WEBVTT - Should I join the mass exodus and leave for another company?

0:00:02.109 --> 0:00:05.139
<v Speaker 1>Hi, this is our Ask Me Anything segment where we

0:00:05.139 --> 0:00:09.069
<v Speaker 1>tackle a question you have sent us. Our listener quaint

0:00:09.069 --> 0:00:11.739
<v Speaker 1>sent one to us and we're going to talk about it.

0:00:12.029 --> 0:00:14.909
<v Speaker 1>He's in a close knit team of about 15 people

0:00:14.909 --> 0:00:17.549
<v Speaker 1>and they're in the banking sector. One of the senior

0:00:17.549 --> 0:00:21.069
<v Speaker 1>managers came across an opportunity in a competing firm and

0:00:21.069 --> 0:00:23.459
<v Speaker 1>has floated the idea to 5 people in the team,

0:00:23.829 --> 0:00:24.590
<v Speaker 1>including Queen.

0:00:25.290 --> 0:00:28.649
<v Speaker 1>Now no one has a non-compete or a non-solicitation clause

0:00:28.649 --> 0:00:32.569
<v Speaker 1>in their contract, but they're concerned about the fallout when

0:00:32.569 --> 0:00:36.699
<v Speaker 1>they announced their resignation. Before we could record this AMA,

0:00:36.930 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Quin wrote back to me that one of the directors

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.529
<v Speaker 1>that he wants to work with pulled out saying that

0:00:42.529 --> 0:00:45.278
<v Speaker 1>he prefers the stability of the current job but may

0:00:45.279 --> 0:00:47.689
<v Speaker 1>move in 9 months' time. Quinn is not sure what

0:00:47.689 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to do now. Should he move? And if he does,

0:00:50.209 --> 0:00:53.490
<v Speaker 1>will this mass exodus look bad for all of them.

0:00:53.729 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I think Tiffany, this is a very interesting situation. 15

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>people are moving

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>together. Yeah, 15 people in the team, but about 5

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>people are going to move, so a third of them

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are going

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to move.

0:01:02.990 --> 0:01:03.599
<v Speaker 2>So it's like the first

0:01:03.599 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>batch, batch. Who knows, there may

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 2>be

0:01:05.839 --> 0:01:06.010
<v Speaker 1>more.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.239
<v Speaker 2>I think just based on this situation, right, my suspicion

0:01:09.239 --> 0:01:11.690
<v Speaker 2>is Quinn may be seeing things from perhaps a rose.

0:01:11.925 --> 0:01:15.044
<v Speaker 2>The lens of a happy family working together, but I

0:01:15.044 --> 0:01:17.054
<v Speaker 2>think in reality it really doesn't work that way. Yeah.

0:01:18.144 --> 0:01:21.775
<v Speaker 2>Usually most of big groups of people moving across competing firms,

0:01:22.035 --> 0:01:24.305
<v Speaker 2>they don't really happen. When they break it up into

0:01:24.305 --> 0:01:26.785
<v Speaker 2>like batches of the 1st 5, sometimes there's a reason

0:01:26.785 --> 0:01:29.264
<v Speaker 2>why they break you into the batches, right? Certain things

0:01:29.264 --> 0:01:30.065
<v Speaker 2>are maybe

0:01:30.250 --> 0:01:31.869
<v Speaker 2>The first group of people are the ones that they really,

0:01:31.879 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 2>really want, and then after that, things may

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:34.449
<v Speaker 2>change.

0:01:34.519 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like nice to have, but then I feel bad

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't bring you across. So we kind of

0:01:39.559 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>floated the idea

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:40.690
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.750
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's what I mean by the rose-tinted lenses.

0:01:42.839 --> 0:01:46.019
<v Speaker 2>Usually the higher, maybe they prefer certain employees and then

0:01:46.019 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 2>they want them to come as the first batch. The

0:01:47.559 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>rest is like see how. I think also when such

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.650
<v Speaker 2>moves are being discussed, right, it's not just the demand

0:01:53.650 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>side that may change, but it's also even on the

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.309
<v Speaker 2>employee side, the supply side, the supply side.

0:01:58.663 --> 0:02:01.773
<v Speaker 2>In different life stages, different tenure in the company. Some

0:02:01.773 --> 0:02:04.053
<v Speaker 2>of them might feel that, OK, if some people in

0:02:04.053 --> 0:02:07.212
<v Speaker 2>my team move on, I have opportunities. Oh yes, that's true.

0:02:07.373 --> 0:02:09.973
<v Speaker 2>If I stay on, the loyalty may be rewarded. I'm

0:02:09.973 --> 0:02:12.242
<v Speaker 2>be able to progress further, there's a gap, you see.

0:02:12.651 --> 0:02:15.332
<v Speaker 2>So it's not realistic to say everybody will move together

0:02:15.332 --> 0:02:15.722
<v Speaker 2>for the same

0:02:15.723 --> 0:02:16.003
<v Speaker 2>thing.

0:02:16.093 --> 0:02:18.013
<v Speaker 1>I think the sound of it at the start sounds

0:02:18.013 --> 0:02:21.172
<v Speaker 1>very good because it sounds like very spartan moment, like

0:02:21.173 --> 0:02:24.563
<v Speaker 1>we are going to go and then everybody is like, move,

0:02:24.733 --> 0:02:26.931
<v Speaker 1>judge that kind of stuff, but you're right.

0:02:27.085 --> 0:02:29.745
<v Speaker 1>Because there might be people who are, let's say parents

0:02:29.746 --> 0:02:32.386
<v Speaker 1>or who have loans and they might go, you know,

0:02:32.505 --> 0:02:34.906
<v Speaker 1>I would prefer the stability, like one of the directors

0:02:34.906 --> 0:02:37.424
<v Speaker 1>that he mentioned, right, would prefer the stability. And I

0:02:37.425 --> 0:02:39.805
<v Speaker 1>think when he said I might move in 9 months' time,

0:02:39.826 --> 0:02:42.326
<v Speaker 1>I think that person is also sussing out because what

0:02:42.326 --> 0:02:45.424
<v Speaker 1>if things change within the current company if he gets

0:02:45.425 --> 0:02:47.985
<v Speaker 1>a promotion like you say, he might not move or

0:02:47.985 --> 0:02:50.785
<v Speaker 1>if the company decides, OK, this is not very, yeah,

0:02:50.945 --> 0:02:53.246
<v Speaker 1>there's not double bootload, we are not going to increase headcount,

0:02:53.386 --> 0:02:55.275
<v Speaker 1>then maybe he will move. But whatever is the case.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>There are people who want the stability. They don't really

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.258
<v Speaker 1>want the lure of going to something that is new,

0:03:01.399 --> 0:03:04.199
<v Speaker 1>something that pays well now, because they want something that

0:03:04.199 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like bird in hand, right? You have the bird

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in hand. Why do I want to shake my own foundation.

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.228
<v Speaker 1>So you're right, I think maybe what Quin can do

0:03:12.229 --> 0:03:14.550
<v Speaker 1>is to think where is he at at this point

0:03:14.550 --> 0:03:17.029
<v Speaker 1>in his career. Does he need the stability or

0:03:17.184 --> 0:03:19.984
<v Speaker 1>Does he want to try something different? So move not

0:03:19.985 --> 0:03:22.704
<v Speaker 1>because it's like a spartan moment, but you know, do

0:03:22.705 --> 0:03:25.345
<v Speaker 1>it because he wants to. I mean, would you say

0:03:25.345 --> 0:03:27.065
<v Speaker 1>that would be your advice as a career counselor?

0:03:27.304 --> 0:03:29.695
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. I think when we take ownership of our own career,

0:03:29.985 --> 0:03:32.464
<v Speaker 2>we think for ourselves and not just rely on other

0:03:32.464 --> 0:03:35.065
<v Speaker 2>people and what they are doing. It puts the ownership

0:03:35.065 --> 0:03:36.904
<v Speaker 2>of career into our own hands and we are more

0:03:36.904 --> 0:03:40.264
<v Speaker 2>convinced and convicted, committed towards how we want our career

0:03:40.264 --> 0:03:42.475
<v Speaker 2>to move forward. I mean, just imagine, right, if today

0:03:42.869 --> 0:03:45.539
<v Speaker 2>Quin makes a move across and then he realizes that

0:03:45.539 --> 0:03:47.449
<v Speaker 2>actually the grass is not greener on the other side.

0:03:47.789 --> 0:03:49.589
<v Speaker 2>Then where do you put that blame? Do you blame

0:03:49.589 --> 0:03:52.470
<v Speaker 2>that because everybody went, so that's why I also followed

0:03:52.470 --> 0:03:54.190
<v Speaker 2>on and it's not working out for me, but it's

0:03:54.190 --> 0:03:56.110
<v Speaker 2>working out for everybody else. I think it's important to

0:03:56.110 --> 0:03:58.259
<v Speaker 2>think for yourself so that you have the ownership.

0:03:58.804 --> 0:04:01.675
<v Speaker 2>Good thing is work relationships can progress into friendships outside

0:04:01.675 --> 0:04:04.354
<v Speaker 2>of work. So the relationships that Queen, you built up

0:04:04.354 --> 0:04:06.955
<v Speaker 2>with your 14 other people on the team, it will

0:04:06.955 --> 0:04:09.274
<v Speaker 2>last past the companies that you are in, no matter

0:04:09.274 --> 0:04:11.654
<v Speaker 2>where you are at. So continue to build that into

0:04:11.654 --> 0:04:13.785
<v Speaker 2>a friendship, perhaps then you won't miss them that much.

0:04:13.955 --> 0:04:14.755
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:04:15.250 --> 0:04:18.179
<v Speaker 1>Now, Quaint, I hope our conversation has given you some

0:04:18.178 --> 0:04:21.630
<v Speaker 1>clarity on what to do. Let us know what you decide.

0:04:21.779 --> 0:04:24.579
<v Speaker 1>We're really very curious. If like Quint you have a

0:04:24.579 --> 0:04:28.010
<v Speaker 1>work-related question, do write into us. We're at CNA podcasts

0:04:28.010 --> 0:04:33.730
<v Speaker 1>at Medcorp.com.sg. You can also find us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts,

0:04:33.779 --> 0:04:34.859
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube.

0:04:35.100 --> 0:04:37.730
<v Speaker 1>The team behind the Work It podcast is Christina Robert,

0:04:37.809 --> 0:04:41.890
<v Speaker 1>Joan Chan, Juani Johari and Sai Ye Win. Sound mixing

0:04:41.890 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>by Carrie Lim, video by Hanida Amin. I'm Gry and

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tiffany. Here's wishing you a good work week ahead.