WEBVTT - Spot the red flags in job listings

0:00:03.150 --> 0:00:05.340
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a CNA podcast.

0:00:11.478 --> 0:00:15.710
<v Speaker 1>Hi there. It's the Work It podcast with Tiffany and Gerald. Now, recently,

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I was trolling through Reddit and I was having a

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>good laugh, reading about some insane job postings. OK, so

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.870
<v Speaker 1>for example, there was one looking for a virtual assistant

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.799
<v Speaker 1>but only pays $1000 a month and the caveat is

0:00:29.799 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>that you're not allowed to have a side job, which

0:00:32.598 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>distracts you from giving this role your 100%. And then

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>there's the issue of fake job list.

0:00:38.959 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard about that, Gerald? Fake job listings. I'm

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.790
<v Speaker 1>not talking about a scam kind, right? Yeah, yeah. So

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.990
<v Speaker 1>what I was them as maybe insincere job postings. They're posted,

0:00:49.119 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they're listed on job portals by the employers are not

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.439
<v Speaker 1>really genuine about hiring. So sometimes they could be like

0:00:54.439 --> 0:00:57.909
<v Speaker 1>ictitious jobs posted by recruiters just to build a candidate pool,

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes they're doing market research on salaries. They could be,

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies checking out the market for talent before

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they decide to relocate here.

0:01:05.569 --> 0:01:07.889
<v Speaker 1>Of, of course, we also know that some companies, they

0:01:07.889 --> 0:01:11.139
<v Speaker 1>just post the job ads for the sake of posting. Yeah,

0:01:11.370 --> 0:01:14.239
<v Speaker 1>because they already pre-identified somebody already and they're letting the

0:01:14.410 --> 0:01:16.290
<v Speaker 1>posting go up there. So in fact, I think a

0:01:16.290 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>survey by resume builder, there's a career site, they said

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.769
<v Speaker 1>as many as 4 in 10 companies said that.

0:01:22.029 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a fake job listing. This is something that I'm sure

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.209
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our listeners out there would be very

0:01:26.209 --> 0:01:29.149
<v Speaker 1>keen to know how do we differentiate between a job

0:01:29.150 --> 0:01:32.190
<v Speaker 1>posting that is sincere and one that is just there

0:01:32.190 --> 0:01:35.349
<v Speaker 1>to collect resumes or collect information. So what are some

0:01:35.349 --> 0:01:37.069
<v Speaker 1>red flags that we can look up for when we

0:01:37.069 --> 0:01:38.129
<v Speaker 1>read job descriptions.

0:01:38.699 --> 0:01:40.488
<v Speaker 1>So we are very happy to have in the studio

0:01:40.489 --> 0:01:43.809
<v Speaker 1>with us Han Lee, he is director of executive search

0:01:43.809 --> 0:01:47.569
<v Speaker 1>from Lio Resources, and he's here to give us some tips. Welcome. Hi,

0:01:47.690 --> 0:01:48.519
<v Speaker 2>good morning, everyone.

0:01:48.730 --> 0:01:51.519
<v Speaker 1>So Han, I want to ask you, have you encountered

0:01:51.519 --> 0:01:54.489
<v Speaker 1>any of these kind of absurd job listings before in

0:01:54.489 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>your line of work?

0:01:55.610 --> 0:01:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Of course, I've seen it many times actually. I mean,

0:01:58.010 --> 0:02:00.529
<v Speaker 2>our job of online is really read the job description

0:02:00.529 --> 0:02:02.769
<v Speaker 2>from a clients or so and sometimes you have to

0:02:04.089 --> 0:02:06.339
<v Speaker 2>Really stop yourself from having a laugh, you know, like

0:02:06.339 --> 0:02:08.779
<v Speaker 2>I wrote about the poster a few weeks ago, talk about.

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>When I see the job description, I was asking myself, right,

0:02:12.059 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 2>is this for real? How am I going to find

0:02:14.119 --> 0:02:16.199
<v Speaker 2>someone for these clients when you look at the job

0:02:16.199 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>description like that. So it's not so much of a scammer.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.050
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of time it's a wish list

0:02:21.050 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>they want to have for this perfect candidate and I

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.199
<v Speaker 2>think underneath they also know that it's probably not going

0:02:27.199 --> 0:02:30.559
<v Speaker 2>to happen, but it's more like trying to cast a

0:02:30.559 --> 0:02:33.729
<v Speaker 2>wider net, attracting more people to apply for the job,

0:02:33.758 --> 0:02:37.119
<v Speaker 2>but I think most of the time it's probably counter

0:02:37.119 --> 0:02:37.940
<v Speaker 2>effective because

0:02:38.419 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 2>The great candidates might be looking at a job description

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.029
<v Speaker 2>thinking that hey, I only take like 70% of the boxes,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.758
<v Speaker 2>but I don't want to fail myself for a job, right?

0:02:46.809 --> 0:02:48.478
<v Speaker 2>So I don't apply because I don't have the rest

0:02:48.479 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 2>of the 30%. But the reality is that 30% can

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.839
<v Speaker 2>be just a good to have. But in job description,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:56.839
<v Speaker 2>you don't really list it in the way that this

0:02:56.839 --> 0:02:58.559
<v Speaker 2>is the one I must have, this is the one

0:02:58.559 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm really just OK.

0:03:00.574 --> 0:03:03.005
<v Speaker 2>To not have, right? So that's becoming a problem for

0:03:03.005 --> 0:03:04.244
<v Speaker 2>the job description. Yeah,

0:03:04.365 --> 0:03:04.445
<v Speaker 1>yeah,

0:03:04.565 --> 0:03:06.524
<v Speaker 1>I agree, nobody puts up a section that says this

0:03:06.524 --> 0:03:09.464
<v Speaker 1>is a must have and then the nice to have.

0:03:10.163 --> 0:03:12.524
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I think to myself, there's no way I'm going

0:03:12.524 --> 0:03:15.804
<v Speaker 1>to be able to hit maybe even 50% of what

0:03:15.804 --> 0:03:17.625
<v Speaker 1>they are asking for because they always like I want

0:03:17.625 --> 0:03:21.684
<v Speaker 1>an individual who is a creative, who takes initiative, but

0:03:21.684 --> 0:03:22.704
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day it's like

0:03:23.050 --> 0:03:25.490
<v Speaker 1>How do I measure that you are a person who

0:03:25.490 --> 0:03:27.529
<v Speaker 1>is there, and if I'm the person who is applying

0:03:27.529 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>for the job, I'll be like, yeah, I can do this,

0:03:29.869 --> 0:03:32.130
<v Speaker 1>or some people might say, oh no, I'm not sure

0:03:32.130 --> 0:03:34.770
<v Speaker 1>if I am creative enough for you, or I'm not

0:03:34.770 --> 0:03:36.729
<v Speaker 1>sure what you mean by take initiative. So I think

0:03:36.729 --> 0:03:39.649
<v Speaker 1>some of these lingo or the jargon that they put

0:03:39.649 --> 0:03:42.009
<v Speaker 1>on the job postings may not be very realistic or

0:03:42.009 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>may actually be a barrier to entry.

0:03:44.050 --> 0:03:45.770
<v Speaker 2>I think Tiffany are being very kind. I mean the

0:03:45.770 --> 0:03:49.009
<v Speaker 2>real example, I was writing that article, the job description

0:03:49.009 --> 0:03:50.270
<v Speaker 2>sitting in front of me saying that

0:03:50.490 --> 0:03:56.309
<v Speaker 2>We're looking for someone with strategic view and detail oriented.

0:03:56.839 --> 0:03:59.479
<v Speaker 2>But how is it going to happen? I'm very strategic,

0:03:59.630 --> 0:04:02.070
<v Speaker 2>giving an overview direction or so, but at the same time,

0:04:02.110 --> 0:04:06.190
<v Speaker 2>a very detail-oriented person. You're looking for two personalities in

0:04:06.190 --> 0:04:11.199
<v Speaker 2>one person. So how? I've never met somebody and yet

0:04:11.199 --> 0:04:13.550
<v Speaker 2>these are the things that you often see in the

0:04:13.550 --> 0:04:15.990
<v Speaker 2>job description. So you will be asking yourself, should I

0:04:15.990 --> 0:04:18.829
<v Speaker 2>or should I not? I may be detail oriented, but

0:04:18.829 --> 0:04:20.109
<v Speaker 2>I certainly not a strategic view.

0:04:20.248 --> 0:04:23.398
<v Speaker 2>At the same time. So when a company put the

0:04:23.398 --> 0:04:26.519
<v Speaker 2>words like this, whether it's by default, they write something

0:04:26.519 --> 0:04:30.699
<v Speaker 2>or because of AI generated, they are ineffectively driving certain

0:04:30.699 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>candidates away and the reality is good candidates always have

0:04:35.039 --> 0:04:38.419
<v Speaker 2>great expectation for themselves. You will come across a candidate

0:04:38.419 --> 0:04:39.998
<v Speaker 2>who is really good at what they do and they

0:04:39.998 --> 0:04:42.998
<v Speaker 2>want to set themselves for success. They will not apply

0:04:42.998 --> 0:04:45.118
<v Speaker 2>for any job, they will not walk into any job

0:04:45.118 --> 0:04:46.859
<v Speaker 2>when they think that I'm not going to make it.

0:04:47.398 --> 0:04:49.979
<v Speaker 2>So then those applying to you are

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Maybe just mediocre, maybe in the situation of wanting just

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.988
<v Speaker 2>a job. So a good job description will make wonders

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.558
<v Speaker 2>for you if you are an employer looking to hire

0:05:00.559 --> 0:05:03.390
<v Speaker 2>people right now. So don't just outsource this to AI.

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>They can help you to maybe do a certain draft

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 2>or so, but you need to really verify it.

0:05:08.238 --> 0:05:11.500
<v Speaker 2>And most of the time in enterprise situation, the hiring

0:05:11.500 --> 0:05:14.489
<v Speaker 2>manager who is hiring for that position may be the

0:05:14.488 --> 0:05:17.649
<v Speaker 2>one who's driving it or writing the job description, but

0:05:17.649 --> 0:05:20.290
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it is actually the HR who is doing the

0:05:20.290 --> 0:05:22.690
<v Speaker 2>work for them because the hiring manager may be too

0:05:22.690 --> 0:05:25.690
<v Speaker 2>busy or whatever. So our suggestion is always you want

0:05:25.690 --> 0:05:28.089
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that's right, the combination because HR has

0:05:28.089 --> 0:05:31.769
<v Speaker 2>the expertise in our case it's like massaging the job description,

0:05:31.809 --> 0:05:33.809
<v Speaker 2>the first draft may be from the hiring manager and

0:05:33.809 --> 0:05:35.940
<v Speaker 2>HR can massage it more palatable.

0:05:36.355 --> 0:05:38.515
<v Speaker 2>To the readers or so, but don't just let either

0:05:38.515 --> 0:05:40.303
<v Speaker 2>one of those just do the work, it will never

0:05:40.303 --> 0:05:41.904
<v Speaker 2>really work, in my opinion.

0:05:42.274 --> 0:05:44.875
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit about the unofficial

0:05:44.875 --> 0:05:47.915
<v Speaker 1>translation guide that you actually wrote in terms of the

0:05:47.915 --> 0:05:50.195
<v Speaker 1>job description. I'm asking because when I look at the

0:05:50.195 --> 0:05:52.915
<v Speaker 1>job description, sometimes even when I'm told, please write a

0:05:52.915 --> 0:05:55.674
<v Speaker 1>job description for this role that we would like to

0:05:55.674 --> 0:05:58.345
<v Speaker 1>hire for your team, and I'm just like, I don't know.

0:05:58.553 --> 0:06:03.154
<v Speaker 1>So for example, when somebody says fast-paced environment, what does

0:06:03.154 --> 0:06:03.704
<v Speaker 1>that mean?

0:06:05.019 --> 0:06:08.140
<v Speaker 2>Well, OK, I, I can be wrong, but I've been

0:06:08.140 --> 0:06:10.058
<v Speaker 2>doing this a lot, right? And I will tell the

0:06:10.059 --> 0:06:12.179
<v Speaker 2>client the same thing. When you write fast pace, you're

0:06:12.178 --> 0:06:15.450
<v Speaker 2>literally telling people that you're shorthanded, you don't have enough people,

0:06:15.779 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 2>so you get people to do faster.

0:06:17.500 --> 0:06:20.540
<v Speaker 1>That's true, that's probably what I'll write in there as well.

0:06:20.700 --> 0:06:23.260
<v Speaker 1>I guess I just want to cover a bit of

0:06:23.260 --> 0:06:26.130
<v Speaker 1>my basis, you know, making sure that people are clear.

0:06:26.230 --> 0:06:28.859
<v Speaker 1>But I also don't see, I mean, what would they

0:06:28.859 --> 0:06:29.790
<v Speaker 1>say if they don't say.

0:06:31.510 --> 0:06:36.130
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, normal pace. We are normal pace. Every company these days,

0:06:36.209 --> 0:06:39.450
<v Speaker 1>you see, you expect to see fast pace in the

0:06:39.450 --> 0:06:40.450
<v Speaker 1>first or the last line.

0:06:40.570 --> 0:06:41.970
<v Speaker 2>So that's the first thing I tell my client. You

0:06:41.970 --> 0:06:44.970
<v Speaker 2>put fast-paced candidates, look at this. Then what do you expect?

0:06:45.089 --> 0:06:46.890
<v Speaker 2>You want to lose some candidates. You write a job

0:06:46.890 --> 0:06:50.850
<v Speaker 2>description trying to attract more candidates, right? So it's counterintuitive,

0:06:50.928 --> 0:06:51.410
<v Speaker 2>so why do you put

0:06:51.410 --> 0:06:51.609
<v Speaker 1>it in.

0:06:52.755 --> 0:06:55.024
<v Speaker 1>About the people who are slower paced, you know what

0:06:55.024 --> 0:06:58.325
<v Speaker 1>I mean? Like they're naturally used to the chill vibes.

0:06:58.945 --> 0:07:02.933
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Tiffany I'm not a very fast person,

0:07:03.105 --> 0:07:05.375
<v Speaker 2>when I see the fast pace, would I still click yes,

0:07:05.744 --> 0:07:06.665
<v Speaker 2>depending on my situation,

0:07:07.165 --> 0:07:09.674
<v Speaker 1>buyers beware, right? Then I'm telling you that I already

0:07:09.674 --> 0:07:11.704
<v Speaker 1>told you this is a very fast-paced environment, so when

0:07:11.704 --> 0:07:13.984
<v Speaker 1>you come and join me, don't be a snail about this.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.029
<v Speaker 1>Um, see, I would write that in the job description

0:07:18.029 --> 0:07:19.290
<v Speaker 1>so I can see about people.

0:07:19.369 --> 0:07:22.089
<v Speaker 2>There's a valid point there, but I think the reality

0:07:22.089 --> 0:07:24.929
<v Speaker 2>is out of 100 applicants, if you can get 5

0:07:24.929 --> 0:07:27.410
<v Speaker 2>people out of the 100, you consider yourself lucky. But

0:07:27.410 --> 0:07:30.290
<v Speaker 2>you're right, like the fast pace then some

0:07:30.290 --> 0:07:32.250
<v Speaker 1>competitive salary. Tell me what does that

0:07:32.250 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>mean?

0:07:33.089 --> 0:07:35.750
<v Speaker 2>In my version, that means I can't pay you good enough,

0:07:35.809 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 2>so I'm just only competitive in a sense.

0:07:40.290 --> 0:07:41.250
<v Speaker 1>I mean I might pay you like lower

0:07:41.250 --> 0:07:41.809
<v Speaker 1>than average.

0:07:41.890 --> 0:07:43.730
<v Speaker 2>I might pay you lower than average.

0:07:43.812 --> 0:07:46.191
<v Speaker 2>Or at the best, I pay you just market average.

0:07:46.282 --> 0:07:48.312
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if I'm the best paymaster in the market,

0:07:48.481 --> 0:07:50.601
<v Speaker 2>why would I put it there? You know, it's just

0:07:50.601 --> 0:07:53.842
<v Speaker 2>unnecessary and it's not a selling point. People think that

0:07:53.842 --> 0:07:55.881
<v Speaker 2>competitive salary is a selling point. I can't

0:07:55.881 --> 0:07:58.291
<v Speaker 1>see it. OK, we get this a lot as well, self-starter,

0:07:59.361 --> 0:08:04.231
<v Speaker 1>like the sourdough. What does self-starter even mean? right? at

0:08:04.231 --> 0:08:04.902
<v Speaker 1>the right if you feed me

0:08:04.902 --> 0:08:05.851
<v Speaker 1>well, meaning

0:08:05.851 --> 0:08:08.002
<v Speaker 2>that's right, you come on board the first day, go

0:08:08.002 --> 0:08:10.041
<v Speaker 2>bring me the revenue or whatever things I get you

0:08:10.041 --> 0:08:11.962
<v Speaker 2>to do. So effectively telling the candidate.

0:08:12.204 --> 0:08:14.194
<v Speaker 2>need to grab it all by yourself. I don't have

0:08:14.194 --> 0:08:16.683
<v Speaker 2>enough time to train you and then you have to

0:08:16.683 --> 0:08:19.114
<v Speaker 2>rely on yourself to do that. That's a self-starter in

0:08:19.114 --> 0:08:21.084
<v Speaker 2>my opinion, like what you say is Shad, right? You

0:08:21.084 --> 0:08:23.194
<v Speaker 2>leave it there for you to do whatever works. I'm

0:08:23.194 --> 0:08:25.234
<v Speaker 2>not there to teach you. If not, then my selling

0:08:25.234 --> 0:08:28.664
<v Speaker 2>point will be we have the effective training system set up.

0:08:28.993 --> 0:08:31.243
<v Speaker 2>We have the guidance systems, that is a selling point.

0:08:31.394 --> 0:08:34.554
<v Speaker 2>Self-starter is not a selling point. It's quite the other

0:08:34.554 --> 0:08:35.012
<v Speaker 2>way around.

0:08:35.234 --> 0:08:39.153
<v Speaker 1>Last one, things like 5+ years of experience or 7+

0:08:39.153 --> 0:08:40.304
<v Speaker 1>years of experience.

0:08:40.596 --> 0:08:43.736
<v Speaker 1>Is it true? Do I really need exactly what they say?

0:08:44.026 --> 0:08:46.786
<v Speaker 2>The short answer is no. You don't really have to

0:08:46.785 --> 0:08:49.425
<v Speaker 2>be 100%. And you talk to any headhunters out there,

0:08:49.546 --> 0:08:51.585
<v Speaker 2>the first thing that we do when we talk to

0:08:51.585 --> 0:08:54.026
<v Speaker 2>the clients is to take the job description and then

0:08:54.026 --> 0:08:56.435
<v Speaker 2>strike it back. My question to my clients would be,

0:08:56.505 --> 0:08:59.954
<v Speaker 2>so what is absolutely necessary here? What is good to have?

0:09:00.065 --> 0:09:02.935
<v Speaker 2>That is a rookie 101 for all the recruiters really,

0:09:03.026 --> 0:09:05.705
<v Speaker 2>because everybody knows that the job description is a wish

0:09:05.705 --> 0:09:08.906
<v Speaker 2>list because you know there is no 100% perfect candidate.

0:09:09.159 --> 0:09:11.289
<v Speaker 2>So if you look at the job description, you see

0:09:11.289 --> 0:09:14.609
<v Speaker 2>that you have about 60 or 70% that can fit

0:09:14.609 --> 0:09:17.369
<v Speaker 2>into this job doing what they do so just apply,

0:09:17.460 --> 0:09:21.449
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, because like chances are the rest of the 30%, 40%

0:09:21.450 --> 0:09:23.690
<v Speaker 2>that you don't have is just good to have. And

0:09:23.690 --> 0:09:25.770
<v Speaker 2>I can say for most of the companies, they will

0:09:25.770 --> 0:09:28.650
<v Speaker 2>be willing to train and guide certain people. I don't

0:09:28.650 --> 0:09:30.530
<v Speaker 2>think they are in a fairy tale land and thinking

0:09:30.530 --> 0:09:32.729
<v Speaker 2>about always get the 100% candidates, they don't.

0:09:33.049 --> 0:09:34.780
<v Speaker 2>But I also think most of the clients they are

0:09:34.780 --> 0:09:38.219
<v Speaker 2>not ready to just take on anyone without the essential

0:09:38.219 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>skill set that they need for that particular job. So

0:09:41.460 --> 0:09:43.780
<v Speaker 2>the short answer is yes, just go and apply if

0:09:43.780 --> 0:09:47.500
<v Speaker 2>you think that you've 70%, 60% matching of the job description,

0:09:47.539 --> 0:09:48.329
<v Speaker 2>you're fine to go.

0:09:49.380 --> 0:09:51.619
<v Speaker 1>So far we've been talking about the job description, the

0:09:51.619 --> 0:09:55.218
<v Speaker 1>way it's worded, it alienates some deserving candidates from applying, right?

0:09:55.299 --> 0:09:57.968
<v Speaker 1>But at least the employee is still sincere about hiring,

0:09:58.020 --> 0:10:01.130
<v Speaker 1>so they write a really unrealistic job description. How about

0:10:01.130 --> 0:10:03.689
<v Speaker 1>job descriptions that are not sincere about hiring, you know,

0:10:03.770 --> 0:10:07.530
<v Speaker 1>they are just there to collect information because I've heard

0:10:07.530 --> 0:10:10.250
<v Speaker 1>for many individuals, many clients when they apply for a job,

0:10:10.289 --> 0:10:11.929
<v Speaker 1>they don't even know whether it's real. They said, you know,

0:10:11.969 --> 0:10:14.729
<v Speaker 1>I applied, there's no reply, and I keep seeing this

0:10:14.729 --> 0:10:17.489
<v Speaker 1>job being posted over and over again, right?

0:10:17.659 --> 0:10:20.799
<v Speaker 1>So there's a possibility that they haven't found a perfect candidate, right?

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.789
<v Speaker 1>There's also a possibility that they are just there collecting information.

0:10:24.119 --> 0:10:26.478
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand this collecting resumes. What does that mean?

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Why do companies do that? Well,

0:10:28.719 --> 0:10:30.848
<v Speaker 2>I think there are many reasons why the company will

0:10:30.849 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>want to collect the resume. One, it's probably because the

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.598
<v Speaker 2>headcount is not there yet, but they want to start

0:10:37.599 --> 0:10:39.630
<v Speaker 2>collecting now and when the headcount is ready,

0:10:39.979 --> 0:10:42.799
<v Speaker 2>They can start interviewing. A lot of time they interview

0:10:42.799 --> 0:10:46.010
<v Speaker 2>even before the headcount is granted because they think that

0:10:46.010 --> 0:10:48.729
<v Speaker 2>they will get the headcount. So then I start interviewing,

0:10:48.770 --> 0:10:51.809
<v Speaker 2>I will start running all the necessities and I've even

0:10:51.809 --> 0:10:54.049
<v Speaker 2>come across a situation that, OK, this is the candidate

0:10:54.049 --> 0:10:55.169
<v Speaker 2>we want to hire, but we can't.

0:10:55.270 --> 0:10:58.488
<v Speaker 2>Do it now because the headcount is only ready in July.

0:10:58.700 --> 0:10:59.039
<v Speaker 1>Were they

0:10:59.039 --> 0:11:00.179
<v Speaker 1>very upfront with the

0:11:00.179 --> 0:11:00.630
<v Speaker 1>candidate?

0:11:00.909 --> 0:11:04.820
<v Speaker 2>Um sometimes yes. Unfortunately, sometimes no, but you see, in

0:11:04.820 --> 0:11:07.940
<v Speaker 2>a legitimate situation where a company genuinely wanted to do

0:11:07.940 --> 0:11:10.409
<v Speaker 2>it right, there are ways to overcome this, for example,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>If now is May, my headcount is only ready in July.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.799
<v Speaker 2>I will give you an offer letter right now, but

0:11:15.799 --> 0:11:18.598
<v Speaker 2>it only starts from July onwards, because some organizations, they

0:11:18.599 --> 0:11:20.919
<v Speaker 2>are very strict in their headcount planning, which is nothing

0:11:20.919 --> 0:11:22.429
<v Speaker 2>wrong with it. Yeah, because it could be a new

0:11:22.429 --> 0:11:25.119
<v Speaker 2>financial year, absolutely new financial year, and I will not

0:11:25.119 --> 0:11:27.718
<v Speaker 2>warrant anything before that or so, but I'm legitimate in

0:11:27.719 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>having this headcount right now. So that's OK. But there

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 2>are times like what you mentioned, people just wanting to

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.150
<v Speaker 2>get their resume to understand what's going on in the market. Worst,

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:39.530
<v Speaker 2>you are actually

0:11:39.585 --> 0:11:42.603
<v Speaker 2>Interviewing candidates trying to get a market info for your

0:11:42.604 --> 0:11:45.715
<v Speaker 2>business purposes, but you have no intention to hire people.

0:11:46.125 --> 0:11:48.765
<v Speaker 2>That is real. The listeners can't see your face, Tiffany,

0:11:48.844 --> 0:11:49.604
<v Speaker 2>but I know my

0:11:49.604 --> 0:11:52.843
<v Speaker 1>eyes are wide open and Gerald is like, yeah, I've

0:11:52.844 --> 0:11:55.603
<v Speaker 1>heard of these unscrupulous means, but that's terrible.

0:11:55.854 --> 0:12:00.364
<v Speaker 2>Yes, unfortunately. I even come across the clients asking for

0:12:00.364 --> 0:12:03.853
<v Speaker 2>the client list from the candidate and then just never

0:12:03.854 --> 0:12:06.044
<v Speaker 2>hear from them again. I mean, there are people like that,

0:12:06.125 --> 0:12:08.325
<v Speaker 2>so it is true that as a job seeker,

0:12:08.809 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>You probably want to be a little bit more careful

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.090
<v Speaker 2>about what you encounter, but to answer to Gerald's question,

0:12:15.210 --> 0:12:18.260
<v Speaker 2>how do I see from a job description alone is

0:12:18.260 --> 0:12:22.169
<v Speaker 2>it possible? It's difficult, but there are common things that

0:12:22.169 --> 0:12:24.809
<v Speaker 2>maybe you can look at for examples. If a job

0:12:24.809 --> 0:12:28.169
<v Speaker 2>descriptions are all about telling you all the benefits about

0:12:28.169 --> 0:12:31.609
<v Speaker 2>an organization, or culture are great, we have a morning

0:12:31.609 --> 0:12:35.349
<v Speaker 2>yoga classes with the free, I don't know, smoothies or whatever,

0:12:35.450 --> 0:12:38.260
<v Speaker 2>but it's very little about the actual job and

0:12:38.700 --> 0:12:41.049
<v Speaker 2>I will ask myself, right, and is this for real?

0:12:41.210 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>company hire you, pay you the money for the content

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.650
<v Speaker 2>they're going to produce for them, not to get you

0:12:46.650 --> 0:12:49.729
<v Speaker 2>to enjoy the yoga in the morning. I find it

0:12:49.729 --> 0:12:52.530
<v Speaker 2>quite funny. But then that's one. So there are certain

0:12:52.530 --> 0:12:55.689
<v Speaker 2>cases where the company says in the job description that

0:12:55.690 --> 0:12:59.409
<v Speaker 2>the role may evolve when the company grow. What does

0:12:59.409 --> 0:13:02.250
<v Speaker 2>that mean? Yeah, I mean when you're a startup situation,

0:13:02.359 --> 0:13:03.140
<v Speaker 2>you're really in

0:13:03.190 --> 0:13:05.939
<v Speaker 2>The growing mode, maybe you just get a funding from

0:13:05.940 --> 0:13:08.409
<v Speaker 2>a VC or so you just hire the right talent,

0:13:08.700 --> 0:13:11.358
<v Speaker 2>then there are many positions that you can actually allocate

0:13:11.359 --> 0:13:15.219
<v Speaker 2>them to. So that's real. But in other circumstances, if

0:13:15.219 --> 0:13:17.659
<v Speaker 2>you come across a phrase like this in the company

0:13:17.659 --> 0:13:20.380
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't associate to this situation, you ask yourself, what

0:13:20.380 --> 0:13:23.940
<v Speaker 2>does it mean really? So you're hiring people with any

0:13:23.940 --> 0:13:26.380
<v Speaker 2>potential walk into any role itself, right? That is a

0:13:26.380 --> 0:13:27.500
<v Speaker 2>big question mark to me.

0:13:28.020 --> 0:13:31.650
<v Speaker 2>Another example can be the company say we're hiring across

0:13:31.650 --> 0:13:35.919
<v Speaker 2>multiple levels and we will match based on your experience.

0:13:36.090 --> 0:13:38.890
<v Speaker 2>What does it mean really? So a real example, a

0:13:38.890 --> 0:13:43.049
<v Speaker 2>candidates walk into the interview for a sales director position

0:13:43.049 --> 0:13:46.869
<v Speaker 2>and then the company asking all those questions about sales strategy,

0:13:46.989 --> 0:13:50.010
<v Speaker 2>your go to market, a typical question for a sales

0:13:50.010 --> 0:13:52.968
<v Speaker 2>director and at the end of it, they are thinking about,

0:13:53.090 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>oh we might just need a sales manager. Are you open?

0:13:56.666 --> 0:13:59.697
<v Speaker 2>To consider if it is a sales manager position, then

0:13:59.697 --> 0:14:02.256
<v Speaker 2>you will be asking yourself, is it even possible for

0:14:02.256 --> 0:14:05.817
<v Speaker 2>a company to eye for a sales director, but they

0:14:05.817 --> 0:14:08.617
<v Speaker 2>are actually thinking that I might just need a sales manager.

0:14:08.856 --> 0:14:10.976
<v Speaker 1>But could it be that through the interview, they feel

0:14:10.976 --> 0:14:14.137
<v Speaker 1>that your skills and competencies are not there yet for

0:14:14.136 --> 0:14:16.937
<v Speaker 1>a sales director, but they still like you because you

0:14:16.937 --> 0:14:19.377
<v Speaker 1>have good attitude. So they would like to create a

0:14:19.377 --> 0:14:21.536
<v Speaker 1>position or there could be an open position just that

0:14:21.536 --> 0:14:23.617
<v Speaker 1>you applied for the sales director role. Sure,

0:14:23.656 --> 0:14:25.267
<v Speaker 2>absolutely, that happens. So in the

0:14:25.504 --> 0:14:27.864
<v Speaker 2>situation where I still like you, but I don't think

0:14:27.864 --> 0:14:29.343
<v Speaker 2>you're a sales director level

0:14:29.343 --> 0:14:29.664
<v Speaker 2>yet,

0:14:29.783 --> 0:14:31.544
<v Speaker 1>but we can try and push you

0:14:31.544 --> 0:14:33.424
<v Speaker 2>in the sales manager, then you can show to us

0:14:33.424 --> 0:14:35.703
<v Speaker 2>that you are actually able to become a sales director.

0:14:35.934 --> 0:14:39.294
<v Speaker 2>It's a different story compared to with a multiple position,

0:14:39.504 --> 0:14:42.093
<v Speaker 2>we might consider based on your experience. In my opinion,

0:14:42.304 --> 0:14:46.104
<v Speaker 2>typically organizations don't do that. You don't think about, I'm

0:14:46.104 --> 0:14:49.223
<v Speaker 2>actually having these two positions, I'm toying about what could

0:14:49.223 --> 0:14:52.143
<v Speaker 2>be the possibilities. It's very unlikely. Most of the time

0:14:52.143 --> 0:14:53.823
<v Speaker 2>you get your headcount ready, you have a go.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.500
<v Speaker 2>to market strategy already have the account set up. For

0:14:57.500 --> 0:14:59.991
<v Speaker 2>anyone to come across such a situation, you need to

0:14:59.991 --> 0:15:01.890
<v Speaker 2>be careful because it can be a situation that we

0:15:01.890 --> 0:15:04.750
<v Speaker 2>want to bait you into a certain position, but we

0:15:04.750 --> 0:15:08.281
<v Speaker 2>are trying our luck. Remember, when you are selling yourself

0:15:08.281 --> 0:15:11.270
<v Speaker 2>to a potential job opportunity, most of the time the

0:15:11.270 --> 0:15:15.231
<v Speaker 2>organization is also trying to sell to you the opportunity.

0:15:15.370 --> 0:15:17.911
<v Speaker 2>They may be thinking, hey, if I just say I'm

0:15:17.911 --> 0:15:20.181
<v Speaker 2>hiring a sales manager, I might not have a chance

0:15:20.181 --> 0:15:22.471
<v Speaker 2>to meet this candidate because they won't apply.

0:15:22.809 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 2>So why don't I try my luck? I invite this

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.130
<v Speaker 2>person to come in and then see whether I can

0:15:27.130 --> 0:15:29.919
<v Speaker 2>charm them in the way or so. It's not like

0:15:29.919 --> 0:15:31.630
<v Speaker 2>you can't do that, but if we can be a

0:15:31.630 --> 0:15:33.599
<v Speaker 2>little bit more transparent, this is one of them that

0:15:33.599 --> 0:15:36.030
<v Speaker 2>usually done by the organization.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the baiting part of it. I think it

0:15:37.919 --> 0:15:40.250
<v Speaker 1>does happen quite often. I think we talked about this before,

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.830
<v Speaker 1>getting lowballed into a job, right? You apply for something

0:15:42.830 --> 0:15:44.809
<v Speaker 1>but you're told like actually, you know, it's not really

0:15:44.809 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that thing. You are more suitable for another role, lower pay,

0:15:47.479 --> 0:15:48.929
<v Speaker 1>lower responsibilities, and then

0:15:49.299 --> 0:15:52.820
<v Speaker 1>Because you feel like you're already there and the company

0:15:52.820 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>feels they already pitched to you, they're more likely to

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.580
<v Speaker 1>accept it from the company's perspective. Why they want to

0:15:57.580 --> 0:16:00.500
<v Speaker 1>do that is they want to attract high caliber candidates,

0:16:00.710 --> 0:16:03.820
<v Speaker 1>but in reality, they want them to do slightly lower

0:16:03.820 --> 0:16:05.900
<v Speaker 1>on a role with less responsibilities at a lower pay.

0:16:06.580 --> 0:16:10.219
<v Speaker 1>I brought at this point because I know somebody, he

0:16:10.219 --> 0:16:13.460
<v Speaker 1>saw a job listing for like a department head. They

0:16:13.460 --> 0:16:15.729
<v Speaker 1>were going to create a new department in this company.

0:16:15.940 --> 0:16:18.500
<v Speaker 1>He saw the job listing, he applied for it knowing.

0:16:18.750 --> 0:16:21.299
<v Speaker 1>That he didn't have the skills to do it, but

0:16:21.299 --> 0:16:24.159
<v Speaker 1>he really wanted to join the company and during the interview,

0:16:24.460 --> 0:16:26.700
<v Speaker 1>after maybe about a good half an hour, they did

0:16:26.700 --> 0:16:29.500
<v Speaker 1>tell him, look, you and I both know that you're

0:16:29.500 --> 0:16:32.059
<v Speaker 1>not at that skill competency yet. They were very upfront

0:16:32.059 --> 0:16:35.020
<v Speaker 1>with him and said, actually we would really like to

0:16:35.020 --> 0:16:37.940
<v Speaker 1>hire you but not at this job position.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, would you mind waiting until we

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>basically hire your boss? And this person was like, yeah,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:46.909
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind waiting because I really like your company

0:16:46.909 --> 0:16:49.799
<v Speaker 1>and I would like to work for you. So he

0:16:49.799 --> 0:16:52.450
<v Speaker 1>signed an offer letter and waited for about 4 months.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Eventually did it work out? It did work out, but

0:16:55.359 --> 0:16:57.820
<v Speaker 1>it all sounded pretty scammy to me at that point

0:16:57.820 --> 0:17:00.599
<v Speaker 1>of time with me just thinking now having this conversation,

0:17:00.679 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just thinking.

0:17:01.393 --> 0:17:04.782
<v Speaker 1>To myself, I'll be like, please do not sign that

0:17:04.782 --> 0:17:06.942
<v Speaker 1>contract because we don't know. 4 months later what's going

0:17:06.942 --> 0:17:09.262
<v Speaker 1>to happen, right? But I think in this particular case,

0:17:09.463 --> 0:17:11.052
<v Speaker 1>it kind of worked out and I'm sure like when

0:17:11.052 --> 0:17:13.061
<v Speaker 1>there are new departments, new teams formed, there's going to

0:17:13.061 --> 0:17:16.262
<v Speaker 1>be multiple positions. If the employers up front and sincere

0:17:16.262 --> 0:17:18.623
<v Speaker 1>about it, it's still not so bad, right? But they

0:17:18.623 --> 0:17:21.463
<v Speaker 1>can go the other way where the company didn't have

0:17:21.463 --> 0:17:23.941
<v Speaker 1>any intention of hiring so many and they're just trying

0:17:23.942 --> 0:17:24.422
<v Speaker 1>to bid you.

0:17:24.536 --> 0:17:27.406
<v Speaker 1>So that's a totally different intentions altogether. So I think

0:17:27.406 --> 0:17:30.645
<v Speaker 1>going in also knowing that you're not desperate for this

0:17:30.645 --> 0:17:32.485
<v Speaker 1>allows you to go, you know, can I wait 4 months.

0:17:32.526 --> 0:17:33.845
<v Speaker 1>If I cannot wait 4 months, then I'm going to

0:17:33.845 --> 0:17:36.645
<v Speaker 1>go and find something else. But didn't know that it's

0:17:36.645 --> 0:17:37.465
<v Speaker 1>going to be 4 months as well,

0:17:40.186 --> 0:17:42.125
<v Speaker 2>right? But in the case of your friend Tiffany, if

0:17:42.125 --> 0:17:44.365
<v Speaker 2>I'm the one talking to your friend, I'll be telling

0:17:44.365 --> 0:17:46.406
<v Speaker 2>your friend that you still need to be a little

0:17:46.406 --> 0:17:47.526
<v Speaker 2>bit careful one.

0:17:48.050 --> 0:17:50.469
<v Speaker 2>You really don't know what's going to happen. You don't

0:17:50.469 --> 0:17:53.149
<v Speaker 2>know who is going to be your future boss, someone

0:17:53.150 --> 0:17:55.260
<v Speaker 2>you might or might not like, that is the period

0:17:55.260 --> 0:17:57.750
<v Speaker 2>of gap here, then you just wait. That means that

0:17:57.750 --> 0:18:00.229
<v Speaker 2>4 month period of time, you can't do anything. So

0:18:00.229 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 2>it's a commitment from the candidate that you surrender.

0:18:03.354 --> 0:18:06.625
<v Speaker 2>control in the process. There's nothing much you can do.

0:18:06.885 --> 0:18:09.765
<v Speaker 2>Whereas from the employer's perspective, there are a lot of

0:18:09.765 --> 0:18:12.004
<v Speaker 2>things that they can do. I'm actually secure commitment from

0:18:12.005 --> 0:18:14.964
<v Speaker 2>a candidate, so it's only one side winning, not the

0:18:14.964 --> 0:18:18.204
<v Speaker 2>win-win situation that most of the time we're trying to achieve.

0:18:18.579 --> 0:18:21.129
<v Speaker 2>In this case, I mean, it's the legitimate case, but

0:18:21.130 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 2>it's just very dangerous case for the candidates.

0:18:24.050 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>If let's say I know that this job listing is

0:18:27.770 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not real, the kind that I've gone for the interview

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.250
<v Speaker 1>and I know they're not very sincere in listing and

0:18:33.250 --> 0:18:35.109
<v Speaker 1>then I go back to let's say LinkedIn or all

0:18:35.109 --> 0:18:37.810
<v Speaker 1>the job portals and I keep seeing the same listing

0:18:37.810 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. Is there something that I can do?

0:18:40.744 --> 0:18:44.725
<v Speaker 1>To maybe warn other potential job seekers.

0:18:45.255 --> 0:18:48.535
<v Speaker 2>So you see the My Career Futures portal initiated by

0:18:48.536 --> 0:18:51.336
<v Speaker 2>the government. If you post a job, you cannot repost

0:18:51.336 --> 0:18:53.734
<v Speaker 2>it more than 2 times. So they're trying to restraint

0:18:53.734 --> 0:18:55.495
<v Speaker 2>in that way. They're coming up with a very good

0:18:55.494 --> 0:18:59.125
<v Speaker 2>initiative now trying to encourage whoever advertising it to give

0:18:59.125 --> 0:19:02.234
<v Speaker 2>the response to the candidate because ghosting is a huge problem, right?

0:19:02.911 --> 0:19:05.170
<v Speaker 2>So the time you hear, I apply, I don't hear anything.

0:19:05.342 --> 0:19:08.222
<v Speaker 2>So they're trying to give you a very good view

0:19:08.222 --> 0:19:11.541
<v Speaker 2>about is this the employer that usually gives response to

0:19:11.541 --> 0:19:14.851
<v Speaker 2>the candidates, how often they come back with the response

0:19:14.852 --> 0:19:17.182
<v Speaker 2>and then from the employer's perspective, all you do is

0:19:17.182 --> 0:19:19.741
<v Speaker 2>really just a few click on the system itself. So

0:19:19.741 --> 0:19:22.341
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a very good initiative. I don't think

0:19:22.342 --> 0:19:25.041
<v Speaker 2>there are any specific body or

0:19:25.729 --> 0:19:27.810
<v Speaker 2>Law or rules or so, but then I think the

0:19:27.810 --> 0:19:32.130
<v Speaker 2>government is trying to do in the the other way, encouraging, yes,

0:19:32.170 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 2>at least for their own porter. But ultimately, when it

0:19:35.959 --> 0:19:39.010
<v Speaker 2>comes to the job seekers, I think the better way

0:19:39.010 --> 0:19:41.689
<v Speaker 2>to do in my opinion is to equip yourself with

0:19:41.689 --> 0:19:46.810
<v Speaker 2>the knowledge and better still, knowing what to ask is fundamental.

0:19:46.930 --> 0:19:50.170
<v Speaker 2>For example, when you see the job description is too

0:19:50.170 --> 0:19:52.729
<v Speaker 2>good to be true, ask the question, what is the

0:19:52.729 --> 0:19:53.290
<v Speaker 2>job responsibility?

0:19:53.410 --> 0:19:56.339
<v Speaker 2>Possibility for this one. What is the expectation? You are

0:19:56.339 --> 0:19:59.810
<v Speaker 2>asking for a project directed. How big is the project?

0:19:59.979 --> 0:20:02.979
<v Speaker 2>How big is the scale, how many people asking the

0:20:02.979 --> 0:20:06.859
<v Speaker 2>right question throughout the process. It's fundamental. And if I

0:20:06.859 --> 0:20:09.219
<v Speaker 2>use the case of your friend just now, Tiffany, not

0:20:09.219 --> 0:20:12.458
<v Speaker 2>being seen that you are desperate, because when you're in

0:20:12.459 --> 0:20:15.130
<v Speaker 2>desperate situation, you're probably not going to get a very

0:20:15.130 --> 0:20:17.459
<v Speaker 2>good baroning power in that sense.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.810
<v Speaker 2>So in that situation, I'll be asking, what's the pipeline

0:20:20.810 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 2>of your head of department searching right now? What sort

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.209
<v Speaker 2>of the commitment I'm going to get from you if

0:20:26.209 --> 0:20:29.770
<v Speaker 2>I give you my commitment right now? What is eventually

0:20:29.770 --> 0:20:32.930
<v Speaker 2>the plan for this team? Those questions will help you

0:20:32.930 --> 0:20:35.810
<v Speaker 2>to make a better decision. I think that is the

0:20:35.810 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>fundamental skills that all the job seekers should possess with them.

0:20:39.969 --> 0:20:41.969
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think if I to summarize, one of the

0:20:41.969 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>things is if the job.

0:20:43.770 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Thing looks too good to be true, a yoga and milkshakes, right,

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.339
<v Speaker 1>then be careful about that. And the other thing we

0:20:49.339 --> 0:20:52.349
<v Speaker 1>talked about was also if the job gets reposted several times,

0:20:52.599 --> 0:20:54.569
<v Speaker 1>then you also kind of know something is not quite right.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>The third thing I would say is to maybe counter

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.149
<v Speaker 1>check whether this job exists on other portals because typically

0:21:01.150 --> 0:21:03.719
<v Speaker 1>if the recruiter is sincere in hiring, they will post

0:21:03.719 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on several pages, including their own corporate website. So then

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you go there and you reference and you see, OK.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.469
<v Speaker 1>So this is a legit job, just posted on different places.

0:21:12.550 --> 0:21:12.669
<v Speaker 1>Just

0:21:12.670 --> 0:21:12.829
<v Speaker 2>just

0:21:12.829 --> 0:21:15.189
<v Speaker 2>a caveat a bit. Most of the time right now

0:21:15.189 --> 0:21:18.380
<v Speaker 2>it's very unlikely an organization doesn't have the online footprint,

0:21:18.829 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 2>very unlikely. So I think those are legitimate things you

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:22.709
<v Speaker 2>can look at.

0:21:22.829 --> 0:21:25.629
<v Speaker 1>Well, this podcast definitely has been very helpful for me.

0:21:25.670 --> 0:21:28.420
<v Speaker 1>I think even for myself, the next job listing that

0:21:28.420 --> 0:21:31.949
<v Speaker 1>I put out, I better be very clear, like you say,

0:21:32.109 --> 0:21:33.079
<v Speaker 1>put the

0:21:33.079 --> 0:21:34.750
<v Speaker 2>just won an award, right? People come

0:21:34.750 --> 0:21:35.579
<v Speaker 1>and look for you.

0:21:36.699 --> 0:21:38.579
<v Speaker 1>No, I still have to, but I definitely will still

0:21:38.579 --> 0:21:41.420
<v Speaker 1>put fast-paced environment because I don't want to sieve out

0:21:41.420 --> 0:21:44.219
<v Speaker 1>the snails, but yeah, I shouldn't shoot myself in the

0:21:44.219 --> 0:21:47.420
<v Speaker 1>foot with competitive salary and self-starter because even I don't

0:21:47.420 --> 0:21:49.670
<v Speaker 1>really quite understand that. But thank you so much, Han,

0:21:49.780 --> 0:21:50.900
<v Speaker 1>for coming on our podcast.

0:21:51.739 --> 0:21:52.500
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:21:57.510 --> 0:22:00.780
<v Speaker 1>Hi, it's our Ask Me Anything segment where we answer

0:22:00.780 --> 0:22:03.660
<v Speaker 1>a work-related question that you have sent it to us.

0:22:03.989 --> 0:22:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Please continue to send. I like them. They give me

0:22:06.319 --> 0:22:08.670
<v Speaker 1>very good food for thought and we hope that we

0:22:08.670 --> 0:22:12.140
<v Speaker 1>have helped you a wee bit in your work week.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.900
<v Speaker 1>Today's question is sent in by Shaan. Now Sean's question

0:22:15.900 --> 0:22:19.270
<v Speaker 1>is about how to ask or get time off to

0:22:19.270 --> 0:22:23.829
<v Speaker 1>go and do interviews when you are juggling an existing job. Yeah.

0:22:23.990 --> 0:22:26.781
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure many people are interested right now. Well, this

0:22:26.781 --> 0:22:29.020
<v Speaker 1>is especially for interviews where you don't know if you're

0:22:29.020 --> 0:22:31.461
<v Speaker 1>going to be successful and there are multiple rounds. Yeah,

0:22:31.619 --> 0:22:35.990
<v Speaker 1>so Sean says taking leave for every interview is not feasible,

0:22:36.301 --> 0:22:39.330
<v Speaker 1>especially when you have to save some for other users.

0:22:39.701 --> 0:22:44.100
<v Speaker 1>Is resorting to taking medical leave more recommended or more

0:22:44.100 --> 0:22:47.090
<v Speaker 1>common in the workplace where leave approvals are not required

0:22:47.090 --> 0:22:50.291
<v Speaker 1>or can be requested at the last minute. OK.

0:22:50.702 --> 0:22:53.732
<v Speaker 1>This is a tricky situation, Sean, but how do you

0:22:53.732 --> 0:22:57.092
<v Speaker 1>go for these multiple interviews without raising the question with

0:22:57.092 --> 0:22:59.371
<v Speaker 1>your boss that, hey, you know, this guy is taking

0:22:59.371 --> 0:23:01.531
<v Speaker 1>a lot of leave huh? And also I just want

0:23:01.531 --> 0:23:03.900
<v Speaker 1>to caveat. I'm asking for a friend. OK, OK. Should

0:23:03.901 --> 0:23:08.411
<v Speaker 1>you use medical leave for this? Please don't. Please, please,

0:23:08.531 --> 0:23:11.171
<v Speaker 1>please don't lie. Don't abuse and mistrust because people are

0:23:11.171 --> 0:23:13.121
<v Speaker 1>going to figure out how come you always fall sick

0:23:13.121 --> 0:23:15.612
<v Speaker 1>and you don't really look sick and if it gets

0:23:15.612 --> 0:23:17.331
<v Speaker 1>found out, it's really, really going to look very bad.

0:23:17.912 --> 0:23:20.363
<v Speaker 1>So trust is going to be an issue. Yes, yes.

0:23:20.402 --> 0:23:23.363
<v Speaker 1>So don't don't abuse the benefit of medical leave for

0:23:23.363 --> 0:23:25.602
<v Speaker 1>job interviews. So with that out of the way, then

0:23:25.603 --> 0:23:28.243
<v Speaker 1>how do we get through the multiple rounds of interviews

0:23:28.243 --> 0:23:30.512
<v Speaker 1>if you're not going to use leave? Actually, I feel

0:23:30.512 --> 0:23:32.562
<v Speaker 1>like most of us, we somehow have our own way

0:23:32.561 --> 0:23:36.882
<v Speaker 1>of figuring it out, navigating it so there isn't that

0:23:36.883 --> 0:23:39.641
<v Speaker 1>one fixed answer. Maybe those who are listening, maybe you

0:23:39.642 --> 0:23:41.522
<v Speaker 1>can also drop in your comments on what you have

0:23:41.522 --> 0:23:43.753
<v Speaker 1>done the legit good ones, OK.

0:23:44.234 --> 0:23:47.384
<v Speaker 1>Illegal ones, but one thing is during the interview process,

0:23:47.494 --> 0:23:50.053
<v Speaker 1>it's important for you to ask the recruiter how many

0:23:50.053 --> 0:23:53.644
<v Speaker 1>rounds uh can you expect? sometimes they say 2 to

0:23:53.644 --> 0:23:55.792
<v Speaker 1>3 rounds and you can have a sense over the

0:23:55.792 --> 0:23:58.703
<v Speaker 1>next couple of weeks, uh, if things go according to

0:23:58.703 --> 0:24:00.793
<v Speaker 1>plan and you get caught up for subsequent rounds, and

0:24:00.792 --> 0:24:02.792
<v Speaker 1>how many days of leave you need to take. You

0:24:02.792 --> 0:24:05.244
<v Speaker 1>might not want to take full day leaves you have

0:24:05.244 --> 0:24:07.394
<v Speaker 1>the option of taking half day, right? You can take

0:24:07.394 --> 0:24:09.754
<v Speaker 1>half days. You could also ask some of these interviews,

0:24:09.833 --> 0:24:10.543
<v Speaker 1>are they online?

0:24:11.145 --> 0:24:13.224
<v Speaker 1>Offline, right, I know some of the people are going

0:24:13.224 --> 0:24:16.864
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, hey, but if you are online and then

0:24:16.864 --> 0:24:20.104
<v Speaker 1>your boss calls you or rather your working hours, isn't

0:24:20.104 --> 0:24:22.343
<v Speaker 1>this like eating into the company policy, you're not being

0:24:22.344 --> 0:24:24.304
<v Speaker 1>a good employee, you taking your time off. I mean,

0:24:24.344 --> 0:24:27.265
<v Speaker 1>this is where the gray area happens. Ideally, the new

0:24:27.265 --> 0:24:29.435
<v Speaker 1>company will be nice enough to ask you to maybe

0:24:29.435 --> 0:24:32.104
<v Speaker 1>come down during lunch hours or after office hours for

0:24:32.104 --> 0:24:34.385
<v Speaker 1>an interview, and that's a possibility as well. If that's

0:24:34.385 --> 0:24:37.415
<v Speaker 1>an option, you can consider it, but as a job seeker, right.

0:24:37.546 --> 0:24:39.734
<v Speaker 1>You're wondering whether the person has eaten lunch. Why should

0:24:39.734 --> 0:24:45.336
<v Speaker 1>you career hungry person interviewing you is not good, it's

0:24:45.336 --> 0:24:47.656
<v Speaker 1>not it's gonna make proper assessment because not enough blood

0:24:47.656 --> 0:24:49.936
<v Speaker 1>sugar to the brain. Yeah, so usually if it was

0:24:49.936 --> 0:24:51.696
<v Speaker 1>up to me, right, I would probably say maybe just

0:24:51.696 --> 0:24:55.416
<v Speaker 1>after lunch hour, then it's for you to impress the

0:24:55.416 --> 0:24:58.995
<v Speaker 1>person to keep the person awake during that time or

0:24:58.994 --> 0:25:02.094
<v Speaker 1>maybe just before lunch, just before that, I think it'll

0:25:02.095 --> 0:25:04.166
<v Speaker 1>be OK, but if it's right smack in lunch hour people.

0:25:04.589 --> 0:25:06.909
<v Speaker 1>Might not like it very much, but I do know

0:25:06.910 --> 0:25:09.390
<v Speaker 1>companies HR and the supervisors are willing to meet people

0:25:09.390 --> 0:25:12.179
<v Speaker 1>during lunchtime. It's possible as well. So if it's outside

0:25:12.180 --> 0:25:13.869
<v Speaker 1>of the lunch hours, you still have to take like

0:25:13.869 --> 0:25:15.989
<v Speaker 1>a half day leave and everything. So you still have

0:25:15.989 --> 0:25:18.550
<v Speaker 1>to pace out, I guess Sean probably has to pace

0:25:18.550 --> 0:25:20.630
<v Speaker 1>out the leave quota that he has because he might

0:25:20.630 --> 0:25:22.310
<v Speaker 1>want to use all the other days to go and

0:25:22.310 --> 0:25:25.109
<v Speaker 1>travel with his family, do his own travels, and things

0:25:25.109 --> 0:25:27.469
<v Speaker 1>like that, right? Yes. Honestly, I don't think it will

0:25:27.469 --> 0:25:30.709
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of leave days, right, unless you're aggressively

0:25:30.709 --> 0:25:33.389
<v Speaker 1>being sought after la. But generally, you know, if you

0:25:33.390 --> 0:25:33.790
<v Speaker 1>are a job search.

0:25:34.104 --> 0:25:35.784
<v Speaker 1>While you're still being employed. The leave days is not

0:25:35.785 --> 0:25:38.944
<v Speaker 1>going to be significantly a lot, honestly speaking. But you

0:25:38.944 --> 0:25:40.823
<v Speaker 1>do need to manage if today you are really saving

0:25:40.824 --> 0:25:43.055
<v Speaker 1>up that leave for other things, then you do need

0:25:43.055 --> 0:25:45.083
<v Speaker 1>to plan a little bit. And what we said earlier,

0:25:45.185 --> 0:25:47.754
<v Speaker 1>asking for the number of days, number of rounds that

0:25:47.755 --> 0:25:50.094
<v Speaker 1>you need to have, that you can do it online,

0:25:50.344 --> 0:25:53.544
<v Speaker 1>can do it after office hours, during lunch breaks. I

0:25:53.545 --> 0:25:55.165
<v Speaker 1>think these are some of the advice that I will

0:25:55.165 --> 0:25:56.344
<v Speaker 1>give that you can try.

0:25:56.650 --> 0:25:58.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe we'll hear a lot more from

0:25:58.599 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>our listeners in terms of what they have done, what

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.430
<v Speaker 1>are some of the good tips that they can give

0:26:04.430 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to somebody like Shawn. So yeah, Sean, wish you all

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the best in your job interviews. I hope that you

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.149
<v Speaker 1>don't have to go through that many, many rounds, but

0:26:13.310 --> 0:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>in a nutshell, don't lie, get creative and you know

0:26:17.479 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing this for the first time, try not to

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>do a lunchtime interview, so yeah, let's try and avoid that.

0:26:22.699 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>If like Sean, you have a work-related question, do send

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.900
<v Speaker 1>it to us. We are at CNA podcasts at Mediacorp.com.sg.

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:34.819
<v Speaker 1>We're also on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Me Listen, and YouTube

0:26:34.819 --> 0:26:37.319
<v Speaker 1>where a video version of this is at.

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.708
<v Speaker 1>The team behind the Work It podcast is Junaini Johari,

0:26:40.829 --> 0:26:46.739
<v Speaker 1>Joanne Chan, Saye Win, Allison Jenner, Shahzad Delia, and Christina Robert.

0:26:46.969 --> 0:26:50.750
<v Speaker 1>Video by Hania Ahmed. I'm Gerald and I'm Tiffany. Have

0:26:50.750 --> 0:26:52.989
<v Speaker 1>a good work week ahead and I hope you have

0:26:52.989 --> 0:26:54.310
<v Speaker 1>an understanding boss.