066
<v Speaker 1>a group of investors that tend to be more conservative.

0:18:32.145 --> 0:18:35.036
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that people who are listening to this

0:18:35.046 --> 0:18:39.426
<v Speaker 1>podcast have already self selected themselves and they look at

0:18:39.436 --> 0:18:42.015
<v Speaker 1>the word defensive. They come in because they are more service,

0:18:42.166 --> 0:18:47.296
<v Speaker 1>those who are aggressive investor, they look at this. This

0:18:47.465 --> 0:18:50.764
<v Speaker 1>episode comes up. Defensive is boring.

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:53.379
<v Speaker 1>I need to get rich quick.

0:18:53.949 --> 0:18:56.500
<v Speaker 1>This is too slow for me. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And

0:18:56.510 --> 0:18:59.139
<v Speaker 1>this defensive stores also have the connotation that it is

0:18:59.150 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a boomer kind of. Yes. So I will also assume

0:19:02.170 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>that the audience who are tuning in tend to be

0:19:04.130 --> 0:19:08.270
<v Speaker 1>older and more reasonable. Actually, sometimes women too, apparently the

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.839
<v Speaker 1>psychology of women when they invest is that they are

0:19:10.849 --> 0:19:12.319
<v Speaker 1>in it for the long term. They just want to

0:19:12.329 --> 0:19:14.109
<v Speaker 1>do this and not think about it for the rest

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.589
<v Speaker 1>of their lives until it's time to catch out. Record

0:19:16.599 --> 0:19:19.339
<v Speaker 1>shows that female investors are actually better than male. There

0:19:19.349 --> 0:19:22.079
<v Speaker 1>we go. Yeah, because the male takes too much risk

0:19:22.089 --> 0:19:23.208
<v Speaker 1>so they lose more.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.709
<v Speaker 1>So what mistakes do you think we should avoid when

0:19:27.719 --> 0:19:31.810
<v Speaker 1>buying into the defensive stocks in the market? One of

0:19:31.819 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the key things that potentially may harm a defensive investor

0:19:35.449 --> 0:19:38.319
<v Speaker 1>is that they think that defensive stocks are safe. But

0:19:38.329 --> 0:19:40.079
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, there are no such thing as a

0:19:40.089 --> 0:19:43.859
<v Speaker 1>safe stocks, even defensive stocks have their risk. And the

0:19:43.869 --> 0:19:45.579
<v Speaker 1>worst is that you think that you buy it, you

0:19:45.589 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>will not lose money and the share price come down

0:19:47.650 --> 0:19:49.790
<v Speaker 1>and you panic and then you don't know what to do,

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.909
<v Speaker 1>which means it's a problem with the expectation and reality

0:19:53.140 --> 0:19:55.069
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that people should go away with

0:19:55.079 --> 0:19:58.209
<v Speaker 1>the idea that defensive stores are safe, guarantee. They are

0:19:58.219 --> 0:20:02.198
<v Speaker 1>definitely not as safe as your CPF. They are definitely

0:20:02.209 --> 0:20:05.389
<v Speaker 1>not as safe as your investment grade bonds. They can

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:07.389
<v Speaker 1>return you the money at the end of the maturity

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.409
<v Speaker 1>by your principal guarantee or fixed D or this.

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.569
<v Speaker 1>So it definitely will have a risk that is higher

0:20:12.579 --> 0:20:14.989
<v Speaker 1>than what most people are used to putting their money

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in the banks and treasury bills and such. So they

0:20:18.010 --> 0:20:21.599
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to understand that volatility can happen.

0:20:21.609 --> 0:20:23.209
<v Speaker 1>Which means that if you buy a defensive stock, you

0:20:23.219 --> 0:20:25.500
<v Speaker 1>can still go down 10% because the defensive stock is

0:20:25.510 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>still a stock is still a stock. So it's still

0:20:27.530 --> 0:20:30.530
<v Speaker 1>affected by the general market sentiment. The stock market may

0:20:30.540 --> 0:20:33.290
<v Speaker 1>go down 50% for example, maybe a defensive stock can

0:20:33.300 --> 0:20:35.270
<v Speaker 1>still go down 20% and you must

0:20:35.354 --> 0:20:38.055
<v Speaker 1>you ready for it. Let's talk about an exit strategy.

0:20:38.064 --> 0:20:41.925
<v Speaker 1>So we've bought some defensive stocks. We have diversified our portfolio.

0:20:41.935 --> 0:20:45.564
<v Speaker 1>We're looking good. What should help us decide when to

0:20:45.574 --> 0:20:49.234
<v Speaker 1>exit the market? Is this when the economy improves if

0:20:49.244 --> 0:20:51.925
<v Speaker 1>there are conservative investors out there who pick up these

0:20:51.935 --> 0:20:54.635
<v Speaker 1>defensive stocks, right? And we believe that it makes more

0:20:54.645 --> 0:20:57.104
<v Speaker 1>sense for them to just stay a long haul and

0:20:57.114 --> 0:20:59.665
<v Speaker 1>don't get tempted with during good market times where the

0:20:59.675 --> 0:21:00.984
<v Speaker 1>exciting stocks are running a lot

0:21:01.270 --> 0:21:03.310
<v Speaker 1>because if at that point in time you switch is

0:21:03.319 --> 0:21:06.839
<v Speaker 1>going to make matter worse. So having that stability in

0:21:06.849 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio, that consistency maybe hold for 5, 10 years

0:21:10.219 --> 0:21:14.020
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is a better way for conservative investors.

0:21:14.030 --> 0:21:16.550
<v Speaker 1>I think the affordability of taking the hit is the

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.430
<v Speaker 1>most important thing here. Right? Sometimes you don't know until

0:21:19.439 --> 0:21:22.149
<v Speaker 1>you experience, maybe some people believe that oh I can

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.339
<v Speaker 1>take a 10% hit

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.089
<v Speaker 1>but then when the 10% draw down happens, then they panic, right?

0:21:27.099 --> 0:21:29.369
<v Speaker 1>Some people think that they can take 20% but they can't.

0:21:29.380 --> 0:21:33.129
<v Speaker 1>And for aggressive investors who are thinking of what professional

0:21:33.140 --> 0:21:36.180
<v Speaker 1>cost sector rotation, that means you switch to defensive during

0:21:36.189 --> 0:21:39.329
<v Speaker 1>a recession and you switch to growth during the growth phase.

0:21:39.739 --> 0:21:40.550
<v Speaker 1>And for

0:21:40.714 --> 0:21:43.265
<v Speaker 1>that, you need to get the timing right, very accurately

0:21:43.275 --> 0:21:45.814
<v Speaker 1>and not a lot of people can do it correctly.

0:21:45.824 --> 0:21:49.435
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that there is definitely risk, ok?

0:21:49.444 --> 0:21:52.974
<v Speaker 1>But it's not impossible. It's just very challenging. Yeah, it

0:21:52.984 --> 0:21:54.545
<v Speaker 1>is challenging and I think you need to do a

0:21:54.555 --> 0:21:56.714
<v Speaker 1>lot of research and really know what you're doing. And

0:21:56.724 --> 0:22:00.464
<v Speaker 1>if you don't, the safe path may be the boring path,

0:22:00.474 --> 0:22:02.564
<v Speaker 1>but it's not always a bad thing.

0:22:03.140 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So a recession isn't always doom and gloom. Yes, it's

0:22:07.170 --> 0:22:09.449
<v Speaker 1>a big R word, but it doesn't have to be

0:22:09.459 --> 0:22:12.949
<v Speaker 1>a scary word that said if you harbor fears of

0:22:12.959 --> 0:22:16.899
<v Speaker 1>your holdings as a recession looms completely warranted, we totally

0:22:16.910 --> 0:22:19.670
<v Speaker 1>get it. It's fine to be scared. But there are

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.270
<v Speaker 1>some bright spots that you can consider if you find

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.589
<v Speaker 1>the courage to let some light in. Thanks Elvin for

0:22:25.599 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>coming into money talks and making us a little less

0:22:28.109 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>afraid of an impending recession. Thank you and thank you

0:22:31.569 --> 0:22:34.188
<v Speaker 1>to you, dear listener. Did you enjoy this episode of

0:22:34.199 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Money Talks? Well, there's more content for you to enjoy

0:22:37.130 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and tune into. Just follow us on Apple podcast or Spotify.

0:22:40.650 --> 0:22:43.270
<v Speaker 1>Give us five stars or leave a review. The team

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.170
<v Speaker 1>behind Money Talks is Jacqueline Chan, Joanne Chan Tiffany Ang,

0:22:47.180 --> 0:22:51.739
<v Speaker 1>Christina Robert, Jesselyn Tan and Wind and I'm Andrea Heng.

0:22:51.750 --> 0:22:52.910
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.