WEBVTT - Why oil spills are especially nasty

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.170
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to AC N A podcast.

0:00:06.380 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It's fair to say Singapore's been shocked and a bit

0:00:09.648 --> 0:00:12.890
<v Speaker 1>saddened by the fallout of the oil spill that happened

0:00:12.898 --> 0:00:17.530
<v Speaker 1>on June 14 weeks on the situation is still unfolding,

0:00:17.969 --> 0:00:21.379
<v Speaker 1>containing thousands of tons of oil in the environment is

0:00:21.389 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a major challenge and the cleanup will take a long time.

0:00:25.979 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Even as we wean off fossil fuels, oil is all

0:00:29.530 --> 0:00:33.439
<v Speaker 1>around us. Today. We're looking at how to live with it.

0:00:35.598 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to climate conversations. I'm Jack Ford, coming

0:00:39.689 --> 0:00:43.750
<v Speaker 1>to you from Bangkok and Hello Li Ling Tan in Singapore.

0:00:43.950 --> 0:00:46.168
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're good. Yes, I am. Thank you very

0:00:46.180 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>much for asking. I hope you are too. I am. Now,

0:00:49.090 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this story though has really captured people's attentions and emotions,

0:00:53.049 --> 0:00:55.290
<v Speaker 1>hasn't it? And we will get into the nitty gritty.

0:00:55.299 --> 0:00:55.709
<v Speaker 1>But what sort

0:00:55.792 --> 0:00:59.053
<v Speaker 1>feelings have you experienced? Kind of seeing all these horrible

0:00:59.062 --> 0:01:03.303
<v Speaker 1>images of oil in what is normally a reasonably clean environment? Yeah,

0:01:03.312 --> 0:01:06.333
<v Speaker 1>it's really jarring and very surreal. A lot of the

0:01:06.343 --> 0:01:08.953
<v Speaker 1>attention was along the beaches of Sentosa. A lot of

0:01:08.962 --> 0:01:10.962
<v Speaker 1>the spill was there and I go there a lot,

0:01:10.972 --> 0:01:13.502
<v Speaker 1>usually to the beach clubs at Tanjong Beach. I'm sure

0:01:13.513 --> 0:01:15.892
<v Speaker 1>you've been there too. These are beach clubs where family

0:01:15.986 --> 0:01:18.206
<v Speaker 1>go during the day and party people go at night

0:01:18.215 --> 0:01:20.934
<v Speaker 1>and these are also the beaches where our Children play.

0:01:20.944 --> 0:01:24.606
<v Speaker 1>And for our international listeners, the hotel that hosted the

0:01:24.615 --> 0:01:28.325
<v Speaker 1>Trump Kim Summit is right there to Capella Sentosa, right

0:01:28.334 --> 0:01:31.865
<v Speaker 1>by Palawan Beach. So to see these pictures of the

0:01:31.875 --> 0:01:34.685
<v Speaker 1>oil slick on the water of this getaway destination and

0:01:34.694 --> 0:01:36.075
<v Speaker 1>the blackened sand,

0:01:36.290 --> 0:01:38.970
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to believe, Jack. It's difficult to imagine that

0:01:38.980 --> 0:01:41.518
<v Speaker 1>something like this could happen. So, are you the family

0:01:41.529 --> 0:01:44.220
<v Speaker 1>person going during the day or the party person going

0:01:44.230 --> 0:01:49.260
<v Speaker 1>at night? I will neither deny nor confirm anything. Both actually. Well,

0:01:49.269 --> 0:01:50.819
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what point of my life.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Gotcha. Gotcha.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:00.389
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into our weekly quiz. Everybody's favorite time of

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.940
<v Speaker 1>the episode. We will be talking about alternative marine fuels

0:02:03.949 --> 0:02:07.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later. But developing a cleaner global shipping

0:02:07.250 --> 0:02:10.300
<v Speaker 1>fleet is a big challenge. So I would like to

0:02:10.309 --> 0:02:14.100
<v Speaker 1>know how significant do you think the pollution is from

0:02:14.110 --> 0:02:17.820
<v Speaker 1>one typical large shipping container vessel? One of those big

0:02:17.830 --> 0:02:19.479
<v Speaker 1>ships that you probably see every day.

0:02:19.985 --> 0:02:22.764
<v Speaker 1>If you live in a condominium, you're looking into the sea,

0:02:22.774 --> 0:02:26.035
<v Speaker 1>the Malacca Strait, you'll see these vessels everywhere. One of them,

0:02:26.044 --> 0:02:30.074
<v Speaker 1>is it the same amount of pollution as 50,000 cars

0:02:30.085 --> 0:02:34.195
<v Speaker 1>b the same as a million cars? And for context,

0:02:34.205 --> 0:02:38.195
<v Speaker 1>that's about how many cars Singapore has in total or

0:02:38.205 --> 0:02:43.913
<v Speaker 1>c the same as 50 million cars. Le Ling any

0:02:43.925 --> 0:02:46.354
<v Speaker 1>early thoughts or you wanna save it to the end.

0:02:46.964 --> 0:02:48.235
<v Speaker 1>I'll save it to the end.

0:02:49.710 --> 0:02:52.699
<v Speaker 1>All right. It's news time, Le Ling. What stories have

0:02:52.710 --> 0:02:56.970
<v Speaker 1>captured your attention from the newsroom this week? Well, the

0:02:56.979 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>first one comes from your motherland. Time is running out

0:03:01.089 --> 0:03:05.100
<v Speaker 1>to save the Great Barrier Reef. Jack. That's right, Australia.

0:03:06.809 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So time is running out to save the Great Barrier

0:03:08.729 --> 0:03:10.978
<v Speaker 1>Reef but not so bad that it needs to be

0:03:10.990 --> 0:03:15.119
<v Speaker 1>on the unesco's list of endangered heritage sites. Yet,

0:03:15.470 --> 0:03:17.770
<v Speaker 1>a new report from the UN S Education science and

0:03:17.779 --> 0:03:21.899
<v Speaker 1>cultural arms says the reef remains under serious threat and

0:03:21.910 --> 0:03:26.130
<v Speaker 1>urgent action is needed to protect it. This includes calls

0:03:26.139 --> 0:03:29.970
<v Speaker 1>for more ambitious climate targets. It's among a list of

0:03:29.979 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>recommendations from the UNESCO report about preserving the reef status

0:03:34.889 --> 0:03:38.809
<v Speaker 1>as a world heritage site, but the report stopped short

0:03:38.820 --> 0:03:41.809
<v Speaker 1>of recommending that the reef be placed on its list

0:03:41.820 --> 0:03:43.649
<v Speaker 1>of endangered heritage

0:03:43.753 --> 0:03:46.733
<v Speaker 1>site, something that Australia wants to avoid. Now, it did

0:03:46.742 --> 0:03:51.013
<v Speaker 1>however suggest that Australia submit a progress report by February

0:03:51.022 --> 0:03:54.582
<v Speaker 1>next year. The committee could consider including the reef in

0:03:54.593 --> 0:03:59.292
<v Speaker 1>its list of endangered sites. Later in 2026. The report

0:03:59.302 --> 0:04:02.662
<v Speaker 1>cited concerns about pollution from land clearing that then flow

0:04:02.673 --> 0:04:05.973
<v Speaker 1>into the reef about invasive starfish that feed on the

0:04:05.983 --> 0:04:08.563
<v Speaker 1>coral as well as the mass coral bleaching over the

0:04:08.572 --> 0:04:11.772
<v Speaker 1>past few months. And it wants Australia to make

0:04:12.535 --> 0:04:15.955
<v Speaker 1>the extent of coral die off from this latest bleaching

0:04:15.966 --> 0:04:20.506
<v Speaker 1>event going on for a couple of years and particularly

0:04:20.515 --> 0:04:24.976
<v Speaker 1>the previous Australian government was very strong on not having

0:04:24.985 --> 0:04:28.846
<v Speaker 1>the reef listed as endangered, something that it considers a

0:04:28.855 --> 0:04:32.135
<v Speaker 1>hammer blow to one of the most important sites that

0:04:32.145 --> 0:04:34.895
<v Speaker 1>Australia has. But something has to be done. And I

0:04:34.906 --> 0:04:37.126
<v Speaker 1>feel like a lot of this is just putting our

0:04:37.135 --> 0:04:40.195
<v Speaker 1>head in the sand pretending that there's not a big problem.

0:04:40.579 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 1>There's clearly issues at the reef. Why does Australia not

0:04:43.809 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>want to be on the endangered heritage sites for the reef?

0:04:47.329 --> 0:04:50.649
<v Speaker 1>Why not? It suggests to me that there will be

0:04:50.660 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>blame placed on the lack of protections that have been implemented,

0:04:55.928 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that activity

0:04:57.285 --> 0:05:01.565
<v Speaker 1>that continue all around the reef, including mining, including shipping

0:05:01.575 --> 0:05:05.625
<v Speaker 1>continues and that is putting the reef at further risk.

0:05:05.695 --> 0:05:08.424
<v Speaker 1>So there's a political angle to that. There's a lot

0:05:08.434 --> 0:05:12.553
<v Speaker 1>of politics being played between the government and unesco interesting

0:05:12.565 --> 0:05:13.864
<v Speaker 1>space to watch. I think.

0:05:14.220 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>So. Next up, Jack remember how just over a month

0:05:17.850 --> 0:05:20.609
<v Speaker 1>ago before the oil spill in Singapore took up all

0:05:20.619 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>our head space here. What the big news was the

0:05:23.329 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>extreme turbulence on SQ 321 that led to one death

0:05:27.910 --> 0:05:30.589
<v Speaker 1>and more than 100 people injured. That's like just over

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.539
<v Speaker 1>a month ago, it seems much longer than that, doesn't it? Well,

0:05:33.549 --> 0:05:36.399
<v Speaker 1>we got word this week of technology that can reduce

0:05:36.410 --> 0:05:39.988
<v Speaker 1>the danger of air turbulence. Something that is reportedly becoming

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.070
<v Speaker 1>much more common due to climate change.

0:05:42.380 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And interestingly, it's not new technology. It's actually something that's

0:05:46.609 --> 0:05:50.299
<v Speaker 1>already being used in self driving cars. Jack, you ever

0:05:50.309 --> 0:05:53.290
<v Speaker 1>heard of Lidar? I've heard of it, but I don't

0:05:53.299 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>have a self driving car. So maybe you better explain

0:05:56.850 --> 0:06:00.109
<v Speaker 1>it to me. So it's a type of 3D laser

0:06:00.119 --> 0:06:05.549
<v Speaker 1>scanning technology that can apparently also detect clear air turbulence

0:06:05.570 --> 0:06:09.820
<v Speaker 1>up to 20 miles or 32 kilometers ahead of an aircraft.

0:06:09.829 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And this is according to a

0:06:11.350 --> 0:06:14.089
<v Speaker 1>specialist Chang Chin Wei in an interview with media Corp

0:06:14.100 --> 0:06:18.469
<v Speaker 1>program talking point. Now Chung explains how lidar can detect

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.820
<v Speaker 1>clear air turbulence in the absence of water vapors, which

0:06:22.829 --> 0:06:26.010
<v Speaker 1>current weather radar systems cannot do. And it does this

0:06:26.019 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>by picking up the movement of air molecules and sending

0:06:30.170 --> 0:06:32.809
<v Speaker 1>this data back to the pilots on a screen. Now

0:06:32.820 --> 0:06:36.010
<v Speaker 1>it's color coded. So red means the object is closer

0:06:36.019 --> 0:06:39.808
<v Speaker 1>to the aircraft lighter color means it's further away.

0:06:40.089 --> 0:06:43.209
<v Speaker 1>The question of course is when can it deploy for

0:06:43.220 --> 0:06:47.589
<v Speaker 1>aircraft use? Cheng says about 3 to 10 years possibly

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.709
<v Speaker 1>because there's still a lot of hurdles to overcome, there's

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.820
<v Speaker 1>a need for high processing power and that also requires

0:06:53.829 --> 0:06:57.109
<v Speaker 1>a big lighter unit which adds weight to the aircraft

0:06:57.119 --> 0:07:01.469
<v Speaker 1>in flight. Now altitude also affects the range of detection.

0:07:01.829 --> 0:07:05.299
<v Speaker 1>Hm Super interesting and it seems like something in terms

0:07:05.309 --> 0:07:08.969
<v Speaker 1>of safety that would be really useful. We've heard since

0:07:08.980 --> 0:07:10.649
<v Speaker 1>the Singapore Airlines incident,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.579
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other planes have been encountering something similar.

0:07:14.589 --> 0:07:18.100
<v Speaker 1>We know that climate change is obviously making turbulence worse

0:07:18.109 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and more frequent. Yeah, maybe three years would be better

0:07:21.179 --> 0:07:24.390
<v Speaker 1>in 10 years. If we're waiting 10 years, then might

0:07:24.399 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>take some investment from some of these airlines as well.

0:07:27.190 --> 0:07:29.980
<v Speaker 1>The good news is it's already existing tax. So it's

0:07:29.989 --> 0:07:33.179
<v Speaker 1>not something that needs a longer runway to runway, needs

0:07:33.190 --> 0:07:36.230
<v Speaker 1>a longer runway to deploy. Ok, let's go to our

0:07:36.239 --> 0:07:37.459
<v Speaker 1>main story this week,

0:07:38.670 --> 0:07:43.089
<v Speaker 1>around 400 metric tons of oil was spilled following Friday's

0:07:43.100 --> 0:07:46.329
<v Speaker 1>shipping crash when a dredger struck a bunker vessel and

0:07:46.339 --> 0:07:50.130
<v Speaker 1>ruptured an oil tank. And where does all that oily

0:07:50.140 --> 0:07:53.179
<v Speaker 1>sand go? A big part of cleaning up last Friday's

0:07:53.190 --> 0:07:57.269
<v Speaker 1>oil spill involves removing and treating oil soaked sand from

0:07:57.279 --> 0:08:00.670
<v Speaker 1>affected shorelines. Singapore is deploying more oil absorb

0:08:01.049 --> 0:08:04.850
<v Speaker 1>booms to contain the oil spill along the southern shores.

0:08:04.859 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Two kingfishers drenched in oil have already died despite being rescued.

0:08:09.779 --> 0:08:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Plans to monitor wildlife with surveys and long term research

0:08:13.130 --> 0:08:16.380
<v Speaker 1>are in the works. The next stage of cleaning could

0:08:16.390 --> 0:08:20.089
<v Speaker 1>take up to three months with sea activities only resuming

0:08:20.100 --> 0:08:22.769
<v Speaker 1>after the water is repeatedly tested,

0:08:25.279 --> 0:08:28.779
<v Speaker 1>oil and water don't mix. It's an old saying and

0:08:28.790 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to these marine or industrial incidents, it's

0:08:32.409 --> 0:08:35.570
<v Speaker 1>true and we hate to see it happen. The good

0:08:35.580 --> 0:08:38.369
<v Speaker 1>news generally is that the number of accidents and the

0:08:38.380 --> 0:08:42.030
<v Speaker 1>amounts of oil being spilled around the world is reducing.

0:08:42.450 --> 0:08:46.989
<v Speaker 1>In the 19 seventies every year, there were 79 spills

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.330
<v Speaker 1>of over seven tons of oil on average. Now in

0:08:50.340 --> 0:08:52.729
<v Speaker 1>2023 there were only 10,

0:08:53.059 --> 0:08:57.390
<v Speaker 1>the average this decade is 6.8. Let's kind of look

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.449
<v Speaker 1>at the biggest oil spills. I think we can kind

0:08:59.460 --> 0:09:02.450
<v Speaker 1>of put the Singapore spill into context a little bit.

0:09:02.780 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>The biggest ever Li Ling. You probably don't remember this

0:09:05.409 --> 0:09:11.460
<v Speaker 1>one in 1910 was the Lake View Gusher in California.

0:09:11.539 --> 0:09:16.750
<v Speaker 1>It released an estimated 378 million gallons of crude oil,

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>some one

0:09:17.940 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>0.2 million tons. And then during the Gulf War, not

0:09:21.890 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a single oil spill, but the biggest oil disaster the

0:09:24.690 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>world has ever seen where especially in Kuwait, billions of

0:09:27.650 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>gallons were spilled and burnt. And of course, something that

0:09:30.770 --> 0:09:33.869
<v Speaker 1>you probably do remember and we all remember the Deepwater

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.459
<v Speaker 1>Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. That

0:09:37.469 --> 0:09:39.849
<v Speaker 1>was a shocking incident. Yeah, it was and you know,

0:09:39.859 --> 0:09:42.130
<v Speaker 1>we were in the US at the time and following

0:09:42.140 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it very closely

0:09:43.469 --> 0:09:46.369
<v Speaker 1>remember that this spill kept on going for about five

0:09:46.380 --> 0:09:51.579
<v Speaker 1>months from April to September. It was astonishing how long

0:09:51.590 --> 0:09:54.598
<v Speaker 1>it took to. Yeah, and I remember how mind boggling

0:09:54.609 --> 0:09:57.669
<v Speaker 1>it was that we were seeing this oil just gushing

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.809
<v Speaker 1>out from the pipe on the ocean floor happening in

0:09:59.820 --> 0:10:03.450
<v Speaker 1>real time and how helpless we all felt because for

0:10:03.460 --> 0:10:07.478
<v Speaker 1>so long, nothing could be done to stop it. But

0:10:07.630 --> 0:10:11.179
<v Speaker 1>the difference, that was an ocean rig, the Lakeview was

0:10:11.190 --> 0:10:12.890
<v Speaker 1>an oil well, the Gulf War

0:10:12.989 --> 0:10:16.989
<v Speaker 1>was a war. So these spills from ships. So there's

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a difference to the situation we're

0:10:19.409 --> 0:10:21.869
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Now. That's correct. That's correct. And when you

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.070
<v Speaker 1>compare apples to apples, we need to consider shipping oil

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.869
<v Speaker 1>spills like the Exxon Valdez Supertanker spill of 1989. I

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.690
<v Speaker 1>think for a lot of people that's still fresh in

0:10:30.700 --> 0:10:36.169
<v Speaker 1>their minds, that was more than 37,000 tons of oil spilled.

0:10:36.179 --> 0:10:41.270
<v Speaker 1>Now Singapore's largest maritime oil spill was about 28,000 tons

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>when two tankers collected

0:10:42.700 --> 0:10:46.309
<v Speaker 1>in 1997. So if you think about the 400 tons

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.390
<v Speaker 1>spilled in this latest incident here in Singapore, it is

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:54.848
<v Speaker 1>small in comparison but still the damage is done. Exactly right. Now,

0:10:54.859 --> 0:10:57.449
<v Speaker 1>why does it happen? You've been there? You've kind of

0:10:57.460 --> 0:11:00.608
<v Speaker 1>looked at the forensics of this incident. A lot of

0:11:00.619 --> 0:11:04.390
<v Speaker 1>it has been about human error, technical issues and accidents,

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.130
<v Speaker 1>even weather conditions like hurricanes can cause incidents resulting in

0:11:08.140 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>oil spills. So when it comes to these oil spills

0:11:11.330 --> 0:11:11.929
<v Speaker 1>from ships,

0:11:12.140 --> 0:11:14.710
<v Speaker 1>the question that comes up and something that struck my

0:11:14.719 --> 0:11:18.270
<v Speaker 1>mind initially, when I saw this incident in Singapore is

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>whether these overly congested shipping ports have something to do

0:11:22.770 --> 0:11:25.950
<v Speaker 1>with it. That's a very valid question. And you're not

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.150
<v Speaker 1>alone in asking this. Others have also asked and Singapore's

0:11:30.159 --> 0:11:33.369
<v Speaker 1>government says this spill here wasn't a result of congestion

0:11:33.380 --> 0:11:36.609
<v Speaker 1>and preliminary findings show that it was actually caused by

0:11:36.619 --> 0:11:40.219
<v Speaker 1>the tragical losing engine and steering controls. The Singapore government

0:11:40.229 --> 0:11:41.450
<v Speaker 1>also said that the port water

0:11:41.599 --> 0:11:45.429
<v Speaker 1>here and the anchorages are not congested. But it's a

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.409
<v Speaker 1>valid question, especially when you consider that this is one

0:11:48.419 --> 0:11:51.669
<v Speaker 1>of the world's busiest ports and whether having more vessels

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.770
<v Speaker 1>in the water increases the risk. I think the simple

0:11:54.780 --> 0:11:58.239
<v Speaker 1>fact is there are increasing concerns all around the world

0:11:58.250 --> 0:12:01.348
<v Speaker 1>that just by having more vessels in the water carrying

0:12:01.359 --> 0:12:05.130
<v Speaker 1>large amounts of toxic cargoes, incidents can keep on happening.

0:12:05.140 --> 0:12:08.229
<v Speaker 1>And the stakes we know are so high for important

0:12:08.239 --> 0:12:10.969
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems and the communities that rely on them.

0:12:11.349 --> 0:12:13.729
<v Speaker 1>So I want to look at the case of the Philippines,

0:12:13.739 --> 0:12:16.450
<v Speaker 1>a story called Black Waters that I put together last

0:12:16.460 --> 0:12:20.659
<v Speaker 1>year in February about seven kilometers offshore from the island

0:12:20.669 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>province of Oriental Mindoro, a tanker named Mt Princess Empress

0:12:27.010 --> 0:12:30.830
<v Speaker 1>sank in rough sea conditions. Now it had a toxic

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:35.289
<v Speaker 1>cargo of 800,000 L of industrial oil which began spilling

0:12:35.299 --> 0:12:38.919
<v Speaker 1>into one of the world's most important biodiversity hotspots.

0:12:39.289 --> 0:12:42.289
<v Speaker 1>It's called the Verde Island Passage and it's a vital

0:12:42.299 --> 0:12:45.909
<v Speaker 1>waterway that separates Luzon and Medora. And now this is

0:12:45.919 --> 0:12:49.189
<v Speaker 1>part of the coral triangle and the VIP as they

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.229
<v Speaker 1>like to call it over there is kind of the

0:12:51.239 --> 0:12:56.130
<v Speaker 1>center of the center of global shore fish biodiversity and

0:12:56.140 --> 0:12:59.770
<v Speaker 1>it's estimated to support about 2 million people in terms

0:12:59.780 --> 0:13:02.580
<v Speaker 1>of food and livelihoods. So it's not the kind of

0:13:02.590 --> 0:13:06.260
<v Speaker 1>place where you want industrial oil accidents happening.

0:13:06.650 --> 0:13:09.659
<v Speaker 1>It's also this fisheries hub. It's a burgeoning e tourism

0:13:09.669 --> 0:13:14.229
<v Speaker 1>site and critical shipping pathway. So basically after the spill,

0:13:14.239 --> 0:13:16.630
<v Speaker 1>the same things you've seen in Singapore happen there

0:13:16.929 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>across this vast shoreline in the Philippines. The Hazmat suits

0:13:20.330 --> 0:13:23.369
<v Speaker 1>the blobs of oil appearing in the sand. And sadly,

0:13:23.380 --> 0:13:26.429
<v Speaker 1>for many locals there, the decimation of their local fishing

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.450
<v Speaker 1>industry now all of it was cleaned up, but people

0:13:29.460 --> 0:13:31.940
<v Speaker 1>are still really scared and there's a fear that the

0:13:31.950 --> 0:13:36.359
<v Speaker 1>environment and local people's livelihoods are being imperiled by a

0:13:36.369 --> 0:13:40.669
<v Speaker 1>regional rush to further develop the fossil fuel industry, which

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.030
<v Speaker 1>I think goes at odds to what we understand of

0:13:44.039 --> 0:13:45.309
<v Speaker 1>the climate change agenda

0:13:45.619 --> 0:13:48.150
<v Speaker 1>and especially this is happening in the form of liquefied

0:13:48.159 --> 0:13:53.469
<v Speaker 1>natural gas hubs or LNG and potentially more activated oil

0:13:53.479 --> 0:13:56.809
<v Speaker 1>and gas fields, offshore oil and gas fields and then

0:13:56.890 --> 0:14:00.979
<v Speaker 1>heavy shipping and those potentially dangerous cargoes are one of

0:14:00.989 --> 0:14:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the symptoms of the growth of that industry. And so

0:14:04.250 --> 0:14:07.119
<v Speaker 1>too is the leakage of heavy metals into waterways and

0:14:07.130 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>heightened interest in the expansion of offshore oil and gas drilling.

0:14:11.359 --> 0:14:14.429
<v Speaker 1>So I did an interview with Ivan Andres. He's from

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.900
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Energy Ecology and Development or seed. It's

0:14:18.909 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a Philippine NGO focused on sustainable energy industry and governments

0:14:22.890 --> 0:14:26.380
<v Speaker 1>and they've been monitoring the situation closely. Um

0:14:26.390 --> 0:14:31.429
<v Speaker 2>The most recent pressure that the VIP felt we believe

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:36.010
<v Speaker 2>are the impacts of the fossil gas industries. We saw

0:14:36.020 --> 0:14:40.330
<v Speaker 2>the impact of bankers passing through the Red Island Passage.

0:14:40.719 --> 0:14:44.380
<v Speaker 2>And as a result, there are locations of oil spills

0:14:44.390 --> 0:14:49.619
<v Speaker 2>both documented and undocumented because there are, there are capsizing

0:14:49.630 --> 0:14:52.539
<v Speaker 2>of ships in the area that are not being picked

0:14:52.549 --> 0:14:53.940
<v Speaker 2>up by the media.

0:14:54.349 --> 0:14:58.479
<v Speaker 2>And we see that as the fossil gas industries and

0:14:58.489 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the LNG terminals are being built more and more tankers,

0:15:02.770 --> 0:15:07.179
<v Speaker 2>LNG tankers will be able to pass through the area.

0:15:07.190 --> 0:15:10.659
<v Speaker 2>And of course, with the elevated number of these tankers

0:15:10.669 --> 0:15:14.090
<v Speaker 2>in the area, there is more chances of capsizing and

0:15:14.099 --> 0:15:17.890
<v Speaker 2>catastrophic events such as the one we saw in Oriental mind.

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.849
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Singapore is a major importer of LNG liquefied

0:15:22.859 --> 0:15:26.450
<v Speaker 1>natural gas. It's the region's second largest gas importer and

0:15:26.460 --> 0:15:30.590
<v Speaker 1>has been expanding its existing LNG importing facility and then

0:15:30.599 --> 0:15:34.059
<v Speaker 1>it also imports large amounts of oil and petroleum. So

0:15:34.070 --> 0:15:38.030
<v Speaker 1>there are inevitably toxic cargoes in the surrounding waters all

0:15:38.039 --> 0:15:41.619
<v Speaker 1>the time and that has to be carefully managed. Yeah, exactly.

0:15:41.630 --> 0:15:43.979
<v Speaker 1>And as renewables increasingly

0:15:44.054 --> 0:15:47.244
<v Speaker 1>enter the energy mix, you'd expect that these movements of

0:15:47.255 --> 0:15:51.794
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels will inevitably reduce. But at the same time,

0:15:51.974 --> 0:15:54.885
<v Speaker 1>we are actually not weaning off oil as quickly as

0:15:54.895 --> 0:15:58.364
<v Speaker 1>you might expect. Now, OPEC which is the collective of

0:15:58.375 --> 0:16:01.434
<v Speaker 1>major oil producing nations predicts that the world will be

0:16:01.445 --> 0:16:05.765
<v Speaker 1>using more oil in 2045 than it does today. Yeah,

0:16:05.775 --> 0:16:09.155
<v Speaker 1>that's really discouraging when you think about that

0:16:09.570 --> 0:16:11.909
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Jack, when it comes to greening the

0:16:11.919 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>maritime industry, there is a will to do that but

0:16:14.330 --> 0:16:17.909
<v Speaker 1>not enough, I suppose, just based on what we're hearing

0:16:17.919 --> 0:16:21.239
<v Speaker 1>from countries in the region, it's challenging for sure. But

0:16:21.250 --> 0:16:23.250
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it also has to do with the

0:16:23.260 --> 0:16:27.090
<v Speaker 1>lack of deployable alternatives. The future we know is in

0:16:27.099 --> 0:16:30.150
<v Speaker 1>greening the fuel, greening maritime fuel, but most ships

0:16:30.414 --> 0:16:34.215
<v Speaker 1>still run on conventional fuel. And although we are seeing

0:16:34.224 --> 0:16:38.674
<v Speaker 1>growth in emerging alternatives like ammonia and methanol, these synthetic

0:16:38.684 --> 0:16:42.534
<v Speaker 1>fuels may be more sustainable but not zero carbon. They're

0:16:42.544 --> 0:16:46.075
<v Speaker 1>also still very expensive and much of their green value

0:16:46.085 --> 0:16:49.005
<v Speaker 1>will be in greening the hydrogen that they're made from

0:16:49.015 --> 0:16:50.994
<v Speaker 1>and lowering the cost of production.

0:16:51.260 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>We are clearly not there yet and there's also the

0:16:54.330 --> 0:16:57.429
<v Speaker 1>safety issue. Ammonia is known to be highly toxic and

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.010
<v Speaker 1>dangerous in the event of a spill, a ship sinking

0:17:00.020 --> 0:17:04.129
<v Speaker 1>with a cargo of ammonia could potentially sterilize quote unquote

0:17:04.140 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>cubic miles of ocean. And that's according to one leading

0:17:06.890 --> 0:17:08.550
<v Speaker 1>expert on the issue

0:17:08.900 --> 0:17:12.150
<v Speaker 1>and that's pretty scary. Now, there are also safety concerns

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>around methanol as it is also toxic and flammable and

0:17:15.569 --> 0:17:20.530
<v Speaker 1>must be handled carefully. Lots of barriers to greening up

0:17:20.540 --> 0:17:23.390
<v Speaker 1>the industry, but maybe let's not forget, electric, it may

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.629
<v Speaker 1>not be the silver bullet, but there are a lot

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of ferries especially in Europe and also in Thailand, we

0:17:28.290 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>are starting to see

0:17:29.589 --> 0:17:32.989
<v Speaker 1>that are turning to battery powered motors and I think

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.718
<v Speaker 1>for situations where distance isn't a major factor or you

0:17:36.729 --> 0:17:39.930
<v Speaker 1>have close to shore operations, it does seem very practical.

0:17:39.939 --> 0:17:42.699
<v Speaker 1>And we've discussed before that Singapore is looking at, rolling

0:17:42.709 --> 0:17:45.510
<v Speaker 1>out more of these types of vessels. And I'm also

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.609
<v Speaker 1>really on board the wind train

0:17:47.869 --> 0:17:51.130
<v Speaker 1>or the wind ship in this case. Yeah, let's go

0:17:51.140 --> 0:17:54.609
<v Speaker 1>old school. Like 20 commercial cargo ships are already using

0:17:54.619 --> 0:17:58.329
<v Speaker 1>wind power to reduce their fuel use. So imagine a

0:17:58.339 --> 0:18:01.290
<v Speaker 1>world where the wind rules again. Don't rule it out

0:18:01.300 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of not having to deal with more

0:18:03.650 --> 0:18:06.849
<v Speaker 1>of these types of horrible spills year on year.

0:18:07.500 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And they're also solar powered boats. I don't know if

0:18:10.770 --> 0:18:13.500
<v Speaker 1>you've heard or seen them. I've read a bit about them.

0:18:13.510 --> 0:18:16.900
<v Speaker 1>Not many but they exist and there's even a cruise

0:18:16.910 --> 0:18:21.579
<v Speaker 1>company that plans to launch an electric ship with retractable

0:18:21.589 --> 0:18:24.729
<v Speaker 1>cells that have solar panels on them. Can you imagine

0:18:24.739 --> 0:18:29.319
<v Speaker 1>this solar cells? So there you go, electricity from wind

0:18:29.329 --> 0:18:31.079
<v Speaker 1>and the sun all in one.

0:18:32.319 --> 0:18:36.899
<v Speaker 1>Ok. Let's get our answer to the quiz to repeat

0:18:36.910 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the question. How significant do you think the pollution is

0:18:40.500 --> 0:18:45.349
<v Speaker 1>from one typical large shipping container vessel? Is it the

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.660
<v Speaker 1>same as 50,000 cars,

0:18:47.939 --> 0:18:51.599
<v Speaker 1>the same as a million cars or the same as

0:18:51.609 --> 0:18:58.790
<v Speaker 1>50 million cars? Those are all very different options. So 50,000, yeah,

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.718
<v Speaker 1>I know. But you know, different variations of big so

0:19:01.729 --> 0:19:05.420
<v Speaker 1>50,000 cars. I think it's too small. A million cars.

0:19:05.849 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like that is a reasonable middle ground. 50

0:19:10.130 --> 0:19:13.540
<v Speaker 1>million cars is a lot, but we're talking about a

0:19:13.550 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>huge shipping container vessel

0:19:16.959 --> 0:19:20.579
<v Speaker 1>carrying all that fuel. So I hope it's not 50

0:19:20.589 --> 0:19:22.849
<v Speaker 1>million cars, but I'm gonna go with that. Actually, you're

0:19:22.859 --> 0:19:26.260
<v Speaker 1>going with 50 million. I'm going with bold, a bold

0:19:26.270 --> 0:19:30.180
<v Speaker 1>choice and you are correct. It is 50 million cars.

0:19:30.189 --> 0:19:34.339
<v Speaker 1>And this, we're talking about a large modern vessel astonishing

0:19:34.699 --> 0:19:38.419
<v Speaker 1>and further to that, the 15 largest ships in the

0:19:38.430 --> 0:19:38.939
<v Speaker 1>world

0:19:39.300 --> 0:19:43.729
<v Speaker 1>emit as much nitrogen oxide and sulfur oxide as the

0:19:43.739 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>world's 760 million cars, 15 ships the same as every

0:19:48.410 --> 0:19:51.589
<v Speaker 1>car in the world. And these contribute greatly to obviously

0:19:51.599 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>bad air in cities and they also cause diseases like

0:19:54.449 --> 0:19:55.770
<v Speaker 1>cancer and asthma.

0:19:56.209 --> 0:19:59.810
<v Speaker 1>So the shipping industry as a whole represents up to 3%

0:19:59.819 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of global emissions more than the aviation sector and 10%

0:20:03.890 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of transport emissions. So lots of work to try and

0:20:07.410 --> 0:20:11.198
<v Speaker 1>find solutions here because the difference you can make seems

0:20:11.209 --> 0:20:13.688
<v Speaker 1>like it would be profound. And that's why there are

0:20:13.699 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>global efforts to try to reduce the amount of these

0:20:17.689 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 1>pollutant

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.839
<v Speaker 1>gasses like sulfur oxide from marine fuel. So in the

0:20:21.849 --> 0:20:24.829
<v Speaker 1>previous episode, we were talking about low sulfur fuel, which

0:20:24.839 --> 0:20:28.349
<v Speaker 1>is what the spill was from this Singapore incident. And

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.699
<v Speaker 1>that was part of efforts to try and manage or

0:20:30.709 --> 0:20:35.129
<v Speaker 1>reduce the amount of sulfur content in the fuel and

0:20:35.140 --> 0:20:37.699
<v Speaker 1>Singapore suffers from bad air. I'm sure you know about it.

0:20:37.709 --> 0:20:40.260
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that is because of the shipping industry.

0:20:40.890 --> 0:20:43.770
<v Speaker 1>So let's clean it up. We can have cleaner air

0:20:43.780 --> 0:20:45.430
<v Speaker 1>to breathe for everybody.

0:20:46.239 --> 0:20:49.069
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's it for climate conversations this week. Thank you.

0:20:49.079 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>As always for your company. Every Thursday, we have a

0:20:52.369 --> 0:20:55.140
<v Speaker 1>new episode and good to have you all here today

0:20:55.150 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and we hope to catch up again real soon. Bye

0:20:57.810 --> 0:21:00.130
<v Speaker 1>for now. I'm Li Ling Tan and I'm Jack Boyd.

0:21:00.250 --> 0:21:02.579
<v Speaker 1>Thanks as always as well to the team that put

0:21:02.589 --> 0:21:07.540
<v Speaker 1>together this podcast, Tiffany Janani, Jahari, Kristina Robert and Sai Ye.