WEBVTT - It’s time for some cheerful climate news

0:00:03.039 --> 0:00:05.340
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to AC N A podcast.

0:00:07.250 --> 0:00:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes we all need a bit of positivity. If you

0:00:11.369 --> 0:00:14.399
<v Speaker 2>listened to our episode, last week, we learned about the

0:00:14.409 --> 0:00:18.450
<v Speaker 2>power of communicating solutions and optimism when it comes to

0:00:18.459 --> 0:00:20.829
<v Speaker 2>climate change and the state of our planet,

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.939
<v Speaker 2>we've taken some inspiration from that discussion and this week

0:00:24.950 --> 0:00:29.799
<v Speaker 2>we bring you nothing but good news. Hi and welcome

0:00:29.809 --> 0:00:33.580
<v Speaker 2>to climate conversations. I'm Jack Boyd. Hello, Li Link Tan.

0:00:33.590 --> 0:00:37.330
<v Speaker 2>How are you? Feeling? Excited, feeling, positive, excited might be

0:00:37.340 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 2>overstating it. I, I actually struggle with this assignment. I

0:00:41.889 --> 0:00:45.580
<v Speaker 2>trawled the internet looking for positive climate news to cheer

0:00:45.590 --> 0:00:47.259
<v Speaker 2>me up and it wasn't a very,

0:00:47.369 --> 0:00:52.509
<v Speaker 2>pretty easy finding anything recent that really made me smile.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.139
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about you whether you had the same issues.

0:00:55.150 --> 0:00:57.369
<v Speaker 2>I had to sift through a lot of doom and

0:00:57.380 --> 0:01:02.060
<v Speaker 2>gloom actually to get to these five happy news bits today. Hey,

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.830
<v Speaker 2>there's silver linings in every little story. If you search

0:01:05.839 --> 0:01:10.029
<v Speaker 2>for it, the eternal optimist aren't you? Yeah, maybe that's me.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.389
<v Speaker 2>My career choice and focus on climate change.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.019
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, I didn't find it too bad. I think

0:01:16.029 --> 0:01:19.430
<v Speaker 2>what was very clear was that the solutions or the

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.819
<v Speaker 2>positive aspects tend to be hidden at the end of

0:01:21.830 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 2>stories and stories tend to get written with the kind

0:01:24.970 --> 0:01:28.708
<v Speaker 2>of doom and gloom to start with. Yeah, that was interesting. Alright.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:30.860
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into all of that later, but it's our

0:01:30.870 --> 0:01:33.449
<v Speaker 2>beloved weekly quiz.

0:01:35.569 --> 0:01:38.830
<v Speaker 2>Now, last week, Li Ling, I asked you about the

0:01:38.839 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 2>populations of certain countries that believed that climate change was

0:01:43.410 --> 0:01:45.739
<v Speaker 2>a threat to their country and now you got them.

0:01:45.750 --> 0:01:50.690
<v Speaker 2>All right. It was quite amazing. Now, on a symbol

0:01:50.709 --> 0:01:53.620
<v Speaker 2>of vein, I want to know which populations have the

0:01:53.629 --> 0:01:59.519
<v Speaker 2>brightest outlooks rank these countries by respondents who are optimistic

0:01:59.529 --> 0:02:04.709
<v Speaker 2>about the future. All four options. A South Korea

0:02:05.059 --> 0:02:12.138
<v Speaker 2>B is China C Australia and D, Sweden. Oh man,

0:02:12.149 --> 0:02:15.509
<v Speaker 2>another ranking quiz. I feel like I've exhausted all my

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.570
<v Speaker 2>brain cells for the last one already. Ok. So the

0:02:18.580 --> 0:02:24.279
<v Speaker 2>four countries South Korea, Australia, China and Sweden. Yep, that's it.

0:02:24.330 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Let me have a think. Ok. Answers at the end.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.179
<v Speaker 2>Now this week we're going to skip right over news time.

0:02:33.190 --> 0:02:35.229
<v Speaker 2>Sorry Le Ling. We won't be coming to you in

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.459
<v Speaker 2>the newsroom because that is going to be the thrust

0:02:38.470 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of our main segment this week. I'm not in my newsroom.

0:02:42.250 --> 0:02:46.089
<v Speaker 2>I'm in my living room actually. But same. Well, you're

0:02:46.100 --> 0:02:50.508
<v Speaker 2>gonna use the clip, right? And you see the home, obviously,

0:02:50.910 --> 0:02:54.369
<v Speaker 2>I'm in my living room. And so are you ok? Hey,

0:02:54.380 --> 0:02:57.279
<v Speaker 2>my office is my newsroom. Yeah. Well,

0:02:57.729 --> 0:03:01.149
<v Speaker 2>it's an occupational hazard for all of us. Yeah, my

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>dog is literally lying behind me.

0:03:07.820 --> 0:03:12.038
<v Speaker 2>As famed climate change scientist, Katharine Hayhoe said to us

0:03:12.050 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 2>here on climate conversations last week, communicating solutions to the

0:03:16.610 --> 0:03:20.770
<v Speaker 2>existential crisis that is climate change is so important to

0:03:20.779 --> 0:03:25.020
<v Speaker 2>inspire action and to come up with collective solutions big

0:03:25.029 --> 0:03:28.309
<v Speaker 2>and small. Now we've taken that message to heart and

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 2>both of us have searched the globe for recent and

0:03:31.850 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>interesting and positive stories about how humanity is finding hope

0:03:36.889 --> 0:03:37.630
<v Speaker 2>in the gloom.

0:03:37.929 --> 0:03:41.789
<v Speaker 2>Now, some of these will be monumental. Some might seem

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.979
<v Speaker 2>significant some less so, but we hope you'll hear them

0:03:45.990 --> 0:03:48.529
<v Speaker 2>and go, that's a reason to be optimistic. So the

0:03:48.539 --> 0:03:51.380
<v Speaker 2>format we're gonna take it in turns to chat briefly

0:03:51.389 --> 0:03:55.389
<v Speaker 2>about five stories. Each, we haven't divulged the stories to

0:03:55.399 --> 0:03:58.589
<v Speaker 2>each other beforehand. So we'll be coming in fresh like

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.979
<v Speaker 2>you to hear about them and interesting to see both

0:04:01.990 --> 0:04:04.029
<v Speaker 2>of our responses to those stories.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.898
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready to smile for planet Earth. Are you ready

0:04:07.910 --> 0:04:13.139
<v Speaker 2>for that, Lili? Oh, yeah, let's do that. Cheer for

0:04:13.149 --> 0:04:14.539
<v Speaker 2>Planet Earth. Woohoo.

0:04:17.838 --> 0:04:20.897
<v Speaker 2>Ok. My story number one. Now, these are not in

0:04:20.908 --> 0:04:22.998
<v Speaker 2>any order. I'm gonna kick us off with this very

0:04:23.009 --> 0:04:24.889
<v Speaker 2>cool story. It was courtesy of Bloomberg.

0:04:25.250 --> 0:04:28.709
<v Speaker 2>It's about a trial that's been going on since last

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:35.029
<v Speaker 2>month between Singapore Airlines, Qantas and New Zealand and Garuda, Indonesia.

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:40.808
<v Speaker 2>And they're choosing the exact air routes that they fly. Basically,

0:04:40.820 --> 0:04:44.690
<v Speaker 2>they're taking shortcuts. In the sky. The aim is to

0:04:44.700 --> 0:04:49.399
<v Speaker 2>be more efficient, use less fuel and create fewer greenhouse

0:04:49.410 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>gas emissions. So basically, there are 38 different routes where

0:04:53.450 --> 0:04:54.630
<v Speaker 2>this is happening already.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.559
<v Speaker 2>And for Singapore Airlines that includes flying to Sydney to Perth,

0:04:58.570 --> 0:05:01.099
<v Speaker 2>to Christchurch among a bunch of other places.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.070
<v Speaker 2>And the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore has already said

0:05:05.079 --> 0:05:08.510
<v Speaker 2>that airlines can potentially save up to 1.7 tons of

0:05:08.519 --> 0:05:12.238
<v Speaker 2>fuel for a flight between Singapore and Melbourne simply by

0:05:12.250 --> 0:05:15.540
<v Speaker 2>taking a faster path, a more efficient route.

0:05:16.260 --> 0:05:19.190
<v Speaker 2>And the idea is that this could actually be extended

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.429
<v Speaker 2>to many other cities. Europe has been looking at this

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.540
<v Speaker 2>for a long time. So for me, seems like a win, right.

0:05:24.549 --> 0:05:29.649
<v Speaker 2>We're flying faster to our destinations, fewer emissions and given

0:05:29.660 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the struggles that seem to be persisting with sustainable fuels smart. Right. Yeah, this,

0:05:35.570 --> 0:05:37.899
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of surprised because I had always just assumed

0:05:37.910 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>that planes would take the shortest route possible, right.

0:05:43.609 --> 0:05:46.178
<v Speaker 2>But there are dynamics, I guess in the sky they've

0:05:46.190 --> 0:05:48.988
<v Speaker 2>got wind, you've got the shape of the earth. Yes,

0:05:49.070 --> 0:05:50.929
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's a bit surprising. We're not doing this

0:05:50.940 --> 0:05:54.018
<v Speaker 2>already but better late than never. Yeah. Good, good. Oh,

0:05:54.029 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm really happy about that start. I'll see your flying

0:05:57.928 --> 0:06:04.420
<v Speaker 2>shortcuts and raise your cargo for shortcuts. Alright. So Japan

0:06:04.428 --> 0:06:08.469
<v Speaker 2>has plans to build this giant 500 kilometer road and

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.339
<v Speaker 2>tunnel conveyor belt system

0:06:10.579 --> 0:06:15.339
<v Speaker 2>to move cargo between two of its busiest cities Tokyo,

0:06:16.559 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 2>you've stolen my conveyor belt. Oh, did I sorry? Beat

0:06:19.369 --> 0:06:22.510
<v Speaker 2>you to the punch. So this conveyor belt system think

0:06:22.519 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 2>conveyor belt sushi, right? But just a bit bigger actually

0:06:26.850 --> 0:06:30.709
<v Speaker 2>a lot bigger and it solves two big issues for

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the country. First, it addresses

0:06:32.291 --> 0:06:35.553
<v Speaker 2>a shortage of truck drivers that is becoming increasingly worse

0:06:35.562 --> 0:06:38.713
<v Speaker 2>as the population ages and then it also helps to

0:06:38.722 --> 0:06:44.601
<v Speaker 2>slash transport emissions. Now, freight transportation accounted for more than 7%

0:06:44.613 --> 0:06:48.442
<v Speaker 2>of Japan's total co two emissions. And this so called

0:06:48.452 --> 0:06:51.602
<v Speaker 2>auto flow road reportedly can carry the same amount of

0:06:51.613 --> 0:06:53.773
<v Speaker 2>cargo as 25,000

0:06:53.906 --> 0:06:56.765
<v Speaker 2>trucks a day. And it involves, I looked at the

0:06:56.776 --> 0:07:00.226
<v Speaker 2>pictures of this and it involves belts either in the

0:07:00.235 --> 0:07:03.186
<v Speaker 2>middle of the highway or on the road shoulders as

0:07:03.196 --> 0:07:06.955
<v Speaker 2>well as underground tunnels to transport the cargo. It all

0:07:06.966 --> 0:07:09.615
<v Speaker 2>goes according to plan, it will be ready in about

0:07:09.626 --> 0:07:12.196
<v Speaker 2>10 years. So I think it will be quite a

0:07:12.205 --> 0:07:14.585
<v Speaker 2>sight to see and really if anybody could pull this off,

0:07:14.596 --> 0:07:15.446
<v Speaker 2>Japan could,

0:07:15.790 --> 0:07:18.739
<v Speaker 2>yeah, this is Japan in my mind like coming up

0:07:18.750 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>with these like high tech ideas that we always associate

0:07:22.609 --> 0:07:25.019
<v Speaker 2>with the country. Yeah, I mean efficient logistics makes a

0:07:25.029 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of sense, moving some goods I think would be

0:07:27.890 --> 0:07:31.589
<v Speaker 2>much faster, I think especially like fresh food, for example,

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.109
<v Speaker 2>could be moved in a much more efficient manner. I

0:07:34.119 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>bet it's gonna be super expensive. But yeah, some blue

0:07:36.929 --> 0:07:38.089
<v Speaker 2>sky thinking for sure.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.279
<v Speaker 2>My story number two. This one's also from a few

0:07:43.290 --> 0:07:45.670
<v Speaker 2>weeks back. But I think it's worth mentioning because we

0:07:45.679 --> 0:07:50.450
<v Speaker 2>often talk about this issue about fossil fuel financing back

0:07:50.459 --> 0:07:53.510
<v Speaker 2>in my backyard. One of the major banks in Australia,

0:07:53.519 --> 0:07:57.829
<v Speaker 2>the country's largest lender, the Commonwealth Bank announced that it'll

0:07:57.839 --> 0:08:02.769
<v Speaker 2>be moving away from funding fossil fuel companies that don't

0:08:02.779 --> 0:08:05.309
<v Speaker 2>have proper emissions reduction plans.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.899
<v Speaker 2>Supposedly, it's ditching coal, it's ditching gas if those lenders

0:08:09.910 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 2>don't have policies that are in line with the Paris Agreement.

0:08:13.730 --> 0:08:16.899
<v Speaker 2>Good news, right. This has already been happening to a degree.

0:08:16.910 --> 0:08:20.489
<v Speaker 2>The CB A has dropped its fossil fuel loans already

0:08:20.500 --> 0:08:24.619
<v Speaker 2>by 92% over the past few years and halved its

0:08:24.630 --> 0:08:27.380
<v Speaker 2>exposure to oil and gas. And there are a number

0:08:27.390 --> 0:08:30.940
<v Speaker 2>of reasons why they're doing this. These are increasingly uncertain

0:08:30.950 --> 0:08:33.700
<v Speaker 2>investments that can add risk to a bank's portfolio.

0:08:33.789 --> 0:08:37.689
<v Speaker 2>It also increases their exposure to lawsuits and climate activism.

0:08:37.820 --> 0:08:40.940
<v Speaker 2>And we always talk about how climate financing is so

0:08:40.950 --> 0:08:45.270
<v Speaker 2>important and the lingering trails of fossil fuel investment is

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.228
<v Speaker 2>a big complication to why we're not reaching our climate

0:08:48.239 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>goals and many banks are not moving very fast. If

0:08:51.409 --> 0:08:54.718
<v Speaker 2>you look around this region, the fossil fuel investments are

0:08:54.729 --> 0:08:57.210
<v Speaker 2>still happening. They're still in the pipeline of many of

0:08:57.219 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>our banks.

0:08:58.409 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>When banks do this, I think it's well worth celebrating. Absolutely. Ok.

0:09:03.090 --> 0:09:07.159
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of fossil fuels and the transition away from them,

0:09:07.419 --> 0:09:11.059
<v Speaker 2>I have something, some good news about the cost of renewables.

0:09:11.070 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 2>And of course, a lot of this has to do

0:09:12.289 --> 0:09:15.530
<v Speaker 2>with demand and supply. So new renewable power capacity set

0:09:15.539 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a record in 2023 with over 470 gigawatts of new

0:09:21.210 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 2>installed capacity.

0:09:23.109 --> 0:09:26.289
<v Speaker 2>This is from a report issued this month by the

0:09:26.299 --> 0:09:30.530
<v Speaker 2>International Renewable Energy Agency and it loss. Yeah, the big

0:09:30.539 --> 0:09:35.109
<v Speaker 2>dogs and this is a 54% increase compared to 2022.

0:09:35.119 --> 0:09:40.039
<v Speaker 2>It's the largest annual growth since around 2000 I believe. Now.

0:09:40.049 --> 0:09:43.150
<v Speaker 2>Also encouraging is that it found that the cost of

0:09:43.500 --> 0:09:48.909
<v Speaker 2>electricity generated from renewable power is dropping rather significantly. Get

0:09:48.919 --> 0:09:53.450
<v Speaker 2>this of new or additional renewable power last year was

0:09:53.460 --> 0:09:57.929
<v Speaker 2>cheaper than fossil fuel. And the global weighted average cost

0:09:57.940 --> 0:10:03.729
<v Speaker 2>of electricity fell rapidly between 2010 and 2023.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>So I know this is a lot of numbers but

0:10:05.890 --> 0:10:10.869
<v Speaker 2>try and keep up. Now this decline in cost includes

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.830
<v Speaker 2>a 90% plunge in the cost of power from solar

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:18.179
<v Speaker 2>photovoltaics and a 70% decline in onshore wind power cost.

0:10:18.190 --> 0:10:21.369
<v Speaker 2>So basically it means that utility or large scale renewable

0:10:21.380 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 2>power is getting cheaper at a very encouraging pace. Sit

0:10:25.729 --> 0:10:28.659
<v Speaker 2>there very good. Now we just need to

0:10:29.099 --> 0:10:33.549
<v Speaker 2>upgrade all of our grids and transmission lines to really

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:38.789
<v Speaker 2>make the most of this increasingly cheap energy infrastructure.

0:10:42.099 --> 0:10:45.630
<v Speaker 2>Ok. Changing pace a little bit emojis. Are you a

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:50.429
<v Speaker 2>big fan slash user leading of emojis? I don't see

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.340
<v Speaker 2>you using them that much. No, not really. I'm not

0:10:53.349 --> 0:10:56.489
<v Speaker 2>even a fan of the exclamation mark. So emojis that

0:10:56.500 --> 0:10:58.890
<v Speaker 2>could be a bit aggressive, right? The exclamation. I just

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.119
<v Speaker 2>realized that so many of my messages come across

0:11:01.215 --> 0:11:05.234
<v Speaker 2>as like, too serious and mean. So I have started

0:11:05.244 --> 0:11:09.494
<v Speaker 2>using emojis. Yes, I'm all about them. I use them

0:11:09.505 --> 0:11:11.885
<v Speaker 2>a bit too much. Even in professional emails I probably

0:11:11.895 --> 0:11:14.635
<v Speaker 2>should stop. There are going to be some new ones

0:11:14.645 --> 0:11:17.875
<v Speaker 2>coming up. Yay. Ok. That's not the full news because

0:11:17.885 --> 0:11:21.125
<v Speaker 2>of course, there are so many emojis already, but from

0:11:21.135 --> 0:11:23.614
<v Speaker 2>next year, there's going to be a new set released

0:11:23.924 --> 0:11:27.875
<v Speaker 2>with at least one of them having the environment in mind.

0:11:28.549 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>This might not sound positive, but this new emoji is

0:11:31.890 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>a leafless tree and it's dry and it's suffering from drought.

0:11:36.429 --> 0:11:39.530
<v Speaker 2>The idea is that having this little picture can help

0:11:39.539 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 2>people communicate about the changing planet and drought is like

0:11:43.690 --> 0:11:46.090
<v Speaker 2>a massive issue for many communities around the world. And

0:11:46.099 --> 0:11:49.340
<v Speaker 2>it seems that environmental groups are pretty happy about this,

0:11:49.349 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>like seemingly insignificant news. But as Catherine told us last week,

0:11:54.010 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the best way to combat climate change is to talk

0:11:56.530 --> 0:11:58.049
<v Speaker 2>about it. So here's another way

0:11:58.469 --> 0:12:00.809
<v Speaker 2>that we can do it. There are other interesting emojis

0:12:00.820 --> 0:12:04.218
<v Speaker 2>not really related to the climate, but you'll soon be

0:12:04.229 --> 0:12:07.260
<v Speaker 2>able to have a fingerprint, a shovel. It's like a

0:12:07.270 --> 0:12:10.039
<v Speaker 2>purple splatter kind of thing. I don't know what that's

0:12:10.049 --> 0:12:14.250
<v Speaker 2>for and a yellow face that's looking completely exhausted with

0:12:14.260 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 2>bags under its eyes. So I reckon maybe that's one

0:12:17.010 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 2>you could start to use or on group chat. Yeah,

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.049
<v Speaker 2>I know you're working hard. So I think you're working.

0:12:25.059 --> 0:12:26.799
<v Speaker 2>Moving on. All right,

0:12:27.530 --> 0:12:30.659
<v Speaker 2>I'll take your emojis. I'll see your emojis and raise

0:12:30.669 --> 0:12:33.119
<v Speaker 2>you Royal British goats.

0:12:33.659 --> 0:12:36.460
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to King Charles the third who in July bestowed

0:12:36.469 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 2>a royal title to a rare gold haired goat breed

0:12:41.369 --> 0:12:44.969
<v Speaker 2>that is seemingly at risk. And according to the associated press,

0:12:44.979 --> 0:12:48.260
<v Speaker 2>the breed now has the special title of Royal Golden

0:12:48.270 --> 0:12:52.489
<v Speaker 2>Guns Goat. And the title applies to the breed anywhere

0:12:52.500 --> 0:12:57.179
<v Speaker 2>in the world. It recognizes their value to biodiversity, the

0:12:57.190 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 2>environment

0:12:58.330 --> 0:13:02.900
<v Speaker 2>and sustainable food production and their milk is apparently quite

0:13:02.909 --> 0:13:06.789
<v Speaker 2>good chock a win for the goat royal milk. You'd

0:13:06.799 --> 0:13:08.969
<v Speaker 2>be drinking. I don't think milk is royal, but the

0:13:08.979 --> 0:13:12.049
<v Speaker 2>goat is, although I suppose the milk would be royal too,

0:13:12.059 --> 0:13:13.909
<v Speaker 2>then wouldn't it? So hang on. Why is it a

0:13:13.919 --> 0:13:18.510
<v Speaker 2>royal goat? Because King Charles the third likes it

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.229
<v Speaker 2>and I think they wanted to preserve it because it's

0:13:22.239 --> 0:13:26.189
<v Speaker 2>a vulnerable breed. Yeah, we just need more species, maybe

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.950
<v Speaker 2>a knighted sheep or something. Money flowing to these goats.

0:13:30.119 --> 0:13:33.729
<v Speaker 2>Uh Yeah. Yeah, it could be just symbolic. I don't know,

0:13:33.739 --> 0:13:37.469
<v Speaker 2>but hey, it grabs attention, right? A goat, royal goat

0:13:37.479 --> 0:13:37.950
<v Speaker 2>breed

0:13:40.349 --> 0:13:45.739
<v Speaker 2>story four is about a I your favorite topic and

0:13:45.750 --> 0:13:49.179
<v Speaker 2>we had an episode a few months back where we

0:13:49.190 --> 0:13:53.099
<v Speaker 2>talked about how A I is helping in the environmental space.

0:13:53.570 --> 0:13:56.419
<v Speaker 2>And I think they were really interesting examples in our region.

0:13:56.429 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>And now Google is teaming up with Griffith University and

0:14:00.289 --> 0:14:05.419
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna use A I technology to monitor humpback whale migrations.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>So normally my understanding of tracking whales is really time

0:14:10.770 --> 0:14:14.940
<v Speaker 2>consuming and really logistically difficult. But now they're going to

0:14:14.950 --> 0:14:19.409
<v Speaker 2>deploy these underwater microphones and they'll use Google A I

0:14:19.460 --> 0:14:25.940
<v Speaker 2>to continuously detect whale sounds, track their location, classify species.

0:14:26.140 --> 0:14:29.169
<v Speaker 2>And it should give the researchers a clearer picture about

0:14:29.179 --> 0:14:33.650
<v Speaker 2>how whales are behaving and where they are moving. So

0:14:34.210 --> 0:14:36.419
<v Speaker 2>yeah, and in the end, it might help us to

0:14:36.429 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 2>conserve and protect the species. So A I once again

0:14:39.969 --> 0:14:42.590
<v Speaker 2>stepping in and doing the tasks that we don't like

0:14:42.599 --> 0:14:46.419
<v Speaker 2>or we're unable to in an efficient way. Absolutely. A

0:14:46.469 --> 0:14:52.460
<v Speaker 2>good news story undeniably. Yes. Yes. Fantastic news. Always happy

0:14:52.469 --> 0:14:55.919
<v Speaker 2>to hear good news about very scary A I OK.

0:14:56.359 --> 0:14:59.859
<v Speaker 2>What do I have? I've got plastic eating microbes. Now,

0:14:59.869 --> 0:15:01.260
<v Speaker 2>the French beauty brand

0:15:01.539 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Loxy than has an almond oil shower gel bottled in

0:15:06.530 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>a plastic pe T flask made from plastic, recycled through

0:15:12.330 --> 0:15:16.619
<v Speaker 2>the digestion of used bottles by microbial enzymes. So basically

0:15:16.630 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 2>these microbes digest use plastics and then what they digest

0:15:22.849 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>is then made in

0:15:24.046 --> 0:15:29.367
<v Speaker 2>to new poly ethylene Terrel bottles. So it's a product

0:15:29.377 --> 0:15:34.067
<v Speaker 2>by French Biotech company, Carbs in partnership with Loxy. And

0:15:34.077 --> 0:15:37.177
<v Speaker 2>it's an example of what microbes can do to help

0:15:37.187 --> 0:15:40.877
<v Speaker 2>the environment and address this massive waste problem that we

0:15:40.887 --> 0:15:43.396
<v Speaker 2>are seeing around the world. Now, it's from the Nature

0:15:43.406 --> 0:15:46.137
<v Speaker 2>Journal and it says that research is underway to see

0:15:46.146 --> 0:15:46.466
<v Speaker 2>how they can

0:15:46.554 --> 0:15:49.263
<v Speaker 2>be harnessed these microbes, how they can be harnessed to

0:15:49.273 --> 0:15:53.823
<v Speaker 2>eat pollutants from what we call forever chemicals to cyanide,

0:15:53.833 --> 0:15:56.294
<v Speaker 2>as well as petroleum. It's a proven signs and the

0:15:56.304 --> 0:16:00.814
<v Speaker 2>market for this so called bio remediation is expected to

0:16:00.823 --> 0:16:05.684
<v Speaker 2>grow by more than $8 billion by 2028 compared to

0:16:05.693 --> 0:16:08.963
<v Speaker 2>last year. And part of the explanation is that bacteria,

0:16:09.060 --> 0:16:12.661
<v Speaker 2>our microbes can mutate and evolve quickly to adapt to

0:16:12.671 --> 0:16:17.370
<v Speaker 2>their environment and consume whatever carbon sources are available and

0:16:17.380 --> 0:16:23.721
<v Speaker 2>that includes plastic. So new discovery, new research potential A I,

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.721
<v Speaker 2>are you afraid of? You know, I am I like

0:16:26.731 --> 0:16:29.460
<v Speaker 2>the microbes, not such a fan of A I but

0:16:29.471 --> 0:16:31.401
<v Speaker 2>I I recognize its value.

0:16:34.140 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Alright. Last story going to Italy. Now my partner and

0:16:38.650 --> 0:16:41.789
<v Speaker 2>I were thinking about planning a trip recently to Sicily.

0:16:41.799 --> 0:16:45.190
<v Speaker 2>It's been on my list for quite a few years.

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.010
<v Speaker 2>Have you been? No, I hear it's very dry now. Well, yeah,

0:16:48.020 --> 0:16:50.710
<v Speaker 2>it is dry and that's one of the reasons why

0:16:50.719 --> 0:16:52.409
<v Speaker 2>we decided actually against it.

0:16:52.659 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd read news about the extreme drought situation that was

0:16:56.210 --> 0:16:58.719
<v Speaker 2>happening there over the past few months and I felt

0:16:58.729 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 2>like tourism during times of resource shortages is a bit irresponsible.

0:17:05.150 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I just felt like ah, maybe we

0:17:07.050 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't go there when

0:17:08.255 --> 0:17:11.534
<v Speaker 2>people are struggling with having enough water and the farmers

0:17:11.545 --> 0:17:13.685
<v Speaker 2>don't have enough water and you're adding to the strain

0:17:13.694 --> 0:17:16.444
<v Speaker 2>of a community that's very thoughtful of you. It was

0:17:16.454 --> 0:17:18.454
<v Speaker 2>at least a factor. It was at least a factor now,

0:17:18.535 --> 0:17:23.775
<v Speaker 2>incredibly thoughtful of you. Jack. I've got my respect for you. Right.

0:17:24.214 --> 0:17:31.114
<v Speaker 2>So now though, they have found a huge underground water reserve,

0:17:31.474 --> 0:17:35.974
<v Speaker 2>17 billion cubic meters of water. Now, that's a lot

0:17:35.984 --> 0:17:36.545
<v Speaker 2>of water

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.099
<v Speaker 2>and it dates back millions of years. And basically, it's

0:17:40.109 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 2>the equivalent of 6.8 million Olympic size swimming pools or

0:17:45.569 --> 0:17:48.300
<v Speaker 2>the equivalent of giving every single person in the world

0:17:48.310 --> 0:17:51.659
<v Speaker 2>a 2000 L tank of water. So

0:17:52.099 --> 0:17:56.510
<v Speaker 2>it's an immense discovery actually, they think it was discovered

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.459
<v Speaker 2>about 20 years ago, but they've done some proper research

0:17:59.469 --> 0:18:02.599
<v Speaker 2>on it. Now, it's pretty far underground. Obviously, lots of

0:18:02.609 --> 0:18:05.780
<v Speaker 2>people want to utilize the water for drinking needs, for animals,

0:18:05.790 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>for farming and Sicily has been suffering. So undoubtedly, of course,

0:18:09.569 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 2>there will be some bureaucratic obstacles studies that need to

0:18:12.930 --> 0:18:15.219
<v Speaker 2>be done. But yeah, it could be a little lifeline

0:18:15.229 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 2>for the people there and

0:18:16.439 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe I will get to go on that holiday without

0:18:18.770 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the guilt of using up their precious resources. Ok. So

0:18:22.569 --> 0:18:24.569
<v Speaker 2>we've got the last one and I think this is

0:18:24.579 --> 0:18:27.949
<v Speaker 2>quite fitting. It's about climate therapy for those of us

0:18:27.959 --> 0:18:30.250
<v Speaker 2>who have had enough of the doom and gloom and

0:18:30.260 --> 0:18:34.699
<v Speaker 2>need a little bit of self care. There are resources

0:18:34.709 --> 0:18:36.060
<v Speaker 2>that you can tap into

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.619
<v Speaker 2>so people with eco distress, so called eco distress can

0:18:40.630 --> 0:18:45.139
<v Speaker 2>get group therapy. Now, it's called the Good Grief Network.

0:18:45.150 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 2>And they started out from research at the University of Utah.

0:18:50.550 --> 0:18:54.099
<v Speaker 2>They now offer group climate therapy sessions across

0:18:54.175 --> 0:18:57.275
<v Speaker 2>the world. This is based from a report from insight,

0:18:57.285 --> 0:19:01.264
<v Speaker 2>climate news.org. It said in early September that this is

0:19:01.275 --> 0:19:05.314
<v Speaker 2>the brainchild of a psychiatrist who started up the therapy

0:19:05.324 --> 0:19:08.454
<v Speaker 2>support network a decade ago to help front line climate

0:19:08.464 --> 0:19:13.944
<v Speaker 2>workers overwhelmed by global warming. It involves a 10 step

0:19:13.954 --> 0:19:18.515
<v Speaker 2>program for resilience and empowerment in a chaotic climate.

0:19:18.729 --> 0:19:22.430
<v Speaker 2>And that begins with acceptance grieving over harm caused and

0:19:22.439 --> 0:19:26.829
<v Speaker 2>investing in meaningful effort. Sounds a bit like alcoholic anonymous.

0:19:26.839 --> 0:19:28.599
<v Speaker 2>If it's across the world, is it like an in

0:19:28.719 --> 0:19:31.780
<v Speaker 2>person thing or online or I'm not sure. But I

0:19:31.790 --> 0:19:35.409
<v Speaker 2>think they have like representation in different parts of the world.

0:19:35.689 --> 0:19:36.189
<v Speaker 2>And

0:19:36.324 --> 0:19:38.564
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that they have online courses. I didn't really

0:19:38.574 --> 0:19:40.864
<v Speaker 2>look into this, but I will because I'm quite interested

0:19:40.875 --> 0:19:42.264
<v Speaker 2>in signing up. I think we get a lot of

0:19:42.275 --> 0:19:45.714
<v Speaker 2>trauma from doing this podcast and having to sift through

0:19:45.724 --> 0:19:49.204
<v Speaker 2>all the doom and gloom, right? Maybe not you. But yeah,

0:19:49.214 --> 0:19:52.574
<v Speaker 2>let me know how it goes. It's pretty gloomy material.

0:19:54.969 --> 0:19:58.810
<v Speaker 2>Ok. Anyway, we hope that those stories were a little

0:19:58.819 --> 0:20:02.329
<v Speaker 2>bit uplifting in a way, at least showing some of

0:20:02.339 --> 0:20:05.819
<v Speaker 2>the solutions that are out there. Not everything is about

0:20:05.829 --> 0:20:08.329
<v Speaker 2>the end of the planet. All right. Shall we do

0:20:08.339 --> 0:20:11.329
<v Speaker 2>the quiz now? Oh, you're excited for the quiz. Ok.

0:20:14.239 --> 0:20:17.859
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you the question again. Rank these countries by

0:20:17.869 --> 0:20:24.459
<v Speaker 2>respondents who are optimistic about the future, South Korea, China,

0:20:24.469 --> 0:20:28.699
<v Speaker 2>Australia and Sweden. So I'm gonna go with Australia first

0:20:28.709 --> 0:20:31.958
<v Speaker 2>because you're Australian and you're really quite optimistic. So I'm

0:20:31.969 --> 0:20:35.180
<v Speaker 2>guessing it's kind of part of the national collective DNA.

0:20:35.189 --> 0:20:37.419
<v Speaker 2>So Australia tops the list for me.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:42.020
<v Speaker 2>Then I'm going to go with Sweden because Nordic countries

0:20:42.030 --> 0:20:44.699
<v Speaker 2>keep topping the World Happiness Index. So I think it

0:20:44.709 --> 0:20:48.899
<v Speaker 2>might translate into the optimism over climate change.

0:20:49.339 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Then I'm going to go to South Korea, but only

0:20:51.689 --> 0:20:56.969
<v Speaker 2>because it's smaller than China, which has a massive surface area,

0:20:56.979 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 2>vulnerable to multiple effects of climate change and with its

0:20:59.689 --> 0:21:02.819
<v Speaker 2>population of over 1.4 billion people. So I imagine it's

0:21:02.829 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 2>harder for the country as a whole to be very

0:21:06.199 --> 0:21:11.839
<v Speaker 2>optimistic about climate change. How did I do? Interesting logic.

0:21:12.349 --> 0:21:16.839
<v Speaker 2>You've got one out of four. I love that. You

0:21:16.849 --> 0:21:20.179
<v Speaker 2>thought Australians are so optimistic. I think we generally are,

0:21:20.349 --> 0:21:23.688
<v Speaker 2>but we're also hit by a bunch of hard stuff.

0:21:24.020 --> 0:21:27.660
<v Speaker 2>So Australia comes in at 2nd, 55% of people are

0:21:27.670 --> 0:21:31.229
<v Speaker 2>optimistic about the future still pretty low. But second on

0:21:31.239 --> 0:21:31.849
<v Speaker 2>this list,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 2>South Korea, you got correct in third place. Only 36%

0:21:37.369 --> 0:21:44.510
<v Speaker 2>of people are optimistic. There top is China, 71% are

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.910
<v Speaker 2>optimistic and the bottom was Sweden, 35%. Despite all they've

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:50.739
<v Speaker 2>got going on for them over there,

0:21:51.050 --> 0:21:54.010
<v Speaker 2>they still have this negative view of the world. They're

0:21:54.020 --> 0:21:57.930
<v Speaker 2>like constantly ranking top, you know, top five on in

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and they're so difficult to please. Jeez. So there you go.

0:22:04.369 --> 0:22:06.790
<v Speaker 2>Not as good as last week, but good effort. That's ok.

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.188
<v Speaker 2>We all learn something new and that's what matters indeed.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.489
<v Speaker 2>Alright. That's it for climate conversations. Thanks as always for

0:22:14.500 --> 0:22:17.579
<v Speaker 2>joining us. We'll be back next week and until then,

0:22:17.589 --> 0:22:21.020
<v Speaker 2>I'm Li Ling Tan Ari Dei and I'm Jack Boyd.

0:22:21.030 --> 0:22:23.949
<v Speaker 2>Thanks as always to the team that put together this podcast,

0:22:23.959 --> 0:22:29.300
<v Speaker 2>Tiffany Ang, Janani, Jahari, Kristina Robert and SA NC. Bye.